1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4]{article}
2: %\documentstyle[11pt,emulateapj,epsfig]{article}
3: %\documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass{article}
5: \documentclass{aa}
6: \usepackage{graphicx}
7: \usepackage{txfonts}
8: %\usepackage{emulapj,epsf,apjfonts}
9: \def\bibi{\bibitem}
10: \def\refe{\reference}
11: \newcommand{\Msun}{\mbox{$M_{\odot}\;$}}
12: \def\lsim{\;\raise0.3ex\hbox{$<$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\;}
13: \def\gsim{\;\raise0.3ex\hbox{$>$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\;}
14: \def\gr{$\gamma$-ray }
15: \def\gc{$\gamma$-Cyg }
16: \def\etal{et al. }
17: \def\beg{\begin}
18: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
19: \def\enq{\end{equation}}
20: \def\begar{\begin{eqnarray}}
21: \def\endar{\end{eqnarray}}
22: \def\mathnew{\mathsurround=0pt}
23: \def\simov#1#2{\lower .5pt\vbox{\baselineskip0pt \lineskip-.5pt
24: \ialign{$\mathnew#1\hfil##\hfil$\crcr#2\crcr\sim\crcr}}}
25: \def\simg{\mathrel{\mathpalette\simov >}}
26: \def\siml{\mathrel{\mathpalette\simov <}}
27: \def\gcm{\rm ~g~cm^{-3}}
28: \def\cmc{\rm ~cm^{-3}}
29: \def\cms{\rm ~cm^{-2}}
30: \def\kms{\rm ~km~s^{-1}}
31: \def\ergs{\rm ~erg~s^{-1}}
32: \def\enf{\rm ~erg~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}
33: \def\fl{\rm ~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}
34: \def\phfl{\rm ~ph~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}~keV^{-1}}
35: \def\lfl{\rm ~ph~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}
36: \def\nh{N$_H$}
37: \def \rchisq {$\chi_{\nu} ^{2}$}
38: \def\approxgt{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\lower.55ex \hbox {$\sim$}}
39: \kern-.3em \raise.4ex \hbox{$>$}}}}
40: \def\approxlt{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\lower.55ex \hbox {$\sim$}}
41: \kern-.3em \raise.4ex \hbox{$<$}}}}
42: %\textheight=8.75in
43: %\textwidth=5.5in
44: %\voffset=-1cm
45: %\hoffset=-1cm
46: %Received{ }
47: %\accepted{}
48: %\journalid{337}{}
49: %\articleid{11}{}
50: %\slugcomment{}
51: %\slugcomment{}
52: \begin{document}
53: \title{\bf
54: Hard X-ray Emission Clumps in the $\gamma$-Cygni Supernova Remnant:
55: an INTEGRAL-ISGRI View}
56:
57: \author{
58: A.M.Bykov
59: \inst{1},
60: A.M.Krassilchtchikov
61: \inst{1},
62: Yu.A.Uvarov
63: \inst{1},
64: H.Bloemen
65: \inst{2},
66: R.A.Chevalier
67: \inst{3},
68: M.Yu.Gustov
69: \inst{1},
70: W.Hermsen
71: \inst{2},
72: F.Lebrun
73: \inst{4},
74: T.A.Lozinskaya
75: \inst{5},
76: G.Rauw
77: \inst{6},
78: T.V.Smirnova
79: \inst{7},
80: S.J.Sturner
81: \inst{8},
82: J.-P.\,Swings
83: \inst{6},
84: R.Terrier
85: \inst{4},
86: I.N.Toptygin
87: \inst{1}
88: }
89:
90: \offprints{A.M.Bykov~(byk@astro.ioffe.ru)}
91:
92: \institute{A.F.Ioffe Institute for Physics and Technology,
93: 26 Polytechnicheskaia, 194021, St.Petersburg, Russia %\\
94: %\email{byk@astro.ioffe.ru; kra@astro.ioffe.ru; uv@astro.ioffe.ru}
95: \and
96: SRON National Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2,
97: 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands %\\
98: %\email{H.Bloemen@sron.nl, W.Hermsen@sron.nl}
99: \and
100: Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia,
101: P.O. Box 3818, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA %\\
102: %\email{rac5x@virginia.edu}
103: \and
104: CEA-Saclay, DSM/DAPNIA/Service d'Astrophysique,
105: 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France % \\
106: %\email{flebrun@cea.fr}
107: \and
108: Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow State University,
109: 13 Universitetskij, 119899, Moscow, Russia % \\
110: %\email{lozinsk@sai.msu.ru}
111: \and
112: Institut d'Astrophysique et de G\'eophysique, Universit\'e de Li\`ege,
113: All\'ee du 6 Ao\^ut 17, B\^at B5c, 4000 Li\`ege, Belgium % \\
114: %\email{rauw@astro.ulg.ac.be, swings@astro.ulg.ac.be}
115: \and
116: Astro Space Center of the Lebedev Physics Institute,
117: 84/32 Profsoyuznaia, 117810, Moscow, Russia % \\
118: %\email{tania@prao.psn.ru}
119: \and
120: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 661, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA % \\
121: %\email{sturner@swati.gsfc.nasa.gov}
122: }
123:
124: \date{Received September 22, 2004; accepted October 9, 2004}
125:
126: \abstract{ Spatially resolved images of the galactic supernova
127: remnant G78.2+2.1 ($\gamma$-Cygni) in hard X-ray energy bands from
128: 25 keV to 120 keV are obtained with the {\it IBIS-ISGRI} imager
129: aboard the International Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory {\it
130: INTEGRAL}. The images are dominated by localized clumps of about
131: ten arcmin in size. The flux of the most prominent North-Western
132: (NW) clump is (1.7$\pm$0.4)$\times$10$^{-11} \enf$ in the 25-40
133: keV band. The observed X-ray fluxes are in agreement with
134: extrapolations of soft X-ray imaging observations of \gc by {\it
135: ASCA GIS} and spatially unresolved {\it RXTE PCA} data. The
136: positions of the hard X-ray clumps correlate with bright patches
137: of optical line emission, possibly indicating the presence of
138: radiative shock waves in a shocked cloud. The observed spatial
139: structure and spectra are consistent with model predictions of
140: hard X-ray emission from nonthermal electrons accelerated by a
141: radiative shock in a supernova interacting with an interstellar
142: cloud, but the powerful stellar wind of the O9V star HD 193322 is a
143: plausible candidate for the NW source as well.
144:
145: \keywords{gamma rays: observations -- X rays: ISM: Supernova
146: Remnants
147: --- individual: G78.2+2.1 ($\gamma$-Cygni)--- radiation mechanisms: nonthermal---cosmic rays}
148: }
149:
150: \authorrunning{A.M.Bykov et al.}
151: \titlerunning{Hard X-ray Emission Clumps in $\gamma$-Cygni}
152: \maketitle
153:
154: \section{\bf Introduction}
155:
156: The supernova remnant (SNR) G78.2+2.1 ($\gamma$-Cygni) is a degree
157: size extended source which has been imaged in radio
158: waves to $\gamma$-rays. %% may not be so spectacular in, e.g. optical
159: The SNR is located in the complex Cygnus X region of massive gas
160: and dust complexes and close to the most powerful Cyg OB2
161: association. Radio observations by Higgs \etal (1977) established
162: a shell-like structure of the remnant, suggested also by
163: Lozinskaya (1977). Multi-frequency radio observations by
164: Zhang \etal (1997) revealed a patchy structure of the radio
165: spectral-index distribution. The integrated radio spectral index
166: $\alpha$ = 0.54 $\pm$ 0.02, with variations of $\pm$ 0.15
167: within the remnant. Prominent radio brightness
168: enhancements are present in the South-East and the North-West of
169: \gc (e.g. Zhang \etal 1997). A distance to \gc of $\sim$ 1.5 kpc
170: was estimated by Landecker \etal (1980) from radio HI
171: observations.
172:
173: Optical images of \gc in H$_{\alpha}$+[NII], [SII] and [OIII]
174: filters, recently presented by Mavromatakis (2003), clearly show a
175: patchy structure with bright spots of some ten arcminutes scale
176: and line emission fluxes of a few times $\,10^{-15}$ erg cm$^{-2}$
177: s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-2}$ for H$_{\alpha}$ filters and a few times
178: $\,10^{-16}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-2}$ for the [OIII]
179: filter.
180:
181: Archival {\it ROSAT} and {\it ASCA} observations of G78.2+2.1 were
182: analyzed by Lozinskaya \etal (2000). They pointed out a complex
183: structure of the remnant with {\it ROSAT} emission extending well
184: beyond the apparent SNR radio shell, possibly indicating expansion
185: into a progenitor star wind cavity. With archival {\it ASCA}
186: observations, Uchiyama \etal (2002) found X-ray emission above 4
187: keV to be dominated by several localized clumps, mostly in the
188: Northern part of the remnant. The 4-10 keV emission of the clumps
189: has a hard photon index of 0.8--1.5.
190:
191: A high-energy \gr source, 2CG 078+2, was discovered in the field
192: of \gc with the {\it COS B} satellite (e.g. Swanenburg \etal
193: 1981). {\it CGRO-EGRET} confirmed this source (2EG J2020+4026/3EG
194: J2020+4017), which is one of the brightest steady-state
195: unidentified sources in the {\it EGRET} catalogue with a flux of
196: $\sim$ 1.2 $\times 10^{-6}\fl$ above 100 MeV (Sturner and Dermer
197: 1995; Esposito \etal 1996). {\it Whipple} \gr telescope
198: observations (e.g. Buckley \etal 1998) established an upper limit
199: of 2.2 $\times 10^{-11}\fl$ for the flux above 300 GeV, indicating
200: a break in the high-energy emission spectrum above a few GeV. The
201: \gr emission might be produced by a pulsar, but can be attributed
202: to interactions of accelerated energetic particles with ambient
203: matter and radiation as well (e.g. Sturner \etal 1997; Gaisser \etal 1998;
204: Bykov \etal 2000). Solving this problem of the origin
205: of the \gr emission requires the analysis of multiwavelength
206: imaging observations. Hard X-ray imaging provides a crucial tool
207: to distinguish between leptonic and hadronic contributions to the
208: \gr emission. We present below the first hard X-ray imaging
209: observation of \gc.
210:
211:
212: \begin{figure}
213: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{f1.ps}
214: \caption{The {\it ISGRI} 25--40 keV broad view of the \gc region
215: (linearly scaled S/N map of the sources above 2$\sigma$).
216: The solid circle is the same as in Fig.~\ref{fig:A_R_I} .
217: }
218: \label{fig:broad_view}
219: \end{figure}
220:
221:
222:
223: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
224:
225: \subsection{INTEGRAL ISGRI observations}
226:
227: The SNR G78.2+2.1 was observed with the {\it ISGRI\,} imager (Lebrun
228: \etal 2003) aboard {\it INTEGRAL} (Winkler \etal 2003). We
229: combined data from 21 Core Program and calibration observations
230: (revolutions 12-82: Nov 18, 2002 --- Jun 15, 2003) and added 28
231: pointings from AO1 (rev. 80, 11-12 Jun 2003) and AO2 (rev. 191,
232: 8-9 May 2004) observations [Obs. Ids 0129700 and 0229700:
233: amalgamated observations with G. Rauw as PI].
234:
235: The data obtained from {\it ISGRI\,} have been reduced with the
236: standard off-line scientific analysis software developed at the
237: INTEGRAL Science Data Center (the OSA 4.0 package). The standard
238: good time selection criteria were applied; only science windows
239: (SCWs) with more than 100~s of good time were considered. Wide
240: energy bands were used (25-40 keV, 40-80 keV, and 80-120 keV) in
241: order to be able to detect sources at a few mCrab level. In order
242: to improve on source detection (at the cost of source-localization
243: accuracy), pixel spreading was switched off. We analysed 360 good
244: ks of FCFOV (fully coded field of view) observations and 1,060
245: good ks of PCFOV (partially coded field of view) observations,
246: although only FCFOV data were used for the flux estimates
247: presented here. Source reconstruction with FCFOV data is more
248: secure in the Cygnus region with its bright point sources and
249: complex diffuse background emission. The angular resolution (FWHM)
250: of {\it ISGRI} is about 12\arcmin\, and the images were sampled in
251: $\sim$ 5\arcmin\, pixels (Lebrun \etal 2003; Goldwurm \etal 2003).
252:
253: \begin{figure*}
254: \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{f21.ps}
255: \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{f22.ps}
256: \includegraphics[width=0.33\textwidth]{f23.ps}
257: \caption{{\it Left}: {\it ASCA GIS} 6-10 keV grayscale map with an
258: {\it INTEGRAL ISGRI} 25-40 keV 4.2 $\sigma$ contour in the NW
259: area. {\it Centre}: {\it ROSAT PSPC-B} 0.4-2.0 keV grayscale map
260: with the same {\it INTEGRAL ISGRI} 25-40 keV 4.2 $\sigma$ contour.
261: {\it Right}: {\it INTEGRAL ISGRI} 25-40 keV significance map
262: (linear scale) with H$_{\alpha}$+[NII] 6560 \AA\,
263: 3$\times$10$^{-15}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$ contours
264: (dotted line) and [OIII] 5010 \AA\, 3$\times$10$^{-16}$ erg
265: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$ contours (solid line) [optical
266: data are from Mavromatakis (2003)]. The hard emission regions NW,
267: NE, and SE are marked in the first two panels. The NE clump is
268: seen with {\it ISGRI} only in the 40-80 keV band. The {\it RXTE
269: PCA} field of view is indicated by the large solid circle. The
270: black cross on the {\it ROSAT} map marks the position of the O9V
271: star HD 193322 (20:18:07,+40:43:55). All maps are made for J2000.}
272:
273: %\caption{INTEGRAL ISGRI FCFOV 25-40 keV 4.2 $\sigma$
274: %contour (solid line), H$_{\alpha}$+N[II] 6560 \AA\, 3$\cdot$10$^{-15}$
275: %erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$ contour (crosses) and
276: %O[III] 6010 \AA\, 3$\cdot$10$^{-16}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ arcsec$^{-1}$
277: %contour (diamonds) [optical data are from Mavromatakis (2003)]
278: %on ASCA GIS 6-10 keV (left) and ROSAT PSPC-B 0.4-2.0 keV (right)
279: %greyscale maps. Hard emission regions NW, NE, and SE are marked.}
280:
281: \label{fig:A_R_I}
282: \end{figure*}
283:
284: %Although the total good time exposure (360 ks) of FCFOV is
285: %substantially less than the FCFOV+PCFOV exposure (above 1,300 ks),
286: %source reconstruction with FCFOV data is more secure in the Cygnus
287: %region with its bright point sources and complex diffuse
288: %background emission. However, the brightest features in the FCFOV
289: %(see Fig.~\ref{fig:broad_view}) were seen with similar
290: %significance in the FCFOV+PCFOV \gc mosaics as well.
291:
292: Source significances were derived
293: from a statistical distribution of count-rate values for a sample of
294: about 100$\times$100 pixels in {\it ISGRI}\, FCFOV images around
295: \gc (using the mean and the standard deviation of the distribution).
296:
297: At present, the most reliable {\it ISGRI} flux estimates can be
298: obtained by cross calibration with the Crab, i.e. by comparing the
299: source and Crab count rates in the same energy bands, accounting
300: for different [model] spectral distributions. The systematic
301: uncertainties of this procedure are estimated to be about 25\% ,
302: mainly due to the possibly extended nature ($\gsim$ 10\arcmin) of
303: the detected sources (cf. Lubinski 2004 where calibrations of
304: point sources are discussed).
305:
306:
307: In Figs.~\ref{fig:broad_view},~\ref{fig:A_R_I} we show X-ray images of G78.2+2.1 obtained
308: with {\it INTEGRAL ISGRI}, {\it ASCA}, and {\it ROSAT}.
309: The {\it ISGRI} images in
310: our three energy bands are dominated by a few localized clumps of
311: emission. The flux estimates of the North-Western (NW) clump are
312: $(1.7\pm0.4)\times 10^{-11} \enf$ in the 25--40 keV band,
313: $(1.2\pm0.8)\times 10^{-11} \enf$ in the 40-80 keV band, and
314: $(2.5\pm1.2)\times 10^{-11} \enf$ in the 80--120 keV band. For the
315: SE clump we find $(1.2\pm0.5)\times 10^{-11} \enf$ (25-40 keV),
316: $(1.5\pm0.8) \times 10^{-11} \enf$ (40-80 keV), and
317: $(3.0\pm1.2)\times 10^{-11} \enf$ (80-120 keV). The NE clump that
318: coincides with the ASCA hard source C1 (Uchiyama \etal 2002) is
319: seen only in the 40-80 keV band with a flux of $(1.7\pm0.7)\times
320: 10^{-11} \enf$. A longer exposure with {\it ISGRI} is required to
321: detect (or reject) this NE-clump emission; the weak detection
322: obtained so far might be related to the extended nature of the ASCA
323: C1 source.
324:
325: \subsection{RXTE PCA and ASCA GIS observations}
326:
327: Hard X-ray emission from G78.2+2.1 can be also constrained from
328: non-imaging {\it RXTE} observations. We used public archive {\it
329: RXTE} 61.4 ksec observations of \gc\ performed on 5-10 Apr 1997.
330: The {\it RXTE PCA} data were reduced with the standard HEASARC
331: FTOOLS 5.3
332: %\footnote{http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/software/ftools/}
333: software.% according to recipes from ``The RXTE Cookbook.''
334: %\footnote{http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/xte/recipes/cook\_book.html}.
335: Only Standard-2 mode data were used.
336: %, as no timing analysis was performed.
337: The PCA background was accounted for with the latest
338: faint source background model (cmfaintl7\_eMv20031123). The
339: standard good time selection procedure was applied. The {\it RXTE
340: PCA} field of view covers a substantial part of \gc\ including the
341: hard clumps seen with {\it INTEGRAL ISGRI}. We found the X-ray
342: emission of \gc\ to extend beyond $\sim$ 20 keV and fitted the
343: {\it RXTE PCA} 5-15 keV data simultaneously with archival {\it
344: ASCA GIS2} 3-7 keV data for the total remnant emission with a
345: broken power-law with a Lorentz line at 6.2 keV. Here we used the
346: same set of {\it ASCA GIS} data that was analyzed by Uchiyama
347: \etal (2002).
348:
349: The total remnant emission (3-15 keV) was fitted by a power-law
350: with photon indexes $\alpha_1 = 2.0 \pm 0.4$ below the break
351: energy $E_b = 11.1 \pm 1.2$ keV and $\alpha_2 = 1.2 \pm 0.4$ for
352: $E_b < E < 15$ keV (the reduced \rchisq = 0.91 at $\nu$=85
353: d.o.f.). The power-law normalization was (8.1 $\pm$ 0.56) $\times$
354: 10$^{-3} \phfl$ at 1 keV. We found a correction factor (0.72
355: $\pm$ 0.19) for the {\it RXTE PCA} flux normalization considered
356: as a free parameter with a fixed {\it ASCA GIS2} flux
357: normalization. The line at 6.2 $\pm$ 0.04 keV has a width of 1.0
358: $\pm$ 0.2 keV (equivalent width is 1.1 $\pm$ 0.5 keV) and
359: normalization (2.5 $\pm$ 0.8) $\times$ 10$^{-4} \lfl$. Note here
360: that a similar signature of a 6.4 keV line was found by Pannuti
361: \etal (2003) in the {\it RXTE} analysis of another extended SNR
362: G347.3-0.5. While the low energy branch of the fit is a
363: combination of thermal and nonthermal components, the high energy
364: emission above the break is nonthermal. Using the joint {\it ASCA
365: GIS2 - RXTE PCA} fit, we estimated the ranges of the extrapolated
366: hard X-ray fluxes of the total remnant emission in the 25-40 keV
367: band as (1.0 - 1.7)$\times 10^{-11} \enf$, while in the 80-120 keV
368: regime the range is (1.4 - 4.5)$\times 10^{-11} \enf$. Since the
369: hard X-ray {\it ISGRI} images are dominated by the NW, NE, and SE
370: clumps that are located at the boundary of the {\it RXTE PCA}
371: pointing, we have applied flux corrections accounting for the
372: {\it RXTE PCA} collimator response at $\sim$ 30\arcmin\ from the
373: axis.
374:
375: \begin{figure}
376: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth,height=6.5cm,bb= 26 77 565 493,clip]{f3.eps}
377: \caption{The spectral energy distribution of the hard emission
378: from \gc. The {\it ISGRI} datapoints correspond to the NW clump
379: only.} \label{fig:spectra}
380: \end{figure}
381:
382:
383: The total flux estimations are in agreement with the summed {\it
384: INTEGRAL ISGRI} fluxes of the NW, NE, and SE clumps if a 25\%
385: systematic error in the calibration procedure is accounted for.
386: The hard-emission spectrum of \gc is presented in
387: Fig.~\ref{fig:spectra}. We show the total remnant {\it ASCA
388: GIS2 - RXTE PCA} flux, the fluxes of the {\it ISGRI}\, NW clump and of {\it EGRET}\, 3EG J2020+4017 source, and the {\it Whipple} upper
389: limit.
390:
391: \section{\bf Discussion}
392:
393: The locations of the hard X-ray clumps detected by {\it INTEGRAL
394: ISGRI} correlate with dim regions of high \nh $\gsim 5\times
395: 10^{21} \cms$ in the {\it ROSAT PSPC-B} 0.4-2.0 keV greyscale map
396: in Fig.~\ref{fig:A_R_I}. The clumps adjoin the patches of bright
397: optical H$_{\alpha}$+[NII], [SII] and [OIII] line emission (of
398: $\gsim$ 10\arcmin\ scale size) observed by Mavromatakis (2003).
399: The line emission may indicate an interaction of the SNR with a
400: nearby cloud and the presence of a radiative shock wave.
401:
402: In evolved supernova remnants interacting with interstellar
403: clouds, such as \gc\ and IC~443, a highly inhomogeneous structure
404: consisting of a forward shock of a moderate Mach number, a cooling
405: layer, a dense radiative shell, and an interior region filled with
406: hot tenuous plasma is expected. A SNR evolving in
407: the inter-clump medium of a molecular cloud of density $n_a \sim
408: 25$ H atoms cm$^{-3}$ becomes radiative at radii $\sim 6$ pc
409: (Chevalier 1999). A model of nonthermal electron acceleration and
410: interactions in such SNRs by Bykov \etal (2000) predicted that
411: these SNRs are efficient electron accelerators and sources of hard
412: X- and \gr emission.
413: %The energy spectrum of the nonthermal
414: %electrons is shaped by the joint action of first and second order
415: %Fermi acceleration in a turbulent plasma with substantial Coulomb losses.
416: %Bremsstrahlung, synchrotron, and inverse Compton radiation
417: %of the nonthermal electrons produce multiwavelength photon
418: %spectra.
419: A distinctive feature of the model is the presence of emitting
420: clumps with very flat hard X-ray spectra of photon indexes
421: $\alpha \sim 1$. The photon break energy and the maximum energy of
422: accelerated electrons depend on the ambient density. A radiative
423: shock propagating through the interclump medium could accelerate
424: radio-emitting electrons in the GeV regime, also producing hard X-ray
425: and \gr {\it EGRET}-regime emission. A slower MHD shock in a dense
426: molecular clump could produce bright hard X-ray emission without
427: prominent radio and \gr counterparts. Bremsstrahlung radiation from
428: the nonthermal electrons has a hard X-ray photon spectrum. The
429: nonthermal X-ray flux $F_x$ from the electrons accelerated by
430: a MHD shock of a velocity $v_{s7}$ (in 100 $\kms$) and of an
431: apparent angular size $\theta$ (in arcmin) can be estimated as a
432: fraction of the shock ram pressure:
433: \begin{equation}
434: F_x \approx 9.2\times 10^{-12}\, \eta\,\, \frac{n_a\,
435: v_{s7}^3}{2}\,\, \theta^2 \,\, \enf.
436: \end{equation}
437: The efficiency of X-ray bremsstrahlung emission $\eta$ is
438: relatively low due to the Coulomb losses of fast particles,
439: providing powerful optical and IR diffuse emission from the
440: interclump medium. Having in mind that $\eta < 10^{-5}$ in the
441: ambient medium [of solar abundance] for the energy band below
442: 100 keV, one may conclude that $n_a \cdot v_{s7}^3 \cdot \theta^2 >
443: 10^5$. That is a rather stringent requirement implying a high
444: efficiency of electron acceleration by a relatively slow shock
445: with $v_{s7} \gsim$ 1 and $n_a > 100 \cmc$ for $\theta \sim$ 10.
446: A more detailed confrontation of the observational data and the
447: model predictions, including GeV \gr emission, will be described elsewhere.
448:
449: An alternative interpretation of the observed hard X-ray sources
450: could be a fast massive ballistically moving ejecta fragment
451: interacting with a cloud. The fragment could drive a shock of
452: velocity about 1,000 $\kms$ in the inter-clump medium providing a
453: powerful source of X-ray emission both in continuum and lines
454: (Bykov 2003). The fragments being enriched with metals (of an
455: average nuclear charge $\langle Z\rangle$) have higher radiation
456: efficiency, since $\eta \propto\, \langle Z\rangle$. The energetic
457: problem of the bremsstrahlung emission models $\langle Z\rangle
458: \cdot n_a \cdot v_{s7}^3 \cdot \theta^2 > 10^5$ is alleviated. The
459: line signature around 6.2~keV required to fit the {\it RXTE PCA}
460: data could be naturally explained in that case as a Fe K line
461: complex predicted for the ejecta fragment model, though a
462: contribution from hidden accreting sources (AGNs or X-ray
463: binaries) cannot be excluded.
464:
465: A powerful wind of the early type O9V star HD 193322 located just
466: 7\arcmin\ from the NW bright clump (see Fig.~\ref{fig:A_R_I})
467: could also be considered as a candidate source for the observed
468: emission. The star is the central object of the open
469: cluster Collinder 419 located at an estimated distance 1.4 kpc
470: (e.g. McKibben et al., 1998)
471: which is close to the \gc distance estimations. The trigonometric parallax
472: of HD 193322 provided by the {\it Hipparcos} catalogue is
473: (2.1 $\pm$ 0.61) mas marginally consistent with the distance.
474: Interaction of the wind of HD 193322 with G78.2+2.1
475: would be a plausible source of
476: particle acceleration and hard X-ray emission.
477:
478: %The energetic
479: %requirements for the hard X-ray source at the distance of the
480: %visual binary HD 193322 are less demanding than that for \gc\ .
481: %Another plausible source of hard emission
482: %in SNR could be a pulsar wind nebula.
483:
484: A deeper exposure of the field with {\it ISGRI}\, is required to
485: detect [or to place meaningful upper limits] on the hard emission
486: from the NW, NE, SE regions up to
487: 120 keV. The presence of a few clumps of hard emission at a level
488: above 10$^{-11} \enf$ at the borders of \gc would support the
489: hypothesis of SNR origin of the nonthermal clumps with important
490: implications for particle acceleration mechanisms in SNRs.
491:
492:
493:
494: \begin{acknowledgements}
495:
496: The present work is partly based on observations with INTEGRAL, an
497: ESA project with instruments and a science data centre funded by
498: ESA member states (especially the PI countries: Denmark, France,
499: Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Spain), Czech Republic and Poland,
500: and with the participation of Russia and the USA. This research
501: has made use of data obtained from the High Energy Astrophysics
502: Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC), provided by NASA's
503: Goddard Space Flight Center. We are grateful to F.Mavromatakis who
504: generously provided us with optical data.
505:
506: The work was partially supported by RFBR grants 03-02-17433,
507: 04-02-16595, 04-02-16042, RAS program, MK 2642.2003.02 and by the European Space
508: Agency. R.A.C. was supported by NASA grant NNG04GA41G. G.R. and J.P.S.
509: acknowledge support through the Belgian FNRS and the INTEGRAL PRODEX project.
510: Support from the International Space Science Institute (Bern) through the
511: international teams program is gratefully acknowledged.
512:
513: \end{acknowledgements}
514:
515:
516: {\bf References} \\
517:
518: % \begin{references}
519:
520:
521:
522:
523: Buckley, J.H., Akerlof, C.W., Carter-Lewis, D.A. et al. 1998,
524: A\&A, 329, 639
525: %\medskip
526:
527:
528: Bykov, A.M., Chevalier, R.A., Ellison, D.C. \& Uvarov, Yu.A. 2000,
529: ApJ, 538, 203
530: %\medskip
531:
532:
533: Bykov, A.M. 2003, A\&A, 410 ,L5
534: %\medskip
535:
536:
537: Chevalier, R.A. 1999, ApJ, 511, 798
538: %\medskip
539:
540:
541: Esposito, J.A., Hunter, S.D., Kanbach, G., et al. 1996, ApJ, 461,
542: 820
543: %\medskip
544:
545: %Fegan, S. 2001, in: The nature of unidentified galactic
546: %high-energy gamma-ray sources. Eds. A.Carraminana, Kluwer, 285
547: %\medskip
548:
549: Gaisser, T., Protheroe, R., \& Stanev, T. 1998, ApJ, 492, 219
550: %\medskip
551:
552: Goldwurm, A., David, P., Foschini, L. et al., 2003, A\&A, 411,
553: L223
554: %\medskip
555:
556: Higgs, L., Landecker, T., \& Roger, R. 1977, AJ, 82, 718
557: %\medskip
558:
559:
560: Landecker, T., Roger, R., \& Higgs, L. 1980, A\&AS, 39, 133
561: %\medskip
562:
563:
564: Lebrun, F., Leray, J.P., Lavocat, P., et al., 2003, A\&A, 411,
565: L141
566: %\medskip
567:
568:
569: Lozinskaya, T.A. 1977, Sov. Astron. Lett.,3,163.
570: %\medskip
571:
572: Lozinskaya, T.A., Pravdikova, V.V., \& Finoguenov, A.V. 2000, Astron.
573: Lett., 26, 77
574: %\medskip
575:
576: Lubinski, P., 2004, astro-ph/0405460.
577: %\medskip
578:
579:
580: Mavromatakis, F. 2003, A\&A, 408, 237
581: %\medskip
582:
583: McKibben, W.P., Bagnuolo, W. G., Jr., Gies, D. R. et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 900
584:
585:
586: Pannuti, T., Allen, G., Houck, J. et al. 2003, ApJ, 593, 377
587: %\medskip
588:
589:
590: Sturner, S.J., \& Dermer, C.D. 1995, A\&A, 293, L17
591: %\medskip
592:
593: Sturner, S.J., Skibo, J.G., Dermer, C.D., \& Mattox, J.R. 1997,
594: ApJ, 490, 619
595: %\medskip
596:
597: Swanenburg, B.N., Bennett, K., Bignami, G. F. et al. 1981, ApJ, 243, L69
598: %\medskip
599:
600: Uchiyama, Y., Takahashi, T., Aharonian, F.A., \& Mattox, J.R. 2002,
601: ApJ, 571, 866
602: %\medskip
603:
604: Winkler, C., Courvoisier, T., Di Cocco, G., et al. 2003, A\&A,
605: 411, L1
606: %\medskip
607:
608: Zhang, X., Zheng, Y., Landecker, T. L., \& Higgs, L. A. 1997, A\&A, 324, 641
609: %\medskip
610: % \end{references}
611:
612: %%\medskip
613:
614: %\end{flushleft}
615: \clearpage
616:
617:
618: \end{document}
619: