1: 

2: %\documentclass{emulateapj}

3: %\input{lb.sty}

4: 

5: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:

6: 

7: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

8: 

9: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:

10: 

11: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

12: 

13: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so

14: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before

15: %% the \begin{document} command.

16: %%

17: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts

18: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing

19: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide

20: %% for information.

21: 

22: %\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}

23: %%\newcommand{\kms}{km~s$^{-1}$}

24: \newcommand{\HI}{\ion{H}{1}}

25: \newcommand{\HII}{\ion{H}{2}}

26: %\newcommand{\myemail}{dthilker@pha.jhu.edu}

27: %\newcommand{\secpoint}{\mbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}

28: %\newcommand{\as}{\mbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}

29: %%%\newcommand{\dlam}{\mbox{$\lambda\lambda$}}

30: %\newcommand{\ebv}{$E(B-V)$}

31: %\newcommand{\ala}{$\lambda$}

32: \newcommand{\Ha}{\mbox{H${\alpha}$}}

33: %\newcommand{\ha}{\mbox{H${\alpha}$}}

34: %%\newcommand{\Te}{\mbox{$T_{\rm e}$}}

35: %%\newcommand{\Ne}{\mbox{$N_{\rm e}$}}

36: %\newcommand{\Teff}{\mbox{$T_{\rm eff}$}}

37: %\newcommand{\Lbol}{\mbox{$L_{\rm bol}$}}

38: %\newcommand{\lbol}{\mbox{$L_{\rm bol}$}}

39: %\newcommand{\Lsun}{\mbox{$L_{\odot}$}}

40: %\newcommand{\Lx}{\mbox{{$L_x$}/$L_{\odot}$}}

41: %\newcommand{\Rstar}{\mbox{$R_{\ast}$}}

42: %\newcommand{\Rsun}{\mbox{$R_{\odot}$}}

43: \newcommand{\Msun}{\mbox{$M_{\odot}$}}

44: %\newcommand{\msun}{\mbox{$M_{\odot}$}}

45: %%\newcommand{\wzero}{\mbox{$w_{\rm 0}$}}

46: %%\newcommand{\wone}{\mbox{$w_{\rm 1}$}}

47: %%\newcommand{\aone}{\mbox{$\alpha_{\rm 1}$}}

48: %%\newcommand{\atwo}{\mbox{$\alpha_{\rm 2}$}}

49: %\newcommand{\Vinf}{\mbox{$V_{\infty}$}}

50: %\newcommand{\vinf}{\mbox{$V_{\infty}$}}

51: %\newcommand{\MV}{\mbox{$M_V$}}

52: %%\newcommand{\Rt}{\mbox{$R_t$}}

53: %%

54: %\newcommand{\kms}{km s$^{-1}$}

55: %\newcommand{\Myr}{M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$}

56: %\newcommand{\myr}{M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$}

57: %%

58: %\newcommand{\mdot}{$\dot M$}

59: %\newcommand{\Mdot}{$\dot M$}

60: 

61: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.

62: 

63: %\slugcomment{To appear in the GALEX special edition of ApJ Letters}

64: 

65: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although

66: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.

67: %% The left head contains a list of authors,

68: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.).  The right

69: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.  Running heads

70: %% will not print in the manuscript style.

71: 

72: %\shorttitle{

73: %\shortauthors{Thilker et al.}

74: 

75: %% This is the end of the preamble.  Indicate the beginning of the

76: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.

77: 

78: %\received{2003 June 27}

79: 

80: %\lefthead{Thilker et al.}

81: %\righthead{GALEX imaging of M31 and M33} 

82: %\slugcomment{Version of  \today}

83: %\received{2004 April 19}

84: \begin{document}

85: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than

86: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if

87: %% you desire.

88: \title{Panoramic GALEX FUV and NUV imaging of M31 and M33}

89: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format

90: %% author and affiliation information.

91: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command

92: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address

93: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.

94: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.

95: %\author{David A. Thilker\altaffilmark{1}, Luciana Bianchi\altaffilmark{1}}

96: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which

97: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name.  Specify alternate

98: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each

99: %% affiliation.

100: %\altaffiltext{1}{Center for Astrophysical Sciences, Johns Hopkins University,

101: %3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA}

102: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript

103: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the

104: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author

105: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the

106: %% editorial office after submission.

107: \author{

108: David A. Thilker\altaffilmark{1},

109: Charles G. Hoopes\altaffilmark{1},

110: Luciana Bianchi\altaffilmark{1}, 

111: Samuel Boissier\altaffilmark{2},

112: R. Michael Rich\altaffilmark{3},

113: Mark Seibert\altaffilmark{4},

114: Peter G. Friedman\altaffilmark{4},

115: Soo-Chang Rey\altaffilmark{4,5},

116: Veronique Buat\altaffilmark{6},

117: Tom A. Barlow\altaffilmark{4},

118: Yong-Ik Byun\altaffilmark{5},

119: Jose Donas\altaffilmark{6},

120: Karl Forster\altaffilmark{4},

121: Timothy M. Heckman\altaffilmark{7},

122: Patrick N. Jelinsky\altaffilmark{8},

123: Young-Wook Lee\altaffilmark{5},

124: Barry F. Madore\altaffilmark{2,9},

125: Roger F. Malina\altaffilmark{6},

126: Christopher Martin\altaffilmark{4},

127: Bruno Milliard\altaffilmark{6},

128: Patrick F. Morrissey\altaffilmark{4},

129: Susan G. Neff\altaffilmark{10},

130: David Schiminovich\altaffilmark{4},

131: Oswald H. W. Siegmund\altaffilmark{8},

132: Todd Small\altaffilmark{4},

133: Alex S. Szalay\altaffilmark{7},

134: Barry Y. Welsh\altaffilmark{8}, and

135: Ted K. Wyder\altaffilmark{4}}

136: 

137: 

138: \altaffiltext{1}{Center for Astrophysical Sciences, The Johns Hopkins

139: University, 3400 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, dthilker,choopes,bianchi@pha.jhu.edu}

140: 

141: \altaffiltext{2}{Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington,

142: 813 Santa Barbara St., Pasadena, CA 91101, boissier@ociw.edu, barry@ipac.caltech.edu}

143: 

144: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of

145: California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, rmr@astro.ucla.edu}

146: 

147: \altaffiltext{4}{California Institute of Technology, MC 405-47, 1200 East

148: California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, mseibert,friedman,screy,krl,cmartin,patrick,ds,tas,wyder@srl.caltech.edu, tab@ipac.caltech.edu}

149: 

150: \altaffiltext{5}{Center for Space Astrophysics, Yonsei University, Seoul

151: 120-749, Korea, byun@obs.yonsei.ac.kr, ywlee@csa.yonsei.ac.kr}

152: 

153: \altaffiltext{6}{Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, BP 8, Traverse

154: du Siphon, 13376 Marseille Cedex 12, France, veronique.buat,jose.donas,roger.malina,bruno.milliard@oamp.fr}

155: 

156: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins

157: University, Homewood Campus, Baltimore, MD 21218, heckman,szalay@pha.jhu.edu}

158: 

159: \altaffiltext{8}{Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California at

160: Berkeley, 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, patj,ossy,bwelsh@ssl.berkeley.edu}

161: 

162: \altaffiltext{9}{NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database, California Inst.

163: of Tech., Mail Code 100-22, 770 S. Wilson Ave., Pasadena, CA 91125}

164: 

165: \altaffiltext{10}{Laboratory for Astronomy and Solar Physics, NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, neff@stars.gsfc.nasa.gov}

166: 

167: 

168: 

169: \begin{abstract}

170: We present {\it Galaxy Evolution Explorer} (GALEX) far-UV and near-UV

171: mosaic observations covering the entirety of M31 and M33.  For both

172: targets, we measure the decline of surface brightness (in FUV and NUV)

173: and changes in FUV--NUV color as a function of galactocentric radius.

174: These UV radial profiles are compared to the distribution of ionized

175: gas traced by $\Ha$ emission.  We find that the extent of the UV emission,

176: in both targets, is greater than the extent of the observed \ion{H}{2}

177: regions and diffuse ionized gas.  We determine the ultraviolet diffuse

178: fraction in M33 using our FUV observations and compare it to the

179: H$\alpha$ diffuse fraction obtained from wide-field narrow-band

180: imaging.  The FUV diffuse fraction appears to be remarkably constant

181: near 0.65 over a large range in galactocentric radius, with departures

182: to higher values in circumnuclear regions and, most notably, at the

183: limit of the $\Ha$ disk.  We suggest that the increase in FUV diffuse

184: fraction at large galactocentric radii could indicate that a

185: substantial portion of the diffuse emission beyond this point is not

186: generated in situ but rather scattered from dust, after originating in

187: the vicinity of the disk's outermost \ion{H}{2} regions.  Radial

188: variation of the $\Ha$ diffuse fraction was also measured.  We found

189: the $\Ha$ diffuse fraction generally near 0.4 but rising toward the

190: galaxy center, up to 0.6.  We made no attempt to correct our diffuse

191: fraction measurements for position-dependent extinction, so the quoted

192: values are best interpreted as upper limits given the plausibly higher

193: extinction for stellar clusters relative to their surroundings.

194: 

195: \end{abstract}

196: %\keywords{ --- galaxies: formation --- galaxies: individual (M31)}

197: 

198: %\keywords{dark matter --- galaxies: formation --- galaxies: individual (M31)}

199: 

200: 

201: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented

202: %\keywords{dark matter --- galaxies: formation --- galaxies: individual (M31)}

203: 

204: %\keywords{dark matter --- galaxies: formation --- galaxies: individual (M31)}

205: 

206: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors

207: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine

208: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.

209: 

210: \keywords{galaxies: individual (M31, M33) --- Local Group --- ultraviolet: galaxies}

211: %---galaxies: ISM---galaxies: formation---ISM: clouds---galaxies: halos}

212: 

213: %% From the front matter, we move on to the body of the paper.

214: %% In the first two sections, notice the use of the natbib \citep

215: %% and \citet commands to identify citations.  The citations are

216: %% tied to the reference list via symbolic KEYs. The KEY corresponds

217: %% to the KEY in the \bibitem in the reference list below. We have

218: %% chosen the first three characters of the first author's name plus

219: %% the last two numeral of the year of publication as our KEY for

220: %% each reference.

221: 

222: \section{Introduction}

223: \label{sintro}

224: 

225: A fundamental goal of the {\it Galaxy Evolution Explorer} (GALEX)

226: mission is to gauge the history of star formation in the Universe over

227: the interval $0 < z < 2$.  This (forthcoming) analysis will depend on

228: integrated FUV and NUV flux measurements for $>10^7$ distant galaxies,

229: anticipated upon completion of the GALEX imaging surveys.  However,

230: accurate interpretation of these data requires a comprehensive

231: understanding of the possibly heterogeneous resolved UV source

232: population amongst galaxies of diverse type.  Also, detailed

233: rest-frame UV observations of nearby galaxies are critically needed as

234: a benchmark for optical observations of galaxy morphology at high

235: redshift.  For these reasons, in addition to the intrinsic interest in

236: bright, well-resolved targets, the GALEX Nearby Galaxy Survey (NGS:

237: Bianchi et al. 2004a, b) is being undertaken.

238: 

239: We have obtained FUV and NUV GALEX NGS observations of M31 and M33,

240: covering the full extent of each galaxy.  Local Group objects

241: constitute an especially critical portion of the NGS sample, as our

242: angular resolution affords separation of individual young stellar

243: clusters from their neighbors and host environment.  Furthermore,

244: these nearby targets provide an excellent opportunity to measure

245: properties of the apparently diffuse UV emission, uncontaminated by

246: embedded stellar clusters which ultimately generate the extended

247: radiation field (although some ``diffuse'' emission may also originate

248: from faint, unresolved stars).

249: 

250:  

251: In this Letter, we describe preliminary analysis of the GALEX M31 and

252: M33 mosaics.  We characterize the overall UV morphology and contrast

253: the GALEX sources with corresponding ionized nebulae

254: (\ion{H}{2} regions, shells, filaments, and diffuse gas).  For

255: reference, Keel (2000) provides a succinct review of previous UV

256: investigations in M31 and M33.

257: 

258: 

259: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}

260: 

261: We analyzed FUV (1350--1750~\AA) and NUV (1750--2750~\AA) imaging data

262: from GALEX, plus pre-existing ground-based $\Ha$ observations. For

263: Local Group targets within the NGS, the GALEX mission plan calls for

264: two integrations (conducted during separate orbits), amounting to a

265: total of $\sim$ 3 ks per field.  The imagery presented here represents

266: most of the eventual M31/M33 database, but one pointing in M33 and a

267: few in M31 remain to be observed for the second time.  We note that

268: fields probing some portions of Andromeda's extreme outer HI disk and

269: high-velocity cloud population (Thilker et al. 2004, Braun et al. in

270: prep) are not yet available.

271: 

272: The tiling of M31, which incorporates some coverage gaps, was dictated

273: by the need to avoid bright stars.  Fifteen $1.25\arcdeg$ diameter

274: fields were observed. Central coordinates and total exposure times are

275: given in Table 1.  M33 has been surveyed in its entirety without any

276: gaps, using one ``first-look'' exposure of the northern disk and a

277: 7-pointing hexagonal mosaic centered on the galaxy.  The majority of

278: M33 lies within the central pointing of this mosaic.  Figures 1 and 2

279: present our GALEX (FUV, NUV) color-composite images of M31 and M33.

280: 

281: %\clearpage

282: 

283: {\footnotesize

284: \begin{deluxetable}{lccclcccc}

285: \tablewidth{0pt}

286: \tablecaption{GALEX FIELDS FOR M31 AND M33 {\label{tlimits}} }

287: \tablehead{

288: \multicolumn{1}{l}{Field}         & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\alpha_{J2000}$}    & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\delta_{J2000}$} &

289: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Exp. (s)}

290: }

291: \startdata

292: M31-F1&00:42:37.01&41:13:22.08&650\\

293: M31-F3&00:45:00.00&41:51:24.84&1704\\

294: M31-MOS0&00:40:40.11&40:49:57.25&2437\\

295: M31-MOS1&00:35:30.52&41:05:53.34&2180\\

296: M31-MOS2&00:39:24.06&41:51:18.50&1637\\

297: M31-MOS3&00:45:34.56&40:32:05.78&2374\\

298: M31-MOS4&00:44:46.35&41:32:38.22&2750\\

299: M31-MOS5&00:33:25.82&39:57:06.66&1642\\

300: M31-MOS6&00:45:11.80&39:34:21.00&3075\\

301: M31-MOS7&00:43:33.38&42:34:07.90&2762\\

302: M31-MOS8&00:48:40.83&42:01:58.15&2699\\

303: M31-MOS9&00:36:26.40&42:45:00.72&3265\\

304: M31-MOS10&00:29:42.56&40:44:45.92&1452\\

305: M31-MOS11&00:48:51.16&42:57:45.14&1879\\

306: M31-MOS12&00:41:23.84&40:21:34.52&3031\\

307: \hline

308: M33&01:33:52.27&31:08:19.61&1660\\

309: M33-MOS0&01:33:50.90&30:39:36.00&3399\\

310: M33-MOS1&01:31:53.70&31:22:50.02&3409\\

311: M33-MOS2&01:29:58.40&30:39:22.00&3366\\

312: M33-MOS3&01:31:55.60&29:56:13.99&1959\\

313: M33-MOS4&01:35:46.30&29:56:15.00&3269\\

314: M33-MOS5&01:37:43.40&30:39:24.01&3035\\

315: M33-MOS6&01:35:48.00&31:22:50.99&3171

316: \enddata

317: %\tablecomments{ }

318: \end{deluxetable}

319: }

320: \normalsize

321: 

322: %\clearpage

323: 

324: %%Our narrow-band $\Ha$ data originate from multiple sources.  

325: 

326: For M31, we compared the GALEX observations with $\Ha$ data from 10

327: KPNO-4m/MOS fields belonging to the NOAO ``Survey of Local Group

328: Galaxies Currently Forming Stars'' (Massey et al. 2001).  In M33, we

329: used a Burrell Schmidt $\Ha$ mosaic (Hoopes \& Walterbos 2000)

330: covering all of the disk.

331: 

332: We adopt distances of 770 and 840 kpc, respectively, to M31 and M33

333: (M31: Freedman \& Madore 1990, M33: Freedman, Wilson, \& Madore 1991).

334: The $5\arcsec$ ~FWHM GALEX PSF corresponds to $\sim20$ pc.  RMS flux

335: sensitivity varies with position. Typical 1$\sigma$ limits are 6.6 and

336: $2.8\times10^{-19}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ \AA$^{-1}$ for FUV and NUV,

337: respectively, evaluated at the scale of the PSF.  Expressed in terms

338: of surface brightness, these limits correspond to 28.0(28.2) AB mag

339: arcsec$^{-2}$ in FUV(NUV).  This sensitivity is sufficent to detect

340: substantial diffuse emission throughout both galaxies.

341: 

342: 

343: \section{UV morphology and correlation with $\Ha$}

344: \label{sfits}

345: 

346:  

347: Figure 3 presents FUV, NUV, and FUV--NUV radial profiles for both

348: galaxies.  For M33, we also show a radial profile for diffuse $\Ha$

349: emission.  We have measured the median (sky-background-subtracted)

350: surface brightness in concentric elliptical annuli to $2\arcdeg$ along

351: the major axis for M31 and $0.6\arcdeg$ for M33, stepping by

352: 15\arcsec.  A complete description of the procedure is given by

353: Bianchi et al. (this volume). In M31, to the limit of our sensitivity,

354: there is no well-defined ``edge'' of the stellar disk traced by the

355: GALEX observations.  At least out a galactocentric distance of 27 kpc,

356: there is no significant downturn in the surface density of

357: intermediate mass stars producing the observed UV radiation in M31.

358: This is interesting given the much more obvious limit to the extent of

359: \ion{H}{2} regions traced in $\Ha$ imaging ($\sim 20$ kpc).

360: Enhancements in the median surface brightness occur at radii dominated

361: by Andromeda's well-known 10 and 15 kpc arms. In M33, at the disk's

362: edge, we note that the UV emission drops off significantly slower than

363: the median $\Ha$ emission.  Furthermore, we see no evidence for a UV

364: edge at 32' reported by Buat (1994), most likely a consequence of our

365: improved sensitivity.  On both FUV--NUV panels, we indicate

366: Bruzual \& Charlot (2003) model colors for starbursts spanning a range in

367: age, and three model colors appropriate for differing periods of continuous

368: star formation.  The plotted models are for solar metallicity.

369: When interpreting the measured colors in relation to the starburst

370: models, one may consider the age corresponding to the best matching

371: model color as the age of the last major star formation episode.  In

372: both galaxies, the FUV--NUV color of the typical stellar population

373: generally becomes bluer with increasing radius, however the magnitude

374: of this effect is variable.  In M33, the outward trend toward bluer UV

375: color is slight and FUV--NUV remains remarkably constant over the

376: majority of the galactocentric radii examined.  This reflects the

377: global extent of recent star formation in M33.  Almost every locale

378: within M33 has undergone a significant burst within the past $\sim

379: 200$ Myr.  See Bianchi et al. (this volume) for similar analysis of

380: M51 and M101.

381: 

382: 

383: The proximity of our Local Group targets provides an excellent

384: opportunity for decomposition of the GALEX imaging data into discrete

385: (compact) sources and diffuse emission, especially so for M33 due to

386: its favorable inclination ($i = 57\arcdeg$).  As in the study of diffuse

387: ionized gas (DIG, Hoopes et al. 2001), the UV diffuse fraction

388: (defined as the integral of diffuse emission / integral of all

389: emission) can be used to consider issues of radiation transport in the

390: ISM.  The UV diffuse fraction acts as a indicator for the origin and

391: subsequent path of non-ionizing photons, whereas the $\Ha$ diffuse

392: fraction provides an indirect tracer of the Lyman continuum.

393: 

394: We measured the diffuse fraction (in FUV, NUV, and $\Ha$) as a

395: function of radius in M33 using our GALEX data and the Schmidt mosaic

396: of Greenawalt (1998).  This was accomplished by computing the average

397: ratio of two images in elliptical annuli oriented to match the M33

398: disk.  The first of these two images was a representation of the

399: diffuse emission on 1.5 kpc scales, generated by applying a large

400: circular median-filter to the data.  The median operator effectively

401: eliminated the flux from all discrete structures smaller than 1.5 kpc.

402: The second image contributing to our measured ratio was a smoothed

403: version of the original data, generated by convolving with a Gaussian

404: kernel sized to achieve resolution (1.5 kpc) matching the median image

405: described above.  Both these images were background subtracted before

406: computation of the diffuse fraction.  To verify the accuracy of our

407: method in the UV, we compared with published work on the diffuse

408: ionized gas. Consistent with Hoopes \& Walterbos (2000), we find that

409: the $\Ha$ diffuse fraction is approximately 0.4 at radii hosting the

410: bulk of M33's emission line gas.  We determined the UV diffuse

411: fraction in M33 using both FUV and NUV images, but found the NUV

412: estimate is notably contaminated (in spots) by foreground stars.

413: Accordingly, we adopt the FUV-band for gauging the UV diffuse

414: fraction.

415: 

416: Figure 4 presents the UV and $\Ha$ diffuse fractions measured for M33.

417: The ultraviolet diffuse fraction appears to be remarkably constant

418: near 0.65 over a large range in galactocentric radius, with departures

419: to higher values in circumnuclear regions and, most notably, at the

420: limit of the $\Ha$ disk.  The increase in FUV diffuse fraction at

421: large galactocentric radii may reflect that a substantial portion of

422: the diffuse emission beyond this point is not generated in situ but

423: rather scattered from dust, after originating in the vicinity of the

424: disk's outermost \ion{H}{2} regions.  Note that we have not attempted

425: correction of the UV diffuse fraction for decreased extinction in the

426: field away from compact star forming regions, but it is possible that

427: the UV diffuse fraction could adjust substantially downward once this

428: is considered (Buat et al. 1994).  Radial variation of the $\Ha$

429: diffuse fraction was also measured.  We found values generally near

430: 0.4 but rising toward the galaxy center, up to 0.6.

431: 

432: 

433: The relative intensity of diffuse UV and $\Ha$ emission and UV color

434: in DIG as a function of distance from associated stellar clusters is

435: another useful probe of the ISM.  Indeed, the ionization mechanism of

436: the DIG has long been a puzzle, as it requires a very large (30-50$\%$

437: of the ionizing photons from a galaxy's OB stellar pop.), sustained

438: energy source for the gas to remain ionized.  If OB stars in cluster

439: environments are responsible for the ionization, the Lyman continuum

440: photons must ``leak'' from \ion{H}{2} regions.  Hoopes \& Walterbos

441: (2000) first considered the contribution of field OB stars as an

442: additional way to support the DIG, finding that they can account for

443: roughly 40\% of the observed emission.  Our GALEX observations will

444: soon be used to measure extinction corrected FUV/H$\alpha$ and FUV--NUV

445: within the DIG, comparing FIR, NIR bands with our FUV image to gauge

446: extinction (Thilker et al. in prep.).

447: 

448: The GALEX FUV and NUV imagery of M31 and M33 allows for a detailed

449: study of the relation between resolved emission line structures

450: (traced by $\Ha$) and young stellar clusters (and/or single massive

451: stars).  For this Letter, we present an overview of the issue. Figure

452: 5 shows a color-composite image of $\Ha$ + continuum (red), continuum

453: (green), and GALEX NUV (blue) imagery for the whole of M33, whereas

454: Fig. 6 presents an analogous high-resolution view for a spiral arm

455: segment in M31.  [Note that the full-quality figures of this paper are

456: electronically available, and retain much more detail than in print.]

457: The GALEX imagery exhibits nearly one to one correlation with the

458: distribution of \ion{H}{2} regions (as expected), but notably also

459: shows UV bright clusters or star inside the vast majority of apparent

460: $\Ha$ bubbles.  Although $\Ha$ is a very sensitive tracer of massive

461: star formation, it reveals only those sources which are still very

462: young.  GALEX provides a more complete census of recent star formation

463: as it traces young-to-moderate age stellar populations, up to several

464: hundred Myr, unless they are highly obscured.  This conclusion is

465: obvious from inspection of Figs. 5 and 6, and serves to highlight the

466: most basic premise of the GALEX mission: to survey cosmic star

467: formation history in the vacuum ultraviolet.

468: 

469: 

470: 

471: 

472: 

473: 

474: \begin{acknowledgments}

475: GALEX (Galaxy Evolution Explorer) is a NASA Small

476: Explorer, launched in April 2003. We gratefully acknowledge NASA's

477: support for construction, operation, and science analysis for the

478: GALEX mission.

479: \end{acknowledgments}

480: 

481: 

482: 

483: 

484: 

485: %\begin{thebibliography}{}

486: \begin{references}

487: \reference{NGS} Bianchi, L., Madore, B., Thilker, D., Gil de Paz, A., and Martin, C., 2004a, in "The Local Group as an

488: Astrophysical Laboratory" 

489: \reference{NGSAAS}Bianchi, L., Madore, B., Thilker, D., Gil de Paz, A., and the GALEX team, 2004b, AAS 203, 91.12 

490: \reference{BC03}Bruzual, G. \& Charlot, G., 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000

491: \reference{}Buat, V. et al. 1994, \aap, 281, 666

492: \reference{}Freedman, W. L. \& Madore, B. F. 1990, 365, 186

493: \reference{}Freedman, W. L., Wilson, C. D., \& Madore, B. F. 1991, \apj, 372, 455

494: \reference{}Greenawalt, B. 1998, Ph.D. thesis, New Mexico State University

495: \reference{}Hoopes, C. G. \& Walterbos, R. A. M. 2000, \apj, 541, 597

496: \reference{}Hoopes, C. G., Walterbos, R. A. M., Bothun, G. 2001, \apj, 599, 878

497: 

498: \reference{Keel}Keel, W. C., 2000, in ``The Interstellar Medium in M31 and M33, Proceedings 232. WE-Heraeus Seminar'', 22-25 May 2000, Bad Honnef, Germany

499: \reference{Masseysurvey}Massey,P., et al. 2001, AAS 13.005 

500: \reference{}Thilker, D. A. et al. 2004, \apjl 601, 39  

501: \end{references}

502: %\end{thebibliography}

503: 

504: 

505: \clearpage

506: 

507: \begin{figure}

508: \epsscale{0.85}

509: \plotone{f1.lowres.ps}

510: \caption{\small The centermost $3\times3\arcdeg$ region of the GALEX M31 mosaic.

511: The image, a composite representation of our FUV and NUV data, has

512: been created so as to make sources brightest in FUV appear blue and

513: those features brightest in NUV appear orange.  Regions which are

514: especially bright in both bands are rendered nearly white.  Note that

515: two of the early ``test'' pointings listed in Table 1 (M31-F1, M31-F3)

516: and depicted here lie within the bright disk of the galaxy, where they

517: were reimaged with the subsequent grid of ``mosaic'' fields.  Six of the 15 M31 fields do

518: not appear in this image (MOS1,5,6,9,10,11) as they are located

519: outside the bounds of the figure.  The conspicuous gap in coverage to

520: the SW of Andromeda's southern tip is caused by the need to avoid a

521: bright field star.  Later in the GALEX mission, the bright star limit will be relaxed. When this takes place, we will observe the M31 coverage gaps as much as practical. \label{foverlay} }

522: \end{figure}

523: 

524: \begin{figure}

525: \epsscale{0.85}

526: \plotone{f2.lowres.ps}

527: \caption{The central field of the M33 GALEX mosaic.  The

528: color-composite image has been created as for M31 in Fig. 1, with

529: FUV-bright regions appearing blue.  A contiguous area extending

530: $\sim$ $2.6\arcdeg$ in diameter around M33 has already been observed.}

531: \end{figure}

532: 

533: \begin{figure}

534: \epsscale{1.}

535: \plotone{f3.ps}

536: \caption{Radial profiles of FUV, NUV surface brightness and FUV--NUV

537: color in M31 and M33.  On the top panels of the figure we plot the

538: median surface brightness (AB mag / sq. arcsec) in both bands.  The

539: dark line indicates NUV, whereas the light colored line shows FUV.  We

540: also plot the estimated sky background with horizontal lines.  An

541: $\Ha$ profile for M33 is also plotted, with the normalization adjusted

542: to match the FUV at 30\arcmin ~radius.  Note the remarkable range in

543: surface brightness probed from the inner disk to the outer disk.  For

544: this measurement, we took the median value within each concentric

545: elliptical annulus so as to gauge the ``background'' underlying

546: stellar population, rather than the (luminosity-weighted) mean which

547: is biased toward the clusters which are presently UV-brightest.

548: The bottom panels show median FUV--NUV with error bars ($\pm 1\sigma$)

549: indicated on the profile.  We also plot intrinsic and reddened

550: synthetic colors for instantaneous burst populations of varied age and

551: three prolonged periods of continuous star formation (CSP: 100 Myr, 1

552: Gyr, 10 Gyr).  In M31, note the strong FUV--NUV indication for rather

553: minimal recent SF (during the past 500 Myr) within the interarm gap

554: between Andromeda's bulge and 5 kpc arm.  Our measurements have not

555: been corrected for the variable extinction which is bound to exist.}

556: \end{figure}

557: 

558: \begin{figure}

559: \epsscale{0.85}

560: \plotone{f4.ps}

561: \caption{The diffuse fraction in FUV and $\Ha$ as a function of

562: galactocentric radius in M33.  The effective resolution of these

563: curves is $\sim 400 \arcsec$, owing to the method used to isolate the

564: DIG from compact sources.}

565: \end{figure}

566: 

567: \begin{figure}

568: \epsscale{0.85}

569: \plotone{f5.lowres.ps}

570: \caption{Multi-wavelength view of M33, showing the same field as

571: Fig. 2 (11.4 kpc in projected extent).  The color channels of this

572: image are assigned as follows: $\Ha+{\rm continuum}$ (red), continuum

573: (green), GALEX NUV (blue). Differences in overall NUV and $\Ha$

574: morphology highlight the advantage of UV observations as a direct

575: tracer of sites which have recently hosted star-formation, rather than

576: the environmentally dependent, indirect, and highly age-sensitive view

577: given by $\Ha$.  This is not meant to downplay the importance of $\Ha$

578: observations, but rather to highlight the importance of both datasets

579: whenever the goal is to obtain a comprehensive view of star-formation

580: over the past few hundred Myr.}

581: \end{figure}

582: 

583: \begin{figure}

584: \epsscale{0.85}

585: \plotone{f6.lowres.ps}

586: \caption{A small section of M31's spiral arm structure, located to the

587: NE of the galaxy center.  The color channels of this image are

588: assigned as follows: $\Ha+{\rm continuum}$ (red), continuum (green),

589: GALEX NUV (blue). The detected distribution of NUV sources is clearly

590: more extensive than observed in $\Ha$, whereas the morphology of

591: emission line structures can provide valuable information on the

592: radiative- and mechanically-driven ISM feedback processes associated

593: with massive stars.}

594: \end{figure}

595: \end{document}

596: 

597: %%

598: %% End of file `sample.tex'.

599: