1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentstyle[emulateapj,epsf]{aastex}
3: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
4:
5: \begin{document}
6:
7: \title{The Double-Lined Spectroscopic Binary Haro 1-14c}
8:
9: \author{M. SIMON\altaffilmark{1} and L.PRATO\altaffilmark{2,3}}
10:
11: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, SUNY,
12: Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800; michal.simon@sunysb.edu}
13:
14: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA,
15: Los Angeles, CA 90095-1562; lprato@astro.ucla.edu}
16:
17: \altaffiltext{3}{Current address: Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road,
18: Flagstaff, AZ 86001}
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21: We report detection of the low-mass secondary in the spectroscopic binary
22: Haro 1-14c in the Ophiuchus star forming region. The secondary/primary
23: mass ratio is $0.310\pm 0.014$. With an estimated photometric primary mass of
24: 1.2~$M_{\odot}$, the secondary mass is $\sim 0.4~M_{\odot}$ and
25: the projected semi-major axis is $\sim 1.5$ AU. The system is well-suited
26: for astrometric mapping of its orbit with the current generation of
27: ground-based IR interferometers. This could yield precision values
28: of the system's component masses and distance.
29:
30: \end{abstract}
31:
32: \keywords{binaries: spectroscopic --- stars: pre$-$main-sequence}
33:
34: \section{Introduction}
35:
36: Reipurth et al. (2002) discovered that Haro 1-14c, a weak-lined
37: pre$-$main-sequence star
38: in the Ophiuchus star forming region (HBC 644, Herbig \& Bell
39: 1988), is actually the primary component of a single-lined spectroscopic
40: binary (SB1) with a period of 591 days. We have been using high resolution
41: infrared (IR) spectroscopy to detect the low-mass secondaries in main-sequence
42: SB1s (Mazeh et al. 2003) and PMS SB1s (Prato et al. 2002a).
43: We included Haro 1-14c in our program for two
44: reasons. First, detection of its secondary would contribute to our study
45: of the mass ratio distribution among PMS spectroscopic binaries
46: (e.g., Prato et al. 2002a, 2002b). Second, it is important to test
47: theoretical models of PMS evolution with stars whose masses have been
48: measured independently (e.g.,~Simon et al. 2000; Hillenbrand \& White 2004).
49: Meaningful tests require masses known to a few percent; this is possible
50: with masses measured dynamically. The fairly long period of Haro 1-14c
51: and its location in the Ophiuchus SFR at $\sim 140$ pc distance suggested
52: that the orbit might be resolvable with the current generation interferometers
53: operating in the near IR. Mapping observations of Haro 1-14c, combined
54: with the parameters derivable from analysis of the binary as a double-lined
55: spectroscopic binary (SB2), could yield precision measurements of
56: the primary and secondary masses and the
57: distance to the system (e.g., Boden et al. 2000).
58: We have detected the secondary in Haro 1-14c in 6 observations distributed
59: over its orbital period. This paper describes our results.
60:
61: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
62:
63: We measured the radial velocities of the Haro 1-14c primary and secondary
64: at the Keck II telescope of the Keck Observatory using
65: the NIRSPEC high-resolution IR spectrometer
66: (McLean et al. 1998, 2000). We centered the
67: spectrometer at 1.55 $\mu$m and obtained data following the procedures
68: we have described previously (Prato et al. 2002a,~2002b). All the
69: observations were made without the adaptive optics system and have
70: average spectral resolution R $\sim$ 28,000. The total integration times
71: ranged from 6$-$20 minutes, depending on seeing conditions,
72: which provided spectra with signal-to-noise ratio $\sim 100$. The UT dates
73: and modified Julian Dates (MJD) of the observations are listed in Table 1,
74: columns 1 and 2. We used the REDSPEC software\footnote{See
75: http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/inst/nirspec/redspec/index.html} to extract
76: the spectra and place them on a wavelength scale. As in our previous
77: work, we used only order 49 because it is almost completely free of
78: terrestrial absorption lines.
79:
80: To measure the radial velocities of the primary and secondary,
81: we used the TODCOR two-dimensional algorithm (Zucker \& Mazeh 1994)
82: and our suite of spectral templates as we have described before
83: (Mazeh et al. 2003, Prato et al. 2002a). Of the templates available,
84: the main sequence star HR 8085, rotationally
85: broadened to 12 km s$^{-1}$, usually provided the best fit to the primary
86: of Haro 1-14c. Its K5 spectral type template is in reasonable agreement
87: with the spectral type K3 listed in the Herbig and Bell Catalogue
88: (Herbig \& Bell 1988) for the component of Haro 1-14c
89: brighter in visible light. The M1.5 main sequence star GL 15A, also
90: rotationally broadened to 12 km s$^{-1}$, fit the secondary the best.
91: The average secondary/primary flux ratio at 1.55 $\mu$m was $\sim 0.4$.
92: However, because the main-sequence templates are not likely to match the
93: surface gravity and metallicity of the PMS components of Haro 1-14c exactly,
94: we do not regard as definitive the best-fitting spectral types and flux ratio.
95: Table 1 lists our measured radial velocities of the primary and secondary,
96: $V_1$, and $V_2$, and their estimated uncertainties.
97:
98: Reipurth et al.'s (2002) observations of Haro 1-14c provided 56 measurements
99: of its primary velocity and spanned $\sim 3.6$ orbital periods. These yielded
100: accurate values of the binary center-of-mass velocity, $\gamma$, orbital
101: period, P, velocity semi-amplitude of the primary $K_1$, eccentricity, e,
102: primary semi-major axis multiplied by the sine of the inclination, $a_1 sini$,
103: mass function, $f(M)$, time of periastron passage, $T_\circ$, and longitude
104: of the periastron of the primary, $\omega_1$. To these parameters, our
105: measurements of the system contribute uniquely the velocity semi-amplitude of
106: the secondary, $K_2$, and hence the mass ratio, $q = M_2/M_1$, and
107: secondary semi-major axis, $a_2 sini$. We merged our
108: measurements with Reipurth et al's and, by least squares minimization of
109: a phase shift of the SB2 data, first improved the precision of the P and
110: $T_\circ$ values enabled by the longer time span of the combined data.
111: We then derived the other orbital parameters by least squares minimization;
112: Table 2 lists the values and Figure 1 shows the corresponding double-lined
113: orbital solution. The parameters in common with those calculated by Reipurth
114: et al. are very close to their values, as expected, because the data set is
115: dominated by their 56 measurements of the primary velocity. The improvement
116: in precision is greatest for $P$ and $T_\circ$ because of the longer
117: time interval of the merged data. We used the new values of
118: $P$ and $T_\circ$ to calculate the phases of the SB2 observations listed
119: in the last column of Table 1.
120:
121: \section{Discussion}
122:
123: The K3 spectral type of the primary (Reipurth et al. 2002) and PMS
124: evolutionary tracks (e.g., Baraffe et al. 1998) for a few million year-old
125: star suggest that $M_1 \sim 1.2$ $M_{\odot}$. This value, with the
126: measured mass ratio, indicate that $M_2 \sim 0.4 M_{\odot}$ .
127: From Table 1 we have the estimate
128: $a~sini = (a_1 + a_2) sin i = 229.0 \pm8.0$ Gm $\sim 1.5$ AU. At the
129: 140 pc assumed distance to the Ophiuchus SFR, the apparent angular
130: size of the projected semi-major axis would be $\sim 11$ mas.
131:
132: Spectroscopic observations of SB2s leave three parameters undetermined:
133: the two describing the binary orientation with respect to our line of
134: sight, the orbital inclination, $i$, and the position angle of the line of
135: nodes, and the distance to the binary. These parameters can be
136: determined by resolving the components of the SB2 and mapping the orbit
137: (e.g., Boden et al. 2000).
138: The requirements for a binary to be resolvable with the current generation
139: of IR interferometers are very stringent. The apparent angular extent of
140: the binary orbit must be small enough that it lies within the diffraction
141: limit of a single telescope of the interferometer, but large enough that
142: it is resolvable at the projected interferometer baselines. Both components
143: of the binary must be bright enough in the near-IR, usually K-band,
144: that fringes can be detected, and bright enough in the visible for wavefront
145: correction by adaptive optics. Targets satisfying these requirements
146: are rare.
147:
148: With K$\sim7.8$ mag (2MASS catalog) and V$\sim 12.3$ mag (Rydgren et al. 1976),
149: and an estimated projected semi-major axis of 11 mas, Haro 1-14c
150: is suitable study for study by the combined techniques of
151: IR interferometry and spectroscopy. The measurements will yield
152: the component masses, system distance (hence total luminosity),
153: component flux ratios at the wavelengths of the interferometric
154: and spectroscopic observations (enabling apportionment of the
155: luminosity between the components), and estimates of the effective
156: temperature (from the best matching templates for the analysis of
157: the spectra). These parameters, together with the reasonable
158: assumption of equal age of the components, will enable definitive
159: tests of theoretical calculations of PMS evolution at masses below
160: 0.5 $M_{\odot}$ (e.g. Simon et al. 2000; Hillenbrand and White 2004).
161:
162: \section{Conclusions}
163:
164: We have detected the secondary in the PMS binary Haro 1-14c by high
165: spectral resolution observations at $1.55\mu$m. We find that:
166:
167: 1) The mass ratio of $\sim 0.31$ suggests that for an estimated photometric
168: mass of 1.2 $M_{\odot}$ for the primary, the secondary mass is $\sim 0.4
169: M_{\odot}$.
170:
171: 2) Assuming these estimated masses, the projected orbital semi-major axis
172: is $a~sini \sim 1.5$ AU. At an assumed 140 pc distance to the Ophiuchus
173: SFR, the binary is angularly resolvable with the current generation of
174: interferometers operating in the near-IR.
175:
176: 3) Astrometric measurements that map the binary orbit, and continued
177: spectroscopic observations that improve the precision of the mass ratio
178: offer the promise to measure the distance to the binary and the
179: masses of its components at the few percent level.
180:
181: \section{Acknowledgements}
182:
183: We thank the referee for a constructive comment that helped us improve
184: the discussion section.
185: We are very grateful to Tsevi Mazeh and Shay Zucker for allowing us to use
186: their TODCOR algorithm. We thank the Keck observing assistants, and the
187: staff in Waimea, for their thorough support.
188: This research was supported in part by NSF Grant AST 02-05427. The data
189: were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory which is operated as a scientific
190: partnership between the California Institute of Technology, the University
191: of California, and NASA. The observatory was made possible by the generous
192: financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation. Our research made use of
193: data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project
194: of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis
195: Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics
196: and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. Our research
197: also used the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.
198: The authors extend special thanks to those of Hawaiian ancestry on whose
199: sacred mountain we are privileged to be guests.
200:
201: \begin{thebibliography}{}
202:
203: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{bar98} Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G.,
204: Allard, F., and Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, \aap, 337, 403
205:
206: \bibitem[Boden et al. (2000)]{Bod98} Boden, A.F., Creech-Eakman, M.J.,
207: \& Queloz, D. 2000, ApJ, 536, 880
208:
209: \bibitem[Herbig \& Bell (1988)]{Her88} Herbig, G.H.
210: \& Bell, K.R. 1988, Lick Obs. Bull. No. 1111
211:
212: \bibitem[Hillenbrand \& White (2004)]{Hil04} Hillenbrand, L.A. \&
213: White, R.J., 2004, ApJ, 604, 741
214:
215: \bibitem[Mazeh et al.(2003)]{maz03}Mazeh, T., Simon, M., Prato, L.,
216: Markus B., \& Zucker, S. 2003, ApJ, 599, 1344
217:
218: \bibitem[McLean et al.(1998)]{mcl98} McLean, I. S., et al. 1998,
219: SPIE, 3354, 566
220:
221: \bibitem[McLean et al.(2000)]{mcl00} McLean, I. S., et al. 2000,
222: SPIE, 4008, 1048
223:
224: \bibitem[Prato et al.(2002a)]{pra02a} Prato, L., Simon, M., Mazeh, T.,
225: McLean, I. S., Norman, \& D., Zucker, S. 2002a, ApJ, 569, 863
226:
227: \bibitem[Prato et al.(2002b)]{pra02b} Prato, L., Simon, M., Mazeh, T.,
228: S. Zucker, \& McLean, I. S. 2002b, ApJ, 579, L99
229:
230:
231: \bibitem[Reipurth et al. 2002]{Rei02} Reipurth, B.,
232: Lindgren, H., Mayor, M., Mermilliod, J-C.,\& Cramer, N. 2002, AJ, 124, 2813
233:
234: \bibitem[Rydgren et al. 1976]{Ryd02} Rydgren, A.E., Strom, S.E,,
235: \& Strom, K.M. 1976, ApJS, 30, 307
236:
237: \bibitem[Simon et al.(2000)]{Sim00} Simon, M., Dutrey, A.,
238: \& Guilloteau, S. 2000, \apj, 545, 1034
239:
240: \bibitem[Wilson 1941]{Wil41} Wilson, O.C. 1941, ApJ, 93, 29
241:
242: \bibitem[Zucker \& Mazeh(1994)]{zuc94} Zucker, S.,
243: \& Mazeh, T. 1994, \apj, 420, 806
244:
245: \end{thebibliography}
246:
247: \clearpage
248:
249: \begin{figure}
250: \plotone{f1.eps}
251: \vskip 1.0cm
252: \caption{Radial velocity as a function of phase for Haro 1-14c. The crosses
253: represent Reipurth et al.'s (2002) measurements of the primary velocity.
254: The open symbols, and 1 $\sigma$ uncertainties indicate our measurements
255: for the primary (circles) and secondary (squares). The solid line shows
256: the best fit to the primary star data, and the dashed line for the secondary.
257: The horizontal dashed line indicates the center-of-mass velocity of the
258: system. The abscissa spans a 20\% redundancy in phase for clarity.
259: \label{fig1}}
260: \end{figure}
261:
262: \clearpage
263: \begin{deluxetable}{llccccc}
264: \tablewidth{0pt}
265: \tablecaption{Measured Velocities\label{tbl-1}}
266:
267: \tablehead{
268: \colhead{UT Date} &\colhead{MJD} &\colhead{ $V_1$} &\colhead{$\sigma$}&
269: \colhead{$V_2$}&\colhead{$\sigma_2$}&\colhead{Phase} \\
270: \colhead{} &\colhead{} &\colhead{km s$^{-1}$}&\colhead{km s$^{-1}$}&
271: \colhead{km s$^{-1}$} &\colhead{km s$^{-1}$} &\colhead{}}
272: \startdata
273: 2001 June 1 & 52061.50 &~ -2.9 & 2.0 & -18.7 & 2.0 & 0.307\\
274: 2002 July 17 & 52472.28 & -16.1 & 2.0 & ~18.7 & 2.0 & 0.002\\
275: 2003 Feb 8 & 52678.67 &~-4.9 & 2.0 &-18.3 & 2.0 & 0.351\\
276: 2003 Aug 10 & 52861.32 &~-8.4 & 2.0 &~~-5.8 & 2.0 & 0.660\\
277: 2003 Sep 8 & 52890.20 &~-9.3 & 2.0 &~~-3.6 & 2.0 & 0.709\\
278: 2004 Jan 26 & 53030.69 &-19.4 & 2.0 & ~26.6 & 2.0 & 0.947\\
279: \enddata
280: \end{deluxetable}
281:
282: %\clearpage
283:
284: \pagestyle{empty}
285:
286: \begin{deluxetable}{ll}
287: \tablewidth{0pt}
288: \tablecaption{Orbital Elements\label{tbl-2}}
289: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameter}&\colhead{Value}}
290: \startdata
291: $\gamma$ & $-8.71\pm0.07$ km s$^{-1}$ \\
292: $P$ &$591.3\pm0.3$ days \\
293: $K_1$ &$8.52\pm0.13$ km s$^{-1}$ \\
294: $K_2$ &$27.5\pm 1.3$ km s$^{-1}$ \\
295: $e$ &$0.617\pm0.008$ \\
296: $q$ & $0.310\pm 0.014$ \\
297: $a_1 sin i$ &$54.2\pm0.8$ Gm \\
298: $a_2 sin i$ &$174.8\pm7.8$ Gm \\
299: $M_1sin^3i$ &$0.98\pm0.14$ $M_{\odot}$ \\
300: $M_2sin^3i$ &$0.30\pm0.05$ $M_{\odot}$ \\
301: $\omega_1$ &$232.90\pm 0.55^\circ$ \\
302: $T_\circ$ &$45375.4\pm3.0$ MJD \\
303:
304: \enddata
305: \end{deluxetable}
306:
307: \end{document}
308:
309: