1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aaspp4]{article}
2: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
3: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass[12pt,article]{aastex}
5:
6: %\received{}
7: \accepted{}
8:
9: \slugcomment{Submitted to ApJ}
10:
11: \newcommand{\ms}{\mbox{m s$^{-1}~$}}
12: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{km s$^{-1}~$}}
13: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_{\odot}$}
14: \newcommand{\rsun}{R$_{\odot}$}
15: \newcommand{\mjup}{M$_{\rm JUP}$}
16: \newcommand{\msat}{M$_{\rm SAT}$}
17: \newcommand{\rjup}{R$_{\rm JUP}~$}
18: \newcommand{\msini}{$M \sin i~$}
19: \newcommand{\sini}{$sin i~$}
20: \newcommand{\vsini}{V$sin i~$}
21: \newcommand{\Mv}{M$_{\rm v}~$}
22: \newcommand{\simgt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
23: \newcommand{\simlt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
24:
25: %\lefthead{Butler {\it et~al.\/}}
26: %\righthead{New Extrasolar Planets}
27: \shortauthors{Butler {\it et~al.\/}}
28: \shorttitle{Two New Planets}
29: \received{2004 June 10}
30: \begin{document}
31:
32: \title{Multiple Companions to HD 154857 \& HD 160691$~^{1}$}
33:
34: \author{Chris McCarthy\altaffilmark{2,3},
35: R. Paul Butler\altaffilmark{2},
36: C. G. Tinney\altaffilmark{4},
37: Hugh R. A. Jones\altaffilmark{5},
38: Geoffrey W. Marcy\altaffilmark{6,3},
39: Brad Carter\altaffilmark{7},
40: Alan J. Penny\altaffilmark{8},
41: Debra A. Fischer\altaffilmark{3,6}}
42:
43: %\affil{DTM-CIW}
44: %\authoraddr{}
45: \authoremail{paul@dtm.ciw.edu}
46:
47: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations obtained at the
48: Anglo--Australian Telescope, Siding Spring, Australia.}
49:
50: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution
51: of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington DC, USA 20015-1305}
52:
53: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics and Astronomy,
54: San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA 94132}
55:
56: \altaffiltext{4}{Anglo--Australian Observatory, P.O. Box 296,
57: Epping, NSW 1710, Australia}
58:
59: \altaffiltext{5}{Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores
60: University, Twelve Quays House, Egerton Wharf, Birkenhead CH41 1LD, UK}
61:
62: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy, University of California,
63: Berkeley, CA USA 94720}
64:
65: \altaffiltext{7}{Faculty of Sciences, University of Southern Queensland,
66: Toowoomba, Queensland 4350, Australia}
67:
68: \altaffiltext{8}{Rutherford Appleton Laboratory,
69: Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK}
70:
71: \begin{abstract}
72: Precise Doppler measurements from the AAT/UCLES spectrometer reveal
73: two companions to both HD 154857 and HD 160691. The inner companion
74: to HD 154857 has a period of 398 d, an eccentricity of 0.51, and a
75: minimum mass of 1.8 \mjup. An outer companion has a period much
76: longer than 2 years and is currently detected only as a linear trend
77: of 14 \ms per year. The inner companion to HD 160691, previously
78: announced from AAT data, has a period of 645 d, an eccentricity of
79: 0.20, and a minimum mass of 1.7 \mjup. For the outer planet, whose
80: orbit is less well constrained, a two Keplerian fit
81: yields a period of 8.2 yr, an eccentricity of 0.57, and a minimum mass
82: of 3.1 \mjup. With these orbital parameters, its maximum separation
83: from the star of 0.4 arcsec makes it a viable target for direct
84: imaging.
85:
86: \end{abstract}
87:
88: \keywords{planetary systems -- stars: individual (HD 154857, HD 160691)}
89:
90: \section{Introduction}
91: \label{intro}
92:
93: All $\sim$110 extrasolar planets\footnote{Count based on list
94: maintained at www.exoplanets.org as of 10 June 2004} discovered
95: within 50 parsecs have been found from precision Doppler surveys
96: over the past decade. It is these nearest stars with planets
97: that are of the greatest interest for immediate follow up by
98: HST astrometry (Benedict et al. 2002) and spectroscopy
99: (Charbonneau et al. 2002). Next generation follow up missions
100: include precision astrometry with the Space Interferometry Mission
101: , and direct imaging of jovian and terrestrial planets
102: with giant ground--based telescopes
103: such as TMT\footnote{http://tmt.ucolick.org} (CELT),
104: GSMT
105: \footnote{http://klwww.aura-nio.noao.edu/science}
106: , Giant Magellan
107: \footnote{http://www.helios.lsa.astro.umich.edu/magellan/sciencecase.php},
108: and OWL
109: \footnote{http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~imh/ELT},
110: and space--based telescopes such as TPF and DARWIN.
111:
112: % Astrometric systems such as KeckI, VLTI, SIM, and GAIA
113: % should begin taking data within a decade, while direct
114: % imaging systems such as TPF and DARWIN may begin operation
115: % before 2020. These programs are all distance limited,
116: % capable of detecting and characterizing planets around the
117: % nearest stars. Over the next decade precision Doppler
118: % surveys will remain the primary means of detecting planets
119: % around nearby stars.
120:
121: Precision Doppler surveys are most sensitive to planets orbiting
122: sun--like stars older than 2 Gyr that have no stellar companions
123: within 3 arc--seconds. Stars of spectral type earlier than late F
124: rotate rapidly and have few absorption lines. Stars younger than 2
125: Gyr have photospheric magnetic fields and spots, which cause an
126: intrinsic velocity ``jitter'' that correlates with chromospheric
127: activity (Wright et al. 2004). Stars with close companions can not be
128: cleanly separated on a spectrometer entrance slit. Coincidentally
129: single stars that are older than 2 Gyr represent the ideal targets for
130: habitable terrestrial planet searches, and by extension searches for
131: extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) (Turnbull \& Tarter 2003).
132: There are roughly 2,000 FGKM stars within 50 parsecs that meet these
133: criteria.
134:
135: Over the past 5 years the number of stars being monitored by
136: our precision Doppler programs has increased from $\sim$500
137: to nearly all 2,000 primary targets within 50 pc. We
138: are carrying out northern hemisphere surveys with the Lick 3--m telescope
139: (Fischer et al. 2003) and Keck 10--m telescope (Vogt et al. 2002), and
140: southern surveys with the AAT 3.9--m (Tinney et al. 2003) and the
141: Magellan 6.5--m telescopes. These programs have yielded 75 of the
142: 110 published extrasolar planets (Butler et al. 2002).
143:
144: In 2002 the guaranteed allocation to our AAT planet search
145: program was increased from 20 to 32 nights per year. In
146: response two changes were made. Sixty new stars were added,
147: and observations with S/N $>$200 were demanded for all stars.
148: In this paper we report two new planets from this survey, a
149: planet around HD 154857 including evidence of a second more
150: distant companion, and a second planet around HD 160691.
151:
152:
153: \section{Doppler Velocities and Keplerian Fits}
154:
155: High resolution spectra, R $\sim$ 50000, are taken with the
156: UCLES echelle spectrometer (Diego et al. 1990) on the 3.9--m
157: Anglo--Australian Telescope. These spectra span the wavelength
158: range from 4820--8550 \AA. An iodine absorption cell
159: (Marcy \& Butler 1992) provides wavelength calibration from
160: 5000 to 6100 \AA. The spectrometer PSF is derived from the detailed
161: shapes of the embedded iodine lines (Valenti et al. 1995;
162: Butler et al. 1996).
163:
164: Figure 1 shows four stable stars from the AAT. These observations
165: span the time interval and the spectral types of the two planet
166: bearing stars reported in this paper. The Doppler analysis
167: technique is outlined in Butler et al. (1996). Over the past
168: year numerous improvements have been made to this algorithm.
169: The long term single--shot precision of chromospherically quiet
170: G and K stars is currently 2 \ms. Similar systems on the
171: Lick 3--m, Keck 10--m and VLT2 8--m telescopes currently yield
172: photon--limited precision of 3 \ms (Butler \& Marcy 1997;
173: Vogt et al. 2000; Butler et al. 2001; Butler et al. 2004,
174: Marcy et al. 2004).
175:
176: \subsection{HD 154857}
177:
178: Houk \& Cowley (1975) classify HD 154857 (HIP 84069, SAO 244491) as a
179: G5 dwarf, consistent with its color, $B-V$ $=$ $0.65$. The HIPPARCOS
180: derived distance, 68.5 pc (ESA 1997; Perryman et al. 1996), yields an absolute V
181: magnitude, $M_{\rm V}$ = 3.07, $\sim$2 magnitudes above the main
182: sequence, suggesting that the star is evolved. High metallicity alone is unlikely
183: to produce such a large displacement from the main sequence. Like most evolved
184: stars moving toward subgiant status, HD 154857 is chromospherically
185: quiet with log R'HK = - 5.14 (Henry et al. 1996), but not in a Maunder
186: Minimum state (Wright 2004). The
187: star is photometrically stable with a scatter of 0.008 mag, consistent with
188: HIPPARCOS measurement error (ESA 1997).
189:
190: Spectral synthesis matched to the spectrum of HD 154857
191: (Fischer \& Valenti 2004) yields Teff $=$ $5628$ ($\pm$40) K,
192: log g $=$ $4.06$ ($\pm$0.05), and \vsini $=$ $3.31$ ($\pm$0.3) \kms,
193: consistent with a G5 dwarf evolving toward subgiant status.
194: The derived metallicity, [Fe/H] $=$ $-0.23$ ($\pm$0.03), is slightly lower
195: than for typical field stars (Reid 2001). Interpolation on the grid of stellar models
196: of Girardi et al. (2002) yields a stellar mass of 1.17 ($\pm$0.05) \msun \ and an
197: age of 5 Gyr.
198:
199: A total of 18 observations of HD 154857, taken between 2002 Apr and
200: 2004 Feb, are shown in Figure 2 and listed in Table 1. The median
201: value of internal measurement uncertainties is 3.39 \ms. The dashed
202: line shows the best--fit single Keplerian model. The RMS to this fit
203: is 7.66 \ms, yielding $\chi_{\nu}$ = 2.21. The poor quality of this
204: fit motivated the addition of a linear trend to the Keplerian. The
205: solid line shows the resulting best--fit Keplerian plus linear trend.
206: The RMS to this fit is 3.15 \ms, yielding $\chi_{\nu}$ = 0.87. The
207: period of the Keplerian is 398.5 d, the semiamplitude is 52 \ms, and
208: the eccentricity is 0.51, yielding a minimum (\msini) mass of 1.80
209: \msun \ and a semimajor axis of 1.11 AU. The linear trend of -14 \ms
210: per year is presumably due to an additional companion with a period
211: much longer than 2 years and a semiamplitude greater than 14 \ms.
212: Astrometry from HIPPARCOS reveals no wobble at the level of 1 mas (ESA
213: 1997). This places no useful constraint on the outer companion as its
214: orbital period is longer than the HIPPARCOS mission duration of 3
215: years, allowing any astrometric wobble to be absorbed in the solution
216: for proper motion.
217:
218: \subsection{HD 160691}
219:
220: The Bright Star Catalog (Hoffleit \& Jaschek 1982) assigns a spectral type
221: of G3 IV-V to HD 160691 (HR 6585, HIP 86796, GL 691, Mu Ara), in
222: reasonable agreement with numerous other determinations (see SIMBAD)
223: that typically yield G5 V. The HIPPARCOS distance of HD 160691
224: is 15.3 pc, yielding an absolute magnitude of $M_{\rm V}$ $=$ $4.23$.
225: The star is photometrically stable within HIPPARCOS measurement error,
226: exhibiting photometric scatter of 0.002 magnitudes, and is chromospherically
227: inactive, with log$R$'(HK) = $-$5.02 (Henry et al. 1996).
228:
229: Spectral synthesis models fit to our high resolution spectrum of HD 160691
230: (Fischer \& Valenti 2004) yield Teff $=$ $5807$ ($\pm$30) K,
231: log g $=$ $4.37$ ($\pm$0.05), and \vsini $=$ $4.07$ ($\pm$0.3) \kms.
232: The derived metallicity, [Fe/H] $=$ $+0.263$ ($\pm$0.03), is consistent
233: with previous determinations (Favata et al. 1997; Bensby et al. 2003).
234: Interpolation on the grid of stellar models by Girardi et al. (2002) yields a
235: stellar mass of 1.08 ($\pm$0.05) \msun \ and an age of 6 Gyr.
236:
237: Based on 2 years of AAT data, Butler et al. (2001) reported a
238: planet with a 2 year period orbiting HD 160691. With 4 years
239: of data, Jones et al. (2003) confirmed this planet and found an
240: additional linear trend. Table 2 lists the 45 observations of
241: HD 160691 that now span 5.8 years. These measurements, shown
242: in Figure 3, have a median internal uncertainty of 2.76 \ms.
243: The RMS to the best--fit Keplerian model plus a linear trend (solid line)
244: is 8.84 \ms. With $\chi_{\nu}$ = 2.60 this model no longer
245: adequately fits the data.
246:
247: Figure 4 shows a double Keplerian fit to the data. The periods of
248: these two Keplerian models are 1.76 and 8.17 years, with orbital
249: eccentricities of 0.20 and 0.57, semiamplitudes of 38 and 51 \ms,
250: minimum (\msini) masses of 1.67 and 3.10 \mjup, and semimajor axes of
251: 1.50 and 4.16 AU respectively. This double Keplerian model represents
252: a significant improvement over the single Keplerian model with a
253: linear trend, with residuals yielding RMS = 4.66 \ms and $\chi_{\nu}$
254: = 1.60. Nonetheless, other fits, with somewhat different periods and
255: eccentricities may have only slightly worse values of RMS scatter and
256: $\chi_{\nu}$. Multi-Keplerian best fits can occasionally yield
257: solutions which are not dynamically stable (Gozdziewski, Konacki \&
258: Maciejewski, 2003). Sophisticated dynamical analyses of this system,
259: such as those which impose the assumption of orbital stability, employ
260: Jacobi coordinates (e.g. Lee \& Peale, 2003; Gozdziewski, Konacki \&
261: Maciejewski, 2003), and which use genetic algorithms to derive superior
262: inital guesses are warrented, but beyond the scope of the present
263: paper. Table 3 shows the orbital parameters for these two planets as
264: well as the those of the companion to HD 154857.
265:
266: Figure 5 shows each of the Keplerian orbits separately. While the
267: period of the inner planet is tightly constrained with more than 3
268: full orbits observed, the outer planet is somewhat under constrained
269: with observations spanning only 70\% of the full period. HIPPARCOS
270: astrometry reveals no wobble above standard errors of $\sim$1 mas.
271: The outer companion would cause a wobble easily absorbed into the
272: solution for proper motion.
273:
274: Based on these fits, the maximum angular separation of the outer
275: planet, HD 160691c, from the star is expected to be $\alpha =
276: a(1+e)/d$ = 0.43 arcsec. This planet is detectable by future imaging
277: systems that achieve resolution ($\sim 4 \lambda / d$) of less than
278: 0.4 arcsec and that carefully suppresses the wings of the PSF due to
279: mirror roughness, including proposed space--based programs such as
280: ECLIPSE (Easley \& Trauger 2003), and ground based efforts at
281: VLT\footnote{http://www.eso.org/instruments} and
282: Gemini\footnote{http://www.gemini.edu/science}.
283:
284: Future astrometry with precision of better than 1 mas, such as that
285: offered by the Hubble Space Telescope and its Fine Guidance Sensor
286: (Benedict et al. 2002) or by SIM, can also detect HD
287: 160691c, however a duration of $\sim$ 8 yr would be required.
288:
289: \section{Discussion}
290:
291: Multiple planet systems are revealed considerably more slowly than
292: single--planets. For ``hierarchical'' systems with widely separated
293: planets, the inner planet usually induces the largest Doppler wobble
294: in the host star, making it typically detectable first, as occurred
295: with 55 Cancri (Marcy et al. 2002) and $\upsilon$ And (Butler et al. 1999;
296: Butler et al. 1997). For cases where the periods of both planets are
297: short, the most massive planet may be revealed first, as with GL 876
298: (Marcy et al. 2001). Detectability stems from both the amplitude of
299: the Doppler signal and the number of cycles that have transpired during
300: the string of observations.
301:
302: Both of the systems reported in this paper are of the first type, with
303: the inner planet detected first. For the case of HD 154857, the
304: presumed outer companion is detected only as a linear trend at this
305: time. Similarly, the existence of the second companions to HD 160691
306: and to 55 Cancri were first reported as a linear trends (e.g., Jones
307: et al. 2002).
308:
309: Based on the results of Jones et al. (2002), Bois et al. (2003)
310: carried out a study of the dynamic stability of the HD 160691 system.
311: They concluded that the two planets must be in a 2:1 mean motion
312: resonance, and that the outer companion should be in a highly eccentric
313: (e $>$ 0.52) orbit. With the identical data set, Gozdziewski et
314: al. (2003) conclude that this system cannot be in a 2:1 mean motion
315: resonance, and that if the semimajor axis of the outer companion is
316: smaller than 5.2 AU the system should be in a low-order mean motion
317: resonance (``3:1, 7:2, 4:1, 5:1, or to their vicinity''), and that the
318: eccentricity of the outer companion should be less than 0.5.
319:
320: With data covering only $\sim$70\% of the orbit, the orbital
321: parameters of the outer companion to HD 160691 have relatively large
322: uncertainties. Nonetheless the lower limit of the period of HD
323: 160691c is 8 yr, ruling out a 2:1 mean motion resonance with the
324: inner planet ($P$=1.76 yr). Similarly, mean--motion resonances of 3:1
325: and 4:1 seem ruled out. A 5:1 mean motion resonance remains plausible
326: as is one of 9:2 ratio. The orbital eccentricity of the outer planet,
327: however, remains poorly constrained.
328:
329: Both of these systems highlight the importance of long term monitoring
330: and of Doppler measurement precision. Neither the second planet to HD
331: 160691 nor the linear trend to HD 154857 would be detectable with
332: measurement uncertainties greater than 7 \ms. The outer planet around
333: HD 160691 is one of only a few known extrasolar planets that is separated
334: from its host star at apastron by over 0.4 arcsec, making it a prime target for
335: future efforts designed to directly image extrasolar planets.
336:
337: \acknowledgements
338:
339: We gratefully acknowledge the superb technical support at the
340: Anglo--Australian Telescope which has been critical to the success of
341: this project -- in particular E. Penny, R. Paterson, D. Stafford,
342: F. Freeman, S. Lee, J. Pogson, and G. Schaffer. We further
343: acknowledge the UK and Australian government support of the
344: Anglo-Australian Telescope through their PPARC and DETYA funding to
345: HRAJ, AJP, \& CGT. We received support from NSF grant AST-9988087 and
346: travel support from the Carnegie Institution of Washington (to RPB),
347: NASA grant NAG5-8299 and NSF grant AST95-20443 (to GWM), and from Sun
348: Microsystems. We thank the Australian and UK Telescope assignment
349: committees (ATAC \& PATT) for allocations of telescope time. This
350: research has made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System, and the
351: SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.
352:
353: \clearpage
354:
355: \begin{thebibliography}{}
356: %\parsep 0pt
357: %\itemsep -3pt
358:
359: \bibitem[Benedict { et~al.} 2002]{Benedict03}
360: Benedict, G.~F., McArthur, B.~E., Forveille, T.,
361: Delfosse, X., Nelan, E., Butler, R.~P., Spiesman, W.,
362: Marcy, G.~W., Goldman, B., Perrier, C.,
363: Jefferys, W.~H. \& Mayor, M. 2002,
364: \newblock { ApJ Letters, }, 581, L115.
365:
366: \bibitem[Bensby { et~al.} 2003]{Bensby03}
367: Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., \& Lundstroem, I. 2003,
368: \newblock { A\&A, }, 410, 527.
369:
370: \bibitem[Bois { et~al.} 2003]{Bois03}
371: Bois, E., Kiseleva-Eggleton, L.,
372: Rambaux, N., \& Pilat-Lohinger, E. 2003
373: \newblock { ApJ, }, 598, 1392.
374:
375: \bibitem[Butler { et~al.} 1996]{BuMaWi96}
376: Butler, R.~P., Marcy, G.~W., Williams, E., McCarthy, C.,
377: Dosanjh, P., \& Vogt, S.~S. 1996,
378: \newblock { PASP }, {108}, 500
379:
380: \bibitem[Butler \& Marcy 1997]{BuMa97}
381: Butler, R.~P. \& Marcy, G.~W. 1997, in ``Brown Dwarfs and
382: Extrasolar Planets'', ed. R.Rebolo, E.L.Martin,
383: \& M.R.Zapatero Osorio, ASP Conference Series 134, p. 162.
384:
385: \bibitem[Butler { et~al.} 1997]{BuMaWi97}
386: Butler, R.~P., Marcy, G.~W., Williams, E.,
387: Hauser, H., \& Shirts, P. 1997,
388: \newblock { ApJ Letters }, 474, L115.
389:
390: \bibitem[Butler { et~al.} 1999]{BuMaWi99}
391: Butler, R.~P., Marcy, G.~W., Fischer, D.~A.,
392: Brown, T.~M., Contos, A.~R., Korzennik, S.~G.,
393: Nisenson, P., \& Noyes, R.~W. 1999,
394: \newblock { ApJ }, 526, 916.
395:
396: \bibitem[Butler { et~al.} 2001]{AAT01}
397: Butler, R.~P., Tinney, C.~G., Marcy, G.~W.,
398: Jones, H.~R.~A., Penny, A.~J. \& Apps, K. 2001,
399: \newblock { ApJ }, 555, 410.
400:
401: \bibitem[Butler { et~al.} 2002]{HD83443:02}
402: Butler, R.~P., Marcy, G.~W., Vogt, S.~S., Tinney, C.~G.,
403: Jones, H.~R.~A., McCarthy, C., Penny, A.~J.,
404: Apps, K., \& Carter, B.~D. 2002,
405: \newblock { ApJ }, 578, 565.
406:
407: \bibitem[Butler { et~al.} 2004]{VLT:04}
408: Butler, R.~P., Bedding, T.~R., Kjeldsen, H., McCarthy, C.,
409: O'Toole, S.~J., Tinney, C.~G., Marcy, G.~W., Wright, J.~T. 2004,
410: \newblock { ApJ Letters}, 600, L75.
411:
412: \bibitem[Charbonneau { et~al.} 2002]{Charbon02}
413: Charbonneau, D, Brown, T.~M., Noyes, R.~W. \& Gilliland, R.~L. 2002,
414: \newblock { ApJ, } 568, 377.
415:
416: \bibitem[Diego { et~al.} 1991]{diego:90}
417: Diego, F., Charalambous, A., Fish, A.~C., \& Walker, D.~D. 1990,
418: Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instr. Eng., 1235, 562
419:
420: \bibitem[ESA 1997]{esa97}
421: ESA 1997, Vizier Online Data Catalog, HIPPARCOS, 1239.
422:
423: \bibitem[Easley \& Trauger 2004]{easley04}
424: Easley, M.~A. \& Trauger,J.T. 2004,
425: in "UV/Optical/IR space Telescopes: Innovative Technologies and Concepts",
426: ed MacEwen,H.A., in Proceedings of the SPIE, v.5166, p172.
427:
428: \bibitem[Favata { et~al.} 1997]{Fav97}
429: Favata, F., Micela, G., \& Sciortino, S. 1997,
430: \newblock { A\&A }, {323}, 809
431:
432: \bibitem[Fischer { et~al.} 2003]{Fischer2003}
433: Fischer, D.~A., Marcy, G.~W., Butler, R.~P.,
434: Vogt, S.~S., Henry, G.~W., Pourbaix, D.,
435: Walp, B., Misch, A.~A. \& Wright, J.~T. 2003,
436: \newblock { ApJ, } 586, 1394.
437:
438: \bibitem[Fischer \& Valenti 2004]{FischVal04}
439: Fischer, D.~A. \& Valenti, J 2004,
440: \newblock { ApJ, } submitted.
441:
442: \bibitem[Girardi { et~al.} 2002]{Girardi02}
443: Girardi, L, Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., Chiosi, C.,
444: Groenewegen, M.~A.~T., Marigo, P.,
445: Salasnich, B. \& Weiss, A. 2002,
446: \newblock { A\&A, } 391, 195.
447:
448: \bibitem[Gozdziewski { et~al.} 2003]{Goz03}
449: Gozdziewski, K., Konacki, M., \& Maciejewski, A.~J. 2003,
450: \newblock { ApJ }, 594, 1019
451:
452: \bibitem[Henry { et~al.} 1996]{Henry96}
453: Henry, T. J., Soderblom, D. R., Donahue, R. A., \& Baliunas, S. L. 1996,
454: \newblock { AJ, } {111}, 439
455:
456: \bibitem[Hoffleit 1982]{Hoff82}
457: Hoffleit, D. \& Jaschek, C. 1982, {\it Yale Bright Star Catalogue},
458: 4th edition (Yale University, New Haven).
459:
460: \bibitem[Houk \& Cowley 1975]{Houk75}
461: Houk, N. \& Cowley, A.~P. 1975,
462: {\it Michigan Catalog of Two Dimensional Spectral Types for the HD Stars},
463: (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan).
464:
465: \bibitem[Jones 2002]{jones02}
466: Jones, H.~R.~A., Butler, R.~P., Marcy, G.~W., Tinney, C.~G.,
467: Penny, A.~J., McCarthy, C., \& Carter, B.~D. 2002,
468: \newblock { MNRAS }, 337, 1170.
469:
470: \bibitem[Marcy \& Butler 1992]{MaBu92}
471: Marcy, G.~W. \& Butler, R.~P. 1992,
472: \newblock { PASP }, {104}, 270.
473:
474: \bibitem[Marcy { et~al.} 2001]{gl876:01}
475: Marcy, G.~W., Butler, R.~P., Fischer, D.~A.,
476: Vogt, S.~S., Lissauer, J.~J., Rivera, E.~J. 2001,
477: \newblock { ApJ, } 556, 296.
478:
479: \bibitem[Marcy { et~al.} 2002]{55can:02}
480: Marcy, G.~W., Butler, R.~P., Fischer, D.~A.,
481: Laughlin, G., Vogt, S.~S., Henry, G.~W., \& Pourbaix, D. 2002,
482: \newblock { ApJ, } 581, 1375.
483:
484: \bibitem[Marcy { et~al.} 2004]{marcy:04}
485: Marcy, G.~W., Butler, R.~P., Vogt, S.~S., Fischer, D.~A.,
486: Henry, G.~W., Laughlin, G., Wright, J.~T., \& Johnson, J. 2004,
487: \newblock { ApJ, } submitted.
488:
489: \bibitem[Perryman { et~al.} 1997]{Perry97}
490: Perryman, M.~A.~C., et al. 1997, { A\&A }, 323, L49.
491: The HIPPARCOS Catalog
492:
493: \bibitem[Reid 2002]{Reid02}
494: Reid, I.~N. 2002, PASP, 114, 306.
495:
496: \bibitem[Tinney { et~al.} 2003]{TinBut03}
497: Tinney, C.~G., Butler, R.~P., Marcy, G.~W., Jones, H.~R.~A.,
498: Penny, A.~J., McCarthy, C., Carter, B.~D., \& Bond, J. 2003,
499: \newblock { ApJ, } 587, 423.
500:
501: \bibitem[Turnbull \& Tarter 2003]{TurnTart03}
502: Turnbull, M.~C. \& Tarter, J.~C. 2003,
503: \newblock { ApJS, } 145, 181.
504:
505: \bibitem[Valenti { et~al.} 1995]{VaBuMa95}
506: Valenti, J., Butler, R.~P., \& Marcy, G.~W. 1995,
507: \newblock { PASP }, {107}, 966
508:
509: \bibitem[Vogt { et~al.} 2000]{vogt:00}
510: Vogt, S.~S., Marcy,G.W., Butler,R.P., \& Apps,K. 2000,
511: \newblock { ApJ, } {536}, 902
512:
513: \bibitem[Vogt { et~al.} 2002]{vogt:02}
514: Vogt, S.~S., Butler, R.~P., Marcy, G.~W., Fischer, D.~A.,
515: Dimitri, P., Apps, K., Laughlin, G. 2002,
516: \newblock { ApJ, } {568}, 352.
517:
518:
519: \bibitem[Wright { et~al.} 2004]{wrighta:04}
520: Wright, J.~T., Marcy, G.~W., Butler, R.~P. \& Vogt, S.~S. 2004,
521: \newblock { ApJ Supp, } in press.
522:
523: \bibitem[Wright 2004]{wrightb:04}
524: Wright, J.~T. 2004,
525: \newblock { ApJ, } in press.
526:
527: \end{thebibliography}
528:
529: \clearpage
530: \vspace{-0.5in}
531: \begin{figure}
532: \epsscale{0.8}
533: \plotone{fig1.ps}
534: \caption{AAT Doppler velocities of chromospherically quiet
535: G and K dwarfs and subgiants. These observations span the
536: full 6 years of the AAT Planet Search Project.}
537: \label{fig1}
538: \end{figure}
539:
540: \begin{figure}
541: \vspace{-0.5in}
542: \plotone{fig2.ps}
543: \caption{Doppler velocities for HD 154857. The dashed line is the
544: best--fit Keplerian. The RMS of 7.66 \ms is significantly worse
545: than the median measurement uncertainty of 3.39 \ms. The solid
546: line shows the best--fit Keplerian model with an additional linear trend.
547: The RMS of 3.15 \ms is consistent with measurement uncertainty.
548: The period of this Keplerian model is 398.5 d, the semiamplitude is
549: 52 \ms, the eccentricity is 0.51, yielding a minimum mass of
550: 1.80 \mjup \ and a semimajor axis of 1.11 AU. The linear trend
551: is presumably due to a companion with a period much longer than
552: 2 years and a mass significantly greater than 1 \mjup.}
553: \label{fig2}
554: \end{figure}
555:
556: \begin{figure}
557: \vspace{-0.5in}
558: \plotone{fig3.ps}
559: \caption{Doppler velocities for HD 160691. The solid line is
560: the best--fit Keplerian plus linear trend. The RMS to this
561: model is 8.84 \ms, significantly worse than the median internal
562: measurement uncertainty of 2.76 \ms.}
563: \label{fig3}
564: \end{figure}
565:
566: \begin{figure}
567: \vspace{-0.5in}
568: \plotone{fig4.ps}
569: \caption{A double Keplerian fit to HD 160691. The inner Keplerian
570: has a period of 645 d, and eccentricity of 0.20, and a semiamplitude
571: of 38 \ms, yielding a minimum mass of 1.68 \mjup \ and a semimajor
572: axis of 1.50 AU. The outer Keplerian has a period of 8.2 yr,
573: an eccentricity of 0.57, and a semiamplitude of 51 \ms, yielding
574: a minimum mass of 3.1 \mjup \ and a semimajor axis of 4.16 AU.
575: The RMS to this model is 4.66 \ms (1.69 $\sigma$)}
576: \label{fig4}
577: \end{figure}
578:
579: \begin{figure}
580: \vspace{-0.5in}
581: \plotone{fig5.ps}
582: \caption{Individual Keplerian models to HD 160691. Each of the
583: two Keplerian models from Figure 4 is shown separately. The
584: top figure shows the 645 d Keplerian, while the bottom
585: figure shows the 8.17 yr Keplerian. Approximately 70\%
586: of the outer Keplerian has been observed.}
587: \label{fig5}
588: \end{figure}
589:
590: \clearpage
591:
592: \begin{deluxetable}{rrr}
593: \tablenum{1}
594: \tablecaption{Velocities for HD 154857}
595: \label{velbd-103166}
596: \tablewidth{0pt}
597: \tablehead{
598: JD & RV & error \\
599: (-2450000) & (m s$^{-1}$) & (m s$^{-1}$)
600: }
601: \startdata
602: \tableline
603: 2389.2358 & -14.6 & 3.4 \\
604: 2390.2122 & -16.9 & 3.2 \\
605: 2422.1371 & -30.6 & 3.0 \\
606: 2453.0198 & -24.1 & 2.8 \\
607: 2455.0253 & -25.0 & 3.9 \\
608: 2455.9766 & -27.6 & 3.6 \\
609: 2509.9485 & -28.0 & 4.5 \\
610: 2510.9162 & -18.4 & 3.7 \\
611: 2711.2461 & 52.9 & 5.6 \\
612: 2745.2427 & 50.8 & 3.7 \\
613: 2747.2115 & 49.2 & 3.4 \\
614: 2750.1777 & 40.9 & 3.0 \\
615: 2751.2291 & 34.6 & 2.7 \\
616: 2784.1264 & -27.3 & 2.6 \\
617: 2857.0297 & -44.9 & 5.1 \\
618: 2857.9860 & -43.8 & 2.8 \\
619: 2942.9120 & -28.7 & 3.3 \\
620: 3044.2691 & -2.4 & 3.5 \\
621: \enddata
622: \end{deluxetable}
623:
624: \clearpage
625:
626: \begin{deluxetable}{rrr}
627: \tablenum{2}
628: \tablecaption{Velocities for HD 160691}
629: \label{vel160691}
630: \tablewidth{0pt}
631: \tablehead{
632: JD & RV & error \\
633: (-2450000) & (m s$^{-1}$) & (m s$^{-1}$)
634: }
635: \startdata
636: \tableline
637: 915.2911 & -18.8 & 5.1 \\
638: 1118.8874 & -4.9 & 2.7 \\
639: 1119.9022 & -9.9 & 2.4 \\
640: 1120.8870 & -8.7 & 2.4 \\
641: 1121.8928 & -8.0 & 2.6 \\
642: 1236.2864 & -35.4 & 3.6 \\
643: 1410.8977 & -47.8 & 2.4 \\
644: 1413.8981 & -43.0 & 2.2 \\
645: 1630.3042 & 36.0 & 2.8 \\
646: 1683.0926 & 41.4 & 2.9 \\
647: 1684.1320 & 38.4 & 3.5 \\
648: 1718.1184 & 26.5 & 3.1 \\
649: 1742.9096 & 13.4 & 2.8 \\
650: 1743.9240 & 24.0 & 3.1 \\
651: 1745.0440 & 14.5 & 2.8 \\
652: 1766.9330 & 9.9 & 2.3 \\
653: 1767.9689 & 8.7 & 2.5 \\
654: 1827.8973 & -5.0 & 2.4 \\
655: 1828.8866 & -2.3 & 3.1 \\
656: 1829.8890 & -2.4 & 3.4 \\
657: 1855.9058 & -10.7 & 4.4 \\
658: 1984.2618 & -25.1 & 3.1 \\
659: 2010.2829 & -30.8 & 5.3 \\
660: 2061.1132 & -29.2 & 2.9 \\
661: 2091.9807 & -28.0 & 2.6 \\
662: 2126.9766 & -13.1 & 2.9 \\
663: 2151.9693 & -2.7 & 2.7 \\
664: 2152.9493 & -2.9 & 2.3 \\
665: 2153.8626 & 2.8 & 2.6 \\
666: 2186.9095 & 18.1 & 2.2 \\
667: 2187.8879 & 19.5 & 2.4 \\
668: 2360.3245 & 28.7 & 2.2 \\
669: 2387.1722 & 29.2 & 2.3 \\
670: 2388.2097 & 25.9 & 2.4 \\
671: 2421.1696 & 10.9 & 2.2 \\
672: 2425.1226 & 18.3 & 2.8 \\
673: 2455.0437 & 10.6 & 2.8 \\
674: 2509.9587 & 4.0 & 3.0 \\
675: 2712.1925 & -42.4 & 3.5 \\
676: 2745.2553 & -22.7 & 2.5 \\
677: 2752.1799 & -20.7 & 2.8 \\
678: 2785.1422 & -1.8 & 2.8 \\
679: 2857.0201 & 27.3 & 1.8 \\
680: 2860.9744 & 25.2 & 2.6 \\
681: 3044.2886 & 14.0 & 2.9 \\
682: \enddata
683: \end{deluxetable}
684:
685: \clearpage
686:
687: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
688: \tablenum{3}
689: \tablecaption{Orbital Parameters}
690: \label{orbit}
691: \tablewidth{0pt}
692: \tablehead{
693: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{HD 154857\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{HD 160691b} & \colhead{HD 160691c}
694: }
695: \startdata
696: Orbital period $P$ (d) & 398.5 (9) & 645.5 (3) & 2986 (30) \\
697: Velocity amp. $K$ (m\,s$^{-1}$) & 52 (5) & 38 (2) & 51 (7) \\
698: Eccentricity $e$ & 0.51 (0.06) & 0.20 (0.03) & 0.57 (0.1) \\
699: $\omega$ (deg) & 50 (11) & 294 (9) & 161 (8) \\
700: Periastron Time (JD) & 2451963 (10) & 2450645.5 (4) & 2450541 (96) \\
701: Msini (\mjup) & 1.80 (0.27) & 1.67 (0.11) & 3.10 (0.71) \\
702: a (AU) & 1.11 (0.02) & 1.50 (0.02) & 4.17 (0.07) \\
703: RMS (\ms) & 3.15 & 4.66 & --- \\
704: \enddata
705: \tablenotetext{a}{Additional Slope is -14.3 $\pm$3.5 \ms per yr.}
706:
707:
708: \tablecomments{Errors in fit parameters (1-$\sigma$, shown in
709: parenthesis), are derived from formal Monte Carlo tests. Error in the
710: derived quantities $Msini$ and $a$ reflect the quadrature sum of
711: 1-$\sigma$ errors in fit Keplerian parameters and stellar mass.}
712:
713: \end{deluxetable}
714:
715: \clearpage
716: \end{document}
717: