astro-ph0411271/ms.tex
1: \documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}
2: \usepackage{asp2004}
3: \usepackage{psfig}
4: \usepackage{epsf}
5: \usepackage{graphics}
6: \usepackage{lscape}
7: \usepackage{xspace}
8: \markboth{Hamaguchi}{XMM-Newton Observations of $\eta$ Carinae}
9: \pagestyle{myheadings}
10: 
11: % Some definitions I use in these instructions.
12: 
13: \def\emphasize#1{{\itshape#1\/}}
14: \def\arg#1{{\it#1\/}}
15: \let\prog=\arg
16: \parsep 0pt
17: \itemsep 0pt
18: \def\edcomment#1{\iffalse\marginpar{\raggedright\sl#1\/}\else\relax\fi}
19: \marginparwidth 1.25in
20: \marginparsep .125in
21: \marginparpush .25in
22: \reversemarginpar
23: 
24: %\input{macro.inp}
25: \newcommand{\advs}{{\it Advances in Space Research}\xspace}
26: \newcommand{\chaa}{{\it Chin. A\&A}\xspace}    
27: \newcommand{\sci}{{\it Science}\xspace}
28: 
29: \newcommand{\HAKUCHO}{{\it Hakucho}\xspace}
30: \newcommand{\TENMA}{{\it Tenma}\xspace}
31: \newcommand{\GINGA}{{\it Ginga}\xspace}
32: \newcommand{\ASCA}{{\it ASCA}\xspace}
33: \newcommand{\ASTROE}{{\it Astro-E}\xspace}
34: \newcommand{\HINOTORI}{{\it Hinotori}\xspace}
35: \newcommand{\YOHKOH}{{\it Yohkoh}\xspace}
36: \newcommand{\BBXRT}{{\it BBXRT}\xspace}
37: \newcommand{\HEAO}{{\it HEAO}\xspace}
38: \newcommand{\HIPPARCOS}{{\it HIPPARCOS}\xspace}
39: \newcommand{\EINSTEIN}{{\it Einstein}\xspace}
40: \newcommand{\EXOSAT}{{\it EXOSAT}\xspace}
41: \newcommand{\ARIELV}{{\it Ariel~V}\xspace}
42: \newcommand{\UHURU}{{\it Uhuru}\xspace}
43: %\newcommand{\OSO8}{{\it OSO-8}\xspace}
44: \newcommand{\OSO}{{\it OSO}\xspace}
45: \newcommand{\IRAS}{{\it IRAS}\xspace}
46: \newcommand{\GRO}{{\it GRO}\xspace}
47: \newcommand{\COBE}{{\it COBE}\xspace}
48: \newcommand{\Astro}{{\it Astro}\xspace}
49: \newcommand{\ASTRO}{{\it ASTRO}\xspace}
50: \newcommand{\GRANAT}{{\it GRANAT}\xspace}
51: \newcommand{\ROSAT}{{\it ROSAT}\xspace}
52: \newcommand{\XMM}{{\it XMM-Newton}\xspace}
53: \newcommand{\AXAF}{{\it AXAF}\xspace}
54: \newcommand{\CHANDRA}{{\it Chandra}\xspace}
55: \newcommand{\SAX}{{\it Beppo SAX}\xspace}
56: \newcommand{\XTE}{{\it XTE}\xspace}
57: \newcommand{\MIR}{{\it MIR}\xspace}
58: \newcommand{\KVANT}{{\it KVANT}\xspace}
59: \newcommand{\SIS}{{SIS}\xspace}
60: \newcommand{\GIS}{{GIS}\xspace}
61: \newcommand{\XMA}{{XMA}\xspace}
62: \newcommand{\HRI}{{HRI}\xspace}
63: \newcommand{\PSPC}{{PSPC}\xspace}
64: 
65: \newcommand{\UNITFLUX}{{\rm ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$}\xspace}
66: \newcommand{\UNITCNTS}{{\rm cnts}\xspace}
67: \newcommand{\UNITCPS}{{\rm cnts~s$^{-1}$}\xspace}
68: \newcommand{\UNITCPPIXPOBS}{{\rm cnts~pixel$^{-1}$~obs$^{-1}$}\xspace}
69: \newcommand{\UNITCPPIX}{{\rm cnts~pixel$^{-1}$}\xspace}
70: \newcommand{\UNITPFLUX}{{\rm cnts~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$}\xspace}
71: \newcommand{\UNITLUMI}{{\rm ergs~s$^{-1}$}\xspace}
72: \newcommand{\UNITEI}{{\rm cm$^{-3}$}\xspace}
73: \newcommand{\UNITPPCC}{{\rm cm$^{-3}$}\xspace}
74: \newcommand{\UNITNH}{{\rm cm$^{-2}$}\xspace}
75: \newcommand{\UNITVEL}{{\rm km~s$^{-1}$}\xspace}
76: \newcommand{\UNITSOLARLUMI}{{\it L$_{\odot}$}\xspace}
77: \newcommand{\UNITSOLARMASS}{{\it M$_{\odot}$}\xspace}
78: \newcommand{\UNITSOLARRADIUS}{{\it R$_{\odot}$}\xspace}
79: \newcommand{\UNITSOLARABUND}{{\it Z$_{\odot}$}\xspace}
80: \newcommand{\DEGREECENT}{{$^{\circ}$C}\xspace}
81: \newcommand{\DEGREEKELV}{K\xspace}
82: \newcommand{\DEGREE}{{$^{\circ}$}\xspace}
83: \newcommand{\ARCMIN}{{$'$}\xspace}
84: \newcommand{\FARCM}{{.$'$}\xspace}
85: \newcommand{\ARCSEC}{{$''$}\xspace}
86: \newcommand{\FARCS}{.{$''$}\xspace}
87: \newcommand{\HOUR}{{$^{h}$}\xspace}
88: \newcommand{\MIN}{{$^{m}$}\xspace}
89: \newcommand{\SEC}{{$^{s}$}\xspace}
90: \newcommand{\FSECM}{.{$^{s}$}\xspace}
91: 
92: \newcommand{\NH}{{\it N$_{\rm H}$}\xspace}
93: \newcommand{\AV}{{\it A$_{\rm V}$}\xspace}
94: \newcommand{\RV}{{\it R$_{\rm V}$}\xspace}
95: \newcommand{\FX}{{\it f$_{\rm X}$}\xspace}
96: \newcommand{\LX}{{\it L$_{\rm X}$}\xspace}
97: \newcommand{\Lbol}{{\it L$_{\rm bol}$}\xspace}
98: \newcommand{\Lkin}{{\it L$_{\rm kin}$}\xspace}
99: \newcommand{\Vterm}{{\it V$_{\rm term}$}\xspace}
100: \newcommand{\LB}{{\it L$_{\rm B}$}\xspace}
101: \newcommand{\Teff}{{\it T$_{\rm eff}$}\xspace}
102: \newcommand{\LOPT}{{\it L$_{\rm opt}$}\xspace}
103: \newcommand{\LR}{{\it L$_{\rm R}$}\xspace}
104: \newcommand{\LH}{{\it L$_{\rm H}$}\xspace}
105: \newcommand{\LIR}{{\it L$_{\rm IR}$}\xspace}
106: \newcommand{\LNIR}{{\it L$_{\rm NIR}$}\xspace}
107: \newcommand{\LFIR}{{\it L$_{\rm FIR}$}\xspace}
108: %%\newcommand{\KT}{{\it k$_{\rm B}T$}\xspace}
109: \newcommand{\KT}{{\it kT}\xspace}
110: \newcommand{\KTgas}{{\it k$_{\rm B}T_{\rm gas}$}\xspace}
111: \newcommand{\EM}{{\it E.M.}\xspace}
112: \newcommand{\nel}{{\it n$_{\rm e}$}\xspace}
113: \newcommand{\np}{{\it n$_{\rm p}$}\xspace}
114: %\newcommand{\mp}{{\it m$_{\rm p}$}\xspace}
115: \newcommand{\nH}{{\it n$_{\rm H}$}\xspace}
116: \newcommand{\mH}{{\it m$_{\rm H}$}\xspace}
117: \newcommand{\nFe}{{\it n$_{\rm Fe}$}\xspace}
118: \newcommand{\LALPHA}{{\it L$_{\alpha}$}\xspace}
119: \newcommand{\LBETA}{{\it L$_{\beta}$}\xspace}
120: \newcommand{\PSF}{PSF\xspace}
121: %\newcommand{\PSF}{{\it psf}\xspace}
122: %\newcommand{\FOV}{FOV\xspace}
123: \newcommand{\FOV}{{\it fov}\xspace}
124: \newcommand{\HPD}{{\it HPD}\xspace}
125: \newcommand{\HAEBE}{HAeBe\xspace}
126: \newcommand{\HAEBEs}{HAeBes\xspace}
127: 
128: \newcommand{\rcore}{{\it r$_{\rm core}$}\xspace}
129: \newcommand{\Rcut}{{\it R$_{\rm cut}$}\xspace}
130: \newcommand{\Mlumi}{{\it M$_{\rm lumi}$}\xspace}
131: \newcommand{\Mbaryon}{{\it M$_{\rm baryon}$}\xspace}
132: \newcommand{\MFE}{{\it M$_{\rm Fe}$}\xspace}
133: \newcommand{\MFe}{{\it M$_{\rm Fe}$}\xspace}
134: \newcommand{\MGAS}{{\it M$_{\rm gas}$}\xspace}
135: \newcommand{\Mgas}{{\it M$_{\rm gas}$}\xspace}
136: \newcommand{\Mgastot}{{\it M$_{\rm gas}^{tot}$}\xspace}
137: \newcommand{\Mgrav}{{\it M$_{\rm grav}$}\xspace}
138: \newcommand{\Mgravtot}{{\it M$_{\rm grav}^{tot}$}\xspace}
139: \newcommand{\MSTELLAR}{{\it M$_{\rm stellar}$}\xspace}
140: \newcommand{\Mstellar}{{\it M$_{\rm stellar}$}\xspace}
141: \newcommand{\Mstellartot}{{\it M$_{\rm stellar}^{tot}$}\xspace}
142: \newcommand{\Mstar}{{\it M$_{\rm star}$}\xspace}
143: \newcommand{\Mstartot}{{\it M$_{\rm star}^{tot}$}\xspace}
144: \newcommand{\Mdot}{{$\dot M$}\xspace}
145: \newcommand{\Lcool}{{\it L$_{\rm cool}$}\xspace}
146: \newcommand{\Lexcess}{{\it L$_{\rm excess}$}\xspace}
147: \newcommand{\Egas}{{\it M$_{\rm gas}$}\xspace}
148: \newcommand{\Egastot}{{\it M$_{\rm gas}^{tot}$}\xspace}
149: \newcommand{\HubbleCNST}{{\it H$_0$}\xspace}
150: 
151: %%\renewcommand{\appendix}{%
152: %%	\renewcommand{\section}{%
153: %%		\newpage\thispagestyle{plain}%
154: %%		\secdef\Appendix\sAppendix}%
155: %%	\setcounter{section}{0}%
156: %%	\renewcommand{\thesection}{\Alph{section}}%
157: %%}
158: 
159: 
160: \begin{document}
161: \title{\XMM Observations of the 2003 X-ray Minimum of $\eta$ Carinae}
162: \author{K. Hamaguchi$^{1,2}$, M.~F. Corcoran$^{1,3}$, T. Gull$^{4}$, N.~E. White$^{1}$, A. Damineli$^{5}$, K. Davidson$^{6}$}
163: \affil{1: NASA/GSFC/LHEA, Greenbelt, MD 20771,
164: 2: National Research Council, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001,
165: 3: Universities Space Research Association, 7501 Forbes 
166: Blvd, Ste 206, Seabrook, MD 20706,
167: 4: NASA/GSFC/LASP, Greenbelt, MD 20771,
168: 5: Instituto Astron{\^ o}mico e Geof{\' i}sico da USP, 
169: R. do Matao 1226, 05508-900, S{\~ a}o Paulo, Brazil,
170: 6: Astronomy Department, University of Minnesota, 116 Church Street SE, Minneapolis,
171: MN 55455
172: }
173: 
174: \begin{abstract}
175: The \XMM X-ray observatory took part in the 
176: multi-wavelength observing campaign of the massive, evolved 
177: star $\eta$ Carinae in 2003 during its recent X-ray minimum.
178: This paper reports on the results of these 
179: observations, mainly from the aspect of spectral change.
180: Hard X-ray emission from the point source of $\eta$ Carinae was 
181: detected even during the minimum. During the minimum the observed flux above 3 
182: keV was $\sim$3$\times$10$^{-12}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, which is 
183: about one percent of the flux before the minimum. 
184: Changes in the spectral shape revealed two X-ray emission components in the central
185: point source.
186: One component is non-variable and has relatively cool plasma of $kT\sim$1~keV
187: and moderate absorption, $N_{H}\sim$5$\times$10$^{22}$~\UNITNH.
188: The plasma is probably located far from the star, possibly produced by
189: the high speed polar wind from $\eta$ Carinae.
190: The other high temperature component has $kT\sim5$~keV and is strongly variable.  This component shows 
191: an increase in the apparent column 
192: density from 5$\times$10$^{22}$~\UNITNH to 2$\times$10$^{23}$~\UNITNH,
193: probably originating near the heart of the binary system.
194: These changes in \NH were smaller than expected if the minimum is produced solely by an
195: increase of hydrogen column density.
196: The X-ray minimum seems to be dominated by a decrease of the apparent
197: emission measure, suggesting that the brightest part of the 
198: X-ray emitting region is completely obscured during the 
199: minimum in the form of an eclipse. A ``partial covering'' model might explain the residual emission seen during the minimum.
200: \end{abstract}
201: \thispagestyle{plain}
202: \section{Introduction}
203: The supermassive star, $\eta$ Carinae, is now widely described
204: as a binary system
205: with a period of 5.5~years \citep[e.g.][]{Ishibashi1999,Damineli2000}.
206: A collision between the wind from the primary star and the hidden companion forms a strong bow shock,
207: which will produce hot X-ray emitting plasma.
208: The emission undergoes a flux minimum apparently coincident with 
209: periastron passage, which 
210: may be caused by partial or full eclipse by the wind of the primary star and/or
211: collapse of the bow shock.
212: During the minimum in 1997$-$98,
213: the \ASCA satellite detected hard X-ray emission, characterized by similar \KT and \NH to
214: the pre-minimum state 
215: with reduced
216: plasma emission measure (\EM).
217: The limited spatial resolution of \ASCA, however, left the possibility that 
218: the observed emission 
219: was contaminated by emission from 
220: unresolved nearby sources.
221: 
222: The latest X-ray minimum began at 2003 June 29.
223: It was monitored with three X-ray observatories, RXTE, \CHANDRA, and \XMM
224: (see Corcoran et al., this meeting, for the results of the RXTE and \CHANDRA\ campaigns.)
225: Of these observatories, \XMM has the largest effective area, with moderate spatial and spectral resolution,
226: and therefore is suitable for tracing  changes in \NH and \KT.
227: \XMM observed $\eta$ Carinae 
228: 1) 5 times in January 2003 before the minimum, 
229: which are treated as one set of data in our analysis, 
230: 2) twice in June 2003 prior to the minimum, near the X-ray maximum, 
231: 3) four times during the minimum in July and August 2003, for a total of 11 observations.
232: This paper reports on the results 
233: from the EPIC  pn and MOS CCD detectors.
234: 
235: \begin{figure}
236: \plotone{figure1.eps}
237: \caption{EPIC pn spectra of $\eta$ Carinae in 2003.
238: Spectra from each observation are shown as individual points with error bars.
239: Spectra of the ``Outer Debris Field'' and the Homunculus Nebula, and their summed spectrum
240: are shown as solid lines.
241: The bottom left panel displays a \CHANDRA image during the X-ray minimum \citep{Corcoran2004}.
242: Strong emission lines from individual elements are shown at the top of the figure.}
243: \label{fig:xmmspectra}
244: \end{figure}
245: 
246: 
247: \section{Results}
248: A \CHANDRA observation by \citet{Corcoran2004} confirmed that hard X-ray 
249: emission during the X-ray minimum comes mainly from a point source at the position of
250: $\eta$ Carinae and partly from 
251: faint X-ray emission reflected from the Homunculus Nebula around $\eta$ Carinae
252: (see the bottom left panel in Figure~\ref{fig:xmmspectra}).
253: Unfortunately, \XMM cannot 
254: spatially
255: resolve these components nor well separate the 
256: soft X-ray emission from the ``Outer Debris Field'' beyond the Homunculus,
257: which is made by ancient ejecta interacting with the interstellar medium or 
258: previous ejecta.
259: We therefore included all these components in the source region when extracting source events,
260: and took background events from source free regions on the same CCD chip.
261: 
262: Background subtracted light curves above $\sim$2~keV
263: exhibited 
264: variation up to $\sim$5\% on timescales of $\sim$30 ksec,
265: which reflects emission from the central point source.
266: The variation 
267: roughly agrees with
268: the 
269: interpolated 
270: daily fluxes monitored with RXTE
271: 
272: \begin{figure}[t]
273: \plotone{figure2.eps}
274: \caption{\XMM EPIC pn spectra and the best-fit model of the \CHANDRA spectrum on September 26,
275: normalized at the Fe$_{\rm XXV}$ line intensity.
276: The vertical unit is correct for the data on January 25--29.
277: Smooth gray lines with indications of \NH
278: represent absorbed 1T thin-thermal plasma (MeKaL) models with \KT =5 keV,
279: \NH =5$\times$10$^{22}$\UNITNH (upper line) and =2$\times$10$^{23}$ \UNITNH (lower line),
280: \EM =1.7$\times$10$^{57}$ cm$^{-3}$ and abundance $Z/Z_{\odot}=0.87$.}
281: \label{fig:xmmnormspectra}
282: \end{figure}
283: 
284: The EPIC pn spectra in Figure~\ref{fig:xmmspectra} demonstrate 
285: a
286: strong decrease
287: in hard X-ray emission up to a factor of $\sim$100
288: above 1~keV during the minimum,
289: with
290: no variation in the emission below
291: 1~keV.
292: This is 
293: similar to the \ASCA results 
294: from
295: the previous X-ray cycle
296: \citep{Corcoran2000}.
297: The contribution of the X-ray
298: emission from the outer debris field
299: and the Homunculus Nebula,
300: neither of which varied
301: on timescales of a month or longer,
302: was
303: estimated 
304: from
305: the \CHANDRA data on 2003 July 20 during the minimum,
306: and is overlaid in Figure~\ref{fig:xmmspectra}.
307: Except for the excess below 1~keV
308: (which is produced by the poor absolute flux calibration between \CHANDRA\ and \XMM),
309: the excess above 1~keV should 
310: represent
311: emission from the central source.
312: 
313: During the minimum, this emission shows
314: a non-variable component
315: between 1--3~keV.
316: To estimate the physical 
317: properties of this non-variable component,
318: we subtracted the 
319: X-ray emission from the outer debris field and the reflected emission from the Homunculus
320: from the spectra during the minimum, 
321: and simultaneously fit them
322: by a two-temperature (2T) optically thin-thermal plasma (APEC) model with
323: independently absorbed 1T non-variable and 1T variable components.
324: We also used the \CHANDRA spectra of the central region for the fitting.
325: The best-fit parameters of the non-variable component are \KT $\sim$1~keV, 
326: \NH $\sim$5$\times$10$^{22}$~\UNITNH, and log~\LX $\sim$34.2~\UNITLUMI.
327: 
328: We extracted spectra of the variable component by subtracting 
329: this
330: non-variable component in addition to the X-ray 
331: debris field and Homunculus emission components
332: (Figure~\ref{fig:xmmnormspectra}).
333: In the figure, we also display the best-fit model of the \CHANDRA spectrum from September 26 
334: when the minimum had just ended, and normalized all the spectra
335: at the Fe$_{\rm XXV}$ line energy.
336: Interestingly, the normalized spectra do not show any significant change in
337: hard band slope above 7~keV, which is equivalent to a continuum temperature of \KT $\sim$5~keV.
338: Meanwhile, the relative flux in the lower energy band decreased, 
339: with \NH increasing from 5$\times$10$^{22}$~\UNITNH 
340: to 2$\times$10$^{23}$~\UNITNH.
341: The \NH increase was moderate, and is not large enough to account
342: entirely for the strong flux decrease during the minimum,
343: especially at energies $>3$~keV.
344: The flux decrease is more consistently described as an apparent decrease of \EM 
345: as suggested in the earlier \ASCA observations \citep{Corcoran2000}.  
346: This could either represent a real reduction in the amount of X-ray emitting plasma, or an obscuration of X-ray emitting plasma.
347: The flux  during the minimum started to increase 
348: around July 22, though 
349: \NH was still increasing, and \NH continued to increase
350: through the recovery on September 26.
351: The \NH increase seems to lag
352: the apparent \EM decrease.
353: In the spectra near the X-ray intensity maximum,
354: the Fe$_{\rm XXV}$ emission line seems to have a lower energy tail, which is
355: also seen in the \CHANDRA HETG high resolution spectra 
356: (see Corcoran et al., this meeting).
357: The feature seemed to be enhanced during the minimum though photon statistics 
358: were rather limited.
359: This low energy tail may suggest that 
360: the ionization of the X-ray emitting plasma during the X-ray minimum may have been out of collisional equilibrium.
361: The EWs of the Fe fluorescent line were 140--220~eV before the minimum and were
362: restricted to less than 700~eV during the minimum.
363: 
364: \section{Discussion}
365: 
366: \subsection{What is the Non-Variable X-ray Source?}
367: 
368: The non-variable X-ray emission was stable for about two months during the 
369: minimum when the X-ray emission from the colliding winds exhibited prominent variation.
370: The \NH of $\sim$5$\times$10$^{22}$~\UNITNH is smaller than the columns to the colliding wind
371: X-rays around the minimum and are
372: the same as those in January and near apastron \citep[e.g.][]{Leutenegger2003}.
373: These results  
374: suggest that this emission component is remote from the binary system and not affected by the increasing column to the colliding wind source.
375: On the other hand, \CHANDRA images during the minimum between 1$-$3~keV,
376: dominated by the non-variable X-ray emission,
377: did not show any extended structure.
378: The plasma size is therefore restricted to within $\sim$1\ARCSEC, equivalent to 
379: a physical size of $\sim$2300~AU assuming $d \sim$2.3~kpc.
380: These results suggest that the X-ray plasma is produced by collision of a fast outflow
381: with ambient gas relatively far from the star.
382: A good candidate for this outflow is the polar wind from $\eta$ Carinae, which
383: has a high speed outflow up to $\sim$1000 \UNITVEL \citep{Smith2003},
384: which can produce plasma at temperatures near 1~keV.
385: 
386: \subsection{What Caused the X-ray Minimum?}
387: 
388: The series of the \XMM observations confirmed that 
389: the spectral variations during the minimum are caused by a
390: change in \EM, and not the observed increase in \NH (which is too low to provide the observed 
391: decline at $E>5$ keV).
392: There are a number of ways in which this apparent reduction in X-ray brightness can be produced.
393: One scenario is that the X-ray activity decayed close to the periastron passage, perhaps due to strong instabilities near periastron \citep{Davidson2002}.
394: However, while the behavior of the Fe$_{\rm XXV}$ line suggests that the ionization balance of the plasma may be  changing during the minimum,
395: the hottest plasma temperature appears so stable that it does not support
396: a dramatic decay of X-ray activity.
397: An alternative is that the X-ray emission is only partially blocked by an optically thick absorber.
398: In this scenario, the plasma \EM is apparently reduced during the X-ray minimum
399: because the volume is mostly obscured from our line of sight.
400: A partial or annular eclipse geometry seems unlikely  because
401: of the rapid change in geometry caused by the motion of the companion near periastron.
402: A possible solution is a "leaky absorber" consisting of optically thick clumps immersed in a 
403: lower-density gas  which obscures 95--99\% of the emitting region.
404: 
405: \begin{thebibliography}{}
406: 
407: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Corcoran}, {Fredericks}, {Petre}, {Swank},
408:   and {Drake}}{{Corcoran} et~al.}{2000}]{Corcoran2000}
409: {Corcoran}, M.~F., {Fredericks}, A.~C., {Petre}, R., {Swank}, J.~H., \&
410:   {Drake}, S.~A. 2000,
411: \newblock {\bf {\em \apj\/}~{\em 545}}, 420.
412: 
413: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Corcoran}, {Hamaguchi}, {Gull}, {Davidson},
414:   {Petre}, {Hillier}, {Smith}, {Damineli}, {Morse}, {Walborn}, {Verner},
415:   {Collins}, {White}, {Pittard}, {Weis}, {Bomans}, and {Butt}}{{Corcoran}
416:   et~al.}{2004}]{Corcoran2004}
417: {Corcoran}, M.~F., {Hamaguchi}, K., {Gull}, T., {Davidson}, K., {Petre}, R.,
418:   {Hillier}, D.~J., {Smith}, N., {Damineli}, A., {Morse}, J.~A., {Walborn},
419:   N.~R., {Verner}, E., {Collins}, N., {White}, S., {Pittard}, J.~M., {Weis},
420:   K., {Bomans}, D., \& {Butt}, Y. 2004,
421: \newblock {\bf {\em \apj\/}~{\em 613}}, 381.
422: 
423: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Corcoran}, {Swank}, {Petre}, {Ishibashi},
424:   {Davidson}, {Townsley}, {Smith}, {White}, {Viotti}, and
425:   {Damineli}}{{Corcoran} et~al.}{2001}]{Corcoran2001a}
426: {Corcoran}, M.~F., {Swank}, J.~H., {Petre}, R., {Ishibashi}, K., {Davidson},
427:   K., {Townsley}, L., {Smith}, R., {White}, S., {Viotti}, R., \& {Damineli},
428:   A. 2001,
429: \newblock {\bf {\em \apj\/}~{\em 562}}, 1031.
430: 
431: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Damineli}, {Kaufer}, {Wolf}, {Stahl},
432:   {Lopes}, and {de Ara{\' u}jo}}{{Damineli} et~al.}{2000}]{Damineli2000}
433: {Damineli}, A., {Kaufer}, A., {Wolf}, B., {Stahl}, O., {Lopes}, D.~F., \& {de
434:   Ara{\' u}jo}, F.~X. 2000,
435: \newblock {\bf {\em \apjl\/}~{\em 528}}, L101.
436: 
437: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Davidson}}{2002}]{Davidson2002}
438: {Davidson}, K. 2002, in ASP Conf. Ser. 262, The High Energy Universe at 
439: Sharp Focus: Chandra Science, p.267.
440: 
441: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Ishibashi}, {Corcoran}, {Davidson}, {Swank},
442:   {Petre}, {Drake}, {Damineli}, and {White}}{{Ishibashi}
443:   et~al.}{1999}]{Ishibashi1999}
444: {Ishibashi}, K., {Corcoran}, M.~F., {Davidson}, K., {Swank}, J.~H., {Petre},
445:   R., {Drake}, S.~A., {Damineli}, A., \& {White}, S. 1999,
446: \newblock {\bf {\em \apj\/}~{\em 524}}, 983.
447: 
448: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Leutenegger}, {Kahn}, and
449:   {Ramsay}}{{Leutenegger} et~al.}{2003}]{Leutenegger2003}
450: {Leutenegger}, M.~A., {Kahn}, S.~M., \& {Ramsay}, G. 2003,
451: \newblock {\bf {\em \apj\/}~{\em 585}}, 1015.
452: 
453: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{{Smith}, {Davidson}, {Gull}, {Ishibashi}, and
454:   {Hillier}}{{Smith} et~al.}{2003}]{Smith2003}
455: {Smith}, N., {Davidson}, K., {Gull}, T.~R., {Ishibashi}, K., and {Hillier},
456:   D.~J. (2003).
457: \newblock {\bf {\em \apj\/}~{\em 586}}, 432.
458: 
459: \end{thebibliography}
460: 
461: %\input{etacarxmmbbl.inp}
462: 
463: %\bibliographystyle{apjchicago}
464: %\bibliography{inst,sci_AI,sci_JZ,scibook}
465: 
466: \end{document}
467: 
468: 
469: