1: %version: Nov,3 2004
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: \usepackage{emulateapj5,epsf}
4: %\usepackage{epsf}
5:
6: %\slugcomment{preparation for submitting to ApJ Letters}
7:
8: \shortauthors{T. Hosokawa \& S.Inutsuka}
9: \shorttitle{A Mode of Triggered Star Formation}
10:
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{Dynamical Expansion of Ionization and Dissociation Front around
15: a Massive Star. I. A Mode of Triggered Star Formation}
16: \author{Takashi Hosokawa\altaffilmark{1} and
17: Shu-ichiro Inutsuka\altaffilmark{2}}
18:
19: \altaffiltext{1}{Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University,
20: Kyoto, Japan, 606-8502 ; hosokawa@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp}
21: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan,
22: 606-8502 ; inutsuka@tap.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp}
23:
24: \begin{abstract}
25: We analyze the dynamical expansion of the H~II region and outer
26: photodissociation region (PDR) around a massive star by solving
27: the UV and FUV radiation transfer and the thermal and chemical
28: processes in a time-dependent hydrodynamics code.
29: We focus on the physical structure of the shell swept up by the shock
30: front (SF) preceding the ionization front (IF).
31: After the IF reaches the initial Str$\ddot {\rm o}$mgren radius,
32: the SF emerges in front of the IF and the geometrically
33: thin shell bounded with the IF and the SF is formed.
34: The gas density inside the shell is about $10^{1-2}$ times
35: as high as the ambient gas density.
36: Initially the dissociation fronts expands faster than IF and the PDR
37: is formed outside the H~II region. Thereafter the IF and SF
38: gradually overtakes the proceeding dissociation fronts (DFs), and
39: eventually DFs are taken in the shell.
40: The chemical composition within the shell is initially
41: atomic, but hydrogen and carbon monoxide molecules are gradually
42: formed. This is partly because the IF and SF overtake DFs and SF
43: enters the molecular region, and partly because the reformation
44: timescales of the molecules become shorter than the dynamical timescale.
45: The gas shell becomes dominated by the molecular gas by the
46: time of gravitational fragmentation, which agrees with some recent
47: observations. A simple estimation of star formation rate in the shell
48: can provide a significant star formation rate in our galaxy.
49: \end{abstract}
50: \keywords{ Circumstellar matter -- H~II regions -- ISM: molecules
51: -- STARS : formation}
52:
53:
54: \section{Introduction}
55:
56: As the H~II region expands around a massive star, the shock front (SF)
57: emerges preceding the ionization front (IF). This SF sweeps up the
58: ambient gas and the gas shell is formed at the edge of the H~II
59: region. Many authors have studied the scenario that
60: the shell becomes unstable and next star formation is triggered
61: around H~II region (collect and collapse model, see, e.g.,
62: Elmegreen \& Lada 1977, Whitworth et al. 1994, Elmegreen 1998,
63: and references therein).
64: Recently, Deharveng et al.(2003, hereafter DV03) observed the
65: fragmented molecular shell around the classical H~II region,
66: Sh104 and show the young stars (cluster) is formed in the
67: core of one fragment. They argue that this is the evidence
68: of collect and collapse model. Now we can refine the theory for
69: the evolution of the shell and compare it with the detailed observation.
70: Especially, we can focus on the amount of the fragmented {\it molecular}
71: gas they observed. The SF initially emerges in front of the IF, where
72: sufficient FUV photons to dissociate molecules are available.
73: Therefore, it is not clear whether the SF can gather the molecular
74: gas in the shell as observation indicates or not.
75:
76: Roger \& Dewdney (1992) and Diaz-Miller, Franco
77: \& Shore (1998) studied the time-dependent expansion of H~II and
78: PDR solving the radiative transfer of UV and FUV photons.
79: Although these works do not include hydrodynamics, they have shown
80: that the IF gradually overtakes the dissociation front (DF) and
81: this means that IF and preceding SF gradually enter the molecular region.
82: The numerical study of the hydrodynamical expansion
83: of the IF has been studied since 1960's
84: (e.g. Mathews 1965, Lasker 1966, Tenorio-Tagle 1976, Tenorio-Tagle 1979
85: , Franco et al. 1990 etc.). These works successfully show the various
86: dynamical aspects of the expansion in both homogeneous and
87: inhomogeneous ambient medium. However, these do not include
88: the outer photodissociation region (PDR) and thermal processes dominant in PDR.
89:
90: We perform the time-dependent calculation including the IF,
91: DF, and the shell, which has been very limited.
92: We solve the UV and FUV radiation transfer and hydrodynamics
93: numerically to investigate the structure and evolution
94: of the shell and PDR as well as H~II region.
95: Since the compression rate behind the SF depends on the
96: thermal processes, we include the thermal processes which dominate
97: either in H~II region or PDR. In this letter, we consider the simple
98: situation that there is one massive star within the homogeneous
99: ambient medium, which can be compared with Sh104 observed by DV03.
100: The detailed quantitative aspects of the evolution
101: will be given in subsequent paper (Hosokawa \& Inutsuka 2004,
102: hereafter, Paper II).
103:
104:
105:
106: \section{Numerical Methods}
107:
108: We use a one-dimensional spherically-symmetrical numerical method.
109: The numerical scheme for the hydrodynamics is based on the 2nd-order
110: Lagrangian Godunov method (see, e.g., van Leer 1979).
111: We use the on-the-spot approximation for UV and FUV radiation transfer.
112: We assume that all hydrogen molecules are in the ground vibrational
113: level of X$^1 \Sigma_{\rm g}$ and ortho/para ratio is 3:1
114: (Diaz-Miller, Franco \& Shore 1998).
115: For the Lyman-Werner bands to photodissociate hydrogen molecule,
116: we solve the frequency dependent transfer using the representative
117: set of lines.
118: The UV and FUV photon luminosity of the central star is adopted from
119: Diaz-Miller, Franco \& Shore (1998) for the case of $Z = 1 Z_\odot$.
120: The main thermal processes included in the energy equation is UV/FUV
121: heating (e.g., H photoionization, photoelectric heating) and radiative
122: cooling (e.g., H recombination, Ly-$\alpha$, OI~(63.0$\mu$m, 63.1$\mu$m)
123: , OII~(37.29$\mu$m), CII~(23.26$\mu$m, 157.7$\mu$m), H$_2$, and CO,
124: see Hollenbach \& McKee 1979, 1989, Koyama \& Inutsuka 2000).
125: Non-equilibrium reaction equations are implicitly solved for the
126: species of e, H, H$^+$, H$_2$, C$^+$, and CO.
127: The ionization rate of O is assumed to be the same as that of
128: H. We adopt the simple approximation for the dissociation process
129: of CO molecule given by Nelson \& Langer (1997).
130: The hydrodynamic equations and the radiative transfer equation,
131: energy equation, and reaction equations are combined following
132: Tenorio-Tagle (1976).
133: The dust extinction is included only outside the IF and the dust
134: temperature is calculated following Hollenbach, Takahashi \& Tielens
135: (1991).
136: We have checked our numerical code with the well-studied problems
137: (e.g., Franco et al. 1990).
138:
139:
140:
141: \section{Results of the Numerical Calculation}
142:
143: In this letter, we consider one typical case where there is
144: one massive star of $T_{\rm eff} =40000~{\rm K}~( M=41~M_\odot )$
145: in the ambient medium.
146: This corresponds to the O6V star, which is the
147: central star of Sh104. The initial ambient number density of the hydrogen
148: nucleon is unknown, and we adopt a typical value of the giant
149: molecular cloud, $n_{\rm H,0} = 10^3~{\rm cm}^{-3}$
150: $( n_{\rm H_2,0} = 500~{\rm cm}^{-3} )$.
151: As in the standard picture (e.g. Spitzer 1978),
152: the IF expands rapidly as the weak R-type front in the recombination
153: timescale, $t_{\rm rec} \sim 100 $~yr for $n_{\rm H,0} = 10^3~{\rm cm}^{-3}$
154: (formation phase).
155: As the IF reaches Str$\ddot {\rm o}$mgren radius, $R_{\rm st} = 0.56$~pc,
156: the photoionization rate and the recombination rate in the
157: H~II region becomes equal, the H~II region begins to expand owing to
158: the pressure difference between H~II region and outer PDR or molecular
159: cloud. At this phase, the SF appears in front of the
160: IF and the IF changes to the weak D-type front (expansion phase).
161: The expansion law in this phase is given by
162:
163: \begin{equation}
164: R_{\rm IF}(t) = R_{\rm st} \left( 1 + \frac74
165: \frac{C_{\rm HII}t}{R_{\rm st}}
166: \right)^{4/7}
167: \label{law}
168: \end{equation}
169: (e.g. Spitzer 1978), where $C_{\rm HII}$ is the sound speed
170: in the H~II region.
171: The dynamical timescale is now given by
172: $t_{\rm dyn} = R_{\rm st}/C_{\rm HII} \sim 10^5$~yr.
173: Fig.1 shows the time evolution of the physical quantities
174: of the gas in the expansion phase.
175: The radius of Sh104 is 4~pc and the IF reaches this radius at
176: $t=0.7$~Myr in our calculation.
177: For each snapshot, we can see the H~II region $( T \sim 10^4~{\rm K} )$,
178: the gas shell swept up by the SF
179: $( n_{\rm H} \sim 10^{4-5}~{\rm cm^{-3}} )$ and the outer PDR
180: $( T \sim 100~{\rm K} )$ and the outermost molecular cloud
181: $( T \sim 10~{\rm K} )$.
182: The SF emerges just in front of the IF.
183: The density behind the SF significantly increases from the ambient
184: value owing to the line cooling, and the gas density
185: within the shell is about 10-100 times as high as the ambient density.
186: The more detailed inner structure of the shell is shown below (Fig.3).
187: The geometrical thickness of the shell, $h$ increases throughout the
188: calculation, $h \sim 0.02-0.2~{\rm pc}$.
189: The PDR $( T \sim 100~{\rm K} )$ becomes narrow as the IF
190: expands, that is, the IF gradually catches
191:
192: \vspace{3mm}
193: \begin{center}
194: \epsfxsize=8cm
195: \epsfbox{f1.eps}
196: \figcaption{The snapshots of the gas-dynamical evolution.
197: In each panel, five snapshots represents the profiles at
198: $t = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7$, and 0.9~Myr respectively.}
199: \end{center}
200: \vspace{-4mm}
201:
202: \noindent
203: up with the preceding DFs
204: (e.g. Roger \& Dewdney 1992, Diaz-Miller, Franco \& Shore 1998).
205: The upper panel of Fig.2 represents the overtaking of the IF more
206: clearly. The position of the SF is very close to
207: that of the IF.
208: As the system switches from the formation phase to the
209: expansion phase, the timescale of the expansion of the IF suddenly
210: becomes longer to $t_{\rm dyn}$.
211: Even in this phase, the preceding DFs continue to expand. Then
212: the region between IF and DFs appears as a PDR.
213: However, the DFs gradually slow down because the FUV flux at each DF
214: decreases owing to the geometrical dilution and the dust extinction in the
215: PDR. The IF expands because of the pressure difference between the
216: H~II region and the outer PDR, and the deceleration is more slower
217: according to eq.(\ref{law}).
218:
219: \vspace{3mm}
220: \begin{center}
221: \epsfxsize=8cm
222: \epsfbox{f2.eps}
223: \figcaption{
224: {\it Upper panel} : The time evolution of the various front positions.
225: The solid and dotted lines mean the position of the IF and SF respectively.
226: The broken (dot-solid) line represents the DF of H$_2$ (CO).
227: To define the DFs of H$_2$ and CO, we use
228: ${\rm X_{\rm H_2}} \equiv 2 n_{\rm H_2}/n_{\rm H_{\rm nuc}}=0.5$
229: and $ {\rm X_{\rm CO}} \equiv n_{\rm CO}/n_{\rm C_{\rm nuc}} = 0.5$.
230: The shaded region corresponds to $t < (G \rho)^{-1/2}$ within the
231: shell, and hence, the gravitational fragmentation is expected (see \S4.1).
232: {\it Middle panel} : The time evolution of the column density of each region.
233: Thin contour lines represent the position where
234: ${\rm X}_{\rm H_2}$ (broken), ${\rm X}_{\rm CO}$ (dot-solid)
235: = 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8.
236: {\it Lower panel} : Same as the meddle panel but for showing
237: the gravitationally unstalbe region.
238: The shaded region corresponds to the region where $t < (G \rho)^{-1/2}$.
239: }
240: \end{center}
241:
242: \noindent
243: The lower two panels of Fig.2 represents the time evolution of the
244: column density of each region. The column density of the H~II region
245: gradually decreases because the number density decreases as
246: $n_{\rm HII} \propto R_{\rm IF}^{-3/2}$ in the expansion phase, where
247: $R_{\rm IF}$ is the radius of the H~II region. The column density
248: of the gas shell $\sigma$ increases.
249: The ambient mass swept up by the time $t$ is proportional to
250: $R_{\rm IF}(t)^3$ and the mass within the H~II region is
251: $\propto n_{\rm HII} R_{\rm IF}(t)^3 \propto R_{\rm IF}(t)^{3/2}$.
252: Then the most of the swept-up mass does not flow into the H~II region but
253: remains in the shell. The calculated mass of the H~II region is
254: $430 M_\odot$ and the shell mass is $9000 M_\odot$ at $t=0.7$~Myr
255: (including both PDR and molecular region), which is in good agreement
256: with the observation (see DV03).
257: The PDR initially spreads outside the shell, but H$_2$ and CO
258: molecules are gradually accumulated from the outer side of the shell.
259: The accumulation of the molecules already begins when each DF is still
260: outside the
261:
262: \vspace{5mm}
263: \epsfxsize=8.0cm
264: \epsfbox{f3.eps}
265: \figcaption{
266: The distribution of gas density, pressure,
267: temperature, and the chemical compositions at $t=0.3$~Myr.
268: In the lowest panel, ${\rm X}_{\rm H_2}$ and ${\rm X}_{\rm CO}$ are
269: molecular ratios (see the caption of Fig.2) and ${\rm X}_{\rm HII}$
270: is the ionization rate defined as $n_{\rm H^+}/n_{\rm H_{\rm nuc}}$. }
271: \vspace{8mm}
272:
273: \noindent
274: SF.
275: Therefore, the accumulation is not simply explained by
276: the fact that the IF and the SF overtakes the DFs and that the SF
277: enters the molecular region.
278: The gas density within the shell is so high that the
279: reformation timescales of the molecules become short enough.
280: The reformation timescale of the hydrogen molecule is about
281: $\sim 10^6$yr for $n_{\rm H,0} \sim 10^3 {\rm cm^{-3}}$.
282: The dynamical timescale is about $t_{\rm dyn} \sim 10^5$~yr,
283: then the reformation of H$_2$ on the grain surface is not
284: important with the ambient number density. However, the reformation
285: timescale in the gas shell, $\sim 10^{4-5}$~yr, is shorter
286: than $t_{\rm dyn}$,
287: therefore the formation of H$_2$ molecule is significant in the shell.
288:
289: Fig.3 shows the detailed structure of the physical quantities and the
290: chemical composition of the shell at $t=0.3$~Myr.
291: As this figure shows, the molecular fraction in the shell is higher
292: than the value in the PDR outside the shell owing to the rapid reformation.
293: As H~II region expands, the DFs are taken in the shell and the denser
294: ($n_{\rm H} > 10^4 {\rm cm^{-3}}$) PDR is formed in the inner side
295: of the shell.
296: Once the molecules are reformed in the shell, the FUV radiation is
297: consumed by the photodissociation of these molecules, which decelerates the
298: expansion of the preceding DFs to accelerates the accumulation
299: of the molecules.
300: About 80 \% (55 \%) of the hydrogen (carbon) atoms within the shell
301: exist as H$_2$ (CO) molecule at $t = 0.7$~Myr in our calculation.
302: Fig.3 also shows other interesting features of the shell.
303: The thermal pressure inside the shell is high and about constant
304: at the value of the H~II region.
305: The gas temperature has negative gradient from the inner side to the
306: outer side of the shell, because the FUV radiation is attenuated owing to the
307: dust extinction through the shell, and the photoelectric heating
308: decreases. Conversely, the gas density has positive gradient to the
309: outer side of the shell.
310:
311:
312: \section{Discussion}
313:
314: \subsection{Dust in H~II Region}
315:
316:
317: In this section, we discuss the possible effect of dust grains
318: in the H~II regions (e.g. Spitzer 1978).
319: For example, the grains can be driven by the radiation pressure
320: during the expansion of the H~II region (e.g., Arthur et al. 2004).
321: Arthur et al. have shown the small grains are destroyed by the sublimation
322: but the large graphite grains can exist close to the star.
323: In contrast, the recent observation by Roger et al. (2004) found no
324: far-infrared component correlated with H~II region, Sh170.
325: The photoelectric heating works even in H~II regions comparatively
326: with the photoionization heating (Weingartner \& Draine 2001)
327: and is sensitive to the uncertain abundance of the small dust grains.
328: If we adopt the dust absorption cross section,
329: $6 \times 10^{-22} {\rm cm}^2$ (H nucleon)$^{-1}$ in H~II region,
330: which we adopt in the PDR and the outer region, the radius of the
331: H~II region becomes slightly smaller, but the difference from the
332: case without dust in H~II region is always less than 5\%.
333: The temperature in the PDR decreases by 10-20\% because of the
334: attenuation of FUV photons by dust grains in the H~II region.
335: The gas density within the shell rises by a factor, 1.4-1.5.
336: Theses changes in the shell, however, only slightly
337: promotes the accumulation of the molecular gas.
338: If we include the standard photoelectric heating rate and dust
339: recombination cooling rate in the H~II region (Bakes
340: \& Tielens 1994), the temperature near the central star in the H~II
341: region rises, but the temperature near the gas shell hardly changes.
342: Therefore, the existence of dust grains do not significantly alter
343: the results in this paper.
344:
345:
346:
347: \subsection{Fragmentation of the Shell}
348:
349: The triggered star formation scenario predicts that the shocked layer
350: fragments and these fragments collapse to stars of the second
351: generation. Although the fragmentation of the shocked layer is studied by
352: many authors, it is still uncertain which instability actually occurs
353: and which induces the next star formation. Here, we assume that
354: non-gravitational instabilities (e.g. decelerating shock instability
355: (DSI)) themselves are not the essential ones for the sequential star
356: formation.
357: Elmegreen (1989) showed that the gravitational instability couples with
358: DSI for the decelerating layer using the linear analysis, but
359: MacLow \& Norman (1993) pointed out that the DSI quickly saturates
360: in the non-linear phase.
361:
362: However, Garcia-Segura \& Franco (1996) showed the DSI is strongly
363: modified with the presence of the IF. The shell rapidly fragments and
364: the finger-like structures are formed in their 2D calculation.
365: Furthermore, the shadowing instability and corrugation instability of
366: the IF were studied by Williams (1999, 2002) and these
367: instabilities also can disturb the IF and the shell.
368: Although these complexities are beyond the scope of this paper,
369: it will be interesting to study the effect of these instabilities
370: on the evolution of the DF and the post-shock layer with 2D or 3D
371: calculations in the future.
372:
373: Elmegreen \& Elmegreen (1978),
374: Miyama, Narita \& Hayashi (1987), Lubow \& Pringle (1993),
375: and Nagai et al.(1998) have studied the stability of the dense gas layer
376: and show that the earliest gravitational instability occurs with
377: a wavelength which comparable to the layer thickness and
378: the growth rate is $\sim ( G \rho )^{-1/2}$.
379: The calculated shell suffers from this instability,
380: and the shaded region in Fig.2 represents the unstable region,
381: where $t \leq ( G \rho )^{-1/2}$.
382: Although the mass scale at the maximum growth rate is comparatively
383: small, $\sim \sigma h^2 \sim 1~M_\odot$, larger mass scale perturbation
384: gradually grows in turn.
385: As mentioned above, the gas
386: density is higher in the outer part of the shell, then the unstable
387: region extends from the outer edge to the inner part of the shell.
388: By the age of Sh104, 0.7~Myr, the outer part of the shell dominated
389: by CO molecule becomes unstable.
390: Therefore, the dense molecular fragments are formed around H~II
391: region and the triggered star formation may occur in the core of them,
392: as DV03 shows.
393:
394:
395:
396: \subsection{The Role of this Triggering Process}
397:
398: Even if the molecular gas is successfully gathered around the H~II
399: region and the triggered star formation actually occurs, its impact
400: on the global star formation is still uncertain. However, we can
401: show its significance in a simple argument.
402: In our galaxy, most of stars are formed in clusters
403: (e.g., Evans 1999), then the feedback effects from massive stars
404: are ubiquitous for the global star formation.
405: If every massive star gather the molecular gas of
406: $M_{\rm sh}$ on average and the triggered
407: star formation occurs within the shell, the induced star formation
408: rate SFR$_{\rm HII}$ is estimated as
409: %\begin{equation}
410: %{\rm SFR}_{\rm HII} \sim {\rm SFR}_0
411: %\Biggl( \frac{M_{\rm av}}{0.6 M_\odot} \Biggr)^{-1}
412: %\Biggl( \frac{f~(>20 M_\odot)}{0.0006} \Biggr)
413: %\Biggl( \frac{M_{\rm sh}}{10^4 M_\odot} \Biggr)
414: %\Biggl( \frac{\epsilon}{0.1} \Biggr)_,
415: %\label{order}
416: %\end{equation}
417: \begin{eqnarray}
418: \lefteqn{ {\rm SFR}_{\rm HII} \sim {\rm SFR}_0 } \nonumber\\
419: && \times
420: \Biggl( \frac{M_{\rm av}}{0.6 M_\odot} \Biggr)^{-1}
421: \Biggl( \frac{f~(>20 M_\odot)}{0.0006} \Biggr)
422: \Biggl( \frac{M_{\rm sh}}{10^4 M_\odot} \Biggr)
423: \Biggl( \frac{\epsilon}{0.1} \Biggr)_,
424: \label{order}
425: \end{eqnarray}
426: where SFR$_0$ is the current total star formation rate in our galaxy,
427: $M_{\rm av}$ is the average stellar mass, $f~(>20 M_\odot)$ is the
428: number fraction of the massive star which creates relative large H~II
429: regions $(>20M_\odot)$, and $\epsilon$ is the star formation efficiency
430: for the swept-up gas.
431: The normalization values of $M_{\rm av} \sim 0.6 M_\odot$ and
432: $f~(>20 M_\odot) \sim 0.0006$ are calculated with the initial mass
433: function (IMF) given by Miller \& Scalo (1979). Equation
434: (\ref{order}) shows that if the average mass of the gas shell
435: is $\sim 10^4 M_\odot$, this triggering process even alone can sustain
436: the current galactic star formation rate.
437: In our calculation, the molecular gas of $\sim 10^4 M_\odot$
438: is accumulated around one massive star owing to the expansion of the
439: H~II region by the time of $t \sim 1$~Myr. Therefore, this mode
440: of triggered star formation should be an important process.
441: The efficiency of triggering should depend on the physical conditions,
442: such as type of the central star, ambient density structure and so on.
443: For example, many H~II regions show the ``blister-like''
444: or ``champagne flow'' (Tenorio-Tagle 1979) features.
445: In these cases, the IF rapidly erodes the parental cloud and
446: only a part of the swept-up mass remains within the shell
447: , which might result in smaller $M_{\rm sh}$
448: (e.g., Whitworth 1979, Franco et al. 1994).
449: More realistic estimation including such cases will be explored in
450: Paper II.
451:
452:
453: \section{Conclusion}
454:
455: We have calculated the dynamical expansion of H~II region and
456: PDR around a massive star, focusing on the dense gas shell around
457: H~II region. Our results are simply summarized as follows,
458: \begin{itemize}
459: \item[1]
460: The dense gas shell is formed just in front of the IF, and this shell
461: is initially atomic but gradually dominated with molecules.
462: This is partly because the IF and SF overtake the preceding DFs
463: and SF enters the molecular region, and partly because
464: the reformation timescale within the shell becomes shorter than
465: the dynamical time because of the high density of the shell.
466: \item[2]
467: The calculation successfully reproduce the observed properties
468: of Sh104. The mass of the shell and H~II region,
469: and the location of the IF at $t \sim 0.7$~Myr agree with the observation.
470: The gravitational instability occurs after the gas shell
471: is dominated with the molecular gas. By the time of $t \sim 0.7$~Myr,
472: the gravitationally unstable molecular shell is formed around H~II
473: region, as the observation shows.
474: \item[3]
475: In our calculation, the molecular gas shell of
476: the order of $\sim 10^4 M_\odot$ is formed in 1~Myr around one massive
477: star. With simple estimation, we show the triggering process owing to
478: the expansion of H~II region is important in context of Galactic
479: star formation.
480: \end{itemize}
481:
482:
483:
484: %{\acknowledgements }
485:
486: \begin{thebibliography}{}
487:
488: \bibitem{AK04}
489: Arthur, S.J., Kurtz, S.E., Franco, J. \& Albarran, Y. 2004, \apj, 608, 282
490:
491:
492: \bibitem{BT94}
493: Bakes, E.L.O. \& Tielens, A.G.G.M. 1994, \apj, 427, 822
494:
495: \bibitem{Deh03}
496: Deharveng, L. et al. 2003, \aap, 408, 25L
497:
498: \bibitem[Diaz-Miller et al. (1998)]{DFS98}
499: Diaz-Miller, R.I., Franco, J. \& Shore, S.N. 1998, \apj, 501, 192
500:
501: \bibitem{EL77}
502: Elmegreen, B.G. \& Lada, C.J. 1977, \apj, 214, 725
503:
504: \bibitem{EE78}
505: Elmegreen, B.G. \& Elmegreen, D.M., 1978, \apj, 220, 1051
506:
507: \bibitem{Elm89}
508: Elmegreen, B.G. 1989, \apj, 340, 786
509:
510: \bibitem{Elm98}
511: Elmegreen, B.G., 1998, in Woodward, C.E., Shull, M., Thronson, H.A.,
512: eds, ASP Conf.Ser.Vol.148, Origins, Astron.Soc.Pac.San Francisco, p.150
513:
514: \bibitem{Ev99}
515: Evans, N.J.II, 1999, \araa, 37, 311
516:
517: \bibitem{FST94}
518: Franco, J., Shore, S.N. \& Tenorio-Tagle, G. 1994, \apj, 436, 795
519:
520: \bibitem{FTB90} Franco, J., Tenorio-Tagle, G. \& Bodenheimer, P. 1990, \apj,
521: 349, 126
522:
523: \bibitem{GF96} Garcia-Segura, G. \& Franco, J. 1996, \apj, 469, 171
524:
525:
526: \bibitem{HM79} Hollenbach, D. \& McKee, C.F. 1979, \apjs,41, 555
527:
528: \bibitem{HM89} Hollenbach, D. \& McKee, C.F. 1989, \apj, 342, 306
529:
530: \bibitem{HTT91} Hollenbach, D., Takahashi, T. \& Tielens,A.G.G.M.
531: 1991, \apj, 377, 192
532:
533: \bibitem{hi04} Hosokawa, T. \& Inutsuka, S., 2005, in prep. (Paper II)
534:
535: \bibitem{ki00}
536: Koyama, H. \& Inutsuka, S. 2000, \apj, 532, 980
537:
538: \bibitem{Lk66}
539: Lasker, B.M. 1966, \apj, 143, 700
540:
541: \bibitem{lp93}
542: Lubow, S. H. \& Pringle, J.E. 1993, \mnras, 263, 701
543:
544: \bibitem{MN93}
545: Mac Low, M. \& Norman, M.L. 1993, \apj, 407, 207
546:
547: \bibitem{M1965} Mathews,W.G. 1965, \apj, 142, 1120
548:
549: \bibitem{MS79}
550: Miller, G.E. \& Scalo, J.M. 1979, \apjs, 41, 513
551:
552: \bibitem{MNH87}
553: Miyama, S.M., Narita, S. \& Hayashi, C. 1987, Prog.Theor.Phys., 78, 105
554:
555: \bibitem{NIM98}
556: Nagai, T., Inutsuka, S. \& Miyama, S.M. 1998, \apj, 506, 306
557:
558: \bibitem{NL97} Nelson, R.P. \& Langer, W.D. 1997, \apj, 482, 796
559:
560: \bibitem{RM04}
561: Roger, R.S., McCutcheon, W.H., Purton, C.R. \& Dewdney, P.E. 2004, \aap,
562: 425, 553
563:
564: \bibitem{RD92}
565: Roger, R.S. \& Dewdney, P.E. 1992, \apj, 385, 536
566:
567: \bibitem{Sp78}
568: Spitzer, L. 1978, {\it Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium}
569: (New York: Wiley).
570:
571:
572: \bibitem{Tt76} Tenorio-Tagle, G. 1976, \aap, 53, 411
573:
574: \bibitem{Tt79} Tenorio-Tagle, G. 1979, \aap, 71, 59
575:
576: \bibitem{vL97} van Leer, B. 1979, J.Comput.Phys., 32, 101
577:
578: \bibitem{WD01} Weingartner, J.C. \& Draine, B.T. 2001, \apj, 548, 296
579:
580: \bibitem{Wt79} Whitworth, A.P. 1979, \mnras, 186, 59
581:
582: \bibitem{wt94}
583: Whitworth, A,P., Bhattal, A.S., Chapman, S.J., Disney, M.J.,
584: \& Turner, J.A. 1994, \aap, 268, 291
585:
586: \bibitem{Wl99}
587: Williams, R.J.R. 1999, \mnras, 310, 789
588:
589: \bibitem{Wl02}
590: Williams, R.J.R. 2002, \mnras, 331, 693
591:
592: \end{thebibliography}
593:
594: \end{document}
595:
596:
597: