1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'ms.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Draft version: Avishay, Mar. 18, 2004
5: %%
6: %% This is a manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The command below calls the preprint style
10: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
11: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
12: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
13:
14: %\documentclass{aastex}
15: %\documentstyle[emulateapj]{article}
16:
17: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
18: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
19: %\usepackage{natbib}
20:
21: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
22:
23: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
24:
25: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
26:
27: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
28:
29: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
30:
31: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
32: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
33: %% the \begin{document} command.
34: %%
35: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
36: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
37: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
38: %% for information.
39:
40: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
41: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
42: \def\gtorder{\mathrel{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$}\mkern-14mu
43: \lower0.6ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
44: \newcommand{\chandra}{\textit{Chandra}}
45: \newcommand{\chandralong}{\textit{Chandra X-ray Observatory}}
46: \newcommand{\percmsq}{\mbox{${\rm cm}^{-2}$}}
47: \newcommand{\ergcms}{\mbox{erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$}}
48: \newcommand{\xray}{\mbox{X-ray}}
49:
50: % Define "less than or approximately" symbol.
51: \def\ltsima{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}
52: \def\simlt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}}
53: % Define "greater than or approximately" symbol.
54: \def\gtsima{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}
55: \def\simgt{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}}
56:
57:
58: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
59:
60: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
61:
62: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
63: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
64: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
65: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
66: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
67: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
68:
69: %\shorttitle{Collapsed Cores in Globular Clusters}
70: %\shortauthors{Djorgovski et al.}
71:
72: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
73: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
74:
75: \begin{document}
76:
77: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
78: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
79: %% you desire.
80:
81: \title{The $J$-band Light Curve of SN 2003lw, Associated
82: with GRB 031203}
83:
84: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
85: %% author and affiliation information.
86: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
87: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
88: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
89: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
90:
91: \author{A. Gal-Yam\altaffilmark{1,2}, D.-S. Moon\altaffilmark{1,3}, D. B. Fox\altaffilmark{1}, A. M. Soderberg\altaffilmark{1}, S. R. Kulkarni\altaffilmark{1}, E. Berger\altaffilmark{1},
92: S. B. Cenko\altaffilmark{1}, S. Yost\altaffilmark{1},
93: D. A. Frail\altaffilmark{4},
94: M. Sako\altaffilmark{5},
95: W. L. Freedman\altaffilmark{6}, S. E. Persson\altaffilmark{6}, P. Wyatt\altaffilmark{6}, D. C. Murphy\altaffilmark{6},
96: M. M. Phillips\altaffilmark{7},
97: N. B. Suntzeff\altaffilmark{8},
98: P. A. Mazzali\altaffilmark{9,10}
99: K. Nomoto\altaffilmark{10}
100: }
101: \email{avishay@astro.caltech.edu}
102:
103: \altaffiltext{1}{Division of Physics, Mathematics, \& Astronomy, MS 105-24, California Institute of Technology,
104: Pasadena, CA 91125}
105: \altaffiltext{2}{Hubble Fellow}
106: \altaffiltext{3}{Robert A. Millikan Fellow}
107: \altaffiltext{4}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box 0, Socorro, New Mexico 87801}
108: \altaffiltext{5}{Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, 2575 Sand Hill Road M/S 29, Menlo Park, CA 94025}
109: \altaffiltext{6}{Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101}
110: \altaffiltext{7}{Las Campanas Observatory, Carnegie Observatories, Casilla 601, La Serena, Chile}
111: \altaffiltext{8}{Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile}
112: \altaffiltext{9}{INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via Tiepolo, 11, I-34131 Trieste, Italy}
113: \altaffiltext{10}{Dept. of Astronomy and RESCEU, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}
114:
115: %\author{A. Gal-Yam\altaffilmark{1}, D. B. Fox, A. M. Soderberg, S. R. Kulkarni, E. J. Berger}
116: %\affil{Astronomy Department, California Institute of Technology,
117: %Pasadena, CA 91125}
118: %\email{avishay@astro.caltech.edu}
119: %\author{D.-S. Moon, B. Cenko, S. Yost}
120: %\affil{Space Radiation Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125}
121: %\author{D. A. Frail}
122: %\affil{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box 0, Socorro, New Mexico 87801}
123: %\author{M. Sako}
124: %\affil{Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, 2575 Sand Hill Road M/S 29, Menlo Park, CA ,94025}
125: %\author{W. L. Freedman, S. E. Persson, P. Wyatt}
126: %\affil{Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA
127: %91101}
128: %\author{M. M. Phillips}
129: %\affil{Las Campanas Observatory, Carnegie Observatories, Casilla 601, La Serena, Chile}
130: %\and
131: %\author{N. B. Suntzeff}
132: %\affil{Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Casilla 603, La
133: %Serena, Chile}
134: %\and
135: %\author{R.~Jayawardhana and D. Paulson}
136: %\affil{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 830 Dennison, Ann Arbor MI, 48109}
137:
138: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
139: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
140: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
141: %% affiliation.
142:
143:
144:
145: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
146: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
147: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
148: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
149: %% editorial office after submission.
150:
151: \begin{abstract}
152:
153: At $z=0.1055$, the gamma-ray burst GRB 031203 is one of the two nearest GRBs known.
154: Using observations from the Very Large Array (VLA) and \chandralong\,
155: we derive sub-arcsecond localizations of the radio and
156: X-ray afterglow of this GRB. We present near-infrared observations of
157: the supernova SN 2003lw, which exploded in the
158: host galaxy of the GRB 031203. Our deep, high resolution Magellan/PANIC
159: data establish that this SN is spatially coincident with the
160: radio and X-ray localizations of the afterglow of GRB 031203 to sub-arcsecond
161: precision, and is thus firmly associated with the GRB.
162: We use image differencing to subtract the bright
163: emission from the host galaxy, and measure the time evolution of the SN
164: between $\sim5$ and $\sim50$ days after the GRB.
165: The resulting light curve has a shape which is quite different from
166: that of the two SNe previously associated with GRBs, SN 1998bw and SN 2003dh.
167: With SN 2003lw securely associated with this burst, we confirm that all three GRBs with
168: redshifts $z<0.3$ were accompanied by SN explosions.
169:
170: \end{abstract}
171:
172: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
173: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
174: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
175: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
176:
177: \keywords{supernovae: individual (SN 2003lw) -- gamma rays: bursts}
178:
179: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
180: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
181: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
182: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
183: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
184: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
185: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
186: %% each reference.
187:
188: \section{Introduction}
189:
190: The emerging association between long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)
191: and type Ic supernovae (SNe Ic) is perhaps the most significant breakthrough
192: in our understanding of GRBs, and may also provide new insights into
193: the physics of core-collapse SNe and the deaths of massive stars.
194: The initial strong evidence for this connection came from the spatial
195: and temporal coincidence between GRB 980425 and SN 1998bw (Galama et al. 1998).
196: More recently, this picture was convincingly affirmed by the detection
197: of SN features in the optical afterglow spectrum of GRB 030329 (Stanek et al. 2003;
198: Hjorth et al. 2003; Matheson et al. 2003). Both of these milestone discoveries
199: resulted from the study of the nearest GRBs yet identified, GRB 980425
200: at $z=0.0085$ and GRB 030329 at $z=0.1685$. Indeed, each relatively rare occurrence of a GRB
201: at low redshift ($z<0.3$) provides a unique opportunity for further study of
202: the GRB-SN connection.
203:
204: GRB 031203\footnotemark~was detected by IBIS on board the INTEGRAL spacecraft on
205: 2003 December 3, at 22:01:28 UT (Gotz et al. 2003).
206: A fading X-ray afterglow was discovered by XMM-Newton on 2003 December 4
207: (Santos-Lleo et al. 2003; Campana et al. 2003; Rodriguez-Pascual et al. 2003)
208: and found to be consistent with the location of a radio transient (Frail 2003; Soderberg,
209: Kulkarni, \& Frail 2003). Prochaska et al. (2003a; 2003b; 2004) identified the
210: host galaxy of the X-ray and radio transients, determined its redshift ($z=0.1055$)
211: and studied its properties in detail. Recently, several groups (Bersier et al. 2004;
212: Tagliaferri et al. 2004a; Thomsen et al. 2004; Cobb et al. 2004) reported optical
213: photometric and spectroscopic observations of
214: this GRB, which apparently reveal the signatures of an associated SN (designated
215: SN 2003lw; Tagliaferri et al. 2004b). In spite of the
216: low redshift of this event, its low Galactic latitude (less than $5^{\circ}$ from
217: the plane) and the resulting Galactic extinction ($E[B-V]=1.04$;
218: Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis 1998),
219: as well as its bright host galaxy, make the study of this event challenging.
220:
221: \footnotetext{The possible classification of this event as an X-ray flash (XRF) was debated
222: in recent literature (e.g., Prochaska et al. 2004; Watson et al. 2004; Thomsen et al. 2004).
223: However, the high-energy observations presented by Sazonov, Lutovinov, \& Sunyaev (2004)
224: conclusively show that this event does not fit any of the commonly used definitions of
225: XRFs.}
226:
227: To overcome these difficulties, we have undertaken near infrared (NIR) observations.
228: The results of this effort are reported in this {\it Letter}.
229: Coordinated radio and X-ray observations, which enabled us to probe the total
230: energy output of this sub-energetic GRB, are reported elsewhere (Soderberg et al. 2004).
231:
232: \section{Observations}
233:
234: \subsection{Near Infrared imaging}
235:
236: The location of the X-ray and radio transients associated with
237: GRB 031203 was observed with Persson's Auxiliary Nasmyth Infrared Camera
238: (PANIC; equipped with a $1024 \times 1024$ HgCdTe Hawaii I infrared focal plane array),
239: mounted on the Baade (Magellan I) 6.5m telescope, during 5 nights, in
240: the $J$ ($1.25\mu$) and $K_s$ ($2.16\mu$) bands. Due to their lower sensitivity and poor
241: temporal coverage, we did not detect SN 2003lw in our $K_s$-band
242: data. We therefore report in this {\it Letter} only the analysis
243: of our $J$-band observations. We obtained 18 or 36 dithered frames
244: during four epochs, approximately 5, 7, 50, and 81 days after
245: the GRB. A journal of the observations is given in Table 1.
246: The integration time for each frame was 120 s.
247: We obtained a common sky frame for each data set from the stacked image cube, and subtracted
248: it from each frame. We then carried out flat fielding, and shifted each frame
249: to a common reference position to create the final image.
250:
251: \begin{deluxetable}{llll}
252: \tablecolumns{4}
253: \tablewidth{0pt}
254: \tablecaption{$J$-band observations of SN 2003lw\label{TableObservations}}
255: \tablehead{
256: \colhead{Epoch} & \colhead{UT date} & \colhead{Days after} & \colhead{Number of}\\
257: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{GRB 031203} & \colhead{120s frames}
258: }
259: \startdata
260: % epoch& UT date & Days since GRB & number of $120s$ frames \\
261: $01$ & 2003 December 9, 07:07:39 & $5.38$ & $18$ \\
262: $02$ & 2003 December 11, 07:20:05 & $7.39$ & $18$ \\
263: $03$ & 2004 January 23, 03:10:01 & $50.21$ & $36\times2$\tablenotemark{a}\\
264: $04$ & 2004 February 23, 00:45:25 & $81.11$ & $36$ \\
265: \enddata
266: %\tablecomments{}
267: \tablenotetext{a}{Data from two consecutive nights were combined.}
268: \end{deluxetable}
269:
270:
271: \subsection{Image subtraction and SN photometry}
272:
273: In order to extract the faint SN signal from the bright host galaxy background,
274: we have used the Common Point-spread-function (PSF) image subtraction method
275: (CPM; Gal-Yam, Poznanski, \& Maoz, in preparation)\footnotemark. We find that
276: extra flux is detected in our three early epochs (obtained 5.38, 7.39 and 50.21 days
277: after the GRB) when compared
278: with our latest epoch (day 81.11; see Fig. 1). We therefore proceed in our analysis by assuming
279: that our latest image contains only a negligible amount of SN light. This is supported
280: by $J$-band observations presented by Cobb et al. (2004).
281:
282: \footnotetext{CPM compares a new image with a reference one by extracting
283: an empirical point-spread-function (PSF) from both images, and convolving each
284: image with the PSF of the other. While slightly degrading the final seeing
285: (as the final PSF of both images is worse than the initial PSF of either image), this
286: procedure produces output images with nominally identical PSFs, while introducing
287: a minimal amount of noise. In particular, we have found that this algorithm often
288: produces difference images which have lower subtraction residuals near the nuclei of
289: bright galaxies compared to other popular image subtraction packages, and thus allows
290: better sensitivity to variable sources which are superposed on bright galactic background.}
291:
292: To accurately measure the SN flux in each of the difference frames (Fig. 1, panels a-c),
293: we have added an artificial point source, of known negative flux and with the native PSF,
294: to our reference image. This results in the introduction of a positive artificial star
295: to each of the difference images, which should have an identical PSF to any real
296: variable point source (the native PSF of the reference image convolved with the PSF
297: of the image from which it was subtracted). This source is visible in panels a-c of
298: Fig. 1, in the lower left quadrant.
299: Using aperture photometry (with the aperture equal to the FWHM of the artificial
300: star), we measure the flux of SN 2003lw with respect to this constant source,
301: and derive the relative photometry of SN 2003lw. We have identified 22 objects which
302: appear in the 2MASS point source catalog and fall into the PANIC field of view. Of these,
303: the brightest 6 are saturated or non-linear in our images. We have used the
304: remaining 16 objects to tie our zero-point to the 2MASS photometry. We then
305: used 10 secondary calibrators in the close vicinity of GRB 031203 to set the
306: absolute calibration of the artificial reference star.
307: From the scatter in calibrations derived using different secondary calibrators,
308: we estimate a final absolute calibration error of $0.08$ mag.
309: Assuming this zero point, we calculate the $J$-band magnitudes of SN 2003lw at 5.38,
310: 7.39 and 50.21 days after GRB 031203, which are reported in Table 2 and plotted in Fig. 3.
311: Our calibration yields $J$-band magnitudes for the
312: host galaxy and the SN which are consistent with those reported by Cobb et al. (2004).
313:
314: \begin{deluxetable}{lll}
315: \tablecolumns{3}
316: \tablewidth{0pt}
317: \tablecaption{$J$-band photometry of SN 2003lw\label{TableObservations}}
318: \tablehead{
319: \colhead{UT date} & \colhead{Days after} & \colhead{$J$ magnitude} \\
320: \colhead{} & \colhead {GRB 031203} & \colhead{}
321: }
322: \startdata
323: % UT date & Days since GRB & $J$ magnitude \\
324: 2003 December 9, 07:07:39 & $5.38$ & $21.66\pm0.60$ \\
325: 2003 December 11, 07:20:05 & $7.39$ & $20.57\pm0.21$ \\
326: 2004 January 23, 03:10:01 & $50.21$ & $20.60\pm0.21$ \\
327: \enddata
328: %\tablecomments{}
329: %\tablenotetext{a}{}
330: \end{deluxetable}
331:
332:
333:
334: The main source of error in the derivation of the magnitudes reported here is the
335: uneven background levels of the difference images, caused by effects such as non-perfect
336: flat-fielding and sky subtraction (as seen in panels a-c
337: of Fig. 1). In order to quantify this error, we have added 20 artificial point sources
338: to each of the images, at random positions sampling both empty sky and high-background
339: areas of the image, with the appropriate PSF. We then subtracted the reference image using
340: CPM. We photometered the resulting difference frames and have iteratively adjusted the flux of the
341: artificial sources until their mean measured flux from the difference image was equal to
342: the flux we measured for SN 2003lw at the same epoch. Finally, we adopted the measured scatter
343: in the magnitudes of the artificial sources as the error in the SN magnitude at that epoch.
344: We find that these errors are far larger than other sources of error, e.g.,
345: the Poisson errors in the aperture photometry
346: of the bright artificial reference star we used in our photometric sequence, which are therefore
347: neglected. To these errors we add in quadrature our absolute calibration uncertainty
348: given above.
349:
350:
351: \begin{figure*}
352: \includegraphics[width=17cm]{f1.eps}
353: \caption{NIR detection of SN 2003lw. Panels a-c show $37.7"\times37.7"$ sections of
354: the difference images obtained by subtracting our last observed epoch (81
355: days after the GRB) from the first three epochs, obtained at
356: 5.38, 7.39 and 50.21 days post burst. SN 2003lw is at the center of each frame
357: (indicated by crosshairs) and its brightness can be compared to an artificial
358: reference star added to each image (marked in panel a) which has a constant flux.
359: The Grey levels in panels a-c are linearly scaled between the peak of the
360: artificial reference star and $1\sigma$ of the sky noise below the mode sky level.
361: Comparing panels b and c,
362: note the similar IR flux detected at 7 and 50 days after the GRB. For orientation
363: purposes, panel d shows a section from our reference (fourth epoch) PANIC image with the
364: same scale and orientation. The host galaxy of GRB 031203/SN 2003lw lies at the
365: center of panel d. North is up, East to the left.}
366: \end{figure*}
367:
368: \section{Results}
369:
370: \subsection{Spatial Coincidence with the Radio and X-ray Afterglow of
371: GRB\,031203}
372:
373: The position of the radio afterglow from VLA observations (Soderberg et al.
374: 2004) is (J2000) RA 08:02:30.1833(18), Dec $-$39:51:03.522(78), as
375: referenced to the ICRS (uncertainties in the final digits are given in
376: parentheses). This position is derived from our first-epoch 22~GHz
377: observation, the highest resolution of our various radio observations,
378: which had a beam size of 1.14$\times$0.29 arcsec.
379:
380: The position of the \xray\ afterglow is derived from our \chandralong\
381: observations. We observed the afterglow with \chandra\ in a single
382: 21.6~ksec exposure beginning at 21:35~UT on 22~January 2004 (mean
383: epoch 49.1~days post-burst), with the afterglow position at the
384: aimpoint of the \mbox{ACIS-S3} CCD. Data were reduced in the standard
385: manner using the CIAO tools (v.~3.0.2). In particular, a
386: comprehensive ``wavdetect'' source detection analysis reveals six
387: X-ray sources on the S3 chip with coincident objects in the
388: \mbox{GSC-2.2} catalog. Using these sources we confirm the absolute
389: astrometry to $\pm$0.13 arcsec precision, and derive a position for
390: the afterglow of (J2000) RA 08:02:30.159, Dec $-$39:51:03.51, with
391: 0.18\arcsec\ uncertainty. We then identify two X-ray sources on the
392: S3 chip with point-like sources in our 9~December 2003 PANIC $J$-band
393: image. By registering these two \xray\ source positions against their
394: $J$-band counterparts, we are able to locate the afterglow on the
395: PANIC image to $\approx$1.2-pixel precision.
396:
397: The resulting X-ray localization,
398: 0.56$\times$0.64 arcsec in size, is shown as the red ellipse in
399: Figure~2, along with the VLA radio (cyan) and PANIC NIR
400: transient (green) localizations, as transferred to the same image.
401: All ellipses are two-sigma ($95\%$ confidence level).
402: The WCS on the PANIC image is derived
403: from the positions of 23 2MASS counterparts, and the uncertainty in
404: the VLA position is dominated by the 0.095$\times$0.121 arcsec RMS of
405: this mapping. The NIR localization is derived from two of our
406: subtracted images; the two relative localizations differ by (0.23,
407: 0.46) pixels and so we adopt 0.029$\times$0.058 arcsec as our
408: one-sigma uncertainty.
409:
410: Fig.~2 shows that the location of the NIR transient is
411: consistent with that of the afterglow across all wavelengths, to high
412: precision, confirming the association that has already been inferred
413: from the temporal coincidence of GRB\,031203 and SN\,2003lw.
414:
415: Moreover, this location is consistent with the peak of the host galaxy
416: light: the NIR offset, which has the highest precision, is
417: 0.15$\pm$0.23~pixels West, 0.26$\pm$0.46~pixels North. At $z=0.1055$,
418: this 0.04$\pm$0.06 arcsec offset corresponds to a physical distance of
419: 0.07$\pm$0.13~kpc.
420:
421: % Angular scale at z=0.105: 1.903 kpc/arcsec
422:
423: \begin{figure}
424: \label{fig:panic}
425: \includegraphics[width=17cm]{f2.eps}
426: \caption{
427: PANIC $J$-band image of the host galaxy of GRB\,031203 from 9~December
428: 2003, with localizations of the \chandra\ \xray\ afterglow (red), the
429: VLA radio afterglow (cyan), and the PANIC NIR transient (green)
430: superposed; the position of the central maximum of the host galaxy
431: light is indicated by the white ticks, and North is up and East is to
432: the left. The ellipses shown are two-sigma (95\%-confidence)
433: localizations; see text for details. The NIR transient ellipse is
434: 0.46$\times$0.92 pixels (0.06$\times$0.11 arcsec) in size. The size
435: of the VLA ellipse is 0.38$\times$0.58 arcsec; the X-ray ellipse is
436: 0.56$\times$0.64 arcsec. Although transient light contributes to this
437: image, its effect on the appearance of the host galaxy at this color
438: stretch is negligible. The localizations of the afterglow and
439: transient are consistent across all wavelengths, and locate the source
440: within 0.2~kpc of the central maximum of the host galaxy light.
441: }
442: \end{figure}
443:
444: \subsection{The J-band Light Curve}
445:
446: Figure 3 shows the $J$-band light curve of SN 2003lw. Our deep observations detect
447: the SN light as early as $\sim5$ days after the burst (the earliest detection of
448: this SN), and suggest a steep rise in flux
449: between the first two epochs ($\sim5$ and $\sim7$ days after the GRB). The flux
450: measurements at $\sim7$ and $\sim50$ days after the GRB are comparable.
451:
452: To better interpret these observations,
453: we wish to compare our data to the $J$-band light curve of SN 1998bw, the prototype
454: and best observed GRB-associated SN. Unfortunately, NIR observations of SN 1998bw
455: are scarce - the only data available are 3 epochs of photometry and spectroscopy
456: reported by Patat et al. (2001). We have used these NIR spectra, in conjunction with
457: optical spectroscopy from the same source, to calculate the $I-J$
458: colors of SN 1998bw, redshifted to $z=0.1055$, using the methods described
459: by Poznanski et al. (2002). We then construct a
460: model for the $J$-band light curve of SN 1998bw as it would appear at $z=0.1055$
461: in the following manner. Based on the observations of Galama et al. (1998) we construct
462: the I-band light curve of SN 1998bw at $z=0.1055$, using the extinction
463: correction given by Cobb et al. (2004). The resulting curve is shown in Fig. 3
464: (dashed curve). We then use the three epochs of $I-J$ colors calculated above, along with
465: the appropriate (smaller) $J$-band extinction correction (from Prochaska
466: et al. 2004) to calculate $J$-band anchors for our light curve model (asterisks in Fig. 3). Finally, we assume
467: that the shapes of the $J$ and $I$-band light curves of SN 1998bw are similar, and
468: adjust the $I$-band light curve upward by the mean of the three color measurements we have,
469: yielding the solid curve plotted in Fig. 3. Note that using the $I$-band light curve shape we can
470: obtain a decent fit to all three $J$-band anchors, and thus it appears that assuming
471: this light curve shape is reasonable, at least during the declining
472: part of the light curve, sampled by the available NIR photometry of SN 1998bw.
473:
474: Having exhausted the relevant observational data, we turn to models of SN 1998bw.
475: Iwamoto et al. (1998) present hydrodynamical models of exploding C+O stars
476: which reproduce the optical light curve and spectra of SN 1998bw. Synthetic
477: spectra calculated by these authors extend out to $1.2\mu$. We use these spectra to
478: calculate synthetic $I-J$ colors of SN 1998bw (as it would seem at $z=0.1055$)
479: between $\sim10$ and $\sim107$ days after the GRB, as we have done with the real
480: date. Errors resulting from incomplete coverage of the
481: $J$-band by the available spectra, are calculated as in Poznanski
482: et al. (2002). We then repeat the process described above, creating a new set of
483: synthetic anchors (marked by small filled circles in Fig. 3). The distribution
484: of these anchor points suggests again that the $I$ and $J$-band light curves of SN 1998bw
485: had similar shapes. Indeed, applying the average synthetic color correction $I-J\sim0.9$
486: and the appropriate extinction correction to our model $I$-band light curve of SN 1998bw,
487: the resulting model $J$-band light curve of SN 1998bw (light solid curve in Fig. 3)
488: fits the synthetic anchors very well. The $J$ band model light curves derived from
489: the sparse NIR observations (boldsolid curve) and the
490: model spectra (light solid curve) are reasonably consistent with each
491: other and support the notion that the $I$ and $J$-band light curves of SN 1998bw had similar shape.
492: Interestingly, the rough $I-J$ colors of SN 2003lw
493: measured by Cobb et al. (2004; $I-J\sim1$) appear similar to the colors we derive for SN 1998bw
494: at $z=0.1055$.
495:
496: Comparing our model SN 1998bw light curves with the data, an obvious discrepancy is
497: immediately revealed. While our late-time point is marginally consistent with the models,
498: the early-time $J$-band data points fall significantly below model
499: expectations (by at least $\sim0.9$ mag, a $9\sigma$ effect).
500: This discrepancy is enhanced if SN 2003lw was intrinsically brighter than SN 1998bw
501: by $\sim0.4$ mag, as advocated by Thomsen et al. (2004). We also note that the fast
502: early rise implied by our early data points is not reproduced by either model.
503: Making SN 2003lw less luminous overall would make the model inconsistent with
504: our late time data point, and would conflict with the observations of
505: Thomsen et al. (2004) and Cobb et al. (2004).
506: Thus, it appears that SN 2003lw had a significantly
507: different light curve shape than SN 1998bw, at least in the $J$-band.
508:
509: \begin{figure*}
510: \includegraphics[width=17cm]{f3.eps}
511: \caption{$J$-band photometry of SN 2003lw. Our measurements (Stars with
512: $2\sigma$ error bars, see text) are compared to model light curves
513: of SN 1998bw. The bold dashed line shows the $I$-band light curve of SN 1998bw,
514: redshifted to $z=0.1055$, assuming an extinction of $A_I=1.4$ mag (Cobb et al. 2004).
515: The only available $J$-band
516: spectra of SN 1998bw (Patat et al. 2001) are used to calculate $I-J$
517: color offsets, correcting for the different extinction values in the $I$
518: and $J$ bands (from Prochaska et al. 2004; see text).
519: These points are plotted as asterisks, and serve as our guidance in constructing
520: a model $J$-band light curve for SN 1998bw. This is done by adopting the I-band
521: light curve shape, normalized to fit these three points (bold solid curve).
522: A second model, based on $J$-band points calculated using synthetic color corrections
523: (small circles, see text) is shown as a light solid curve. Note that both $J$-band
524: models are inconsistent with our early data points.
525: }
526: \end{figure*}
527:
528: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
529:
530: In this {\it Letter}, we have presented $J$-band observations of SN 2003lw.
531: The sensitivity and resolution of our data enabled us to pinpoint
532: the location of SN 2003lw within its host galaxy, and to show
533: it is consistent with sub-arcsecond localizations of the
534: radio and X-ray afterglow of GRB 031203, thus confirming the association
535: of these two events. The precise NIR localization of this event also
536: puts it within $0.2$~kpc from the host galaxy center.
537: The $J$-band light curve of SN 2003lw shows a rapid
538: initial rise ($5-7$ days after the GRB)
539: and evidence for bright emission more than $50$ days after the GRB.
540: The fast early rise of SN 2003dh, associated with GRB 030329, has been
541: interpreted by Woosley \& Heger (2003) and Mazzali et al. (2003)
542: as evidence for asymmetry in the explosion.
543: A thorough investigation of this possibility will
544: probably require an analysis of our data in combination with other extensive
545: data sets of optical and NIR photometry and spectroscopy collected by
546: other groups (e.g., Thomsen et al. 2004; Tagliaferri et al. 2004; Bersier et al. 2004;
547: Cobb et al. 2004).
548:
549: Cobb et al (2004) have recently reported $I$ and $J$-band observations of
550: this event, obtained with the SMARTS 1.3m telescope. A direct comparison between
551: our observations and the SMARTS data, obtained on numerous epochs, is complicated
552: by the fact that these authors do not present the light curve of SN 2003lw. Instead, they
553: plot the temporal evolution of the combined light
554: of the SN and its bright host galaxy, derived from aperture photometry,
555: which shows considerable scatter. It is thus
556: hard to say whether their data show the same early fast rise we detect.
557: Our observation that SN 2003lw had similar
558: flux levels 7 and 50 days after the GRB is consistent with the reported SMARTS
559: data. Furthermore, comparing their $I$-band data with model light curves
560: of SN 1998bw, these authors arrive at the conclusion that
561: the light curve shape of SN 2003lw does not resemble that of SN 1998bw. This
562: is in accord with our analysis of the $J$-band data (Cobb et al. 2004 do not attempt
563: to compare their $J$-band data with a model of SN 1998bw). It appears that both
564: our observations and the Cobb et al. (2004) data set suggest that SN 2003lw had
565: a light curve quite unlike that of SN 1998bw; with a fast rise to maximum, which appears
566: broader, and perhaps showing a secondary peak in the IR.
567:
568: The above discussion provides further evidence for the
569: diversity of SNe associated with GRBs [see, e.g., Thomsen et al. (2004) and
570: Lipkin et al. (2004) for recent reviews].
571: With SN 2003lw, all three nearby GRBs are firmly associated with SNe,
572: apparently supporting suggestions made, e.g., by Podsiadlowski et al (2004),
573: that all long GRBs are accompanied by SNe.
574: It may well be the case that the focus of future studies should now move from
575: proving the association between SNe and GRBs to an attempt to characterize the
576: properties of this population of SNe. Such studies may provide new clues about
577: the progenitors and engines of GRBs, by requiring viable GRB models to be
578: able to produce the large quantities of nickel derived from the SN observations,
579: as well as valuable insights into possible explosion mechanisms of
580: core-collapse SNe, which may involve GRB-like aspherical effects [e.g., Khokhlov et al. (1999),
581: see Gal-Yam et al. (2004) for further discussion]. Low-redshift GRBs, expected to
582: be localized in larger numbers by the upcoming {\it SWIFT} mission, as well as
583: systematic studies of local core-collapse SNe (e.g., Berger et al. 2003; Soderberg
584: et al. 2004, in preparation; Stockdale et al. 2004) will probably shed
585: more light on these intriguing questions.
586:
587:
588: \section*{Acknowledgments}
589:
590: We thank D. Poznanski for his help with synthetic photometry.
591: A.G. acknowledges support by NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant
592: \#HST-HF-01158.01-A awarded by STScI, which is operated by AURA, Inc.,
593: for NASA, under contract NAS 5-26555.
594: The Guide Star Catalog was produced at the Space Telescope Science
595: Institute under U.S. Government grant. These data are based on
596: photographic data obtained using the Oschin Schmidt Telescope on
597: Palomar Mountain and the UK Schmidt Telescope.
598:
599: %% If you wish to include an acknowledgments section in your paper,
600: %% separate it off from the body of the text using the \acknowledgments
601: %% command.
602:
603: %% Included in this acknowledgments section are examples of the
604: %% AASTeX hypertext markup commands. Use \url without the optional [HREF]
605: %% argument when you want to print the url directly in the text. Otherwise,
606: %% use either \url or \anchor, with the HREF as the first argument and the
607: %% text to be printed in the second.
608:
609: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
610: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
611: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
612: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
613: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
614: %%
615: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
616: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
617: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
618: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
619: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
620: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
621: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
622: %% place of the \cite commands.
623:
624: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
625: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
626: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
627:
628: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
629: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
630: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
631: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
632: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
633:
634: \begin{thebibliography}{}
635:
636: \bibitem{} Berger, E., Kulkarni, S.~R., Frail, D.~A., \& Soderberg, A.~M.\ 2003, \apj,
637: 599, 408
638: \bibitem{} Bersier, D., et al.\ 2004, GRB Circular Network, 2544, 1
639: \bibitem{} Campana, S., Tagliaferri, G., Chincarini, G., Covino, S., Fugazza, D., \& Stella, L.\
640: 2003, GRB Circular Network, 2478, 1
641: \bibitem{} Cobb, B.~E., Bailyn, C.~D., van Dokkum, P.~G., Buxton, M.~M., \&
642: Bloom, J.~S.\ 2004, ApJL, submitted, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0403510
643: \bibitem{} Frail, D.~A.\ 2003, GRB Circular Network, 2473, 1
644: \bibitem{} Galama, T.~J.,~et al.\ 1998, \nat, 395, 670
645: \bibitem{} Gal-Yam, A., Poznanski, D., Maoz, D., Filippenko, A.~V., \& Foley, R.~J.\ 2004, PASP,
646: submitted, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0403296
647: \bibitem{} Gotz, D., Mereghetti, S., Beck, M., Borkowski, J., \& Mowlavi, N.\ 2003,
648: GRB Circular Network, 2459, 1
649: \bibitem{} Hjorth, J., et al.\ 2003, \nat, 423, 847
650: \bibitem{} Iwamoto, K., et al.\ 1998, \nat, 395, 672
651: \bibitem{} Khokhlov, A.~M., H{\"o}flich, P.~A., Oran, E.~S., Wheeler, J.~C., Wang, L., \& Chtchelkanova,
652: A.~Y.\ 1999, \apjl, 524, L107
653: \bibitem{} Lipkin, Y.~M.~et al.\ 2003, ApJ, in press, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0312594
654: \bibitem{} Matheson, T.,~et al.\ 2003, \apj, 599, 394
655: \bibitem{} Mazzali, P.~A., et al.\ 2003, \apjl, 599, L95
656: \bibitem{} Patat, F.,~et al.\ 2001, \apj, 555, 900
657: \bibitem{} Podsiadlowski, P., Mazzali, P.~A., Nomoto, K., Lazzati, D., \& Cappellaro, E.\ 2004,
658: ApJL, submitted, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0403399
659: \bibitem{} Poznanski, D., Gal-Yam, A., Maoz, D., Filippenko, A.~V., Leonard, D.~C., \& Matheson, T.\
660: 2002, \pasp, 114, 833
661: \bibitem{} Prochaska, J.~X., Chen, H.~W., Hurley, K., Bloom, J.~S., Graham, J.~R., \& Vacca, W.~D.\
662: 2003a, GRB Circular Network, 2475, 1
663: \bibitem{} Prochaska, J.~X., Bloom, J.~S., Chen, H.~W., Hurley, K., Dressler, A., \& Osip, D.\ 2003b, GRB
664: Circular Network, 2482, 1
665: \bibitem{} Prochaska, J.~X., et al.\ 2004, ApJ, submitted, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0402085
666: \bibitem{} Rodriguez-Pascual, P., Santos-Lleo, M., Gonzalez-Riestra, R., Schartel, N.,
667: \& Altieri, B.\ 2003, GRB Circular Network, 2477, 1
668: \bibitem{} Sazonov, S. Yu., Lutovinov, A. A., \& Sunyaev, R. A., in prep.
669: \bibitem{} Santos-Lleo, M., Calderon, P., \& Gotz, D.\ 2003, GRB Circular Network, 2464, 1
670: \bibitem{} Schlegel, D.~J., Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525
671: \bibitem{} Soderberg, A.~M., Kulkarni, S.~R., \& Frail, D.~A.\ 2003, GRB Circular
672: Network, 2483, 1
673: \bibitem{} Soderberg, A. M., et al. 2004, in prep.
674: \bibitem{} Stanek, K.~Z.,~et al.\ 2003, \apjl, 591, L17
675: \bibitem{} Stockdale, C.~J., Van Dyk, S.~D., Sramek, R.~A., Weiler, K.~W., Panagia, N., Rupen, M.~P., \&
676: Paczynski, B.\ 2004, \iaucirc, 8282, 2
677: \bibitem{} Tagliaferri, G., et al.\ 2004a, GRB Circular Network, 2545, 1
678: \bibitem{} Tagliaferri, G., et al.\ 2004b, IAU Circular 8303
679: \bibitem{} Thomsen, B., et al.\ 2004, A\&A, submitted, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0403451
680: \bibitem{} Watson, D., et al.\ 2004, ApJL, submitted, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0401225
681: \bibitem{} Woosley, S.~E.~\& Heger, A.\ 2003, ApJ, submitted, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0309165
682:
683: \end{thebibliography}
684:
685:
686: \clearpage
687:
688: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
689: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
690:
691: \end{document}
692:
693:
694:
695:
696: