1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
3: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title{Kinematics of X-ray Emitting Components in Cassiopeia A}
8:
9: \author{Tracey DeLaney\altaffilmark{1}, Lawrence Rudnick\altaffilmark{1},
10: Robert A. Fesen\altaffilmark{2}, T. W. Jones\altaffilmark{1}, Robert
11: Petre\altaffilmark{3}, and Jon A. Morse\altaffilmark{4}}
12:
13: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, University of Minnesota, 116 Church
14: Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455; tdelaney@astro.umn.edu,
15: larry@astro.umn.edu, twj@astro.umn.edu}
16: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, Dartmouth College,
17: Hanover, NH 03755; fesen@snr.dartmouth.edu}
18: \altaffiltext{3}{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771;
19: petre@lheavx.gsfc.nasa.gov}
20: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, Arizona State
21: University, Box 871504, Tempe, AZ 85287-1504; Jon.Morse@asu.edu}
22:
23: \begin{abstract}
24:
25: We present high-resolution X-ray proper motion measurements of Cassiopeia A
26: using \emph{Chandra X-ray Observatory} observations from 2000 and 2002. We
27: separate the emission into four spectrally distinct classes:
28: Si-dominated, Fe-dominated, low-energy-enhanced, and continuum-dominated.
29: These classes also represent distinct spatial and kinematic components. The
30: Si- and Fe-dominated classes are ejecta and have a mean expansion rate of
31: 0.2\% yr$^{-1}$. This is the same as for the forward shock filaments but
32: less than the 0.3\% yr$^{-1}$ characteristic of optical ejecta. The
33: low-energy-enhanced spectral class possibly illuminates a clumpy circumstellar
34: component and has a mean expansion rate of 0.05\% yr$^{-1}$. The
35: continuum-dominated emission likely represents the forward shock and consists
36: of diffuse circumstellar material which is seen as a circular ring around the
37: periphery of the remnant as well as projected across the center.
38:
39: \end{abstract}
40:
41: \keywords{ISM: supernova remnants --- ISM: individual (Cassiopeia A)}
42:
43: \section{Introduction}
44:
45: Cassiopeia A (Cas A) is the youngest known ($\sim$ 330 yr, Thorstensen,
46: Fesen, \& van den Bergh 2001) Galactic supernova remnant (SNR). It is about
47: 3.4 kpc \citep{rhf95} away and was most likely the result of either a type
48: Ib or IIn supernova explosion \citep{co03}. As one of the brightest X-ray
49: and radio sources in the sky, Cas A is one of the best targets for studying
50: SNR evolution. At radio, X-ray, and optical wavelengths, Cas A is dominated
51: by a 3$\farcm$5 diameter bright ring of emission with a fainter 5$\arcmin$
52: diameter plateau of radio and X-ray emission. The X-ray emission is
53: dominated by a thermal spectrum rich in emission lines from highly ionized
54: atoms. The radio emission is consistent with synchrotron radiation from
55: relativistic electrons accelerated at shocks. The optical emission
56: originates from a complex system of chemically enriched knots.
57:
58: The kinematics of small and large scale radio features of Cas A are well
59: studied. The small-scale radio knots are significantly decelerated relative
60: to the X-ray and optical emission. They are not in homologous expansion and
61: there are even inward moving knots. The expansion rates of the small-scale
62: features of the bright ring vary by over a factor of two as a function of
63: azimuth with a mean rate of 0.11\% yr$^{-1}$ \citep{ar95,krg98,tuf86}.
64: The bulk expansion of Cas A has been measured in several ways by
65: \citet{ar95}, \citet{ag99}, and \citet{dr03} with reported expansion rates
66: of $\approx$0.11\% yr$^{-1}$, $\approx$0.22\% yr$^{-1}$, and
67: $\approx$0.07\% yr$^{-1}$, respectively. For this discussion, we adopt the
68: \citet{dr03} value of 0.07\% yr$^{-1}$ because it is the least contaminated
69: by brightness changes and azimuthal asymmetries.
70:
71: The optical components of Cas A consist of slow-moving ($\lesssim$ 500
72: km s$^{-1}$) quasi-stationary flocculi (QSFs) and fast moving knots (FMKs,
73: 4000$-$6000 km s$^{-1}$, $\approx$0.3\% yr$^{-1}$) \citep{kv76,vk85}. The
74: QSFs are thought to be shocked circumstellar material (CSM) from the
75: presupernova wind of the progenitor while most of the FMKs are located on the
76: bright ring and represent emission from ejecta that have interacted with the
77: reverse shock. There are also outlying knots of enriched composition with
78: velocities from 8000$-$15,000 km s$^{-1}$ ($\approx$0.3\% yr$^{-1}$)
79: \citep{fes01}.
80:
81: Previous X-ray proper motion measurements, conducted with \emph{Einstein}
82: and \emph{ROSAT} at a resolution of 5\arcsec, showed that the mean
83: expansion rate was 0.2\% yr$^{-1}$ \citep{krg98,vbk98}. This established a
84: paradoxical difference in expansion rates for the cospatial bright ring
85: measured in optical, X-ray, and radio of approximately 3:2:1, respectively
86: (Thorstensen, Fesen, \& van den Bergh 2001 and references therein). The
87: factor of two discrepancy between the X-ray and radio expansion is a common
88: theme in young SNRs and has been found in both Kepler's SNR
89: \citep{hug99,dsa88} and Tycho's SNR \citep{hug00}.
90:
91: With the advent of the \emph{Chandra X-ray Observatory}, we are now able to
92: measure proper motions with unprecedented spatial resolution. The results
93: for the forward shock filaments around the outer edge of the remnant showed a
94: mean expansion rate of 0.21\% yr$^{-1}$ \citep{dr03}, the same as the bright
95: ring. In this paper we extend our proper motion analysis to the rest of the
96: SNR, for four spectrally distinct components. One of these components
97: represents a new class of X-ray emission while three components have been
98: previously identified \citep{hrb00}. We interpret the proper motions based
99: on these spectral components and propose a solution to the expansion rate
100: paradox.
101:
102: \section{Observations, Analysis, and Results}
103:
104: Cas A was observed for 50 ks with the ACIS-S3 chip onboard
105: \emph{Chandra} on 2000 January 30-31 and 2002 February 6. For details
106: of the observing parameters and data reduction see \citet{hhp00},
107: \citet{gkr01}, and \citet{dr03}. To measure proper motions, we
108: registered the 2000 and 2002 broadband (0.3$-$10 keV) X-ray images by
109: aligning them on the point source as described in \citet{dr03}. The
110: uncertainty of the registration to the point source is 0$\farcs$015 based on
111: Monte Carlo simulations which translates to a proper motion error of 0.005\%
112: yr$^{-1}$ at the mean radius of the exterior forward shock filaments
113: (150\arcsec). The possible 0$\farcs$02 yr$^{-1}$ \citep{tfv01} motion
114: of the point source would result in a maximum proper motion error of
115: 0.013\% yr$^{-1}$ at 150$\arcsec$. We constrained rotation between the two
116: images by requiring the bright knots in the northeast jet to have no
117: average rotation. The jet knots are the least decelerated features in the
118: remnant and so should be the least affected by CSM interactions. The
119: uncertainty in rotation alignment is $<0\fdg05$. The proper motion
120: measurements for 261 knots and filaments were then made by minimizing
121: $\chi^2$ for a $\approx$7$\arcsec$ region around each feature, using the
122: difference maps between the 2000 image and a set of 2002 images, shifted over
123: a range of $\pm 2.5\arcsec$ in both RA and DEC. \cite{dr03} contains a
124: detailed description of the one-dimensional analog of this procedure.
125: We assigned an error of 0\farcs07 yr$^{-1}$ to all 261 features, which
126: corresponds to the top 20\% of the Monte Carlo errors derived in \citet{dr03}
127: where the mean error was 0\farcs04 yr$^{-1}$. These Monte Carlo simulations
128: include problems that would arise from features of varying sizes and the
129: different point spread functions across the remnant, such as affects the 261
130: features measured here. The positions and proper motions for the 261
131: features are shown in Table \ref{tbl1}. We determined the radial component
132: of the motion for each knot or filament and calculated the radial expansion
133: rate ($v_r$) using the distance from the optical expansion center at
134: $23^{\mathrm{h}}23^{\mathrm{m}}27\fs77$,
135: $+58\degr48\arcmin49\farcs4$ (J2000) \citep{tfv01}.
136:
137: The 261 knots and filaments were spectrally classified using both extracted
138: spectra and spectral tomography, as discussed below. Based on the extracted
139: spectra, four major classes were identified: Si-dominated,
140: Fe-dominated, low energy (LowE) enhanced, and continuum-dominated.
141: The Si-, Fe-, and continuum-dominated classes were previously identified by
142: \citet{hrb00}. Representative spectra are shown in Figure \ref{spectra}.
143: The Si-dominated emission is marked by very strong line emission from Si and
144: S with contributions from O, Ca, Ar, and Mg. The Fe-dominated spectrum shows
145: strong FeL and FeK emission and can in some cases be modeled with nearly pure
146: Fe emission \citep{hl03,lh03}. The LowE-enhanced emission shows a relative
147: increase in emission at low energies ($\approx$ 0.8$-$1.6 keV) compared to
148: the global spectrum. The continuum-dominated emission is marked by very
149: little or no line emission and an increase in 4$-$6 keV emission. Only 50\%
150: of the knots and filaments can be cleanly classified using their spectra
151: alone. The remaining features combine the characteristics of two or more of
152: the four basic classes identified above.
153:
154: To separate overlapping spectral structures and to spatially visualize the
155: spectral components, we used spectral tomography. The spectral tomography
156: technique has been used to analyze the spectra of radio galaxies \citep{kr97}
157: and supernova remnants \citep{dkr02}. It involves taking differences between
158: images from two different energies with a scale factor chosen to accentuate
159: features of interest. In Figure \ref{tomos} we show four tomography images
160: each representing the dominant spectral type indicated by the spectra in
161: Figure \ref{spectra}. To make the tomography images, we first constructed
162: emission line images for Si (1.72$-$1.96 keV which includes Al and possibly
163: weak Mg), FeL+Ne (0.9$-$1.15 keV which includes Ni), and FeL+Mg (1.35$-$1.55
164: keV) and an image of the high energy continuum (HEC) region from 4$-$6 keV.
165: These energy ranges were chosen to exploit the differences between the
166: spectral classes. The images were convolved to 3$\arcsec$ resolution and
167: there was no background subtraction or correction applied for differential
168: absorption across the remnant. The Si-dominated image was constructed by
169: scaling and subtracting the HEC image from the Si image. Regions that are
170: bright on the Si-dominated image represent ejecta whose emission is dominated
171: by strong emission lines of the Si-group (Si, S, Ar, Ca) which all scale with
172: the Si line \citep{hhp00}. Regions that are dark on the Si-dominated image
173: represent features where the line emission is not dominant with respect to
174: the continuum. The scale factor was chosen to separate the bimodal
175: distribution of ratios in the log(Si/HEC) image. The appearance of the image
176: in Figure \ref{tomos} is only weakly dependent on the value of the scale
177: factor. Because only the HEC image was subtracted to create the Si-dominated
178: image, there are low levels of contamination from the Fe-dominated and
179: LowE-enhanced classes. Subtracting out these two components does not
180: significantly alter the Si-dominated image because the relative strength of
181: the Si emission is very strong compared to the other classes.
182:
183: The continuum-dominated image was made in the same way as the Si-dominated
184: image, but with a slightly different scaling factor to better show the
185: continuum-dominated component. The brightness on the image was reversed so
186: the continuum-dominated emission appears positive while the Si-dominated
187: emission appears negative. The Fe-dominated image was constructed from
188: scaling and subtracting the FeL+Mg image from the FeL+Ne image. The bright
189: areas represent regions where the ratio of FeL+Ne to FeL+Mg is greater than
190: one, which is unique to the Fe-dominated ejecta class. The LowE-enhanced
191: image was made by first scaling and subtracting the Si image from the FeL+Ne
192: image. Because the resulting image also contained significant Fe-dominated
193: ejecta emission, a second scaling and subtraction was applied using the
194: positive brightness areas on the Fe-dominated image to eliminate regions
195: with strong Fe ejecta emission. The resulting image only shows those regions
196: with spectra similar to the LowE-enhanced spectrum in Figure \ref{spectra}.
197:
198: The Si-dominated and Fe-dominated tomography images basically reproduce the
199: spatial distributions of Si and Fe as shown by the equivalent width images
200: in \citet{hhp00}, with the exception that the western region does not show as
201: much Si and Fe emission as is actually present due to the increased
202: absorption of low energy X-ray emission in that region \citep{kra96,wbv02}.
203: The continuum-dominated image shows the same forward shock filaments around
204: the outer edge of the remnant as described by \citet{gkr01}. There is also
205: continuum-dominated filamentary emission interior to the bright ring of the
206: remnant which \citet{hrb00} speculated results from X-ray synchrotron emission
207: associated with the forward shock. The continuum-dominated image matches the
208: 8-15 keV \emph{XMM} continuum image \citep{bwv01}, in the west particularly,
209: indicating that this emission may indeed have a strong nonthermal component.
210:
211: The LowE-enhanced image represents emission that has not previously been
212: explored. Some of the LowE-enhanced emission is associated with optical QSF
213: emission such as the features in the interior of the remnant, the bright
214: northeast region at the outer edge of the bright ring, and the southern arc
215: \citep{lmu95}. Some of the LowE-enhanced emission has no QSF counterparts
216: such as the emission to the southeast. This may be because the low energy
217: spectral region contains emission lines of O, Fe, Ne, and Mg, making it
218: possible that some of the emission in the LowE-enhanced image is due to more
219: than one spectral component.
220:
221: The power of the tomography technique is in its ability to isolate spatially
222: overlapping spectral components. Using spectra alone, one may misidentify
223: features as intermediate spectral types when they are simply a combination of
224: unrelated overlapping structures. The fact that the tomography images
225: isolate X-ray structures that match emission features in other wavebands
226: proves the efficacy of the technique. This will be explored in more detail
227: in a future paper (DeLaney et al. in preparation).
228:
229: Using both extracted spectra and spectral tomography, 80\% of the 261 knots
230: were classified into one of the four spectral classes. Histograms showing
231: the radial expansion rates broken down by spectral class are shown in Figure
232: \ref{hist}. Also included for completeness are the expansion rates from the
233: 29 forward shock filaments presented in \citet{dr03}. The expansion rate
234: distribution of the knots and filaments is very broad; however, when broken
235: down by spectral class, it is clear that each species has its own
236: characteristic motion. The expansion rate distribution of each class holds
237: for both the tomography and spectrum identified sets independently -- proving
238: the robustness of the tomography identifications. The Si- and Fe-dominated
239: ejecta knots have the fastest expansion rates with a mean value of
240: 0.2$\pm$0.01\% yr$^{-1}$. The expansion rate, expressed in \% yr$^{-1}$, is
241: independent of projection effects.
242:
243: To compare to Doppler measurements, we can project the expansion rates onto
244: the plane of the sky. The Si-dominated knots are at an average radius of
245: 95$\arcsec$ which converts to a transverse velocity of 3100 km s$^{-1}$ for a
246: distance of 3.4 kpc to Cas A. The Fe-dominated knots lie further out on
247: average at a radius of 120$\arcsec$ yielding an average transverse velocity
248: of 3900 km s$^{-1}$ for the same expansion rate. The Doppler measurements
249: from \emph{XMM} show that the Fe emission is at a larger radius on average
250: than the Si emission and that the average line-of-sight velocities are
251: smaller than the average transverse velocities at approximately 1500
252: km s$^{-1}$ for the Fe and 1000 km s$^{-1}$ for the Si \citep{wbv02}. The
253: Doppler velocities measured for Si with \emph{Chandra} are slightly faster
254: than those measured with \emph{XMM} at 2000-3000 km s$^{-1}$ \citep{hsp01}.
255: The difference between the Doppler measurements for Si could be due to the
256: way in which the zero point in velocity was determined or possibly to the
257: different spectral and spatial resolutions of \emph{XMM} and \emph{Chandra}.
258: The mismatch of Doppler velocities and transverse velocities is not
259: surprising. The average transverse and line-of-sight velocities would only
260: match if the ejecta were uniformly distributed and thus observed at all
261: projected radii such that, on average, projection effects would contribute
262: equally in each case. For Cas A, the ejecta do not appear to be uniformly
263: distributed \citep{wbv02}.
264:
265: The LowE-enhanced knots are moving quite slowly with a mean expansion rate of
266: 0.05$\pm$0.01\% yr$^{-1}$. The Si- and Fe-dominated knot distribution and
267: the LowE-enhanced knot distribution are narrow with respect to the separation
268: between them which is consistent with virtually non-overlapping populations.
269: The continuum-dominated knots and filaments are split into ``exterior'' and
270: ``projected interior'' where the exterior features are the forward shock
271: filaments around the periphery of the remnant. The exterior features have a
272: mean expansion rate of 0.2$\pm$0.01\% yr$^{-1}$ while the expansion rates of
273: the projected interior population varies significantly and includes apparent
274: inward motions. Most of the inward motions are concentrated to the south and
275: west between 170$\degr$ and 300$\degr$ azimuth. Radio proper motion
276: measurements also show inward moving features in this region \citep{ar95}.
277:
278: \section{Discussion}
279:
280: As was found previously with the \emph{Einstein} and \emph{ROSAT} proper
281: motion measurements \citep{krg98,vbk98}, the X-ray ejecta are moving slower,
282: as a class, relative to the cospatial \emph{population} of optical ejecta and
283: moving faster, as a class, than the cospatial \emph{population} of radio
284: knots (On a case-by-case basis, the small number of matched X-ray/optical and
285: X-ray/radio knots show the same motions (DeLaney et al. in preparation)).
286: The X-ray/optical population difference is thought to be due to the density
287: difference between the two populations \citep{ajr94,hsp01,fes01,dr03}. High
288: density ejecta experience very little deceleration, and thus very little
289: disruption, allowing the ejecta to cool rather quickly and emit at optical
290: wavelengths. Low density ejecta experience more deceleration, and are heated
291: to higher temperatures. These ejecta emit at X-ray wavelengths and may even
292: be completely disrupted before they can cool enough to emit optically. The
293: radio emission arises from synchrotron radiation, which requires
294: amplification of magnetic fields to be strong enough for the emission to be
295: seen. This amplification results from the turbulence associated with ejecta
296: deceleration. If significant deceleration is needed for amplification, radio
297: emitting knots would be decelerated the most.
298:
299: Of particular interest is the fact that the Si- and Fe-dominated ejecta have
300: experienced the same fractional deceleration in their expansion rate from the
301: free expansion rate of 0.3\% yr$^{-1}$ to 0.2\% yr$^{-1}$. The Fe-rich
302: emission (which results from explosive silicon burning near the core of the
303: progenitor) is on average exterior to the Si-group emission (which results
304: from explosive oxygen burning farther out from the star's center). This
305: spatial overturning of material could be due to several scenarios such as:
306: 1. The Si and Fe ejecta may have had different initial velocities imparted
307: from the SN explosion such that the Fe layer overtook the Si layer. 2. The
308: Fe ejecta may have experienced less deceleration at the reverse shock than
309: the Si ejecta (perhaps due to density differences between the two types of
310: ejecta). 3. The overturning may have occurred in the star prior to or during
311: the SN explosion resulting in a spatial separation between the Fe and Si even
312: in the event of the same initial explosion velocities. These scenarios would
313: not necessarily predict that the Si and Fe would have the same expansion
314: rate, as observed. Furthermore, the X-ray ejecta have the same expansion
315: rate as the forward shock filaments (i.e. homologous expansion on average),
316: perhaps implying that the two populations are part of a coupled dynamical
317: system in which the pressure in the X-ray ejecta is determined by the forward
318: shock speed; although this does not explain why the optical ejecta would not
319: be affected. Even if initially the different types of ejecta were not
320: coupled to eachother or to the forward shock speed, after interaction with
321: the reverse shock and secondary shocks, the ejecta may now be coupled and
322: expanding with the forward shock \citep{lh03}.
323:
324: At the other end of the expansion rate spectrum are the LowE-enhanced knots
325: and filaments. Spatially, many of these features match very well with
326: optical QSF emission, particularly the arc to the south, the emission on the
327: bright ring to the northeast, and much of the interior emission
328: (DeLaney et al., in preparation). On average, QSFs show little or no motion
329: \citep{vk85} while the mean expansion rate of the LowE-enhanced knots is
330: 0.05$\pm$0.01\% yr$^{-1}$. Based on the spatial and dynamical similarities,
331: we propose that the LowE-enhanced X-ray emission, like the optical QSF
332: emission, represents the clumpy component of the CSM that was deposited by
333: the wind from the progenitor. The slight difference in expansion rates
334: between the optical QSF population and the X-ray LowE-enhanced population
335: might be due to a pre-existing density distribution in the progenitor wind
336: \citep{co03}. On average, less dense X-ray clumps may be accelerated more by
337: the forward shock than more dense optical clumps. The low-energy enhancement
338: in the X-ray spectrum relative to the global X-ray spectrum (i.e. a
339: ``softer'' X-ray spectrum) is expected as dense clumps are overrun by the
340: forward shock resulting in slow moving transmitted shocks through the clumps
341: \citep{co03} which will produce an X-ray spectrum with a ``cooler''
342: characteristic temperature compared to other X-ray components
343: \citep{hc86,pbg03}.
344:
345: Another likely CSM component, a diffuse component, was discovered when the
346: ``first light'' observation of \emph{Chandra} revealed a thin,
347: continuum-dominated ring of emission around the outer edge of the remnant
348: which has been identified as the forward shock \citep{gkr01}. We find
349: similar continuum-dominated knots and filaments across the face of the
350: remnant and propose that these are also forward shock filaments seen in
351: projection. These ``projected interior'' filaments are associated with
352: edges and filaments of radio emission (DeLaney et al., in preparation) just
353: as the ``exterior'' forward shock filaments are associated with the edge of
354: the radio plateau \citep{gkr01}. The projected interior and exterior
355: filaments also have the same X-ray spectral shape (bottom panel of Figure
356: \ref{spectra}) and they are both associated with steep radio spectral index
357: features \citep{ar96}. The projected interior filaments are not evenly
358: distributed across the face of the remnant, but rather are concentrated to
359: the west where there is significant X-ray absorption \citep{kra96,wbv02}.
360: The ``inward'' motions and the apparent motions faster than free expansion
361: for the projected filaments are consistent with the forward shock following
362: the path of least resistance through the clumpy medium and showing apparent
363: chaotic behavior when seen face on. We may also be observing a more complex
364: pattern involving both motions and changes in synchrotron brightness as
365: magnetic fields are amplified in shear layers and in turbulent wakes due to
366: the forward shock wrapping around CSM clumps \citep{jk93}. The interior
367: continuum-dominated filaments have also been interpreted as nonthermal
368: bremsstrahlung emission associated with the ejecta/reverse shock
369: \citep{bwv01}. The \emph{XMM} hard X-ray continuum images show that the
370: continuum-dominated emission in the west is significantly brighter than the
371: exterior forward shock filaments possibly indicating that the two
372: continuum-dominated populations arise through different emission processes.
373: If the interior filaments are instead internal to the SNR, they are unlikely
374: to arise through X-ray synchrotron emission because the high magnetic field
375: strength will cause rapid aging of electrons at these energies \citep{vl03}.
376:
377: In summary, the high-resolution proper motion measurements, along with the
378: spectral classes, reveal that the X-ray emission can be separated into three
379: components each with a distinct kinematic signature. The ejecta component
380: consists of both Si- and Fe-dominated emission populations, is associated
381: with optical FMK emission, and has been significantly decelerated relative to
382: the FMKs. This greater deceleration of the X-ray ejecta is likely due to the
383: lower densities in this material relative to the optical FMKs. The
384: slow-moving LowE-enhanced emission may be analogous to optical QSF emission
385: thus representing a clumpy CSM component. A diffuse CSM component may be
386: associated with continuum-dominated emission from material swept up by the
387: forward shock. In this scenario, the chaotic motions of the interior
388: continuum-dominated filaments would be explained as the projected behavior of
389: the forward shock interacting with an inhomogeneous CSM. The exterior
390: continuum-dominated filaments have the same expansion rate as the X-ray
391: ejecta suggesting a dynamic coupling between the forward shock and the ejecta.
392:
393: \acknowledgments
394:
395: We thank Una Hwang for valuable conversations and manuscript comments. This
396: work was supported at the University of Minnesota under Smithsonian grant
397: SMITHSONIAN/GO1-2051A/NASA, NASA grants HST-AR-09537.01 and NAG5-10774 and by
398: the Minnesota Supercomputer Institute.
399:
400: \begin{thebibliography}{}
401:
402: \bibitem[Ag\"{u}eros \& Green(1999)]{ag99} Ag\"{u}eros, M. A. \& Green,
403: D. A. 1999, \mnras, 305, 957
404:
405: \bibitem[Anderson et al.(1994)]{ajr94} Anderson, M., Jones, T. W., Rudnick,
406: L., Tregillis, I. L., \& Kang, Hyesung 1994, \apj, 421, L31
407:
408: \bibitem[Anderson \& Rudnick(1995)]{ar95} Anderson, M. \& Rudnick, L. 1995,
409: \apj, 441, 307
410:
411: \bibitem[Anderson \& Rudnick(1996)]{ar96} Anderson, M. \& Rudnick, L. 1996,
412: \apj, 456, 234
413:
414: \bibitem[Bleeker et al.(2001)]{bwv01} Bleeker, J. A. M., Willingale, R.,
415: van der Heyden, K., Dennerl, K., Kaastra, J. S., Aschenbach, B. \& Vink, J.
416: 2001, \mnras, 365, L225
417:
418: \bibitem[Chevalier \& Oishi(2003)]{co03} Chevalier, R. \& Oishi, J. 2003,
419: \apj, 593, L23
420:
421: \bibitem[DeLaney et al.(2002)]{dkr02} DeLaney, T., Koralesky, B., \& Rudnick,
422: L. 2002, \apj, 580, 914
423:
424: \bibitem[DeLaney \& Rudnick(2003)]{dr03} DeLaney, T. \& Rudnick, L. 2003,
425: \apj, 589, 818
426:
427: \bibitem[Dickel et al.(1988)]{dsa88} Dickel, J. R., Sault, R.,
428: Arendt, R. G., Matsui, Y., \& Korista, K. T. 1988, \apj, 330, 254
429:
430: \bibitem[Fesen(2001)]{fes01} Fesen, R. A. 2001, \apjs, 133, 161
431:
432: \bibitem[Fesen et al.(2001)]{fmc01} Fesen, R. A., Morse, J. A., Chevalier,
433: R. A., Borkowski, K. J., Gerardy, C. L., Lawrence, S. S., \& van den Bergh,
434: S. 2001, \aj, 122, 2644
435:
436: \bibitem[Gotthelf et al.(2001)]{gkr01} Gotthelf, E., Koralesky, B.,
437: Rudnick, L., Jones, T., Hwang, U., \& Petre, R. 2001, \apj, 552, L39
438:
439: \bibitem[Hester \& Cox(1986)]{hc86} Hester, J. J. \& Cox, D. P. 1986, \apj,
440: 300, 675
441:
442: \bibitem[Hughes(1999)]{hug99} Hughes, J. P. 1999, \apj, 527, 298
443:
444: \bibitem[Hughes(2000)]{hug00} Hughes, J. P. 2000, \apjl, 545, L53
445:
446: \bibitem[Hughes et al.(2000)]{hrb00} Hughes, J. P., Rakowski, C. E.,
447: Burrows, D. N., \& Slane, P. O. 2000, \apj, 528, L109
448:
449: \bibitem[Hwang, Holt, \& Petre(2000)]{hhp00} Hwang, U., Holt, S., \& Petre,
450: R. 2000, \apj, 537, L119
451:
452: \bibitem[Hwang \& Laming(2003)]{hl03} Hwang, U. \& Laming, J. M. 2003, \apj,
453: 597, 362
454:
455: \bibitem[Hwang et al.(2001)]{hsp01} Hwang, U., Szymkowiak, A. E., Petre, R.,
456: \& Holt, S. S. 2001, \apj, 560, L175
457:
458: \bibitem[Jones \& Kang(1993)]{jk93} Jones, T. W. \& Kang, Hyesung 1993,
459: \apj, 402, 560
460:
461: \bibitem[Kamper \& van den Bergh(1976)]{kv76} Kamper, K. \& van den Bergh, S.
462: 1976, \apjs, 32, 351
463:
464: \bibitem[Katz-Stone \& Rudnick(1997)]{kr97} Katz-Stone, D. M. \& Rudnick,
465: L. 1997, \apj, 488, 146
466:
467: \bibitem[Koehane, Rudnick \& Anderson(1996)]{kra96} Koehane, J. W., Rudnick,
468: L., \& Anderson, M. C. 1996, \apj, 466, 309
469:
470: \bibitem[Koralesky et al.(1998)]{krg98} Koralesky, B., Rudnick, L.,
471: Gotthelf, E., \& Keohane, J. 1998, \apj, 505, L27
472:
473: \bibitem[Lawrence et al.(1995)]{lmu95} Lawrence, J. L., MacAlpine, G. M.,
474: Uomoto, A., Woodgate, B. E., Brown, L. W., Oliversen, R. J., Lowenthal,
475: J. D., \& Liu, C. 1995, \aj, 109, 2635
476:
477: \bibitem[Laming \& Hwang(2003)]{lh03} Laming, J. M. \& Hwang, U. 2003, \apj,
478: 597, 347
479:
480: \bibitem[Park et al.(2003)]{pbg03} Park, S., Burrows, D. N., Garmire, G. P.,
481: Nousek, J. A., Hughes, J. P., \& Williams, R. M. 2003, \apj, 586, 210
482:
483: \bibitem[Reed et al.(1995)]{rhf95} Reed, J. E., Hester, J. J., Fabian, A. C.,
484: \& Winkler, P. F. 1995, \apj, 440, 706
485:
486: \bibitem[Thorstensen, Fesen, \& van den Bergh(2001)]{tfv01} Thorstensen, J.,
487: Fesen, R., \& van den Bergh, S. 2001, \aj, 122, 297
488:
489: \bibitem[Tuffs(1986)]{tuf86} Tuffs, R. 1986, \mnras, 219, 13
490:
491: \bibitem[van den Bergh \& Kamper(1985)]{vk85} van den Bergh, S. \& Kamper,
492: K. 1985, \apj, 293, 537
493:
494: \bibitem[Vink et al.(1998)]{vbk98} Vink, J., Bloemen, H., Kaastra,
495: J. S., \& Bleeker, J. A. M. 1998, \aap, 339, 201
496:
497: \bibitem[Vink \& Laming(2003)]{vl03} Vink, J. \& Laming, J. M. 2003,
498: \apj, 584, 758
499:
500: \bibitem[Willingale et al.(2002)]{wbv02} Willingale, R., Bleeker,
501: J. A. M., van der Heyden, K. J., Kaastra, J. S., \& Vink, J. 2002, \aap,
502: 381, 1039
503:
504: \end{thebibliography}
505:
506: \clearpage
507:
508: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccccccc}
509: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
510: \tablecaption{Knot and Filament Proper Motions \label{tbl1}}
511: \tablewidth{0pt}
512: \tablehead{
513: \colhead{\#} &
514: \colhead{blc$_x$} &
515: \colhead{blc$_y$} &
516: \colhead{trc$_x$} &
517: \colhead{trc$_y$} &
518: \colhead{$\mu_x$} &
519: \colhead{$\mu_y$} &
520: \colhead{$v_r$} &
521: \colhead{$\delta v_r$} &
522: \colhead{class}
523: \\
524: \colhead{ } &
525: \colhead{$\arcsec$} &
526: \colhead{$\arcsec$} &
527: \colhead{$\arcsec$} &
528: \colhead{$\arcsec$} &
529: \colhead{$\arcsec$ yr$^{-1}$} &
530: \colhead{$\arcsec$ yr$^{-1}$} &
531: \colhead{\% yr$^{-1}$} &
532: \colhead{\% yr$^{-1}$} &
533: \colhead{ }
534: }
535: \startdata
536: 1 & \phs\phn2.0 & $-$105.3 & \phs\phn8.4 & \phn$-$99.9 & \phs0.01 & $-$0.20 & \phs0.19 & 0.07 & L \\
537: 2 & \phs60.5 & $-$122.5 & \phs67.4 & $-$115.6 & \phs0.05 & $-$0.01 & \phs0.03 & 0.05 & M \\
538: 3 & \phs25.6 & \phn$-$83.6 & \phs32.0 & \phn$-$77.2 & \phs0.01 & $-$0.03 & \phs0.03 & 0.09 & M \\
539: 4 & $-$32.0 & \phn$-$65.4 & $-$25.1 & \phn$-$58.1 & $-$0.01 & $-$0.10 & \phs0.15 & 0.11 & S \\
540: 5 & \phn$-$7.4 & \phn$-$33.0 & \phn$-$1.0 & \phn$-$27.1 & $-$0.02 & \phs0.05 & $-$0.15 & 0.24 & L \\
541: \enddata
542: \tablecomments{The complete version of this table is in the electronic
543: edition of the Journal. The printed edition contains only a sample. All
544: knots have been assigned a constant error of 0\farcs07 yr$^{-1}$. Col.
545: 1. Knot or filament designation number. Cols. 2-5. Location of bottom left
546: corner and top right corner of box defining the region used to measure each
547: knot or filament and extract spectra (arcseconds of offset on epoch 2002
548: image with respect to the optical expansion center at
549: $23^{\mathrm{h}}23^{\mathrm{m}}27\fs77$,
550: $+58\degr48\arcmin49\farcs4$ (J2000) \citep{tfv01}). Cols. 6-7. Proper
551: motion in right ascension and declination ($\arcsec$ yr$^{-1}$). Positive
552: right ascension offset or motion is defined to be westward. Col. 8. Radial
553: component of motion (\% yr$^{-1}$). Col. 9. Error in radial expansion
554: (\% yr$^{-1}$). Col. 10. Spectral classification: S=Si-dominated,
555: F=Fe-dominated, L=LowE-enhanced, C=continuum-dominated, M=mixture of two or
556: more classes.}
557: \end{deluxetable}
558:
559: \clearpage
560:
561: \begin{figure}
562: \epsscale{0.5}
563: \plotone{f1.eps}
564: \caption{\emph{Chandra} ACIS-S spectra of Cas A showing the global spectrum
565: (in red) and typical spectra for the four spectral classes identified in the
566: text. The Si-dominated emission is marked by very strong Si group emission.
567: The Fe-dominated spectrum shows strong FeL and FeK emission. The
568: LowE-enhanced emission shows a relative increase in emission at low energies
569: compared to the global spectrum. The continuum-dominated emission is marked
570: by very little or no line emission and an increase in 4$-$6 keV emission
571: relative to the global spectrum.
572: \label{spectra}}
573: \end{figure}
574:
575: \begin{figure}
576: \epsscale{1}
577: \plotone{f2.eps}
578: \caption{Representative tomography images used to spatially identify
579: emission from the four classes whose spectra are shown in Figure
580: \ref{spectra}. The Si- and Fe- dominated images represent ejecta emission.
581: Note that, because of absorption, the ejecta emission on the western side of
582: the remnant is underrepresented. The LowE-enhanced image likely represents
583: clumpy CSM emission analogous to optical QSF emission. The
584: continuum-dominated image possibly represents emission from diffuse CSM
585: swept up by the forward shock.
586: \label{tomos}}
587: \end{figure}
588:
589: \begin{figure}
590: \epsscale{0.5}
591: \plotone{f3.eps}
592: \caption{Histogram of expansion rates in Cas A. Arrows represent the average
593: measurement error for each population. Dashed lines represent the mean
594: expansion values for the Si-dominated and LowE-enhanced populations. There
595: are also two continuum-dominated knots with expansion rates less than
596: $-$0.4\% yr$^{-1}$. The ``exterior'' continuum-dominated filaments are from
597: \citet{dr03} and have been included here for completeness. Free expansion
598: corresponds to 0.3\% yr$^{-1}$.
599: \label{hist}}
600: \end{figure}
601:
602: \end{document}
603:
604: