1: \documentclass[10pt, preprint2]{aastex}
2:
3: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
4: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
5:
6: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
7:
8: \slugcomment{Beyond the Milky Way}
9:
10: \shorttitle{Solid Pulsars}
11: \shortauthors{R. X. Xu}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \title{A note on solid pulsars}
16:
17: \author{R. X. Xu}
18: \affil{School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871,
19: China}
20:
21: \begin{abstract}
22:
23: After a brief introduction to the necessary of {\em quark stars}
24: in modelling pulsars, I present a qualitative analysis of the {\em
25: solidification} of quark matter with low-temperature but
26: high-density. The reason, that a solid neutron star could {\em
27: not} be possible, is also given.
28:
29: \end{abstract}
30:
31: \keywords{pulsars: general --- stars: neutron --- elementary
32: particles}
33:
34: %\section{Introduction}
35:
36: What's the nature of pulsars? This question seems to have been
37: answered: pulsars are simply {\em neutron stars} --- a kind of
38: boring big ``nuclei'' bound dominantly by gravity rather nuclear
39: force.
40: %
41: However, this view is criticized in both theoretical and
42: experimental grounds: (1) nucleons (neutron and proton) are in
43: fact not structureless points although they were thought to be
44: elementary particles in Landau's time (1930s), they (and other
45: hadrons) have been actually composed of {\em quarks} proposed
46: since 1964; (2) the neutron star model does sometimes not fit well
47: the recent observations of advanced X-ray facilities in space, and
48: there is still {\em no} convincing evidence that pulsars are just
49: neutron stars.
50: %
51: Therefore, we have to pay attention to this issue, and to
52: reconsider the question again, even more than 35 years later.
53:
54: The neutron star ideal appeared in 1932, soon after the discovery
55: of neutrons by Chadwick. After the first radio pulsars was
56: discovered in 1967 and as the quark model of hadrons developed in
57: 1960s, a new ideal was proposed: there may exist a kind of compact
58: stars to be similar to neutron stars, so-called {\em Quark stars},
59: that are composed mainly of quark matter, rather than neutron
60: matter\footnote{
61: %
62: {\em Quark matter} is defined as a state in which quarks and
63: gluons are de-confined (to be thus called also as quark-gluon
64: plasma), whereas {\em neutron matter} as a state of free nucleons
65: (neutrons and a few parts of protons).
66: }. %
67: %
68: Since quark stars can also reproduce the behaviors of pulsar-like
69: stars, it is argued then that both neutron and quark star models
70: are possible. But nature may choose only the second one of these
71: two if quark matter with strangeness (i.e., {\em strange quark
72: matter}) is absolutely stable. Quark stars with strangeness are
73: called to be {\em strange stars} \citep{xu03a}. Are pulsars really
74: neutron or strange stars? Because we can {\em not} now determine
75: whether strange quark matter is absolutely stable from the first
76: principles, we have to try to answer the question via
77: astrophysical experiments: observations!
78:
79: Strange stars, if they are radio pulsars, were usually considered
80: to be crusted (i.e., there is a $\sim 10^{-5\sim -6} M_\odot$
81: crust around a strange quark matter core) until 1998 when
82: \cite{xq98} addressed that {\em bare} strange stars (i.e., strange
83: stars without crusts) being chosen as the interior of radio
84: pulsars have three advantages: 1, the spectral features; 2, the
85: bounding energy; and 3, the core collapse process during
86: supernova.
87: %
88: The formation of bare strange stars is possible in principle, and
89: their emission can generally explain various observations of
90: pulsar-like stars \citep{xu03b}.
91: %
92: Furthermore, it is suggested that pulsar-like stars could be solid
93: quark stars with strangeness, sometimes exposing their quark
94: surfaces, in order to fit the continuum thermal X-ray spectra and
95: to understand the free-precession behaviors \citep{xu03c}.
96:
97: In this note, two selected points relevant to solid pulsars are
98: discussed.
99:
100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
101:
102: 1. {\em Can a solid neutron star be possible?}
103: %
104: The answer is {\em no}.
105: %
106: Free precession of isolated pulsars could be common in nature; the
107: gradual, long-term variation of RX J0720.4-3125 (a radio-quiet
108: isolated neutron star) observed in X-ray band may imply that the
109: star is precessing \citep{de04}, besides two wobble radio pulsars:
110: PSR B1828-11 \citep{sls00} and PSR B1642-03 \citep{slu01}.
111: %
112: However, solid pulsars are suggestive because of the difficulties
113: of explaining this feature in the the conventional models of fluid
114: neutron stars. The precession should be damped down soon due to
115: various dissipation processes (e.g., the vertex pinning, the
116: surface-rubbing of Ekman layer immediately beneath the crust), and
117: solid quark star model for pulsar-like stars is then proposed
118: \citep{xu03c}.
119: %
120: Recently, \cite{ld04} studied the magnetohydrodynamic coupling
121: between the crust and the core of a rotating neutron star, and
122: found that the precession of PSR B1828-11 should decay over a
123: human lifetime. This well-defined MHD dissipation should certainly
124: be important in order to test the stellar models.
125: %
126: A solid quark star is just a rigid body, no damping occurs, and
127: the solid pulsar model may survive the observational tests if the
128: free precession keeps the same over several tens of years.
129: %
130: We may expect a precession without damping even hundreds of years,
131: or we might be lucky enough\footnote{
132: %
133: The chance that we detect two precessing radio pulsars among 1500
134: ones with ages $\sim 10^6$ years during 30 years is just $\sim
135: 4\times 10^{-8}$! More precessing pulsars could be found if the
136: detection and analysis technique develops and long-term monitoring
137: keeps.
138: }.%
139:
140: A neutron star can not be in a solid state.
141: %
142: The nuclear liquid model is successful experimentally, the
143: original version of which is the nuclear Fermi-gas model. Nucleons
144: can be regarded as Fermi-gas due to the Pauli exclusive in the
145: model. A great part of neutron star matter has density to be
146: approximately the nuclear saturation density, and at least this
147: part is in a fluid state.
148: %
149: In this sense, a quark star is identified if one convinces that a
150: pulsar is in a solid state.
151:
152: 2. {\em Why can a solid quark star be possible?}
153: %
154: A quark star (or quark matter) is called to be strange if it has
155: strangeness. Certainly it is not necessary that quark matter is
156: strange \citep{cea03,shh03}, but it is conjectured that the
157: presence of strangeness might be energetically favorable
158: \citep{bodm71,wit84}. Phenomenological calculation shows that the
159: conjecture is very likely to be true \citep{fj84}.
160:
161: For quark matter in low temperature, $T$, but high baryon density,
162: $n_{\rm b}$, there exists a {\em competition} between color
163: superconductivity and solidification, just like the case of
164: laboratory low-temperature physics.
165: %
166: Normal matter should be solidified as long as the interaction
167: energy between neighboring ions is at least\footnote{%
168: %
169: The value could be $\sim 10$ if the the matter is composted of
170: neutral molecular.
171: } %
172: $\sim 10^2$ times that of the kinetic thermal energy \citep{dn99}.
173: In this sense, high density (then a small separation between ions,
174: $l$) and low temperature favor a solid state. However, this
175: classical view is not applicable (i.e., quantum effects dominate)
176: when the de Broglie wavelength of ions $\lambda\sim
177: h/\sqrt{3mkT}>l$ ($m$ the mass of ions).
178: %
179: So small values of $l$ and $T$ result also in a quantum state of
180: the system. \underline{This is the very competition}.
181: %
182: We need thus {\em weak interaction} between particles and {\em low
183: mass} in order to obtain a quantum fluid before solidification.
184: This is why {\em only helium}, of all the elements, shows
185: superfluid phenomenon though other noble elements have similar
186: weak strength of interaction due to filled crusts of electrons.
187: %
188: The superconductivity of electrons can also be understood
189: accordingly.
190:
191: Quark-gluon plasma is a system with elemental color interaction.
192: This strong interaction ({\em and} the Coulomb interaction in
193: system with strangeness) may be responsible for a possible
194: quark-clusters in quark matter with low $T$ but high $n_{\rm b}$.
195: Note that such a cluster differs ordinary colorless hadron very
196: much. The residual color interaction between the massive clusters
197: could conduce to a solid state of quark stars
198:
199: The color superconductivity state proposed is based on the field
200: theories, beginning with a phenomenological Lagrangian. One theory
201: with this spirit, which is successful in description of nuclear
202: matter, is the relativistic nuclear mean field theory
203: \citep{glen00}, where meson fields are considered to be constant
204: in space-time (an approximation of classical fields).
205: %
206: However, the $\alpha$-decay, which is well known experimentally,
207: can {\em not} be understood (because of no $\alpha$-clusters) in
208: this theory.
209: %
210: Nevertheless, it is interesting whether quark-clusters can form in
211: quark stars according to phenomenological QCD calculations.
212:
213: Anyway, further experiments (in low-energy heavy ion colliders)
214: might help us to answer the question in the near future --- quark
215: matter with low temperature but high density:
216: color-superconductivity {\em or} solidification?
217:
218: \acknowledgments
219:
220: This work is supported by National Nature Sciences Foundation of
221: China (10273001) and the Special Funds for Major State Basic
222: Research Projects of China (G2000077602).
223:
224: \begin{thebibliography}{}
225:
226: \bibitem[Bodmer(1971)]{bodm71}
227: Bodmer, A. R. 1971, \prd4, 1601
228:
229: \bibitem[Cea(2003)]{cea03}
230: Cea, P. 2003, preprint (astro-ph/0301578)
231:
232: \bibitem[de Vries et al.(2004)]{de04}
233: de Vries, C. P., Vink, J., Mendez, M., Verbunt, F. \aap (Letters),
234: accepetd (astro-ph/0401028)
235:
236: \bibitem[Dubin \& O'Neil(1999)]{dn99}
237: Dubin, D. H. E., O'Neil, T. M. 1999, Rev. Mod. Phys., 71, 87
238:
239: \bibitem[Farhi \& Jaffe(1984)]{fj84}
240: Farhi, E., Jaffe, R. L. 1984, \prd30, 2379
241:
242: \bibitem[Glendenning(2000)]{glen00}
243: Glendenning, N. K. 2000, Compact Stars (Berlin: Springer)
244:
245: \bibitem[Levin \& D'Angelo(2004)]{ld04}
246: Levin, Y., D'Angelo, C. 2004, preprint (astro-ph/0403014)
247:
248: \bibitem[Shabanova, Lyne \& Urama(2001)]{slu01}
249: Shabanova, T. V., Lyne, A. G., Urama, J. O. 2001, \apj, 552, 321
250:
251: \bibitem[Shovkovy, Hanauske \& Huang(2003)]{shh03}
252: Shovkovy, I., Hanauske, M., Huang, M. 2003, \prd67, 103004
253: (hep-ph/0303027)
254:
255: \bibitem[Stairs, Lyne \& Shemar(2000)]{sls00}
256: Stairs, I. H., Lyne, A. G., Shemar, S. L. 2000, \nat, 406, 484
257:
258: \bibitem[Witten(1984)]{wit84}
259: Witten, E., 1984, \prd30, 272
260:
261: \bibitem[Xu(2003a)]{xu03a}
262: Xu, R. X. 2003a, in: High Energy Processes, Phenomena in
263: Astrophysics, Proceedings of IAU Symposium No. 214, eds. X. D.Li,
264: Z. R. Wang \& V. Trimble, 191 (astro-ph/0211348)
265:
266: \bibitem[Xu(2003b)]{xu03b}
267: Xu, R. X. 2003b, in: Stellar astrophysics --- a tribute to Helmut
268: A. Abt, eds. K. S. Cheng, K. C. Leung \& T. P. Li , Kluwer
269: Academic Publishers, 73 (astro-ph/0211563)
270:
271: \bibitem[Xu(2003c)]{xu03c}
272: Xu, R. X. 2003c, \apjl, 596, L59
273:
274: \bibitem[Xu \& Qiao(1998)]{xq98}
275: Xu, R. X., Qiao, G.J. 1998, Chin. Phys. Lett., 15, 934
276:
277: \end{thebibliography}
278:
279: \end{document}
280: