1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{amsmath}
3:
4: \usepackage{epsf}
5:
6: \shortauthors{Zucker et al.}
7: \shorttitle{Andromeda IX}
8:
9: \newcommand{\nd}{\nodata}
10: \newcommand{\ha}{{\rm H$\alpha$ }}
11: \newcommand{\hb}{{\rm H$\beta$ }}
12: \newcommand{\hbns}{{\rm H$\beta$}}
13: \newcommand{\hahb}{{\rm H$\alpha$/H$\beta$ }}
14: \newcommand{\hahbns}{{\rm H$\alpha$/H$\beta$}}
15: \newcommand{\hi}{{\rm H{\sc i} }}
16: \newcommand{\mol}{{\rm H$_2$ }}
17: \newcommand{\hans}{{\rm H$\alpha$}}
18: \newcommand{\hii}{{\rm H\,{\sc ii} }}
19: \newcommand{\hiins}{{\rm H\,{\sc ii}}}
20: \newcommand{\msun}{${\rm M_{\sun}}$}
21: \newcommand{\peg}{{\sc P\'egase }}
22: \newcommand{\combo}{{\sc combo-17 }}
23:
24: %%\slugcomment{{\sc Submitted to ApJ Letters: } 13 April 2004 }
25:
26: \begin{document}
27:
28:
29: \title{Andromeda IX: A New Dwarf Spheroidal Satellite of M31}
30:
31: \author{Daniel B.\ Zucker\altaffilmark{1,10},
32: Alexei Y.\ Kniazev\altaffilmark{1}, Eric F.\ Bell\altaffilmark{1},
33: David Mart\'{i}nez-Delgado\altaffilmark{1}, Eva K.\
34: Grebel\altaffilmark{1,2}, Hans-Walter Rix\altaffilmark{1}, Constance
35: M.\ Rockosi\altaffilmark{3}, Jon A.\ Holtzman\altaffilmark{4}, Rene
36: A.\ M.\ Walterbos\altaffilmark{4}, James Annis\altaffilmark{5}, Donald
37: G. York\altaffilmark{6},
38: \v{Z}eljko Ivezi\'{c}\altaffilmark{7}, J.~Brinkmann\altaffilmark{8},
39: Howard Brewington\altaffilmark{8}, Michael Harvanek\altaffilmark{8},
40: Greg Hennessy\altaffilmark{9}, S.\ J.\ Kleinman\altaffilmark{8}, Jurek Krzesinski\altaffilmark{8}, Dan Long\altaffilmark{8}, Peter~R.~Newman\altaffilmark{8}, Atsuko Nitta\altaffilmark{8}, Stephanie A.\ Snedden\altaffilmark{8}}
41:
42: \altaffiltext{1}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astronomie,
43: K\"onigstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany; \texttt{zucker@mpia.de}}
44: \altaffiltext{2}{Astronomisches Institut, Universit\"{a}t Basel, Venusstrasse 7,CH-4102 Binningen, Switzerland}
45: \altaffiltext{3}{Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 351580,
46: Seattle WA 98195-1580}
47: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy, New Mexico State University,
48: 1320 Frenger Mall, Las Cruces NM 88003-8001}
49: \altaffiltext{5}{Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500,
50: Batavia, IL 60510}
51: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637}
52: \altaffiltext{7}{Princeton University Observatory
53: Princeton, NJ 08544}
54: \altaffiltext{8}{Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59, Sunspot, NM
55: 88349}
56: \altaffiltext{9}{US Naval Observatory, 3450 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20392-5420}
57: \altaffiltext{10}{Guest Investigator of the UK Astronomy Data Centre}
58:
59:
60: \begin{abstract}
61:
62: We report the discovery of a new dwarf spheroidal satellite of M31,
63: Andromeda IX, based on resolved stellar photometry from the Sloan
64: Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). Using both SDSS and public archival data
65: we have estimated its distance and other physical properties, and
66: compared these to the properties of a previously known dwarf
67: spheroidal companion, Andromeda V, also observed by SDSS.
68: Andromeda IX is the lowest surface brightness galaxy
69: found to date ($\mu_{V,0} \sim 26.8\, {\rm mag~arcsec}^{-2}$), and at the
70: distance we estimate from the position of the tip of Andromeda IX's
71: red giant branch, $(m - M)_0 \sim 24.5$ (805 kpc), Andromeda IX would
72: also be the
73: faintest galaxy known ($M_V \sim -8.3$).
74:
75: \end{abstract}
76:
77: \keywords{galaxies: dwarf --- galaxies: individual (Andromeda V) --- galaxies:
78: individual (Andromeda IX) --- galaxies: evolution --- Local Group}
79:
80: \section{Introduction}
81: \label{txt:intro}
82:
83: Hierarchical cold dark matter (CDM) models, while successful at large
84: scales,
85: predict too many low-mass dark subhalos to be
86: consistent with the observed abundance of dwarf galaxies, by at least 1 -- 2 orders of magnitude
87: \citep[e.g.,][]{klyp99,moor99,bens02b}.
88: This problem can be at least qualitatively addressed if star formation in low mass
89: subsystems were inhibited, for example by photoionization
90: in the early universe; this could lead to galaxy luminosity functions with shallow faint-end slopes
91: at the present day \citep[e.g.,][]{some02,bens02a}, with observed
92: satellites embedded in much larger, more massive dark subhalos \citep{stoe02}.
93:
94:
95: Observational efforts to constrain the form of the
96: luminosity function for faint galaxies are hindered by the extremely low surface
97: brightnesses expected of such galaxies \citep[$\mu_{V} \gtrsim 26\, {\rm
98: mag~arcsec}^{-2}$, e.g.,][]{cald99,bens02b}.
99: Conducting a comprehensive ground-based survey for such diffuse
100: objects would be extremely difficult even in nearby galaxy groups.
101: Fortunately, in the case of the Local Group (LG), galaxies can be
102: resolved into stars, allowing one to reach much fainter limits
103: \citep[e.g.,][]{ferg02} and potentially place strong constraints on
104: both the LG luminosity function and galactic formation models.
105:
106:
107: In this letter, we report the discovery, using resolved stellar data from the Sloan Digital Sky
108: Survey (SDSS), of a new dwarf spheroidal
109: companion to M31, one which is the lowest luminosity, lowest surface brightness
110: galaxy found to date.
111: For this work, we have assumed a distance
112: to M31 of 760\,kpc \citep[$(m - M)_0 = 24.4$;][]{vand99}.
113:
114:
115: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
116: \label{txt:obsdata}
117:
118: SDSS \citep{york00} is an imaging and spectroscopic
119: survey that will eventually cover $\sim 1/4$
120: of the sky.
121: Drift-scan imaging in the five SDSS bandpasses ($u,g,r,i,z$)
122: \citep{fuku96,gunn98,hogg01} is processed through data reduction pipelines
123: to measure photometric and astrometric properties
124: \citep{lupt02, stou02, smit02, pier03} and
125: to identify targets for spectroscopic followup. For this work, we used
126: an SDSS scan along the major axis of M31, carried out on 5 October
127: 2002 \citep[see][]{zuck04a} and processed with the same pipeline as Data Release 1 (DR1)
128: \citep{abaz03}.
129: In the
130: following, all references
131: to dereddening and conversion from the SDSS magnitudes to
132: $V,I$ magnitudes (for literature comparison) make use of \citet*{schl98} and
133: \citet{smit02}, respectively.
134:
135: This scan
136: also included
137: Andromeda V \citep[And V;][]{arma98}, a
138: known dwarf spheroidal (dSph) companion to M31;
139: applying a simple photometric filter to the SDSS data,
140: namely selecting all stars with $i > 20.5$, reveals the presence
141: of And V (Fig.\ref{fig:sdssimgs}a), even though it
142: is barely visible in the summed SDSS $g,r,i$ images of the field
143: (Fig.\ref{fig:sdssimgs}c). This same filter
144: yields another overdensity of faint stars (Fig.\ref{fig:sdssimgs}b) much closer to M31 on the sky, although it is not
145: apparent in the summed SDSS
146: image (Fig.\ref{fig:sdssimgs}d). In order to place some constraints on the nature of this stellar
147: overdensity, we compared the color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) of stars in the fields of
148: And V and the new feature. For each object, we chose a circular region
149: of radius $r = 2 \arcmin$, and
150: annuli with $8\arcmin \leq r
151: \leq 10\arcmin$ as control fields for estimating foreground and field
152: star contamination.
153: Fig. \ref{fig:sdsscmds} shows the resulting Hess
154: diagrams of And V and the stellar feature (top panels), the control
155: fields, scaled by the area ratio of target and control fields (middle
156: panels), and the difference of the two
157: (bottom panels). The fact that
158: the red giant branch (RGB) in the new object extends to fainter magnitudes than that of
159: And V is explained by the significant differences in seeing ($\sim 1\farcs3$
160: vs. $\sim 1\farcs9$ in $i$-band)
161: and the consequent differences in completeness near the
162: faint
163: detection limit.
164: RGB
165: fiducials for Galactic globular clusters spanning a wide range of
166: metallicities
167: are overplotted.
168: The similarity between the two bottom
169: panels is striking, as both And V and the new stellar structure show
170: rather narrow, blue RGBs. While individual photometric errors and
171: uncertainties in the transformations between $g,r,i$ and $V,I$
172: photometric systems do not allow us to assign a specific metallicity
173: to either object, the blue color is significant; And V has a
174: metallicity of [Fe/H]$\lesssim -2$ \citep{davi02,guha00}, and the RGB color of the
175: new feature suggests a comparably low metallicity.
176:
177:
178:
179:
180: \begin{figure}[th]
181: \epsscale{1.0}
182: \plotone{./f1.eps}
183: \caption{\label{fig:sdssimgs}
184: And V and And IX as seen by SDSS:
185: {\it Top:} The spatial distribution of all SDSS stars with $i > 20.5$
186: in the fields of And V ({\it a}) and And IX ({\it b}). The data in both panels were binned $30\arcsec \times 30 \arcsec$ and smoothed with a Gaussian (FWHM$ = 1\arcmin$).
187: {\it Bottom:} Combined $g$, $r$ and $i$ SDSS images of And V ({\it c})
188: and And IX ({\it d}). Each panel spans $14\arcmin \times 14 \arcmin$ and
189: is oriented with north up and east to the left.}
190: \end{figure}
191:
192: \begin{figure}[th]
193: \epsscale{0.75}
194: \plotone{./f2.eps}
195: \caption{\label{fig:sdsscmds}
196: Hess diagrams of And V ({\it left}) and And IX ({\it right}) from SDSS
197: Data: {\it Top}:
198: Stars within a
199: $2\arcmin$ radius of the center of each galaxy. {\it Middle}:
200: The control field for each galaxy (an annulus spanning
201: $8\arcmin$ to $10 \arcmin$ from each galaxy center). {\it Bottom}:
202: Hess diagrams for each galaxy, minus the control field Hess diagram (scaled
203: by the ratio of areas).
204: Data are dereddened, converted to $V,I$, binned by $0.25$ in $I$
205: and $V - I$, and smoothed with a Gaussian filter. The number of stars
206: in each bin is indicated by the grayscale to the right of each pair of
207: panels.
208: Fiducial sequences are overplotted
209: for Galactic globular clusters with metallicities of (left to right) [Fe/H] = $-2.2$ (M15),
210: $-1.6$ (M2), $-0.7$ (47~Tuc), and $-0.3$ (NGC~6553) \citep{daco90,
211: saga99}, shifted to the adopted M31 distance modulus of 24.4; for
212: NGC~6553, a distance modulus of 13.7 and a reddening of $E(V - I) =
213: 0.95$ were assumed \citep{saga99}. }
214: \end{figure}
215:
216:
217:
218: \section{A New Companion of M31}
219:
220: The stars in this new overdensity exhibit magnitudes and colors
221: consistent with their being near the tip of the RGB (TRGB), at approximately
222: the distance of M31 and its satellites. Their CMD is distinct from the
223: surrounding field (cf. Fig. \ref{fig:sdsscmds}), and is in fact rather
224: similar to that of And V, the known dSph satellite of M31 referred to
225: above; the similar angular size and extremely low surface brightness
226: are further indications that this structure is also a dSph galaxy.
227: Following the
228: nomenclature of \citet{vand72}, and in light of the recently proposed
229: Andromeda VIII \citep{morr03}, we have named the new object
230: Andromeda IX (And IX).
231:
232: We applied the methodology of \citet{knia04} to the SDSS data; briefly, this entailed masking foreground stars and background
233: galaxies and subtracting a fitted sky level prior to measuring
234: integrated fluxes and central surface brightnesses.
235: The properties of And V derived in this way are shown in the first
236: column of Table\,\ref{tbl:pars}; \citet{cald99} found a central
237: surface brightness $\mu_{0,V} = 24.8 \pm 0.2$ and an integrated
238: magnitude $V_{tot} = 15.42 \pm 0.14$ for And V, both in good agreement with our
239: results.
240: However, owing to And IX's extremely low surface brightness, no
241: unresolved luminous component was detected in the SDSS
242: data. Consequently we used the data for And V (in which unresolved
243: luminosity could be quantified) to estimate corrections for And IX
244: surface brightness measurements based on resolved stars alone:
245: 3\fm1$\pm$0\fm2, 2\fm6$\pm$0\fm2 and 2\fm3$\pm$0\fm2 for $g$, $r$ and
246: $i$ bands, respectively. These values are
247: consistent with those derived in \citet{zuck04a} from observations of
248: the Pegasus dwarf irregular and the Draco dSph.
249: Applying these corrections to the resolved-star surface brightness
250: profile calculated for And IX, we obtained dereddened central surface
251: brightnesses of
252: 27.0$\pm$0\fm5, 26.1$\pm$0\fm5 and 25.8$\pm$0\fm3
253: mag arcsec$^{-2}$ in $g,r,i$ (26.3$\pm$0.5 in $V$, second column of Table\,\ref{tbl:pars}). Unfortunately, the small number of
254: stars detected in And IX (an excess of $\sim 60$ stars above the mean
255: field density in a $2\arcmin$-radius region) made it impossible to
256: reliably measure an integrated magnitude for And IX from the SDSS data.
257:
258:
259:
260: \begin{figure}[th]
261: \epsscale{1.0}
262: \plotone{./f3.eps}
263: \caption{\label{fig:intdata} And IX as seen by the INT: {\it Left}: An 800s
264: archival $V$-band image, covering $7\arcmin \times 7\arcmin$. {\it
265: Right}: A dereddened, control-field-subtracted Hess diagram of And IX.
266: The dashed lines
267: indicate the limits of the color-magnitude region selected from both
268: SDSS and INT data for analysis of the $I$-band luminosity function
269: (see Fig. \ref{fig:lumfuncs}); the crosses show typical photometric
270: errors for stars over a range of $I$-band magnitudes.
271: Binning, smoothing, and the overplotted fiducials are the same as for
272: Fig. \ref{fig:sdsscmds}. The grayscale indicates the number of stars
273: in each bin.}
274: \end{figure}
275:
276: \begin{figure}[th]
277: \epsscale{0.75}
278: \plotone{f4.eps}
279: \caption{\label{fig:lumfuncs} $I$-Band Luminosity Functions for And V
280: and And IX:
281: {\it Top}: Cumulative $I$-band luminosity function for SDSS stars within a $2\arcmin$ radius of the center of And V
282: (black solid line), the scaled cumulative $I$-band luminosity function for the
283: corresponding control field (black dotted line), and the difference of
284: the two (gray solid line). The arrow indicates the presumed location of the TRGB, $I = 20.55$.
285: {\it Middle}: The same as in the top panel, but for SDSS stars within
286: a $2\arcmin$ radius of the center of And IX.
287: {\it Bottom}: The same as in the top panel, but for INT stars within a
288: $2\arcmin$ radius of the center of And IX. The arrow indicates the presumed location of the TRGB, $I = 20.50$. All luminosity functions --
289: for both target and control fields -- are for dereddened stars falling in the
290: color-magnitude region illustrated in the lower panel of
291: Fig. \ref{fig:intdata}.
292: }
293: \end{figure}
294:
295:
296: In order to learn more about And IX, we
297: analyzed
298: two images covering the region of the galaxy from the ING
299: Archive. These images, 800s exposures in $V$ and $i\arcmin$ filters,
300: were taken with the 2.5m Isaac Newton Telescope (INT)
301: on La Palma. The INT images
302: are significantly deeper than those from SDSS;
303: in fact, And IX is readily visible in the INT
304: $V$-band image (Fig. \ref{fig:intdata}, left panel).
305: We reduced the data using standard {\tt
306: IRAF} tasks, obtained stellar photometry with DAOPhot \citep{stet94}, used our SDSS data to
307: bootstrap-calibrate this photometry to $V$ and $I$ magnitudes, and
308: dereddened the photometric data.
309:
310:
311: We then generated Hess diagrams for stars from the same
312: $2\arcmin$-radius region around the center of And IX as for the SDSS data, and from a nearby
313: $11\arcmin \times 11\arcmin$ control field, scaling the control field diagram by the area ratio of
314: target and control fields. The right panel of
315: Fig. \ref{fig:intdata} shows the
316: difference of these two Hess
317: diagrams.
318: As in
319: Fig. \ref{fig:sdsscmds}, the control-field-subtracted Hess diagram for
320: And IX generated from the INT data reveals a narrow, blue RGB,
321: confirming that the observed stellar population of
322: And IX is distinct from that of the projected field and
323: quite metal poor ([Fe/H] $\lesssim -2$).
324:
325: The deeper INT images also provided better stellar number statistics and
326: allowed us to directly measure the unresolved luminosity of And
327: IX. Applying the same techniques as for the SDSS data, we determined the physical parameters listed in the third
328: column of Table~\ref{tbl:pars}.
329: As a check on this method, we also tried psf-subtracting (rather than
330: masking) foreground
331: stars from the archival images before measuring physical parameters,
332: but the results differed by $\lesssim 0.05$\, mag from our initial
333: estimates (i.e., within the quoted measurement errors).
334: Of particular note are the dereddened
335: values for the central surface brightness, $\mu_{0,V} = 26.77 \pm
336: 0.09$, and the integrated magnitude, $V_{tot} = 16.17 \pm 0.06$; not only do they
337: confirm And IX as the lowest surface brightness galaxy found to date,
338: but, at the distance of M31,
339: And IX
340: would also be the lowest luminosity galaxy known.
341:
342:
343: The true distance to And IX is thus of considerable importance. One
344: method of measuring the distance to resolved, metal-poor galaxies like
345: And IX is by determining the magnitude of the TRGB \citep[e.g.,][]{lee93}.
346: We generated cumulative dereddened $I$-band luminosity functions for stars within the central
347: $2\arcmin$ radius of And V and And IX,
348: selecting only stars
349: from the
350: color-magnitude region shown by the dashed lines in the right panel
351: of Fig. \ref{fig:intdata}. We did the same for the respective
352: control fields, scaling
353: by the
354: ratio of target and control field areas, and then subtracted the
355: appropriate control field luminosity function from that of each
356: galaxy
357: (Fig. \ref{fig:lumfuncs}).
358: The field-star-subtracted luminosity
359: function begins to rise significantly
360: at $I \sim 20.55\pm 0.15$ in And V and
361: $I \sim 20.50\pm 0.15$ in And IX, which we interpret as the TRGB in
362: each galaxy.
363: Assuming metallicities of [Fe/H]$ =
364: -2.2$ and TRGB colors of $(V - I)_{TRGB} = 1.2$ for both galaxies, we
365: applied the empirical formulae of \citet{daco90} to
366: derive a calibration for the TRGB distance: $(m - M)_0 =
367: I_{TRGB} + 3.98$. Thus we calculate And IX's distance modulus to be $\sim
368: 24.48$ (790 kpc), with errors on the order of $0\fm2\, (\sim \pm 70\,{\rm
369: kpc})$. While this is a somewhat crude estimate, it is worth
370: noting that our distance to And V,
371: $(m - M)_0 \sim
372: 24.53$ (805 kpc) is in excellent agreement with that obtained by \citet{arma98},
373: $24.55$ (810 kpc).
374: The angular separation of And IX from the center of M31 is
375: $\sim 2\fdg6$, which at an M31 distance of 760 kpc
376: translates to a projected separation of 34 kpc; assuming that And IX
377: is some 30 kpc more distant than M31 places And IX at 45 kpc from the
378: center of M31. Thus, barring an improbably high relative velocity, And
379: IX is a bound satellite of M31.
380: At a distance modulus of $24.48$, the dereddened integrated magnitude
381: $V_{tot} = 16.17$
382: translates to an absolute magnitude of $M_V
383: \sim -8.3$, making And IX $0\fm6$ (a factor of 1.7) fainter than
384: the least luminous galaxy known, the Ursa Minor dSph \citep{kley98}.
385:
386: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
387: \tabletypesize{\small}
388: \tablecaption{Properties of And V and And IX \label{tbl:pars}}
389: \tablewidth{0pt}
390: \tablehead{
391: \colhead{Parameter\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{And V} &
392: \colhead{And IX$_{\rm SDSS}$} & \colhead{And IX$_{\rm INT}$}
393: }
394: \startdata
395: R.A.(J2000.0) & ~~01 10 16.2 & ~~00 52 53.0 & ~~00 52
396: 52.8 \\
397: DEC.(J2000.0) & $+$47 37 52 & $+$43 11 45 & $+$43 12
398: 00 \\
399: A$_{\rm V}$ & 0\fm41 & 0\fm26 & 0\fm26
400: \\
401: $\mu_{\rm 0,V}$ & $25\fm02 \pm 0\fm11$ & $26\fm3 \pm
402: 0.5$ & $26\fm77 \pm 0\fm09$ \\
403: V$_{\rm tot}$ & $15\fm32 \pm 0\fm06$ & \nodata &
404: $16\fm17 \pm 0\fm06$ \\
405: (m$-$M)$_0$ & $24\fm53 \pm 0\fm20$ & \nodata &
406: $24\fm48 \pm 0\fm20$ \\
407: M$_{\rm tot,V}$ & $-9\fm2$ & \nodata
408: & $-8\fm3$
409:
410: \enddata
411:
412: \tablenotetext{a}{Surface brightnesses and integrated magnitudes are corrected for the mean
413: galactic foreground reddenings, A$_{\rm V}$, shown.}
414:
415:
416: \end{deluxetable}
417:
418: \section{Discussion}
419:
420: And IX is the lowest surface brightness,
421: lowest luminosity galaxy found to date, with a metallicity comparable
422: to the least chemically-evolved stellar systems in the LG; its
423: distance from the center of M31, $\sim 45$ kpc, places it well within,
424: e.g.,
425: the virial radius (272 kpc) assumed by \citet{bens02b} in their
426: models, indicating that it is in all likelihood a satellite of
427: that galaxy.
428: At an absolute magnitude of $M_V \sim -8.3$ ($\sim 2 \times 10^5$
429: L$_{\odot}$), And IX is comparable in luminosity to many globular
430: clusters, although two orders of magnitude larger ($r
431: \gtrsim 500 {\rm pc}$) .
432:
433:
434: Given that current hierarchical CDM models for galaxy formation still
435: generate a satellite galaxy luminosity function which rises at low luminosities
436: (albeit with a shallower slope than some earlier models), the discovery of And IX
437: raises some interesting questions. Is And IX a rarity, one of a small
438: number of such extremely low luminosity galaxies in the LG,
439: with the vast majority of the predicted large numbers of low mass
440: subhalos surviving only as dark matter? Or could And IX be the tip of
441: the iceberg, representative of a large population of low luminosity
442: dwarf satellites that have remained undetected
443: because of their extremely low surface brightnesses
444: \citep[e.g.,][]{bens02b}?
445:
446:
447: The discovery of And IX \citep[like that of And NE,][]{zuck04a} also highlights the capabilities of large-scale imaging
448: surveys with uniform photometry, like SDSS, for detecting incredibly
449: diffuse stellar structures in the LG using their resolved
450: stellar components \citep[see][for a detailed discussion]{will02}. If
451: And IX is but one of a large population of extremely faint M31
452: satellites, it is quite
453: likely that further analysis of the SDSS data
454: will yield more such objects, bringing the observed galaxy luminosity
455: function into better agreement with model predictions.
456:
457:
458:
459: \acknowledgements
460:
461:
462: DBZ acknowledges support from a National Science Foundation International Postdoctoral Fellowship.
463: EFB acknowledges the financial support provided through the European
464: Community's Human Potential Program under contract
465: HPRN-CT-2002-00316, SISCO. This research has made use of data from the ING archive.
466:
467: Funding for the creation and distribution of the SDSS Archive has been
468: provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating
469: Institutions, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the
470: National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the
471: Japanese Monbukagakusho, and the Max Planck Society. The SDSS Web
472: site is (\texttt{http://www.sdss.org/}).
473:
474: The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium (ARC) for the
475: Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are The University
476: of Chicago, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation
477: Group, The Johns Hopkins University, Los Alamos National Laboratory, the
478: Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute for
479: Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, University of Pittsburgh,
480: Princeton University, the United States Naval Observatory, and
481: the University of Washington.
482:
483:
484:
485: \begin{thebibliography}{}
486:
487: \bibitem[Abazajian et al.(2003)]{abaz03}
488: Abazajian, K., et al. 2003, \aj, 126, 2081
489:
490: \bibitem[Armandroff et al.(1998) Armandroff, Davies \& Jacoby]{arma98}
491: Armandroff, T.E., Davies, J.E., \& Jacoby, G.H. 1998, \aj, 116,
492: 2287
493:
494:
495:
496: \bibitem[Benson et al.(2002a)]{bens02a} Benson, A.~J., Lacey,
497: C.~G., Baugh, C.~M., Cole, S., \& Frenk, C.~S.\ 2002a, \mnras, 333, 156
498:
499: \bibitem[Benson et al.(2002b)]{bens02b} Benson, A.~J., Frenk,
500: C.~S., Lacey, C.~G., Baugh, C.~M., \& Cole, S.\ 2002b, \mnras, 333, 177
501:
502:
503: \bibitem[Caldwell(1999)]{cald99}
504: Caldwell, N. 1999, \aj, 118, 1230
505:
506: \bibitem[Davidge et al.(2002)]{davi02}
507: Davidge et al. 2002, \aj, 124, 886
508:
509: \bibitem[Da Costa \& Armandroff(1990)]{daco90}
510: Da Costa, G.\ S., \& Armandroff, T.\ E. 1990, \aj, 100, 162
511:
512: \bibitem[Ferguson et al.(2002)]{ferg02}
513: Ferguson, A.\ M.\ N., Irwin, M.\ J., Ibata, R.\ A., Lewis, G.\ F., \&
514: Tanvir, N.\ R. 2002, \aj, 124, 1452
515:
516: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(1996)]{fuku96}
517: Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J.\ E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., \&
518: Schneider, D. P. 1996, \aj, 111, 1748
519:
520: \bibitem[Guhathakurta, Reitzel, \& Grebel(2000)]{guha00}
521: Guhathakurta, P., Reitzel, D.~B., \& Grebel, E.~K.\ 2000, \procspie, 4005,
522: 168
523:
524:
525: \bibitem[Gunn et al.\ (1998)]{gunn98} Gunn, J.E. et al. 1998, \aj, 116, 3040
526:
527:
528: \bibitem[Hogg et al.(2001)]{hogg01}
529: Hogg, D.W., Finkbeiner, D.P., Schlegel, D.J., and Gunn, J.E. 2001,
530: \aj, 122, 2129
531:
532:
533: \bibitem[King(1966)]{king66} King, I.~R.\ 1966, \aj, 71, 64
534:
535:
536: \bibitem[Kniazev et al.(2004)]{knia04}
537: Kniazev, A.\ Y., Grebel, E.\ K., Pustilnik, S.\ A., Pramskij, A.\ G.,
538: Kniazeva, T.\ F., Prada, F., \& Harbeck, D. 2004, \aj, 127, 704
539:
540: \bibitem[Kleyna et al.(1998)]{kley98}
541: Kleyna, J.\ T., Geller, M.\ J.,
542: Kenyon, S.\ J., Kurtz, M.\ J., \& Thorstensen, J.\ R. 1998, \aj,
543: 115, 2359
544:
545:
546: \bibitem[Klypin et al.(1999)]{klyp99}
547: Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A.\ V., Valenzuela, O., \& Prada, F. 1999, \apj, 522, 82
548:
549:
550: \bibitem[Lee, Freedman, \& Madore(1993)]{lee93} Lee, M.~G.,
551: Freedman, W.~L., \& Madore, B.~F.\ 1993, \apj, 417, 553
552:
553:
554: \bibitem[Lupton et al.(2002)]{lupt02} Lupton, R.\ H., Ivezic, Z.,
555: Gunn, J.\ E., Knapp, G., Strauss, M.\ A., \& Yasuda, N.\ 2002,
556: \procspie, 4836, 350
557:
558:
559: \bibitem[Moore et al.(1999)]{moor99}
560: Moore, B., Ghigna, S., Governato, F., Lake, G., Quinn, T., Stadel, J., \& Tozzi, P. 1999, \apjl, 524, 19
561:
562: \bibitem[Morrison et al.(2003)]{morr03}
563: Morrison, H.\ L., Harding, P., Hurley-Keller, D., \& Jacoby, G.
564: 2003, \apj, 596, L183
565:
566:
567: \bibitem[Pier et al.(2003)]{pier03}
568: Pier, J.R., Munn, J.A., Hindsley, R.B, Hennessy, G.S., Kent, S.M.,
569: Lupton, R.H., \& Ivezic, Z. 2003, \aj, 125, 1559
570:
571:
572: \bibitem[Sagar et al.(1999)]{saga99}
573: Sagar, R., Subramaniam, A., Richtler, T., \&
574: Grebel, E.\ K. 1999, \aaps, 135, 391
575:
576:
577: \bibitem[Schlegel et al.(1998)Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis]{schl98} Schlegel, D.\ J.,
578: Finkbeiner, D.\ P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525
579:
580: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2002)]{smit02}
581: Smith, J.A. et al. 2002, \aj, 123, 2121
582:
583: \bibitem[Somerville(2002)]{some02} Somerville, R.~S.\ 2002,
584: \apjl, 572, L23
585:
586: \bibitem[Stetson(1994)]{stet94} Stetson, P.~B.\ 1994, \pasp,
587: 106, 250
588:
589:
590:
591:
592: \bibitem[Stoehr et al.(2002)]{stoe02}
593: Stoehr, F., White, S.~D.~M., Tormen, G., \& Springel, V.\ 2002, \mnras,
594: 335, L84
595:
596:
597:
598: \bibitem[Stoughton et al.(2002)]{stou02}
599: Stoughton, C. et al. 2002, \aj, 123, 485
600:
601:
602: \bibitem[van den Bergh(1972)]{vand72}
603: van den Bergh, S. 1972, \apj, 171, L31
604:
605: \bibitem[van den Bergh(1999)]{vand99}
606: van den Bergh, S. 1999, \aapr, 9, 273
607:
608: \bibitem[Willman et al.(2002)]{will02} Willman, B.,
609: Dalcanton, J., Ivezi{\' c}, {\v Z}., Jackson, T., Lupton, R.,
610: Brinkmann, J., Hennessy, G., \& Hindsley, R.\
611: 2002, \aj, 123, 848
612:
613:
614: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{york00} York, D.G.
615: et al.\, 2000, \aj, 120, 1579
616:
617: \bibitem[Zucker et al.(2004)]{zuck04a}
618: Zucker et al.\, 2004, submitted to \apj
619:
620: \end{thebibliography}
621:
622:
623:
624: \end{document}
625: