1: %%
2: %%
3: %% -------------------------------------------------
4: \ProvidesFile{esapub.tex}
5: [2001/04/25 1.1 (PWD)]
6: \documentclass[a4paper,twocolumn]{esapub} % European paper
7: \usepackage{graphicx}
8:
9: \usepackage{times}
10: \usepackage{natbib}
11:
12: \title{Study of Unidentified EGRET sources with INTEGRAL: first results and future prospects}
13:
14: \author[1]{G. Di Cocco}
15: \author[2]{A.J. Castro--Tirado}
16: \author[3,4]{S. Chaty}
17: \author[5]{A.J. Dean}
18: \author[6]{M. Del Santo}
19: \author[1]{L. Foschini}
20: \author[7]{N. Gehrels}
21: \author[1]{P. Grandi}
22: \author[3,4]{I. Grenier}
23: \author[8]{W. Hermsen}
24: \author[8]{L. Kuiper}
25: \author[9]{N. Lund}
26: \author[1]{G. Malaguti}
27: \author[3]{F. Mirabel}
28: \author[10]{R. Much}
29:
30: \affil[1]{IASF/CNR, Sezione di Bologna, via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy}
31:
32: \affil[2]{Instituto de Astrof\`{\i}sica de Andaluc\`{\i}a (IAA--CSIC), P.O. Box 03004,
33: E--18080 Granada, Spain}
34:
35: \affil[3]{Service d'Astrophysique, Centre d'\`Etudes de Saclay, DSM/DAPNIA/SAp, CEA--Saclay,
36: F-91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, Cedex, France}
37:
38: \affil[4]{Universit\'e Paris 7, Denis-Diderot 2, place Jussieu 75251 Paris Cedex 05, France}
39:
40: \affil[5]{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Southampton University, UK}
41:
42: \affil[6]{IASF/CNR, Sezione di Roma, via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, Roma, Italy}
43:
44: \affil[7]{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics, Code
45: 661, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA}
46:
47: \affil[8]{SRON National Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, The
48: Netherlands}
49:
50: \affil[9]{Danish Space Research Institute, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark }
51:
52: \affil[10]{ESA/ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, Postbus 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands}
53:
54: \newcommand{\btx}{\textsc{Bib}\TeX}
55: \newcommand{\filename}{esapub}
56:
57: \begin{document}
58:
59: \keywords{Gamma rays: observations -- Galaxies: active -- Galaxies: Individuals: GRS$1734-292$}
60:
61: \maketitle
62:
63: \begin{abstract}
64: The primary objective of the study of unidentified EGRET sources with INTEGRAL is to locate
65: with a few arcminute accuracy the hard X-ray / soft $\gamma$-ray counterparts within the
66: EGRET error circle or to
67: determine upper limits on their emission in the INTEGRAL energy range. The INTEGRAL Galactic
68: Plane Scan (GPS) and Galactic Centre Deep Exposure (GCDE) data have been analysed and
69: cross--correlated with the EGRET $3^{\rm rd}$ Catalogue to search for counterparts of EGRET
70: sources.
71: The IBIS detection of a source within the EGRET error circle of 3EG J$1736-2908$ is presented
72: and its possible identification with the active galaxy GRS $1734-292$ is discussed.
73: Finally, preliminary results on the cross-correlation between EGRET unidentified sources and
74: the first data from the IBIS survey of the Galactic Centre are presented.
75:
76: \end{abstract}
77:
78: \section{Introduction}
79:
80: The $3^{\rm rd}$ Energetic Gamma--Ray Experiment Telescope (EGRET) Catalogue of high--energy
81: (E$>$100 MeV) $\gamma$--ray sources (Hartman et al. 1999) refers to the observations carried
82: out by the EGRET experiment onboard the Compton Gamma--Ray Observatory (CGRO) between April
83: 1991 and October 1995. It contains 271 point sources, including: 1 solar flare, the Large
84: Magellanic Cloud, 5 pulsars, the radio galaxy Centaurus A, and 66 high--confidence
85: identifications of blazars. In addition, 27 lower--confidence blazar identifications are
86: included in the catalog, which leaves 170 sources unidentified. Since the publication of the
87: catalog, a lot of effort has been dedicated to the identification of the 170 unidentified
88: EGRET sources (Grenier 2003). While most of the extragalactic counterparts are blazars, two
89: possible identifications of EGRET sources with radiogalaxies have been recently proposed
90: (Combi et al. 2003, Mukherjee et al. 2003), in addition to the well known radiogalaxy Cen A.
91: However, the multiwavelength counterpart search is hampered by the limited EGRET point spread
92: function, which gives error radii of $0.5^\circ-1^\circ$.
93:
94: One of the two main telescopes on board INTEGRAL (Winkler et al. 2003) is the IBIS imager
95: (Ubertini et al. 2003). IBIS combines for the first time broad band high energy coverage
96: ($15$~keV -- $10$~MeV) with imaging capability. IBIS has a large field of view
97: ($19^\circ\times 19^\circ$ at half response), and a fine angular resolution of $12'$, sampled
98: in $5'$ pixels in the low energy ($0.015-1$~MeV) layer ISGRI (Lebrun et al. 2003), and in
99: $10'$ pixels in the high energy ($0.175-10$~MeV) detector PICsIT (Di Cocco et al. 2003).
100: ISGRI reaches a point source location accuracy better than $1'$ for a $30\sigma$ detection
101: (Gros et al. 2003). These unprecedented characteristics for a $\gamma$--ray telescope clearly
102: make IBIS one of the best instruments available to date to search for counterparts of
103: unidentified EGRET sources. Within the framework of the Core Programme (CP) observations, a
104: project has been set up to systematically search for associations between INTEGRAL sources
105: and EGRET unidentified error sources. A first possible identification of an EGRET source has
106: already been found (see Di Cocco et al. 2004, A\&A submitted, for details).
107:
108: \section{The case of 3EG~J$1736-2908$}
109:
110: Every single pointing (Science Window, ScW) of the INTEGRAL Core Programme observations is progressively analysed,
111: and all the sources detected with signal--to--noise ratio (SNR) greater than $6\sigma$ are cross--correlated
112: with the $3^{\rm rd}$ EGRET Catalogue to look for possible identifications. All the INTEGRAL data analysis described
113: in the present work has been done with the latest version of the Offline Standard Analysis (OSA) available
114: through the INTEGRAL Science Data Centre (ISDC\footnote{\texttt{http://isdc.unige.ch/index.cgi?Soft+download}})
115: and whose algorithms are described in Goldwurm et al.~(2003).
116:
117: During these scans, one source within the probability contours of 3EG J$1736-2908$
118: was found with
119: a statistical significance of $\approx 10\sigma$ in the ScW 57 of revolution 61
120: (Fig.~\ref{fig:scwdet}, \emph{top}). The
121: source, later identified with the active galaxy GRS$1734-292$, had a flux of
122: ($2.1\pm0.3$)$\times10^{-10}$ erg cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ (or $28\pm4$ mCrab) in the $20-40$~keV
123: energy band.
124:
125: \begin{figure}[!ht]
126: \centering
127: \vspace*{0.2cm}
128: \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{single_scw_2.ps}\\
129: \vspace*{0.2cm}
130: \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{mosaic_20_40.ps}\\
131: \vspace*{0.2cm}
132: \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{mosaic_40_60.ps}\\
133: \caption{(\emph{top panel:}) IBIS/ISGRI image of the 3EG J$1736-2908$ region obtained in one
134: ScW (ScW 57 of Rev. 61).
135: (\emph{centre panel:}) IBIS/ISGRI mosaic ($320$~ks total exposure time) of the 3EG
136: J$1736-2908$ region in
137: the energy band $20-40$~keV. (\emph{bottom panel}) The same as above, but in the energy band
138: $40-60$~keV.
139: The $95$\% and $99$\% EGRET probability contours of 3EG $1736-2908$ are superimposed.
140: (N.B.: The rotation of the figures in the centre and bottom panels with respect to the single ScW observation of the top
141: panel is caused by the mosaicing procedure.)}
142: \label{fig:scwdet}
143: \end{figure}
144:
145: The detection significance was increased with the mosaic obtained by adding together all the ScWs
146: containing the 3G J$1736-2908$ region within $10^\circ$ from the centre of the field of view
147: (FOV). The obtained images (Fig.~\ref{fig:scwdet}, \emph{centre} and \emph{bottom} panels)
148: correspond to
149: an effective exposure time of $\sim320$ ks. The source position ($90$\% confidence radius =
150: 1.2$'$) obtained with this longer exposure, $\alpha=17:37:27$ and $\delta=-29:08:24$ (J2000),
151: is fully compatible with the single ScW detection, while the detection significances
152: increased to
153: $17\sigma$ and $8.5\sigma$, in the $20-40$ and $40-60$ keV, respectively. The corresponding
154: fluxes are ($4.9\pm0.4$)$\times10^{-11}$ erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$ and
155: ($2.1\pm0.3$)$\times10^{-11}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$, respectively.
156:
157: GRS$1734-292$ is also clearly visible in the mosaics of the Galactic Centre presented by Paizis et
158: al.~(2003), in the field of view of the black hole candidate H$1743-322$ observation by Parmar
159: et al.~(2003), and in the IBIS survey of the Galactic Centre region performed by Revnivtsev et
160: al. (2004). The flux and the detections are consistent with the present results.
161:
162: For more details about the possible identification of GRS$1734-292$ as counterpart
163: of 3EG~J$1736-2908$ we refer the reader to Di Cocco et al. (submitted to A\&A).
164:
165:
166: \section{Search for other counterparts of EGRET unidentified sources}
167:
168: \begin{figure*}[!ht]
169: \centering
170: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=90]{p2a.ps}\\
171: \includegraphics[scale=0.5,angle=90]{p2b.ps}
172: \caption{ (\emph{Top panel:}) IBIS/ISGRI sources detected by Revnivtsev et al. (2004) in the
173: Galactic Centre region
174: survey ($3'$ radius, blue circles) superimposed to the EGRET error circles (95\% probability radius, red asterisks) in the
175: same
176: region. (\emph{Bottom panel:}) The zoom panel clearly shows the coincidence
177: position of the source
178: identified as GRS$1734-292$ with 3EG J$1736-2908$.}
179: \label{fig:mike}
180: \end{figure*}
181:
182:
183: The 2~Ms IBIS/ISGRI mosaic by Revnivtsev et al.~(2004) gives a list of sources detected in the central radian of the Milky Way
184: down to a limiting flux of $1.3\times10^{-11}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$. Therefore, we performed a cross--correlation of the
185: $3^{\rm rd}$ EGRET Catalog with the source list of Revnivtsev et al. (2004). The results shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:mike} confirm
186: that GRS$1734-292$ is the only source detected by IBIS inside the error circle of 3EG~J$1736-2908$. On the other hand, while
187: two IBIS sources are found within the 95\% error circle of the EGRET unidentified source 3EG J$1746-2851$ at the Galactic
188: Centre, no other unidentified EGRET sources match with the INTEGRAL detections. The only other EGRET source coincident with an
189: IBIS source is a known blazar, PKS $1830-211$ which lies within the error circle of 3EG J$1832-2110$.
190:
191:
192:
193: \section{Conclusions}
194:
195: We presented the first results of the early activity in the search for
196: counterparts of the unidentified EGRET sources in the framework of the
197: INTEGRAL Core Programme. One candidate counterpart has been found close to the
198: Galactic Centre and the identification with the active galaxy GRS$1734-292$ has been
199: proposed.
200: The cross--correlation of the 2~Ms mosaic of the central radiant (Revnivstev et al. 2004)
201: with the $3^{\rm rd}$ EGRET catalog has not produced other possible counterparts.
202: The research should now be extended to the others regions of the sky covered by
203: the INTEGRAL core programme.
204:
205:
206: \section*{Acknowledgments}
207: Based on observations obtained with \emph{INTEGRAL}, an ESA project with instruments and science
208: data centre funded by ESA member states (especially the PI countries:
209: Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Spain), Czech Republic and
210: Poland, and with the participation of Russia and the USA.
211:
212: The italian participation to the INTEGRAL/IBIS project is financed by the Italian Space Agency (ASI).
213:
214: \begin{thebibliography}{}
215: \bibitem[Combi et al. (2003)]{comb} Combi, J.A., Romero, G.E., Paredes, J.M., Torres, D.F.,
216: Rib\'{o}, M. 2003, ApJ, 588, 731
217:
218: \bibitem[Di Cocco et al. (2003)]{dico} Di Cocco, G., Caroli, E., Celesti, E., et al., 2003, A\&A 411, L189
219:
220: \bibitem[Goldwurm et al. (2003)]{gold03} Goldwurm, A., David, P., Foschini, L., et al., 2003, A\&A 411, L223
221:
222: \bibitem[Grenier (2003)]{ig} Grenier, I.A., 2003, astro-ph/0303498
223:
224: \bibitem[Gros et al. (2003)]{PSF} Gros A., Goldwurm A., Cadolle-Bel M., et al., 2003, A\&A 411, L179
225:
226: \bibitem[Hartmann et al. (1999)]{hart99} Hartman, R.C., Bertsch, D.L., Bloom, S.D. et al. 1999, ApJ, 123, 79
227:
228: \bibitem[Lebrun et al. (2003)]{leb03} Lebrun, F., Leray, J.P., Lavocat, P., et al., 2003, A\&A 411, L141
229:
230: \bibitem[Mukherjee et al. 2002]{MUK} Mukherjee, R., Halpern, J., Mirabal, N., Gotthelf, E.V., 2002, ApJS, 574, 693
231:
232: \bibitem[Paizis et al. (2003)]{ada} Paizis, A., Beckmann, V., Courvoisier, T.J.-L., et al., 2003, A\&A 411, L363
233:
234: \bibitem[Revnivtsev et al. (2004)]{rev)} Revnivtsev, M., Sunyaev, R.A., Varshalovich, D., et al.,
235: 2004, Astronomy Letters, in press (astro-ph/0402027)
236:
237: \bibitem[Ubertini et al. (2003)]{ube03} Ubertini, P., Lebrun, F., Di Cocco, G., et al., 2003, A\&A 411, L131
238:
239: \bibitem[Winkler et al. (2003)]{wink} Winkler, C., Courvoisier, T.J.-L., Di Cocco, G., et al., 2003, A\&A 411, L1
240:
241: \end{thebibliography}
242: \end{document}
243:
244:
245:
246:
247:
248:
249: