1: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4,lscape]{article}
2:
3:
4: %*****************APJ STYLE**********************
5: %\documentclass{article}
6: %\usepackage{emulateapj}
7: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
8: %\usepackage{lscape}
9: %\setlength{\topmargin}{0.5in}
10: %\renewcommand{\topfraction}{1.0}
11: %\renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{1.0}
12: %\renewcommand{\textfraction}{0.00}
13: %\raggedbottom
14: %*****************APJ STYLE**********************
15:
16:
17:
18: %*****************APJ STYLE**********************
19: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
20: %\usepackage{emulateapj}
21: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
22: \usepackage{lscape}
23: %\setlength{\topmargin}{0.5in}
24: %\renewcommand{\topfraction}{1.0}
25: %\renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{1.0}
26: %\renewcommand{\textfraction}{0.00}
27: %\raggedbottom
28: %*****************APJ STYLE**********************
29:
30:
31: %\documentstyle[12pt,aasms4,flushrt]{article}
32: %\documentstyle[11pt,aaspp4,flushrt]{article}
33: % \received{} \accepted{~~}
34: \newcommand{\ltsima}{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}
35: \newcommand{\simlt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{\ltsima}} % < over ~
36: \newcommand{\gtsima}{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}
37: \newcommand{\simgt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{\gtsima}} % > over ~
38: \def\lsimeq{{_<\atop^{\sim}}}
39: \def\gsimeq{{_>\atop^{\sim}}}
40:
41:
42: \newcommand{\oiii}{[{\sc O\, iii}]}
43: \newcommand{\oii}{[{\sc O\, ii}]}
44: \newcommand{\mgii}{[{\sc Mg\, ii}]}
45: \newcommand{\feka}{Fe K$\alpha$}
46: \newcommand{\chandra}{{\emph{Chandra} }}
47: \newcommand{\xmm}{{XMM-\emph{Newton} }}
48: \newcommand{\asca}{{\emph{ASCA} }}
49: \newcommand{\hst}{{\emph{HST} }}
50: \newcommand{\rxte}{{\emph{RXTE} }}
51: \newcommand{\sax}{{\emph{Beppo}SAX} }
52: \newcommand{\bfsax}{\emph{\textbf{Beppo}}SAX}
53: \newcommand{\ginga}{{\emph{Ginga} }}
54: \newcommand{\rosat}{{\emph{ROSAT} }}
55: \newcommand{\ein}{{\emph{Einstein} }}
56: \newcommand{\integral}{{\emph{Integral} }}
57: \newcommand{\lum}{erg~s$^{-1}$}
58: \newcommand{\sfr}{{$M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$ }}
59: \newcommand{\flux}{{erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$ }}
60: \newcommand{\nh}{cm$^{-2}$}
61: \newcommand{\norm}{photons~keV$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$}
62: \renewcommand{\arcsec}{\mbox{$^{\prime\prime}$} }
63: \newcommand{\kev}{\,\mbox{\scriptsize keV}}
64: \newcommand{\mum}{\:\mu\mbox{\scriptsize m}}
65: \newcommand{\cl}{\centerline}
66:
67:
68:
69: % VERSION 1.0
70: % APRIL 17, 2002
71:
72:
73: \begin{document}
74:
75:
76: \title{X-ray Line Emitting Objects in XMM-Newton
77: observations: the tip of the iceberg.}
78:
79:
80: \author{T. Maccacaro$^{1}$, V. Braito$^{1}$, R. Della Ceca$^1$, P. Severgnini$^{1}$,
81: and A. Caccianiga$^{1}$}
82:
83: \affil{$^1$ INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via Brera 28, 20121
84: Milan, Italy; tommaso@brera.mi.astro.it, braito@brera.mi.astro.it, rdc@brera.mi.astro.it,
85: paola@brera.mi.astro.it, caccia@brera.mi.astro.it}
86:
87: \begin{abstract}
88: We present preliminary results from a novel search for X-ray Line Emitting
89: Objects (XLEOs) in XMM-Newton images. Three sources have been detected in a
90: test-run analysis of 13 XMM-Newton observations. The three objects found are
91: most likely extremely absorbed AGN characterized by a column density $N_H
92: \sim 10^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$. Their redshift has been directly determined from the
93: X-ray data, by interpreting the detected emission line as the 6.4 keV Fe line. The
94: measured equivalent width of the X-ray line is, in all three cases, several
95: keV. This pilot study demonstrates the success of our search method and
96: implies that a large sample of XLEOs can be obtained from the public
97: XMM-Newton data archive.
98: \end{abstract}
99:
100: \keywords{galaxies: active -- galaxies: nuclei -- X-rays: surveys -- X-rays: galaxies}
101:
102:
103: \section{Introduction}
104:
105: Both Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) and clusters of galaxies are known to
106: exhibit, under the right circumstances, a prominent emission line in their
107: spectrum.
108:
109: In the case of AGN the strongest line in the 2-10 keV range is the ``neutral"
110: Fe K${\alpha}$ line at 6.4 keV (Mushotzky, Done and Pounds, 1993). In
111: ``classical" optically Type 1 AGN, where both the continuum and the Fe-emitting
112: region are viewed directly, the equivalent width (EW) of the Fe line is small
113: and typically less than 200 eV (e.g. Nandra and Pounds, 1994). On the
114: contrary, in the case of optically Type 2 AGN the Unification Scheme predicts
115: that obscuring material (a molecular torus?) near the active nucleus blocks the direct
116: view to the central engine. In these cases, if the ``line emitting" material
117: is exposed to a stronger continuum than the one detected by the observer,
118: we should observe very large EW (Krolik and Kallman, 1987). For example, according to the modeling
119: presented in Levenson et al. (2002), EW up to 10 keV are expected in the case of
120: the most extreme Compton-thick ($N_H > 10^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$) deeply buried AGN.
121:
122: Furthermore it is now clear and well established that the classification of
123: galactic nuclei based only on their optical spectrum provides an incomplete
124: description of their nature (e.g. Vignali et al., 1999; Della Ceca et al.,
125: 2002; Maiolino et al., 2003) and that X-ray data are fundamental for the
126: recognition and classification of galactic nuclei (see, among others,
127: Severgnini et al., 2003 and references therein). For example, studies of active
128: objects at IR and X-ray wavelengths indicate a concomitant AGN and starburst
129: activity (Fadda et al., 2002) which seems to happen in a high-density medium
130: ($N_H > 10^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$) characterized by high dust extinction of the UV
131: optical flux and strong photoelectric absorption of the soft X-rays. For
132: these objects a detailed investigation around the iron line at 6.4 keV seems
133: to be at the moment the only way to find evidence of the presence of an AGN
134: (see e.g. Della Ceca et al., 2002). The existence (and the census) of such
135: optically elusive AGN may have profound implications on the Cosmic X-ray
136: Background (CXB) synthesis models as well as on our understanding of the
137: accretion history vs. the stellar history of the Universe. As already
138: discussed and emphasized by Levenson et al. (2002), the prominent Fe
139: K${\alpha}$ line, which seems to be a very common feature of very obscured
140: AGN, ``can be exploited to find more of them".
141:
142: The second class of extragalactic objects known to exhibit a prominent iron
143: line (the ``ionized" Fe K${\alpha}$ line at 6.7 keV) in their X-ray
144: spectrum are clusters of galaxies. X-ray selected cluster surveys in the ROSAT
145: era, based on the source extent, (e.g. the RDCS survey: Rosati et al., 1995;
146: 1998) have led to routine identification of clusters out to z = 0.85, with
147: only a few examples at higher redshift (see Rosati, Borgani and Norman, 2002
148: and references therein). The search proposed here has the potential for
149: finding clusters of galaxies up to a redshift of ~1.6, thanks to their 6.7 keV
150: ionized Fe K${\alpha}$ line. Indeed this line is clearly detected in the
151: X-ray spectra of RDCS1252.9-2927 (Rosati et al., 2004), a massive cluster at z
152: = 1.24. We are aware, however, that since the EW of the Fe line is smaller in
153: cluster of galaxies than in absorbed AGN, the search for clusters of galaxies
154: through their emission lines could be more difficult and/or less efficient
155: than the search for heavily absorbed AGN.
156:
157: The unprecedented combination of high throughput ($\sim$600 cm$^{2}$ effective
158: area in the $\sim$2.3$-$5.0 keV energy band) and high energy and spatial
159: resolution (100 eV FWHM at 3 keV and $\sim$15\arcsec respectively) offered by
160: the ESA XMM-Newton X-ray telescope (just the one mirror module with the
161: Epic-pn detector), has convinced us of the possibility of searching the sky
162: in a
163: novel way, to discover weak X-ray sources whose emission is mainly
164: concentrated in line flux. Without a dedicated detection technique these
165: sources, X-ray Line Emitting Objects (XLEOs), would be hard or
166: impossible to find because their line emission is usually diluted within
167: the typical broad energy interval of the X-ray images (a few keV). Even when
168: detected also by ``standard" techniques, as is the case of the three sources
169: presented in this letter (the X-ray brightest candidates among those found from
170: the test run analysis of 13 XMM-Newton images), these sources would remain
171: indistinguishable (unless very bright) from the other thousands of serendipitous
172: sources because of their very limited number of photons. None of the usual
173: diagnostic diagrams (hardness ratios, Fx/Fopt, etc.) have the capability of
174: clearly separating these sources from the multitude of generic serendipitous sources.
175: Even an automated standard X-ray spectral analysis of a huge number of
176: serendipitous sources will probably fail to identify them since the paucity of
177: counts will force a rather large binning over the energy axis.
178:
179: \section{The method of analysis}
180:
181: The idea is based on the extension to the energy axis of the usual source
182: detection techniques that are typically restricted to the spatial coordinates.
183: The selected energy range (2.3$-$5.2 keV) implies that the sources
184: discovered will have a redshift in the interval 0.3$-$1.7, when we consider
185: that
186: the most prominent X-ray line is typically the iron line.
187: The energy range chosen minimizes variations in the effective area (there is a
188: sharp change below $\sim$ 2 keV, due to the Au M edge). As a consequence no
189: strong or sudden variations are expected in the background (cosmic +
190: instrumental + source continuum) across the energy range considered. It will
191: be interesting at some point to extend the line search to the largest
192: possible range so as to sample from ``local" to z $\sim 5$ objects.
193:
194:
195: A detailed discussion of the
196: detection algorithm and of its performance will be given in Braito et al.
197: (2005, in preparation). In the interest of clarity we briefly summarize here the basic
198: properties of our search. Each XMM-Newton image (data cube), has been
199: raster-scanned with a 3-D detection cell of $50\arcsec \times 50\arcsec \times
200: 200$ eV. The
201: step of the scan is half a cell width, in both the spatial axis and in the
202: energy axis. At each X,Y position, counts in the energy range 2.1$-$5.4 keV
203: are considered and binned in 200 eV bins. This range is one bin larger, on
204: each side, than the range of interest for the line detection. The background
205: level along the energy axis is then determined, after an iterative process to
206: remove the possible presence of an excess due to a line, with a quadratic fit
207: to the data. For the purpose of line detection, the source continuum, if
208: present, is treated as background. Candidates XLEOs are then flagged if a
209: particular energy bin in the range 2.3$-$5.2 keV contains a number of counts such
210: that their probability of being a fluctuation of the estimated background
211: level is smaller than $\sim 10^{-5}$.
212:
213: \section{Results from the test-run}
214:
215: We have test-run the above algorithm on a small number of data sets, thirteen,
216: in order to assess its success rate and to fine-tune the various critical
217: parameters (e.g. cell size in both spatial and energy dimensions, background
218: determination, threshold for XLEO candidate flagging, etc.). Only the Epic-pn
219: data have been used. We have chosen the XMM-Newton test observations among
220: those at high galactic latitude, with an exposure time in the range from $\sim
221: 1.5\times 10^4$ s to $4.5\times 10^4$ s. Of the candidates found during the
222: test-run, we present here the three most significant ones, which are also
223: characterized by the highest continuum. The three candidates were flagged
224: because of the detection of 9 counts in the energy bin 3.7$-$3.9 keV (1.4
225: counts expected), 7 counts in the bin 4.5$-$4.7 keV (0.7 counts expected) and
226: 10 counts in the bin 4.6$-$4.8 keV (1.2 counts expected) respectively (see
227: inset in Figure 1a$-$c).
228:
229: With respect to the statistical significance of the lines, we would like to stress
230: the following. In the energy bin where the line is detected, the probability that
231: the excess seen is a random noise fluctuation is $1.6 \times 10^{-5}$, $8.9 \times
232: 10^{-6}$ and $5.8 \times 10^{-7}$ for the three sources respectively. This is
233: computed as the probability of observing 9, 7 and 10 counts (or more) when 1.4,
234: 0.7, and 1.2 counts are expected. However, one should also consider the number of
235: energy bins (14) and of the spatial cells searched. Although we have
236: raster-scanned the whole image (but have ignored cells affected by gaps and
237: edges), in analyzing the preliminary results of our search we have conservatively
238: considered here only those XLEO candidates coincident with an X-ray source,
239: unambiguously detected by other means (i.e. standard XMM Science Analysis System).
240: Indeed these three sources were independently found by the standard detection
241: algorithm used to produce the 1XMM source catalog (XMM-Newton SSC,
242: 2003)\footnote{http://xmmssc-www.star.le.ac.uk/newpages/xcat\_public.html} and are
243: listed there. Thus, given that there are $\sim 600$ sources in the set of images
244: used at the brightness level considered, the
245: number of trials is $14 \times 600$ and the resulting total number
246: of false detections expected is $\sim 0.1$. Furthermore, we can adopt the X-ray
247: positions reported in the 1XMM catalog since they are significantly better than
248: those produced by our algorithm.
249:
250: For all three sources, we did go back to the XMM-Newton data to extract the
251: broad band spectrum, estimating the background from a nearby, source-free
252: region. Apertures of 20\arcsec, 20\arcsec and 25\arcsec radius were used to
253: extract the source counts, and of 23\arcsec (because of the closeness to an
254: intra-chip gap), 40\arcsec and 50\arcsec radius for the background counts.
255: When possible, (XLEOJ153241$-$082906 and XLEOJ220425$-$015123) data from the
256: MOS detectors were also used in order to maximize the available statistics
257: and have contributed to the determination of the values given in Table 1. In
258: the interest of clarity, however, the MOS data have not been plotted in Figure 1.
259:
260: Inspection of the distribution of the resulting net counts reveals a rather
261: weak continuum, the possible emission line that prompted the detection, and an
262: excess of counts at high energies. All three sources seem to be characterized
263: by an X-ray spectrum consisting of a two component model: a ``leaky absorbed"
264: power law continuum plus an emission line. This is typical of absorbed AGN and
265: thus suggests that these three sources are indeed AGN. Although this is not
266: the first time that an AGN is recognized as such and classified directly from
267: the X-ray data (e.g. AXJ2254+1146, Della Ceca et al., 2000), to our
268: knowledge, it is the first time that this happens beyond the local universe.
269:
270: In Figure 1 (a through c) we report the X-ray spectrum of the three sources and
271: the distribution of the total counts (inset) in the 3-D cells, which has led
272: to the line detection. From the position of the emission line, and assuming
273: that it is due to cold Fe at 6.4 keV, it is possible to derive, directly from
274: the X-ray data, the redshift of the sources. The values are reported in Table
275: 1 where the basic X-ray properties of these three sources are summarized. We
276: stress that the values derived should be considered as indicative given the
277: very low statistics involved (the three sources have of the order of 50 net
278: counts each in the Epic-pn detector). In the fitting procedure, we did not apply Occam's razor, rather
279: we have assumed a reasonable model (see above), and determined a set of values
280: that well describe the data. This is why no formal errors are quoted on the
281: derived quantities.
282:
283: Inspection of deep optical material reveals the presence of 1$-$2 candidates
284: consistent (on positional ground) with being the optical counterparts of the
285: X-ray sources. Their magnitudes are in the range 22.0$-$23.5. Considering,
286: for each X-ray source, the brightest candidate, the resulting
287: log($F_{x}/F_{opt}$) are in the range $\sim 1.2-1.8$. These values are
288: typical of absorbed AGN (see, among others, Fiore et al. 2003 and Della Ceca et
289: al. 2004) and thus further support our proposed
290: identifications. Optical spectroscopy is of course needed to validate these
291: results and has been proposed, together with follow up XMM-Newton observations.
292:
293: \section{Discussion}
294:
295: The results presented here are very preliminary. We have no doubts about the
296: reality of the sources and we are confident on the presence of the X-ray
297: emission line in the source spectra. Three objects are too few to derive
298: ``general properties". Also, we still have to determine the complex
299: visibility function of our novel algorithm, the volume investigated for a
300: given line luminosity/EW, the sensitivity of our search as a function of the
301: spectral characteristics of the sources (continuum slope, intrinsic N$_{H}$, iron
302: density etc.) and of their redshift. Once this is obtained and a larger sample
303: is assembled, it will be possible to derive volume densities, population
304: properties and more general conclusions.
305:
306: This said, and with the caveat of the low statistics and un-quantified
307: selection effects, we would like to note a few things:
308:
309: 1) all three objects found are most likely AGN in, or close to, the
310: Compton thick regime. They have resulted from the analysis of 13 XMM-Newton
311: observations. This initial success rate is very encouraging since quite a
312: large sample can be readily assembled using the hundreds of suitable
313: XMM-Newton observations already available from the ESA archive. If follow up
314: studies confirm that the three objects found are indeed AGN absorbed by
315: a column density of $\sim 10^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ and more, then we have a
316: formidable tool to find and study these AGN, beyond the local universe and up
317: to redshifts of cosmological relevance;
318:
319: 2) for the brightest XLEOs, characterized by a detectable continuum, it will
320: be often possible to recognize the nature of the object and to determine its
321: redshift directly from the X-ray data, especially in cases like the ones
322: reported here of absorbed AGN;
323:
324: 3) the redshifts of the three objects found (0.64, 0.45, 0.42) are in the
325: middle to low part of our window (0.3 $\simlt z \simlt 1.7$). To understand
326: whether this is primarily due to selection effects or whether it reflects an
327: intrinsic distribution, requires a detailed mapping of the visibility function
328: of our algorithm;
329:
330: 4) no cluster has been found in this test run. It is not clear at this point
331: whether this result is meaningful. A space density of $\sim 15-20$ clusters
332: per sq. deg. (with z $>$ 0.3) and with an X-ray flux $> 8\times 10^{-15}$ erg
333: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ (0.5$-$4.0 keV) has been reported (Andreon, 2004, private
334: communication). It is not obvious, however, how this limiting flux compares
335: with our detection threshold based on a line contrast, neither is known the
336: fraction of clusters with a prominent (detectable) emission line. To attack
337: this issue we plan to run our algorithm on a number of XMM-Newton observations
338: known to contain high redshift clusters of galaxies.
339:
340: To conclude, prompted by the power of the XMM-Newton mirror module plus
341: Epic-pn detector we have developed a novel algorithm to search X-ray datacubes
342: (X,Y,E) for X-ray Emission Line Objects. A test-run on a dozen XMM-Newton
343: observations has proven this search extremely successful, yielding the
344: discovery of three sources, most likely highly absorbed AGN ($N_H > 10^{24}$
345: cm$^{-2}$), and allowing a crude, but direct, determination of their redshift
346: from the detected X-ray line. If these findings are confirmed by a more
347: extensive analysis and by follow up studies of the candidate objects, we have
348: unlocked the doors to the long sought large sample of highly absorbed, Compton
349: thick AGN, a key to the Cosmic X-Ray Background synthesis models. Also, it is
350: possible that other rarer objects will be detected, as the volume searched
351: increases.
352:
353:
354: \acknowledgements
355:
356: The idea of searching for Line Emitting Objects in X-ray images dates back to
357: 1993 when one of us (TM), during a conference by Professor Y. Tanaka, was
358: impressed by the quality of the X-ray spectra provided by the ASCA SIS, the
359: first large field of view, solid state, X-ray detector flown. Unfortunately
360: ASCA lacked the throughput and the angular resolution necessary to make the
361: search for XLEO feasible and we had to wait for about 10 years to convert the
362: idea into a successful experiment. We thank S. Andreon, L. Maraschi and A.
363: Wolter for useful suggestions and stimulating discussions. PS acknowledges
364: a research fellowship from the Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF).
365: \clearpage
366: \begin{thebibliography}{}
367:
368:
369:
370: %\bibitem[Andreon (2004)]{326} private communication.
371: %\bibitem {} Braito, V., et al., 2005, in preparation.
372:
373: \bibitem[Della Ceca et al.(2004)]{A&A, in press} Della Ceca, R., et
374: al.\ 2004, \aap, in press
375:
376: \bibitem[Della Ceca et al.(2003)]{2003A&A...406..555D} Della Ceca, R., et
377: al.\ 2003, \aap, 406, 555
378:
379: \bibitem[Della Ceca et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...581L...9D} Della Ceca, R., et
380: al.\ 2002, \apjl, 581, L9
381:
382: \bibitem[Della Ceca, Maccacaro, Rosati, \&
383: Braito(2000)]{2000A&A...355..121D} Della Ceca, R., Maccacaro, T., Rosati,
384: P., \& Braito, V.\ 2000, \aap, 355, 121
385:
386: \bibitem[Fadda et al.(2002)]{2002A&A...383..838F} Fadda, D., Flores, H.,
387: Hasinger, G., Franceschini, A., Altieri, B., Cesarsky, C.~J., Elbaz, D., \&
388: Ferrando, P.\ 2002, \aap, 383, 838
389:
390: \bibitem[Krolik and Kallman, 1987] {1987ApJ...320...L5} Krolik, J.H., \& Kallman,
391: T.R., \ 1987, \apjl, 320, L5
392:
393: \bibitem[Fiore et al.(2003)]{2003A&A...409...79F} Fiore, F., et al.\ 2003,
394: \aap, 409, 79
395:
396: \bibitem[Levenson et al.(2002)]{2002ApJ...573L..81L} Levenson, N.~A.,
397: Krolik, J.~H., {\. Z}ycki, P.~T., Heckman, T.~M., Weaver, K.~A., Awaki, H.,
398: \& Terashima, Y.\ 2002, \apjl, 573, L81
399:
400: \bibitem[Maiolino et al.(2003)]{2003MNRAS.344L..59M} Maiolino, R., et al.\
401: 2003, \mnras, 344, L59
402:
403: \bibitem[Mushotzky, Done, \& Pounds(1993)]{1993ARA&A..31..717M} Mushotzky,
404: R.~F., Done, C., \& Pounds, K.~A.\ 1993, \araa, 31, 717
405:
406: \bibitem[Nandra \& Pounds(1994)]{1994MNRAS.268..405N} Nandra, K.~\& Pounds,
407: K.~A.\ 1994, \mnras, 268, 405
408:
409: \bibitem[Rosati et al.(1995)]{1995ApJ...445L..11R} Rosati, P., Della Ceca,
410: R., Burg, R., Norman, C., \& Giacconi, R.\ 1995, \apjl, 445, L11
411:
412: \bibitem[Rosati, Della Ceca, Norman, \&
413: Giacconi(1998)]{1998ApJ...492L..21R} Rosati, P., Della Ceca, R., Norman,
414: C., \& Giacconi, R.\ 1998, \apjl, 492, L21
415:
416: \bibitem[Rosati, Borgani, \& Norman(2002)]{2002ARA&A..40..539R} Rosati, P.,
417: Borgani, S., \& Norman, C.\ 2002, \araa, 40, 539
418:
419: \bibitem[Rosati et al.(2004)]{2004AJ....127..230R} Rosati, P., et al.\
420: 2004, \aj, 127, 230
421:
422: \bibitem[Severgnini et al.(2003)]{2003A&A...406..483S} Severgnini, P., et
423: al.\ 2003, \aap, 406, 483
424:
425: \bibitem[Vignali et al.(1999)]{1999ApJ...516..582V} Vignali, C., Comastri,
426: A., Cappi, M., Palumbo, G.~G.~C., Matsuoka, M., \& Kubo, H.\ 1999, \apj,
427: 516, 582
428:
429: %\bibitem[XMM-Newton SSC (2003)], http://xmmssc-www.star.le.ac.uk/newpages/xcat\_public.html
430:
431:
432: \end{thebibliography}
433:
434:
435: \clearpage
436:
437:
438: %\centerline{ \bf Figure Captions}
439:
440: \clearpage
441: \begin{figure}
442: %\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth, angle=0, scale=1.1]{f1a.eps}
443: %\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth, angle=0, scale=1.1]{f1b.eps}
444: %\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth, angle=0, scale=1.1]{f1c.eps}
445: \rotatebox{-90}{
446: \epsscale{0.8}
447: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
448: \epsscale{.4}
449: \plotone{f1c.eps}}
450:
451: \caption{X-ray spectrum, in photon units, of XLEOJ153241$-$082906 (panel a),
452: XLEOJ220425$-$015123 (panel b) and XLEOJ222744$-$051525 (panel c), obtained with
453: XSPEC v. 11.2. The unfolded spectrum (points) and best fit model
454: (lines) are shown. For each source, in the inset, the total counts
455: distribution from the 3-D detection cell raster scan that has led to the line
456: detection is shown, together with the estimated background (noise + source
457: continuum) level. See text for details.} \end{figure}
458:
459: \clearpage
460:
461: \begin{table}
462: \begin{center}
463: \caption{X-ray data}
464: \begin{tabular}{lclllllll}
465: \hline
466: \hline
467: Source name & X-ray position & E$_{line}$ & EW & $N_H$ & Flux & z$_x$ & $\Gamma$ \\
468: & J2000.0 & keV & keV & cm$^{-2}$ & 2$-$10 keV & & \\
469: (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6) & (7) & (8) \\
470: \hline
471:
472: XLEOJ153241$-$082906 & 15 32 40.6 $-$08 29 03 & 3.9 & 5 & $9\times 10^{23}$ & $4\times 10^{-14}$ & 0.64 & 1.9 \\
473: XLEOJ220425$-$015123 & 22 04 24.9 $-$01 51 28 & 4.4 & 5 & $4\times 10^{24}$ & $8\times 10^{-14}$ & 0.45 & 2.7 \\
474: XLEOJ222744$-$051525 & 22 27 44.3 $-$05 15 24 & 4.5 & 7 & $8\times 10^{24}$ & $9\times 10^{-14}$ & 0.42 & 2.4 \\
475: \hline
476: \hline
477: \end{tabular}
478: \end{center}
479: Column (1): Source name; column (2): X-ray source position; column (3) line energy
480: position; column (4) observed line equivalent width, computed with respect to the
481: absorbed component; column (5): intrinsic absorbing column density; column (6):
482: observed flux in erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$; column (7): redshift estimated from the
483: X-ray line position; column (8): photon index of the power law component.
484:
485: \end{table}
486:
487: \newpage
488:
489: %\begin{figure*}
490: %\begin{center}
491: %\begin{tabular}{c}
492: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth, angle=-90]{xleo1532-0829.ps}\\
493: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth, angle=-90]{xleo2204-0151.ps}\\
494: %\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth, angle=-90]{xleo2227-0515.ps}\\
495: %\end{tabular}
496: %\caption{}
497: %\end{center}
498: %\end{figure*}
499:
500: %\begin{figure}
501: % \centerline
502: %\epsscale{0.37}
503: %\plotone{f1a.eps}
504: %\end{figure}
505:
506: %\begin{figure}
507: %\centerline
508: %\plotone{f1b.eps}
509: %\end{figure}
510:
511: %\begin{figure}
512: % \centerline
513: %\plotone{f1c.eps}
514: %\end{figure}
515:
516:
517:
518: \end{document}
519:
520:
521:
522:
523:
524:
525: