1: % mem.cls
2: % demonstration file
3: % for style of the Memorie della Societa' Astronomica Italiana
4: % (c) SAIt
5: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
6: %
7: %
8: \documentclass[a4paper]{mem}
9: \usepackage{natbib}
10: \usepackage{graphicx}
11: \usepackage[a4paper]{hyperref}
12: \idline{0}{1}
13: %
14: \begin{document}
15: %
16: \title{Spatial distributions of the
17: REFLEX-DXL galaxy clusters at $z \sim 0.3$ observed by
18: XMM-Newton
19: \thanks{This work is based on observations
20: made with the XMM-Newton, an ESA science mission with
21: instruments and contributions directly funded by
22: ESA member states and the USA (NASA).}
23: }
24:
25: \author{Y.-Y. Zhang\inst{1}, A. Finoguenov\inst{1},
26: H. B\"ohringer\inst{1},
27: Y. Ikebe\inst{1,2}, K. Matsushita\inst{1,3},
28: P. Schuecker\inst{1},L. Guzzo\inst{4} and
29: C. A. Collins\inst{5}
30: }
31:
32:
33: \offprints{Y.-Y. Zhang,\\
34: email: yyzhang@mpe.mpg.de }
35:
36: \institute{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, Germany;
37: \and Joint Center for Astrophysics, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA;
38: \and Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan;
39: \and INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Merate/Milano, Italy;
40: \and Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, U.K.}
41:
42: \abstract{
43: We present XMM-Newton results on the spatially resolved
44: temperature profiles of eight massive galaxy clusters of a
45: volume-limited sample at redshifts $z\sim0.3$ (REFLEX-DXL sample) and an
46: additional luminous cluster at $z=0.2578$,
47: selected from the REFLEX survey.
48: Useful temperature measurements
49: could be performed out to radii with overdensity 500 ($r_{500}$).
50: The scaled temperature distributions show good similarities.
51: We discovered diversities in the temperature
52: gradients at the outer cluster radii with examples of both flat and
53: strongly decreasing profiles which call for different physical
54: interpretations.
55: We found an indication of the 'warm-hot' gas existing
56: in or around the hot clusters.
57: Using RXCJ0307.0$-$2840 we demonstrate that the
58: errors on the mass estimates are within
59: 25\% up to $r_{500}$.
60:
61: \keywords{cosmology: observations -- galaxies: clusters: general --
62: X-rays: galaxies: clusters
63: }
64: }
65: \authorrunning{Zhang et al.}
66: \titlerunning{Spatial distributions of the REFLEX-DXL galaxy clusters}
67: \maketitle
68: %
69: %________________________________________________________________
70:
71: \section{Introduction}
72:
73: The most massive clusters are
74: especially important in tracing large scale structure (LSS)
75: evolution since they are expected
76: to show the largest evolutionary effects. In hierarchical
77: modeling the structure of the X-ray emitting
78: plasma in the most massive clusters is
79: essentially determined by gravitational effects
80: and shock heating. With decreasing cluster mass and intracluster
81: medium (ICM) temperature, non-gravitational effects play an important
82: role before and after the shock heating (Voit \& Bryan 2001; Voit et
83: al. 2002; Zhang \& Wu 2003; Ponman et al. 2003). Therefore, the most
84: massive clusters provide the cleanest results in comparing theory with
85: observations.
86:
87: In this project we are analysing an almost volume-complete sample of thirteen
88: X-ray luminous ($L_{X}~\geq~10^{45}~{\rm erg~s^{-1}}$
89: for 0.1--2.4~keV)
90: clusters selected from the ROSAT-ESO Flux-Limited X-ray (REFLEX)
91: galaxy cluster survey (B\"ohringer et al. 2001) in the redshift
92: interval $z=0.27$ to $0.31$ (see Fig.~\ref{f:reflex1}).
93: % Two column figure (place early!)
94: %______________________________________________ Gamma_1 (lg rho, lg e)
95: \begin{figure}
96: \includegraphics%[width=\textwidth]
97: [width=5.6cm]{plots/f1.ps}
98: \caption{X-ray luminosity-redshift distribution
99: of the REFLEX clusters. The box shows the
100: selection of the 13 REFLEX-DXL clusters
101: (see B\"ohringer et al. 2003).}
102: \label{f:reflex1}
103: \end{figure}
104: \begin{figure}
105: \includegraphics[width=6cm]{plots/f2.ps}
106: \caption{A preliminary REFLEX-DXL temperature
107: function (crosses) is compared to the $<z>=0.05$
108: (solid circles) and $<z>=0.38$
109: (open circles) temperature functions from Henry (2000).
110: See B\"ohringer et al. 2003.}
111: \label{f:reflex2}
112: \end{figure}
113: %______________________________________________________________
114: There is only a very small correction
115: to the volume completeness with a well known selection function
116: for $L_{X}~\geq~10^{45}~{\rm erg~s^{-1}}$ at the higher redshift
117: as described in B\"ohringer et al. (2003).
118: With this REFLEX-DXL (Distant X-ray
119: Luminous) sample, we obtain reliable
120: ICM temperatures to measure the cluster masses
121: based on the high
122: resolution observations from XMM-Newton
123: (Zhang et al 2004).
124: Since peculiarities in the cluster structure introduce a
125: scatter in the mass-temperature relation and since in particular
126: on-going cluster mergers can lead to a temporary increase in the
127: cluster temperature and X-ray luminosity (Randall et al. 2002), we aim
128: for a detailed study of the deep XMM-Newton observations described
129: here. The clusters are also scheduled for a detailed spectroscopic
130: study of the cluster dynamics with the ESO-VLT-VIMOS instrument.
131: One prime goal is to study
132: the temperature function evolution
133: (see Fig.~\ref{f:reflex2}, B\"ohringer et al. 2003) by
134: comparing our sample with more
135: nearby and more distant clusters in literature.
136: The selection of the REFLEX-DXL sample and its properties are
137: described in detail in B\"ohringer et al. (2003).
138: The method is well described in Zhang et al. (2004), which is
139: established for a reliable determination of the spatially resolved
140: temperature profiles for the REFLEX-DXL clusters.
141: XMM-Newton with its superior sensitivity combined with its good
142: spatial resolution provides the best means for such studies (Arnaud et
143: al. 2002). Previously, large data sets on cluster temperature profiles
144: have been compiled from ASCA (e.g. Markevitch et al. 1998; White 2000;
145: Finoguenov et al. 2001a; Finoguenov et al. 2002; Sanderson et al. 2003)
146: and BeppoSAX observations (Molendi \& De Grandi 1999; Ettori et
147: al. 2002).
148:
149: In this proceeding we contribute the temperature profile measurements,
150: discuss physics of diversity,
151: describe an indication for soft excess from warm InterGalactic Medium
152: (IGM), and present the mass estimates. We
153: adopt a flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmology with the density parameter
154: $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.3$ and the Hubble constant $H_{\rm
155: 0}=70$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$. Error bars correspond to the 68\%
156: confidence level, unless explicitly stated otherwise.
157:
158: \section {Temperature distributions}
159: \label{s:method}
160:
161: We developed a reliable double background subtraction method for
162: the XMM-Newton data reduction,
163: in which we use the
164: XMM-Newton observations of the Chandra Deep Field South (CDFS)
165: background and model the difference
166: of the target and CDFS backgrounds with the data from the outer
167: Field of view (FOV). The details are available in Zhang et al (2004).
168:
169: Comparing the spectral results,
170: we have noted that the differences between the global
171: temperatures of the regions covering radii of
172: $0.5<r<4^\prime$ and $r<8^\prime$, respectively,
173: are caused by systematic differences in the temperature
174: gradients. For a more detailed study of the temperature profiles we
175: divide the cluster regions into the five annuli 0--0.5$^\prime$,
176: 0.5--1$^\prime$, 1--2$^\prime$, 2--4$^\prime$, and 4--8$^\prime$.
177:
178: We use $>1$~keV band except for RXCJ0658.5$-$5556. We
179: apply the 2--12~keV band for this high temperature cluster. The
180: temperature profile of each cluster is shown
181: in Zhang et al. (2004).
182: We detect the gradients in the spatially resolved temperature profiles
183: with an accuracy of better than 10 to 20\% in the $r<4^\prime$ region.
184: The temperatures vary as a function of the radius by a factor of 1.5
185: to 2.
186: To some degree the difference of the central structure
187: might reveal the effect of non-gravitational
188: processes and radiative cooling.
189: No significant cooling gas lower than 2 keV is found in the center.
190:
191: In Fig.~\ref{f:ktcomp2}, we present the scaled temperatures
192: of eight REFLEX-DXL clusters together with
193: an additional cluster at slightly lower redshift $z=0.2578$.
194: The radii are scaled by the virial radii obtained from the M-T
195: relation in Bryan and Norman (1998). The temperatures are scaled by
196: the temperatures of the regions covering radii of $0.5<r<4^\prime$,
197: which cover almost the whole X-ray emission regions of
198: the clusters.
199: The grey shadow shows the self-similar temperature profile of
200: Markevitch et al.
201: (1998). The temperature profiles are on average flattened and
202: the high accuracy of our data
203: shows that the decrease in our temperature
204: profiles happens at further out radii. There are also diversities
205: in the temperature profiles which were not observed before.
206: %
207: \begin{figure*}
208: \centering
209: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=12.cm]
210: {plots/f3.ps}
211: \caption{Scaled temperature profiles fitted
212: in the 1--10~keV band, noted
213: the temperature profile of RXCJ0658.5$-$5556 was
214: fitted in the 2--12~keV band.}
215: \label{f:ktcomp2}%
216: \end{figure*}
217: %
218:
219: \section{Physical interpretations}
220: \label{s:physics}
221:
222: The variations of the temperature profiles call for different
223: physical interpretations rather than simple reflections of
224: measurement errors (see Fig.~\ref{f:cl052d}).
225: Symmetric X-ray 2-D maps and regular temperature profiles suggest
226: a relaxed dynamical state, e.g. RXCJ0307.0$-$2840.
227: %
228: \begin{figure*}
229: \centering
230: \includegraphics[width=4cm]{plots/f41.ps}
231: \includegraphics[width=4cm]{plots/f42.ps}
232: \includegraphics[width=4cm]{plots/f43.ps}
233: \caption{
234: %Temperature profiles (upper) and
235: Pressure maps
236: %(lower)
237: of RXCJ0307.0$-$2840 (left), RXCJ0658.5$-$5556 (middle)
238: and RXCJ1131.9$-$1955 (right). }
239: \label{f:cl052d}%
240: \end{figure*}
241: %
242: On the other hand irregular temperature profiles
243: like diversities in the temperature gradients, e.g. RXCJ0658.5$-$5556,
244: suggest mergers and/or significant substructures
245: in those particular regions. Detailed spectroscopy
246: of the particular regions
247: should be performed based on the combination of the
248: temperature profile and 2-D map implications.
249: Since deprojection dilutes the
250: fluctuations in 2-D maps, some clusters have regular
251: temperature profiles but very disturbed structures in their 2-D maps,
252: e.g. RXCJ1131.9$-$1955.
253: Chandra and VLT observation are granted to study these
254: interesting examples via their galaxy dynamics.
255:
256: \section{Soft excess}
257: \label{s:excess}
258:
259: We found some inconsistencies in the fitting of the spectra
260: with one temperature model, depending on the inclusion or exclusion
261: of the 0.4--1~keV band, which could be an indication of the
262: presence of a colder component.
263: Cluster RXCJ1131.9$-$1955 is not
264: affected at all, RXCJ0014.3$-$3022, RXCJ0307.0$-$2840 and
265: RXCJ0528.9$-$3927 (see Fig.~\ref{f:ktdeviation}) are
266: affected in the center, while RXCJ0043.4$-$2037 and
267: RXCJ0232.2$-$4420 are affected in the outskirts. Since the instrumental
268: setup used to observe this sample is the same, it hardly is an
269: instrumental artifact.
270: We notice that the temperature of RXCJ0528.9$-$3927
271: (also in other clusters) changes
272: significantly with the low cut-off of the energy band used in the
273: fit. We thus performed the X-ray spectral analysis to
274: test the energy band dependence
275: and possible method dependence by comparing the temperature
276: measurements versus low energy band (low-E) cut-off
277: from two different methods:
278: the double background subtraction method in Zhang et al. (2004)
279: and the method applied in Arnaud et al. (2002).
280: We found that soft excess exists independent of the method.
281:
282: The metallicity and
283: redshift measurements among the different methods and different
284: low-E cut-off vary within 5\%. The results presented in
285: Fig.~\ref{f:ktdeviation} suggest some influence of the low energy
286: band on the temperature measurements.
287: Thus the global galaxy cluster temperature is underestimated
288: including the soft band. The results
289: obtained in the harder energy band should recover the correct cluster
290: temperature. Similar phenomena are found for A1413
291: (Pratt \& Arnaud 2002) using XMM-Newton data, and Coma, A1795 and
292: A3112 (Nevalainen et al. 2003) based on the comparison of XMM-Newton
293: and ROSAT PSPC observations. Nevalainen et al. interprete it as a
294: `warm-hot' intergalactic medium.
295: The 'warm-hot' gas existing in or around the hot clusters
296: might be related with the LSS enviroment.
297: %
298: \begin{figure}
299: \centering
300: \includegraphics[width=3.2cm]
301: {plots/f51.ps}
302: \includegraphics[width=3.2cm]
303: {plots/f52.ps}
304: \caption{Left: Spectra of RXCJ0528.9$-$3927 fitted
305: in the 1--10~keV band. Right: Temperature
306: measurements versus low-E cut-off.}
307: \label{f:ktdeviation}%
308: \end{figure}
309:
310: \section{Modeling RXCJ0307.0$-$2840}
311: \label{s:result}
312:
313: We use RXCJ0307.0$-$2840 as an illustrative example to demonstrate the
314: accuracy of measurements of the total gravitating cluster mass and the
315: gas mass fraction attainable with the XMM-Newton observations of the
316: REFLEX-DXL-like clusters. Similar analysis of all REFLEX-DXL clusters
317: is in progress.
318:
319: According to the regularity of the photon distribution of
320: RXCJ0307.0$-$2840 (see Fig.~\ref{f:cl052d})
321: we assume a radially symmetric gas
322: distribution.
323: We found that the parameterization
324: %
325: \begin{equation}
326: k_{\rm B}T(r)=\frac{1}{A r^2+Br+C }
327: \label{e:tprof}
328: \end{equation}
329: %
330: fits the measured temperature profiles quite well.
331: The polytropic index ($\sim 1.59$) of the temperature
332: distribution in the outskirts implies a convectively stable state there.
333: For the electron density distribution
334: we use the standard $\beta$ model (Michie 1961).
335: Navarro et al. (1997; NFW) described a universal density profile
336: for dark matter (DM) from
337: numerical simulations in hierarchical clustering scenarios.
338: We assume the intracluster gas to be in hydrostatic equilibrium with
339: the underlying gravitational potential dominated by DM
340: component.
341:
342: We thus demonstrate two methods to obtain the modeling of
343: the spatial distributions of RXCJ0307.0$-$2840.
344: One is to combine the $\beta$ model, Eq.(\ref{e:tprof}) and hydrostatic
345: equilibrium (here after Method I);
346: the other is to combine the $\beta$ model, NFW model
347: and hydrostatic
348: equilibrium (here after Method II). In Fig~\ref{f:model_4},
349: we present the spatially resolved temperature, electron number density,
350: total mass, gas mass, and gas mass fraction
351: distributions of RXCJ0307.0$-$2840.
352: The uncertainties in the mass estimates
353: are within 25 percent based on our temperature measurements.
354: We found a slightly lower
355: gas mass fraction comparing the WMAP result.
356: %
357: \begin{figure}
358: \centering
359: \includegraphics[width=3cm]{plots/f61.ps}
360: \includegraphics[width=3cm]{plots/f62.ps}\\
361: \includegraphics[width=3cm]{plots/f63.ps}
362: \includegraphics[width=3cm]{plots/f64.ps}\\
363: \caption{Spatial
364: distributions of the temperature (top left),
365: electron density (top right), gas mass and
366: gravitational mass (bottom left), and gas mass fraction (bottom right) for
367: RXCJ0307.0$-$2840 using Method I (black) and Method II (green).
368: An additional dashed curve of the gravitational mass presents
369: the result of the isothermal $\beta$ model.}
370: \label{f:model_4}%
371: \end{figure}
372: %
373:
374: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
375: \label{s:conclusion}
376:
377: We obtain spatially resolved, consistant X-ray temperature profiles
378: from three instruments for 9 clusters with an accuracy
379: of better than 10--20\% in the
380: $<4^\prime$ region. We found
381: good similarities in the scaled temperature distributions.
382: While the high accuracy of our data shows that
383: the decrease in our data happens at further out radii comparing
384: to the self-similar temperature profile of Markevitch et al. (1998).
385: Temperature structures are easily disturbed by some physical
386: processes and are thus complicated.
387: Differences of the central structures reveal the effect of
388: non-gravitational process. No significant cooling gas ($<2$~keV)
389: is found in the center. The variations of the temperature
390: distributions in the outer region call for different
391: formation histories (e.g. Finiguenov et al 2001b). Among the sample,
392: six clusters show regular temperature structures, while three do not.
393: Combination of the regular temperature profiles and symmetric 2-D maps
394: suggest a relaxed dynamical state. Fluctuations noted in 2-D maps
395: might be diluted in the temperature profiles. The
396: uncertainty in the temperature measurements is a key point to
397: the accurate determinations of mass, gas mass fraction, and thus affects
398: the L-T and M-T scaling relations.
399:
400: \begin{acknowledgements}
401: The XMM-Newton project is
402: supported by the Bundesministerium f\"ur Bildung und Forschung,
403: Deutschen Zentrum f\"ur Luft und Raumfahrt (BMBF/DLR), the Max-Planck
404: Society and the Haidenhaim-Stiftung. We acknowledge Jacqueline
405: Bergeron, PI of the CDFS XMM-Newton observation, Martin
406: Turner, PI of the RXJ0658.5-5556 XMM-Newton observation,
407: Michael Freyberg, Ulrich G. Briel, and William R. Forman
408: providing useful suggestions. YYZ
409: acknowledges receiving the International Max-Planck Research School
410: Fellowship. AF acknowledges receiving the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
411: Fellowship. PS acknowledges support under the DLR grant
412: No.\,50\,OR\,9708\,35.
413: \end{acknowledgements}
414:
415: \bibliographystyle{aa}
416: \begin{thebibliography}{}
417:
418: \bibitem[]{} Arnaud, M., Majerowicz, S., Lumb, D., et al. 2002, A\&A, 390, 27
419: \bibitem[]{} B\"ohringer, H., Schuecker, P., Guzzo, L., et al. 2001, A\&A, 369, 826
420: \bibitem[]{} B\"ohringer, H., Schuecker, P., Zhang, Y.-Y., et al. 2003, A\&A, to be submitted.
421: \bibitem[]{} Bryan, G. L., \& Norman, M. L. 1998, ApJ, 495, 80
422: \bibitem[]{} Ettori, S., De Grandi, S., \& Molendi, S. 2002, A\&A, 391, 841
423: \bibitem[]{} Finoguenov, A., Arnaud, M., \& David, L. P. 2001a,
424: ApJ, 555, 191
425: \bibitem[]{} Finoguenov, A., Reiprich, T. H., \&
426: B\"ohringer, H. 2001b, A\&A, 368, 749
427: \bibitem[]{} Finoguenov, A., Jones, C., B\"ohringer, H., \& Ponman, T. J.
428: 2002, ApJ, 578, 74
429: \bibitem[]{} Henry, J. P. 2000, ApJ, 534, 565
430: \bibitem[]{} Markevitch, M., Forman, W. R., Sarazin, C. L.,
431: \& Vikhlinin, A. 1998, ApJ, 503, 77
432: \bibitem[]{} Michie, R. W., 1961, ApJ, 133, 781
433: \bibitem[]{} Molendi, S., \& De Grandi, S. 1999, A\&A, 351, L41
434: \bibitem[]{} Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., \& White, S. D. M. 1997,
435: ApJ, 490, 493 (NFW)
436: \bibitem[]{} Nevalainen, J., Lieu, R., Bonamente, M., \&
437: Lumb, D. 2003, ApJ, 584, 716
438: \bibitem[]{} Ponman, T. J., Sanderson, A. J. R.,
439: \& Finoguenov, A. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 331
440: \bibitem[]{} Pratt, G. W., \& Arnaud, M. 2002, A\&A, 394, 375
441: \bibitem[]{} Randall, S. W., Sarazin, C. L.,
442: \& Ricker, P. M. 2002, AAS, 201, 6706
443: \bibitem[]{} Sanderson, A. J. R., Ponman, T. J., Finoguenov, A.,
444: Lloyd-Davies, E. J., Markevitch, M. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 989
445: \bibitem[]{} Voit, G. M., \& Bryan, G. L. 2001, Nature, 414, 425
446: \bibitem[]{} Voit, G. M., Bryan, G. L., Balogh, M. L., \& Bower, R. G.
447: 2002, ApJ, 576, 601
448: \bibitem[]{} White, D. A. 2000, MNRAS, 312, 663
449: \bibitem[]{} Zhang, Y.-Y., Finoguenov, A., B\"ohringer, H.,
450: et al. 2003, A\&A, 413, 49
451: \bibitem[]{} Zhang, Y.-Y., \& Wu, X.-P. 2003, ApJ, 583, 529
452:
453: \end{thebibliography}
454:
455: \end{document}
456:
457: