1: \documentclass[10pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3:
4: %\received{2004 January 29}
5: \begin{document}
6:
7:
8: \shortauthors{Luhman \& Steeghs}
9: \shorttitle{Spectroscopy in $\eta$ Cha and MBM~12}
10:
11: \title{Spectroscopy of Candidate Members of the $\eta$ Cha and MBM~12
12: Young Associations \altaffilmark{1}}
13:
14: \author{K. L. Luhman \& D. Steeghs}
15: \affil{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St.,
16: Cambridge, MA 02138}
17:
18: \email{kluhman, dsteeghs@cfa.harvard.edu}
19:
20: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations performed at Las Campanas Observatory
21: and the MMT Observatory.
22: This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All
23: Sky Survey and the Deep Near-Infrared Survey of the Southern Sky.}
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26:
27: We present an analysis of candidate members of the $\eta$~Cha and MBM~12A
28: young associations.
29: For an area of 0.7~deg$^2$ toward $\eta$~Cha, we have performed a search for
30: members of the association by combining $JHK_s$ photometry from 2MASS and
31: $i$ photometry from DENIS
32: with followup optical spectroscopy at Magellan Observatory.
33: We report the discovery of three new members with spectral types of
34: M5.25-M5.75, corresponding to masses of 0.13-0.08~$M_{\odot}$ by theoretical
35: evolutionary models.
36: Two and three of these members were found independently
37: by Lyo and coworkers and Song and coworkers, respectively.
38: Meanwhile, no brown dwarfs were detected in $\eta$~Cha down to the
39: completeness limit of 0.015~$M_{\odot}$.
40: For MBM~12A, we have obtained spectra of three of the remaining candidate
41: members that lacked spectroscopy at the end of the survey by Luhman,
42: all of which are found to be field M dwarfs.
43: Ogura and coworkers have recently presented four ``probable" members of
44: MBM~12A. However, two of these objects were previously classified
45: as field dwarfs by the spectroscopy of Luhman. In this work, we find that
46: the other two objects are field dwarfs as well.
47:
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50: \keywords{infrared: stars --- stars: evolution --- stars: formation --- stars:
51: low-mass, brown dwarfs --- stars: emission-line --- stars: pre-main sequence}
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54:
55: The environs of the B8 star $\eta$ Cha and the dark cloud MBM~12 have
56: been revealed as sites of small associations of newly formed stars.
57: Through deep {\it ROSAT} observations of 0.35~deg$^2$ toward $\eta$ Cha,
58: \citet{mam99} discovered X-ray emission from 12 sources, including $\eta$ Cha
59: itself. From {\it Hipparcos} parallactic distances and proper motions,
60: the two earliest stellar counterparts and an early-type star without X-ray
61: emission were found to be comoving at a distance of $\sim100$~pc.
62: \citet{mam99} confirmed the youth of the remaining 10 late-type stars through
63: measurements of H$\alpha$ emission and Li absorption, which indicated their
64: probable membership in an association with the early-type stars.
65: An age of 4-10 Myr has been inferred for these stars through
66: comparisons of their positions on the Hertzsprung-Russell (H-R) diagram
67: to theoretical isochrones \citep{mam99,law01}.
68: Recently, five additional low-mass members of the association
69: (0.08-0.3~$M_{\odot}$) have been identified through spectroscopy of candidates
70: appearing in color-magnitude diagrams generated from photometry at $V$ and $I$
71: \citep{law02,lyo04} and from data in the USNO-B1 and Two-Micron
72: All-Sky Survey (2MASS) catalogs \citep{sz04}.
73: Although not precisely determined, the completeness limits of these latest
74: surveys appeared to be near 0.1~$M_{\odot}$.
75:
76: Surveys for sources of H$\alpha$ and X-ray emission toward
77: cloud 12 from \citet{mbm85} (MBM~12) have resulted in the discovery of seven
78: T Tauri stars (e.g., \citet{hb88}).
79: MBM~12 was long believed to be the nearest molecular cloud at a distance
80: of 50-100 pc \citep{hbm86,hea00}, making the associated group of young
81: stars (MBM~12A) a particularly attractive site for studies of star formation.
82: However, during a search for new members, \citet{luh01} noticed that the
83: members of MBM~12A exhibited anomalously old ages ($\sim100$~Myr)
84: when placed on the H-R diagram with the published distances.
85: Through new distance estimates in that work and subsequent studies
86: \citep{str02,and02}, the distance of MBM~12 cloud is now firmly established
87: near a value of $\sim300$~pc.
88: Using this distance, theoretical isochrones produce an age of $\sim2$~Myr, which
89: is consistent with the evolutionary state of the association implied by
90: various signatures of newly formed stars \citep{luh01}.
91: The magnitude-limited survey by \citet{luh01} achieved a completeness limit
92: of 0.03~$M_{\odot}$ and uncovered five new members (0.1-0.4~$M_{\odot}$),
93: bringing the total known membership to a dozen sources at a resolution of
94: $\sim1\arcsec$. \citet{ogu03} have since identified four ``probable" members of
95: MBM~12A via H$\alpha$ emission detected with slitless grism spectroscopy.
96:
97: In this paper, we present spectroscopy of candidate members of the $\eta$~Cha
98: and MBM~12 associations.
99: For $\eta$~Cha, we select candidate members of the
100: association by combining $i$ photometry from the Deep
101: Near-Infrared Survey of the Southern Sky (DENIS) and $JHK_s$ data from
102: the Two-Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS) (\S~\ref{sec:ident1}),
103: measure their spectral types and determine
104: their status as field stars or association members (\S~\ref{sec:class1}),
105: evaluate the completeness of the survey (\S~\ref{sec:complete}), and place
106: the known members of $\eta$~Cha on the H-R diagram (\S~\ref{sec:hr}).
107: For MBM~12A, we select candidate members from \citet{luh01} and
108: \citet{ogu03} for spectroscopy (\S~\ref{sec:ident2}) and use these data to
109: measure spectral types and assess membership (\S~\ref{sec:class2}).
110:
111: \section{$\eta$ Cha}
112:
113: \subsection{Selection of Candidate Members}
114: \label{sec:ident1}
115:
116: To search for new members of a stellar group, one can select stars
117: that exhibit the colors and magnitudes expected of members in color-color
118: and color-magnitude diagrams and obtain followup spectroscopy to distinguish
119: between field stars and bonafide members. For our survey of $\eta$~Cha,
120: we utilized $i$ photometry from the DENIS Second Release and $JHK_s$
121: photometry from the 2MASS Point Source Catalog.
122: These surveys exhibit a signal-to-noise of 10 at $i\sim17$, $J\sim15.8$,
123: $H\sim15.1$, and $K_s\sim14.3$.
124: We considered all sources
125: appearing in both databases within a radius of $0\fdg5$ from
126: $\alpha=8^{\rm h}42^{\rm m}30^{\rm s}$, $\delta=-78\arcdeg58\arcmin00\arcsec$
127: (J2000). The size of this survey field was selected to extend well beyond
128: the positions of the known members of the association.
129: Two areas within this radius were not available from the DENIS
130: Second Release. They are defined approximately by
131: $\alpha=8^{\rm h}50^{\rm m}27^{\rm s}$ to $8^{\rm h}51^{\rm m}11^{\rm s}$
132: and $\alpha<8^{\rm h}35^{\rm m}27^{\rm s}$.
133: The resulting survey field has a size of 0.7~deg$^2$ and is illustrated in
134: Figure~\ref{fig:map}.
135: These data are shown on the diagram of $i-K_s$ versus $H$ in
136: Figure~\ref{fig:ik}.
137: We also include the 10~Myr isochrone from \citet{bar98} for masses
138: of 0.015 to 1~$M_{\odot}$ at a distance of 97~pc \citep{mam99}.
139: This isochrone was converted to photometric magnitudes from predicted
140: effective temperatures and bolometric luminosities in the
141: manner described by \citet{luh03a}.
142: To separate candidate members of $\eta$~Cha from likely field stars, we
143: defined a boundary that is below this isochrone. To account for the larger
144: photometric errors that would be exhibited by any members at the faintest
145: levels, we placed the boundary at a larger distance below the isochrone at
146: lower masses.
147: Above this boundary, there are 22 stars that are not previously known
148: members. We selected 16 of these candidates for spectroscopy.
149: Among the six remaining sources, three stars were already
150: classified as field giants by \citet{law02}. The other three candidates,
151: 2MASS~J08501189-7844236, J08382996-7924507, and J08501972-7906344, were not
152: observed because they are likely to be field giants according to their
153: $J-H$ and $H-K_s$ colors, as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:jhhk}.
154: The 12 known members at K and M spectral types were
155: included in our spectroscopic sample as well.
156: Table~\ref{tab:log1} summarizes long-slit spectroscopy of these 28 targets.
157: The observing and data reduction procedures are the same as those
158: described by \citet{luh04}.
159:
160:
161:
162:
163: \subsection{Classification of Candidate Members}
164: \label{sec:class1}
165:
166: We measured spectral types and assessed membership for the 16 candidate
167: members of $\eta$~Cha by applying the methods of classification described
168: by \citet{luh04} for a similar set of data in Chamaeleon~I.
169: In this way, we classified 13 candidates as field dwarfs and background giants.
170: Astrometry, photometry, and spectral types for these sources are listed in
171: Table~\ref{tab:back}. We also include the three field stars identified
172: spectroscopically by \citet{law02}.
173: Among the three remaining candidates, source 16 has
174: emission in H$\alpha$ ($W_\lambda=77$~\AA) that is
175: above the levels observed for active field dwarfs \citep{giz00,giz02}
176: and emission in He~I at 6678~\AA.
177: Although emission lines of this kind can arise from flaring field dwarfs,
178: the low duty cycle of such flares \citep{giz00} combined
179: with the presence of these strong lines during the separate observations
180: in this work and in \citet{sz04} indicates that the emission source
181: is probably a young star rather than a flaring field dwarf.
182: The spectra of this object and the other two remaining candidates exhibit
183: conclusive evidence of youth, and thus membership in $\eta$~Cha, in the form
184: of the weak K~I and Na~I absorption features that are characteristic of
185: pre-main-sequence objects \citep{mar96,luh99}.
186: These three new members were independently discovered in the survey by
187: \citet{sz04}. Sources 17 and 18 were also reported by \citet{lyo04}.
188: The spectra of the three new members and the 12 previously known late-type
189: members are presented in Figure~\ref{fig:ec}.
190: Astrometry, photometry, spectral types, and evidence of membership for the
191: 18 known members of $\eta$~Cha are compiled in Table~\ref{tab:mem}.
192: The $I$ photometry from \citet{law01}, \citet{law02}, and \citet{lyo04}
193: agree with the $i$ data from DENIS for most of the members of $\eta$~Cha
194: with the exception of the third brightest member, source 13 (HD~75505),
195: for which $i$ is fainter than $I$.
196: The two brightest stars, sources 2 and 8 ($\eta$~Cha and RS~Cha) were not
197: measured at $I$, but their $i$ data are also much fainter than expected
198: relative to the IR photometry from 2MASS. Therefore, the DENIS $i$
199: measurements for these three members are not included in Table~\ref{tab:mem}.
200:
201:
202:
203:
204: \subsection{Completeness of Survey}
205: \label{sec:complete}
206:
207:
208: Because low-mass, cool sources are most easily detected at near-IR wavelengths,
209: we use the diagram of $H-K_s$ versus $H$ in Figure~\ref{fig:hk} to evaluate
210: the mass completeness of our survey for new members of $\eta$~Cha.
211: The completeness limits of the 2MASS photometry are taken to be the magnitudes
212: at which the logarithm of the number of sources as a function of magnitude
213: departs from a linear slope and begins to turn over
214: ($H\sim15.5$, $K_s\sim15.25$).
215: Without quantitative support, \citet{sz04} asserted that late-M members of
216: $\eta$~Cha are not detectable with data from 2MASS.
217: However, according to the evolutionary models of \citet{bar98}, the
218: completeness limits of the 2MASS data correspond to a mass of
219: $\sim0.01$~$M_{\odot}$ and a spectral type of $\sim$L0 for objects at
220: the age and distance of the association (6~Myr, 97~pc).
221:
222: In Figure~\ref{fig:hk}, we have plotted the theoretical isochrone from
223: \citet{bar98} for 10~Myr, which is near the upper limit we find for
224: the age of the $\eta$~Cha association (\S~\ref{sec:hr}).
225: We have omitted the field stars identified with spectroscopy as well as
226: objects that are probable field stars by their location below the
227: boundary in Figure~\ref{fig:ik}. The three stars lacking spectroscopy
228: that were identified as likely field giants by Figure~\ref{fig:jhhk} are also
229: excluded. The remaining IR sources consist of known members of the
230: association and objects that were not detected at $i$ by DENIS.
231: As demonstrated in Figure~\ref{fig:hk}, our search for new members is complete
232: to masses of 0.015~$M_{\odot}$, which is near the deuterium burning mass limit
233: \citep{bur97}.
234:
235: \subsection{H-R Diagram}
236: \label{sec:hr}
237:
238: In this section, we estimate effective temperatures and bolometric
239: luminosities for the members of $\eta$~Cha, place these data on the
240: H-R diagram, and use theoretical evolutionary models to infer masses and ages.
241:
242: In the following analysis, standard dwarf colors are taken from the compilation
243: of \citet{kh95} for types earlier than M0 and from the young
244: disk populations described by \citet{leg92} for types of M0 and later.
245: The IR colors from \citet{kh95} are transformed from the
246: Johnson-Glass photometric system to the CIT system \citep{bb88}.
247: Near-IR colors in the 2MASS and CIT photometric systems agree at a level of
248: $<0.1$~mag \citep{car01}.
249:
250: To estimate the amount of extinction toward each member of $\eta$~Cha,
251: \citet{luh01} compared the $V-I$ color from \citet{law01} to the value
252: for a dwarf at the published spectral type of that source. The resulting
253: extinctions ranged from $A_V=0$ to 0.8. However, when we include
254: $V-R$ and $R-I$ in this analysis and use the spectral types measured in
255: this work, we arrive at extinctions that are close to zero for most of the
256: members. A comparison of our spectra to the estimates of unreddened
257: spectra of young stars from \citet{luh04} also indicates essentially
258: no extinction, with a firm limit of $A_V<0.5$ for most members.
259: Therefore, we take $A_V=0$ when computing bolometric luminosities from the
260: observed photometry. The one exception is source 13 (HD~75505), whose
261: optical colors do imply a non-zero extinction of $A_V=0.4$.
262:
263: Spectral types of M0 and earlier are converted to effective temperatures
264: with the dwarf temperature scale of \citet{sk82}.
265: For spectral types later than M0, we use the temperature scale that was designed
266: by \citet{luh03b} to be compatible with the models of \citet{bar98} and
267: \citet{cha00}. Bolometric luminosities are estimated by combining
268: $J$-band measurements, a distance of 97~pc, and bolometric corrections
269: described in \citet{luh99}.
270: The combined uncertainties in $A_J$, $J$, and BC$_J$ ($\sigma\sim0.14$, 0.03,
271: 0.1) correspond to errors of $\pm0.07$ in the relative values of
272: log~$L_{\rm bol}$.
273: When an uncertainty in the distance modulus is included ($\sigma\sim0.1$),
274: the total uncertainties are $\pm0.12$.
275: The temperatures and luminosities of the components of the binary system
276: source 8 (RS Cha) are from \citet{rib00} and \citet{mam00}, respectively.
277: Two additional known binaries among the members of $\eta$~Cha are
278: sources 1 and 9 \citep{kp02}.
279: The luminosities plotted on the H-R diagram in Figure~\ref{fig:hr}
280: are corrected for the contribution of the secondary by assuming that for
281: each system the ratio of the luminosities is equal to the ratio the $K$-band
282: fluxes from \citet{kp02}. Meanwhile, the luminosities in Table~\ref{tab:mem}
283: are uncorrected and reflect the total system photometry.
284: The effective temperatures, bolometric luminosities, and adopted
285: spectral types for the members of $\eta$~Cha are listed in Table~\ref{tab:mem}.
286:
287: The temperatures and luminosities for the members of
288: $\eta$~Cha can be interpreted in terms of masses and ages with theoretical
289: evolutionary models. After considering the available sets of models,
290: \citet{luh03b} concluded that those of \citet{pal99} for $M/M_\odot>1$ and
291: \citet{bar98} and \citet{cha00} for $M/M_\odot\leq1$ provided the best
292: agreement with observational constraints. The known members of $\eta$~Cha
293: are plotted with these models on the H-R diagram in Figure~\ref{fig:hr}.
294: One member, source 12, appears overluminous compared to the other sources and
295: thus may be an unresolved binarity. Otherwise, the remaining members form a
296: relatively narrow, well-defined sequence that is parallel to the model
297: isochrones and is consistent with a single age of $6^{+2}_{-1}$~Myr
298: for all members.
299: This age agrees within the uncertainties with previous estimates by
300: \citet{mam99} and \citet{law01}.
301: According to the H-R diagram and evolutionary models in Figure~\ref{fig:hr},
302: the three newly discovered members of $\eta$~Cha have masses of
303: 0.08-0.13~$M_{\odot}$, and thus are just above and straddling the hydrogen
304: burning mass limit.
305:
306: \subsection{Implications of Survey}
307:
308: We now examine the implications of our survey of the
309: $\eta$~Cha association. We have identified three new members just above
310: the hydrogen burning limit, but have found no objects at lower masses down to
311: the completeness limit of 0.015~$M_{\odot}$. Is this result consistent with
312: the mass functions
313: measured in younger, star-forming clusters? In Taurus and IC~348, the
314: ratio of the number of brown dwarfs at 0.02-0.08~$M_{\odot}$ to the
315: number of stars has been measured to be 0.13 \citep{bri02,luh03a,luh03b}.
316: If this ratio applies to
317: $\eta$~Cha, then we would expect to find only 2.3 substellar members in this
318: mass range. Therefore, the lack of any detected brown dwarfs does not
319: comprise a statistically significant difference from mass functions in
320: these two populations.
321: Meanwhile, $\eta$~Cha does appear to differ at a modestly significant
322: level from the Trapezium Cluster in Orion,
323: which exhibits a frequency of brown dwarfs that is about twice the value
324: found in Taurus and IC~348 \citep{luh00,hc00,mue02}.
325: As illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:map}, the
326: three members of $\eta$~Cha with the lowest masses do have the largest
327: angular separations from the center of the association, which is suggestive
328: of mass segregation and could indicate that
329: substellar members of the association are preferentially
330: located in the outskirts of the association and beyond our survey field.
331: The possibility of the formation of a low-mass halo in $\eta$~Cha
332: through dynamical evolution was discussed by \citet{mam00}.
333: A survey like the one performed in this work for a larger area toward
334: $\eta$~Cha would provide a test of this scenario.
335: Finally, we note that \citet{lyo04} predicted the presence of at least 20
336: undiscovered members at masses of 0.025-0.15~$M_{\odot}$ based on an
337: extrapolation of the IMF of the known members. However, we demonstrate
338: that only one new member beyond the census of \citet{lyo04} is present in
339: this mass range.
340:
341:
342:
343: \section{MBM~12A}
344:
345: \subsection{Selection of Candidate Members}
346: \label{sec:ident2}
347:
348: In a recent search for members of MBM~12A, \citet{ogu03} identified four
349: objects as probable members of the association through slitless grism
350: spectroscopy. Two of these sources were in the spectroscopic sample of
351: \citet{luh01} and the other two stars are included in our sample here.
352: At the end of the survey for new members of MBM~12A by \citet{luh01},
353: there remained six candidates that had not been observed spectroscopically.
354: In this work, we selected the three brightest candidates for spectroscopy,
355: 2MASS~J02524907+1952523, J02585238+1958402, and J02583445+1946506.
356: To facilitate the classification of the spectra of the candidates, we also
357: observed the known member MBM~12A-3.
358: Table~\ref{tab:log2} summarizes our long-slit spectroscopy of these targets.
359:
360:
361: \subsection{Classification of Candidate Members}
362: \label{sec:class2}
363:
364: \citet{ogu03} obtained slitless grism spectroscopy toward the MBM~12 cloud
365: and identified four stars as ``probable" members of MBM~12A on the basis of
366: emission in H$\alpha$.
367: However, H$\alpha$ emission also occurs in field dwarfs and thus can serve
368: as evidence of youth and membership only if it is above the levels observed
369: in active dwarfs.
370: For instance, the equivalent widths from \citet{ogu03} for three of
371: the four sources are less than 10~\AA, which is within the range observed
372: for field M dwarfs \citep{giz02}. For H$\alpha$ in the fourth star, they report
373: an equivalent width of 56.4~\AA\ while we measure only 10~\AA.
374: We suggest that the measurement from \citet{ogu03} is either spurious or
375: obtained during a flare. In summary, the H$\alpha$ strengths for these four
376: sources are consistent with both field dwarfs and young members of MBM~12A,
377: and hence cannot be used to assess membership in the association.
378:
379: To conclusively determine the membership of the four objects from \citet{ogu03},
380: we checked for the presence of strong Li absorption at 6707~\AA,
381: which is a signature of youth.
382: Prior to the study of \citet{ogu03}, two of the four
383: candidates therein, 2MASS~J02553502+2006484 (Byu-1) and 2MASS~J02575018+1958302
384: (Byu-4), already had been classified as field dwarfs through spectroscopy of
385: Li by \citet{luh01}. Those data exhibit a clear absence of Li absorption,
386: as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:li}, where a spectrum of the known member
387: MBM~12A-3 obtained with the same instrument configuration is included
388: for comparison. Similarly, Li absorption is not present in the spectra
389: obtained in this work for the other two sources from \citet{ogu03},
390: 2MASS~J02562431+2035117 (Byu-2) and 2MASS~J02573101+1943459 (Byu-3).
391: Membership in MBM~12A for these two stars would have been somewhat surprising
392: given their location below the boundary in the $R-I$ versus $I$ diagram
393: from \citet{luh01}, which is the reason they were not observed
394: spectroscopically or listed as candidates in that work.
395:
396: \citet{luh01} found that the optical and near-IR colors of
397: 2MASS~J02524907+1952523, J02583445+1946506, and J02585238+1958402
398: were consistent with those of unreddened stars at spectral types of M4 to M5,
399: either foreground dwarfs or young members of MBM~12A.
400: From the spectra collected for these objects, we have measured spectral types
401: of M3.5V, M4.75V, and M4.75-M5V, which are in agreement with the estimates from
402: the photometry. Given the lack of Li absorption in the spectra
403: in Figure~\ref{fig:li}, we classify these stars as field dwarfs.
404:
405:
406:
407: \section{Conclusions}
408:
409: We have performed spectroscopic studies of candidate members of the
410: $\eta$~Cha and MBM~12A young associations, the conclusions for which are
411: summarized as follows:
412:
413:
414: For $\eta$~Cha, we have used $JHK_s$ photometry from 2MASS and
415: $i$ photometry from DENIS to construct color-color and color-magnitude
416: diagrams for an area of 0.7~deg$^2$. Through spectroscopy of the candidate
417: members appearing in these data, we have discovered three new members
418: of the association with spectral types of M5.25-M5.75, corresponding
419: to masses of 0.13-0.08~$M_{\odot}$ according to evolutionary models.
420: These sources were independently found in recent work by \citet{sz04}
421: and \citet{lyo04}. No brown dwarfs were detected in $\eta$~Cha down to the
422: completeness limit of 0.015~$M_{\odot}$ for our survey, which is roughly
423: consistent with the yield of $\sim2$ substellar members expected if the
424: relative numbers of stars and brown dwarfs in $\eta$~Cha are similar to those
425: of the Taurus and IC~348 star-forming regions.
426: On the other hand, the fact that the three
427: least massive members of the association are the outermost members may
428: indicate that the substellar members are preferentially located at large
429: distances from the center of the association and outside of our survey field.
430: For the 18 known members of $\eta$~Cha, we have estimated bolometric
431: luminosities and effective temperatures and placed the members on the
432: H-R diagram, from which we infer an age of $6^{+2}_{-1}$~Myr for the
433: association with the evolutionary models of \citet{bar98}.
434:
435: For MBM~12A, we have presented spectra of three of the remaining candidate
436: members that lacked spectroscopy at the end of the survey by \citet{luh01}
437: and of the four ``probable" members from \citet{ogu03}. We classify all
438: of these sources as field dwarfs based on the absence of Li absorption in
439: their spectra.
440:
441:
442: \acknowledgements
443:
444: We thank the staff at Las Campanas Observatory for their outstanding support
445: of these observations.
446: We are grateful to Isabelle Baraffe and Francesco Palla for access to their
447: most recent calculations. K. L. was supported by grant NAG5-11627 from the
448: NASA Longterm Space Astrophysics program and D. S. acknowledges a Smithsonian
449: Astrophysical Observatory Clay Fellowship.
450: 2MASS is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts
451: and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute
452: of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space
453: Administration and the National Science Foundation.
454: DENIS is funded by the SCIENCE and the Human Capital and Mobility plans of
455: the European Commission under grants CT920791 and CT940627 in France,
456: by l'Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers, the Minist\`{e}re de
457: l'\'{E}ducation Nationale and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
458: (CNRS) in France, by the State of Baden-W\"{u}rtemberg in Germany, by the
459: DGICYT in Spain, by the Sterrewacht Leiden in Holland, by the Consiglio
460: Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) in Italy, by the Fonds zur F\"{o}rderung der
461: wissenschaftlichen Forschung and Bundesministerium f\"{u}r Wissenschaft
462: und Forschung in Austria, and by the ESO C \& EE grant A-04-046.
463:
464: \newpage
465:
466: \begin{thebibliography}{}
467:
468:
469: \bibitem[Andersson et al.(2002)]{and02}
470: Andersson, B.-G., Idzi, R., Uomoto, A., Wannier, P. G., Chen, B., \&
471: Jorgensen, A. M. 2002, \aj, 124, 2164
472:
473: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{bar98}
474: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, \aap, 337, 403
475:
476:
477: \bibitem[Bessell \& Brett(1988)]{bb88}
478: Bessell, M. S., \& Brett, J. M. 1988, \pasp, 100, 1134
479:
480:
481: \bibitem[Brice\~no et al.(2002)]{bri02}
482: Brice\~{n}o, C., Luhman, K. L., Hartmann, L., Stauffer, J. R., \& Kirkpatrick,
483: J. D. 2002, \apj, 580, 317
484:
485: \bibitem[Burrows et al.(1997)]{bur97}
486: Burrows, A., et al. 1997, \apj, 491, 856
487:
488:
489: \bibitem[Carpenter(2001)]{car01}
490: Carpenter, J. M. 2001, \aj, 121, 2851
491:
492: \bibitem[Chabrier et al.(2000)]{cha00}
493: Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I. Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 2000,
494: \apj, 542, 464
495:
496: \bibitem[Covino et al.(1997)]{cov97}
497: Covino, E., Alcala, J. M., Allain, S., Bouvier, J., Terranegra, L., \&
498: Krautter, J. 1997, \aap, 328, 187
499:
500: \bibitem[Gizis et al.(2000)]{giz00}
501: Gizis, J. E., Monet, D. G., Reid, I. N., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Liebert, J.,
502: \& Williams, R. J. 2000, \aj, 120, 1085
503:
504: \bibitem[Gizis et al.(2002)]{giz02}
505: Gizis, J. E., Reid, I. N., \& Hawley, S. L. 2002, \aj, 123, 3356
506:
507:
508:
509: \bibitem[Hearty et al.(2000)]{hea00}
510: Hearty, T., Fern\'{a}ndez, J. M., Alcal\'{a}, J. M., Covino, E.,
511: \& Neuh\"{a}user, R. 2000, \aap, 357, 681
512:
513: \bibitem[Herbig \& Bell(1988)]{hb88}
514: Herbig, G. H., \& Bell, K. R. 1988, Lick Obs.\ Bull.\ Ser., No.\ 1111
515:
516: \bibitem[Hillenbrand \& Carpenter(2000)]{hc00}
517: Hillenbrand, L. A., \& Carpenter, J. M. 2000, \apj, 540, 236
518:
519: \bibitem[Hobbs et al.(1986)]{hbm86}
520: Hobbs, L. M., Blitz, L., \& Magnani, L. 1986, \apj, 306, L109
521:
522: \bibitem[Houk \& Cowley(1975)]{hc75}
523: Houk, N., \& Cowley, A. P. 1975, University of Michigan Catalogue of Spectral
524: Types, Vol. 1., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
525:
526:
527: \bibitem[Kenyon \& Hartmann(1995)]{kh95}
528: Kenyon, S. J., \& Hartmann, L. 1995, \apjs, 101, 117
529:
530:
531:
532: \bibitem[K\"{o}hler \& Petr-Gotzens(2002)]{kp02}
533: K\"{o}hler, R., \& Petr-Gotzens, M. G. 2002, \aj, 124, 2899
534:
535: \bibitem[Lawson et al.(2001)]{law01}
536: Lawson, W. A., Crause, L. A., Mamajek, E. E., \& Feigelson, E. D. 2001, \mnras,
537: 321, 57
538:
539: \bibitem[Lawson et al.(2002)]{law02}
540: Lawson, W. A., Crause, L. A., Mamajek, E. E., \& Feigelson, E. D. 2002, \mnras,
541: 329, L29
542:
543: \bibitem[Leggett(1992)]{leg92}
544: Leggett, S. K. 1992, \apjs, 82, 351
545:
546: \bibitem[Luhman(1999)]{luh99}
547: Luhman, K. L. 1999, \apj, 525, 466
548:
549: \bibitem[Luhman(2001)]{luh01}
550: Luhman, K. L. 2001, \apj, 560, 287
551:
552: \bibitem[Luhman(2004)]{luh04}
553: Luhman, K. L. 2004, \apj, 602, 816
554:
555: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2000)]{luh00}
556: Luhman, K. L., et al. 2000, \apj, 540, 1016
557:
558: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2003a)]{luh03a}
559: Luhman, K. L., Brice\~{n}o, C., Stauffer, J. R., Hartmann, L.,
560: Barrado y Navascu\'{e}s, D., \& Nelson, C. 2003a, \apj, 590, 348
561:
562: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2003b)]{luh03b}
563: Luhman, K. L., Stauffer, J. R., Muench, A. A., Rieke, G. H., Lada, E. A.,
564: Bouvier, J., \& Lada, C. J. 2003b, \apj, 593, 1093
565:
566: \bibitem[Lyo et al.(2004)]{lyo04}
567: Lyo, A.-R, Lawson, W. A., Feigelson, E. D., \& Crause, L. A. 2004, \mnras, 347,
568: 246
569:
570: \bibitem[Magnani et al.(1985)]{mbm85}
571: Magnani, L., Blitz, L., \& Mundy, L. 1985, \apj, 295, 402
572:
573: \bibitem[Mamajek et al.(1999)]{mam99}
574: Mamajek, E., Lawson, W. A., \& Feigelson, E. D. 1999, \apj, 516, 77
575:
576: \bibitem[Mamajek et al.(2000)]{mam00}
577: Mamajek, E., Lawson, W. A., \& Feigelson, E. D. 2000, \apj, 544, 356
578:
579:
580: \bibitem[Mart{\'\i}n et al.(1996)]{mar96}
581: Mart{\'\i}n, E. L., Rebolo, R., \& Zapatero Osorio, M. R. 1996, \apj, 469, 706
582:
583: \bibitem[Muench et al.(2002)]{mue02}
584: Muench, A. A., Lada, E. A., Lada, C. J., \& Alves, J. 2002, \apj, 573, 366
585:
586: \bibitem[Ogura et al.(2003)]{ogu03}
587: Ogura, K., Sugitani, K., Magakian, T. Yu., Movsessian, T. A., Nikogossian,
588: E. H., Itoh, Y., \& Tamura, M. 2003, \pasj, 55, L49
589:
590: \bibitem[Palla \& Stahler(1999)]{pal99}
591: Palla, F., \& Stahler, S. W. 1999, \apj, 525, 772
592:
593: \bibitem[Ribas et al.(2000)]{rib00}
594: Ribas, I., Jordi, C., Torra, J., \& Gim\'{e}nez, A. 2000, \mnras, 313, 99
595:
596:
597: \bibitem[Schmidt-Kaler(1982)]{sk82}
598: Schmidt-Kaler, T. 1982, in Landolt-Bornstein, Group VI, Vol. 2, ed. K.-H.
599: Hellwege (Berlin: Springer), 454
600:
601: \bibitem[Song et al.(2004)]{sz04}
602: Song, I., Zuckerman, B., \& Bessell, M. S. 2004, \apj, 600, 1016
603:
604:
605:
606:
607: \bibitem[Strai\v{z}ys et al.(2002)]{str02}
608: Strai\v{z}ys, V., \v{C}ernis, K., Kazlauskas, \& Laugalys, V. 2002,
609: Baltic Astronomy, 11, 231
610:
611: \end{thebibliography}
612:
613: \clearpage
614:
615: \begin{deluxetable}{llllll}
616: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
617: \tablewidth{0pt}
618: \tablecaption{Observing Log for $\eta$ Cha\label{tab:log1}}
619: \tablehead{
620: \colhead{} &
621: \colhead{} &
622: \colhead{Grating} &
623: \colhead{Resolution} &
624: \colhead{} \\
625: \colhead{Date} &
626: \colhead{Telescope + Instrument} &
627: \colhead{l~mm$^{-1}$} &
628: \colhead{\AA} &
629: \colhead{ID\tablenotemark{a}}
630: }
631: \startdata
632: 2003 May 1 & Magellan~I + B\&C & 600 & 5 & 14,15,16,17,J08381023-7842153,J08481929-7911034,J08483486-7853513 \\
633: & & & & J08362667-7902260,J08492628-7900397 \\
634: 2003 May 2 & Magellan~I + B\&C & 600 & 5 & 3,4,5,6,9,10,12,13 \\
635: 2003 June 24 & Magellan~I + B\&C & 1200 & 2.6 & 1,7,11,J08430440-7837463,J08423433-7832282,J08493005-7844228, \\
636: & & & & J08453547-7843596,J08491452-7848397,J08411327-7910044, \\
637: & & & & J08435227-7910133,J08440502-7855289 \\
638: \enddata
639: \tablenotetext{a}{Identifications are from Table~\ref{tab:mem} for members of
640: $\eta$~Cha and from the 2MASS Point Source Catalog for the remaining stars.}
641: \end{deluxetable}
642:
643: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllllll}
644: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
645: \tablewidth{0pt}
646: \tablecaption{Field Stars Toward $\eta$ Cha \label{tab:back}}
647: \tablehead{
648: \colhead{} &
649: \colhead{} &
650: \colhead{} &
651: \colhead{} &
652: \colhead{} &
653: \colhead{Field Star} &
654: \colhead{} &
655: \colhead{} &
656: \colhead{} &
657: \colhead{} &
658: \colhead{} \\
659: \colhead{2MASS} &
660: \colhead{$\alpha$(J2000)\tablenotemark{a}} &
661: \colhead{$\delta$(J2000)\tablenotemark{a}} &
662: \colhead{Spectral Type} &
663: \colhead{Ref} &
664: \colhead{Evidence\tablenotemark{b}} &
665: \colhead{Ref} &
666: \colhead{$i$\tablenotemark{c}} &
667: \colhead{$J-H$\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{$H-K_s$\tablenotemark{a}}
668: & \colhead{$K_s$\tablenotemark{a}}
669: }
670: \startdata
671: J08362667-7902260 & 08 36 26.67 & -79 02 26.1 & G8III & 1 & sp & 1 & 9.53 & 0.71 & 0.17 & 7.59 \\
672: J08364076-7854583 & 08 36 40.77 & -78 54 58.3 & M2III & 2 & Li,sp,$\mu$ & 2 & 10.46 & 0.92 & 0.25 & 8.05 \\
673: J08375143-7844370 & 08 37 51.44 & -78 44 37.1 & K5III & 2 & Li,sp,$\mu$ & 2 & 9.81 & 0.83 & 0.17 & 7.69 \\
674: J08381023-7842153 & 08 38 10.23 & -78 42 15.4 & K2III & 1 & sp & 1 & 10.11 & 0.58 & 0.18 & 8.42 \\
675: J08411327-7910044 & 08 41 13.28 & -79 10 04.5 & K2III & 1 & Li,sp & 1 & 9.22 & 0.70 & 0.20 & 7.16 \\
676: J08423433-7832282 & 08 42 34.34 & -78 32 28.2 & K5III & 1 & Li,sp & 1 & 11.14 & 0.80 & 0.22 & 8.99 \\
677: J08430440-7837463 & 08 43 04.41 & -78 37 46.3 & K4III & 1 & Li,sp & 1 & 10.83 & 0.72 & 0.27 & 8.71 \\
678: J08435227-7910133 & 08 43 52.28 & -79 10 13.4 & K2III & 1 & Li,sp & 1 & 10.42 & 0.61 & 0.18 & 8.68 \\
679: J08440502-7855289 & 08 44 05.03 & -78 55 28.9 & K1III & 1 & Li,sp & 1 & 8.93 & 0.52 & 0.18 & 7.23 \\
680: J08453547-7843596 & 08 45 35.47 & -78 43 59.7 & K4III & 1 & Li,sp & 1 & 11.62 & 0.77 & 0.22 & 9.44 \\
681: J08481929-7911034 & 08 48 19.29 & -79 11 03.4 & K2III & 1 & sp & 1 & 10.48 & 0.60 & 0.15 & 8.75 \\
682: J08483486-7853513 & 08 48 34.87 & -78 53 51.4 & M5V,M4.75V & 2,1 & Li,$\mu$,NaK & 2,2,1 & 14.08 & 0.54 & 0.31 & 11.38 \\
683: J08491452-7848397 & 08 49 14.53 & -78 48 39.7 & K3-K4III & 1 & Li,sp & 1 & 11.56 & 0.81 & 0.19 & 9.52 \\
684: J08492628-7900397 & 08 49 26.29 & -79 00 39.7 & K2III & 1 & sp & 1 & 10.44 & 0.67 & 0.15 & 8.70 \\
685: J08493005-7844228 & 08 49 30.05 & -78 44 22.8 & K2III & 1 & Li,sp & 1 & 11.64 & 0.80 & 0.19 & 9.51 \\
686: J08512320-7905232 & 08 51 23.20 & -79 05 23.2 & K4III & 2 & Li,sp,$\mu$ & 2 & 9.78 & 0.67 & 0.20 & 7.77 \\
687: \enddata
688: \tablecomments{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds, and
689: units of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds.}
690: \tablenotetext{a}{2MASS Point Source Catalog.}
691: \tablenotetext{b}{Status as a field star is indicated by
692: a spectral classification as a dwarf or a giant (``sp"),
693: weak Li absorption (``Li"), strong Na~I and K~I absorption (``NaK"),
694: or a proper motion that differs from that of
695: the known members of $\eta$ Cha (``$\mu$").}
696: \tablenotetext{c}{Second DENIS Release.}
697: \tablerefs{
698: (1) this work;
699: (2) \citet{law02}.}
700: \end{deluxetable}
701:
702:
703: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllllllllllllll}
704: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.04in}
705: \tabletypesize{\tiny}
706: \rotate
707: \tablewidth{0pt}
708: \tablecaption{Data for Members of $\eta$ Cha \label{tab:mem}}
709: \tablehead{
710: \colhead{} &
711: \colhead{Other} &
712: \colhead{} &
713: \colhead{} &
714: \colhead{} &
715: \colhead{} &
716: \colhead{} &
717: \colhead{Membership} &
718: \colhead{} &
719: \colhead{} &
720: \colhead{} &
721: \colhead{} &
722: \colhead{} &
723: \colhead{} &
724: \colhead{} &
725: \colhead{} &
726: \colhead{} &
727: \colhead{} \\
728: \colhead{ID\tablenotemark{a}} &
729: \colhead{Names} &
730: \colhead{$\alpha$(J2000)\tablenotemark{b}} &
731: \colhead{$\delta$(J2000)\tablenotemark{b}} &
732: \colhead{Spectral Type\tablenotemark{c}} &
733: \colhead{Ref} &
734: \colhead{Adopt} &
735: \colhead{Evidence\tablenotemark{d}} &
736: \colhead{Ref} &
737: \colhead{$T_{\rm eff}$\tablenotemark{e}} &
738: \colhead{$L_{\rm bol}$} &
739: \colhead{$V-R$\tablenotemark{f}} & \colhead{$R-I$\tablenotemark{f}} &
740: \colhead{$I$\tablenotemark{f}} &
741: \colhead{$i$\tablenotemark{g}} &
742: \colhead{$J-H$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$H-K_s$\tablenotemark{b}} &
743: \colhead{$K_s$\tablenotemark{b}}
744: }
745: \startdata
746: 1 & GSC 9402-0921 & 08 36 56.23 & -78 56 45.5 & K4,K4,K6 & 1,2,3 & K6 & $\mu$,Li & 2,(1,2) & 4205 & 1.0 & 0.71 & 0.71 & 9.19 & 9.17 & 0.66 & 0.16 & 7.34 \\
747: 2 & $\eta$ Cha & 08 41 19.48 & -78 57 48.1 & B8 & 4,2 & B8 & $\mu$,$\pi$ & 2 & 11900 & 94 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & -0.03 & 0.00 & 5.72 \\
748: 3 & \nodata & 08 41 37.03 & -79 03 30.4 & M3,M3.25 & 2,3 & M3.25 & Li,NaK & 2,3 & 3379 & 0.097 & 1.14 & 1.40 & 11.81 & 11.70 & 0.70 & 0.23 & 9.41 \\
749: 4 & GSC 9403-1083 & 08 42 23.73 & -79 04 03.0 & K7,M1.75 & 2,3 & M1.75 & Li & 2 & 3596 & 0.24 & 0.92 & 1.07 & 10.79 & 10.71 & 0.76 & 0.16 & 8.62 \\
750: 5 & \nodata & 08 42 27.11 & -78 57 47.9 & M5,M4 & 2,3 & M4 & Li,NaK & 2,3 & 3270 & 0.062 & 1.29 & 1.52 & 12.39 & 12.26 & 0.68 & 0.24 & 9.86 \\
751: 6 & GSC 9403-0288 & 08 42 38.80 & -78 54 42.8 & M2,M3 & 2,3 & M3 & Li,NaK & 2,3 & 3415 & 0.11 & 1.00 & 1.40 & 11.68 & 11.64 & 0.65 & 0.29 & 9.29 \\
752: 7 & Anonymous & 08 43 07.24 & -79 04 52.5 & K4,K3,K6 & 1,2,3 & K6 & Li & 1,2 & 4205 & 0.79 & 0.67 & 0.73 & 9.44 & 9.40 & 0.66 & 0.12 & 7.63 \\
753: 8A & RS Cha A & 08 43 12.23 & -79 04 12.3 & A7 & 2 & A7 & $\mu$,$\pi$ & 2 & 7638 & 13.9 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 0.12 & 0.02 & 5.85 \\
754: 8B & RS Cha B & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 7228 & 13.4 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata \\
755: 9 & \nodata & 08 44 16.38 & -78 59 08.1 & M4,M4.5 & 2,3 & M4.5 & Li,e,$\mu$,NaK & 2,2,5,3 & 3198 & 0.096 & 1.36 & 1.63 & 12.01 & 11.98 & 0.59 & 0.33 & 9.34 \\
756: 10 & GSC 9403-1279 & 08 44 31.88 & -78 46 31.2 & K7-M0,K7,M1 & 1,2,3 & M1 & Li,$\mu$ & (1,2),5 & 3705 & 0.23 & 0.86 & 0.92 & 10.75 & 10.71 & 0.73 & 0.19 & 8.73 \\
757: 11 & GSC 9403-1016 & 08 47 01.66 & -78 59 34.5 & K4,K5.5 & 2,3 & K5.5 & Li,$\mu$ & 2,5 & 4278 & 0.59 & 0.66 & 0.71 & 9.76 & 9.84 & 0.70 & 0.37 & 7.66 \\
758: 12 & GSC 9403-0389 & 08 47 56.77 & -78 54 53.2 & M2,M2,M3.25 & 1,2,3 & M3.25 & Li,$\mu$,NaK & (1,2),5,3 & 3379 & 0.25 & 1.07 & 1.30 & 10.80 & 10.83 & 0.64 & 0.27 & 8.41 \\
759: 13 & HD 75505 & 08 41 44.72 & -79 02 53.1 & A1 & 4 & A1 & $\mu$ & 2 & 9230 & 13 & 0.06 & 0.09 & 7.12 & \nodata & 0.07 & 0.06 & 6.93 \\
760: 14 & USNO Anon 1 & 08 41 30.30 & -78 53 06.5 & M4,M4.75 & 6,3 & M4.75 & Li,NaK & 6,3 & 3161 & 0.023 & 1.52 & 1.73 & 13.82 & 13.58 & 0.57 & 0.26 & 10.98 \\
761: 15 & USNO Anon 2 & 08 43 18.58 & -79 05 18.2 & M2-M3,M3.25 & 6,3 & M3.25 & Li,e,NaK & 6,(6,3),3 & 3379 & 0.083 & 0.99 & 1.21 & 11.77 & 11.81 & 0.67 & 0.40 & 9.43 \\
762: 16 & \nodata & 08 44 09.15 & -78 33 45.7 & M4.5-M5.5,M5.75 & 7,3 & M5.75 & Li,e,NaK & 7,(7,3),3 & 3024 & 0.010 & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 14.79 & 0.53 & 0.36 & 11.62 \\
763: 17 & \nodata & 08 38 51.50 & -79 16 13.7 & M5,M5.2,M5.25 & 7,8,3 & M5.25 & Li,NaK & (7,8),3 & 3091 & 0.035 & 1.61 & 1.93 & 13.28 & 13.28 & 0.55 & 0.29 & 10.43 \\
764: 18 & \nodata & 08 36 10.73 & -79 08 18.4 & M5.5 & 7,8,3 & M5.5 & Li,NaK & (7,8),3 & 3058 & 0.020 & 1.72 & 2.04 & 13.90 & 13.93 & 0.57 & 0.33 & 10.95 \\
765: \enddata
766: \tablecomments{Units of right ascension are hours, minutes, and seconds, and
767: units of declination are degrees, arcminutes, and arcseconds.}
768: \tablenotetext{a}{1 through 12 are RECX designations from \citet{mam99}.
769: Identifications 13 through 18 are assigned in this work.}
770: \tablenotetext{b}{2MASS Point Source Catalog.}
771: \tablenotetext{c}{Measurement uncertainties for the spectral types from
772: this work are $\pm0.5$ and 0.25 subclass for K and M types, respectively.}
773: \tablenotetext{d}{Membership in $\eta$~Cha is indicated by
774: strong emission in H$\alpha$ (``e"),
775: Na~I and K~I strengths intermediate between those of dwarfs and giants (``NaK"),
776: strong Li absorption (``Li"),
777: or a proper motion (``$\mu$") or parallax (``$\pi$")
778: that is similar to that of the known members of $\eta$~Cha.}
779: \tablenotetext{e}{Temperature scale from \citet{sk82} ($\leq$M0) and
780: \citet{luh03b} ($>$M0), except for RS Cha A and B, where the temperatures
781: are from \citet{rib00}.}
782: \tablenotetext{f}{\citet{law01} and \citet{lyo04}.}
783: \tablenotetext{g}{Second DENIS Release.}
784: \tablerefs{
785: (1) \citet{cov97};
786: (2) \citet{mam99};
787: (3) this work;
788: (4) \citet{hc75};
789: (5) \citet{law01};
790: (6) \citet{law02};
791: (7) \citet{sz04};
792: (8) \citet{lyo04}.}
793: \end{deluxetable}
794:
795:
796: \begin{deluxetable}{llllll}
797: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
798: \tablewidth{0pt}
799: \tablecaption{Observing Log for MBM 12A\label{tab:log2}}
800: \tablehead{
801: \colhead{} &
802: \colhead{} &
803: \colhead{Grating} &
804: \colhead{Resolution} &
805: \colhead{} \\
806: \colhead{Date} &
807: \colhead{Telescope + Instrument} &
808: \colhead{l~mm$^{-1}$} &
809: \colhead{\AA} &
810: \colhead{ID\tablenotemark{a}}
811: }
812: \startdata
813: 2002 January 12 & MMT + Blue Channel & 600 & 2.8 & J02524907+1952523,J02583445+1946506,J02585238+1958402 \\
814: 2003 December 14 & MMT + Red Channel & 1200 & 2.1 & MBM~12A-3,J02562431+2035117,02573101+1943459 \\
815: \enddata
816: \tablenotetext{a}{Identifications are from the 2MASS Point Source Catalog,
817: except for MBM~12A-3, which is from \citet{luh01}.}
818: \end{deluxetable}
819:
820: \clearpage
821:
822: \begin{figure}
823: \plotone{f1.eps}
824: \caption{
825: Map of the 18 known members of the $\eta$~Cha young association.
826: The masses of these sources range from 0.08 to 3.2~$M_\odot$ and are
827: represented by the sizes of the points.
828: The three circled members were discovered in this work and independently by
829: \citet{lyo04} and \citet{sz04}. The boundaries of our survey field are
830: indicated.
831: }
832: \label{fig:map}
833: \end{figure}
834: \clearpage
835:
836: \begin{figure}
837: \plotone{f2.eps}
838: \caption{
839: Color-magnitude diagram for the field toward the $\eta$~Cha young association
840: in Figure~\ref{fig:map}.
841: The 15 known late-type members of the association are shown
842: ({\it large points}). We also indicate sources spectroscopically classified
843: as new members ({\it circles}) and as field stars ({\it plusses}).
844: The dashed line is the 10~Myr isochrone (1-0.015~$M_{\odot}$) from the
845: evolutionary models of \citet{bar98}.
846: Objects below the solid boundary are probable field stars ({\it small points}).
847: The three remaining sources above this boundary without spectroscopy
848: have positions in Figure~\ref{fig:jhhk} that are indicative of field giants
849: ({\it open triangles}).
850: These measurements are from DENIS ($i$) and 2MASS ($H$, $K_s$).}
851: \label{fig:ik}
852: \end{figure}
853: \clearpage
854:
855: \begin{figure}
856: \plotone{f3.eps}
857: \caption{
858: $H-K_s$ versus $J-H$ for the field toward the $\eta$~Cha young association
859: in Figure~\ref{fig:map}.
860: The symbols are the same as in Figure~\ref{fig:ik}, with the addition
861: of sequences for typical field dwarfs ({\it solid line}; $\leq$M6V)
862: and giants ({\it dotted line}; $\leq$M5~III). Objects identified as
863: probable field stars by their location below the boundary in
864: Figure~\ref{fig:ik} are omitted. These measurements are from 2MASS.}
865: \label{fig:jhhk}
866: \end{figure}
867: \clearpage
868:
869: \begin{figure}
870: \vspace{-4cm}
871: \plotone{f4.eps}
872: \caption{
873: Low-resolution spectra of the 15 known late-type members of the $\eta$ Cha
874: young association. Source identifications are from Table~\ref{tab:mem}.
875: The data are displayed at a resolution of 8~\AA\ and are
876: normalized at 7500~\AA.}
877: \label{fig:ec}
878: \end{figure}
879: \clearpage
880:
881: \begin{figure}
882: \plotone{f5.eps}
883: \caption{
884: $H-K_s$ versus $H$ for the field toward the $\eta$~Cha young association
885: in Figure~\ref{fig:map}.
886: Known members of the association ({\it points}) and sources without
887: detections at $i$ by DENIS ({\it triangles}) are indicated.
888: We have omitted the field stars identified through spectroscopy
889: (Tables~\ref{tab:back}) as well as objects that are probable field stars
890: by their location below the boundary in Figure~\ref{fig:ik}.
891: The solid line is the 10~Myr isochrone
892: from the evolutionary models of \citet{bar98}. These measurements are from 2MASS
893: and have completeness limits of $H=15.5$ and $K_s=15.25$ ({\it dashed line}).}
894: \label{fig:hk}
895: \end{figure}
896:
897: \begin{figure}
898: \plotone{f6.eps}
899: \caption{
900: H-R diagram for the known members of the $\eta$~Cha young association.
901: These data are shown with the theoretical evolutionary models of \citet{pal99}
902: ({\it upper panel}) and \citet{bar98} ($0.1<M/M_\odot\leq1$) and \citet{cha00}
903: ($M/M_\odot\leq0.1$) ({\it lower panel}), where the mass tracks
904: ({\it dotted lines}) and isochrones ({\it solid lines}) are labeled in units
905: of $M_\odot$ and Myr, respectively. These models imply an age of
906: $6^{+2}_{-1}$~Myr for the association.
907: }
908: \label{fig:hr}
909: \end{figure}
910: \clearpage
911:
912: \begin{figure}
913: \plotone{f7.eps}
914: \caption{
915: Medium-resolution spectra of MBM~12A-3 (LkH$\alpha$~263), the four candidate
916: members of MBM~12A presented by \citet{ogu03} ({\it left and middle}), and
917: three candidate members from \citet{luh01} ({\it right}).
918: The strong absorption in Li 6707~\AA\ that is found in young stars like
919: MBM~12A-3 is absent in the data for the candidates,
920: indicating that they are field dwarfs rather than members of the association.
921: From left to right, the spectra have resolutions of 3.1, 2.1, and 2.8~\AA,
922: respectively, and are normalized to the continuum near the Li line.}
923: \label{fig:li}
924: \end{figure}
925: \clearpage
926:
927: \end{document}
928: