1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \title {MID-INFRARED SPECTRA OF DUST DEBRIS AROUND MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS\footnote{Based on observations with the NASA {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}, which is operated by the California Institute of Technology for NASA}}
6:
7:
8:
9: \author{M. Jura\footnote{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles CA 90095-1562}$\,\,$, C. H. Chen\footnote{Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91109}$\,\,$, E. Furlan\footnote{Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14853-6801}$\,\,$, J. Green$^{5}$, B. Sargent$^{5}\,$, W. J. Forrest\footnote{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester NY 14627-0171}$\;$, D. M. Watson$^{5}$, D. J. Barry$^{4}$, P. Hall$^{4}$, T.L. Herter$^{4}$, J. R. Houck$^{4}$, G. C. Sloan$^{4}$, K. Uchida$^{4}$, P. D'Alessio\footnote{Centro de Radioastronomia y Astrofisica, UNAM, 58089 Morelia, Michoacan, Mexico }$\;$, B. R. Brandl\footnote{Sterrewacht Leiden, Leiden 2300 RA Netherlands}$\;$, L. D. Keller\footnote{Department of Physics, Ithaca College, Ithaca NY 14850}$\;$, F. Kemper$^{2,}\,$\footnote{{\it Spitzer} Fellow}$\,$, P. Morris\footnote{{\it Spitzer} Science Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125}$\,\,\,\,$, J. Najita\footnote{National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson AZ 85726-6732}$\,\,\,\,$, N. Calvet\footnote{Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge MA 02138}$\,\,\,$, L. Hartmann$^{12}$, P. C. Myers$^{12}$}
10:
11:
12:
13: \begin{abstract}
14:
15: We report spectra obtained with the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} in the ${\lambda}$ = 14 -- 35 ${\mu}$m range of 19 nearby main-sequence stars with infrared excesses. The six stars with strong dust emission show no recognizable spectral features, suggesting that the bulk of the emitting particles have diameters larger than
16: 10 ${\mu}$m. If the observed dust results from
17: collisional grinding of larger solids, we infer minimum masses of the parent body population between 0.004 M$_{\oplus}$ and 0.06 M$_{\oplus}$. We estimate grain production rates of ${\sim}$10$^{10}$ g s$^{-1}$ around ${\lambda}$ Boo and HR 1570; selective accretion of this matter may help explain their peculiar surface abundances. There appear to be inner truncations
18: in the dust clouds at 48 AU, 11 AU, 52 AU and 54 AU around HR 333, HR 506, HR 1082 and HR 3927, respectively.
19:
20:
21:
22:
23:
24: \end{abstract}
25: \keywords{circumstellar matter -- stars, main sequence}
26:
27: \section{INTRODUCTION}
28: The discovery with IRAS of a large infrared excess around Vega (Aumann et al. 1984) initiated the
29: detailed study of other planetary systems. We can now use the dust
30: emission from main sequence stars to constrain models for the origin and evolution of these environments (Lagrange, Backman \& Artymowicz 2000, Zuckerman 2001) with the long-term goal of developing a more comprehensive understanding of the formation and evolution of planets and
31: related minor bodies.
32: Most previous studies of the dust around main-sequence stars have been restricted to using broad-band infrared fluxes (e. g. Habing et al. 2001, Spangler et al. 2001). Here, we report measurements with the Infrared Spectrograph\footnote{The IRS was a collaborative venture between Cornell
33: University and Ball Aerospace Corporation funded by NASA
34: through the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Ames Research
35: Center.} (IRS, Houck et al. 2004) on the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} (Werner et al. 2004) of 19 main-sequence
36: stars.
37:
38: \section{OBSERVATIONS}
39:
40:
41:
42:
43: We obtained spectra of main sequence stars with previously reported IRAS excesses
44: with both the Short-Low (5.2 -- 14.5 ${\mu}$m) and Long-Low (14.0 -- 38.0 ${\mu}$m; ${\lambda}/{\Delta}{\lambda}$ ${\sim}$ 90) modules on the IRS. Table 1 lists the six targets in our
45: sample with strong infrared excesses. We did not
46: detect a substantial excess around 13 other stars. An example of a star without a strong excess is
47: HR 4732; its spectrum (from {\it Spitzer} aor 0003579392) is shown in Figure 1.
48: The other stars without
49: strong excesses are HD 16157 (aor 0003554560), HD 221354 (aor 0003565842), HR 818 (aor 0003554816), HR 1338 (aor 0003555584), HR 2015 (aor 0003556608), HR 3220 (aor 0003557888), HR 3862 (aor 0003558400), HR 5447 (aor 0003560192), HR 8085 (aor 0003564544), HR 8549 (aor 0003588608), HR 8799 (aor 0003565568) and Ross 128 (aor 0003559168).
50:
51: In order to avoid time-consuming peak-up on our relatively bright targets with accurately known positions, we operated
52: the observatory in IRS Spectral Mapping mode where a 2x3 raster
53: (spatial x dispersion) centered on the star is performed. The slit
54: positions were separated by half of the slit width in the dispersion direction,
55: and by a third of the slit length in
56: the spatial direction.
57:
58: We carried out the bulk of the reduction and analysis of our spectra with the IRS team`s
59: SMART program (Higdon et al 2004). We started with intermediate products from the {\it Spitzer}
60: IRS data-reduction pipeline, that lacked only stray light and flat-fielding corrections.
61: We extracted point-source spectra for each nod position
62: using a uniformly weighted column profile for which the variable width scales with the width of the
63: instrumental pointspread function. We also made similar spectral extractions for observations
64: of our photometric standard star, $\alpha$ Lac (A1V). Then we divided
65: each target spectrum, nod position by nod position, by the spectrum of the standard
66: star, multiplied the quotient by the appropriate template spectrum (Cohen et al 2003), and
67: averaged the resulting spectra from corresponding nod
68: positions. We plot the resulting spectra of our targets with IR excesses in Figure 1.
69: Based upon comparisons of IRS spectra of non-variable calibration sources to ground-based, IRAS, and {\it Spitzer} IRAC flux densities, we estimate
70: that the absolute spectrophotometric accuracy of these spectra is 10\% (1$\sigma$). It is important to
71: distinguish this absolute photometric accuracy, which describes the vertical positions of
72: the spectra on our plots relative to the flux density scale, from the point-to-point
73: fluctuation in the spectra, which is a measure of the precision of our
74: spectral feature strengths and therefore of our ability to identify spectral features and
75: compare them to our models. In general, the accuracy of our spectral feature identifications
76: and feature
77: strengths is limited by the point-to-point scatter (currently much larger than the system noise,
78: in bright objects) that is visible in the spectra. Therefore almost all features that
79: significantly exceed the fluctuations, and are wider than the two-pixel IRS spectral
80: resolution element, are significant. The lack of spectral features that we refer to
81: in this paper is based on this criterion.
82:
83:
84:
85:
86: \section{INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS}
87:
88:
89:
90:
91:
92:
93:
94: To interpret the data for the infrared excess, we need
95: luminosities, $L_{*}$, and
96: ages, $t_{*}$, of the stars. We take distances, $D_{*}$, from
97: {\it Hipparcos}, apparent magnitudes from the Yale Bright Star Catalog, assume no interstellar reddening, and use the bolometric corrections given by Flower (1996) to infer the total luminosities. For four stars, we adopt published estimated ages. For HR 506, the age is highly uncertain
98: since Zuckerman \& Song (2004) and Decin et al. (2000, 2003) estimate 0.3 Gyr and 3.0 Gyr, respectively. In view of the recently measured lithium abundance
99: of 2.6 on the usual 12-point logarithmic scale (Israelian et al. 2004), we adopt the younger age. For HR 333 and HR 3927, we assume ages of 0.1 Gyr, representative of dusty main
100: sequence A-type stars (Song et al. 2001).
101:
102: \subsection{Grain Size}
103: The dust
104: continua for ${\lambda}$ $>$ 20 ${\mu}$m show no spectral features. If the particles are spheres of diameter $a$, then any spectral features that might be present are
105: weakened if $a$ $>$ ${\lambda}/{\pi}$ (e. g. Spitzer 1978, Wolf \& Hillenbrand 2003). Our data thus suggest that the diameter of the grains is larger than 10 ${\mu}$m, as predicted by models such as those of Krivov, Mann \& Krivova (2000) and found for the particles that produce the zodiacal light in the Solar System (Fixsen \& Dwek 2002).
106:
107:
108: \subsection{Spatial Distribution and Dynamics}
109:
110: A standard model of dust debris systems
111: assumes that collisions among a population of large, unseen parent bodies produces smaller, detectable dust particles (Lagrange et al. 2000, Zuckerman 2001). Some of the best studied systems such as HR 4796A exhibit a well defined
112: ring of material (Schneider et al. 1999). Very approximately,
113: for circumstellar envelopes with $L_{30}/L_{*}$ $>$ 10$^{-4}$ (where $L_{30}$ is the characteristic luminosity of the infrared excess in the 30 ${\mu}$m spectral window, or ${\nu}L_{\nu}$ at 30 ${\mu}$m), particle-particle collisions
114: typically are the most important grain destruction mechanism (e. g. Krivov, Mann \& Krivova 2000, Wyatt \& Dent 2001).
115: In these relatively dusty environments, the grains do not migrate far before
116: they are fragmented into sufficiently small
117: pieces that they are driven out of the system by radiation pressure. Thus,
118: the spatial distribution of the dust reproduces the spatial distribution
119: of the parent bodies which might be determined by the history of planet
120: formation in the system.
121: In contrast, in less dusty
122: envelopes with $L_{30}/L_{*}$ $<$ 10$^{-4}$, mutual collisions are not so important, and the grains spiral inwards under the Poynting-Robertson drag. In such models, the spatial distribution of the
123: grains need not reproduce that of the parent bodies.
124:
125: Motivated by these models of dust debris, we consider two possible fits to the reduced data. First, we fit the spectra by a function of the form:
126: \begin{equation}
127: F_{\nu}\;=\;K_{1}\,{\nu}^{2}\;+\;K_{2}{\nu}^{-1}
128: \end{equation}
129: where $K_{1}$ and $K_{2}$ are constants.
130: The first term in equation (1) describes the photospheric emission while the second term represents
131: the infrared excess. We show in Figure 1 the comparison of our best fits with the data, and we
132: list in Table 1 our values for $K_{2}$ and $L_{30}/L_{*}$ where $L_{30}$ is $4{\pi}D_{*}^{2}K_{2}$.
133: Equation (1) fits the spectra for the two stars with the lowest values of $L_{30}/L_{*}$, HR 1570 and ${\lambda}$ Boo. However,
134: the infrared excesses of four stars require another model since fits using equation (1) either underestimate the observed photospheric fluxes
135: measured at ${\lambda}$ ${\leq}$ 12 ${\mu}$m (HR 333 and HR 3927) or the measured IRAS and/or ISO fluxes (Decin et al. 2000)
136: at ${\lambda}$ = 60 ${\mu}$m (HR 506 and HR 1082).
137:
138: Our second method to model the infrared excess is to fit a single temperature
139: to the dust particles so the total flux is fit with a function of the form:
140: \begin{equation}
141: F_{\nu}\;=\;C_{1}\,{\nu}^{2}\;+\;C_{2}\,B_{\nu}(T_{ex})
142: \end{equation}
143: where $B_{\nu}$ is the Planck function. In principle,
144: $C_{1}$ must equal $K_{1}$, but the absolute level of our spectra is somewhat uncertain because of imprecise calibration.
145: As can be seen in Figure 1, we can fit our infrared spectra adequately with equation (2) with the values of $T_{ex}$ given in Table 1 ranging from 72 K
146: to 114 K.
147:
148: The spectral energy distribution of the infrared excess can test the models.
149: If Poynting-Robertson drag dominates, the spectrum varies as ${\nu}^{-1}$ (e. g. Buitrago \&
150: Mediavilla 1985), the dust is smeared over a wide range of radii and equation (1) should fit the data. In contrast, in a model where collisions limit the lifetime of the
151: particles, then inward drift is not as important and the dust is more concentrated near its birthplace. In environments with $L_{30}/L_{*}$ $>$ 10$^{-4}$, there might be a dust ring or at least a well defined inner hole to the dust distribution which achieves a characteristic maximum temperature. Within the limited IRS spectral range, equation (2) can fit the data. Inner dust truncations might be
152: the result of the formation of low mass companions which might be planets (Kenyon \& Bromley 2002), but other models can produce rings as well (Takeuchi \& Artymowicz 2002). Also, since $T_{ex}$ is near 100 K, if water ice is an important constituent of the material,
153: there may be substantial grain destruction by sublimation which contributes
154: to the observed deficiency of warm grains (Jura et al. 1998).
155:
156:
157:
158: We now estimate some parameters for the circumstellar
159: dust. We assume that the particles
160: radiate like black bodies so that particles at temperature $T$ lie at distance $D$ from the star:
161: \begin{equation}
162: D\;=\;\left(\frac{L_{*}}{16{\pi}T^{4}{\sigma}_{SB}}\right)^{1/2}.
163: \end{equation}
164: For the two stars where the spectra can be fit by equation (1), there is no
165: constraint on the maximum temperature and thus no evidence for any inner
166: truncation in the dust distribution.
167: There are four stars where we use equation (2) to fit the data, and we
168: thus find a characteristic
169: grain temperature, which, from equation (3), we can translate
170: into a distance from the star.
171: Using the values of $T_{ex}$ and $L_{*}$ given in Table 1, we find values for the inner boundary of the dust of 48 AU, 11 AU, 52 AU and 54 AU around HR 333, HR 506, HR 1082 and HR 3927, respectively.
172: Consistent with models for those dust debris systems
173: where frequent collisions lead to smaller particles which are then ejected by radiation pressure, the stars with the strongest evidence for inner holes in the dust distribution have the highest values of $L_{30}/L_{*}$. If the inner holes are caused by inner planets, then in the future, with sufficiently high angular resolution, it may be possible to identify azimuthal asymmetries
174: in the dust which might indicate gravitational perturbations by
175: this unseen system of planets (e. g. Wyatt 2003).
176:
177:
178: We can also use our data to make a rough estimate of the minimum mass of the parent bodies, $M_{PB}$.
179: Since Poynting-Robertson drag provides a maximum grain lifetime, then in an approximate steady state, we can write (Chen \& Jura 2001):
180: \begin{equation}
181: M_{PB}\;{\geq}\frac{4L_{30}t_{*}}{c^{2}}
182: \end{equation}
183: This estimate of $M_{PB}$ is insensitive to the grain size and composition;
184: the minimum values of $M_{PB}$ derived from equation (4) are shown in Table 1. In systems with $L_{30}/L_{*}$ $>>$ 10$^{-4}$, collisions among dust grains occur often, the Poynting-Robertson lifetime is thus much longer than the
185: collision time, and we may severely underestimate $M_{PB}$. There may also
186: be large objects such as planets that are not experiencing rapid collisions and which do not contribute to the detected dust.
187:
188:
189:
190:
191:
192:
193: \section{DISCUSSION}
194: We show in Table 1 that the inferred lower bounds to $M_{PB}$
195: range from 0.004 M$_{\oplus}$ to 0.06 M$_{\oplus}$. The summed mass of the KBOs in the Solar System is uncertain and is currently estimated to be between 0.02 M$_{\oplus}$ and 0.1 M$_{\oplus}$ (Bernstein et al. 2003; Luu \& Jewitt 2002). Typical analogs of the Kuiper Belt may have total masses ${\leq}$
196: 0.1 M$_{\oplus}$ (Jura 2004). Since we observed stars with notable infrared excesses, we probably selected objects with particularly massive systems of parent bodies. In the Solar System, the value of the infrared luminosity of the dust is ${\sim}$ 10$^{-7}$ L$_{\odot}$ (e. g. Fixsen \& Dwek 2002).
197: Either the mass of parent bodies around our sample of stars is much
198: larger than the inferred minimum, or the collision rate of these objects
199: is substantially greater than in the Kuiper Belt of the Solar System.
200:
201:
202:
203:
204:
205:
206:
207: Two of the stars in Table 1, ${\lambda}$ Boo itself and HR 1570, are ${\lambda}$ Boo stars, a subclass of ${\sim}$2\% of all main-sequence A-type stars that is defined as having nearly solar abundances of C, N and O, but marked deficiencies of Fe elements by factors of 10--100 (Paunzen et al. 2002).
208: The explanation for this abundance pattern is not known.
209: One theory to account for their
210: surface abundances is that they have preferentially accreted some circumstellar matter (Venn \& Lambert 1990), and within the star's atmosphere there is an element-dependent chemical separation controlled by gravitational
211: settling and radiative acceleration at the base of the thin outer convection zone of the star (Turcotte \& Charbonneau 1993).
212: As shown in Jura (2004), the rate at which circumstellar dust is being produced scales
213: as the infrared excess luminosity such that ${\dot M}$ ${\sim}$ $L_{30}/c^{2}$
214: where $c$ is the speed of light. We therefore find from the results in Table 1 that ${\dot M}$ ${\sim}$10$^{10}$ g s$^{-1}$ for both ${\lambda}$ Boo and HR 1570.
215: According to Turcotte \& Charbonneau (1993), hydrogen-rich gas infall rates of ${\geq}$10$^{12}$ g s$^{-1}$ with selective accretion of ${\geq}$10$^{10}$ g s$^{-1}$ of metals in dust is required to explain the
216: surface abundances of ${\lambda}$ Boo stars. While more sophisticated treatments are required to the
217: accretion/diffusion models, our results at least show that metal infall at the required rate appears
218: to be occuring around ${\lambda}$ Boo stars.
219:
220: In models for the first 100 Myr of the Solar System, Petit, Morbidelli \& Chambers (2001) have computed that approximately 50\% of the ${\sim}$5 M$_{\oplus}$ of planetesimals initially within the asteroid belt had their
221: orbits perturbed by Jupiter so they hit the Sun. Murray et al. (2001) have
222: argued that such models can be generally extended to other main sequence
223: stars. Assuming that this accretion of ${\sim}$5 ${\times}$ 10$^{12}$ g s$^{-1}$ of rocky material often occurs, the atmospheres of the A stars
224: should be substantially polluted. We speculate that the main sequence stars
225: with inner holes in their dust distributions may also be systems with
226: asteroidal belts where gravitational perturbations by giant planets leads
227: to a significant supply of metals to an atmosphere where they would be otherwise
228: depleted. An infall of large rocks or asteroids may lead to observable variations in the abundance of the elements in the star's atmosphere (Cowley 1977) which could be different
229: from the effects of dust inflows occuring around
230: the ${\lambda}$ Boo stars.
231:
232:
233: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
234: We have obtained {\it Spitzer} mid-infrared spectra of 19 main-sequence stars. Our data are most useful for constraining the
235: evolution of the solid material in regions between ${\sim}$10
236: AU and ${\sim}$60 AU from the stars. We conclude the following:
237: \begin{itemize}
238: \item{There are no strong spectral features; we suggest that the typical
239: diameter of a dust particle is greater than 10 ${\mu}$m.}
240: \item{The infrared excesses can be explained by dust arising from collisions
241: between parent bodies whose minimum total mass lies between 0.004
242: M$_{\oplus}$ and 0.06 M$_{\oplus}$. These derived minimum masses are comparable to the
243: total mass of KBOs in the Solar System.}
244: \item{We estimate dust production rates of ${\sim}$10$^{10}$ g s$^{-1}$ around ${\lambda}$ Boo and HR 1570; selective accretion of this material may help explain their peculiar surface abundances.}
245: \item{There appear to be inner truncations
246: in the dust clouds at 48 AU, 11 AU, 52 AU and 54 AU around HR 333, HR 506, HR 1082 and HR 3927, respectively.}
247: \end{itemize}
248:
249: This work is based on observations made with the
250: {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}, which is operated by the Jet
251: Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
252: under NASA contract 1407. Support for this work was provided
253: by NASA through Contract Number 1257184 issued by
254: JPL/Caltech. F.K. is supported by the {\it Spitze}r Fellowship Program under award 011 808-001. Work at Cornell and the University of Rochester has been supported by JPL contract 960803 to Cornell and Cornell subcontract 31419-5714 to the University of Rochester. We are grateful to the entire
255: team of scientists and engineers that have made {\it Spitzer} and the IRS function so well.
256: \begin{thebibliography}{}
257: \bibitem{aumann1984} Aumann, H. H. et al. 1984, \apj, 278, 32
258: \bibitem{bernstein2003} Bernstein, G. M., Trilling, D. E., Allen, R. L., Brown, M. E., Holman, M. \& Malhorta, R. 2004, \aj, in press
259: \bibitem{buitrago1985} Buitrago, J. \& Mediavilla, E. 1985, \aap, 148, L8
260: \bibitem{chen2001} Chen, C. H. \& Jura, M. 2001, \apj, 560, L171
261: \bibitem{cohen2003} Cohen, M., Megeath, T. G., Hammersley, P. L., Martin-Lui, F.
262: \& Stauffer, J. 2003, \aj, 125, 2645
263: \bibitem{cowley1977} Cowley, C. 1977, Ap. Space Sci. 51, 349
264: \bibitem{decin2000} Decin, G., Dominik, C., Malfait, K., Mayor, M. \& Waelkens, C. 2000, \aap, 357, 533
265: \bibitem{Decin2003} Decin, G., Dominik, C., Waters, L. B. F. M. \& Waelkens, C. 2003, \apj, 598, 636
266: \bibitem{fixsen2002} Fixsen, D. J. \& Dwek, E. 2002, \apj, 578, 1009
267: \bibitem{flower1996} Flower, P. J. 1996, \apj, 469, 355
268: \bibitem{habing2001} Habing, H. J. et al. 2001, \aap, 365, 545
269: \bibitem{heiter2002} Heiter, U., Weiss, W. W. \& Paunzen, E. 2002, \aap, 381, 971
270: \bibitem{higdon2004} Higdon, S. J. U. 2004, \pasp, submitted
271: \bibitem{houck2004} Houck, J. 2004 et al., \apjs, submitted
272: \bibitem{israelian2004} Israelian, G., Santos, N. C., Mayor, M. \& Rebolo, R. 2004, \aap, 414, 601
273: \bibitem{jura1998} Jura, M., Malkan, M., White, R., Telesco, C., Pina, R. \& Fisher, R. S. 1998, \apj, 505, 897
274: \bibitem{jura2004} Jura, M. 2004, \apj, 603, 729
275: \bibitem{kalas2002} Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Beckwith, S. V. W., Jewitt, D. C. \& Lloyd, J. P. 2002, \aj, 567, 999
276: \bibitem{kenyon2002a} Kenyon, S. J. \& Bromley, B. C. 2002, \apj, 577, L35
277: Bromley,
278: \bibitem{krivov2000} Krivov, A. V., Mann, I. \& Krivova, N. A. 2000, \aap, 362, 1127
279: \bibitem{lagrange2000} Lagrange, A.-M., Backman, D. E. \& Artymowicz, P. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, Mannings, V., Boss A. \& Russell, S. S. eds,
280: (Tucson: University of Arizona), 639
281: \bibitem{luu2002} Luu, J. X. \& Jewitt, D. C. 2002, \araa, 40, 63
282: \bibitem{murray2001} Murray, N., Chaboyer, B., Arras, P., Hansen, B. \& Noyes, R. W. 2001, \apj, 555, 801
283: \bibitem{paunzen2002} Paunzen, E., Iliev, I. Kh., Kamp, I. \& Barzova, S. 2002, \aap, 336, 1030
284: \bibitem{petit2001} Petit, J.-M., Morbidelli, A. \& Chambers, J. 2001, Icarus, 153, 338
285: \bibitem{schneider1999} Schneider, G. et al. 1999, \apj, 513, L127
286: \bibitem{song2001} Song, I., Caillault, J.-P., Barrado y Navascues, D. \& Stauffer, J. R. 2001, \apj, 546, 352
287: \bibitem{spangler2001} Spangler, C., Sargent, A. I., Silverstone, M. D., Becklin, E. E., \& Zuckerman, B. 2001, \apj, 555, 932
288: \bibitem{spitzer1978} Spitzer, L. 1978, Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium (J. Wiley: New York)
289: \bibitem{takeuchi2001} Takeuchi, T. \& Artymowicz, P. 2001, \apj, 557, 990
290: \bibitem{turcotte1993} Turcotte, S. \& Charbonneau, P. 1993, \apj, 413, 376
291: \bibitem{uchida2004} Uchida, K. et al. 2004, \apjs, submitted
292: \bibitem{Venn1990} Venn, K. A. \& Lambert, D. L. 1990, \apj, 363, 234
293: \bibitem{werner2004} Werner, M. W. et al. 2004, \apjs, submitted
294: \bibitem{wolf2003} Wolf, S. \& Hillenbrand, L. A. 2003, \apj, 596, 603
295: \bibitem{wyatt2003} Wyatt, M. C. 2003, \apj, 598, 1321
296: \bibitem{wyatt2002} Wyatt, M. C. \& Dent, W. R. F. 2002, \mnras, 334, 589
297: \bibitem{zuckerman2001}Zuckerman, B. 2001, \araa, 39, 549
298: \bibitem{zuckerman2003} Zuckerman, B. \& Song, I. 2004, \apj, 603, 738
299: \end{thebibliography}
300: \newpage
301: \begin{center}
302: Table 1 -- Stars with Excesses in the IRS data
303: \end{center}
304: \begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrrrrrr}
305: \hline
306: \hline
307: Star & Sp. & $D$ & $L_{*}$ & $t_{*}$ & $K_{2}$ &$L_{30}/L_{*}$ &$T_{ex}$ &$M_{PB}$&t(exp)& AOR$^{3}$ \\
308: & & (pc) & (L$_{\odot}$) & (Gyr) & & (10$^{-4}$) & (K) & (M$_{\oplus}$) & (s)\\
309: \hline
310: HR 333 & A3V & 83 & 34&0.1&0.16&1 &97&0.03 &24 &0003553536\\
311: HR 506 & F9V & 17 & 1.5&0.3$^{1}$&0.15&0.9&94 &0.004&24&0003553792\\
312: HR 1082 & A3IV/V & 74& 12 & 0.1$^{1}$ & 0.15&2&72&0.02&24&0003555328\\
313: HR 1570 & A0V & 37 & 15 & 0.1$^{2}$& 0.14 &0.4&88& 0.005&24& 0003555840 \\
314: HR 3927 & A0V & 98 &44 &0.1&0.21&1&98&0.06& 24&0003558656\\
315: ${\lambda}$ Boo & A0V & 30 & 15 & 0.2$^{2}$ & 0.21 & 0.4&114 &0.01 & 24&0003559936\\
316: \hline
317: \end{tabular}
318: \\
319: \\
320: $^{1}$
321: Zuckerman \& Song (2004); $^{2}$Heiter, Weiss \& Paunzen (2002). In this Table, $K_{2}$ (10$^{13}$ Jy Hz) is defined in equation (1). $^{3}$ The {\it Spitzer} aor data file identification number.
322: \newpage
323: \begin{figure}
324: \epsscale{1}
325: \plotone{f1.eps}
326: \caption{Plots of $F_{\nu}$ vs. ${\lambda}$ for the 6 stars in Table 1 plus
327: HR 4732 which has, at most, a modest infrared excess. The fits from equation (1) are shown in red while the fits from equation (2) are shown in blue. We also display 3${\sigma}$ error bars at 25 ${\mu}$m in green. The sum of the two terms in each equation is given by a solid line while dotted and dashed lines represent the photospheric fluxes and dust excesses, respectively.}
328: \end{figure}
329: \end{document}
330:
331:
332:
333:
334: