1: \documentclass[10pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \shortauthors{Luhman, Peterson, \& Megeath}
6: \shorttitle{Chamaeleon Brown Dwarf}
7:
8: \title{Spectroscopic Confirmation of the Least Massive Known Brown Dwarf in Chamaeleon\altaffilmark{1}}
9:
10: \author{K. L. Luhman\altaffilmark{2}, Dawn E. Peterson\altaffilmark{3,4},
11: \& S. T. Megeath\altaffilmark{2,3}}
12:
13:
14: \altaffiltext{1}
15: {Based on observations obtained at the Gemini Observatory, which is operated
16: by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under
17: a cooperative agreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partnership:
18: the National Science Foundation (United States), the Particle Physics and
19: Astronomy Research Council (United Kingdom), the National Research Council
20: (Canada), CONICYT (Chile), the Australian Research Council (Australia),
21: CNPq (Brazil) and CONICET (Argentina).
22: This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All
23: Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts
24: and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute
25: of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space
26: Administration and the National Science Foundation.}
27:
28: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St.,
29: Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; kluhman, tmegeath@cfa.harvard.edu.}
30:
31: \altaffiltext{3}
32: {Visiting Astronomer at the Infrared Telescope Facility, which is operated
33: by the University of Hawaii under Cooperative Agreement no. NCC 5-538 with
34: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Space Science,
35: Planetary Astronomy Program.}
36:
37: \altaffiltext{4}{The University of Rochester, Department of Physics and
38: Astronomy, Rochester, NY 14627, USA; dawnp@astro.pas.rochester.edu.}
39:
40: \begin{abstract}
41:
42: We present spectroscopy of two candidate substellar members of
43: the Chamaeleon~I star-forming region.
44: The candidates, which were identified photometrically by Oasa, Tamura, \&
45: Sugitani, have been observed at 1-2.5~\micron\ during commissioning of the
46: Gemini Near-Infrared Spectrograph.
47: The late-type nature of one of the candidates, OTS~44, is confirmed through the
48: detection of strong steam absorption bands. The other object, OTS~7,
49: exhibits no late-type features and is likely a background star or galaxy.
50: The gravity-sensitive shape of the $H$- and $K$-band continua demonstrate
51: that OTS~44 is a young, pre-main-sequence object rather than a field dwarf.
52: We measure a spectral type of M9.5 for OTS~44 based on a comparison of its
53: spectrum to data for optically-classified young late-type objects.
54: Because OTS~44 is the coolest and faintest object with confirmed membership
55: in Chamaeleon I, it is very likely the least massive known member of the
56: cluster. By comparing the position of OTS~44 on the H-R diagram to
57: the evolutionary models of Chabrier \& Baraffe, we infer a mass of
58: $\sim0.015$~$M_\odot$. Although this estimate is uncertain by at least
59: a factor of two, OTS~44 is nevertheless one of the least massive
60: free-floating brown dwarfs confirmed spectroscopically to date.
61:
62:
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65: \keywords{infrared: stars --- stars: evolution --- stars: formation --- stars:
66: low-mass, brown dwarfs --- stars: pre-main sequence}
67:
68: \section{Introduction}
69: \label{sec:intro}
70:
71:
72: Because brown dwarfs are relatively bright soon after birth and fade
73: precipitously thereafter, star-forming clusters are the most
74: promising sites in which to search for the least massive brown dwarfs.
75: At a distance of 160-170~pc \citep{whi97,wic98,ber99}, the Chamaeleon~I
76: cloud complex is one of the nearest major star formation regions
77: and therefore is a particularly attractive hunting ground.
78: A variety of methods have been used to identify candidate low-mass stars
79: and brown dwarfs in Chamaeleon~I, including objective prism spectroscopy at
80: H$\alpha$ \citep{com99,com00,com04,nc99}, photometric variability \citep{car02},
81: X-ray emission \citep{com00,fl04}, and optical and infrared (IR) photometry
82: \citep{cam98,ots99,per00,per01,gk01,lm04,cc04}.
83: All spectroscopic observations of candidates from these surveys have been
84: compiled and evaluated by \citet{luh04a}, with the exception of the
85: recent spectroscopy provided by \citet{com04}.
86: To date, the coolest confirmed members of Chamaeleon~I have spectral types
87: of $\sim$M8, corresponding to masses of $\sim0.03$~$M_\odot$.
88:
89:
90: From the previous surveys of Chamaeleon, there remain several promising
91: candidate brown dwarfs that lack spectroscopy and that should have masses
92: as low as 0.01~$M_\odot$ if they are indeed late-type members of the
93: star-forming region.
94: During the recent commissioning of the Gemini Near-Infrared Spectrograph
95: (GNIRS), we obtained near-IR spectroscopy of the two faintest objects
96: from the compilation of candidates in \citet{luh04a},
97: sources 7 and 44 from \citet{ots99} (hereafter OTS~7 and 44).
98: In this letter, we describe these observations (\S~\ref{sec:obs}),
99: assess the membership of the candidates in Chamaeleon~I and measure
100: the spectral type for the one confirmed member
101: (\S~\ref{sec:mem}), estimate the extinction, effective temperature, and
102: bolometric luminosity of that source (\S~\ref{sec:ext}),
103: and infer its mass from theoretical evolutionary models (\S~\ref{sec:mass}).
104:
105:
106: \section{Observations}
107: \label{sec:obs}
108:
109:
110: Near-IR spectroscopy was performed on the brown dwarf candidates OTS~44 and 7
111: during queue observations with GNIRS at Gemini South Observatory on the
112: nights of 2004 March 9 and 10, respectively. To facilitate the spectral
113: classification of these objects, we also observed an optically-classified
114: late-type member of Chamaeleon~I, source 17173 from \citet{car02}
115: (hereafter CHSM~17173).
116: The spectrograph was operated in the cross-dispersed mode with the
117: 31.7~l~mm$^{-1}$ grating and a $0\farcs3\times6\arcsec$ slit, producing
118: full coverage from 1 to 2.5~\micron\ with a spectral resolution that varied
119: between $R=\lambda/\Delta\lambda=1800$ and 2200 depending on wavelength.
120: Each object
121: was dithered between two positions along the slit separated by $3\arcsec$.
122: The numbers of exposures and the integration times were $8\times60$,
123: $8\times100$, and $20\times100$~sec for CHSM~17173, OTS~44, and OTS~7,
124: respectively.
125: A nearby A0~V star (HD~98671) was also observed for the correction of telluric
126: absorption. After dark subtraction and flat-fielding, adjacent images
127: along the slit were subtracted from each other to remove sky emission.
128: The sky-subtracted images were aligned and combined.
129: A spectrum was extracted from each of the five orders in the cross-dispersed
130: format. The detectable hydrogen absorption lines in the spectrum of the
131: telluric standard were removed manually through interpolation.
132: The intrinsic spectral slope of the standard was removed with an artificial
133: blackbody spectrum of $T_{\rm eff}=10000$~K. At a given order, this modified
134: spectrum was then divided into the extracted spectra of the three targets.
135: Wavelength calibration was performed with OH airglow lines.
136: For each object, the spectra from the five orders were scaled
137: multiplicatively to align the overlapping regions between adjacent orders
138: to the same flux level.
139:
140:
141: During the spectral classification of the GNIRS targets in \S~\ref{sec:mem},
142: we use spectra of standards obtained with the near-IR
143: spectrometer SpeX \citep{ray03} at the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF).
144: The field dwarf LHS~2065 (M9V) and the young Taurus member KPNO~4
145: (M9.5, \citet{bri02})
146: were observed with SpeX on the nights of 2003 December 21 and 23, respectively.
147: The instrument was operated in the prism mode with a $0\farcs5$ slit,
148: producing a wavelength coverage of 0.8-2.5~\micron\ and a resolution of
149: $R\sim200$. The spectra were reduced with the Spextool package \citep{cus04},
150: which included the same basic steps described for the GNIRS data reduction.
151: We corrected for telluric absorption with the method described by \citet{vac03}.
152:
153: \section{Analysis}
154:
155: \subsection{Membership and Spectral Classification}
156: \label{sec:mem}
157:
158: The GNIRS spectra of the brown dwarf candidates OTS~7 and 44 and the known
159: late-type Chamaeleon member CHSM~17173 are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:spec1}.
160: The spectrum of OTS~44 closely resembles that of CHSM~17173, mostly notably
161: in terms of the strong steam absorption bands. In this section,
162: we assess the membership of this object in Chamaeleon~I and measure its
163: spectral type. Meanwhile, the steam absorption expected from a cool photosphere
164: is absent from the spectrum of OTS~7. This object is probably
165: an early-type field star or a background galaxy and is discussed no further.
166:
167:
168: OTS~44 could be a field dwarf, a field giant, or
169: a young, pre-main-sequence member of Chamaeleon~I.
170: These distinct luminosity classes can be differentiated with spectral features
171: that are sensitive to surface gravity, a variety of which have
172: been identified for cool objects at both optical
173: \citep{mar96,luh99,mc04} and near-IR \citep{luh98,gor03,mc04} wavelengths.
174: In this work, we do not consider the gravity-sensitive atomic transitions,
175: such as K~I at $J$ and Na~I at $K$, because of insufficient signal-to-noise
176: and spectral resolution in the GNIRS spectrum of OTS~44 and the SpeX data,
177: respectively. Instead, we use the steam absorption bands to determine
178: if OTS~44 is a young member of Chamaeleon~I. The shape of the continuum
179: induced by steam absorption varies noticeably with surface gravity.
180: The broad plateaus in the $H$ and $K$ spectra of late-M and L dwarfs
181: \citep{rei01,leg01} are absent in young objects,
182: resulting in sharply peaked, triangular continua \citep{luc01}.
183: This gravity diagnostic is easily detectable at the signal-to-noise and
184: resolution of our data, as illustrated with the spectra of the young late-type
185: object KPNO~4 and the field dwarf LHS~2065 in Figure~\ref{fig:spec2}.
186: OTS~44 is compared to these two objects in Figure~\ref{fig:spec2}, where
187: we find that it clearly exhibits the triangular continua that are
188: indicative of youth rather than the broad plateaus expected for a field dwarf.
189: Meanwhile, the strength of the CO bandheads in OTS~44 is comparable to that
190: of the comparison dwarf and young object and much less than that of
191: an M giant (e.g., \citet{lr99}).
192: Based on the behavior of these spectral features, we conclude that
193: OTS~44 is not a field dwarf or giant and is instead a member of the
194: Chamaeleon~I star-forming region.
195:
196:
197:
198:
199:
200:
201:
202: In addition to surface gravity, the IR steam bands are also sensitive to
203: temperature and thus can be used to measure spectral types
204: \citep{wgm99,cus00,rei01,leg01,tes01}.
205: At a given optical spectral type, these bands are stronger in young objects
206: than in field dwarfs \citep{lr99,luc01,mc04}, as shown with
207: KPNO~4 and LHS~2065 in Figure~\ref{fig:spec2}. As a result,
208: if a young source is classified by comparing the strength of its steam
209: absorption to that of field dwarfs, the derived spectral type will be
210: systematically too late.
211: To arrive at accurate spectral types, optically-classified young objects
212: rather than dwarfs should be used as the standards \citep{lr99,luh03b},
213: which is the approach we adopt for classifying OTS~44.
214: In Figure~\ref{fig:spec2}, we find that the depths of the steam bands in
215: OTS~44 closely match those in KPNO~4, which has an optical type of M9.5.
216: Because few IR spectra of young optically-classified late-type objects
217: are available, we cannot compare OTS~44 to a finely sampled sequence of
218: standards and determine the precise range of types that would match the steam
219: depths for OTS~44. This source is clearly later than CHSM~17173
220: (M8, \citet{luh04a}) according to the relative
221: strengths of their steam bands, as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:spec1}.
222: Meanwhile, we have no constraints on the latest possible type for this object.
223: For the purposes of this work, we assign an uncertainty of $\pm1$~subclass
224: to the M9.5 classification of OTS~44.
225: The latest spectral types for previously confirmed members of Chamaeleon~I
226: are M8 for CHSM~17173 \citep{luh04a}, M8.25 for 2MASS~J11011926-7732383B
227: \citep{luh04b}, and M8.5 for source 554 from
228: \citet{com04}\footnote{
229: The spectral types from \citet{com04} are systematically later than
230: those in \citet{luh04a} by an average of 0.5~subclass, which suggests
231: that 554 is probably M8 in our spectral type system.}. At a type of M9.5,
232: OTS~44 is now the latest confirmed member of Chamaeleon~I.
233:
234:
235: \subsection{Extinction, Temperature, and Luminosity}
236: \label{sec:ext}
237:
238:
239: We can estimate the extinction of OTS~44 from its near-IR spectrum and colors.
240: The comparison of the 1-2.5~\micron\ spectra of OTS~44 and CHSM~17173
241: in Figure~\ref{fig:spec1} and the relative $J-H$ and $H-K_s$ colors of
242: OTS~44 and KPNO-Tau~4 imply that OTS~44 is slightly redder ($A_J\sim0.3$)
243: than both of these objects. Both CHSM~17173 and KPNO~4 lack noticeable
244: reddening in their optical spectra. Therefore, for OTS~44 we estimate an
245: extinction $A_J=0.3\pm0.3$.
246: For the M9.5 spectral type of OTS~44, we adopt the
247: temperature of 2300~K used by \citet{bri02} for KPNO~4.
248: The bolometric luminosity is estimated by combining the $H$-band measurement
249: from \citet{ots99}, a distance of 168~pc \citep{whi97,wic98,ber99}, and a
250: bolometric correction for M9.5 from \citet{rei01}.
251: The combined uncertainties in $A_H$, $H$, BC$_H$, and the distance modulus
252: ($\sigma\sim0.2$, 0.05, 0.2, 0.13) correspond to an error of $\pm0.12$
253: in log~$L_{\rm bol}$. The extinction, effective temperature, and bolometric
254: luminosity for OTS~44 are listed in Table~\ref{tab:data}.
255: For comparison, we also include the same parameters for KPNO~4 as
256: estimated by \citet{bri02}.
257:
258: \subsection{Mass}
259: \label{sec:mass}
260:
261: The temperature and luminosity for OTS~44 from the previous section
262: can be used to estimate its mass via theoretical evolutionary models.
263: We select the models of \citet{bar98} and \citet{cha00} because they provide
264: the best agreement with observational constraints \citep{luh03b}.
265: OTS~44 and previously known late-type members of Chamaeleon~I
266: \citep{luh04a,luh04b} are plotted on the Hertzsprung-Russell (H-R)
267: diagram in Figure~\ref{fig:hr} with these evolutionary models, which
268: imply a mass of $\sim0.015$~$M_\odot$ for OTS~44.
269: The uncertainty in the spectral type of OTS~44 corresponds to roughly a
270: factor of two in mass. The conversion of spectral type to temperature and
271: the models themselves contribute additional errors to this mass estimate
272: that cannot be quantified. Nevertheless, because OTS~44 has the lowest
273: luminosity and temperature of any confirmed member of Chamaeleon~I,
274: it very likely has the lowest mass. This brown dwarf is one of the nearest and
275: least massive free-floating objects discovered to date.
276:
277:
278: \acknowledgements
279: We thank the staff of Gemini Observatory, particularly Bernadette Rodgers,
280: for performing the GNIRS observations. We also thank John Rayner for assistance
281: with the IRTF SpeX observations. K. L. was supported by grant NAG5-11627
282: from the NASA Long-Term Space Astrophysics program.
283:
284: \begin{thebibliography}{}
285:
286: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{bar98}
287: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 1998, \aap, 337, 403
288:
289:
290:
291:
292: \bibitem[Bertout et al.(1999)]{ber99}
293: Bertout, C., Robichon, N., \& Arenou, F. 1999, \aap, 352, 574
294:
295:
296:
297: \bibitem[Brice\~no et al.(2002)]{bri02}
298: Brice\~{n}o, C., Luhman, K. L., Hartmann, L., Stauffer, J. R., \& Kirkpatrick,
299: J. D. 2002, \apj, 580, 317
300:
301:
302: \bibitem[Cambr\'esy et al.(1998)]{cam98}
303: Cambr\'esy, L., et al. 1998, \aap, 338, 977
304:
305: \bibitem[Carpenter et al.(2002)]{car02}
306: Carpenter, J. M., Hillenbrand, L. A., Skrutskie, M. F., \& Meyer, M. R. 2002,
307: \aj, 124, 1001
308:
309: \bibitem[Chabrier et al.(2000)]{cha00}
310: Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I. Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 2000, \apj, 542, 464
311:
312: \bibitem[Comer\'{o}n \& Claes(2004)]{cc04}
313: Comer\'{o}n, F., \& Claes, P. 2004, \apj, 602, 298
314:
315: \bibitem[Comer\'{o}n et al.(2000)]{com00}
316: Comer\'{o}n, F., Neuh\"{a}user, R., \& Kaas, A. A. 2000, \aap, 359, 269
317:
318: \bibitem[Comer\'{o}n et al.(2004)]{com04}
319: Comer\'{o}n, F., Reipurth, B., Henry, A., \& Fern\'{a}ndez, M. 2004, \aap, 417,
320: 583
321:
322: \bibitem[Comer\'{o}n et al.(1999)]{com99}
323: Comer\'{o}n, F., Rieke, G. H., \& Neuh\"{a}user, R. 1999, \aap, 343, 477
324:
325: \bibitem[Cushing et al.(2000)]{cus00}
326: Cushing, M. C., Tokunaga, A. T., \& Kobayashi, N. 2000, \aj, 119, 3019
327:
328: \bibitem[Cushing et al.(2004)]{cus04}
329: Cushing, M. C., Vacca, W. D., \& Rayner, J. T. 2004, \pasp, 116, 362
330:
331: \bibitem[Feigelson \& Lawson(2004)]{fl04}
332: Feigelson, E. D., \& Lawson, W. A. 2004, \apj, in press
333:
334: \bibitem[G\'{o}mez \& Kenyon(2001)]{gk01}
335: G\'{o}mez, M., \& Kenyon, S. J. 2001, \aj, 121, 974
336:
337: \bibitem[Gorlova et al.(2003)]{gor03}
338: Gorlova, N. I., Meyer, M. R., Rieke, G. H., \& Liebert, J. 2003, \apj, 593, 1074
339:
340:
341:
342:
343: \bibitem[Leggett et al.(2001)]{leg01}
344: Leggett, S. K., Allard, F., Geballe, T. R., Hauschildt, P. H., \& Schweitzer,
345: A. 2001, \apj, 548, 908
346:
347: \bibitem[L\'{o}pez Mart{\'\i} et al.(2004)]{lm04}
348: L\'{o}pez Mart{\'\i}, B., Eisl\"{o}ffel, J., Scholz, A., \& Mundt, R. 2004,
349: \aap, 416, 555
350:
351: \bibitem[Lucas et al.(2001)]{luc01}
352: Lucas, P. W., Roche, P. F., Allard, F., \& Hauschildt, P. H. 2001,
353: \mnras, 326, 695
354:
355: \bibitem[Luhman(1999)]{luh99}
356: Luhman, K. L. 1999, \apj, 525, 466
357:
358: \bibitem[Luhman(2004a)]{luh04a}
359: Luhman, K. L. 2004a, \apj, 602, 816
360:
361: \bibitem[Luhman(2004b)]{luh04b}
362: Luhman, K. L. 2004b, \apj, in press
363:
364:
365: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(1998)]{luh98}
366: Luhman, K. L., Brice\~{n}o, C., Rieke, G. H., \& Hartmann, L. 1998, \apj,
367: 493, 909
368:
369: \bibitem[Luhman \& Rieke(1999)]{lr99}
370: Luhman, K. L., \& Rieke, G. H. 1999, \apj, 525, 440
371:
372: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2003)]{luh03b}
373: Luhman, K. L., Stauffer, J. R., Muench, A. A., Rieke, G. H., Lada, E. A.,
374: Bouvier, J., \& Lada, C. J. 2003, \apj, 593, 1093
375:
376: \bibitem[Mart{\'\i}n et al.(1996)]{mar96}
377: Mart{\'\i}n, E. L., Rebolo, R., \& Zapatero Osorio, M. R. 1996, \apj, 469, 706
378:
379: \bibitem[McGovern et al.(2004)]{mc04}
380: McGovern, M. R., Kirkpatrick, J. D., McLean, I. S., Burgasser, A. J.,
381: Prato, L., \& Lowrance, P. J. 2004, \apj, 600, 1020
382:
383: \bibitem[Neuh\"{a}user \& Comer\'{o}n(1999)]{nc99}
384: Neuh\"{a}user, R., \& Comer\'{o}n, F., 1999, \aap, 350, 612
385:
386: \bibitem[Oasa et al.(1999)]{ots99}
387: Oasa, Y., Tamura, M., \& Sugitani, K. 1999, \apj, 526, 336
388:
389: \bibitem[Persi et al.(2000)]{per00}
390: Persi, P., et al. 2000, \aap, 357, 219
391:
392: \bibitem[Persi et al.(2001)]{per01}
393: Persi, P., Marenzi, A. R., G\'{o}mez, M., \& Olofsson, G. 2001, \aap, 376, 907
394:
395: \bibitem[Rayner et al.(2003)]{ray03}
396: Rayner, J. T., et al. 2003, \pasp, 115, 362
397:
398: \bibitem[Reid et al.(2001)]{rei01}
399: Reid, I. N., Burgasser, A. J., Cruz, K. L., Kirkpatrick, J. D., \& Gizis, J. E.
400: 2001, \aj, 121, 1710
401:
402: \bibitem[Testi et al.(2001)]{tes01}
403: Testi, L., et al. 2001, \apj, 552, L147
404:
405: \bibitem[Vacca et al.(2003)]{vac03}
406: Vacca, W. D., Cushing, M. C., \& Rayner J. T., 2003, \pasp, 115, 389
407:
408: \bibitem[Whittet et al.(1997)]{whi97}
409: Whittet, D. C. B., Prusti, T., Franco, G. A. P., Gerakines, P. A.,
410: Kilkenny, D., Larson, K. A., \& Wesselius, P. R. 1997, \aap, 327, 1194
411:
412: \bibitem[Wichmann et al.(1998)]{wic98}
413: Wichmann, R., Bastian, U., Krautter, J., Jankovics, I., \& Ruci\'nski, S. M.
414: 1998, \mnras, 301, L39
415:
416: \bibitem[Wilking et al.(1999)]{wgm99}
417: Wilking, B. A., Greene, T. P., \& Meyer, M. R. 1998, \aj, 117, 469
418:
419:
420: \end{thebibliography}
421:
422: \clearpage
423: \begin{deluxetable}{llllllllll}
424: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
425: %\tablewidth{0pt}
426: \tablecaption{Data for OTS 44 and KPNO-Tau 4\label{tab:data}}
427: \tablehead{
428: \colhead{} &
429: \colhead{} &
430: \colhead{} &
431: \colhead{} &
432: \colhead{$T_{\rm eff}$} &
433: \colhead{} &
434: \colhead{} &
435: \colhead{} &
436: \colhead{} &
437: \colhead{} \\
438: \colhead{ID} &
439: \colhead{$\alpha$(J2000)} &
440: \colhead{$\delta$(J2000)} &
441: \colhead{Spectral Type} &
442: \colhead{(K)} &
443: \colhead{$A_J$} &
444: \colhead{$L_{\rm bol}$} &
445: \colhead{$J-H$} &
446: \colhead{$H-K_s$} &
447: \colhead{$K_s$}}
448: \startdata
449: OTS 44 & 11 10 09.33\tablenotemark{a} & -76 32 18.1\tablenotemark{a} & M9.5$\pm1$ & 2300\tablenotemark{b} & 0.3 & 0.0013 & 1.01\tablenotemark{c} & 0.79\tablenotemark{c} & 14.61\tablenotemark{c} \\
450: KPNO-Tau 4\tablenotemark{d} & 04 27 28.01 & 26 12 05.3 & M9.5$^{+0.5}_{-0.25}$ & 2300 & 0.00 & 0.0023 & 0.97 & 0.74 & 13.28 \\
451:
452: \enddata
453: \tablenotetext{a}{Measured in $I$-band images from Luhman (in preparation).}
454: \tablenotetext{b}{Temperature for M9.5 from \citet{bri02}.}
455: \tablenotetext{c}{\citet{ots99}.}
456: \tablenotetext{d}{Data for KPNO-Tau 4 from \citet{bri02}, updated with the
457: values of $JHK_s$ from the 2MASS Point Source Catalog.}
458: \end{deluxetable}
459:
460: \clearpage
461:
462: \begin{figure}
463: \plotone{f1.eps}
464: \caption{
465: GNIRS near-IR spectra of two candidate substellar members of the Chamaeleon I
466: star-forming region identified by \citet{ots99} (OTS~7 and 44). The
467: previously known late-type member CHSM 17173 (M8) is included for comparison.
468: The steam absorption bands in the spectrum of OTS~44 confirm that it is a
469: cool object and indicate a spectral type later than that of CHSM 17173.
470: The other candidate, OTS~7, is probably a field star or extragalactic source
471: given the absence of steam absorption or other late-type features.
472: The spectra are displayed at a resolution of $R=200$ and are
473: normalized at 1.68~\micron.
474: }
475: \label{fig:spec1}
476: \end{figure}
477:
478: \begin{figure}
479: \plotone{f2.eps}
480: \caption{
481: GNIRS $H$- and $K$-band spectra of the candidate brown dwarf OTS~44
482: compared to IRTF SpeX data for the field dwarf LHS~2065 (M9V) and the young
483: Taurus member KPNO~4 (M9.5). OTS~44 exhibits the triangular continua that are
484: indicative of young late-type objects rather than the broad plateaus
485: found in field dwarfs \citep{luc01}, confirming its youth and membership
486: in the Chamaeleon~I star-forming region. A spectral type of M9.5 is assigned
487: to OTS~44 based on the close match to KPNO~4.
488: The spectra are displayed at a resolution of $R=200$ and are
489: normalized at 1.68 and 2.25~\micron.}
490: \label{fig:spec2}
491: \end{figure}
492:
493: \begin{figure}
494: \plotone{f3.eps}
495: \caption{
496: H-R diagram for previously known late-type members of Chamaeleon~I
497: \citep{luh04a,luh04b} and the new member OTS~44
498: shown with the theoretical evolutionary models of
499: \citet{bar98} ($M/M_\odot>0.1$) and \citet{cha00} ($M/M_\odot\leq0.1$),
500: where the mass tracks ({\it dotted lines}) and isochrones ({\it solid lines})
501: are labeled in units of $M_\odot$ and Myr, respectively.
502: These models imply a mass of $\sim0.015$~$M_\odot$ for OTS~44.
503: }
504: \label{fig:hr}
505: \end{figure}
506:
507: \end{document}
508:
509: