1: \documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}
2: \usepackage{asp2004}
3: \usepackage{psfig}
4: \usepackage{epsf}
5: \usepackage{graphics}
6: \usepackage{lscape}
7: \markboth{Chandra et al.}{Synchrotron aging in young Supernovae}
8: \pagestyle{myheadings}
9:
10: % Some definitions I use in these instructions.
11:
12: \def\emphasize#1{{\itshape#1\/}}
13: \def\arg#1{{\it#1\/}}
14: \let\prog=\arg
15: \parsep 0pt
16: \itemsep 0pt
17: \def\edcomment#1{\iffalse\marginpar{\raggedright\sl#1\/}\else\relax\fi}
18: \marginparwidth 1.25in
19: \marginparsep .125in
20: \marginparpush .25in
21: \reversemarginpar
22:
23: \begin{document}
24: \title{Implications of aging in young supernovae
25: }
26: \author{Poonam Chandra \& Alak Ray}
27: \affil{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai -400 005}
28:
29: %\author{Poonam Chandra$^{1,2}$ \& Alak Ray$^{1}$}
30: %\affil{$^1$Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai -400 005}
31: %\affil{$^2$Joint Astronomy Programme, IISc, Bangalore -560 012}
32:
33: \begin{abstract}
34: We present here the combined radio spectrum from the
35: Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT)
36: and Very Large Array (VLA) of
37: type-IIb SN 1993J (age 11 years)
38: and a type-Ic SN 2003bg (age 1 year). In SN 1993J, we
39: find a break in the spectrum at 4 GHz and associate it with
40: Synchrotron cooling break. Hence, we
41: determine the magnetic field
42: independent of equipartition assumption between relativistic
43: electrons and magnetic energy. We also see a hint of break
44: in the spectrum of SN 2003bg between 22-40 GHz. The spectrum of SN 2003bg
45: is well described by the synchrotron self absorption model.
46: %The spectrum suggests synchrotron self absorption as the dominant
47: %absorption mechanism.
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50: \thispagestyle{plain}
51:
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54:
55: %titles listed in the references at the end of this guide. \citet{lam94} offers
56: %Synchrotron aging has been seen in many old radio galaxies,
57: %CSS sources etc and is crucial in determining the age of such
58: %sources. However in young sources, whose ages are already known,
59: Synchrotron aging
60: %, in young sources where the age
61: %of the source is known,
62: can provide wealth of information
63: related to plasma conditions in young supernovae.
64: % in shocked ejecta using age as
65: %an input parameter.
66: We discuss two supernovae in this context
67: - an eleven years old type-IIb supernova SN 1993J and a one year
68: old type-Ic SN 2003bg.
69: %SN 1993J is the
70: %youngest supernova in which synchrotron aging has been observed which
71: %lead us to determine the ratio of magnetic energy density to relativistic
72: %energy density.
73: %We will also discuss a young supernova SN 2003bg in this context.
74:
75: \section{SN 1993J in M81}
76: %SN 1993J exploded on March 28, 1993 in M81 (3.6 Mpc).
77: %and was classified as type IIb supernova.
78: We observed SN 1993J around day 3200 with the GMRT
79: %in 610 and 235 MHz wavebands on 2001 Dec 30
80: %and in 1420 MHz band on 2001 Oct 15 and
81: in 610, 235 and 1420 MHz bands
82: combined this
83: dataset with the high frequency VLA observations
84: provided by C. Stockdale \& collaboration
85: %in 22.5, 14.9, 8.4, 4.8
86: %and 1.4 GHz wavebands observed on 2002 Jan 13
87: (see \citet{cha04}).
88: The spectrum suggests a break in the
89: spectral index ($\Delta \alpha= 0.6$) in the optically
90: thin part of the spectrum
91: at 4 GHz (Fig. 1).
92: This variation is consistent with that
93: predicted from the synchrotron cooling effect
94: with continuous injection \citep{kar62}.
95: %The break in the spectrum will occur for those
96: %electron energies for which the time scales for the
97: %cumulative rate of change of electron energy
98: %due to synchrotron cooling plus adiabatic losses
99: %and gain through diffusive acceleration
100: %becomes comparable to the life time of the supernova \citep{kar62}.
101: %Setting
102: %the life time $\tau=t$, break frequency can be derived as:
103: Including the effect of acceleration and adiabatic loss processes,
104: %\begin{equation}
105: %\label{synchr_freq}
106: %{\nu}_{break}=\frac{2\times 10^{24}}{{B_0}^3}
107: %{\left[\frac{R^2}{20 {\kappa}_{\perp}}t^{-1/2}-2\,t^{1/2}\right]}^2
108: % \,{\rm Hz}
109: %\end{equation}
110: and using size of the SN $R=2.65\times 10^{17}$ cm on day 3200
111: from VLBI \citep{bar02}, we obtain magnetic field
112: $B=0.33\pm0.01 $ G \citep{cha04}.
113: From the best fit in SSA, the magnetic
114: field under equipartition assumption is $B_{eq}=38\pm17$ mG.
115: Comparison of the two magnetic field determines the
116: %magnetic field obtained from the life time argument
117: %with that obtained from
118: %SSA model best fit under assumption of equipartition determines the
119: the ratio of relativistic energy of
120: particles to magnetic field energy,
121: %Equipartition fraction
122: %$a=U_{rel}/U_{mag}$ varies with magnetic field $B$ as
123: %$a = (B/B_{eq})^{-(2 \gamma +13)/4}$ \citep{che98}.
124: %Therefore, the fraction $a$ ranges between
125: %which is $ 8.5 \times
126: %10^{-6}\,-\, 4.0 \times 10^{-4}$.
127: which is $ (0.85-40) \times 10^{-5}$.
128: % with a central value (corresponding
129: %to $B_{eq}=38$ mG) of $a=1.0 \times 10^{-4}$ on day 3200.
130:
131: \begin{figure}
132: %\epsscale{0.50}
133: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
134: \caption{Left Panel: Combined GMRT and VLA spectrum of SN 1993J
135: (day 3200).
136: Solid line shows the SSA fit to the data with
137: the break in the spectrum ($\Delta \alpha=0.6$)
138: at 4 GHz. Right panel:
139: SSA (solid line) and FFA (dashed line) fits to
140: the combined GMRT and VLA spectrum of SN 2003bg.}
141: %There may be a hint of possible
142: %break between 22-40 GHz.}
143: \end{figure}
144:
145: \section{SN 2003bg in MCG -05-10-015}
146:
147: SN 2003bg is type Ic supernova in MCG -05-10-015 (19 Mpc). It was discovered
148: on 2003 Feb 25, most likely two weeks after the explosion.
149: % (based
150: %on the spectral chronometers).
151: %, hence we
152: %assume the explosion date to be February 10, 2003 for our purpose.
153: %It was devoid of Hydrogen and Helium in the optical spectra, hence
154: %classified as type Ic supernova.
155: We observed SN 2003bg with GMRT in 1280, 610 and 325 MHz
156: bands between 2003 Feb 2- Feb 8
157: % band on 2003 Feb 2
158: %and then in 610 MHz band on 2003 Feb 5 and in 325 MHz band on 2003 Feb 8
159: %On our request A. Soderberg and S. Kulkarni
160: %observed the SN at
161: and it was observed at high VLA frequencies on 2003 Feb 8
162: by A. Soderberg and S. Kulkarni, thus obtaining
163: the radio spectrum covering $0.3-44.0$ GHz.
164: %Fig 1shows the 1280 MHz band GMRT radio map of SN 2003bg.
165: %\subsection{Modeling the composite radio spectrum}
166: %Radio emission in SNe is usually absorbed in the early stages.
167: %It can be
168: %either due to FFA or SSA. The data in the optically thick part of the
169: %spectrum can distinguish between the two
170: %because of their varied dependence on frequency.
171: %For SSA model, the flux density goes as $ F \propto \nu^{5/2}$
172: %and for FFA model, the flux density goes as
173: %$ F \propto \nu^{-4}$.
174: We fit homogeneous
175: Free-free absorption (FFA) and Synchrotron Self Absorption (SSA) models
176: to the spectrum (see Fig. 1).
177: The 610 MHz data point
178: clearly eliminates the FFA model and favors the SSA model.
179: %From the SSA fit to the data under equipartition assumption,
180: We find the following parameters from our fits: spectral
181: index ($\alpha = 3$), size of SN 2003bg ($R= (9.98 \pm 0.43) \times
182: 10^{16}$ cm), expansion speed ($ v = 33,000\,{\rm km \, s^{-1}}$),
183: and magnetic field ($ B = 0.18 \pm 0.03$ G).
184: %We notice that 44 GHz data point is not falling on the powerlaw in the
185: %optically thin part and it suggests
186: %a break somewhere between 22 GHz to 44 GHz.
187: %The break may be due to the synchrotron aging. Since we have only one
188: %data point, we cannot draw any conclusive evidence.
189: % and it will be useful to have the spectrum extended beyond 44 GHz.
190: There seems to be hint of a break around 30 GHz, although this
191: could be due to calibration problems at high frequencies.
192: We need the radio spectrum
193: extended beyond 40 GHz to determine if the break is real.
194: We are planning simultaneous observations of SN 2003bg with GMRT along with VLA
195: and ATCA. This will provide us the spectrum from 0.2 GHz to 80 GHz
196: and will establish whether the spectral break is real or due to data artefact.
197: %In that case, it
198: %will determine the magnetic field directly, independent of
199: %equipartition assumption, as was in the case of SN 1993J.
200:
201: \section{Discussion and conclusion}
202:
203: The relativistic particle energy density is
204: far below than the magnetic energy density
205: (by a factor of 1/10000).
206: %, although there are indications that in
207: %SNe like SN 1998bw/GRB980425, there may exist this
208: %equipartition (Kulkarni et al. 1998).
209: %Future studies of the equipartition factor for SN 1993J may indicate for the
210: %first time how particle acceleration efficiency in
211: %strongly turbulent magnetized plasma evolves with time
212: %in the large magnetic-Reynolds and Reynolds numbers limit.
213: %There could be a break in the radio spectrum of SN 2003bg.
214: %calibration error at 44 GHz datapoint.
215: %If the break is real, it will lead
216: % to the direct estimation of magnetic field independent of
217: %equipartition assumption, as in SN 1993J.
218: %We also could discard the
219: %homogeneous free-free absorption model over the SSA model from the
220: %low-frequency optically thin part of the spectrum.
221: This is quite unlike the expectation of efficient shock acceleration
222: of relativistic particles in SNe. The expected fraction of post-shock
223: pressure in relativistic particles is $W \ge 0.1$ as 10\% of the energy ejected
224: by the SNe is needed to power the cosmic rays in the galaxy \citep{mck87}.
225: It indicates that perhaps the efficiency of acceleration is either highly
226: variable in SNe, or it will evolve with time in SN 1993J.
227:
228: \acknowledgments{
229: %We thank Dr. S. Bhatnagar for crucial help in the analysis of early GMRT
230: %data for SN 1993J.
231: We thank K. Weiler \&
232: collaboration, and
233: %for kindly providing the VLA data for SN 1993J at high
234: %frequencies and
235: A. Soderberg \& S. Kulkarni for data on SN 1993J and
236: 2003bg respectively.
237: %for observing SN 2003bg on our request.
238: We thank GMRT staff for making the observations possible.
239: % that made these observations possible.
240: %Poonam Chandra is a Sarojini Damodar International Fellow.
241: }
242:
243: \begin{thebibliography}{}
244: %\bibitem[Bland-Hawthorn \& Jones(1998a)]{bh1998a}
245: %Bland-Hawthorn, J., \& Jones, D. H. 1998a,
246: %PASA, 15, 44
247: \bibitem[Bartel et al.(2002)]{bar02} Bartel, N., Bietenholz,M.F.,
248: Rupen, M.P., et al 2002 ApJ, 581, 404
249: \bibitem[Chandra et al.(2004)]{cha04}
250: Chandra, P., Ray, A., Bhatnagar, S. 2004, \apj, 612, 974
251: %\bibitem[Bland-Hawthorn \& Jones(1998a)]{bh1998a}
252: %Bland-Hawthorn, J., \& Jones, D. H. 1998a, PASA, 15, 44
253: %\bibitem[Chandra et al.(2004a)]{cha04} Chandra, P., Ray, A.,
254: %Bhatnagar, S. 2004a, ApJ, 612, 974
255: %\bibitem[Chandra et al.(2004b)]{cha04b} Chandra, P., Ray, A.,
256: %Bhatnagar, S. 2004b, ApJ, 604, L97
257: \bibitem[Chevalier(1998)]{che98} Chevalier, R. 1998 ApJ, 499, 810
258: \bibitem[Kardashev(1962)]{kar62} Kardashev, N.S., 1962, Sov. Astr., 6, 317
259: \bibitem[McKee(1987)]{mck87} McKee, C. F. 1987, Spectroscopy of
260: astrophysical plasmas, p. 226
261: %\bibitem[Kulkarni et al.(1998)]{kul98} Kulkarni, S.R., Frail, D.A.,
262: %\& Wieringa, M.H., et al. 1998, Nature, 395, 663
263: %\bibitem[Fransson \& Bjornsson(1998)]{fra98} Fransson, C.,
264: %Bjornsson, C. 1998 ApJ, 509, 861
265: %\bibitem[Ball \& Kirk(1992)]{bal92} Ball, L., Kirk, J. G., 1992 ApJ, 396, L39
266: \end{thebibliography}
267:
268: \end{document}
269: