1: %MS#
2: %\documentclass[referee]{aa}
3: \documentclass{aa}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: \usepackage{psfig}
6: %\usepackage{txfonts}
7: \newcommand{\mincir}{\raise
8: -2.truept\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{$\sim$}}\raise5.truept \hbox{$<$}\ }}
9: \newcommand{\magcir}{\raise
10: -2.truept\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{$\sim$}}\raise5.truept \hbox{$>$}\ }}
11: \newcommand{\hm}{\,h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}}
12: \begin{document}
13: %\twocolumn[
14:
15: %\thesaurus{12.12.1; 12.03.1; 12.04.2 }
16:
17: \title{Simulating the Soft X-ray excess in clusters of galaxies}
18:
19: \author{L.-M. Cheng\inst{1,2,3,4} \and S. Borgani\inst{1,4}
20: \and P. Tozzi\inst{5} \and L. Tornatore\inst{1,4} \and
21: A. Diaferio\inst{6} \and K. Dolag\inst{7} \and
22: X.-T. He\inst{2} \and
23: L. Moscardini\inst{8} \and G. Murante\inst{9}
24: %\and V. Springel \inst{6}
25: \and G. Tormen\inst{10}}
26:
27: \offprints{L.-M. Cheng}
28: \mail{cheng@ts.astro.it}
29: \institute{Dipartimento di Astronomia dell'Universit\'a di Trieste,
30: via Tiepolo 11, I-34131 Trieste, Italy
31: \and
32: Department of Astronomy, Beijing Normal University,
33: Beijing 100875, China
34: \and
35: National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
36: Beijing 100012, China
37: \and
38: INFN-National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Trieste, Italy
39: \and
40: INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, via Tiepolo 11,
41: I-34131 Trieste, Italy
42: \and
43: Dipartimento di Fisica Generale ``Amedeo Avogadro'', Universit\'a
44: degli Studi di Torino, Torino, Italy
45: \and
46: Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild Strasse
47: 1, Garching bei M\"unchen, Germany
48: \and
49: Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a di Bologna, via Ranzani
50: 1, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
51: \and
52: INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino, Strada Osservatorio 20,
53: I-10025 Pino Torinese, Italy
54: \and
55: Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a di Padova, vicolo
56: dell'Osservatorio 2, I-35122 Padova, Italy
57: }
58:
59: %\date{Received 00 January, 2004; accepted}
60:
61: \titlerunning{Soft X-ray excess}
62: \authorrunning{Cheng et al.}
63:
64:
65: \abstract{The detection of excess of soft X-ray or Extreme Ultraviolet
66: (EUV) radiation, above the thermal contribution from the hot
67: intracluster medium (ICM), has been a controversial subject ever since
68: the initial discovery of this phenomenon. We use a large--scale
69: hydrodynamical simulation of a concordance $\Lambda$CDM model, to
70: investigate the possible thermal origin for such an excess in a set of
71: 20 simulated clusters having temperatures in the range 1--7 keV.
72: Simulated clusters are analysed by mimicking the observational
73: procedure applied to ROSAT--PSPC data, which for the first time showed
74: evidences for the soft X--ray excess: we compare the low--energy
75: (e.g. [0.2--1] keV) part of the spectrum of each cluster with that
76: predicted for a plasma having temperature and metallicity computed
77: after weighting by emissivity in a harder band (e.g., [1--2] keV). For
78: cluster--centric distances $0.4< R/R_{\rm vir}< 0.7$ we detect a
79: significant excess in most of the simulated clusters, whose relative
80: amount changes from cluster to cluster and, for the same
81: cluster, by changing the projection direction. In about 30 per cent of
82: the cases, the soft X--ray flux is measured to be at least 50 per cent
83: larger than predicted by the one--temperature plasma model. We find
84: that this excess is generated in most cases within the cluster
85: virialized regions. It is mainly contributed by low--entropy and
86: high--density gas associated with merging sub--halos, rather than to
87: diffuse warm gas. Only in a few cases the excess arises from
88: fore/background groups observed in projection, while no evidence is
89: found for a significant contribution from gas lying within
90: large--scale filaments. We compute the distribution of the relative
91: soft excess, as a function of the cluster--centric distance, and
92: compare it with the observational result by Bonamente et al. (2003)
93: for the Coma cluster. Similar to observations, we find that the
94: relative excess increases with the distance from the cluster center,
95: with no significant excess detected for $R<0.4R_{\rm vir}$. However,
96: an excess as large as that reported for the Coma cluster at scales
97: $0.4\mincir R/R_{\rm vir}\mincir 0.7$ is found to be rather unusual in
98: our set of simulated clusters.
99:
100:
101: \keywords{cosmology: numerical simulation --- galaxies: clusters ---
102: intergalactic medium --- large-scale structure of universe ---
103: Soft X-rays: diffuse filament}}
104:
105: \maketitle
106: \section{Introduction}
107: Clusters of galaxies provide a reservoir of baryons in the form of a
108: hot plasma with typical temperatures of $10^7$--$10^8$ K, which emits
109: over a broad band from Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) to $\sim 10$ keV
110: X--rays. Most of the observed X-ray features of clusters can be well
111: accounted for within the framework of thermal bremsstrahlung emission
112: plus emission lines associated to the metal content of the
113: intra--cluster medium (ICM). However, a number of observations with
114: the Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer (EUVE; e.g. Lieu et al. 1996a,b;
115: Mittaz et al. 1998; Maloney \& Bland-Hawthorn 2001), ROSAT
116: (e.g. Bonamente et al. 2001a,b) and XMM-Newton (e.g. Finoguenov et
117: al. 2003; Kaastra et al. 2003) have claimed the detection of an excess
118: of EUV and soft X-ray emission in the spectrum of several clusters,
119: with respect to what expected from a one--temperature plasma model.
120:
121: A number of suggestions have been proposed for the origin of this
122: excess, the two most popular scenarios being the non--thermal origin
123: from inverse Compton scattering of the cosmic microwave background
124: photons by relativistic electrons in the intracluster gas (e.g. Hwang
125: 1997; En$\beta$lin \& Biermann 1998; De Paolis et al. 2003), and the
126: thermal origin due to warm gas at $T\sim 10^6\,K$, either from inside
127: clusters or from diffuse filaments outside clusters (Lieu et
128: al. 1996b; Nevalainen et al. 2003). However, the existence of the
129: excess has been disputed by Bowyer et al. (1999), who argued that the
130: EUV excess is an artifact caused by improper subtraction of the
131: instrumental background (see also Berghofer \& Bowyer 2002; Durret et
132: al. 2002), although they concluded that a relatively weak EUV excess
133: in the Virgo and Coma clusters may be real. Bregman et al. (2004) also
134: argued that the excess may be caused by an improper inclusion in the
135: data analysis of the effect of fluctuations of the galactic hydrogen
136: column density.
137:
138: Even within the framework of the thermal models, it is a matter of
139: debate whether the gas responsible for the excess is located within
140: clusters or in large--scale filamentary structures. For instance,
141: Ettori (2003) found evidence for as much as $17$ per cent of the
142: baryons in clusters to be presumably in the form of warm
143: ($10^5$--$10^7$ K) material, which must emit EUV or soft X-ray photons
144: in excess to those expected from the hot phase of the ICM. On the
145: other hand, Kaastra et al. (2003) and Finoguenov et al. (2003) claim
146: that the soft excess may have originated in filaments in the gas
147: distribution in the vicinity of clusters.
148:
149: In this paper, we present an analysis of a set of clusters extracted
150: from a large cosmological hydrodynamical simulation (Borgani et
151: al. 2004, Paper I), which is aimed at investigating the presence and
152: origin of a soft X--ray excess in their spectra. By taking advantage
153: of the cosmological environment of our simulation, which includes
154: radiative cooling, star formation and galactic winds triggered by
155: supernova (SN), we ``observe'' clusters in projection and estimate
156: their spectra also including the contribution from the
157: background/foreground large--scale gas distribution. Since in our
158: simulation we treat only thermal emissivity processes, the two main
159: questions that we intend to address are the following: (a) does a
160: realistic description of the evolution of cosmic baryons account for a
161: soft X--ray excess of thermal origin as large as that observed in the
162: spectra of clusters? (b) is the excess associated to warm gas
163: residing within clusters or to large--scale filaments observed in
164: projection?
165:
166: The structure of the paper is as follows. In Section 2 we describe our
167: set of simulated clusters. After describing the procedure to compute
168: the synthetic spectra, we present in Section 3 our results on the
169: excess, its origin and a comparison with observations. We draw our
170: main conclusions in Section 4.
171:
172:
173: \section{The simulated clusters}
174: %\subsection{The simulation}
175: We analyze a representative set of 20 simulated clusters, which are
176: extracted from a cosmological box for a standard flat $\Lambda$CDM
177: cosmological model, with $\Omega_m=0.3, \Omega_\Lambda=0.7$, Hubble
178: constant $H_0=100h$ km s$^{-1}$Mpc$^{-1}$,$h=0.7$, baryon density
179: $\Omega_b=0.04$ and $\sigma_8=0.8$ for the normalization of the power
180: spectrum. The box has side-length of $192h^{-1}\rm Mpc$ and contains
181: $480^3$ dark matter particles and an initially equal number of gas
182: particles, thus resulting in $m_{\rm DM}=4.6\times 10^9 h^{-1}M_\odot$ and
183: $m_{\rm gas}=6.9\times 10^8 h^{-1}M_\odot$ for the mass of the two particle
184: species. The Plummer--equivalent gravitational force softening is set
185: to $7.5\,h^{-1}$kpc in physical units from $z=2$ to $z=0$, while it is
186: kept fixed in comoving units at higher redshift. The SPH smoothing
187: scale is allowed to decrease at most to one--fourth of the
188: gravitational softening (see Paper I, for a more
189: detailed description of this simulation).
190: %The hydrodynamical description of the gas within the whole box allows
191: %us to account for the contribution of the cluster surrounding
192: %environment to the synthetic X--ray spectra.
193:
194: The run has been evolved using {\tt P-GADGET2}, a massively parallel
195: Tree--SPH code (Springel et al. 2001) with fully adaptive time-step
196: integration. The implementation of SPH adopted in the code follows the
197: entropy--conserving formulation by Springel \& Hernquist (2002). The
198: simulation includes a treatment of star formation based on a
199: sub--resolution model of the interstellar medium and the effect of
200: galactic winds powered by SN-II explosions (Springel \& Hernquist
201: 2003, SH03). The code also includes a treatment of metal production
202: from SN-II. The resulting metallicity value, which is assigned to each
203: gas and star particle, has to be interpreted as a global value which
204: is contributed by different heavy elements with solar relative
205: abundances. We exclude those particles from the computation of X--ray
206: emissivity having temperature below $3\times 10^4$ K and gas density
207: above $500\bar\rho_{\rm bar}$, being $\bar\rho_{\rm bar}$ the mean
208: baryon density. Furthermore, following SH03, each gas particle which
209: lies above a limiting density threshold is assumed to be composed of a
210: hot ionized phase and a cold neutral phase, whose relative amounts
211: depend on the local conditions of density and temperature. Since such
212: particles are aimed at describing the multi-phase nature of the
213: inter-stellar medium, we decided to exclude also their contribution in
214: the computation of the ICM X--ray emissivity. Although the number of
215: such particles is always very small, their high density may cause a
216: sizable, although spurious, contribution to the soft X--ray emission.
217:
218: \begin{table*}
219: \caption{\footnotesize The set of simulated clusters. Column 1:
220: Cluster identification; Column 2: virial mass; Column 3: virial
221: radius; Columns 4 and 5: temperature and metallicity within $R_{\rm
222: vir}$, emission--weighted in the [1--2] keV energy band; Columns
223: 6--8: relative soft excess (see eq. \ref{eq:relex}) in the [0.2--1]
224: keV band, computed in the region $0.4<R/R_{\rm vir}<0.7$, by
225: projecting along three orthogonal directions.}
226: \begin{center}
227: \begin{tabular}{cccccccc}
228: %\begin{tabular}{|cccc|}
229: \hline
230: Cluster& $M_{\rm vir}$ & $R_{\rm vir}$& $T_{\rm ew}$ & $Z_{\rm ew}$ & $\eta_x$ & $\eta_y$ & $\eta_z$ \\
231: Index & $[10^{14}h^{-1}M_{\odot}]$ & $[h^{-1}Mpc]$& $[keV]$ & $[Z_{\odot}]$& & & \\
232: \hline
233: CL01 & 1.60& 1.11 & 2.43 & 0.16 &0.97 & 0.19 & 0.10\\
234: CL02 & 2.46& 1.28 & 2.74 & 0.17 &0.12 & 0.80 & 0.53\\
235: CL03 & 2.59& 1.30 & 3.05 & 0.17 &0.17 & 0.18 &0.21\\
236: CL04 & 7.00& 1.82 & 5.12 & 0.13 &0.11 & 0.40 &0.10\\
237: CL05 & 2.00& 1.20 & 2.42 & 0.19 &0.48 & 0.20 &0.21\\
238: CL06 & 1.72& 1.14 & 2.40 & 0.18 &0.17 & 0.17 &0.19\\
239: CL07 & 1.99& 1.20 & 2.59 & 0.14 &0.28 & 0.23 &0.24\\
240: CL08 & 13.0& 2.23 & 6.50 & 0.11 &0.58 & 0.26 &0.36\\
241: CL09 & 2.57& 1.30 & 3.02 & 0.12 &0.53 & 0.44 &0.11\\
242: CL10 & 3.76& 1.48 & 3.74 & 0.11 &0.34 & 0.31 &0.17\\
243: CL11 &1.46 & 1.08 & 2.02 &0.18&0.56 & 0.30 &0.68\\
244: CL12 &1.57 & 1.21 & 1.56 &0.24&0.67 & 0.61 &0.26\\
245: CL13 &1.08 & 0.97 & 1.87 &0.20&0.22 & 1.47 &1.34\\
246: CL14 &1.45 & 1.07 & 2.17 &0.13&1.73 & 1.36 &1.68\\
247: CL15 &2.07 & 1.21 & 2.60 &0.16&0.17 & 0.18 &0.12\\
248: CL16 &1.76 & 1.15 & 1.79 &0.26&0.60 & 0.70 &0.26\\
249: CL17 &6.04 & 1.81 & 5.14 &0.12&0.09 & 0.07 &0.34\\
250: CL18 &1.06 & 1.04 & 1.21 &0.26&1.79 & 1.19 &1.22\\
251: CL19 &3.34 & 1.41 & 3.50 &0.15&0.17 & 0.20 &0.13\\
252: CL20 &2.90 & 1.42 & 2.58 &0.11&0.57 & 0.53 &0.50\\
253:
254: \hline\\[-0.6em]
255: \end{tabular}
256: \end{center}
257: %\begin{enumerate}
258: %\item[$\star$]{\footnotesize ~ Emission-weighted temperature and metallicity
259: %in computed in the [1--2] keV energy band.}
260: %\end{enumerate}
261:
262: \end{table*}
263:
264:
265: %\begin{center}
266: %\begin{figure}
267: % \psfig{figure=fig1.ps.simple,width=88mm,bbllx=80pt,bblly=120pt,bburx=540pt,bbury=650pt,clip=,angle=270}
268: %\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{phase.ps}}
269: %\caption{Density--temperature phase diagram of particles in one simulated
270: %cluster. Hot and cold particles are represented by small points and cross
271: %respectively, while open triangles refer to the particles with a small hot
272: %component.}
273: %\label{f1}
274: %\end{figure}
275: %\end{center}
276:
277: The selected clusters have virial masses spanning about a decade from
278: $\sim 10^{14}h^{-1}M_\odot$ to $\sim 10^{15}h^{-1}M_\odot$ (see Table
279: 1). We did not apply any particular criterion to select the clusters
280: to be analysed and, therefore, our set is representative of the whole
281: cluster population in our simulation within this mass range. For each
282: cluster, we measure the virial radius, $R_{\rm vir}$, as the distance
283: from the most--bound DM particle, which encompasses an average density
284: equal to the virial density for our cosmological model (e.g., Eke et
285: al. 1996). Accordingly, the virial mass, $M_{\rm vir}$, is defined as
286: the mass contained within $R_{\rm vir}$. We refer to Paper I for a
287: description of the cluster identification algorithm that we have
288: applied. The emission--weighted temperature and metallicity in a given
289: energy band used to model the hot ICM also are listed in Table 1.
290: Around each cluster we extract a spherical region extending out to
291: $6\,R_{\rm vir}$. This region is then observed in projection, by
292: extracting a cylinder with axis on the center of each cluster. This
293: allows us to account for the contribution of the surrounding
294: large--scale structure to the X--ray emission of each cluster. As we
295: will show below, taking the fore/back--ground structure out to
296: $6R_{\rm vir}$ is sufficient to obtain converged estimates of this
297: contribution.
298:
299:
300: \section{Analysis and Results}
301:
302: \subsection{Measuring the Soft Excess}
303:
304: The X--ray luminosity contributed by the $i$--th gas particle in the
305: simulation is computed according to
306: \begin{equation}
307: L_{X,i}=(\mu m_p)^{-2}
308: %\sum_i ^{N_{gas}}
309: \left(\frac{n_e}{n_H}\right)_i
310: m_i\rho_i\Lambda(T_i,Z_i;E_1,E_2)
311: \end{equation}
312: where $m_i$ and $\rho_i$ are the mass and the density of the hot phase
313: of that particle, respectively, $\mu$ is the mean molecular weight,
314: $n_e$ and $n_H$ are the number densities of electrons and protons,
315: respectively. The cooling function
316: $\Lambda(T,Z;E_1,E_2)$ is calculated within the energy band
317: [$E_1$--$E_2$] using the plasma emission model by Raymond \& Smith
318: (1977), where $Z$ is the gas metallicity. Using this cooling
319: function, the spectra are computed by binning the emissivity within
320: energy intervals, so as to have an energy resolution $\Delta \log
321: E=0.01$.
322:
323: In their analysis of the soft X--ray excess of the Coma cluster from
324: ROSAT--PSPC data, Bonamente et al. (2003) apply a MEKAL model to fit
325: the high--energy ([1--2] keV) portion of the spectrum. Then they
326: extrapolate the best--fitting model to a lower energy ([0.2--1] keV) band,
327: where the predicted spectrum is compared with the actually observed
328: one. In order to reproduce this same procedure, we would be
329: required to simulate mock observations of our simulated clusters, and
330: extract a spectrum with signal--to--noise appropriate for a realistic
331: exposure time and using the appropriate response function. Since
332: reproducing in detail the observational setup is beyond the scope of
333: this paper, we adopt the approach of computing for each cluster the
334: emission--weighted temperature,
335: \begin{equation}
336: T_{\rm ew}=\frac{\sum_i m_i \rho_i \Lambda(T_i,Z_i;E_1,
337: E_2)T_i}{\sum_i m_i \rho_i \Lambda(T_i,Z_i;E_1, E_2)}
338: \label{eq:tew}
339: \end{equation}
340: and the emission--weighted metallicity,
341: \begin{equation}
342: Z_{\rm ew}=\frac{\sum_i m_i \rho_i \Lambda(T_i,Z_i;E_1,
343: E_2)Z_i}{\sum_i m_i \rho_i \Lambda(T_i,Z_i;E_1,E_2)}.
344: \label{eq:zew}
345: \end{equation}
346: in the [1--2] keV band. Then, we compute the corresponding MEKAL spectrum
347: for this temperature and metallicity, to be compared with the actual
348: synthetic spectrum in the [0.2--1] keV band (we use in the following
349: the solar photospheric abundance by Anders \& Grevesse 1989, when
350: expressing metallicity in solar units). Clearly, our approach is
351: correct as long as emission--weighted measures coincide with the
352: corresponding quantities obtained from spectral fitting. Mazzotta et
353: al. (2004) have recently pointed out that the complex ICM
354: temperature structure in simulated clusters causes the
355: spectral--fitting temperatures to be about 20 per cent lower than
356: $T_{\rm ew}$ (see also Mathiesen \& Evrard 2001). They provide an
357: expression for a spectroscopic--like temperature, which represents an
358: effective recipe to compute the actual spectral temperature in
359: simulations. However, the fitting function given by Mazzotta et al.
360: is specific to the response function and energy coverage of the
361: Chandra and XMM--Newton detectors, therefore not applicable to the
362: ROSAT--PSPC. Furthermore, no such effective recipe has been
363: calibrated so far to estimate the spectroscopic metallicity in
364: simulated clusters. Finally, the spectroscopic--like temperature is
365: well defined only for clusters hotter than 3 keV, while a significant
366: fraction of the simulated clusters in our set has lower temperature
367: (see Table 1). For these reasons, we prefer to use here
368: eqs.(\ref{eq:tew}) and (\ref{eq:zew}) for the definition of
369: temperature and metallicity. We defer to a forthcoming paper a more
370: detailed analysis, based on synthetic XMM-Newton pn and MOS spectra of
371: simulated clusters, to investigate the detectability of a soft excess
372: under realistic observing conditions (Cheng et al., in preparation).
373:
374: The values of $T_{\rm ew}$ and $Z_{\rm ew}$ in the [1--2] keV band are
375: given in Table 1 for all our clusters. The resulting metallicity
376: values are smaller than the typical observed Fe abundance, $\sim 0.3
377: Z_{\odot}$ (e.g., Arnaud et al. 2001; Ikebe et al. 2002; Baumgartner
378: et al. 2003). A careful study of the ICM metallicity would require
379: including in simulations the contribution of the SN-Ia and accounting
380: for the different yields of different elements (e.g., Tornatore et
381: al. 2004). In principle, this may represent a limitation of the
382: present analysis, since metal lines are expected to give a significant
383: contribution to the total emissivity in the soft part of the spectrum,
384: where we are seeking for the excess. In order to test whether our
385: final results are affected by the uncertain description of the ICM
386: metal enrichment, we have verified by how much our results change when
387: we assume either $Z=0$ or $Z=0.25 Z_{\odot}$ in the MEKAL spectrum of
388: a plasma with temperature $T=2$ keV. We find that the contribution to
389: the total emission from metal lines turns out to be $\sim 3$ per cent
390: in the [0.2--1] keV band, this tiny difference being due to the lack of
391: prominent lines in the above energy range. Therefore, we expect that
392: our final results should be largely insensitive to the approximate
393: treatment of the ICM metal enrichment.
394:
395: Having estimated $T_{\rm ew}$ and $Z_{\rm ew}$ for each cluster by
396: emission-weighting in the [1--2] keV band, we can now compute the
397: corresponding one--temperature and one--metallicity spectrum. This
398: spectrum is then compared with the synthetic one, obtained by summing the
399: contributions from all gas particles within the ``observational''
400: cylinder of each cluster. The presence and amount of a soft excess is
401: then established by comparing the two spectra in the [0.2--1] keV band.
402:
403: \begin{center}
404: \begin{figure*}
405: \psfig{file=z-spectra-center.ps,width=15cm,angle=270}
406: \caption{Simulated spectra as seen in the projected region within $0.4
407: R_{\rm vir}$ from the cluster center, for a representative subset of
408: 9 clusters (solid lines). The dotted lines are for the spectra expected
409: from a one-temperature and one-metallicity plasma model, using the
410: values of $T_{\rm ew}$ and $Z_{\rm ew}$ computed within the same region in the
411: [1--2] keV energy band.}
412: \label{fi:sp04}
413: \end{figure*}
414: \end{center}
415:
416: The result of this comparison is shown in Figure \ref{fi:sp04}, where
417: we plot the projected luminosity density as a function of the
418: frequency, $F_\nu$, for cluster-centric distances $R\le 0.4\,R_{\rm
419: vir}$. Instead of showing spectra for the whole cluster set, we report
420: here the results only for the first nine clusters of the list. The
421: solid lines show the synthetic spectra, while the dotted lines are the
422: prediction from the one--temperature and one--metallicity model. Quite
423: apparently, the two spectra are always very similar, thus
424: demonstrating that no appreciable soft excess is generated in the
425: central regions of our simulated clusters. The only appreciable
426: difference is related to the presence of soft metal lines in the
427: synthetic spectra.
428: %
429: %which are generated by warm gas particles, having temperature of a few
430: %tenths of keV, which do not contribute to the continuum. Such lines
431: %are absent from the hot ICM model spectra, since they are computed for
432: %an isothermal plasma with a temperature of a few keV.
433:
434: A quite different result is found if we concentrate, instead, on more
435: external cluster regions, $0.4\le R/R_{\rm vir}\le 0.7$ (see Figure
436: \ref{fi:sp07}), which corresponds to the typical scales where the soft
437: excess is detected from observational data. In this case, a fair
438: number of clusters in our set shows evidence for a significant excess
439: at $h\nu\mincir 1$ keV, thus witnessing the presence of a warm gas
440: component, which contributes to the soft X--ray emission. This result
441: is consistent with the observational evidence for a
442: %relative
443: X--ray excess, that is more pronounced at larger cluster--centric
444: radii (e.g., Bonamente et al. 2002; see the discussion here below).
445:
446: In order to quantify the amount of soft excess, we define the relative
447: excess
448: \begin{equation}
449: \eta=\frac{p-q}{q}
450: \label{eq:relex}
451: \end{equation}
452: (see Bonamente et al. 2002), where $p$ is the flux in a given soft
453: band, as computed from the synthetic spectrum, and $q$ is the
454: prediction from the hot ICM model. We provide in Table 1 the values of
455: the relative excess measured in this region, after projecting each
456: cluster along three orthogonal directions. In about 30 per cent of the
457: cases, we find a relative excess $\eta >0.5$. In several cases, the
458: $\eta$ value for the same cluster changes quite substantially with the
459: projection direction. This already indicates that the excess is
460: sensitive to the occurrence of a few significant structures along the
461: line-of-sight, rather than to the overall large--scale distribution of
462: the gas.
463:
464: \begin{center}
465: \begin{figure*}
466: \psfig{file=z-spectra-middle-new.ps,width=15cm,angle=270}
467: \caption{The same as in Figure \ref{fi:sp04}, but in the 0.4--0.7
468: $R_{\rm vir}$ projected region. In addition the thick lines are the
469: same as the thin lines, but using only the gas particles whose
470: line-of-sight distance from the cluster centers is $\le R_{\rm
471: vir}$.}
472: \label{fi:sp07}
473: \end{figure*}
474: \end{center}
475:
476: Having established that the soft excess phenomenon is rather common in
477: the outskirt region of simulated clusters, when observed in
478: projection, it is worth asking whether such an excess is generated by
479: warm gas inside clusters or is associated to fore/back--ground
480: large--scale filamentary structures, extending over scales of several
481: Mpc. Large-scale hydrodynamic simulations (e.g. Cen \& Ostriker 1999;
482: Cen et al. 2001; Dav\'e et al. 2001) indicate that about half of the
483: baryons in the local Universe exist in the form of a warm-hot
484: intergalactic medium (WHIM) with temperature $ T\sim 10^5$--$10^7
485: K$. The WHIM permeates the so-far elusive large--scale filamentary
486: structures, from which galaxy clusters continuously accrete gas.
487: Therefore, it is quite possible that the soft excess originates from
488: large--scale diffuse filaments. On the other hand, an observational
489: census of the baryons inside clusters (Ettori 2003) suggests that
490: about 20 per cent of the ICM may be contributed by warm gas in the
491: above temperature range. This gas would also provide a soft X--ray
492: emissivity on top of that generated by the hot gas heated to the
493: cluster virial temperature.
494:
495: Tracing in simulations the gas distribution in the large--scale
496: environment of galaxy clusters offers the possibility to distinguish
497: between the internal and the external origin for the soft excess. To
498: this purpose, we compute the synthetic spectrum of each cluster by
499: excluding from the observational cylinder all the gas particles lying
500: at a distance larger than $R_{\rm vir}$ along the line-of-sight from
501: the cluster center. The corresponding spectra are shown with the thick
502: lines in Figure \ref{fi:sp07}. In the large majority of the cases we
503: find that, after excluding the contribution from the gas outside
504: $R_{\rm vir}$, the spectrum shows only a very modest change. This
505: implies that the soft excess is mostly contributed by warm gas
506: residing inside the virial cluster regions, while excluding a
507: significant contribution from the large--scale filaments. The only
508: exception, among the nine clusters shown in Fig. \ref{fi:sp07}, is
509: represented by CL03, for which a significant part of the excess is
510: generated outside the virial region. A visual inspection of the gas
511: distribution along the projection direction reveals the presence of a
512: small group just approaching the virial region of the cluster, which
513: is responsible for this excess.
514:
515: \begin{figure}
516: \psfig{figure=nRvir_new.ps,width=88mm,angle=270}
517: \caption{The relative excess $\eta$ in the [0.2-1] keV energy band,
518: estimated in the region $0.4<R/R_{\rm vir}<0.7$, as a function of
519: the maximum line-of-sight distance from the cluster center, $R_{\rm
520: los}$. Here we show results for the 20 clusters projected only along
521: one direction.}
522: \label{fi:exdis}
523: \end{figure}
524:
525: In order to investigate this point further, we show in Figure
526: \ref{fi:exdis} how the relative excess changes with the extension
527: along the line-of-sight, $R_{\rm los}$, of the region where the
528: spectra are computed. In most cases the values of $\eta$ do not
529: increase beyond $R_{\rm los}=R_{\rm vir}$, thus confirming that the
530: excess does not generally receive a significant contribution outside
531: the cluster virial regions. In the few cases where the excess
532: increases along the line-of-sight, this takes place always in a narrow
533: interval of distance. This confirms that the excess is contributed by
534: individual small--scale structures (i.e. fore/background groups),
535: rather than by the integrated effect of large--scale filaments.
536:
537: In general, the amount of soft X--ray emission from filaments may depend
538: on the energy feedback from SN and AGN, that heats the diffuse
539: baryons: an efficient feedback brings the gas on a high adiabat, thus
540: preventing it from reaching the density contrast of dark matter within
541: filaments, therefore suppressing its X--ray emissivity. As discussed
542: in Paper I, the feedback used in this simulation may be somewhat too
543: weak to prevent overcooling within clusters and to break to the
544: observed level the self--similarity of X-ray scaling relations at the
545: scale of galaxy groups. If more efficient feedback needs to be
546: introduced, then we expect an even smaller contribution of filaments
547: to the soft X--ray excess.
548:
549: \begin{center}
550: \begin{figure*}
551: \hbox{\psfig{file=phase.ps,width=8cm,angle=270}\psfig{file=25174.gt.s400.ps,width=8cm,angle=270}}
552: \caption{Tracing the gas particles responsible for the soft excess in
553: the CL02 cluster. Left panel: the phase diagram shows entropy
554: vs. density for the gas particles at projected cluster--centric
555: distance $0.4<R/R_{\rm vir}<0.7$. Right panel: the synthetic
556: spectrum of CL02 (thick line) is compared with that expected from
557: the hot ICM one (dotted curve) and with the synthetic one obtained by
558: excluding from the computations all the gas particles with entropy
559: $S<400$ keV cm$^2$ (horizontal dashed line in the left panel).}
560: \label{fi:phase}
561: \end{figure*}
562: \end{center}
563:
564: In order to verify whether the soft excess is generated by a diffuse
565: warm gas phase or by high density gas within subhalos, we plot in the
566: left panel of Figure \ref{fi:phase} the entropy--density phase diagram
567: of the gas lying at projected cluster--centric distance $0.4<R/R_{\rm
568: vir}<0.7$ for the CL02 cluster. This structure is the one displaying
569: the largest excess among those shown in Fig.\ref{fi:sp07}. The
570: entropy of the $i$--th gas particle is defined as
571: $S_i=T_i/n_{e,i}^{2/3}$, where $T_i$ is its temperature (in keV) and
572: $n_{e,i}$ is the associated number density of electrons (in
573: cm$^{-3}$). Quite apparently, gas particles occupy two distinct
574: regions of the $S$--$\rho$ plane; (1) the high--entropy low--density
575: region, which corresponds to the shocked phase formed by gas whose
576: high entropy has been generated by diffuse accretion; (2) a tail of
577: condensed gas at lower entropy and high density, which is formed by
578: gas within merging subhalos that preserved its low entropy during the
579: accretion phase. As shown in the right panel of Fig. \ref{fi:phase},
580: the soft excess disappears once we remove the condensed gas phase
581: (i.e., particles with $S<400$ keV cm$^2$) from the computation of the
582: spectrum. This demonstrates that the soft excess is associated with the
583: presence of previously virialized clumps of high density gas at a
584: temperature of a few tenths of keV, which are still surviving in the
585: ICM, rather than to a diffuse phase of warm gas superimposed on the
586: hot cluster atmosphere.
587:
588:
589: \subsection{Comparison with observations}
590:
591: Using ROSAT--PSPC pointings of the Coma cluster, Bonamente et
592: al. (2003) reported the detection of a soft excess in the [0.2--1] keV
593: band at a high statistical significance. After performing the analysis
594: at different angular distances from the cluster center,
595: they concluded that the relative excess is an increasing function of
596: this distance. In order to verify how typical is this result within
597: our set of simulated clusters, we convert angular scales at
598: the redshift of Coma to physical scales, and then rescale physical
599: scales in units of the virial radius. To this purpose, we take the
600: value, $R_{\rm vir}=1.9\hm$ obtained for the Coma cluster by Lokas \&
601: Mamon (2003) from their analysis of the kinematics of cluster galaxies.
602: The result of this comparison is shown in Figure
603: \ref{obs_coma}. Crosses are the observational values of the average
604: excess within different annuli, as reported in Table 2 of Bonamente
605: et al. (2003). For each of the 20 simulated clusters, we plot the
606: excess obtained by projecting along three orthogonal directions. The
607: solid line marks the upper 90 percentile in the distribution of the
608: relative soft excesses in simulated clusters.
609:
610: \begin{center}
611: \begin{figure}
612: %\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{fig6p.ps}}
613: \psfig{figure=Coma_comp.ps,width=88mm,bbllx=80pt,bblly=120pt,bburx=540pt,bbury=650pt,clip=,angle=270}
614: \caption{The relative excess $\eta$ in the [0.2-1] keV energy band, as
615: a function of the projected cluster--centric distance, in units of
616: the virial radius, from the simulated clusters (points), compared to
617: the observational results for Coma (crosses with errorbars) as
618: reported by Bonamente et al. (2003). With the exception of the
619: outermost point, each observational point represents the average
620: excess value computed over four quadrants, in which the Coma cluster
621: has been divided. For each simulated cluster, we report the excess
622: computed by projecting it along three orthogonal directions. The solid
623: line shows the upper $90$ percentile for the distribution of
624: the excess computed over the ensemble of simulated clusters.}
625: \label{obs_coma}
626: \end{figure}
627: \end{center}
628:
629: As a general result, both simulations and observational data show a
630: relative excess that increases with the projected radius. The lower
631: soft excess at small radii is due to the less complex thermal
632: structure of the ICM in the inner cluster regions: small sub--clumps
633: reaching such regions had time to be disrupted and their gas to get
634: thermalized with the surrounding hot cluster atmosphere. Still, for
635: $0.4\mincir R/R_{\rm vir}\mincir 0.7$, the excess observed in Coma is
636: somewhat higher than the level of the 90 percentile in the
637: distribution of the simulated soft X--ray excess. This indicates that
638: an excess as large as that observed in the Coma cluster represents a
639: rather rare event in our set of simulated clusters. We refrain from
640: drawing any strong conclusion from this comparison, since most of the
641: simulated clusters in our set are substantially smaller than the Coma
642: cluster.
643:
644: From their analysis of an ensemble of galaxy clusters, observed with
645: the ROSAT--PSPC, Bonamente et al. (2002) report that the soft excess
646: in the narrower [0.2--0.4] keV band is in fact a rather widespread
647: phenomenon, which is detected at high significance in a fair
648: fraction, $\sim 20$ per cent, of the sources. We compare in Figure
649: \ref{observ} the relative excess in this band as a function of the
650: cluster temperature, for both observed and simulated systems. As for
651: data, the values of the excess are those reported in Figure 3 by
652: Bonamente et al. (2002), while the temperature values have been taken
653: from White (2000). The simulation results are obtained by computing
654: the mean relative excess within $0.7\,R_{\rm vir}$, therefore
655: including also the contribution from the innermost regions. This scale
656: represents a good approximation to the typical size of the regions
657: covered by observations. Within the temperature interval sampled by
658: both observed and simulated clusters, the corresponding values of the
659: relative excess are quite consistent with each other. We note that few
660: observed systems have a significant negative excess. Bonamente et
661: al. (2002) interpret this as due to a soft absorption associated to
662: the presence of cold gas in central cluster regions. For $T\mincir 2$
663: keV the scatter in the relative excess increases for simulations, with
664: few clusters being characterized by a soft X--ray excess larger than
665: 20 per cent. This indicates that the relative importance of the warm
666: component of the ICM increases in a few cases for colder systems, thus
667: potentially leading to an intrinsic difficulty of defining a single
668: temperature for systems with temperature below 2 keV (see also
669: Mazzotta et al. 2004).
670:
671: \begin{center}
672: \begin{figure}
673: %\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{fig6p.ps}}
674: \psfig{figure=T_eta_new.ps,width=88mm,bbllx=80pt,bblly=120pt,bburx=540pt,bbury=650pt,clip=,angle=270}
675: \caption{The relative excess $\eta$ in the [0.2-0.4] keV energy band
676: for the observational data by Bonamente et al. (2002; crosses
677: indicate the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties) and for simulations (filled
678: circles). Results from simulations are obtained by computing the
679: mean excess within $0.7\,R_{\rm vir}$, which represents a good
680: approximation for the scales sampled by observations. As in Figure
681: \ref{obs_coma}, we plot for each cluster the results obtained by
682: projecting along three orthogonal directions.}
683: \label{observ}
684: \end{figure}
685: \end{center}
686:
687: As a concluding remark, it is worth mentioning that the approximate
688: treatment of metal production in our simulation represents a potential
689: source of uncertainty in the estimate of the soft excess. As already
690: mentioned, the simulation includes energy feedback and the production
691: of metals only from SN-II, using global metal yields (SH03). This is
692: the main reason for the rather low metallicity measured in the
693: simulated clusters (see Table 1). An improved treatment of the
694: chemical enrichment of the gas in simulations requires accounting for
695: the contribution from SN--Ia, hereby including detailed stellar yields
696: and stellar evolution models (e.g., Tornatore et al. 2004, and
697: references therein). As we have shown, the soft excess is associated
698: to clumped gas at a temperature of a few tenths of keV. At such
699: temperatures, a significant fraction of the emissivity is associated
700: to metal lines. Therefore, an underestimate of the plasma metallicity
701: would lead to an underestimate of the synthetic soft flux from the
702: warm clumps, while leaving nearly unaffected the soft flux from the
703: hot cluster atmosphere. In this respect, the values of the soft excess
704: presented here may be somewhat underestimated.
705:
706: \section{Conclusions and future perspectives}
707:
708: We have studied a sample of 20 simulated clusters, extracted from a
709: large SPH cosmological simulation of a concordance $\Lambda$CDM model,
710: with the aim of exploring the presence and the origin of the soft
711: X--ray excess in galaxy clusters. Besides the {\em non--radiative} gas
712: dynamics, our simulation includes the treatment of star formation and
713: energy feedback from galactic winds powered by supernovae. As such it
714: provides a quite realistic description of the evolution of the diffuse
715: gas in a cosmological environment.
716:
717: Each cluster is observed in projection, by including the line-of-sight
718: contribution from the surrounding large-scale gas distribution. This
719: allows us to verify whether simulated clusters predict any soft excess
720: of thermal origin and whether such an excess is generated within or
721: outside the cluster virial region. Our analysis is aimed at mimicking
722: the observational procedure followed by Bonamente et al. (2002, 2003),
723: in their analysis of ROSAT--PSPC data. For each cluster we compute the
724: corresponding emission--weighted temperature and metallicity in a
725: relatively hard energy band. These values are then used to calculate
726: the spectrum of a one-temperature and one-metallicity plasma
727: model. The flux predicted by this spectrum in a softer band is then
728: compared to that from the synthetic spectrum, computed by summing over
729: the contribution of all the gas particles lying within the
730: ``observational cylinder'' of each simulated cluster.
731:
732: Our main results can be summarized as follows.
733: \begin{description}
734: \item[(a)] A significant soft X--ray excess is detected for
735: cluster-centric distances $0.4<R/R_{\rm vir}<0.7$, whose amount
736: varies from cluster to cluster (see Table 1 and
737: Fig.\ref{fi:sp07}). In about 30 per cent of the cases we detect a
738: relative excess at least as large as 50 per cent. However, the
739: excess turns out to be always negligible in the central cluster
740: regions, $R<0.4R_{\rm vir}$ (see Fig.\ref{fi:sp04}).
741: \item[(b)] In most of the cases, the excess is found to originate
742: inside the virial region of the simulated clusters (see
743: Fig.\ref{fi:exdis}). In the few cases in which a sizable
744: contribution to the excess arises from the large--scale cluster
745: environment, we find that it is contributed by fore/background
746: groups lying along the cluster line-of-sight. Based on this result,
747: we predict that the soft excess detected in observations receives
748: only a minor contribution from the warm--hot medium permeating the
749: large--scale cosmic web.
750: \item[(c)] Even within the virial cluster regions, the soft excess is
751: contributed by high--density and low--entropy gas, rather than by a
752: diffuse phase of warm gas (see Fig.\ref{fi:phase}). This gas is
753: associated to merging sub--groups, which still preserve their
754: identity before being destroyed and thermalized in the hot ICM.
755: \item[(d)] We compare our results with those reported by Bonamente et
756: al. (2003) for the Coma cluster. Although both observations and
757: simulations show that the relative excess increases with the
758: cluster-centric distance, its value in Coma is larger than for most
759: of the simulated clusters. This implies that an excess as large as
760: that observed for Coma is a rather rare event in our set of
761: simulated systems.
762: \end{description}
763:
764: A general conclusion of our analysis is that a soft X--ray excess of
765: thermal origin is naturally predicted by hydrodynamical simulations of
766: galaxy clusters in a cosmological environment. While this is an
767: interesting result {\em per se}, we believe that the comparison
768: between data and simulation does not yet have the required level of
769: accuracy to exclude the presence of a non--thermal origin (i.e.,
770: inverse Compton scattering), at least for part of the observed
771: excess. There is little doubt that solving this issue requires both a
772: more refined analysis of simulations and higher quality data.
773:
774: Recent XMM--Newton observations have confirmed the presence of a soft
775: excess in the Coma cluster (Finoguenov et al. 2003) and in other four
776: clusters (Kaastra et al. 2003), which are consistent with having a
777: thermal origin. Finoguenov et al. (2003) claims that the soft excess
778: arises from a fairly large filamentary structure containing warm
779: gas. Although this result may be in contradiction with our results
780: from the simulations, it is clear that a detailed comparison would
781: require mimicking the observational procedure as close as possible on
782: a cluster-by-cluster basis.
783:
784: It is clear that establishing the exact amount, nature and origin of
785: the soft X--ray excess requires an optimal control of observational
786: systematics, such as the instrumental calibration, accounting for
787: instrumental and cosmic background, as well as for the galactic
788: hydrogen column density in the cluster direction. Indeed, since the
789: soft emission occurs close to the lower boundary of the useful energy
790: range of currently available detectors, it is of paramount importance
791: to assess the accuracy of their calibration.
792:
793: On the other hand, a detailed analysis of simulations requires
794: reproducing as close as possible the observational setup. In the
795: analysis presented in this paper, synthetic spectra of the simulated
796: clusters have been generated under the assumptions of dealing with an
797: ideal detector, with a flat response function across the whole energy
798: range of interest, and with no, or perfectly controlled,
799: background. It is clear that, with the steadily increasing quality of
800: data and level of sophistication of numerical simulations, accounting
801: for the instrumental features is mandatory for a self--consistent and
802: meaningful comparison between theoretical predictions and
803: observations, with both operating (e.g., Gardini et al. 2003) and
804: planned satellites (e.g., Yoshikawa et al. 2004). We are currently
805: undertaking a program of simulation analysis, based on mimicking
806: XMM--Newton spectrum observations with both pn and MOS detectors. This
807: will allow us to perform a more quantitative comparison with
808: observations, so as to shed light on the implication of the soft
809: excess on the physical properties of baryons within and around galaxy
810: clusters.
811:
812: \begin{acknowledgements}
813: The simulation has been realized using the IBM-SP4 machine at the
814: ``Consorzio Interuniversitario del Nord-Est per il Calcolo
815: Elettronico'' (CINECA, Bologna), with CPU time assigned thanks to an
816: INAF-CINECA grant.
817: We are greatly indebted to Volker Springel, who provided the GADGET
818: code for the simulation and for a careful reading of the paper.
819: We acknowledge useful discussions with Andrea
820: Biviano, Pasquale Mazzotta, Silvano Molendi and Xiang-Ping
821: Wu. L.-M.C. has been supported by a pre--doctoral fellowship of
822: Regione Friuli Venezia--Giulia. This work has been partially supported
823: by the PD51 INFN grant.
824:
825: \end{acknowledgements}
826:
827: \begin{thebibliography}{}
828: \bibitem{}Anders, E.\& Grevesse, N. 1989, GeCoA, 53, 197
829: \bibitem{}Arnaud, M., et al. 2001,\aap, 365, L67
830: \bibitem{}Baumgartner, W. H., Loewenstein, M., Horner, D. J.,
831: \& Mushotzky R. F. 2003, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0309166)
832: \bibitem{}Berghofer, T.W. \& Bowyer, S. 2002, \apj, 565, L17
833: \bibitem{}Bonamente, M., Lieu, R. \& Mittaz, J.P.D. 2001a, \apj, 547, L7
834: \bibitem{}Bonamente, M., Nevalainen, J., \& Kaastra, J.S. 2001b,\apj, 552, L7
835: \bibitem{}Bonamente, M., Lieu, R., Joy, K.M. \& Nevalainen, H.J. 2002
836: \apj, 576, 688
837: \bibitem{}Bonamente, M., Joy, K.M. \& Lieu, R. 2003, \apj, 585, 722
838: \bibitem{}Borgani, S., Murante, G., Springel, V. et al. 2004, \mnras,
839: 348, 1078 (Paper I).
840: \bibitem{}Bowyer, S., Berghofer, T.W. \& Korpela, E.J. 1999, \apj, 526, 592
841: \bibitem{}Bregman,J. N., Dupke,R. A., Miller,E. D., 2004, \apj, in
842: press, astro-ph/0407365
843: %\bibitem{}Buote, D. A., 2001, \apj, 548, 652
844: \bibitem{}Cen, R. \& Ostriker, J. P. 1999, \apj, 514, 1
845: \bibitem{}Cen, R., Tripp, T., Ostriker, J. \& Jenkins, E., 2001, \apj, 559, L5
846: \bibitem{}Dav\'e, R., et al. 2001, \apj, 552, 473
847: \bibitem{}De Paolis, F., Ingrosso, G., Nucita, A.A. \& Orlando, D. 2003,
848: \aap, 398, 435
849: \bibitem{}Durret, F., Slezak, E., Lieu, R., Dos Santos, S. \& Bonamente, M.
850: 2002, \aap, 390, 397
851: \bibitem{}Eke, V. R., Cole, S., Frenk, C. S., \& Navarro, J. F. 1996,
852: \mnras, 281,703
853: \bibitem{}En$\beta$lin T. A., \& Biermann, P. L. 1998, \aap, 330, 90
854: \bibitem{}Ettori, S. 2003, \mnras, 344, L13
855: \bibitem{}Finoguenov, A., Briel,G. U., Henry, P. J. 2003, \aap, 410, 777
856: \bibitem{}Gardini, A., Rasia, E., Mazzotta, P., et al. 2004, \mnras,
857: 351, 505
858: \bibitem{}Hwang, C.-Y. 1997, Science, 278, 1917
859: \bibitem{}Ikebe,Y., Reiprich, T.H., B\"ohringer, H., Tanaka, Y., \& Kitayama,
860: T. 2002, \aap, 383,773
861: \bibitem{}Kaastra, J. S., Lieu, R., Tamura, T., Paerels, F. B. S.,\& den
862: Herder,J. W. 2003, \aap, 397, 445
863: \bibitem{}Lieu, R., Mittaz,J.P.D., Bowyer, S. et al. 1996a, \apj, 458, L5
864: \bibitem{}Lieu, R., Mittaz,J.P.D., Bowyer, S. et al. 1996b, Science,
865: 274, 1335-1338
866: %\bibitem{}Lieu, R., Bonamente, M. \& Mittaz, J.P.D. 1999, \apj, 517, L91
867: \bibitem{}Lokas, E. L.\& Mamon, G. A. 2003, \mnras, 343, L401
868: \bibitem{}Maloney, P.R.,\& Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2001,\apj, 553, L129
869: \bibitem{}Mathiesen, B. F. \& Evrard, A. E. 2001, \apj, 546, 100
870: \bibitem{}Mazzotta, P., Rasia, E., Moscardini,L., \& Tormen, G. 2004,
871: \mnras, in press (astro-ph/0404425)
872: \bibitem{}Mittaz, J.P.D., Lieu, R., Lockman, F.J. 1998, \apj, 498, L17
873:
874: \bibitem{}Nevalainen, J., Lieu, R., Bonamente, M., \& Lumb, D. 2003,\apj,
875: 584, 716
876: %\bibitem{}Pierpaoli E., Borgani S., Scott D., White M., 2003, \mnras, 342, 163
877: \bibitem{}Raymond, J.C.,\& Smith, B.W. 1977, \apjs, 35, 419
878: %\bibitem{}Spergel D. N., Verde L., Peiris, H.V., et al. 2004, \apj, 608, 10
879: \bibitem{}Springel, V., Yoshida, N., White, S.D.M., 2001, NewA, 6, 79
880: \bibitem{}Springel, V., Hernquist, L., 2002, \mnras, 333, 649
881: \bibitem{}Springel, V., Hernquist, L., 2003, \mnras, 339, 289 (SH03)
882: \bibitem{}Tornatore, L., Borgani, S., Matteucci, F., Recchi, S., \&Tozzi, P.
883: 2004, \mnras, 349, L19
884: \bibitem{}Yoshikawa, K., Dolag,K., Suto, Y. et al. 2004, PASJ,
885: submitted (astro-ph/0408140)
886: \bibitem{}White, D. A. 2000, \mnras, 312, 663
887: \end{thebibliography}
888:
889: \end{document}
890:
891:
892:
893:
894:
895:
896:
897:
898:
899:
900:
901:
902:
903: