1: %\documentclass{aastex}
2: % preprint produces a one-column, single-spaced document:
3: % preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
4: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
5: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
6: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
7: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
8: %\newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
9: %\setcounter{totalnumber}{150}
10: %\setcounter{topnumber}{150}
11: %\setcounter{bottomnumber}{150}
12: \usepackage{longtable}
13: %% You can inS\'ert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
14:
15: %\slugcomment{To appear in Astrophys. Journal Supplement Series}
16:
17: \shorttitle{The Properties of Satellites in External Systems}
18: \shortauthors{C. M. Gutierrez \& M. Azzaro}
19:
20: %\received{2004 January 29}
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \title{The Properties of Satellite Galaxies in External Systems.
24: II. Photometry and Colors}
25: \author{Carlos M. Guti\'errez} \affil{Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias,
26: E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain} \email{cgc@ll.iac.es}
27: \and \author{Marco Azzaro} \affil{Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Ap.
28: 321, E-38700 S/C de La Palma, La Palma, Spain}
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31:
32: In this second paper dedicated to the study of satellite galaxies we present
33: broad-band photometry in the $B$, $V$, $R$ and $I$ filters of 49 satellite
34: galaxies orbiting giant isolated spiral galaxies. First analysis of the
35: properties of these objects are presented by means of color--color and
36: color--magnitude diagrams for early- and late-type satellites. Although we
37: find differences in the slope of the $V-I$ vs. $M_v$ color magnitude diagram, as
38: a whole, the relations are in agreement with the trends known to date for
39: galaxies of similar magnitudes in nearby clusters of galaxies. Comparison with
40: the relations found for satellites in the Local Group allows us to sample
41: better the bright end of the luminosity function of satellite galaxies and
42: extends for brighter objects the validity of the color--magnitude relation
43: found for dwarf galaxies in the Local Group. Most of the E/S0 galaxies in our
44: sample show a negative color gradient with values similar to those known for
45: early type galaxies in other environments.
46:
47: \end{abstract}
48:
49: \keywords{galaxies: fundamental parameters,
50: galaxies: photometry, galaxies: structure, galaxies}
51:
52: \section{Introduction}
53:
54: The study of the small scale structure in the Universe is a much discussed
55: topic in current astronomy. One of the reasons for this wide interest is
56: the discrepancies between observations and the predictions of the standard
57: cold dark matter (CDM) model. For instance, from $n$-body simulation (Moore et
58: al.\ 1999; Klypin et al.\ 1999) the expected number of satellites orbiting
59: galaxies like the Milky Way or Andromeda is an order of magnitude larger than
60: that observed in the Local Group (e.g., Mateo 1998). This is a potentially
61: strong objection against the hierarchical scenario proposed in the standard
62: CDM model. To solve this discrepancy several mechanisms that suppress the
63: formation of satellites after the re-ionization in the early epoch of the
64: Universe have been proposed (e.g., Bullock, Kravtsov, \& Weinberg 2000). So
65: far, it is unclear whether this or any of the other mechanisms proposed is
66: able to reconcile fully the predictions from the models and the observations.
67:
68: Satellite galaxies are also interesting for tracing the gravitational
69: potential and for estimating the mass of the parent galaxy at
70: distances unreachable with other methods (Erickson, Gottesman \& Hunter
71: 1999). The standard models predict a decline in satellite galaxy
72: velocity with distance to the primary. This has been observationally
73: explored by Zaritsky et al.\ (1997) and Prada et al.\ (2003). The
74: predicted effect was not found in the analysis of the first group.
75: However, Prada et al., with better statistics and the removal of
76: interlopers, have claimed the existence of this decline in the way
77: predicted by the standard models.
78:
79: Our knowledge of satellite galaxies beyond the Local Group is still very limited, owing
80: to the intrinsic faintness of these objects. For instance, in the
81: Local Group the known dwarf satellite galaxies have brightnesses in the range $-18\le M_B
82: \le -8$. So detailed studies of external systems are limited
83: to galaxies in the nearby Universe. Even surveys such as the Sloan Digital Sky
84: Survey (Prada et al.\ 2003) are capable to sampling only the very bright part of the
85: luminosity function of these objects, typically detecting 1--2
86: satellites orbiting each giant galaxy. For instance, the external isolated
87: galaxies in which a larger number of galaxies have been found are NGC~1961 (Gottesman,
88: Hunter \& Shostak 1993) and NGC~5084 (Carignan et al.\ 1997) in which 5 and 9
89: satellites respectively have been catalogued.
90:
91: Bearing all the above points in mind, we decided to start a study of satellite
92: galaxies orbiting external isolated galaxies. We extracted our sample from
93: the compilation of such objects by Zaritsky et al.\ (1997). Only spiral
94: parents were included in that catalogue. A similar catalogue for parents with
95: elliptical morphologies is being compiled by Smith \& Martinez (2003). With
96: photometry in optical broad ($BVRI$) and narrow bands (H$\alpha$), and near
97: infrared ($J$ and $K$) of both the satellites and their parent galaxies we
98: address the following questions: i) what are the properties (statistics,
99: luminosity function, morphology, structure, colors, etc.) of the satellite
100: galaxies, and how do they compare with those found in the Local Group; ii)
101: how the above properties are related to the relative positions of the
102: satellite galaxies with respect to their parents; iii) what the possible
103: interactions are between satellites, and between satellites and their
104: parents; and iv) the star formation rate and how it is related with the
105: overall properties and relative position of the satellites. In the first paper
106: of this series, Gutierrez, Azzaro, \& Prada (2002, hereafter Paper~I), we
107: presented the structural parameters and morphological classification of $\sim
108: 60$ of such objects. Here, we present the photometry and first analysis of
109: the colors of most of them. A full analysis combining structure and photometry
110: and testing against the predictions of theoretical models will be conducted
111: and presented in the near future.
112:
113: \section{Observations and Photometry}
114:
115: The observations presented here were performed during several runs at the
116: IAC80,\footnote{The IAC-80 is located at the Spanish Teide Observatory on the island
117: of Tenerife and is operated by the Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de Canarias.}
118: the Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT),\footnote{The Nordic Optical Telescope is operated on the island of La
119: Palma jointly by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, in the Spanish
120: Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrof\'\i sica de
121: Canarias Observatory.}, and the 1.23 and 2.2 m Calar Alto\footnote{The German-Spanish Astronomical
122: Centre, Calar Alto, is operated by the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy,
123: Heidelberg, jointly with the Spanish National Comission for Astronomy.}
124: telescopes. The details of the sample can be found in Zaritsky et al.\ (1997)
125: and Paper~I. Typical integration times per filter and galaxy range from
126: $\sim 30$ to $\sim 90$
127: minutes on the IAC80, and from $\sim$5 to $\sim$30 min on the other
128: telescopes. The seeing was between 1.5 and 2.0 arcsec in most cases.
129: The observations were usually performed in photometric conditions and
130: calibrated using Landolt stars (Landolt 1992). In a few cases of
131: non-photometric nights we made relative calibrations with photometric nights using
132: bright field stars (typically 4--8 in each case). The typical rms accuracy of
133: the calibration is $\sim$0.03 mag. The data were reduced using
134: IRAF.\footnote{IRAF is the Image Reduction and Analysis Facility, written and
135: supported by the IRAF programming group at the National Optical Astronomy
136: Observatory (NOAO) in Tucson, Arizona.} More details on the observations and
137: reduction can be found in Paper~I. The magnitudes presented here were
138: computed using the software Sextractor (Bertin \& Arnouts 1996) and correspond
139: to the total integrated magnitudes computed in apertures defined in the way proposed by Kron
140: (1980). The uncertainty in the estimation of these magnitudes are dominated by
141: the sky subtraction and the extrapolation of the external profile of the
142: galaxies. We estimate the typical overall uncertainty as $\sim$0.1 mag.
143:
144: Table~1 presents the integrated photometry in the four bands. We have
145: photometry for 49 objects, $\sim$80\% of them in all four bands.
146: For most of them we have also analyzed the morphology and structure (see Paper~I).
147: The galaxies span a range of $\sim$6 mag in apparent magnitude. When converted
148: to absolute magnitudes, this range is $\sim$5 mag, i.e., a factor of $\sim$100
149: in mass.
150:
151: We have made a comparison between the $M_B$ magnitudes presented by
152: Zaritsky et al.\ and our estimate in this band. To obtain the absolute
153: magnitudes from our measurements we have used a value of the Hubble
154: constant of 72 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$. We have excluded in this
155: comparison the object NGC~5965$a$ because we have found two objects
156: (denoted as NGC~5965$a$1 and NGC~5965$a$2 in Table~1) that are very
157: close together (the angular distance between them is 1.6 arcsec), and it
158: is unclear if the magnitude quoted by Zaritsky et al.\ corresponds to
159: one of the two components or to the combination of both. The objects
160: show evidence of interaction, so we think that both are satellites of
161: NGC~5965. After these objects were excluded, we have 39 objects with
162: measurements in the $B$ band. The absolute magnitude in the $B$ band
163: Zaritsky et
164: al.\ (denoted here by $M_{Bz}$) were slightly modified in order to take into account the different
165: values of the Hubble constant used by these authors and by us (75 and 72
166: km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ respectively). In Figure~\ref{comparison} we
167: present this comparison. The differences are $\Delta =|M_B-M_{Bz}|\le
168: 1$. The figure shows no systematic error, the mean value of the
169: residuals being 0.31 mag and the rms $0.45$ mag. Considering that the
170: magnitudes reported by Zaritsky et al.\ are photographic, and that these
171: authors estimated a proper uncertainty of $\pm 0.5$ mag, we conclude
172: that both estimates are in very good agreement. This comparison also
173: indicates that our uncertainties in the estimation of the magnitudes are
174: small compared with the above value.
175:
176: \section{The Color--Magnitude Relation for Satellite Galaxies}
177:
178: The existence of a color--magnitude relation for elliptical galaxies
179: in clusters is widely known (e.g., Visvanathan \& Sandage 1977). The
180: origin of this relation is controversial: while some authors (Kodama
181: \& Arimoto 1997) have argued that the relation is a consequence of
182: changes in metallicity, others (Ferreras, Charlot, \& Silk 1999) think
183: that it is a consequence of changes in both age and metallicity.
184: Recently (Vazdekis et al.\ 2001) have analyzed high signal-to-noise
185: ratio spectra of six elliptical galaxies in the Virgo Cluster using a
186: new spectral index, and conclude that the color--magnitude relation is
187: a consequence of a relation between luminosity (or mass) and
188: metallicity. For the analysis presented in this section, we have
189: corrected the magnitudes quoted in Table~1 for Galactic extinction
190: using the model by Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis (1998).
191:
192:
193: Figure~\ref{cmr} presents a color--magnitude diagram for the galaxies
194: classified as early and late types in our sample. The objects span a range of
195: $\sim$4 mag while they are in a narrow range in the $B-V$ and $V-I$ colors.
196: Although the statistics are poor because of the low number of objects
197: analyzed, the existence of a tight relation between colors and magnitudes is
198: clear. This color--magnitude relation is similar for both types of galaxies
199: (early and late), although it is notable that the dispersion of the early
200: types with respect to these relations is smaller. The mean values are +0.70 and
201: +0.65 for the $B-V$ colors, and $+0.93$ and $+0.88$ for the $V-I$ colors of early
202: and late types respectively. For these two type of galaxies we have conducted
203: least squares fits of the equations $B-V=aM_V+b$ and $V-I=aM_V+b$
204: respectively. For these fits we assigned the same weight to all galaxies. The parameters of these fits are presented in Table~2.
205: Combining the two colors $B-V$ and $V-I$, we obtain the color--color diagram
206: presented in Figure~\ref{col}. As expected from the previous figure, galaxies
207: tend to occupy a narrow region in this diagram, with the brightest galaxies
208: being redder than the faintest ones. Roughly speaking, the position (0.8, 1.0)
209: in the ($B-V$, $V-I$) plane separates galaxies with $M_B\le -18$ from those
210: with $M_B\ge -18$. We have compared these results with those found for
211: galaxies with similar magnitudes in the Fornax Cluster by Karick, Drinkwater,
212: \& Gregg (2003), and Griersmith (1982). We note similar trends but with a
213: larger dispersion in our objects; and a reddening with luminosity similar in
214: the $B-V$ colors and larger in $V-I$ for the galaxies of our sample. For
215: instance, Karick et al. obtained mean values of $B-V$ of 0.70 and 0.57 for
216: their sample of dwarf ellipticals and late types. These values are roughly
217: compatible with those that we have obtained. The small discrepancy found
218: between the $B-V$ colors of late types is partially due to the different
219: magntitude range of galaxies in both samples. Karick et al. obtained a
220: slope for the $B-V$ relation of the early type population of $-0.034\pm 0.006$;
221: this and the value found by Griersmith (1982) are compatible with our results.
222: However the slope obtained for the $V-I$ curve is different between the Fornax
223: members and the objects analyzed here. The slope of this color-magnitude relation
224: is larger in our sample. If we restrict our analysis to the
225: common range in magnitude between both samples, this difference persists.
226: Possible reasons for this difference will be analyzed in a future paper.
227:
228: We have compared the photometric properties of the satellites of our sample
229: with those found for galaxies in the Local Group. The values for the
230: photometric integrated magnitudes have been taken from the compilation by
231: Mateo (1998) and correspond to all the members of the Local Group known by
232: that time, apart of the Milky Way, M31, and the two Magellanic clouds which
233: have been excluded from the analysis. This is illustrated in
234: Figure~\ref{compar_gl} in which we present the color--magnitude diagram for
235: both sets of objects. The typical uncertainties for our measurements in $B$ and $V$ are
236: $\sim$0.1 mag (when the colors are computed part of the
237: systematic errors cancel out). In this figure we have also
238: included a few objects for which we do not have a morphological
239: classification and so excluded them from Figure~\ref{cmr}. For the Local Group
240: galaxies the uncertainties in the colors are $\sim$0.05 while, according to
241: the compilation by Mateo (1998), the uncertainty is, in general, large for the
242: integrated magnitudes. Although we have not represented these errors, they are
243: not essential for making a qualitative analysis of the figure. We see how the
244: external satellites correspond to the brightest part of the Local Group
245: luminosity function, and also to some brighter satellites with luminosities
246: similar to that of M33. This is expected because of the way in which the
247: original sample by Zaritsky et al.\ was built. Galaxies within the common
248: range of magnitudes have similar $B-V$ color and dispersions. The
249: least-squares fit of $B-V$ vs. $M_B$ obtained for the early-type external satellites seems also
250: to fit notably well the galaxies of the Local Group. This extends the
251: validity of this color--magnitude relation through a range of 12 magnitudes
252: and demonstrates the universal nature of the color--magnitude relation for
253: satellite galaxies.
254:
255: \section{Internal Color Gradients of Early-Type Satellites}
256:
257: The existence of color gradients in early-type galaxies is well known.
258: In general, elliptical galaxies tend to be redder in their inner regions.
259: As for the color--magnitude relation, the effect could be explained by either a
260: gradient in stellar age or metallicity, or by a combination of both. The
261: existence of dust more concentrated in the central parts of the galaxy could
262: also contribute totally or partially to the observed color gradients. The first
263: studies for giant ellipticals using CCD measurement were conducted by Franx \&
264: Illingworth (1990), Peletier et al.\ (1990), and de Jong (1996). Using the
265: {\itshape Hubble Space Telescope}, this study has been extended to galaxies at higher
266: redshift (Moth \& Elston 2002), who show the existence
267: of negative gradients at intermediate ($0.5\le z\le 1.2$) redshifts, while the
268: gradients become very positive at higher ($2.0\le z\le 3.5$) redshifts.
269:
270: We have analyzed the gradients of the 16 galaxies classified as E or E/S0 in
271: the morphological analysis presented in Paper~I. Considering the angular size
272: of the objects and the limiting magnitude and spatial resolution of our data,
273: we decided to conduct a very simple analysis in the following way: i) we checked the value
274: of the seeing in both filters (in cases of significant different values, the
275: image in the filter with best seeing was convolved with a Gaussian of
276: appropriate width to match in the convolved image the seeing in the other
277: filter), ii) we selected the angular range between $2\times$ FWHM and the
278: radius which encloses the full galaxy and computed the integrated magnitudes in
279: several concentric apertures within this range, and iii) we did a linear
280: least-squares fit of $B-R$ vs. $\log r$. The slope of this relation is denoted
281: by $\Delta (B-R)/\Delta (\log r)$ and is presented in Table~3. In some cases we
282: check the behavior of this gradient with that
283: obtained using other colors (usually $V-I$).
284:
285: A few galaxies were excluded from this analysis for the reasons detailed
286: below: NGC~895$a$, which has an off-center nucleus and is also a rather compact object
287: with an angular size too small to compute the gradients;
288: NGC~2718$a$, which, apart from being an object in clear interaction with NGC~2718$b$,
289: has another object very close to it (we were able to separate it from the main
290: galaxy in the photometric analysis presented in this paper, but not in this
291: estimate of gradients); NGC~5962$a$, whose angular size is too small with
292: respect to the seeing; A910$a$ and NGC~2939$a$ because we have observed
293: them in only one filter; and NGC~4541$b$, which is in clear
294: interaction with NGC~4541$e$ and whose gradients shows a complex dependence on
295: radius. We have also included the galaxy NGC~3735$b$, classified
296: as early type in Paper~I, but which is not included in Table~1 because of the lack of
297: calibrated observations of this galaxy. After this selection, we were left with nine
298: objects, whose results are presented in Table~3. Seven of the nine galaxies have
299: negative slopes, while NGC~488$a$ has a value very close to 0 and, surprisingly,
300: NGC~4725$b$ shows an extremely positive gradients (i.e., the outer parts
301: are notably redder than the inner ones. We have checked this trend
302: measuring the gradients in other
303: colors and obtained the same tendency. Positive gradients such as this are
304: uncommon in low redshift galaxies and probably indicate strong star formation in
305: the central part of the galaxy. This galaxy is rather regular, and so far, we
306: have not found any clear evidence of distortions associated with any interactions
307: or mergers that could trigger this burst. The mean value of the
308: gradient (excluding NGC~4725$b$) is $\Delta (B-R)/\Delta (\log r)=-0.085\pm
309: 0.027$.
310: \section{Summary}
311:
312: \begin{enumerate}
313: \item We have presented integrated photometry of 49 satellite galaxies orbiting
314: external isolated spiral galaxies.
315:
316: \item The $B-V$ vs.\ $M_V$ color magnitude relation is similar to the one
317: found in the Fornax Cluster for galaxies with similar magnitudes. However
318: the $V-I$ vs.\ $M_V$ relation is steeper in our sample as compared with
319: galaxies in Fornax.
320:
321: \item The $B-V$ vs.\ $M_B$ color diagram extends to brighter magnitudes the
322: relations found for satellite galaxies in the Local Group.
323:
324: \item We have measured the internal color gradients of nine early-type satellites.
325: Excluding a galaxy with a strong positive gradient, we found
326: $\Delta (B-R)/\Delta (\log r)=-0.085\pm 0.027$.
327: \end{enumerate}
328: \acknowledgments We would like to thank Francisco Prada for fruitful and
329: encouraging discussions. We also thank the anonymous referee for useful comments.
330: \newpage
331:
332: \begin{thebibliography}{}
333: \bibitem[]{320} Bertin, E., \& Arnouts, S. 1996, A\&A, 117, 393
334: \bibitem[]{321} Bullock, J. S., Kravtsov, A. V., \& Weinberg, D. H. 2000, ApJ, 539, 517
335: \bibitem[]{322} Carignan, C., Cote, S., Freeman, K. C., \& Quinn, P. J. 1997, AJ, 113, 1585
336: \bibitem[]{323} de Jong, R. S. 1996, A\&A, 313, 377
337: \bibitem[]{324} Erickson, L. K., Gottesman, S. T., \& Hunter, Jr., J. H. 1999, ApJ,
338: 515, 153
339: \bibitem[]{326} Ferreras, I., Charlot, S. \& Silk, J. 1999, ApJ, 521, 81
340: \bibitem[]{327} Franx, M., \& Illingworth, G. 1990, ApJ, 359, L41
341: \bibitem[]{328} Gottesman, S. T., Hunter, Jr., J. H., \& Shostak, G. S. 1993, MNRAS,
342: 212, p21
343: \bibitem[]{330} Griersmith, D. 1982, ApJ, 87, 462
344: \bibitem[]{331} Gutierrez, C. M., Azzaro, M., \& Prada, F. 2002, ApJS, 141, 61 (Paper I)
345: \bibitem[]{332} Karick, A. M., Drinkwater, M. J., \& Gregg, M. D. 2003, MNRAS, 344,
346: 188
347: \bibitem[]{334} Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Valenzuela, O., \& Prada, F. 1999,
348: ApJ, 522, 82
349: \bibitem[]{336} Kodama, T. \& Arimoto, Y. 1997, A\&A, 320, 41
350: \bibitem[]{337} Kron, R. G. 1980, ApJS, 43, 305
351: \bibitem[]{338} Landolt, A. U. 1992, A\&A, 104, 340
352: \bibitem[]{339} Mateo, M. L. 1998, ARA\&A, 36, 435
353: \bibitem[]{340} Moore, B., Ghigna, S., Governato, F., Lake, G., Quinn, T., Stadel,
354: J., \& Tozzi, P. 1999,, ApJ, 524, L19\bibitem[]{341} Moth, P., \& Elston, R. J. 2002, ApJ, 124, 1886
355: \bibitem[]{342} Peletier, R. F., Davies, R. L., Illingworth, G. D., Davis, L. E.,
356: \& Cawson, M. 1990, AJ, 100, 1091
357: \bibitem[]{344} Prada, F. et al. 2003, ApJ, 598, 260
358: \bibitem[]{345} Smith, R. M., \& Martinez, V. 2003, proceedings of the "Satellite galaxies and tidal
359: streams", eds. F. Prada, D. Mart\'\i nez-Delgado and T. Mahoney. ASP Conf. Ser. astro-ph/0309818
360: \bibitem[]{346} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998,
361: ApJ, 500, 525
362: \bibitem[]{348} Vazdekis, A., Kuntschner, H., Davies, R. L., Arimoto, N., Nakamura,
363: O., \& Peletier, R. 2001, ApJ, 551, L127
364: \bibitem[]{350} Visvanathan, N., \& Sandage, A. 1977, ApJ, 216, 214
365: \bibitem[]{351} Zaritsky, D., Smith, R., Frenk, C., \& White, S. D. M. 1997, ApJ,
366: 478, 39
367: \end{thebibliography}
368: \clearpage
369:
370: \onecolumn
371: %{\footnotesize
372: \begin{longtable}{lllllll}
373: \caption{Integrated photometry of satellite galaxies. The columns are: 1)
374: name of the object; 2) recessional
375: velocity of the parent galaxy (from Zaritsky et al. 1997); 3-6)
376: $B$, $V$, $R$, and $I$ integrated magnitudes; telescope (1. IAC80, 2 NOT, 3. 1.23 m Calar Alto, 4.
377: 2.2 m Calar Alto).} \\
378:
379: Object & $V$ (km s$^{-1})$ & $B$ & $V$ & $R$ & $I$ & Telescope \\
380: \hline
381: \\
382: NGC~259b & 3808 & 15.04 & 14.37 & 13.83 & 13.30 &1\\
383: NGC~488a & 2268 & 15.39 & 14.48 & 13.93 & 13.34 &1\\
384: NGC~488b & 2268 & 16.18 & 15.63 & 15.29 & 14.99 &1\\
385: NGC~488c & 2268 & 16.60 & 15.61 & 15.22 & 14.62 &1\\
386: I1723a & 5531 & 19.45 & 18.85 & 17.99 & 18.10 &1\\
387: I1723b & 5531 & 16.94 & 16.08 & 15.53 & 14.91 &1\\
388: NGC~749a & 4406 & ----- & ----- & 15.59 & ----- &1\\
389: NGC~749b & 4406 & ----- & ----- & 16.93 & ----- &1\\
390: NGC~772a & 2468 & 14.42 & 13.49 & 12.86 & 12.19 &1\\
391: NGC~772b & 2468 & ----- & ----- & 15.55 & 15.08 &1\\
392: NGC~772c & 2468 & 16.22 & 15.43 & 14.88 & 14.42 &1\\
393: NGC~895a & 2290 & ----- & 16.72 & 16.49 & 16.13 &1\\
394: NGC~1517a & 3483 & 16.54 & 15.77 & 15.11 & 14.74 &1\\
395: NGC~1620a & 3513 & ----- & 15.17 & 14.27 & ----- &1\\
396: NGC~1620b & 3513 & 14.91 & 13.91 & 13.26 & 12.74 &1\\
397: NGC~1961a & 3934 & 14.98 & 14.14 & 13.52 & 12.73 &4\\
398: NGC~1961b & 3934 & 15.82 & 14.88 & 14.25 & 13.38 &4\\
399: NGC~1961c & 3934 & 14.94 & 14.18 & 13.66 & 12.80 &4\\
400: NGC~1961d & 3934 & 14.81 & 14.22 & 13.51 & 12.95 &1\\
401: NGC~1961e & 3934 & 15.64 & ----- & 12.71 & 12.17 &1\\
402: NGC~2718a & 3842 & 17.32 & 16.71 & 16.44 & 16.14 &3\\
403: NGC~2718b & 3842 & 16.23 & 15.69 & 15.26 & 14.88 &3\\
404: NGC~2775a & 1357 & 15.48 & 14.87 & 14.59 & 14.28 &2\\
405: NGC~4162a & 2561 & 16.81 & 16.10 & 15.58 & 15.12 &2\\
406: NGC~4541a & 6898 & 16.45 & 15.72 & 15.11 & 14.43 &3\\
407: NGC~4541b & 6898 & 16.71 & 16.16 & 15.36 & 14.84 &3\\
408: NGC~4541d & 6898 & 17.07 & 16.44 & 16.03 & 15.65 &3\\
409: NGC~4541e & 6898 & 15.62 & 14.95 & 14.37 & 13.87 &3\\
410: A1242a & 6301 & 17.11 & 16.56 & 16.37 & 16.20 &2\\
411: NGC~4725a & 1207 & 13.01 & 12.33 & 11.88 & 11.27 &3\\
412: NGC~4725b & 1207 & 15.80 & 15.14 & 14.71 & 14.26 &2\\
413: NGC~5248a & 1154 & 15.25 & 14.72 & 14.57 & 14.34 &1\\
414: NGC~5324b & 3044 & 16.60 & 16.06 & 15.68 & 15.37 &2\\
415: A1416a & 6809 & 16.09 & 14.96 & 14.35 & 13.72 &2\\
416: NGC~5899a & 2563 & 14.43 & 13.39 & 12.67 & 11.95 &1\\
417: NGC~5921a & 1478 & 15.66 & ----- & 14.38 & ----- &1\\
418: NGC~5965a1 & 3413 & 16.29 & 15.86 & 15.54 & 15.20 &2\\
419: NGC~5965a2 & 3413 & 17.19 & 16.50 & 16.60 & 16.29 &2\\
420: NGC~5962a & 1955 & ----- & 17.50 & 16.92 & 16.08 &1\\
421: NGC~5962d & 1955 & 15.55 & 14.78 & 14.33 & 13.72 &1\\
422: NGC~6181a & 2371 & 14.46 & 13.75 & 13.23 & 12.69 &2\\
423: NGC~6384a & 1655 & 14.24 & 12.94 & 12.61 & 12.00 &1\\
424: NGC~7137a & 1691 & ----- & ----- & 16.27 & 15.52 &1\\
425: NGC~7177a & 1150 & 14.56 & 13.85 & 13.22 & 12.55 &1\\
426: NGC~7184a & 2632 & 18.48 & 17.16 & 16.71 & 15.98 &1\\
427: NGC~7290a & 2900 & 17.00 & 16.51 & 16.05 & 16.17 &1\\
428: NGC~7290b & 2900 & 16.97 & 16.17 & 15.83 & 15.25 &1\\
429: NGC~7678a & 3486 & 15.30 & 14.86 & 14.35 & 13.94 &1\\
430: NGC~7755a & 2961 & 17.83 & ----- & ----- & 17.15 &1\\
431: \end{longtable}
432: %}
433:
434: \newpage
435: \begin{table}
436: \caption{Color-magnitude relations for satellite
437: galaxies.}
438: \begin{center}
439: \begin{tabular}{cccccc}
440: Color & Type &$N$ & $a$ & $b$ & $\sigma$ \\
441: \hline
442: \\
443: $B-V$ & Early & 11 & $-0.048\pm 0.019$ & $-0.158$& 0.140 \\
444: & Late & 22 & $-0.049\pm 0.012$ & $-0.241$& 0.185 \\
445: $V-I$ & Early & 12 & $-0.138\pm 0.017$ & $-$1.539 & 0.173 \\
446: & Late & 22 & $-0.193\pm 0.013$ & $-$2.650 & 0.249 \\
447: \end{tabular}
448: \end{center}
449: \end{table}
450:
451: \newpage
452:
453: \begin{table}
454: \caption{Color gradients for early-type satellite galaxies.}
455: \begin{center}
456: \begin{tabular}{lcc}
457: Galaxy & Range & $\Delta (B-R)/\Delta (\log r)$ \\
458: & (arcsec) & (mag arcsec$^{-2}$) \\
459: \hline
460: \\
461: NGC~259b & $2-8$ & $-0.031$ \\
462: NGC~488a & $2-6$ & +0.009 \\
463: I1723b & $2-6$ & $-$0.056 \\
464: NGC~772a & $2-7$ & $-$0.076 \\
465: NGC~1620b& $2-7$ & $-$0.121 \\
466: NGC~2718b& $2-5$ & $-$0.216 \\
467: NGC~3735b& $2-7$ & $-$0.169 \\
468: NGC~4725b& $2-7$ & +0.621 \\
469: NGC~7290b& $2-4$ & $-$0.023 \\
470: \end{tabular}
471: \end{center}
472: \end{table}
473:
474: \clearpage
475: \newpage
476: \begin{figure}
477: \begin{center}
478: \includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{f1.eps}
479: \protect\caption[ ]{Comparison between the absolute magnitudes derived by Zaritsky et
480: al. (1997) ($M_{Bz}$) and those ($M_B$) derived from the observations presented in
481: this paper.}
482: \label{comparison}
483: \end{center}
484: \end{figure}
485:
486: \newpage
487: \begin{figure}
488: \begin{center}
489: \includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{f2.eps}
490: \protect\caption[ ]{Color--magnitude diagrams for early type ($filled \;
491: circles$) and late type ($open \; circles$) satellite galaxies. The lines are
492: least-squares fits to the early type galaxies.}
493: \label{cmr}
494: \end{center}
495: \end{figure}
496:
497: \newpage
498: \begin{figure}
499: \begin{center}
500: \includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{f3.eps}
501: \protect\caption[ ]{Color--color diagram of the satellite galaxies with $M_B\le
502: -18$ ($open\; circles$) and $M_B\ge -18$ ($filled\; circles$).}
503: \label{col}
504: \end{center}
505: \end{figure}
506:
507: \newpage
508: \begin{figure}
509: \begin{center}
510: \includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{f4.eps}
511: \protect\caption[ ]{Color--magnitude diagram of the satellite galaxies
512: presented in this article ($filled\; circles$) and the dwarf galaxies of the
513: Local Group ($open \; circles$). The line is a least-squares fit to the
514: external early type satellite galaxies.}
515: \label{compar_gl}
516: \end{center}
517: \end{figure}
518:
519: \end{document}
520:
521:
522: