1: % File draft date: 2 Jan 2002
2: % \documentstyle[12pt,../aasms]{article}
3: %\documentstyle[12pt,emulateapj5]{article}
4: \documentclass[12pt,preprint,flushrt]{aastex}
5: %\doublespace
6:
7: \begin{document}
8: \newcommand{\etal}{{\it et al.}}
9: \include{idl}
10:
11: \title{CHANDRA Detection of the AM CVn binary ES Cet (KUV 01584-0939)}
12: \author{Tod E. Strohmayer}
13: \affil{Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics, NASA's Goddard Space Flight
14: Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771; stroh@clarence.gsfc.nasa.gov}
15:
16: \begin{abstract}
17:
18: We report on {\it Chandra} ACIS observations of the ultracompact AM
19: CVn binary ES Cet. This object has a 10.3 minute binary period and is
20: the most compact of the confirmed AM CVn systems. We have, for the
21: first time, unambiguously detected the X-ray counterpart to ES Cet. In
22: a 20 ksec ACIS-S image a point-like X-ray source is found within 1''
23: of the catalogued optical position. The mean countrate in ACIS-S is
24: 0.013 s$^{-1}$, and there is no strong evidence for variability. We
25: folded the X-ray data using the optical ephemeris of Warner \& Woudt,
26: but did not detect any significant modulation. If an $\approx 100 \%$
27: modulation similar to those seen in the ultracompact candidates V407
28: Vul and RX J0806.3+1527 were present then we would have detected
29: it. The upper limit (3$\sigma$) to any modulation at the putative
30: orbital period is $\approx 15\%$ (rms). We extract the first X-ray
31: spectrum from ES Cet, and find that it is not well described by simple
32: continuum models. We find suggestive evidence for discrete spectral
33: components at $\approx 470$ and $890$ eV, that can be modelled as
34: gaussian emission lines. In comparison with recent X-ray detections of
35: nitrogen and neon in another AM CVn system (GP Com), it appears
36: possible that these features may represent emission lines from these
37: same elements; however, deeper spectroscopy will be required to
38: confirm this. Our best spectral model includes a black body continuum
39: with $kT = 0.8$ keV along with the gaussian lines. The unabsorbed 0.2
40: - 5 keV X-ray flux was $\approx 7 \times 10^{-14}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$
41: s$^{-1}$. The observed luminosity in the hard component is a small
42: fraction of the total expected accretion luminosity, most of which
43: should be radiated below 0.1 keV at the expected mass accretion rate
44: for this orbital period. We discuss the implications of our results
45: for the nature of ES Cet.
46:
47: \end{abstract}
48:
49: \keywords{Binaries: close - Stars: individual (KUV 01584-0939, ES Cet,
50: Cet3) - Stars: white dwarfs -- X-rays: binaries -- Gravitational
51: Waves}
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54:
55: The AM CVn stars are a class of ultracompact, semidetached binaries
56: which are transferring helium from a degenerate (or semi-degenerate)
57: dwarf onto a companion white dwarf (see Warner 1995). There are
58: presently ten confirmed systems of this type (Woudt \& Warner 2003),
59: and an eleventh has recently been proposed (SDSS J1240-01; Roelofs et
60: al. 2004) based on optical spectroscopy. ES Cet (also known as KUV
61: 01584-0939, and Cet3) was discovered in the Kosi survey for UV-excess
62: objects (Kondo, Noguchi \& Maehara 1983), and it is also listed in the
63: CV catolog of Downes, Webbink, \& Shara (1997). Its optical spectrum
64: was studied by Wegner, McMahan \& Boley (1987) and shows strong He II
65: emission lines. A strong blue continuum, likely due to accretion, is
66: also present and provides additional evidence that the system is a
67: compact binary. Recently, Warner \& Woudt (2002) strengthened this
68: conclusion with the report of a 10.3 minute modulation of its V band
69: flux. The modulation is very likely the orbital period or a
70: ``superhump'' period of an AM CVn binary. The superhump periods in AM
71: CVn's are thought to be caused by disk warping and precession, and are
72: typically found just longward of the orbital periods (see Patterson et
73: al. 2002; Warner 1995). The 10.3 minute orbital period makes ES Cet
74: the most compact of the {\it bona fide} AM CVn stars. Two additional
75: AM CVn candidates with shorter periods have recently been proposed;
76: V407 Vul (Cropper et al. 1998; Ramsay et al. 2000; Marsh \& Steeghs
77: 2002; Wu et al. 2002; Strohmayer 2002; Strohmayer 2004a) and RX
78: J0806.4+1527 (Israel et al. 2002; Ramsay et al. 2002; Hakala et
79: al. 2003; Strohmayer 2003), however, it is still possible that the
80: observed periods in these systems are not the orbital periods of
81: ultracompact systems (see Cropper et al. 2003; Warner 2003; Norton,
82: Haswell \& Wynn 2004; Strohmayer 2004a).
83:
84: If ES Cet is indeed an ultracompact binary, then gravitational
85: radiation can drive mass transfer at a rate as high as $1 \times
86: 10^{-8} M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$, and the object should be a bright soft
87: X-ray source. Several AM CVn systems have been detected in the X-ray
88: band, including AM CVn, CR Boo and GP Com (van Teeseling \& Verbunt
89: 1994; Ulla 1995; Eracleous, Halpern \& Patterson; and Strohmayer
90: 2004b). Indeed, recent XMM/Newton observations of GP Com have
91: provided, for the first time, both high signal to noise spectra as
92: well as detections of X-ray emission lines from an AM CVn system
93: (Strohmayer 2004b). These results indicate that X-ray spectral studies
94: can provide detailed information about the accretion process as well
95: as the composition of the accreted matter in such systems. It is
96: therefore important to expand the X-ray sample and identify additional
97: targets suitable for more comprehensive follow-up. Moreover, as the
98: most compact of the confirmed AM CVn stars, ES Cet should be a strong
99: gravitational radiation source, and changes in the orbital period
100: should be measureable (see Woudt \& Warner 2003; Strohmayer 2004a).
101:
102: The ROSAT all sky survey (RASS) faint source catalog shows a 0.0166
103: counts s$^{-1}$ source, 1RXS J020052.9-092435, within $\approx 10''$
104: of ES Cet, however, the source is too faint to provide any useful
105: X-ray colors, and ROSAT's positional accuracy is not sufficient to
106: unambiguously confirm it as the X-ray counterpart to ES Cet (Voges et
107: al 2000). Here we present new {\it Chandra} observations which have
108: unambiguously identified the X-ray counterpart to ES Cet, further
109: solidifying its accreting, ultracompact credentials. In \S 2 we give a
110: brief overview of our {\it Chandra} observations and the imaging
111: analysis. We discuss our spectral and timing analyses in \S 3. We
112: close in \S 4 with a discussion of the implications of our findings
113: for the nature of ES Cet.
114:
115: \section{Data Extraction and Analysis}
116:
117: {\it Chandra} observed the region around ES Cet for $\approx 20$ ksec
118: on October 2, 2003 (TT). Imaging was performed with ACIS-S using
119: TIMED-FAINT mode and the aimpoint was on the ACIS-S3 backside
120: illuminated chip. We used the FTOOLS version 5.3 to extract an image
121: centered on the optical position of ES Cet. We then employed the CIAO
122: tool {\it wavdetect} to search the image for point sources. Figure 1
123: shows the central portion of the ACIS-S3 image. Seven new X-ray
124: sources are detected in this field with $> 4\sigma$ significance (the
125: sources are marked with 3'' radius circles), including a source at a
126: location consistent with the optical position of ES Cet ($\alpha =
127: 02:00:52.23\; , \delta = -09:24:31.68$; J2000). Table 1 summarizes
128: some of the basic properties of all these sources. This object, which
129: we denote CXO 020052.2-092431.6, is additionally marked with the pair
130: of orthogonal lines in Figure 1. Its derived position is within 1'' of
131: the optical position of ES Cet. Based on the positional coincidence
132: and the gross X-ray properties described below we conclude that CXO
133: 020052.2-092431.7 is the X-ray counterpart to ES Cet. The detection of
134: the source in X-rays provides additional confirmation that it is
135: indeed an accreting, ultracompact binary.
136:
137: \section{Timing and Spectral Properties}
138:
139: To probe the X-ray timing and spectral properties of ES Cet we first
140: used the CIAO tool {\it axbary} to correct the photon arrival times to
141: the solar system barycenter. For this we used the source coordinates
142: obtained from our imaging analysis above. We then extracted photons in
143: an $\approx 1.5''$ region centered on the source. This resulted in a
144: total of 249 photons for our analyses. Figure 2 shows a lightcurve,
145: using all source photons binned at 1,000 seconds. The mean countrate
146: is $1.25\times 10^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. There is no strong evidence for
147: variability in the lightcurve.
148:
149: To search for a modulation at the observed optical (presumably
150: orbital) period we folded the data using the ephemeris of Woudt \&
151: Warner (2003), but we did not detect any significant modulation. We
152: also computed a $Z_n^2$ power spectrum (see Buccheri et al. 1983;
153: Strohmayer 2002), which allows a search for periodic signals with
154: arbitrary harmonic content, $n$. We used $n = 3$ for consistency with
155: the pulse profiles from V407 Vul and RX J0806 which have this number
156: of significant harmonics. Consistent with the folding analysis, no
157: signal is detected in the $Z_3^2$ spectrum. We can place an upper
158: limit on the signal power using the $Z_3^2$ power level found in the
159: immediate vicinity of the optical frequency. Expressed as an
160: amplitude, this gives a ($3\sigma$) upper limit of 15\% (rms). This
161: limit is consistent with the value $a = 1/2 (I_{max} -
162: I_{min})/(I_{max} + I_{min})$, where $I_{max}$ and $I_{min}$ are the
163: maximum and minimum values of the folded profile, respectively. The
164: quantity $a$ is a convenient, frequently used measure of the amplitude
165: of a pulsed signal.
166:
167: Interestingly, if the source had an X-ray modulation profile similar
168: to those seen from V407 Vul and RX J0806.4+1527, then we would have
169: easily been able to detect it. Our ability to detect a signal of a
170: given strength in these data can be quantified using the so called
171: signal sensitivity, which is the pulsed amplitude that, if present,
172: would be detected with at least a given confidence level. For these
173: data we have a $3\sigma$ sensitivity to a pulsed X-ray flux at the
174: known orbital period of $\approx 28\%$ (rms).
175:
176: We extracted source and background spectral files, used the CIAO tools
177: to generate response matrices and modelled the spectrum within
178: XSPEC. The low energy response of ACIS is effectively reduced and
179: modified by a contaminant (Marshall et al. 2003). To account for this
180: we used an ancillary response file (ARF) corrected with the ACISABS
181: tool. We began by fitting several simple continuum models, including,
182: power-law, black body, and thermal bremsstrahlung spectra. Using these
183: continuum models we found there is essentially no sensitivity to a
184: neutral hydrogen absorbing column, so we fixed $n_H = 0.02 \times
185: 10^{22}$, which is the value deduced from the ``$n_H$'' tool available
186: at the HEASARC webpage (Dickey \& Lockman 1990). We found that the
187: best fitting thermal bremsstrahlung temperature was $> 100$ keV. Over
188: the bandpass of interest this spectral form looks essentially like a
189: power-law. Since the two models have essentially the same goodness of
190: fit, for the sake of brevity we do not give further details of the
191: fits for the bremsstrahlung model.
192:
193: Given the relatively modest number of counts it is perhaps surprising
194: that none of these continuum models alone does a very good job of
195: fitting the spectrum. See Table 2 for a summary of the spectral
196: fits. For each of these models the additional contribution to $\chi^2$
197: appears to be associated with localized emission at about 0.9 and 0.5
198: keV, respectively. These excesses can be adequately modelled with
199: gaussian emission line profiles. Including these two additional
200: components we find that the best overall model is the black body
201: continuum (plus the gaussian lines). This fit has a minimum $\chi^2 =
202: 13.5$ with 23 degrees of freedom. For comparison, the power-law model
203: including the two emission lines achieves a minimum $\chi^2 = 23.7$,
204: which is formally acceptable, but not as good as the fit using the
205: black body continuum with lines. We show the data and the best fit
206: with this model in Figure 3. Using our best spectral model, the
207: unabsorbed X-ray flux in the 0.2 - 5 keV band is $7.1 \times 10^{-14}$
208: ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. An absorbing column of $2 \times 10^{20}$
209: cm$^{-2}$ reduces this number by 3\%.
210:
211: The significance of the line components can be estimated by evaluating
212: the significance of the change in $\chi^2$ using the F-test. However,
213: a difficulty with this procedure is that the continuum is not known
214: {\it a priori}. Using the power-law continuum and fitting each line
215: separately we find $\Delta\chi^2 = 5.4$ and 7.7 for the 470 and 890 eV
216: features, respectively, while including both lines simultaneously
217: gives $\Delta\chi^2 = 15.1$. These numbers correspond to F-test
218: probabilities of 0.148, 0.055, and 0.0135, respectively. Using the
219: blackbody continuum results in $\Delta\chi^2$ values of 20.8, 13.1,
220: and 35.7 for the 470 eV, 890 eV and simultaneous fits. This yields
221: F-test probabilities of 0.0012, 0.021, and $5\times 10^{-6}$,
222: respectively. Because we do not know {\it a priori} the form of the
223: continuum, and since the lines are not compellingly significant
224: against the power-law continuum, we regard the present evidence for
225: the line features as suggestive, requiring confirmation with higher
226: signal to noise measurements.
227:
228: We note, however, that recent high resolution X-ray spectral
229: measurements of the AM CVn system GP Com (Strohmayer 2004b) have
230: revealed strong nitrogen emission lines at $24.78 \AA = 500.4$ eV (N
231: VII Ly$\alpha$), and $\approx 29 \AA = 427.6$ eV (N VI). When observed
232: with the lower resolution of a CCD, such nitrogen emission could
233: produce a feature with a centroid energy consistent with the $\approx
234: 500$ eV feature tentatively identified in ES Cet. Moreover, strong
235: lines of hydrogen- and helium-like neon were also detected in GP
236: Com. A possible origin for the $\approx 900$ eV feature suggested in
237: the spectrum of ES Cet could be emission from helium-like neon at
238: $\approx 13.5 \AA = 918.5$ eV, however, this would require very little
239: neon in the hydrogen-like ionization state (Ne X Ly$\alpha$ at $12.134
240: \AA = 1,021.9$ eV), since there is no evidence for an emission line
241: component in ES Cet at $\approx 1$ keV.
242:
243: \section{Discussion and Implications}
244:
245: The gravitational radiation torque on an ultracompact binary is a
246: strongly increasing function of the orbital frequency. For an
247: $\approx 10$ minute system like ES Cet, the mass accretion rate should
248: approach $1\times 10^{-8}$ $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$. Assuming that
249: matter falls from the inner Lagrange point, and that half the
250: gravitational potential energy is dissipated in the accretion disk,
251: the X-ray luminosity, $L_x$, can be expressed as (see, for example,
252: Nelemans et al. 2004),
253: \begin{equation}
254: L_x = \frac{1}{2}\frac{GM_1 \dot m}{R} \left ( 1 - \frac{R}{R_{L_1}}
255: \right ) \;,
256: \end{equation}
257: where $M_1$, $R$, $R_{L_1}$, and $\dot m$ are the primary mass,
258: primary radius, the distance from the inner Lagrange point to the
259: center of the accretor, and the mass accretion rate,
260: respectively. With $\dot m = 10^{-8}$ $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ this
261: expression predicts a luminosity of $\approx 3.4 \times 10^{34}$ ergs
262: s$^{-1}$.
263:
264: The X-ray flux from accreting, non-magnetic white dwarfs is likely
265: produced in a boundary layer whose properties are a strong function of
266: the mass accretion rate. At the high rates expected for ES Cet the
267: boundary layer should be optically thick, radiating with an effective
268: temperature in the range $3 - 5 \times 10^5$ K (see for example,
269: Pringle \& Savonije 1979; Narayan \& Popham 1993). The spectrum we see
270: with {\it Chandra} is clearly much harder than a simple black body at
271: $\approx 5 \times 10^5$ K ($0.043$ keV). The distance to ES Cet is not
272: well constrained, however, even at a distance of 1 kpc the observed
273: 0.2 - 5 keV flux corresponds to a luminosity of $8.3 \times 10^{30}$
274: ergs s$^{-1}$, which is much less than that expected for $\dot m =
275: 10^{-8}$ $M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$. Clearly the hard X-ray flux observed
276: with {\it Chandra} represents a small fraction of the total accretion
277: luminosity.
278:
279: If the accretion rate is indeed as high as $10^{-8}$ $M_{\odot}$
280: yr$^{-1}$, then the boundary layer is expected to be optically thick,
281: and the bulk of the accretion luminosity should be emitted below 100
282: eV. For example, a thermal spectrum with $T = 4\times 10^5$ K would
283: peak at $\approx 100$ eV, below the nominal {\it Chandra} band.
284: Moreover, even a modest interstellar column would strongly absorb such
285: a soft component. Although the uncertainty in $n_H$ makes it difficult
286: to be precise, we can put some constraints on the strength of such a
287: component. Assuming a 40 eV blackbody temperature, and taking $n_H =
288: 0.02 \times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$, we find that such a component could
289: have an intrinsic flux as large as $2 - 4 \times 10^{-13}$ ergs
290: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ before a soft excess becomes evident in the lowest
291: energy channel of the {\it Chandra} spectrum. If the temperature were
292: as low as 30 eV then it would not be too difficult to hide an even
293: larger flux of $\approx 1 - 2 \times 10^{-12}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$
294: s$^{-1}$. We note that {\it Chandra's} low energy sensitivity is
295: further compromised by the ACIS contaminant. Better sensitivity at and
296: below 100 eV will be required to adequately address the issue of the
297: bolometric accretion luminosity of ES Cet. A distance measurement
298: would also be extremely useful in constraining the energetics of the
299: system.
300:
301: The detection of ES Cet as an X-ray source further solidifies its
302: ultracompact credentials. Comparisons with the two ultracompact
303: candidates; V407 Vul and RX J0806.4+1527 could therefore lead to
304: insights as to the true nature of these systems. Although ES Cet has
305: a photometric period similar to both of the ultracompact candidates,
306: there would appear to be important differences between the systems. ES
307: Cet has a much harder spectrum than either V407 Vul or J0806, which
308: both show essentially no emission above 1 keV. Thus, if accretion
309: powers the emission in all three sources, there must be something
310: different about the nature of the accretion. The lack of strong
311: variability in ES Cet suggests the X-ray emission covers a large
312: azimuthal extent on the white dwarf, as would likely be produced from
313: a boundary layer. On the other hand the pulsations in V407 Vul and
314: J0806 suggest localized emission on the white dwarf surface.
315:
316: The detection with {\it Chandra} of hard ($> 2$ keV) emission from ES
317: Cet as well as the suggestive evidence for line features indicates
318: that a hard, optically thin, line dominated spectral component similar
319: to that seen from GP Com can still be produced even at very high mass
320: accretion rates. Clearly deeper high resolution spectroscopy of ES Cet
321: as well as GP Com, with, for example, XMM/Newton, has the potential to
322: probe in detail the composition and physical properties of the
323: boundary layers in these systems. Moreover, comparisons between a low
324: $\dot m$ system such as GP Com, and a high $\dot m$ system like ES Cet
325: can provide important information on the mass accretion rate
326: dependence of the boundary layer spectrum and structure.
327:
328: \centerline{\bf References}
329:
330: \noindent{} Buccheri, R. et al. 1983, A\&A, 128, 245.
331:
332: \noindent{} Cropper, M., Ramsay, G., Wu, K. \& Hakala, P. 2003, ASP
333: Conference Series to be published in Proc. Cape Town Workshop on
334: magnetic CVs, held Dec 2002, (astro-ph/0302240).
335:
336: \noindent{} Cropper, M. et al. 1998, MNRAS, 293, L57.
337:
338: \noindent{} Dickey, J. M. \& Lockman, F. J. 1990, ARAA, 28, 215.
339:
340: \noindent{} Eracleous, M., Halpern, J. \& Patterson, J. 1991, ApJ, 382, 290.
341:
342: \noindent{} Downes, R. A., Webbink, R. F. \& Shara, M. M. 1997, PASP, 109, 345.
343:
344: \noindent{} Hakala, P. et al. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 10L.
345:
346: \noindent{} Israel, G. L. et al. 2002, A\&A, 386, L13.
347:
348: \noindent{} Kondo, M., Noguchi, T. \& Maehara, H. 1984, Ann. Tokyo
349: Astron. Obs., 20, 130.
350:
351: \noindent{} Marsh, T. R. \& Steeghs, D. 2002, MNRAS, 331, L7.
352:
353: \noindent{} Marshall, H. L. et al. 2003, astro-ph/0308332.
354:
355: \noindent{} Narayan, R. \& Popham, R, G. 1993, Nature, 362, 820.
356:
357: \noindent{} Nelemans, G., Yungelson, L.~R., \& Portegies Zwart, S.~F.\
358: 2004, MNRAS, 349, 181.
359:
360: \noindent{} Norton, A. J., Haswell, C. A. \& Wynn, G. A. 2004, A\&A,
361: in press, (astro-ph/0206013).
362:
363: \noindent{} Patterson, J. et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 65.
364:
365: \noindent{} Popham, R. G. \& Narayan, R. 1995, ApJ, 442, 337.
366:
367: \noindent{} Pringle, J. E. \& Savonije, G. J. 1979, MNRAS, 187, 777.
368:
369: \noindent{} Ramsay, G. Hakala, P. \& Cropper, M. 2002, MNRAS, 332, L7.
370:
371: \noindent{} Ramsay, G., Cropper, M., Wu, K., Mason, K.~O., \& Hakala, P.\
372: 2000, MNRAS, 311, 75.
373:
374: \noindent{} Strohmayer, T. E. 2004a, ApJ, in press, (astro-ph/0403675).
375:
376: \noindent{} Strohmayer, T. E. 2004b, ApJ, in press, (astro-ph/0404542).
377:
378: \noindent{} Strohmayer, T. E., 2003, ApJ, 593, 39L.
379:
380: \noindent{} Strohmayer, T. E., 2002, ApJ, 581, 577.
381:
382: \noindent{} Ulla, A. 1995, A\&A, 301, 469.
383:
384: \noindent{} van Teeseling, A. \& Verbunt, F. 1994, A\&A, 292, 519.
385:
386: \noindent{} Voges, W. et al. 2000,
387: http://wave.xray.mpe.mpg.de/rosat/catalogues/rass-fsc/
388:
389: \noindent{} Warner, B. 2003, to appear in the proceedings of IAU JD5,
390: `White Dwarfs: Galactic and Cosmological Probes', eds. Ed Sion,
391: Stephane Vennes and Harry Shipman, (astro-ph/0310243).
392:
393: \noindent{} Warner, B. 1995, {\it Cataclysmic Variable Stars}, Cambridge
394: Univ. Press, Cambridge UK.
395:
396: \noindent{} Warner, B. \& Woudt, P. A. 2002, PASP, 114, 129.
397:
398: \noindent{} Wegner, G., McMahon, R. K. \& Boley, F. I. 1987, AJ, 94, 1271.
399:
400: \noindent{} Woudt, P. A. \& Warner, B. 2003, to appear in the
401: proceedings of IAU JD5, `White Dwarfs: Galactic and Cosmological
402: Probes', eds. Ed Sion, Stephane Vennes and Harry Shipman,
403: (astro-ph/0310494).
404:
405: \noindent{} Wu, K., Cropper, M., Ramsay, G. \& Sekiguchi, K. 2002,
406: MNRAS, 331, 221.
407:
408: \pagebreak
409:
410: \begin{figure}
411: \begin{center}
412: \includegraphics[width=5.0in, height=4.5in]{f1.ps}
413: \end{center}
414: Figure 1: Chandra/ACIS-S 0.2 - 10 keV image of the region around ES
415: Cet. Seven previously unknown sources are identified with 3'' radius
416: circles. The position of ES Cet is additionally marked by the pair of
417: orthogonal lines.
418: \end{figure}
419: \clearpage
420:
421: \begin{figure}
422: \begin{center}
423: \includegraphics[width=6in, height=6in]{f2.ps}
424: \end{center}
425: Figure 2: Lightcurve of ES Cet in the full {\it Chandra} band. The
426: time bins are 1000 s. There is no evidence for variability.
427: \end{figure}
428: \clearpage
429:
430: \begin{figure}
431: \begin{center}
432: \includegraphics[width=6in, height=6in,angle=-90]{f3.ps}
433: \end{center}
434: Figure 3: ACIS-S data and best fitting spectral model. The model
435: includes black body emission with $kT = 0.8$ keV, as well as narrow
436: gaussian emission lines at 470 and 890 eV. See Table 2 for details of
437: the spectral modeling.
438: \end{figure}
439: \clearpage
440:
441: \begin{table*}
442: \begin{center}{Table 1: X-ray Sources in the Vicinity of ES Cet}
443: \begin{tabular}{cccc} \\
444: \tableline
445: \tableline
446: Source & RA (J2000) & DEC (J2000) & Count Rate (s$^{-1}$)$^1$ \\
447: \tableline
448: CXO 020052.2-092431.6 (ES Cet) & 02:00:52.23 & -09:24:31.68 & 0.0101 \\
449: CXO 020056.0-092454.4 & 02:00:56.05 & -09:24:54.40 & 0.0011 \\
450: CXO 020050.1-092329.2 & 02:00:50.18 & -09:23:29.26 & 0.0045 \\
451: CXO 020101.8-092509.5 & 02:01:01.82 & -09:25:09.52 & 0.0012 \\
452: CXO 020051.1-092145.3 & 02:00:51.10 & -09:21:45.32 & 0.0012 \\
453: CXO 020046.8-092215.4 & 02:00:46.81 & -09:22:15.49 & 0.0007 \\
454: CXO 020045.4-092331.6 & 02:00:45.43 & -09:23:31.60 & 0.0027 \\
455: \tableline
456: \end{tabular}
457: \end{center}
458: $^1$ Background subtracted count rate.
459: \end{table*}
460:
461: \clearpage
462:
463: \begin{table*}
464: %\hoffset=-1.5in
465: \begin{center}{Table 2: X-ray Spectral Fits for ES Cet}
466: %\hoffset=-1.5in
467: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc} \\
468: \tableline
469: \tableline
470: Model & $kT/\alpha^1$ & Norm$^2$ & Flux$^3$ &
471: E$_1^4$ & Flux$_{E_1}^5$ & E$_2^4$ & Flux$_{E_2}^5$ & $\chi^2_r$ \\
472: \tableline
473: powerlaw & $0.95 \pm 0.1$ & $1.1\times 10^{-5}$ & $6.7$ & -
474: & - & - & - & 1.4 \\
475: blackbody & $0.68 \pm 0.05$ & 0.029 & $6.1$ & - & - & - & - & 1.84 \\
476: powerlaw + lines & $ 0.88 \pm 0.14$ & $8.1\times
477: 10^{-6}$ & $7.1$ & $471 \pm 29$ & $3.1$ & $891 \pm 29$ & $1.9$ & 0.95 \\
478: blackbody + lines & $ 0.79 \pm 0.08$ & 0.017 & $6.9$ & $470 \pm 19$
479: & $4.7$ & $890 \pm 23$ & $2.3$ & 0.60 \\
480: \tableline
481: \end{tabular}
482: \end{center}
483: $^1$ Temperature in keV (for blackbody), or power law index.
484:
485: $^2$ Continuum normalization parameter.
486:
487: $^3$ Model flux in units of $10^{-14}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.
488:
489: $^4$ Line centroid in eV.
490:
491: $^5$ Line flux in units of $10^{-6}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.
492:
493: \end{table*}
494:
495:
496:
497: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
498: %%%%% End of document %%%%%
499: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
500:
501: \end{document}
502: