1: %this is 2-column
2: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
3:
4: %\documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
5: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
6:
7: %this is suitable for submission to ApJ fast track
8: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
9:
10: %\usepackage{graphicx}
11: \documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
12:
13: %this is one column, double-spaced
14: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
15:
16: %\usepackage{graphicx}
17:
18: \def\mnheh{\hbox{n$_{\rm He}$/n$_{\rm H}$}}
19: \def\nnihe{\hbox{n$_{\rm N}$/n$_{\rm He}$}}
20: \def\Mdot{\hbox{$\dot {M}$}}
21: \def\Zdot{\hbox{$\dot {Z}$}}
22: \def\Rsun{\hbox{\it R$_\odot$}}
23: \def\Zsun{\hbox{\it Z$_\odot$}}
24: \def\Rstar{\hbox{\it R$_*$}}
25: \def\Lsun{\hbox{\it L$_\odot$}}
26: \def\Lstar{\hbox{\it L$_*$}}
27: \def\Msun{\hbox{\it M$_\odot$}}
28: \def\Minit{\hbox{\it M$_{\rm initial}$}}
29: \def\Msunyr{\hbox{\it M$_\odot\,$yr$^{-1}$}}
30: \def\Myr{\hbox{\it Myr}}
31: \def\Gyr{\hbox{\it Gyr}}
32: \def\kpc{\hbox{\it kpc}}
33: \def\Teff{\hbox{\it T$_{\rm eff}$}}
34: \def\Vinf{\hbox{$v_\infty$}}
35: \def\kms{\hbox{km$\,$s$^{-1}$}}
36: \def\AV{\hbox{\it A$_{\rm V}$}}
37: \def\AJ{\hbox{\it A$_{\rm J}$}}
38: \def\AH{\hbox{\it A$_{\rm H}$}}
39: \def\AK{\hbox{\it A$_{\rm K}$}}
40: \def\H{\hbox{\it H}}
41: \def\K{\hbox{\it K}}
42: \def\mk{\hbox{\it K}}
43: \def\AL{\hbox{\it A$_{\rm L}$}}
44: \def\BCK{\hbox{\it BC$_{\rm K}$}}
45: \def\BCV{\hbox{\it BC$_{\rm V}$}}
46: \def\simgr{\mathrel{\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{\lower4pt\hbox{$\sim$}}}\hbox{$>$}}}}
47: \def\HH{H{\sc ii}} % HII region
48: \def\mnk{\hbox{\it m$_{\rm F205W}$}}
49: \def\mnh{\hbox{\it m$_{\rm F160W}$}}
50: \def\mnj{\hbox{\it m$_{\rm F110W}$}}
51: \def\fnk{\hbox{\it F$_{\rm F205W}$}}
52: \def\fnh{\hbox{\it F$_{\rm F160W}$}}
53: \def\fnj{\hbox{\it F$_{\rm F110W}$}}
54: \def\Fnp{\hbox{\it F$_{\rm F187N}$}}
55: \def\Fnc{\hbox{\it F$_{\rm F190N}$}}
56: \def\Frh{\hbox{\it F$_{\rm 8.5~GHz}$}}
57: \def\Frl{\hbox{\it F$_{\rm 4.9~GHz}$}}
58: \def\ew{\hbox{\it EW$_{\rm 1.87~\micron}$}}
59: \def\lbv{\hbox{LBV~1806$-$20}}
60: \def\sgr{\hbox{SGR~1806$-$20}}
61:
62: \shorttitle{SGR 1806$-$20 CLUSTER}
63: \shortauthors{FIGER ET AL.}
64:
65: \begin{document}
66:
67: \title{MASSIVE STARS IN THE \sgr\ CLUSTER}
68:
69: \author{
70: Donald F. Figer\altaffilmark{1},
71: Francisco Najarro\altaffilmark{2},
72: T. R. Geballe\altaffilmark{3},
73: R. D. Blum\altaffilmark{4},
74: Rolf P. Kudritzki\altaffilmark{5}
75: }
76:
77: \email{figer@stsci.edu}
78:
79: \altaffiltext{1}{Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218; figer@stsci.edu }
80: \altaffiltext{2}{Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Serrano 121, 29006 Madrid, Spain }
81: \altaffiltext{3}{Gemini Observatory, 670 N. A'ohoku Pl., Hilo, HI 96720}
82: \altaffiltext{4}{Cerro Tololo Interamerican Observatory, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile}
83: \altaffiltext{5}{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822}
84:
85: \begin{abstract}
86: We report the discovery of additional hot and massive stars in the cluster surrounding the soft
87: gamma repeater
88: SGR~1806$-$20, based upon UKIRT and Keck near-infrared spectroscopy. Of the newly
89: identified stars, three are Wolf-Rayet stars of types WC8, WN6, and WN7, and a fourth
90: star is an OB supergiant. These three stars, along with four previously discovered,
91: imply a cluster age of $\sim$3.0-4.5~\Myr, based on the presence of WC stars and
92: the absence of red supergiants. Assuming coevality, this age suggests that the
93: progenitor of \sgr\ had an initial mass greater than $\sim$50~\Msun.
94: This is consistent with the suggestion that SGRs are post-supernovae end states of massive
95: progenitors, and may suggest that only massive stars evolve into magnetars that
96: produce SGRs. It also suggests that very massive stars can evolve into neutron stars,
97: not just black holes, as recently predicted by theory. The cluster age also provides
98: constraints on the very high mass object, \lbv.
99:
100: \end{abstract}
101: \keywords{stars: evolution --- stars: neutron --- stars: individual (LBV1806-20) --- stars: individual (SGR 1806$-$20) --- infrared: stars}
102:
103: \section{Introduction}
104: Massive stellar clusters are the birth sites of the most massive stars, and are
105: proving grounds for theories of massive star formation, evolution, end states,
106: and Galactic chemical enrichment. With the recent advent of
107: sensitive infrared instrumentation, on ground and space based platforms, many massive
108: clusters in the Galaxy are now just being discovered and investigated. At least two of
109: these clusters contain soft gamma repeaters (SGRs), a rare phenomenon characterized
110: by persistent and energetic bursts of gamma ray emission lasting up to several seconds
111: and releasing $\sim$10$^{40}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$ \citep{maz79a,maz79b,kou98}. Only four
112: SGRs are known, three in the Galaxy and one in the SMC. Three
113: of the SGRs are associated with massive stellar clusters.
114:
115: SGR~1806$-$20 is surrounded by a cluster of massive stars \citep{fuc99}.
116: \citet{kul95} identified a luminous star that they claimed may be the infrared
117: counterpart to \sgr, but \citet{eik01} and \citet{kap02} determined that it is too
118: far from the Chandra error box; no near-infrared counterpart has yet been found, even
119: down to very faint magnitudes \citep{kou04,isr04}. \citet{van95} find that
120: this star has characteristics
121: similar to those of Luminous Blue Variables (LBVs), i.e.\ it has L$\simgr$10$^6$~\Lsun\ and a
122: spectral type in the range O9-B2. \citet{eik04} estimated an extremely high mass for
123: \lbv, $\sim$200~\Msun; but \citet{fig04} have shown that it has double lines and
124: thus may be binary.
125:
126: In this Letter we present near-infrared spectra of fifteen bright sources near \sgr,
127: We find that three of them are massive stars in the advanced Wolf-Rayet stage of
128: post-main sequence evolution, and another three are less evolved OB supergiant stars.
129: We use these results to constrain the nature of \sgr.
130:
131: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
132:
133: Data were obtained at UKIRT\footnote{The United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) is
134: operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre on behalf of the Particle Physics and Astronomy
135: Research Council.} on 7 and 8 June 2004, using UIST \citep{ram98} in medium resolution
136: mode (R$\sim$800=$\lambda/\Delta\lambda_{\rm FWHM}$, 0$\farcs$24 slit width) from
137: 1.50~\micron\ to 2.50~\micron. One or two 60 second exposures were obtained,
138: after which the telescope was nodded along the direction of the slit and the similar
139: exposures obtained. Star HIP86814 (F6V) was observed as a telluric standard; its
140: Brackett series lines were removed by interpolation prior to ratioing.
141:
142: Additional imaging and spectroscopic data were obtained at Keck\footnote{Data
143: presented herein were obtained at the W.M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a
144: scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of
145: California and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory was
146: made possible by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck Foundation.} on 22
147: June 2003, using NIRSPEC \citep{mcl98}, with the NIRSPEC-6 filter, which covers the H
148: and K bands). The slit-viewing camera (SCAM) exposures were 2 seconds and provided
149: stellar images having FWHM$\sim$0$\farcs$4. Figure~\ref{fig:cont} shows a SCAM image;
150: note the faint image produced by the slit. Spectra covering 1.6--2.35~\micron were
151: obtained at high resolution (R$\sim$26,500=$\lambda/\Delta\lambda_{\rm FWHM}$,
152: 0$\farcs$45 slit width), using two 100 second exposures per grating setting,
153: with the telescope nodded along the direction of the slit length in between exposures.
154: Star \#3 of the Quintuplet cluster was observed as a telluric standard \citep{fig99}.
155:
156: \begin{figure}
157: \epsscale{1.4}
158: \plotone{f1.eps}
159: \caption
160: {\label{fig:cont} NIRSPEC/SCAM image of stars in the 1806$-$20 cluster with coordinates
161: offset from \lbv\ at 18$^h$08$^m$40.312$^s$ $-$20$\arcdeg$24$\arcmin$41$\farcs$14 (J2000).
162: Number designations are from this paper. Letter designations are from \citet{eik04}.
163: Stars \#8, 9, and 10 are to the west of the field. The slit
164: can be seen as a linear artifact superpositioned on images of Star ``C'' and ``B.'' A
165: circle marks the location of \sgr \citep{kap02}.}
166: \end{figure}
167:
168: For both sets of spectra arc lamps were observed to set the wavelength scale and
169: continuum lamps provided ``flat'' images. Data were reduced by differencing the nod
170: pair frames to remove background flux, dark current, and residual bias
171: and dividing the result by the flat field frame in order to compensate
172: for non-uniform response and illumination of the array. Finally, each extracted
173: target spectrum was divided by the spectrum of a telluric standard.
174:
175: Table~1 lists the coordinates, magnitudes, spectral types, and dates observed for the
176: massive stars and field red giants.
177: Figures~\ref{fig:wrspectra}, \ref{fig:hei}, and \ref{fig:otherspectra}
178: show spectra of these stars.
179:
180: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrrrrl}
181: \tablewidth{0pt}
182: \tablecaption{Massive Stars in the 1806$-$20 Cluster}
183: \tablehead{
184: \colhead{ID} &
185: \colhead{R.A.} &
186: \colhead{Dec.} &
187: \colhead{H$-$K} &
188: \colhead{K} &
189: \colhead{Type} &
190: \colhead{Dates Observed} }
191: \startdata
192: 1 & 38.32 & 33.5 & NA & 11.76 & WC8 & 7 June 2004 \\
193: %1 & 38.32 & 33.5 & NA & 13.30 & WC8 & 7 June 2004 \\
194: 2 & 39.42 & 42.57 &1.87 & 12.16 & WN6 & 8 June 2004 \\
195: 3 & 39.50 & 35.88 & NA & 12.87 & WN7? & 8 June 2004 \\
196: %3 & 39.51 & 35.9 & 15.662 & 12.366 & 10.620 & WN7 & 8 June 2004 \\
197: 4 & 39.16 & 32.88 & NA & 12.45 & OBI & 22 June 2003 \\
198: 5 & 38.13 & 34.77 & 1.68 & 9.25 & RG & 7 June 2004\\
199: 6 & 38.12 & 43.35 & 1.42 & 10.96 & RG & 7 June 2004\\
200: 7 & 38.75 & 26.48 & 1.49 & 11.90 & OBI? & 7 June 2004 \\
201: 8 & 36.72 & 54.27 & 1.40 & 8.70 & RG & 8 June 2004 \\
202: 9 & 36.72 & 27.80 & 1.45 & 8.89 & RG & 8 June 2004 \\
203: 10 & 37.96 & 16.47 & 2.95 & 10.09 & RG & 8 June 2004 \\
204: 11 & 38.52 & 39.95 & 1.66 & 11.92 & OBI? & 8 June 2004 \\
205: 12 & 38.57 & 13.55 & 1.42 & 10.81 & RG & 8 June 2004 \\
206: 13 & 39.49 & 11.77& NA & 11.16 & NA & 8 June 2004 \\
207: 14 & 39.40 & 13.02 & NA & 12.00 & RG & 8 June 2004 \\
208: A & 40.31 & 41.14 & NA & 9.26 & LBV & 22 June 2003 \\
209: B & 39.24 & 31.86 & 2.94 & 10.50 & WC9 & 22 June 2003 \\
210: %2MASS photometry crowded? B & 39.24 & 31.86 & 1.41 & 10.27 & WC9 & 22 June 2003 \\
211: C & 39.51 & 30.02 & 1.85 & 10.96 & OBI & 22 June 2003 \\
212: D & 39.51 & 35.91 & 1.73 & 11.11 & OBI & 22 June 2003 \\
213: %2MASS photometry crowded? D & 39.51 & 35.91 & 1.75 & 10.62 & OBI & 22 June 2003 \\
214: \enddata
215: \tablecomments{Number designations are from this paper. Letter designations are from \citet{eik04}.
216: Coordinates are offset from Right Ascension 18$^h$08$^m$ and
217: Declination $-$20$^{\arcdeg}$24$^{\arcmin}$ (J2000), and are from the
218: 2MASS PSC, except for \#3, \#4, \#13, and \#14 which were estimated from the Keck SCAM image. Photometry are from
219: the PSC, except for \#1, \#3, \#4, \#13, \#14, and ``A'' which are estimated from the Keck SCAM image, and
220: ``B'' and ``D'' which are from \citet{eik04}.
221: The spectral type for ``B'' is taken from \citet{eik04}.
222: Star \#2 is source ``E'' in \citet{eik01}. The ``RG'' label refers to red giants.}
223: \end{deluxetable}
224:
225: \section{Discussion}
226:
227: \subsection{Photometry and Spectral Analysis}
228:
229: Photometry was mostly obtained from the 2MASS \footnote{This publication makes use
230: of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the
231: University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California
232: Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
233: and the National Science Foundation.} \citep{skr97} Point Source Catalog (PSC). Stars
234: \#1, \#3, and \#4 are not in the catalog, so we estimated photometry for them from the
235: Keck SCAM image using the 2MASS PSC to set a zero point. As a check, photometry for
236: stars \#7 and \#11 from the Keck SCAM image differ from the PSC by +0.11 and $-$0.07
237: magnitudes, respectively. Note that our method relies on the fact that the NIRSPEC-6
238: filter transmission function, convolved with the spectral energy distributions with
239: the appropriate extinction of the target stars, gives similar photometry as measured
240: with the K filter used in 2MASS. Star ``B'' and ``D'' are in crowded regions, so we
241: use photometry for them from \citet{eik04}, instead of the PSC. As a further
242: consistency check on the photometric systems used in the Table, note that 2MASS and
243: \citet{eik01} photometry match to within the quoted uncertainties of 0.1 magnitudes
244: for Star \#2.
245:
246: We estimated spectral types by comparing the observed spectra to those
247: in the Wolf-Rayet spectral atlas of \citet{fig97} and \citet{han96}.
248:
249: The spectra in Figure~\ref{fig:wrspectra} reveal three new WR stars. Star \#1 has
250: strong lines of \ion{C}{3} (2.11~\micron), \ion{C}{4} (2.08~\micron), \ion{He}{1}
251: (1.70~\micron\ and 2.06~\micron), and \ion{He}{2} (1.87~\micron\ and 2.16~\micron).
252: Taken together, these lines indicate a classification of WC8. Stars \#2 and \#3 have
253: strong lines of \ion{He}{2}; neither has appreciable \ion{N}{5} (2.10~\micron)
254: emission. Star \#2 has relatively strong \ion{He}{2} (1.87~\micron\ and
255: 2.16~\micron), and EW$_{2.189~\micron}$/EW$_{2.112~\micron}$=2.3, consistent with
256: a WN6 spectral type \citep{fig97}.
257: For star \#3, we
258: suggest a classification of WN7, but note that the spectrum has relatively low S/N.
259:
260: \begin{figure}
261: \epsscale{1.01}
262: \plotone{f2.ps}
263: \caption
264: {\label{fig:wrspectra} UKIRT/UIST spectra of the newly discovered WR stars. The number
265: labels refer to objects in Table~1.}
266: \end{figure}
267:
268: The spectra in Figure~\ref{fig:hei} show three less evolved OBI stars (``4'', ``C'',
269: and ``D''), as well as the evolved luminous blue variable, \lbv, and a previously
270: identified WR star, ``B'' \citep{eik04}. \lbv\ is discussed at length in
271: \citet{fig04}, and references therein. The OBI stars show modest \ion{He}{1} and
272: \ion{H}{1} absorption components with equivalent widths of
273: EW$_{2.112~\micron}$$\sim$2-3~\AA\ and EW$_{2.166~\micron}$$\sim$3-5~\AA, and
274: FWHM$\sim$70-80~\kms; both line depths and equivalent widths are consistent with the
275: classifications of O9-B3 for these stars \citep{han96}. Note that our high-resolution
276: spectra successfully resolve these individual lines that would otherwise
277: appear as blends in lower resolution spectra. Indeed, our
278: linewidths are significantly less than those estimated in much lower spectral
279: resolution data of \citet{eik04}, and they do not support
280: the suggestion that these stars are extraordinarily luminous hypergiants.
281:
282: \begin{figure}
283: \epsscale{1.6}
284: \plottwo{f3a.eps}{f3b.eps}
285: \caption
286: {\label{fig:hei} Keck/NIRSPEC spectra of massive stars near the 2.112/2.113~\micron\ \ion{He}{1} doublet ({\it left}),
287: and the 2.166~\micron\ Br-$\gamma$ line ({\it right}).
288: The spectra (except for ``B'') show the
289: \ion{He}{1} doublet in absorption near 2.1125~\micron\ is marked
290: by vertical lines. This feature in \lbv\ is obviously double.
291: The broad feature near 2.089~\micron\ is common to LBV spectra and corresponds to an \ion{Fe}{2} transition.
292: Weak \ion{He}{1} absorption lines just short of 2.166~\micron\ are visible in all spectra, except for ``B.''}
293: \end{figure}
294:
295: Figure~\ref{fig:otherspectra} demonstrates that most of the remaining sources are red
296: giants (RG's), given their strong CO absorptions at 2.3~\micron\ and beyond. These
297: stars are relatively old ($\tau_{\rm age}>$100~Myr) and have no physical association
298: with the cluster. Stars \#7
299: and \#11 lack CO and thus could be OBI~stars, but they lack Br-$\gamma$ absorption
300: lines. Pa-$\alpha$ absorption lines in their spectra would be comparable to the noise
301: levels, so it is difficult to rule out their existence.
302:
303: \begin{figure}
304: \epsscale{1.1}
305: \plotone{f4.ps}
306: \caption
307: {\label{fig:otherspectra} UKIRT/UIST spectra of stars within and near the field
308: in Figure~\ref{fig:cont}. Most of the spectra have CO bandhead absorption starting
309: at 2.293~\micron\ and characteristic of red giants.}
310: \end{figure}
311:
312: \subsection{Massive Stars and \sgr}
313:
314: The 1806$-$20 cluster contains at least four WR stars, three OBI stars, and an
315: LBV-candidate. While such a collection of spectral types may seem extraordinary, it is
316: expected from stellar evolution models.
317: The non-rotating Geneva models predict the onset of red supergiants
318: at $\sim$4-4.5~\Myr\ and WC stars at $\sim$3.0-3.5~\Myr\ for solar to twice-solar
319: metallicity \citep{mey94}. Non-zero rotation rates tend to increase both limits
320: by $\sim$20\% \citep{mey05}. Given the presence of WC stars and absence of red supergiants, we estimate a cluster age of
321: $\sim$3.0-4.5~\Myr, assuming coeval formation.
322: Appealing to the Geneva models, we should then expect to still be able
323: to see stars with initial masses $\sim$50-120~\Msun\ in the cluster.
324: Our age estimate indicates a somewhat lower mass for \lbv\ than given by \citet{eik04} since
325: such massive progenitors typically have ages less than 3~\Myr\ \citep{bon84}. A lower
326: mass is also consistent with the claim by \citet{fig04} that \lbv\ may
327: be a binary system having \Minit$\sim$130~\Msun.
328:
329: The 1806$-$20 cluster is similar in spectral content to the Quintuplet cluster
330: \citep{fig99}, albeit at a much smaller mass. Both have roughly equal numbers of WC
331: and WN stars, although the latter may have twice as many WC's if the five very red
332: sources for which the Quintuplet was named are indeed dusty WC stars. One minor
333: difference is the presence of one red supergiant in the Quintuplet and none in the
334: 1806$-$20 cluster. This may be the consequence of low number statistics, as the
335: Quintuplet cluster has four times more massive stars; or it may be an indication that
336: the 1806$-$20 cluster is slightly younger than the 4~\Myr\ age estimated for the
337: Quintuplet. Assuming 8 stars with \Minit$>$20~\Msun, we estimate M$_{\rm
338: cluster}>$1,750~\Msun, assuming a Salpeter IMF down to 0.8~\Msun\ \citep{sal55}. If WR
339: and LBV stars have \Minit$>$50~\Msun, then M$_{\rm cluster}>$6,600~\Msun. The
340: supernova producing \sgr\ likely could not have triggered formation of the cluster
341: \citep{eik01}, because the magnetar is thought to be $<$10$^4$ yrs old, while the
342: cluster stars are $\sim$4~\Myr\ old.
343:
344: A further important conclusion is that the masses and ages of the cluster stars are
345: consistent with the hypothesis that \sgr\ represents the end state of a particularly
346: massive cluster member. Because more massive stars reach their end states more quickly
347: than less massive stars, the likely mass of the SGR progenitor must be greater than
348: presently observed masses. Assuming that the presently observed stars had
349: \Minit$\gtrsim$50~\Msun, \sgr\ had a larger initial mass, as suggested by
350: \citet{kap02}. SGR~1900+14 and SGR~0526$-$66 are also associated with massive stellar
351: clusters \citep{vrb00,klo04}, suggesting that magnetars may be short-lived
352: descendants of massive stars. These three cases support the theoretical prediction
353: that very massive stars lose most of their mass and collapse as neutron stars, not
354: black holes \citep{fry01,woo02}. They may also support a model in which magnetars are
355: preferentially produced by stars with large initial mass \citep{eik04}.
356:
357: \acknowledgements
358: We acknowledge useful discussions with Jeff Valenti, Andy Fruchter, and Stephan Eikenberry.
359: We thank Keck staff members Randy Campbell and Grant Hill for assistance with
360: the observations. F.~N. acknowledges grants AYA2003-02785-E and ESP2002-01627.
361: Finally, we acknowledge a similar result, by independent means, in Gaensler et al.\ (2005).
362:
363: \small
364: \begin{thebibliography}{}
365: %\bibitem[Allen, Swings, \& Harvey(1972)]{all72} Allen, D.~A., Swings, J.~P., \& Harvey, P.~M.\ 1972, \aap, 20, 333
366: %\bibitem[Blum, Depoy, \& Sellgren(1995)]{blu95} Blum, R.~D., Depoy, D.~L., \& Sellgren, K.\ 1995, \apj, 441, 603
367: %\bibitem[Bonanos et al.(2004)]{bon04} Bonanos, A.~Z., et al.\ 2004, \apj, in press, ArXiv Astrophysics, astro-ph/0405338
368: \bibitem[Bond, Arnett, \& Carr(1984)]{bon84} Bond, J.~R., Arnett, W.~D., \& Carr, B.~J.\ 1984, \apj, 280, 825
369: %\bibitem[Brand \& Blitz(1993)]{bra93} Brand, J.~\& Blitz, L.\ 1993, \aap, 275, 67
370: %\bibitem[Damineli et al.(2000)]{dam00} Damineli, A., Kaufer, A., Wolf, B., Stahl, O., Lopes, D.~F., \& de Ara{\' u}jo, F.~X.\ 2000, \apjl, 528, L101
371: %\bibitem[Damineli, Conti, \& Lopes(1997)]{dam97} Damineli, A., Conti, P.~S., \& Lopes, D.~F.\ 1997, New Astronomy, 2, 107
372: %\bibitem[Dehnen \& Binney(1998)]{deh98} Dehnen, W.~\& Binney, J.~J.\ 1998, \mnras, 298, 387
373: \bibitem[Eikenberry et al.(2001)]{eik01} Eikenberry, S.~S., Garske, M.~A., Hu, D., Jackson, M.~A., Patel, S.~G., Barry, D.~J., Colonno, M.~R., \& Houck, J.~R.\ 2001, \apjl, 563, L133
374: \bibitem[Eikenberry et al.(2004)]{eik04} Eikenberry, S.~S. et al.\ 2004, \apj, 616, 506
375: \bibitem[Feitzinger, Schlosser, Schmidt-Kaler, \& Winkler(1980)]{fei80} Feitzinger, J.~V., Schlosser, W., Schmidt-Kaler, T., \& Winkler, C.\ 1980, \aap, 84, 50
376: %\bibitem[Figer(2003)]{fig03} Figer, D.~F.\ 2003, IAU Symposium, 212, 487
377: \bibitem[Figer et al.(2004)]{fig04} Figer, D.~F., Najarro, F., \& Kudritzki, R.~P.\ 2004, ApJ, 610, L109
378: %\bibitem[Figer et al.(2002)]{fig02} Figer, D.~F.~et al.\ 2002, \apj, 581, 258
379: %\bibitem[Figer et al.(2000a)]{fig00a} Figer, D.\ F.\ et al.\ 2000a, \apjl, 533, L49
380: %\bibitem[Figer et al.(2000b)]{fig00b} Figer, D.\ F., McLean, I.\ S., Becklin, E.\ E., Graham, J.\ R., Larkin, J.\ E., Levenson, N.\ A., \& Teplitz, H.\ I.\ 2000b, \procspie, 4005, 104
381: \bibitem[Figer, McLean, \& Najarro(1997)]{fig97} Figer, D.~F., McLean, I.~S., \& Najarro, F.\ 1997, \apj, 486, 420
382: %\bibitem[Figer, McLean, \& Morris(1995)]{fig95b} Figer, D.~F., McLean, I.~S., \& Morris, M.\ 1995, \apjl, 447, L29
383: %\bibitem[Figer(1995)]{fig95} Figer, D.\ F.\ 1995, Ph.D.\ Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles
384: \bibitem[Figer \& Kim(2002)]{fig02} Figer, D.~F.~\& Kim, S.~S.\ 2002, ASP Conf.~Ser.~263: Stellar Collisions, Mergers and their Consequences, 287
385: %\bibitem[Figer et al.(1999b)]{fig99b} Figer, D.\ F., Kim, S.\ S., Morris, M., Serabyn, E., Rich, R.\ M., \& McLean, I.\ S.\ 1999, \apj, 525, 750
386: \bibitem[Figer et al.(1999)]{fig99} Figer, D. F., McLean, I. S., \& Morris, M. 1999, \apj, 514, 202
387: %\bibitem[Figer et al.(1999b)]{fig99b} Figer, D.\ F., Morris, M., Geballe, T.\ R., Rich, R.\ M., Serabyn, E., McLean, I.\ S., Puetter, R.\ C., \& Yahil, A.\ 1999b, \apj, 525, 759
388: \bibitem[Figer et al.(1998)]{fig98} Figer, D. F., Najarro, F., Morris, M., McLean, I. S., Geballe, T. R., Ghez, A. M., \& Langer, N. 1998, \apj, 506, 384
389: \bibitem[Fryer \& Kalogera(2001)]{fry01} Fryer, C.~L.~\& Kalogera, V.\ 2001, \apj, 554, 548
390: \bibitem[Fuchs et al.(1999)]{fuc99} Fuchs, Y., Mirabel, F., Chaty, S., Claret, A., Cesarsky, C.~J., \& Cesarsky, D.~A.\ 1999, \aap, 350, 891
391: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(2005)]{gae05} Gaensler, B.~M., McClure-Griffiths, N.~M., Oey, M.~S., Haverkorn, M., Dickey, J.~M., \& Green, A.~J.\ 2005, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0501563
392: \bibitem[Geballe et al.(2000)]{geb00} Geballe, T.R., Figer, D.F., \& Najarro, F.\ 2000, \apj, 530, 97
393: \bibitem[Genzel et al.(1996)]{gen96} Genzel, R., Thatte, N., Krabbe, A., Kroker, H., \& Tacconi-Garman, L. E. 1996, \apj, 472, 153
394: \bibitem[G{\" o}tz, Mereghetti, Mirabel, \& Hurley(2004)]{got04} G{\" o}tz, D., Mereghetti, S., Mirabel, I.~F., \& Hurley, K.\ 2004, \aap, 417, L45
395: \bibitem[Hanson, Conti, \& Rieke(1996)]{han96} Hanson, M.~M., Conti, P.~S., \& Rieke, M.~J.\ 1996, \apjs, 107, 281
396: \bibitem[Hurley et al.(1999)]{hur99} Hurley, K., Kouveliotou, C., Cline, T., Mazets, E., Golenetskii, S., Frederiks, D.~D., \& van Paradijs, J.\ 1999, \apjl, 523, L37
397: \bibitem[Israel et al.(2004)]{isr04} Israel, G.~L., Mignani, R., Covino, S., Campana, S., Stella, L., Rea, N., Testa, V., \& Marconi, G.\ 2004, GRB Circular Network, 2609, 1
398: \bibitem[Kaplan et al.(2002)]{kap02} Kaplan, D.~L., Fox, D.~W., Kulkarni, S.~R., Gotthelf, E.~V., Vasisht, G., \& Frail, D.~A.\ 2002, \apj, 564, 935
399: \bibitem[Klose et al.(2004)]{klo04} Klose, S., et al.\ 2004, \apjl, 609, L13
400: \bibitem[Koornneef(1983)]{koo83} Koornneef, J.\ 1983, \aap, 128, 84
401: \bibitem[Kouveliotou et al.(1998)]{kou98} Kouveliotou, C., Kippen, M., Woods, P., Richardson, G., Connaughton, V., \& McCollough, M.\ 1998, \iaucirc, 6944, 2
402: \bibitem[Kouveliotou et al.(2004)]{kou04} Kouveliotou, C., Klose, S., Wachter, S., Woods, P., Patel, S., Greiner, J., Stecklum, B., \& van der Klis, M.\ 2004, GRB Circular Network, 2607, 1
403: %\bibitem[Kroupa, Figer, \& Weidner(2004)]{kro04} Kroupa, P., Figer, D.F., \& Weidner, C. 2004, in preparation
404: \bibitem[Kulkarni et al.(1995)]{kul95} Kulkarni, S.~R., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., Reid, I.~N., van Kerkwijk, M.~H., \& Vasisht, G.\ 1995, \apjl, 440, L61
405: \bibitem[LaVine, Eikenberry, \& Davis(2003)]{lav03} LaVine, J.~L., Eikenberry, S., \& Davis, J.~D.\ 2003, American Astronomical Society Meeting, 203,
406: \bibitem[Mazets, Golenetskij, \& Guryan(1979)]{maz79a} Mazets, E.~P., Golenetskij, S.~V., \& Guryan, Y.~A.\ 1979, Soviet Astronomy Letters, 5, 343
407: \bibitem[Mazets et al.(1979)]{maz79b} Mazets, E.~P., Golentskii, S.~V., Ilinskii, V.~N., Aptekar, R.~L., \& Guryan, I.~A.\ 1979, \nat, 282, 587
408: \bibitem[McLean et al.(1998)]{mcl98} McLean et al.\ 1998, SPIE Vol. 3354, 566
409: \bibitem[Meynet et al.(1994)]{mey94} Meynet, G., Maeder, A., Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., \& Charbonnel, C.\ 1994, \aaps, 103, 97
410: \bibitem[Meynet \& Maeder(2005)]{mey05} Meynet, G., \& Maeder, A.\ 2005, \aap, 429, 581
411: %\bibitem[Moneti et al.(1994)]{mon94} Moneti, A., Glass, I.S. \& Moorwood, A.F.M. 1994, \mnras, 268, 194
412: %\bibitem[Najarro, Figer \& Kudritzki(2004)]{naj04} Najarro, F., Figer, D. F. \& Kudritzki, R. P. 2004, in preparation
413: %\bibitem[Panagia, Tanzi, \& Tarenghi(1983)]{pan83} Panagia, N., Tanzi, E.~G., \& Tarenghi, M.\ 1983, \apj, 272, 123
414: %\bibitem[Pittard \& Corcoran(2002)]{pit02} Pittard, J.~M.~\& Corcoran, M.~F.\ 2002, \aap, 383, 636
415: %\bibitem[Rauw et al.(2004)]{rau04} Rauw, G., et al.\ 2004, \aap, accepted, ArXiv Astrophysics, astro-ph/0404551
416: \bibitem[Ramsay Howat et al.(1998)]{ram98} Ramsay Howat, S.~K., et al.\ 1998, \procspie, 3354, 456
417: %\bibitem[Rieke, Rieke, \& Paul(1989)]{rie89} Rieke, G.~H., Rieke, M.~J., \& Paul, A.~E.\ 1989, \apj, 336, 752
418: \bibitem[Salpeter(1955)]{sal55} Salpeter, E.~E.~1955, \apj, 121, 161
419: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(1997)]{skr97} Skrutskie, M.~F., et al.\ 1997, ASSL Vol.~210: The Impact of Large Scale Near-IR Sky Surveys, 25
420: %\bibitem[Tamblyn et al.(1996)]{tam96} Tamblyn, P., Reike, G., Hanson, M., Close, L., McCarthy, D., Reike, M. 1996, \apj, 456, 206
421: \bibitem[Vacca, Garmany, \& Shull(1996)]{vac96} Vacca, W.~D., Garmany, C.~D., \& Shull, J.~M.\ 1996, \apj, 460, 914
422: %\bibitem[van der Hucht(2001)]{van01} van der Hucht, K.~A.\ 2001, New Astronomy Review, 45, 135
423: \bibitem[van Kerkwijk, Kulkarni, Matthews, \& Neugebauer(1995)]{van95} van Kerkwijk, M.~H., Kulkarni, S.~R., Matthews, K., \& Neugebauer, G.\ 1995, \apjl, 444, L33
424: \bibitem[Vrba et al.(2000)]{vrb00} Vrba, F.~J., Henden, A.~A., Luginbuhl, C.~B., Guetter, H.~H., Hartmann, D.~H., \& Klose, S.\ 2000, \apjl, 533, L17
425: %\bibitem[Weidner \& Kroupa(2004)]{wei04} Weidner, C.~\& Kroupa, P.\ 2004, \mnras, 348, 187
426: %\bibitem[Weigelt et al.(1991)]{wei91} Weigelt, G.~et al.\ 1991, \apjl, 378, L21
427: \bibitem[Woosley, Heger, \& Weaver(2002)]{woo02} Woosley, S.~E., Heger, A., \& Weaver, T.~A.\ 2002, Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 1015
428: \end{thebibliography}
429:
430: \end{document}