1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

2: \documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}

3: \usepackage{apjfonts}

4: % Definitions

5: \newcommand{\kms}{\,km\,s$^{-1}$}     

6: \newcommand{\ha}{\,H$\alpha$}     

7: \newcommand{\hii}{\ion{H}{2}}

8: \newcommand{\arcs}{$^{\prime\prime}$}

9: \newcommand{\arcm}{$^{\prime}$}

10: \newcommand{\ie}{$i.e.,$}

11: \newcommand{\eg}{$e.g.,$}

12: \newcommand{\fuse}{{\em FUSE}}

13: \newcommand{\FUSE}{{\em FUSE}}

14: \newcommand{\chandra}{{\em Chandra}}

15: \newcommand{\rosat}{{\em ROSAT}}

16: \journalinfo{To be published the Galaxy Evolution

17: Explorer (GALEX) Astrophysical Journal Letters Special Issue}

18: \shorttitle{GALEX observations of NGC~253 and M82}

19: \shortauthors{Hoopes et al.}

20: 

21: \begin{document}

22: 

23: \title{GALEX Observations of the Ultraviolet Halos of NGC~253 and M82}

24: 

25: \author{

26: Charles G. Hoopes\altaffilmark{1}, 

27: Timothy M. Heckman\altaffilmark{1}, 

28: David K. Strickland\altaffilmark{1}, 

29: Mark Seibert\altaffilmark{2}, 

30: Barry F. Madore\altaffilmark{3,4}, 

31: R. Michael Rich\altaffilmark{5}, 

32: Luciana Bianchi\altaffilmark{6}, 

33: Armando Gil de Paz\altaffilmark{3, 4}, 

34: Denis Burgarella\altaffilmark{7}, 

35: David A. Thilker\altaffilmark{1}

36: Peter G. Friedman\altaffilmark{2},

37: Tom A. Barlow\altaffilmark{2},

38: Yong-Ik Byun\altaffilmark{8}, 

39: Jose Donas\altaffilmark{7},

40: Karl Forster\altaffilmark{2}, 

41: Patrick N. Jelinsky\altaffilmark{9},

42: Young-Wook  Lee\altaffilmark{8},

43: Roger F. Malina\altaffilmark{7},

44: D. Christopher Martin\altaffilmark{2}, 

45: Bruno Milliard\altaffilmark{7},

46: Patrick F. Morrissey\altaffilmark{2}, 

47: Susan G. Neff\altaffilmark{10},

48: David Schiminovich\altaffilmark{2},

49: Oswald H. W. Siegmund\altaffilmark{9}, 

50: Todd Small\altaffilmark{2},

51: Alex S. Szalay\altaffilmark{1}, 

52: Barry Y. Welsh\altaffilmark{9},

53: and Ted K. Wyder\altaffilmark{2}

54: }

55: 

56: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins

57: University, Homewood Campus, Baltimore, MD 21218}

58: 

59: \altaffiltext{2}{California Institute of Technology, MC 405-47, 1200 East

60: California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125}

61: 

62: \altaffiltext{3}{Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington,

63: 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101}

64: 

65: \altaffiltext{4}{NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database, California Institute

66: of Technology, MC 100-22, 770 S. Wilson Ave., Pasadena, CA 91125}

67: 

68: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of

69: California, Los Angeles, CA 90095}

70: 

71: \altaffiltext{6}{Center for Astrophysical Sciences, The Johns Hopkins

72: University, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218}

73: 

74: \altaffiltext{7}{Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, BP 8, Traverse

75: du Siphon, 13376 Marseille Cedex 12, France}

76: 

77: \altaffiltext{8}{Center for Space Astrophysics, Yonsei University, Seoul

78: 120-749, Korea}

79: 

80: \altaffiltext{9}{Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California at

81: Berkeley, 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720}

82: 

83: \altaffiltext{10}{Laboratory for Astronomy and Solar Physics, NASA Goddard

84: Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771}

85: 

86: \begin{abstract}

87: 

88: We present Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) images of the

89: prototypical edge-on starburst galaxies M82 and NGC~253. Our initial

90: analysis is restricted to the complex of ultraviolet (UV) filaments in

91: the starburst-driven outflows in the galaxy halos. The UV luminosities

92: in the halo are too high to be provided by continuum and line emission

93: from shock-heated or photoionized gas except perhaps in the brightest

94: filaments in M82, suggesting that most of the UV light is the stellar

95: continuum of the starburst scattered into our line of sight by dust in

96: the outflow. This interpretation agrees with previous results from

97: optical imaging polarimetry in M82. The observed luminosity of the

98: halo UV light is $\la0.1\%$ of the bolometric luminosity of the

99: starburst. The morphology of the UV filaments in both galaxies shows a

100: high degree of spatial correlation with \ha\ and X-ray emission. This

101: indicates that these outflows contain cold gas and dust, some of which

102: may be vented into the intergalactic medium (IGM). UV light is seen in

103: the ``\ha\ cap'' 11 kpc North of M82. If this cap is a result of the

104: wind fluid running into a pre-existing gas cloud, the gas cloud

105: contains dust and is not primordial in nature but was probably

106: stripped from M82 or M81.  If starburst winds efficiently expel dust

107: into the IGM, this could have significant consequences for the

108: observation of cosmologically distant objects.

109: 

110: \end{abstract}

111: 

112: \keywords{galaxies: halos --- galaxies: starburst --- galaxies: individual(M82, NGC 253) --- ISM: jets and outflows --- ultraviolet: galaxies}

113: 

114: \section{Introduction}

115: 

116: Many local starburst galaxies have galactic-scale outflows of

117: metal-enriched gas, called starburst superwinds, which are

118: driven by the stellar winds and supernovae of numerous massive

119: stars ({\it e.g.,} Heckman, Armus, \& Miley 1990). These outflows

120: contain a hot ($10^7$~K), metal-enriched wind fluid as well as

121: entrained cooler gas and dust \citep{ss00}. It is likely that the

122: hot gas can escape from the potential well of the parent galaxy,

123: enriching the intergalactic medium (IGM) with metals and energy

124: \citep{hlsa00}. It is not clear whether the colder gas can escape, and

125: this is an important question since it would mean that superwinds

126: also enrich the IGM with dust, which could affect observations

127: of high-redshift objects \citep{a99,adb99,a01,hlsa00}. This question

128: is even more crucial since similar outflows are now known to be common

129: in high-redshift starbursts \citep{pet01,sspa03}.

130: 

131: Several lines of evidence suggest that superwinds contain dust

132: \citep{sb98,hlsa00}.  Optical imaging polarimetry shows light

133: scattered by dust in the halos of starburst galaxies, including M82

134: (e.g Scarrott, Eaton, \& Axon 1991; Alton et al. 1994). Far-IR and

135: sub-mm imaging reveal thermal emission from extraplanar dust in

136: several edge-on starburst galaxies (Alton, Davies, \& Bianchi

137: 1999). Finally, the strong correlation between the strength of the

138: blueshifted interstellar Na~D line and the line-of-sight reddening in

139: superwinds \citep{hlsa00}, strongly suggests the dust is actually

140: outflowing. What remains unclear is the physical relationship between

141: the cool dust-bearing gas and the warm and hot gas probed by optical

142: lines and X-rays respectively. Comparison of sensitive, high

143: resolution images of the dusty material with \ha\ and X-ray emission

144: images would shed light on this relationship.  Dust is highly

145: reflective in the ultraviolet (UV) \citep{d03}, so imaging of

146: starburst superwinds in the UV can trace the location of dust, if one

147: can account for UV emission by photoionized or shock-heated

148: gas. Indeed, Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (UIT) near-UV data for M82

149: show evidence of UV light in the halo corresponding to known \ha\

150: features \citep{marcum01}.  Here we present Galaxy Evolution

151: Explorer (GALEX) ultraviolet images of two prototypical starburst

152: superwind galaxies: NGC~253 and M82. The images reveal prominent UV

153: light in the superwind region. Our goal is to understand the origin of

154: this light.

155: 

156: \section{Observations}

157: 

158: \begin{figure*}

159: \plottwo{f1a_small.ps}{f1b.ps}

160: \caption{

161: NGC~253 in UV and \ha. The left panel shows a two-color image, with

162: GALEX NUV in red and FUV in blue. The right panel shows the

163: continuum-subtracted \ha\ image. The images are $30^{\prime}$ (22.7

164: kpc) on each side, with North up and East on the left, and are aligned

165: with each other. The intensity scales in both panels are

166: logarithmically scaled and stretched to emphasize the faint, diffuse

167: emission, so the bright disk of the galaxy is saturated.  }

168: \label{n253fig}

169: \end{figure*}

170: 

171: NGC~253 was observed by GALEX on 2003 October 13 for 3289 seconds.

172: M82 was observed by GALEX on 2003 December 8 for 3083 seconds.  The

173: GALEX data include far-ultraviolet (FUV; $\lambda_{eff}=1528$~\AA,

174: $\Delta\lambda=268$~\AA) and near-ultraviolet (NUV;

175: $\lambda_{eff}=2271$~\AA, $\Delta\lambda=732$~\AA) images with a circular

176: field of view with radius $\sim38$\arcm. The spatial resolution is

177: $\sim5$~\arcs. Details of the GALEX instrument and data

178: characteristics can be found in \citet{dcm04} and

179: \citet{pm04}.

180: 

181: We also use previously obtained H$\alpha$ data. The \ha\ image of

182: NGC~253 is described in detail in \citet{hwg96}. The \ha\ image of M82

183: is part of a mosaic of the M81-M82 system taken with the Burrell-Schmidt

184: telescope at KPNO, and is described in \citet{gwth98}.

185: 

186: \section{Analysis}

187: 

188: \subsection{Ultraviolet Morphology}

189: 

190: Figure~\ref{n253fig} compares the two-color GALEX image of NGC~253

191: with the \ha\ image. Extended \ha\ emission was noted by

192: \citet{sh02}. Diffuse emission extending several kpc into the halo on

193: both sides of the disk, north-east of the galaxy center with the brightest and

194: more extended emission toward the east end of the disk. \citet{sh02}

195: found that the X-ray emission matched the \ha\ emission in

196: morphology. These features are also visible in the GALEX images.

197: 

198: Figure~\ref{m82fig} shows the UV and \ha\ images of M82 (in the same

199: manner as Figure~\ref{n253fig}). The M82 images show a bright, complex

200: network of filaments, very different in appearance from NGC~253. The

201: morphology in the UV and \ha\ images is strikingly similar. Prominent

202: \ha\ filaments are seen perpendicular to the disk on both sides,

203: surrounded by a lower surface brightness component of diffuse light

204: (see also Ohyama et al. 2002). The filaments are also visible in the

205: UV, but there is less contrast between the filaments and the diffuse

206: UV light. The GALEX images are much more sensitive than the earlier UIT NUV

207: image \citep{marcum01}, and show that the UV-\ha\ correlation in

208: morphology extends to very faint \ha\ filaments, and exists in the FUV

209: as well (which was not detected by UIT).  \citet{sh04} noted

210: that the X-ray and \ha\ morphology are similar on all scales, and this

211: is also true for the UV light. The \ha\ and X-ray ``cap''

212: \citep{db99,lhw99} 11~kpc above the North side of the disk is visible

213: in both GALEX bands. We will address the UV properties of these and

214: other nearby starbursts, including possible reasons for the striking

215: differences between M82 and NGC~253, in a forthcoming paper (Hoopes et

216: al., in preparation).

217: 

218: \subsection{Luminosities and Flux Ratios}

219: 

220: \begin{figure*}

221: \plottwo{f2a_small.ps}{f2b_small.ps}\\

222: \caption{

223: M82 in UV and \ha. The left panel shows a two-color image, with GALEX

224: NUV in red and FUV in blue. The right panel shows the

225: continuum-subtracted \ha\ image. The images are $21^{\prime}$ (22.0

226: kpc) on each side, with North up and East on the left, and are aligned

227: with each other. The intensity scales in both panels are

228: logarithmically scaled and stretched to emphasize the faint, diffuse

229: emission, so the bright disk of the galaxy is saturated.  }

230: \label{m82fig}

231: \end{figure*}

232: 

233: \begin{deluxetable*}{lccccccccc}

234: \tabletypesize{\small}

235: \tablecaption{Measured Properties\tablenotemark{a} \label{lum}}

236: \tablewidth{0pt}

237: \tablehead{

238: \colhead{Galaxy} & \colhead{Distance} & 

239: \colhead{$L_{H\alpha}$ Halo} & \colhead{$L_{H\alpha}$ Total} & 

240: \colhead{$L_{NUV}$ Halo} & \colhead{$L_{NUV}$ Total} & 

241: \colhead{$L_{FUV}$ Halo} & \colhead{$L_{FUV}$ Total} & 

242: \colhead{$L_{Bol}$\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$\beta$\tablenotemark{c}} \\

243: \colhead{} & \colhead{(Mpc)} & 

244: \colhead{(erg~s$^{-1}$)}& \colhead{(erg~s$^{-1}$)}& 

245: \colhead{(erg~s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(erg~s$^{-1}$)} & 

246: \colhead{(erg~s$^{-1}$)} & \colhead{(erg~s$^{-1}$)} & 

247: \colhead{(erg~s$^{-1}$)} &  \colhead{}

248: }

249: \startdata

250: NGC~253 & 2.6 & $1.5\times10^{39}$ & $3.8\times10^{40}$ & $3.1\times10^{40}$ & $4.5\times10^{41}$ & $2.1\times10^{40}$ & $2.2\times10^{41}$ & $7.8\times10^{43}$ & -1.5\\

251: M82     & 3.6 & $1.3\times10^{40}$ & $6.1\times10^{40}$ & $1.5\times10^{41}$ & $3.5\times10^{41}$ & $7.1\times10^{40}$ & $1.1\times10^{41}$ & $2.0\times10^{44}$ & -0.6\\

252: \enddata

253: \tablenotetext{a}{The measured luminosities were corrected for foreground Galactic

254: extinction. Calibration uncertainties are $\sim10$~\% in the UV bands

255: \citep{pm04} and are of similar magnitude in H$\alpha$.}

256: \tablenotetext{b}{The bolometric luminosities were taken from \cite{sh00} (NGC~253) and

257: \citet{mrrk93} (M82).}

258: \tablenotetext{c}{The spectral slope, defined via

259: $F_{\lambda}\propto\lambda^{\beta}$, was estimated from the FUV/NUV flux

260: ratio following \citet{k04}.}

261: \end{deluxetable*}

262: 

263: Table~\ref{lum} compares the UV and \ha\ luminosities of the halo with

264: the total and bolometric luminosities. The measurements have been

265: corrected for Galactic foreground extinction using $E(B-V)=0.019$ for

266: NGC~253 and $E(B-V)=0.493$ for M82 \citep{schlegel98}. A correction factor

267: of 0.59 has been applied to remove [\ion{N}{2}] from the \ha\

268: flux. The extraplanar UV light in both cases is less than $0.1\%$ of

269: the bolometric luminosity of the starburst. The observed halo

270: luminosity is $7\%$ ($10\%$) of the total {\it observed} NUV(FUV)

271: luminosity of NGC~253, and for M82 it is $43\%$ ($65\%$).  The \ha\

272: luminosity of the halo is $4\%$ of the total \ha\ luminosity for

273: NGC~253 and $21\%$ for M82.

274: 

275: Figure~\ref{ratios} shows flux ratios measured in square regions

276: 30\arcs\ on each side. The GALEX monochromatic fluxes were multiplied

277: by the effective filter bandpass to give units of

278: ergs~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$.  Figure~\ref{ratios} also shows model

279: predictions for the continuum (Balmer, Bremsstrahlung, and two-photon)

280: and line emission of shock-heated and photoionized gas \citep{ds96,

281: f96}. The shock models span shock velocities from 100 to 900 \kms, and

282: include both shock and precursor emission. The photoionization models

283: are of spherically symmetric clouds ionized by a central source (the

284: UV continuum of the ionizing source is not included in the model

285: predictions), and span stellar temperatures ranging from 30000~K to

286: 50000~K and electron densities from 0.1 to 10~cm$^{-3}$. Solar

287: abundances were assumed in both cases.

288: 

289: Most of the regions have too much UV light (relative to \ha) to be

290: explained by nebular emission alone. The observed FUV/\ha\

291: ratios in some of the brighter regions in the M82 halo are consistent

292: with a significant contribution from shock ionization, but these

293: values have {\it not} been corrected for extinction intrinsic to the

294: wind. The optical spectrum of the M82 wind indicates a reddening of

295: $E(B-V)\ga0.21$~mag \citep{ham90}, which would increase the observed

296: FUV/\ha\ ratios by a factor of $\ga3.9$ ($\ga2.6$ for NUV/\ha). This

297: implies that the wind is substantially brighter in FUV and NUV than

298: would be possible for photoionized or shock heated gas. The absence of

299: \ion{O}{6} emission seen in {\em Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic

300: Explorer} data limits shock speeds in the bright M82 filaments to

301: $v_s\le 160$~km~s$^{-1}$ \citep{hhsh03}, much slower than the wind

302: velocity ($v\ge10^3$~km~s$^{-1}$, Strickland \& Stevens 2000). Taken

303: together, these facts imply that another source is required to explain

304: the excess extraplanar UV light. The diffuse morphology argues against

305: star formation in the wind as the source. The most likely remaining

306: mechanism is scattering of stellar continuum from the starburst by

307: dust in the halo.

308: 

309: \section{Discussion}

310: 

311: The spectral slopes $\beta$ in the halo implied by the observed

312: FUV/NUV ratio are listed in Table~\ref{lum}. The values are redder

313: than an unreddened starburst ($-2.5\le\beta\le-2.0$), and in fact

314: agree well with observed ({\it i. e.,} reddened) values of local

315: starbursts ($-2.0\le\beta\le-0.6$; Meurer, Heckman, \& Calzetti

316: 1999). While it is clear that dust in a starburst environment may have

317: properties that differ from the standard Galactic dust models

318: \citep{gcw97,p00}, the FUV/NUV ratio is in general agreement with the

319: dust scattering models of \citep{d03} in which the dust albedo is

320: greater in the NUV than in the FUV.

321: 

322: In a sample of local star forming galaxies, \citet{b02} found that the

323: observed \ha\ flux was on average 2.5-5.0\% of the observed UV flux

324: near 2000~\AA\ (similar to the GALEX NUV band). The observed \ha\

325: flux of the NGC~253 halo is 5\% of the NUV flux, and for M82 the

326: corresponding value is 12\%.  This may indicate that not all of

327: the \ha\ emission in the M82 halo is scattered light, although

328: polarization measurements indicate the presence of some scattered

329: light in the \ha\ filaments and the more extended diffuse \ha\

330: component of M82 ({\it e. g.,} Scarrott et al. 1991). Scattered light

331: could be a substantial component of the fainter NGC~253 halo.

332: 

333: \cite{lhw99} suggested that the \ha\ cap near M82 is the result of a

334: collision between the hot wind fluid and a pre-existing neutral

335: cloud. If this scenario is correct, our results imply that the cloud

336: is not primordial since it contains dust. The cloud may have been

337: pushed out of M82 by the starburst wind or stripped from either M82 or

338: M81 by the tidal interaction between the two galaxies.

339: 

340: \begin{figure*}

341: \epsscale{1.12}

342: \plotone{f3.eps}

343: \caption{

344: Comparison of measured ratios with model predictions. The points are

345: the measured values, and have been corrected for Galactic foreground

346: extinction using the extinction law of \citet{ccm89}.  The hatched

347: regions indicate the range of model predictions. The models are

348: described in the text. We have not attempted to correct for internal

349: extinction. Reddening vectors for $E(B-V)=0.21$ (measured in the M82

350: wind by Heckman et al. 1990) are shown in each panel, assuming the

351: \citet{c01} starburst extinction law. The M82 points are separated into

352: bright and faint based on their \ha\ surface brightness, with the

353: division occurring at

354: $I(H\alpha)=4\times10^{-17}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$~cm$^{-2}$~arcsec$^{-2}$. The

355: two circled triangles are in the M82 \ha\ cap. Representative error bars are shown in each panel.}

356: \label{ratios}

357: \end{figure*}

358: 

359: Our results establish for the first time a close morphological

360: correspondence between the dust and the hotter phases of the winds

361: probed in \ha\ and X-ray emission. We have direct evidence that the

362: hotter gas is outflowing ({\it e.g.,} Strickland \& Stevens 2000), so

363: the new UV images provide further evidence for outflowing dust

364: \citep{hlsa00}.  This is consistent with the idea that the cool dusty

365: material is ambient interstellar gas in the disk or inner halo that

366: has been has been entrained and accelerated by the hot outflowing gas

367: generated in the starburst.

368: 

369: If this dust is ejected into the IGM, there could be important

370: implications for cosmological observations. While the dust density is

371: small, over cosmological distances the resulting extinction could be

372: significant \citep{a99,hlsa00}.  \citet{abd01} point out that

373: intergalactic dust may affect the determination of the evolution of

374: the cosmic star formation rate, for example. More work is needed to

375: understand the effects of intergalactic dust.

376: 

377: \acknowledgments

378: 

379: We appreciate the helpful comments from the referee, Giuseppe Gavazzi.

380: We thank Daniela Calzetti, Cristina Popescu, and Richard Tuffs for

381: useful suggestions, and Ren\'e Walterbos and Bruce Greenawalt for

382: their part in obtaining and reducing the \ha\ data. GALEX (Galaxy

383: Evolution Explorer) is a NASA Small Explorer, launched in April

384: 2003. We gratefully acknowledge NASA's support for construction,

385: operation, and science analysis for the GALEX mission, developed in

386: cooperation with the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales of France and

387: the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology. The grating, window,

388: and aspheric corrector were supplied by France. We acknowledge the

389: dedicated team of engineers, technicians, and administrative staff

390: from JPL/Caltech, Orbital Sciences Corporation, University of

391: California, Berkeley, Laboratory Astrophysique Marseille, and the

392: other institutions who made this mission possible.

393: 

394: %Facilities: \facility{GALEX}

395: 

396: \begin{thebibliography}{}

397: 

398: \bibitem[Aguirre(1999)]{a99} 

399: Aguirre, A. 1999, \apj, 525, 583 

400: 

401: \bibitem[Aguirre et al.(2001)]{a01} 

402: Aguirre, A., Hernquist, L., Katz, N., Gardner, J., \& Weinberg, D.\

403: 2001, \apjl, 556, L11

404: 

405: \bibitem[Alton, Bianchi, \& Davies(2001)]{abd01} 

406: Alton, P.~B., Bianchi, S., \& Davies, J.\ 2001, \apss, 276, 949 

407: 

408: \bibitem[Alton, Davies, \& Bianchi(1999)]{adb99} 

409: Alton, P. B., Davies, J. I., \& Bianchi, S. 1999, \aap, 343, 51 

410: 

411: \bibitem[Alton et al.(1994)]{alton94} 

412: Alton, P.~B., Draper, P.~W., Gledhill, T.~M., Stockdale, D.~P.,

413: Scarrott, S.~M., \& Wolstencroft, R.~D.\ 1994, \mnras, 270, 238

414: 

415: \bibitem[Buat et al.(2002)]{b02} 

416: Buat, V., Boselli, A., Gavazzi, G., \& Bonfanti, C.\ 2002, \aap, 383,

417: 801

418: 

419: \bibitem[Calzetti(2001)]{c01} 

420: Calzetti, D.\ 2001, \pasp, 113, 1449 

421: 

422: \bibitem[Cardelli, Clayton, \& Mathis(1989)]{ccm89} 

423: Cardelli, J.~A., Clayton, G.~C., \& Mathis, J.~S.\ 1989, \apj, 345,

424: 245

425: 

426: \bibitem[Devine \& Bally(1999)]{db99} 

427: Devine, D.~\& Bally, J.\ 1999, \apj, 510, 197 

428: 

429: \bibitem[Dopita \& Sutherland(1996)]{ds96} 

430: Dopita, M.~A.~\& Sutherland, R.~S.\ 1996, \apjs, 102, 161 

431: 

432: \bibitem[Draine(2003)]{d03} 

433: Draine, B.~T.\ 2003, \apj, 598, 1017 

434: 

435: \bibitem[Ferland(1996)]{f96} 

436: Ferland, G. J. 1996, {it Hazy, A Brief Introduction to Cloudy,}

437: Univ. of Kentucky Dept. of Physics and Astronomy Internal Report

438: 

439: \bibitem[Gordon, Calzetti, \& Witt(1997)]{gcw97} 

440: Gordon, K.~D., Calzetti, D., \& Witt, A.~N.\ 1997, \apj, 487, 625 

441: 

442: \bibitem[Greenawalt et al.(1998)]{gwth98} 

443: Greenawalt, B., Walterbos, R. A. M., Thilker, D., \& Hoopes,

444: C. G. 1998, \apj, 506, 135

445: 

446: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(1990)]{ham90} 

447: Heckman, T. M., Armus, L., \& Miley, G.~K.\ 1990, \apjs, 74, 833

448: 

449: \bibitem[Heckman et al.(2000)]{hlsa00} 

450: Heckman, T. M., Lehnert, M. D., Strickland, D. K., \& Armus, L. 2000,

451: \apjs, 129, 493

452: 

453: \bibitem[Hoopes et al.(2003)]{hhsh03} 

454: Hoopes, C. G., Heckman, T. M., Strickland, D. K., \& Howk, J. C. 2003,

455: \apj, 569, L175

456: 

457: \bibitem[Hoopes, Walterbos, \& Greenawalt(1996)]{hwg96} 

458: Hoopes, C. G., Walterbos, R. A. M., \& Greenawalt, B. E. 1996, \aj,

459: 112, 1429

460: 

461: \bibitem[Kong et al.(2004)]{k04} 

462: Kong, X., Charlot, S., Brinchmann, J., \& Fall, S.~M.\ 2004, \mnras, 349, 

463: 769 

464: 

465: \bibitem[Lehnert et al.(1999)]{lhw99} 

466: Lehnert, M.~D., Heckman, T.~M., \& Weaver, K.~A.\ 1999, \apj, 523, 575 

467: 

468: \bibitem[Marcum et al.(2001)]{marcum01} 

469: Marcum, P.~M.~et al.\ 2001, \apjs, 132, 129 

470: 

471: \bibitem[Martin et al.(2004)]{dcm04} 

472: Martin, D. C. , et al., 2004. \apjl, present volume.

473: 

474: \bibitem[McLeod et al.(1993)]{mrrk93} 

475: McLeod, K.~K., Rieke, G.~H., Rieke, M.~J., \& Kelly, D.~M.\ 1993,

476: \apj, 412, 111

477: 

478: \bibitem[Meurer et al.(1999)]{mhc99} 

479: Meurer, G.~R., Heckman, T.~M., \& Calzetti, D.\ 1999, \apj, 521, 64 

480: 

481: \bibitem[Morrissey et al.(2004)]{pm04} 

482: Morrissey, P., et al., 2004. \apjl, present volume.

483: 

484: \bibitem[Ohyama et al.(2002)]{o02} 

485: Ohyama, Y., et al.\ 2002, \pasj, 54, 891

486: 

487: \bibitem[Pettini et al.(2001)]{pet01} 

488: Pettini, M., Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., Cuby, J., Dickinson, M.,

489: Moorwood, A. F. M., Adelberger, K. L., \& Giavalisco, M. 2001, \apj,

490: 554, 981

491: 

492: \bibitem[Popescu et al.(2000)]{p00} 

493: Popescu, C.~C., Tuffs, R.~J., Fischera, J., \& V{\" o}lk, H.\ 2000,

494: \aap, 354, 480

495: 

496: \bibitem[Scarrott et al.(1991)]{sea91} 

497: Scarrott, S.~M., Eaton, N., \& Axon, D.~J.\ 1991, \mnras, 252, 12P

498: 

499: \bibitem[Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis(1998)]{schlegel98} 

500: Schlegel, D.~J., Finkbeiner, D.~P., \& Davis, M.\ 1998, \apj, 500, 525

501: 

502: \bibitem[Shapley et al.(2003)]{sspa03} 

503: Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., \& Adelberger,

504: K. L. 2003, \apj, 588, 65

505: 

506: \bibitem[Shopbell \& Bland-Hawthorn(1998)]{sb98} 

507: Shopbell, P.~L.~\& Bland-Hawthorn, J.\ 1998, \apj, 493, 129

508: 

509: \bibitem[Strickland et al.(2004)]{sh04} 

510: Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Colbert, E. J. M., Hoopes, C. G. \&

511: Weaver, K. A., 2004, \apjs, 151, 193

512: 

513: \bibitem[Strickland et al.(2000)]{sh00} 

514: Strickland, D.~K., Heckman, T.~M., Weaver, K.~A., \& Dahlem, M.\ 2000,

515: \aj, 120, 2965

516: 

517: \bibitem[Strickland et al.(2002)]{sh02} 

518: Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Weaver, K. A., Hoopes, C. G., \&

519: Dahlem, M.  2002, \apj, 568, 689

520: 

521: \bibitem[Strickland \& Stevens(2000)]{ss00} 

522: Strickland, D. K. \& Stevens, I. R. 2000, \mnras, 314, 511 

523: 

524: \end{thebibliography}

525: 

526: \end{document}

527: 

528: 

529: