1: % Template article for preprint document class `elsart'

2: % with harvard style bibliographic references

3: % SP 2001/01/05

4: 

5: \documentclass{elsart3}

6: %\documentclass{aa}

7: 

8: % Use the option doublespacing or reviewcopy to obtain double line spacing

9: % \documentclass[doublespacing]{elsart}

10: 

11: % the natbib package allows both number and author-year (Harvard)

12: % style referencing;

13: \usepackage{natbib}

14: \usepackage{psfig}

15: \usepackage{graphicx}

16: 

17: % if you use PostScript figures in your article

18: % use the graphics package for simple commands

19: % \usepackage{graphics}

20: % or use the graphicx package for more complicated commands

21: % \usepackage{graphicx}

22: % or use the epsfig package if you prefer to use the old commands

23: % \usepackage{epsfig}

24: 

25: % The amssymb package provides various useful mathematical symbols

26: \usepackage{amssymb}

27: \parindent=1cm

28: 

29: \newcommand{\aap}{A\&A\ }

30: \newcommand{\aaps}{A\&AS\ }

31: \newcommand{\pasp}{PASP\ }

32: \newcommand{\apj}{ApJ\ }

33: \newcommand{\apjl}{ApJ\ }

34: \newcommand{\apjs}{ApJS\ }

35: \newcommand{\mnras}{MNRAS\ }

36: \newcommand{\aj}{AJ\ }

37: \newcommand{\araa}{ARA\&A\ }

38: \newcommand{\gca}{Geocosmochimica Acta\ }

39: \newcommand{\AuJP}{AuJP\ }

40: \newcommand{\nat}{Nat\ }

41: \newcommand{\pasj}{PASJ\ }

42: \newcommand{\procspie}{Proc.E\ }

43: \newcommand{\advspres}{Adv. Sp. Res.\ }

44: \newcommand{\iaucirc}{IAU Circ.\ }

45: \newcommand{\qjras}{QJRAS\ }

46: 

47: \begin{document}

48: 

49: \begin{frontmatter}

50: 

51: % Title, authors and addresses

52: 

53: % use the thanksref command within \title, \author or \address for footnotes;

54: % use the corauthref command within \author for corresponding author footnotes;

55: % use the ead command for the email address,

56: % and the form \ead[url] for the home page:

57: % \title{Title\thanksref{label1}}

58: % \thanks[label1]{}

59: % \author{Name\corauthref{cor1}\thanksref{label2}}

60: % \ead{email address}

61: % \ead[url]{home page}

62: % \thanks[label2]{}

63: % \corauth[cor1]{}

64: % \address{Address\thanksref{label3}}

65: % \thanks[label3]{}

66: 

67: \title{Detection of thermal X-ray emission in the halo of the plerionic supernova remnant G21.5-0.9}

68: 

69: % use optional labels to link authors explicitly to addresses:

70: % \author[label1,label2]{}

71: % \address[label1]{}

72: % \address[label2]{}

73: 

74: \author[label2]{F. Bocchino}

75: 

76: \address[label2]{INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, 90134 Palermo, Italy

77: }

78: \begin{abstract}

79: The detection of a soft thermal X-ray component in the spectrum of a

80: bright knot in the halo of the plerion G21.5-0.9 is reported. Using a

81: collisional ionization equilibrium model for an hot optically thin plasma,

82: a temperature $kT=0.12-0.24$ kev, a mass of 0.3--1.0 M$_\odot$ and a

83: density of 1.6-6 cm$^{-3}$ is derived. The spectral analysis suggests

84: a possible overabundance of Silicon with respect to the solar value

85: in the knot; if this will be confirmed this object may be a clump of

86: shocked ejecta.

87: 

88: \end{abstract}

89: 

90: \begin{keyword}

91: % keywords here, in the form: keyword \sep keyword

92: PWN \sep ejecta \sep G21.5-0.9 \sep plerion \sep X-rays

93: % PACS codes here, in the form: \PACS code \sep code

94: 

95: \end{keyword}

96: 

97: \end{frontmatter}

98: 

99: % main text

100: 

101: \section{Introduction and data analysis}

102: 

103: The plerion G21.5-0.9 has been the subject of various studies in radio

104: (\citealt{bwd01} and references therein), infrared (\citealt{gt98})

105: and X-ray (\citealt{shp01,lm02}). However, its weak X-ray halo was

106: discovered only recently (\citealt{scs00,wbb01}) thanks to the larger

107: sensitivity of Chandra (\citealt{wtv00}) and XMM-Newton (\citealt{jla01})

108: with respect to previous X-ray astronomy satellites. The weakness of the

109: halo has prevented a detailed study of its features up to now.  Luckily,

110: G21.5-0.9 is a calibration source for both Chandra and XMM-Newton and a

111: large number of calibration datasets have been accumulated and is still being

112: accumulated to this purpose.  In this paper, this large collection

113: of public data is used to investigate the nature of the brightest spot in the

114: X-ray halo of this plerion, namely the North Spur (\citealt{wbb01}).

115: 

116: For XMM-Newton, the data consist of the observation of G21.5-0.9

117: with the source positioned on the axis and off the axis of the EPIC

118: cameras (observation ID 0122700101, 0122700201, 0122700301, 0122700401,

119: 0122700501), which have a total summed live time of 142 ks for PN and

120: 146 ks for the MOS cameras. The observations were taken on April 7--17,

121: 2000. The original event files were screened to eliminate the contribution

122: of soft proton flares. After the screening, the summed exposure time

123: were 79 ks for PN and 116 ks for MOS. All the analysis of XMM data

124: was performed with the software SAS v6.0.  The XMM-Newton spectra of

125: the North Spur, collected in the single observations using a circular

126: region of 20 arcsec radius centered at location 18$^h$33$^m$32.7$^s$

127: RA and -10$^d$32$^m$49$^s$ DEC (J2000), were summed and their response

128: averaged. The spectra of the two MOS cameras were also summed and

129: their effective areas and response matrices were averaged.  The fit

130: was performed separately for the PN and MOS, and then, after checking

131: that they give consistent results, they were fitted simultaneously.

132: The spectra have been rebinned to a minimum of 20 counts per bin and

133: the 0.5--9 keV energy range was selected for the spectral fitting.

134: The background used for the spectral analysis was collected in an annulus

135: centered on $18^h33^m33.8^s$ RA and $-10^d34^m07^s$ DEC J2000 between

136: 85$^{\prime\prime}$ and 120$^{\prime\prime}$ from the center (this region

137: is inside the X-ray halo at the same average off-axis angle as the North

138: Spur). This method subtracts the contribution of the underlying continuum

139: due to diffuse emission of the X-ray halo from the source spectrum,

140: and concentrate the study on the intrinsic spectral properties of the

141: North Spur.

142: 

143: For Chandra, 21 observations from the Chandra archive for

144: which the source was located on the ACIS S3 chip were selected, in order to maximize

145: the instrument response in the soft X-ray band, and at off-axis angle

146: $<5^\prime$. The sequence number of the selected observation are 0159,

147: 1433,  1554,  1717,  1769,  1771, 1839,  2873, 3693, 4353, 5166,1230,

148: 1553, 1716, 1718, 1770, 1838, 1840, 3474,3700, 4354. The datasets

149: include the dataset used by \citet{shp01}, the latest report on X-ray

150: data of the North Spur. However, they used only 6 observation for a total

151: of 65 ks, whereas we also include all the more recent observation that

152: have been done, for a total of 196.5 ks. This is the reason why they did

153: not detect the thermal emission reported in this work. The observations

154: were reprocessed using CIAO 3.1 and CALDB 2.28 in order to apply the

155: most recent calibrations to all the data, including time dependent gain

156: correction. Afterwards, the data were filtered to retain grade 0,2,3,4,6

157: and the status column equal zero.  All the filtered datasets were merged

158: together using the CIAO {\sc merge\_all} task. The spectrum of the North

159: Spur was extracted using a circular region centered at the same location

160: as before, but with a smaller radius (13 arcsec) to exploit the high

161: resolution of the Chandra mirrors. The spectrum was rebinned like the

162: EPIC spectrum and the band 0.5--8 keV was used. The response matrix and

163: effective area were generated using the CIAO tasks for the analysis of

164: extended sources. The background was selected in the same way as the

165: XMM-Newton background.  All the fits were performed using XSPEC v11.3.

166: 

167: \section{Results of spectral fitting}

168: 

169: The spectra were first fitted with a power law model modified by

170: the interstellar absorption of \citet{mm83} and a reasonable fit was

171: found. All the best-fit parameters and their uncertainties are reported

172: in Table \ref{res}.  However, given the non uniform distribution of

173: residuals in the soft band and the possibility that the North Spur may

174: show signs of thermal emission due to hot plasma, as part of a shell

175: or ejecta associated to G21.5-0.9, the spectra were fitted with a

176: combination of a power law model and the {\sc mekal} optically-thin

177: thermal plasma model (\citealt{mgv85}, \citealt{log95}). The results,

178: also showed in Table \ref{res}, indicate that the two components fit is

179: better then the power law only fit. The decrement of $\chi^2$ is

180: significant according to the F-test (probability $\sim 10^{-4}$),

181: and the distribution of residuals is more homogeneous. The discrepancy

182: between XMM-Newton and Chandra derived fluxes are due to different

183: extraction region area and suggests that the source is extended

184: (especially its non-thermal emission).

185: 

186: \begin{table*}

187:   \caption{Summary of spectral fitting results to the X/ray spectrum of the bright knot ``North Spur.}

188: \label{res}

189: \medskip

190: \centering\begin{minipage}{12.2cm}

191: \begin{tabular}{lcccccc} \hline

192: \small

193:   Model & $N_H$  & $\gamma$ & Norm & $kT$ & flux\footnote{Absorbed flux due to the thermal component only, in the 0.5--2.0 keV.} & $\chi^2/dof$ \\

194:       & cm$^{-2}$ & photon & cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ keV$^{-1}$ & keV & erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$  \\

195:       & $\times 10^{22}$ & index & $\times 10^{-4}$  & & $\times 10^{-15}$ & \\ \hline

196: 

197: \multicolumn{7}{c}{XMM-Newton PN and MOS} \\

198: 

199: Power-law & $1.45\pm0.13$ & $1.91\pm0.12$ & $13.9\pm2.5$ & - & - & 442/407 \\

200: P.L.+MEKAL & $2.63\pm0.30$ & $2.30\pm0.15$ & $29.3\pm6.5$ & $0.15\pm0.03$ & $12.0\pm4.5 $ & 423/405 \\

201: P.L.+VMEKAL\footnote{Only Mg and Si abundances were fitted (best-fit values and 90\% uncertainties are 1.0(0.1--2.3) and 4(1.3--8), respectively). Flux of Mg XI line at 1.34 keV is $3.4^{+2.0}_{-1.8}\times 10^{-6}$ ph cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, whereas flux of Si XIII line at 1.86 keV is $8.7^{+6.2}_{-5.3}\times 10^{-6}$ ph cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.} & $2.63\pm0.39$ & $2.26\pm0.13$ & $28.5\pm7.6$ & $0.17\pm0.03$ & $11.4\pm5.6$ & 410/403 \\

202: 

203: \multicolumn{7}{c}{Chandra ACIS S3} \\

204: 

205: Power-law & $1.15\pm0.09$ & $1.72\pm0.10$ & $9.3\pm1.2$ & - & - & 237/187 \\

206: P.L.+MEKAL & $1.78\pm0.32$ & $2.04\pm0.16$ & $15.4\pm3.7$ & $0.17\pm0.04$ & $5.3\pm1.3$ & 217/185 \\

207: P.L.+VMEKAL\footnote{Only Mg and Si abundances were fitted (90\% confidence range is $>0.6$ for Mg and $>5$ for Si). Flux of Mg XI line at 1.34 keV is $2.8^{+1.5}_{-2.5}\times 10^{-6}$ ph cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, whereas flux of Si XIII line at 1.86 keV is $9.5^{+3.7}_{-4.2}\times 10^{-6}$ ph cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.} & $1.81\pm0.24$ & $2.01\pm0.14$ & $14.8\pm3.0$ & $0.15\pm0.03$ & $7.9\pm2.3$ & 206/183 \\

208: 

209: \hline

210: 

211: \end{tabular}

212: \end{minipage}

213: \end{table*}

214: 

215:    \begin{figure}[bp!]

216:   % \centering

217:    \centerline{

218:       \includegraphics[width=6.5cm,angle=-90]{fig1.ps}

219:       }

220:    \caption{XMM-Newton PN and MOS spectra of the bright knot named North

221:    Spur in the X-ray halo of the plerion G21.5-0.9. Solid line corresponds

222:    to the best-fit obtained with a thermal+non thermal model. We also

223:    show the contribution of thermal and non-thermal components to the

224:    total best-fit spectra (for MOS only).}

225: 

226:    \label{epic}

227:    \end{figure}

228: 

229:    \begin{figure}[bp!]

230:   % \centering

231:    \centerline{

232:       \includegraphics[width=9.5cm,angle=-90]{fig2.ps}

233:       }

234:    \caption{Same as Fig. \protect\ref{epic} but for Chandra ACIS S3.}

235:    \label{acis}

236:    \end{figure}

237: 

238: The XMM-Newton and Chandra spectra are shown in Fig. \ref{epic} and

239: \ref{acis}, along with the best-fit two component model.  Emission

240: lines of Mg XI at 1.34 keV and Si XIII at 1.86 keV may be identified in

241: FIg. \ref{acis}. Other expected emission lines at different energies are

242: not evident due to limited statistics of these highly absorbed spectra

243: and moderate CCD spectral resolution.

244: 

245:    \begin{figure}[tbp!]

246:    \centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{fig3.ps}}

247:    \caption{68\%, 90\% and 99\% confidence level contours for the plasma temperature and emission measure of the thermal component used in the fit of the North Spur XMM-Newton EPIC ({\em thin lines}) and Chandra ACIS-S ({\em thick lines}) spectra.}

248:    \label{ktnorm}

249:    \end{figure}

250: Fig. \ref{ktnorm} shows the $\chi^2$ contour levels in the temperature-emission measure plane corresponding to confidence levels of 68\%, 90\% and 99\% on parameter uncertainties.

251:    \begin{figure}[tbp!]

252:   % \centering

253:    \centerline{\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{fig4.ps}}

254:    \caption{Same as Fig. \protect\ref{ktnorm} but for Mg and Si abundances relative to solar.}

255:    \label{mgsi}

256:    \end{figure}

257: Fig. \ref{mgsi} shows the same contours levels of Fig. \ref{ktnorm},

258: but for the Mg and Si abundances when these parameters are left free to

259: vary. The $\chi^2$ obtained in this case is better than the

260: case of abundances fixed to solar values (F-test probability of $2\times

261: 10^{-3}$), but the solar values for both elemental abundances are still

262: within the 99\% confidence level.

263: 

264: \section{Discussion}

265: 

266: The best-fit Si abundances obtained from the fit is around 4 and its 90\%

267: confidence level range is between about 2 and 10 for the XMM-Newton EPIC

268: and above 5 for Chandra  ACIS-S. Even though the solar value cannot be

269: excluded at a 99\% confidence level for XMM-Newton, the fact that both Chandra

270: and XMM-Newton independently give a best-fit Si abundance above solar

271: can be considered a hint that this element is somewhat

272: overabundant with respect to solar. On the other hand, Mg abundance is

273: found to be compatible with the solar value.

274: 

275: The best-fit Si abundance is not compatible with the abundances

276: found in shocks of young SNR interacting with the circumstellar material

277: (see, e.g., \citealt{phs04}). Instead, it may indicate that the North

278: Spur is an ejecta knot. The fact that the Mg abundance ranges between

279: 0.3 and 2 with a best-fit of $\sim 1$ may imply that we are seeing at a

280: Si-rich knot like the one observed in Cas A (\citealt{lh03}) and in other

281: remnant. However, given the lack of other emission line in the spectrum

282: and the overall weakness of the thermal component, a full comparison

283: with the abundance patterns observed in ejecta of other young SNRs

284: is not possible, so the interpretation of North Spur as

285: a Si-rich ejecta knot needs more data to be confirmed.

286: 

287: Assuming a reasonable line of sight of the emitting plasma in the North

288: Spur (about 1 pc), a density of the knot of $3.8 (1.6-6) \times

289: d_5^{-1/2}$ cm$^{-3}$ were derived (where $d_5$ is the distance in units of 5 kpc,

290: \citealt{bs81}), and a total mass of the thermal plasma of $0.7 (0.3-1)

291: \times d_5^{-5/2}$ M$_\odot$. Both density and mass are consistent with

292: an ejecta of a Type II SN. However, the measured temperature (between

293: 0.12 and 0.2 keV, considering both the EPIC and ACIS measurements)

294: is lower then typical ejecta knot temperature measured in young SNRs

295: (e.g. \citealt{lh03} for Cas A).

296: 

297: This discrepancy can be eliminated if we assume that the ejecta we are

298: observing have not been heated by the passage of the reverse shock, but by

299: the supersonic shock of the expanding pulsar wind nebula. The expansion

300: of a PWN in the freely expanding ejecta of its SNR has been studied

301: by several authors (\citealt{rc84}, \citealt{vag01}, \citealt{che04}).

302: The X-ray emission associated to the PWN supersonic shock into the ejecta

303: have been observed up to now only in 3C58 (\citealt{bwm01}), while for

304: the Crab and 0540-69 has been observed in the optical (\citealt{sh97},

305: \citealt{kmw89}). There are no other established observational signature

306: of PWN expanding into ejecta (see \citealt{che04} for a review). In

307: 3C58, \citet{bwm01} measured an X-ray temperature of 0.2 keV, which

308: is remarkably similar to the one found here in the North Spur of

309: G21.5-0.9. However, the mass reported in the case of 3C58 was only 0.1

310: M$_\odot$ and \citet{che04} noted that these was higher then the predicted

311: swept-up mass of ejecta for the evolutionary stage of that remnant. If

312: we assume a similar evolutionary stage for G21.5-0.9, our mass estimate

313: in the North Spur is even more problematic for this scenario.

314: 

315: We note that the interpretation of the North Spur

316: in term of ejecta overrun by the PWN would imply a radius of the X-ray

317: plerion much larger then the radio plerion (about 120 arcsec vs. 50

318: arcsec of the radio plerion, \citealt{fhm88}), a feature which is not

319: expected and indeed not observed in any other PWN. Even if such a large

320: radius of the X-ray nebula compared to the radius of the radio nebula

321: was suggested elsewhere in literature for G21.5-0.9 (\citealt{shp01}),

322: it would be hard to explain it in terms of conventional PWN models.

323: 

324: Finally, we note that the differences of best-fit values between Chandra

325: and XMM in Table \ref{res} do not affect the conclusion of the paper

326: about the presence of an additional thermal component in the spectrum.

327: One of the reason of the differences may be the different extraction

328: radii used for Chandra and XMM (this fully explains the differences in

329: the fluxes, for instance). Further discussions about the nature of the

330: differences are outside the scope of this work.

331: 

332: % The Appendices part is started with the command \appendix;

333: % appendix sections are then done as normal sections

334: % \appendix

335: 

336: % \section{}

337: % \label{}

338: 

339: % Bibliographic references with the natbib package:

340: % Parenthetical: \citep{Bai92} produces (Bailyn 1992).

341: % Textual: \citet{Bai95} produces Bailyn et al. (1995).

342: % An affix and part of a reference:

343: %   \citep[e.g.][Ch. 2]{Bar76}

344: %   produces (e.g. Barnes et al. 1976, Ch. 2).

345: 

346: 

347: 

348: % \bibitem[Names(Year)]{label} or \bibitem[Names(Year)Long names]{label}.

349: % (\harvarditem{Name}{Year}{label} is also supported.)

350: % Text of bibliographic item

351: %\bibitem[]{}

352: 

353: %\begin{acknowledgements}

354: %  I thank Eric van der Swaluw for useful discussions at the COSPR 2004

355: %  meeting in Paris on this topic.

356: %

357: %\end{acknowledgements}

358: 

359: \begin{thebibliography}{}

360: 

361: \bibitem[{Becker} and {Szymkowiak}(1981)]{bs81}

362: {Becker}, R.~H. and {Szymkowiak}, A.~E., {High resolution X-ray and radio

363:   images of the Crab-like supernova remnant G21.5-0.9}, {\em \apjl}, {\bf 248},

364:   L23--L26, 1981.

365: 

366: \bibitem[{Bocchino} et al.(2001)]{bwm01}

367: {Bocchino}, F., {Warwick}, R.~S., {Marty}, P., {et~al.}, The X-ray nebula of

368:   the filled center supernova remnant 3C 58 and its interaction with the

369:   environment, {\em \aap}, {\bf 369}, 1078--1087, 2001.

370: 

371: \bibitem[{Bock} et al.(2001)]{bwd01}

372: {Bock}, D.~C.-J., {Wright}, M.~C.~H., and {Dickel}, J.~R., {The Crab-like

373:   Supernova Remnant G21.5-0.9 at Millimeter Wavelengths}, {\em \apjl}, {\bf

374:   561}, L203--L206, 2001.

375: 

376: \bibitem[{Chevalier}(2004)]{che04}

377: {Chevalier}, R.~A., {Pulsar wind nebulae: theoretical aspects and observational

378:   constraints}, {\em Advances in Space Research}, {\bf 33}, 456--460, 2004.

379: 

380: \bibitem[{Furst} et al.(1988)]{fhm88}

381: {Furst}, E., {Handa}, T., {Morita}, K., {et~al.}, {Detection of axisymmetric

382:   filaments in the filled-center supernova remnant G21.5-0.9}, {\em \pasj},

383:   {\bf 40}, 347--356, 1988.

384: 

385: \bibitem[{Gallant} and {Tuffs}(1998)]{gt98}

386: {Gallant}, Y.~A. and {Tuffs}, R.~J., {Infrared observations of plerions with

387:   ISO}, {\em Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana}, {\bf 69}, 963--970,

388:   1998.

389: 

390: \bibitem[{Jansen} et al.(2001)]{jla01}

391: {Jansen}, F., {Lumb}, D., {Altieri}, B., {et~al.}, {XMM-Newton observatory. I.

392:   The spacecraft and operations}, {\em \aap}, {\bf 365}, L1--L6, 2001.

393: 

394: \bibitem[{Kirshner} et al.(1989)]{kmw89}

395: {Kirshner}, R.~P., {Morse}, J.~A., {Winkler}, P.~F., {et~al.}, {The penultimate

396:   supernova in the Large Magellanic Cloud - SNR 0540-69.3}, {\em \apj}, {\bf

397:   342}, 260--271, 1989.

398: 

399: \bibitem[{La Palombara} and {Mereghetti}(2002)]{lm02}

400: {La Palombara}, N. and {Mereghetti}, S., {Timing analysis of the core of the

401:   Crab-like SNR}, {\em \aap}, {\bf 383}, 916--918, 2002.

402: 

403: \bibitem[{Laming} and {Hwang}(2003)]{lh03}

404: {Laming}, J.~M. and {Hwang}, U., {On the Determination of Ejecta Structure and

405:   Explosion Asymmetry from the X-Ray Knots of Cassiopeia A}, {\em \apj}, {\bf

406:   597}, 347--361, 2003.

407: 

408: \bibitem[{Liedahl} et al.(1995)]{log95}

409: {Liedahl}, D.~A., {Osterheld}, A.~L., and {Goldstein}, W.~H., New calculations

410:   of Fe L-shell X-ray spectra in high-temperature plasmas, {\em \apjl}, {\bf

411:   438}, L115--L118, 1995.

412: 

413: \bibitem[{Mewe} et al.(1985)]{mgv85}

414: {Mewe}, R., {Gronenschild}, E. H. B.~M., and {van den Oord}, G. H.~J.,

415:   Calculated X-radiation from optically thin plasmas. V, {\em \aaps}, {\bf 62},

416:   197--254, 1985.

417: 

418: \bibitem[{Morrison} and {McCammon}(1983)]{mm83}

419: {Morrison}, R. and {McCammon}, D., Interstellar photoelectric absorption cross

420:   sections, 0.03-10 keV, {\em \apj}, {\bf 270}, 119--122, 1983.

421: 

422: \bibitem[{Park} et al.(2004)]{phs04}

423: {Park}, S., {Hughes}, J.~P., {Slane}, P.~O., {et~al.}, {Nucleosynthesis in the

424:   Oxygen-rich Supernova Remnant G292.0+1.8 from Chandra X-Ray Spectroscopy},

425:   {\em \apjl}, {\bf 602}, L33--L36, 2004.

426: 

427: \bibitem[{Reynolds} and {Chevalier}(1984)]{rc84}

428: {Reynolds}, S.~P. and {Chevalier}, R.~A., Evolution of pulsar-driven supernova

429:   remnants, {\em \apj}, {\bf 278}, 630--648, 1984.

430: 

431: \bibitem[{Safi-Harb} et al.(2001)]{shp01}

432: {Safi-Harb}, S., {Harrus}, I.~M., {Petre}, R., {et~al.}, {X-Ray Observations of

433:   the Supernova Remnant G21.5-0.9}, {\em \apj}, {\bf 561}, 308--320, 2001.

434: 

435: \bibitem[{Sankrit} and {Hester}(1997)]{sh97}

436: {Sankrit}, R. and {Hester}, J.~J., The Shock and Extended Remnant around the

437:   Crab Nebula, {\em \apj}, {\bf 491}, 796--807, 1997.

438: 

439: \bibitem[{Slane} et al.(2000)]{scs00}

440: {Slane}, P., {Chen}, Y., {Schulz}, N.~S., {et~al.}, Chandra Observations of the

441:   Crab-like Supernova Remnant G21.5-0.9, {\em \apjl}, {\bf 533}, L29--L32,

442:   2000.

443: 

444: \bibitem[{van der Swaluw} et al.(2001)]{vag01}

445: {van der Swaluw}, E., {Achterberg}, A., {Gallant}, Y.~A., {et~al.}, {Pulsar

446:   wind nebulae in supernova remnants. Spherically symmetric hydrodynamical

447:   simulations}, {\em \aap}, {\bf 380}, 309--317, 2001.

448: 

449: \bibitem[{Warwick} et al.(2001)]{wbb01}

450: {Warwick}, R.~S., {Bernard}, J.~., {Bocchino}, F., {et~al.}, The extended X-ray

451:   halo of the Crab-like SNR G21.5-0.9, {\em \aap}, {\bf 365}, L248--L253, 2001.

452: 

453: \bibitem[{Weisskopf} et al.(2000)]{wtv00}

454: {Weisskopf}, M.~C., {Tananbaum}, H.~D., and {van Speybroeck}, L.~P.

455: \newblock {Chandra X-ray Observatory (CXO): overview}.

456: \newblock In {\em Proc. SPIE Vol. 4012, p. 2-16, X-Ray Optics, Instruments, and Missions III, Joachim E. Truemper; Bernd Aschenbach; Eds.}, 

457:   pages 2--16, 2000.

458: 

459: \end{thebibliography}

460: 

461: % \vspace{3cm}

462: % \textbf{Figure captions}

463: % \vspace{0.5cm}

464: % \begin{list}{}

465: % \item Fig. 1. 

466: % \item

467: % \item Fig. 2. 

468: % \item

469: % 

470: % \item Fig. 3. 

471: % \end{list}

472: 

473: \end{document}

474: 

475: