1: \documentclass{aa}
2:
3: \usepackage{graphics}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5: \usepackage{rotating}
6: \usepackage{graphicx}
7: \usepackage{color}
8: \usepackage{xspace}
9: \usepackage{txfonts}
10:
11: \bibliographystyle{aa}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14: \color{black}
15: \title{An ISOCAM survey through gravitationally lensing galaxy clusters.
16: \thanks{Based on observations with ISO, an ESA project with instruments funded by ESA Member States (especially the PI
17: countries: France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom) and with the participation of ISAS and
18: NASA}}
19:
20: \subtitle{III. New results from mid-infrared observations of the cluster Abell 2219}
21: \authorrunning{Coia et~al.}
22: %\titlerunning{New results from mid-infrared observations of the cluster A2219}
23: \titlerunning{An ISOCAM survey through gravitationally lensing galaxy clusters. III.}
24: \author{
25: D.~Coia \inst{1} \and
26: L.~Metcalfe \inst{2, 3} \and
27: B.~McBreen \inst{1}\and
28: A.~Biviano \inst{4}\and
29: I.~Smail \inst{5}\and
30: B.~Altieri \inst{2, 3}\and
31: J.-P.~Kneib \inst{6,7}\and
32: S.~McBreen \inst{1,8}\and
33: C.~Sanchez-Fernandez \inst{2} \and
34: B.~O'Halloran \inst{9}
35: }
36: \institute{ Department of Experimental Physics, University College, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
37: \and XMM-Newton Science Operations Centre, European Space Agency, Villafranca del Castillo, P.O. Box 50727,
38: 28080 Madrid, Spain.
39: \and ISO Data Centre, European Space Agency, Villafranca del Castillo, P.O. Box 50727, 28080 Madrid, Spain.
40: \and INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, via G.B. Tiepolo 11, 34131, Trieste, Italy.
41: \and Institute of Computational Cosmology, University of Durham, South Road, DH1 3LE, U.K.
42: \and Observatoire Midi-Pyr\'{e}n\'{e}es, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, 31400
43: Toulouse, France.
44: \and California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
45: \and Astrophysics Missions Division, Research and Scientific Support Department of ESA, ESTEC, Postbus 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
46: \and Dunsink Observatory, Castleknock, Dublin 15, Ireland.
47: } \offprints{D. Coia, \email{dcoia@bermuda.ucd.ie}}
48:
49: \date{Received 7 July 2004 / Accepted 20 September 2004}
50:
51:
52: \abstract{ The massive cluster of galaxies Abell 2219 (z = 0.228) with two spectacular gravitational lensing
53: arcs was observed at 14.3\,$\mu$m (hereafter 15\,$\mu$m) with the Infrared Space Observatory and results were
54: published by Barvainis et al. (\cite{1999AJ....118..645B}). These observations have been reanalyzed using a
55: method specifically designed for the detection of faint sources that had been applied to other clusters. Five
56: new sources were detected and the resulting cumulative total of ten sources all have optical counterparts. The
57: mid-infrared sources are identified with three cluster members, three foreground galaxies, an Extremely Red
58: Object, a star and two galaxies of unknown redshift. The spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of the galaxies
59: are fit with models from a selection, using the program GRASIL. Best-fits are obtained, in general, with models
60: of galaxies with ongoing star formation. Infrared luminosities and star formation rates are obtained for six
61: sources: the cluster members and the foreground galaxies. For the three cluster members the infrared
62: luminosities derived from the model SEDs are between $\sim5.7\times10^{10}$\,$\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$ and $1.4\times
63: 10^{11}$\,$\mathrm{L}_\odot$, corresponding to infrared star formation rates between 10 and 24
64: $\mathrm{M}_\odot~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$. The two cluster galaxies that have optical classifications are in the
65: Butcher-Oemler region of the color-magnitude diagramme. The three foreground galaxies have infrared luminosities
66: between $1.5\times 10^{10}$\,$\mathrm{L}_\odot$ and $9.4\times 10^{10}$\,$\mathrm{L}_\odot$ yielding infrared
67: star formation rates between 3 and 16 $\mathrm{M}_\odot~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$. Two of the foreground galaxies are
68: located in two foreground galaxy enhancements (Boschin et al. \cite{2004A&A...416..839B}). Including Abell 2219,
69: six distant clusters of galaxies have been mapped with ISOCAM and luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs) have been
70: found in three of them. The presence of LIRGs in Abell 2219 strengthens the association between luminous
71: infrared galaxies in clusters and recent or ongoing cluster merger activity. \keywords{Galaxies: clusters:
72: general -- Galaxies: clusters: individual (\object{Abell 2219}) -- Infrared: galaxies} }
73:
74: \maketitle
75:
76: \section{Introduction}
77:
78: The study of clusters of galaxies is of fundamental importance in understanding the mechanisms that drive galaxy
79: formation and evolution and in constraining cosmological theories for the formation of large-scale structures
80: (e.g. Bahcall \cite{1988ARA&A..26..631B}; Gladders et al. \cite{2002AJ....123....1G}; Schuecker et al.
81: \cite{2003A&A...402...53S}). Moreover clusters offer the opportunity of studying environmental effects on the
82: evolution of galaxies and, through the phenomenon of gravitational lensing, allow the observation of background
83: galaxies that would normally be below detection thresholds (e.g. Mellier \cite{1999ARA&A..37..127M}; Metcalfe et
84: al. \cite{2001IAUS..204..217M,2003A&A...407..791M}).
85:
86: The comprehension of the properties of clusters of galaxies is growing rapidly thanks to a range of
87: exceptionally good observations taken using both ground-based (e.g. Yamada et al. \cite{2000PASJ...52...43Y};
88: B{\" o}hringer et al. \cite{2001A&A...369..826B}; Gladders et al. \cite{2002AJ....123....1G};
89: Andreon \& Cuillandre~\cite{2002ApJ...569..144A}) and space-based
90: telescopes, particularly in the infrared, optical and X-ray bands (e.g. Duc et al. \cite{2002A&A...382...60D};
91: Stanford et al. \cite{2002ApJS..142..153S}; Burke et al. \cite{2003MNRAS.341.1093B}).
92:
93: Mid-infrared deep surveys with ESA's Infrared Space Observatory (ISO, Kessler et al. \cite{1996A&A...315L..27K})
94: have revealed a population of starburst field galaxies that evolve significantly with redshift and have a median
95: redshift of 0.8 (Aussel et al. \cite{1999A&A...342..313A}; Oliver et al. \cite{2000MNRAS.316..749O}; Serjeant et al.
96: \cite{2000MNRAS.316..768S}; Lari et al. \cite{2001MNRAS.325.1173L}; Elbaz et al. \cite{2002A&A...384..848E}; Gruppioni et
97: al. \cite{2002MNRAS.335..831G}; Metcalfe et al.
98: \cite{2003A&A...407..791M}). The mid-infrared emission from the ISOCAM sources accounts for most of the cosmic
99: infrared background (Altieri et al. \cite{1999A&A...343L..65A};
100: Franceschini et al. \cite{2001A&A...378....1F}; Elbaz \& Cesarsky \cite{2003Sci...300..270E};
101: Metcalfe et al \cite{2003A&A...407..791M}; Sato et al.
102: \cite{2003A&A...405..833S}). Mid-infrared data have been published for local clusters (e.g. Boselli et al.
103: \cite{1997A&A...327..522B,1998A&A...335...53B}; Contursi et al. \cite{2001A&A...365...11C}) and distant clusters
104: of galaxies (e.g. Pierre et al. \cite{1996A&A...315L.297P}; L{\' e}monon et al. \cite{1998A&A...334L..21L};
105: Soucail et al. \cite{1999A&A...343L..70S}; Fadda et al. \cite{2000A&A...361..827F}; Metcalfe et al.
106: \cite{2003A&A...407..791M}; Coia et al. \cite{coia}). The results of the observations revealed a wide dispersion
107: in the number of luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs, Genzel \& Cesarsky \cite{2000ARA&A..38..761G}) in clusters.
108: New observations with the Spitzer Space Telescope (Rieke et al. \cite{2001AAS...199.4401R}; Dole et al.
109: \cite{2003ApJ...585..617D}; Werner et al. \cite{spitzer}) will further contribute to the understanding of the
110: infrared population of galaxies in clusters.
111:
112: The cluster of galaxies Abell 2219 ($z = 0.228$) was observed using the 15\,$\mu$m (LW3 : 12 to 18 $\mu$m,
113: $\lambda_\mathrm{eff}= 14.3\,\mu m$) filter of the ISOCAM instrument on board ISO (Cesarsky et al.
114: \cite{1996A&A...315L..32C}). Results were published by Barvainis et al. (\cite{1999AJ....118..645B}, hereafter
115: BAH99) and consist of five sources with flux densities between 530 $\mu$Jy and 1100 $\mu$Jy. One of the sources
116: was identified with the Extremely Red Object (ERO) \object{J164023+4644} at redshift $z\sim 1.048$ and the
117: remaining four sources were identified with galaxies of unknown redshift.
118:
119: In this paper we present the results of our re-analysis of the ISOCAM observations of Abell 2219 using a method
120: specifically designed for the detection of faint sources (Metcalfe et al. \cite{2003A&A...407..791M}). Section
121: \ref{sec:cluster} contains a short description of the cluster. Data reduction, source extraction and photometric
122: calibration are described in section \ref{sec:obs}. The results are given in section \ref{sec:results}.
123: Spectral energy distributions, infrared star formation rates and luminosities are in section \ref{sec:seds}. The
124: discussion is given in section \ref{sec:disc} and conclusions are summarized in section \ref{sec:concl}.
125:
126: We adopt H$_0=70$\,km\,s$^{-1}$\,Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_\lambda=0.7$ and $\Omega_\mathrm{m} =0.3$. With this
127: cosmology, the luminosity distance to the cluster is $\mathrm{D} = 1138\,\mathrm{Mpc}$ and 1\arcsec\ on the sky
128: corresponds to 3.7 kpc. The age of the Universe at the cluster redshift of 0.228 is 10.7 Gyr.
129:
130: \section{The cluster\label{sec:cluster}} %SECTION 2
131:
132: \begin{table}[!t\textwidth] % TABLE 1
133: \caption{Observational parameters: The observations were made with the ISOCAM LW3 filter (filter width: 12 -
134: 18\,$\mu$m, $\lambda_\mathrm{eff}= 14.3\,\mu$m). On-chip integration time was always 10 seconds and the
135: 6\arcsec~per-pixel-field-of-view was used. M and N are the number of steps along each dimension of the raster,
136: while dm and dn are the increments for a raster step. The table also includes the total area covered and the
137: number of readouts per raster step. Fifteen readouts were taken at the beginning of each of the observations to
138: allow for stabilization of the signal. The observations were repeated $k$ times, each time displacing the raster
139: centre by about 20 arcseconds. \textsl{Tot. t} is the total observational time given by the sum of the
140: observation times of the three individual rasters. \label{tab:obs}}
141: \begin{center}
142: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}
143: \hline
144: \hline
145: \noalign{\smallskip}
146: $\lambda$&Reads & \multicolumn{2}{c}{n Steps}&dm &dn & area &Done k & Tot.t \\
147: ($\mu$m)&per step& M & N &($\arcsec$)&($\arcsec$)&$(\arcmin^2)$ × & (sec)\\
148: \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
149: 15.0&12 &3 &3 &14 &14 & 13.4 &3 & 4074 \\
150: \hline
151: \end{tabular}
152: \end{center}
153: \end{table}
154: Abell 2219 is a massive cluster with an estimated value for the mass of $2.8\times
155: 10^{15}$\,$\mathrm{M}_\odot~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ and a virial radius of $\sim3.1$\,Mpc (Carlberg et al.
156: \cite{1997ApJ...476L...7C}; Boschin et al. \cite{2004A&A...416..839B}). It is an optically rich cluster with an
157: Abell richness class of 3 (Abell et al. \cite{1989ApJS...70....1A}). The core is dominated by a cD galaxy with a
158: minor concentration of galaxies visible around the second brightest cluster member at a projected distance of
159: 190 kpc from the core. The cluster exhibits two spectacular gravitational lensing arcs (Smail et al.
160: \cite{1995MNRAS.277....1S}), labelled A and B in Fig. \ref{fig:over_iso}. The distribution of redshifts of
161: cluster galaxies is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:boschin_fig2}.
162: \begin{figure*} %figure 1
163: \centering
164: %\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics*{1648fig1.eps}}
165: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth,bb=-10 0 580 550]{fig1.eps}%}fig1.eps
166: \caption{Contours of the 15\,$\mu$m merged map overlaid on the B-band image of Abell 2219 (Smail et al.
167: \cite{1998MNRAS.293..124S}). The two gravitational lensing arcs are labelled with letters A and B and the second
168: brightest cluster member with the letter C (Smail et al. \cite{1995MNRAS.277....1S}). Sources published by BAH99
169: are labelled with numbers 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 (Table \ref{tab:res_tab}). The centre of the ISOCAM image is at
170: R.A.(J2000) 16$^\mathrm{h}$ 40$^\mathrm{m}$ 20.6$^\mathrm{s}$ DEC.(J2000) 46$^\mathrm{o}$ 42\arcmin\
171: 39.6\arcsec. All axes are in arcseconds. North is up and East is to the left. \label{fig:over_iso}}
172: \end{figure*}
173: Abell 2219 is one of the brightest X-ray clusters detected in the ROSAT All Sky Survey, with a luminosity in the
174: 0.1-2.4 keV band of $1.8\times 10^{45}$\,$\mathrm{erg}$\,$\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ and a temperature, $\mathrm{T_X}$, of
175: $\sim 10$ keV (Allen et al. \cite{1992MNRAS.259...67A}; Rizza et al. \cite{1998MNRAS.301..328R}). The gas
176: distribution traced by the X-ray observations is elliptical in shape and centered on the cD galaxy. The major
177: axis of the ellipse is misaligned with respect to the major axis of the optical mass distribution, but lies
178: close to the axis defined by the cD galaxy and the second brightest cluster member, labelled C in Fig.
179: \ref{fig:over_iso}. This misalignment could indicate a past or ongoing merger of the cluster with the secondary
180: galaxy concentration detected in the optical (Smail et al. \cite{1995MNRAS.277....1S}; Boschin et al.
181: \cite{2004A&A...416..839B}).
182:
183: Abell 2219 is characterized by a diffuse radio halo that extends for more than 2\,Mpc and is similar in shape to
184: the radio halo in Coma but 10 times more powerful (Bacchi et al. \cite{2003A&A...400..465B}). There may be a
185: connection between cluster mergers and the presence of extended and diffuse radio emission (Feretti
186: \cite{2003tsra.symp..209F}).
187:
188: \section{Observations, data reduction, source detection and photometric calibration\label{sec:obs}} % SECTION 3
189:
190: Abell 2219 was observed with ISO in raster mode on April 20, 1997. Three independent observations were made
191: using the LW3 ISOCAM filter. The parameters of the observations are given in Table~\ref{tab:obs}. The area
192: covered was 13.4 square arcminutes centered on the cluster core, corresponding to a physical area of
193: $0.8\times0.8\,\mathrm{Mpc}^2$. The diameter of the central maximum of the point spread function (PSF), at the
194: first Airy minimum, is $0.84\times\lambda(\mu m)$ arcseconds. The full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) is about
195: half that amount and Okumura (\cite{korio}) obtained a value of 4.9\arcsec\ at 15\,$\mu$m for the PSF FWHM in
196: the 6\arcsec~per pixel field-of-view.
197:
198: The data were reduced using the software CIA (Delaney \& Ott \cite{ISOCAM}, Ott et~al.
199: \cite{1997adass...6...34O}) in conjunction with dedicated routines following the method described in Metcalfe
200: et~al. (\cite{2003A&A...407..791M}). The three maps were merged into a single image thus increasing the
201: sensitivity to faint sources. In the process the data were rebinned so that the final maps have a pixel size of
202: 1\arcsec~ benefiting from the raster displacement and thus improving the resolution and allowing better
203: cross-identification with observations at other wavelengths. The 15\,$\mu$m merged map obtained is overlaid in
204: Fig.~\ref{fig:over_iso} on the Palomar B-band image of the cluster.
205:
206: The extraction of sources was done using SExtractor (Bertin \& Arnouts \cite{1996A&AS..117..393B}). The tool
207: was run separately on the three individual maps. For the parameters chosen, the software could automatically
208: detect sources above $\sigma = 1.6$ over 9 consecutive pixels. The program was then run on the merged image
209: with the same parameters used for the individual rasters. A detection was considered real when present on the
210: merged map and on at least two of the three individual maps. The source list obtained is given in
211: Table~\ref{tab:res_tab}. The name of the ISOCAM source is derived from the satellite acronym (ISO), the partial
212: name of the cluster (A2219) and an index number of the 15\,$\mu$m source as listed in Table~\ref{tab:res_tab}
213: (e.g. ISO\_A2219\_01 is source 01 in Table~\ref{tab:res_tab}). The index indicates increasing Right Ascension.
214:
215: Montecarlo simulations involving the insertion of fake sources in the unprocessed data were performed on the
216: three individual rasters to analyse the effects of the data reduction process as described in Metcalfe et al.
217: (\cite{2003A&A...407..791M}). The simulations were performed independently for all rasters and SExtractor was
218: applied with the same parameters adopted in the absence of the inserted fake sources. The recovered signals for
219: the fake sources were typically 60-70\% of the inserted values. The signals from the real sources were then
220: scaled according to the calibration factor determined from the simulations. The scaled signals were converted to
221: mJy using the filter specific ISOCAM calibration factor i.e. 1 ADU per gain per second $\mathrm{\equiv
222: 0.51}$\,mJy for LW3 (Delaney \& Ott \cite{ISOCAM}). A further scaling factor was applied to correct for
223: detector responsive transients effects. The steps for correcting for the detector responsive transients are
224: described in Metcalfe et al. (\cite{2003A&A...407..791M}), Section 4.3. Taking the approach described there,
225: source signals recorded in the CAM LW3 filter in deep micro-scanned rasters were found to relate to stabilised
226: source signals (determined by applying the model of Coulais \& Abergel (\cite{2000A&AS..141..533C}) as
227: implemented in CIA) in the ratio: recorded\_signal/stabilised\_signal = $0.8(+0.05/-0.1)$.
228:
229: The column named Precision in Table~\ref{tab:res_tab} is a measure of the accuracy of the photometric results.
230: The precision values are derived from fake source simulations. For each source brightness the precision is the
231: 1-sigma scatter found in the recovered fluxes of fake sources of similar brightness inserted into the raw data.
232:
233: \begin{figure}% figure 2
234: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{fig2.eps}}
235: \caption{The distribution of redshifts in the direction of the cluster Abell 2219 with two small
236: foreground galaxy enhancements. Data are from Boschin et al. (\cite{2004A&A...416..839B}). }
237: \label{fig:boschin_fig2}
238: \end{figure}
239: \begin{table*} % TABLE 2
240: \caption{List of 15\,$\mu$m sources in order of increasing R.A. From left to right: identification number;
241: source signal and precision in ADU; source flux-density and precision in mJy ; R.A. and DEC (J2000);
242: identification numbers and flux densities as given in BAH99; redshifts of the optical counterparts and source
243: identification numbers from the comprehensive optical catalogue of Boschin et al. (\cite{2004A&A...416..839B}).
244: The source ISO\_A2219\_05, marked with an asterisk, is assumed to be a member of the cluster. The redshift of
245: source ISO\_A2219\_07 is from BAH99. The remaining redshifts are from Boschin et al.
246: (\cite{2004A&A...416..839B}). The flux densities of the five sources published by BAH99 are consistent with
247: those presented here. \label{tab:res_tab} } \centering
248: \begin{tabular}{cccccccccccc}
249: \hline
250: \hline
251: \noalign{\smallskip}
252: ISO\_A2219&Flux & Precision&Flux & Precision&\multicolumn{2}{c}{Coordinates}&\multicolumn{2}{c}{BAH99}&Redshift& Optical \\
253: &(ADU) &(ADU)&(mJy)& (mJy) &R.A. (J2000)& DEC. (J2000)& ID &Flux (mJy) && ID\\
254: \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
255: 01 &0.608 &0.029& 0.891&0.042 & 16 40 12.8 & +46 43 04.0& 1&$0.890\pm0.110$ &0.230& 42\\
256: 02 &0.673 &0.029& 0.985&0.042 & 16 40 14.0 & +46 41 48.0& 2&$0.920\pm0.110$ &0.111& 45 \\
257: 03 &0.289 &0.021& 0.433&0.030 & 16 40 16.4 & +46 42 29.7&-&-&-&-\\
258: 04 &1.072 &0.062& 1.558&0.090 & 16 40 21.4 & +46 40 44.8&3&$1.420\pm0.110$&0.188&72 \\
259: 05 &0.768 &0.055& 1.122&0.079 & 16 40 22.6 & +46 43 12.0&4&$1.100\pm0.110$&$0.228^{\star}$&-\\
260: 06 &0.313 &0.021& 0.468&0.030 & 16 40 23.1 & +46 42 17.7&-&-&0.218&81 \\
261: 07 &0.437 &0.029& 0.644&0.042 & 16 40 23.1 & +46 44 05.1&5&$0.530\pm0.110$&1.048&-\\
262: 08 &0.348 &0.021& 0.515&0.030 & 16 40 25.0 & +46 44 23.2&-&-&0.135&90\\
263: 09 &0.179 &0.021& 0.275&0.030 & 16 40 28.5 & +46 42 57.8&-&-&-&-\\
264: 10 &0.160 &0.021& 0.248&0.030 & 16 40 29.4 & +46 43 32.5&-&-&-&Star\\
265: \hline
266: \end{tabular}
267: \end{table*}
268: \begin{figure*}[] %figure 3
269: \begin{center}
270: \resizebox{0.75\textwidth}{!}{
271: \includegraphics{fig3.eps}
272: \includegraphics{fig4.eps}
273: \includegraphics{fig5.eps}
274: \includegraphics{fig6.eps}
275: } \caption{HST miniature maps of the four ISO 15\,$\mu$m sources within the HST field-of-view (Smith et al.
276: \cite{2002MNRAS.330....1S}). The name of the source is given in the top left hand corner of the figure and the
277: redshift in the top right hand corner. ISO\_A2219\_05 is assumed to be a member of the cluster, for reasons
278: mentioned in the text. All axes are in arcseconds. North is up and East to the left. \label{fig:wfpc}}
279: \end{center}
280: \end{figure*}
281: \begin{table*}
282: \centering \caption{Infrared luminosities and SFRs. The columns list: LW3 identification number as given in
283: Table \ref{tab:res_tab}; luminosity at 15\,$\mu$m; k-corrected total infrared luminosity; the k-corrections
284: derived as described in the text; infrared based SFRs; the model SEDs that give the best fit to the data;
285: alternative SED fits at the 95\% confidence; membership to the cluster (F: foreground galaxy; C: cluster
286: member). }\label{tab:sed_res}
287: \leavevmode \begin{tabular}{cccccccccc} \hline \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
288: ISO\_A2219&L$_{15\mu \mathrm{m}}$&L$_\mathrm{IR}$& k-corr.&SFR[IR] &Best-fit SED&other SED (95\%)& Membership \\
289: & (L$_\odot$) & (L$_\odot$) & &(M$_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$) & Model & & \\
290: \hline \noalign{\smallskip}
291: 01 & 2.20e+09 & 1.04e+11 & 1.2 & 18 & S (Y) & - & C\\
292: 02 & 3.92e+08 & 1.85e+10 & 1.0 & 3 & SB+1 (O) & S (O), SB+1 (Y) & F \\
293: 04 & 1.99e+09 & 9.36e+10 & 1.0 & 16 & S (Y) & S (O), S (Y) & F \\
294: 05 & 3.00e+09 & 1.41e+11 & 1.4 & 24 & SB+1 (O) & S (O), S (O), SB+1 (Y)& C$^\star$\\
295: 06 & 1.21e+09 & 5.73e+10 & 1.5 & 10 & SB+1 (O) & SB+1 (Y) & C\\
296: 08 & 3.15e+08 & 1.49e+10 & 1.0 & 3 & SB+1 (O) & S (O) &F\\
297: \noalign{\smallskip} \hline
298: \end{tabular}
299: \end{table*}
300:
301: \section{Results\label{sec:results}} % SECTION 4
302:
303: The five sources published by BAH99 are confirmed. In addition five new sources were found. The sources are
304: listed in Table~\ref{tab:res_tab} and include the flux densities from BAH99. The small differences in flux and
305: position between the present analysis and the results of BAH99 fall within the combined errors.
306:
307: All of the 15\,$\mu$m sources have an optical counterpart (Fig. \ref{fig:over_iso}). With the exception of
308: source ISO\_A2219\_10, which is associated with a star, all sources are identified with galaxies. The sources
309: are compared with the spectroscopic catalog of Boschin et al. (\cite{2004A&A...416..839B}). ISO\_A2219\_01 and
310: ISO\_A2219\_06 are associated with the cluster galaxies 42 and 81 that are described as Butcher-Oemler galaxies
311: (Butcher \& Oemler \cite{1984ApJ...285..426B}), i.e. a description that refers to the excess of blue galaxies in
312: distant clusters relative to nearby clusters. Galaxy 81 has weak x-ray emission indicating the presence of an
313: active nucleus. ISO\_A2219\_02 is identified with a galaxy in the foreground enhancement of galaxies at z
314: $\approx$ 0.11 and ISO\_A2219\_04 with another density enhancement at z $\approx$ 0.19 (Fig.
315: \ref{fig:boschin_fig2}). They are listed in the catalog of Boschin et al. (\cite{2004A&A...416..839B}) as star
316: forming galaxies number 45 and 82. ISO\_A2219\_08 is listed in the same catalog as source 90. ISO\_A2219\_07 is
317: associated with ERO J164023+4644 at a redshift of $z = 1.048$. Sources ISO\_A2219\_03 and ISO\_A2219\_09 are
318: identified with galaxies of undetermined redshifts; their flux densities, as listed in Table \ref{tab:res_tab},
319: need to be corrected for gravitational lensing if they are confirmed as background sources, as suggested by the
320: faintness of the optical counterparts. ISO\_A2210\_05 is assumed to be in the cluster based on the dimensions of
321: its optical counterpart and location in a group of cluster galaxies. Moreover, it lies quite close to a mass
322: concentration in the lens model described in Smith et al. (\cite{astro-ph/0403588}), streghtening the conclusion
323: that ISO\_A2210\_05 is indeed a cluster galaxy.
324:
325: \subsection{Hubble Space Telescope images} %SECTION 4.1
326:
327: An area of 2.5\arcmin$\times$2.5\arcmin, centered on the cluster core, was observed by the Hubble Space
328: Telescope (HST) using the F702W filter on WFPC-2 (Smith et al. \cite{2002MNRAS.330....1S}). The areas observed
329: with HST and ISOCAM partially overlap and the overlap region includes sources ISO\_A2219\_03, ISO\_A2219\_05,
330: ISO\_A2219\_06 and ISO\_A2219\_07. For these sources, miniature maps centered on the ISOCAM coordinates were
331: extracted from the HST image and the 15\,$\mu$m contours are overlaid on the maps in Fig.~\ref{fig:wfpc}.
332:
333: The HST image of ISO\_A2219\_03 shows a small face-on galaxy, probably an E/S0 galaxy since in this image there
334: is no evidence of a spiral structure. However, the spatial resolution of the image is too poor to determine the
335: morphological type. Given its angular dimensions ($\sim$4\arcsec$\cong$15\,kpc at the cluster redshift),
336: ISO\_A2219\_05 might be a cluster galaxy. It shows disturbances at at least three sites in the outer regions
337: and an elongated bulge which could be the result of past or on-going mergers. ISO\_A2219\_06 is associated with
338: an inclined spiral cluster galaxy. The morphology of the ERO associated with ISO\_A2219\_07 appears irregular.
339: Its color and spectroscopic properties were thoroughly studied by Smith et al.
340: (\cite{2001ApJ...562..635S,2002MNRAS.330....1S}).
341:
342: Overall, these four HST overlays indicate that the mid-infrared detections are not strongly associated with
343: galaxies of a specific morphological type, even though this sample is too small to draw definite conclusions.
344:
345: \section{Spectral energy distributions, infrared star formation rates (SFRs) and luminosities\label{sec:seds}} %SECTION 5
346:
347: Spectral energy distributions (SEDs) were computed for sources ISO\_A2219\_01, ISO\_A2219\_02, ISO\_A2219\_04,
348: ISO\_A2219\_05, ISO\_A2219\_06 and ISO\_A2219\_08 {using the program GRASIL (Silva et al.
349: \cite{1998ApJ...509..103S}) by including archival measurements in the optical and the near-infrared. Additional
350: photometric data were obtained by running SExtractor on optical and near-infrared images. These include images
351: taken in the B (Palomar Hale), I (WHT), J (WHT), and K (WHT) photometric bands (Smail et al.
352: \cite{1998MNRAS.293..124S}; Smith et al. \cite{2002MNRAS.330....1S}).
353: \begin{figure*}[t] % FIGURE 4
354: \begin{center}
355: \includegraphics[height=2cm]{fig7.eps}
356: \includegraphics[height=2cm]{fig8.eps}
357: \includegraphics[height=2cm]{fig9.eps}
358: \includegraphics[height=2cm]{fig10.eps}\\
359: \includegraphics[height=2cm]{fig11.eps}
360: \includegraphics[height=2cm]{fig12.eps}
361: \caption{The observations (dots) and model SEDs (continuous line) for sources ISO\_A2219\_01, ISO\_A2219\_02,
362: ISO\_A2219\_04, ISO\_A2219\_05, ISO\_A2219\_06 and ISO\_A2219\_08. The horizontal axis is the wavelength in the
363: cluster rest frame and the vertical axis is the flux density (in normalized units).} \label{fig:seds}
364: \end{center}
365: \end{figure*}
366:
367: The observed data were compared with SED models that represent broad classes of spectral type, following a
368: procedure fully described in Coia et al. (\cite{coia}) and Biviano et al. (\cite{biviano}).
369:
370: In this work, 20 models were considered. They were either taken from the public GRASIL library, or built by
371: running the publicly available GRASIL code, or kindly provided by L.~Silva (private comm.). The 20 models
372: reproduce the SEDs of several kinds of galaxies, from early-type, passively evolving ellipticals (labelled 'E',
373: in the following), to spiral galaxies (labelled 'S'), and starburst galaxies (similar to the local examples
374: Arp220 and M82), as seen either at the epoch of the starburst event, or 1 Gyr after (labelled 'SB' or 'SB+1',
375: respectively). Two SB models were considered, one involving as much as $\sim 10$\% of the total baryonic mass of
376: the galaxy, and another involving only $\sim 1$\% of the total baryonic mass of the galaxy. The strong burst
377: models generally provide a better fit to the SEDs of our galaxies. At variance with Mann et al.
378: (\cite{2002MNRAS.332..549M}) we avoid considering models older than the age of the Universe at the cluster
379: redshift. Specifically, we consider models for galaxies with a formation redshift $z=1$, corresponding to an age
380: at the cluster redshift of $\sim 3$ Gyr, and models with a formation redshift $z=4$, corresponding to an age at
381: the cluster redshift of $\sim 8$ Gyr. We label the corresponding models with the suffixes 'Y' and 'O',
382: respectively.
383:
384: The best-fitting SED model was determined by $\chi^2$ minimization, leaving the normalisation of the model as a
385: free parameter. The SEDs are plotted in Fig. \ref{fig:seds} and summarized in Table \ref{tab:sed_res}. S and
386: SB+1 models provide the SED best-fits and there seems to be no clear preference for Y or O models.
387:
388: The k-corrections derived from the best-fit SEDs were used to obtain the rest-frame 15\,$\mu$m luminosities
389: using the relationship between the measured 15\,$\mu$m luminosities and the k-corrected total infrared
390: luminosities (L$_\mathrm{IR}$) from Elbaz et al. (\cite{2002A&A...384..848E}).
391:
392: The source ISO\_A2219\_01 has a total infrared luminosity of $\sim 10^{11}$\,$\mathrm{L}_\odot$ (Table
393: \ref{tab:sed_res}) which classifies it as a LIRG. ISO\_A2219\_05 also has an infrared luminosity typical of a
394: LIRG, assuming it is a cluster member. ISO\_A2219\_06 has an infrared luminosity of $\sim6\times10^{10}$
395: $\mathrm{L}_\odot$, which is comparable to the luminosity of cluster sources found in \object{Abell 1689} by
396: Fadda et al. (\cite{2000A&A...361..827F}).
397:
398: SFRs were computed from the mid-infrared fluxes and model SEDs following the conversion of Kennicutt
399: (\cite{1998ARA&A..36..189K}).
400: \begin{equation}\label{eq:kennicutt}
401: \mathrm{SFR} \mathrm{[IR]} \simeq1.71\times 10^{-10}\ (\mathrm{L}_\mathrm{IR}/\mathrm{L}_\odot) \, \, \mathrm{M}_\odot\ \mathrm{yr}^{-1}
402: \end{equation}
403: The values obtained are listed in Table \ref{tab:sed_res}. The infrared SFRs of the three cluster sources range
404: from 10 to 24 $\mathrm{M}_\odot~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$, with a mean value of 17 $\mathrm{M}_\odot~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$.
405: The infrared SFRs for the three foreground galaxies fall in the range between 3 and 16
406: $\mathrm{M}_\odot~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$. The high values of the SFRs in cluster and foreground galaxies are however
407: much less than the values $\approx 100 \,\, \mathrm{M}_\odot\ \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ in field galaxies with redshifts
408: $\approx 0.8$ that were found in deep surveys with ISO (Oliver et al.
409: \cite{2000MNRAS.316..749O}; Mann et al. \cite{2002MNRAS.332..549M}; Elbaz \& Cesarsky \cite{2003Sci...300..270E}).
410:
411: \section{Discussion} \label{sec:disc}
412:
413: The dominant population of galaxies that fall in the Butcher-Oemler region of the color-magnitude diagramme of
414: Abell 2219 are a-type, i.e. galaxies with strong Balmer absorption ($\textrm{EW(H}\delta)>4\,\AA$, Boschin et
415: al. \cite{2004A&A...416..839B}).
416:
417: ISO\_A2219\_01 and ISO\_A2219\_06 are identified with dusty star-forming galaxies 42 and 81 that are classified
418: as a-type with strong H$\delta$ absorption and weak [\ion{O}{ii}] emission with $\mathrm{EW}\sim 3\, \AA$
419: (Boschin et al. \cite{2004A&A...416..839B}). The optical SFR for ISO\_A2219\_01 is estimated at $\sim 2$
420: $\mathrm{M}_\odot~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ which is much less than the value of 18 $\mathrm{M}_\odot\
421: \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$\, given in Table \ref{tab:sed_res}. Most of the star formation is missed in the optical
422: because it is enshrouded by dust. In the clusters Abell 1689 (Fadda et al. \cite{2000A&A...361..827F}, Duc et
423: al. \cite{2002A&A...382...60D}) and \object{Cl 0024+1654} (Coia et al. \cite{coia}), that were observed with
424: ISO, the SFRs inferred using [\ion{O}{ii}] are about one-tenth of those calculated from the infrared
425: luminosities. The mid-infrared sources in Abell 1689 are detected in H$\alpha$, indicating that the star forming
426: processes are not completely hidden by dust (Balogh et al. \cite{2002MNRAS.335...10B}). The GRASIL models have
427: also been used to obtain the SEDs of the ISOCAM sources in Cl 0024+1654 (Coia et al. \cite{coia}) and
428: \object{Abell 2218} (Biviano et al. \cite{biviano}). The galaxies in the Butcher-Oemler region of the
429: color-magnitude diagramme have SEDs that are best-fit by spiral models. However the galaxies on the main
430: sequence in Cl 0024+1654 are usually best-fit with models of starburst galaxies as observed 1 Gyr after the
431: burst event. A large number of cluster sources was detected by ISOCAM at 7~$\mu$m in Abell 2218. The SEDs of
432: most of these sources are best-fit by models of quiescent ellipticals with negligible SFRs.
433:
434: A number of clusters with redshifts between $z = 0.18$ and $z = 0.39$ were mapped with ISOCAM and the numbers of
435: sources that have fluxes consistent with LIRGs, within the precision of the measurements, was determined for
436: each cluster. A comparison was made between the number of LIRGs in the clusters taking into account virial
437: masses and radii, areas scanned and cluster distances (Coia et al. \cite{coia}). The cluster Cl 0024+1654 was
438: compared with the other clusters because it has a large number (10) of luminous sources that have measurements
439: consistent with LIRGs. This comparison revealed a large difference between Cl 0024+1654 ($z = 0.39$) and
440: \object{Abell 370} ($z = 0.37$) because in the latter only one source was detected whereas 8 were expected from
441: the comparison. The two clusters have similar mass, redshift and optical richness and the large difference in
442: the luminous infrared populations was attributed to a recent collision in Cl 0024+1654 (Czoske et al.
443: \cite{2002A&A...386...31C}) and the presence of gas rich progenitors to fuel the starbursts. The collision may
444: account for the large difference in the ratio of mass to infrared light for the two clusters.
445:
446: The cluster Cl 0024+1654 was also compared with Abell 2218 ($z=0.18$), Abell 2390 ($z = 0.23$) and Abell 1689
447: ($z = 0.18$) and a total of three sources was expected whereas none was detected. A similar comparison has now
448: been made between Cl 0024+1654 and Abell 2219. In this case there is good agreement because only one source was
449: expected and two were detected implying that the clusters have similar values for the ratio of mass to infrared
450: light.
451:
452: It is interesting that the redshift distributions along the lines-of-sight to the clusters Cl 0024+1654 and
453: Abell 2219 are quite similar. They have smaller foreground clusters that are displaced from the main cluster by
454: a small amount $\sim0.02$ in redshift (Fig. 2). In Cl 0024+1654 there is strong evidence that the two clusters
455: were recently involved in a collision (Czoske et al. \cite{2001A&A...372..391C,2002A&A...386...31C}). There is
456: also very strong evidence for merger activity in Abell 2219 as shown by the merging of small clumps of galaxies
457: with the cluster, the radio halo and powerful X-ray emission (Boschin et al. \cite{2004A&A...416..839B}). The
458: presence of LIRGs in Cl 0024+1654 and Abell 2219 strengthens the link between luminous infrared sources in
459: clusters with recent or ongoing merger activity.
460:
461: The sample of clusters will be expanded by the ongoing observations with the Spitzer Space Telescope (Werner et
462: al. \cite{spitzer}).
463:
464: \section{Conclusions\label{sec:concl}} %SECTION 5
465:
466: This paper presents new results from mid-infrared observations of the massive cluster Abell 2219. The number of
467: mid-infrared sources is increased from 5 to 10 with respect to the earlier work of Barvainis et al
468: (\cite{1999AJ....118..645B}). All the sources have optical counterparts. Three sources are identified with
469: foreground galaxies, three with cluster galaxies, one with ERO J164023+4644 at $z \simeq 1.05$ and one with a
470: star. The remaining two sources have undetermined redshifts and are likely to be background sources that are
471: gravitationally lensed by the cluster.
472:
473: SEDs were obtained for the three cluster members and the three foreground galaxies. Model SEDs were used to
474: estimate parameters such as the infrared luminosity and SFR for the observed infrared sources. Models providing
475: the best-fits to the observed SEDs are those of actively star-forming galaxies, either massive spirals, or
476: starburst galaxies observed $\sim 1$ Gyr after the burst event. Two of the cluster galaxies are classified as
477: LIRGs and have a mean SFR of $\sim 17\,\mathrm{M}_\odot\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$, while the third has infrared
478: luminosity and SFR comparable to those star forming galaxies found in other clusters. The foreground galaxies
479: have infrared SFRs between 3 and 16 $\mathrm{M}_\odot~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ and two of them are located in
480: foreground galaxy enhancements.
481:
482: The mid-infrared properties of the galaxies in Abell 2219 are compared with five distant clusters that were
483: mapped with ISOCAM. The number of LIRGs detected in Abell 2219 agrees with the expected number when compared
484: with Cl 0024+1654 that is rich in luminous infrared galaxies.
485:
486: \begin{acknowledgements}
487: JPK acknowledges support from CNRS and Caltech.
488:
489: The ISOCAM data presented in this paper were analyzed using CIA, a joint development by the ESA
490: Astrophysics Division and the ISOCAM Consortium. The ISOCAM Consortium is led by the ISOCAM PI, C. Cesarsky. \\
491: This research has made use of data obtained from the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center
492: (HEASARC), provided by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.
493: \end{acknowledgements}
494:
495:
496: \begin{thebibliography}{}
497:
498: \bibitem[1989]{1989ApJS...70....1A}
499: Abell, G.~O., Corwin, H.~G., \& Olowin, R.~P.\ 1989, \apjs, 70, 1
500:
501: \bibitem[1992]{1992MNRAS.259...67A}
502: Allen, S.~W., Edge, A.~C., Fabian, A.~C.~et al. \ 1992, \mnras, 259, 67
503:
504: \bibitem[1999]{1999A&A...343L..65A}
505: Altieri, B., Metcalfe, L., Kneib, J. P.~et al. \ 1999, \aap, 343, 65
506:
507: \bibitem[2002]{2002ApJ...569..144A}
508: Andreon, S.~\& Cuillandre, J.-C.\ 2002, \apj, 569, 144
509:
510: \bibitem[1999]{1999A&A...342..313A}
511: Aussel, H., Cesarsky, C. J., Elbaz, D. \& Starck, J. L.\ 1999, \aap, 342, 313
512:
513: \bibitem[2003]{2003A&A...400..465B}
514: Bacchi, M., Feretti, L., Giovannini, G., \& Govoni, F.\ 2003, \aap, 400, 465
515:
516: \bibitem[1988]{1988ARA&A..26..631B} Bahcall, N.~A.\ 1988, \araa, 26, 631
517:
518: \bibitem[2002]{2002MNRAS.335...10B}
519: Balogh, M.~L., Couch, W.~J., Smail, I., Bower, R.~G., \& Glazebrook, K.\ 2002, \mnras, 335, 10
520:
521: \bibitem[1999]{1999AJ....118..645B}
522: Barvainis, R., Antonucci, R. \& Helou, G. \ 1999, \apj, 118, 645 (BAH99)
523:
524: \bibitem[1996]{1996A&AS..117..393B}
525: Bertin, E. \& Arnouts, S.\ 1996, \aaps, 117, 393
526:
527: \bibitem[2004]{biviano}
528: Biviano, A., Metcalfe, L., McBreen, B. et al. \ 2004, \aap accepted.
529:
530: \bibitem[2001]{2001A&A...369..826B}
531: B{\" o}hringer, H., Schuecker, P., Guzzo, L.~et al.\ 2001, \aap, 369, 826
532:
533: \bibitem[2004]{2004A&A...416..839B}
534: Boschin, W., Girardi, M., Barrena, R. et al. \ 2004, \aap, 416, 839
535:
536: \bibitem[1997]{1997A&A...327..522B}
537: Boselli, A., Gavazzi, G., Lequeux, J.~et al. \ 1997, \aap, 327, 522
538:
539: \bibitem[1998]{1998A&A...335...53B}
540: Boselli, A., Lequeux, J., Sauvage, M. et al.\ 1998, \aap, 335, 53
541:
542: \bibitem[2003]{2003MNRAS.341.1093B} Burke, D.~J., Collins,
543: C.~A., Sharples, R.~M., Romer, A.~K., \& Nichol, R.~C.\ 2003, \mnras, 341, 1093
544:
545: \bibitem[1984]{1984ApJ...285..426B}
546: Butcher, H \& Oemler A.~Jr.\ 1984, \apj, 285, 426
547:
548: \bibitem[1997]{1997ApJ...476L...7C}
549: Carlberg, R.~G., Yee, H.K.C., Ellingson, E.~et al.\ 1997, \apjl, 476, L7
550:
551: \bibitem[1996]{1996A&A...315L..32C}
552: Cesarsky, C.~J., Abergel, A., Agnese, P.~et al.\ 1996, \aap, 315, L32
553:
554: \bibitem[2003]{coia}
555: Coia, D., McBreen, B., Metcalfe, L. et al. \ 2003, submitted to \aap (astro-ph/0310317)
556:
557: \bibitem[2001]{2001A&A...365...11C} Contursi, A., Boselli,
558: A., Gavazzi, G.~et al.\ 2001, \aap, 365, 11
559:
560: \bibitem[2000]{2000A&AS..141..533C}
561: Coulais, A.~\& Abergel, A.\ 2000, \aaps, 141, 533
562:
563: \bibitem[2001]{2001A&A...372..391C}
564: Czoske, O., Kneib, J.-P., Soucail, G.~et al. \ 2001, \aap, 372, 391
565:
566: \bibitem[2002]{2002A&A...386...31C}
567: Czoske, O., Moore, B., Kneib, J.P. \& Soucail, G.\ 2002, \aap, 386, 31
568:
569: \bibitem[2002]{ISOCAM}
570: Delaney, ~M. \& Ott, ~S. 2002, "ISOCAM Interactive Analysis User's Manual", Version 5.0, SAI/96-5226/Dc,
571: http://www.iso.vilspa.esa.es/users/expl\_lib/CAM\_top.html
572:
573: \bibitem[2003]{2003ApJ...585..617D} Dole, H.,
574: Lagache, G., \& Puget, J.-L.\ 2003, \apj, 585, 617
575:
576: \bibitem[2002]{2002A&A...382...60D}
577: Duc, P.A., Poggianti, B., Fadda, D. ~et al.\ 2002, \aap, 382, 60
578:
579: \bibitem[2002]{2002A&A...384..848E}
580: Elbaz, D., Cesarsky, C., Chanial, P. et al.\ 2002, \aap, 384, 848
581:
582: \bibitem[2003]{2003Sci...300..270E}
583: Elbaz, D. \& Cesarsky, C. \ 2003, Science, 300, 270
584:
585: \bibitem[2000]{2000A&A...361..827F}
586: Fadda, D., Elbaz, D., Duc, P.-A. et al.\ 2000, \aap, 361, 827
587:
588: \bibitem[2003]{2003tsra.symp..209F}
589: Feretti, L.\ 2003, in Texas in Tuscany. XXI Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics. Eds.: R. Bandiera, R.
590: Maiolino, F. Mannucci. World Scientific pp. 209-220
591:
592: \bibitem[2001]{2001A&A...378....1F}
593: Franceschini, A., Aussel, H., Cesarsky, C. J.~et al. \ 2001, \aap, 378, 1
594:
595: \bibitem[2000]{2000ARA&A..38..761G}
596: Genzel, R.~\& Cesarsky, C.~J.\ 2000, \araa, 38, 761
597:
598: \bibitem[2002]{2002AJ....123....1G}
599: Gladders, M.~D., Yee, H.~K.~C., \& Ellingson, E.\ 2002, \aj, 123, 1
600:
601: \bibitem[2002]{2002MNRAS.335..831G}
602: Gruppioni, C., Lari, C. \& Pozzi, F.~et al.\ 2002, \mnras, 335, 831
603:
604: \bibitem[1998]{1998ARA&A..36..189K}
605: Kennicutt, R.~C.\ 1998, \araa, 36, 189
606:
607: \bibitem[1996]{1996A&A...315L..27K}
608: Kessler, M.~F., Steinz, J.~A., Anderegg, M.~E.~et al.\ 1996, \aap, 315, L27
609:
610: \bibitem[2001]{2001MNRAS.325.1173L}
611: Lari, C., Pozzi, F., Gruppioni, C. ~et al. \ 2001, \mnras, 325, 1173
612:
613: \bibitem[1998]{1998A&A...334L..21L} L{\' e}monon, L., Pierre,
614: M., Cesarsky, C.~J.~et al. \ 1998, \aap, 334, L21
615:
616: \bibitem[2002]{2002MNRAS.332..549M}
617: Mann, R.G., Oliver, S., Carballo, R.~et al. \ 2002, \mnras, 332, 549
618:
619: \bibitem[1999]{1999ARA&A..37..127M} Mellier, Y.\ 1999, \araa, 37, 127
620:
621: \bibitem[2001]{2001IAUS..204..217M}
622: Metcalfe, L., McBreen, B., Kneib, J.-P. \& Altieri, B.\ 2001, in Proc. IAU Symp., 204, The Extragalactic
623: Infrared Background and its Cosmological Implications, ed. M. Harwit \& G. Hauser, PASP.
624:
625: \bibitem[2003]{2003A&A...407..791M}
626: Metcalfe, L., Kneib, J.-P., McBreen, B.~et al.\ 2003, \aap, 407, 791
627:
628: \bibitem[1998]{korio}
629: Okumura, K. 1998, ISOCAM PSF report, ver. 1.0
630:
631: \bibitem[2000]{2000MNRAS.316..749O}
632: Oliver, S., Rowan-Robinson, M., Alexander, D.M.~et al. \ 2000, \mnras, 316, 749
633:
634: \bibitem[1997]{1997adass...6...34O}
635: Ott, S., Abergel, A., Altieri, B.~et al.\ 1997, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VI,
636: A.S.P.~Conference Series, Vol.~125, 1997, Gareth Hunt and H.~E.~Payne, eds., p.~34., 6, 34
637:
638: \bibitem[1996]{1996A&A...315L.297P} Pierre, M., Aussel, H., Altieri, B.~et al.\ 1996,
639: \aap, 315, L297
640:
641: \bibitem[2001]{2001AAS...199.4401R} Rieke, G.~H., Young, E.~T., Ade, P.~A.~R. et al.\
642: 2001, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 33, 1366
643:
644: \bibitem[1998]{1998MNRAS.301..328R} Rizza, E., Burns, J.~O.,
645: Ledlow, M.~J. et al.\ 1998, \mnras, 301, 328
646:
647: \bibitem[2003]{2003A&A...405..833S}
648: Sato, Y., Kawara, K., Cowie, L. L. et al. \ 2003, \aap, 405, 833
649:
650: \bibitem[2003]{2003A&A...402...53S} Schuecker, P.,
651: Caldwell, R.~R., B{\" o}hringer, H.~et al.\ 2003, \aap, 402, 53
652:
653: \bibitem[2000]{2000MNRAS.316..768S}
654: Serjeant, S., Oliver, S., Rowan-Robinson, M.~et al. \ 2000, \mnras, 316, 768
655:
656: \bibitem[1998]{1998ApJ...509..103S}
657: Silva, L., Granato, G.L., Bressan, A., \& Danese, L. \ 1998, \apj, 509, 103
658:
659: \bibitem[1995]{1995MNRAS.277....1S}
660: Smail, I., Hogg, D.~W., Blandford, R.~et al. \ 1995, \mnras, 277, 1
661:
662: \bibitem[1998]{1998MNRAS.293..124S}
663: Smail, I., Edge, A. C., Ellis, R. S., \& Blandford, R. D.\ 1998, \mnras, 293, 124
664:
665: \bibitem[1999]{1999ApJ...525..609S}
666: Smail, I., Morrison, G., Gray, M. E.~et al. \ 1999, \apj, 525, 609
667:
668: \bibitem[2001]{2001ApJ...562..635S}
669: Smith, G.~P., Treu, T., Ellis, R., Smail, I., Kneib, J.-P., \& Frye, B.~L.\ 2001, \apj, 562, 635
670:
671: \bibitem[2002]{2002MNRAS.330....1S}
672: Smith, G.~P., Smail, I., Kneib, J.-P.~et al. \ 2002, \mnras, 330, 1
673:
674: \bibitem[2004]{astro-ph/0403588}
675: Smith, G.~P., Kneib, J.-P., Smail, I.~et al.\ 2004, submitted to \mnras, astro-ph/0403588
676:
677: \bibitem[1999]{1999A&A...343L..70S} Soucail, G., Kneib,
678: J.~P., B{\' e}zecourt, J.~et al.\ 1999, \aap, 343, L70
679:
680: \bibitem[2002]{2002ApJS..142..153S}
681: Stanford, S.~A., Eisenhardt, P.~R., Dickinson, M., Holden, B.~P., \& De Propris, R.\ 2002, \apjs, 142, 153
682:
683: \bibitem[2004]{spitzer}
684: Werner, M. W., Roellig, T. L., Low, F. J. et al.\ 2004, \apjs\ (Spitzer Special Issue) accepted
685:
686: \bibitem[2000]{2000PASJ...52...43Y}
687: Yamada, T., Kajisawa, M., Tanaka, I.~et al.\ 2000, \pasj, 52, 43
688:
689: \end{thebibliography}
690:
691: %\listofobjects
692: \end{document}
693: