1: \documentclass{pasj00}
2: \draft
3:
4: \begin{document}
5: \SetRunningHead{Ojha et al.}{V1647 Orionis : A New Look at McNeil's Nebula}
6: \Received {yyyy/mm/dd}
7: \Accepted {yyyy/mm/dd}
8:
9: \title{{\bf V1647 Orionis} (IRAS 05436-0007) : A New Look at McNeil's Nebula}
10:
11: \author{D.K. \textsc{Ojha}}
12: \affil{Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai (Bombay) - 400 005, India}
13: \email{ojha@tifr.res.in}
14: \and
15: \author{N. \textsc{Kusakabe}, M. \textsc{Tamura}, Y. \textsc{Nakajima},
16: and M. \textsc{Fukagawa}}
17: \affil{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
18: \and
19: \author{K. \textsc{Sugitani}}
20: \affil{Institute of Natural Sciences, Nagoya City University, Mizuho-ku,
21: Nagoya 467-8501, Japan}
22: \and
23: \author{D. \textsc{Baba}, D. \textsc{Kato}, M. \textsc{Kurita},
24: C. \textsc{Nagashima}, T. \textsc{Nagayama}, T. \textsc{Nagata},
25: and S. \textsc{Sato}}
26: \affil{Department of Astrophysics, Faculty of Sciences,
27: Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan}
28:
29: \KeyWords{stars: formation --- stars: pre-main-sequence -- Reflection
30: nebulae -- ISM: individual (McNeil's nebula) -- stars: variables: other}
31:
32: \maketitle
33:
34: \begin{abstract}
35: We present a study of the newly discovered McNeil's nebula in Orion using the
36: JHK$_s$-band simultaneous observations with the near-infrared (NIR) camera
37: SIRIUS on the IRSF 1.4m telescope. The cometary infrared nebula is clearly
38: seen extending toward north and south from the NIR source
39: {\bf (V1647 Orionis)} that
40: illuminates McNeil's nebula. The compact nebula has an apparent diameter of
41: about 70\arcsec. The nebula is blue (bright in J) and has a cavity structure
42: with two rims extending toward north-east and north-west. The north-east rim
43: is brighter and sharp, while the north-west rim is diffuse. The north-east rim
44: can be traced out to $\sim$ 40\arcsec~from the location of the NIR source. In
45: contrast, no cavity structure is seen toward the south, although diffuse nebula
46: is extended out to $\sim$ 20\arcsec. New NIR photometric data show a
47: significant variation in the magnitudes ($>$ 0.15 mag) of the source of
48: McNeil's nebula within a period of one week, that is possibly under the phase
49: of {\bf eruptive} variables like FUors or EXors.
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52: \section{Introduction}
53:
54: On the night of 2004 January 23, Jay McNeil discovered a new reflection nebula
55: in the L1630 cloud in Orion (McNeil 2004). His amazing discovery is now
56: recognized as a newly visible reflection nebula surrounding a
57: {\bf young star} -- McNeil's nebula. \mbox{McNeil's} new object
58: {\bf (V1647 Ori)}
59: seems to be a faint optical counterpart to the infrared source catalogued as
60: \mbox{IRAS 05436-0007} that has gone into outburst, producing a large
61: reflection nebulosity (Reipurth \& Aspin 2004; Abrah\'am et al. 2004;
62: Brice\~no et al. 2004; Vacca, Cushing \& Simon 2004; Andrews,
63: Rothberg \& Simon 2004; {\bf Walter et al. 2004}). Little is known about the
64: source. The discovery was announced by B. Reipurth in the Star Formation
65: Newsletter
66: No. 136.\footnote{http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/$\sim$reipurth/newsletter.htm}
67: Reipurth \& Aspin (2004) reported that NIR images taken with the Gemini 8m
68: telescope show that the object has brightened by about 3 magnitudes in JHK,
69: relative to the 1998 2MASS measurements. Gemini spectra reveal strong features
70: of CO and Br$\gamma$ in emission in the IR; in the optical, H$\alpha$ shows
71: emission with a P Cygni profile (Reipurth \& Aspin 2004).
72:
73: The McNeil's source at the apex of the nebula was also observed to brighten
74: dramatically in X-ray and optical wavelengths. The X-ray data from
75: {\it Chandra} gives strong evidence that the probable cause of the outburst is
76: the sudden infall of gas onto the surface of the star from an orbiting disk of
77: gas (Kastner et al. 2004).
78:
79: In this letter we present the infrared morphology of McNeil's nebula
80: as well as infrared monitoring of its central source, especially,
81: in a short (about one week) timescale. Both of these pieces of information
82: will be useful to understand the nature of this enigmatic source.
83: We carried out simultaneous JHK$_s$-band photometry of the McNeil's nebula
84: during five nights from
85: 2004 Feb 17 to March 14 and report a significant variation in the source
86: brightness of McNeil's nebula within a period of one week.
87: These observations also show a new look at McNeil's nebula in NIR
88: wavelengths. In \S 2 we present the details of observations and data
89: reduction procedures. \S 3 deals with the results and discussion on
90: short time variability of the star that {\bf illuminates} McNeil's nebula and
91: describe the details of infrared nebula. We then summarize our
92: conclusions in \S 4.
93:
94: \section{Observations and data reduction}
95:
96: The imaging observations of the McNeil's nebula region in the NIR wavelengths
97: J ($\lambda$ = 1.25 $\mu$m), H ($\lambda$ = 1.65 $\mu$m), and
98: K$_s$ ($\lambda$ = 2.15 $\mu$m) were obtained on 2004 February 17 (22:00 UT),
99: 23 (18:36 UT), 25 (17:55 UT), 29 (17:48 UT), and 2004 March 14 (17:51 UT) with
100: the Infrared Survey Facility (IRSF) 1.4m telescope situated at the South
101: African Astronomical Observatory, Sutherland and SIRIUS
102: (Simultaneous three-color InfraRed Imager for Unbiased Surveys),
103: equipped with three 1024$\times$1024 HgCdTe arrays. The field of view in each
104: band is $\sim$ 7\arcmin.7 $\times$ 7\arcmin.7, with a pixel scale of
105: 0\arcsec.45.
106: Further details of the instrument are given in Nagashima et al. (1999) and
107: Nagayama et al. (2003).
108:
109: {\bf For the photometry of the bright NIR source,
110: %counterpart of the
111: %nebula that is positionally coincident with the IRAS source (IRAS 05436-0007),
112: we obtained 10 dithered exposures} of the target centered at
113: ($\alpha$, $\delta$)$_{2000}$ = ($05^h46^m14^s.0$,
114: \mbox{-00$^{\circ}05^{\arcmin}40^{\arcsec}.1$)}, each 1s long to avoid the
115: saturation, simultaneously for each band during all four nights.
116: Total on-target
117: integration times in each of the bands were 10s for the photometry of bright
118: NIR counterpart on all four nights.
119:
120: We also obtained 10 dithered exposures
121: on 2004 Feb 17 each 30s long, 15 dithered exposures on 2004 Feb 23 and 25
122: each 10s long, and 45 dithered exposures each 20s long
123: on 2004 Feb 29 and March 14 of the target to study the morphological
124: details of {\bf the reflection nebula}. Total on-target
125: integration times in each of the bands were
126: %10s for the photometry of bright NIR counterpart on all four nights, and
127: 300s, 150s, 150s, 900s, and {\bf 900s
128: %for the morphological study of McNeil's nebula
129: on 2004 Feb 17, 23, 25, 29, and March 14, respectively}.
130:
131: The observations
132: on 2004 Feb 23, 25, and 29 were done under good photometric sky conditions.
133: The NIR images were obtained at high airmass ($\sim$ 1.9) and in poor
134: seeing condition (FWHM $>$ 2\arcsec)
135: %in J, H and K$_s$-bands)
136: on 2004 Feb 17 and the sky condition was not photometric during 2004 March 14.
137: Therefore we use these observations for the study of the morphological details
138: only. The average seeing sizes (FWHMs) in all the bands were 2.2\arcsec,
139: 1.6\arcsec, 0.9\arcsec, 1.4\arcsec, and 0.9\arcsec on 2004 Feb 17, 23, 25,
140: 29, and March 14, respectively
141: during the observations. The observations were made at airmasses between
142: 1.2 and 1.4 during 2004 Feb 23 - 29. Dark frames and twilight flats were
143: obtained at the beginning
144: and end of the observations. The photometric calibration was obtained by
145: observing the standard star 9116 in the faint NIR standard star catalogue of
146: Persson et al. (1998) at air masses closest to the target observations.
147:
148: Data reduction was done using the pipeline software based on NOAO's
149: IRAF\footnote{IRAF is distributed by the
150: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the
151: Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under contract
152: to the National Science Foundation.} package tasks. Twilight flat-fielding
153: and sky subtraction with a median sky frame were applied. Identification
154: and photometry of point sources were performed by using the DAOFIND and
155: DAOPHOT packages in IRAF, respectively. We used an aperture radius of
156: 16 pixels ($\sim$ 7\arcsec) for the photometry of the McNeil's source.
157: The local sky was evaluated in an annulus with an inner radius of 64 pixels
158: and a width of 12 pixels.
159:
160: \section{Results and Discussion}
161:
162: \subsection{IR morphology {\bf of McNeil's} nebula}
163:
164: The composite color images are constructed from the SIRIUS J, H, and K$_s$-band
165: images (J represented in blue, H in green, and K$_s$ in red) obtained on
166: different seeing (FWHMs) conditions and are shown
167: in Fig. 1. The lower right panel (Fig. 1d) shows the RHK$_s$ (R: blue,
168: H:green, K$_s$: red) composite color image {\bf of McNeil's} nebula after
169: adjusting the spatial resolutions. R-band image was acquired using
170: GMOS-N camera on the Gemini north telescope (Reipurth \& Aspin 2004).
171: The cometary infrared nebula is clearly seen extending toward north from the
172: NIR source (see Figs. 1a, 1b and 1c). {\bf It has a strong morphological
173: resemblance to a ring-shaped nebula, RNO 54, which is associated with an
174: H$\alpha$-emission star (Goodrich 1987)}.
175: {\bf The McNeil's nebula} is blue (bright in J) and has
176: a cavity structure with two rims extending toward north-east and north-west.
177: The north-east rim is brighter and sharp, while the north-west rim is diffuse.
178: The north-east rim can
179: be traced out to $\sim$ 40\arcsec~or $\sim$ 16000 AU at a surface
180: brightness of K$_s$ $\sim$ 18.2 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ (where we assume
181: the distance to L1630 is 400 pc; Anthony-Twarog 1982).
182: %Counter cavity structure is not seen toward the south in our image.
183: This kind of morphology can be probably seen
184: when the eruption has cleared out some of the dust and gas
185: in the envelope
186: surrounding the young star, allowing light to escape and illuminate a
187: cone-shaped cavity carved out by previous eruptions
188: %into the gas
189: (Reipurth \& Aspin 2004).
190: Counter cavity structure is not seen toward the south in our image.
191:
192: In Fig. 2 we show the contour diagram of the region around {\bf V1647 Ori} as
193: seen in our deep K$_s$-band image obtained on 2004 Feb 29.
194: %and March 14, 2004.
195: The star is surrounded by a compact reflection nebulosity that has a
196: {\bf curved tail (north-east rim) characteristic}
197: (see also Reipurth \& Aspin 2004). There is a southward
198: continuation of the extended nebula that is shown in the PSF subtracted image
199: of Fig. 3.
200: This is confirmed by comparing the PSF of the NIR central source which is the
201: counterpart of the IRAS source with the PSF
202: of the star located about 30\arcsec~south-west of the IRAS source (Fig. 3).
203: {\bf We thus find that the compact nebula that encloses all the nebular
204: structure including the two rims has an apparent diameter of about
205: 70\arcsec.}
206:
207: The IR/optical comparison of the region surrounding McNeil's nebula
208: (see Figs. 1d and 4) shows that the position of the bright infrared source is
209: coincident with that of an optical source at the apex of the nebula that is
210: illuminating the fan-shaped cloud of gas, or nebula (Reipurth \& Aspin 2004).
211: It is interesting to compare the morphology of the optical nebula
212: (see Figs. 1d, 4 and Fig. 1 of Reipurth \& Aspin 2004 ) and our IR nebula
213: (Figs. 1 - 4). The optical nebula is more widely and
214: predominantly extended to the north, while the IR nebula is
215: relatively confined but definitely extended to the south, too.
216: In fact, the IR nebula well matches the reddest parts of
217: the optical nebula.
218: %and the
219: The bluest portion of the optical nebula
220: is not seen in IR including the blue knot HH 22 to the north-east
221: and the blue patch to the north. There is a clear color gradient
222: from north to south, as well as from inside to outside the cavity.
223: The gradient is very steep near the central star and the
224: southern extension of the nebula is seen only at IR.
225: This large color gradient
226: and the sudden absence of optical nebula to the south is
227: suggestive of a large scale disk-like structure (or envelope)
228: surrounding the central source
229: which hides the southern nebula. This is often the case for
230: the YSOs associated with a cometary nebula (e.g., Tamura et al. 1991).
231:
232: \subsection{Short timescale variability of the central IR source}
233:
234: NIR photometry {\bf of McNeil's} source obtained on three nights is listed in
235: Table 1. A comparison of the JHK$_s$ magnitudes of {\bf V1647 Ori}
236: %NIR counterpart of IRAS 05436-0007
237: shows that the source has varied over the time of observation between 2MASS
238: (Oct 1998) and IRSF (Feb 2004). Reipurth \& Aspin (2004) have first shown
239: that the object has become brighter by $\sim$ 3 mag in
240: J, H, and K$_s$ bands (Table 1). Our photometry is more accurate
241: ($\Delta$m $\sim$ 0.03) than their measurements, although the values
242: are consistent within 0.1 mag error of the Gemini data.
243: We also see a significant variation in
244: the source brightness ($\Delta$J = 0.16 mag, $\Delta$H = 0.18 mag, and
245: $\Delta$K$_s$ = 0.22 mag) during a period of one
246: week (2004 Feb 23 - 29; Table 1).
247: Since the difference in magnitudes is much
248: larger than the photometric errors, we believe that this is real. To examine
249: this, we also did the photometry of three bright reference stars
250: in our IR FOV (see Table 2).
251: % $\sim$ 80\arcsec~north-east to IRAS 05436-0007 (Table 2).
252: As seen in Table 2, we do not see a large variation in the
253: magnitudes of the reference stars. This further proves that
254: the brightness variation in {\bf V1647 Ori} during a period of one week is
255: real. It also shows that the
256: variability is larger at longer wavelengths than shorter ones
257: and the brightness decreased by about 0.2 mag at J, H and K$_s$-bands
258: during 2004 Feb 23 - 29 (Table 1).
259: %We detect no significant color changes (J-H \& H-K$_s$) over a period of
260: %one week (Feb 23 - 29, 2004; Table 1).
261: Walter et al. (2004) have followed the source in optical and NIR wavelengths
262: over the 25 nights (2004 Feb 11 - May 7) and also found
263: a general decline in brightness of about 0.3-0.4 magnitudes during these
264: 87 days based on the differential light curves. They presented the
265: differential photometry {\bf of McNeil's} source in NIR wavelengths with
266: respect
267: to the only available comparison star (2MASS 05461162-0006279) in their
268: smaller IR FOV.
269: %however nothing else is known about the nature of
270: %the comparison star (variable or steady).
271: We also examined this 2MASS source and found that the brightness of the
272: 2MASS source is fairly constant during a period of one week (see Table 2).
273: Therefore, our observations
274: give absolute value to the McNeil's source variability and are more
275: reliable.
276:
277: Fig. 5 shows a J-H/H-K color-color (CC) diagram. For the purpose of
278: plotting the SIRIUS data in CC diagram, we have converted them into
279: the California Institute of Technology (CIT) system using the color
280: transformations between the SIRIUS and CIT systems
281: (Nakajima et al., in prep)
282: \footnote{available at
283: http://www.z.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp/$\sim$sirius/about/color$_{-}$e.html},
284: that have been obtained by observing several of the red standard stars of
285: Persson et al. (1998).
286: We notice the changes of the
287: infrared colors from before (1998) to after the eruption (2004).
288: The star has moved precisely along a reddening vector due to the intrinsic
289: brightening of the star between six years as well as between one week
290: %(Reipurth \& Aspin 2004)
291: and is moving toward the tip of the locus
292: of classical T Tauri stars (Meyer et al. 1997). This suggests that
293: the central source has an NIR color similar to a dereddened T Tauri star.
294: It is to be noted that the seeing is almost the same for the data points
295: 1 and 3 but different for point 2 (Fig. 5 and Table 1). Therefore, the
296: comparison between 1 and 3 is more reliable.
297: The J-H and H-K values
298: indicate that the circumstellar matter of A$_V$ $\sim$ 8 mag was cleared
299: probably in the eruption,
300: %definitely
301: in less than six years since the 2MASS observations. There is still
302: a significant amount (A$_V$ $\sim$ 6 mag) of
303: circumstellar matter if its original colors are assumed to be those
304: of T Tauri stars.
305:
306: Variability in low-mass
307: YSOs is known (e.g., Hartmann 1998). The total luminosity depends on the mass
308: accretion rate and low mass YSOs like FUor and EXor types of objects
309: have shown variability of several magnitudes in the optical and NIR
310: wavelengths ($\Delta$m $\sim$ 3-4 mag)
311: %and NIR wavelengths
312: (Bell et al. 1995, and references therein). It is possible that we
313: have witnessed an FU Orionis kind of behavior as the source has about the
314: right amplitude (Reipurth \& Aspin 2004). On the other hand EXor eruptions,
315: which may occur repeatedly in a given star, have amplitudes that can be
316: comparable to those of FUors but with much shorter durations
317: (Reipurth \& Aspin 2004). Our data show a significant variation in
318: the source brightness within a period of one week (Table 1).
319: So far, there have been no infrared data showing such significant
320: variation within a period of one week or so.
321: Further
322: photometric monitoring of the object is required to settle the class of eruptive
323: variables to which source of McNeil's nebula belongs.
324:
325: \section{Conclusions}
326:
327: In this letter we have presented the short time variability and the new
328: look of the McNeil's nebula in NIR wavelengths. We
329: carried out deep simultaneous NIR observations of the McNeil's nebula
330: during five nights. From the analysis of NIR images we derive the
331: following conclusions :
332:
333: 1) The McNeil's nebula has a cavity structure with two rims as seen in the
334: NIR images. This might have been produced by the eruption that has cleared out
335: a part of the envelope surrounding the young star.
336: %some of the dust and gas surrounding the young star.
337:
338: 2) The IR/optical comparison of the McNeil's nebula
339: shows that the optical nebula is more widely and
340: predominantly extended to the north, while the IR nebula is
341: relatively confined but definitely extended to the south, too.
342: This color gradient of the nebula is most likely due to
343: the presence of a large scale disk around the young star.
344:
345: 3) The NIR photometric data show a significant
346: variation in the source brightness \mbox{($>$ 0.15 magnitudes)}
347: within a period of one week.
348: %We find that the brightness of the source has decreased by about
349: %0.2 mag at K over a period of one week.
350:
351: 4) Based on the NIR photometry, a post outburst extinction (A$_V$) to
352: McNeil's source appears to be about 6 mag, if the intrinsic JHK$_s$
353: colors of the central star are the same as that of a T Tauri star.
354:
355: %5) Although it is not clear whether McNeil's source falls in FUor
356: %or in an EXor category yet these
357: %NIR observations of the present outburst will provide additional knowledge on
358: %the source.
359:
360: %\Acknowledgments
361:
362: We thank the referee, Prof. George Herbig, for a most thorough
363: reading of this paper and several useful comments and
364: suggestions, which greatly improved the scientific content of the paper.
365: We thank the staff of the South African Astronomical Observatory for their
366: kind support during the observations.
367: DKO was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
368: (JSPS) through a fellowship during which most of this work was done.
369: MT acknowledges support by Grant-in-Aid 12309010 from the Ministry of
370: Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology.
371: We thank Colin Aspin and Bo Reipurth for providing us with the FITS images of
372: their Gemini optical bands {\bf of McNeil's} nebula.
373:
374: \begin{thebibliography}{}
375: \bibitem[]{}Abrah\'am, P., K\'osp\'al, A., Csizmadia, Sz., et al. 2004,
376: \aap, 419, L39
377: \bibitem[]{}Andrews, S.M., Rothberg, B., \& Simon, T. 2004, \apj, 610, L45
378: \bibitem[]{}Anthony-Twarog, B.J. 1982, \aj, 87, 1213
379: \bibitem[]{}Bell, K.R., Lin, D.N.C., Hartmann, L.W., \& Kenyon, S.J. 1995,
380: \apj, 444, 376
381: \bibitem[]{}Bessell, M.S., \& Brett, J.M. 1988, \pasp, 100, 1134
382: \bibitem[]{}Brice\~no, C., Vivas, A.K., Hern\'andez, J., et al. 2004, \apj,
383: 606, L123
384: \bibitem[]{}Goodrich, R.W. 1987, \pasp, 99, 116
385: \bibitem[]{}Hartmann, L. 1998, in Accretion Processes in Star Formation,
386: Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
387: \bibitem[]{}Kastner, J.H., Richmond, M., Grosso, N., \& et al. 2004,
388: \nat, 430, 22
389: \bibitem[]{}McGehee, P.M., Smith, J.A., Henden, A.A., et al. 2004 (in press,
390: astro-ph/0408308)
391: \bibitem[]{}Meyer, M., Calvet, N., \& Hillenbrand, L.A. 1997, \aj, 114, 288
392: \bibitem{} McNeil, J.W. 2004, IAUC 8284
393: \bibitem[]{}Nagashima, C., et al. 1999, Proc. Star Formation 1999, ed.
394: T. Nakamoto (Nagano: Nobeyama Radio Obs.), 387
395: \bibitem[]{}Nagashima, C., Dobbie, P. D., Nagayama, T., et al. 2003,
396: \mnras, 343, 1263
397: \bibitem[]{}Nagayama, T., et al. 2003, Proc. SPIE, 4841, 459
398: \bibitem[]{}Persson, S.E., Murphy, D.C., Krzeminski, W., Roth, M., \&
399: Rieke, M.J. 1998, \aj, 116, 2475
400: \bibitem[]{}Reipurth, B., \& Aspin, C. 2004, \apj, 606, L119
401: \bibitem[]{}Rieke, G.H., \& Lebofsky, M.J. 1985, \apj, 288, 618
402: \bibitem[]{}Tamura, M., Gatley, I., Waller, W., \& Werner, M.W. 1991,
403: \apj, 374, L25
404: \bibitem[]{}Vacca, W.D., Cushing, M.C., \& Simon, T. 2004, \apj, 609, L29
405: \bibitem[]{}Walter, F.M., Stringfellow, G.S., Sherry, W.H., \& Pollatou, A.F.
406: 2004, {\bf \aj, 128, 1872})
407: \end{thebibliography}
408:
409: \clearpage
410:
411: \begin{table}
412: \caption{JHK photometry {\bf of McNeil's source (V1647 Ori)}}
413: %\footnotesize
414: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}
415: \\
416: \hline
417: \hline
418: Date (UT) & JD & J & H & K$_s$ & K$^\prime$ & K & FWHM$^a$ & Telescope \\
419: \hline
420: 1998 Oct 7 & -- & 14.74$\pm$.03 & 12.16$\pm$.03 & 10.27$\pm$.02 & -- & -- & & 2MASS \\
421: 2004 Feb 3 & -- & 11.1$\pm$.1 & 9.0$\pm$.1 & -- & 7.4$\pm$.1 & -- & 0.5\arcsec & Gemini$^b$\\
422: 2004 Feb 11 & -- & 10.79$\pm$.01 & 8.83$\pm$.01 & -- & -- & 7.72$\pm$.01 & -- & USNO$^d$\\
423: 2004 Feb 23$^c$ & 2453058.784 & 10.74$\pm$.05 & 8.93$\pm$.01 & 7.40$\pm$.02 & -- & -- & 1.6\arcsec & IRSF\\
424: 2004 Feb 25$^c$ & 2453060.756 & 10.79$\pm$.05 & 8.95$\pm$.01 & 7.47$\pm$.01 & -- & -- & 0.9\arcsec & IRSF\\
425: 2004 Feb 29$^c$ & 2453064.782 & 10.90$\pm$.06 & 9.11$\pm$.01 & 7.62$\pm$.02 & -- & -- & 1.4\arcsec & IRSF\\
426: 2004 Apr 12 & -- & 10.94$\pm$.02 & 9.06$\pm$.02 & -- & -- & 7.59$\pm$.02 & -- & USNO$^d$ \\
427: %Mar 14, 2004$^a$ & 10.71$\pm$.06 & 9.65$\pm$.02 & 7.55$\pm$.04 & IRSF\\
428: \hline
429: \end{tabular}
430: \\
431: $^a$ Measured FWHM of a standard star. This is a measure of the seeing.
432:
433: $^b$ Reipurth \& Aspin (2004): photometry is obtained in an aperture with radius 0.9\arcsec
434:
435: $^c$ IRSF photometry is obtained in an aperture with radius 7.2\arcsec.
436:
437: $^d$ McGehee et al. (2004)
438: \end{table}
439:
440: \begin{table}
441: \caption{JHK photometry of the reference stars at IRSF}
442: %\footnotesize
443: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
444: \\
445: \hline
446: \hline
447: Reference star & J & H & K$_s$ & Date (UT)\\
448: \hline
449: 2MASS05461946-0005199 & 10.81$\pm$.07 & 9.73$\pm$.02 & 8.96$\pm$.07 & 2004 Feb 23\\
450: & 10.77$\pm$.05 & 9.70$\pm$.02 & 8.97$\pm$.04 & 2004 Feb 29\\
451: \\
452: 2MASS05460575-0002396 & 12.34$\pm$.02 & 11.27$\pm$.01 & 10.82$\pm$.02 & 2004 Feb 23\\
453: & 12.35$\pm$.02 & 11.29$\pm$.01 & 10.87$\pm$.01 & 2004 Feb 29\\
454: \\
455: 2MASS05461162-0006279 & 13.81$\pm$.07 & 12.26$\pm$.04 & 11.32$\pm$.05 & 2004 Feb 23\\
456: & 13.80$\pm$.07 & 12.27$\pm$.02 & 11.33$\pm$.02 & 2004 Feb 29\\
457: \hline
458: \end{tabular}
459: \end{table}
460:
461: \clearpage
462:
463: \begin{figure}
464: \begin{center}
465: %\FigureFile(175mm,175mm){f1.eps}
466: \end{center}
467: \caption{JHK$_s$ three-color composite images {\bf of McNeil's nebula} (J: blue,
468: H: green, K$_s$: red) obtained with SIRIUS mounted on the IRSF 1.4m telescope
469: on 2004 Feb 23 [a],
470: %(seeing $\sim$ 1.6\arcsec),
471: Feb 25 [b]
472: %(seeing $\sim$ 0.9\arcsec)
473: and Feb 29 [c],
474: %(seeing $\sim$ 1.4\arcsec),
475: respectively.
476: %The total integration times are 150s, 150s and 900s on Feb 23, 25 and 29,
477: %respectively.
478: d) RHK$_s$ three-color optical/IR composite image (R: blue, H: green,
479: K$_s$: red) after adjusting the spatial resolutions. R-band image was
480: acquired with Gemini on 2004 Feb 14 (Reipurth \& Aspin 2004) and H and
481: K$_s$-band images were obtained with SIRIUS on 2004 Feb 25. North is up and
482: east is to the left.
483: \label{fig1}}
484: \end{figure}
485:
486: \clearpage
487:
488: \begin{figure}
489: \begin{center}
490: %\FigureFile(175mm,175mm){f2.eps}
491: \end{center}
492: \caption{{\bf A compact nebula (the nebular structure including the two rims)}
493: is seen around the illuminating star of McNeil's
494: nebula in \mbox{K$_s$-band} image obtained on 2004 Feb 29.
495: % and March 14, 2004, respectively.
496: %The total on source integration time is 900 s.
497: The lowest contour and the contour interval are 18.2 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ and
498: 0.3 mag arcsec$^{-2}$, respectively.
499: %for both images.
500: The abscissa and the ordinate are in J2000 epoch.
501: \label{fig2}}
502: \end{figure}
503:
504: \clearpage
505:
506: \begin{figure}
507: \begin{center}
508: %\FigureFile(175mm,175mm){f3.eps}
509: \end{center}
510: \caption{The PSF subtracted image of McNeil's nebula region in H-band
511: obtained on 2004 Feb 23 displayed in a logarithmic intensity scale.
512: North is up and east is to the left. The locations of the NIR central source
513: {\bf (V1647 Ori)} which is the counterpart of the IRAS source
514: and the star $\sim$ 30\arcsec~south-west of {\bf V1647 Ori}
515: %the IRAS source
516: are marked
517: by filled triangles in the H-band image (see the text).
518: \label{fig3}}
519: \end{figure}
520:
521: \clearpage
522:
523: \begin{figure}
524: \begin{center}
525: %\FigureFile(175mm,175mm){f4.eps}
526: \end{center}
527: \caption{IR and optical images of the region surrounding McNeil's nebula.
528: SIRIUS K$_s$-band image (grey color) obtained on 2004 Feb 29 is overlaid with
529: contours from the optical R-band image obtained with Gemini
530: (Reipurth \& Aspin 2004). The abscissa and the ordinate are in J2000 epoch.
531: \label{fig4}}
532: \end{figure}
533:
534: \clearpage
535:
536: \begin{figure}
537: \begin{center}
538: %\FigureFile(175mm,175mm){f5.eps}
539: \end{center}
540: \caption{J-H/H-K color-color diagram showing the location of {\bf V1647 Ori}
541: %counterpart of IRAS 05436-0007
542: as observed with 2MASS (filled circle) on
543: 1998 Oct 7; with IRSF (filled squares) on 2004 Feb 23 [1], Feb 25 [2] and
544: Feb 29 [3]; with Gemini (filled triangle) on 2004 Feb 3; and with USNO
545: (asterisks) on 2004 Feb 11 and Apr 12.
546: The sequences of field dwarfs (solid curve) and giants (thick dashed curve)
547: are from Bessell \& Brett (1988). The dotted line represents the locus of
548: T-Tauri stars (Meyer et al. 1997). Dashed straight lines represent the
549: reddening vectors (Rieke \& Lebofsky 1985). The crosses on the dashed lines
550: are separated by A$_V$ = 5 mag.
551: \label{fig5}}
552: \end{figure}
553:
554: \end{document}
555: