1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \def\kms{\ifmmode{\rm km\thinspace s^{-1}}\else km\thinspace s$^{-1}$\fi}
4: \def\ms{\ifmmode{\rm m\thinspace s^{-1}}\else m\thinspace s$^{-1}$\fi}
5:
6: \shortauthors{Konacki et al.}
7: \shorttitle{OGLE-TR-113}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{A transiting extrasolar giant planet around the star OGLE-TR-113}
12:
13: \author{Maciej Konacki\altaffilmark{1}, Guillermo Torres\altaffilmark{2},
14: Dimitar D. Sasselov\altaffilmark{2}, Grzegorz Pietrzy\'nski\altaffilmark{3,4},
15: Andrzej Udalski\altaffilmark{4}, Saurabh Jha\altaffilmark{5},
16: Maria Teresa Ruiz\altaffilmark{6}, Wolfgang Gieren\altaffilmark{3},
17: and Dante Minniti\altaffilmark{7}}
18:
19: \altaffiltext{1}{California Institute of Technology, Div.\ of
20: Geological \& Planetary Sciences 150-21, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA;
21: e-mail: maciej@gps.caltech.edu}
22:
23: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60
24: Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138}
25:
26: \altaffiltext{3}{Universidad de Concepci\'on, Departamento de F\'\i
27: sica, Astronomy Group, Casilla 160-C, Concepci\'on, Chile}
28:
29: \altaffiltext{4}{Warsaw University Observatory, AL.\ Ujazdowskie 4,
30: 00-478, Warsaw Poland}
31:
32: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Astronomy, University of California,
33: Berkeley, CA 94720, USA}
34:
35: \altaffiltext{6}{Departamento de Astronom\'\i a, Universidad de Chile,
36: Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile}
37:
38: \altaffiltext{7}{Pontificia Universidad Cat\'olica de Chile,
39: Departamento de Astronom\'\i a y Astrof\'\i sica, Casilla 306,
40: Santiago 22, Chile}
41:
42: \begin{abstract}
43: We report the independent discovery of a new extrasolar transiting planet around
44: OGLE-TR-113, a candidate star from the Optical Gravitational Lensing
45: Experiment. Small radial-velocity variations have been detected based
46: on observations conducted with the MIKE spectrograph on the
47: Magellan~I (Baade) telescope at the Las Campanas Observatory (Chile)
48: during 2003. We have also carried out a light-curve analysis
49: incorporating new photometry and realistic physical parameters for the
50: star. OGLE-TR-113b has an orbital period of only 1.43 days, a mass of
51: $1.08\pm0.28$~M$_{\rm Jup}$, and a radius of $1.09\pm0.10$~R$_{\rm
52: Jup}$. Similar parameters have been obtained very recently in an
53: independent study by Bouchy et al., from observations taken a year
54: later. The orbital period of OGLE-TR-113b, and also that of the
55: previously announced planet OGLE-TR-56b ($P_{\rm orb}=1.21$~days)
56: ---the first two found photometrically--- are much shorter than the
57: apparent cutoff of close-in giant planets at 3-4-day periods found
58: from high-precision radial velocities surveys. Along with a third case
59: reported by Bouchy et al.\ (OGLE-TR-132b, $P_{\rm orb} = 1.69$~days),
60: these objects appear to form a new class of ``very hot Jupiters'' that
61: pose very interesting questions for theoretical study.
62:
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65: \keywords{planetary systems --- line: profiles --- stars: evolution
66: --- stars: individual (OGLE-TR-113) --- techniques: radial velocities}
67:
68: \section{Introduction}
69:
70: In recent years the field of extrasolar planet research has seen
71: significant developments in the ability to discover and measure these
72: objects using a variety of techniques. High-precision Doppler searches
73: \citep[e.g.,][]{Fischer:03, Naef:04} have yielded the vast majority of
74: the discoveries, and measurements in at least one case have even been
75: made astrometrically \citep{Benedict:02}. Transit searches had their
76: first success with HD~209458 \citep{Henry:00, Charbonneau:00}, a
77: bright star ($V = 7.65$) that was known previously to harbor a planet
78: in a 3.5-day period orbit from its radial-velocity signature.
79: Numerous photometric programs are monitoring large samples of stars
80: looking for small dips in the brightness of the central object at the
81: $\sim$1\% level \citep[see][]{Horne:03}, which might indicate a
82: planet-size object crossing in front of the star. These studies are
83: very important for the additional information they bring to bear on
84: the nature of the companion, namely, the inclination angle of the
85: orbit ($\sim$90\arcdeg) and the absolute radius of the planet. The
86: inclination angle complements the spectroscopic information and allows
87: a direct determination of the mass.
88:
89: Dozens of transiting planet candidates among faint stars have already
90: been reported by several teams including OGLE \citep{Udalski:02a},
91: EXPLORE \citep{Mallen-Ornelas:03}, MACHO \citep{Drake:04}, and others.
92: Multiple efforts are underway to follow-up on these candidates, a
93: necessary step given the high incidence of false positive detections,
94: particularly among fainter stars in crowded fields. The first case to
95: be confirmed was that of OGLE-TR-56, a star with $V = 16.6$ located in
96: the direction of the Galactic center \citep{Udalski:02b, Konacki:03a,
97: Torres:04}. The very short orbital period of this planet (only
98: 1.21~days) makes it extremely interesting, and has provided theorists
99: the opportunity to explore the effects of strong irradiation from the
100: central star as well as evaporation \citep[e.g.,][]{Burrows:03,
101: Baraffe:03, Baraffe:04}.
102:
103: In this paper we report the detection of a Doppler signature induced
104: by a giant planet orbiting OGLE-TR-113, another faint transit
105: candidate ($I = 14.42$) in the constellation of Carina reported
106: recently by the OGLE project \citep{Udalski:02c}. This star shows
107: periodic dips in brightness of about 3\%, and has a photometric period
108: of 1.43~days. OGLE-TR-113 was originally identified as a very
109: promising candidate from our low-res\-o\-lu\-tion spectroscopic
110: observations conducted in 2002 \citep[see][]{Konacki:03b}. This
111: reconnaissance showed it to be a star of late spectral type with no
112: obvious velocity variations at the level of a few \kms, which would
113: have otherwise disqualified it for implying a stellar
114: companion. Subsequently it was placed on our program for
115: high-resolution follow-up, and the observatios were carried out in
116: early 2003. As this paper was being prepared we learned of a very
117: recent independent detection of radial velocity variations in
118: OGLE-TR-113 by \cite{Bouchy:04}, based on observations taken in 2004.
119: That study found yet another case of a very short-period
120: transiting planet (OGLE-TR-132, $P_{\rm orb} = 1.69$~d), which brings
121: the number of such objects to three. It appears, therefore, that they
122: form a new class of ``very hot Jupiters'' not previously seen in
123: high-precision radial-velocity surveys.
124:
125: \section{Observations and reductions}
126: \label{sec:observations}
127:
128: Our high-resolution spectroscopic observations were carried out with
129: the MIKE spectrograph \citep{Bernstein:03} on the Magellan~I (Baade)
130: telescope at the Las Campanas Observatory in Chile. Seven spectra of
131: OGLE-TR-113 were obtained from February to April of 2003. The
132: resolving power of these observations is $\lambda/\Delta\lambda
133: \approx 54,000$, and the wavelength coverage is from 450 to
134: 725~nm. Only 22 of the 29 echelle orders were used, since the others
135: had low signal or were affected by telluric lines. The average
136: signal-to-noise ratios achieved in our 30--40~minute exposures range
137: from about 15 to 20 per pixel. In addition to OGLE-TR-113 we observed
138: several brighter stars with known planets each night as radial
139: velocity standards. The wavelength reference for all observations was
140: determined from exposures of a hollow-cathode Thorium-Argon lamp taken
141: immediately before and after each stellar exposure.
142:
143: The spectra were reduced using standard tasks in IRAF\footnote{IRAF is
144: distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which is
145: operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy,
146: Inc., under contract with the National Science Foundation.}, as well
147: as rectification tools developed by \cite{Kelson:03}. Radial
148: velocities were obtained by cross-correlation against a calculated
149: template that was tuned to match the star. For OGLE-TR-113 the
150: stellar parameters we determined are $T_{\rm eff} = 4800\pm150$~K,
151: $\log g = 4.5^{+0.5}_{-0.8}$, [Fe/H] $= 0.0^{+0.1}_{-0.3}$,
152: macroturbulent velocity $\zeta_{\rm RT} = 2\pm1$~\kms, and $v \sin i =
153: 9\pm3$~\kms. These were derived by careful comparison of calculated
154: LTE model spectra against features such as the H$\alpha$, H$\beta$,
155: and Na~D lines, in addition to numerous other metal lines, which taken
156: together provide strong constraints on the effective temperature and
157: surface gravity of the star. The parameters for the standards were
158: adopted from detailed analyses in the literature. The velocity
159: results from the different orders were combined for each star, and the
160: scatter between orders was used to derive an estimate of the
161: uncertainty. Instrumental shifts during the night were monitored and
162: corrected for by using telluric lines present in the spectrum. Typical
163: corrections average 100-150~\ms\ with occasionally larger values, and
164: they are found to improve the accuracy of the velocities
165: significantly.
166:
167: The results for one of our standards, $\tau$~Boo (HD~120136), are
168: shown in Figure~\ref{fig:tauboo}. The measured radial velocities are
169: in excellent agreement with the known spectroscopic orbit for this
170: star from \cite{Butler:97}, which has a semi-amplitude of about
171: 470~\ms. The RMS residual from the published orbit is 85~\ms, and the
172: only parameter adjusted to match the observations is a velocity
173: offset. This demonstrates that the instrumental setup allows us to
174: clearly detect small velocity changes at the level of a few hundred
175: \ms.
176:
177: \section{Spectroscopic results}
178: \label{sec:sborbit}
179:
180: Our velocity measurements for OGLE-TR-113 are listed in
181: Table~\ref{tab:rvs} and shown in Figure~\ref{fig:oglervs}. Typical
182: measurement errors are $\sim$100~\ms. We fitted a Keplerian orbit to
183: these observations holding the well-determined period and epoch fixed
184: from the photometry (see \S\ref{sec:lightcurve}), and adjusting only
185: the velocity semi-amplitude ($K$) and the center-of-mass velocity
186: ($\gamma$). A circular orbit was assumed, based on the extremely
187: short orbital period and the likelihood that tidal forces have reduced
188: the eccentricity to zero. We obtained $K = 229 \pm 58$~\ms\ and
189: $\gamma = -7.939 \pm 0.043$~\kms, with an RMS residual from the fit of
190: 108~\ms\ (Table~\ref{tab:results}). The semi-amplitude is significantly
191: different from zero and it is robust. The minimum mass of the companion
192: derived from our best orbital fit is $M_p \sin i = (0.00121 \pm 0.00031)
193: (M_*+M_p)^{2/3}$~M$_{\sun}$, where $M_*$ is the mass of the primary
194: star. Formally our systemic velocity for OGLE-TR-113 agrees very well
195: with the value of $\gamma = -7.944 \pm 0.027$~\kms\ by
196: \cite{Bouchy:04}. For our standard $\tau$~Boo we obtain $\gamma =
197: -16.632 \pm 0.033$~\kms, which also compares favorably with the
198: determination by \cite{Nidever:02} of $-16.542$~\kms, refered to a
199: well-defined velocity system. However, we do not claim here that the
200: accuracy of our zero point is much better than $\sim$100~\ms, partly
201: because of the small number of observations. Nevertheless, the
202: similarity of the systemic velocity we derive for OGLE-TR-113 with
203: that of \cite{Bouchy:04} places at least some constraint on the
204: presence of additional massive planets in wider orbits around the
205: star.
206:
207: Among the phenomena that can mimic the photometric and spectroscopic
208: signatures of transit candidates, the presence of an eclipsing binary
209: along the same line of sight (a ``blend") is one of the most common.
210: Deep eclipses in the binary can be strongly diluted by the main star,
211: and appear with depths of only a few percent that are very similar to
212: those produced by a Jupiter-size planet around a solar-type star.
213: Furthermore, light from one of the stars in the eclipsing binary can
214: contaminate the spectrum of the main star, and introduce line
215: asymmetries that could lead to spurious velocity variations. To
216: examine this possibility we quantified the asymmetries by computing
217: the line bisector spans \citep[see, e.g.,][]{Gray:92}. This was done
218: directly from the cross-correlation function of OGLE-TR-113 co-added
219: over all echelle orders, following \cite{Santos:02} and
220: \cite{Torres:04}. The results are shown as a function of phase in
221: Figure~\ref{fig:bisplot}. Within the errors we detect no significant
222: variation, indicating that line asymmetries cannot be the source of
223: the velocity variations ($\sim$500~\ms, peak to peak) since these two
224: quantities should be of the same order.
225:
226: \section{Light curve solution}
227: \label{sec:lightcurve}
228:
229: The discovery of a transit signature in OGLE-TR-113 was reported by
230: \citep{Udalski:02c}, and was based on observations collected during
231: the 2002 observing season in which 10 transit events were recorded.
232: Since then further measurements spanning two additional seasons have
233: been made (for a total of 1517), and 4 more transits have been
234: detected. We have incorporated these new measurements into our
235: analysis. The internal errors of 0.003~mag, possibly a bit optimistic,
236: were rescaled to 0.006~mag for consistency with the out-of-eclipse
237: variations and also to provide a reduced $\chi^2$ near unity in the
238: light curve solution. The best fit transit model, computed following
239: \cite{Mandel:02}, is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:lcurve} together with
240: the observations. The resulting parameters along with the period and
241: transit epoch, which were adjusted simultaneously, are given in
242: Table~\ref{tab:results}. The improved period and transit epoch are
243: $P_{\rm orb} = 1.4324758 \pm 0.0000046$~days and $T {\rm (HJD)} =
244: 2,\!452,\!325.79823 \pm 0.00082$. The limb-darkening coefficient in
245: the $I$ band (linear law), $u_I = 0.586\pm0.015$, was derived from
246: models consistent with the physical properties of the star.
247:
248: The photometric observations provide strong constraints on the model
249: fit and the $\chi^2$ surface has a well-defined minimum
250: (Figure~\ref{fig:chi2}). The statistical error on the radius of the
251: planet, $R_p$, is only $0.02$~R$_{\rm Jup}$. However, the dominant
252: contribution to the total error in $R_p$ is the uncertainty in the
253: stellar radius, $R_*$. For a fixed stellar mass of $M_* =
254: 0.79$~M$_{\sun}$ the value of $R_*$ ($\sim$0.78~R$_{\sun}$) can be
255: determined to about $\pm$0.02~R$_{\sun}$ from stellar evolution
256: models. But the stellar mass itself is uncertain by
257: $\sim$0.06~M$_{\sun}$, and this propagates directly into $R_*$ because
258: the star must presumably conform to a model isochrone. When this
259: increased error for the stellar radius is accounted for the
260: uncertainty in the planet radius is $R_p = 1.09 \pm 0.10$~R$_{\rm
261: Jup}$. This is larger than the uncertainty reported by
262: \cite{Bouchy:04}, but we believe it is much more realistic.
263:
264: \section{Discussion}
265:
266: From the combination of the spectroscopic and photometric solutions we
267: have derived the key physical parameters of the planet. OGLE-TR-113b
268: has an orbital period of only 1.43 days, a mass of $1.08 \pm
269: 0.28$~M$_{\rm Jup}$, and a radius of $1.09 \pm 0.10$~R$_{\rm Jup}$
270: (Table~\ref{tab:results}). These values are consistent at the
271: 1-$\sigma$ level with the determinations by \cite{Bouchy:04}. Perhaps
272: the most interesting parameter in this case is the very short orbital
273: period. OGLE-TR-56b, OGLE-TR-113b, and also the recently announced
274: OGLE-TR-132b \citep[][$P_{\rm orb} = 1.69$~days]{Bouchy:04} all have
275: orbital periods much shorter than the apparent cutoff of close-in
276: giant planets at around 3-day periods, determined from the radial
277: velocities surveys. Thus, OGLE-TR-56b (the first of these discoveries)
278: can no longer be considered an oddity among the extrasolar planets,
279: and it appears these new cases point toward an extremely interesting
280: new class of ``very hot'' Jupiters.
281:
282: It is worth pointing out that these three short-period planets are the
283: result of just the first two campaigns conducted by the OGLE team, in
284: relatively small fields toward the Galactic center and Carina. If
285: these or similar surveys were to continue producing candidates at the
286: current rate for a period of operation similar to that of the Doppler
287: surveys, it is not unreasonable to expect that the number of very hot
288: Jupiters could increase significantly and even exceed the number of
289: 3-4-day period planets from the radial velocity searches. The
290: \emph{frequency} of occurrence of very hot Jupiters, however, appears
291: to be much lower than that of the shortest-period Doppler planets, as
292: discussed by \cite{Bouchy:04}. Thus, the apparent inconsistency with
293: the lack of any Doppler discoveries having periods as short as those
294: of the OGLE planets may simply be due to a combination of their lower
295: rate of occurrence and the much higher sensitivity to these objects in
296: the photometric surveys. The latter is the result of the relatively
297: short duration of the OGLE photometric campaigns (a few weeks) and the
298: increased probability of transits from geometry, such that the chance
299: of finding longer-period transiting planets actually falls off
300: dramatically beyond $P_{\rm orb}$ of 3-4 days. The extreme conditions
301: of proximity to the parent stars in these very hot Jupiters opens up
302: the possibility of very interesting theoretical studies into their
303: structure and evolution, as well as migration scenarios.
304:
305: \acknowledgements
306:
307: MK\ acknowledges partial support by the Polish Committee for
308: Scientific Research, Grant No.~2P03D~001~22.. GT\ acknowledges
309: support for this work from the NASA's Kepler mission, STScI program
310: GO-9805.02-A, and the Keck PI Data Analysis Fund (JPL 1257943).
311: AU was partly supported by the Polish KBN grant 2P03D02124 and the grant
312: `Subsydium Profesorskie'' of the Foundation for Polish Science.
313: GP, MTR, WG and DM gratefully acknowledge support for this research
314: from the Chilean Center for Astrophysics FONDAP 15010003.
315: SJ\ thanks the Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science at UC
316: Berkeley for support through a research fellowship. We are gratefull
317: for a generous telescope time allocation and support
318: at the Las Campanas Observatory. This research has
319: made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System Abstract Service.
320:
321: \newpage
322:
323: \begin{thebibliography}{}
324:
325: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(2003)]{Baraffe:03}
326: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Barman, T.\ S., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt,
327: P.\ H. 2003, \aap, 402, 701
328:
329: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(2004)]{Baraffe:04}
330: Baraffe, I., Selsis, F., Chabrier, G., Barnam, T.\ S., Allard, F.,
331: Hauschidt, P.\ H., \& Lammer, H. 2004, \aap, in press
332: (astro-ph/0404101)
333:
334: \bibitem[Benedict et al.(2002)]{Benedict:02}
335: Benedict, G.\ F., McArthur, B.\ E., Forveile, T.\ et al. 2002, \apj,
336: 581, L115
337:
338: \bibitem[Bernstein et al.(2003)]{Bernstein:03}
339: Bernstein, R., Shectman, S.\ A., Gunnels, S.\ M., Mochnacki, S., \&
340: Athey, A.\ E. 2003, in Instrument Design and performance for
341: Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes, Proc.\ SPIE, 4841, eds.\ I.
342: Masanori \& Moorwood, A.\ F.\ M., p.\ 1694
343:
344: \bibitem[Bevington(1969)]{Bevington:69}
345: Bevington, P.\ R. 1969, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the
346: Physical Sciences (New York: McGraw-Hill), p.\ 200
347:
348: \bibitem[Bouchy et al.(2004)]{Bouchy:04}
349: Bouchy, F., Pont, F., Santos, N.\ C., Melo, C., Mayor, M., Queloz,
350: D., \& Udry, S. 2004, \aap, in press (astro-ph/0404264)
351:
352: \bibitem[Burrows, Sudarsky \& Hubbard(2003)]{Burrows:03}
353: Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., \& Hubbard, W.\ B. 2003, \apj, 594, 545
354:
355: \bibitem[Butler et al.(1997)]{Butler:97}
356: Butler, R.\ P., Marcy, G.\ W., Williams, E., Hauser, H., \& Shirts,
357: P. 1997, \apj, 474, L115
358:
359: \bibitem[Charbonneau et al.(2000)]{Charbonneau:00}
360: Charbonneau, D., Brown, T.\ M., Latham, D.\ W., \& Mayor, M. 2000,
361: \apjl, 529, L45
362:
363: \bibitem[Drake \& Cook(2004)]{Drake:04}
364: Drake, A.\ J., \& Cook, K.\ H. 2004, \apj, 604, 379
365:
366: \bibitem[Fischer et al.(2003)]{Fischer:03}
367: Fischer, D.\ A., Butler, R.\ P., Marcy, G.\ W., Vogt, S.\ S., \&
368: Henry, G.\ W. 2003, \apj, 590, 1081
369:
370: \bibitem[Gray(1992)]{Gray:92}
371: Gray, D.\ F. 1992, The Observation and Analysis of Stellar
372: Photospheres, 2nd Ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ.\ Press), 417
373:
374: \bibitem[Henry et al.(2000)]{Henry:00}
375: Henry, G.\ W., Marcy, G.\ W., Butler, R.\ P., \& Vogt, S.\ S. 2000,
376: \apjl, 529, L41
377:
378: \bibitem[Horne(2003)]{Horne:03}
379: Horne, K. 2003, in Scientific Frontiers of research on Extrasolar
380: Planets, eds.\ D.\ Deming and S.\ Seager (San Francisco: ASP), ASP
381: Conf.\ Ser., 294, 361
382:
383: \bibitem[Kelson(2003)]{Kelson:03}
384: Kelson, D.\ D. 2003, \pasp, 115, 688
385:
386: \bibitem[Konacki et al.(2003a)]{Konacki:03a}
387: Konacki, M., Torres, G., Jha, S., \& Sasselov, D.\ D. 2003a, \nat,
388: 421, 507
389:
390: \bibitem[Konacki et al.(2003b)]{Konacki:03b}
391: Konacki, M., Torres, G., Sasselov, D.\ D., \& Jha, S. 2003b, \apj,
392: 597, 1076
393:
394: \bibitem[Kruszewski \& Semeniuk(2003)]{Kruszewski:03}
395: Kruszewski, A., \& Semeniuk, I. 2003, Acta Astronomica, 53, 241
396:
397: \bibitem[Mall\'en-Ornelas et al.(2003)]{Mallen-Ornelas:03}
398: Mall\'en-Ornelas, G., Seager, S., Yee, H.\ K.\ C., Minniti, D.,
399: Gladders, M.\ D., Mall\'en-Fullerton, G.\ M., \& Brown, T.\ M. 2003,
400: \apj, 582, 1123
401:
402: \bibitem[Mandel \& Agol(2002)]{Mandel:02}
403: Mandel, K., \& Agol, E. 2002, \apjl, 580, L171
404:
405: \bibitem[Naef et al.(2004)]{Naef:04}
406: Naef, D., Mayor, M., Beuzit, J.\ L., Perrier, C., Queloz, D., Sivan,
407: J.\ P., \& Udry, S. 2004, \aap, 414, 351
408:
409: \bibitem[Nidever et al.(2002)]{Nidever:02}
410: Nidever, D.\ L., Marcy, G.\ W., Butler, R.\ P., Fischer, D.\ A., \&
411: Vogt, S.\ S. 2002, \apjs, 141, 503
412:
413: \bibitem[Santos et al.(2002)]{Santos:02}
414: Santos, N.\ C., Mayor, M., Naef, D., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., Udry, S.,
415: Burnet, M., Clausen, J.\ V., Helt, B.\ E., Olsen, E.\ H., \&
416: Pritchard, J.\ D. 2002, \aap, 392, 215
417:
418: \bibitem[Torres et al.(2004)]{Torres:04}
419: Torres, G., Konacki, M., Sasselov, D.\ D., \& Jha, S. 2004, \apj, in
420: press (astro-ph/0310114)
421:
422: \bibitem[Udalski et al.(2002a)]{Udalski:02a}
423: Udalski, A., Paczy\'nski, B., \.{Z}ebru\'n, K., Szyma\'nski, M.,
424: Kubiak, M., Soszy\'nski, I., Szewczyk, O., Wyrzykowski, \L., \&
425: Pietrzy\'nski, G. 2002a, Acta Astronomica, 52, 1
426:
427: \bibitem[Udalski et al.(2002b)]{Udalski:02b}
428: Udalski, A., \.{Z}ebru\'n, K., Szyma\'nski, M., Kubiak, M.,
429: Soszy\'nski, I., Szewczyk, O., Wyrzykowski, \L., \& Pietrzy\'nski, G.
430: 2002b, Acta Astronomica, 52, 115
431:
432: \bibitem[Udalski et al.(2002c)]{Udalski:02c}
433: Udalski, A., Szewczyk, O., \.Zebru\'n, K., Pietrzy\'nski, G.,
434: Szyma\'nski, M., Kubiak, M., Soszy\'nski, I., \& Wyrzykowski, \L.\
435: 2002c, Acta Astronomica, 52, 317
436:
437: \end{thebibliography}
438:
439: \newpage
440:
441: \begin{figure}
442: \figurenum{1}
443: \hskip 0.9in \includegraphics[scale=0.85]{f1.ps}
444: \caption{Radial velocity measurements for $\tau$~Boo as a function of
445: orbital phase, along with the orbit determined by \cite{Butler:97}.
446: The only parameter we have adjusted is the velocity of the center of
447: mass.\label{fig:tauboo}}
448: \end{figure}
449:
450: \begin{figure}
451: \figurenum{2}
452: \hskip 0.9in \includegraphics[scale=0.85]{f2.ps}
453: \caption{Radial velocity measurements and fitted velocity curve for
454: OGLE-TR-113, as a function of orbital phase. Only the semi-amplitude
455: and center-of-mass velocity have been adjusted. The transit ephemeris
456: is adopted from the photometry (see text)\label{fig:oglervs}.}
457: \end{figure}
458:
459: \begin{figure}
460: \figurenum{3}
461: \vskip -2.2in \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{f3.ps}
462: \vskip -1.2in
463: \caption{Bisector span used to quantify the line asymmetry for each
464: of our spectra of OGLE-TR-113, plotted as a function of orbital phase.
465: The error bars are determined from the agreement between different
466: echelle orders. There is no obvious correlation with
467: phase.\label{fig:bisplot}}
468: \end{figure}
469:
470: \begin{figure}
471: \figurenum{4}
472: \vskip 0.2in \hskip 0.2in \includegraphics[scale=0.95]{f4.ps}
473: \caption{OGLE photometry for OGLE-TR-113 in the $I$ band, with our
474: best fit transit light curve. The resulting parameters are listed in
475: Table~\ref{tab:results}.\label{fig:lcurve}}
476: \end{figure}
477:
478: \begin{figure}
479: \figurenum{5}
480: \hskip 0.3in \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{f5.ps}
481: \caption{$\chi^2$ surface corresponding to the light curve solution
482: for OGLE-TR-113, in the plane of orbital inclination vs.\ planet
483: radius. The number of degrees of freedom in the fit is 1512.
484: \label{fig:chi2}}
485: \end{figure}
486:
487: \newpage
488:
489: %
490: % TABLE 1
491: %
492:
493: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
494: \tablenum{1}
495: \tablewidth{23pc}
496: \tablecaption{Radial velocities measurements for OGLE-TR-113, in the
497: barycentric frame.\label{tab:rvs}}
498: \tablehead{
499: \colhead{HJD} & \colhead{} & \colhead{Velocity} & \colhead{Error\tablenotemark{a}} \\
500: \colhead{(2,400,000+)} & \colhead{Phase} & \colhead{($\kms$)} & \colhead{($\kms$)} }
501: \startdata
502: 52690.6259 & 0.683 & -7.797 & 0.105 \\
503: 52691.7230 & 0.449 & -8.008 & 0.114 \\
504: 52692.7873 & 0.192 & -8.195 & 0.118 \\
505: 52692.8128 & 0.210 & -8.257 & 0.116 \\
506: 52693.7298 & 0.850 & -7.837 & 0.122 \\
507: 52694.7927 & 0.592 & -7.707 & 0.104 \\
508: 52754.7244 & 0.430 & -7.845 & 0.127 \\
509: \enddata
510: \tablenotetext{a}{Internal errors have been scaled to provide a
511: reduced $\chi^2$ of unity in the orbital solution.}
512: \end{deluxetable}
513:
514: %
515: % TABLE 2
516: %
517:
518: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
519: \tablenum{2}
520: \tablewidth{32.4pc}
521: \tablecaption{Orbital and physical parameters for OGLE-TR-113b.\label{tab:results}}
522: \tablehead{
523: \colhead{\hfil ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Parameter~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~} & \colhead{Value} }
524: \startdata
525: \vspace{2pt}
526: ~~~Orbital period (days)\dotfill & 1.4324758~$\pm$~0.0000046 \\
527: ~~~Transit epoch (HJD$-$2,400,000)\dotfill & 52325.79823~$\pm$~0.00082\phm{2222} \\
528: ~~~Center-of-mass velocity (km~s$^{-1}$)\dotfill & \phm{$1$}$-$7.939~$\pm$~0.043\phm{$-3$} \\
529: ~~~Eccentricity (fixed)\dotfill & 0 \\
530: ~~~Velocity semi-amplitude (m~s$^{-1}$)\dotfill & 229~$\pm$~58\phn \\
531: \vspace{10pt}
532: ~~~Inclination angle (deg)\dotfill & 88.4~$\pm$~2.2\phn \\
533: ~~~Stellar mass (M$_{\sun}$) (adopted) \dotfill & 0.79~$\pm$~0.06 \\
534: ~~~Stellar radius (R$_{\sun}$) (adopted) \dotfill & 0.78~$\pm$~0.06 \\
535: \vspace{10pt}
536: ~~~Limb darkening coefficient ($I$ band)\dotfill & 0.586~$\pm$~0.015 \\
537: ~~~Planet mass (M$_{\rm Jup}$)\dotfill & 1.08~$\pm$~0.28 \\
538: ~~~Planet radius (R$_{\rm Jup}$)\dotfill & 1.09~$\pm$~0.10 \\
539: ~~~Planet density (g~cm$^{-3}$)\dotfill & 1.0~$\pm$~0.4 \\
540: ~~~Semi-major axis (AU)\dotfill & 0.02299~$\pm$~0.00058 \\
541: \enddata
542: \end{deluxetable}
543:
544:
545: \end{document}
546: