1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % This is a sample input file for your contribution to a
3: % multi-author book ("proceedings-like) to be published
4: % by Springer Verlag.
5: %
6: % Please use it as a template for your own input, and please
7: % follow the instructions for the formal editing of your
8: % manuscript as described in the file "1readme".
9: %
10: % Please send the Tex and figure files of your manuscript
11: % together with any additional style files as well as the
12: % PS file to the editor of your book.
13: %
14: % He or she will collect all contributions for the planned
15: % book, possibly compile them all in one go and pass the
16: % complete set of manuscripts on to Springer.
17: %
18: % Vers. 07/99
19: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
20:
21:
22:
23: %RECOMMENDED%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
24:
25: \documentclass[runningheads]{svmult}
26:
27: \usepackage{makeidx} % allows index generation
28: \usepackage{graphicx} % standard LaTeX graphics tool
29: % for including eps-figure files
30: \usepackage{subeqnar} % subnumbers individual equations
31: % within an array
32: \usepackage{multicol} % used for the two-column index
33: %\usepackage{cropmark} % cropmarks for pages without
34: % pagenumbers - only needed when manuscript
35: % is printed from paper and not from data
36: \usepackage{physprbb} % modified textarea for proceedings,
37: % lecture notes, and the like.
38: \makeindex % used for the subject index
39: % please use the style sprmidx.sty with
40: % your makeindex program
41:
42: %%upright Greek letters (example below: upright "mu")
43: \newcommand\hb{H${\beta}$~} %letizia
44: \newcommand\ha{H${\alpha}$~} %letizia
45: \newcommand\sm{M$_{\odot}$} %letizia
46:
47: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48:
49:
50: %OPTIONAL%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
51: %
52: %\usepackage{amstex} % useful for coding complex math
53: %\mathindent\parindent % needed in case "Amstex" is used
54: %
55: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
56:
57: %AUTHOR_STYLES_AND_DEFINITIONS%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
58: %
59: %Please reduce your own definitions and macros to an absolute
60: %minimum since otherwise the editor will find it rather
61: %strenuous to compile all individual contributions to a
62: %single book file
63: %
64: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
65:
66: \begin{document}
67: %
68: \title*{Clues on post-Asymptotic Giant Branch Evolution and Planetary Nebulae
69: Populations from the Magellanic Clouds.}
70: %%
71: % allows explicit linebreak for the table of content
72: %
73: %
74: \titlerunning{Magellanic Cloud PNe}
75: % allows abbreviation of title, if the full title is too long
76: % to fit in the running head
77: %
78: \author{Letizia Stanghellini}
79: %
80: \authorrunning{Letizia Stanghellini}
81: % if there are more than two authors,
82: % please abbreviate author list for running head
83: %
84: %
85: \institute{National Optical Astronomy Observatory
86: 950 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson AZ 85719, USA}
87:
88: \maketitle % typesets the title of the contribution
89:
90: \begin{abstract}
91: %The abstract\index{abstract} is optional. If present it should summarize
92: %the contents of the paper in at least 70 and at most 150 words; neither
93: %too long nor too short but to the point!
94:
95:
96:
97: \end{abstract}
98: The recent {\it HST}
99: optical images, and the optical and ultraviolet spectra, of Magellanic planetary nebulae (PNe),
100: together with the large data-base that has been collected in the past decade,
101: allows unprecedented insight in the evolution of PNe and their central stars.
102: In this paper
103: we present a selection of recent results: The analysis of PN
104: morphology, both in the optical and ultra-violet emission lines; the relation between
105: nebular morphology and the
106: chemistry produced by stellar evolution;
107: the direct determination of the transition time from observations;
108: and the study of the nature and evolutionary stage of the components of the planetary nebula luminosity function.
109:
110: \section{Introduction}
111: Planetary nebulae (PNe) in the Magellanic Clouds (LMC, SMC) are the nearest
112: extragalactic PNe known. They are close enough for detailed individual analysis, and they
113: can be spatially resolved with the current technology; yet, they do not suffer the distance biases and extreme differential
114: interstellar absorption that Galactic PNe are well known for. Magellanic
115: PNe are thus the ideal probes to study stellar evolution of low- and
116: intermediate-mass stars. They also are ideal benchmarks to extend the knowledge
117: of PNe to the extra-Galactic PN populations, with the additional bonus of
118: covering a large metallicity range.
119:
120: PNe in the Magellanic Clouds have been observed from the ground, as point sources, since the
121: sixties. The advent of the Hubble Space Telescope ({\it
122: HST}) afforded their spatial resolution, making it possible
123: to study their
124: size, morphology, and their central stars (CSs).
125: The work presented in this paper is based on the most recent {\it HST} data-sets acquired by the MCPN team\footnote{
126: Team membership and other information are available in the MAST MCPN web page http://archive.stsci.edu/hst/mcpn/home/html} in Cycles 8 through 10 with
127: the Space Telescope Imaging Specrograph (STIS, Programs 8271, 8663, 9077, and 9120) and the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2, Program 8702).
128: Older archived narrow-band images (Program 6407, 5185, 4821, 4075, and 1266) were also used to augment the morphological
129: data-set.
130:
131:
132: \begin{figure}
133: \centering
134: \includegraphics[width=3.8cm]{j33.eps}%
135: % \hspace{1cm}%
136: \includegraphics[width=3.8cm]{smp101.eps}%
137: %\hspace{1cm}%
138: \includegraphics[width=3.8cm]{smp91.eps}%
139: \hspace{1cm}%
140: \includegraphics[width=3.8cm]{sp34.eps}%
141: %\hspace{1cm}%
142: \includegraphics[width=3.8cm]{mg8.eps}%
143: % \hspace{1cm}%
144: \includegraphics[width=3.8cm]{1682.eps}%
145: \hspace{1cm}%
146: \includegraphics[width=3.8cm]{mg40.eps}%
147: % \hspace{1cm}%
148: \includegraphics[width=3.8cm]{mg13.eps}%
149: % \hspace{1cm}%
150: \includegraphics[width=3.8cm]{mg16.eps}%
151:
152:
153: \caption{Magellanic PNs. Left panel (each panel from top to bottom): R PNs LMC~J~33,
154: SMC~SP~34, and LMC~MG~40; Central panel: E PNs LMC~SMP~101, SMC~MG~8,
155: and SMC~MG~13; Right panel: B PNs LMC~SMP~91, SMC~MA~1682,
156: and LMC~MG~16. All thumbnails are 9 arcsec$^2$ sections of the
157: STIS broad-band images
158: }
159: \end{figure}
160:
161:
162: \section{Planetary Nebula Morphology}
163:
164: The morphology of Galactic PNe has been studied thoroughly in the nineties,
165: and it has been found that morphological type is related to
166: the PN progenitor's evolutionary history and its mass. There is strong evidence
167: that bipolar PNe are the progeny of the massive
168: Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) stars (4-8 \sm). Bipolar PNe are nitrogen-rich and carbon-poor
169: [1,2]. The analysis of the morphological
170: types and their distribution in a given PN population are then good indicators of age and evolutionary history.
171:
172: Galactic PNe have been classified as round (R), elliptical (E), bipolar (B; includes quadrupolar and multipolar), bipolar
173: core (BC; R or E PNe with a central {\it bilobate} concentration, or ring enhancement),
174: and point-symmetric (P). A recent description of these classes is published by [1].
175: The majority of Galactic PNe are elliptical, but the actual number of
176: B PNe could be underestimated,
177: given that they typically lie in the Galactic plane (i.e., they may suffer from high
178: reddening).
179: PNe in the Magellanic Clouds, when spatially resolved, show the same admixture of morphological types
180: than the Galactic PNe, as illustrated in Figure 1 [3, 4, 5].
181: While we do not attempt a statistical comparison of the
182: Magellanic and Galactic PN morphological types, given the selection effects that hamper
183: Galactic PNe, we can meaningfully compare the LMC and SMC samples. Both
184: samples are characrerized by low field extinction, and they have been preselected in
185: more or less the same way.
186:
187:
188: \begin{table}
189:
190: \caption{Morphological Distribution}
191: \begin{center}
192: \begin{tabular}{lrr}
193: &&\\
194: Morphological type& $\%$ LMC& $\%$ SMC\\
195: &&\\
196: Round (R)& 29& 35\\
197: Elliptical (E)& 17& 29\\
198: R \& E& 46& 64\\
199: Bipolar (B)& 34& 6\\
200: Bipolar core (BC)& 17& 24\\
201: Point-symmetric (P)& 3& 6\\
202:
203: \end{tabular}
204:
205: \end{center}
206: \end{table}
207:
208: The results of the morphological distribution of PNe in the Clouds is illustrated in Table 1.
209: One striking difference
210: between the LMC and SMC morphological type distributions is that the fraction of
211: B PNe in the LMC is almost six times that of the SMC. Furthermore, half of the LMC
212: PNe are either bipolar or have a morphology that suggests a central ring (BC),
213: while only a third of the SMC PNe fall in these two aspherical morphological classes.
214:
215: From this analysis it results that the different processes involved in the
216: formation of the
217: different PN shapes occur in all galaxies where morphology has been
218: studied. It is also apparent that the SMC environment may disfavor the onset
219: of bipolarity in PNe. Otherwise, the different morphological statistics
220: may indicate different populations of stellar progenitors in the two Clouds.
221: While it seems reasonable to conclude that a low metallicity environment
222: is unfavorable to bipolar formation and evolution, the exact causes have not been studied
223: yet. A detailed study of metallicity and mass-loss may clarify this
224: point. On the other hand, the different morphology counts may simply
225: imply that most of the progenitors of the SMC PNe have masses in the lower-mass range (M$<$4\sm),
226: thus they do not produce B PNe.
227: A comparison of the SMC and LMC CS masses does not disagree with such a possibility [6].
228:
229:
230: \begin{figure}
231: \begin{center}
232: \includegraphics[width=.8\textwidth]{fig2.epsi}
233: \end{center}
234: \caption{The C/O vs. N/O relation for R (open circles), E (asterisks),
235: BC (triangles), B (squares), and P (filled circles) PNe in the LMC
236: (adapted from [11])}
237: \end{figure}
238:
239: \section{Results from UV Spectroscopy}
240:
241: The study of the chemical composition that characterizes PN ejecta
242: is a way to determine the origin and evolution of the progenitor stars.
243: PNe contain the products of stellar nucleosynthesis, dredged-up at the
244: stellar envelope during the late AGB evolution. The study of carbon and nitrogen
245: abundance in PNe is especially interesting. The theory of stellar evolution
246: suggests that Galactic and Magellanic AGB evolution
247: yield to different N and C concentrations depending on the AGB progenitor's mass.
248: If M$_{\rm MS} >4$ \sm, the
249: so-called {\it hot-bottom burning} (HBB) process would convert much of the
250: carbon content into nitrogen, resulting in a different chemical
251: make-up of the remnant PN [7]. In order to disclose possible correlation between the
252: morphology and the {\it evolutionary} chemistry of the LMC PNe
253: we need to have at our disposal the carbon and nitrogen abundance of a sufficient number of
254: PNe to populate the major morphological classes. We use the nitrogen and oxygen abundances in the
255: literature [8, 10] and the carbon abundance in [9, 11] to plot,
256: in Figure 2, the relation between the (logarithmic) C/O and N/O abundances.
257:
258: From this Figure we infer that the carbon stars progeny (log C/O$>$0) is limited to R,
259: E, and BC PNe. B and P PNe originate from the
260: evolution of stars that did not go though the carbon star phase, or, more likely, their
261: progenitor underwent a carbon depletion, possibly due to the occurrence of the HBB. It appears that
262: R and E PNe are the progeny of lower-mass stars, those with M$_{\rm MS}< 4$ \sm,
263: while the opposite holds for the most aspherical (B and P) PNe.
264: From Figure 2 we see that BC PNe might have evolved from carbon stars in some cases, while in other
265: cases they had evolved from more massive stars. It remains
266: to be seen whether some of the BC PNe are indeed bipolar with faint lobes
267: (those with low carbon and high nitrogen content), and others are misclassified R and E PNe.
268:
269: \begin{figure}
270: \centering
271: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{bw.ps}
272: \caption{Morphology of LMC PNe. Lerft column: clear STIS CCD images.
273: Right column: C III] 1908 \AA~images from the G230L 2D STIS spectra. The PNe are, from top to bottom, SMP~19, SMP~79, SMP~95,
274: and SMP~102 }
275: \end{figure}
276:
277: In order to enlarge the sample of Magellanic PNe whose carbon abundance is known,
278: we have used the {\it HST} data
279: from program 9120, acquired with {\it STIS} grisms G140L and G230L [11]. The 2D spectra were obtained
280: with a large aperture, showing the morphology of the PNe through the brightest UV
281: emission line. It is then possible to compare the UV to optical morphology.
282: In Figure 3 we show the clear optical images through the {\it STIS} CCD
283: (left column) and the parts of the G230L spectra corresponding to the C III] emission line
284: at $\lambda$1908 \AA. The image sections are all to scale, thus the (relative) physical
285: sizes are also to scale. The clear images have been rotated so their orientation coicides with the orientation of
286: the 2D spectra. The UV emission deriving from the CIII] line originates
287: in the same volume of the nebulae than the optical emission
288: [4]. In Figure 3 we can also clearly see the spectrum of
289: the central star of SMP~102.
290:
291: The fitting of the UV stellar continua have been used to derive stellar tempeatures. In some cases,
292: central stars of Magellanic PNe show P-Cygni profiles in the UV spectra [12].
293:
294:
295: \section{Stellar Evolution Beyond the AGB, and the Transition Time}
296:
297: The known distance of Magellanic PNe makes them the ideal probes to study stellar evolution.
298: AGB and post-AGB evolution have been studied theoretically and observationally
299: in many different fashions. Nonetheless, there are still several processes
300: that need to be understood to make the comparison between theory and data meaningful.
301: In this section we describe how Magellanic PNe are used to shed some light on the
302: transition time problem. Other aspect of AGB evolution
303: will be examined in future papers.
304:
305: \begin{figure}
306: %\centering
307: \includegraphics[width=.5\textwidth]{fig4a.epsi}
308: \includegraphics[width=.5\textwidth]{fig4b.epsi}
309:
310: \caption{{\bf (a)}: Evolutionary vs. dynamical time for LMC (diamonds) and SMC (stars) PNe. {\bf (b)} :
311: Transition time histogram}
312: \end{figure}
313:
314: When comparing CS data to theoretical predictions, it is often assumed that the
315: time lag between the envelope ejection quenching (EEQ) and the PN illumination, the so-called transition time
316: (t$_{\rm tr}$), has a duration either
317: of a fixed value (generally 1000 yr), or it is set to zero. Both of these assumptions are inadequate to
318: express a time-scale that is likely to assume different values in different PNe, and that represents a sizeable fraction of
319: the PN life-time [13]. From a conceptual point of view, the transition time
320: is mainly dependent on the residual envelope mass that survives the envelope ejection (M$_{\rm e}^{\rm R}$) and
321: on the post-AGB mass-consumption process (or processes) that is in place in each specific CS.
322: The dynamical time, $\tau_{\rm dyn}=D_{\rm PN}/v_{\rm exp}$ (where D$_{\rm PN}$ is the diameter of the nebula and
323: v$_{\rm exp}$ is the nebular expansion velocity), represents the dynamical nebular age in the assumption that
324: the nebular shell does not suffer acceleration. If we measure the diameter of the main nebular shell,
325: the dynamical time tracks the evolutionary time measured from the EEQ event. In order to compare the dynamical
326: time to the stellar
327: evolutionary time we need to use the equation $\tau_{\rm dyn}=t_{\rm tr}+t_{\rm ev}$, where t$_{\rm ev}$ is the
328: evolutionary time evaluated {\it after} the PN illumination. This equation holds as long as the evolutionary
329: tracks mark the temporal zero-point at
330: T$_{\rm eff}\simeq 30,000$ K, as they usually do.
331:
332: In order to estimate the transition time one needs to determine the residual envelope mass, the mass-loss
333: during transition, and whether the CSs are burning hydrogen or helium. All these properties are rarely known, if ever.
334: Another approach to determine, or at least constrain, the transition time is to use the
335: Magellanic CSs. Since the distance to the Magellanic PNe is known, their CS mass can
336: be estimated much more reliably than for Galactic PNe. In Figure 4 {\bf (a)} we plot the evolutionary time
337: of the Magellanic CSs, derived from their location in the HR diagram,
338: against the dynamical time of their nebular shells.
339: Stellar luminosities and temperatures used to deterine the CSs location on the HR diagram with
340: respect to the Magellanic post-AGB evolutionary tracks are from [6] and [14]; the nebular diameters
341: are from [4] and [5], and the
342: expansion velocities are taken from [15]. Note that the majority of LMC post-AGB evolutionary tracks
343: are He-burning tracks [16], while
344: there is an indication that these stars are H-burners (see below in the PNLF section).
345: To compensate for this mismatch we have scaled the H- versus He-burning tracks and
346: increased the evolutionary time-scales accrodingly. Figure 4 {\bf (a)} shows that the dynamical and
347: evolutionary times correlate to one another (R$_{\rm xy}$=0.88), yet the dynamical time is usually higher, as predicted
348: in most evolutionary cases [13]. There is one exception,
349: LMC~SMP~13, whose transition time is just below zero ( t$_{\rm ev}$ and t$_{\rm dyn}$ are
350: within their respective errorbars).
351: From the evolutionary and dynamical times we derive the transition time in all cases but for SMP~13, whose
352: transition time is obviously close to zero, or, alternatively, whose evolution occurs in
353: thermal time-scale [13]. In Figure 4 {\bf (b)} we report the histogram of
354: the transition times for the Magellanic PNe whose dynamical and evolutionary times are
355: available. The values of the transition time spread from a few hundreds to several thoudands years. In a
356: few cases it goes to 10,000 yr, certainly a considerable fraction of the PN life-time.
357: The most important conclusion from this exercise is that transition time can not be
358: ignored when dealing with the evolution of PNe and their central stars.
359: To our knowledge this is the first time that transition time has been effectively
360: estimated for nebulae whose distance is reliable. A detailed analysis of the Magellanic PN
361: estimated transition times and their models will be presented in a future paper.
362:
363:
364: \section{The Planetary Nebula Lumonsity Function }
365:
366: The planetary nebula luminosity function (PNLF) is a well-known secondary distance indicator [17].
367: The high-luminosity cut-off of the PNLF seems to be invariant for galaxies
368: with similar metallicites, while with a metallicity-correction it is also possible to unify the
369: method for all galaxies. Despite its empirical success, it is still theoretically unclear why the PNLF
370: is invariant for different PN population. Moreover, the evolutionary mechanisms behind the PNLF shape
371: are still uncertain. In particular, the PNLF seems extremely hard to model. A realistic representation
372: of the PNLF would involve several
373: unknown and unconstrained parameters and processes related to the post-AGB and nebular
374: evolution, such as the transition time, the mass-loss and its rates, the onset of PN
375: morphology.
376: The morphological data-base of Magellanic PNe may be used to gain insight in the PNLF. In Figures 5 and 6 we plot the luminosity of the LMC and the
377: SMC PNe against their photometric physical radii.
378: The luminosity is given in [O III] $\lambda$5007 \AA~ magnitudes, as typical for PNLFs, and
379: the radii are in parsecs. All targets have been coded for morphological type, as described in the labels.
380:
381: \begin{figure}
382: \centering
383: \includegraphics[width=.9\textwidth]{fig5.epsi}
384: \caption{Magnitude $\lambda$5007 \AA~ versus photometric radius for round (open circles), elliptical (asterisks),
385: round and elliptical with a bipolar core (triangles), bipolar (squares), and point-symmetric
386: (filled circles) PNe in the LMC }
387: \end{figure}
388:
389:
390: The snapshot survey targets plotted in Figures 5 and 6 were selected from the brightest
391: LMC and SMC PNe [4, 5], thus the completeness near the
392: high luminosity cut-off should be adequate [17].
393: In both Figures, but more clearly in Figure 5, one can see two different {\it branches} of PNe,
394: running from small to large radii. These branches decline
395: in brightness for larger radii, and the B and P PNe populate the low brightness- large radii
396: parts of the plots.
397: The PNLF structure that derives from the Figure has a dip at intermediate magnitudes, as predicted
398: for H-burning post-AGB stars [13, 18].
399:
400: More importantly, the high luminosity PNe in both Figures are
401: R, E, and BC. These are tipically the low nitrogen
402: and high carbon PNe, the progeny of the lower mass stars
403: (M$<$4 \sm). The usefulness of this information is multi-fold: when modeling the high luminosity parts of the PNLF one
404: could set aside the more difficult modeling of bipolar PNe, since spherical and ellipsoidal
405: approximation should suffice. Furthermore, the mass range of PN progenitors that involve the
406: high luminosity cut-off of the PNLF may be limited to M$<$4 \sm~ in PNLF models.
407:
408: The brighest PNe in the SMC are definitely R and E. The brightest B PNe are almost two magnitudes below the
409: high luminsoity cut-off. In the LMC, there is a considerable
410: fraction of bright BC PNe. Are these the same BC PNe
411: with high carbon and low nitrogen abundances as seen in Figure 2? We have abundance information for three of the five
412: bipolar core PNe in the brightest two magnitudes of the LMC PNLF, and these three objects have high carbon and low
413: nitrogen content.
414:
415: In Figure 6 we plot all the known (spatially-resolved) SMC PNe and
416: the two H II regions corresponding to young stellar clusters, that were previously misclassified as
417: PNe [19].
418: The Figure illustrated that misclassified PNe may occupy the same areas of the diagnostic m$_{\rm 5007}$ - log R$_{\rm phot}$
419: plot.
420: The brightest of these miscalssified PNe is just one magnitude below the high luminosity
421: cut-off of the SMC PNLF. In a galaxy particularly rich of these ultra-compact H II regions that embedd young stellar
422: clusters the distance
423: determination based on the PNLF should be revisited after accounting for the contamination effects.
424:
425: \begin{figure}
426: \centering
427: \includegraphics[width=.9\textwidth]{fig6.epsi}
428: \caption{Same as in Figure 5, for SMC PNe. The location of the target-like symbols correspond to
429: two previously misclassified ultra-compact H II regions}
430: \end{figure}
431:
432: \section{Finale}
433:
434: Magellanic PNe and their central stars have proven essential to probe post-AGB evolution and
435: the ensemble properties of PNe, such as those related to the PNLF.
436: The multi-wavelength
437: data-base of Magellanic PNe is homogeneous, and now comprises spatially-resolved {\it HST} images
438: of a represenaive fraction of PNe in these galaxies. This data-base
439: allows umprecedented
440: insight of stellar and nebulae evolution.
441: In this paper we showed that R, E, B and P nebular morphology
442: exists in both the LMC and the SMC, and that their relative frequency is different, being aspherical
443: PNe rare in the SMC. Morphology in the light of the ultraviolet C III] $\lambda$5007 \AA~ line is similar to
444: that of the major optical emission lines, such as \ha and [O III] $\lambda$5007 \AA~.
445:
446: We have also shown that, as in the Milky Way, morphology correlates
447: with nitrogen and carbon abundances,
448: and that the aspherical PNe are typically carbon-poor and nitrogen-rich, as expected of the
449: progeny of the high-mass AGB stars.
450:
451: By comparing rate of nebular and stellar evolution of Magellanic PNe it has been possible to measure
452: the time-lag between the EEQ and the PN illumination. The resulting transition time are a sizeable fraction of
453: the nebular life-time in some cases. We conclude that the transition time can not be ignored when comparing nebular and stellar models.
454:
455: The Magellanic PNLF can be studied in its components. The high luminosity PNe are generally
456: R or E, and, in all the cases where abundances have been calculated,
457: the high luminosity PNe are carbon-rich and nitrogen-poor. This result has bearing on the
458: future modeling of the PNLF.
459:
460: Some of the results outlined here will be more sound when the planned Magellanic PN data-set
461: will reach completion. In particular, we
462: plan to obtain UV spectra of several SMC PNe to extend the result of PN carbon abundances to the SMC. The transition time calculation will be extended to the whole sample of Magellanic PNe
463: whose central stars have been observed, and more SMC central
464: stars will be observed as planned.
465: Finally, a thorough study of the Magellanic PNLF is about to be completed by the
466: MCPN team with the inclusion of the optical images form recent {\it HST} observations. The characteristics of the central stars hosted by the brightest nebulae in each galaxy will be studied in detail for more
467: astrophysical insight in the invariance of the PNLF high luminosity cut-off
468: across galaxies.
469:
470: \vskip 1truecm
471:
472: It is a pleasure to thank the MCPN team for their contribution to
473: this project. Arturo Manchado and the IAC are warmly thanked for their hospitality in July 2004, when this paper was written.
474:
475:
476:
477: \begin{thebibliography}{}
478:
479: \bibitem 1 L.~Stanghellini, E.~Villaver, A.~Manchado, \& M.~A.~Guerrero: Ap.~J. 576, ~285 (2002)
480:
481: \bibitem 2 M.~Peimbert: IAU Symp.~ 76: Planetary Nebulae 76, ed. by Y.~Terzian (Dordrecht: Reidel 1978) ~p. 215
482:
483: \bibitem 3 L.~Stanghellini, J.~C.~Blades, S.~J.~Osmer, M.~J.~Barlow, \& X.-W.~Liu:
484: Ap.~J. 510, ~687 (1999)
485:
486:
487: \bibitem 4 R.~A.~Shaw, L.~Stanghellini, M.~Mutchler, B.~Balick, \& J.~C.~Blades: Ap.~J. 548, ~727 (2001)
488:
489: \bibitem 5 L.~Stanghellini, R.~A.~Shaw, B.~Balick, M.~Mutchler, J.~C.~Blades, \&
490: E.~Villaver: Ap.~J. 596, ~997 (2003)
491:
492: \bibitem 6 E.~Villaver, L.~Stanghellini, \& R.~A.~Shaw: Ap.~J. (in press)
493:
494: \bibitem 7 L.~B.~van den Hoek \& M.~A.~T.~Groenewegen: Astron.~Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 123, ~305 (1997)
495:
496: \bibitem 8 G.~Stasinska, M.~G.~Richer, and M.~L.~McCall: Astron.~Astrophys. 336, ~667 (1998)
497:
498: \bibitem 9 P.~Leisy \& M.~Dennefeld: Astron.~Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 116, ~95 (1996)
499:
500: \bibitem 1 P.~Leisy \& M.~Dennefeld: Astron.~Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. (submitted)
501:
502: \bibitem 1 L.~Stanghellini, R.~A.~Shaw, \& D.~Gilmore: Ap.~J. (submitted)
503:
504: \bibitem 1 A.~Arrieta \& L.~Stanghellini: (this~volume)
505:
506: \bibitem 1 L.~Stanghellini \& A.~Renzini: Ap.~J. 542, ~308 (2000)
507:
508: \bibitem 1 E.~Villaver, E., L.~Stanghellini, \& R.~A.~Shaw: Ap.~J. 597, ~298 (2003)
509:
510: \bibitem 1 M.~A.~Dopita, S.~J.~Meatheringham, B.~L.~Webster, \& H.~C.~Ford: Ap.~J. 327, ~639 (1988)
511:
512: \bibitem 1 E.~Vassiliadis \& P.~R.~Wood: Ap.~J. Suppl. Ser. 92, ~125 (1994)
513:
514: \bibitem 1 R.~Ciardullo: (this~volume)
515:
516: \bibitem 1 R.~H.~Mendez \& T.~Soffner: Astron.~Astrophys. 321, ~898 (1997)
517:
518: \bibitem 1 L.~Stanghellini, E.~Villaver, R.~A.~Shaw, \& M.~Mutchler: Ap.~J. 598, ~1000 (2003)
519:
520: \end{thebibliography}
521:
522:
523: \end{document}
524:
525:
526: