1: %
2: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,epsfig,epsf,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
4:
5: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
6: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
7: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
8: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
9:
10: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
11: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
12: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
13:
14: %\nofiles
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: %\preprint{APS/123-QED}
19:
20: \title{Black-hole ejecta by frame-dragging along the axis of rotation}
21:
22: \author{Maurice H.P.M. van Putten}
23: \affiliation{LIGO Laboratory, MIT 17-161, 175 Albany Street, Cambridge, MA 02139}
24:
25: \date{\today}
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28: An energy $E=\omega J$ is derived for gravitational spin-orbit coupling
29: by frame-dragging $\omega$ acting on angular momentum $J$. This interaction
30: defines a no-boundary mechanism for linear acceleration of magnetized matter
31: along the axis of rotation of black holes. We explain GRB030329/SN2003dh by
32: centered nucleation of a high-mass black hole with rapid rotation, producing
33: baryon-poor ejecta by gravitational spin-orbit coupling. The duration of the
34: burst is attributed to spin-down in the emission of gravitational-waves
35: by a surrounding non-axisymmetric torus.
36: \end{abstract}
37:
38: \pacs{Valid PACS appear here}
39:
40: \maketitle
41:
42: GRB030329/SN2002dh showed that Type Ib/c supernovae are the parent populuation of
43: cosmological gamma-ray bursts. Type II and Type Ib/c supernovae are believed to
44: represent core-collapse of massive stars \cite{fil97,tur03}. These events
45: probably take place in binaries, such as in the Type II/Ib event SN1993J
46: \cite{mau04}. This binary association suggests a hierarchy, in which hydrogen-rich,
47: envelope rataining Type II events are associated with wide binaries, while
48: hydrogen-poor, envelope stripped Type Ib and Type Ic are associated with
49: increasingly compact binaries \cite{nom95,tur03}. By tidal coupling in the latter,
50: the primary star rotates at the obital period. Consequently, core-collapse
51: of the primary with an evolved core \cite{bro00} produce a rapidly rotating
52: black hole \cite{lee02,bet03,van04b}.
53:
54: The Kerr metric \cite{ker63} establishes the exact solution of frame-dragging
55: induced black holes with nonzero angular momentum.
56: Frame-dragging appears in the form of nonzero angular velocities of zero angular
57: momentum observers. It creates additional contributions to the
58: Riemann tensor \cite{cha83}. The Riemann tensor couples to spin \cite{pap51a,pap51b,pir56,mis74},
59: so that rotating black holes couple to the angular momentum of nearby particles.
60: Indeed, specific angular momentum represents a rate of change of surface area and the
61: Riemann tensor is of dimension cm$^{-2}$ in geometrical units (Newton's constant $G=1$
62: and velocity of light $c=$1). Thus, curvature-spin coupling produces a force, whereby
63: test particles follow non-geodesic trajectories \cite{pir56}.
64:
65: Consistent with the Rayleigh criterion -- the energy per unit of angular momentum is
66: small at large distances -- we find that rotating black holes couple to radiation as
67: a channel to lower the total energy (of the black hole and radiation).
68: With the second law of thermodynamics $dS\ge0$ on the entropy $S$, specific
69: angular momentum increases with radiation:
70: \begin{eqnarray}
71: a_p \equiv \frac{-\delta J_H}{-\delta M} \ge \Omega_H^{-1} \ge 2M > M \ge a,
72: \label{EQN_RAYLEIGH}
73: \end{eqnarray}
74: based on the Kerr solution which has an angular velocity $\Omega_H\le 1/2M$,
75: where $M$ denotes the mass of the black hole with angular momentum $J_H$ and
76: specific angular momentum $a$. Nevertheless,
77: isolated black holes are stable by exponential suppression due to
78: due to canonical angular momentum barriers \cite{unr74,haw75,teu73,pre72,teu74}.
79:
80: Here, we identify the potential energy induced by spin-orbit interactions. This
81: is a completely new result, which expresses a powerful interaction of
82: frame-dragging along the axis of rotation of a black hole.
83: We begin with a new four-covariant derivation of curvature-spin coupling. This
84: result radically differs from the common view, that black-hole energetic processes
85: are confined to frame-dragging in the ergosphere.
86:
87: The world-line $x^a$ of a particle moving in a periodic orbit about the orbital
88: center describes helical motion about the time-axis in spacetime. Fig. (\ref{FIG_51})
89: shows the closed curve $\gamma$ of a single orbit of period $T$ as measured in a
90: local restframe, consisting of an open curve plus closing line-segment
91: \begin{eqnarray}
92: \gamma^\prime: x^b(t) ~(0<t<T),~~~\gamma^{\prime\prime}: t~(0<t<T).
93: \end{eqnarray}
94: The surface enclosed by $\gamma$ may be taken to be sum of the curved spiral surface
95: $S$ and a closing wedge $W$
96: \begin{eqnarray}
97: S^{ab}=\int_{\gamma^\prime} x^{[a}v^{b]} ds,~~W^{ab}=Tw^{ab} = Tx^{[a}u^{b]},
98: \label{EQN_Q2}
99: \end{eqnarray}
100: where $\dot{}=d/ds$ and $v^b=dx^b/ds$ denotes the unit tangent to the particle
101: world-line. This introduces the separation vector and four-velocity
102: \begin{eqnarray}
103: [x^b(t)]=x^b(t+T)-x^b(t),~~~u^b=\frac{[x^b(t)]}{T}
104: \label{EQN_SV}
105: \end{eqnarray}
106: of the particle between two consecutive orbits
107:
108: \begin{figure*}
109: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{f1}
110: \caption{
111: {\em Left:}
112: Spacetime diagram of a particle in orbital motion. The orbital center and the
113: orientation of the orbital plane are unconstraint. The separation vector
114: $[x^b(t)]=x^b(t+T)-x^b(t)$ between successive orbits of period $T$ is carried
115: along by parallel transport. It defines the tangent $u^b=[x^b]/T$ to the
116: world-line of the orbital center, and its evolution.
117: {\em Right:}
118: Curvature-spin coupling changes $u^b$ proportional to the surface area of $S$
119: and the wedge $W$ in a single orbit $\gamma^\prime$, closed by
120: $\gamma^{\prime\prime}$.}
121: \label{FIG_51}
122: \end{figure*}
123: For parallel transport of a vector $\xi^b$ along $\gamma$ we have,
124: according to the definition of the Riemann tensor \cite{lan84},
125: \begin{eqnarray}
126: \frac{\Delta \xi_{c}}{T} =\frac{1}{2T}R_{abcd}S^{ab}\xi^d
127: +\frac{1}{2}R_{abcd}w_n^{ab}\xi^d.
128: \label{EQN_4A}
129: \end{eqnarray}
130: Localizing to orbits of small radius $x^a$, the surface $S^{ab}$ is
131: orthogonal to $u^b$. Consider, therefore,
132: \begin{eqnarray}
133: \dot{S}^{ab}=\frac{1}{T}\int_{\gamma^\prime} x^{[a}v^{b]}ds=
134: \epsilon^{ab}_{~~cd}s^cu^d
135: \end{eqnarray}
136: where $\dot{}=d/d\tau$ expressed in terms of the specific angular momentum $s^b$:
137: a spatial vector orthogonal to $\dot{S}^{ab}$ whose magniture equals
138: the rate of change of surface area. The variation satisfies
139: \begin{eqnarray}
140: \dot{\xi}_c=\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{abef}R^{ef}_{~~cd}s^au^b\xi^d
141: +\frac{1}{2}R_{abcd}w^{ab}\xi^d.
142: \label{EQN_QQ3}
143: \end{eqnarray}
144:
145: In case of a point symmetric mass-distribution about the orbital center, such
146: as two particles attached to the end-points of a rod \cite{tho86}, a continuous
147: mass-distribution in a solid ring or charged particles in a magnetic field, we can
148: integrate (\ref{EQN_QQ3}) over the mass-distribution. Since $w^{ab}$ is $2\pi$-periodic
149: in the angular position of the wedge, only the term coupled to $s^b$ survives. Taking
150: $\xi^b=u^b$, the acceleration of the orbital center satisfies
151: \begin{eqnarray}
152: \dot{u}_c=\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{abef}R^{ef}_{~~cd}s^au^bu^d.
153: \label{EQN_QQ4}
154: \end{eqnarray}
155: This is curvature coupling to specific angular momentum \cite{pap51a,pap51b,pir56}.
156: The particle trajectory becomes completely spefified by Fermi-Walker transport of $s^b$.
157:
158: The Kerr metric describes curvature induced by spin. This is the converse
159: of (\ref{EQN_QQ4}) above. Spinning bodies hereby couple to spinning bodies \cite{oco72}.
160: Such interactions are commonly referred to as gravitomagnetic effects
161: \cite{tho86} by analogy to magnetic moment-magnetic moment interactions, although
162: there is a difference in sign. To study this in the Kerr metric, we study
163: spin-orbit interactions along the axis of rotation. Based on dimensional
164: analysis, the gravitational potential for spin aligned interactions should satisfy
165: \begin{eqnarray}
166: E=\omega J,
167: \label{EQN_USS}
168: \end{eqnarray}
169: where $\omega$ refers to the frame-dragging angular velocity produced
170: by the massive body and $J$ is the angular momentum of the spinning object.
171:
172: The non-zero components of the Riemann tensor of the Kerr metric
173: have been expressed in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates
174: relative to tetrad 1-forms
175: ${\bf e}_0=\alpha {\bf d}t,$
176: ${\bf e}_1=\frac{\Sigma}{\rho}({\bf d}\phi-\omega{\bf d}t)\sin\theta,$
177: ${\bf e}_2=\frac{\rho}{\sqrt{\Delta}}{\bf d}r,$ and
178: ${\bf e}_3=\rho{\bf d}\theta$
179: by Chandrasekhar \cite{cha83}. Here, we use the expressions
180: \begin{eqnarray}
181: \Sigma^2=(r^2+a^2)^2-a^2\Delta \sin\theta,
182: ~~\rho^2=r^2+a^2\cos^2\theta
183: \end{eqnarray}
184: and $\Delta = r^2 +a^2 -2Mr$
185: for a black hole of mass $M$ and specific angular momentum $a$.
186: In particular, one of the Riemann tensor
187: component satisfies
188: \begin{eqnarray}
189: R_{1302} = AD,
190: \end{eqnarray}
191: where $A ={aM}{\rho^{-6}}(3r^2-a^2\cos^2\theta)$ and $D
192: =\Sigma^{-2}[2(r^2+a^2)^2+a^2\Delta\sin^2\theta].$ On-axis $(\theta=0)$,
193: we have
194: \begin{eqnarray}
195: 2A=-\partial_r\omega = \frac{2aM}{\rho^6}(3r^2-a^2),~~D=2.
196: \label{EQN_A10}
197: \end{eqnarray}
198: According to (\ref{EQN_QQ4}), this component of the Riemann tensor
199: creates the radial force
200: \begin{eqnarray}
201: F_2=JR_{3120}=JAD=-\partial_2\omega J.
202: \label{EQN_QQ6}
203: \end{eqnarray}
204: The assertion (\ref{EQN_USS}) follows from
205: \begin{eqnarray}
206: E=\int_r^\infty F_2 ds = \omega J.
207: \label{EQN_USS1}
208: \end{eqnarray}
209:
210: The result (\ref{EQN_USS1}) also follows from a completely independent derivation,
211: by considering the
212: difference in total energy between two particles in counter rotating orbits about
213: the axis of rotation of the black hole. Let $u^b$ denote the velocity four-vector
214: and $u^\phi/u^t=\Omega$ the angular velocities of either one of these,
215: $-1=u^cu_c=[g_{tt}+g_{\phi\phi}\Omega(\Omega-2\omega)](u^t)^2.$
216: This normalization condition has the two roots
217: \begin{eqnarray}
218: \Omega_\pm=\omega \pm \sqrt{\omega^2 - (g_{tt}+(u^t)^{-2})/g_{\phi\phi}}.
219: \end{eqnarray}
220: We insist that these two particles have angular momenta of opposite sign and
221: equal magnitude, $J_\pm = g_{\phi\phi} u^t (\Omega_\pm - \omega)$,
222: \begin{eqnarray}
223: J_\pm =g_{\phi\phi}u^t
224: \sqrt{\omega^2 - (g_{tt}+(u^t)^{-2})/g_{\phi\phi}}=\pm J.
225: \label{EQN_EJ}
226: \end{eqnarray}
227: This shows that $u^t$ is the same for each particle. The total
228: energy of the particles is given by $E_\pm = (u^t)^{-1}+\Omega_\pm J_\pm,$
229: and hence one-half their difference
230: \begin{eqnarray}
231: E=\frac{1}{2}(E_+-E_-)=\omega J.
232: \label{EQN_USS2}
233: \end{eqnarray}
234:
235: The above shows that curvature-angular momentum coupling (\ref{EQN_USS1}) is
236: universal: it applies whether the angular momentum is mechanical,
237: electromagnetic or quantum mechanical in origin.
238:
239: \begin{figure}
240: \includegraphics[scale=0.3]{f2}
241: \caption{Gravitational spin-orbit coupling betweem frame-dragging $\omega$ and
242: the angular momentum $J$ of the blob produces a potential energy $E=\omega J$.
243: In the limit of perfect conductivity, the blob assumes a uniform angular
244: velocity $\Omega_b$ with $J\propto \Omega_b-\omega$. The blob is ejected
245: when $E>0$ and absorbed if $E<0$.
246: This spin-orbit interaction is a no-boundary mechanism for linear acceleration:
247: it does not require any contact with the event horizon of the black hole for the
248: formation of baryon-poor ejecta.}
249: \label{FIG_52}
250: \end{figure}
251:
252: A magnetized blob of perfectly conducting fluid is characterized by rigid
253: rotation \cite{tho86} with angular velocity $\Omega_b$. In the frame of
254: zero angular momentum observers, the local charge-density is given by the
255: Golreich-Julian charge density \cite{gol69}. In their
256: lowest energy state characterized by vanishing canonical angular momentum,
257: their angular momentum satisfies $J=eA_\phi$, where $e$ denotes the
258: unit of electric charge and $A_\phi$ the $\phi-$component of the
259: electromagnetic vector potential $A_a$ \cite{van00}. Consider a magnetized blob
260: about the axis of rotation of the black hole shown in Fig.
261: (\ref{FIG_52}). The number density $N(s)$ of particles
262: per unit distance $s$ along the axis of rotation -- the number density per
263: unit scale-height for a given magnetic flux -- satisfies
264: \begin{eqnarray}
265: N(s)=\frac{\rho}{e}=(\Omega_b-\omega)A_\phi.
266: \end{eqnarray}
267: A pair of blobs in both directions along the spin-axis of scale height $h$
268: hereby receives an energy
269: \begin{eqnarray}
270: E_{blob}= \omega JNh = \omega(\Omega_b-\omega)A^2_\phi h.
271: \label{EQN_EBLOB}
272: \end{eqnarray}
273: Expressed in dimensionful form, we have
274: \begin{eqnarray}
275: E_{blob} = \left(1\times 10^{47}\mbox{erg}\right)
276: B_{15} h_M^3 H,
277: \end{eqnarray}
278: where $h_M=h/M$ denotes the linear dimension of the blob, $B_{15}=B/10^{15}$.
279: Here, we use the normalized function
280: $H=4\hat{\omega}\left(\hat{\Omega}_b-\hat{\omega}\right)$,
281: where $\hat{\omega}=\omega/\Omega_H$ and $\hat{\Omega}_b=\Omega_b/\Omega_H$.
282:
283: We propose that blobs are ejected along the axis of rotation {\em both} to
284: infinity ($H>0$) {\em and} into the black hole ($H<0$).
285: This happens, for example, by break-up of a blob of perfectly conducting
286: fluid with vanishing total angular momentum into two peaces, by tidal
287: interaction of gravitational spin-orbit coupling given that $\omega$
288: is strong near the black hole and weak at larger distances.
289:
290: A discrete, intermittent process produces ``pancakes," which produce
291: gamma-rays by shocks when they collide (see \cite{pir04} for a review).
292: This forms an alternative to continuous outflows in the form of baryon-poor
293: jets (see \cite{lev04} for a recent account), wherein shocks appear either
294: by steepening due to temporal fluctuations \cite{lev97} or in the interaction
295: with the environment.
296:
297: We explain GRB-supernova GRB030329/SN2003dh in terms of core-collapse
298: supernova \cite{woo93,kat94} by centered nucleation of a rapidly
299: rotating black hole in a massive star, followed by the ejection of baryon-poor
300: blobs and radiative spin-down of the black hole against gravitational radiation
301: catalyzed by a surrounding non-axisymmetric torus \cite{van01}. We attribute the
302: supernova to irradiation of the remnant stellar envelope from within, by
303: high-energy photons produced in the dissipation of a subdominant torus wind.
304:
305: {\bf Acknowledgment.}
306: The author thanks A. Levinson, E. Schuryak and R.P. Kerr for constructive comments. This research is
307: supported by the LIGO Observatories, constructed by Caltech and MIT
308: with funding from NSF under cooperative agreement PHY 9210038.
309: The LIGO Laboratory operates under cooperative agreement
310: PHY-0107417. This paper has been assigned LIGO document number
311: LIGO-P0400XX-00-R.
312:
313: \begin{thebibliography}{}
314: \bibitem{fil97}
315: Filipenko, A.V., 1997, ARA\&A, 35, 309
316: \bibitem{tur03}
317: Turatto, M., 2003, in Supernovae and Gamma-ray Bursters, ed.
318: K.W. Weiler (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg), p21
319: \bibitem{mau04}
320: Maund, J.R., Smartt, S.J., Kudritzki, R.P., Podsiadiowski, P.,
321: \& Gilmore,, G.F., 2004, Nature, 427, 129
322: \bibitem{nom95}
323: Nomoto, K., Iwamoto, K., \& Suzuki, T, 1995, Phys. Rep. 256, 173
324: \bibitem{bro00}
325: Brown, G.E., Lee, C.-H., Wijers R.A.M.J., Lee, H.K., Israelian G.
326: \& Bethe H.A., 2000, NewA, 5, 191
327: \bibitem{lee02}
328: Lee, C.-H., Brown, G.E., \& Wijers, R.A.M.J., 2002, ApJ, 575, 996
329: \bibitem{bet03}
330: Bethe, H.A., Brown, G.E., \& Lee, C.-H., 2003, Selected Papers: Formation
331: and Evolution of Black Holes in the Galaxy (World Scientific), p262
332: \bibitem{ker63}
333: Kerr, R.P., 1963, Phys. Rev. Lett., 11, 237
334: \bibitem{pap51a}
335: Papapetrou, A., 1951, Proc. Roy. Soc., 209, 248
336: \bibitem{pap51b}
337: Papapetrou, A., 1951, Proc. Roy. Soc. 209, 259
338: \bibitem{pir56}
339: Pirani, F.A.E., 1956, Act. Phys. Pol., XV, 389
340: \bibitem{van00}
341: van Putten, M.H.P.M., 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 3752
342: \bibitem{van04a}
343: van Putten, M.H.P.M., Levinson, A., Lee, H.-K., Regimbau, T., \& Harry, G.,
344: 2004, Phys. Rev. D., 69, 044007
345: \bibitem{mas00}
346: Mashhoon, B., 2000, Class. Quant. Grav., 31, 681
347: \bibitem{van04b}
348: van Putten, M.H.P.M., 2004, ApJ, 611, L81
349: \bibitem{mis74}
350: Misner, Thorne, K.S., Wheeler, A., 1974, Gravitation (San Francisco)
351: \bibitem{unr74}
352: Unruh W.G., 1974, Phys. Rev. D., 10, 3194
353: \bibitem{haw75}
354: Hawking S.W. {Commun. Math. Phys.}, {\bf 43}:199 (1975).
355: \bibitem{teu73}
356: Teukolsky S.A., 1973, ApJ., 185, 635
357: \bibitem{pre72}
358: Press W.H. and Teukolsky S.A., 1972, ApJ., 178, 347
359: \bibitem{teu74}
360: Teukolsky, S.A., \&, Press, W.H., 1974, ApJ., 193, 443
361: \bibitem{tho86} Thorne, K.S., Price, R.H., MacDonald, D.A., 1986, Black Holes:
362: The Membrane Paradigm, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
363: \bibitem{lan84}
364: Landau, L.D., \& Lifschitz, E.M., 1984, Classical Theory of Fields,
365: Pergamon Press, Oxford
366: \bibitem{cha83}
367: Chandrasekhar, S., 1983, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes,
368: Oxford University Press, Oxford
369: \bibitem{oco72}
370: O'Connel, R.F., 1972, Phys. Rev. D., 10, 3035
371: \bibitem{woo93}
372: Woosley, S.E., 1993, ApJ, 405, 273
373: \bibitem{kat94}
374: Katz, J.I., 1994, 432, L27
375: \bibitem{gol69}
376: Goldreich, P., \& Julian, W.H., 1969, ApJ, 157, 869
377: \bibitem{van03b}
378: van Putten, M.H.P.M., \& Levinson, A., 2003, ApJ, 584, 953
379: \bibitem{lev97}
380: Levinson A., van Putten, M.H.P.M., 1997, ApJ, 488, 69
381: \bibitem{pir04}
382: Piran, T., 2004, astro-ph/0405503
383: \bibitem{lev04}
384: Levinson, A., 2004, ApJ, 608, 411
385: \bibitem{van01}
386: van Putten, M.H.P.M., 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 091101
387: \end{thebibliography}
388:
389: \end{document}
390: