1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % FDF ellipses paper
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4:
5: \documentclass{aa}
6: %\documentclass[referee]{aa} % for a referee version
7:
8: \usepackage{psfig}
9: \usepackage{graphicx}
10: \usepackage{natbib}
11: \usepackage{latexsym}
12: \usepackage{amssymb}
13: \bibpunct{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}
14:
15: %\usepackage[light,all]{draftcopy}
16:
17: %\usepackage{txfonts}
18:
19: \newcommand{\kms}{km\,s$^{-1}$}
20:
21: \newcommand{\fefiv}{\mbox{Fe\,5270}}
22: \newcommand{\fesix}{\mbox{Fe\,5335}}
23: \newcommand{\hb}{\mbox{H$\beta$}}
24: \newcommand{\hd}{\mbox{H$\delta$}}
25: \newcommand{\hdf}{\mbox{H$\delta_F$}}
26: \newcommand{\hda}{\mbox{H$\delta_A$}}
27: \newcommand{\hg}{\mbox{H$\gamma$}}
28: \newcommand{\hgf}{\mbox{H$\gamma_F$}}
29: \newcommand{\hga}{\mbox{H$\gamma_A$}}
30: \newcommand{\meanFe}{\mbox{$\langle$Fe$\rangle$}}
31: \newcommand{\mgb}{\mbox{Mg$_b$}}
32: \newcommand{\oiii}{O\,\textsc{iii}}
33:
34: \begin{document}
35:
36: \title{
37: Kinematic and chemical evolution of early--type galaxies
38: \thanks{Based on observations with the European Southern
39: Observatory Very Large Telescope (ESO-VLT),
40: observing run IDs 65.O-0049, 66.A-0547 and 68.A-0013.}
41: \thanks{Based in parts on observations (PID\,9502) with the NASA/ESA
42: {\it Hubble Space Telescope}, obtained at the Space Telescope
43: Science Institute, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under
44: NASA contract NAS\,5-26555.}
45: }
46:
47: \author{
48: B. L. Ziegler\inst{1} \and
49: D. Thomas\inst{2} \and
50: A. B\"ohm\inst{1} \and
51: R. Bender\inst{2}\inst{,}\inst{3} \and
52: A. Fritz\inst{1} \and
53: C. Maraston\inst{2}
54: }
55:
56: \offprints{B. L. Ziegler, \\ e-mail: bziegler@uni-sw.gwdg.de}
57:
58: \institute{Universit\"atssternwarte G\"ottingen, Geismarlandstra{\ss}e 11,
59: 37083 G\"ottingen, Germany
60: \and Max--Planck--Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik,
61: Giessenbachstra{\ss}e, 85748 Garching, Germany
62: \and Universit\"atssternwarte M\"unchen, Scheinerstra{\ss}e 1,
63: 81679 M\"unchen, Germany
64: }
65:
66: \date{Received 02/12/2004 / Accepted 07/12/2004}
67:
68: \abstract{ We investigate in detail 13 early--type field galaxies with
69: $0.2<z<0.7$ drawn from the F{\sc ors} Deep Field. Since the majority
70: (9 galaxies) is at $z\approx0.4$, we compare the field galaxies to 22
71: members of three rich clusters with $z=0.37$ to explore possible
72: variations caused by environmental effects. We exploit VLT/FORS
73: spectra ($R\approx1200$) and HST/ACS imaging to determine internal
74: kinematics, structures and stellar population parameters. From the
75: Faber--Jackson and Fundamental Plane scaling relations we deduce a
76: modest luminosity evolution in the $B$--band of 0.3--0.5\,mag for both
77: samples.
78: We compare measured Lick absorption line
79: strengths (\hd, \hg, \hb, \mgb, \& \fesix) with evolutionary stellar
80: population models to derive light-averaged ages, metallicities and the
81: element abundance ratios Mg/Fe. We find that all these three stellar
82: parameters of the distant galaxies obey a scaling with velocity
83: dispersion (mass) which is very well consistent with the one of local
84: nearby galaxies. In particular, the distribution of Mg/Fe ratios of
85: local galaxies is matched by the distant ones, and their derived mean
86: offset in age corresponds to the average lookback time. This
87: indicates that there was little chemical enrichment and no significant
88: star formation within the last $\sim5$\,Gyr.
89: The calculated luminosity evolution of a simple stellar population model
90: for the derived galaxy ages and lookback times is in most cases very
91: consistent with the mild brightening measured by the scaling relations.
92: %
93: % 6 keywords at maximum!
94: %
95: \keywords{galaxies: elliptical and lenticular --
96: galaxies: evolution --
97: galaxies: abundances --
98: galaxies: stellar content --
99: galaxies: kinematics and dynamics --
100: galaxies: distances and redshifts
101: }
102: }
103:
104: \titlerunning{Kinematic and chemical evolution of early--type galaxies}
105: \authorrunning{B. L. Ziegler et al.}
106:
107: \maketitle
108:
109: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
110:
111: \section{\label{intro}Introduction}
112:
113: Recently, it has become feasible to study physical parameters of
114: galaxies out to redshifts $z\approx1$. Spectroscopy at 10m-class
115: telescopes allows to determine the internal kinematics like rotational
116: speed and velocity dispersion as well as the age and metallicity
117: distribution of the stellar populations. Spatially high-resolution
118: imaging with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) reveals morphologies,
119: characteristic sizes and total luminosities of distant galaxies. In
120: particular powerful are scaling relations that combine the kinematics
121: (sampling both dark and bright matter) and the stellar populations
122: (baryons). For dynamically hot galaxies, such scaling relations are
123: the Faber--Jackson relation \citep[FJR;][]{FJ76} between the velocity
124: dispersion $\sigma$ and the absolute luminosity and the Fundamental
125: Plane \citep[FP;][]{DD87,DLBDFTW87} encompassing effective radius
126: $R_e$, effective surface brightness $\langle\mu\rangle_e$, and
127: $\sigma$. The chemical enrichment history of the galaxies can be
128: examined by comparing absorption line strengths to evolutionary
129: stellar population models.
130:
131: With these observational quantitative measurements, it is now possible
132: to perform robust tests of galaxy formation theories. The basic
133: prediction of cold dark matter (CDM) models of hierarchically growing
134: structure is the gradual increase of mass of galaxies. Connecting
135: this mass assembly with the physics of star formation leads to further
136: predictions for the evolution of the stellar populations of a galaxy.
137: The combination of characteristic velocities and sizes could in
138: principle constrain the mass of galaxies, but this transformation is
139: degenerate. The main problem is the cutoff radius for the dark matter
140: halo which must follow certain assumptions by considering various
141: constraints which greatly affects the estimated total mass of a
142: galaxy. Thus, observations can better be taken to investigate the
143: luminosity and chemical evolution and the age distributions of the
144: stellar populations.
145:
146: For spheroidal (elliptical) galaxies, CDM simulations yield a
147: dependence on environment \citep[e.g.][]{BCF96}. Galaxies born in
148: high-density regions that evolve into rich clusters are cutoff from
149: external influences much earlier on average than those in the field.
150: Two third of the field ellipticals should still get produced at
151: $z<1$ \citep[e.g.][]{KCW97}, whereas the last major merger between two
152: large galaxies in high density environments ending up in a big
153: elliptical is predicted to occur at somewhat higher redshifts
154: \citep[e.g.][]{Kauff96,CLBF00}. These predictions manifest themselves
155: in measureable parameters like mean age, metallicity and element
156: abundances on the one side and a specific luminosity and color
157: evolution on the other side. Thus, field ellipticals, in particular
158: the bright ones, should on average have younger global ages
159: \citep[e.g.][]{KC98} and more solar-like element abundance
160: ratios \citep[e.g.][]{Thoma99} than cluster ellipticals.
161:
162: The FJR \& FP scaling relations \citep[e.g.][]{BBF92},
163: the color-magnitude \citep[e.g.][]{BLE92} and
164: Mg-$\sigma$ relations \citep[e.g.][]{BBF93}
165: of \textit{local} early-type galaxies are very tight indicating that the
166: bulk of their stars must have been formed at high redshifts ($z\gtrsim2$).
167: Nevertheless, this homogeneity can be reconciled with the hierarchical
168: merging scenario \citep{Kauff96}.
169: Difficulties arise because of a probable degeneracy between age and
170: metallicity effects, in particular for the Mg-$\sigma$ relation
171: \citep[e.g.][]{TFWG00a,KSCDK02,TMBM04}.
172:
173: But the Fundamental Plane is very well suited to study the \textit{redshift
174: evolution} of the luminosity \citep[e.g.][]{BSZBBGH97b} and
175: the mass/light ratios \citep[e.g.][]{Franx93b}.
176: Observations up to $z\approx1$ were predominantly carried out for
177: (bright and massive) galaxies in clusters.
178: Here, consistent results were obtained of a very modest brightening and
179: slow decrease of $M/L$ with $z$ fully compatible with the assumption of a very
180: high formation redshift \citep[e.g.][]{DFKI98,KIDF00b,DS03}.
181: On the other hand, findings for high-$z$ field galaxies are more discrepant.
182: Some studies argue for a strong evolution \citep[e.g.][]{TSCMB02,GFKIS03}
183: whereas other authors favor a behaviour very similar to cluster galaxies
184: \citep[e.g.][]{DE03,WFDR04}.
185: The differences might mainly come from the low number of observed
186: galaxies.
187: But the samples might also be affected by the so-called progenitor bias
188: \citep{DF01} in the sense that the selection criteria for early-type galaxies
189: differ strongly among researchers.
190:
191: Many stellar population studies of the age and metallicity distribution have
192: been carried out for \textit{local} galaxies.
193: %
194: The majority of cluster ellipticals have very old mean ages
195: ($\approx10$\,Gyr), high metallicities ($\approx1-3\times Z_\odot$)
196: and are enhanced in Mg over Fe compared to the solar ratio
197: ([Mg/Fe]\,$\approx0.3$)
198: \citep[e.g.][]{TFWG00a,PBCMD01,MTSBW03,EHFNB03,TMBM04}. There are
199: trends between these parameters and the luminosity with less luminous
200: galaxies having a wider spread and being skewed to younger ages. A
201: more diverse behaviour is found for S0 galaxies in clusters. At least
202: two families can be distinguished with one being very similar to the
203: ellipticals and the other having younger luminosity-weighted ages
204: ($\approx5$\,Gyr) indicating recent star formation activity. For
205: field early-type galaxies, \citet{KSCDK02} find that they are younger
206: (by $2-3$\,Gyr) but more metal-rich (by $\approx0.2$ dex) than cluster
207: galaxies exhibiting similar super-solar Mg/Fe ratios. In their recent
208: study of field and cluster galaxies compiling high-quality data from
209: several sources, \citet{TMBM04} show that mean ages, metallicities,
210: and $\alpha$/Fe ratios correlate with galaxy mass ($\sigma$). Both
211: zero-point and slope of the $\alpha$/Fe--$\sigma$ relation are
212: independent of the environmental density, while the ages of objects in
213: low density environments appear systematically lower accompanied by
214: slightly higher metallicities.
215:
216: Little work has been done yet investigating ages and metallicities
217: from absorption lines in \textit{distant} galaxies because the high
218: $S/N$ needed for such an analysis is achieved with only long exposures
219: even at big telescopes and because individual lines can be severely
220: corrupted by terrestrial spectral features in the red wavelength
221: regime. But models of galaxy formation can be constrained much
222: stronger by measurements at higher redshifts because differences among
223: the predictions are much larger. \citet{JSC00}, for example, use
224: combinations of \hd\ with metal lines measured in co-added spectra of
225: several E and S0 galaxies in clusters at $z=0, 0.3, 0.5$,
226: respectively. They claim that there is no significant difference in
227: the age--metallicity distribution between these two galaxy types at
228: any redshift. \citet{KIFD01} presented a study of the evolution of
229: the \hg\ and \hd\ Balmer absorption in galaxies in four clusters up to
230: $z=0.8$. Assuming that the same relation between these indices and
231: velocity dispersion holds at all redshifts, they derived a modest
232: evolution in the zero-point as expected for a passive evolution of old
233: stellar populations and consistent with the evolution of $M/L$
234: determined from an FP analysis. Recently, \citet{EHFNB03} examined
235: 22,000 bright early-type galaxies from the SDSS averaging the spectra
236: within bins of luminosity, environment, and redshift ($0<z<0.5$) to
237: produce high-$S/N$ mean spectra. They confirmed that these $L_*$
238: galaxies have mainly old quiescent stellar populations with high
239: metallicities and an excess of $\alpha$- (Mg-) elements with respect
240: to the solar value independent of environment or redshift.
241:
242:
243:
244: In this paper, we analyse the properties of galaxies at redshifts
245: $z\approx0.4$ both in clusters and in the field. In Section 2 our
246: observations and data analysis is described. The Faber--Jackson
247: relation and the Fundamental Plane are used to investigate the
248: evolution in luminosity in Section 3. Measured absorption line
249: strengths (Section 5) are compared in Section 6 to stellar population
250: models that explicitely take into account variations in the abundance
251: of elements to explore the chemical enrichment histories of the
252: galaxies. A summary and discussion is presented in Section 7.
253:
254:
255: Throughout the paper, we adopt the ``concordance'' cosmology with
256: $\Omega_{\rm matter}=0.3$, $\Omega_{\lambda}=0.7$, and
257: $H_0 = 70$\,km\,s$^{-1}$\,Mpc$^{-1}$
258: \citep[e.g.][]{TSBCC03}.
259: This yields a distance luminosity of
260: 104.75 for the Coma cluster which is used as a local reference sample.
261:
262:
263: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
264:
265: \section{\label{obs}Observations and data analysis}
266:
267: \subsection{Elliptical galaxies from the F{\sc ors} Deep Field}
268:
269: The spectroscopic observations of our sample of field ellipticals were
270: performed in parallel to those of
271: late--type galaxies in the F{\sc ors} Deep Field that form the basis for
272: our analysis of the evolution of the Tully--Fisher relation
273: \citep{ZBFJN02,BZSBF03}.
274: The main differences are that the early--type galaxy candidates were placed
275: onto slitlets independent of their position angles and were observed with
276: more than one MOS setup in many cases to increase the respective exposure
277: time.
278: All in all, nine different setups with the FORS1\&2 instruments at the VLT
279: were acquired in three different observing runs with a total integration time
280: of 2.5 hours for each setup.
281: Typically, each setup contained 2--4 elliptical candidates.
282:
283: Object selection was based on the deep $UBgRI$ photometry of the F{\sc ors}
284: Deep Field (FDF), which is described e.g. in \citet{HAGJS03}.
285: Candidates were chosen according to their spectrophotometric type and their
286: extended structureless appearance.
287: Main criterium was the apparent brightness ($R\le22.0$) in order to
288: ensure sufficient $S/N$ in the absorption lines for a robust determination
289: of line strengths and velocity dispersions.
290: Photometric redshifts were restricted to $z_p<0.6$ of objects with an
291: early model SED type (for a description of the photometric redshift
292: performance see e.g. \citet{BABDF01}).
293: Although the twodimensional distribution of FDF objects indicated a cluster of
294: galaxies with $z_p\approx0.33$ and our primary goal was to target
295: \textit{field} ellipticals, we did not preselect against such candidates.
296: After the spectral analysis, we could confirm that 15 out of
297: 32 observed different elliptical galaxy candidates are most probably members
298: of a cluster.
299: Taking our measurements of the radial velocities of these galaxies, the lower
300: limit for the velocity dispersion of the cluster is $\sigma_c\gtrsim430$\,\kms.
301: Since the cluster center was not observed but only the outer parts, the true
302: $\sigma_c$ is probably larger.
303: At $z=0.33$, the Mg\,5170 absorption feature is unfortunately corrupted due
304: to terrestrial absorption (the B band)
305: making it impossible to accurately determine the internal velocity dispersion
306: of a galaxy (see below).
307: For that reason we do not include these cluster galaxies in our analysis and,
308: from hence forward, when we speak of FDF galaxies only the field ellipticals
309: are meant.
310:
311: The elliptical candidates were spread out among the spiral candidates for
312: each setup placing them on a region of the CCD corresponding to observed
313: wavelengths where either the \mgb-feature ($\lambda_0\approx5170$\,\AA) or
314: the G-band ($\lambda_0\approx4300$\,\AA) should have been visible according
315: to the photometric redshifts.
316: As is described in more detail in \citet{BZSBF03} the MOS spectroscopy was
317: performed using grism \textsf{600R} with order separation filter
318: \textsf{GG435} with FORS2 (September and October 2000) and FORS1 (October
319: 2001) at the VLT.
320: With slit widths of 1\arcsec, a spectral resolution of $R\approx1200$ was
321: achieved, the spatial scale was 0.2\arcsec/pixel, and seeing conditions
322: were sufficient (varying between 0.4\arcsec\ and 0.9\arcsec\ FWHM) to meet
323: the Nyquist theorem.
324:
325: Image reduction followed the usual steps of bias subtraction, flat fielding,
326: sky subtraction, and wavelength calibration. Because some spectra exhibited
327: spatial distortions, the images of each individual slitlet were extracted
328: from the full frame after bias subtraction allowing the typical
329: two-dimensional image reduction of long-slit spectroscopy. All images of
330: one respective slitlet including the science, flatfield, and arclamp frames
331: were rectified in exactly the same manner with the procedure described in
332: \citet{JZBHM04} to ensure correct wavelength calibration.
333: The spectral rows of an object were averaged using a Horne-based
334: \citep{Horne86} algorithm as implemented in the image analysis software
335: MIDAS\footnote{ESO-MIDAS (Munich Image Data Analysis System) is developed and
336: maintained by the European Southern Observatory.}
337: (see e.g. \citet{ZBSDL01}).
338: Finally, the one-dimensional spectra of the respective exposures were
339: summed up.
340: In those cases where a galaxy was observed in two or three different MOS
341: setups, the wavelength ranges covered did not match each other exactly
342: leading to varying final count rates at different wavelengths.
343:
344: The internal velocity dispersions $\sigma$ and the radial velocities $v$
345: of the galaxies were determined applying the \textit{Fourier
346: Correlation Quotient} (FCQ) method with an updated version of \citet{Bende90a}.
347: For each galaxy, $\sigma$ and $v$ were measured using 3--4 different
348: kinematic standard stars.
349: Deviations from star to star ranged from 2 to 20\,\kms.
350: Since only one good template star (SAO\,162947) was available that was
351: observed with FORS like the galaxies,
352: three more K giant stars (SAO\,32042, SAO\,80333 \& SAO\,98087) were used
353: which had been observed with MOSCA at the 3.5m-telescope at the Calar Alto
354: observatory\footnote{The German--Spanish Astronomical Center (DSAZ or CAHA),
355: operated by the
356: Max--Planck--Institut f\"ur Astronomie, Heidelberg, jointly with the Spanish
357: National Commission for Astronomy.}
358: and have sufficiently resolved spectra ($\sigma_*\approx55$\,\kms\ around
359: \mgb).
360: FCQ was run on either a ``red'' part of a galaxy spectrum (ideally covering
361: \hb\ --- \fesix, but sometimes only \mgb\ or only \hb\ could solely be used)
362: or a
363: ``blue'' part (around the G-band), in some cases (5 out of 13) in both regimes.
364: In order to determine the instrumental resolution of the galaxy spectra, the
365: widths of 3--5 emission lines of the respective arc spectrum used for the
366: wavelength calibration were measured at wavelengths corresponding to \mgb\ and
367: the G-band separately.
368: Typical instrumental resolutions are $\sigma_i\approx90-100$\,\kms.
369: To provide the ``correct'' template for the respective instrumental
370: broadening, each stellar
371: spectrum was artificially smeared out to $\sigma_i$ before its usage in FCQ.
372: In the Appendix, we tabulate the error-weighted averages of $\sigma$ and
373: $v$ (corrected for the radial velocities of the template stars) and their
374: respective errors for 13 FDF field galaxies that had sufficient $S/N$.
375: We give only either the values derived from the blue or the red spectral
376: part depending on their quality, since only these values are used for the
377: analysis below.
378: The signal-to-noise of a galaxy's continuum was determined with FCQ,
379: too, which was calibrated with Monte-Carlo simulations using the stellar
380: spectra.
381:
382: Absorption line strengths as defined in the Lick system \citep{WO97,TWFBG98}
383: were measured as described in \citet{ZBSDL01}.
384: To this purpose, the galaxy spectra had been artificially broadened first to
385: match the instrumental resolution of the stellar Lick/IDS spectra
386: ($\sigma_{\mathrm{IDS}}\approx210$\,\kms\ around \mgb) before the equivalent
387: widths were calculated taking the redshifts into account.
388: The measured values were then corrected for the decrease in strength caused by
389: the broadening due to the galaxies' internal velocity dispersions.
390: The correction functions for the different absorption lines were determined
391: by simulating this effect with the stellar spectra.
392: Lick indices of the galaxies can be badly affected if either the central
393: bandpass or those that sample the pseudo-continuum of a line are redshifted
394: into the region where telluric emission lines are so strong that the residual
395: spectrum after sky subtraction is too noisy.
396: A line gets totally corrupted, if it falls onto the telluric absorption
397: features of the A- and B-band.
398: Since the FDF galaxies have varying redshifts different lines are affected
399: in each case.
400: Therefore, the quality of each measurement was checked individually and we
401: give quality flags along with the line strengths and their (statistical)
402: errors in the Appendix.
403: The presented values are still not directly comparable to the central values
404: of local galaxies that were measured on the Lick system.
405: The reason for this is that the distant galaxies are apparently so small that
406: the slitlet of width 1\arcsec\ covered a large fraction of the light
407: distribution, typically 1--2 half-light radii $R_e$.
408: The observed line strengths are, therefore, only luminosity-weighted average
409: values, which are not equivalent to the central values if a radial gradient
410: across the galaxy exists.
411: To take this effect into account, the measured values were corrected based on
412: the logarithmic gradients as they were determined by \citet{MTSBW03}
413: with high-$S/N$ spectra of Coma cluster galaxies (see also \citet{JFK95}).
414: The aperture of the 13 FDF galaxies were determined individually considering
415: both the slitwidth and the number of rows that were averaged by the Horne
416: extraction algorithm.
417: The same correction procedure was applied to the velocity dispersions, too.
418:
419: Structural parameters as well as the total brightness of a galaxy were
420: measured on our HST/ACS images of the FDF.
421: With a mosaic of four pointings, almost the entire field of the FDF was imaged
422: through the F814W filter by the ACS/WFC with a total exposure time of 2360\,s
423: per quadrant.
424: Analysis was performed on the pipeline-reduced images with an additional
425: cosmic ray rejection procedure.
426: The two-dimensional surface brightness distribution of a galaxy was fitted
427: using the GALFIT package of \citet{PHIR02} to determine total light and
428: half-light radius.
429: Four different fitting functions (pure de Vaucouleurs, pure Sersic with
430: variable exponent ($n=1-4$), and these two profiles in combination with an
431: exponential disk component) were applied.
432: Comparing the residual images and reduced $\chi^2$-quality values, the best
433: fit to the observed light distribution of a galaxy was assessed,
434: which was in most cases the combination of a Sersic plus disk component.
435: To test the robustness of the profile analysis, 2D--surface brightness fits
436: were also performed using the GIM2D package of \citet{SWVSP02}.
437: Total magnitudes determined with the two methods agree well within the errors
438: as well as with those values derived with the SExtractor package \citep{BA96}
439: applied on the groundbased $I$ band images.
440: The magnitudes were calibrated onto the Vega system with a zeropoint of
441: 25.478 and a color term of $0.042 (V-I) + 0.012 (V-I)^2$
442: (M. Sirianni, ESA STScI, priv. com.).
443: Aperture colors (2\arcsec diameter) were taken from our groundbased
444: photometry.
445: K-corrections were calculated by convolving respective filter transmission
446: curves with the redshifted SED of the elliptical template galaxy from
447: \cite{KCBMS96}.
448: We checked for internal consistency by transforming observed $F814W$-magnitudes
449: into rest-frame Johnson-$B$ as well as observed F{\sc ors} filter magnitudes
450: that best match the redshifted $B$-band ($g$ for $0.2<z<0.3$ and $R$ for
451: $0.3<z<0.7$).
452: The derived $B_{\rm rst}$ values agree well with each other (differences are
453: smaller than errors).
454:
455: Structural parameters, total magnitudes as well as the distance luminosities
456: for the cosmology we use are given in the Appendix.
457:
458:
459: \subsection{Elliptical galaxies in distant clusters}
460:
461: To explore possible differences in galaxy evolution due to
462: environment, we investigate here in addition to the field galaxies
463: also early--type galaxies in clusters. Since the majority of the FDF
464: galaxies have redshifts around $z\approx0.4$, we take
465: galaxies from three clusters at $z\approx0.37$: Abell\,370,
466: CL\,0949$+$4409, MS\,1512.4$+$3647. The image reduction and data
467: analysis was already published in \citet{ZB97,BSZBBGH97b,SMGBZ00}. In
468: contrast to \citet{ZB97}, we here aperture correct line indices and
469: the velocity dispersions using the logarithmic gradients to be fully
470: consistent with the field ellipticals. All other corrections and the
471: derivation of the Lick line indices were performed as described above.
472: Half-light radii and total luminosities were determined on HST/WFPC2
473: images using the method described by \citet{SBBBCDMW97}. Combining de
474: Vaucouleurs and exponential surface brightness profile fits with their
475: procedure is equivalent to the GALFIT measurements used for the FDF
476: galaxies, so that the field and cluster samples can be directly
477: compared to each other here. Absolute magnitudes and pysical sizes
478: were re-calculated for the cosmology adopted here.
479:
480: \section{\label{KSR}The kinematic scaling relations}
481:
482: \subsection{\label{FJR}The Faber--Jackson relation}
483:
484: %
485: \begin{figure*}
486: %\psfig{figure=sigbabs.eps}
487: \psfig{figure=sigbabs.ceps}
488: \caption{\label{fjr}
489: Faber--Jackson relation between the central velocity dispersion and
490: the absolute restframe $B$ magnitude. Local early--type galaxies in the
491: Virgo (small
492: triangles) and Coma (small squares) clusters are from \citet{DLBDFTW87},
493: the straight line indicates their principal components fit \citep{ZB97}.
494: Both, ellipticals in distant clusters (large triangles) and in the field (large
495: circles) follow a similar distribution, which is offset to larger luminosities.
496: }
497: \end{figure*}
498: %
499:
500: As the first of the scaling relations that combine the kinematics
501: (representing both luminous and dark mass) to the stellar populations
502: (baryons only) of galaxies we investigate the Faber--Jackson relation
503: \citep[FJR,][]{FJ76}. Here, the absolute $B$ magnitude and the
504: velocity dispersion $\sigma$ of local cluster galaxies follow a tight
505: relation. In Figure\,\ref{fjr}, we compare the distant galaxies to
506: the local sample of ellipticals in the Virgo and Coma clusters from
507: \citet{DLBDFTW87}. The straight line is a principal components fit to
508: the nearby galaxies \citep{ZB97}. For this comparison, we use the
509: luminosities of the distant galaxies as derived from the ground-based
510: photometry in order to have a somewhat larger sample (trends are the
511: same when restricting to space-based magnitudes). The FDF data points
512: match the distribution of the distant cluster galaxies very well.
513: Both distant samples are tight and clearly offset to larger
514: luminosities with respect to the local FJR. At low $\sigma$ a few
515: galaxies with rather large offsets do exist in both samples.
516: %(the value of $\sigma$ for the FDF galaxy with the lowest $\sigma$ (No. 7796)
517: %may be wrongly determined since this data point stays out in the
518: %\mgb--$\sigma$ diagram (Fig.\,\ref{msr}) as well
519: %although the spectrum itself has no convincing evidence for broader lines).
520: Excluding these outliers, the 17 distant cluster galaxies are brighter
521: on average for given $\sigma$ by $\langle \Delta M_B^c\rangle = -0.55$
522: with a standard deviation of 0.25. This general brightening is
523: consistent with expectations from passive evolution models if a formation
524: redshift of $z_f=4$ is assumed.
525: For a simple stellar population the predicted $B$-band evolution of such an
526: object between $z=0$ (age 12\,Gyr) and $z=0.4$ (age 8\,Gyr)
527: is $\Delta M_B^m = -0.50$
528: (using models by \citet{Maras05} for two times solar metallicity
529: and Salpeter initial mass function).
530: A similar offset is displayed by the ten FDF ellipticals:
531: $\langle \Delta M_B^f\rangle = -0.37$ with standard deviation of 0.27.
532:
533: \subsection{\label{FP}The Fundamental Plane relation}
534:
535: %
536: \begin{figure*}
537: %\psfig{figure=fpb.eps}
538: \psfig{figure=fpb.ceps}
539: \caption{\label{fpb} The Fundamental Plane in $B$ seen edge-on. The
540: local relation is a principal components fit to
541: elliptical and S0 galaxies
542: in Coma. Ellipticals in distant clusters are indicated by large
543: triangles, distant field ellipticals by large circles. A typical
544: errorbar is displayed in the upper left corner. }
545: \end{figure*}
546: %
547:
548: In Figure\,\ref{fpb}, we present the Fundamental Plane (FP) in the
549: restframe $B$ band. The edge-on projection is chosen in a way that
550: the distant-dependent parameter $R_e$ (effective or half-light radius)
551: is plotted on the x-axis, whereas the distant-independent parameters
552: $\sigma$ and $\langle SB\rangle _e$ (effective surface brightness) are
553: displayed along the y-axis. The local sample which defines the FP
554: comprises both elliptical and S0 galaxies in the Coma cluster from
555: \citet{DLBDFTW87}. Total luminosities and half-light radii of these
556: galaxies were determined by \citet{SBD93} in exactly the same manner
557: as our distant cluster galaxies by a simultaneous de Vaucouleurs and
558: exponential fit to the respective surface brightness profile. The
559: straight line indicates the principal components fit from
560: \citet{BSZBBGH97b}.
561:
562: The distant galaxy samples displayed here are reduced by two (FDF) and
563: six (clusters) objects with respect to the FJR analysis, because these
564: galaxies are not visible on the respective HST images. Not counting
565: the galaxy with the smallest and largest radius, the distant cluster
566: members are on average brighter by $\langle \Delta M_B^c\rangle =
567: -0.50$ with standard deviation of 0.19. This assumes that the slope
568: of the FP does not change within the $\sim4$\,Gyr lookback-time. This
569: is equivalent with assuming that the structural parameters $R_e$ and
570: $\sigma$ do not change within that time and that only the luminosity
571: of the stellar populations evolves. The derived value of the global
572: luminosity increase is then again compatible with a pure passive
573: evolution of the bulk of the stars that have already old ages
574: ($\sim8$\,Gyr) at the time of observations.
575:
576: The sample of distant field galaxies lacks the large ellipticals and
577: cD galaxies present in clusters of galaxies. On the contrary, the
578: field sample encompasses some smaller galaxies. These objects display
579: the largest luminosity offsets from the local FP, but lie still within
580: $2\,\sigma$ from the mean offset of the cluster galaxies. Excluding
581: the two galaxies with ``positive'' evolution, the average brightening
582: of the remaining nine FDF galaxies is $\langle \Delta M_B^f\rangle =
583: -0.34$ with standard deviation of 0.28.
584:
585: The one outlying galaxy (object FDF\,6336) has a very elongated and
586: distorted appearance on the HST image. It's very low Sersic index may
587: indicate the presence of a disk but the disk/bulge ratio is very
588: small. In the Kormendy diagram (relating $R_e$ to $SB_e$) it is also
589: an outlier with either too faint a surface brightness or too small a
590: half-light radius. The same behaviour is exhibited by object
591: FDF\,7796, which may have an overestimated $\sigma$. The combined
592: effect makes this galaxy look ``normal'' in the FP. But its
593: appearance is again very elongated and distorted on the ACS image and
594: it may be associated with a companion galaxy. The galaxies which are
595: likely to be lenticular galaxies judging from their appearance do
596: follow the same distribution in the FP as the ellipticals without any
597: prominent disk.
598:
599:
600: \section{\label{MSR}The \mgb--$\sigma$ relation}
601:
602: %
603: \begin{figure*}
604: \psfig{figure=sigmgb.ceps}
605: \caption{\label{msr} \mgb--$\sigma$ relation between the central
606: velocity dispersion and the central \mgb\ line strength. Local
607: galaxies (small symbols) are drawn from the compilation of
608: \citet{TMBM04} with E and S0 galaxies from
609: the field (cyan circles) and clusters (magenta triangles). Both,
610: ellipticals in distant clusters (green large triangles) and in the
611: field (blue large circles) follow a similar distribution that is
612: offset from the local relation (solid line) towards lower
613: \mgb-strengths for given $\sigma$. }
614: \end{figure*}
615: %
616:
617: Another scaling relation that combines the kinematics to the stellar
618: population is the \mgb--$\sigma$ relation \citep{BBF93}.
619: %
620: In the following sections and figures we compare the distant galaxies
621: to the recent compilation of 124 early--type local galaxies by
622: \citet{TMBM04} that contains both morphological classes E and S0 and
623: encompasses different environments from the field to clusters. They
624: combined galaxies with high $S/N$ measurements of absorption line
625: strengths and velocity dispersions selected from
626: \citet{Gonza93,MTSBW03,BBMTM02} and \citet{MZTMB05}. This compilation
627: has the advantage for us that very similar methods to our procedures
628: were used for the derivation of indices and $\sigma$ utilizing the
629: same correction functions. Furthermore, model parameters of the
630: stellar populations (see Section\,\ref{sp}) are based on the same
631: code. Thus, possible systematic biases between the distant and local
632: samples are greatly reduced.
633:
634: In Figure\,\ref{msr}, we show the \mgb--$\sigma$ relation of the local
635: sample with the distant galaxies overplotted. We linearily fit the
636: total local sample by a bisector, since differences between the
637: various local subpopulations are significantly smaller than the
638: average offset displayed by both distant samples. For fixed $\sigma$,
639: \mgb\ values are smaller with a mean offset of --0.8\,\AA\ in both
640: cases. This can be interpreted as evolution in age and metallicity
641: \citep{BZB96}. To further explore this, we will compare below the
642: measured equivalent widths of absorption features to evolutionary
643: models of stellar populations in so-called line diagnostic diagrams
644: (Section\,\ref{ldd}). In Section\,\ref{sp}, we derive model ages and
645: metallicities and explore their dependence on mass $\sigma$.
646:
647: For galaxies with $\sigma>250$\kms, the relation of the distant
648: samples is as tight as for the local comparison galaxies. Smaller
649: galaxies display a larger scatter which is compatible with the result
650: by \citet{TMBM04} that low-mass galaxies have more extended star
651: formation histories.
652: %
653: \citet{ZB97} speculated whether some of the cluster galaxies with low
654: \mgb\ for their $\sigma$ might be post-starburst E$+$A galaxies, where
655: a recent ($\sim1.5$\,Gyr ago) starburst diluted the \mgb\ feature.
656: Those E$+$A galaxies are thought to be intermediate between spirals
657: and ellipticals in the sense that two spirals are transformed into an
658: early--type galaxy through merging. Although some of local
659: representatives of this galaxy type have still discernible disks,
660: their surface brightness profiles are already bulge dominated
661: \citep{YZZLM04} and their kinematics pressure supported
662: \citep{NGZZ01}. One of the characteristics of E$+$A galaxies is their
663: relatively strong absorption in the higher Balmer lines like \hd\
664: compared to quiescent ellipticals. Unfortunately, we can not access
665: this issue for the cluster galaxies, because our spectra do not cover
666: this ``blue'' part. Also, the [\oiii]\,5007 line, if present in
667: emission often used as indicator for ongoing star formation or for
668: correcting the \hb\ absorption for possible emission fill-in, falls
669: into the atmospheric B band at redshifts around 0.4 and can,
670: therefore, not be used for this investigation.
671:
672: In the case of the FDF galaxies, we could measure \hd\ for seven
673: objects. But only three (FDF\,1161, 4285, 7459) of the four FDF
674: galaxies (\& FDF\,6439) with seemingly too low an \mgb\ for their
675: $\sigma$ have \hd\ measurements. The other four FDF objects with
676: known \hd\ (FDF\,5011, 6307, 6336, 7796) are distributed in the
677: \mgb--$\sigma$ plane like the other ones, although one of them
678: (FDF\,7796) has rather strong \hd. Only one of the low-\mgb\ objects
679: (FDF\,7459) has very strong \hd\ absorption which would be in
680: compliance with a post-starburst model.
681:
682: \section{\label{ldd}Line diagnostic diagrams}
683:
684: %
685: \begin{figure*}
686: \psfig{figure=mgbhb.ceps}
687: \caption{\label{mghb}
688: The same samples (and symbols) as in Figure\,\ref{msr}, displaying
689: \hb\ vs. \mgb\ taken
690: as indicative of age and metallicity [Z/H], respectively.
691: Big open triangle and square denote the mean value of the distant and local
692: cluster sample respectively.
693: The lines connect model values from \cite{TMB03} enhanced in Mg so that
694: [Mg/Fe]\,$=0.3$. Solid lines correspond to ages of 2, 5, 10, 15\,Gyr top to
695: bottom and dashed lines to [Z/H]\,$=-0.33, 0, 0.33, 0.67$ left to right.
696: }
697: \end{figure*}
698: %
699:
700: Absorption line strengths can be taken as measurements of the average
701: age and metallicity of a stellar population. Within the Lick/IDS
702: system, \hb\ usually is taken as an indicator for age, whereas a
703: combination of \mgb, \fefiv, and \fesix\ yields information on the
704: mean metallicity [Z/H] \citep[e.g.][]{FFBG85,TWFBG98}. Since a
705: galaxy's spectrum is averaged over the slit aperture, any possible
706: radial gradient of the lines is smeared out and the measurements
707: represent luminosity-weighted mean values only. The first effect is
708: counterbalanced by correcting the observed line strength (see
709: Section\,\ref{obs}) according to aperture size assuming the validity
710: of the locally determined radial gradients at higher redshifts. The
711: age and metallicity of a stellar population can be deduced by
712: comparing different indices in so-called line diagnostic diagrams to a
713: model grid. Minimizing the differences between observed and model
714: values, best fitting values for age and metallicity can be determined.
715: Before we investigate the fitted model parameters in
716: Section\,\ref{sp}, we show the actual data in Figures\,\ref{mghb} and
717: \ref{mgfe}. As mentioned before, important absorption lines of a
718: galaxy can get redshifted into the regime of strong terrestrial
719: emission and absorption features, so that it is not possible to
720: measure them with sufficient accuracy. For our distant galaxies at
721: $z\approx0.4$ one or more of the four traditional indices are
722: affected. In order not to greatly reduce the samples, we do neither
723: combine as usual \fefiv\ and \fesix\ to a mean Fe index
724: $\langle\mbox{Fe}\rangle$ nor do we add \mgb\ to form [MgFe].
725:
726: To investigate qualitatively age and metallicity effects, we plot in
727: Figure\,\ref{mghb} only \hb\ versus \mgb\ with a model grid from \citet{TMB03}
728: that takes into
729: account the enhancement of Mg over Fe observed in most elliptical galaxies
730: by fixing [Mg/Fe] to 0.3.
731: The local cluster galaxies are mainly located in a region between solar and
732: thrice solar [Z/H] and old ages of 5--15\,Gyrs \citep{TMBM04}.
733: The error-weighted mean values for the local \textit{cluster} galaxies are
734: 1.76\,\AA\ for \hb\ and 4.67\,\AA\ for \mgb.
735: The distant cluster ellipticals show a wide spread in \mgb\ with accordingly
736: sub- to supersolar metallicities.
737: The error-weighted mean values are 1.74\,\AA\ for \hb\ and 4.28\,\AA\ for
738: \mgb.
739: The statistics of the distant field ellipticals suffers from the low number
740: of eight galaxies.
741: Three galaxies have intermediate
742: populations similar to the mean of the distant cluster sample.
743: Two FDF galaxies have such low \hb\ that they fall below the ``oldest'' model
744: line (15\,Gyr) and seem to have subsolar [Z/H],
745: whereas three other ones are compatible with ages of $2-3$\,Gyrs
746: with $1-2\times$ solar [Z/H] assuming simple stellar populations (SSPs).
747:
748: %
749: \begin{figure*}
750: \psfig{figure=mgbfe6.ceps}
751: \caption{\label{mgfe}
752: The same samples (and symbols) as in Figure\,\ref{msr}, displaying
753: \fesix\ vs. \mgb\ to investigate the relative enrichment of Fe and Mg.
754: The lines connect model values from \cite{TMB03} for a constant age of 10\,Gyr.
755: Solid lines correspond to [Mg/Fe]\,$=0, 0.3, 0.5$ top to
756: bottom and dashed lines to [Z/H]\,$=-0.33, 0, 0.33, 0.67$ left to right.
757: }
758: \end{figure*}
759: %
760:
761: To look for any possible enhancement of Mg over Fe with respect to the solar
762: abundance ratio [Mg/Fe]\,$=0$, we plot in Figure\,\ref{mgfe} the \fesix\
763: index versus \mgb.
764: Local galaxies are located between $1-3\times$ solar [Mg/Fe].
765: The distant objects scatter within the same range independent from being in
766: a cluster or field environment.
767:
768:
769: \section{\label{sp}The stellar populations}
770:
771: We now discuss the model parameters for the galaxies. For each
772: individual galaxy best fitting model parameters were determined by a
773: minimization algorithm as explained in detail in \citet{TMBM04}. The
774: measured ($\sigma$ and aperture corrected) line strengths were
775: compared iteratively to predicted model line strengths where the
776: [Mg/Fe] ratio, metallicity [Z/H], and age was varied. Observed
777: strengths of \mgb\ and \fesix\ were used in combination whenever their
778: measurement was trustworthy. These lines were simultanously fitted
779: together with one of the Balmer indices \hb, \hgf, or \hdf\ (when
780: available). With that procedure we took into account the dependence
781: of these lines on the Mg/Fe ratio, which is in particular important
782: for the higher order Balmer lines \citep{TMK04}.
783:
784: %
785: \begin{figure*}
786: \psfig{figure=sigmod.ceps}
787: \caption{\label{sigmod} The samples (and symbols) as in Figure\,\ref{msr}
788: except that the local sample is now restricted to Category\,1 (ages older
789: than $\sim5$\,Gyr) galaxies.
790: The lines indicate the local relations between
791: age, metallicity [Z/H], and [$\alpha$/Fe] with velocity dispersion as
792: derived through Monte Carlo simulations by \citet{TMBM04}, separately
793: for the cluster (solid line) and field sample (dotted line).
794: For the distant galaxies, the
795: respective look-back times have been added to the derived ages. }
796: \end{figure*}
797: %
798:
799: In Figure\,\ref{sigmod}, we investigate the scaling relations of the
800: resulting stellar parameters with velocity dispersion found for local
801: early-type galaxies \citep{TMBM04}. Ages, metallicities, and
802: $\alpha$/Fe ratios correlate with $\sigma$ and therefore stellar mass.
803: For the comparison, we now only take the 86 galaxies from the local sample
804: classififed as being old ($\gtrsim5$\,Gyr),
805: since the presented scaling relations were
806: derived for this object class (Category\,1) only.
807: The local cluster and field samples differ slightly in the zeropoint
808: of the linear fits for ages and for metallicities. In
809: Figure\,\ref{sigmod}, we overplot the derived stellar population
810: parameters of the distant galaxies. For this comparison, we
811: \textit{add the respective look-back time to the age of a
812: galaxy}.
813: For all three distributions, the distant samples nicely match the
814: local ones. The individual data points scatter around the local fit
815: lines, but not significantly larger than the local ones, and follow
816: the same trends. In particular, the local $\alpha$/Fe--$\sigma$
817: relation is also obeyed by the distant galaxies. This is in
818: compliance with the derived ages that are younger only corresponding
819: to their look-back times. From this we can conclude that for the
820: majority of the local galaxies no significant star formation episodes
821: and no further chemical enrichment has taken place within the
822: last $\sim5$\,Gyr. Slight differences (which are not significant) in
823: [Z/H]--$\sigma$ between the local and distant samples may be
824: attributed to the fact, that the aperture correction in the case of
825: the distant galaxies was done onto the nominal aperture whereas the
826: local galaxies were measured within 1/10th of $R_e$. Since age and
827: $\alpha$/Fe have zero radial gradients in local galaxies
828: \citep{MTSBW03}, only our [Z/H] determinations could be affected in
829: the sense that they are systematically slightly too low.
830:
831:
832: \section{\label{su}Summary and discussion}
833:
834: We have investigated the kinematic, photometric, structural, and stellar
835: population parameters of a sample of field galaxies with mean redshift 0.4.
836: The galaxies were drawn from the F{\sc ors} Deep Field on the basis of their
837: early--type SED, i.e. their optical and near-infrared colours.
838: It turned out that they all have indeed absorption-line spectra without any
839: emission line, i.e. without obvious indication for ongoing star formation.
840: Their structure is mostly dominated by a bulge component, but a few galaxies
841: clearly have disks like local lenticular S0 galaxies.
842:
843: To learn about any possible evolution specific to the low-density
844: environment, we compare the FDF sample to galaxies in three rich
845: clusters at similar redshifts and to local samples both with field and
846: cluster galaxies. We have first explored the luminosity evolution via
847: the Faber--Jackson and Fundamental Plane relations. Assuming that the
848: structure (size) and mass (velocity dispersion) of elliptical galaxies
849: do not change with time, we find consistently from both scaling
850: relations a very modest evolution in brightness that can be modeled by
851: passive evolution of a simple stellar population (SSP). The average
852: increase of the $B$ luminosities by 0.3--0.5\,mag is found for both
853: the distant field and cluster galaxies and can be explained by a high
854: formation redshift ($z_f>2$) of their stars.
855:
856: This result is consistent with those studies that also find a weak
857: luminosity evolution and little difference between field and cluster
858: ellipticals. In their FP study of 18 field early--type galaxies with
859: $\langle z\rangle=0.4$, \citet{DFKI01} also find that they are
860: brighter in $B$ by 0.4\,mag in general, which can be modeled with an
861: SSP only slightly younger than in the case of their cluster galaxies.
862: A similar conclusion was reached by \citet{RKFKM03}, who measured an
863: increase by 0.5\,mag at $z=0.4$. In contrast, other groups like
864: \citet{TSCMB02} or \citet{GFKIS03} find that the evolution for field
865: galaxies is stronger compatible with a significant younger mean age
866: for their stellar populations than in the case of cluster galaxies.
867: Restricting their samples to galaxies around $z=0.4$, $\Delta B$
868: amounts to 0.7--0.8\,mag. The differences among the various studies
869: become even more prominent at higher $z$, where the latter authors
870: derive a much larger brightening for the field galaxies in comparison
871: to cluster members. The rather small differences at $z\approx0.4$ may
872: arise from the still quite small numbers of observed galaxies per
873: sample. These small samples may therefore also be more subject to the
874: particular method to select the targets. Our FDF galaxies are, for
875: example, redder by 0.7\,mag on average in observed $(V-I)$ color than
876: the Gebhardt et al. sample, which has $\langle (V-I)\rangle=1.3$ for 5
877: ellipticals at $0.3<z<0.5$, while both our field and cluster galaxies
878: have $\langle (V-I)\rangle=2.0$.
879: This indicates that our field galaxies probably trace predominantly the
880: upper envelope of the age--$\sigma$ distribution.
881:
882: Compatibility with SSP models of passive evolution is also found for
883: the majority of the FDF galaxies in the \mgb--$\sigma$ relation.
884: Their mean offset from the local relation is with $-0.8$\,\AA\
885: identical to the one for the distant cluster galaxies.
886: The local slope is followed by the distant galaxies as well
887: with a tendency for a slight steepening at the low-mass end.
888: This indicates that age cannot be the
889: principal driver of the main part of the relationship. Otherwise a
890: significant steepening also at the high-mass end would be detected, as
891: the \mgb\ index of younger objects,
892: that also have on average lower $\sigma$ according to the age--$\sigma$
893: correlation, would evolve
894: faster to lower index values with increasing redshift. This result is
895: in line with the conclusion drawn by several local studies
896: \citep[e.g.][]{TFWG00a,KSCDK02,TMBM04}
897: that the \mgb--$\sigma$ relation is driven by metallicity rather than by age.
898:
899: To explore in
900: more detail the distribution in metallicity, chemical enrichment, and
901: mean ages of the stellar systems, we compare diagnostic absorption
902: lines from the Lick system to SSP models. To this purpose we
903: simultaneously fit measured Mg, Fe, and Balmer indices by varying
904: model ages, [Z/H] metallicities, and [$\alpha$/Fe] ratios. We find a
905: broad range in these model parameters for both distant samples, field
906: and clusters. But their distributions are not random because all
907: three stellar population parameters scale with velocity dispersion,
908: and, therefore, to some degree with total mass, like their local
909: counterparts.
910:
911: A passive evolution of cluster galaxies from $z=0.5$ to 0 was also
912: favoured by \citet{JSC00} investigating the distribution of \hda\ with
913: metal lines measured in co-added spectra. They detect no significant
914: difference between morphologically classified S0 and E galaxies
915: arguing also, that the majority of S0 cluster members do not show any
916: evidence of recent star formation activity as expected in some
917: scenarios of galaxy transformation. Two of our FDF galaxies
918: (FDF\,6336 \& 7796) have extraordinary \hdf\ absorption leading to
919: young model ages under the assumption of a single stellar population.
920: Their strengths may also be explained in a scenario where these
921: galaxies had experienced a short intense star burst in their recent
922: past involving only a small fraction of their mass. The ACS images
923: reveal a significant disk component in these two galaxies, which may
924: point to a very early spiral morphology. In that case a low-level
925: continous star formation might be expected, but we do not detect any
926: emission line.
927:
928: \citet{KIFD01} investigated the higher-order Balmer lines \hda\ and
929: \hga\ of early--type galaxies in three clusters at $z=0.3,0.6$ \& 0.8
930: claiming that there is a correlation with $\sigma$ with small scatter.
931: Interpreting the offsets in the zeropoint for the three redshifts as
932: caused by an evolution in the mean age of the stellar systems, they
933: derive formation redshifts of $z_f\gtrsim2$ for SSP models assuming
934: co-evality for all galaxies. Since we only have four FDF galaxies
935: with high-quality measurements of the two indices (and none in the
936: cluster sample), we can not confirm or exclude a correlation with
937: $\sigma$. But the assumption that all galaxies have roughly the same
938: age must be rejected for our cluster galaxies.
939:
940: %
941: \begin{figure*}
942: \psfig{figure=fpevocor.ceps}
943: \caption{\label{fpevo} The Fundamental Plane as in Figure\,\ref{fpb}
944: but restricted to those galaxies for which we could derive light-averaged
945: model ages of their stellar population.
946: The open symbols represent the data ``corrected'' for the predicted
947: brightening for each galaxy and nicely match the distribution of the local
948: galaxies.
949: }
950: \end{figure*}
951: %
952:
953: At last, we investigate whether our findings derived from the Fundamental
954: Plane and the absorption line diagnosis with respect to luminosity evolution
955: are compatible with each other also quantitatively.
956: We determine the model brightening of our galaxies from the predicted
957: restframe $B$ magnitudes for the respective ages and lookback times
958: taking into account the derived [Z/H] metallicities and [$\alpha$/Fe] ratios
959: using again SSP models by \citet{Maras05}.
960: In Figure\,\ref{fpevo}, we make this comparison by subtracting the predicted
961: luminosity evolution from the observed data points.
962: The evolution-corrected distant FP falls onto the local relation and nicely
963: matches the distribution of the local galaxies.
964: The one outlier is that galaxy (FDF\,7796), for which we speculated above
965: that it has undergone a recent starburst therby causing the light-averaged
966: age to be very low.
967:
968: In summary, we conclude from our study that the evolution of the
969: stellar populations of the majority of early--type galaxies within the
970: last 3--6\,Gyr is compatible with the scenario of passive evolution.
971: Since the $\alpha$/Fe--$\sigma$ and age--$\sigma$ relations did not
972: change since $z=0.4$, no significant star formation and chemical
973: enrichment has occured since that time. To investigate certain issues
974: in more detail, like any possible difference between low- and
975: high-density environments, new studies with more objects are required
976: with high $S/N$ measurements allowing the investigation of several
977: aspects (FP \& line diagnostics) ideally out to higher redshifts. To
978: this respect, we are currently analyzing another sample of
979: distant absorption-line galaxies drawn from the William--Herschel Deep
980: Field for which we also have VLT spectra and HST/ACS imaging with a
981: similar quality as for the FDF galaxies presented here.
982:
983:
984:
985:
986:
987:
988:
989:
990: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
991:
992: \begin{acknowledgements}
993: We thank the anonymous referee for a very quick response.
994: We acknowledge fruitful discussions with all FDF consortium members,
995: in particular with Dr. A. Gabasch, M. Pannella, Dr. R. P. Saglia, Dr. S. Seitz
996: (all Munich \& Garching) and Dr. K. J\"ager and B. Gerken (G\"ottingen).
997: We thank J. Fliri and A. Riffeser (Sternwarte Munich) for applying their
998: cosmic ray removal algorithm to the HST/ACS images.
999: We are grateful to Drs. J. Heidt, D. Mehlert, and S. Noll (Landessternwarte
1000: Heidelberg) for performing the FDF spectroscopic observations and thank ESO
1001: and the Paranal staff and the STScI and ST--ECF staff for efficient support.
1002: We also thank the PI of the FORS project, Prof. I. Appenzeller (Heidelberg),
1003: and Prof. K. J. Fricke (G\"ottingen) for providing guaranteed time for this
1004: project.
1005: This work has been supported by the Volkswagen Foundation (I/76\,520)
1006: and the BMBF/DLR (50\,OR\,0301)
1007: and made use of the ADS, astro--ph, and CDS data bases.
1008: \end{acknowledgements}
1009:
1010: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
1011:
1012: \bibliographystyle{aa}
1013: %\bibliography{/home/bziegler/tex/bib/abb,/home/bziegler/tex/bib/all}
1014: %\bibliography{/home/sagitarius/bziegler/tex/bib/abb,/home/sagitarius/bziegler/tex/bib/all}
1015: \input{ebib}
1016:
1017: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
1018:
1019: \appendix
1020:
1021: \section{Parameters of the FORS Deep Field galaxies}
1022:
1023:
1024: %
1025: \begin{table*}
1026: \caption[]{Basic parameters for the FORS Deep Field galaxies.\newline
1027: 1. ID from \citet{HAGJS03}, 2. redshift, 3. luminosity distance, 4.
1028: lookback time,
1029: 5. signal/noise, % of continuum,
1030: 6. velocity dispersion corrected for aperture (see Section\,\ref{obs}),
1031: 7. its error,
1032: 8.--11. FORS total magnitudes (SExtractor's \textsc{mag\_best}),
1033: 12. absolute restframe B magnitude,
1034: \hfill 3., 4., \& 12. for $\Omega_{\rm matter}=0.3$, $\Omega_{\lambda}=0.7$,
1035: $H_0 = 70$\,km\,s$^{-1}$\,Mpc$^{-1}$\newline
1036: *: no entry because object not visible on respective image
1037: }
1038: \label{hst}
1039: $$
1040: \begin{tabular}{lcccrcrccccc}
1041: \hline
1042: \noalign{\smallskip}
1043: FDF & $z$ & $dl$ & $t_{lb}$ & $S/N$ & $\sigma$ & $\Delta\sigma$ &
1044: $B_{tot}$ & $g_{tot}$ & $R_{tot}$ & $I_{tot}$ & $M_B$ \\
1045: & & & [Gyr] & & [km/s] & [km/s] & [mag] & [mag] & [mag] & [mag] & [mag] \\
1046: \noalign{\smallskip}
1047: \hline
1048: \noalign{\smallskip}
1049: 1161 & 0.40 & 2147 & 4.2 & 19 & 134 & 16 & 23.4 & 22.3 & 20.6 & 19.9 & -20.2 \\
1050: 4285 & 0.40 & 2145 & 4.2 & 29 & 172 & 16 & 23.2 & 22.1 & 20.4 & 19.6 & -20.4 \\
1051: 5011 & 0.65 & 3922 & 6.0 & 15 & 268 & 18 & 23.9 & 23.0 & 21.5 & 20.9 & -21.0 \\
1052: 5908 & 0.22 & 1112 & 2.7 & 127 & 305 & 5 & 19.7 & 18.4 & 17.1 & 16.5 & -21.9 \\
1053: 6307 & 0.45 & 2508 & 4.7 & 29 & 203 & 14 & 23.5 & 22.3 & 20.5 & 19.7 & -20.7 \\
1054: 6336 & 0.46 & 2561 & 4.7 & 8 & 156 & 43 & 24.7 & 23.7 & 21.9 & 21.1 & -19.4 \\
1055: 6338 & 0.41 & 2238 & 4.4 & 22 & 178 & 19 & 23.9 & * & * & 20.3 & -19.7 \\
1056: 6439 & 0.40 & 2145 & 4.2 & 41 & 217 & 15 & 22.4 & 21.4 & 19.7 & 18.9 & -21.0 \\
1057: 7116 & 0.46 & 2544 & 4.7 & 28 & 133 & 21 & 24.2 & 23.0 & 21.3 & 20.5 & -20.0 \\
1058: 7459 & 0.54 & 3100 & 5.3 & 20 & 189 & 23 & 24.3 & 22.9 & 21.2 & 20.3 & -20.6 \\
1059: 7796 & 0.41 & 2231 & 4.4 & 15 & 116 & 33 & 23.6 & 22.5 & 20.8 & 20.1 & -20.1 \\
1060: 8372 & 0.23 & 1142 & 2.7 & 57 & 170 & 9 & 21.6 & 20.7 & * & 18.5 & -20.1 \\
1061: 8626 & 0.41 & 2226 & 4.4 & 27 & 348 & 29 & 21.4 & * & * & 17.7 & -22.4 \\
1062: \noalign{\smallskip}
1063: \hline
1064: \end{tabular}
1065: $$
1066: \end{table*}
1067: %
1068:
1069: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1070:
1071: %
1072: \begin{table*}
1073: \caption[]{Line strengths of fully corrected (see Section\,\ref{obs})
1074: Lick indices of the FORS Deep Field galaxies
1075: together with their errors and (by-eye) quality flags. Units are \AA.
1076: Quality flags: 0: satisfactory, 1: a bit noisy, 2: in region of strong sky
1077: line, 6: affected by telluric B band, 7: affected by telluric A band,
1078: 8: affected by end of spectrum, 9: not visible.
1079: }
1080: \label{lick}
1081: $$
1082: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccccccc}
1083: \hline
1084: \noalign{\smallskip}
1085: FDF & \hdf & d\hdf & q\hdf & \hgf & d\hgf & q\hgf & \hb & d\hb & q\hb & \mgb & d\mgb & q\mgb \\
1086: \noalign{\smallskip}
1087: \hline
1088: \noalign{\smallskip}
1089: 1161 & 1.3 & 0.2 & 0 & -0.6 & 0.2 & 0 & 1.6 & 0.2 & 0 & 2.7 & 0.3 & 1 \\
1090: 4285 & 1.2 & 0.2 & 0 & -0.7 & 0.2 & 0 & 1.5 & 0.2 & 0 & 3.3 & 0.2 & 0 \\
1091: 5011 & 1.0 & 0.2 & 0 & 0.4 & 0.2 & 0 & 1.9 & 0.3 & 1 & * & * & 9 \\
1092: 5908 & * & * & 9 & * & * & 9 & 1.8 & 0.1 & 0 & 4.5 & 0.1 & 0 \\
1093: 6307 & 0.8 & 0.2 & 2 & -0.8 & 0.3 & 2 & 1.9 & 0.2 & 0 & 3.7 & 0.3 & 0 \\
1094: 6336 & 2.6 & 0.3 & 0 & -0.7 & 0.3 & 2 & 0.5 & 0.3 & 2 & * & * & 7 \\
1095: 6338 & * & * & 9 & * & * & 8 & * & * & 6 & 3.7 & 0.2 & 0 \\
1096: 6439 & * & * & 9 & * & * & 8 & 2.5 & 0.3 & 0 & 3.1 & 0.4 & 0 \\
1097: 7116 & * & * & 9 & -0.4 & 0.2 & 2 & 2.3 & 0.2 & 0 & 3.9 & 0.3 & 1 \\
1098: 7459 & 2.5 & 0.2 & 2 & -0.1 & 0.2 & 0 & 2.4 & 0.2 & 0 & 3.2 & 0.4 & 1 \\
1099: 7796 & 2.0 & 0.2 & 0 & 1.0 & 0.2 & 0 & * & * & 6 & 3.8 & 0.3 & 0 \\
1100: 8372 & * & * & 9 & * & * & 8 & 1.8 & 0.3 & 0 & 4.2 & 0.4 & 2 \\
1101: 8626 & * & * & 9 & * & * & 8 & * & * & 6 & 5.3 & 0.2 & 0 \\
1102: \noalign{\smallskip}
1103: \hline
1104: \end{tabular}
1105: $$
1106: \end{table*}
1107: %
1108:
1109: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1110:
1111: %
1112: \begin{table*}
1113: \caption[]{Fully corrected \fesix\ Lick index and SSP model ages,
1114: metallicities [Z/H], and Mg/Fe ratios [$\alpha$/Fe] of the FORS Deep Field
1115: galaxies.
1116: Average errors in $\log$\,(age), [Z/H], and [$\alpha$/Fe] are
1117: 0.18\,dex, 0.2\,dex, and 0.15\,dex, respectively.
1118: In column\,8 it is indicated, which Balmer line was used
1119: to derive the model age.
1120: The last four columns are based on the HST/ACS images:
1121: ACS total I magnitude (\textsc{galfit}),
1122: mean surface brightness in B within $R_e$ corrected
1123: for cosmological dimming, and half-light radius (\textsc{galfit}).
1124: Physical units for $\Omega_{\rm matter}=0.3$, $\Omega_{\lambda}=0.7$,
1125: $H_0 = 70$\,km\,s$^{-1}$\,Mpc$^{-1}$.
1126: }
1127: \label{mod}
1128: $$
1129: \begin{tabular}{cccccrrlcccc}
1130: \hline
1131: \noalign{\smallskip}
1132: FDF & \fesix & d\fesix & q\fesix & age & [Z/H] & [$\alpha$/Fe] & Balmer
1133: & $I_{tot}$ & $\langle\mu_B\rangle_e$ & $R_e$ & $\log R_e$\\
1134: & \AA & \AA & & Gyr & & & line
1135: & [mag] & [mag/sq.as.] & [arcsec] & [kpc] \\
1136: \noalign{\smallskip}
1137: \hline
1138: \noalign{\smallskip}
1139: 1161 & 2.5 & 0.3 & 1 & 5.3 & -0.07 & -0.09& \hgf & 19.9 & 20.3 & 0.40 & 0.33 \\
1140: 4285 & 1.6 & 0.3 & 2 & 6.3 & -0.15 & 0.44& \hdf & 19.9 & 20.3 & 0.40 & 0.33 \\
1141: 5011 & * & * & 9 & * & * & * & * & 20.8 & 20.6 & 0.50 & 0.54 \\
1142: 5908 & 2.6 & 0.2 & 0 & 6.5 & 0.32 & 0.26& \hb & 16.3 & 21.5 & 2.50 & 0.95 \\
1143: 6307 & 1.8 & 0.5 & 0 & 8.8 & -0.10 & 0.37& \hb & 19.8 & 20.8 & 0.59 & 0.53 \\
1144: 6336 & * & * & 9 & * & * & * & * & 21.2 & 21.8 & 0.50 & 0.46 \\
1145: 6338 & 2.5 & 0.3 & 0 & 5.0 & 0.16 & 0.12& \hb & * & * & * & * \\
1146: 6439 & 2.3 & 0.5 & 0 & 1.9 & 0.20 & 0.15& \hb & 19.1 & 19.2 & 0.35 & 0.27 \\
1147: 7116 & 2.5 & 0.4 & 2 & 2.6 & 0.25 & 0.15& \hb & 20.6 & 19.7 & 0.25 & 0.16 \\
1148: 7459 & * & * & 9 & * & * & * & * & * & * & * & * \\
1149: 7796 & 2.7 & 0.4 & 0 & 1.3 & 0.65 & 0.12& \hgf & 20.1 & 21.8 & 0.75 & 0.61 \\
1150: 8372 & 2.3 & 0.4 & 0 & 7.2 & 0.16 & 0.28& \hb & 18.6 & 19.8 & 0.40 & 0.17 \\
1151: 8626 & 3.4 & 0.2 & 1 & * & * & * & * & 17.9 & 21.0 & 1.45 & 0.90 \\
1152: \noalign{\smallskip}
1153: \hline
1154: \end{tabular}
1155: $$
1156: \end{table*}
1157: %
1158:
1159:
1160:
1161: \end{document}
1162:
1163: %
1164: \begin{figure}
1165: \psfig{figure=?}
1166: \label{}
1167: \caption{
1168: }
1169: \end{figure}
1170: %
1171:
1172: %
1173: \begin{table*}
1174: \caption[]{Red indices.}
1175: \label{red}
1176: $$
1177: \begin{tabular}{r}
1178: \hline
1179: \noalign{\smallskip}
1180: Name
1181: \noalign{\smallskip}
1182: \hline
1183: \noalign{\smallskip}
1184: name etc
1185: \noalign{\smallskip}
1186: \hline
1187: \end{tabular}
1188: $$
1189: \end{table*}
1190: %
1191:
1192: