1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3: \usepackage{apjfonts}
4:
5: \newcommand{\timav}{\langle \dot M \rangle}
6: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{eqnarray}}
7: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{eqnarray}}
8: \bibliographystyle{apj}
9:
10: \shorttitle{Seismology of the WD in GW Lib}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \submitted{Accepted by ApJL}
15: \title{ Seismology of the Accreting White Dwarf in GW Lib }
16:
17: \author{Dean M. Townsley\altaffilmark{1},
18: Phil Arras\altaffilmark{2},
19: and Lars Bildsten\altaffilmark{1,2}}
20:
21: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics, Broida Hall,
22: University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; townsley@physics.ucsb.edu}
23: \altaffiltext{2}{Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kohn Hall,
24: University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; arras@kitp.ucsb.edu,
25: bildsten@kitp.ucsb.edu}
26:
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29:
30: We present a first analysis of the g-mode oscillation spectrum for
31: the white dwarf (WD) primary of GW Lib, a faint cataclysmic variable
32: (CV). Stable periodicities have been observed from this WD for a number
33: of years, but their interpretation as stellar pulsations has been
34: hampered by a lack of theoretical models appropriate to an accreting
35: WD. Using the results of Townsley and Bildsten, we construct accreting
36: models for the observed effective temperature and approximate mass of
37: the WD in GW Lib. We compute g-mode frequencies for a range of accreted
38: layer masses, $M_{\rm acc}$, and long term accretion rates, $\timav$.
39: If we assume that the observed oscillations are from $\ell=1$ g-modes,
40: then the observed periods are matched when $M\approx 1.02M_\odot$,
41: $M_{\rm acc}\approx 0.31\times10^{-4}M_\odot$ and $\timav\approx 7.3\times
42: 10^{-11}M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. Much more sensitive observations are needed
43: to discover more modes, after which we will be able to more accurately
44: measure these parameters and constrain or measure the WD's rotation rate.
45:
46: \end{abstract}
47:
48: \keywords{binaries: close---novae, cataclysmic
49: variables-- stars: dwarf novae ---white dwarfs}
50:
51: \defcitealias{TownBild03}{TB}
52:
53: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
54: \section{Introduction}
55:
56: Dwarf Novae (DN) are the subset of CVs with low time-averaged accretion rates
57: $\timav\lesssim10^{-9}M_\odot \ {\rm yr}^{-1}$ and thermally unstable accretion
58: disks that lead to sudden accretion events which interrupt the otherwise
59: quiescent state. In quiescence,
60: the UV (and sometimes optical) emission from the binary is dominated by
61: light from the WD surface, allowing for a measurement of the WD's $T_{\rm
62: eff}$. These $T_{\rm eff}$'s are much hotter than expected for a WD of the age
63: of the binary (a few Gyr) and
64: must be related to accretion \citep{Sion99}. Calculations of the
65: heating of the deep interior of the WD by the prolonged accretion
66: \citep{TownBild04}
67: explains the observed values of $T_{\rm eff}$ and yields a unique
68: relationship between
69: $\timav$, the WD mass, $M$, and the orbital period $P_{\rm orb}$
70: \citep{TownBild03}.
71:
72: GW Lib is one of the shortest orbital period CVs known, $P_{\rm orb} = 77$
73: min \citep{Thoretal02}, and therefore has a very low $\timav\sim 5\times
74: 10^{-11} M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ \citep{TownBild03}. Only one
75: disk outburst has been observed from GW Lib
76: \citep{Gonz83}. Much later photometric observations during quiescence led to
77: the discovery of
78: periodic variability \citep{vanZetal00} similar to that of
79: isolated WDs which pulsate due to non-radial g-modes
80: (see \citealt{Brad98} for a review of the DAV WDs).
81: The highest signal to noise photometric observations comprise two weeks of
82: single-site data taken in 1998 with some supplement from other longitudes
83: \citep{vanZetal04}. There are three clear periodicities, listed in Table
84: \ref{tab:periods}, with some evidence for mild period variability.
85:
86: \begin{deluxetable}{cc}
87: \tablewidth{0pt}
88: \tablecaption{\label{tab:periods}Observed Periods}
89: \tablehead{ System & Principal Period, $P$\\ & (seconds) }
90: \startdata
91: GW Lib & $236$, $377$, $646$\\
92: SDSS 1610 & 345, 607\\
93: SDSS 0131 & $\simeq$ 330, $\simeq$ 600\\
94: SDSS 2205 & $\simeq$ 330, $\simeq$ 600
95: \enddata
96: \end{deluxetable}
97:
98:
99: Three additional CV WD pulsators have been found
100: \citep{WarnWoud03,WoudWarn04} by taking
101: photometric time series of DN identified in the Sloan Digital Sky
102: Survey (SDSS; \citealt{Szkoetal03}) which show WD spectral features in the
103: optical. These objects and their dominant periods
104: are also listed in Table \ref{tab:periods}. At this discovery
105: fraction we expect
106: $\simeq$15 CV WD pulsators total by the end of the SDSS.
107: Seismology of the CV WD pulsators provides the prospect of well-determined
108: masses for these systems and the parameters we derive for GW Lib are
109: the first step in this process.
110:
111: Mass determinations are especially interesting due to possible implications
112: for progenitor systems of Type Ia supernovae. Thought to be accreting WDs near
113: the Chandrasekhar mass \citep{HillNiem00}, these progenitors are closely
114: related to the CV population, but the precise nature of this relationship is
115: unknown. Important clues in this mystery lie in how the masses of CV primary
116: WDs change over the accreting lifetime of the binary, but progress is
117: hampered by the difficulty of measuring CV primary masses \citep{Patt98}.
118: This mass evolution, as well as probing the $M_{\rm acc}$ directly with
119: seismology, is also important for determining how much, if any, of the
120: original WD material has been ejected into the ISM in classical nova
121: outbursts, contributing to the ISM metallicity \citep{Gehretal98}.
122:
123: We begin in \S 2 by discussing the observed properties of the WD in GW Lib
124: and constructing accreting WD models that are consistent with the
125: observations. Section 3 discusses the g-mode properties for the accreting
126: model of GW Lib, and in Section 4 we show what can be learned about the
127: accreting WD from the observed mode periods. We conclude in Section 5 with a
128: discussion of future work.
129:
130:
131:
132:
133: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
134:
135: \section{Observed Properties of the White Dwarf in GW Lib}
136:
137: Though the periods make it clear that the oscillations in GW Lib are
138: non-radial g-modes, without secure identification of the radial and angular
139: quantum numbers ($n$ and $\ell$), it is difficult to carry out the
140: seismology. Hence, we start by using the binary's observed properties to
141: constrain a few of the WD's properties, thus reducing the range of
142: possibilities we need to consider in our modeling efforts.
143:
144: \subsection{Limits from Distance and $T_{\rm eff}$ }
145:
146: We use three observations: (1) the parallax (2) a $T_{\rm eff}$-$\log
147: g$ relationship determined from the UV spectrum, and (3) the $P_{\rm orb}$.
148: The parallax of GW Lib has been measured from the ground \citep{Thor03} and
149: gives a distance of $104^{+30}_{-20}$ pc. Current UV spectroscopic
150: observations can only constrain $T_{\rm eff}$ and $\log g$ to a
151: well-determined linear relationship (see \citealt{Howeetal02} for a
152: discussion). In the case
153: of GW Lib, $T_{\rm eff}/{\rm K} = 14700+2000\log_{10} g_8$ where $g_8$
154: is the surface gravity measured in $10^8$ cm
155: s$^{-2}$ \citep{SzkoGWLib02}. By using this, the UV flux measured from the
156: same observation, the distance, and a WD mass-radius relation
157: we find $M=1.03$ to $1.36M_\odot$ from the range of allowed
158: distances. This constraint excludes the diagonally shaded regions in Figure
159: \ref{fig:constraints}.
160:
161: \begin{figure}
162: \plotone{constraints.eps}
163: \caption{\label{fig:constraints}
164: Parameter space constraints from non-seismological observations.
165: Distance, UV flux and UV spectral measurements constrain $M$ (diagonal
166: shading) and gravitational wave radiation provides a (mass dependent) lower
167: limit on $\timav$ (solid line). Actual models considered here are indicated by
168: the circles.
169: The $*$ indicates our best fit to the observed pulsations.
170: }
171: \end{figure}
172:
173: Another parameter needed is the time-averaged accretion
174: rate, $\timav$. For each $M$, $P_{\rm orb}$ sets
175: the orbital separation, and with a mass-radius relation for the Roche Lobe
176: filling companion (we use \citeauthor{KolbBara99}'s 1999 for a low mass main sequence
177: star) this allows a derivation of a mimimum $\timav$ due
178: only to gravitational radiation from the orbit.
179: This limit is shown by the solid line in Figure
180: \ref{fig:constraints}, and can be high if the system has
181: passed through the period minimum, so that the companion is a
182: sub-stellar object which is out of thermal equilibrium and has a
183: lower mean density.
184:
185: Optical spectroscopy (\citealt*{Szkoetal00}; \citealt{Thoretal02})
186: has given lower $T_{\rm
187: eff}$ (11000 K and 13220 K respectively), however both of these studies used
188: gravities much lower than the allowed range derived above ($\log g=8$ and
189: 7.4 as opposed to 8.6 for $M=1.0M_\odot$),
190: and were unable to effectively account for contamination by the quiescent
191: accretion disk, both of which would lead to low fitted $T_{\rm eff}$.
192: The UV spectrum is the most reliable indicator of
193: $T_{\rm eff}$.
194:
195:
196: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
197: \subsection{The Accreting White Dwarf Structure}
198:
199:
200: The WD interior structure is from \citet[hereafter TB]{TownBild04}. We
201: chose a simple compositional structure consisting of a solar composition
202: accreted layer of mass $M_{\rm acc}$ on the WD core, an equal mixture
203: of $^{12}$C and $^{16}$O. For calculation of the buoyancy properties, a
204: smooth transition region of $0.2$ times the local pressure scale height was
205: put in between these layers (see TB for a discussion of the diffusion
206: timescales). With this compositional structure, a WD model is parameterized
207: by $M$, $T_{\rm core}$, $\timav$ and $M_{\rm acc}$, and compression of material
208: by accretion powers a surface luminosity $L$.
209: TB related $T_{\rm core}$ to $\timav$ by finding the equilibrium
210: state where between classical novae outbursts (as $M_{\rm acc}$ is growing)
211: the WD core would suffer no net heating or cooling. For a fixed $T_{\rm
212: eff}$ at the observed value, TB also relate $\timav$ and
213: $M_{\rm acc}$, with a higher $M_{\rm acc}$ implying a lower $\timav$ for the
214: same $T_{\rm eff}$. Using these two constraints we are left with $M$ and
215: $M_{\rm acc}$ as free parameters, where we only consider $M_{\rm acc} \le
216: M_{\rm ign}\sim 10^{-4}M_\odot$, the classical nova ignition mass.
217:
218: This smaller grid of models are shown by the circles in Figure
219: \ref{fig:constraints}, and have $M/M_\odot=1.0, 1.05, 1.1, 1.15,$ and 1.20,
220: each with $M_{\rm acc} = 0.1$, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9$M_{\rm ign}$. The
221: ignition masses for these models were $M_{\rm ign}= 1.40$, 1.32, 1.22, 1.14,
222: and $1.08\times 10^{-4}M_\odot$. The model at $M=1.05M_\odot$ and $M_{\rm
223: acc}= 0.3M_{\rm ign} = 0.40\times 10^{-4}M_\odot$ has $T_{\rm eff}=16070$ K
224: (that implied for this $M$ by the UV spectrum), $\timav = 6.4\times
225: 10^{-11}M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, and $T_{\rm core} = 5.9\times 10^6$ K. The
226: downward trend in $\timav$ with increasing $M$ is due to $L$ decreasing with
227: the WD radius with $T_{\rm eff}$ constrained to the measured relation.
228:
229:
230: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
231: \section{ G-modes in GW Lib's White Dwarf}
232:
233: In a nonrotating star, all variables can be decomposed into
234: spherical harmonics $Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)$. We ignore the perturbed
235: gravitational potential (the Cowling approximation) and work in the adiabatic
236: approximation.
237: The linearized momentum and energy equations are
238: then written in terms of the radial displacement $\xi_r(r)$ and
239: the Eulerian pressure perturbation $\delta p(r)\equiv \rho \psi(r)$ as
240: (See e.g. eq.14.2 and 14.3 in \citealt{Unnoetal89})
241: \be
242: \frac{d\psi}{dr} &=& \frac{N^2}{g} \psi -(N^2-\omega^2)\xi_r\ ,
243: \nonumber \\
244: \frac{d\xi_r}{dr} &=&
245: -\left( \frac{1}{c^2} - \frac{l(l+1)}{r^2 \omega^2} \right) \psi
246: - \left( \frac{2}{r} - \frac{g}{c^2} \right) \xi_r\ .
247: \ee
248: Here $\omega=2\pi/P$ is the mode frequency, $P$ is the period,
249: $c=(\Gamma_1 p/\rho)^{1/2}$ is the adiabatic sound speed, $g=GM(r)/r^2$ is
250: the downward gravitational acceleration, and $N^2=-g \left(d\ln\rho/dr -
251: \Gamma_1^{-1} d\ln p/dr \right)$ is the square of the Brunt-V\"ais\"al\"a
252: frequency. For boundary conditions, we impose zero Lagrangian pressure
253: perturbation, $\Delta p/\rho=\psi - g\xi_r=0$, at the top of the model
254: and $\xi_r=0$ at the interface between the solid core and surrounding
255: liquid. This interface occurs at the freezing point for a Coulomb solid
256: %$\Gamma_{\rm ion}=\langle Z^{5/3} \rangle (e^2/k_bT) (4\pi n_e/3)^{1/3}
257: %\gtrsim 173$
258: (\citealt{BildCutl95}; \citealt{MontWing99}) and
259: g-modes cannot penetrate into the solid core as
260: their frequency is too low to excite significant shearing motion of
261: the Coulomb solid.
262: A solid core is present in the GW Lib model due to
263: the high mass.
264: %A lower mass star would have a fluid core, in which case
265: %$\xi_r=l\psi/r$ as $r \rightarrow 0$.
266:
267: \begin{figure}
268: \plotone{cavity_integral.eps}
269: \caption{ \label{fig:propint}
270: Comparison of propagation diagram (top panel) and WKB integrand
271: (bottom panel) for an accreting model (solid
272: lines) and
273: non-accreting model (dashed line) with the same composition and $T_{\rm eff}$.
274: The vertical solid (dashed) line on the right indicates the
275: liquid-solid boundary.
276: The solid horizontal lines are the observed frequencies and the dotted
277: horizontal line is the breakup frequency.
278: The accreting model has $M=1.05M_\odot$, $M_{\rm
279: acc}= 0.3M_{\rm ign} = 0.40\times 10^{-4}M_\odot$, $T_{\rm eff}=16070$ K
280: (that implied for this $M$ by the UV spectrum), $\timav = 6.4\times
281: 10^{-11}M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, and $T_{\rm core} = 5.9\times 10^6$ K. The
282: non-accretor has $T_{\rm core}=9.3\times10^6$ K.
283: }
284: \end{figure}
285:
286: The propagation cavity for the observed short wavelength g-modes
287: (\citealt{Unnoetal89}) in GW Lib is bounded from above by $\omega^2
288: = L_l^2=l(l+1)c^2/r^2$, the Lamb frequency, and by
289: the solid core below.
290: %For periods longer than $\sim 1000\ {\rm sec}$
291: %the upper turning point will be set by the surface convection zone
292: %($\log_{10}p \sim 6-7$ for $T_{\rm eff}=16,000$ K). The wave energy
293: %decreases rapidly in the evanescent region outside the propagation cavity.
294: The propagation diagram for the model with $M=1.05M_\odot$ and $M_{\rm
295: acc} = 0.3M_{\rm ign}=0.40\times10^{-4}M_\odot $ is shown
296: in the upper panel of Figure \ref{fig:propint}.
297: The large peak in $N$ at $\log_{10} p\simeq 19$ is due to the
298: change in mean molecular weight in the transition layer from the solar
299: composition accreted envelope to the C/O core. In the roughly constant
300: flux envelope, $N^2 \simeq g/z$ where $z$ is the depth
301: from the surface. In the degenerate core, $N^2 \simeq (g/H_p)(k_bT/E_F)$,
302: where $E_F$ is the electron Fermi energy and
303: $H_p = p/\rho g$ is the pressure scale height.
304: In the propagation zone of the wave, the WKB dispersion
305: relation for low frequency g-modes gives a radial wavenumber
306: $k_r=(N/\omega)[l(l+1)]^{1/2}/r$.
307: %For short period (long wavelength)
308: %waves, the width of the compositional discontinuity is smaller than the
309: %wavelength, acting to split the core and envelope into separate resonant
310: %cavities.
311: %For sufficiently long periods (short wavelengths), the wave
312: %can propagate through the compositional discontinuity. In either case,
313: The quantized WKB phase $\varphi$ accrued by the wave in a given region is
314: $\varphi = \int dr k_r = [l(l+1)]^{1/2} \omega^{-1} \int N dr/r$ so that $\omega
315: \propto \int NH_p\,d\ln p$.
316: The integrand is shown in the bottom panel
317: of Figure \ref{fig:propint}, representing the number of nodes per
318: decade in pressure. Shown are two WD models: an accreting model with
319: $M=1.05M_\odot$ and $M_{\rm acc} = 0.3M_{\rm ign}=0.40\times 10^{-4}M_\odot$
320: used in our mode
321: analysis (solid line), and a non-accreting model with the same $T_{\rm
322: eff}$ (dashed line) and composition.
323:
324: Not shown in Figure \ref{fig:propint} is the difference due to the envelope
325: mean molecular weight, $\mu$, from the case of a pure H or He envelope to one
326: of solar compositon. Such a change is reflected in the periods as
327: $P_n\propto\mu^{0.5}$, since the envelope is well-approximated
328: by an $n=4$ polytrope.
329: The non-accreting model also has a higher $T_{\rm core}$
330: %($8.7\times 10^6$ K)
331: than the accreting model
332: %($5.9\times 10^6$ K),
333: by about 50\%,
334: leading to two important effects: (1) the WKB integrand has a higher
335: value in the core for the non-accreting model ($\omega \propto T_{\rm
336: core}^{1/2}$), and (2) the solid core is smaller,
337: pushing the inner boundary condition deeper into the star. Both effects
338: directly influence the observed periods, and period spacings,
339: hence {\it it is essential to use a WD model including the effects of
340: compressional heating and nuclear burning}, rather than a passively
341: cooling WD model.
342:
343: %\emph{Knowing the
344: %relationship between $T_{\rm eff}$ and $T_{\rm core}$ is essential to
345: %understanding g-modes on accreting WD.}
346:
347: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
348:
349:
350: \section{Inferring the WD Properties from the Periods}
351:
352: The existing optical time-series photometry of GW Lib \citep{vanZetal04}
353: consists of 7 time series taken in 1997, 1998, and 2001. Here we focus on
354: the best of these, the two weeks of data from May 1998.
355: Table \ref{tab:periods} represents our estimate of the three periods.
356: From the $O-C$ phase plots shown by \citet{vanZetal04}, the
357: periodicity near 646 s varies with $\dot\nu =\dot\omega/2\pi\simeq
358: - 10^{-11}$ Hz s$^{-1}$, and the phase is tracked by the
359: observations. For that near 377 s, the phase is lost,
360: and therefore it is inconclusive whether
361: there are multiple closely spaced periods or just unresolved variability.
362: The highest frequency is quite stable, and though close to a sum is
363: unlikely to be a combination frequency. Splittings $\simeq 1$ $\mu$Hz
364: are ubiquitous in the Fourier transforms, but their origin is unclear. The
365: Doppler shift due to the orbit should have a magnitude of $0.5$ to 1.3
366: $\mu$Hz for the 646 and 236 s periods respectively. The frequency resolution
367: set by the inverse length of the time series is also $\sim \mu$Hz.
368:
369: As mentioned by \citet{vanZetal04}, the mode frequencies might drift due to
370: the cooling of the material accreted in the last DN outburst. The magnitude
371: and sign of this drift can be approximated using the cooling time of the freshly
372: accreted material and its fractional contribution to the WKB integral
373: discussed above. For a recurrence time of 20 years (the time since the last
374: outburst) with $\timav\simeq 5\times 10^{-11}M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$,
375: $\Delta M\simeq10^{-9}M_\odot$ was deposited in the last outburst.
376: For $M=1.0M_\odot$ the base of this layer has $p_{b} \simeq
377: 2\times 10^{14}$ dyne cm$^{-2}$, and a thermal time of
378: $\tau_{\rm th} = c_p T_b \Delta M / L \sim 1$ yr $(p_b/10^{14}{\rm dyne\
379: cm^{-2}})^{1.2}$, implying that this layer relaxes to close to the static
380: solution in a few years after the outburst, though a small
381: amount of cooling continues. As can be seen from the lower panel in Figure
382: \ref{fig:propint}, the mode frequencies are largely determined deeper in
383: the WD; however, this outer layer does have a contribution $\int N dz\propto
384: p_b^{1/10}\propto T_b^{1/2}$, for an
385: $n=4$ polytrope. This accounts for about 20\% of the whole integral, and
386: leads to $\dot \nu \simeq0.2\nu\dot T/2T = -\nu/10\tau_{\rm th} \sim
387: -10^{-12}{\rm Hz\ s^{-1}}$ for $\nu = 1/646$ s, close enough to the observed
388: drift to warrant further calculations of this effect, which we do not
389: undertake here.
390: Shorter period (lower $n$) modes reside deeper in the star, making them
391: less vulnerable to transient heating and cooling effects.
392:
393: \begin{figure}
394: \plotone{rms_contours_bw.eps}
395: \caption{
396: Contours in the root mean squared difference between the mode periods
397: observed and the closest modes in the model, $\Delta P_{\rm rms}$. The best
398: solution lies in the lower left hand corner where $M=1.02M_\odot$, $M_{\rm
399: acc} = 0.23 M_{\rm ign} = 0.31\times 10^{-4}M_\odot$. The dot-dashed line
400: demonstrates approximately how $M_{\rm acc}/M_{\rm ign}$ scales with $M$ for
401: a fixed period and $n$.
402: \label{fig:rms_cont}
403: }
404: \end{figure}
405:
406: We have calculated the g-mode spectrum of model WDs with parameters
407: on the grid indicated in Figure \ref{fig:constraints} for $\ell=1$.
408: By interpolating within this grid we compute the model periods
409: $P_{n}(M,M_{\rm acc})$. The root mean square period difference between
410: the observed three modes and the models is defined as $\Delta P_{\rm
411: rms}^2=\sum_{i=1}^3 {\rm min}_{\{n\}}[(P_{n} - P_i)^2]/3$, where the
412: observed periods have been indexed with $i=1,2,3$. The contours of $\Delta
413: P_{\rm rms}$ are shown in Figure \ref{fig:rms_cont}, implying a best fit
414: solution with $\Delta P_{\rm rms} = 1.8$s for $M=1.02M_\odot$ and $M_{\rm
415: acc} = 0.23M_{\rm ign} = 0.31\times 10^{-4}M_\odot$. The mode identifications
416: for this best fit model are $n=3$, 8, and 17
417: for the three observed periods. These do not appear to correspond to any
418: particular mode trapping pattern reflected in the mode kinetic energy.
419: For this model, we can predict additional
420: mode periods yet to be observed; up to $n=17$ these are 141, 191, 234,
421: 268, 289, 310, 351, 377, 400, 432, 463, 492, 519, 553, 586, 617, 647, 678 s.
422:
423: The contours for $\Delta P_{\rm rms}$ do not close around a single
424: solution, implying additional data is needed to get better constraints.
425: There are two other areas in the $M$-$M_{\rm acc}$ plane which also
426: provide fairly good matches ($P_{\rm rms}< 3$ s) to the observed periods.
427: These are centered near $(M/M_\odot,\ M_{\rm acc}/M_{\rm ign})$ of (1.06,
428: 0.53) and (1.15, 0.6), and extend in the $M_{\rm
429: acc}$ direction. Each of the three minima represent a different set
430: of mode IDs, the shallower ones having $n=4$, 9, 19 and 5, 11, 22 for
431: the 236, 377, and 646 s modes. The $M$, $M_{\rm acc}$ degeneracy can be
432: simply explained. For a mode trapped in the envelope, $P_n\propto n /
433: \int_{\rm env} N dz \propto n M_{\rm acc}^{-0.1}M^{-2.3}$ for a polytrope
434: of index $4$ and an assumed scaling $R\propto M^{-1.8}$, suitable for
435: $M=1.0$ to $1.2M_\odot$. Thus fixing $n$ and $P_n$ defines the relation
436: $M_{\rm acc} /M_{\rm ign}\propto M^{-21.5}$, where $M_{\rm ign}\propto
437: M^{-1.5}$, leading to the degeneracy shown by the dot-dashed line
438: in Figure \ref{fig:rms_cont}.
439:
440:
441: %As a final note, it is possible that the 377 and 646 s modes
442: %are an $l=2$ and $l=1$ respectively due to their ratio being almost exactly
443: %$\sqrt{2(2+1)/1(1+1)}=\sqrt{3}$. We have not explored this possibility in
444: %detail.
445:
446:
447:
448:
449: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
450: \section{Conclusions and Uncertainties}
451: \label{sec:rotation}
452:
453: We have found non-rotating accreting WD models which fit the
454: periodic variability observed in GW Lib, implying $M=1.02M_\odot$,
455: $M_{\rm acc}=0.31\times10^{-4}M_\odot$ and $\timav=7.3\times
456: 10^{-11}M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$. This model is quite simple, but since it is
457: capable of accounting for the observed periods, a more complex model is
458: not called for at this time. A number of important issues were not dealt
459: with, such as the presence of a residual He layer due to inefficient
460: nova mass ejection, or our treatment of the accreted
461: layer-C/O boundary. More detailed non-adiabatic calculations will be
462: undertaken to address mode excitation.
463: The most essential omission in our calculations is
464: the WD rotation, since it is expected to be spun up by accretion. If the
465: WD is rapidly rotating, the model parameters derived here are likely to
466: be inaccurate. Better observations are necessary for this next essential
467: parameter to be constrained. These observations should accomplish two
468: goals (1) to clearly characterize the substructure or variability of the
469: 377 s and 646 s periods, (2) probe for lower amplitude signals. A larger
470: number of identified modes are essential for conclusive seismology.
471:
472: %As noted by Van Zyl et.al. (2004),
473: Rotation may significantly modify the mode frequencies. Since the maximum
474: rotation rate for our GW Lib models is $\sim 1 {\rm\
475: rad\ s^{-1}}$ and the observed mode frequencies are $\omega\sim 10^{-2} {\rm
476: \ rad\ s^{-1}}$, {\it spin frequencies above 1\% breakup will cause large
477: frequency shifts for observed modes.} In fact \citet{SzkoGWLib02}
478: estimate $v\sin i< 300\ {\rm km \ s^{-1}}$, allowing spin rates up to 6\% of
479: breakup even for high $i$. Rotation rates this large lead to a qualitative
480: change in mode properties. When the spin frequency $\Omega_{\rm
481: spin} \lesssim 0.5\omega$, rotation can be treated as a small perturbation.
482: Also, observationally this rotational frequency splitting allows a determination
483: of the $l$ quantum number. If, however, $\Omega_{\rm spin} \gtrsim
484: 0.5\omega$, the Coriolis force has a ``nonperturbative'' effect on the mode
485: frequencies, modifying the relation between the frequency and quantum numbers
486: \citep*{Bildetal96}. Hence accreting WDs may provide a unique proving ground
487: for techniques of seismology for rapidly rotating stars.
488:
489:
490: %reference to Livio about accretors being very slow rotators?
491:
492: This work was supported by the National
493: Science Foundation under grants PHY99-07949, AST02-05956, and 0201636, and by
494: NASA through grant AR-09517.01-A from STScI, which is operated by
495: AURA, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555.
496: Phil Arras is a NSF AAPF fellow.
497:
498: %BIB
499:
500: \bibliography{gwlib}
501:
502: \end{document}
503:
504: