1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4,psfig]{article}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: \makeatletter
5: \newenvironment{inlinetable}{%
6: \def\@captype{table}%
7: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\begin{center}\footnotesize}
8: {\end{center}\end{minipage}\smallskip}
9:
10: \newenvironment{inlinefigure}{%
11: \def\@captype{figure}%
12: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\begin{center}}
13: {\end{center}\end{minipage}\smallskip}
14: \makeatother
15:
16: % Misc macros
17:
18: \def\deg{\hbox{deg}}
19: \def\Mpc{\hbox{Mpc}}
20:
21: \newcommand{\js}{}
22: \newcommand{\etal}{{\js et~al.\/}}
23: \newcommand{\eg}{{\js e.g.\/}}
24: \newcommand{\ie}{{\js i.e.\/}}
25: \newcommand{\Lsol}{L$_{\odot}$}
26: \newcommand{\Msun}{\mbox{$M_\sun$}}
27: \newcommand{\0}{\phantom{0}} % for spacing in tables and such
28:
29: \newcommand{\sst}{{\it Spitzer Space Telescope}}
30: \newcommand{\s}{{\it Spitzer}}
31: \newcommand{\hii}{{\sc h~ii}}
32:
33: %%%%%
34:
35: \lefthead{Huang et al.~}
36:
37: \slugcomment{DRAFT \today}
38: \shorttitle{IRAC Imaging of Lockman Hole}
39: \shortauthors{Huang et al.}
40: %\received{2001 November 19}
41: \begin{document}
42: \title{IRAC Imaging of the Lockman Hole}
43: \author{J.-S.\ Huang,$\!$\altaffilmark{1}
44: P. Barmby,$\!$\altaffilmark{1}
45: G. G. Fazio,$\!$\altaffilmark{1}
46: S. P. Willner,$\!$\altaffilmark{1}
47: G. Wilson, $\!$\altaffilmark{2}
48: D. Rigopoulou, $\!$\altaffilmark{3}
49: A. Alonso-Herrero,$\!$\altaffilmark{4}
50: H. Dole,$\!$\altaffilmark{4,}$\!$\altaffilmark{5}
51: E. Egami,$\!$\altaffilmark{4}
52: E. Le Floc'h,$\!$\altaffilmark{4}
53: C. Papovich,$\!$\altaffilmark{4}
54: P.~G. P\'erez-Gonz\'alez,$\!$\altaffilmark{4}
55: J. Rigby,$\!$\altaffilmark{4}
56: C. W. Engelbracht,$\!$\altaffilmark{4}
57: K. Gordon,$\!$\altaffilmark{4}
58: D. Hines,$\!$\altaffilmark{4}
59: M. Rieke,$\!$\altaffilmark{4}
60: G. H. Rieke,$\!$\altaffilmark{4}
61: K. Meisenheimer$\!$\altaffilmark{6}
62: S. Miyazaki$\!$\altaffilmark{7}
63: }
64:
65: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
66: Cambridge, MA02138}
67: \altaffiltext{2}{Spitzer Science Center,
68: Caltech, 1200 E. California, Pasadena, CA91125}
69: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astrophysics, Oxford University, Keble Rd, Oxford, OX1 3RH, U.K.}
70: \altaffiltext{4}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ85721}
71: \altaffiltext{5}{Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale, bat 121,
72: Universite Paris Sud, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France}
73: \altaffiltext{6}{Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Astronomie, K\"{o}nigstuhl 17,
74: D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany}
75: \altaffiltext{7}{Subaru Telescope,National Astronomical Observatory of Japan,
76: 650 North A'ohoku Place,
77: Hilo, HI 96720}
78:
79:
80: \slugcomment{Accepted by the ApJS, Spitzer Special Issue}
81: %\dataset{ads/sa.spitzer#0006620160}
82: %\facility{Spitzer/IRAC}
83:
84: \begin{abstract}
85:
86: IRAC imaging of a
87: $4\farcm7\times4\farcm7$ area in the Lockman Hole detected over
88: 400 galaxies in the IRAC 3.6$\mu$m
89: and 4.5$\mu$m bands, 120 in the 5.8$\mu$m band, and 80 in the
90: 8.0$\mu$m band in 30 minutes of observing time.
91: Color-color diagrams suggest that about half of these galaxies are at
92: redshifts $0.6<z<1.3$ with about a quarter
93: at higher redshifts ($z>$1.3).
94: We also detect IRAC counterparts for 6 of the 7 SCUBA sources
95: and all 9 XMM sources in this area. The detection
96: of the counterparts of the SCUBA sources and galaxies at $z>1.3$
97: demonstrates the ability
98: of IRAC to probe the universe at very high redshifts.
99:
100:
101:
102:
103: \end{abstract}
104: \keywords{cosmology: observations --- galaxies: evolution --- galaxies:
105: Survey --- galaxies: Mid-Infrared}
106:
107:
108:
109: \section{Introduction}
110:
111: Much effort has gone into deep optical imaging with hope of detecting
112: galaxies at high redshifts \citep{koo92, ell97}. Obtaining redshifts
113: for faint, optically selected galaxies require long observations on
114: $\ge$8-meter class telescopes, but most of the galaxies identified
115: are at intermediate redshifts (z$\sim$1) \citep{cow96,coh99,cim02}.
116: Applying faintness criteria to visible-wavelength (UBVRI)
117: surveys is not an efficient way of selecting high-redshift galaxies
118: unless color
119: selection methods such as the Lyman break technique \citep{ste03} or
120: extreme red color selection \citep{tho99} are applied. Furthermore,
121: optical studies of high redshift galaxies are heavily affected by
122: dust extinction because rest-frame UV photons are being observed
123: \citep{ste03}.
124:
125:
126: By contrast, far-infrared and submillimeter surveys are
127: efficient tools for generating samples of high-redshift starburst galaxies.
128: For example, SCUBA on the JCMT
129: has made it possible to carry out deep extragalactic surveys in the
130: submm band. Now it is known that most SCUBA sources are ultra luminous
131: infrared galaxies (ULIRG) at high redshifts.
132: They are detected in the submillimeter band,
133: because the infrared luminosity peak at about 100--200 \micron\ shifts
134: to the submillimeter and millimeter band at z$>$2 \citep{cha03,ivi02,sma02}.
135:
136:
137: Little is known about the properties of mid-infrared selected
138: samples, although in principle they should have many advantages.
139: Mid-infrared observations of high-redshift galaxies detect light
140: emitted at 1-2 \micron\, near the peak of the stellar emission.
141: At these wavelengths the emission is only modestly
142: affected by dust extinction. The
143: difficulty is that a space observatory is essential for sensitive
144: mid-infrared observations. The Infrared Space Observatory (ISO)
145: \citep{kes96} carried out the first deep infrared extragalactic
146: surveys and detected galaxies at redshifts up to $z=1.5$ in the
147: mid--infrared bands \citep{oli97, elb99, aus99, gen00, dol01, sat03}.
148: With its combination of high sensitivity and high spatial resolution in four
149: mid-infrared bands, the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) \citep{faz04} on
150: the Spitzer Space Telescope (SST) can carry out deeper and larger
151: surveys and should be able to detect galaxies at
152: $z>3$ \citep{bar04}.
153:
154: This Letter reports the results of a SST survey carried out during the
155: SST In-Orbit-Checkout (IOC) period. Observations were taken as one of
156: the Early Release Observations to demonstrate the sensitivity
157: of Spitzer and its capability of detecting galaxies at high
158: redshifts. The program included both IRAC and MIPS
159: observations of the same Lockman Hole field.
160: \citet{ega04} and \citet{emr04} present the
161: results of the MIPS observations of the same field.
162: The survey area centered on RA(J2000)=10:51:56, DEC(J2000)=57:25:32
163: has been covered
164: by surveys at many other wavelengths, including SCUBA, XMM, and
165: deep optical/NIR imaging. Of seven SCUBA sources in
166: the survey area, IRAC detected six in the 3.6
167: and 4.5~\micron\ bands and four in the 5.8 and 8.0~$\mu$m bands. IRAC
168: also detected mid-infrared counterparts of all 9 XMM sources.
169: Analysis of the Spitzer counterparts of the SCUBA, XMM and MAMBO
170: sources are presented by \citet{ega04}, \citet{alo04} and \citet{ivi04}.
171:
172: % We briefly describe the observation and
173: %data reduction in $\S$2. In $\S$3, we will discuss the galaxy
174: %population detected in the 4 IRAC bands. In $\S$4, we will present
175: %the possible candidates for high redshift objects, including the
176: %counterparts of the SCUBA sources. We conclude in $\S$5.
177:
178:
179: \section{Observations and data reduction}
180:
181: The observations\footnote{Spitzer Program ID 1077, executed 2003 November 20}
182: covered one field-of-view in all four IRAC bands.
183: The observations used the 30-s frame time and 25 dithers per
184: pointing, giving an exposure time (\ie, effective on-chip charge
185: accumulation time after accounting for readout overheads) of 670~s in
186: each band. We used a
187: shorter frame time and many dithers to be able to reject cosmic-rays
188: effectively. Because of the dithering, the area covered to full
189: depth was $4\farcm7 \times 4\farcm7$.
190:
191: Data processing began with the Basic Calibrated Data (BCD)
192: delivered by the Spitzer Science Center (SSC).
193: These data include flat-field corrections,
194: dark subtraction, and linearity and flux calibrations. Additional
195: steps included pointing refinement, distortion correction, and
196: mosaicking. Cosmic rays were rejected during the last step by
197: sigma-clipping.
198:
199: Source extraction used DAOPHOT because the images are so crowded
200: in the 3.6$\mu$m and 4.5$\mu$m bands even for the short
201: observations reported here. Given the 1\farcs8 FWHM of the point
202: spread function \citep{faz04} in both bands, almost all faint sources
203: are point-like. We used a signal/noise ratio of 2.5, and a PSF with
204: full-widths at half-maximum (FHWM) of 1\farcs8, 1\farcs8, 2\farcs0,
205: and 2\farcs0 in the 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0~\micron\ bands respectively
206: as parameters for DAOPHOT.
207:
208: Star/galaxy separation was based on morphology in deep R-band images
209: taken with the Suprime camera on the Subaru Telescope and on a ($V-I$
210: vs $I-K$) color-color diagram \citep{hua97,wil01}. We identified 13
211: stars in the field with $K\le20.5$. Though fainter stars may be
212: missed, their density is extremely low \citep{gla94}.
213: Table~1 gives the numbers of galaxies and
214: stars detected in each band along with the limiting flux.
215: The number of galaxies detected in the MIPS 24$\mu$m band \citep{ega04, emr04}
216: is also in Table~1.
217: Fewer sources were detected in the two long wavelength bands
218: because of the high zodiacal background at those wavelengths. All
219: objects detected at 5.8 or 8.0~\micron\ are detected at both 3.6 and
220: 4.5~\micron\. There are about 25000 ``beams'' in the field, and the
221: 3.6~\micron\ source counts thus correspond to 57 beams per source.
222:
223: \section{The Properties of Galaxies Detected by IRAC}
224:
225:
226: With no redshifts available for most of the IRAC galaxy sample, we
227: rely on color-color diagrams to estimate redshifts. In the rest
228: near-infrared wavelength range, the most important spectral feature is the
229: 1.6~$\mu$m bump, which is caused by the H$^{-}$ opacity minimum
230: in the atmospheres of cool stars. This feature is seen in
231: the spectral energy distributions (SEDs)
232: of all galaxies except AGN-dominated ones
233: and has long been considered a photometric redshift indicator
234: \citep{wri94, sim99, saw02}. At $z > 0.6$, the bump shifts beyond the
235: $K$ band, and $f_{\nu}(3.6\micron) > f_{\nu}(2.2\micron)$. For
236: $z>1.3$, the bump passes 3.6~\micron, and $f_{\nu}(4.5\micron)
237: > f_{\nu}(3.6\micron)$. Local, dusty starburst
238: galaxies such as M82
239: also have red colors with $f_{\nu}(4.5\micron) >
240: f_{\nu}(3.6\micron)$, and we need to require $f_{\nu}(3.6\micron) >
241: f_{\nu}(2.2\micron)$ to identify them.
242:
243: Figures~1 and~2 show the IRAC data along with the tracks followed by
244: typical galaxy SEDs as redshift increases,
245: and Table~2 summarizes the observed galaxy number distribution as a function
246: of color, which imply redshift. Figure~1 shows that the observed
247: colors are consistent with the model tracks. The most-populated
248: redshift bin in Table~2 for all four IRAC bands is $0.6 < z < 1.3$.
249: This bin includes about 50\% of all detected IRAC galaxies.
250: Figure~1 shows a few sources with very red K-[3.6] color.
251: \citet{wil04} found that these sources are actually
252: the same extreme red objects as those detected in optical-near-infrared
253: surveys using the (R-K)$>$5 color selection.
254:
255: The color-color diagrams will not give accurate redshifts for AGN,
256: which do not exhibit the 1.6$\mu$m bump in their SEDs. X-ray
257: observation is a good way of detecting AGN. This field has 9 XMM
258: sources \citep{has01}, whose colors are plotted along with other
259: galaxies in Figures~1 and~2. These 9 sources probably represent
260: most of the AGN in the field and constitute only a few percent of the
261: galaxies detected. Thus they should not affect our statistics on
262: redshift distribution.
263:
264: Unlike the XMM sources, whose color distribution fills the entire
265: color space in Figures~1 and~2, most of the SCUBA source counterparts have
266: colors indicating $z>1.3$. Using the deep radio counterpart positions to
267: identify the SCUBA sources in the optical and Spitzer images,
268: \citet{ega04} did a detailed analysis of
269: SED for the SCUBA sources. They found that LE~850.1\footnote{The full names
270: according to SINBAD are of the form [SFD2002]LHE~N.},
271: LE~850.4, LE~850.7,
272: and LE~850.14 have the 1.6\micron~ bump
273: in their SEDs.
274: This implies that
275: their SEDs are dominated by stellar light, and thus
276: their IRAC colors following the galaxy color tracks well in Figures~1 and~2
277: with expected redshfits $z>2$.
278: This is consistent with most of the SCUBA sources
279: being dusty galaxies at $z>2$ \citep{cha03, ega04}.
280: LE~850.8 is the only object for which
281: we have both SCUBA and XMM detection. \citet{ega04} found that LE~850.8 has a
282: power-law continuum.
283: Its IRAC colors are not close to any of the tracks in Figures~1 and~2.
284: Another SCUBA source, LE~850.18,
285: also has colors not close to any of the tracks
286: and a power-law SED \citep{ega04}.
287: In the deep R-band image, however, there are more than 2 objects within
288: $3''$ radius centered on the radio counterpart positions for both
289: LE~850.8 and LE~850.18. IRAC will not be able to resolve them if all components
290: emit in the IRAC bands.
291: Hence we suspect foreground contamination in the IRAC flux
292: densities in both cases and are cautious in using IRAC colors to classify
293: both objects.
294:
295:
296: There are 32 sources in this field detected in the MIPS
297: 24~\micron\ band at or above the 5-sigma confidence level.
298: Their IRAC counterparts show that half of the
299: MIPS sources are at $z>1.3$. Given the 5$\sigma$ limiting flux of 200
300: $\mu$Jy, these MIPS sources at $z>1.3$ have a minimun infrared
301: luminosity of 10$^{12}$ L$_{\odot}$, thus are LIRGs and ULIRGs \citep{emr04}.
302:
303:
304: The extragalactic background light (EBL) from both resolevd and
305: unresolved extragalactic sources is an indicator of the total luminosity of
306: the Unverse \citep{mad00}.
307: Because the intermediate
308: redshift galaxy population contributes most to the EBL \citep{elb02},
309: integral resolved galaxy light (IGL) in a deep survey
310: should give a good lower limit on the EBL.
311: Table~3 shows the results of
312: integrating the fluxes, $\nu I_{\nu}$, from IRAC counterparts
313: of objects identified by
314: SCUBA \citep{sco01}, XMM \citep{has01}, and MIPS 24~\micron\ images
315: \citep{ega04, emr04}.
316: The IGL at the 5.8~\micron\ and 8.0~\micron\
317: are 1.31 and 1.02 nW m$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$, very
318: close to the ISO LW2 (6.75~\micron) IGL, 1.7$\pm$0.5 nW m$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$
319: \citep{alt99, elb02}.
320: Given that the XMM sources in
321: this field are neither stars or clusters, it is safe to assume that
322: most of them are AGN \citep{leh00,alo04}. The light
323: contributed by the XMM sources is constant in all four IRAC bands
324: because of the flat SED of AGN in the mid-infrared. Because the
325: total light decreases with wavelength, the XMM
326: source contribution increases from 3.7\% at 3.6~$\mu$m to 13.6\% at
327: 8~$\mu$m. This is consistent with the 15$\pm$5\% XMM source
328: contribution found by the ISO survey \citep{fad02}. As shown in
329: Figure~2, most of the MIPS 24~\micron\ sources are at
330: intermediate and high redshifts. Most of them must be LIRG's or even
331: ULIRG's \citep{ega04}. The starburst light percentage increases from
332: 20\% at 3.6~$\mu$m to 62\% at 8~$\mu$m. AGN and starburst galaxies
333: together contribute about two thirds of the IGL at 8~$\mu$m. The bulk
334: of the light at 3.6~$\mu$m and 4.5~$\mu$m appears to
335: come from evolved stars in galaxies, while the 8~$\mu$m and 24~$\mu$m
336: light traces the star forming regions in galaxies. This explains
337: the large contribution of the 24$\mu$m selected sample to the 8$\mu$m
338: IGL.
339:
340:
341:
342: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
343:
344: Even with only 30 minutes observing time, IRAC detected
345: 419 galaxies in a $4\farcm7\times4\farcm7$ area in the Lockman Hole.
346: Based on their colors, most of the detected galaxies are likely to be
347: at intermediate redshifts $0.6<z<1.3$, but $\ga$25\% appear to be at
348: $z>1.3$. 30\% of the 5.8~$\mu$m sources and 50\% of the
349: 8.0~$\mu$m sources show colors indicating higher redshifts (z$>$1.3).
350: The counterparts of the SCUBA sources have colors
351: consistent with galaxies at $z>1.3$. The
352: integrated galaxy light seen in our sample is consistent with
353: 1.7$\pm$0.5 nW m$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$ derived using the ISO survey
354: data at the 6.75~$\mu$m.
355: The AGN fraction, as revealed by XMM, increases from
356: 3.7\% in the 3.6~$\mu$m band to 13.6\% in the 8.0~$\mu$m band. The MIPS
357: population, most of which are starburst galaxies at intermediate
358: redshifts, contributes up to 60\% in the 8.0$\mu$m band.
359:
360:
361:
362: \acknowledgements
363:
364: This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space
365: Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
366: California Institute of Technology under NASA contract 1407. Support
367: for this work was provided by NASA through Contract Number 1256790
368: issued by JPL.
369:
370:
371:
372:
373: \begin{thebibliography}{}
374:
375: \bibitem[Alonso-Herrero et al.(2004)]{alo04}Alonso-Herrero et al. 2004, \apj,
376: submited.
377: \bibitem[Altieri et al.(1999)]{alt99}Altieri, B., Metcalfe, L., \& Kneib, J. P.,
378: et al. 1999, \aap, 343, L65
379:
380: \bibitem[Aussel et al.(1999)]{aus99}Aussel, H., Elbaz, D., \& Cesarsky, C. J.
381: 1999, \apss, 266, 307
382:
383: \bibitem[Barmby et al.(2004)]{bar04}Barmby, P., Huang, J.-S., Fazio, G. G.,
384: at al. 2004, \apj, submitted
385:
386: \bibitem[Chapman et al.(2003)]{cha03}Chapman, S. C., Blain, A. W., Ivison, R.
387: J., \& Smail, Ian R. 2003, Nature, 422, 369
388:
389: \bibitem[Cimatti et al.(2002)]{cim02}Cimatti, A., Mignoli, M., Daddi, E.,
390: et al. 2002, \aap, 392, 395
391:
392: \bibitem[Coleman et al.(1980)]{col80}Coleman, G. D., Wu, C.-C., \& Weedman, D. W.
393: 1980, \apjs, 43, 393
394:
395: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(1999)]{coh99}Cohen, J G., Hogg, D W., Pahre,
396: M A., Blandford, R, Shopbell, P L., \& Richberg, K 1999, \apjs, 120 171
397:
398: \bibitem[Cowie et al.(1996)]{cow96}Cowie, L. L., Songaila, A.,
399: Hu, E. M., \& Cohen, J. G. 1996, \aj, 112, 839
400:
401: \bibitem[Dole et al.(2001)]{dol01}Dole, H., Gispert, R., Lagache, G.,
402: et al. 2001, \aap, 372, 362
403:
404: \bibitem[Dole et al.(2004)]{dol04}Dole, H. et al 2004, \apj, submitted
405:
406: \bibitem[Egami et al.(2004)]{ega04}Egami, E. et al 2004, \apj, submitted
407:
408: \bibitem[Elbaz et al.(1999)]{elb99}Elbaz, D., Cesarsky, C. J., Fadda, D.,
409: et al. 1999, \aap, 351, 37
410:
411: \bibitem[Elbaz et al.(2002)]{elb02}Elbaz D., Cesarsky, C. J., Chanial, P., Aussel, H., Franceschini, A., Fadda, D., \& Chary, R. R. 2002, \aap, 384, 848
412:
413: \bibitem[Ellis (1997)]{ell97}Ellis, R. S. 1997, \araa, 35, 389
414:
415: \bibitem[Fadda et al.(2002)]{fad02}Fadda, D., Flores, H., Hasinger, G.,
416: Franceschini, A., Altieri, B., Cesarsky, C. J., Elbaz, D., \& Ferrando, Ph. 2002,
417: \aap, 383, 838
418:
419: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{faz04}
420: Fazio, G. G. et al 2004, \apj, submitted (performance)
421:
422: %\bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004b)]{numbers}
423: %Fazio, G. G. et al 2004, \apj, submitted (number counts)
424:
425: \bibitem[Genzel \& Cesarsky (2000)]{gen00}Genzel, R, Cesarsky, C. J. 2000,
426: \araa, 38, 761
427:
428: \bibitem[Glazebrook et al.(1994)]{gla94}Glazebrook, K., Peacock, J. A.,
429: Collins, C. A., \& Miller, L. 1994, \mnras, 266, 65
430:
431: \bibitem[Granato et al.(2000)]{gra00}Granato, G. L., Lacey, C. G.,
432: Silva, L., Bressan, A., Baugh, C. M., Cole, S., \& Frenk, C. S. 2000, \apj,
433: 542, 710
434:
435: \bibitem[Hasinger et al.(2001)]{has01}Hasinger, G., Altieri, B., Arnaud, M.,
436: et al. 2001, \aap, 365, 45
437:
438:
439: \bibitem[Huang et al.(1997)]{hua97}Huang, J.-S., Cowie, L. L., Gardner, J. P.,
440: Hu, E. M., Songaila, A.,\& Wainscoat, R. J. 1997, \apj, 476, 12
441:
442: \bibitem[Ivison et al.(2002)]{ivi02}Ivison, R. J., Greve, T. R., Smail, Ian,
443: et al. 2002, \mnras, 337, 1
444:
445: \bibitem[Ivison et al.(2004)]{ivi04}Ivison, R. J., Greve, T. R., et al. 2004
446: \apj, submitted
447:
448: \bibitem[Kessler (1996)]{kes96}Kessler, M. F. 1996, AAS, 188, 5201
449:
450: \bibitem[Koo \& Kron (1992)]{koo92}Koo, D. C. \& Kron, R. G 1992, \araa,
451: 30, 613
452:
453: \bibitem[Lehmann et al.(2000)]{leh00}Lehmann, I., Hasinger, G., Schmidt, M.,
454: Gunn, J. E., Schneider, D. P., Giacconi, R., McCaughrean, M.,
455: Trumper, J., \& Zamorani, G. 2000, \aap, 345, 35L
456:
457: \bibitem[Le Floc'h et al.(2004)]{emr04}Le Floc'h et al. 2004, submmited
458:
459: \bibitem[Lu et al.(2003)]{lun03}Lu, Nanyao, Helou, George,
460: Werner, Michael W., et al. 2003, \apj, 58, 199
461:
462: \bibitem[Kauffmann \& Charlot (1998)]{kau98}Kauffmanm, G. \& Charlot, S.
463: 1998, \mnras, 297, L23
464:
465: \bibitem[Madau \& Pozzetti (2000)]{mad00}Madau, P. \& Pozzetti, L. 2000,
466: \mnras, 312, L9
467:
468: \bibitem[Oliver et al.(1997)]{oli97}Oliver, S. J., Goldschmidt, P.,
469: Franceschini, A., et al. 1997, \mnras, 289, 471
470:
471: \bibitem[Pozzetti et al.(2003)]{poz03}Pozzetti, L., Cimatti, A.,
472: Zamorani, G., et al. 2003, \aap, 402, 837
473:
474:
475: \bibitem[Sato et al.(2003)]{sat03}Sato, Y., Kawara, K., Cowie, L. L.,
476: Taniguchi, Y., Sanders, D. B., et al. 2003, \aap, 405, 833
477:
478: \bibitem[Scott et al.(2001)]{sco01}Scott, S. E., Fox, M. J., Dunlop, J. S.,
479: et al. 2002, \mnras, 331, 817S
480:
481: \bibitem[Sawicki (2002)]{saw02} Sawicki, M 2002, \aj, 124, 3050
482:
483: \bibitem[Simpson \& Eisenhardt (1999)]{sim99}Simpson, C, Eisenhardt, P 1999
484: \pasp, 111, 691
485:
486: \bibitem[Smail et al.(2002)]{sma02}Smail, Ian, Ivison, R. J., Blain, A. W.,
487: \& Kneib, J.-P. 2002, \mnras, 331, 495
488:
489: \bibitem[Steidel et al.(2003)]{ste03}Steidel, C C., Adelberger, K L.,
490: Shapley, A E., Pettini, M, Dickinson, M, \& Giavalisco, M 2003, \apj, 2003,
491: 592, 728
492:
493: \bibitem[Sturm et al.(2000)]{stu00}Sturm, E., Lutz, D., Tran, D.,
494: Feuchtgruber, H., Genzel, R.,
495: Kunze, D., Moorwood, A. F. M., Thornley, M. D., 2000, \aap, 358, 481
496:
497: \bibitem[Thompson et al.(1999)]{tho99}Thompson, D., Beckwith, S. V. W.,
498: Fockenbrock, R., Fried, J., Hippelein, H.,
499: Huang, J.-S., von Kuhlmann, B., Leinert, Ch., Meisenheimer, K., Phleps, S.,
500: R\"{o}ser, H.-J.,Thommes, E., \& Wolf, C. 1999, \apj, 523, 100
501:
502: \bibitem[Wilson et al.(2001)]{wil01}Wilson, G, Kaiser, N, Luppino, G. A.,
503: Cowie, L. L. 2001, \apj, 555, 572
504:
505: \bibitem[Wilson et al.(2004)]{wil04}Wilson, G, Huang, J.-S., et al. 2004,
506: \apj, submitted
507:
508: \bibitem[Wright et al.(1994)]{wri94}Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P., \& Fazio, G.
509: 1994, AAS, 184, 2503
510:
511: \end{thebibliography}
512:
513:
514: \clearpage
515:
516:
517:
518:
519: \clearpage
520: \begin{figure}
521: \plotone{fig1.ps}
522: \caption{Color-color diagram for objects detected at 3.6~$\mu$m and
523: 4.5~$\mu$m. Filled circles are objects also detected at
524: 24~$\mu$m, open circles are remaining sample.
525: Arrows indicate objects not detected
526: at $K$, points are plotted at 3$\sigma$ limits. Blue diamonds
527: denote XMM sources, and red circles denote SCUBA sources.
528: Solid lines show color tracks for
529: elliptical galaxies (blue), Sbc galaxies (green), and M82 (red).
530: Expected colors for ellipticals and spirals are based on rest frame
531: SED's from \citet{col80} in visible light and \citet{lun03} in the
532: infrared. M82 tracks are derived from the model of \citet{gra00} and
533: ISO observations \citep{stu00}. The tracks are derived by shifting
534: the SED without adding any evolution; numbers marked along each track
535: indicate redshift. In this diagram, galaxies in the upper left
536: quadrant are likely to be at $0.6<z<1.3$, those in the upper right
537: are likely to be at $z>1.3$, and galaxies in the two lower quadrants are
538: likely to have $z<0.6$ with starburst galaxies to the right.
539: \label{fig1}}
540: \end{figure}
541:
542: \clearpage
543: \begin{figure}
544: \plotone{fig2.ps}
545: \caption{
546: Color-color diagram for galaxies detected at 8~\micron. Blue diamonds
547: show XMM sources, red dots SCUBA sources with numbers according to
548: \citet{sco01}, and black dots are
549: objects detected at 24~$\mu$m.
550: Open circles show the remaining sample galaxies.
551: Color tracks are the same as those in Figure~2.
552: \label{fig2}
553: }
554: \end{figure}
555:
556: \clearpage
557:
558:
559:
560:
561: \begin{table*}[hbt]
562: {\scriptsize
563: \begin{center}
564: \centerline{\sc Table 1}
565: \vspace{0.1cm}
566: \centerline{\sc Number of Objects detected in the IRAC bands}
567: \vspace{0.3cm}
568: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
569: \hline\hline
570: \noalign{\smallskip}
571: Band & Galaxies & Stars & Total & Mag Limit(5$\sigma$,AB)\cr
572: \hline
573: \noalign{\smallskip}
574: 3.6$\mu$m & 419 & 13 & 432 &23.73\cr
575: 4.5$\mu$m & 403 & 13 & 413 &23.77\cr
576: 5.8$\mu$m & 120 & 5 & 125 &21.90\cr
577: 8.0$\mu$m & 80 & 5 & 85 &21.68\cr
578: 24.0$\mu$m & 32 & 0 & 32 &18.15\cr
579: \noalign{\hrule}
580: \noalign{\smallskip}
581: \end{tabular}
582:
583:
584: \end{center}
585: }
586: \label{tab1}
587: \end{table*}
588:
589:
590: \begin{table*}[hbt]
591: {\scriptsize
592: \begin{center}
593: \centerline{\sc Table 2}
594: \vspace{0.1cm}
595: \centerline{\sc Galaxies in each IRAC Color Bin }
596: \vspace{0.3cm}
597: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
598: \hline\hline
599: \noalign{\smallskip}
600: $K_{AB}-[3.6]_{AB}$ & $[3.6]_{AB}-[4.5]_{AB}$ & Estimated Redshift & 3.6$\mu$m &4.5$\mu$m &5.8$\mu$m&8.0$\mu$m&24$\mu$m\cr
601: \hline
602: \noalign{\smallskip}
603: $>0$& $>0$ & $z>1.3$& 113&122&35&24&16\cr
604: $>0$ & $<0$&$0.6<z<1.3$&191&176&57&34&8\cr
605: $<0$& $<0$ &$z<0.6$ & 101 &81&27&22&8\cr
606: $<0$& $>0$ &$z<0.6$& 14 & 24&1&0&0\cr
607: \noalign{\hrule}
608: \noalign{\smallskip}
609: \end{tabular}
610:
611: \end{center}
612: }
613: \label{tab2}
614: \end{table*}
615:
616:
617: \begin{table*}[hbt]
618: {\scriptsize
619: \begin{center}
620: \centerline{\sc Table 3}
621: \vspace{0.1cm}
622: \centerline{\sc Integrated Galaxy Light $\nu$ I$_{\nu}$ (nW m$^{-2}$ sr$^{-1}$) in the IRAC Bands }
623: \vspace{0.3cm}
624: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
625: \hline\hline
626: \noalign{\smallskip}
627: ~~& 3.6$\mu$m &4.5$\mu$m &5.8$\mu$m&8.0$\mu$m\cr
628: \hline
629: \noalign{\smallskip}
630: All galaxies detected& 3.47 & 2.43 & 1.31& 1.03\cr
631: SCUBA counterparts & 0.05 & 0.05 & 0.05 &0.04\cr
632: XMM counterparts& 0.13& 0.12 & 0.13 & 0.14\cr
633: MIPS counterparts & 0.68 & 0.52 & 0.43 & 0.62\cr
634: \noalign{\hrule}
635: \noalign{\smallskip}
636: \end{tabular}
637: \end{center}
638: }
639: \label{tab3}
640: \end{table*}
641:
642: \end{document}