1: %% History:
2: %% First draft: GJS 5/17/04
3: %% Second draft: PS+NS 6/23/04
4: %% TB 7/23/04
5: %% 1st PASP draft: 9/08/04
6: %% (includes everyone's corrections)
7: %% After 1st ref report 10/19/04
8: %%
9: %% The 2 column preprint style
10: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
11: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
12:
13: \shorttitle{Quiescent observations of PQ And}
14: \shortauthors{Schwarz et al.}
15:
16: \begin{document}
17:
18: \title{Quiescent observations of the WZ Sge type dwarf nova PQ Andromedae}
19:
20: \author{Greg J. Schwarz\altaffilmark{1},
21: Travis Barman\altaffilmark{2},
22: Nicole Silvestri\altaffilmark{3},
23: Paula Szkody\altaffilmark{3},
24: Sumner Starrfield\altaffilmark{4},
25: Karen Vanlandingham\altaffilmark{1,5}, and
26: R. Mark Wagner\altaffilmark{6}
27: }
28:
29: \altaffiltext{1}{Steward Observatory, 933 N. Cherry Ave.,
30: Tucson, AZ 85721, gschwarz@as.arizona.edu}
31: \altaffiltext{2}{Dept. of Physics, Wichita State University,
32: 1845 Fairmount Rd., Box 32, Wichita, KS 67260-0032}
33: \altaffiltext{3}{Dept. of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580,
34: Seattle, WA 98195}
35: \altaffiltext{4}{Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University,
36: Tempe, AZ 85287-1504}
37: \altaffiltext{5}{Dept. of Astronomy, Columbia University, 1328 Pupin Hall,
38: 550 W. 120th Street, New York, NY 10027}
39: \altaffiltext{6}{LBT Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Ave.,
40: Tucson, AZ 85721}
41:
42: \begin{abstract}
43:
44: We have obtained time series optical spectra of the cataclysmic variable
45: PQ And in quiescence. The spectra show a white dwarf continuum with
46: narrow Balmer emission superimposed over strong Balmer absorption. The
47: emission lines have blue and red components whose strength changes
48: with time. An analysis of the H$\alpha$ emission line implies a short
49: orbital period below the period gap. Given its lack of accretion disk
50: features, its large and infrequent outbursts, and an orbital period below
51: the period gap, PQ And is probably a low accretion rate object similar
52: to WZ Sge. In addition, white dwarf model fits imply that PQ And
53: is an excellent ZZ Cet candidate.
54:
55: \end{abstract}
56:
57: \keywords{binaries: close --- stars: dwarf novae --- stars:
58: individual (PQ And)}
59:
60: \section{Introduction}
61:
62: PQ And was discovered by McAdam on 21 March 1988 \citep{iauc4570} at
63: a visual magnitude of 10. Examination of the Palomar Sky Survey plates
64: showed a precursor object with a blue magnitude between 18-19 and a
65: red magnitude of about 20 \citep{iauc4577,iauc4579}. Within 19 days
66: the light curve had declined by 2 magnitudes. The large outburst
67: amplitude and rapid decline led to the initial classification of a
68: classical nova but spectra taken 3.5 months after the outburst by
69: \citet{iauc4629} lacked the nebular features typically observed in
70: classical novae. Instead, the spectra had strong Balmer emission
71: surrounded by broad absorption similar to the quiesent spectra of
72: the dwarf nova WZ Sge. The strong absorption indicated that the
73: energy distribution was primarily from the white dwarf (WD) and implied
74: an extremely low accretion rate. Recently, it has been shown that
75: systems with this type of spectra are good candidates for containing
76: non-radially pulsating DA WDs or ZZ Cet stars \citep{WW04a,WW04b}.
77:
78: WZ Sge is a dwarf nova whose outbursts occur on timescales of tens of
79: years and with amplitudes of 7-8 magnitudes. Cataclysmic variables (CVs)
80: of this type are also known as TOADS or Tremendous Outburst Amplitude
81: Dwarf novae \citep{HSC95}. These characteristics are thought to be
82: due to the very close binary separation and the extremely low accretion
83: rate in these systems. TOAD orbital periods are all below the period
84: gap and are typically of order 90 minutes. The mass transfer rates
85: implied by the models are only 10$^{-11}$M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$
86: \citep{HSC95}.
87:
88: Given PQ And's similarities to a dwarf nova, \citet{richter90} searched
89: archival plates for evidence of previous outbursts. Two other outbursts
90: with maximum magnitudes of $\sim$ 11 were found on 23 August 1938
91: and 7 March 1967. With decades long superoutburst timescales, an
92: outburst amplitude of $\sim$ 9 mag, and a WZ Sge like quiescent spectrum,
93: PQ And clearly has TOAD characteristics. In this paper we show
94: that the orbital period {\em appears to be} below the period gap
95: and that the system likely contains a WD in the instability strip.
96:
97: \section{Observations}
98:
99: We obtained 10 spectra of PQ And on the 6.5m Multiple Mirror
100: Telescope (MMT) on 16 September 2003. We used the blue channel CCD
101: spectrograph with a 500 grooves per millimeter grating and a 1\arcsec\
102: wide slit for a
103: spectral resolution of 3.6\AA. Spectral coverage extends from
104: 4100\AA\ to 7200\AA. The exposure
105: time was set to 480 seconds in order to resolve an orbital period as
106: low as 80 minutes. The seeing ranged from 1\farcs0-1\farcs5
107: during the night. Biases and flat fields were obtained at the beginning
108: and end of each night and a HeNeAr comparison lamp spectrum was
109: obtained after each PQ And observation for optimum wavelength
110: calibration. Standard stars were also observed throughout
111: the night for flux calibration. The spectra were reduced using
112: standard IRAF\footnote{ IRAF is distributed by the National
113: Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association
114: of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative
115: agreement with the National Science Foundation.} routines.
116:
117: The combined spectrum is shown in Figure
118: \ref{modelfit}\footnote{Since the extinction toward PQ And provided
119: by the \citet{SFD98} maps is extremely low, E($B-V$) = 0.06, none of
120: the spectra shown in this paper have been dereddened nor have they
121: been Doppler corrected.}. The combined
122: spectrum has narrow emission lines flanked by broad absorption similar
123: to that described by \citet{iauc4629}. The equivalent widths, fluxes,
124: and FWZI values of the observed emission lines in the combined
125: spectrum are given in Table \ref{tab:emission}. All the emission
126: lines have a red and a blue component whose strength and peak vary
127: with time. The evolution of these components can best be seen in
128: H$\alpha$ and is shown in Figure \ref{evolve}.
129:
130: \section{Emission line analysis}
131:
132: Radial velocities from the line wings were measured by convolving
133: the line profiles with a pair of Gaussian bandpasses
134: \citep[see][for details]{shaft,P1} whose width is set to the resolution
135: and whose separation is varied. For each separation, the velocities are
136: fit to a sine function of the form
137: \begin{equation}
138: v = \gamma - K\rm sin[2\pi(\phi - \phi_{0})]
139: \end{equation}
140: where $\gamma$ is the systemic velocity, K is the semiamplitude,
141: and $\phi$ is the offset from superior conjunction of the WD. The
142: best solution is chosen as the one producing the smallest errors
143: in the individual parameters and the total $\sigma$ of the fit.
144:
145: We fit both the H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ lines with this method but
146: unfortunately not all the observed line profiles were useful.
147: Two H$\alpha$ and one H$\beta$ profiles were discarded due to
148: cosmic rays or noise at a particular separation. Even with one
149: less data point the H$\alpha$ fit was significantly better than
150: that determined for H$\beta$ thus we adopt the H$\alpha$ separation
151: and period as the best solution and force H$\beta$ to match.
152: The best fit period is 1.7$\pm$0.1 hours where this is the formal
153: uncertainty from the analysis. The true uncertainty in the period is
154: greater since the derived period is longer than the sampling time.
155: Figure \ref{radvel} shows the radial velocity data for H$\alpha$ and
156: H$\beta$ fits. The radial velocity data is provided in Table \ref{tab:RV}.
157: The orbital parameters of the lowest total $\sigma$ fit are
158: given in Table \ref{tab:parms} along with other parameters of PQ And.
159:
160: To quantify the component changes, we calculated the ratio of the blue
161: (violet) to red components (V/R) for each spectrum that shows H$\alpha$.
162: The V/R ratios were calculated with the IRAF program splot with two
163: Gaussians which had the same FWHM and were centered at 6554\AA and 6574\AA.
164: In each spectrum the Gaussians were only allowed a single wavelength shift
165: provided that the separation was always 20\AA. The results are shown in
166: Figure \ref{ratio}.
167:
168: Superior conjunction of the WD is defined as the red to blue crossing
169: point of the emission lines. In Figure \ref{ratio} we have fit the
170: V/R data with a sine wave of the form:
171: \begin{equation}
172: V/R = A + B\rm sin[2\pi(t-t_0/P_{orb})]
173: \end{equation}
174: to determine the crossing point. With P$_{orb}$ = 1.7 hours the best fit
175: gives a superior conjunction date of HJD 2,452,898.902. The other model
176: parameters are provided in Table \ref{tab:parms}.
177:
178: \subsection{Differential photometry}
179:
180: As an added check on the derived period we utilized differential photometry
181: of PQ And from a CV orbital period survey taken in early 1999.
182: The data were obtained at the Steward Observatory 1.6m Kuiper Telescope
183: on Mount Bigalow with the 2K$\times$2K back-illuminated CCD Imager.
184: The CCD was set at 2$\times$2 binning
185: giving an image scale of 0.3$\arcsec$/pixel. The seeing varied during
186: the run between 1$\arcsec$\ and 2$\arcsec$. The observations were carried
187: out in the $I$ band where the accretion disk and secondary star are
188: typically of comparable brightness. The exposure time in the PQ And
189: field was 600 seconds. Biases and flats were taken at
190: the beginning and end of each night and the data were reduced in IRAF.
191: The only night that we spent sufficient time to confirm a 1.7 hour
192: period was 19 January 1999. On that night PQ And was observed 18 times
193: over 3 hours. A differential light curve of the results is shown in
194: Figure \ref{lightcurve}. The observed changes are suggestive of a
195: variation similar to our derived spectroscopic period. The normalized
196: periodogram \citep{Scar82,HB86} of the photometry gives a longer period
197: of 2.1 hours but at a low confidence level of only 50\%.
198:
199: We emphasize that these are not definitive orbital period solutions
200: since the derived periods are similar in length to the total time that
201: PQ And was observed. More data are necessary to reach a more definitive
202: orbital period for this object. However, the fact that the radial velocities
203: and the changes in the blue and red components show sine wave like behavior on
204: the timescale of our observation runs imply that the period must be short.
205: A firm upper limit on the orbital period can be established since the
206: accretion disk would overwhelm the WD at periods $>$ 3 hours and there
207: are no known dwarf novae in the gap. Thus for the remainder of the paper
208: we will assume an orbital period range between 1.7 and 2.1 hours.
209:
210: \section{White dwarf model fitting}
211:
212: The WD effective temperature and gravity were determined by comparing the
213: observed spectrum to a grid of synthetic spectra computed using the {\tt
214: PHOENIX} model atmosphere code. Details of the modeling can be found in
215: \cite{Barman00}. The grid includes models with $T_{eff}$ = 9,000K -- 15,000K
216: (in steps of 1000K), $\log(g)$ = 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, and 10$^{-1}$, 10$^{-2}$
217: and solar metallicities. After masking the Balmer emission lines due to the
218: accretion disk, $T_{eff}$ was first determined using least-squares minimization
219: across the full observed spectral range. Fixing $T_{eff}$, the surface
220: gravity was found by fitting only the wings of H$\delta$, H$\gamma$, and
221: H$\beta$ since these were the only features available that are reasonably
222: sensitive to gravity. The models with sub-solar metallicities gave only
223: marginally better fits; however, models with solar metallicities indicate
224: that several metal absorption lines should have been detected but clearly
225: were not observed. Consequently, the metallicity is likely less than
226: 10$^{-1}$ solar. Overall, varying metallicity had little effect on the
227: final $T_{eff}$ and $\log(g)$ values. The final best-fitting model had
228: $T_{eff}$ = 12,000K $\pm$ 1000K and $\log(g)$ = 7.7 $\pm$ 0.3 (cgs units)
229: with 10$^{-2}$ solar metallicity. Estimates for the WD mass and radius
230: were found by using theoretical cooling tracks on a $T_{eff}$ -- $\log(g)$
231: plane \cite[]{Driebe98}. Figure \ref{wdplot} shows that the best fit
232: $T_{eff}$ and $\log(g)$ values give $M_{wd} = 0.47\pm0.13 M_\odot$ and
233: $R_{WD} = 0.0165 R_\odot$. Note that this is only a mass estimate since
234: the WDs in CVs are heated by accretion. The WD in PQ And might not
235: follow this exactly.
236:
237: There was residual flux red-ward of 6000\AA\ between the observed and the
238: best fit WD model spectra. This red excess is from the secondary. To
239: improve the model fit, a synthetic spectrum of an M dwarf was added to
240: the best-fitting WD synthetic spectrum. Since the secondary in CVs fill
241: their Roche lobe, their characteristics are determined by the properties
242: of the binary system. Equation 2.101 in \citet{War95},
243: \begin{equation}
244: R_2(\odot) = 0.094 P^{1.08}_{orb}(h),
245: \end{equation}
246: relates the orbital period and secondary radius.
247: Applying this equation to our derived periods gives a range of
248: $R_{2} = 0.17-0.20 R_\odot$. The best fit effective temperature of the
249: secondary from visual inspection was 2500 K, however, this should not
250: be taken as definitive since the uncertainty is easily $\pm$ 500 K.
251: Even this range and the short orbital period still imply a late M dwarf
252: as the secondary star. The best fit WD plus secondary model
253: spectral energy distribution is shown in Figure \ref{modelfit}.
254: An attempt was made to extract the secondary spectrum by subtracting
255: the best-fitting WD synthetic spectrum from the observed spectrum.
256: Unfortunately, the resulting spectrum was too noisy and did not cover
257: enough of the TiO and VO bands to make a reliable determination of
258: the spectral type. The only reported infrared color for
259: PQ And, ($J-K$) = 0.85$\pm$0.49 \citep{SHM96}, is consistent within
260: the uncertainty with a late M spectral type. PQ And is too faint
261: have been detected by the 2MASS survey \citep{2MASS}.
262:
263: The mass equation, Equation 2.100 in \citet{War95},
264: \begin{equation}
265: M_2(\odot) = 0.065 P^{5/4}_{orb}(h),
266: \end{equation}
267: is valid for P$_{orb}$ between 1.3 and 9 hours and provides
268: a secondary mass range of 0.13-0.16 M$_{\odot}$ for periods
269: between 1.7 and 2.1 hours. Given the derived WD mass the binary
270: system mass ratio, $q = M_2/M_1$, is 0.28-0.34.
271:
272: Using the derived WD radius, an absolute magnitude was computed for the
273: best-fitting WD synthetic spectrum; M$_v$ = 11.2. With an apparent
274: magnitude, m$_v$ = 19 \citep{DS93} and E(B-V) = 0.06, the distance to PQ And
275: was found to be $330 \pm 50$ pc. This distance places PQ And 110 pc below
276: the galactic plane. The only other distance estimate in
277: the literature is from \citet{SHM96}. They use the observed $K$ band
278: magnitude to determine the absolute magnitudes. Their method depends
279: on knowledge of the secondary's size and its fractional contribution to
280: the $K$ band flux. Without any period information \citet{SHM96} obtained
281: a large range in distance for PQ And by assuming orbital periods between
282: 80 minutes and 6 hours. Using their same method but now with our derived
283: period range gives a distance between 319-817 pc. This estimate
284: is still only an lower limit since it assumes that the secondary contributes
285: 100\% of the $K$ band flux however it is consistent with the distance
286: from our WD analysis.
287:
288: The best fit {\tt PHOENIX} WD model puts PQ And in the region of
289: the ZZ Ceti instability strip \citep{B95}. The low accretion rate implied
290: by the strong Balmer absorption makes PQ And an ideal candidate for
291: follow-up observations for non-radial pulsations. If found, an analysis
292: of the oscillations will provide information on important WD parameters
293: including mass, composition, magnetic field, rotation, temperature, and
294: luminosity \citep{Win91}. GW Lib \citep{van04}, SDSS J161033.64-010223.3
295: \citep{WW04a}, SDSSJ013132.39-090122.3 and SDSSJ220553.98+115553.7
296: \citep{WW04b} are other WZ Sge type dwarf novae of similar WD temperature
297: that have already been shown to exhibit non-radial pulsations.
298:
299: \section{Conclusions}
300:
301: PQ And has characteristics similar to WZ Sge type variable stars. Its
302: quiescent spectra show little indication of an accretion disk
303: implying a low mass transfer rate. PQ And had three known
304: superoutbursts of amplitude $\sim$ 9 magnitudes in the 50 years
305: prior to 1988. Fits to spectra give P$_{orb}$ = 1.7 hours while
306: the period derived from photometry is slightly longer at 2.1 hours.
307: More observations are required to confirm the true period but the
308: available evidence strongly supports an orbital period below the orbital gap.
309: The best fit WD model gives T$_{eff}$ = 12,000 K,
310: log(g) = 7.7, and a distance of 330 pc. The WD parameters place it
311: within the ZZ Cet instability strip. With a quiescent magnitude of $V$ = 19,
312: non-radial pulsations could be detected in PQ And with a mid-sized
313: telescope.
314:
315: \acknowledgments
316:
317: SS is grateful to the NSF and NASA for partial support of this research.
318:
319: \begin{thebibliography}{}
320:
321: \bibitem[Barman et al.(2000)]{Barman00} Barman, T.~S.,
322: Hauschildt, P.~H., Short, C.~I, \& Baron, E.,\ 2000, \apj, 537, 946
323:
324: \bibitem[Bergeron et al.(1995)]{B95} Bergeron, P.,
325: Wesemael, F., Lamontagne, R., Fontaine, G., Saffer, R.~A., \& Allard,
326: N.~F.\ 1995, \apj, 449, 258
327:
328: \bibitem[Downes \& Shara(1993)]{DS93} Downes R.A., \& Shara M.,
329: 1993, PASP, 105, 127
330:
331: \bibitem[Driebe et al.(1998)]{Driebe98} Driebe, T., Sch\"onberner, D.,
332: Bl\"ocker T., \& Herwig, F., \ 1998, \aap, 339, 123
333:
334: \bibitem[Hoard et al.(2002)]{2MASS}
335: Hoard, D.~W., Wachter, S., Clark, L.~L., \& Bowers, T.~P.\ 2002, \apj, 565,
336: 511
337:
338: \bibitem[Howell, Szkody, \& Cannizzo(1995)]{HSC95} Howell,
339: S.~B., Szkody, P., \& Cannizzo, J.~K.\ 1995, \apj, 439, 337
340:
341: \bibitem[Horne \& Baliunas(1986)]{HB86} Horne, J.~H.~\&
342: Baliunas, S.~L.\ 1986, \apj, 302, 757
343:
344: \bibitem[Hurst et al.(1988a)]{iauc4570}
345: Hurst, G.~M., McAdam, D., Mobberley, M., \& James, N.\ 1988, \iaucirc,
346: 4570, 2
347:
348: \bibitem[Hurst et al.(1988b)]{iauc4577} Hurst, G.~M., Young, A.,
349: Manning, B., Mobberley, M., Oates, M., Boattini, A., \& Scovil, C.\ 1988,
350: \iaucirc, 4577, 3
351:
352: \bibitem[Hurst \& Young(1988)]{iauc4579} Hurst, G.~M.~\& Young,
353: A.\ 1988, \iaucirc, 4579, 1
354:
355: %%\bibitem[Kato, Sekine, \& Hirata(2001)]{KSH01} Kato, T., Sekine, Y., \&
356: %%Hirata, R.\ 2001, \pasj, 53, 1191
357:
358: %%\bibitem[McAdam et al.(1988)]{1988IAUC.4620....1M} McAdam, D., Hurst, G.~M.,
359: %%Manning, B., Lubbock, S., \& Young, A.\ 1988, \iaucirc, 4620, 1
360:
361: %%\bibitem[Mennickent(1994)]{Menn94} Mennickent, R.\ 1994, \aap, 285, 979
362:
363: \bibitem[Richter(1990)]{richter90} Richter, G.~A.\ 1990,
364: Informational Bulletin on Variable Stars, 3546, 1
365:
366: \bibitem[Scargle(1982)]{Scar82} Scargle, J.~D.\ 1982, \apj, 263, 835
367:
368: \bibitem[Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis(1998)]{SFD98}
369: Schlegel, D.~J., Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525
370:
371: \bibitem[Shafter(1985)]{shaft} Shafter, A. W. 1985, in Cataclysmic
372: Variable and Low Mass X-Ray Binaries, ed. D. Q. Lamb \& J. Patterson
373: (Dordrecht: Reidel), 355
374:
375: \bibitem[Sproats, Howell, \& Mason(1996)]{SHM96} Sproats,
376: L.~N., Howell, S.~B., \& Mason, K.~O.\ 1996, \mnras, 282, 1211
377:
378: \bibitem[Szkody et al.(2002)]{P1} Szkody, P., et al. 2002, \aj, 123,
379: 430 (Paper 1)
380:
381: \bibitem[van Zyl et al.(2004)]{van04} van Zyl. L. et al. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 307
382:
383: \bibitem[Wade \& Hamilton(1988)]{iauc4629} Wade, R.~A.~\&
384: Hamilton, D.\ 1988, \iaucirc, 4629, 1
385:
386: \bibitem[Warner(1995)]{War95} Warner, B., 1995, in Cataclysmic Variable
387: Stars, (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)
388:
389: \bibitem[Winget et al.(1991)]{Win91} Winget, D.~E., et al.\
390: 1991, \apj, 378, 326
391:
392: \bibitem[Warner \& Woudt(2004)]{WW04b} Warner, B. \&
393: Woudt, P. A. 2004, in ASP Conf Ser. Variable Stars in the Local
394: Group, eds. D. Kurtz \& Karen Pollard, in press
395:
396: \bibitem[Woudt \& Warner(2004)]{WW04a} Woudt, P.~A.~\&
397: Warner, B.\ 2004, \mnras, 348, 599
398:
399: \end{thebibliography}
400:
401: %\clearpage
402:
403: \begin{figure}
404: \plotone{fg1.eps}
405: \caption{The combined spectrum (black line) and the
406: best fit {\tt PHOENIX} white dwarf model (grey line). The white dwarf
407: model parameters are T$_{eff}$ = 12,000 K, log($g$) = 7.7,
408: Z = 10$^{-2}$ Z$_{\sun}$. The model also includes the flux from a
409: M dwarf secondary with a T$_{eff}$ = 2500 K.}
410: \label{modelfit}
411: \end{figure}
412:
413: %\clearpage
414:
415: \begin{figure}
416: \plotone{fg2.eps}
417: \caption{The evolution of H$\alpha$. The numbers on the right
418: hand side of the figure give the time of mid exposure for each
419: spectrum. NOTE TO EDITOR: This figure requires
420: a minimum of 1/2 a page to show its details.}
421: \label{evolve}
422: \end{figure}
423:
424: %\clearpage
425:
426: \begin{figure}
427: \plotone{fg3.eps}
428: \caption{Radial velocity data obtained from a double Gaussian
429: fitting to the line wings. Top panel gives the radial velocities as
430: determined from the H$\alpha$ emission feature. The bottom panel gives
431: the radial velocities as determined from the H$\beta$ emission feature.
432: The best-fit solution yields a period of 1.7 hours.}
433: \label{radvel}
434: \end{figure}
435:
436: %\clearpage
437:
438: \begin{figure}
439: \plotone{fg4.eps}
440: \caption{The ratio of the blue (violet) peak to red H$\alpha$ peaks.
441: The solid line is the best sinusoidal fit assuming P$_{orb}$ = 1.7 h.}
442: \label{ratio}
443: \end{figure}
444:
445: %\clearpage
446:
447: \begin{figure}
448: \plotone{fg5.eps}
449: \caption{The 19 January 1999 differential light curve. The squares and
450: diamonds are PQ And minus the comparison star and the comparison star minus
451: the check star (plus 1 magnitude) values plus their summed photometric
452: errors, respectively. The line at the bottom left of the figure displays
453: 1.7 hours in this plot.}
454: \label{lightcurve}
455: \end{figure}
456:
457: %\clearpage
458:
459: \begin{figure}
460: \plotone{fg6.eps}
461: \caption{The derived PQ And parameters on the theoretical white dwarf
462: cooling tracks of \citet{Driebe98}. The White Dwarf mass is estimated
463: to be $\approx$ 0.5 $M_\odot$.}
464: \label{wdplot}
465: \end{figure}
466:
467: \clearpage
468:
469: \begin{deluxetable}{lrcc}
470: \tablewidth{0pt}
471: \tablecaption{Emission line measurements\label{tab:emission}}
472: \tablehead{
473: \colhead{Line} & \colhead{EW} & \colhead{Flux} & \colhead{FWZI} \\
474: \colhead{} & \colhead{(\AA)} & \colhead{(erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$)} &
475: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)}
476: }
477: \startdata
478: H$\delta$ & 4 & 2.6e-16 & 2100 \\
479: H$\gamma$ & 7 & 4.6e-16 & 2100 \\
480: H$\beta$ & 21 & 1.0e-15 & 2500 \\
481: \ion{He}{1} & 5 & 2.1e-16 & \nodata \\
482: H$\alpha$ & 75 & 2.1e-15 & 2700 \\
483: \enddata
484: \end{deluxetable}
485:
486: \begin{deluxetable}{crrrr}
487: \tablewidth{0pt}
488: \tablecaption{Radial Velocity measurements\label{tab:RV}}
489: \tablehead{
490: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{H$\alpha$} &
491: \multicolumn{2}{c}{H$\beta$} \\
492: \colhead{HJD\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{Phase} & \colhead{RV} &
493: \colhead{Phase} & \colhead{RV} \\
494: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
495: \colhead{} & \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)}
496: }
497: \startdata
498: 2898.890 & 0.92 & 149.1 & 0.84 & 116.6 \\
499: 2898.897 & 0.02 & -20.9 & 0.94 & 202.4 \\
500: 2898.904 & 0.12 & -23.4 & 0.04 & 72.8 \\
501: 2898.911 & 0.21 & -88.1 & 0.13 & -86.4 \\
502: 2898.918 & 0.31 & -80.0 & 0.23 & -88.2 \\
503: 2898.925 & \nodata & \nodata & 0.32 & -83.3 \\
504: 2898.932 & 0.50 & 52.3 & \nodata & \nodata \\
505: 2898.945 & 0.68 & 155.9 & 0.60 & 183.9 \\
506: 2898.952 & \nodata & \nodata & 0.70 & 240.7 \\
507: 2898.958 & 0.88 & 142.7 & 0.80 & 88.3 \\
508: \enddata
509: \tablenotetext{a}{Heliocentric JD of mid-integration minus 2,450,000.}
510: \end{deluxetable}
511:
512: \begin{deluxetable}{ll}
513: \tablewidth{0pt}
514: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
515: \tablecaption{PQ And system parameters\label{tab:parms}}
516: \tablehead{
517: \colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Value}
518: }
519: \startdata
520: \cutinhead{Observed parameters}
521: RA (J2000) & +02:29:29.54 \\
522: DEC (J2000) & +40:02:39.40 \\
523: b & -19.06$^{\circ}$ \\
524: E(B-V) & 0.06 \citep{SFD98} \\
525: Outbursts & 23 August 1938 \citep{richter90} \\
526: & 7 March 1967 \citep{richter90} \\
527: & 21 March 1988 \citep{iauc4570} \\
528: Recurrence Timescale & 25$\pm$4 years \\
529: Maximum magnitude & 10 (visual) \citep{iauc4570} \\
530: Minimum magnitude & 19.0 (V band) \citep{DS93} \\
531: \cutinhead{H$\alpha$ emission line analysis}
532: Orbital period & 1.7$\pm$0.1 hours \\
533: Systemic velocity & 46.0$\pm$3.5 km s$^{-1}$ (Equ. 1) \\
534: Semiamplitude & 135.7$\pm$13.7 km s$^{-1}$ (Equ. 1) \\
535: Superior conjunction & 2,452,898.902 HJD (Equ. 2)\\
536: A & 0.95$\pm$0.01 (Equ. 2)\\
537: B & 0.25$\pm$0.01 (Equ. 2)\\
538: \cutinhead{{\tt PHOENIX} WD analysis}
539: T$_{eff}$ & 12,000$\pm$1,000 K \\
540: log(g) & 7.7$\pm$0.3 \\
541: Z & 10$^{-2}$ Z$_\odot$ \\
542: Distance & 330$\pm$50 pc \\
543: M$_1$ & 0.47$\pm$0.13 M$_\odot$ \\
544: \enddata
545: \end{deluxetable}
546:
547: \end{document}
548: