1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% This is a LaTeX-2e file, using the AASTeX v5.x macros (aastex.cls) %%
3: %% %%
4: %% last modification: 28 Aug 2003 %%
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6:
7: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex} %% 1-column, 1-spaced
8: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex} %% 2-column, 1-spaced
9: %\documentclass[12pt,manuscript]{aastex} %% 1-column, 2-spaced
10: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
11:
12: %%% Define new commands:
13: \newcommand{\nd}{\nodata}
14: \newcommand{\tnm}{\tablenotemark}
15: \newcommand{\gsim}{\rlap{$>$}{\lower 1.0ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
16: \def\oii{[\ion{O}{2}]}
17:
18: \renewcommand{\sec}{\prime\prime}
19: \renewcommand{\min}{\prime}
20: \renewcommand{\deg}[0]{\circ}
21:
22: %% Editorial Information:
23: %\received{}
24: %\revised{}
25: %\accepted{}
26: %\journalid{}{}
27: %\articleid{}{}
28:
29: %% Title page comment:
30: %% \slugcomment{Draft -- to be submitted to ApJ.}
31:
32: %Running heads:
33: \shorttitle{Spitzer 24micron Observations of EROs}
34: \shortauthors{Yan et al}
35:
36: %% Misc additional LaTeX stuff:
37: \normalsize
38:
39: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
40: \begin{document}
41:
42: %\title{24~micron Mid-infrared Properties of Optical/near-IR Selected
43: %Extremely Red Galaxies}
44: %\title{Assembly of Massive Galaxies at $z \sim 1 - 2$:
45: %Evidence from the Spitzer 24micron Observations
46: %in the First Look Survey ELAIS N1 Field}
47:
48: \title{Spitzer 24micron Observations of Optical/Near-IR Selected
49: Extremely Red Galaxies: Evidence for Assembly of Massive Galaxies at $z \sim 1 - 2$?}
50:
51: \author{Lin Yan\altaffilmark{1}, Philip I. Choi\altaffilmark{1}, D. Fadda\altaffilmark{1},
52: F.R. Marleau\altaffilmark{1}, B.T. Soifer\altaffilmark{1,2} \\
53: M. Im\altaffilmark{3}, L. Armus\altaffilmark{1}, D.T. Frayer\altaffilmark{1}, L.J. Storrie-Lombardi\altaffilmark{1},
54: D.J. Thompson\altaffilmark{2},
55: H.I. Teplitz\altaffilmark{1}, G. Helou\altaffilmark{1}, P.N. Appleton\altaffilmark{1},
56: S. Chapman\altaffilmark{2}, F. Fan\altaffilmark{1}, I. Heinrichsen\altaffilmark{1}, M. Lacy\altaffilmark{1}, D.L. Shupe\altaffilmark{1}, G.K. Squires\altaffilmark{1}, J. Surace, G. Wilson\altaffilmark{1}}
57:
58: \altaffiltext{1}{Spitzer Space Telescope Science Center, California
59: Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, MS 220-6,
60: Pasadena, CA 91125; Send offprint requests to Lin Yan:
61: lyan@ipac.caltech.edu.}
62:
63: \altaffiltext{2}{The Caltech Optical Observatories, Caltech, Pasadena, CA~91125}
64:
65: \altaffiltext{3}{School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Shillim-dong, Kwanak-gu,Seoul, S. Korea}
66:
67: \begin {abstract}
68:
69: We carried out the direct measurement of the fraction of dusty sources in a
70: sample of extremely red galaxies with ($R - K_s) \ge 5.3$mag and
71: $K_s < 20.2$mag, using 24$\mu m$ data from the
72: {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}. Combining deep 24$\mu m$, $K_s$- and
73: $R$-band data over an area of $\sim$64~sq.arcmin in ELAIS N1 of
74: the Spitzer First Look Survey (FLS),
75: we find that 50$\pm6$\%\ of our ERO sample have measurable 24$\mu m$ flux
76: above the 3$\sigma$ flux limit of 40$\mu$Jy. This flux limit
77: corresponds to a SFR of 12$M_\odot$/yr at $z \sim 1$, much more
78: sensitive than any previous long wavelength measurement.
79: The 24$\mu m$-detected EROs have
80: 24-to-2.2 and 24-to-0.7$\mu m$ flux ratios consistent with
81: infrared luminous, dusty sources at $z \ge 1$, and an
82: order of magnitude too red to be explained by an infrared quiescent spiral
83: or a pure old stellar population at any redshift.
84: Some of these 24$\mu m$-detected EROs
85: could be AGN, however, the fraction among the whole ERO sample is probably
86: small, 10-20\%, as suggested by deep X-ray observations
87: as well as optical spectroscopy. Keck optical spectroscopy of a sample of similarly
88: selected EROs in the FLS field suggests that most of the
89: EROs in ELAIS N1 are probably at $z \sim 1$.
90: The mean 24$\mu m$ flux (167$\mu$Jy) of the 24$\mu m$-detected ERO sample
91: roughly corresponds to the rest-frame
92: 12$\mu m$ luminosity ($\nu L_{\nu}(12\mu m)$) of $3 \times 10^{10} L_\odot$ at $z \sim 1$.
93: Using the correlation between IRAS $\nu L_{\nu}(12\mu m)$ and
94: infrared luminosity $L_{IR}(8-1000\mu)$, we infer that the
95: $<L_{IR}>$ of the 24$\mu m$-detected EROs is $3 \times 10^{11}
96: L_\odot$ and $10^{12} L_\odot$ at $z=1.0, 1.5$ respectively, similar to
97: that of local LIRGs and ULIGs. The corresponding SFR would be
98: roughly $50 - 170 M_\odot$/yr. If the time scale of this starbursting phase
99: is on the order of $10^8$yr as inferred for the local LIRGs and ULIGs, the
100: lower limit on the masses of these 24$\mu m$-detected EROs
101: is $5\times 10^9 - 2\times 10^{10} M_\odot$. It is plausible that some of the
102: starburst EROs are in the midst of violent transformation to become massive
103: early type galaxies at the epoch of $z \sim 1 - 2$.
104:
105: \end{abstract}
106:
107: \keywords{galaxies: bulges --
108: galaxies: starbursts --
109: galaxies: infrared luminous --
110: galaxies: galaxy evolution --
111: galaxies: high-redshifts}
112:
113: \section{Introduction}
114:
115: Optical/near-IR colors, such as $(R - K_s)$ or $(I - K_s)$ have been
116: commonly used in wide-area surveys to select old stellar populations
117: at $z \sim 1-2$ (Cimatti et al.\ 2002; McCarthy et al.\ 2001; McCarthy
118: 2004 for the review of this subject). Near-IR observations, which
119: sample cool low-mass stars, are sensitive to old stellar populations.
120: The ($R - K_s)$ of 5.3 corresponds to the calculated color
121: of a passively evolving elliptical galaxy at $z = 1$. Therefore, in principle,
122: the color criterion of ($R - K_s) \ge 5.3$mag or ($I
123: - K_s) \ge 4$mag (EROs) should select early type galaxies at $z \sim 1$.
124: However, these color
125: selections are also sensitive to dust-reddened, star-forming systems,
126: and examples of both passively evolving ellipticals and dusty starburst
127: EROs have been found (Soifer et al.\ 1999; Hu \&\ Ridgway 1994;
128: McCarthy, Persson \&\ West 1992; Graham \&\ Dey 1996). This indicates
129: that the optical/near-IR SEDs of these sources are sufficiently
130: degenerate that these color criteria cannot effectively distinguish
131: between them. In addition, a small fraction of EROs (10-20\%) could also be AGN,
132: as shown by deep Chandra data and optical spectroscopy
133: (Alexander et al. 2002; Yan, Thompson \&\ Soifer 2004).
134: The relative contribution of these two galaxy types ---
135: old stellar populations and dust-reddened, star-forming galaxies ---
136: is a critical issue for many surveys whose goal is to determine the
137: evolution of the mass function and the formation of massive galaxies.
138: Deep optical spectroscopy indicates that a large fraction (30-50\%) of
139: EROs have emission lines (Cimatti et al.\ 2002; Yan, Thompson \&\
140: Soifer 2004; McCarthy et al.\ 2004); however, it remains unclear what
141: fraction of EROs are truly dust obscured galaxies.
142:
143: MIPS 24$\mu m$ data from the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} (Rieke et
144: al. 2004; Werner et al.\ 2004) offer the first opportunity to directly
145: address this critical issue. Dusty, star-forming galaxies are clearly
146: distinguished from early-type galaxies at mid-IR wavelengths. Between
147: $z \sim 1-2$, the MIPS data is especially discriminating as strong,
148: rest-frame 6$-$12$\mu$m polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) dust
149: features redshift into the 24$\mu m$-band. In this Letter, we present
150: our initial study of the 24$\mu m$ properties of the ($R - K_s \ge
151: 5.3$)mag selected EROs in ELAIS N1. Throughout the paper,
152: we adopt $H_0=70$km/s/Mpc, $\Omega_{M} = 0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda} =
153: 0.7$, and the Vega system for optical/NIR magnitudes.
154:
155: \section{Data}
156:
157: \subsection{Spitzer 24$\mu m$ Observations and Data Reduction}
158:
159: The primary dataset used in this Letter is in the ELAIS N1 field,
160: which is a part of the Spitzer First Look Survey (FLS)\footnote{For
161: details of the FLS observation plan and the data release, see
162: http://ssc.spitzer.caltech.edu/fls.}. The field was observed in a
163: $2\times2$ photometry mode mosaic, and the raw data were processed and
164: stacked by the data processing pipeline at the Spitzer Science Center
165: (SSC). Source catalogs at 24$\mu m$ were generated using StarFinder
166: (Diolaiti et al.\ 2000), which measures profile-fitted fluxes for
167: point sources. The complete description of the 24$\mu m$ data
168: reduction and source catalog can be found in Fadda et al.\ (2004b) and
169: Marleau et al. (2004). To aid in the interpretation of the results
170: from ELAIS N1, we also analyzed the FLS verification strip (FLSV).
171: The data presented here covers 64~sq.arcmin in ELAIS N1 and
172: 256~sq.arcmin in the FLSV. Table 1 summarizes the salient
173: characteristics of all data used in this paper.
174:
175: \subsection{Optical, Near-IR Imaging and Keck Spectroscopy}
176:
177: All $R$-band observations were taken at the Kitt Peak National
178: Observatory. Final stacked images and source catalogs have been
179: publicly released (Fadda et al. 2004a). The $K_s$-band data were
180: obtained using the Wide-Field Infrared Camera (WIRC) on the Palomar
181: 200-inch telescope. The $K-band$ data in Elais N1 covers $8^{\min}\times8^{\min}$.
182: A detailed description of the WIRC observations and data reduction will
183: included in a separate paper by Choi et al.\ (2004). Finally,
184: high-resolution, optical spectra of a $K_s$-selected galaxy sample
185: within the FLS region were obtained using the Keck, Deep Imaging
186: Multi-Object Spectrograph (DEIMOS) (Faber et al.\ 2003). A total of
187: $\approx1000$ redshifts were measured, of which 112 (52 EROs) are
188: included in the analysis in this paper.
189:
190: \section{Results and Implications}
191:
192: \subsection{The 24$\mu m$ detected EROs}
193:
194: To merge the R/K and $24\mu m$ source catalogs, we used
195: a simple positional matching method with a $2.4^{''}$ match radius,
196: which corresponds to $3\sigma$ combined astrometric uncertainty
197: from the $K_s$ and $24\mu m$ data. Due to the relatively low source
198: density (7arcmin$^{-2}$), the likelihood of spurious matches
199: is small (3\%), consistent with the fact
200: that we find only one multiple match out of 65. In addition,
201: we test the robustness of each match by comparing
202: the probability of the measured separation based on the astrometric
203: uncertainties to the probability of a
204: spurious detection based on the 24$\mu m$ source density. The probability ratios
205: above unity imply to be likely real matches, and we found that all but two
206: matches meet this criteria. We retained these two matches since the visual
207: inspection suggests that they could still be associated with physical
208: offset centroids. Bright stars were rejected using $R$-band images.
209: Stellar contamination in our sample is expected to be small since
210: the field is at the galactic latitude of 41$^\deg$, and
211: 24$\mu m$ data samples the tail of the Rayleigh-Jeans energy distribution.
212:
213: Since the $R$- and $K_s$-band data have similar seeing, ($R - K_s$)
214: colors were measured using a fixed $3^{\sec}$ diameter aperture.
215: The ERO catalog with ($R-K_s) \ge 5.3$mag and $K_s < 20.2$mag (6$\sigma$)
216: consists of 129 galaxies over 64~sq.arcmin in ELAIS N1. Figure 1
217: shows the $(R-K_s)$ vs. $K_s$ distribution for all sources ({\it black crosses}.
218: The ($R-K_s) \ge 5.3$mag and $K_s < 20.2$mag limits are shown
219: as {\it solid horizontal} and {\it solid vertical lines}, and sources with 24$\mu m$
220: detected counterparts are indicated as {\it red open circles}.
221: We find that 24$\mu m$ detected sources have slightly redder ($R - K_s$)
222: colors than non-detected sources, consistent with the expectation that
223: 24$\mu m$ emission is an indicator of dust extinction.
224:
225: Of the 129 EROs, 65 (50$\pm$6\%) have 24$\mu m$ emission with flux
226: greater than 40$\mu$Jy. The fraction of 24$\mu m$ detected EROs
227: becomes slightly higher for redder sources, with 56$\pm15$\%\ and
228: 67$\pm30$\%\ for ($R - K_s) \ge 6.0$mag and ($R - K_s) \ge 6.5$mag
229: respectively. However, the errors of these fractions are large due to
230: the shallow $R$ band limit. Deeper data would be needed to reduce
231: the uncertainties. In figure 2a, we show the 24$\mu m$ flux
232: distributions of both the total and ERO samples.
233: We find that 70\%\ of the 24$\mu m$ EROs have
234: $f_{24\mu m} > 90\mu$Jy and that the mean 24$\mu m$ flux of the ERO
235: sample is 167$\mu$Jy. Figure 2b shows $K_s$ vs. 24$\mu m$ flux for all detected sources
236: ({\it solid squares}) and for the EROs ({\it large open circles}). We
237: find that amongst the 24$\mu m$ detected sources, $K_s$ is weakly
238: correlated with $f_{24\mu m}$, with large scatter. This is expected
239: since these two bands sample light from different physical origins,
240: stellar photosphere versus dust emission. This also explains why many faint
241: $K_s$ sources have fairly bright 24$\mu m$ fluxes. For $K_s$ bright ($\sim18 - 17$)
242: and 24$\mu m$-faint sources, the mid-infrared data is deep enough to detect
243: the emission from normal galaxy populations at low redshifts.
244:
245: \begin{figure}[h!]
246: \plotone{fig1.eps}
247: %\includegraphics[width=260pt,height=204pt,angle=0.]{fig1_cmd.eps}
248: \caption{The ($R - K_s$) vs. $K_s$ color-magnitude diagram.
249: All $K_s$-band detected sources are shown as {\it crosses},
250: and sources with 24$\mu m$ counterparts are indicated by {\it
251: open circles}. The ($R-K_s) \ge 5.3$mag and $K_s < 20.2$mag
252: limits are shown as {\it solid horizontal} and {\it solid vertical}
253: lines. }
254: \end{figure}
255:
256: \begin{figure}[h!]
257: \plotone{fig2.eps}
258: %\includegraphics[width=240pt,height=190pt,angle=0.]{fig2_hist.ps}
259: \caption{{\bf Panel 2a} shows
260: the 24$\mu m$ flux distribution of the total ({\it dashed line})
261: and 24$\mu m$-detected ERO ({\it solid line}) populations. {\bf Panel 2b} shows $K_s$
262: vs. 24$\mu m$ flux for all detected sources ({\it solid squares})
263: and for the EROs ({\it large open circles}).}
264: \end{figure}
265:
266: \subsection{The Nature of the EROs with 24$\mu m$ Emission}
267:
268: What types of galaxies are the 24$\mu m$ detected EROs? In Figure 3a,
269: we present a 24-to-0.7$\mu m$ and 24-to-2.2$\mu m$ color-color diagram
270: showing that 24$\mu m$-detected EROs ({\it red squares}) are clearly
271: separated from EROs without 24$\mu m$ emission ({\it green points}), as
272: well as the general non-ERO population ({\it black and blue}). This
273: suggests that the MIR/Optical and MIR/NIR colors of 24$\mu m$-detected
274: EROs are unique, distinguishing them from other populations. Figure
275: 3b presents the expected colors as a function of redshift for various
276: SED templates, assuming no evolution. The SEDs for M51 (normal
277: spiral), M82 (starburst) and Mrk231 (dusty AGN) are taken from Silva
278: et al.\ (1998), Fadda et al.\ (2002), and Chary \&\ Elbaz (2001). In
279: the case of M31's bulge (old stellar population), we use the near-IR
280: J, H, K, IRAS 12, 25, 60 and 100$\mu$m fluxes, all within a 4$^{'}$
281: diameter aperture of the central nucleus (Soifer et al.\ 1986) and
282: merge this with a 10~Gyr theoretical SED from Bruzual \&\ Charlot.
283: \footnote{ftp://gemini.tuc.noao.edu/pub/charlot/bca5}
284: For comparison,
285: a sample of 112, 24$\mu m$ sources from the FLSV with known
286: spectroscopic redshifts are marked to show the actual redshift range
287: of the 24$\mu m$ EROs in ELAIS N1. Of these 112 redshifts, 10 are
288: 24$\mu m$-detected EROs with $ 0.8 < z_{spec} < 1.3$, and the optical
289: spectra of these 10 sources all have [OII]3727\AA emission line.
290:
291: Comparing Figure 3a \& 3b, we reach the following conclusions:
292: 1) 24$\mu m$-detected EROs in ELAIS N1 with
293: ($R - K_s) \ge 5.3$mag, $K_s<20.2$mag, and $f_{\nu}(24\mu m$)$>40\mu$Jy
294: are infrared bright sources at $z \ge 1$. They have colors similar to
295: starbursts like M82 at $z \ge 1$, or dust reddened AGN like Mrk231 at $z \ge 0.7$.
296: Their colors are too red to be explained by any normal spiral or old stellar
297: populations at any redshifts.
298: 2) The likely redshift range of these 24$\mu m$ EROs is $z \ge 1$, as predicted
299: from the model SEDs of M82 and Mrk231. This is further confirmed
300: by comparison to the Keck spectroscopic sample from the FLSV.
301: 3). The remaining half of the ERO population are probably galaxies with old stellar
302: populations at $z \sim 1$, as suggested by the tracks in Figure 3b.
303:
304: \begin{figure}[h!]
305: \plotone{fig3.eps}
306: %\includegraphics[width=250pt,height=250pt,angle=0.]{fig3_cc.eps}
307: \caption{The two panels show $\log_{10}(\nu f_{\nu}(24\mu m)/\nu f_{\nu}(0.7\mu m$))
308: versus $\log_{10}(\nu f_{\nu}(24\mu m)/\nu f_{\nu}(8\mu m$)). {\bf Panel 3a}
309: presents the data from ELAIS N1. In this panel, {\it red/green
310: squares} represent EROs with/without 24$\mu m$ detections. For the
311: non-24$\mu m$ EROs, the green crosses have only upper limits in the
312: $R$-band.
313: The {\it black/blue points} represent the full $K_s$-selected sample
314: with/without 24$\mu m$ detections. The plotted colors of sources not
315: detected at 24$\mu m$ are upper limits and could move down to
316: lower-right corner of the diagram, as illustrated by the {\it green
317: \& blue arrows}. The {\it black solid line} in both panels
318: represents constant ($R - K_s) = 5.3$mag color. {\bf Panel 3b}
319: shows the computed color-color tracks as a function of redshift for
320: a set of SED templates of local, well-known galaxies. The subset of
321: the FLSV sample with measured spectroscopic redshifts
322: are overplotted for three different redshift bins:
323: $z < 0.5$ ({\it magenta open triangles}); $0.5 < z < 1.0$
324: ({\it orange open squares}); and $z> 1.0$ ({\it cyan open circles}).
325: }
326: \end{figure}
327:
328: Half of the ELAIS N1 ERO sample have 24$\mu m$ dust emission.
329: The key question is what their infrared luminosities are.
330: In the previous section, we conclude that the 24$\mu m$-detected EROs
331: have colors similar to M82, however, Figure 3a does not set any constraints
332: on either their luminosities or masses.
333: We have a total of 112 redshifts for objects with 24$\mu m$
334: counterparts (the FLSV 3$\sigma$ flux limit is 90$\mu$Jy). In Figure
335: 4, we present the observed 24$\mu m$ luminosity versus redshift for the
336: spectroscopic FLSV sample. At $z \sim 1$ the observed 24$\mu m$
337: luminosity roughly corresponds to the rest-frame IRAS 12$\mu m$
338: luminosity, within a factor of 2.
339: The Spitzer 24$\mu m$ filter is narrower than the IRAS 12$\mu m$ filter,
340: but ignoring this difference, a crude conversion of the observed
341: Spitzer 24$\mu m$ flux can be made to place a lower limit on the
342: rest-frame IRAS 12$\mu m$ luminosity.
343: We can infer the total infrared luminosity of 24$\mu m$ sources at $z
344: \sim 1$ by using the correlation between the 12$\mu m$ luminosity ($\nu
345: L_{\nu}(12\mu m)$) and the infrared luminosity $L_{IR}(8-1000\mu m)$,
346: $L_{IR} = 0.89\times (\nu L_{\nu}(12\mu m))^{1.094} L_\odot$ (Soifer et
347: al.\ 1989; Chary \&\ Elbaz 2001). The mean flux (167$\mu$Jy)
348: of the 24$\mu m$-detected EROs in ELAIS N1 implies the $L_{IR} \sim 3 \times 10^{11}
349: L_\odot$ at $z=1.0$ and $L_{IR} \sim 10^{12} L_\odot$ at $z=1.5$,
350: similar to that of local LIRGs and ULIGs.
351: The corresponding SFR is $50 - 170 M_\odot$/yr, using
352: $SFR = 1.71 \times 10^{-10} L_{IR}(M_\odot/yr)$ (Kennicutt 1998).
353: We emphasize that the 3$\sigma$ flux limit of 40$\mu$Jy in ELAIS N1
354: corresponds to a SFR of 12$M_\odot$/yr, more sensitive than the deepest
355: 1.4GHz observation (Smail et al. 2002).
356: In comparison, the SFR derived from
357: the rest-frame [OII]3727\AA emission line for EROs
358: is roughly a few $\times M_\odot$/yr (Yan, Thompson \&\ Soifer 2004; Cimatti et al. 2003).
359: Our results are consistent with very deep 1.4GHz (rms $\sim 3\mu$Jy) measurements
360: (Smail et al. 2002).
361:
362: \begin{figure}[h!]
363: \plotone{fig4.eps}
364: %\includegraphics[width=550pt,height=380pt,angle=0.]{fig4_lum.ps}
365: \caption{The observed 24$\mu m$ luminosity as a function of spectroscopic redshift for
366: a sample of 112 24$\mu m$-detected sources in the FLSV region. The
367: solid triangles are 24$\mu m$-detected EROs.}
368: \end{figure}
369:
370: \subsection{Summary \& Implications}
371:
372: Spitzer 24$\mu m$ data in ELAIS N1 have revealed that 50$\pm6$\%\
373: of EROs with ($R - K_s) \ge 5.3$mag and $K_s <20.2$mag have detectable
374: 24$\mu m$ emission above 40$\mu$Jy.
375: The colors and inferred redshifts of the 24$\mu m$-detected EROs
376: suggest that they are infrared-luminous, dusty sources at $z \ge 1$.
377: Their mean 24$\mu m$ flux (167$\mu$Jy)
378: corresponds to $<L_{IR}> \sim 3\times 10^{11} L_\odot$ at $z \sim 1$
379: and to $<L_{IR}> \sim 10^{12} L_\odot$ at $z \sim 1.5$.
380: Some of these 24$\mu m$-detected EROs could be AGN.
381: The one mega-second Chandra observation in the HDF and
382: optical spectroscopy suggest that the fraction of EROs likely to be
383: AGN is small, around 10-20\%\ (Alexander et al. 2002; Yan, Thompson \&\ Soifer 2004).
384: These dusty AGN can be identified when we
385: combine this current analysis with the IRAC data.
386: Our result suggests that a significant fraction of EROs are
387: extremely active starbursts (LIRGs or ULIGs). If the time scale of
388: this starbursting phase is on the order of $10^8$/yr, as inferred from
389: local LIRGs and ULIGs (Sanders \&\ Mirabel 1996), we can set a lower limit to
390: the mass of these 24$\mu m$-detected EROs as SFR$\times \tau = 50 - 170 \times 10^8
391: =5\times 10^9 - 2\times 10^{10} M_\odot$.
392: If the EROs {\it without} detectable 24$\mu m$ are indeed
393: massive systems with old stellar populations at $z \sim 1$ as
394: measured by several recent surveys (Glazebrook et al.\ 2004; Bell et
395: al.\ 2003), one plausible connection between the
396: starburst and early-type ERO populations is that the former
397: may be in the process of transforming into the latter,
398: as initially postulated by Kormendy \&\ Sanders (1992).
399: In the hierarchical clustering paradigm, it could be interpreted that
400: our deep 24$\mu m$ observations are capturing a massive galaxy
401: population in the midst of violent transformation -- possibly in the
402: process of assembly via mergers/starbursts at the epoch of $z \sim 1 -
403: 2$. The accurate determination of the stellar and dynamical masses of
404: these starburst EROs at $z \sim 1- 2$ will be critical for the
405: resolution of this question.
406: Finally, the measurement of volume averaged mass density at $z \sim 1
407: - 2$ would require a better understanding of the physical source of
408: the integrated K-band light --- whether from dusty systems or from old stars.
409:
410: Our result is consistent with what has been found with HST morphological studies
411: of EROs. Yan \&\ Thompson (2003) and Moustakas et al.\ (2004) have
412: found that close to 50\%\ of
413: EROs with $K_s < 20$ have morphologies consistent with disk or later type galaxies
414: in the observed 8100--8500~\AA\ wavelength, and less than $40$\%\
415: show clean bulge type profiles. With the HST/ACS/NICMOS images
416: in the FLSV region, we will be able to investigate the morphologies of these
417: infrared luminous EROs, and to determine if indeed they are starbursting
418: mergers at $z \sim 1$.
419:
420: This work is based in part on
421: observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope,
422: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion
423: Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under NASA
424: contract 1407. Support for this work was provided by NASA.
425: The spectroscopic data presented herein were obtained
426: at the W.M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific
427: partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the
428: University of California, and the National Aeronautics and Space
429: Administration. The Observatory was made possible by the generous
430: financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation.
431: We also wish to
432: recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and
433: reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always had within the
434: indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the
435: opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.
436:
437:
438: \clearpage
439: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
440: \tablewidth{0pt}
441: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
442: \tablecaption{Summary of Optical, NIR and 24$\mu m$ Observations}
443: \startdata
444: \hline\hline \\
445: Filter & $R$ & $K_s$ & 24$\mu m$ \\
446: FWHM ($\sec$) & 1.0 & 1.0 & 5.5\\
447: Pixel Scale ($\sec$/pixel) & 0.26 & 0.25 & 2.55 \\
448: $<$Exp. Time$>$ (sec) & 1800 & 1800\tnm{a}/9000\tnm{b} & $349\tnm{a}/4268\tnm{b}$\\
449: 3$\sigma$ Limits & $25.5\tnm{a}/25.2\tnm{b}$ & $20.3\tnm{a}/21.0\tnm{b}$ & $90\tnm{a}/40\tnm{b}$ \\
450: & mag & mag & $\mu$Jy \\
451: \enddata
452: \tablenotetext{a}{FLSV}
453: \tablenotetext{b}{ELAISN1}
454: \end{deluxetable}
455:
456: \clearpage
457:
458: %%%############################################################################
459: %%% References:
460: \begin{thebibliography}{}
461:
462: \bibitem[Alexander(2002)]{alexander}
463: Alexander, D.M. et al. 2002, \aj, 123, 1149
464:
465: \bibitem[bell(2003)]{bell03}
466: Bell, E. et al. 2003, ApJS, 149, 289
467:
468: \bibitem[Choi(04)]{phil04}
469: Choi, P., et al. 2004, in prep.
470:
471: \bibitem[Daddi et al.(2000)]{daddi00a} % Strong clustering
472: Daddi, E., et al.
473: %Cimatti, A., Pozzetti, L., Hoekstra, H., R{\"o}ttgering, H.J.A.,
474: % Renzini, A., Zamorani, G., \& Mannucci, F.
475: 2000, \aap, 361, 535
476:
477: \bibitem[Diolaiti(2000)]{dio00}
478: Diolaiti, E.; et al.
479: %Bendinelli, O.; Bonaccini, D.; Close, L.;
480: % Currie, D.; Parmeggiani, G.,
481: 2000, A\&A, 147, 335
482:
483: \bibitem[Chary(2001)]{chary01}
484: Chary, R. \&\ Elbaz, D. 2001, ApJ, 556 562
485:
486: \bibitem[cimatti (2002)]{andrea02}
487: Cimatti, A., et al.
488: %Daddi, E., Mignoli, M., Pozzetti, L., Renzini, A.,
489: % Zamorani, G., Broadhurst, T., Fontana, A., Saracco, P., Poli, F.,
490: % Cristiani, S., D'Odorico, S., Giallongo, E., Gilmozzi, R., \& Menci, N.
491: 2002, \aap, 381, 68
492:
493: \bibitem[cimatti(1998)]{andrea98}
494: Cimatti, Andrea; et al.
495: %di Serego Alighieri, Sperello;
496: % Vernet, Joel; Cohen, Marshall; Fosbury, Robert A. E.
497: 1998, ApJ, 499L, 21
498:
499: \bibitem[dey(1999)]{dey}
500: Dey, A. et al. 1999, ApJ, 519, 610
501:
502: \bibitem[faber(2003)]{faber03}
503: Faber, S.M., et al. 2003, SPIE, 4841, 1657
504:
505: \bibitem[fadda(2004)]{fadda04a}
506: Fadda, D., Jannuzi, B., Ford, A., \& Storrie-Lombardi, L.J.,
507: 2004, AJ, in press [astro-ph/0403490]
508:
509: \bibitem[fadda(2004)]{fadda04b}
510: Fadda, D. et al. 2004b, ApJS, in this volume.
511:
512: \bibitem[glazebrook(2004)]{karl04}
513: Glazebrook, K. et al. 2004, ApJL, in print. astroph/0401037
514:
515: \bibitem[Graham (1996)]{graham}
516: Graham, J. \&\ Dey, A.
517: 1996, \apj, 471, 720
518:
519: \bibitem[Hu(1994)]{hu94}
520: Hu, E.M., \&\ Ridgway, S.E. 1994, AJ, 107, 1303
521:
522: \bibitem[kormendy(1992)]{kormendy92}
523: Kormendy, J. \&\ Sanders, D., 1992, ApJL, 390, 53
524:
525: \bibitem[marleau(2004)]{francine04}
526: Marleau, F. et al. 2004, ApJS, this volume.
527:
528: \bibitem[mccarthy(2001)]{pat01}
529: McCarthy, P.J., et al.
530: %Carlberg, R.G., Chen, H.-W., Marzke, R.O., Firth, A.E.,
531: % Ellis, R.S., Persson, S.E., McMahon, R.G., Lahav, O., Wilson, J.,
532: % Martini, P., Abraham, R.G., Sabbey, C.N., Oemler, A., Murphy, D.C.,
533: % Somerville, R.S., Beckett, M.G., Lewis, J.R., \& MacKay, C.D.
534: 2001, \apjl, 560, L131
535:
536: \bibitem[mccarthy(2004)]{pat04}
537: McCarthy, P.J., 2004, AR\&AA, 2004, submitted.
538:
539: \bibitem[mccarthy(1992)]{pat92}
540: McCarthy, P.J., Persson, S.E., West, S.C. 1992, ApJ, 386, 52
541:
542: \bibitem[moustakas(2003)]{moustakas}
543: Moustakas, L. et al. 2003, ApJL, in press
544:
545: \bibitem[rieke(2004)]{rieke04}
546: Rieke, G. et al. 2004, in the same volume
547:
548: \bibitem[Roche et al.(2002)]{roche}
549: Roche, N.D., Almaini, O., Dunlop, J., Ivison, R.J., Willott, C.J.
550: 2002, \mnras, 337, 1282
551:
552: \bibitem[sanders(1996)]{sanders96}
553: Sanders, D. \&\ Mirabel, I.F. 1996, AR\&A, 34, 749
554:
555: \bibitem[Silva(1998)]{silva98}
556: Silva, L., Granato,G.L., Bressan, A., Danese, L. 1998, ApJ, 509, 103
557:
558: \bibitem[Smail(2002)]{smail02}
559: Smail, I. et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, 844
560:
561: \bibitem[Soifer et al.(1999)]{Sea99}
562: Soifer, B.T., et al.
563: %Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., Armus, L., Cohen, J.G.,
564: % Persson, S.E., \& Smail, I.
565: 1999, \aj, 118, 2065
566:
567: \bibitem[Soifer et al.(1989)]{rbgs89}
568: Soifer, B.T., Boehmer, L., Neugebauer, G.,
569: Sanders, D.B., 1989, AJ, 98, 766
570:
571: \bibitem[Soifer et al.(19860]{m3186}
572: Soifer, B.T., et al.
573: %Rice, W.L., Mould, J.R.,
574: %Gillett, F.C., Rowan-Robinson, M., habing, H.J,
575: 1986, ApJ, 304, 651
576:
577: \bibitem[Werner(2004)]{werner04}
578: Werner, M. et al. 2004, in the same volume
579:
580: \bibitem[yan(2003)]{yan03}
581: Yan, L. \&\ Thompson, D.J. 2003, \apj, 586, 765
582:
583: \bibitem[yan(2004)]{yan04}
584: Yan, L., Thompson, D.J., \&\ Soifer, B.T. 2004, \aj, 2004, 127, 1274
585:
586: \end{thebibliography}
587:
588: \end{document}
589:
590: