1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2004 January 9
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}
20: \usepackage{graphicx}
21: \usepackage{natbib}
22:
23: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
24:
25: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
26:
27: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
28:
29: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
30:
31: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
32: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
33: %% use the longabstract style option.
34:
35: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
36:
37: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
38: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
39: %% the \begin{document} command.
40: %%
41: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
42: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
43: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
44: %% for information.
45:
46: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
47: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
48:
49: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
50:
51: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
52:
53: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
54: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
55: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
56: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
57: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
58: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
59:
60: \shorttitle{High-Resolution Spectroscopy of TrES-1}
61: \shortauthors{Sozzetti et al.}
62:
63: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
64: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
65:
66: \begin{document}
67:
68: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
69: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
70: %% you desire.
71:
72: \title{High-Resolution Spectroscopy of the Transiting Planet Host Star TrES-1}
73:
74: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
75: %% author and affiliation information.
76: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
77: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
78: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
79: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
80:
81: \author{Alessandro Sozzetti\altaffilmark{1,2}, David Yong\altaffilmark{3},
82: Guillermo Torres\altaffilmark{2}, David
83: Charbonneau\altaffilmark{2}, David W. Latham\altaffilmark{2},
84: Carlos Allende Prieto\altaffilmark{4}, Timothy M.
85: Brown\altaffilmark{5}, Bruce W. Carney\altaffilmark{3}, and John
86: B. Laird\altaffilmark{6}} \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics
87: \& Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA}
88: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60
89: Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA}
90: %\altaffiltext{3}{INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino, 10025 Pino
91: %Torinese, Italy}\email{alex@phyast.pitt.edu}
92: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy,
93: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA}
94: \altaffiltext{4}{McDonald Observatory and Department of Astronomy,
95: University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA}
96: \altaffiltext{5}{High Altitude Observatory/National Center for
97: Atmospheric Research, 3450 Mitchell Lane, Boulder, CO 80307 USA}
98: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy,
99: Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA}
100: \email{asozzett@cfa.harvard.edu}
101: \email{yong@physics.unc.edu}
102: \email{gtorres@cfa.harvard.edu}
103: \email{dcharbon@cfa.harvard.edu}
104: \email{dlatham@cfa.harvard.edu}
105: \email{callende@hebe.as.utexas.edu}
106: \email{timbrown@hao.ucar.edu}
107: \email{bruce@physics.unc.edu}
108: \email{laird@tycho.bgsu.edu}
109: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
110: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
111: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
112: %% affiliation.
113:
114:
115: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
116: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
117: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
118: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
119: %% editorial office after submission.
120:
121: \begin{abstract}
122: We report on a spectroscopic determination of the stellar parameters and
123: chemical abundances for the parent star of the transiting planet
124: TrES-1. Based on a detailed analysis of iron lines in our Keck
125: and HET spectra we derive $T_\mathrm{eff} = 5250\pm 75$ K,
126: $\log g = 4.6\pm 0.2$, and [Fe/H] $= 0.00\pm 0.09$. By measuring
127: the \ion{Ca}{2} activity indicator and by putting useful upper
128: limits on the Li abundance we constrain the age of TrES-1 to be
129: $2.5\pm 1.5$ Gyr. By comparing theoretical stellar evolution
130: models with the observational parameters we obtain $M_\star =
131: 0.89\pm 0.05$ $M_\odot$, and $R_\star = 0.83\pm 0.05$ $R_\odot$.
132: Our improved estimates of the stellar parameters are utilized in a
133: new analysis of the transit photometry of TrES-1 to derive a mass
134: $M_p = 0.76\pm 0.05$ $M_\mathrm{J}$, a radius $R_p =
135: 1.04^{+0.08}_{-0.05}$ $R_\mathrm{J}$, and an inclination $i =
136: 89^\circ.5^{+0.5}_{-1.3}$. The improved planetary mass and radius
137: estimates provide the grounds for new crucial tests of theoretical
138: models of evolution and evaporation of irradiated extrasolar giant
139: planets.
140:
141: \end{abstract}
142:
143: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
144: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
145: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
146: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
147:
148: %% Authors who wish to have the most important objects in their paper
149: %% linked in the electronic edition to a data center may do so in the
150: %% subject header. Objects should be in the appropriate "individual"
151: %% headers (e.g. quasars: individual, stars: individual, etc.) with the
152: %% additional provision that the total number of headers, including each
153: %% individual object, not exceed six. The \objectname{} macro, and its
154: %% alias \object{}, is used to mark each object. The macro takes the object
155: %% name as its primary argument. This name will appear in the paper
156: %% and serve as the link's anchor in the electronic edition if the name
157: %% is recognized by the data centers. The macro also takes an optional
158: %% argument in parentheses in cases where the data center identification
159: %% differs from what is to be printed in the paper.
160:
161: \keywords{planetary systems: formation --- stars: individual
162: (TrES-1) --- stars: abundances}
163:
164: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.
165: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep
166: %% and \citet commands to identify citations. The citations are
167: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds
168: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have
169: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus
170: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for
171: %% each reference.
172:
173: \section{Introduction}
174:
175: The discovery of an extra-solar Jupiter-sized planet transiting
176: the disk of the K0V star TrES-1 (Alonso et al. 2004) has marked
177: the first success of ground-based photometric surveys targeting
178: large areas of the sky with small-size telescopes searching for
179: low-amplitude periodic variations in the light curves of bright
180: stars (V $\leq 13$). In this Letter we report on a detailed
181: spectroscopic determination of the stellar parameters and chemical
182: abundances of iron and lithium of the transiting planet host star.
183:
184: TrES-1 is only the second transiting planet orbiting a star bright
185: enough to allow for a variety of follow-up analyses similar to
186: those conducted for HD 209458b (see for example Charbonneau 2003,
187: and references therein).
188: In particular, high-resolution, high signal-to-noise ratio
189: spectroscopic observations of TrES-1 can be readily conducted,
190: allowing for improved values of the effective temperature, surface
191: gravity, and metallicity of the star. These parameters, when
192: compared with stellar evolution models, provide the means to
193: derive good estimates of its mass and radius. Finally, by
194: combining spectroscopic observations with transit photometry it is
195: possible to determine refined estimates of the mass and radius of
196: the planet. A better knowledge of these parameters offers the
197: tantalizing possibility for crucial tests of giant planet
198: formation, migration, and evolution. In addition, the hypothesis
199: of self-enrichment due to recent ingestion of planetary material
200: can be tested using detailed abundances of elements such as
201: lithium.
202:
203: \section{Data Reduction and Abundance Analysis}
204:
205: The spectroscopic observations which led to the radial-velocity
206: confirmation of the planetary nature of the transiting object
207: detected by the TrES (Trans-atlantic Exoplanet Survey) consortium
208: (Alonso et al. 2004) were performed with the HIRES spectrograph
209: and its I$_2$ absorption cell on the Keck I telescope (Vogt et al.
210: 1994). Eight star+iodine spectra and one template spectrum were
211: collected over 18 days in July 2004. The template spectrum used here
212: has a resolution $R\simeq 65,\,000$ and a signal-to-noise-ratio
213: $S/N\simeq 80$ pixel$^{-1}$. Three $R\simeq 60,\,000$ spectra were taken
214: with the High Resolution Spectrograph (HRS, Tull 1998) on the
215: Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET) during consecutive nights in August
216: 2004, with spectral coverage in the range 5879-7838 \AA. The
217: averaged spectrum has $S/N\simeq 120$ pixel$^{-1}$. For all spectra,
218: Thorium-Argon lamp exposures provided the wavelength
219: calibration.
220:
221: Our abundance analysis of the Keck/HIRES and HET/HRS spectra of TrES-1
222: was carried out under the assumption of standard local
223: thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) using a modified version of the
224: spectral synthesis code MOOG (Sneden 1973) and a grid of Kurucz
225: (1993) stellar atmospheres. We selected a set of 30 \ion{Fe}{1}
226: and 4 \ion{Fe}{2} lines (with lower excitation potentials
227: $0.86\leq\chi_l\leq 5.03$ eV and $2.58\leq\chi_l\leq 3.90$ eV,
228: respectively) from the HIRES spectrum, and used standard packages
229: in IRAF to derive equivalent widths (EWs) for all of them. Our selection
230: of lines and transition probabilities followed that of Lee \&
231: Carney (2002).
232:
233: \section{Stellar Parameters}
234:
235: Alonso et al. (2004) report on the analysis of 7 spectra of TrES-1
236: taken with the CfA Digital Speedometers (Latham 1992). By
237: comparing them with a library of synthetic spectra they derive
238: estimates of the effective temperature, surface gravity, and
239: metallicity as follows: $T_\mathrm{eff} = 5250 \pm 200$ K, $\log g
240: = 4.5\pm 0.5$, [Fe/H]$\sim 0.0$. As the authors later point out in
241: their discovery paper, these relatively large uncertainties have a
242: significant impact on the final estimates of the mass and radius
243: of the transiting planet, and ultimately on the possibility to
244: confront theory with observation. We describe below the four-fold
245: strategy we have devised to better constrain the stellar and
246: consequently planetary parameters, based on a detailed analysis of
247: our Keck and HET spectra.
248:
249: \subsection{Atmospheric Parameters from Spectroscopy}
250:
251: The stellar atmospheric parameters for TrES-1 were obtained using
252: a standard technique of Fe ionization balance (see for example
253: Santos et al. 2004, and references therein). The best-fit
254: configuration of the parameters is obtained by means of an
255: iterative procedure that encompasses the following three steps:
256: $a)$ the effective temperature is obtained by imposing that the
257: abundances $\log\varepsilon($\ion{Fe}{1}$)$ obtained from the
258: \ion{Fe}{1} lines be independent of the lower excitation potential
259: $\chi_l$ (i.e., zero correlation coefficient); $b)$ the
260: microturbulent velocity $\xi_t$ is determined so that
261: $\log\varepsilon($\ion{Fe}{1}$)$ is independent of the reduced
262: equivalent widths $EW_\lambda/\lambda$; $c)$ the surface gravity
263: is determined by forcing exact agreement between abundances
264: derived from the \ion{Fe}{2} and those obtained from the
265: \ion{Fe}{1} lines. Uncertainties in the parameters were estimated
266: following the prescriptions of Neuforge \& Magain (1997) and
267: Gonzalez \& Vanture (1998), and rounded to 25 K in
268: $T_\mathrm{eff}$, 0.1 dex in $\log g$, and 0.05 km s$^{-1}$ in
269: $\xi_t$.
270:
271: The final atmospheric parameters, along with the best-fit
272: \ion{Fe}{1} abundances, are: $T_\mathrm{eff} = 5250\pm 75$ K,
273: $\log g = 4.6\pm 0.2$, $\xi_t = 0.95\pm 0.1$ km s$^{-1}$, and
274: [Fe/H] $= 0.00\pm 0.09$. Including in the analysis EWs of 11
275: \ion{Fe}{1} and 4 \ion{Fe}{2} lines measured in the region of the
276: HRS averaged spectrum in common with the Keck template spectrum
277: gave identical results. The good agreement between the HIRES-only
278: and HIRES+HRS analysis suggests that significant sources of
279: systematic errors due to different spectrograph/configurations are
280: absent. Our spectroscopic estimates of $T_\mathrm{eff}$, $\log g$,
281: and [Fe/H] also agree remarkably well with the numbers reported by
282: Alonso et al. (2004).
283:
284: Finally, a possible matter of concern are systematic
285: uncertainties inherent to the 1-D, LTE model atmospheres used in
286: the derivation of effective temperature and metallicity for a star
287: as cool as TrES-1.
288: However, recent studies (Yong et al. 2004) argue that non-LTE
289: effects arise primarily in stars significantly cooler than TrES-1,
290: and with metallicities significantly departing from solar (e.g.,
291: Asplund (2003), and references therein).
292:
293: \subsection{$T_\mathrm{eff}$ Estimate from Photometry}
294:
295: There is no direct distance estimate for TrES-1, and this prevents
296: the determination of an absolute luminosity. In addition, as the
297: star does not show signs of evolution off the main sequence, the
298: surface gravity constitutes a poor constraint for the models. The
299: effective temperature and metallicity, together with an age
300: estimate as we discuss below, are thus the only reliable metrics
301: that can be used in the comparison with theoretical isochrones. It
302: is then crucial to provide an independent estimate of
303: $T_\mathrm{eff}$ for an assessment of the validity of its
304: spectroscopic value and uncertainty.
305:
306: To this end, we utilized the $BVJHK$ apparent magnitudes to derive
307: several $T_\mathrm{eff}$ estimates based on a number of empirical
308: color-temperature calibrations from the literature. The Johnson
309: $B$ and $V$ magnitudes for TrES-1 were obtained by means of
310: differential photometry (including differential extinction)
311: relative to a number of nearby stars (Mandushev, private
312: communication). For the apparent luminosity in the infrared
313: filters we relied upon the 2MASS catalog. From these values, and
314: their relative uncertainties, we derived empirical
315: $T_\mathrm{eff}$ estimates based on the color-temperature
316: calibrations of Mart{\'\i}nez-Roger et al. (1992), Alonso et al.
317: (1996), and Ram{\'\i}rez \& Mel\'endez (2004). We obtained an
318: average value for the effective temperature of $T_\mathrm{eff} =
319: 5206\pm 92$ K. This result is in good agreement with our own
320: spectroscopic $T_\mathrm{eff}$ determinations reported in the
321: previous Section, giving us confidence in the spectroscopically
322: determined $T_\mathrm{eff}$ from Keck and HET.
323:
324: \subsection{Stellar Activity and Age}
325:
326: Inspection of the \ion{Ca}{2} H and K lines in the HIRES spectra
327: revealed a slight core reversal, indicating that TrES-1 is an
328: active star. In Figure~\ref{activity1} we show a region of the
329: HIRES template spectrum centered on the \ion{Ca}{2} H line. For
330: comparison, we have overplotted the spectrum of an old, inactive
331: star (HIP 86830) with the same temperature from the Sozzetti et
332: al. (2004) sample of metal-poor stars, which has a metallicity
333: [Fe/H] $= -0.68$. The emission feature is clearly evident. A
334: possible explanation for the activity level is that the star is
335: not very old. To provide useful constraints on its age, we have
336: collected three different pieces of external evidence.
337:
338: First, we have measured the chromospheric activity index S from
339: the Ca H and K lines, based on the prescriptions by Duncan et al.
340: (1991), for TrES-1 and for two Hyades stars (HD 28462 and HD
341: 32347) of the same spectral type observed in the context of the
342: G-dwarf Planet Search program (Latham 2000). We transformed our S
343: values to the standard Mount Wilson S index applying the relation
344: derived by Paulson et al. (2002). We then applied relations from
345: Noyes et al. (1984, and references therein) to convert to the
346: chromospheric emission ratio $R^\prime_\mathrm{HK}$ and to derive
347: estimates of the age $t$ for the three stars. We obtained $\log
348: R^\prime_\mathrm{HK} = -4.77$ for TrES-1. The activity levels for
349: the two Hyades stars are in excellent agreement with the values
350: reported by Paulson et al. (2002), giving us confidence that our
351: $R^\prime_\mathrm{HK}$ for TrES-1 is reliable. As its activity
352: level is about half that of the two Hyades members, but higher
353: than that reported for its very close analog $\alpha$ Cen B ($\log
354: R^\prime_\mathrm{HK} = -4.92$; Chmielewski 2000), we can argue
355: that TrES-1 is older than Hyades stars of the same spectral type,
356: but younger than $\alpha$ Cen B ($\sim$4.2 Gyr; Henry et al.
357: 1996). Indeed, based on the Noyes et al. (1984) relations, we find
358: an age value $t = 2.5$ Gyr. We note, however, that our measure of
359: $R^\prime_\mathrm{HK}$ is based on a single-epoch observation, thus
360: additional \ion{Ca}{2} meausurements are clearly encouraged.
361:
362: Secondly, following Gonzalez (1998), using the atmospheric
363: parameters derived from the Fe-line analysis, we synthesized a 10
364: \AA\, region of the spectrum including the 6707.8 \AA\, Li line in
365: the HRS averaged spectrum. In Figure~\ref{activity2} we show the
366: comparison of the spectrum of TrES-1 with three models, each
367: differing only in the Li abundance assumed. The lithium line is
368: not detectable by eye in the noise. We place an upper
369: limit for the Li abundance of $\log\varepsilon(\mathrm{Li}) <
370: 0.1$, consistent with the star being older than a Hyades star of
371: the same temperature.
372:
373: Finally, due to a fast decrease in activity levels for ages
374: greater than $\sim 1$ Gyr (Pace \& Pasquini 2004), at $\sim 2$ Gyr
375: the emission in \ion{Ca}{2} is down by a factor of a few with
376: respect to the Hyades, and the value of $R^\prime_\mathrm{HK}$ for
377: TrES-1 is consistent with this interpretation. Our preliminary age
378: estimate for TrES-1 is then $2.5\pm 1.5$ Gyr.
379:
380: \subsection{Stellar Mass and Radius}
381:
382: Using the constraints described above on $T_\mathrm{eff}$, [Fe/H],
383: and the age of the star, we used stellar evolution models and ran
384: Monte Carlo simulations to infer the stellar mass and radius for
385: TrES-1 as well as their uncertainties. The simulations were
386: repeated using two different evolutionary models: Girardi et al.
387: (2000) and Yi et al. (2003). We obtain very good agreement in the
388: derived parameters in both cases, to within 0.01 solar units in
389: both mass and radius, despite slightly different assumptions in
390: the input physics of these two sets of models.
391: We report here the results for TrES-1 using the Girardi et al.
392: (2000) models: $M_\star = 0.89\pm 0.05$ $M_\odot$, $R_\star =
393: 0.83\pm 0.05$ $R_\odot$. These error bars include a somewhat
394: arbitrary contribution of 0.04 added in quadrature to the formal
395: Monte Carlo errors of 0.03 in both mass and radius, to account for
396: unforeseen systematics in both the stellar evolution and stellar
397: atmosphere models, as well as other physical assumptions. The
398: uncertainties on metallicity and effective temperature contribute
399: about equally to the errors on both mass and radius, while the age
400: uncertainty contributes negligibly.
401:
402: Finally, based on our simulations, we estimate an absolute
403: magnitude $M_v = 5.85\pm 0.15$, and thus place TrES-1 at a nominal
404: distance $d \simeq 150$ pc. Its resulting galactic velocity vector
405: is [$U$,$V$,$W$] = [-15, -33, 16] km s$^{-1}$.
406:
407:
408: \section{Planetary Parameters}
409:
410: Following Alonso et al. (2004), we utilized the revised values of
411: $M_\star$ and $R_\star$, and their uncertainties, in a new
412: $\chi^2$ minimization procedure of the photometric points for the
413: model light curve as a function of $R_p$ and $i$. We find $R_p =
414: 1.04^{+0.08}_{-0.05}$ $R_\mathrm{J}$, and $i =
415: 89^\circ.5^{+0.5}_{-1.3}$. The values and uncertainties for the
416: primary mass, inclination, and the radial velocity semi-amplitude
417: are then combined to give a value of the planetary mass $M_p =
418: 0.76\pm 0.05$ $M_\mathrm{J}$. With the improved value of the
419: stellar mass, now the dominant contribution to the planet mass
420: uncertainty comes from the spectroscopic orbit, while the
421: contribution due to the error in the inclination angle is
422: negligible.
423:
424: While the revised value for $M_p$ is essentially identical to the
425: one reported by Alonso et al. (2004), the planetary radius found
426: here is slightly smaller, due to the smaller stellar radius
427: estimate obtained in our analysis.
428:
429: \section{Summary and Discussion}
430:
431: We have derived new values of the stellar atmospheric parameters
432: of the transiting planet host-star TrES-1 from high-resolution,
433: high S/N spectra. Our spectroscopic $T_\mathrm{eff}$ values are in
434: very good agreement with empirical color-temperature calibrations
435: and with the estimates reported by Alonso et al. (2004). The star
436: is a main-sequence object with a metallicity consistent with
437: solar. The lack of detectable lithium argues both against youth
438: and recent pollution events due to ingestion of planetary
439: material. Its measured \ion{Ca}{2} activity levels are further
440: suggestive of an object with an age of a few Gyr, an intermediate
441: value between the Hyades and $\alpha$ Cen B.
442:
443: Based on the new constraints on atmospheric parameters and age, we
444: have significantly improved on the determination of the stellar
445: and planetary mass and radius. Our updated values for $M_\star$
446: and $R_\star$ are consistent with those reported by Alonso et al.
447: (2004), although we find a slightly smaller radius and a slightly
448: larger mass. The most significant improvement comes at the level
449: of the determination of $R_p$ and $M_p$ with our new analysis of
450: the transit photometry. In Figure~\ref{massrad} we show masses and
451: radii for all transiting planets known to-date, including TrES-1.
452: Thanks to the more accurate values of the stellar parameters, the
453: radius and mass of the planet have reduced uncertainties with
454: respect to those reported by Alonso et al. (2004). In particular,
455: for very similar values of $M_p$, the difference between the
456: values of $R_p$ for HD 209458 and TrES-1, about $25 \%$, is now
457: significant at the 3-$\sigma$ level.
458:
459: The well-determined radius of TrES-1 opens the door to new
460: important tests of theoretical evolutionary models of irradiated
461: extrasolar giant planets (e.g., Bodenheimer et al. 2003; Burrows
462: et al. 2004; Chabrier et al. 2004), as its parent star is about
463: 1000 K cooler than HD 209458 and OGLE-TR-56, the other two objects
464: that have recently been targets of extensive investigations. Its
465: radius seems to agree better with the predictions from models that
466: do not invoke additional heat/power sources in the core (Showman
467: \& Guillot 2002; Baraffe et al. 2003), or tidal heating effects
468: due to the gravitational perturbation of an undetected long-period
469: companion (Bodenheimer et al. 2003). Given its orbital radius and
470: the characteristics of the host star, its mass loss rate (Baraffe
471: et al. 2004) is also likely to be significantly reduced with
472: respect to those, for example, expected for OGLE-TR-56b and
473: OGLE-TR-132b.
474:
475: Additional detections of giant planets transiting relatively
476: bright stars covering a range of spectral types are clearly
477: necessary for a continued improvement of our understanding of the
478: structure and evolutionary properties of this peculiar class of
479: objects.
480:
481: \acknowledgments
482:
483: Over the course of this investigation, we have benefited from
484: stimulating discussion with various colleagues, in particular G.
485: Mandushev, R. Alonso, H. Deeg, J. Belmonte, E. Dunham, and F.
486: O'Donovan. We are thankful to the Director of the McDonald
487: Observatory, D. Lambert, for providing Director's discretionary
488: time, and to the HET staff, in particular S. Odewahn, V. Riley,
489: and M. Villareal for their assistance. The Hobby-Eberly Telescope
490: is operated by the McDonald Observatory on behalf of the
491: University of Texas at Austin, the Pennsylvania State University,
492: Stanford University, Ludwig Maximillians Universit\"at M\"unchen,
493: and Georg August Universit\"at G\"ottingen. Some of the data
494: presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory, which
495: is operated as a scientific partnership among the California
496: Institute of Technology, the University of California and the
497: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
498:
499: \begin{thebibliography}{}
500: \bibitem[Alonso et al. 1996]{alonso96}
501: Alonso, A., Arribas, S., Martinez-Roger, C. 1996, \aap, 313, 873
502: \bibitem[Alonso et al. 2004]{alonso04}
503: Alonso, R., et al. 2004, \apj, 613, L153
504: \bibitem[Asplund 2003]{asplund03}
505: Asplund, M. 2003, to appear in IAU Highlights of Astronomy, Vol.
506: 13
507: \bibitem[Baraffe et al. 2003]{baraffe03}
508: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Barman, T., Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H.
509: 2003, \aap, 402, 701
510: \bibitem[Baraffe et al. 2004]{baraffe04}
511: Baraffe, I., Selsis, F., Chabrier, G., Barman, T., Allard, F.,
512: Hauschildt, P. H., Lammer, H. 2004, \aap, 419, L16
513: \bibitem[Bodenheimer et al. 2003]{bodenheimer03}
514: Bodenheimer, P., Laughlin, G., Lin, D. N. C. 2003, \apj, 592, 555
515: \bibitem[Bouchy et al. 2004]{bouchy04}
516: Bouchy, F., Pont, F., Santos, N. C., Melo, C., Mayor, M., Queloz,
517: D., Udry, S. 2004, \aap, 421, L13
518: \bibitem[Brown et al. 2001]{brown01}
519: Brown, T. M., Charbonneau, D., Gilliland, R. L., Noyes, R. W.,
520: Burrows, A. 2001, \apj, 552, 699
521: \bibitem[Burrows et al. 2004]{burrows04}
522: Burrows, A., Hubeny, I., Hubbard, W. B., Sudarsky, D., Fortney, J. J.
523: 2004, \apj, 610, L53
524: \bibitem[Chabrier et al. 2004]{chabrier04}
525: Chabrier, G., Barman, T., Baraffe, I., Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H.
526: 2004, \apj, 603, L53
527: \bibitem[Charbonneau 2003]{charbonneau03}
528: Charbonneau, D. 2003, in Scientific Frontiers in Research on
529: Extrasolar Planets, D. Deming \& S. Seager eds., ASP Conf. Ser.,
530: 294, 449
531: \bibitem[Chmielewski 2000]{chmielewski00}
532: Chmielewski, Y. 2000, \aap, 353, 666
533: \bibitem[Duncan et al. 1991]{duncan91}
534: Duncan, D. K., et al. 1991, \apjs, 76, 383
535: \bibitem[Girardi et al. 2000]{girardi00}
536: Girardi, L., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., Chiosi, C. 2000, \aap,
537: 141, 371
538: \bibitem[Gonzalez 1998]{gonzalez98}
539: Gonzalez, G. 1998, \aap, 334, 221
540: \bibitem[Gonzalez and Vanture 1998]{gonzvant98}
541: Gonzalez, G., Vanture, A. D. 1998, \aap, 339, L29
542: \bibitem[Henry et al. 1996]{henry96}
543: Henry, T. J., Soderblom, D. R., Donahue, R. A., Baliunas, S. L.
544: 1996, \aj, 111, 439
545: \bibitem[Kurucz 1993]{kurucz93}
546: Kurucz, R. L. 1993, ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s
547: Grid CDROM, Vol. 13, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
548: \bibitem[Latham 1992]{latham92}
549: Latham, D. W. 1992, in IAU Colloquium 135: Complementary
550: Approaches to Double and Multiple Star Research, H.A. McAlister \&
551: W.I. Hartkopf eds, ASP Conf. Ser., 32, 110.
552: \bibitem[Latham 2000]{latham00}
553: Latham, D. W. 2000, in Disks, Planetesimals, and Planets, F.
554: Garzón, C. Eiroa, D. de Winter, and T. J. Mahoney eds, ASP Conf.
555: Ser., 219, 596
556: \bibitem[Lee \& Carney 2002]{lee02}
557: Lee J.-W., Carney, B. W. 2002, \aj, 124, 1511
558: \bibitem[Mart{\'\i}nez-Roger et al. 1992]{roger92}
559: Mart{\'\i}nez-Roger, C., Arribas, S., \& Alonso, A. 1992, Mem.\
560: Soc.\ Astr.\ Italiana, 63, 263
561: \bibitem[Moutou et al. 2004]{moutou04}
562: Moutou, C., Pont, F., Bouchy, F., Mayor, M. 2004, \aap, 424, L31
563: \bibitem[Neuforge \& Magain 1997]{neuforge97}
564: Neuforge-Verheecke, C., Magain, P. 1997, \aap, 328, 261
565: \bibitem[Noyes et al. 1984]{noyes84}
566: Noyes, R. W., Hartmann, L. W., Baliunas, S. L., Duncan, D. K.,
567: Vaughan, A. H. 1984, \apj, 279, 763
568: \bibitem[Pace \& Pasquini 2004]{pace04}
569: Pace, G., Pasquini, L. 2004, \aap, accepted (astro-ph/0406651)
570: \bibitem[Paulson et al. 2002]{paulson02}
571: Paulson, D. B., Saar, S. H. Cochran, W. D., Hatzes, A. P. 2002,
572: \aj, 124, 572
573: \bibitem[Pont et al. 2004]{pont04}
574: Pont, F., Bouchy, F., Queloz, D., Santos, N. C, Melo, C., Mayor,
575: M., Udry, S. 2004, \aap, 426, L15
576: \bibitem[Radick et al. 1987]{radick87}
577: Radick, R. R., Thompson, D. T., Lockwood, G. W., Duncan, D. K.,
578: Baggett, W. E. 1987, \apj, 321, 459
579: \bibitem[Ram{\'\i}rez \& Mel\'endez 2004]{ramirez04}
580: Ram{\'\i}rez, I., Mel\'endez, J. 2004, \apj, 609, 417
581: \bibitem[Santos et al. 2004]{santos04}
582: Santos, N. C., Israelian, G., Mayor, M. 2004, \aap, 415, 1153
583: \bibitem[Showman \& Guillot 2002]{showman02}
584: Showman, A. P., Guillot, T. 2002, \aap, 385, 166
585: \bibitem[Sneden 1973]{sneden73}
586: Sneden, C. A. 1973, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Texas at
587: Austin
588: \bibitem[Sozzetti et al. 2004]{sozzetti04}
589: Sozzetti, A., Latham, D. W., Torres, G., Stefanik, R. P., Boss, A.
590: P., Carney, B. W., Laird, J. B. 2004, \baas, 204, 62.01
591: \bibitem[Torres et al. 2003]{torres03}
592: Torres, G., Konacki, M., Sasselov, D. D., Jha, S. 2004, \apj, 609,
593: 1071
594: \bibitem[Tull 1998]{tull98}
595: Tull, R. G. 1998, in Optical Astronomical Instrumentation, S.
596: D'Odorico ed., Proc. SPIE, 3355, 387
597: \bibitem[Vogt et al. 1994]{vogt94}
598: Vogt, S. S., et al. 1994, in Instrumentation in Astronomy VIII, D.
599: L. Crawford \& E. R. Craine eds., Proc. SPIE , 2198, 362
600: \bibitem[Yi et al. 2003]{yi03}
601: Yi, S., Kim, Y. -C., Demarque, P. 2003, \apjs, 144, 259
602: \bibitem[Yong et al. 2004]{yong04}
603: Yong, D., Lambert, D. L., Allende Prieto, C., Paulson, D. B. 2004,
604: \apj, 603, 697
605: \end{thebibliography}
606:
607: \clearpage
608: %% To help institutions obtain information on the effectiveness of their
609: %% telescopes, the AAS Journals has created a group of keywords for telescope
610: %% facilities. A common set of keywords will make these types of searches
611: %% significantly easier and more accurate. In addition, they will also be
612: %% useful in linking papers together which utilize the same telescopes
613: %% within the framework of the National Virtual Observatory.
614: %% See the AASTeX Web site at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX
615: %% for information on obtaining the facility keywords.
616:
617: %% After the acknowledgments section, use the following syntax and the
618: %% \facility{} macro to list the keywords of facilities used in the research
619: %% for the paper. Each keyword will be checked against the master list during
620: %% copy editing. Individual instruments can be provided in parentheses,
621: %% after the keyword, but they will not be verified.
622:
623:
624: %% The reference list follows the main body and any appendices.
625: %% Use LaTeX's thebibliography environment to mark up your reference list.
626: %% Note \begin{thebibliography} is followed by an empty set of
627: %% curly braces. If you forget this, LaTeX will generate the error
628: %% "Perhaps a missing \item?".
629: %%
630: %% thebibliography produces citations in the text using \bibitem-\cite
631: %% cross-referencing. Each reference is preceded by a
632: %% \bibitem command that defines in curly braces the KEY that corresponds
633: %% to the KEY in the \cite commands (see the first section above).
634: %% Make sure that you provide a unique KEY for every \bibitem or else the
635: %% paper will not LaTeX. The square brackets should contain
636: %% the citation text that LaTeX will insert in
637: %% place of the \cite commands.
638:
639: %% We have used macros to produce journal name abbreviations.
640: %% AASTeX provides a number of these for the more frequently-cited journals.
641: %% See the Author Guide for a list of them.
642:
643: %% Note that the style of the \bibitem labels (in []) is slightly
644: %% different from previous examples. The natbib system solves a host
645: %% of citation expression problems, but it is necessary to clearly
646: %% delimit the year from the author name used in the citation.
647: %% See the natbib documentation for more details and options.
648:
649:
650: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
651: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
652: %% To embed the sample graphics in
653: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
654: %% \includegraphics commands
655: %%
656: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
657: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
658: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
659: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
660: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
661: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
662: %%
663: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
664: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
665: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
666: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
667: %% journal to journal.
668:
669: \figcaption{Comparison between the \ion{Ca}{2} H line for TrES-1
670: (solid line) and an inactive star of the same temperature (dotted
671: line)\label{activity1} }
672:
673: \figcaption{A portion (upper panel) of the HET averaged spectrum
674: of TrES-1 containing the \ion{Li}{1} line at 6707.8 \AA\, (filled
675: dots), compared to three syntheses (lines of various colors and
676: styles), each differing only for the lithium abundance assumed.
677: The bottom panel shows the data on an enlarged scale, so the model
678: spectra for low Li abundance can be
679: distinguished\label{activity2}}
680:
681: \figcaption{Radius vs. mass for the sample of transiting
682: extrasolar planets discovered to-date, including TrES-1 (this
683: work). The values and uncertainties are taken from Brown et al.
684: (2001) for HD 209458b, Torres et al. (2004) for OGLE-TR-56b,
685: Bouchy et al. (2004) for OGLE-TR-113b, Moutou et al. (2004) for
686: OGLE-TR-113b, and Pont et al. (2004) for
687: OGLE-TR-111b\label{massrad} }
688:
689: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
690: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
691: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
692: %% available in the electronic journal.
693:
694: \begin{figure}
695: \plotone{f1.eps}
696: \end{figure}
697:
698: \clearpage
699:
700: \begin{figure}
701: \plotone{f2.eps}
702: \end{figure}
703:
704: \clearpage
705:
706: \begin{figure}
707: \plotone{f3.eps}
708: \end{figure}
709:
710: %% Here we use \plottwo to present two versions of the same figure,
711: %% one in black and white for print the other in RGB color
712: %% for online presentation. Note that the caption indicates
713: %% that a color version of the figure will be available online.
714: %%
715:
716: %\begin{figure}
717: %\plottwo{f2.eps}{f2_color.eps}
718: %\caption{A panel taken from Figure 2 of \citet{rudnick03}. See the electronic edition of the Journal for a color version of this figure.\label{fig2}}
719: %\end{figure}
720:
721: %% This figure uses \includegraphics to scale and rotate the still frame
722: %% for an mpeg animation.
723:
724: %\begin{figure}
725: %\includegraphics[angle=90,scale=.50]{f3.eps}
726: %\caption{Animation still frame taken from \citet{kim03}.
727: %This figure is also available as an mpeg
728: %animation in the electronic edition of the
729: %{\it Astrophysical Journal}.}
730: %\end{figure}
731:
732: %% If you are not including electonic art with your submission, you may
733: %% mark up your captions using the \figcaption command. See the
734: %% User Guide for details.
735: %%
736: %% No more than seven \figcaption commands are allowed per page,
737: %% so if you have more than seven captions, insert a \clearpage
738: %% after every seventh one.
739:
740: %% Tables should be submitted one per page, so put a \clearpage before
741: %% each one.
742:
743: %% Two options are available to the author for producing tables: the
744: %% deluxetable environment provided by the AASTeX package or the LaTeX
745: %% table environment. Use of deluxetable is preferred.
746: %%
747:
748: %% Three table samples follow, two marked up in the deluxetable environment,
749: %% one marked up as a LaTeX table.
750:
751: %% In this first example, note that the \tabletypesize{}
752: %% command has been used to reduce the font size of the table.
753: %% We also use the \rotate command to rotate the table to
754: %% landscape orientation since it is very wide even at the
755: %% reduced font size.
756: %%
757: %% Note also that the \label command needs to be placed
758: %% inside the \tablecaption.
759:
760: %% This table also includes a table comment indicating that the full
761: %% version will be available in machine-readable format in the electronic
762: %% edition.
763: %%
764:
765: %% Tables may also be prepared as separate files. See the accompanying
766: %% sample file table.tex for an example of an external table file.
767: %% To include an external file in your main document, use the \input
768: %% command. Uncomment the line below to include table.tex in this
769: %% sample file. (Note that you will need to comment out the \documentclass,
770: %% \begin{document}, and \end{document} commands from table.tex if you want
771: %% to include it in this document.)
772:
773: %% \input{table}
774:
775: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
776: %% that appears after it.
777:
778: \end{document}
779: %%
780: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
781: