1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
4: \newcommand{\myemail}{jfarihi@astro.ucla.edu}
5:
6: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
7:
8: \shorttitle{MID INFRARED OBSERVATIONS OF VAN MAANEN 2}
9: \shortauthors{J. Farihi}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \title{MID INFRARED OBSERVATIONS OF VAN MAANEN 2:\\
14: NO SUBSTELLAR COMPANION}
15:
16: \author{J. Farihi and E. E. Becklin}
17: \affil{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, 8371 Math Sciences Building,
18: University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1562}
19: \email{jfarihi@astro.ucla.edu,becklin@astro.ucla.edu}
20:
21: \and
22:
23: \author{B. A. Macintosh}
24: \affil{Institute of Geophysics \& Planetary Physics, Lawrence
25: Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue L-413,
26: Livermore, CA 94551}
27: \email{bmac@igpp.llnl.gov}
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30:
31: The results of a comprehensive infrared imaging search for
32: the putative $0.06M_{\odot}$ astrometric companion to the
33: 4.4 pc white dwarf van Mannen 2 are reported. Adaptive optics
34: images acquired at $3.8\mu$m reveal a diffraction limited core
35: of $0.09''$ and no direct evidence of a secondary. Models predict
36: that at 5 Gyr, a $50M_{\rm J}$ brown dwarf would be only 1 magnitude
37: fainter than van Maanen 2 at this wavelength and the astrometric
38: analysis suggested a separation of $0.2''$. In the case of a chance
39: alignment along the line of sight, a 0.4 mag excess should be
40: measured. An independent photometric observation at the same
41: wavelength reveals no excess. In addition, there exist published
42: {\em ISO} observations of van Maanen 2 at $6.8\mu$m and $15.0
43: \mu$m which are consistent with photospheric flux of a 6750 K white
44: dwarf. If recent brown dwarf models are correct, there is no
45: substellar companion with $T_{\rm eff}\ga500$ K.
46:
47: \end{abstract}
48:
49: \keywords{binaries: general---stars: low-mass, brown dwarfs---stars:
50: individual(van Maanen 2)---white dwarfs}
51:
52: \section{INTRODUCTION}
53:
54: Van Maanen's star, also known as van Maanen 2 was discovered
55: in 1917 by Adrian van Maanen \citep{van17}. Its discovery was
56: quite accidental, as van Maanen was searching for common proper
57: motion companions to HD4628 (Lalande 1299) and noticed the even
58: larger proper motion of a nearby star. At 4.4 pc, van Maanen 2
59: is the nearest single white dwarf \citep{hol02}.
60:
61: \citet{mak04} reported the astrometric detection of a substellar
62: companion to van Maanen 2 through analysis of {\em Hipparcos} data.
63: The data suggested an orbital solution with a lower bound companion
64: mass of $0.06\pm0.02M_{\odot}$, a period of 1.57 yr, and a maximum
65: separation on the sky of $0.3''$. Based on the published parameters,
66: a binary orbital calculator (A. Ghez 2004, private communication)
67: indicated a separation of $0.19''$ at position angle $274\arcdeg$
68: near the middle of January 2004. This paper presents the results
69: of a direct imaging search carried out during that time frame.
70:
71: \section{OBSERVATIONS, DATA REDUCTION, \& PHOTOMETRY}
72:
73: \subsection{\it Keck Adaptive Optics Observations}
74:
75: Van Maanen 2 was observed using the facility adaptive optics system
76: \citep{win00a,win00b} and the NIRC2 camera at Keck Observatory on
77: 12 Jaunuary 2004. Five dithered images were obtained through an
78: $L^{'}$ ($3.4-4.1\mu$m) filter. To reduce thermal backgrounds
79: and provide a more symmetric PSF, a circular pupil stop was used
80: which describes an inscribed circle on the hexagonal Keck primary,
81: with a diameter of $\sim9$ meters. Each image consisted of 100 coadds
82: of 0.4 seconds each. Van Maanen 2 itself was used as the guide
83: star, with the adaptive optics system running at a rate of 80 Hz.
84: The correction was quite good, with a Strehl ratio (measured
85: relative to the PSF of the 9 meter pupil) of 0.75 and a full width
86: at half maximum of $0.089''$, essentially diffraction limited. The
87: plate scale was $0.01''$ per pixel.
88:
89: The adaptive optics images were reduced using standard
90: programs in the IRAF environment. For a given raw image,
91: the sky was extracted by taking the median of the four remaining
92: dithered images with rejection of hot and cold pixels. A flat
93: frame was created by averaging all five sky frames and subsequently
94: normalizing. Each dithered frame was then sky subtracted, flat
95: fielded, and the resulting five frames were registered and averaged.
96:
97: Due to the uncertainties in the wings of the adaptive optics
98: PSF and weather that was not photometric, it was difficult to
99: perform photometry on the Keck data. Therefore photometric
100: observations of van Maanen 2 were acquired at the IRTF.
101:
102: \subsection{\it IRTF and ISO Observations}
103:
104: $3.8\mu$m data on van Maanen 2 and two standard stars were
105: acquired on 1 February 2004 by Alan Stockton at the 3 meter
106: NASA Infrared Telescope Facility with NSFCAM \citep{ray03}.
107: For the standards, a 9 point dither pattern was used with each
108: frame consisting of 0.15 second exposure times 100 coadds --
109: yielding a total integration time of 135 seconds. The UKIRT
110: faint standard SA92-342 ($L^{'}=10.44$ mag) was observed
111: immediately before van Maanen 2 and the Elias standard star
112: HD22686 ($L^{'}=7.19$ mag) was observed immediately afterward
113: \citep{leg03}. Two sets of images, acquired in the same manner
114: as the standards, were obtained for van Maanen 2 for a total of
115: 18 frames and 270 seconds integration. Conditions during the
116: observations were reported as photometric.
117:
118: The data on the two standards were reduced using
119: standard programs in the IRAF environment. For a given raw
120: image, the sky was extracted by taking the median of the eight
121: remaining dithered images with rejection of hot and cold pixels.
122: A flat frame was created by averaging all nine sky frames and
123: subsequently normalizing. Each dithered frame was then sky
124: subtracted, flat fielded, and the resulting nine frames were
125: registered and averaged. Reducing the two sets of images on van
126: Maanen 2 was more difficult due to the faintness of the target in
127: each raw frame. It was found that the target was more easily
128: seen in pairwise subtracted images rather than in sky subtracted
129: images. All 18 pairwise subtracted frames were flat fielded,
130: registered and averaged, creating one final image for photometric
131: measurements.
132:
133: The flux of both standards was measured with aperture radii
134: of $1.2''$ and $2.4''$ and corrected for extinction. The error
135: in determining the zero point was 0.03 mag. Van Maanen 2 was
136: measured in the smaller aperture to minimize noise, corrected
137: to the larger aperture (with an error of 0.04 mag) and extinction
138: corrected. This yielded a signal to noise of 48 and a measurement
139: error of 0.03 mag. The photometric measurement including all errors
140: was $L^{'}=11.40\pm0.06$ mag for van Maanen 2.
141:
142: ISOCAM observations of van Maanen 2 were carried out in
143: 1997 in an effort to provide observational constraints
144: on the origin of metals in the photospheres of cool white
145: dwarfs \citep{cha99}. Data were taken at $6.8\mu$m and
146: $15.0\mu$m on van Maanen 2 and several other white dwarfs
147: as well as an A0V calibrator star. The data are listed in
148: Table \ref{tbl-1}.
149:
150: \section{RESULTS \& DISCUSSION}
151:
152: \subsection{\it Adaptive Optics - No Direct Evidence}
153:
154: In order to estimate the brightness of the reported companion,
155: a model for a $50M_{\rm J}$ brown dwarf at 5 Gyr was chosen. This
156: mass lies conservatively in the lower range of possible values and
157: required no interpolation within available models. The model age
158: is likely to be greater than the 3.67 Gyr cooling age \citep*{ber01}
159: of van Maanen 2 plus the $\sim0.5$ Gyr main sequence lifetime \citep
160: {mae89} for a $\sim4M_{\odot}$ progenitor of the $0.83M_{\odot}$ white
161: dwarf \citep{wei87,wei90,wei00,bra95,ber01}. A substellar companion
162: of this mass and age would be a late T dwarf ($T_{\rm eff}\sim800$ K)
163: and have $M_{L^{'}}=14.3$ mag which is $L^{'}=12.5$ mag at 4.4 pc
164: \citep{bur97}. Photometric $L^{'}$ band data on known brown dwarfs do
165: exist and the measurements agree with the models used here to within
166: 0.3 mag for spectral type T6 \citep{leg02}. Van Maanen 2 is predicted
167: to have $L^{'}=11.43$ mag based on the model predicted $V-K=0.84$ color
168: of a 6750 K helium white dwarf \citep{ber95} and the $K-L^{'}=0.12$
169: color of a 6750 K blackbody. $V-K=0.89$ is the measured color -- the
170: extrapolation was done from $V$ in case of any contamination by a
171: companion at $K$.
172:
173: The reduced $L^{'}$ image (Figure \ref{fig1}) shows no indication
174: whatsoever of a companion with the brightness expected from a
175: brown dwarf of the type reported by \citet{mak04}. From the
176: published orbital parameters, the companion should have been at
177: a separation of $0.19''$ and position angle of $274\arcdeg$
178: on the date of the observation. The full width at half maximum
179: of van Maanen 2 in the reduced image is $0.089''$ and the distance
180: to the first Airy ring is $\approx0.14''$. There are two extremely
181: faint features within the Airy ring at position angles of 284 and
182: $295\arcdeg$. Small aperture flux measurements, relative to the
183: primary, at eight different evenly spaced locations around the Airy
184: ring indicate that these features are unlikely to be real. The flux
185: at 284 and $295\arcdeg$, $f/{f_0}=0.069$ and 0.073 respectively,
186: are both within $2\sigma$ (0.018) of the average flux ($f/{f_0}=
187: 0.056$) in the ring and are almost certainly artifacts due to
188: imperfect optical guide star corrections. If the feature at
189: $295\arcdeg$ were real, its brightness after subtracting the flux
190: of the primary in the Airy ring implies $L^{'}=15.9$ mag and a
191: mass of $\sim15M_{\rm J}$, assuming an age of 5 Gyr \citep{bur97}.
192: This is simply not massive enough to cause the reported
193: astrometric wobble.
194:
195: An artificial star was planted at $0.19''$ from the primary
196: in order to test the ability to detect faint companions at this
197: separation. The adaptive optics PSF, extracted from the reduced
198: image of van Maanen 2, was used for the stellar profile of the
199: planted star. To be conservative, this artificial star is a full
200: 2.0 magnitudes fainter than the white dwarf -- this was confirmed
201: by placing the star at many positions on the image and measuring
202: its flux without contamination by the primary. The simulated star
203: is readily seen in Figure \ref{fig2}.
204:
205: Large errors in the reported orbital parameters allow for the
206: possibility that the companion remained unresolved due to chance
207: alignment during the observation. The values and computed errors
208: in separation and position angle, derived from the binary orbital
209: calculator, are ${0.19''} \ ^{+0.07}_{-0.18}$ and ${274\arcdeg} \
210: ^{+180}_{-2}$ respectively. Hence the putative companion could
211: have been located at almost any position in its orbit by the
212: epoch of the observation. However, there is further evidence
213: against this possibility.
214:
215: \subsection{\it Photometry - No Indirect Evidence}
216:
217: In the case of a chance alignment, any substellar companion
218: would still cause excess emission at mid infrared wavelengths.
219: This is primarily due to the size difference between brown dwarfs
220: and white dwarfs; a ratio of 10:1 in radius. It is not possible
221: for a significant occultation to occur. At most, a white dwarf
222: could block only $\sim1$\% of the light from an orbiting brown
223: dwarf.
224:
225: As mentioned above, a value of $L^{'}=11.40\pm0.06$ mag was
226: measured for van Maanen 2. This is to be compared with the
227: value predicted for a 6750 K white dwarf, $L^{'}=11.43$ mag.
228: The combined flux of the white dwarf plus a $50M_{\rm J}$ brown
229: dwarf at 5 Gyr would have a magnitude of $L^{'}=11.09$ mag.
230: Hence it is concluded there is no excess emission at this
231: wavelength.
232:
233: Furthermore, the published {\em ISO} observations place even
234: stronger constraints on the absence of flux from a brown dwarf
235: around van Maanen 2. A recent model \citep*{bur03} of the flux
236: from a 5 Gyr, $25M_{\rm J}$ brown dwarf was integrated over the
237: {\em ISO} $15.0\mu$m filter LW3. This results in a flux of about
238: 1.0mJy in this filter. The reported measurement taken at van Maanen
239: 2 in 1997 was $0.5\pm0.2$ mJy. This measurement is consistent
240: with photospheric flux from the white dwarf and an {\em excess} of
241: $5\sigma$ most likely would have been detected. If the {\em ISO}
242: results are correct and the models are right, any companion with
243: $T_{\rm eff} \ga500$ K is ruled out -- this includes 10 Gyr old
244: brown dwarfs with $M\geq35M_{\rm J}$ \citep{bur97,bur03}.
245:
246: Table \ref{tbl-1} summarizes all existing photometric data
247: on van Maanen 2 and the corresponding fluxes are plotted in Figure
248: \ref{fig3}. It should be clear from the figure that the measured
249: fluxes are all consistent with a single white dwarf with a
250: temperature around 6800 K.
251:
252: \section{CONCLUSION}
253:
254: Three compelling infrared observations of van Maanen 2 are
255: presented which rule out the presence of a substellar companion
256: warmer than $\sim500$ K. First, $3.8\mu$m adaptive optics images
257: reveal no significant flux at the predicted magnitude and position
258: of the putative companion reported by \citet{mak04}. Second,
259: $3.8\mu$m photometric observations are consistent with no excess
260: emission at this wavelength as would be expected from a $50M_
261: {\rm J}$ brown dwarf at 5 Gyr. And third, $15.0\mu$m data also
262: are consistent with no excess emission, ruling out any possible
263: companion massive enough to induce the reported astrometric
264: wobble.
265:
266: \acknowledgments
267:
268: Part of the data presented herein were obtained at Keck
269: Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership
270: among the California Institute of Technology (CIT), the
271: University of California and the National Aeronautics and
272: Space Administration (NASA). This publication makes use
273: of data acquired at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which
274: is operated by the University of Hawaii under Cooperative
275: Agreement no. NCC 5-538 with NASA, Office of Space Science,
276: Planetary Astronomy Program. Some data used in this paper
277: are part of the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS), a joint
278: project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared
279: Processing and Analysis Center (IPAC)/CIT, funded by NASA and
280: the National Science Foundation (NSF). 2MASS data were retrieved
281: from the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated
282: by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, CIT, under contract with NASA.
283: The authors wish to express their gratitude to A. Stockton,
284: J. Rayner and A. Tokunaga for their assistance in acquiring
285: the IRTF observations of van Maanen 2. Sincere thanks go to
286: J. Larkin and M. Barczys for donating some of their Keck adaptive
287: optics time for this project. Acknowledgement also goes to B.
288: Hansen for bringing this system to our attention, to B. Zuckerman
289: for a careful reading of this manuscript and many discussions,
290: to A. Ghez for the binary orbit calculator, and to B. Vacca for
291: help in the data reduction. Part of this work was performed under
292: the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear
293: Security Administration by the University of California, Lawrence
294: Livermore National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48.
295: This research has been supported in part by grants from NASA to UCLA.
296:
297: Facilities: \facility{Keck}, \facility{IRTF}
298:
299: \begin{thebibliography}{}
300:
301: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(2001)Bergeron, Leggett, \& Ruiz]{ber01}
302: Bergeron, P., Leggett, S. K., \& Ruiz, M. T. 2001, \apjs,
303: 133, 413
304:
305: \bibitem[Bergeron, Wesemael, \& Beauchamp(1995)]{ber95} Bergeron, P.,
306: Wesemael, F., \& Beauchamp, A. 1995, \pasp, 107, 1047
307:
308: \bibitem[Bessell \& Brett(1988)]{bes88} Bessell, M. S., \& Brett, J. M.
309: 1988, \pasp, 100, 1134
310:
311: \bibitem[Bragaglia, Renzini \& Bergeron(1995)]{bra95} Bragaglia, A.,
312: Renzini, A., \& Bergeron, P. 1995, \apj, 443, 735
313:
314: \bibitem[Burrows et al.(1997)]{bur97} Burrows, A. 1997, \apj, 491, 856
315:
316: \bibitem[Burrows et al.(2003)Burrows, Sudarsky, \& Lunine]{bur03} Burrows,
317: A., Sudarsky, D., \& Lunine, J. I. 2003, \apj, 596, 587
318:
319: \bibitem[Chary, Zuckerman, \& Becklin(1999)]{cha99} Chary, R., Zuckerman,
320: B., \& Becklin, E.E. 1999, Conf. Proceedings: the Universe as Seen
321: by ISO, ed. P. Cox \& M. F. Kessler (Noordwijk: ESA/ESTEC), 289
322:
323: \bibitem[Holberg, Oswalt, \& Sion(2002)]{hol02} Holberg, J. B., Oswalt,
324: T. D., \& Sion, E. M. 2002, \apj, 571, 512
325:
326: \bibitem[Leggett et al.(2002)]{leg02} Leggett, S. K. et al. 2002
327: \apj, 564, 452
328:
329: \bibitem[Leggett et al.(2003)]{leg03} Leggett, S. K. et al. 2003
330: \mnras, 345, 144
331:
332: \bibitem[Maeder(1989)]{mae89} Maeder, A. 1989, Proceedings of the
333: ${\rm 5^{th}}$ IAP Workshop: Astrophysical Ages and Dating
334: Methods, eds. E. Vangioni-Flam, M. Cass\'e, J. Audouze, J.
335: Tran Thanh Van, 71
336:
337: \bibitem[Makarov(2004)]{mak04} Makarov, V. V. 2004, \apj, 600, L71
338:
339: \bibitem[Rayner et al.(1993)]{ray03} Rayner, J. T., et al. 1993, SPIE,
340: 1946, 490
341:
342: \bibitem[van Maanen(1917)]{van17} van Maanen, A. 1917, \pasp, 29, 258
343:
344: \bibitem[Weidemann(1987)]{wei87} Weidemann, V. 1987, \aap, 188, 74
345:
346: \bibitem[Weidemann(1990)]{wei90} Weidemann, V. 1990, \araa, 28, 103
347:
348: \bibitem[Weidemann(2000)]{wei00} Weidemann, V. 2000, \aap, 363, 647
349:
350: \bibitem[Wizinowich et al.(2000a)]{win00a} Wizinowich, P., et al.
351: 2000, \pasp, 112, 315
352:
353: \bibitem[Wizinowich et al.(2000b)]{win00b} Wizinowich, P., Acton, D. S.,
354: Lai, O., Gathright, J., Lupton, W., \& Stomski, P., 2000, SPIE
355: 4007, 64
356:
357: \end{thebibliography}
358:
359: \clearpage
360:
361: \begin{figure}
362:
363: \plotone{f1.eps}
364: \caption{$3.8\mu$m adaptive optics image of van Maanen 2.
365: There is no direct evidence for a companion one magnitude
366: fainter than the primary. \label{fig1}}
367: \end{figure}
368:
369:
370: \clearpage
371:
372: \begin{figure}
373:
374: \plotone{f2.eps}
375: \caption{Adaptive optics image of van Maanen 2 with an artificial
376: star placed at $0.19''$ from the white dwarf. The magnitude of
377: the planted star is $L^{'}\approx13.4$ mag and is clearly seen.
378: \label{fig2}}
379: \end{figure}
380:
381:
382: \clearpage
383:
384: \begin{figure}
385:
386: \plotone{f3.eps}
387: \caption{Spectral energy distribution of van Maanen 2 from the
388: data in Table \ref{tbl-1}. Overplotted is a 6800 K blackbody
389: demonstrating that the data reveal no excess emission in the infrared
390: and are consistent with a single star.
391: \label{fig3}}
392: \end{figure}
393:
394:
395: \clearpage
396:
397:
398: \begin{deluxetable}{lccr}
399: %\tabletypesize{\small}
400: \tablecaption{Photometric Data on van Maanen 2 \label{tbl-1}}
401: \tablewidth{0pt}
402: \tablehead{
403: \colhead{Filter} &
404: \colhead{$\lambda_{0}(\mu$m)} &
405: \colhead{Magnitude} &
406: \colhead{$F_{\nu}$(mJy)}}
407:
408: \startdata
409:
410: $B$ & 0.44 & 12.91 & $27.9\pm1.4$\\
411: $V$ & 0.55 & 12.39 & $40.2\pm1.2$\\
412: $R$ & 0.64 & 12.13 & $43.1\pm1.3$\\
413: $I$ & 0.80 & 11.90 & $42.0\pm1.3$\\
414: $J$ & 1.22 & 11.69 & $34.4\pm0.6$ \\
415: $H$ & 1.65 & 11.57 & $24.7\pm0.5$ \\
416: $K_s$ & 2.16 & 11.50 & $16.7\pm0.5$ \\
417: $L^{'}$ & 3.76 & 11.40 & $6.8\pm0.4$ \\
418: LW2 & 6.75 & \nodata & $2.0\pm0.4$ \\
419: LW3 & 15.0 & \nodata & $0.5\pm0.2$ \\
420:
421: \enddata
422:
423: \tablecomments{$BVRI$ photometry is from \citet{ber01} and
424: is on the Johnson-Cousins system. $JHK_s$ data are from 2MASS
425: and agree with the near infrared data reported by \citet{ber01}.
426: The $L^{'}$ data are from the present work and the LW2 \& LW3
427: fluxes are from {\em ISO} \citep{cha99}.}
428:
429: \end{deluxetable}
430:
431: \end{document}
432:
433:
434: