1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \notetoeditor{refer to: Fiamma Capitanio. Institute: IASF, CNR-INAF,Via Fosso del Cavaliere, 100, 00133 Rome ITALY. Tel: +390649934557. E-mail: fiamma@rm.iasf.cnr.it}
3: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
4: \newcommand{\integral}{{\it INTEGRAL}}
5: \newcommand{\xte}{{\it RXTE}}
6: \newcommand{\myname}{Fiamma Capitanio}
7: \newcommand{\nh}{N_{\rm H}}
8: \shorttitle{IGR J17464-3213 temporal and spectral behaviour}
9: \shortauthors{Capitanio F. et al.}
10: \begin{document}
11: \title{3-200 keV spectral states and variability of the INTEGRAL Black Hole binary IGR J17464-3213\altaffilmark{1}}
12: \author{F. Capitanio\altaffilmark{2}, P. Ubertini\altaffilmark{2}, A. Bazzano\altaffilmark{2},
13: P. Kretschmar\altaffilmark{3,4},A. A. Zdziarski\altaffilmark{5}, A. Joinet\altaffilmark{6}, E.J. Barlow\altaffilmark{7},
14: A.J.Bird\altaffilmark{7}, A.J.Dean\altaffilmark{7}, E. Jourdain\altaffilmark{6},
15: G. De Cesare\altaffilmark{2}, M. Del Santo\altaffilmark{2}, L. Natalucci\altaffilmark{2},
16: M.Cadolle Bel\altaffilmark{8}, A. Goldwurm\altaffilmark{8}}
17: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations with {\it INTEGRAL}, an ESA project with instruments and
18: science data centre
19: funded by ESA member states (especially the PI countries: Denmark,
20: France,Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Spain), Czech Republic and
21: Poland and with the participation of Russia and the USA.}
22: \altaffiltext{2}{IASF, CNR-INAF, Rome, Italy, Via Fosso del Cavaliere
23: 100, I-00133 Rome, Italy}
24: \altaffiltext{3}{MPE, Postfach 1603, 85740 Garching, Germany}
25: \altaffiltext{4}{{\it INTEGRAL} Science Data Centre,Chemin d'Ecogia
26: 16,1291, Versoix, Switzerland}
27: \altaffiltext{5}{Centrum Astronomiczne im.\ M. Kopernika, 18 00716
28: Warszawa, Poland}
29: \altaffiltext{6}{CESR,Toulouse, France}
30: \altaffiltext{7}{School of Physics and Astronomy, University of
31: Southampton,Highfield, Southampton, SO 17 1BJ, UK.}
32: \altaffiltext{8}{Sap-CEA, Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France}
33: \begin{abstract}
34: %
35: On March 2003, IBIS, the gamma-ray imager on board the
36: {\it INTEGRAL} satellite, detected an outburst from a new source, IGR
37: J17464-3213, that turned out to be a {\it HEAO-1} transient, H1743-322.
38: In this paper we report on the high energy behaviour of this BHC
39: studied with the three main instruments onboard {\it INTEGRAL}.
40: The data, collected with unprecedented sensitivity in the hard X-Ray range,
41: show a quite hard Comptonised emission from 3 keV up to 150
42: keV during the rising part of the source outburst, with no thermal
43: emission detectable. A few days later, a prominent soft disk multicolour
44: component appears, with the hard tail luminosity almost unchanged:
45: $\sim\!5\times 10^{-9}$\,erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$.
46: Two months later, during a second monitoring
47: campaign near the end of the outburst, the observed disk component
48: was unchanged. Conversely, the Comptonised emission from the central-hot
49: part of the disk reduced by a factor of $\sim10$.
50: We present here its long term behaviour in different energy ranges and the
51: combined JEM-X, SPI and IBIS wide band spectral evolution of this source.
52: %
53: \end{abstract}
54: %
55: \keywords{Galaxy:High Energy --- gamma rays: LMXB, Black Hole Candidates \objectname{IGR J17464-3213}}
56: %
57: %
58: \section{Introduction}
59: On 2003 March 21 during the Galactic Centre Deep Exposure (GCDE) Program {\it INTEGRAL}
60: detected a relatively bright source ($\sim$60 mCrab at 15-40 keV) named IGR J17464-3213
61: \citep{REV}. The source was then localised at R.A.\ (2000) $=17^{\rm h}46.3^{\rm m}$, Dec.\ $=-32\degr
62: 14.4^\prime$, with an error
63: box of 1.6 arcmin (90\% confidence) and associated with
64: H1743-322 \citep{Mark}, a bright BHC observed by HEAO1 in 1977 with an intensity of 700 mCrab at
65: 2-10 keV and localised with two possible
66: positions \citep{Dox}. The error box of IGR J17464-3213 was compatible with only one
67: of these two, thereby resolving this 25 year old ambiguity. After the 2003 outburst, follow up
68: observations with $\xte$ and {\it INTEGRAL}
69: reported strong flux and possible spectral variability \citep{Parmar}.
70: $\xte$ observed the source for
71: the first time on 2003 March 29 during a PCA Galactic bulge scan followed by
72: a pointed observation. The mean PCA fluxes, in the bands 2-10, 15-40 and
73: 40-100 keV, were 50, 200, 220 mCrab respectively.
74: The spectrum was consistent with an absorbed power law with a photon index
75: 1.49$\pm$ 0.02, and a column density:$\nh$= $2.4\times10^{22}\ cm^{-2}$ \citep{Mark}.
76: In this paper we focus on the data collected with the coded mask co-aligned telescopes
77: IBIS (15 keV - 10MeV)\citep{Uber}, SPI (20 keV - 8 MeV)\citep{Ved} and JEM-X (3-35 keV)\citep{Lund}
78: on board {\it INTEGRAL} \citep{Winkl}.
79: The source was monitored by {\it INTEGRAL} in the framework of the Core
80: Programme (CP) observations \citep{Kre,Gre}.
81: The data analysed here cover the period from the beginning of the outburst
82: (March 2003) to its end (October 2003).
83: \section{Data Analysis}
84: %
85: %1%
86: The analysed data set consists of all CP observations in which
87: IGR J17464-3213 was within the high energy detectors field of
88: view. In particular, the observations were performed in three different
89: periods: from 2003 March 12 to 2003 April 15, from 2003 August 19 to 20, from
90: 2003 October 4 to 9. The first period contains four observations of the pre-outburst state of the source;
91: the other two shorter observations cover the end of the outburst phase.
92: All the CP observations are organised into un-interrupted 2000s long science windows (SCW):
93: light curves, hardness ratio and spectra are then extracted
94: for each individual SCW.
95: Wide band spectra of the source are obtained using data from the three
96: high energy instruments (JEM-X, IBIS and SPI).
97: In particular, the IBIS data were processed using the Off-line Scientific
98: Analysis (OSA version 3) \citep{Gold} released by the {\it INTEGRAL} Scientific Data Centre
99: (ISDC) \citep{Courv} with a modified pipeline in order to optimise the source spectral extraction.
100: The IBIS data set has been divided in two subsets according to
101: the source position being within the partially coded field of view (PCFOV)
102: or in the narrower fully coded field of view (FCFOV). Both data sets
103: have been used, after source intensity correction for off-axis
104: detectors response, to produce the source light curves in different energy
105: ranges. The off-axis correction was made using the available calibration
106: data, the accuracy on the flux being from 10\% at low energy (15-20 keV) up to 5\% at higher
107: energy ($>$ 60keV). Only FCFOV data, less affected by the off-axis response of the gamma-ray
108: instruments, was selected for spectral extraction and fitting.\\
109: SPI spectra were extracted using software specially developed for fitting the positions
110: and the fluxes of all significant sources in the field of view. The background model used for SPI data is
111: based on an uniformity map determined for each energy band from empty fields observation.\\
112: JEM-X spectra were derived with the ISDC OSA version 4 release, and updated spectral matrices.
113: While IBIS and SPI provide a very large FOV ($>$30 deg), Jem-X has a narrower FOV ($>$10 deg), thus providing
114: only a partial overlap with the high energy detectors.
115: When spectral data are obtained in the same time interval from more then
116: one instrument, the proper normalizing constant is added in the data fit, taking into
117: account the best knowledge of the instrument cross calibration. In optimum conditions,
118: the {\it INTEGRAL} spectra we produced cover the range from 3 keV to 200 keV.
119: %
120: \section{Results}
121: \subsection{The time evolution of the outburst}
122: %%
123: The source was continuously monitored by the $\xte$ ASM and whenever possible by {\it INTEGRAL} as shown in
124: Figure~\ref{fig:fig1}, with the simultaneous {\it INTEGRAL} observation periods
125: represented by dashed rectangles. The monitoring of the source was quite continuous during the pre-outburst episode (from revolution 53 to 61) and
126: then only two deep observations were performed after about 4 (revolution 103)
127: and 5.5 month (revolutions 119-120). In our work we have not analysed the
128: data of the outburst itself as they are proprietary data published elsewhere \citep{Parmar}.
129: We have produced light curves in the 20-30, 30-40, 40-80 keV energy ranges and investigated the Hardness Ratio,
130: defined as $HR=({flux_{40-80}-flux_{20-30})/(flux_{40-80}+flux_{20-30}})$.
131: The IBIS 20-30 keV and 40-60 keV light curves of the initial part of the outburst,
132: flux averaged over one SCW, are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:fig2}.
133: The IBIS light curves show strong variations and it is possible to note several short peaks in the flux
134: intensity with different shapes in the lower and higher energy bands.
135: From the beginning of the IBIS observation, MJD $\sim$52729 to
136: $\sim$52731, (Modified Julian Date) the source averaged intensity increases monotonically
137: in the lower energy range while the flux is almost unchanged at higher energies: this
138: is reflected in the anticorrelation shown by the HR that decreases
139: continously in the same week as can be seen in Figure~\ref{fig:fig2}(c).
140: The few points sampled in the next 20 days,
141: due to a limited coverage, show a decrease in both low energy flux and HR.
142: Starting from day $\sim$52744, the source shows a clearly visible flux increase in a few hours by a factor of 2.6, 3.0
143: and 3.2 in the 20-30, 30-40 and 40-60 keV ranges respectively, without any corresponding
144: hardening. After the peak, the source
145: emission falls by a factor of $\sim$4.5 in the following hours
146: (20-30 keV) with a small decrease of the HR; the soft part of the spectrum becomes now more
147: prominent (Figure~\ref{fig:fig2}). This
148: corresponds to a dip in the flux emission, lasting a few hours (around day
149: 52745.1), during which the source shows the lowest observed value for the HR.
150: Finally, the high energy component, and the HR, increase again
151: (MJD=52745.5). The source shows a similar behaviour around MJD=52750.
152: To look for a possible correlation of the Flux vs. Spectral index we have fitted the
153: available IBIS spectra during revolution 53, 57, 59-61 and 119-120,
154: with a Cutoff power law model. We noticed that the cut off energy of the model had
155: substantially the same value in each fit, so we freeze it to an average value of E=53.3 keV. The reduced spectral fit
156: $\chi^2$ covers a range from 0.8 to 1.3.
157: The result, summarised in Figure~\ref{fig:fig3}, shows that the spectral index has a ``circular" or ``hysteresis" like
158: behaviour. In fact, at the end of the main outburst (revolution 103-120), the
159: source goes back in a hard state, very similar to the one of the pre-outburst IBIS measurements
160: (revolution 53), but in the lower energy range a disk black body component is still present.
161: This behaviour is not unusual for BHC even if the physical reason is not fully understood \citep{Zias}.
162: %
163: \subsection{Spectral evolution of the source}
164: %
165: The whole set of data has been fitted with standard XSPEC tools and the
166: best fits have been obtained with a multicolor disk black body (Diskbb) model \citep{Mit}
167: for the low energy data and a Termal Comptonization model (CompTT) \citep{Tit}
168: for the non thermal component. CompTT generally provides lower values for the plasma temperature
169: $kT_{e}$ if compared with other models (i.e. Compps) while modelling hard state spectra of
170: BH transients, the advantage being the proper modelling of plasma with high optical thickness.
171: The detailed spectral behaviour of the source is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:fig4}.
172: At the beginning of the outburst (Rev53) the source is very weak and therefore the flux in the lower part of the JEM-X spectrum is below the instruments sensitivity.
173: Therefore, it was possible to extract only a few points from JEM-X data in the range 15-22 keV and only a
174: 2$\sigma$ upper limit at lower energy.
175: A single CompTT model fits the whole data set (15-150 keV) well, as shown in Table 1 with a $\textit{kT}$$_\textit{e}$$\sim$ 20 keV and a $\tau_{p}$$\sim$ 3.
176: The point corresponding to revolution 53 in Figure~\ref{fig:fig3} shows the correlation between
177: the photon index and the flux for this data, indicating a Low/Hard state
178: \citep{Gre}. In a few days the source flux is then increasing
179: quickly, and the statistics enable extraction of the SPI spectra as well (revolutions 56 and 60-61).
180: The high energy spectral evolution clearly indicates that the source make a transition to the soft
181: state as also shown in the HR evolution (see Figure~\ref{fig:fig2}~(c)).
182: During revolution 56 the source was out of the JEM-X FOV therefore, only in this case, there are no data for E$<$ 20 keV.
183: But the source is quite luminous in the hard X-ray as shown by IBIS and, moreover, looking at the time
184: spectral evolution (Figure~\ref{fig:fig4}), is possible to suppose that the source is still in a Low/Hard state.
185: In revolutions 57-59 the 3-200 keV data can be fitted with a cutoff power law or
186: with a thermal Comptonization Model without adding any black body component (Table 1).
187: Conversely in revolutions 60-61 the disk black body appears very bright and the emission of this
188: component account for 45$\%$ of the total luminosity.
189: During the phase of decreasing flux (Rev 103), there was no evidence of a hard tail in the IBIS data (20-250 keV, 2 $\sigma$ upper limit corresponding to $0.2\times10^{9}$erg$\times$$cm^{-2}s^{-1}$) while the source was
190: clearly detected by JEM-X (see figure~\ref{fig:fig4}) and the data fitted with a Diskbb component showing a large value of the normalization constant
191: ($\textit{N}$$_\textit{Disk}$, see Table 1), that is proportional to the square of the inner accretion disk radius \citep{Mit}.
192: The presence of a Diskbb in IGR J17464-3213 soft state is confirmed by the $\xte$ observation
193: performed in 2003 May 28 (MJD=52787) \citep{Hom}.
194: Two months later, close to the end of the outburst (revolutions 119-120), most of the flux is still due to the disk
195: emission but a clear, though faint,comptonized high energy tail is present the IBIS data. The IBIS spectra taken at
196: revolution 53 and 119-120,(i.e. at the beginning and at end of the outburst) are compatible with the same CompTT
197: model parameters: it is clear that in both cases the source shows a hard tail in the high energy spectrum.
198: Moreover, at the end of the outburst a disk component is still present, as also confirmed by the $\xte$
199: analysis of the data collected immediately before this {\it INTEGRAL} observation (from 2003 August
200: 26 to 2003 September 23) \citep{Luv}.
201: %
202: \section{Discussion and Conclusion}
203: %
204: The picture obtained from the spectral analysis in Figure~\ref{fig:fig4} is
205: quite clear, and summarised as follows.
206: Phase 1: The source is in a ``hard state". At the beginning of the {\it INTEGRAL}
207: monitoring campaign (revolution 53) the source has a low luminosity and the bulk of the
208: emission is in the energy range 50-90 keV via Comptonisation of soft
209: photons in an optically thick hot inner part of the disk or corona
210: ($\textit{kT}$$_\textit{e}$$\sim$20
211: keV and $\tau_{p}$ $\sim$3). In this phase there is no evidence of a soft disk component emission,
212: with the disk being eventually truncated far from the hot inner region, though
213: injecting soft photons that are up-scattered by the inner hot flow. In the
214: next few days the amount of accreted matter is increasing dramatically and
215: in revolution 56 ($\sim$10 days later) the total emitted energy has increased by a
216: factor of 30: the temperature of the Comptonised plasma is not changed and
217: the optical thickness of the inner part of the corona become
218: smaller, i.e. from $\tau_{p}$$\sim$3 to $\tau_{p}$$\sim$1.3 (revolution
219: 57-59). There is still no evidence of soft emission from the system.
220: Slowly, the peak emission shifts
221: from 70 keV (revolution 53) to 40 keV (revolution 56) to finally 20 keV (revolution
222: 57-59). The spectral evolution is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:fig4} (top panel).
223: Phase 2: The source is in a ``soft/intermediate state" (revolution 60-61). Over a
224: few days the average amount of energy released increases by a factor of 3 to 5, the
225: optical thickness of the inner part of the corona becomes lower and lower ($\tau_{p}$
226: $\sim$0.4),
227: the temperature of the hot Comptonised part increases accordingly up
228: to $\sim$40 keV and a bright soft disk component become visible, being
229: responsible for the majority of the system energy release. The fit
230: parameters are compatible with a $T_{in}$ temperature of 1.5 keV and a disk
231: close to the last stable orbit. The spectrum obtained with JEM-X,
232: IBIS and SPI (Figure~\ref{fig:fig4}, middle panel)
233: has a high statistical significance showing the presence
234: of a substantial Comptonised component.
235: A few days later the source has reached its maximum, showing a factor of two
236: more flux but basically unchanged high energy behaviour \citep{Parmar}.
237: Phase 3: The source enters the ``soft state". The last
238: observations were performed a few months after the main peak of the outburst
239: (revolution 103-120). The energy release has substantially decreased
240: (factor of $\sim$3), the hard emission has basically switched off, and the
241: Comptonised photons energetics dropped by a factor of more than 10 with emission peaked at about
242: 70 keV as in the pre-outburst state (revolution 53). This primarily indicates
243: the temperature of the disk dropping to 0.9 keV, and the disk substantially
244: outside from the last stable orbit. Soon afterwards, the source was no longer
245: detectable by {\it INTEGRAL}; one month later it
246: was also below the ASM/$\xte$ detection capability.
247: The {\it INTEGRAL} observation of IGR J17464-3213 has been essential to
248: disentangle the source behaviour and its spectral state evolution and, in
249: turn, to better understand the physical processes active in the system in
250: the different states.
251: %--------------------------------------------------
252: \acknowledgments
253: We acknowledge the ASI financial/programmatic support
254: via contracts I/R/389/02 and I/R/041/02; C. Spalletta for the careful editing of the manuscript,
255: M. Federici for supervising the {\it INTEGRAL} data analysis
256: system and A. Tarana for useful scientific discussions.
257: \begin{thebibliography}{b}
258: \bibitem[Courvoisier et~al.(2003)]{Courv}
259: Courvoisier T.J.L., R. Walter, V. Beckmann, et al., A\&A, 2003, 411,L53
260: \bibitem[Doxsey et~al.(1977)]{Dox}
261: Doxsey, H. Bradt, G. Fabbiano, et al., 1977, IAU Circ.3113
262: \bibitem[Goldwurm et~al.(2003)]{Gold}
263: Goldwurm A., P. David, L. Foschini, et al., A\&A, 2003, 411, L223
264: \bibitem[Grebenev et~al.(2003)]{Gre}
265: Grebenev S. A., Lutovinov A. A., Sunyaev R. A. et al. 2003 Atel 189
266: \bibitem[Homan et~al.(2003)]{Hom}
267: Homan J., Miller, J.M., Wijinands, R, et al. 2003 Atel 162
268: \bibitem[Kaluzienski et~al.(1977)]{Kaluz}
269: Kaluzienski L.J. \& Holt S.S., 1977, IAU Circ.3099
270: \bibitem[Kretschmar et~al.(2003)]{Kre}
271: Kretschmar, P., Chenevez, J., Capitanio, F., et al. 2003 Atel 180
272: \bibitem[Lund et~al.(2003)]{Lund}
273: Lund N., C. Butz-Jorgentsen, N.J. Westergaard, et al., A\&A, 2003, 411,L231
274: \bibitem[Lutovinov et~al.(2004)]{Luv}
275: Lutovinov A., Revnivtsev M., S.Molkov et al. 2004 astro-ph/0407342
276: \bibitem[Markwardt et~al.(2003)]{Mark}
277: Markwardt, C.B. \& Swank,J.H. 2003, Atel 133
278: \bibitem[Mitsuda et~al.(1984)]{Mit}
279: Mitsuda K., Inoue H., Koyama K. et al. 1984, PASJ, 36, 741
280: \bibitem[Parmar et~al.(2003)]{Parmar}
281: Parmar A.N., E. Kuulkers, T. Oosterbroek, et al., A\&A, 2003, 411, L421
282: \bibitem[Revnivtsev et~al.(2003)]{REV}
283: Revnivtsev M., Chernyakova, M., Capitanio, F., et al. 2003, Atel 132
284: \bibitem[Titarchuk et~al.(1994)]{Tit}
285: Titarchuk L. 1994 ApJ,434,570
286: \bibitem[Ubertini et~al.(2003)]{Uber}
287: Ubertini P., F. Lebrun, G. Di Cocco, et al., A\&A, 2003, 411, L131
288: \bibitem[Vedrenne et~al.(2003)]{Ved}
289: Vedrenne, G., J.P. Roques, V. Shoenfelder, A\&A 2003, 411, L63
290: \bibitem[Winkler et~al.(2001)]{Winkl}
291: Winkler C. \& T.L.L. Courvoisier, et al., A\&A, 2003, 411, L1.
292: \bibitem[A. Zdziarski et~al.(2004)]{Zias}
293: A. Zdziarski \& Gierlinski. Progress of theoretical Physiscs 2004 in press
294: \end{thebibliography}
295: %%%%%%%%%FIGURE E TABELLE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
296: \clearpage
297: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
298: \begin{figure}%[ht!]
299: \begin{center}
300: \includegraphics[angle=0, scale=0.55]{fig1.ps}
301: \end{center}
302: \vspace{-0.6cm}
303: \caption{$\xte$-ASM one day averaged light curve. The gray dashed rectangles represent the simultaneous {\it INTEGRAL} observation periods corresponding to the spectra in figure~\ref{fig:fig4}. The time scale is
304: represented in Modified Julian Date}
305: \label{fig:fig1}
306: \end{figure}
307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
308: \begin{figure}%[!ht]
309: \begin{center}
310: \includegraphics[scale=0.6]{fig2.ps}
311: \end{center}
312: \vspace{-0.6cm}
313: \caption{(a) 20-30 keV and (b) 40-60 keV IBIS light curves from revolution 53 to revolution 61. The hardness ratio derived from the two energy ranges is shown in the bottom part of the figure (c)}
314: \label{fig:fig2}
315: \end{figure}
316: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
317: \begin{figure}%[!ht]
318: %\begin{center}
319: \includegraphics[angle=90, scale=0.6]{fig3.ps}
320: %\end{center}
321: \caption{Flux vs power law photon index for every SCW. The labels indicate the revolution number.}
322: \vspace{-0.8cm}
323: \label{fig:fig3}
324: \end{figure}
325: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
326: \begin{figure}%[!ht]
327: \begin{center}
328: \vspace{-0.35 cm}
329: \includegraphics[angle=90, scale=0.8]{fig4.ps}
330: \end{center}
331: \caption{IBIS JEM-X and SPI common spectra in different states of the source outburst:
332: the numbers on the top of each spectrum indicate the revolution number of the corresponding
333: {\it INTEGRAL} observation.}
334: \label{fig:fig4}
335: \end{figure}
336: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
337: \clearpage
338: \begin{center}
339: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccccccc}
340: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize} \tablenum{1} \tablewidth{0pt}
341: %\label{tab:table1}
342: \tablecaption{Fit parameter values (90 \% confidence)} \tablehead{
343: %\multicolumn{1}{l}{}& \multicolumn{4}{c}{}&
344: %\multicolumn{5}{c}{}\\
345: \multicolumn{1}{l}{Revolution}& \multicolumn{1}{c}{$T_\textit{in}$
346: }& \multicolumn{1}{c}{$N_\textit{Disk}$}& \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\textit{kT}$$_\textit{e}$}&
347: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\tau_{p}$}&
348: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$N_\textit{Comp}$ $\times10^{2}$}&
349: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\chi^2_\nu$}&
350: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Deg.of}&
351: \multicolumn{1}{c}{flux $(\times10^{9}$}&
352: \multicolumn{1}{l}{Fluxband}
353: \\
354: \multicolumn{1}{l}{}&
355: \multicolumn{1}{c}{keV}&
356: \multicolumn{1}{c}{}&
357: \multicolumn{1}{c}{keV}&
358: \multicolumn{1}{c}{}&
359: \multicolumn{1}{c}{}&
360: \multicolumn{1}{c}{}&
361: \multicolumn{1}{c}{freedom}&
362: \multicolumn{1}{c}{erg$\times$$cm^{-2}s^{-1}$)}&
363: \multicolumn{1}{l}{ keV}}
364: \startdata
365: Rev53&\nodata&\nodata&$20^{+15}_{-5}$&$3^{+4}_{-2}$&$2.38^{+0.01}_{-0.01}$&0.7&7&$\sim$0.3&(15-250)\\
366: \\
367: Rev56&\nodata&\nodata&$24^{+3}_{-3}$&$1.5^{+0.2}_{-0.3}$&$8.3^{+0.8}_{-0.7}$&0.96&14 &$\sim$7&(20-250)\\
368: \\
369: Rev57-59&\nodata&\nodata&$19^{+5}_{-3}$&$1.3^{+0.2}_{-0.4}$&$1.5^{+03}_{-0.3}$&1.03&57 & $\sim$6&(3-250) \\
370: \\
371: Rev60-61&$1.5^{+0.1}_{-0.1}$&$77^{+16}_{-18}$&$33^{+14}_{-8}$&$0.4^{+0.2}_{-0.2}$&$8.3^{-2}_{+2}$&1.01&106&$\sim$20&(3-250)\\
372: \\
373: Rev 103&$1.09^{+0.02}_{-0.02}$&$357^{-26}_{+39}$&\nodata&\nodata&\nodata&1.09&57&$\sim$3&(3-20)\\
374: \\
375: Rev119-120&$0.87^{+0.02}_{-0.02}$&$402^{+344}_{-214}$&$>$13&$<$3&$1.5^{+5}_{-0.3}$&1.10&68&$\sim$1&(3-250)\\
376: \enddata
377: \end{deluxetable}
378: \end{center}
379: \end{document}
380:
381: