1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: %\usepackage{emulateapj5}

3: \newcommand{\cluster}{RCS043938-2904.9} 

4: \newcommand{\clusterz}{$z=0.951$}

5: \newcommand{\etal}{\it et al.}  

6: \newcommand{\I}{$I$}

7: \newcommand{\Js}{$J_s$}

8: \newcommand{\Ks}{$K_s$} 

9: \slugcomment{20-10-2004}

10: \begin{document}

11: 

12: \title{RCS043938-2904.9: A New Rich Cluster of Galaxies at 

13: $z=0.951$\altaffilmark{1}}

14: 

15: \author{

16: L. Felipe Barrientos\altaffilmark{2},

17: Michael D. Gladders\altaffilmark{3},

18: H.K.C. Yee\altaffilmark{4},

19: Leopoldo Infante\altaffilmark{2},

20: Erica Ellingson\altaffilmark{6}, 

21: Patrick B. Hall\altaffilmark{2,5} and

22: Gisela Hertling\altaffilmark{2}

23: }

24: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations obtained at: (a) the Cerro Tololo

25: Inter-American Observatory.  CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under

26: contract to the National Science Foundation; (b) The European Southern

27: Observatory, Paranal, Chile; and (c) the Observatories of the Carnegie

28: Institution of Washington, Las Campanas, Chile.}

29: 

30: \altaffiltext{2}{Departamento de Astronom\'{\i}a y Astrof\'{\i}sica,

31: Pontificia Universidad Cat\'olica de Chile, Avda. Vicu\~na Mackenna

32: 4860, Casilla 306, Santiago 22, Chile; barrientos@astro.puc.cl,

33: phall@astro.puc.cl, linfante@astro.puc.cl}

34: 

35: \altaffiltext{3}{Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of

36: Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, California 91101, USA;

37: gladders@ociw.edu} 

38: 

39: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University

40: of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H8, Canada;

41: hyee@astro.utoronto.ca}

42: 

43: \altaffiltext{5}{Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall,

44: Princeton, NJ 08544, USA}

45: 

46: \altaffiltext{6}{Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, CB389

47: University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA;

48: e.elling@casa.colorado.edu}

49: 

50: \begin{abstract}

51: We present deep $I,J_s,K_s$ imaging and optical spectroscopy of the

52: newly discovered Red-Sequence Cluster Survey cluster \cluster. This

53: cluster, drawn from an extensive preliminary list, was selected for

54: detailed study on the basis of its apparent optical

55: richness. Spectroscopy of 11 members places the cluster at \clusterz

56: $\pm 0.006$, and confirms the photometric redshift estimate from the

57: (R-z) color-magnitude diagram. Analysis of the infrared imaging data

58: demonstrates that the cluster is extremely rich, with excess counts in

59: the \Ks-band exceeding the expected background counts by

60: $9\sigma$. The properties of the galaxies in \cluster\ are consistent

61: with those seen in other clusters at similar redshifts. Specifically,

62: the red-sequence color, slope and scatter, and the size-magnitude

63: relation of these galaxies are all consistent with that seen in the

64: few other high redshift clusters known, and indeed are consistent with

65: appropriately evolved properties of local cluster galaxies. The

66: apparent consistency of these systems implies that the rich,

67: high-redshift RCS clusters are directly comparable to the few other

68: systems known at $z \sim 1$, most of which have been selected on the

69: basis of X-ray emission.

70: 

71: \end{abstract}

72: 

73: \keywords{clusters: galaxies}

74: 

75: \section{Introduction}

76: The search for distant galaxy clusters began decades ago with

77: \cite{abe58} original identification of a large sample of (then)

78: distant clusters in the Palomar Optical Sky Survey plates. A major

79: goal of many surveys since has been to push the redshift limits of

80: searches to as high as possible. Currently, the most distant clusters

81: known are at $z \sim 1.3$ \citep{stanford1997,rosati1999} . A wide

82: variety of techniques, both blank field \citep[e.g.,][]{dalcanton1996}

83: and targeted \citep[e.g.,][]{chambers1996} have been used as viable

84: methods for pushing cluster searches to high redshifts, with the

85: blank-field methods being the most promising for cosmologically

86: motivated studies. Broadly, these methods either search for visible

87: effects from the intra-cluster gas via X-ray surveys

88: \citep[e.g.,][]{rosati1999,mul03} or proposed Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ)

89: effect surveys, or the effects of the cluster galaxies themselves, via

90: extragalactic background light fluctuations \citep{dalcanton1996}, or

91: matched-filter \citep[e.g.,][]{pos96} or cluster red-sequence

92: \citep{gladders2000} analyses of resolved images. Direct detection of

93: massive clusters via weak-lensing has also been suggested

94: \citep{wittman2001}.

95: 

96: A significant, and at this point unresolved, issue is whether or not

97: the clusters discovered by various methods will in fact sample the

98: same fundamental population. This is particularly relevant at high

99: redshifts since various observables are likely to be more divergent

100: and less closely tied to mass during the process of cluster

101: assembly. Addressing these issues fully requires surveys using

102: multiple techniques over the same areas. In this letter we present

103: detailed observations of one of the first and richest clusters found

104: in the RCS at $z \sim 1$. We use $\Omega_M=0.27$, $\Omega_\Lambda =

105: 0.73$ and $H_0=71$ km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$ throughout.

106: 

107: \section{The Red-Sequence Cluster Survey}

108: 

109: The Red-Sequence Cluster Survey (RCS) searches for clusters by

110: exploring over-densities in position and color space, detecting the

111: unambiguous signal from the early-type galaxy color sequence seen in

112: local and high redshift clusters \citep{gladders2000}. The survey has

113: been conducted using the large format mosaic cameras at CFHT and the

114: CTIO 4m in $R(AB)$ and $z'(AB)$ to a $5~\sigma$ point source detection

115: limit of 25.1 and 23.7 mag, respectively. The first data and cluster

116: catalogs for the northern patches are presented in \citet{gladders2004}

117: and for the southern patches in \citet{barrientos2004}.

118: 

119: This letter presents detailed optical and IR observations of \cluster\

120: at $\alpha = 04^h39^m38\fs0, ~~\delta = -29\arcdeg 04' 55\farcs2$

121: (J2000), one of the most massive and distant RCS clusters for which

122: ancillary data have been acquired. We have detected this cluster with

123: a peak significance of 4.98 $\sigma$, and estimated its photometric

124: redshift to be $z_{phot} = 1.037$.

125: 

126: \section{Observations and Basic Reductions}

127: \subsection{Imaging}

128: 

129: IR imaging was taken using ISAAC on the VLT during the nights of the

130: 26-27 October 2001, under photometric and excellent seeing conditions

131: ($\leqslant 0\farcs5$).The exposure time was 3240 s and 5184 s in the

132: \Js\ and \Ks\ bands, respectively. The reduction of the images was

133: carried out in the usual manner, masking out the objects to properly

134: subtract the sky in the images. The final individual registered images

135: were scaled to correct for airmass differences and then combined to

136: produce the final \Js\ and \Ks\ images. The images were calibrated

137: using the IR standard stars of \citet{persson1998} to a 0.04 mag

138: uncertainty in \Js\ and 0.05 mag in \Ks. The $I$-band image was taken

139: at the Baade 6.5m telescope at the Las Campanas Observatory the night

140: of the 11th of January of 2002, under photometric conditions and 0.6

141: arcsec seeing. The $I$-band data are calibrated to \cite{lan92}

142: standards, with an uncertainty of 0.04 mag. The total exposure time

143: was 2400 s. A color composite image using the optical and IR imaging

144: of this cluster is shown in Figure 1.

145: 

146: Photometry on the field was performed using SExtractor

147: \citep{bertin1996} v2.2.1, using the \Ks-band image for object

148: detection. The total magnitude is determined using the {\em BEST}

149: magnitude given by Sextractor while colors are measured in a fixed

150: $1\farcs5$ circular diameter aperture. The IR images were convolved

151: with a gaussian kernel to match the seeing of the optical image in

152: order to determine accurate colors. In the $2.5 \times 2.5$ arcmin

153: area imaged in $K_s$ we find 228 galaxies down to \Ks(AB)=23, while

154: for a blank field we expect to find only 126 \citep{totani2001}. In

155: \Ks\ the cluster is an over-density of $9\sigma$, assuming Poisson

156: statistics for the background counts. Using the $z'$-band data from

157: the survey itself, we measure a red-sequence richness parameter

158: $B_{gcR}$ \citep[see][]{gladders2004} of $1165 \pm 399$ Mpc$^{-1.8}$

159: $h_{50}^{1.8}$, indicating a richness between Abell Richness 1 and 2

160: \citep[see][]{yee2003}, comparable to the Coma cluster.

161: 

162: \subsection{Spectroscopy}

163: 

164: Multi-object spectroscopy was carried out first on the Baade 6.5 m

165: telescope using LDSS2 under exceptional seeing conditions. These

166: observations confirmed several members. Further spectroscopy was

167: carried out on the VLT in service mode the nights of the 1st, 8th and

168: 29th of January 2003. The spectra were taken using FORS2 with the

169: GRIS\_300I+21 grism and the OG590 filter, with a total integration

170: time of 9510 s (split into six observations). Galaxies were selected

171: by their colors in the central regions where deep IR imaging was

172: available, and by having similar magnitudes in the outer

173: regions.

174: 

175: One aperture mask was made for the field consisting of 37 slits with

176: variable lengths, typically $7 \arcsec$ and widths of $0.7 \arcsec$.

177: The spectra were reduced with IRAF in the usual manner.  For typical

178: spectra the wavelength range spans from $\sim6500$ \AA\ to $\sim9000$

179: \AA\, with a dispersion of $3.2$ \AA\ pix$^{-1}$, and an rms

180: uncertainty in the wavelength solution of 0.12 \AA.

181:  

182: Redshifts were determined using two methods. One was a line by line

183: absorption and emission identification and the other via

184: cross-correlation. For the template spectrum we used NGC 1426, NGC

185: 1407 and a synthetic spectrum \citep{quintana1996}. Prior to

186: cross-correlation, all real emission and residual night sky emission

187: line features were removed through interpolation, and a high order

188: polynomial was fit to the spectra for continuum removal. A simple

189: parabola was fit to the correlation peak. For spectra whose

190: \citet{tonry1979} {\em R} value was below 3.0, a comparison was made

191: with absorption line identifications. If no absorption lines could be

192: identified in the spectra to confirm the RV result, the velocity was

193: discarded.

194: 

195: A total of 29 spectra yielded reliable redshifts, of which 11 are

196: consistent with being at the cluster redshift. We find that \cluster\

197: is at \clusterz $\pm 0.006$, while we had estimated $z=1.037$ from the

198: photometry alone. The spectra for one of the brightest central

199: galaxies is shown in Figure 2. Further details on the spectroscopy for

200: this and other clusters at similar redshifts will be presented in

201: \cite{barrientos2004}.

202:  

203: \section{Photometry Analysis}

204: 

205: \subsection{Size-Magnitude Relation}

206: 

207: The high quality VLT images enable morphological studies of the

208: galaxies in the field of \cluster. For this purpose we used a 2-D

209: galaxy light profile fitting technique \citep{schade1997a}. The

210: morphology and effective radius, for E/S0s, is determined by

211: inspecting the 2-D residual images from subtraction of a PSF-convolved

212: model. The model can be a bulge (i.e., an r$^{1/4}$-law), an

213: exponential disk, or a linear combination of both. Figure 3 shows

214: $r_e$ vs. $M_B(AB)$ for the morphologically selected E/S0s in the

215: field of \cluster. These galaxies follow a size-magnitude relation

216: similar to that for local cluster E/S0s. The difference between these

217: two populations is best interpreted as an offset in magnitude for the

218: galaxies in \cluster, explained as the expected luminosity change for

219: these galaxies due to passive evolution.

220: 

221: \subsection{Color-Magnitude Diagram}

222: 

223: Figure 4 shows the IR and IR-optical color magnitude diagrams for the

224: objects in the field of \cluster, within a diameter of 500 proper

225: kpc. This diagram shows an excess of galaxies at $(J-K)(AB) \sim 0.9$

226: and $(I-K)(AB) \sim 2.5$ over a wide range of magnitude. This excess

227: is enhanced when only the morphologically selected E/S0 galaxies (see

228: \S4 above) are included (solid squares). The broken line shows the

229: color-magnitude relation for the E/S0 galaxies in Coma, $k$-corrected

230: to \clusterz. The galaxies in \cluster\ are bluer than the galaxies in

231: Coma by $\sim 0.1$ mag in $(J-K)$ and about 0.25 in $(I-K)$. A more

232: detailed analysis using population synthesis models

233: \citep{bruzual1993} suggest we should expects a color difference of

234: $\Delta (I-K)=0.25$ and $\Delta (I-J)=0.09$ if most of the stars in

235: these galaxies were formed by $z=2$, and to $\Delta (I-K)=0.15$ and

236: $\Delta (I-J)=0.06$ if these were formed by $z=3$, assuming solar

237: metallicity. These data are consistent with a simple stellar

238: population formed at $z > 2$, consistent with studies of other

239: clusters at similar redshifts.

240: 

241: We use an iterated linear fit with 3-$\sigma$ clipping to fit the

242: red-sequence and estimate the slope and color scatter for all galaxies

243: with an elliptical morphology in Figure 4, in a manner akin to

244: \cite{gladders1998}. Errors were estimated using bootstrap re-sampling

245: of the input catalogs. The measured slopes are

246: -0.052$^{+0.025}_{-0.025}$ and -0.038$^{+0.053}_{-0.039}$ in $J-K$ and

247: $I-K$ respectively, and the measured scatters in the color-magnitude

248: relations for the E/S0 galaxies in \cluster\ amount to $\delta (J-K) =

249: 0.056^{+0.012}_{-0.014}$ mag and $\delta (I-K) =

250: 0.108^{+0.031}_{-0.029}$. Fitting using other techniques such as the

251: biweight estimator of \cite{bee90} yields similar values.  Neither

252: method makes an explicit background correction, nor have we subtracted

253: the effects of photometric errors, and so formally the reported

254: scatter in the red-sequence should be treated as an upper limit.

255: 

256: \section{Comparison to Other Clusters}

257: 

258: The RCS search technique relies on the presence of a population of

259: E/S0 galaxies with similar colors, and as such it is not surprising to

260: find a well defined color-magnitude sequence for \cluster. This

261: relation is also found in the optical/IR selected z=1.273 cluster ClG

262: J0848+4453 \citep{vandokkum2001} with a scatter and slope similar to

263: that found in \cluster. Studies of the X-ray selected clusters RDCS

264: J0910+5422 at z=1.106 \citep{stanford2002} and RDCS J1252.9-2927 at

265: z=1.237\citep{lid03} also show a similar color-magnitude relation,

266: with a small intrinsic scatter. The red-sequence properties seen in

267: \cluster\ are also consistent with those seen in the heterogeneous and

268: mostly lower-redshift cluster sample of \cite{stanford1998}.

269: 

270: Similarly, the luminosity evolution observed in \cluster\ has been

271: observed in other cluster samples up to $z=1.3$. The brightening of

272: $\Delta M_B = -1.2 \pm 0.1$ found here is consistent with that found

273: by a number of other studies of both the fundamental plane

274: \citep[e.g.,][and references therein]{vandok03} and its projection as

275: the Kormendy relation \citep[e.g.,][]{schade1997b}. From both the

276: red-sequence color, slope and scatter, and the apparent luminosity

277: evolution of these galaxies, we thus conclude that there is no

278: evidence that the red galaxy population in \cluster\ is any different

279: than that seen in clusters at similar redshifts but found by other

280: means.

281: 

282: \section{Conclusions}

283: \Ks\ imaging of \cluster\ shows and excess of 102 galaxies

284: ($\sim9\sigma$) over the expected background counts within the imaging

285: field, and confirms expectations from our initial RCS survey imaging

286: that \cluster\ is extremely rich. Spectroscopy of \cluster\ shows it

287: to be a true cluster at \clusterz $\pm 0.006$, making it one of the

288: more distant rich cluster systems known to date. A detailed analysis

289: of our imaging data shows that \cluster\ has an early-type galaxy

290: population consistent with that seen in the few other clusters studied

291: at a similar redshift, in that the color-magnitude and size-magnitude

292: relations of these galaxies is as for other $z\sim1$ systems. This is

293: despite the fact that these various clusters were selected by rather

294: different means. Though this result is expected since the RCS is

295: thought to be complete for massive systems at $z=1$, the apparent

296: uniformity of the galaxy populations between clusters selected at

297: different means implies that the RCS selection method does not

298: introduce significant biases. This will be confirmed by on-going and

299: future follow-up observations in both multi-wavelength imaging and

300: spectroscopy of a much larger sample of $z=1$ RCS clusters.

301: 

302: \acknowledgments We thank the staff at LCO, CTIO and VLT for the

303: excellent support in the observations. LFB's research is supported by

304: FONDECYT, Chile, under proyecto \#1040423. This research is also

305: supported partially by Proyecto FONDAP ``Center for Astrophysics''

306: \#15010003.

307: 

308: \begin{thebibliography}{}

309: 

310: \bibitem[Abell's (1958)]{abe58} Abell, G.O. 1956, \apjs, 3, 211

311: 

312: \bibitem[Barrientos \etal (2004)]{barrientos2004} Barrientos, L.F.,

313: Gladders, M., Yee, H., Hall, P., Ellingson, E. \& Infante, L. 2004,

314: {\it in preparation}

315: 

316: \bibitem[Beers, Flyn \& Gephardt (1990)]{bee90} Beers, T.C., Flynn,

317: K., \& Gebhardt, K. 1990, \aj, 100,32

318: 

319: \bibitem[Benitez \etal (1999)]{benitez1999} Benitez, N., Broadhurst,

320: T., Rosati, P., Courbin, F., Squires, G., Lidman, C. \& Magain,

321: P. 1999, \apj, 527, 31

322: 

323: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts (1996)]{bertin1996} Bertin, E. \& Arnouts,

324: S. 1996, A\&AS, 117, 393

325: 

326: \bibitem[Bower \etal (1992)]{bower1992} Bower, R.G., Lucey, J.R. \&

327: Ellis, R.S. 1992, \mnras, 254, 601

328: 

329: \bibitem[Bruzual \& Charlot(1993)]{bruzual1993} Bruzual A., G.~\&

330: Charlot, S.\ 1993, \apj, 405, 538

331: 

332: \bibitem[Chambers \etal (1996)]{chambers1996} Chambers, K.C., Miley,

333: G.K., van Breugel, W., \& Huang, J.S. 1996, \apjs, 106, 215

334: 

335: \bibitem[Dalcanton (1996)]{dalcanton1996} Dalcanton, J. 1996, \apj,

336: 466, 92

337: 

338: \bibitem[Deltorn \etal (1997)]{deltorn1997} Deltorn, J.M., Le Fevre,

339: O., Crampton, D., Dickinson, M. 1997, \apjl, 483, L21

340: 

341: \bibitem[Gladders \etal (1998)]{gladders1998} Gladders, M.,

342: L\'opez-Cruz, O., Yee, H.K.C. \& Kodama, T. 1998, \apj, 501, 571

343: 

344: \bibitem[Gladders \& Yee (2000)]{gladders2000} Gladders, M. \& Yee,

345: H.K.C. 2000, \aj, 120, 2148

346: 

347: \bibitem[Gladders \& Yee (2004)]{gladders2004} Gladders, M. \& Yee,

348: H.K.C. 2004 {\it submitted to } \apjs

349: 

350: \bibitem[Hattori \etal (1997)]{hattori1997} Hattori, M., Ikebe, Y.,

351: Asaoka, I., Takeshima, T., Boehringer, H., Mihara, T., Neumann, D.,

352: Schindler, S., Tsuru, T. \& Tamura, T. 1997, \nat, 388, 146

353: 

354: \bibitem[Kauffmann \& Charlot (1998)]{kauffmann1998} Kauffmann, G.,

355: \& Charlot, S. 1998, \mnras, 194, 705

356: 

357: \bibitem[Kodama (1997)]{kodama1997} Kodama, T. 1997, Ph.D. thesis

358: Univ. Tokyo

359: 

360: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{lan92} Landolt, A.U. 1992, \aj, 104, 340

361: 

362: \bibitem[Lidman \etal (2004)]{lid03} Lidmanm C., Rosati, P., Demarco,

363: R., Nonino, M., Mainieri, V., Stanford, S.A., \& Toft, S. 2004, \aap, 

364: 416, 829

365: 

366: \bibitem[Mullis et al. (2003)]{mul03} Mullis, C.R. 2003, \apj, 594, 154

367: 

368: \bibitem[Nelson \etal (2001)]{nelson2001} Nelson, A.E., Gonzalez,

369: A.H., Zaritsky, D. \& Dalcanton, J. 2001, \aj, 563, 629

370: 

371: \bibitem[Persson \etal (1998)]{persson1998} Persson, S.E., Murphy,

372: D.C., Krzeminski, W., Roth, M., \& Rieke, M. 1998, \aj, 116, 2475

373: 

374: \bibitem[Postman et al.(1996)]{pos96} {Postman}, M., {Lubin}, L.~M.,

375: {Gunn}, J.~E., {Oke}, J.~B., {Hoessel}, J.~G., {Schneider}, D.~P., \&

376: {Christensen}, J.~A.  1996, AJ, 111, 615

377: 

378: \bibitem[Quintana \etal (1996)]{quintana1996} Quintana, H., Ramirez,

379: A., Way, M. 1996, \aj, 112, 36

380: 

381: \bibitem[Rosati \etal (1999)]{rosati1999} Rosati, P., Stanford, S.A.,

382: Eisenhardt, P.R., Elston, R., Spinrad, H., Stern, D. \& Dey, A. 1999,

383: \aj, 118, 76

384: 

385: \bibitem[Schade \etal (1997)]{schade1997a} Schade, D., Lilly, S.J.,

386: Crampton, D., Ellis, R., Le Fevre, O., Hammer, F., Brinchman, J.,

387: Abraham, R., Colles, M., Glazebrook, K., Tresse, L. \& Broadhurst,

388: T. 1997, \apj, 525, 31

389: 

390: \bibitem[Schade \etal (1997)]{schade1997b} Schade, D., Barrientos,

391: L.F. \& L\'opez-Cruz, O. 1997, \apjl, 477, L17

392: 

393: \bibitem[Soucail \etal (2001)]{soucail2001} Soucail, G., Kneib, J.P.,

394: Jaunsen, A.O., Hjorth, J., Hattori, M. \& Yamada, T. 2001, \aap, 367,

395: 741

396: 

397: \bibitem[Stanford \etal (1997)]{stanford1997} Stanford, S.A., Elston,

398: R., Eisenhardt, P.R., Spinrad, H., Stern, D. \& Dey, A. 1997, \aj,

399: 114, 2232

400: 

401: \bibitem[Stanford \etal (1998)]{stanford1998} Stanford, S.A., Eisenhardt,

402: P.R., \& Dickinson, M. 1998, \apj, 492, 461

403: 

404: \bibitem[Stanford \etal (2002)]{stanford2002} Stanford, S.A., Holden,

405: B., Rosati, P., Eisenhardt, P.R., Stern, D., Squires, G. \& Spinrad,

406: H. 2002, \aj, 123, 619

407: 

408: \bibitem[Thompson \etal (2001)]{thompson2001} Thompson, D., Pozzetti,

409: L, Hasinger, G., Lehmann, I., Schmidt, M., Soifer, B.T., Szokoly, G.,

410: Wilson, G. and Zamorani, G. 2001, \aap, 377, 778

411: 

412: \bibitem[Tonry \& Davis (1979)]{tonry1979} Tonry, J., and Davis, M. 1979, 

413: \aj 84, 1511

414: 

415: \bibitem[Totani \etal (2001)]{totani2001} Totani, T., Yuzuru, Y.,

416: Toshinori, M., Fumihide, I. \& Kentaro, M. 2001, \apj, 559, 592

417: 

418: \bibitem[van Dokkum \& Stanford (2003)]{vandok03} van Dokkum, P.G., \&

419: Stanford, S.A. 2003, \apj, 585, 78

420: 

421: \bibitem[van Dokkum \etal (2001)]{vandokkum2001} van Dokkum, P.G.,

422: Stanford, S.A., Holden, B.P., Eisenhardt, P.R., Dickinson, M. \&

423: Elston, R. 2001, \apjl, 2001, 552, L101

424: 

425: \bibitem[Wittman (2001)]{wittman2001} Whittman, D. 2001, \apjl, 557,

426: L89

427: 

428: \bibitem[Yee \& Ellingson (2003)]{yee2003} Yee, H.K.C. \& Ellingson,

429: E. 2003, \apj, 585, 215

430: 

431: \bibitem[Zaritsky \etal (1997)]{zaritsky1997} Zaritsky, D., Nelson,

432: A.E., Dalcanton, J. \& Gonzalez, A.H. 1997, \apjl, 480, L91

433: 

434: \end{thebibliography}

435: 

436: \clearpage

437: 

438: \begin{figure}

439: %\plotone{f1.eps}

440: \caption{\I\Js\Ks\ color composite image of the field centered on \cluster

441: ($2.4 \times 2.1$ arcmin). North is up and East to the left. This

442: image shows approximately the central 1 Mpc.}

443: \end{figure}

444: 

445: \begin{figure}

446: \plotone{f2.eps}

447: \caption{VLT/FORS2 spectrum of one of the central galaxies in

448: RCS043938-2904.9, at $z=0.951 \pm 0.006$. The galaxy is marked in

449: Fig. 1 and has a redshift of $z=0.970$. Main features are indicated

450: with broken lines. The scale on the vertical axis is in arbitrary

451: units. The inset shows the redshift distribution in the field of this

452: cluster.}

453: \end{figure}

454: 

455: \begin{figure}

456: \plotone{f3.eps}

457: \caption{Size-magnitude diagram for the E/S0 galaxies (filled circles)

458: in the field of \cluster. The size has been obtained from the 2-D

459: galaxy light profile fitting algorithm. For comparison the E/S0

460: galaxies in local clusters are shown as crosses, including the best

461: linear fit to these galaxies \citep[broken line,][]{schade1997b}. The

462: solid line corresponds to the fit for the galaxies in \cluster,

463: constrained to have the same slope as that for the local E/S0

464: galaxies. The offset of the fit for \cluster\ from the local relation

465: amounts to $\Delta M_B (AB) = -1.20 \pm 0.09$.}

466: \end{figure}

467: 

468: \begin{figure}

469: \plotone{f4.eps}

470: \caption{IR and IR-optical color-magnitude diagrams in a 0.5 Mpc

471: diameter field centered on the cluster \cluster. The morphologically

472: selected E/S0 galaxies are shown as filled symbols. These galaxies

473: define a tight sequence (particularly in the IR), similar to that

474: found in local clusters. In this Figure, the expected color-magnitude

475: relation for the E/S0 galaxies in Coma as determined by

476: \citet{bower1992} and $k$-corrected to \clusterz, is shown as a broken

477: line.}

478: \end{figure}

479: 

480: \end{document}

481: