1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2004 January 9
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18:
19: \documentclass[12pt,preprint,longnamesfirst]{aastex}
20: \usepackage{emulateapj5}
21:
22: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
23:
24: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
25:
26: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
27:
28: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
29:
30: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
31: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
32: %% use the longabstract style option.
33:
34: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
35:
36: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
37: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
38: %% the \begin{document} command.
39: %%
40: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
41: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
42: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
43: %% for information.
44:
45: % \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
46: % \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
47: \newcommand{\kms}{\hbox{ km\thinspace s$^{-1}$}} %kms -1
48:
49: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using
50: %% the command below.
51:
52: \slugcomment{Scheduled for the October 2004 issue of The
53: Astronomical Journal}
54:
55: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
56: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
57: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
58: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
59: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
60: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
61:
62: \shorttitle{Structure of NGC\,7662}
63: \shortauthors{Guerrero et al.}
64:
65: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
66: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
67:
68: \begin{document}
69:
70: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
71: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
72: %% you desire.
73:
74: \title{Physical Structure of Planetary Nebulae. II. NGC 7662}
75:
76: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
77: %% author and affiliation information.
78: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
79: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
80: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
81: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
82:
83: \author{Mart\'{\i}n A.\ Guerrero\altaffilmark{1,2},
84: Elizabeth G.\ Jaxon\altaffilmark{2}, and
85: You-Hua Chu\altaffilmark{2,3}}
86: \affil{$^1$ Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Andaluc\'{\i}a, CSIC,
87: Granada 18008, Spain}
88: \affil{$^2$ Astronomy Department, University of Illinois at
89: Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801}
90:
91: \email{mar@iaa.es, ejaxon@uiuc.edu, chu@astro.uiuc.edu}
92:
93: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
94: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
95: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
96: %% affiliation.
97: \altaffiltext{3}{Visiting Astronomer, Kitt Peak National Observatory,
98: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which is operated by the
99: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc. (AURA)
100: under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}
101:
102:
103: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the
104: %% manuscript style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line
105: %% after the title and affiliation information. No date will appear
106: %% since the author does not have this information. The dates will
107: %% be filled in by the editorial office after submission.
108:
109: \begin{abstract}
110: We present a study of the structure and kinematics of the triple-shell
111: planetary nebula NGC\,7662 based on long-slit echelle spectroscopic
112: observations and $HST$ archival narrow-band images.
113: The structure of NGC\,7662 main nebula consists of a central cavity
114: surrounded by two concentric shells.
115: The bright inner shell has a non-negligible thickness and the highest
116: density in the nebula.
117: The outer shell is filled with nebular material whose density profile
118: shows a $\propto r^{-1}$ drop-off in the inner regions of the shell
119: and flattens in the outermost regions.
120: Both the inner and the outer shells can be described as prolate
121: ellipsoids: the inner shell is more elongated, while the outermost
122: layer of the outer shell expands faster.
123: The physical structure of NGC\,7662 is qualitatively consistent with
124: the predictions of hydrodynamical simulations based on the
125: interacting-stellar-wind models for planetary nebulae with a 0.605
126: M$_\odot$ central star. Models with a higher AGB wind velocity
127: are needed for detailed comparisons.
128: \end{abstract}
129:
130: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The
131: %% uncommented example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the
132: %% instructions to authors for the journal to which you are
133: %% submitting your paper to determine what keyword punctuation
134: %% is appropriate.
135:
136: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
137: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
138: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
139: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
140: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
141: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
142: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
143: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
144: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
145: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
146: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
147: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
148:
149: \keywords{ISM: planetary nebulae: general -- ISM: planetary nebulae:
150: individual (\objectname{NGC 7662}) }
151:
152:
153: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
154: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
155: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
156: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
157: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
158: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
159: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
160: %% each reference.
161:
162:
163: \section{Introduction}
164:
165: Planetary nebulae (PNs) exhibit a wide variety of morphologies
166: including round, elliptical, bipolar, and point-symmetric shapes
167: \citep{B87,SCM92,M96}.
168: These main morphological classes can be accounted for by the
169: interacting-stellar-winds model \citep{KPF78} assuming that a
170: pole-to-equator density gradient exists in the Asymptotic Giant
171: Branch (AGB) wind \citep{B87}.
172: The detailed morphology of some PNs has proven to be very complex
173: and rich, however.
174: By analyzing the morphology and kinematics of a PN, it is possible
175: to establish its physical structure and gain insight into its
176: evolutionary stage.
177:
178: We have started a program to analyze high-resolution images
179: and high-dispersion spectra of PNs in multiple nebular lines,
180: in order to determine the physical structure of PNs.
181: By comparing the results with hydrodynamical models, we hope to
182: understand better the formation and evolution of PNs.
183: The first PN we have studied is the Owl Nebula
184: \citep[][hereafter Paper I]{Getal03}.
185: The second PN we have selected to study is NGC\,7662, which is
186: distinct from the Owl Nebula not only in morphology but also
187: in excitation structure.
188:
189: NGC\,7662 has a bright main nebula that shows elliptical,
190: double-shell morphology which is successfully reproduced by
191: the interacting-stellar-winds model \citep[e.g.,][]{FM94}.
192: The high surface brightness and moderately large size of this nebula,
193: 30\arcsec\ in diameter, make it ideal for a detailed case study of
194: the physical structure of elliptical PNs.
195: We have used narrow-band images and high-dispersion spectra of
196: NGC\,7662 to build a 3-D spatio-kinematic model, derived the
197: density and ionization fraction profiles, and interpreted the
198: results in the light of the interacting-stellar-winds model.
199: This paper reports our study of NGC\,7662.
200:
201:
202: \section{Observations}
203:
204: The {\it Hubble Space Telescope} ({\it HST}) archive contains images
205: of NGC\,7662 obtained through narrow-band filters in the H$\alpha$,
206: [O~{\sc iii}] $\lambda$5007, He~{\sc ii} $\lambda$4686, and
207: [N~{\sc ii}] $\lambda$6584 lines (Program ID \#6117, PI: B.\ Balick;
208: Program ID \#6943, PI: S.\ Casertano; Program ID \#8390, PI: A.\ Hajian).
209: These filters have central wavelengths and FWHM bandwidths of 6565.6 \AA\
210: and 29 \AA\ (H$\alpha$), 5012.9 \AA\ and 37 \AA\ ([O~{\sc iii}]), 4694.5
211: \AA\ and 35 \AA\ (He~{\sc ii}), and 6590.9 \AA\ and 40 \AA\ ([N~{\sc
212: ii}]), respectively.
213: We retrieved all archival \emph{HST} images of NGC\,7662 in these
214: lines and combined them respectively to result in total exposure
215: times of 200 s (H$\alpha$), 500 s ([O~{\sc iii}]), 200 s
216: (He~{\sc ii}), and 2,800 s ([N~{\sc ii}]).
217: The [N~{\sc ii}] image is seriously contaminated by the bright
218: H$\alpha$ flux transmitted at the blue wing of the [N~{\sc ii}]
219: filter because NGC\,7662 is a high-excitation PN with
220: [N~{\sc ii}]/H$\alpha$ as low as $\sim$0.007 in the shells and
221: 0.116 in the [N~{\sc ii}]-bright knots \citep{HA97}.
222: We have thus used the transmission curve of the [N~{\sc ii}]
223: filter to estimate this H$\alpha$ contribution and subtracted
224: a scaled H$\alpha$ image from the [N~{\sc ii}] image to produce
225: a net [N~{\sc ii}] image.
226: The H$\alpha$, [O~{\sc iii}], He~{\sc ii}, and the net
227: [N~{\sc ii}] images are presented in Figure~1.
228:
229: High-dispersion spectroscopic observations of NGC\,7662 were obtained
230: with the echelle spectrograph on the 4-m telescope at the Kitt Peak
231: National Observatory (KPNO) on 1986 October 21--23.
232: The spectrograph was used in the single-order, long-slit mode, covering
233: only the [O III] $\lambda$4959, 5007 lines.
234: The 79 line mm$^{-1}$ echelle grating and the long-focus red camera
235: were used; the resultant reciprocal dispersion was 2.47 \AA~mm$^{-1}$.
236: The spectra were recorded with the 800$\times$800 TI $\# 2$ CCD with a
237: 2$\times$2 binning.
238: The resulting pixel size of 30 $\mu$m corresponded to a spatial scale
239: of 0\farcs33~pixel$^{-1}$ and a sampling of 4.5 km s$^{-1}$
240: pixel$^{-1}$ along the dispersion direction.
241: A slit width of 150 $\mu$m (1\arcsec) was used, and the resultant
242: instrumental FWHM was 9.5$\pm$0.3 km s$^{-1}$.
243: The angular resolution, determined by the seeing, was 1\farcs9.
244:
245: We obtained four long-slit spectra of NGC\,7662:
246: one along the major axis (PA=44\arcdeg), two parallel to but with
247: a 3\arcsec\ offset from the major axis, and one along the minor
248: axis (PA=135\arcdeg).
249: The slit positions are marked on the [O~{\sc iii}] image
250: in Figure~1.
251: The exposure times were 300 s for the spectrum along the major axis,
252: and 200 s for the other three.
253: The spectra were reduced using standard IRAF packages\footnote{
254: IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy
255: Observatories, which is operated by the Association
256: of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc.\ (AURA)
257: under cooperative agreement with the National Science
258: Foundation.}.
259: The curvature-corrected, wavelength-calibrated echellograms are
260: displayed in Figure 2.
261: The velocities are referenced to the systemic velocity of
262: NGC\,7662.
263:
264:
265: \section{Results}
266:
267:
268: \subsection{Morphology}
269:
270:
271: NGC\,7662 is a triple-shell nebula with a bright
272: 17\farcs9$\times$12\farcs4 inner shell enveloped
273: by a 30\farcs8$\times$27\farcs2 outer shell and
274: surrounded by a faint spherical halo 134\arcsec\
275: in diameter \citep{C87}.
276: The major-to-minor axial ratio of the inner shell, $\sim$1.4,
277: is noticeably larger than that of the outer shell, $\sim$1.1.
278: The inner shell appears as a bright ``rim''\footnote{The inner
279: shell is called ``rim'' by \citet{FBR90}} with an apparent
280: thickness of $\sim$2\farcs5, about half the length of the
281: semi-minor axis.
282: In contrast, the outer shell appears as an envelope attached
283: to the inner shell, showing no limb-brightening.
284:
285: The morphology of the main nebula is complicated by the
286: presence of ``fast low-ionization emission regions (FLIERs),"
287: as discussed in detail by \citet{B98}.
288: Our aim is to study the basic underlying structure of the nebula,
289: therefore we select the sectors of the main nebula that are free
290: of FLIERs.
291: In particular, the analysis of the density and ionization structure
292: of the nebula in Section $\S$3.3 will be focused in its northwest
293: quadrant.
294:
295:
296: \subsection{Kinematics}
297:
298:
299:
300: The kinematics of NGC\,7662 has been studied by \citet{BPI87}
301: using echelle spectra of the H$\alpha$ and [\ion{N}{2}] lines.
302: As the H$\alpha$ line has a large thermal width and the
303: [\ion{N}{2}] emission is dominated by the FLIERs, we have
304: chosen to use [O~{\sc iii}] to study the kinematics.
305:
306:
307: Our [O~{\sc iii}] echellograms, displayed in Figure 2, show
308: two kinematic systems corresponding to the inner and outer
309: shells.
310: The inner shell appears as a hollow position-velocity ellipse
311: that has a marked tilt along the major axis (PA $45\arcdeg$),
312: indicating that it is an expanding prolate ellipsoidal shell
313: with its northeast side tilted towards us.
314: The velocity dispersion within the shell is small;
315: for example, the blue- and red-shifted components at the central
316: position have an observed velocity FWHM of 13 km~s$^{-1}$,
317: corresponding to an intrinsic velocity FWHM of 8 km~s$^{-1}$
318: (after subtracting the instrumental and thermal widths).
319: The brightness variations along the position-velocity ellipse
320: can be naturally produced by the different line-of-sight path
321: lengths through a prolate ellipsoidal shell \citep{FM94}.
322:
323:
324: The outer shell also appears as a position-velocity ellipse,
325: with a hollow center and thick filled rims, but without an
326: obvious tilt.
327: This echelle line morphology is consistent with a thick
328: expanding shell with a small ellipticity.
329: For sightlines through the thick shell rims, the broad line
330: profiles are caused by the wide range of projection angles
331: between the radial expansion velocity and the line of sight.
332: Near the shell center, the line profiles of the outer shell
333: are superimposed on those of the bright inner shell;
334: however, the narrow widths of the blue- and red-shifted
335: components indicate that the outer shell expands at least
336: as fast as the inner shell and that the velocity dispersion
337: in the outer shell is small as well.
338: The brightness variations within the thick shell rims in the
339: echellograms can be caused by a combination of small density
340: and velocity variations within the shell.
341: The echellograms also show faint unresolved emission beyond the
342: visible boundary of the outer shell.
343: This extension originates from the faint halo of NGC\,7662,
344: and its FWHM $\sim$ 45 \kms\ is unusually large for faint
345: PN halos \citep{CJ89,GVM98}.
346:
347:
348: The observed position-velocity ellipse of an expanding shell can
349: constrain its geometry and kinematics.
350: Assuming a simple homologously expanding ellipsoidal shell
351: (i.e., $v_{\rm exp} \propto r$), it is possible to derive
352: the axial ratios, inclination angles and expansion velocities
353: of the shell.
354: For the inner shell of NGC\,7662, the observed position-velocity
355: ellipse is narrow and well defined, thus it can be directly
356: compared with synthetic position-velocity ellipses to determine
357: its geometry and kinematics.
358: The outer shell is more difficult to model because its thick shell
359: can be divided into multiple thin expanding shells, but the
360: position-velocity ellipses of these thin shells cannot be resolved
361: from one another.
362: In the Owl Nebula, it has been shown that the outermost layer of
363: its outer shell (most well defined in the low ionization
364: [N~{\sc ii}] line) is characterized by a position-velocity ellipse
365: that encloses the echelle line image of that shell (Paper I).
366: We have thus adopted such an ellipse as the position-velocity
367: ellipse of the outermost layer of the outer shell of NGC\,7662.
368: Note that this assumption would be valid as long as there is
369: no negative velocity gradient in the outer shell
370:
371:
372: Using these models, we have produced synthetic position-velocity
373: ellipses to match these observed in the inner shell and the
374: outermost layer of the outer shell.
375: The position-velocity ellipses of the best-fit models are
376: overplotted in Figure~2, and the relevant parameters are
377: summarized in Table~1.
378: For the inner shell, we find that its major axis is tilted by
379: 50\arcdeg\ against the line of sight along PA 45\arcdeg, and
380: that its expansion velocities are 35$\pm$3 km~s$^{-1}$ and
381: 53$\pm$6 km~s$^{-1}$ in the equatorial plane and along the
382: pole, respectively.
383: For the outer shell, the small line tilt implies a small ellipticity
384: or a pole-on geometry.
385: To overcome this ambiguity, we assumed that the inclination of the
386: symmetry axis of the outer shell is the same as that of the inner
387: shell \citep{B98} and derived equatorial and polar expansion
388: velocities for the outer shell of 50$\pm$5 km~s$^{-1}$ and
389: 60$\pm$8 km~s$^{-1}$, respectively.
390: The outer shell of NGC\,7662 has a smaller axial ratio than
391: the inner shell, 1.2 versus 1.5.
392: The outermost layer of the outer shell expands faster than
393: the inner shell, which may be expected for dense gas diffusing
394: into the surroundings with much lower density.
395: The inner shell has a kinematic age of $\sim$700$\times\frac{d}{800}$
396: yr, where $d$ is the distance in pc \citep[$d$=800 pc,][]{HT96}, and
397: the outer shell has a kinematic age of $\sim$1,050$\times\frac{d}{800}$
398: yr.
399:
400:
401: \subsection{Density and Ionization Structure}
402:
403: The spatio-kinematic models of NGC\,7662 deduced in $\S$3.2 can be
404: used along with the observed surface brightness distribution in
405: different emission lines to derive the density and ionization
406: structure within this nebula.
407: The northwest quadrant of NGC\,7662 provides the most appropriate
408: region for this analysis because it has no FLIERs and shows smooth,
409: featureless emission in both the direct images and [O~{\sc iii}]
410: echellogram.
411: Furthermore, this quadrant contains the minor axis along which the
412: surface brightness distribution is less sensitive to the detailed
413: shape and orientation of the nebular shells.
414: The observed surface brightness profiles of the H$\alpha$,
415: [O~{\sc iii}], He~{\sc ii}, and [N~{\sc ii}] lines along
416: this minor axis are displayed in Figure~3.
417: Below is our analysis of the shell structure of NGC\,7662
418: along the minor axis in the northwest quadrant.
419:
420:
421: To derive the density and ionization structure from the observed
422: surface brightness, we have adopted a distance of 800 pc \citep{HT96},
423: a logarithmic extinction $c{\rm (H}\beta${\rm )}=0.10, and an
424: electron temperature of 12,500 K \citep{HA97}.
425: We have approximated the main nebula of NGC\,7662 by two ellipsoidal
426: shells with the sizes, axial ratios and inclinations given in Table~1.
427: We have further assumed that each shell consists of concentric
428: sub-shells of constant density and ionization.
429: As the surface brightness at a given radius $r$ includes
430: contributions from sub-shells of radii $\ge r$, the
431: derivation of the density is best done from outside in.
432:
433:
434: The surface brightness profile of the H$\alpha$ line is used to
435: determine the radial profile of density $n(r)$.
436: We adopt a power law for the density profile, i.e.,
437: $n(r) = n(r_0) r^{-i}$, where $n(r_0)$ and $i$ will be
438: determined from the fit to the surface brightness profile.
439: The presence of multiple kinks in the H$\alpha$ surface brightness
440: profile implies that the density profile cannot be described by a
441: single power law throughout the nebula.
442: We have thus derived the density profile piecewisely.
443: We experimented various power-law index $i$ and find that $i=0$
444: and 1 provide the best fits for the inner and outer shell,
445: respectively.
446: The best-fit density profile is shown in Figure~4.
447: The corresponding surface brightness profile, overplotted in
448: Figure~3, is in good agreement with the observed H$\alpha$
449: profile from radii of 2\arcsec\ to 14\arcsec.
450:
451:
452: It is interesting to note that the density profile in the outer
453: shell is better described by a power law index of 1, instead of
454: 2, as expected for an AGB wind with constant velocity and
455: mass-loss rate.
456: Three segments marked by small density jumps at radii $\sim$10$\farcs8$
457: and $\sim$12$\farcs2$ are present in the density profile of the outer
458: shell.
459: From the outer shell to the inner shell there is a sharp increase in
460: density.
461:
462: The inner shell is best described with a constant density $\sim$5,000
463: cm$^{-3}$ over a thickness $\gtrsim 2\arcsec$, but the density drops
464: off steeply at its inner edge.
465: This shell density is within the range determined from
466: spectrophotometric observations of the [S~{\sc ii}] doublet,
467: $\sim$4,000 cm$^{-3}$ for the inner shell and $>$6,000 cm$^{-3}$
468: in isolated dense regions \citep{LP96,HA97}.
469: The density in the central cavity is low, but it cannot be
470: determined with certainty because the surface brightness at
471: the central region of the nebula is overwhelmed by the emission
472: from the inner and outer shells.
473: The sharp leading edge of the inner shell is in agreement with its
474: supersonic expansion within the inner edge of the outer shell.
475:
476: The density profile and the assumed ellipsoidal shell geometry can be
477: used to determine the ionized mass in the inner and outer shells.
478: The mass in the inner shell is $\sim$0.01 M$_\odot$, while that of the
479: outer shell is $\sim$0.04 M$_\odot$.
480: To test whether the inner shell consists entirely of swept-up AGB wind,
481: we have extrapolated the density profile of the outer shell to the
482: center and determined the swept-up mass.
483: An excellent agreement exists between the expected swept-up mass
484: and the mass in the inner shell, suggesting that no extraneous
485: mass-loss is needed to form the inner shell.
486:
487:
488: The ionization structure of NGC\,7662 can be studied using the
489: observed surface brightness profiles of the He~{\sc ii}, [O~{\sc iii}],
490: and [N~{\sc ii}] lines (Fig.~3).
491: The surface brightness, in conjunction with electron temperature and
492: density, can be used to derive the ionic abundance.
493: We have adopted appropriate electron temperatures for lines of
494: different excitations:
495: 14,000 K and 11,000 K for the high-excitation [O~{\sc iii}] and
496: He~{\sc ii} lines in the inner and outer shells, respectively, and
497: 8,500 K for the low-ionization [N~{\sc ii}] line \citep{B86,HA97}.
498: The ionic abundances determined using these temperatures and the above
499: derived densities are then divided by the corresponding elemental
500: abundances \citep{B86} to compute the ionization fractions of He$^{++}$,
501: O$^{++}$, and N$^{+}$ shown in Figure~4.
502:
503: An inspection of Fig.~4 shows that the ionization fraction of He$^{++}$
504: is rather constant and greater than 0.8 through the nebula, while those
505: of O$^{++}$ and N$^+$ increase outwards, as expected from stratified
506: ionization.
507: It must be noted that the detailed level and shape of the ionization
508: fraction profiles depends on the choice of elemental abundances and
509: electron temperatures.
510: The large ionization fraction of He$^{++}$, for instance, may imply
511: full ionization of He, as typically predicted by ionization models
512: \citep[e.g.,][]{AB97}, with He abundances smaller by $\sim$10\% than
513: those here adopted.
514: Similarly, variations of the electron temperature with radius in
515: NGC\,7662, as reported by \citet{B86}, may affect the derived
516: ionization fraction profiles, especially those of O$^{++}$ and N$^+$,
517: so that larger values of electron temperature mimic larger ionization
518: fractions of O$^{++}$ and N$^+$.
519: The increased ionization fraction of O$^{++}$ in the outermost regions
520: of NGC\,7662 seems real, however, as the electron temperature is known
521: to decrease outwards \citep{B86}.
522: Therefore, the sharp increase of the ionization fraction of O$^{++}$
523: at $r$ $\sim$ 7\arcsec\ signifies the transition of ionization stage
524: at the edge of the O$^{+3}$ Str\"omgren sphere, although the exact
525: shape of the O$^{++}$ ionization fraction profile and the radius of
526: the O$^{+3}$ Str\"omgren sphere might be questionable.
527:
528: %
529: % The ionization fraction profiles vary smoothly across the density
530: % jump from the inner shell to the outer shell, but the O$^{++}$ and
531: % He$^{++}$ ionization fraction show large jumps within the outer
532: % shell where the density variations are mild.
533: % The ionization potentials of O$^{++}$ and He$^{+}$ are 54.9 and
534: % 54.4 eV, respectively.
535: % The sharp increase of the ionization fraction of O$^{++}$ at
536: % $r$ $\sim$ 8\farcs5 probably signifies a transition of
537: % ionization stage at the edge of the O$^{+3}$ Str\"omgren sphere.
538: % The rapid decline of the ionization fraction of He$^{++}$
539: % at $r$ = 11\arcsec\ to 12\farcs5 most likely signifies the
540: % edge of the He$^{++}$ Str\"omgren sphere.
541: %
542:
543: \section{Discussion}
544:
545:
546: Hydrodynamical simulations of the physical structure of PNs have been
547: carried out in the framework of interacting stellar winds taking into
548: account the evolution and mass-loss history of the central star
549: \citep[e.g.,][]{FBR90,M94,VMG02,P04}.
550: In these simulations, the fast stellar wind excavates a central cavity
551: and snowplows the AGB wind to produce a double-shell nebula.
552: The inner shell, being the swept-up AGB wind, is denser than the outer
553: shell.
554: The outer shell has a relatively flat density profile as its sudden
555: ionization has resulted in strong pressure gradients that have modified
556: the original $r^{-2}$ law.
557: This overall structure is observed in NGC\,7662;
558: the H$\alpha$ image and echelle spectra are similar to those
559: simulated by \citet{M94}, and the mass in the inner shell is in
560: agreement with the expected swept-up mass of the AGB wind.
561:
562:
563: We attempt to quantitatively compare the density profile and
564: kinematic structure of NGC\,7662 to PN models.
565: The density profile of NGC\,7662 is characterized by: \begin{itemize}
566: \itemsep-0.1cm
567: \item a density contrast of $\sim$2 between the outer and inner shells,
568: \item an inner shell with a thickness of 0.012 pc, about 0.3--0.5 times
569: the shell radius, and
570: \item an almost flat density profile in the outer shell, significantly
571: flatter than the $r^{-2}$ law.
572: \end{itemize}
573: The radial profile of the expansion velocity of NGC\,7662 cannot be
574: determined observationally because of the limited spatial resolution
575: of the echelle observations and the non-negligible thermal line widths.
576: Our analysis in $\S3.2$ provides only the following basic
577: kinematic characteristics of NGC\,7662: \begin{itemize}
578: \itemsep-0.1cm
579: \item the inner shell has a small internal velocity dispersion, and
580: expands at 35\kms\ and 53\kms\ along the equator and poles,
581: respectively; and
582: \item the outer shell also has small internal velocity dispersions,
583: and expands at similar velocities to the inner shell, but its
584: outermost layer expands faster, at 50\kms\ and 60\kms\ along the
585: equator and poles, respectively.
586: \end{itemize}
587:
588:
589: We have compared the density profile and kinematic structure of
590: NGC\,7662 to those synthesized from the \citet{P04} models of
591: spherical PNs that take into account different initial conditions
592: and central star masses.
593: They have divided the PN evolution into four phases:
594: Phase I corresponds to the youngest stage when the central star is still
595: too cool to ionize the AGB wind;
596: Phase II corresponds to the compression stage when an ionized double-shell
597: structure is visible;
598: Phase III is the stage when the central star reaches the maximum
599: temperature and the inner-to-outer shell density contrast is the highest;
600: and in Phase IV recombination starts and a single shell is observed
601: possibly with a recombination halo.
602: The extended outer shell, high densities, density profile,
603: and velocity structure of NGC\,7662 are compatible with those of
604: a PN at Phase II evolving toward Phase III (compare to Fig.~7
605: of Perinotto et al.).
606:
607: \citet{P04} modeled PNs for different central-star masses and
608: presented their results in Figures 13--16.
609: We can rule out a central star mass much below 0.6 M$_\odot$
610: because the densities in NGC\,7662, a few 10$^3$ cm$^{-3}$,
611: are more than an order of magnitude higher than those expected
612: from PNs with low-mass central stars.
613: We can also rule out a central star mass as high as 0.8--0.9
614: M$_\odot$, because such PNs have higher shell densities and
615: shorter double-shell lifetime than NGC\,7662.
616: The observed properties of NGC\,7662 are most compatible
617: with the model for a 0.605 M$_\odot$ central star.
618:
619:
620: We can also compare NGC\,7662 to the \citet{P04} models for
621: a 0.605 M$_\odot$ central star with different AGB mass loss rates
622: (their Fig.~10).
623: The density and velocity profiles of NGC\,7662 are most compatible
624: with the model with an AGB mass loss rate of $3\times10^{-5}$
625: M$_\odot$ yr${-1}$ and wind velocity of 10 \kms; however, the
626: expansion velocities of NGC\,7662 are much higher than the
627: $\sim$15 km s$^{-1}$ expansion velocities from this model.
628: A higher shell expansion velocity can be achieved if the AGB wind
629: velocity is higher, and to maintain the same AGB wind density profile
630: a proportionally higher AGB mass loss rate is required.
631: It is possible that the AGB wind velocity of NGC\,7662 was 30--50\kms,
632: and the AGB mass loss rate was $\sim10^{-4}$ M$_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$.
633: Future models of NGC\,7662 ought to consider these AGB wind properties.
634:
635:
636: \section{Summary}
637:
638:
639: NGC\,7662 is a triple-shell PN with a bright inner shell (or rim)
640: surrounded by an outer shell and a faint, large halo.
641: We have analyzed high-resolution images and spectra of the inner
642: and outer shells of NGC\,7662, and constructed 3-D spatio-kinematic
643: models for its inner shell and the outermost layer of the outer shell.
644: Both can be modeled as expanding prolate ellipsoidal shells with the
645: northeast end of the major axis tilted toward us.
646:
647: We have further used the spatio-kinematic models and the H$\alpha$,
648: \ion{He}{2}, [\ion{O}{3}], and [\ion{N}{2}] surface brightness profiles
649: to determine the density profile and ionization structure along the
650: minor axis.
651: The density and kinematic structure of NGC\,7662 are compared to
652: \citet{P04} models of spherical PNs.
653: We find that NGC\,7662 is in their Phase II evolutionary stage (the
654: compression stage), as its outer shell is still fairly extended, but
655: may be close to Phase III evolutionary stage as its inner shell
656: does not seem to be compressed strongly from its interior.
657: NGC\,7662 is most compatible with models for a central star mass
658: of 0.605 M$_\odot$.
659: Future models with higher AGB wind velocities, such as 30--50\kms,
660: are needed for detailed comparisons with NGC\,7662.
661:
662:
663:
664: \acknowledgments
665:
666: M.A.G.\ acknowledges support from the grant AYA~2002-00376 of
667: the Spanish MCyT (cofunded by FEDER funds).
668: Some of the data presented in this paper were obtained from the
669: Multimission Archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute (MAST).
670: STScI is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in
671: Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555.
672:
673: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
674: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
675: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
676: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
677: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
678: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
679: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
680: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
681:
682: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
683: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
684: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
685: %% copy editing. Individual instruments can be provided in parentheses,
686: %% after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
687:
688: % Facilities: \facility{KPNO(4-m echelle)}, \facility{HST(WFPC)}.
689:
690:
691: \begin{thebibliography}{}
692: \bibitem[Alexander \& Balick(1997)]{AB97}
693: Alexander, J., \& Balick, B.\ 1987, \aj, 114, 713
694: \bibitem[Balick(1987)]{B87}
695: Balick, B.\ 1987, \aj, 94, 671
696: \bibitem[Balick, Preston, \& Icke(1987)]{BPI87}
697: Balick, B., Preston, H.\ L., \& Icke, V.\ 1987, \aj, 94, 1641
698: \bibitem[Balick et al.(1998)]{B98}
699: Balick, B., Alexander, J., Hajian, A.\ R., Terzian, Y., Perinotto, M., \&
700: Patriarchi, P.\ 1998, \aj, 116, 360
701: \bibitem[Barker(1986)]{B86}
702: Barker, T.\ 1986, \apj, 308, 314
703: \bibitem[Chu \& Jacoby(1989)]{CJ89}
704: Chu, Y.-H., \& Jacoby, G.\ H.\ 1989, IAU Symp.~131: Planetary Nebulae,
705: 131, 198
706: \bibitem[Chu, Jacoby, \& Arendt(1987)]{C87}
707: Chu, Y.-H., Jacoby, G.~H., Arendt, R.\ 1987, \apjs, 64, 529
708: \bibitem[Chu et al.(2001)]{C01}
709: % Chu, Y.-H., Guerrero, M.\ A., Gruendl, R.\ A., Williams, R.\ M., \& Kaler,
710: % J.\ B.\ 2001, \apjl, 553, L69
711: % \bibitem[Corradi et al.(2000)]{C00}
712: % Corradi, R.\ L.\ M., Sch{\" o}nberner, D., Steffen, M., \& Perinotto, M.\
713: % 2000, \aap, 354, 1071
714: \bibitem[Frank et al.(1990)Frank, Balick, \& Riley]{FBR90}
715: Frank, A., Balick, B., \& Riley, J.\ 1990, \aj, 100, 1903
716: \bibitem[Frank \& Mellema(1994)]{FM94}
717: Frank, A., \& Mellema, G.\ 1994, \apj, 430, 800
718: % \bibitem[Guerrero, Chu, \& Gruendl(2000)]{GCG00}
719: % Guerrero, M.\ A., Chu, Y.-H., \& Gruendl, R.\ A.\ 2000, \apjs, 129, 295
720: \bibitem[Guerrero et al.(2003)]{Getal03}
721: Guerrero, M.\ A., Chu, Y.-H., Manchado, A., \& Kwitter, K.\ B.\ 2003,
722: \aj, 125, 3213
723: % \bibitem[Guerrero, Gruendl, \& Chu(2002)]{GGC02}
724: % Guerrero, M.\ A., Gruendl, R.\ A., \& Chu, Y.-H.\ 2002, \aap, 387, L1
725: \bibitem[Guerrero, Villaver, \& Manchado(1998)]{GVM98}
726: Guerrero, M.\ A., Villaver, E., \& Manchado, A.\ 1998, \apj, 507, 889
727: \bibitem[Hajian \& Terzian(1996)]{HT96}
728: Hajian, A.\ R., \& Terzian, Y.\ 1996, \pasp, 108, 258
729: \bibitem[Hyung \& Aller(1997)]{HA97}
730: Hyung, S., \& Aller, L.\ H.\ 1997, \apj, 491, 242
731: % \bibitem[Kwok(1983)]{K83}
732: % Kwok, S.\ 1983, IAU Symp.\ 103: Planetary Nebulae, 103, 293
733: \bibitem[Kwok, Purton, \& Fitzgerald(1978)]{KPF78}
734: Kwok, S., Purton, C.\ R., \& Fitzgerald, P.\ M.\ 1978, \apjl, 219,
735: L125
736: \bibitem[Lame \& Pogge(1996)]{LP96}
737: Lame, N.\ J., \& Pogge, R.\ W.\ 1996, \aj, 111, 2320
738: \bibitem[Manchado et al.(1996)]{M96}
739: Manchado, A., Guerrero, M.\ A., Stanghellini, L., \& Serra-Ricart, M.\
740: 1996, The IAC Catalog of Northern Galactic Planetary Nebulae, IAC
741: Publishing, La Laguna, Tenerife
742: \bibitem[Mellema(1994)]{M94}
743: Mellema, G.\ 1994, \aap, 290, 915
744: \bibitem[Perinotto et al.(2004)]{P04}
745: Perinotto, M., Sch\"onberner, D., Steffen, M., \& Calonaci, C.\ 2004,
746: \aap, 414, 993
747: \bibitem[Schwarz, Corradi, \& Melnick(1992)]{SCM92}
748: Schwarz, H.\ E., Corradi, R.\ L.\ M., \& Melnick, J.\ 1992, \aaps, 96, 23
749: % \bibitem[Steffen et al.(1997)]{S97}
750: % Steffen, M., Sch\"onberner, D., Kifonidis, K., \& Stahlberg, J.\ 1997,
751: % IAU Symp.\ 180: Planetary Nebulae, 180, 368
752: \bibitem[Villaver, Manchado, \& Garc\'{\i}a-Segura(2002)]{VMG02}
753: Villaver, E., Manchado, A., \& Garc\'{\i}a-Segura, G.\ 2002, \apj,
754: 581, 1204
755: \end{thebibliography}
756:
757: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccr}
758: \tablenum{1}
759: \tablewidth{36.5pc}
760: \tablecaption{Spatio-Kinematic Model of the Inner and Outer Shells
761: of NGC\,7662}
762: \tablehead{
763: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
764: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$V_{\rm equatorial}$} &
765: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$V_{\rm polar}$} &
766: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Inclination\tablenotemark{\dagger}} &
767: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Angular Size} &
768: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Linear Size\tablenotemark{\ddagger}} &
769: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Kinematic Age\tablenotemark{\ddagger}} \\
770: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
771: \multicolumn{1}{c}{[km~s$^{-1}$]} &
772: \multicolumn{1}{c}{[km~s$^{-1}$]} &
773: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
774: \multicolumn{1}{c}{} &
775: \multicolumn{1}{c}{[pc]} &
776: \multicolumn{1}{c}{[yr]}}
777: \startdata
778: Inner Shell & 35 & 53 & ~50\arcdeg & 13\arcsec$\times$19\farcs7 & 0.050$\times$0.076 & 700~~~~~~ \\
779: Outer Shell & 50 & 60 & ~50\arcdeg & 28\arcsec$\times$33\farcs6 & 0.109$\times$0.130 & 1,050~~~~~~ \\
780: \enddata
781: \tablenotetext{\dagger}{Angle between the major axis and the line of sight.}
782: \tablenotetext{\ddagger}{Adopting a distance to NGC\,7662 of 800 pc.}
783: \end{deluxetable}
784:
785: \clearpage
786:
787: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
788: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
789: %% after every seventh one.
790:
791: %% There must be a \figcaption command for each legend. Key the text of the
792: %% legend and the optional \label in curly braces. If you wish, you may
793: %% include the name of the corresponding figure file in square brackets.
794: %% The label is for identification purposes only. It will not insert the
795: %% figures themselves into the document.
796: %% If you want to include your art in the paper, use \plotone.
797: %% Refer to the on-line documentation for details.
798:
799:
800: \begin{figure}
801: \epsscale{1.0}
802: \plotone{fig1.eps}
803: \caption{
804: Negative grey-scale representation of the $HST$ WFPC2 narrow-band images
805: of NGC\,7662.
806: The contribution of the H$\alpha$ line in the [N~{\sc ii}] $\lambda$6584
807: filter has been subtracted.
808: The slit positions of the echelle observations are marked on the
809: [O~{\sc iii}] image.
810: The image displays are square root.
811: \label{images}}
812: \end{figure}
813:
814: \begin{figure}
815: \epsscale{0.9}
816: % edit 2spec.ps from ``90 rotate'' to ``0 rotate''
817: % ps2epsi 2spec.ps 2spec.eps
818: % edit bounding box to
819: %%BoundingBox: 390 31 925 350
820: \plotone{fig2.eps}
821: \caption{
822: Negative grey-scale representation of the [O~{\sc iii}] $\lambda$5007
823: emission line echellograms at PAs 44\arcdeg\ and 315\arcdeg.
824: The ellipses overlaid on the echellograms correspond to the best-fit
825: models for the inner and outer shells described in $\S3.2$ (displayed
826: in white and black, respectively).
827: \label{spec}}
828: \end{figure}
829:
830: \clearpage
831:
832: \begin{figure}
833: \epsscale{0.6}
834: \plotone{fig3.eps}
835: \caption{
836: Surface brightness profiles along PA~315\arcdeg\ of the H$\alpha$,
837: [O~{\sc iii}] $\lambda$5007, He~{\sc ii} $\lambda$4686, and [N~{\sc ii}]
838: $\lambda$6584 lines (solid curves) extracted from the $HST$ narrow-band
839: images of NGC\,7662.
840: The dotted curves are our synthetic surface brightness profiles of
841: these lines.
842: \label{profile}}
843: \end{figure}
844:
845: \begin{figure}
846: \epsscale{0.5}
847: \plotone{fig4.eps}
848: \caption{
849: Radial profiles of the best-fit density and O$^{++}$, He$^{++}$ and
850: N$^+$ ionization fractions of NGC\,7662 along PA~315\arcdeg.
851: The positions of the central cavity, inner shell and outer shell
852: are marked by vertical dotted lines.
853: The dashed lines in the plot of the density profile correspond to a
854: density dependence $\propto r^{-1}$ and $\propto r^{-2}$ for the outer
855: shell.
856: In the plot of the ionization fraction profiles, the N$^+$ ionization
857: fraction has been multiplied by 10 and plotted in long dashes. The
858: O$^{++}$ and He$^{++}$ ionization fractions are plotted in solid
859: and short-dahsed curves, respectively.
860: \label{nx}}
861: \end{figure}
862:
863: \end{document}
864:
865:
866: