1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \shorttitle{Sulfur chemistry and isotopic ratios in NGC\,253}
4: \shortauthors{Mart\'{\i}n et al.}
5:
6: \usepackage{graphicx}
7: %
8: \begin{document}
9: %
10: %
11: \title{Sulfur chemistry and isotopic ratios in the starburst galaxy NGC\,253}
12:
13: \shorttitle{Sulfur chemistry in NGC\,253}
14:
15: \author{S. Mart\'{\i}n}
16: \affil{Instituto de Radioastronom\'{\i}a Milim\'etrica (IRAM), Avda. Divina Pastora 7, Local 20, E-18012 Granada, Spain}
17: \author{J. Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado}
18: \affil{Departamento de Astrofis\'{\i}ca Molecular e Infrarroja, Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Serrano 121, E-28006 Madrid, Spain}
19: \author{R. Mauersberger}
20: \affil{Instituto de Radioastronom\'{\i}a Milim\'etrica (IRAM), Avda. Divina Pastora 7, Local 20, E-18012 Granada, Spain}
21: \author{C. Henkel}
22: \affil{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Radioastronomie, Auf dem H\"ugel 69, D-53121 Bonn, Germany}
23: \author{S. Garc\'{\i}a-Burillo}
24: \affil{Observatorio de Madrid, Alfonso XII, 3, 28014 Madrid, Spain}
25: %\maketitle
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28: Based on observations of the most abundant sulfur-bearing molecules (H$_2$S, CS, NS, SO, H$_2$CS, OCS, and SO$_2$) carried out with
29: the IRAM 30m telescope
30: \footnote{Based on observations carried out with the IRAM 30m telescope.
31: IRAM is supported by INSU/CNRS (France), MPG (Germany) and IGN (Spain).} and SEST
32: \footnote{Based on observations with the Swedish/ESO submillimetre telescope (SEST) at the European Southern Observatory,
33: Chile. ESO N$^{\rm o}$70.B-0022.},
34: we present the first analysis of the sulfur chemistry of an extragalactic source, the nuclear region of the
35: starburst galaxy NGC\,253.
36: This is the first time that H$_2$S and, tentatively, H$_2$CS are
37: detected towards the nucleus of a starburst galaxy.
38: Source averaged fractional abundances of these molecules are a few 10$^{-9}$,
39: except for CS and OCS which are more abundant (10$^{-8}$).
40: Sulfur isotopic ratios, $^{32}$S/$^{34}$S$\sim$8$\pm 2$ and $^{34}$S/$^{33}$S$>$9, are measured through observations of $^{13}$CS, C$^{34}$S,
41: and C$^{33}$S.
42: A comparison with the observed relative abundances towards different prototypical Galactic sources suggests that the chemical composition
43: of NGC\,253 is similar to that found towards the molecular clouds complexes like Sgr\,B2 in the nuclear region of the Milky Way.
44: The large overabundance of OCS compared to the predictions of time-dependent sulfur chemistry models supports the idea
45: that OCS is likely injected into the gas phase from the grain mantles by low velocity shocks.
46:
47: \end{abstract}
48:
49: \keywords{ galaxies: abundances --- galaxies: active --- galaxies: individual (\objectname{NGC\,253}) ---
50: galaxies: ISM --- galaxies: nuclei --- galaxies: starburst}
51:
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54: The formation and evolution of stars strongly affects the chemistry of their molecular environment.
55: In particular, sulfur-bearing molecules show enhanced abundances in the hot molecular cores, the condensations associated with massive protostars.
56: The most accepted idea is that during the collapse of a star forming cloud, a large fraction of the available sulfur
57: freezes out by accretion onto grain mantles and hydrogenates in the form of H$_2$S.
58: The high temperatures and turbulent motions in these objects produced by the newly formed stars induce the evaporation and disruption
59: of grain mantles, releasing the H$_2$S into the gas phase.
60: After evaporation, this molecule is believed to drive a fast high temperature gas-phase chemistry leading first to the formation of SO and SO$_2$ and
61: subsequently of other sulfur-bearing molecules such as CS and H$_2$CS \citep{Charnley97,Hatchell98}.
62: It is still uncertain whether the release of H$_2$S is caused exclusively by thermal evaporation or whether
63: shocks play a role in the disruption of the grain mantles \citep{Hatchell02}.
64: In low mass star-forming regions, where the temperatures
65: are not high enough to evaporate the grain mantles,
66: there is evidence that shocks may be responsible for injecting the H$_2$S from ices into the gas-phase \citep{Buckle03}.
67: Sulfur-bearing molecules are considered to be an important tool for studying the presence of shocks within
68: massive star-forming regions.
69: Time-dependent chemical models have roughly succeeded to reproduce the observed abundances of the most common sulfur-bearing species both in high and
70: low mass star-forming regions \citep{Hatchell98,Buckle03}.
71:
72: In starburst galaxies like NGC\,253, only the most abundant sulfur-bearing molecules have been detected so far, namely CS, OCS, SO
73: \citep{Henkel85,Mauers95,Petu92},
74: and recently also SO$_2$ and NS \citep{Martin03}.
75: Extragalactic H$_2$S has only been detected toward the Large Magellanic Cloud, where H$_2$CS is also tentatively detected
76: \citep{Heikkila99}.
77: In this paper we present
78: the first detection of H$_2$S and the tentative detection of
79: H$_2$CS in NGC\,253, allowing us to investigate for the first time the sulfur chemistry in its nuclear region
80: using a set of the most abundant sulfur-bearing species.
81:
82: \section{Observations}
83: Most of the observations of the molecular species listed in Table~\ref{tab:fits} were carried out with the IRAM 30\,m telescope on Pico
84: Veleta (Spain). The measurements were made in symmetrical wobbler
85: switching mode with a frequency of 0.5\,Hz and a beamthrow of $4'$ in azimuth.
86: As spectrometers, we used two $256\times4$\,MHz filterbanks for the transitions at 2\,mm and
87: two $512\times1$\,MHz filterbanks for those at 3\,mm.
88: The $J=2-1$ and $J=5-4$ transitions of CS were measured with
89: the 15\,m Swedish-ESO Submillimetre Telescope (SEST) at La Silla (Chile).
90: Observations were done in wide dual beam switch mode, with $11.8'$ beam throw in azimuth.
91: Acousto Optical Spectrometers were used as backends with a resolution of 1.4\,MHz.
92: Beam sizes ranged from $29''$ (at 85\,GHz) to $12''$ (at 196\,GHz) for the 30m telescope and from $51''$ (at 98\,GHz) to $21''$ (at 244\,GHz) for the SEST.
93: In both telescopes, receivers were tuned to single side band with an image band rejection larger than 10dB.
94: The spectra were calibrated with a dual load system.
95:
96: Fig.~\ref{fig:transitions} shows the observed line profiles of CS and two of its isotopic substitutions ($^{13}$CS and C$^{34}$S),
97: H$_2$S, SO, H$_2$CS, and OCS, as well as the corresponding Gaussian fits.
98:
99: \section{Results}
100: \label{sect:results}
101: For most of the observed transitions, we identify two velocity components, which arise from molecular cloud complexes
102: at two opposing sides of the nucleus \citep{Mauers96}, located at $\sim 5''$ NE (the 180\,km\,s$^{-1}$ component) and
103: $\sim 5 ''$ SW (the 280\,km\,s$^{-1}$ component) as revealed by interferometric maps \citep{Peng96,Burillo00}.
104:
105: The derived parameters from the Gaussian fits to the observed profiles are shown in Table~\ref{tab:fits}.
106: While most of the transitions of the main isotopic species of CS have already been reported \citep{Mauers89,Henkel93},
107: the improved signal-to-noise ratios of our data allow us for the first time to separate the two main velocity
108: components in the line profiles.
109: Unfortunately, the 2\,mm lines of H$_2$CS appear to be blended with other lines.
110: The $4_{1,4}-3_{1,3}$ transition is blended with the H$36\alpha$ recombination line and the
111: $4_{1,3}-3_{1,2}$ transition is contaminated by a contribution of the CS $J=3-2$ line from the image band.
112: In order to perform the Gaussian fits to the H$_2$CS lines, we have respectively subtracted a Gaussian profile similar to that
113: observed for the H$34\alpha$ line measured at 160\,GHz and the CS $J=3-2$ emission measured in the signal band corrected
114: by the corresponding image gain.
115: As seen in the lower panel of the H$_2$CS lines in Fig.~\ref{fig:transitions}, the CS and the H$_2$CS lines do not fully account
116: for the observed feature.
117: The extra emission could be due to the presence of another unidentified line.
118: In spite of the uncertainties due to the blending, both resulting H$_2$CS profiles
119: are self-consistent, since they are expected to have similar intensities. Nevertheless, this detection must be
120: regarded as tentative.
121: Similarly, the OCS $J=7-6$ transition appears blended with the $J=1-0$ line of HC$^{18}$O$^+$. Additional observation of the HC$^{18}$O$^+$ $J=2-1$
122: transition at 170\,GHz allowed us to estimate and subtract the contribution of this species to the observed feature,
123: by assuming local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) with an excitation temperature $T_{\rm ex}\sim$12\,K.
124:
125: \subsection{Molecular abundances and excitation temperatures}
126: In order to derive the physical properties of the molecular material we need to make an assumption on the total emission extent
127: of the molecular emitting region. By smoothing the interferometric CS data from \citet{Peng96}, \citet{Mauers03} derived the dependence
128: of the observed line intensity on the beam size. This dependence indicates an equivalent source size of $\sim20''$ for the
129: CS emitting region. The interferometer maps of CS only miss 36\% of the flux \citep{Peng96} suggesting that the extent of the CS emission is not
130: much larger than this estimate. As we have no additional information on the extent of the emission of the other rarer species, we will
131: assume them to be similar to that of CS. This assumption is supported by the comparison of the high angular resolution maps of the CS emission
132: with those of species with a fairly different chemistry such as SiO, H$^{13}$CO$^+$ \citep{Burillo00} and NH$_3$ (M. Lebron, private communication),
133: where the morphology of the emission seems to be similar.
134:
135: We have derived source averaged column densities by correcting the measured line intensities for the estimated source size of $20''$
136: assuming optically thin emission. The corresponding
137: population diagrams for CS, SO, and OCS are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}.
138: For CS we show the population diagrams for the two velocity components at 180 and 280\,km\,s$^{-1}$ and we derive a
139: rotational temperature $T_{\rm rot}\sim10\,$K for both components. In these diagrams, the population in the $J=2$ level, clearly above the
140: linear fit, shows evidence for the presence of a lower excitation temperature component with $T_{\rm rot}\sim 5$\,K which
141: can be explained by the much larger region observed by the $51''$ beam of the SEST.
142: As derived below, the CS emission is moderately optically thick.
143: The effect of the opacity on the population diagram would result in a slight increase of the derived excitation temperatures.
144: Thus we would get temperatures of $\sim 13$\,K and $\sim 8$\,K for the two components.
145: To derive the CS column density in Table~\ref{tab:MolecDensity} we have used the optically thin emission of one of its isotopes, $^{13}$CS.
146: For OCS
147: we derive a $T_{\rm rot}=16$\,K.
148: Our estimate of the OCS column density in Table~\ref{tab:MolecDensity} is in agreement with that derived by \citet{Mauers95}
149: when the differences in the assumed source size are taken into account.
150: For the 180\,km\,s$^{-1}$ component of SO we obtain a $T_{\rm rot}=23$\,K.
151: As seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}, the 280\,km\,s$^{-1}$ component of the
152: SO $3_4-2_3$ transition (E$_{\rm u}/k\sim29$\,K) has a higher intensity than expected if we assume, from the CS results,
153: both components to have a similar rotational temperature (Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}).
154: This may be due to the contamimation of this component by the emission feature observed at a velocity of $\sim400$
155: km\,s$^{-1}$ which we tentatively identify as the $8_{1,8}-7_{1,7}$ transition of NH$_2$CN (Cyanamide).
156: The measured integrated intensity has been then considered as an upper limit as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}.
157: We have therefore assumed a similar excitation temperature of 23\,K for both velocity components to
158: compute the column density of the 280\,km\,s$^{-1}$ component of SO.
159: Since we have only one transition for H$_2$S and the two observed lines of H$_2$CS have the same upper level energy,
160: we need to make an assumption on the excitation temperature of these species.
161: As the Einstein coefficients of these transitions are similar to those of CS and SO$_2$,
162: we will take an excitation temperature of 12\,K for both species according to that derived from CS in this
163: work, and from SO$_2$ by \citet{Martin03}.
164:
165: Table~\ref{tab:MolecDensity} shows the derived source averaged column densities, rotational temperatures and
166: fractional abundances relative to H$_2$ for all the sulfur bearing molecules detected towards the nucleus of NGC\,253.
167: The main sources of uncertainty in the derived abundances are those from the assumed extent of the emitting region and the H$_2$ column density,
168: which are assumed to be the same for all the species.
169: Assuming the extreme case in which the molecular emission is confined to a much smaller region of $\sim10''$
170: the derived source averaged column densities will be larger by less than a factor 2.
171: However, these uncertainties are expected to be even smaller when column density ratios between different species are considered.
172: A similar argument also applies to the uncertainties in the derived fractional abundances introduced by the assumed H$_2$ column density if,
173: as already discussed, the spatial distribution among different species does not vary substantially.
174: Since we will focus our discussion on the molecular abundance ratios between different species, these uncertainties
175: will not affect our conclusions.
176:
177: Given that the $J=3-2$ transition of CS,
178: $^{13}$CS, and C$^{34}$S were observed with the same telescope
179: we can compare the observed $^{12}$CS to $^{13}$CS line intensity ratio of $21\pm3$ with the $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C
180: ratio of $40\pm10$ estimated by \citet{Henkel93}.
181: Assuming that the $^{12}$CS/$^{13}$CS intensity ratio reflects the $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C abundance ratio, we derive an optical depth for the
182: $^{12}$CS\,$J=3-2$ transition of $\sim1.4$.
183: Therefore from the measured $^{13}$CS/C$^{34}$S line intensities and the
184: $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C ratio mentioned above we derive a $^{32}$S/$^{34}$S abundance ratio of $8\pm2$.
185: From our non detection of the C$^{33}$S line, it is possible to give a $3\sigma$ lower limit to the $^{34}$S/$^{33}$S ratio of $9$.
186:
187: The line intensities corrected for beam dilution of the four observed transitions of CS and the $J=3-2$ lines of $^{13}$CS and C$^{34}$S
188: have been compared with the results of model calculations for the excitation of CS in which the Large Velocity Gradient approximation
189: has been used.
190: A linewidth of 100\,km\,s$^{-1}$ and a kinetic temperature $T_{\rm kin}$=100\,K
191: (similar to the rotational temperature of 100--142\,K derived from NH$_3$ measurements by \citet{Mauers03})
192: have been considered in these non-LTE calculations.
193: Fig.~\ref{fig:CSlvg} shows the results of this model for the observed line intensities and line ratios.
194: The grey region corresponds to the best fit to the observed CS main isotope line intensities, calculated by minimizing the reduced $\chi^2$
195: function as described by \citet{Nummelin}.
196: The best fit gives a CS column density
197: N(CS)=$5.7\times10^{13}$cm$^{-2}$ and a molecular hydrogen density n(H$_2$)=$2.2\times10^{5}$cm$^{-3}$ for the velocity component at
198: 180\,km\,s$^{-1}$ and N(CS)=$5.7\times10^{13}$cm$^{-2}$ and n(H$_2$)=$2.4\times10^{5}$cm$^{-3}$ for that at 280\,km\,s$^{-1}$.
199: These column densities are a factor of two lower than those in Table~\ref{tab:MolecDensity} derived from the isotopomer $^{13}$CS assuming LTE conditions.
200: The H$_2$ density derived from this analysis depends on the assumed kinetic temperature. Therefore, a $T_{\rm kin}$ of 50\,K or 25\,K would
201: lead to H$_2$ densities a factor of 2 and 4 higher respectively. The choice of $T_{\rm kin}$ has, however, almost no effect on the column density determination.
202:
203: As seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:CSlvg} shows, the best fit contour does not cover the $J=2-1$ data at a probability level of 99.5$\%$.
204: This fact suggests that the CS emission is
205: best explained if one consider several gas components
206: in the region covered by the telescope beam. These components are related to the need of two different excitation temperatures to fit the
207: population diagram.
208: The $J=2-1$ to $1-0$ ratio of 1.5 derived by \citet{Paglione}, also plotted in Fig~\ref{fig:CSlvg}, supports this scenario.
209: For the 180\,km\,s$^{-1}$ velocity component (Fig.~\ref{fig:CSlvg}(a)) a higher density component (n(H$_2$)$\sim4\times10^5$ cm$^{-3}$)
210: explains the $J_{\rm u}=5,4,3$ transitions, and a lower density component (n(H$_2$)$\sim6\times10^4$ cm$^{-3}$), with a 3 times higher
211: column density, explains the lower $J$ transitions. Similar results, within the errors, can be derived for the 280\,km\,s$^{-1}$
212: component.
213:
214: From the non-LTE calculations we derive C$^{32}$S/C$^{34}$S ratios of 4--9 and $^{12}$CS/$^{13}$CS ratios of 22--35 for the 180 and
215: 280\,km\,s$^{-1}$ velocity components respectively. The $^{12}$CS/$^{13}$CS intensity ratio obtained for the 180\,km\,s$^{-1}$ component
216: is half the $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C ratio estimated by \citet{Henkel93} while that obtained for the 280\,km\,s$^{-1}$ component is closer to
217: their value. This may be explained by the fact that the $^{13}$CS observation by \citet{Henkel93} where made towards a position $\sim6''$
218: closer to the emission peak of the 280\,km\,s$^{-1}$ component.
219:
220: \section{Discussion}
221: \subsection{Molecular fractional abundances}
222: We find that most of the sulfur-bearing species detected towards the nuclear region of NGC\,253 show similar fractional
223: abundances of a few 10$^{-9}$ (Table~\ref{tab:MolecDensity}).
224: Only CS and OCS have abundances a factor of $\sim5$ higher.
225: In order to understand the mechanism that dominates the chemistry in the nuclear environment of NGC\,253 we
226: summarize in Table~\ref{tab:comparison} the fractional abundances of all the sulfur-bearing molecules detected towards this
227: starburst galaxy and those observed towards selected Galactic sources
228: (hot cores, Galactic center clouds, dark clouds, photodissociation regions (PDRs) and shocks driven by massive protostars)
229: which are dominated
230: by different kinds of chemistry. The abundance ratios discussed on this section are also shown in Table~\ref{tab:comparison}.
231:
232: The SO$_2$ abundance in PDRs is much lower,by a factor of 40, than that found in NGC\,253.
233: Thus, abundance ratios such as H$_2$S/SO$_2$ and CS/SO$_2$ can be used to establish the role of photodissociation
234: in the chemistry of NGC\,253. Particularly instructive is the SO/SO$_2$ abundance ratio. SO/SO$_2$ $\sim100$ towards PDRs is about
235: two orders of magnitude larger than that in NGC\,253 which suggests that photodissociation does not play a major role in the chemistry
236: of its nuclear region.
237:
238: A comparison with dark clouds shows a clearly lower abundance of OCS than that
239: observed towards NGC\,253. The OCS/SO ratio is 0.1 and 0.4 in L134N and TMC-1
240: respectively, while we measure $\sim 4$ in NGC\,253. The abundance ratios of SO$_2$/SO and H$_2$S/SO of $\sim 0.2$ and $\sim 0.05$
241: respectively measured towards these dark clouds are also much smaller than the corresponding ratios of $\sim 1$ observed towards NGC\,253.
242: Therefore, dark molecular
243: clouds like L134N and TMC-1 do not seem to dominate the molecular composition near the nucleus of NGC\,253.
244:
245: Chemistry driven by high velocity shocks in molecular outflows
246: also differs significantly from the chemistry found in NGC\,253.
247: The OCS/SO ratio measured towards these sources
248: is two orders of magnitude smaller than that in NGC\,253, while CS/H$_2$S is three orders of magnitude lower.
249: The large abundance of H$_2$S, as well as the low abundance of molecules such as CS, OCS, and H$_2$CS in local molecular
250: outflows, is not observed in NGC\,253.
251:
252: As far as the hot cores are concerned, the molecular abundances vary significantly between Galactic sources. Different evolutionary states
253: may account for these observed differences. As seen in Table~\ref{tab:comparison} the abundance ratios in the
254: Orion hot core mostly disagree with those in NGC\,253. The relative abundances of most of the species towards SGR\,B2(N) are similar
255: to what we find in NGC\,253 except for the underabundance of H$_2$S and OCS with respect to the other molecules.
256: The ratio OCS/SO is almost two orders of magnitude lower in both hot cores than in NGC\,253.
257: In addition, the low rotational temperatures ($T_{\rm rot}<25$K) derived for all the sulfur-bearing species in NGC\,253 suggest that the observed
258: emission cannot be due to hot cores where much higher rotational temperatures are expected ($T_{\rm kin}>70$K).
259:
260: \citet{Martin03} pointed out that the molecular abundances of SO$_2$, NO, and NS are similar to those
261: found in the envelope of the SGR\,B2 molecular complex.
262: Table~\ref{tab:comparison} also includes the comparison with two different clouds
263: in the envelope of SGR\,B2.
264: The first position, labeled SGR\,B2(OH), is located $30''$ south of SGR\,B2\,M, and
265: the second one $100''$ north-east of SGR\,B2\,M.
266: SO$_2$, SO, and H$_2$CS abundances in the Galactic center clouds agree well with those observed towards NGC\,253.
267: OCS/SO abundances ratios of 5 and 9 are similar to the ratio of $\sim 4$ found in NGC\,253.
268:
269: Our study of the sulfur chemistry towards the nuclear region of NGC\,253 seems to indicate a chemistry similar to that of the envelope of
270: SGR\,B2 where low velocity shocks are thought to be the main heating mechanism of the molecular material
271: \citep{Flower,Pintado97,Pintado01}.
272: The low rotational temperatures derived for NGC\,253 are also in agreement with those derived by \citet{Cummins} in the SGR\,B2 envelope.
273: These results support the idea of large scale low velocity shocks driving the chemistry of the inner molecular material
274: in the nucleus of NGC\,253 which is consistent with the high rotational temperatures derived from NH$_3$ and the large observed
275: SiO abundances \citep{Burillo00,Mauers03}.
276:
277:
278: \subsection{Chemical models}
279: In order to get an insight into the dominant chemistry around the central region of NGC\,253,
280: we compare our results with those available from chemical models \citep{Millar97,Charnley97,Hatchell98,Buckle03}.
281: For this we will assume that the whole nuclear region of NGC\,253 can be described as a single molecular cloud.
282: This is not likely as we are observing a 200\,pc region where a number
283: of unresolved molecular complexes with different physical and chemical properties coexist.
284: Nevertheless, the dominant observed chemistry in the nuclear region of NGC\,253 could be characterized by a single giant cloud as observed
285: for the envelope of SGR\,B2 which has a size of $\sim30$\,pc. The SiO mapping of the Galactic center region show molecular cloud complexes
286: extended over even larger scales \citep{Pintado97}.
287:
288: We have compared the observed molecular abundances in NGC\,253 with the time-dependent models used by \citet{Hatchell98}
289: and \citet{Buckle03} to describe the chemistry of hot cores and low mass protostars respectively.
290: These models assume the release of H$_2$S from grain mantles as the main precursor of the sulfur chemistry.
291: Models with $T_{\rm kin}\leq 50\,\rm K$ and n(H$_2$)$<10^5{\rm cm}^{-3}$
292: seem to best reproduce the abundances measured for SO$_2$, SO, H$_2$S, and H$_2$CS shown in Table~\ref{tab:comparison}.
293: This result is in agreement with the idea that the emission from the nuclear region of NGC\,253 is dominated by low excitation temperature
294: and moderately dense molecular clouds similar to those found in the Galactic center clouds.
295:
296: However current chemical models fall short of accounting for the observed abundances of OCS by more than one order of magnitude.
297: It has been pointed out by \citet{Hatchell98} and \citet{Vandertak03}
298: that OCS may play an important role in the chemistry of sulfur-bearing molecules.
299: Near-IR observations of massive protostars \citep{Geballe95,Tielens89,Palumbo95}
300: show that sulfur may freeze out onto grains not only in the form of H$_2$S but also in the form of OCS.
301: In fact OCS is the only sulfur bearing molecule detected so far in icy grain mantles.
302: This would imply that OCS is also sputtered from grains by shocks.
303: \citet{Hatchell98} revised the chemical model by including an initial large abundance of OCS as well
304: as reducing that of H$_2$S, assuming these species are initially injected into the gas phase.
305: These models, depending on the initially injected H$_2$S and OCS \citep{Wakelam04},
306: may account for the high OCS abundance observed in the nuclear region of NGC\,253.
307:
308: \subsection{Sulfur isotopic ratios}
309: The $^{32}$S/$^{34}$S abundance ratios of $8\pm2$ and $13.5\pm2.5$ observed towards the nuclear starburst environment of NGC\,253
310: (Sect.~\ref{sect:results}) and NGC\,4945 \citep{Wang04}
311: respectively are similar to those found within the Galactic inner 3\,kpc region, but considerably lower than the value
312: of $\sim 24$ measured in the Galactic disk \citep{Chin}.
313: The estimated lower limit of the $^{34}$S/$^{33}$S ratio towards NGC\,253 is higher
314: than the abundance of $\sim6$ measured towards most of the Galactic sources studied by \citet{Chin}.
315:
316: Massive stars, as well as type Ib/c and II supernovae, appear to slightly overproduce $^{34}$S and underproduce $^{33}$S compared to
317: $^{32}$S \citep[see][and references therein]{Chin}.
318: Thus, the compact stellar clusters observed near the center of NGC\,253 \citep{Watson96} and the estimated overall star formation
319: rate of 3.6\,M$_\odot$yr$^{-1}$ \citep{Strickland04} and supernova rate (SNr) of 0.05--0.3\,yr$^{-1}$
320: \citep{Mattila01,Ulvestad97} might account for the low $^{32}$S/$^{34}$S as well as
321: the enhanced $^{34}$S/$^{33}$S ratios in NGC\,253.
322: This fact is supported by the high massive star formation rate of $\sim 0.1$\,M$_\odot$yr$^{-1}$ estimated by \citet{Forbes93} for the
323: inner $6\arcsec$ of this starburst.
324:
325: Uncertainties are large enough that the $^{32}$S/$^{34}$S ratio observed towards NGC\,253 may not significantly differ from that in NGC\,4945,
326: where slightly higher star formation and supernova rates \citep{Strickland04} might also have induced an overproduction of $^{34}$S in its nuclear
327: region.
328:
329:
330: \acknowledgements
331: J.\,M.-P. has been partially supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia Y Tecnolog\'{\i}a with grant ESP2002-01627, AYA2002-10113E, AYA2003-0090
332: and ESP2004-00665. We wish to thank F.F.S. van der Tak for critical reading of the manuscript.
333:
334:
335:
336:
337: \newpage
338:
339: \begin{thebibliography}{}
340: \bibitem[Buckle \& Fuller(2003)]{Buckle03} Buckle, J.V., \& Fuller, G.A. 2003, \aap, 399, 567
341: \bibitem[Charnley(1997)]{Charnley97} Charnley, S.B. 1997, \apj, 481, 396
342: \bibitem[Chin et al.(1996)]{Chin} Chin, Y.-N., Henkel, C., Whiteoak, J.B., Langer, N., \& Churchwell, E.B. 1996, \aap, 305, 960
343: \bibitem[Cummins et al.(1986)]{Cummins} Cummins, S.E., Linke R.A., \& Thaddeus P. 1986, \apjs, 60, 819
344: \bibitem[Flower et al.(1995)]{Flower} Flower, D.R., Pineau des For\^ets, G., \& Walmsley, C.M. 1995, \aap, 294, 815
345: \bibitem[Forbes et al.(1993)]{Forbes93} Forbes, D.A., Ward, M.J., Rotaciuc, V., Blietz, M., Genzel, R., Drapatz, S., van der Werf, P.P., \& Krabbe, A. 1993, ApJ, 406, L11
346: \bibitem[Geballe et al.(1985)]{Geballe95} Geballe, T.R., Baas, F., Greenberg, J.M., \& Schutte, W. 1985, \aap, 146, L6
347: \bibitem[Garc\'{\i}a-Burillo et al.(2000)]{Burillo00} Garc\'{\i}a-Burillo, S., Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado, J., Fuente, A., \& Neri, R. 2000, \aap, 355, 499
348: \bibitem[Hatchell et al.(1998)]{Hatchell98} Hatchell, J., Thompson, M.A., Millar, T.J., \& Macdonald, G.H. 1998, \aap, 338, 713
349: \bibitem[Hatchell \& Viti(2002)]{Hatchell02} Hatchell, J., \& Viti, S. 2002, \aap, 381, L33
350: \bibitem[Henkel \& Bally(1985)]{Henkel85} Henkel, C., \& Bally, J. 1985, \aap, 150, L25
351: \bibitem[Henkel et al.(1993)]{Henkel93} Henkel, C., Mauersberger, R., Wiklind, T., H\"uttemeister, S., Lemme, C., \& Millar, T.J. 1993, \aap, 268, L17
352: \bibitem[Heikkil\"a et al.(1999)]{Heikkila99} Heikkil\"a, A., Johansson, L. E. B., \& Olofsson, H. 1999, \aap, 344, 817
353: \bibitem[Jansen et al.(1995)]{Jansen95} Jansen, D.J., Spaans, M., Hogerheijde, M.R., \& van Dishoeck, E.F. 1995, \aap, 303, 541
354: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}n et al.(2003)]{Martin03} Mart\'{\i}n, S., Mauersberger, R., Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado, J., Garc\'{\i}a-Burillo, S., \& Henkel, C. 2003, \aap, 411, L465
355: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}n et al.(in preparation)]{MartinPrep} Mart\'{\i}n, S., Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado, J., Mauersberger, R., Requena, M.A., in preparation
356: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado et al.(1997)]{Pintado97} Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado, J., de Vicente, P., Fuente, A., \& Planesas, P. 1997, \apj, 482, L45
357: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado et al.(2001)]{Pintado01} Mart\'{\i}n-Pintado, J., Rizzo, J.R., de Vicente, P., Rodr\'{\i}guez-Fern\'andez, N.J., Fuente, A. 2001, \apj, 548, L65
358: \bibitem[Mattila \& Meikle(2001)]{Mattila01} Mattila, S. \& Meikle, W.P.S. 2001, \mnras, 324, 325
359: \bibitem[Mauersberger \& Henkel(1989)]{Mauers89} Mauersberger, R., \& Henkel, C. 1989, \aap, 223, 79
360: \bibitem[Mauersberger et al.(1995)]{Mauers95} Mauersberger, R., Henkel, C., \& Chin, Y.-N., 1995, \aap, 294, 23
361: \bibitem[Mauersberger et al.(1996)]{Mauers96} Mauersberger, R., Henkel, C., Wielebinski, R., Wiklind, T., \& Reuter, H.-P. 1996, \aap, 305, 421
362: \bibitem[Mauersberger et al.(2003)]{Mauers03} Mauersberger, R., Henkel, C., Wei\ss, A., Peck, A.B., \& Hagiwara, Y. 2003, \aap, 403, 561
363: \bibitem[McGonagle et al.(1994)]{McGonagle94} McGonagle, D., Irvine, W.M., \& Ohishi, M. 1994, \apj, 422, 621
364: \bibitem[McGonagle \& Irvine(1997)]{McGonagle97} McGonagle, D., \& Irvine, W.M. 1997, \apj, 477, 711
365: \bibitem[Millar et al.(1997)]{Millar97} Millar, T.J., Macdonald, G.H., \& Gibb, A.G. 1997, \aap, 325, 1163
366: \bibitem[Minh et al.(1990)]{Minh90} Minh, Y.C., Irvine, W.M., McGonagle, D., \& Ziurys, L.M. 1990, \apj, 360, 136
367: \bibitem[Minh et al.(1991)]{Minh91} Minh, Y.C., Ziurys, L.M., Irvine, W.M., \& McGonagle, D. 1991, \apj, 366, 192
368: \bibitem[Nummelin et al.(2000)]{Nummelin} Nummelin A., Bergman P., Hjalmarson \AA., Friberg, P., Irvine, W. M., Millar, T. J., Ohishi, M., \& Saito, S. 2000, \apjs, 128, 213
369: \bibitem[Ohishi et al.(1992)]{Ohishi} Ohishi, M., Irvine, W. M., \& Kaifu, N. 1992, in IAU Symp. 150, Astrochemistry of Cosmic Phenomena, ed. P.D. Singh (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 171
370: \bibitem[Paglione et al.(1995)]{Paglione} Paglione, T. A. D., Jackson, J. M., Ishizuki, S., \& Nguyen-Q-Rieu 1995, \aj, 109, 1716
371: \bibitem[Palumbo et al.(1995)]{Palumbo95} Palumbo, M.E., Tielens, A.G.G.M., \& Tokunaga, A.T. 1995, \apj, 449, 674
372: \bibitem[Peng et al.(1996)]{Peng96} Peng, R., Zhou, S., Whiteoak, J. B., Lo, K. Y., \& Sutton, E. C. 1996, \apj, 470, 821
373: \bibitem[Petuchowski \& Bennet(1992)]{Petu92} Petuchowski, S. J., \& Bennett, C. L. 1992, \apj, 391, 137
374: \bibitem[Strickland et al.(2004)]{Strickland04} Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Colbert, E. J. M., Hoopes, C. G., \& Weaver, K. A. 2004, \apj, 606, 829
375: \bibitem[Sutton et al.(1995)]{Sutton95} Sutton, E.C., Peng, R., Danchi, W.C., Jaminet, P.A., Sandell, G., \& Russell, A.P.G. 1995, \apjs, 97, 455
376: \bibitem[Tielens(1989)]{Tielens89} Tielens, A.G.G.M. 1989, in IAU Symp. 135, Interstellar Dust, ed. L.J. Allamandola \& A.G.G.M. Tielens (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 239
377: \bibitem[Ulvestad \& Antonucci(1997)]{Ulvestad97} Ulvestad, J.S \& Antonucci, R.R.J. 1997, \apj, 488, 621
378: \bibitem[van der Tak et al.(2003)]{Vandertak03} van der Tak, F.F.S., Boonman,A.M.S., Braakman, R., \& van Dishoeck, E.F. 2003, \aap, 412, 133
379: \bibitem[Wakelam et al.(2004)]{Wakelam04} Wakelam, V., Caselli, P., Ceccarelli, C., Herbst, E. \& Castets, A. 2004, \aap, 422, 159
380: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2004)]{Wang04} Wang, M., Henkel, C., Chin, Y.-N., Whiteoak, J., Cunningham, M., Mauersberger, R., \& Muders, D. 2004, \aap, 422, 883
381: \bibitem[Watson et al.(1996)]{Watson96} Watson, A. M., et al. 1996, \aj, 112, 534
382: \end{thebibliography}
383:
384:
385:
386:
387: \newpage
388:
389: \begin{figure}[ht]
390: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.3\textwidth}
391: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{f1a.eps}
392: \\[20 pt]
393: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{f1b.eps}
394: \end{minipage}%
395: \hspace{5 pt}
396: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.3\textwidth}
397: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{f1c.eps}
398: \\[10 pt]
399: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{f1d.eps}
400: \end{minipage}
401: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.3\textwidth}
402: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{f1e.eps}
403: \\[5 pt]
404: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{f1f.eps}
405: \end{minipage}
406: \figcaption {Gaussian fits to the detected transitions of H$_2$S, CS, $^{13}$CS, C$^{34}$S, SO, H$_2$CS, and OCS towards the nuclear
407: region of NGC\,253 ($\alpha_{J2000}=00^{\rm h}47^{\rm m}33\fs4 ,\delta_{J2000}=-25\arcdeg17\arcmin23\arcsec$)
408: The velocity resolution has been smoothed to 10\,km\,s$^{-1}$. Intensities are given in $T_{\rm MB}$ (mK).
409: The figure for H$_2$CS shows in dashed lines the fits to the H$_2$CS transitions, in dotted lines the assumed H36$\alpha$ and CS profiles
410: and in thick line the total fit. Similarly, the figure for the OCS $J=7-6$ transition shows the calculated HC$^{18}$O$^{+}$ in dotted line.
411: \label{fig:transitions}}
412: \end{figure}
413:
414:
415: \begin{figure}[ht]
416: \begin{center}
417: \includegraphics[width=0.23\linewidth, angle=-90]{f2a.eps}
418: \includegraphics[width=0.23\linewidth, angle=-90]{f2b.eps}
419: \includegraphics[width=0.23\linewidth, angle=-90]{f2c.eps}
420: \figcaption {Population diagrams for the CS, SO, and OCS molecules. 180\,km\,s$^{-1}$ component is represented by squares and continuous
421: lines, the 280\,km\,s$^{-1}$ component is shown with triangles and dashed lines.
422: \label{fig:diagrams}}
423: \end{center}
424: \end{figure}
425:
426: \clearpage
427:
428: \begin{figure}[ht]
429: \begin{center}
430: \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth,angle=-90]{f3.eps}
431: \figcaption{LVG model predictions for the observed CS transitions and for the $J=3-2$ line of its isotopomers $^{13}$CS and C$^{34}$S at a $T_{\rm kin}$=100\,K
432: as a function of the H$_2$ density and the CS column density.
433: Upper and lower pannel correspond to the 180 and 280 \,km\,s$^{-1}$ velocity components respectively.
434: Lines show the measured line intensities and intensity ratios. The 2--1/1--0 ratio is from \citet{Paglione}.
435: Best fit to the line intensities of CS that minimizes the reduced $\chi ^2$ function is shown in grey and corresponds to the
436: probability of 99.5\% of enclosing the true parameters.
437: \label{fig:CSlvg}}
438: \end{center}
439: \end{figure}
440:
441: \newpage
442:
443: \begin{table}[ht]
444: \caption{Parameters derived from Gaussian fits to the observed features.\label{tab:fits}}
445: \begin{tabular}{l l c r r r r r}
446: \tableline
447: \tableline
448: Molecule &$\nu$ & Transition & $\int{T_{\rm MB}{\rm d}v}$ & $v_{\rm LSR}$ & $\Delta v_{1/2}$ & $T_{\rm MB}$ & rms\tablenotemark{b} \\
449: &(MHz) & $J-J'$ & (mK\,km\,s$^{-1}$) & (km\,s$^{-1}$) & (km\,s$^{-1}$) & (mK) & (mK) \\
450: \tableline
451: H$_2$S & 168762.8 &$1_{1,0}-1_{0,1}$& 1520 (180) & 180 & 100 & 14.3 & 4.7 \\
452: & & & 2250 ( 80) & 275 & 88 & 23.9 & \\
453: CS & 97981.0 & $2-1$ & 4400 (500) & 172 & 96 & 43.4 & 5.2 \\
454: & & & 8200 (500) & 290 & 116 & 66.5 & \\
455: & 146969.0 & $3-2$ & 11900 (200) & 185 & 100 & 111.2 & 4.1 \\
456: & & & 13700 (200) & 288 & 117 & 110.3 & \\
457: & 195954.2 & $4-3$ & 11500 (400) & 185\tablenotemark{a} & 100 & 108.2 & 7.0 \\
458: & & & 13400 (500) & 288\tablenotemark{a} & 121 & 104.5 & \\
459: & 244935.6 & $5-4$ & 4400 (400) & 158 & 107 & 38.2 & 10.8 \\
460: & & & 5400 (130) & 262 & 108 & 46.7 & \\
461: C$^{34}$S & 144617.1 & $3-2$ & 3000 (300) & 188 & 105 & 27.1 & 1.4 \\
462: & & & 1500 (300) & 284 & 86 & 16.1 & \\
463: $^{13}$CS & 138739.3 & $3-2$ & 550 ( 70) & 188 & 70 & 7.4 & 1.9 \\
464: & & & 390 ( 50) & 274 & 70\tablenotemark{a} & 5.2 & \\
465: C$^{33}$S & 145755.8 & $3-2$ & $<600 $ &... &... & $<3.5$ & 2.8 \\
466: SO & 138178.6 & $4_3-3_2$ & 1400 (200) & 180 & 73 & 17.8 & 2.1 \\
467: & & & 1100 (200) & 274 & 88 & 11.6 & \\
468: & 158971.8 & $3_4-2_3$ & 700 (200) & 180\tablenotemark{a} & 92 & 7.2 & 2.9 \\
469: & & & 1000 (200) & 274\tablenotemark{a} & 84 & 11.4 & \\
470: H$_2$CS & 135297.8 &$4_{1,4}-3_{1,3}$& 1040 ( 90) & 221 & 158 & 6.2 & 1.4 \\
471: & 139483.4 &$4_{1,3}-3_{1,2}$& 1340 (150) & 221 & 176 & 7.2 & 2.0 \\
472: OCS & 85139.1 & $7-6$ & 1100 (300) & 212\tablenotemark{a} & 210\tablenotemark{a} & 5.1 & 2.7 \\
473: & 97301.2 & $8-7$ & 1080 (120) & 214 & 219 & 4.6 & 1.8 \\
474: & 133785.9 & $11-10$ & 1220 (130) & 212 & 200 & 5.8 & 1.3 \\
475: & 145946.8 & $12-11$ & 580 (170) & 212\tablenotemark{a} & 210\tablenotemark{a} & 2.6 & 1.4 \\
476: \tableline
477: \end{tabular}
478: \tablenotetext{a}{fixed parameter.}
479: \tablenotetext{b}{rms values in $T_{\rm mb}$ and smoothed to a 10\,km\,s$^{-1}$ channel width.}
480: \end{table}
481:
482:
483: \begin{table}[ht]
484: \caption{Physical parameters derived for each species.\label{tab:MolecDensity}}
485: \begin{tabular}{l l l l l l}
486: \tableline
487: \tableline
488: \multicolumn{2}{c}{Molecule} & $N$ & $T_{\rm rot}$ & [X]/[H$_2$]\tablenotemark{a} \\
489: & &(10$^{13}$cm$^{-2}$) & (K) & 10$^{-9}$ \\
490: \tableline
491: H$_2$S &(180\,km/s) & 2.4 & 12 & 1.4 \\
492: &(270\,km/s) & 3.6 & 12 & 2.1 \\
493: CS\tablenotemark{b} &(180\,km/s) & 20 & 9.7(0.4) & 12 \\
494: &(280\,km/s) & 14 & 10 (0.2) & 8.2 \\
495: NS\tablenotemark{c}& & 5 & 8(1) & 3 \\
496: SO &(180\,km/s) & 3 & 23(14) & 2 \\
497: &(270\,km/s) & 2.5 & 23 & 1.5 \\
498: H$_2$CS & & 4.6 & 12 & 2.7 \\
499: OCS & & 26 & 16(2) & 15 \\
500: SO$_2$\tablenotemark{c}& & 7 & 14(9) & 4 \\
501: \tableline
502: \end{tabular}
503: \tablecomments{Column densities are source averaged values over a 20\arcsec region.}
504: \tablenotetext{a}{Assumed $N({\rm H}_2)=1.7\,10^{22}{\rm cm}^{-2}$ from \citet{Mauers03}.}
505: \tablenotetext{b}{Column density derived using the optically thin $^{13}$CS line and assuming a ratio $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C=40 \citep{Henkel93}.}
506: \tablenotetext{c}{from \citet{Martin03}.}
507: \end{table}
508:
509:
510: \begin{table}[ht]
511:
512: \caption{Relative abundances of S-bearing molecules in different environments. \label{tab:comparison}}
513: \begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c c c c c}
514: \tableline
515: \tableline
516: & &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Hot Cores} &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Galactic center clouds} &\multicolumn{2}{c}{Dark clouds} &PDRs &Outflows \\
517: & NGC &SGR\,B2 &Orion &SGR\,B2 &Sgr B2 &L134N &TMC-1 &Orion &Orion \\
518: Molecule & 253 &(N)\tablenotemark{(a)} &K-L\tablenotemark{(b)} &(OH)\tablenotemark{(c)} &(envelope)\tablenotemark{(d)} &\tablenotemark{(e)} &\tablenotemark{(e)} &Bar\tablenotemark{(f)} &Plateau\tablenotemark{(b)} \\
519: \tableline
520: H$_2$S &4 &0.2\tablenotemark{(g)} &5000\tablenotemark{(h)} &... &1.5 &0.8 &$<$0.5 &6 &4000\tablenotemark{(h)} \\
521: CS &20 &... &6 &... &11 &1 &10 &20 &4 \\
522: NS &3\tablenotemark{(i)} &10 &0.4\tablenotemark{(j)} &... &2.1 &0.4\tablenotemark{(k)}&1\tablenotemark{(k)}&... &... \\
523: SO &4 &20 &190 &4.4 &6 &20 &5 &9 &200 \\
524: H$_2$CS &3 &20 &0.8 &6 &5 &0.6 &3 &... &8 \\
525: OCS &15 &2 &11 &21 &53 &2 &2 &... &10 \\
526: SO$_2$ &4\tablenotemark{(i)} &30 &120 &5.8 &5.4 &4 &$<$1 &0.1 &100 \\
527: \tableline
528: H$_2$S/SO & 1 & 0.01 & 26 & ... & 0.25 & 0.04 & $<$0.1 &0.7 &20 \\
529: CS/SO$_2$ & 5 & ... & 0.005 & ... & 2 & 0.25 & $<$10 & 200 &0.04 \\
530: SO$_2$/SO & 1 & 1.5 & 0.6 & 1.3 & 0.9 & 0.2 & $<$0.2 & 0.01 & 0.5 \\
531: OCS/SO & 3.75 & 0.1 & 0.06 & 4.8 & 8.8 & 0.1 & 0.4 &... & 0.05 \\
532: CS/H$_2$S & 5 & ... & 0.001 & ... & 7.3 & 1.25 & $>$20 & 3.3 & 0.001 \\
533: \tableline
534: \end{tabular}
535: \tablecomments{Units of 10$^{-9}$ are used.}
536: \tablerefs{
537: ${(a)}$ \citet{Nummelin};
538: ${(b)}$ \citet{Sutton95};
539: ${(c)}$ \citet{Cummins} assuming N(H$_2$)=$1\times10^{23}{\rm cm}^{-2}$;
540: ${(d)}$ \citet{MartinPrep};
541: ${(e)}$ \citet{Ohishi};
542: ${(f)}$ \citet{Jansen95};
543: ${(g)}$ \citet{Minh91};
544: ${(h)}$ \citet{Minh90};
545: ${(i)}$ \citet{Martin03};
546: ${(j)}$ \citet{McGonagle97};
547: ${(k)}$ \citet{McGonagle94};
548: }
549: \end{table}
550:
551:
552:
553:
554:
555: \end{document}
556: