1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 03 Jan 01
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17:
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19:
20: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
21:
22: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
23:
24: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
25:
26: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
27:
28: %\usepackage{emulateapj5} % emulates original format
29: %\usepackage{natbib}
30:
31: \slugcomment{Draft version from \today, Accepted for ApJ Letter}
32:
33: \shorttitle{SMA multi-line observations in IRAS\,18089-1732}
34: \shortauthors{Beuther et al.}
35:
36: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
37: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
38:
39: \begin{document}
40:
41: \title{SMA multi-line observations of the massive star-forming
42: region IRAS\,18089-1732}
43:
44: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
45: %% author and affiliation information.
46: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
47: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
48: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
49: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
50:
51: \author{H. Beuther\altaffilmark{1},
52: Q. Zhang\altaffilmark{1},
53: T. Hunter\altaffilmark{1},
54: T.K. Sridharan\altaffilmark{1},
55: J.-H. Zhao\altaffilmark{1},
56: P. Sollins\altaffilmark{1},
57: P.T.P. Ho\altaffilmark{1,2},
58: S.-Y. Liu\altaffilmark{2},
59: N. Ohashi\altaffilmark{2},
60: Y.N. Su\altaffilmark{2},
61: J. Lim\altaffilmark{2}}
62:
63:
64:
65: \altaffiltext{1}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
66: \altaffiltext{2}{Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, No.1, Roosevelt Rd, Sec. 4, Taipei 106, Taiwan, R.O.C.}
67:
68: \begin{abstract}
69: Submillimeter Array (SMA) observations of the high-mass star-forming
70: region IRAS\,18089-1732 in the 1\,mm and 850\,$\mu$m band with 1\,GHz
71: bandwidth reveal a wealth of information. We present the observations
72: of 34 lines from 16 different molecular species. Most molecular line
73: maps show significant contributions from the outflow, and only few
74: molecules are confined to the inner core. We present and discuss the
75: molecular line observations and outline the unique capabilities of the
76: SMA for future imaging line surveys at high spatial resolution.
77: \end{abstract}
78:
79: \keywords{star: formation -- submillimeter -- techniques:
80: interferometric -- astrochemistry -- line: identification -- ISM:
81: individual(IRAS\,18089-1732)}
82:
83: \section{Introduction}
84:
85: (Sub-)millimeter Interferometry offers great opportunities to study
86: massive star-forming regions in detail. High-mass star formation
87: proceeds in a clustered mode, and at the typical distances of a few
88: kpc high angular resolution is necessary to resolve the different
89: phenomena taking place. Furthermore, massive star-forming cores emit
90: strongly in the (sub-)mm regime and exhibit a forest of molecular line
91: transitions tracing various physical aspects (e.g.,
92: \citealt{schilke1997b}). Here, we present early results obtained in
93: the field of massive star formation with the Submillimeter Array
94: (SMA\footnote{The Submillimeter Array is a joint project between the
95: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Academia Sinica
96: Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, and is funded by the
97: Smithsonian Institution and the Academia Sinica.}) on Mauna
98: Kea/Hawaii. Before the advent of the SMA, the only sub-mm
99: interferometry ever conducted was single-baseline work with the JCMT
100: and CSO, which aimed largely at low-mass sources because the expected
101: structures would be simple (e.g., \citealt{brown2000}).
102:
103: The target source IRAS\,18089-1732 is part of a sample of 69 High-Mass
104: Protostellar Objects selected mainly via infrared color-color criteria
105: and the absence of strong cm continuum emission \citep{sridha}. It is
106: approximately at a distance of 3.6\,kpc\footnote{The kinematic
107: distance ambiguity is solved by associating the region via the near-
108: and mid-infrared surveys 2MASS and MSX on larger scales with sources
109: of known distance (Bontemps, priv. comm.).} and its bolometric
110: luminosity is about $10^{4.5}$\,L$_{\odot}$ \citep{sridha}. Previous
111: Millimeter continuum observations reveal a massive core
112: $>2000$\,M$_{\odot}$ with H$_2$O and CH$_3$OH maser emission, and a
113: weak 1\,mJy cm source is detected
114: \citep{beuther2002a,beuther2002c}. As part of a single-dish CO outflow
115: study, wing emission indicative of molecular outflows was detected
116: \citep{beuther2002b}, and \citet{sridha} report the detection of the
117: hot-core molecules CH$_3$CN and CH$_3$OH. Comprising all features of a
118: young luminous massive star-forming region at an early evolutionary
119: stage just beginning to form a hot core, IRAS\,18089-1732 is an ideal
120: target for early science with the SMA. While this letter focuses on
121: the multi-line observations of IRAS\,18089-1732, an accompanying
122: letter discusses the (sub-)mm continuum and SiO/HCOOCH$_3$ line data
123: revealing the disk-jet system (Beuther et al., this volume).
124:
125: \section{The Submillimeter Array (SMA)}
126: \label{obs}
127:
128: IRAS\,18089-1732 was observed with the SMA between May and July 2003
129: in two different configurations with 3 to 5 antennas in the array\footnote{For more details on the SMA and its specifications see Ho,
130: Moran \& Lo (this volume) and the SMA web-site:
131: http://sma-www.harvard.edu/.}.
132: %The
133: %SMA is the first imaging interferometer in the submillimeter regime
134: %and is designed to cover all earth-accessible frequency bands from
135: %200\,GHz to 900\,GHz with an instantaneous correlator bandwidth of
136: %2\,GHz in each sideband.
137: The phase reference center of the
138: observations was R.A.[J2000] 18:11:51.4 and Dec.[J2000]
139: $-17$:31:28.5. The projected baselines ranged from 10.8/18.6 to 120\,m
140: for the 1.3\,mm/850\,$\mu$m observations, respectively. For bandpass
141: calibration we used the planet Mars. The flux density scale was
142: derived by observations of the planet Uranus and is estimated to be
143: accurate within 25\,$\%$. Phase and amplitude calibration was done via
144: frequent observations of the quasar NRAO530, approximately
145: $10^{\circ}$ from the target source ($S_{\rm{217GHz}}\sim 2.4$\,Jy and
146: $S_{\rm{354GHz}}\sim 1.5$\,Jy). The zenith opacity for the 350\,GHz
147: observations~-- measured at 225\,GHz with the NRAO tipping radiometer
148: operated by the CSO ($\tau(354\,\rm{GHz})\sim
149: 3.2\,\tau(225\,\rm{GHz})$)~-- was excellent for one track
150: ($\tau$(354\,GHz)$\sim 0.19$) but somewhat worse for the second track
151: ($\tau$(354\,GHz)$\sim 0.32$). The data of the second track could only
152: be used for the 850\,$\mu$m continuum because the signal-to-noise
153: ratio in the line data was too low. For the 217\,GHz observations the
154: opacity was slightly higher with $\tau$(225\,GHz)$\sim 0.12$ in one
155: night and $\tau$(225\,GHz)$\sim 0.3$ in the other night. The
156: doppler-tracking center frequency on the source was
157: $v_{\rm{lsr}}=33.8$\,km\,s$^{-1}$. The receivers operate in a
158: double-sideband mode (DSB) with an IF band of 4--6\,GHz. The
159: correlator bandwidth at the time of observation was 1\,GHz, and the
160: frequency resolution was 0.825\,MHz. In the 850\,$\mu$m band we tuned
161: the receivers to the HCN(4--3) line at 354.5055\,GHz in the upper
162: sideband. At 1\,mm the tuning was centered on the SiO(5--4) line at
163: 217.1049\,GHz in the lower sideband. Because of double-sideband
164: reception we obtained simultaneously data at 344\,GHz and
165: 227\,GHz. The beam sizes of the combined datasets at 1.3\,mm was
166: $2.7''\times 1.7''$ and at 850\,$\mu$m $1.4'' \times 0.9''$ (uniform
167: weighting), the beam size of the 850\,$\mu$m line data using only one
168: track was $1.6'' \times 0.7''$ . System temperatures (DSB) in the
169: 850\,$\mu$m band were between 300-900\,K and in the 1\,mm band around
170: 200\,K. The primary beam at 217\,GHz was $\sim 58''$ and at 354\,GHz
171: $\sim 36''$. The continuum rms was $\sim 7$\,mJy at 217\,GHz and $\sim
172: 40$\,mJy at 345\,GHz. The calibration was done with the IDL superset
173: MIR developed originally for OVRO and adapted for the SMA. The imaging
174: was performed in MIRIAD.
175:
176: \section{Results}
177: \label{imaging}
178:
179: \underline{\it Detection of many molecular lines:} Figure
180: \ref{spectra} presents two spectra taken at 217\,GHz and 344\,GHz
181: (both on baselines of $\sim 25$\,m), showing an impressive line forest
182: of various molecular lines. In the whole dataset with a total
183: bandwidth of 4\,GHz (1\,GHz in a DSB mode per frequency setup) we
184: detect 34 molecular lines from 16 molecules/isotopomers, with 5 lines
185: remaining unidentified (Table \ref{tbl-1}). We detected lines from
186: molecular species tracing various physical and chemical processes
187: within massive star-forming regions. While silicon and sulphur bearing
188: molecules are known to be strong in shocked regions and thus often
189: trace molecular outflows, we also detected typical hot core molecules
190: like CH$_3$OCH$_3$, CH$_3$OH, and numerous HCOOCH$_3$ lines. The data
191: are rich in nitrogen bearing species as HCN, HC$_3$N, and HC$^{15}$N,
192: which are subject to a different chemistry than, e.g., oxygen bearing
193: species (e.g., \citealt{wyrowski1999}). Furthermore, we observed the
194: deuterated species DCN which again is subject to different chemical
195: networks (e.g., \citealt{hatchell1998a}). It should be noted that the
196: setup was chosen originally for SiO(5--4) and HCN(4--3), the other
197: line detections were achieved because of the broad
198: bandwidth. Transitions of other typical molecules like CH$_3$CN or CN
199: were absent in this specific setup. The data suggest that because of
200: the richness of lines in the (sub-)millimeter window, the SMA will
201: almost always be able to sample many transitions
202: simultaneously. Figure 1 also shows the different continuum levels at
203: 1\,mm and 850\,$\mu$m of which a detailed analysis is presented in the
204: accompanying letter (Beuther et al., this volume). We estimate the
205: line contamination to the broadband continuum flux in the 1.3\,mm band
206: and the 850\,$\mu$m band both to be about 10\%.
207:
208: Comparing the line forest with Orion-KL, the proto-typical high-mass
209: star-forming region toward which many line surveys have been conducted
210: (e.g., \citealt{sutton1985,schilke1997b}), we detect in the same
211: frequency ranges all lines previously observed toward Orion-KL, but
212: with on average significantly narrower line width toward
213: IRAS\,18089-1732: e.g., toward Orion-KL in the 344\,GHz band the
214: HC$^{15}$N and CH$_3$OCH$_3$ blend into the broad line wings of the SO
215: line \citep{schilke1997b} whereas they are clearly resolved from each
216: other in the IRAS\,18089-1732 data (Fig. \ref{spectra}). The two main
217: reasons likely contributing to this difference are the larger
218: luminosity of Orion (10$^5$\,L$_{\odot}$ compared to
219: 10$^{4.5}$\,L$_{\odot}$) and the earlier evolutionary stage of
220: IRAS\,18089-1732 which is just at the verge of forming a hypercompact
221: H{\sc ii} region \citep{sridha}.
222:
223: The large number of observed HCOOCH$_3$ lines allows us to estimate a
224: temperature for the central region \citep{oesterling1999}. As the data
225: quality is not good enough to image all lines properly, especially in
226: the 850\,$\mu$m band (see \S \ref{imaging}), we fitted the intensities
227: in the visibility domain. From a boltzmann plot we derive a rotation
228: temperature of $350\pm 100$\,K. As HCOOCH$_3$ traces the dense gas at
229: the core center, this rather high temperature indicates the existence
230: of a hot molecular core in the near vicinity of the central
231: hypercompact H{\sc ii} region \citep{beuther2002c}. Such high
232: temperatures at the core center are further supported by recent VLA
233: detections of the NH$_3$(6,6) line with an energy level of 412\,K.
234:
235: \underline{\it Simultaneous imaging:}
236: Many of the presented molecular lines are strong enough to image,
237: which is an enormous step forward compared to single-dish line
238: surveys. Single-dish observations rarely have sufficient angular
239: resolution to resolve the sources, although massive star-forming
240: regions are usually so complex that the chemistry, density and
241: temperatures exhibit detailed spatial structures. Simultaneous
242: interferometric imaging of various molecular lines is thus the best
243: tool to investigate these characteristics in more detail (e.g.,
244: \citealt{wilner1994,wright1996,blake1996,wyrowski1999}).
245:
246: Because we have only one track at 850\,$\mu$m with good enough
247: signal-to-noise ratio to use for the line imaging, we are restricted
248: in this band to the two strongest lines: HCN and SO (Figure
249: \ref{images}). In the 1\,mm band we could image many more
250: lines. Figure \ref{images} presents a characteristic subset of the
251: integrated emission maps, consisting of the outflow tracer SiO, the
252: hot-core tracer HCOOCH$_3$, the molecule CH$_3$OH, the sulphur bearing
253: molecule H$_2$S, the deuterated molecule DCN and the nitrogen bearing
254: molecule HC$_3$N. Table \ref{tbl-1} presents the peak and integrated
255: fluxes $S_{\rm{peak}}$ \& $S$. Individual characteristics of the
256: different species are discussed below. In the accompanying paper
257: (Beuther et al., this volume), we discuss the SiO(5--4) and
258: HCOOCH$_3$(20--19) line observations of this dataset in detail. Here
259: we present only the integrated SiO and HCOOCH$_3$ emission to outline
260: their outflow/core properties and to associate the emission of the
261: other molecules with the different physical components within the
262: region.
263:
264: \section{Discussion}
265: \label{discussion}
266:
267: As shown in Fig. \ref{images} and outlined in Beuther et al. (this
268: volume), the SiO(5--4) data depict an outflow emanating from the
269: central dust core in the northern direction. This outflow is
270: approximately in the plane of the sky and the SiO emission traces only
271: the northern lobe. The hot core molecule HCOOCH$_3$(20--19) traces the
272: central dust condensation with a velocity gradient across the core at
273: a position angle of $35^{\circ}$ with respect to the outflow
274: direction. That the HCOOCH$_3$ velocity gradient is not exactly
275: perpendicular to the outflow can be interpreted as a rotating gas and
276: dust disk which is influenced by the outflow as well as possible
277: infall.
278:
279: To give a flavor of the velocity structures varying with molecular
280: line, Figure \ref{channel} shows two examples of channel maps, with
281: CH$_3$OH tracing the core and H$_2$S tracing the outflow. The
282: line-width of the two molecules is not very different because the
283: outflow is approximately in the plane of the sky. However, the spatial
284: distribution varies significantly. The core-tracing CH$_3$OH shows a
285: similar east-west velocity shift as HCOOCH$_3$ whereas the H$_2$S
286: emission extends to the north comparable to SiO. As the line-widths of
287: the various molecules are of the same order we base the following
288: outflow/core associations mainly on morphological
289: similarities. Comparing the molecular line data shown in Figure
290: \ref{images} with the results from the SiO/HCOOCH$_3$ observations, we
291: find that many lines are influenced by the outflow. Most prominently,
292: this influence is observed in the sulphur bearing species H$_2$S and
293: SO. However, we find extensions to the north also in DCN and HCN, and,
294: although to a lesser degree, in HC$_3$N. CH$_3$OH appears to be least
295: affected by the outflow. Quantitatively speaking, we compare the
296: source sizes within the $10\%$ levels of the peak emission and the
297: ratio of integrated to peak flux presented in Table
298: \ref{tbl-1}. Taking into account the higher angular resolution and the
299: larger interferometric spatial filtering in the 850\,$\mu$m band,
300: HCOOCH$_3$, CH$_3$OH and HC$_3$N are rather compact whereas the other
301: molecules are more extended. This is reflected in the lower integrated
302: to peak flux ratios of the core-tracing molecules.
303:
304: These findings are less of a surprise for H$_2$S and SO, which are
305: known to be released from dust grains in shock interactions with
306: molecular jets and outflows (e.g., \citealt{bachiller2001}). In
307: contrast, species like HCN and HC$_3$N were believed to be mainly hot
308: core tracing molecules \citep{wyrowski1999}. Especially, HCN was
309: considered as a possible disk tracer in massive star formation, which
310: is not the case in IRAS\,18089-1732 because the outflow significantly
311: shapes the overall HCN emission. Similarly, recent observations toward
312: IRAS\,18566+0408 and IRAS\,20126+4104 reveal strong HCN emission
313: toward its outflow (Zhang, priv. comm.). The 354\,GHz HCN(4--3) data
314: need to be improved for a more detailed investigation of HCN outflow
315: and core emission in IRAS\,18089-1732. On first sight, one gets the
316: impression that the DCN emission might be more extended than HCN, but
317: this is mainly due to the different frequency bands and thus varying
318: interferometric spatial filtering. Therefore, we re-imaged the DCN
319: data using a short baseline cutoff as given by the HCN observations
320: ($\geq 22$\,k$\lambda$), and we find that the spatial distribution of
321: HCN and its deuterated species DCN is quite similar. The compact
322: CH$_3$OH emission exhibits an east-west velocity gradient similar to
323: HCOOCH$_3$(20--19). However, CH$_3$OH has been observed to be
324: associated with outflows in other sources (e.g.,
325: \citealt{beuther2002d}). Thus, its emission is not always
326: unambiguously confined to core emission and has to be treated with
327: similar caution as HCN.
328:
329: The data shown in this letter outline the unique capacities of the SMA
330: in performing imaging spectral line surveys. The presented data were
331: taken in summer time in a testing mode with the partially completed
332: SMA. Therefore, using the full capabilities of the SMA in the very
333: near future (e.g., doubled bandwidth of 2\,GHz, 8 antennas within the
334: array, 2 receivers simultaneously, see also Ho et al., this volume) we
335: will get a far better sensitivity and imaging quality for forthcoming
336: physical and chemical studies of various astrophysical objects.
337:
338: \acknowledgments{We like to thank the whole SMA staff for making this
339: instrument possible! H.B. acknowledges financial support by the
340: Emmy-Noether-Program of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG,
341: grant BE2578/1).}
342:
343: %%%%%%%%%% to create the bibliography
344: %\bibliography{/home/hbeuther/bibliography}
345: %\bibliographystyle{aa} % this does the style, aa.bst necessary
346: \input{ms.bbl}
347:
348: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrr}
349: \tablecaption{Observed lines \label{tbl-1}}
350: \tablewidth{0pt}
351: \tablehead{
352: \colhead{Line} & \colhead{$\nu$} & $S_{\rm{peak}}^b$ & $S^{b,c}$ & Size$^c$ & $\frac{S}{S_{\rm{peak}}}^d$ \\ % &$\frac{S_{\rm{p}}}{S}$ \\
353: \colhead{} & \colhead{GHz} & $\frac{\rm{Jy}}{\rm{beam}}$ & Jy & $''^2$
354: }
355: \startdata
356: SO$_2$ $22_{2,20}-22_{1,21}$ & 216.643 \\
357: H$_2$S $2_{2,0}-2_{1,1}$ & 216.710 & 2.3 & 6.4 &39.7 & 0.6 \\ % & 0.3 \\
358: HCOOCH$_3$ 18--17 & 216.839 \\
359: CH$_3$OH $4_2-5_1$ & 216.946 & 2.0 & 2.8 &20.5 & 0.3 \\ % & 0.8 \\
360: HCOOCH$_3$ 20--19 & 216.966 & 2.1 & 2.3 &15.9& 0.2 \\ % & 0.9 \\
361: SiO 5--4 & 217.105 & 1.0 & 2.6 &31.9& 0.6 \\ % & 0.4 \\
362: UL$^a$ & 217.193 \\
363: DCN 3--2 & 217.239 & 1.9 & 4.3 &32.6& 0.5 \\ % & 0.3 \\
364: UL$^a$ & 217.300 \\
365: UL$^a$ & 217.400 \\
366: \hline
367: HCOOCH$_3$ 19--18 E & 227.020 \\
368: HCOOCH$_3$ 19--18 A & 227.028 \\
369: HC$_3$N 25--24 & 227.419 & 3.4 & 5.9 &21.3& 0.4 \\ % & 0.6 \\
370: HCOOCH$_3$ 21--20 & 227.562 \\
371: UL$^a$ & 227.815 \\
372: \hline
373: HCOOCH$_3$ 27--26 E & 343.732 \\
374: CH$_3$OCH$_3$ 17--16 & 343.753 \\
375: HCOOCH$_3$ 27--26 A & 343.758 \\
376: H$_2$CS $10_{2,8}-9_{2,7}$ & 343.811\\
377: OC$^{34}$S 29--28 & 343.983 \\
378: HCOOCH$_3$ 32--31 & 344.030 \\
379: CH$_2$OH-E & 344.110 \\
380: HC$^{15}$N 4--3 & 344.200 \\
381: SO $8_8-7_7$ & 344.311 & 2.4 & 4.2 & 5.6 & 1.5 \\ % & 0.6 \\
382: CH$_3$OCH$_3$ 19--18 & 344.358 \\
383: CH$_3$OH $19_{10,9}-18_{10,8}$ & 344.445 \\
384: CH$_3$OCH$_3$ 11--10 & 344.512 \\
385: $^{34}$SO$_2$ $19_{1,19}-18_{0,18}$ & 344.581 \\
386: \hline
387: UL$^a$ & 354.129 \\
388: $^{13}$CH$_3$OH $4_3-3_2$ & 354.446 \\
389: HCN(0,1,0) 4--3 & 354.461 \\
390: HCN 4--3 & 354.506 & 2.2 & 3.1 & 4.9& 1.3 \\ % & 0.7 \\
391: HCOOCH$_3$ 33--32 & 354.608 \\
392: HC$_3$N 39--38 & 354.699 \\
393: \enddata
394: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
395: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
396: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
397: \tablenotetext{a}{\footnotesize Unidentified line}
398: \tablenotetext{b}{\footnotesize Errors of the fluxes are within the calibration uncertainty of $25\%$.}
399: \tablenotetext{c}{\footnotesize Integrated flux and size within the $10\%$ level of the peak emission}
400: \tablenotetext{d}{\footnotesize To reduce differences between the two bands (different beams and spatial sampling) this ratio is divided by the beam.}
401: %\tablecomments{Occasionally, authors wish to append a short
402: %paragraph of explanatory notes that pertain to the entire table, but
403: %which are different than the caption. Such notes should be placed in
404: %a {\tt tablecomments} command like this.}
405: \end{deluxetable}
406:
407: \clearpage
408:
409: \begin{figure}[htb]
410: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=7cm]{f1a.eps}\\
411: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=7cm]{f1b.eps}
412: \caption{SMA spectra toward the high-mass star-forming region
413: IRAS\,18089-1732. The spectrum on top is taken at 217\,GHz and the bottom
414: one at 344\,GHz, both with baseline length of approximately 25\,m and
415: a bandwidth of 1\,GHz. The other sidebands at 227\,GHz and 354\,GHz
416: are not shown. No continuum subtraction has been performed to show the
417: different continuum levels in the two bands consistent with dust
418: emission (see the accompanying paper by Beuther et al., this
419: volume). UL marks unidentified lines.}
420: \label{spectra}
421: \end{figure}
422:
423: \begin{figure}[htb]
424: \includegraphics[width=8.5cm,angle=-90]{f2}
425: \caption{Integrated line intensity images of various molecular
426: transitions toward IRAS\,18089-1732 are shown as thick contours. The
427: grey-scale and thin contours present the 850\,$\mu$m continuum image
428: (see also Beuther et al., this volume). The molecules are labeled, and
429: the beams are shown at the bottom left corner of each panel. The
430: continuum and the 1\,mm line images are contoured in 10\% level steps
431: from the integrated intensities presented in Table \ref{tbl-1}. Line
432: images of HCN and SO are contoured from 10 to 90\% in 20\% steps.}
433: \label{images}
434: \end{figure}
435:
436: \begin{figure}[htb]
437: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=7cm]{f3a.eps}\\
438: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=7cm]{f3b.eps}
439: \caption{Channel maps of CH$_3$OH and H$_2$S. The grey-scale and thin
440: contours present the 850\,$\mu$m continuum image, the thick contours
441: show the line emission. The continuum is contoured in 10\% steps from
442: the peak intensity, and the channel maps are contoured from 15 to 95\%
443: (10\% steps) from the integrated intensity in the strongest channel,
444: respectively. The $v_{\rm{lsr}}$ velocity of each channel is marked at
445: the top-right of each panel.}
446: \label{channel}
447: \end{figure}
448:
449: \end{document}