1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 03 Jan 01
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17:
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
29: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
30: %% the \begin{document} command.
31: %%
32: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
33: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
34: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
35: %% for information.
36:
37: \newcommand{\FeH}{\mbox{[Fe/H]}\,}
38: \newcommand{\RRab}{\mbox{$RR{\mbox{\scriptsize ab}}\,$}}
39: \newcommand{\RRc}{\mbox{$RR{\mbox{\scriptsize c}}\,$}}
40: \newcommand{\RRd}{\mbox{$RR{\mbox{\scriptsize d}}\,$}}
41:
42: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
43:
44: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
45:
46: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
47: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
48: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
49: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
50: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
51: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
52:
53: \shorttitle{The distance to the LMC cluster Reticulum}
54: \shortauthors{Dall'Ora et al.}
55:
56: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
57: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
58:
59: \begin{document}
60:
61: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
62: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
63: %% you desire.
64:
65: \title{The distance to the LMC cluster Reticulum from the
66: $K$-band Period-Luminosity-Metallicity relation of RR Lyrae
67: stars\footnote{Based on observations collected at the European Southern
68: Observatory, La Silla, Chile on INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma
69: guaranteed time.}}
70:
71: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
72: %% author and affiliation information.
73: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
74: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
75: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
76: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
77:
78: \author{M. Dall'Ora\altaffilmark{1}, J. Storm\altaffilmark{2},
79: G. Bono\altaffilmark{1}, V. Ripepi\altaffilmark{3}, M. Monelli\altaffilmark{1},
80: V. Testa\altaffilmark{1}, G. Andreuzzi\altaffilmark{1,4},
81: R. Buonanno\altaffilmark{1}, F. Caputo\altaffilmark{1},
82: V. Castellani\altaffilmark{1}, C. E. Corsi\altaffilmark{1},
83: G. Marconi\altaffilmark{5}, M. Marconi\altaffilmark{3},
84: L. Pulone\altaffilmark{1}, P. B. Stetson\altaffilmark{6}}
85: %\and
86: %\author{P. Stetson\altaffilmark{5}}
87:
88: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
89: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
90: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
91: %% affiliation.
92:
93: \altaffiltext{1}{INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via Frascati 33,
94: 00040 Monte Porzio Catone, Italy; fname@mporzio.astro.it}
95:
96: \altaffiltext{2}{Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16,
97: 14482 Potsdam, Germany; jstorm@aip.de}
98:
99: \altaffiltext{3}{INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, via
100: Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, Italy; ripepi/marcella@na.astro.it}
101:
102: \altaffiltext{4}{Telescopio Nazionale Galileo, Istituto Nazionale di
103: Astrofisica, P.O. Box 565, E-38700 Santa Cruz de La Palma, Spain;
104: andreuzzi@tng.iac.es}
105:
106: \altaffiltext{5}{European Southern Observatory, 3107 Alonso de Cordova,
107: Santiago, Chile; gmarconi@eso.org}
108:
109: \altaffiltext{6}{Dominion Astrophysical Observatory, Herzberg Institute of
110: Astrophysics, National Research Council, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria,
111: British Columbia V9E 2E7, Canada; Peter.Stetson@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca}
112:
113:
114: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
115: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
116: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
117: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
118: %% editorial office after submission.
119:
120: \begin{abstract}
121: We present new and accurate Near-Infrared $J$ and $K_s$-band data of the
122: Large Magellanic Cloud cluster Reticulum. Data were collected with SOFI
123: available at NTT and covering an area of approximately $5\times5$ arcmin
124: around the center of the cluster. Current data allowed us to derive
125: accurate mean $K$-band magnitudes for 21 fundamental (\RRab) and 9
126: first overtone (\RRc) RR Lyrae stars. On the basis of the semi-empirical
127: $K$-band Period-Luminosity-Metallicity ($PLZ_K$) relation we have recently
128: derived, we find that the absolute distance to this cluster is
129: $18.52\pm0.005 (random) \pm0.117 (systematic)$. Note that the current
130: error budget is dominated by systematic uncertainty affecting the
131: absolute zero-point calibration and the metallicity scale.
132: \end{abstract}
133:
134: \keywords{stars: evolution -- stars: oscillations -- stars: variables: RR Lyrae}
135:
136:
137: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
138: \section{Introduction}
139:
140: Absolute distances of RR Lyrae stars play a fundamental role in stellar
141: astrophysics, and the reasons are manifold. They are widely adopted to
142: establish the absolute age of globular clusters (GCs) and to properly compare
143: predicted and empirical Color-Magnitude diagrams. Moreover, they are
144: robust stellar tracers of low-mass, old populations and are ubiquitous
145: across the Galactic spheroid as well as in Local Group galaxies.
146: During the last few years a paramount theoretical and observational
147: effort has been devoted to the RR Lyrae distance scale to improve not
148: only the intrinsic accuracy but also to constrain the occurrence of
149: deceptive systematic errors (Caputo et al. 2000; Walker 2000; Bono 2003;
150: Cacciari \& Clementini 2003).
151:
152: In a series of previous papers (Bono et al. 2001,2002,2003, hereinafter
153: B01, B02, and B03) we have drawn the attention to the $K$-band
154: Period-Luminosity-Metallicity ($PLZ_K$) relation of RR Lyrae stars.
155: This relation was originally discovered by Longmore et al. (1990,
156: hereinafter L90) and presents several undisputable advantages when
157: compared with other
158: methods available in the literature. In particular, the $PLZ_K$ relation
159: is only marginally affected by evolutionary effects as well as by a spread
160: in stellar mass inside the instability strip. Moreover, it is only weakly
161: affected by uncertainties in the reddening correction and shows a linear
162: trend when moving from metal-poor to metal-rich objects. Current theoretical
163: predictions appear in very good agreement with empirical observations, and
164: indeed the pulsation parallax to RR Lyr itself estimated by B02, is in very
165: good agreement with the trigonometric parallax measured by
166: Benedict et al. (2002) with the Fine Guide Sensor on board the Hubble Space
167: Telescope (HST).
168:
169: Although the theoretical framework concerning the $PLZ_K$ relation has
170: been thoroughly discussed, only a few investigations have been devoted
171: to near-infrared (NIR) observations of cluster and field RR Lyrae stars.
172: In fact, with the exception of the $K$-band data collected by L90 for cluster
173: RR Lyrae and Baade-Wesselink RR Lyrae (see B03 for a detailed list)
174: only one investigation has been devoted to RR Lyrae stars in the Galactic
175: Bulge (Carney et al. 1995). The observational scenario has been recently
176: complemented
177: with new $K$-band data collected by Butler (2003), using the adaptive optics
178: camera available on the 3.5m Calar Alto telescope, for a small sample of
179: RR Lyrae stars located in the very center of the GC M3. The above
180: discussion shows quite clearly that we lack new and accurate NIR data
181: to supply a sound empirical estimate of both the slope and the zero-point
182: of the $PLZ_K$ relation but also to improve current empirical constraints
183: on the metallicity dependence. To fill this gap we undertook an observational
184: project aimed at providing a comprehensive observational investigation of
185: cluster and field RR Lyrae stars in the NIR $J$ and $K_s$-bands.
186:
187: In this investigation we present $K$-band data for RR Lyrae stars in the
188: LMC cluster Reticulum. We selected this cluster for the following reasons:
189: it presents a sizable sample of well-studied RR Lyrae stars (32, Walker 1992),
190: its central density is very low ($\log \rho_0\approx 0\; M_\odot pc^{-3}$,
191: Peterson \& Kunkel 1977), and therefore the NIR photometry is not seriously
192: affected by crowding, and the metal content
193: of this cluster has been estimated using medium resolution spectra
194: ($[Fe/H]\approx=-1.71\pm0.1$, Suntzeff et al. 1992). In section 2, we
195: present the observations and the fit to the $K_s$-band light curves, while
196: in section 3 we discuss the new distance determination together with
197: intrinsic and systematic uncertainties affecting the current estimate.
198:
199:
200: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
201: \section{Observations}
202:
203: Near-Infrared $J$ and $K_s$ images of Reticulum were collected in three
204: different runs from December 1999 to February 2002 with SOFI available
205: at NTT ESO La Silla. The seeing conditions during these observing runs
206: were good and range from 0.5 to 1.3 arcsec. We collected 46 $J$ and 171
207: $K_s$-band frames ($5\times5$ arcmin, pixel size=0.292 arcsec) centered
208: on the cluster and
209: the individual exposure times range for the $J$-band from 10 to 30 s
210: and for the $K_s$-band from 10 to 120 s.
211: We detected 30 out the 32 RR Lyrae stars present in this cluster,
212: and the number of phase points for each object is approximately 12.
213: Raw frames were
214: pre-reduced using standard IRAF procedures. To improve the photometric
215: accuracy along the light curves we performed several tests using
216: different techniques to stack the images, different criteria to select
217: PSF stars across the individual frames as well as different strategies
218: to perform the photometry over the entire data set. We found that the
219: best intrinsic accuracy can be achieved if we do not stack the images.
220: We selected a reasonable number of PSF stars ($\approx$25) for
221: each frame and adopted a variable PSF. Moreover, the NIR ($J$, $K_s$)
222: frames have been simultaneously reduced with DAOPHOT/ALLFRAME together
223: with a few V-band images to improve the accuracy of individual measurements
224: and the limiting magnitudes. Optical (U,B,V,I) data have been collected
225: during the same observing runs, with SUSI2 available at the same telescope.
226: A detailed description of observing and data reduction strategies will be
227: discussed in a companion paper.
228: The absolute photometric calibration of $J$ and $K_s$ ESO magnitudes
229: into the LCO system was performed using the standard star 9109 (HST S055-D)
230: measured by Persson et al. (1998). We did not apply any correction to
231: transform the $K_s$ into the $K$-band, due to the marginal difference
232: (Lidman et al. 2002).
233: This star was measured 10 times at air masses that bracket the
234: observations on Reticulum and the accuracy of the calibration is of the
235: order of 0.002 mag in the $K$-band.
236:
237: Figure 1, shows the Color-Magnitude diagrams in the J, V-J (top) and
238: $K$, $V-K$ (middle), and $V$, $B-V$ (bottom) bands together with the
239: intrinsic photometric accuracy on the mean magnitudes provided by
240: ALLFRAME. Data plotted
241: in this diagram show quite clearly that the intrinsic accuracy for
242: typical RR Lyrae luminosities reaches 0.01 at $J\approx 18.5$ and
243: 0.015 at $K\approx18$. We detected approximately 850 and 550 stars
244: in $J$ and $K$-band, while the limiting magnitudes are $\approx20.5$ and
245: $\approx20$, respectively.
246: Note that the sample of hot stars located at $K\approx19.75$ and
247: $1.0 \le V-K\le 1.6$ are Blue Straggler stars as supported by the
248: cross-identification with the optical CMD (see open circles).
249: This suggests that current photometry almost approaches the
250: Turn-Off region.
251:
252: To further improve the intrinsic accuracy of the RR Lyrae mean magnitudes
253: we decided to perform a fit of the individual phase points measured
254: by ALLFRAME with a template curve. This approach allows us a better
255: propagation of individual errors on the final mean magnitude and avoids
256: the spurious fluctuations introduced by the binning of phase points.
257: Jones et al. (1996) have developed a template fitting
258: technique for determining mean magnitudes in the $K$-band for
259: RR Lyrae stars from few phase observations. They have determined five
260: different template shapes depending on the type of variability
261: (\RRab or \RRc type) and on the $B$-amplitude of the variable and
262: described each of these templates with a fourier series. We have
263: adopted their method and for each star we computed the corresponding
264: fourier template based on the ephemerides and the $B$-amplitudes
265: from Ripepi et al. (2003, in preparation). The candidate \RRd stars
266: have been treated as \RRc variables, due to their small amplitudes
267: and relatively short periods.
268:
269: For each observed phase point we can compute the best estimate of the
270: mean magnitude over phase of the variable by subtracting the template
271: magnitude from the observed magnitude,
272: $\langle m(\phi) \rangle = K_{obs}(\phi) - K_{template}(\phi)$.
273: We computed the weighted intensity averaged magnitude over all the
274: observed phase points for each variable star. The resulting
275: mean magnitudes and their associated intrinsic errors are listed in Table 1.
276: Figure 2 shows the mean $\langle K \rangle$ magnitude as a function
277: of $\log P$. Note that the period of \RRc variables (open circles) in
278: Figure 2 have been fundamentalized, i.e. $\log P_F = 0.127 + \log P_{FO}$.
279: It can be seen that there is an excellent correlation. Linear regression gives:
280:
281: \begin{equation}
282: <K> = -2.16 (\pm 0.09) \log P + 17.352 (\pm0.025)
283: \end{equation}
284:
285: with a standard deviation of only 0.03~mag. This is a remarkable result
286: for a standard candle.
287:
288: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
289: \section{Discussion and final remarks}
290:
291: Based on the mean $K$-magnitudes from the previous section we now
292: proceed to determine the distance to the Reticulum cluster.
293: To further improve the theoretical calibration of the $PLZ_K$ relation,
294: B03 devised a new pulsation approach that relies on mean $K$-band magnitudes
295: and $V-K$ colors. In particular, they derived new $PLZ_K$ relations (see their
296: relations 3 and 4) and Period-Luminosity-Color-Metallicity, $PLCZ_{(V,K)}$,
297: relations (see their relations 7 and 8) that include the luminosity term.
298: Note that these relations when compared with theoretical predictions by B01
299: present three main advantages: {\em i)} they rely on a larger set of pulsation
300: models; {\em ii)} independent theoretical relations have been derived
301: for fundamental and first overtone pulsators; {\em iii)} the new $PLZ_K$ and
302: $PLCZ_{(V,K)}$ relations were derived by adopting predicted mass values for
303: each assumed chemical composition, while B01 adopted an ensemble average.
304: To root the calibration of the zero-point as well as of the coefficient of
305: the metallicity term of the new $PLZ_K$ relation on empirical data, B03
306: adopted a sample of field RR Lyrae stars for which good $V$ and $K$-band
307: light curves, accurate reddening corrections, and metal abundances were
308: available in the literature. For fundamental mode pulsators they found:
309:
310: \begin{equation}
311: M_K = -0.770 (\pm 0.044) - 2.101 \log P + 0.231 (\pm 0.012) \FeH
312: \end{equation}
313:
314: Suntzeff et al. (1992) have determined the metallicity of the Reticulum
315: cluster to be $\FeH=-1.71\pm0.1$ based on spectroscopy of the Calcium II
316: triplet at around 860~nm for 9 individual stars in the cluster.
317: Entering this value in equation 2 we can
318: determine the distance modulus, $(m-M)_K=\langle K \rangle - M_K$,
319: to each star. Forming the weighted average of these estimates we find
320: for the \RRab stars a value of $(m-M)_K=18.531\pm0.006$, while for the
321: \RRc stars, using the fundamentalized periods, we find
322: $(m-M)_K=18.539\pm0.009$ and for the complete sample we
323: find $(m-M)_K=18.534\pm0.005$.
324:
325: The reddening towards Reticulum has been determined by Walker (1992)
326: who finds a very low value of $E(B-V)=0.03\pm0.02$.
327: We combine this value with the reddening law from Cardelli, Mathis,
328: \& Clayton (1989) of $A_K = 0.114 \times 3.1 \times E(B-V)$ which
329: gives a minuscule
330: absorption in the $K$-band of $A_K = 0.011$~mag. Correcting the modulus
331: for the reddening we find a best estimate of $(m-M)_0=18.523\pm0.005$,
332: where the error estimate only consider intrinsic random errors.
333: The referee suggested to perform a detailed check of the systematic
334: uncertainties affecting distance estimates based on the semi-empirical
335: relation derived by B03. To accomplish this goal we selected the Galactic
336: Globular Clusters (GGCs) for which are available both optical and NIR
337: mean magnitudes. To avoid
338: subtle uncertainties in the reddening corrections we only selected GGCs
339: with reddening corrections smaller than 0.2. We ended up with four GGCs
340: whose metallicity ranges from $[Fe/H]=-1.27$ (M~5) to $[Fe/H]=-2.26$
341: (M~15). To estimate the difference in the distance moduli we adopted
342: distances based on the Baade-Wesselink (BW) calibration provided by
343: Fernley (1994) as well as on the First Overtone Blue Edge (FOBE)
344: provided by Caputo et al. (2000). Data listed in the last two columns
345: of Table 2 show that the difference ranges from $\Delta \mu=0.32$
346: for the less metal-poor cluster (M~15) to $\Delta \mu=0.10$ for
347: the more metal-rich cluster (M~5).
348:
349: This finding further strengthens the
350: result obtained by B03, i.e. the difference between distances based
351: on $PLZ_K$ and on the BW method depend on the mean metallicity and
352: it decreases in the metal-rich regime (see figures 6 and 8 in B03).
353: Unfortunately, we still lack accurate mean K-band magnitudes for
354: RR Lyrae stars in a larger sample of metal-rich GGCs. Moreover,
355: current uncertainties affecting distance moduli based on mean V-band
356: magnitudes are systematically larger than 0.1 mag. This hampers any
357: precise quantitative conclusion on the systematic uncertainty affecting
358: the $PLZ_K$ distance scale.
359:
360: It is noteworthy, that cluster distances presented here appear to be
361: systematically larger than distances based on the FOBE method and on
362: the $PLZ_K$ calibration based on theoretical models provided by B01.
363: The semi-empirical calibration by B03 presents a steeper dependence
364: on the metallicity (0.231 vs 0.167) and the reasons for the difference
365: between the empirical and theoretical scales are not clear yet (see
366: also Carney et al. 1992).
367: Finally, we note that the current distance estimate to $\omega$ Cen
368: is also 0.1 mag larger than the distance modulus derived by Thompson
369: et al. (2001) on the basis of the eclipsing binary OGLE17. Although,
370: the analysis of current uncertainties affecting the RR Lyrae distance
371: is far from being definitive we decided to adopt a systematic
372: uncertainty of 0.1 in the calibration of the zero-point.
373:
374: The uncertainty on the reddening correction is quite negligible, but
375: we have to account for the uncertainty in the metallicity and in the
376: metallicity scale. Equation 2 was derived using the metallicity
377: estimates provided by Fernley et al. (1998) and by Zinn (1985)
378: for field and cluster RR Lyrae stars. The metallicities of field
379: RR Lyrae rely on a calibration of the $\Delta S$ method provided by
380: Fernley \& Barnes (1997), i.e. $[Fe/H]=-0.13 - 0.195 \Delta S$, that is
381: quite similar to the calibration provided by Clementini et al. (1995),
382: $[Fe/H]=-0.08 - 0.195 \Delta S$. These calibrations supply metal
383: abundances quite similar to the Zinn \& West (1984) metallicity
384: scale. On the other hand, Gratton (1999) provided a new calibration,
385: $[Fe/H]=-0.03 - 0.176 \Delta S$, that relies on the Carretta \&
386: Gratton (1997) metallicity scale. By accounting for these empirical
387: uncertainties on the zero-point, on the slope as well as on the
388: systematic uncertainties affecting the metallicity scale (Rutledge,
389: Hesser, \& Stetson 1997; Kraft, \& Ivans 2003) we estimate the
390: uncertainty on the metallicity to be of the order of 0.25 dex.
391: This means that the uncertainty on the mean metallicity in equation 2
392: as well as in the cluster metallicity introduces an uncertainty of the
393: order of 0.06 mag in the current distance determination. Therefore, we
394: end up with a distance to Reticulum of $18.52\pm0.005 (random) \pm0.117
395: (systematic)$.
396:
397: Reticulum is located 11 degrees away from the center of LMC, and therefore
398: we can only supply weak constraints on the absolute distance to LMC itself.
399: According to our optical photometry and by assuming a mean reddening of
400: $E(B-V)=0.03\pm0.02$ (Walker 1992) the mean visual magnitude of RR Lyrae
401: stars in Reticulum is: $V_0=18.96\pm0.05$ mag. Note that this estimate is
402: in very good agreement with the estimate provided by Walker (1992), i.e.
403: $V_0=18.98\pm0.04$. Recent estimates of the mean visual magnitude of RR Lyrae
404: stars in the LMC bar range from $V_0=19.05\pm0.06$ (108 stars) by Clementini
405: et al. (2003) to $V_0=18.90\pm0.02$ (7110 stars) derived by the OGLE team
406: (Soszynski et al. 2003) and to $V_0=18.99\pm0.02 (random)\pm 0.16
407: (systematic)$ (80 first overtones) derived by the MACHO team
408: (Alcock et al. 2004). The key differences in these estimates are:
409: statistics, absolute zero-point calibration, and reddening correction.
410: It goes without saying that according to these estimates the position of
411: Reticulum ranges from $\approx 3$ kpc in front of LMC to $\approx 2$ kpc
412: beyond LMC. New and homogeneous NIR data for a sizable sample of RR Lyrae
413: in the LMC bar are mandatory to settle the uncertainty on the relative
414: position of this cluster.
415:
416:
417: The empirical evidence brought out by current data suggests that the $PLZ_K$
418: relation is characterized by a global accuracy better than 0.12 mag.
419: Note that the current discrepancy between HB evolutionary models constructed
420: by adopting different assumptions concerning the input physics is of the
421: order of 0.1-0.15 mag (Cassisi et al. 1999; VandenBerg et al. 2000).
422: However, the most recent systematic survey of $K$-band data for cluster
423: RR Lyrae stars dates back to L90. Therefore new and homogeneous NIR
424: data for GGCs with sizable samples of RR Lyrae stars are strongly
425: required to shed new lights on this {\em vexata questio}. At the same
426: time, a new empirical calibration of the $PLZ_K$ relation based on
427: RR Lyrae stars for which heavy-element abundances has been measured
428: on high-resolution spectra is also necessary.
429:
430: The intrinsic accuracy of the $PLZ_K$ relation seems also very promising in
431: providing a new distance scale for GCs that can allow us to improve their
432: absolute age estimate. It is noteworthy that new cluster data will allow us
433: to derive an independent $PLZ_K$ relation for first overtone RR Lyrae stars,
434: and in turn to further improve the intrinsic accuracy of this method.
435: Finally, due to the marginal dependency on reddening corrections it could
436: also be soundly adopted to derive the 3D-structure not only of the
437: Magellanic Clouds, but also of the Galactic bulge.
438:
439:
440: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
441:
442:
443: \acknowledgments
444: This work was partially supported by MIUR/Cofin~2001, under the project
445: "Galactic Spheroid", and MIUR/Cofin~2002, under the project "Stellar
446: Populations in Local Group Galaxies".
447:
448:
449:
450: \begin{thebibliography}{}
451: %\bibitem[]{366}
452:
453: \bibitem[]{367} Alcock, C., et al. 2004, AJ, 127, 334
454: \bibitem[]{368} Alves, D. R. 2003, New Astronomy Reviews, astro-ph/0310673
455: \bibitem[]{369} Benedict, G. F., et al., 2002, AJ, 123, 473
456: \bibitem[]{370} Bono, G. 2003, in Stellar Candles, ed. D. Alloin \& W. Gieren,
457: Lecture Notes in Physics (Berlin: Springer/Verlag), 85
458: \bibitem[]{372} Bono, G., Caputo, F., Castellani, V., Marconi, M., \& Storm, J. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 1183 (B01)
459: \bibitem[]{374} Bono, G., Caputo, F., Castellani, V., Marconi, M., \& Storm, J. 2002, MNRAS, 332, L78 (B02)
460: \bibitem[]{376} Bono, G., Caputo, F., Castellani, V., Marconi, M., Storm, J.,
461: \& Degl'Innocenti, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1097 (B03)
462: \bibitem[]{377} Butler, D.~J.\ 2003, \aap, 405, 981
463: \bibitem[]{378} Cacciari, C, \& Clementini, G. 2003, in Stellar Candles, ed.
464: D. Alloin \& W. Gieren, Lecture Notes in Physics (Berlin: Springer/Verlag), 105
465: \bibitem[]{3781} Caputo, F., Castellani, V., Marconi, M., \& Ripepi, V. 1999, \mnras, 306, 815
466: \bibitem[]{381} Caputo, F., Castellani, V., Marconi, M., \& Ripepi, V. 2000,
467: MNRAS, 316, 819
468: \bibitem[]{383} Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., \& Mathis, J. S. 1989,
469: \apj, 345, 245
470: \bibitem[]{3688} Carney, B. W., Fulbright, J. P., Terndrup, D. M., Suntzeff,
471: N. B., \& Walker, A. R. 1995, AJ, 110, 1674
472: \bibitem[]{3831} Carney, B.~W., Storm, J., \& Jones, R.~V. 1992, \apj, 386, 663
473: \bibitem[]{388} Carretta, E., \& Gratton, R. G. 1997, A\&AS, 121, 95
474: \bibitem[]{385} Cassisi, S., Castellani, V., degl'Innocenti, S., Salaris, M., \&
475: Weiss, A. 1999, A\&AS, 134, 103
476: \bibitem[]{389} Clementini, G., Carretta, E., Gratton, R. G., Merighi, R., Mould, J. R., \& McCarthy, J. K., 1995, AJ, 110, 2319
477: \bibitem[]{3901} Clementini, G., Gratton, R. G., Bragaglia, A., Carretta, E.,
478: Di Fabrizio, L., \& Maio, M. 2003, \aj, 125, 1309
479: \bibitem[]{3902} Corwin, T. M. \& Carney, B. W. 2001, \aj, 122, 3183
480: \bibitem[]{3903} Fernley, J. 1994, \aap, 284, L16
481: \bibitem[]{390} Fernley, J., \& Barnes, T. G. 1997, A\&AS, 125, 313
482: \bibitem[]{391} Fernley, J., Barnes, T. G., Skillen, I., Hawley, S. L., Hanley, C. J., Evans, D. W., Solano, E., \& Garrido, R. 1998, A\&A, 330, 515
483: \bibitem[]{392} Gratton, R. G. 1999, in Globular Clusters, ed. C. Martinez-Roger, I. Perez Fournon, \& F.Sanchez (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 155
484: \bibitem[]{3922} Harris, W. E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487
485: \bibitem[]{394} Jones, R. V., Carney, B. W., \& Fulbright, J. P. 1996, \pasp,
486: 108, 877
487: \bibitem[]{395} Kraft, R. P., \& Ivans, I. I. 2003, PASP, 115, 143
488: \bibitem[]{3951} Lidman C., Cuby J., Vanzi, L., Billeres, M., Hainaut O.,
489: Pompei, E. 2002, UserDoc. No. LSO-MAN-ESO-40100-0004, issue 1.4
490: \bibitem[]{396} Longmore, A. J., Dixon, R., Skillen, I., Jameson, R. F., \&
491: Fernley, J. A. 1990, MNRAS, 247, 684 (L90)
492: \bibitem[]{3961} Olech, A., Kaluzny, J., Thompson, I.~B., \& Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. 2003, \mnras, 345, 86
493: \bibitem[]{397} Persson, S. E., Murphy, D. C., Krzeminski, W., Roth, M., \& Rieke, M. J. 1998, AJ, 116, 2475
494: \bibitem[]{398} Peterson, C. J., \& Kunkel, W. E. 1977, PASP, 89, 634
495: \bibitem[]{399} Rutledge, G. A., Hesser, J. E., \& Stetson, P. B. 1997, PASP, 109, 907
496: \bibitem[]{4001} Silbermann, N.~A.~\& Smith, H.~A.\ 1995, \aj, 110, 704
497: \bibitem[]{401} Soszynski, I. et al.\ 2003, Acta Astronomica, 53, 93
498: \bibitem[]{402} Suntzeff, N. B., Schommer, R. A., Olszewski, E. W., \& Walker, A. R. 1992, AJ, 104, 1743
499: \bibitem[]{403} Thompson, I.~B., Kaluzny, J., Pych, W., Burley, G., Krzeminski, W., Paczy{\' n}ski, B., Persson, S.~E., \& Preston, G.~W. 2001, \aj, 121, 3089
500: \bibitem[]{404} VandenBerg, D. A., Swenson, F. J., Rogers, F. J., Iglesias,
501: C. A., \& Alexander, D. R. 2000, ApJ, 532, 430
502: \bibitem[]{406} Walker, A. R. 1992, AJ, 103, 1166
503: \bibitem[]{407} Walker, A. R. 2000, in IAU Colloq. 176, The Impact of
504: Large-Scale Surveys on Pulsating Star Research, ed. L. Szabados \& D. Kurtz
505: (San Francisco: ASP), 165
506: \bibitem[]{410} Zinn, R. 1985, ApJ, 293, 424
507: \bibitem[]{411} Zinn, R., \& West, M. J. 1984, ApJS, 55, 45
508:
509:
510: %\bibitem[]{3941} Kov{\' a}cs, G.\ 2003, \mnras, 342, L58
511: %\bibitem[]{400} Schommer, R. A., Suntzeff, N. B., Olszewski, E. W., \& Harris, H. C. 1992, AJ, 103, 447
512:
513: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
514: \end{thebibliography}
515:
516:
517: \clearpage
518:
519: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
520: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
521:
522:
523:
524: %fig1
525: \begin{figure}
526: %\epsscale{0.80}
527: \plotone{f1new.ps}
528: \caption{Reticulum Color-Magnitude Diagrams in the $J$, $V-J$ (top),
529: $K$, $V-K$ (middle), and $V$,$B-V$ (bottom) bands. The boxes on the right
530: show the intrinsic photometric errors given by ALLFRAME. The NIR photometry
531: is quite accurate, and indeed for $J\approx 18.5$ and $K_s\approx18$,
532: i.e. the typical magnitudes of RR Lyrae stars, the intrinsic accuracy
533: is systematically better than 0.02. The open circles mark the position
534: of Blue Stragglers detected in the $K$, $V-K$ CMD and then cross-identified
535: in the other CMDs. By adopting the following selection criteria:
536: $|sharpness| \le 1.1$, and $\chi\le 0.5$ we detected approximately 850
537: and 550 stars in the $J$ and in the $K_s$-band, respectively.\label{fig1}}
538: \end{figure}
539:
540: %fig2
541: \begin{figure}
542: %\epsscale{0.80}
543: \plotone{f2.ps}
544: \caption{The logP-$K$ relation for the Reticulum RR Lyrae stars.
545: Open symbols show the \RRc stars after their periods have been
546: fundamentalized by adding 0.127 to $\log P$. Filled symbols are
547: \RRab stars and the straight line represents the theoretical prediction
548: from Bono et al. (2003) for the derived distance modulus.\label{fig1}}
549: \end{figure}
550:
551:
552: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
553: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
554: %% User Guide for details.
555: %%
556: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
557: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
558: %% after every seventh one.
559:
560:
561: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
562: %% each one.
563:
564: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
565: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
566: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
567: %%
568:
569: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
570: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
571:
572:
573: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
574: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
575: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
576: %% inside the \tablecaption.
577:
578: \clearpage
579: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
580: \begin{deluxetable}{rccccc}
581: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
582: \tablecaption{The weighted intensity averaged $K$-magnitudes based
583: on the template fit method of Jones et al. (1996) and the $K$-band
584: photometry presented here. The epochs are in Heliocentric Julian Days.
585: Type $ab$ and $c$ are for fundamental and first overtone RR Lyrae,
586: while type $d$ for candidate mixed-mode variables.\label{tab1}}
587: \tablewidth{0pt}
588: \tablehead{
589: \colhead{ID} &
590: \colhead{$\log P$} &
591: \colhead{Epoch} &
592: \colhead{$\langle K \rangle$} &
593: \colhead{$\sigma_K$} &
594: \colhead{Type} \\
595: \colhead{} &
596: \colhead{days} &
597: \colhead{HJD} &
598: \colhead{mag} &
599: \colhead{mag} &
600: \colhead{}
601: }
602: \startdata
603: 4 & $-0.45195$ & 2448206.006 & 18.058 & 0.017 & c \\
604: 7 & $-0.20853$ & 2448206.070 & 17.824 & 0.015 & ab \\
605: 25 & $-0.29657$ & 2448206.125 & 18.020 & 0.018 & ab \\
606: 35 & $-0.27164$ & 2448206.285 & 17.963 & 0.015 & ab \\
607: 36 & $-0.48161$ & 2448206.220 & 18.170 & 0.018 & c \\
608: 37 & $-0.29401$ & 2448206.010 & 18.003 & 0.016 & ab \\
609: 38 & $-0.29043$ & 2448206.968 & 18.001 & 0.020 & ab \\
610: 41 & $-0.45157$ & 2448206.150 & 18.055 & 0.017 & d \\
611: 49 & $-0.28158$ & 2448206.708 & 17.958 & 0.017 & ab \\
612: 57 & $-0.28938$ & 2448206.055 & 17.933 & 0.017 & ab \\
613: 64 & $-0.28918$ & 2448206.250 & 17.983 & 0.018 & ab \\
614: 67 & $-0.18245$ & 2448206.515 & 17.746 & 0.014 & ab \\
615: 72 & $-0.45073$ & 2448206.070 & 18.060 & 0.018 & d \\
616: 77 & $-0.45276$ & 2448206.258 & 18.061 & 0.019 & c \\
617: 80 & $-0.24272$ & 2448206.295 & 17.888 & 0.015 & ab \\
618: 97 & $-0.22529$ & 2448206.245 & 17.827 & 0.016 & ab \\
619: 98 & $-0.44894$ & 2448206.000 & 18.077 & 0.018 & d \\
620: 99 & $-0.21497$ & 2448206.535 & 17.785 & 0.014 & ab \\
621: 100 & $-0.23162$ & 2448206.360 & 17.835 & 0.016 & ab \\
622: 108 & $-0.32917$ & 2448206.100 & 18.062 & 0.016 & ab \\
623: 110 & $-0.45906$ & 2448206.100 & 18.031 & 0.017 & d \\
624: 112 & $-0.25124$ & 2448206.250 & 17.863 & 0.019 & ab \\
625: 117 & $-0.29205$ & 2448206.245 & 17.930 & 0.017 & ab \\
626: 135 & $-0.19047$ & 2448206.510 & 17.783 & 0.014 & ab \\
627: 137 & $-0.26363$ & 2448206.455 & 17.954 & 0.016 & ab \\
628: 142 & $-0.24504$ & 2448206.200 & 17.910 & 0.018 & ab \\
629: 145 & $-0.21988$ & 2448206.338 & 17.786 & 0.018 & ab \\
630: 146 & $-0.31439$ & 2448206.044 & 18.035 & 0.019 & ab \\
631: 151 & $-0.49493$ & 2448206.134 & 18.108 & 0.019 & c \\
632: 181 & $-0.52832$ & 2448206.122 & 18.209 & 0.018 & c \\
633: \enddata
634: \end{deluxetable}
635: %\end{tabular}
636: %\end{center}
637: %\end{table}
638:
639: \clearpage
640: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
641: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccc}
642: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
643: \tablecaption{Comparison of distance moduli based on RR Lyrae stars for
644: different GGCs.\label{tab2}}
645: \tablewidth{0pt}
646: \tablehead{
647: \colhead{ID} &
648: \colhead{$[Fe/H]^a$} &
649: \colhead{$E(B-V)^b$} &
650: \colhead{$\langle V \rangle^c$} &
651: \colhead{$\sigma_V$} &
652: \colhead{$\mu_0^V(BW)^d$} &
653: \colhead{$\mu_0^V(FOBE)^e$} &
654: \colhead{$(\mu_0^K)^f$} &
655: \colhead{$\Delta\mu_0^g$} &
656: \colhead{$\Delta\mu_0^h$}
657: }
658: \startdata
659: NGC~5139~~$\omega$ Cen&-1.62&0.12& 14.57&0.12&$13.57\pm0.16$&\ldots\ldots &$13.77\pm0.04$& 0.20 & \ldots\\
660: NGC~5272~~M~3 &-1.57&0.01& 15.61&0.12&$14.94\pm0.16$&$14.97\pm0.07$&$15.15\pm0.06$& 0.21 & 0.18\\
661: NGC~5904~~M~5 &-1.27&0.03& 15.06&0.08&$14.26\pm0.13$&$14.28\pm0.07$&$14.37\pm0.09$& 0.11 & 0.09\\
662: NGC~7078~~M~15 &-2.26&0.10& 15.82&0.08&$15.01\pm0.13$&$15.17\pm0.07$&$15.32\pm0.10$& 0.30 & 0.15\\
663: \enddata
664: \tablenotetext{a}{Mean cluster metallicity according to Harris (1996).\\
665: \hspace*{2.5mm} $^b$Cluster reddening according to Harris (1996).\\
666: \hspace*{2.5mm} $^c$Mean visual magnitude according to: $\omega$ Cen, Olech
667: et al. (2003); M~3, Corwin \& Carney (2001); M~5, Caputo et al. (1999);
668: M~15, Silbermann, \& Smith (1995).\\
669: \hspace*{2.5mm} $^d$Distance moduli based on the Baade-Wesselink calibration
670: provided by Fernley (1994).\\
671: \hspace*{2.5mm} $^e$Distance moduli based on First Overtone Blue Edge method
672: suggested by Caputo et al. (2000).\\
673: \hspace*{2.5mm} $^f$Distance moduli based on K-band mean magnitudes for RR
674: Lyrae stars collected by L90 and the semi-empirical relation derived by B03.\\
675: \hspace*{2.5mm} $^g$Difference in distance moduli between the $PLZ_K$ relation
676: and the BW method.\\
677: \hspace*{2.5mm} $^h$Difference in distance moduli between the $PLZ_K$ relation
678: and the FOBE method.}
679:
680: \end{deluxetable}
681:
682: %% If you use the table environment, please indicate horizontal rules using
683: %% \tableline, not \hline.
684: %% Do not put multiple tabular environments within a single table.
685: %% The optional \label should appear inside the \caption command.
686:
687:
688: \end{document}
689:
690: %%
691: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
692: