1: % ******************************************************************
2: % *********** start of ms.tex ***********
3: % ******************************************************************
4: % TITLE: Reddening, Absorption, and Decline Rate Corrections for a
5: % Complete Sample of Type Ia Supernovae leading to a Fully
6: % Corrected Hubble Diagram to v<30,000kms-1
7: % AUTHOR: B. Reindl (1), G.A. Tammann (1), A. Sandage (2), A. Saha (3)
8: % (1) Astr. Inst. Univ. Basel
9: % (2) Observatories Carnegie Inst. Washington
10: % (3) National Optical Astronomy Observatories
11: %
12: % email: G-A.Tammann@unibas.ch
13: %
14: % 44 pages, 15 figures (*.eps), 8 tables
15: % ******************************************************************
16: % DATE: 17.11.2004 - final
17: % ******************************************************************
18: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
19: %
20: \makeatletter
21: \renewcommand{\fps@table}{t}
22: \renewcommand{\floatpagefraction}{1.0}
23: \renewcommand{\textfraction}{.01}
24: \renewcommand{\topfraction}{.99}
25: \renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{.99}
26: \setcounter{topnumber}{3}
27: \setcounter{bottomnumber}{3}
28: \setcounter{totalnumber}{5}
29: \makeatother
30: % ***********************************************
31: % local defs
32: %\def\nodata{\multicolumn{1}{c}{$\cdots$}}
33: \newcommand{\nodatr}{\multicolumn{1}{r}{$\cdots$}~~}
34: \newcommand{\kms}{\nobreak\mbox{$\;$km\,s$^{-1}$}}
35: \renewcommand{\mag}{\mbox{$\;$mag}}
36: % ***********************************************
37:
38: % ***********************************************
39: \shorttitle{The Hubble Diagram of SNeIa within $30\,000\kms$}
40: \shortauthors{Reindl et al.}
41: % ***********************************************
42:
43:
44: \begin{document}
45: % ******************************************************************
46: \title{REDDENING, ABSORPTION, AND DECLINE RATE CORRECTIONS FOR A
47: COMPLETE SAMPLE OF TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE LEADING TO A FULLY
48: CORRECTED HUBBLE DIAGRAM TO \boldmath{$v < 30\,000\kms$}}
49: \author{B. Reindl and G. A. Tammann}
50: \affil{Astronomisches Institut der Universit\"at Basel,\\
51: Venusstrasse 7, CH-4102 Binningen, Switzerland}
52: \email{G-A.Tammann@unibas.ch}
53: \author{A. Sandage}
54: \affil{The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington,\\
55: 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101}
56: \and
57: \author{A. Saha}
58: \affil{National Optical Astronomy Observatories,\\
59: 950 North Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85726}
60:
61:
62:
63: % ******************************************************************
64: % Abstract
65: % ******************************************************************
66: \begin{abstract}
67: Photometric ($BVI$) and redshift data corrected for streaming
68: motions are compiled for 111 ``Branch normal'', four 1991T-like,
69: seven 1991bg-like, and two unusual supernovae of type Ia. Color
70: excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ of normal SNe\,Ia, due to the
71: absorption of the host galaxy, are derived by three independent
72: methods, giving excellent agreement leading to the intrinsic colors at
73: maximum of $(B\!-\!V)^{00} = -0.024\pm0.010$, and $(V\!-\!I)^{00} =
74: -0.265\pm0.016$ if normalized to a common decline rate of $\Delta
75: m_{15} = 1.1$.
76:
77: The strong correlation between redshift absolute
78: magnitudes (based on an arbitrary Hubble constant of
79: $H_{0}=60\;\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}\,\mbox{Mpc}^{-1}$), corrected
80: only for the extrinsic Galactic absorption, and the derived
81: $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ color excesses leads to the well determined,
82: yet abnormal absorption-to-reddening ratios of
83: ${\cal R}_{BVI}=3.65\pm0.16$, $2.65\pm0.15$, and $1.35\pm0.21$.
84: Comparison with the canonical Galactic values of
85: $4.1$, $3.1$, $1.8$ forces the conclusion that the law of interstellar
86: absorption in the path length to the SN in the host galaxy is
87: different from the local Galactic law, a result
88: consistent with earlier conclusions by others.
89:
90: Improved correlations of the fully corrected absolute magnitudes
91: (on the same arbitrary Hubble constant zero point) with host
92: galaxy morphological type, decline rate, and intrinsic color are
93: derived. We recover the result that SN\,Ia in E/S0 galaxies are
94: $\sim\!0.3$ magnitudes fainter than in spirals for possible reasons
95: discussed in the text. The new decline-rate corrections to
96: absolute magnitudes are smaller than those by some authors for reasons
97: explained in the text.
98:
99: The four spectroscopically peculiar 1991T-type SNe are
100: significantly overluminous as compared to Branch-normal SNe\,Ia. The
101: overluminosity of the seven 1999aa-like SNe is less pronounced. The
102: seven 1991bg-types in the sample constitute a separate class of
103: SNe\,Ia, averaging in $B$ two magnitudes fainter than the normal Ia.
104:
105: New Hubble diagrams in $B$, $V$, and $I$ are derived out to
106: $\sim\!30\,000\kms$ using the fully corrected magnitudes and
107: velocities, corrected for streaming motions.
108: Nine solutions for the intercept magnitudes in these diagrams show
109: extreme stability at the $0.04\mag$ level using various
110: subsamples of the data for both low and high extinctions in the
111: sample, proving the validity of the corrections for host
112: galaxy absorption. -- The same precepts for fully correcting SN
113: magnitudes we shall use for the luminosity recalibration of SNe\,Ia
114: in the forthcoming final review of our HST
115: Cepheid-SN experiment for the Hubble constant.
116: \end{abstract}
117: \keywords{distance scale --- galaxies: distances and redshifts ---
118: supernovae: general}
119: % ******************************************************************
120:
121:
122:
123:
124: % ******************************************************************
125: % 1. Introduction
126: % ******************************************************************
127: \section{INTRODUCTION}
128: %
129: This is the third paper of a series whose purpose is to
130: prepare for the projected final summary review of our 1991-2001
131: Hubble Space Telescope experiment to determine the Hubble
132: constant by calibrating the absolute magnitude of type Ia
133: supernovae. The method used in this observing program has been to
134: measure Cepheid distances to the host galaxies by
135: (1) correcting the raw Cepheid photometric data for reddening to
136: determine the true distance moduli of the parent galaxies using an
137: adopted Cepheid period-luminosity relation and
138: (2) correcting the SNe data for their own intrinsic and extrinsic
139: reddening and absorption values, plus all known second-parameter
140: corrections for light-curve inhomogeneities.
141:
142: The first two papers of this preparatory series concerned
143: revisions in the Cepheid P-L relation and its lack
144: of universality from galaxy to galaxy, showing significant
145: differences in the P-L slope and zero point between the Galaxy
146: \citep{Tammann:etal:03} and the LMC \citep{Sandage:etal:04}.
147:
148: Following the emergence of SNe\,Ia as powerful standard
149: candles \citep{Kowal:68}, it became increasingly clear as the accuracy
150: of the data became better that the dispersion in the SNe\,Ia
151: absolute magnitude at maximum became smaller with each advance in
152: the accuracy of the data
153: \citep{Sandage:Tammann:82,Sandage:Tammann:93,Sandage:Tammann:97,{Saha:etal:97}},
154: and also with the application of corrections for light-curve
155: inhomogeneities that had been found and
156: subsequently systematically improved
157: (\citealt{Pskovskii:67,Pskovskii:71,Pskovskii:84};
158: \citealt{Barbon:etal:73};
159: \citealt{Phillips:93};
160: \citealt{Sandage:Tammann:95};
161: \citealt{Hamuy:etal:95,Hamuy:etal:96a,Hamuy:etal:96d};
162: \citealt{Tripp:98};
163: \citealt{Phillips:etal:99};
164: \citealt{Riess:etal:99};
165: \citealt{Jha:etal:99};
166: \citealt{Tripp:Branch:99};
167: \citealt{Parodi:etal:00};
168: \citealt{Tonry:etal:03};
169: also \citealt{Sandage:etal:01} for a review).
170:
171: The purpose of this third paper of the series is to update
172: the discussion by \citet{Parodi:etal:00} on reddening,
173: absorption, and second parameter corrections (decline rate,
174: color, galaxy type) to the SNe\,Ia light curves, and to determine
175: a revised Hubble diagram based on these corrections using the
176: totality of the modern SNe\,Ia photometry available to date. The
177: sample here consists of 124 supernovae compared with the sample
178: of 35 SNe\,Ia used by \citeauthor{Parodi:etal:00}.
179:
180: The organization of the paper is this:
181:
182: (1) The photometric data for 124 SNe\,Ia are compiled in
183: \S~\ref{sec:Data} from the extensive literature, together with
184: the types and recession velocities of their host galaxies
185: (Table~\ref{tab:SN1}).
186:
187: (2) The {\em intrinsic\/} colors $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$,
188: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{35}$ (i.e.\ 35 days after $B$ maximum), and
189: $(V\!-\!I)^{00}_{\max}$ are derived in \S~\ref{sec:color} from 34
190: normal SNe\,Ia which have occurred in E/S0 galaxies or in the outer
191: regions of spiral galaxies and which are assumed -- after correction
192: for Galactic reddening -- to suffer no reddening in their host
193: galaxies.
194:
195: (3) After correction for Galactic reddening, the reddening of the
196: normal SNe\,Ia due to the host galaxy is derived by three independent
197: methods in \S~\ref{sec:hostgal}, leading to the intrinsic (unreddened)
198: colors of each of the SNe. These corrected data are listed in
199: Table~\ref{tab:SN3}a.
200:
201: (4) New absorption-to-reddening ratios for that part of the
202: reddening due to the host galaxy are derived in
203: \S~\ref{sec:absorption}, leading to the absorption corrections to
204: the observed SN apparent magnitudes (also corrected for the K-term
205: effect due to redshift). The absorption-free magnitudes are also
206: listed in Table~\ref{tab:SN3}a.
207:
208: (5) New dependencies of the fully corrected SN magnitudes on
209: galaxy type, decline rate $\Delta m_{15}$, and intrinsic color are
210: derived in \S~\ref{sec:other}. Magnitudes $m_{BVI}^{\rm corr}$,
211: corrected for absorption and normalized to $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$ and
212: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}=-0.024$ complete Table~\ref{tab:SN3}a.
213:
214: (6) A discussion is made in \S~\ref{sec:SNpec} of the
215: photometric properties of the small group (15\% of the total sample)
216: of peculiar SNe\,Ia, i.e.\ SNe-91T, SNe-99aa, SNe-91bg (named after
217: their eponymous prototypes), and two singular objects (SN-2000cx,
218: SN-1986G), with the conclusion that SNe-91T, including SNe-99aa, are
219: brighter than normal SNe\,Ia by $0.3$ and $0.2\mag$, respectively,
220: even if normalized to $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$, while SNe-91bg are
221: underluminous in $B$ by $2\mag$.
222:
223: (7) Hubble diagrams using $m_{BVI}^{\rm corr}$ are derived for
224: various subsamples of normal SNe\,Ia in \S~\ref{sec:hubble}, together
225: with the rms magnitude deviations for each of the subsamples used. The
226: robustness of the solutions is emphasized.
227:
228: (8) Twelve principal research points made in the paper
229: are summarized in \S~\ref{sec:conclusions}.
230:
231: The conventions used here are these:
232: Colors $(X\!-\!Y)_{\max}$ are always $(X_{\max} - Y_{\max})$.
233: $(X\!-\!Y)^{0}$ stands for colors corrected for Galactic reddening,
234: $(X\!-\!Y)^{00}$ for colors corrected for Galactic reddening
235: {\em and\/} reddening in the host galaxy.
236: Absolute magnitudes $M_{BVI}$ and all listed distance moduli are
237: calculated from the redshift using a flat universe with
238: $\Omega_{\rm matter} = 0.3$, $\Omega_{\Lambda} = 0.7$ with an
239: arbitrarily assumed Hubble constant of
240: $H_{0}=60\;\mbox{km}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}\,\mbox{Mpc}^{-1}$. None of
241: the conclusions as to magnitude corrections and trends of the
242: second-parameter corrections depend on $H_{0}$, hence there is no loss
243: of generality using any assumed value.
244:
245:
246:
247:
248: % ******************************************************************
249: % 2. The Data
250: % ******************************************************************
251: \section{THE DATA}
252: \label{sec:Data}
253: %
254: A list of 19 ``local'' ($v_{220} < 2000\kms$) and 94 ``nearby''
255: ($v_{\rm CMB}\la 30\,000\kms$) supernovae of Type Ia (SNe\,Ia) after
256: 1985 with available maximum magnitudes in $B$ and $V$, and, if
257: possible in $I$, is given in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}.
258: The list aims to be complete as to published template-fitted maximum
259: magnitudes in $B$ and $V$, however the few nearby SNe\,Ia with not so
260: well observed lightcurves by
261: \citet{Germany:etal:04} are not considered. Eleven earlier
262: SNe\,Ia (9 ``local'' and 2 ``nearby'') with useful photometry are
263: added.
264: Table~\ref{tab:SN1} is subdivided into a) 111 spectroscopically
265: ``normal'' SNe\,Ia in the sense of \citet{Branch:etal:93} including
266: objects which are not spectroscopically confirmed but share the
267: photometric properties of normal SNe\,Ia (which is assumed here in
268: first approximation also for the seven 1999aa-like objects); b) the
269: four SNe-91T which are spectroscopically peculiar at early phases
270: \citep{Saha:etal:01,Li:etal:01b}; in addition included is the
271: unique object SN\,2000cx whose spectrum resembles SN\,1991T at least
272: near maximum phase \citep{Li:etal:01c,Candia:etal:03}; and c) the
273: seven SNe-91bg objects which constitute a homogeneous sub-class
274: with very fast decline rates ($\Delta m_{15}\approx1.9$), and which
275: are quite red and underluminous at maximum. Also included here is
276: SN\,1986G; it has, however, a faster decline rate and much of its
277: apparent redness is probably due to absorption in the host galaxy.
278:
279: Table~\ref{tab:SN1} is organized as follows:\\
280: Col.~1: The name of the SN\\
281: Col.~2: The name of the host galaxy\\
282: Col.~3: The coded type of the host galaxy: E$ = -3$, E/S0$ = -2$, S0$ = - 1$,
283: S0/a$ = 0$, the later types as in
284: \citet{deVaucouleurs:etal:76}. The galaxy types are taken from
285: the same sources as the photometry, in some cases from
286: \citet{vandenBergh:etal:02,vandenBergh:etal:03}. \\
287: Col.~4: The mean heliocentric radial velocity as given in the
288: NASA Extragalactic Database (NED). \\
289: Col.~5: The radial velocity corrected for streaming motions. The
290: nearer galaxies are corrected for a self-consistent
291: Virgocentric infall model with a local infall vector of
292: $220\kms$ \citep{Kraan-Korteweg:86}. The more distant galaxies are
293: corrected for the CMB motion, where it is assumed that the
294: co-moving volume extends to $v_{220} = 3000\kms$, justified by
295: the kinematics of the ``local bubble'' that merges into the
296: background field kinematics near $3000\kms$
297: \citep{Federspiel:etal:94}. Even if merging takes place as far
298: out as $6000\kms$ \citep{Dale:Giovanelli:00} it has no
299: noticeable effect on the present results.
300: If $v_{220} < 3000\kms$, the value of $v_{220}$ is listed
301: (denoted with v). All larger velocities are in the CMB
302: frame.
303: Virgo and Fornax cluster members are listed with the mean
304: cluster velocity (denoted with V and F).
305: Also two galaxies in the W-Cloud (NGC\,4527, 4536) outside the
306: Virgo cluster proper, are tentatively assigned
307: the cluster velocity.\\
308: Col.~6-8: Observed $B_{\max}$, $V_{\max}$, and $I_{\max}$ magnitudes
309: as compiled from
310: \citet{Hamuy:etal:96b,Hamuy:etal:96d}, \citet{Riess:etal:99},
311: and \citet{Jha:02}. The latter has published the $V$ and $I$
312: magnitude at the epoch of the $B$ maximum; they were
313: transformed to $V_{\max}$ and $I_{\max}$ by interpolating
314: Hamuy's et al. (1996c) template light curves (their
315: Table~10) with the appropriate decline rate $\Delta m_{15}$.
316: \citet{Riess:etal:99} have published only $B$ and $V$ maxima,
317: their $I$ photometry was reduced by \citet{Parodi:etal:00} by
318: the template method of \citet{Hamuy:etal:96c} -- which is also
319: the procedure that provides the K-corrections for the effects
320: of redshift on the photometry and which is the basis of all
321: magnitudes in this paper. Where available the $B_{\max}$
322: were taken from \citet{Altavilla:etal:04} who have uniformly
323: reduced the available data including various other
324: sources. The corresponding $V_{\max}$ are not published, but
325: were kindly provided by Dr.~G.~Altavilla. Several additional
326: sources are quoted in column~14. \\
327: Col.~9: The decline rate $\Delta m_{15}$ taken from the same sources
328: as the apparent maximum magnitudes. The slight dependence of $\Delta
329: m_{15}$ on the reddening \citep{Phillips:etal:99} is neglected. \\
330: Col.~10: The Galactic reddening following \citet{Schlegel:etal:98}\\
331: Col.~11: The reddening $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$ in the host galaxy as
332: judged from the $(B\!-\!V)^{0}$ color at maximum assuming
333: intrinsic colors of $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$ as given in
334: equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}). \\
335: Col.~12: The reddening in the host galaxy at maximum as
336: judged from the observed color $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{35}$ 35
337: days past $B$ maximum as explained in \S~\ref{sec:hostgal:BVmax}. \\
338: Col.~13: The reddening in the host galaxy as judged from the
339: $(V\!-\!I)^{0}$ color at maximum assuming intrinsic colors
340: $(V\!-\!I)^{00}_{\max}$ as given in
341: equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:VI}). \\
342: Col.~14: The source(s) of the photometry. \\
343:
344:
345:
346:
347: % ******************************************************************
348: % 3. The intrinsic color of SNeIa
349: % ******************************************************************
350: \section{THE INTRINSIC COLOR OF SNe\,Ia}
351: \label{sec:color}
352: %
353: It is expected that SNe in early-type galaxies (S0 and earlier) as
354: well as far outlying SNe in spiral galaxies suffer negligible
355: reddening. In the case of SNe\,Ia in spiral galaxies we require that
356: their distance $r$ from the center of the host galaxy be larger than
357: $0.4r_{25}$, where $r_{25}$ is the isophote corresponding to
358: $25\mag$ per arcsec$^{2}$ \citep[cf.][]{Parodi:etal:00}. A complete
359: list of 34 such SNe\,Ia is given in Table~\ref{tab:color:minred}
360: (omitting only the very red SN\,1974G).
361: Their colors $(B\!-\!V)^{0}$, $(B\!-\!V)^{0}_{35}$, i.e.\ the color 35
362: days past $B$ maximum from \S~\ref{sec:hostgal:BVmax} below,
363: and $(V\!-\!I)^{0}$, all corrected for
364: Galactic reddening (taken from column~10 of Table~\ref{tab:SN1}), are
365: listed in Table~\ref{tab:color:minred}.
366: For the derivation of $(V\!-\!I)^{0}$ it was assumed that
367: $E(V\!-\!I)_{\rm Gal} = 1.3E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm Gal}$.
368: The distribution of the colors is shown in
369: Figure~\ref{fig:color:tab2}, their dependence on the decline rate
370: $\Delta m_{15}$ in Figure~\ref{fig:color:tab2dm15}.
371: % ***********************************************
372: % Table 2: SNeIa with minimum reddening
373: % ***********************************************
374: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrr}
375: \def\baselinestretch{1.1}
376: \tablewidth{0pt}
377: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
378: \tablenum{2}
379: \tablecaption{SNe\,Ia with minimum reddening.\label{tab:color:minred}}
380: % ***********************************************
381: \tablehead{
382: % ***********************************************
383: \colhead{SN} &
384: \colhead{T} &
385: \colhead{$(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$} &
386: \colhead{$E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm Gal}$} &
387: \colhead{$(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{0}$} &
388: \colhead{$(B\!-\!V)_{35}^{0}$} &
389: \colhead{$(V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{0}$} &
390: \colhead{$\Delta m_{15}$}
391: \\
392: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} &
393: \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} & \colhead{(7)} & \colhead{(8)}
394: }
395: % ***********************************************
396: \startdata
397: % ***********************************************
398: \multicolumn{8}{c}{(a) SNe in early-type galaxies}\\
399: \noalign{\smallskip}
400: \tableline
401: % ***********************************************
402: 1990af & $-1$ & $ 0.07$ & $0.035$ & $ 0.035$ & $1.048$ & \nodatr & $1.59$ \\
403: 1992J & $-2$ & $ 0.12$ & $0.057$ & $ 0.063$ & $1.107$ & $-0.194$ & $1.69$ \\
404: 1992ae & $-3$ & $ 0.08$ & $0.036$ & $ 0.044$ & $1.159$ & \nodatr & $1.30$ \\
405: 1992au & $-3$ & $ 0.04$ & $0.017$ & $ 0.023$ & $1.050$ & $-0.402$ & $1.69$ \\
406: 1992bk & $-3$ & $-0.07$ & $0.015$ & $-0.085$ & $1.047$ & $-0.090$ & $1.67$ \\
407: 1992bo & $-2$ & $ 0.02$ & $0.027$ & $-0.007$ & $1.031$ & $-0.145$ & $1.69$ \\
408: 1992bp & $-2$ & $ 0.00$ & $0.069$ & $-0.069$ & $1.103$ & $-0.240$ & $1.52$ \\
409: 1992br & $-3$ & $ 0.07$ & $0.026$ & $ 0.044$ & $1.043$ & \nodatr & $1.69$ \\
410: 1993O & $-2$ & $-0.07$ & $0.053$ & $-0.123$ & $1.082$ & $-0.199$ & $1.26$ \\
411: 1993ac & $-3$ & $ 0.17$ & $0.163$ & $ 0.007$ & $1.092$ & $-0.082$ & $1.25$ \\
412: 1993ae & $-3$ & $-0.10$ & $0.038$ & $-0.138$ & $1.013$ & $-0.179$ & $1.47$ \\
413: 1993ag & $-2$ & $ 0.18$ & $0.112$ & $ 0.068$ & $1.160$ & $-0.246$ & $1.30$ \\
414: 1993ah & $-1$ & $-0.04$ & $0.020$ & $-0.060$ & $1.142$ & $-0.316$ & $1.45$ \\
415: 1994D & $-1$ & $-0.08$ & $0.022$ & $-0.102$ & $1.028$ & $-0.199$ & $1.31$ \\
416: 1994M & $-3$ & $ 0.05$ & $0.023$ & $ 0.027$ & $1.184$ & $-0.130$ & $1.45$ \\
417: 1994Q & $-1$ & $ 0.08$ & $0.017$ & $ 0.063$ & $1.130$ & $-0.292$ & $0.90$ \\
418: 1996X & $-3$ & $ 0.05$ & $0.069$ & $-0.019$ & $1.073$ & $-0.270$ & $1.32$ \\
419: 1997E & $-1$ & $ 0.14$ & $0.124$ & $ 0.016$ & $1.103$ & $-0.171$ & $1.39$ \\
420: 1998dx & $-3$ & $-0.03$ & $0.041$ & $-0.071$ & \nodatr & $-0.173$ & $1.55$ \\
421: 1999gh & $-3$ & $ 0.19$ & $0.058$ & $ 0.132$ & $1.123$ & $-0.055$ & $1.69$ \\
422: 2000B & $-3$ & $ 0.17$ & $0.068$ & $ 0.102$ & $1.117$ & $-0.258$ & $1.46$ \\
423: 2000dk & $-3$ & $ 0.07$ & $0.070$ & $ 0.000$ & $1.001$ & $-0.271$ & $1.57$ \\
424: % ***********************************************
425: \tableline
426: \noalign{\smallskip}
427: \multicolumn{8}{c}{(b) Outlying SNe in spirals}\\
428: \noalign{\smallskip}
429: \tableline
430: % ***********************************************
431: 1972E & Am & $ 0.00$ & $0.056$ & $-0.056$ & $1.048$ & $-0.383$ & $1.05$ \\
432: 1990N & $3$ & $ 0.02$ & $0.026$ & $-0.006$ & $1.195$ & $-0.254$ & $1.05$ \\
433: 1990O & $1$ & $ 0.08$ & $0.093$ & $-0.013$ & $1.117$ & $-0.411$ & $0.94$ \\
434: 1990T & $1$ & $-0.08$ & $0.053$ & $-0.133$ & $1.172$ & $-0.079$ & $1.13$ \\
435: 1991S & $3$ & $ 0.03$ & $0.026$ & $ 0.004$ & $1.154$ & $-0.274$ & $1.00$ \\
436: 1991ag & $3$ & $ 0.11$ & $0.062$ & $ 0.048$ & $1.109$ & $-0.351$ & $0.87$ \\
437: 1992A & $0$ & $ 0.01$ & $0.018$ & $-0.008$ & $1.043$ & $-0.273$ & $1.47$ \\
438: 1992bc & $2$ & $-0.12$ & $0.022$ & $-0.142$ & $0.990$ & $-0.339$ & $0.90$ \\
439: 1992bl & $0$ & $-0.03$ & $0.011$ & $-0.041$ & $1.036$ & $-0.234$ & $1.56$ \\
440: 1995D & $0$ & $ 0.04$ & $0.058$ & $-0.018$ & $1.146$ & $-0.375$ & $1.03$ \\
441: 1998V & $3$ & $ 0.17$ & $0.196$ & $-0.026$ & $1.088$ & $-0.165$ & $1.06$ \\
442: 1998eg & $5$ & $ 0.12$ & $0.123$ & $-0.003$ & \nodatr & $-0.150$ & $1.15$ \\
443: % ***********************************************
444: \tableline
445: % ***********************************************
446: \noalign{\smallskip}
447: \multicolumn{4}{r}{mean [$N=34,32,31$]:}
448: & $-0.013$ & $1.092$ & $-0.232$ & \\
449: \multicolumn{4}{r}{random error of mean:}
450: &$\pm0.012$&$\pm0.010$&$\pm0.018$& \\
451: \multicolumn{4}{r}{$\sigma$:}
452: & $0.07$ & $0.06$ & $0.10$ & \\
453: \enddata
454: % ***********************************************
455: \def\baselinestretch{1.5}
456: \end{deluxetable}
457: % ***********************************************
458:
459: % ***********************************************
460: % Figure 1: Table 2 color distribution
461: % ***********************************************
462: \begin{figure*}[t]
463: \epsscale{0.9}
464: \plotone{fig01.eps}
465: \caption{The true color distribution in $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$,
466: $(B\!-\!V)_{35}^{00}$, and $(V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{00}$ of SNe\,Ia
467: with minimum reddening in their host galaxies from
468: Table~\ref{tab:color:minred}.}
469: \label{fig:color:tab2}
470: \end{figure*}
471: % ***********************************************
472: % ***********************************************
473: % Figure 2: Tab.2 dependence of the color on Dm15
474: % ***********************************************
475: \begin{figure*}[t]
476: \plotone{fig02.eps}
477: \caption{The dependence of the colors $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$,
478: $(B\!-\!V)_{35}^{00}$, and $(V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{00}$ of the SNe\,Ia
479: in Table~\ref{tab:color:minred} on the decline rate $\Delta
480: m_{15}$.}
481: \label{fig:color:tab2dm15}
482: \end{figure*}
483: % ***********************************************
484:
485: Since the SNe in Table~\ref{tab:color:minred} are assumed to
486: suffer no reddening in their host galaxies, their Galactic
487: absorption-corrected colors $(X\!-\!Y)^{0}$ are equal to the colors
488: $(X\!-\!Y)^{00}$ corrected for Galactic {\em and\/} host galaxy
489: reddening. The assumption of zero reddening is supported by several
490: arguments.
491: (a) If one assumes that the average error of
492: $B_{\max}$ and $V_{\max}$ is $0.05$, then the observed scatter of
493: $\sigma_{B\!-\!V}=0.07\mag$ in Table~\ref{tab:color:minred} is
494: fully explained by these errors.
495: In that case the distribution of $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$ in
496: Figure~\ref{fig:color:tab2}a must be Gaussian, which is
497: statistically acceptable in spite of the four very blue SNe\,Ia with
498: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max} < -0.12$.
499: (b) As Figure~\ref{fig:color:tab2} shows, the color distribution of the
500: SNeIa in Table~\ref{tab:color:minred} is skewed bluewards, if
501: anything, while any noticeable reddening would skew the distribution
502: towards red colors.
503: (c) The colors $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$ and $(V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{00}$
504: of the SNe\,Ia in Table~\ref{tab:color:minred} are {\em
505: uncorrelated} (in fact insignificantly anti-correlated); in case
506: of absorption in the host galaxies both values would be redder
507: than average.
508: (d) If the spread in color in Figure~\ref{fig:color:tab2}a
509: was due to absorption, the absolute magnitudes $M_{B}$ would
510: correlate with the color $(B\!-\!V)^{0}_{\max}$ from column~5 with
511: a slope of ${\cal R}_{B}=3.65$, whereas an insignificant slope of
512: $0.137\pm0.904$ is observed.
513:
514: The least squares solutions of the data in
515: Figure~\ref{fig:color:tab2dm15} are
516: \begin{equation}\label{eq:color:mean:BV}
517: (B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00} = (0.045\pm0.044)\Delta m_{15} -
518: (0.073\pm0.060),\; \sigma=0.07,\; N=34
519: \end{equation}
520: \begin{equation}\label{eq:color:mean:BV35}
521: (B\!-\!V)_{35}^{00} = (-0.068\pm0.036)\Delta m_{15} +
522: (1.182\pm0.048),\; \sigma=0.05,\; N=32
523: \end{equation}
524: \begin{equation}\label{eq:color:mean:VI}
525: (V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{00} = (0.150\pm0.062)\Delta m_{15} -
526: (0.430\pm0.083),\; \sigma=0.09,\; N=31.
527: \end{equation}
528: The dependence of $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$ on $\Delta m_{15}$ in
529: equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}) is weaker than suggested by
530: \citet{Phillips:etal:99}, \citet{Nobili:etal:03}, and
531: \citet{Altavilla:etal:04}. In fact the dependence is only marginally
532: significant. Yet it is adopted here at face value. -- The similarity
533: of SN\,Ia spectra at $t_{B}=35^{\rm d}$ and the similar slopes of the
534: color curves at this late phase have led \citet{Lira:95},
535: \citet{Riess:etal:96}, \citet{Phillips:etal:99}, and
536: \citet{Altavilla:etal:04} to assume that $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{35}$ is
537: independent of $\Delta m_{15}$. However,
538: equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV35}) shows this color to become {\em
539: bluer\/} with increasing $\Delta m_{15}$ at a significance of
540: $2\sigma$. -- The $(V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{00}$ colors exhibit in
541: equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:VI}) a clear dependence on $\Delta
542: m_{15}$, becoming {\em redder\/} with increasing decline rate.
543:
544: The mean intrinsic colors of normal SNe\,Ia, normalized to $\Delta
545: m_{15}=1.1$, become from equations
546: (\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}$-$\ref{eq:color:mean:VI})
547: \begin{equation}\label{eq:color:mean}
548: (B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00} = -0.024\pm0.010,
549: (B\!-\!V)_{35}^{00} = 1.107\pm0.009, \mbox{and }
550: (V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{00} = -0.265\pm0.016.
551: \end{equation}
552:
553: Having argued that SNe\,Ia in Table~\ref{tab:color:minred} are
554: essentially redding-free, it is nevertheless clear that their
555: reddening is not exactly zero. Their true colors must therefore
556: be slightly bluer than expressed in
557: equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean}). We will return to this point in
558: \S~\ref{sec:conclusions} where it is stressed that any rest reddening
559: is inconsequential for the use of SNe\,Ia as standard candles as long
560: as they are reduced to some {\em uniform\/} color.
561:
562:
563:
564:
565: % ******************************************************************
566: % 4. The reddening of SNe Ia in their host galaxies
567: % ******************************************************************
568: \section{THE REDDENING OF SNe\,Ia IN THEIR HOST GALAXIES}
569: \label{sec:hostgal}
570: %
571: The reddening $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ of SNe\,Ia at maximum phase due
572: to selective absorption in the host galaxy is determined in three
573: different ways.
574:
575: % ******************************************************************
576: % 4.1 E(B-V)host from (B-V)00max
577: % ******************************************************************
578: \subsection{The Reddening in the Host Galaxy from \boldmath{$(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$}}
579: \label{sec:hostgal:max}
580: %
581: The reddening in the host galaxy is given by
582: \begin{equation}\label{eq:EBVmax}
583: E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}= B_{\max} - V_{\max} - E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm Gal} - (B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}.
584: \end{equation}
585: $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$ follows for all SNe\,Ia in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a
586: and tentatively for the peculiar SNe\,Ia in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}b by
587: inserting the apparent magnitudes and the Galactic reddening from
588: columns~6, 7, and 10 in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a,b and by taking the
589: intrinsic color from equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}). The resulting
590: $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$ are given in column~11 of Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a \& b.
591:
592:
593: % ******************************************************************
594: % 4.2 The Reddening in the Host Galaxy from the Tail Colors
595: % ******************************************************************
596: \subsection{The Reddening in the Host Galaxy from the Tail Colors \boldmath{$(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{35}$}}
597: \label{sec:hostgal:BVmax}
598: %
599: Color excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{35}$ at phase $t_{B}=35\;$days were kindly
600: provided by S.~Jha for 59 SNe\,Ia in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a. He has
601: based them on an adopted intrinsic tail color of
602: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{35}=1.055$ for all SNe\,Ia. Additional tail
603: color excesses were published by \citet{Phillips:etal:99} and
604: \citet{Altavilla:etal:04}. They are in a slightly different system as
605: those by Jha. In a first step the Altavilla excesses were transformed
606: into Jha's system by the regression
607: \begin{equation}\label{eq:color:alta}
608: \Delta E(B\!-\!V)_{{\rm Alta}-{\rm Jha}} =
609: (0.048\pm0.032)E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm Alta} +
610: (0.020\pm0.006), \; \sigma=0.03,\; N=38.
611: \end{equation}
612: In a second step the Phillips excesses were transformed by comparison
613: with the joint set from Jha and Altavilla by means of
614: \begin{equation}\label{eq:color:phil}
615: \Delta E(B\!-\!V)_{{\rm Phil}-{\rm Jha}} =
616: (0.084\pm0.025)E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm Phil} +
617: (0.018\pm0.009), \; \sigma=0.06,\; N=62.
618: \end{equation}
619: The homogenized excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{35}$ of SNe\,Ia with more than
620: one determination were averaged. If one adds to these values Jha's
621: adopted intrinsic color of
622: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{35}=1.055$, one recovers the ``observed'' tail colors
623: $(B\!-\!V)^{0}_{35}$, not listed, for 105 of the SNe\,Ia.
624:
625: New color excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{35}$ are now determined by
626: making allowance for the $\Delta m_{15}$ dependence of the intrinsic
627: color $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{35}$. This is achieved by subtracting
628: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{35}$ as given in equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV35})
629: from the ``observed'' colors $(B\!-\!V)^{0}_{35}$.
630:
631: The adopted tail excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{35}$ apply to
632: the quite red phase at $t_{B}=35^{\rm d}$. They cannot directly be
633: applied to the (blue) SN colors at maximum, because $E(B\!-\!V)$ must
634: depend on color due to bandwidth effects. In fact, if one plots the
635: colors $(B\!-\!V)_{\max15}^{0}$ (corrected for Galactic reddening and
636: reduced to $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$ with equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}))
637: against the adopted values of $E(B\!-\!V)_{35}$ one obtains the
638: following linear regression (Figure~\ref{fig:color:E35}).
639: % ***********************************************
640: % Figure 3: (B-V)015 versus E(B-V)35
641: % ***********************************************
642: \begin{figure}[t]
643: \epsscale{0.55}
644: \plotone{fig03.eps}
645: \caption{The relation of the colors $(B\!-\!V)_{\max15}^{0}$
646: versus the reddening values $E(B\!-\!V)_{35}$ which are derived
647: from a {\em red\/} SN phase.}
648: \label{fig:color:E35}
649: \end{figure}
650: % ***********************************************
651: \begin{equation}
652: \label{eq:color:BVmax}
653: (B\!-\!V)_{\max15}^{0} = (0.823\!\pm\!0.062)E(B\!-\!V)_{35} -
654: (0.005\!\pm\!0.011), \; \sigma=0.09, \; N=92
655: \end{equation}
656: Since the {\em intrinsic\/} color $(B\!-\!V)^{00}$ at maximum must
657: not be a function of reddening it follows from
658: equation~(\ref{eq:color:BVmax}) that
659: \begin{equation}
660: \label{eq:color:EBVmax35}
661: E(B\!-\!V)_{\max35} = (0.823\pm0.062)E(B\!-\!V)_{35}.
662: \end{equation}
663: The resulting values $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max35}$ are listed in
664: Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a, column~12.
665: The excesses from equations~(\ref{eq:EBVmax} \&
666: \ref{eq:color:EBVmax35}) are compared in
667: Figure~\ref{fig:color:comp1}. The agreement is satisfactory with no
668: systematic differences.
669: % ***********************************************
670: % Figure 4: Comparison of color excesses E(B-V)max and E(B-V)max35
671: % ***********************************************
672: \begin{figure}[t]
673: \plotone{fig04.eps}
674: \caption{Comparison of the color excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$
675: from colors at maximum and $E(B\!-\!V)_{max35}$ from tail colors
676: at $t_{B}=35^{\rm d}$.}
677: \label{fig:color:comp1}
678: \end{figure}
679: % ***********************************************
680:
681: The excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max35}$ for four peculiar SNe\,Ia in
682: Table~\ref{tab:SN1}b are given in parentheses. They are smaller on
683: average than their excesses from $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$, suggesting that
684: they are redder at $t_{B}=35^{\rm d}$ than normal SNe\,Ia (see also
685: \S~\ref{sec:SNpec:T}). The excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max35}$ of the
686: SN\,1991bg-like SNe in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}c have not been used, but
687: they are consistent with the assumption that these SNe in early-type
688: galaxies are almost reddening-free.
689:
690: % ******************************************************************
691: % 4.3 The Reddening in the Host Galaxy from (V-I)max
692: % ******************************************************************
693: \subsection{The Reddening in the Host Galaxy from
694: \boldmath{$(V\!-\!I)^{00}_{\max}$}}
695: \label{sec:hostgal:EVImax}
696: %
697: A third possibility to determine the reddening $E(B\!-\!V)$
698: in the host galaxy is provided by the magnitudes $V_{\max}$ and
699: $I_{\max}$ in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a\,\&\,b, columns 7 \& 8. We note
700: \begin{equation}\label{eq:color:EVIhost}
701: E(V\!-\!I) = V_{\max} - I_{\max} - 1.3E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm
702: Gal} - (V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{00},
703: \end{equation}
704: where $E(V\!-\!I)=1.3E(B\!-\!V)$ is adopted for the Galactic
705: reddening. If one inserts the intrinsic colors from
706: equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:VI}), with the $\Delta m_{15}$-values
707: appropriate for each SN\,Ia, into equation~(\ref{eq:color:EVIhost}) one
708: obtains $E(V\!-\!I)$.
709:
710: Since $E(B\!-\!V)$ is required, not $E(V\!-\!I)$, the latter must
711: be converted into the former. This is done by means of
712: Figure~\ref{fig:color:EVIhost}, where
713: $(B\!-\!V)^{0}_{\max15}$ (as in Figure~\ref{fig:color:E35}) is
714: plotted against $E(V\!-\!I)$.
715: From the equation at the
716: bottom of Figure~\ref{fig:color:EVIhost} follows
717: \begin{equation}\label{eq:color:EBVVIhost}
718: E(B\!-\!V)^{V\!-\!I}_{\max} = (0.626\pm0.063)E(V\!-\!I).
719: \end{equation}
720: % ***********************************************
721: % Figure 5: (B-V)max15 versus E(V-I)
722: % ***********************************************
723: \begin{figure}[t]
724: \plotone{fig05.eps}
725: \caption{The correlation of the color $(B\!-\!V)_{\max15}^{0}$ and
726: $E(V\!-\!I)$. SN\,1999cl is not taken into account.}
727: \label{fig:color:EVIhost}
728: \end{figure}
729: % ***********************************************
730: The color excesses $E(B\!-\!V)^{V\!-\!I}_{\max}$, listed in column~13
731: of Table~\ref{tab:SN1}, are compared with the mean of the excesses
732: $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$ and $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max35}$ in
733: Figure~\ref{fig:color:comp2}. Again the agreement is satisfactory.
734:
735: % ***********************************************
736: % Figure 6: Comparison of color excesses <E(B-V)max> and E(B-V)maxVI
737: % ***********************************************
738: \begin{figure}[t]
739: \plotone{fig06.eps}
740: \caption{The difference $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$ minus
741: $E(B\!-\!V)^{V\!-\!I}_{\max}$ plotted against
742: $E(B\!-\!V)^{V\!-\!I}_{\max}$. $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$ is here the
743: mean of $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$ and $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max35}$.}
744: \label{fig:color:comp2}
745: \end{figure}
746: % ***********************************************
747:
748: % ******************************************************************
749: % 4.4 The Adopted Reddening in the Host Galaxies
750: % ******************************************************************
751: \subsection{The Adopted Reddening in the Host Galaxies}
752: \label{sec:hostgal:adopted}
753: %
754: In view of the consistency of the color excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$,
755: $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max35}$, and $E(B\!-\!V)^{V\!-\!I}_{\max}$ they are
756: averaged with equal weights.
757: The means are adopted as the best estimates of the reddenings in the
758: host galaxy, $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$.
759: The values of $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ are listed in
760: Table~\ref{tab:SN3}, column~2. The ensuing colors
761: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$, fully corrected
762: for Galactic and host galaxy reddening, are in column~3.
763:
764: Table~\ref{tab:SN3} is organized as follows:\\
765: Col.~1: The name of the SN.\\
766: Col.~2: The adopted reddening $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ in the host
767: galaxy being the mean of columns 11-13 of
768: Table~\ref{tab:SN1}.\\
769: Col.~3\&4: The intrinsic colors $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$ and
770: $(V\!-\!I)^{00}_{\max}$ corrected for Galactic reddening and
771: reddening in the host galaxy.\\
772: Col.~5-7: The apparent magnitudes $m^{00}_{BVI}$ at maximum, corrected
773: for absorption in the Galaxy and in the host galaxy.\\
774: Col.~8-10: The absorption-corrected apparent magnitudes
775: $m^{\rm corr}_{BVI}$ reduced to a standard decline rate of
776: $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$ and $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}=-0.024$ by
777: the precepts developed in \S~\ref{sec:other:corrected}.\\
778: Col.~11: The photometric absorption-free distance modulus
779: $(m-M)^{00}_{\rm lum}$ from $m^{\rm corr}_{V}$ in column~9 and
780: the mean luminosity $M^{\rm corr}_{V}$ in
781: equation~(\ref{eq:other:Mabs}). The latter assumes $H_{0}=60$.
782:
783: % ***********************************************
784: % Figure 7: (V-I)015 versus E(B-V)host
785: % ***********************************************
786: \begin{figure}[t]
787: \plotone{fig07.eps}
788: \caption{The colors $(V\!-\!I)^0_{\max15}$, corrected for Galactic
789: reddening, versus the adopted reddening $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$
790: in the host galaxy.}
791: \label{fig:color:EVIBVhost}
792: \end{figure}
793: % ***********************************************
794: In order to free the $(V\!-\!I)^{0}$ colors from the host galaxy
795: reddening the relation between $E(V\!-\!I)_{\rm host}$ and
796: $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ is needed. It is obtained from
797: Figure~\ref{fig:color:EVIBVhost}, where $(V\!-\!I)^{0}$ is plotted
798: versus $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$. The figure yields (slightly rounded)
799: \begin{equation}\label{eq:color:EVIBVhost}
800: E(V\!-\!I)_{\rm host} = (1.32\pm0.07)E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host},
801: \end{equation}
802: which we adopt. The conversion factor is consistent with
803: equation~(\ref{eq:color:EBVVIhost}), but here $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$
804: has high weight being the mean of three determinations. The rms
805: dispersion of $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$, if based on the three
806: determinations, is $0.043\;$mag.
807:
808: % ******************************************************************
809: % 4.5 Test of the K-correction
810: % ******************************************************************
811: \subsection{Test of the K-Correction}
812: \label{sec:color:Kcorr}
813: %
814: The template-fitting of the SN light curves by the method of
815: \citet{Hamuy:etal:96c} is applied in a way as to
816: compensate the K-correction, i.e.\ the effect of the redshifts $z$ on
817: the magnitudes and colors, in a single step.
818: To verify the success of the method we plot the adopted
819: colors $(B\!-\!V)_{\max15}^{00}$ and $(V\!-\!I)_{\max15}^{00}$,
820: normalized to $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$, against
821: $\log cz$ in Figure~\ref{fig:color:Kcorr}. Any dependence is hardly
822: significant and is neglected in the following.
823: % ***********************************************
824: % Figure 8: Color versus log cz
825: % ***********************************************
826: \begin{figure*}[t]
827: \epsscale{1.0}
828: \plotone{fig08.eps}
829: \caption{A test of the adopted K-corrections. The colors
830: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max15}$ and $(V\!-\!I)^{00}_{\max15}$,
831: normalized to $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$, show only a negligible
832: correlation.}
833: \label{fig:color:Kcorr}
834: \end{figure*}
835: % ***********************************************
836:
837:
838:
839:
840: % ******************************************************************
841: % 5. The absorption-corrected magnitudes of SNe Ia
842: % ******************************************************************
843: \section{THE ABSORPTION-CORRECTED MAGNITUDES OF SNe\,Ia}
844: \label{sec:absorption}
845: %
846: % ******************************************************************
847: % 5.1 The Galactic absorption
848: % ******************************************************************
849: \subsection{The Galactic Absorption}
850: \label{sec:absorption:galactic}
851: %
852: The Galactic reddenings of \citet{Schlegel:etal:98} are converted into
853: absorption values $A_{B}$, $A_{V}$, and $A_{I}$ by means of
854: conventional absorption-reddening ratios of ${\cal R}_{B} = 4.1$,
855: ${\cal R}_{V} = 3.1$, and ${\cal R}_{I} = 1.8$ (hence $E(V\!-\!I) =
856: 1.3E(B\!-\!V)$ as used in \S~\ref{sec:color}). The resulting
857: absorption values are subtracted from the observed SN magnitudes to
858: obtain $B^{0}$, $V^{0}$, and $I^{0}$ at maximum.
859:
860: Conventional values of ${\cal R}$ have been adopted because the
861: available range of $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm Gal}$ is too small to derive
862: meaningful Galactic ${\cal R}$ values from the SNe\,Ia themselves.
863:
864: % ******************************************************************
865: % 5.2 The absorption in the host galaxy
866: % ******************************************************************
867: \subsection{The Absorption in the Host Galaxy}
868: \label{sec:absorption:host}
869: %
870: Previous attempts to correct SN magnitudes for absorption in the host
871: galaxies have frequently assumed conventional (Galactic) values of
872: ${\cal R}_{BVI}$, although
873: \citet[][and references therein]{Branch:Tammann:92} have argued for
874: significantly smaller values. More recent determinations are (quoted
875: ${\cal R}_{V}$ values are transformed here to ${\cal R}_{B}$ by
876: ${\cal R}_{B}\equiv {\cal R}_{V}+1$)
877: ${\cal R}_{B}=3.55\pm0.30$ \citep{Riess:etal:96},
878: $2.09$ \citep{Tripp:98},
879: $3.5\pm0.4$ \citep{Phillips:etal:99},
880: $2.8$ \citep{Krisciunas:etal:00},
881: $3.88\pm0.15$ \citep{Wang:etal:03},
882: $3.5$ \citep{Altavilla:etal:04}.
883: The present large sample of SNe\,Ia is well suited for an independent
884: determination of the average value of ${\cal R}_{BVI}$ of
885: extragalactic SNe\,Ia.
886:
887: For this purpose the absolute magnitudes $M^{0}_{BVI}$, based on
888: $H_{0}=60$ and corrected only for Galactic absorption, are plotted
889: against the values of the host galaxy reddening $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm
890: host}$ as listed in column~13 of Table~\ref{tab:SN1}
891: (Figure~\ref{fig:absorption:Mabs}).
892: % ***********************************************
893: % Figure 09: -> first R-values for host-reddening
894: % ***********************************************
895: \begin{figure*}[t]
896: \epsscale{1.0}
897: \plotone{fig09.eps}
898: \caption{The dependence of the absolute magnitudes
899: $M^{0}_{BVI}(60)$ on the host galaxy reddening
900: $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ for SNe\,Ia with $3000 < v_{\rm
901: CMB}<20\,000\kms$. The $M^{0}_{BVI}$ magnitudes are only
902: corrected for Galactic absorption. Five SNe\,Ia shown here as
903: open symbols are not used for the solution (see text).}
904: \label{fig:absorption:Mabs}
905: \end{figure*}
906: % ***********************************************
907:
908: The SN sample used here is called in the following the ``fiducial''
909: sample. It contains the 62\,(58) SNe\,Ia in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a with
910: $B$, $V$ (and $I$) magnitudes and with $3000<v_{\rm
911: CMB}<20\,000\kms$. It excludes SN\,1996ai which suffers excessive
912: absorption in its host galaxy (see Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a). It also
913: excludes five SNe\,Ia, which deviate by more
914: than $2\sigma_{M}$. The apparently normal SN\,1999ej is
915: too faint for unknown reasons by $3\sigma_{M}$. SN\,1992ag is very red
916: at $t_{35}$, causing its tail excess $E(B\!-\!V)_{max35}$ to be large,
917: which in turn makes $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$ exceptionally blue
918: and the absolute magnitude very bright (cf.\ Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a and
919: \ref{tab:SN3}). It is believed that either its color
920: $(B\!-\!V)_{35}^{0}$ is in error or its light curve is peculiar. If
921: the color excess was based only on the color at maximum its absolute
922: magnitude would become normal. The overly bright SN\,1997cw is
923: suspicious not so much because its photometry begins only 16 days
924: after $B$ maximum, but because it was classified as SNe-91T
925: \citep{Berlind:etal:97}, which is now revised to SNe-91T/99aa
926: \citep{Li:etal:01b}. Also the very luminous SN\,1998ab and 1999dq are
927: of type SNe-99aa \citep{Li:etal:01b}. The properties of this new
928: class of SNe\,Ia and their overluminosity are taken up again in
929: \S~\ref{sec:SNpec:T}.
930:
931: Four other less overluminous SNe-99aa, designated with a dagger
932: $\dagger$ in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a, are kept in the sample of normal
933: SNe\,Ia. The reason is that they can be isolated only from pre-maximum
934: spectroscopy, which is lacking for many objects in
935: Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a. Thus a few of the ``normal'' SNe\,Ia may
936: actually belong to the elusive class of SNe-99aa without having as
937: extreme luminosities like SN\,1997cw, 1998ab, and 1999dq.
938:
939: As shown by the equations in
940: Figure~\ref{fig:absorption:Mabs} the resulting values of ${\cal
941: R}_{BVI}$ are about 3.6, 2.4, and 1.2. However, these values are
942: still open to criticism. As will be shown below SNe\,Ia in E/S0 have
943: lower intrinsic luminosities {\em and\/} less extinction than
944: average. Therefore there is some dependence of $M^{0}_{BVI}$ on
945: $E(B\!-\!V)$ which cannot be attributed to absorption, but which is
946: due to the intrinsic underluminosity of SNe\,Ia in early-type
947: galaxies. This type-dependent effect can be compensated by the decline
948: rate $\Delta m_{15}$ in \S~\ref{sec:other:lightcurve}. The interplay
949: of ${\cal R}$ and $\Delta m_{15}$ requires therefore a simultaneous
950: solution which is given in equation (\ref{eq:other:dm15R}) below. From
951: this the improved values of ${\cal R}_{BVI}$ become
952: \begin{equation}\label{eq:absorption:R}
953: {\cal R}_{B}=3.65\pm0.16,\quad
954: {\cal R}_{V}=2.65\pm0.15,\quad
955: {\cal R}_{I}=1.35\pm0.21.
956: \end{equation}
957: The ${\cal R}$ values here are in addition adjusted to fulfill the
958: condition ${\cal R}_{B}-{\cal R}_{V}=1$. They are quite close to the
959: provisional values in Figure~\ref{fig:absorption:Mabs}. It is also
960: satisfactory that they agree quite well with those by other authors
961: cited above.
962:
963: If one assumes that the highly reddened SN\,1996ai is a
964: normal SNe\,Ia with average luminosity and that its
965: peculiar motion is $\la200$\kms, one finds ${\cal R}_{B}=3.0\pm0.4$
966: from this single object.
967:
968: The solutions in Table~\ref{tab:other:dm15R} for ${\cal R}_{V}$
969: and ${\cal R}_{I}$ imply a ratio $E(V\!-\!I)/E(B\!-\!V)={\cal
970: R}_{V}-{\cal R}_{I}=1.21\pm0.26$, which may be compared with
971: $1.32\pm0.07$ from equation~(\ref{eq:color:EVIBVhost}). The small
972: error of the latter value is due to the fact that its determination is
973: independent of any assumed value of ${\cal R}$, which is notoriously
974: difficult to determine. It is noted that the adopted value of $1.30$
975: is the same as the conventional Galactic value of 1.3.
976:
977: The values of $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ (Table~\ref{tab:SN3},
978: column~2) were multiplied with the ${\cal R}_{BVI}$ values in
979: equation~(\ref{eq:absorption:R}) to be subtracted from the apparent
980: magnitudes $B$, $V$, and $I$ (Table~\ref{tab:SN1}, columns~6-8),
981: after they are corrected for the conventional
982: Galactic absorption. The resulting fully corrected apparent magnitudes
983: $m_{B\max}^{00}$, $m_{V\max}^{00}$, and $m_{I\max}^{00}$ are tabulated in
984: columns~5-7 of Table~\ref{tab:SN3}.
985:
986:
987:
988:
989: % ******************************************************************
990: % 6. The dependence of SN luminosities on other parameters
991: % ******************************************************************
992: \section{THE DEPENDENCE OF SN LUMINOSITIES ON OTHER PARAMETERS}
993: \label{sec:other}
994: %
995: % ******************************************************************
996: % 6.1 The dependence of SN luminosities on other galaxy type
997: % ******************************************************************
998: \subsection{The Dependence of SN Luminosities on Galaxy Type}
999: \label{sec:other:galaxyT}
1000: %
1001: If one plots the absolute magnitudes $M_{V}^{00}$ as
1002: introduced in \S~\ref{sec:absorption}, but now also corrected for
1003: absorption in the host galaxy and {\em without\/} the $\Delta m_{15}$
1004: correction, against the Hubble type of the host galaxy, a clear
1005: correlation emerges between SN luminosity and the Hubble type as
1006: first shown by \citet{Hamuy:etal:96a,Hamuy:etal:00}, the SNe\,Ia in
1007: early-type galaxies being fainter by $\sim0.3\mag$ than in late spirals
1008: (Figure~\ref{fig:other:type}). The obvious conclusion is that young
1009: populations produce brighter SNe\,Ia.
1010: % ***********************************************
1011: % Figure 10: M_V versus Hubble type T
1012: % ***********************************************
1013: \begin{figure}[t]
1014: \epsscale{0.55}
1015: \plotone{fig10.eps}
1016: \caption{The correlation between the absolute magnitudes
1017: $M_{V}^{00}(60)$, fully corrected for absorption, and the
1018: coded Hubble type of the host galaxy.}
1019: \label{fig:other:type}
1020: \end{figure}
1021: % ***********************************************
1022:
1023: Yes, but why? The most secure conclusion from the data,
1024: which are beyond doubt
1025: \citep[][Fig. 6]{Hamuy:etal:95,Saha:etal:97,Saha:etal:99,Parodi:etal:00, Sandage:etal:01},
1026: is that different channels of SNe\,Ia production exist between
1027: most SNe\,Ia in E/S0 galaxies compared with most SNe Ia in spirals.
1028:
1029: Both channels are fed by old, highly evolved stars near one
1030: solar mass that are in close binaries. By one of two processes
1031: (mass transfer from a normal star to a white dwarf, or mergers of
1032: two white dwarfs due to orbital energy loss caused by
1033: gravitational radiation nudging one or both stars over the
1034: Chandrasekhar limit), catastrophic collapse eventually occurs,
1035: but with different gestation times. Hence, the delay times differ
1036: for progenitor formation to explosion, according to the process.
1037: The consequence is that the star formation rates of the initial
1038: progenitors differ between E/S0 galaxies and spirals (E/S0 with a
1039: single burst of star formation early on; spirals with a more
1040: continuous star formation rate). Hence, the average delay times
1041: differ between E/S0 and spirals (L. Greggio, private communication),
1042: making a difference in the Fe production rate, hence a chemical
1043: composition difference. This expected chemical composition
1044: difference apparently affects the absolute magnitude at maximum
1045: in the SN explosion, as suggested by \citet{Hamuy:etal:00}.
1046:
1047: % ******************************************************************
1048: % 6.2 The dependence of SN luminosity on light curve parameters
1049: % ******************************************************************
1050: \subsection{The Dependence of SN Luminosity on Light Curve Parameters}
1051: \label{sec:other:lightcurve}
1052: %
1053: Since also the decline rate is a function of the Hubble type, one
1054: expects a correlation between the luminosity and the decline rate as
1055: well. This Pskovskii effect was first quantified by the
1056: decline rate parameter $\Delta m_{15}$ by \citet{Phillips:93}.
1057: The corresponding correlation of the form
1058: \begin{equation}\label{eq:absorption:dm15}
1059: M^{00}_{BVI15}=M^{00}_{BVI} - \alpha_{BVI}(\Delta m_{15}-1.1)
1060: \end{equation}
1061: is in fact even tighter than the one in
1062: Figure~\ref{fig:other:type}; it is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:other:dm15}.
1063: The normalization to $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$ corresponds roughly to the
1064: median value of normal SNe\,Ia. The magnitudes $M^{00}_{BVI}$ are
1065: corrected for Galactic and internal absorption described in
1066: \S~\ref{sec:absorption}.
1067: % ***********************************************
1068: % Figure 11: M_B,V,I versus Dm15 -> alpha
1069: % ***********************************************
1070: \begin{figure*}[t]
1071: \epsscale{1.0}
1072: \plotone{fig11.eps}
1073: \caption{The dependence of the absolute magnitudes
1074: $M_{BVI}^{00}(60)$ on the decline rate $\Delta m_{15}$. The
1075: SNe\,Ia with open symbols have not been used for the
1076: solution. They are identified in Figure~\ref{fig:absorption:Mabs}
1077: and discussed in \S~\ref{sec:absorption:host}.}
1078: \label{fig:other:dm15}
1079: \end{figure*}
1080: % ***********************************************
1081:
1082: Since $\alpha$ and ${\cal R}$ and hence $M^{00}$ are not quite
1083: independent, as discussed in \S~\ref{sec:absorption:host}, these
1084: quantities must be simultaneously solved for. The corresponding
1085: regression with two independent variables takes the form of
1086: \begin{equation}\label{eq:other:dm15R}
1087: M^{0}_{BVI}= \alpha_{BVI}(\Delta m_{15}-1.1) +
1088: {\cal R}_{BVI}E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host} +
1089: M^{00}_{BVI15},
1090: \end{equation}
1091: where the constant term, $M^{00}_{BVI15}$, is the mean absolute
1092: magnitude of SNe\,Ia, corrected for Galactic and host galaxy
1093: absorption and reduced to $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$. Least-squares solutions
1094: for the same fiducial SN sample as used for Figure~\ref{fig:absorption:Mabs}
1095: give the values of $\alpha_{BVI}$, ${\cal R}_{BVI}$, and
1096: $M^{00}_{BVI15}$ as shown in Table~\ref{tab:other:dm15R}.
1097: % ***********************************************
1098: % Table 4: The coefficients in equation (15)
1099: % ***********************************************
1100: \def\baselinestretch{1.1}
1101: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
1102: \tablewidth{0pt}
1103: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1104: \tablenum{4}
1105: \tablecaption{The coefficient $\alpha$ of the decline rate, the
1106: absorption-to-reddening ratio ${\cal R}$, and the
1107: absorption-corrected mean absolute magnitude of normal SNe\,Ia with
1108: $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$.\label{tab:other:dm15R}}
1109: % ***********************************************
1110: \tablehead{
1111: % ***********************************************
1112: & \colhead{$B$} & \colhead{$V$} & \colhead{$I$}
1113: }
1114: % ***********************************************
1115: \startdata
1116: % ***********************************************
1117: $\alpha$ & $0.619\pm0.076$ & $0.608\pm0.074$ & $0.438\pm0.076$ \\
1118: ${\cal R}$ & $3.75\pm0.16$ & $2.59\pm0.15$ & $1.38\pm0.21$ \\
1119: $M^{00}_{15}(60)$ &$-19.57\pm0.02$ &$-19.55\pm0.02$ &$-19.28\pm0.02$ \\
1120: $\sigma_{M}$ & $0.15$ & $0.15$ & $0.15$ \\
1121: $N$ & 62 & 62 & 58 \\
1122: % ***********************************************
1123: \enddata
1124: % ***********************************************
1125: \def\baselinestretch{1.5}
1126: \end{deluxetable}
1127: % ***********************************************
1128:
1129: The values of $\alpha_{BVI}$ in Table~\ref{tab:other:dm15R} will
1130: be adopted in the following. The dependence of
1131: $M^{00}_{BVI}=M^{0}_{BVI}-{\cal R}_{BVI}E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ on $\Delta
1132: m_{15}$ is illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:other:dm15}, where
1133: $\alpha_{BVI}$ appears as the slope of the correlation.
1134:
1135: The values of ${\cal R}_{BVI}$ in Table~\ref{tab:other:dm15R}
1136: differ slightly from the values in equation~(\ref{eq:absorption:R}),
1137: which we have adopted as the final ones, because the latter comply
1138: with the additional conditions that ${\cal R}_{B}-{\cal R}_{V}=1$ and
1139: ${\cal R}_{V}-{\cal R}_{I}=1.3$ from
1140: equation~(\ref{eq:color:EVIBVhost}).
1141:
1142: In equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}) it was shown that the color
1143: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$ is only marginally dependent on $\Delta
1144: m_{15}$. This is vindicated here by the $\alpha$'s in
1145: Table~\ref{tab:other:dm15R}. They yield for the relation
1146: \begin{equation}\label{eq:absorption:BVbeta}
1147: (B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max} = \beta\Delta m_{15} + \mbox{const}
1148: \end{equation}
1149: an insignificant value of
1150: $\beta=\alpha_{B}-\alpha_{V}=0.011\pm0.106$. The corresponding
1151: coefficient for the $(V\!-\!I)^{00}_{\max}$ colors becomes
1152: $\alpha_{V}-\alpha_{I}=0.170\pm0.106$, which is consistent with
1153: $0.150\pm0.062$ from equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:VI}).
1154:
1155: It becomes clear from the above that any change of $\beta$
1156: affects necessarily the coefficients $\alpha$, because an
1157: excess $\Delta\beta$ causes a change of the color excess of
1158: \begin{equation}\label{eq:other:beta1}
1159: \Delta E(B\!-\!V)_{\max} \propto -\Delta\beta\Delta m_{15}.
1160: \end{equation}
1161: This affects the absorption-corrected magnitudes $M_{B}^{00}$, taken
1162: as an example, by
1163: \begin{equation}\label{eq:other:beta2}
1164: \Delta M_{B}^{00} \propto {\cal R}_{B}\Delta\beta\Delta m_{15}.
1165: \end{equation}
1166: Hence, if the {\em intrinsic\/} dependence of $M_{B}$ on $\Delta
1167: m_{15}$ is $\Delta M_{B}^{00} \propto \alpha\Delta m_{15}$, one
1168: observes instead
1169: \begin{equation}\label{eq:other:beta3}
1170: \Delta M_{B}^{00} \propto (\alpha_{B} + {\cal R}_{B}\Delta\beta)\Delta m_{15}.
1171: \end{equation}
1172: The analogue holds for the color excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{35}$ derived
1173: from tail colors $(B\!-\!V)_{35}^{0}$. If the true colors vary like
1174: $\Delta(B\!-\!V)_{35}^{0}\propto \gamma\Delta m_{15}$, any deviation
1175: $\Delta \gamma$ from $\gamma$ leads to a variation of the color excess
1176: of
1177: \begin{equation}\label{eq:other:beta4}
1178: \Delta E(B\!-\!V)_{35} \propto -\Delta\gamma\Delta m_{15},
1179: \end{equation}
1180: such that $\Delta E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$, being the mean of
1181: $\Delta E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$ and $\Delta E(B\!-\!V)_{35}$, varies like
1182: \begin{equation}\label{eq:other:beta5}
1183: \Delta E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host} =
1184: -\frac{1}{2}(\Delta\beta+\Delta\gamma)\Delta m_{15}, \quad \mbox{and}
1185: \end{equation}
1186: \begin{equation}\label{eq:other:beta6}
1187: \Delta M_{B}^{00} \propto [\alpha_{B} + \frac{1}{2}{\cal
1188: R}_{B}(\Delta\beta+\Delta\gamma)]\Delta m_{15} = (\alpha_{B} +
1189: \Delta\alpha)\Delta m_{15}.
1190: \end{equation}
1191: We have adopted, besides ${\cal R}_{B}=3.65$, $\beta=0.045$
1192: (equation~\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}),
1193: $\gamma=-0.068$ (equation~\ref{eq:color:mean:BV35})
1194: as the intrinsic values. Yet some authors have adopted
1195: other values of ${\cal R}$, $\beta$ and $\gamma$ which necessarily
1196: reflect on the observed value of $\alpha$.
1197: For instance \cite{Phillips:etal:99} have
1198: chosen $\Delta\beta=0.069$, $\Delta\gamma=0.068$, and ${\cal
1199: R}_{B}=4.16$. If one subtracts the resulting $\Delta\alpha=0.285$
1200: from their proposed value $\alpha'=0.786\pm0.398$ one obtaines
1201: $\alpha_{B}=0.501\pm0.398$. \citet{Altavilla:etal:04} have taken
1202: $\Delta\beta=0.045$, $\Delta\gamma=+0.068$, and ${\cal R}_{B}=3.5$;
1203: this leads to $\Delta\alpha=0.198$ which, subtracted from their
1204: preferred value $\alpha'=1.061\pm0.154$, yields
1205: $\alpha_{B}=0.863\pm0.154$. These two determinations of $\alpha_{B}$
1206: embrace the adopted value of $\alpha_{B}=0.612\pm0.073$ in
1207: Table~\ref{tab:coeff3fit} within statistics.
1208: -- If we had set the coefficient $\beta=0.045\pm0.044$ in
1209: equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}) equal to 0, as
1210: \citet{Parodi:etal:00} did, the present fiducial sample would give
1211: $\alpha_{B}=0.532\pm0.083$ which is the same as their value within the
1212: errors.
1213:
1214: The correlation of type-Ia SN luminosity and light curve shape
1215: has a considerably history. First suggested by
1216: \citet{Pskovskii:67,Pskovskii:71,Pskovskii:84} it was taken up by
1217: \citet{Barbon:etal:73}. \citet{Phillips:93} used first the decline
1218: rate $\Delta m_{15}$ to parametrize the correlation, however he had to
1219: depend on inaccurate Tully-Fisher and surface brightness fluctuation
1220: distances, which resulted in an overestimate of the slope $\alpha_{B}$
1221: by a factor of $\sim\!4.5$. The steep slope was the reason why
1222: \citet{Sandage:Tammann:95} questioned the correlation altogether. If
1223: Phillips had been correct in the steepness of the Pskovskii effect,
1224: implying a luminosity variation of $2.5\;$mag in $B$ over the full
1225: range of $\Delta m_{15}$, the use of SNe\,Ia as standard candles would
1226: have been substantially compromised. Only when sufficient relative
1227: velocity distances became available the determination of the slope
1228: $\alpha$ began to converge
1229: \citep{Hamuy:etal:96b,Phillips:etal:99,Parodi:etal:00,Sandage:etal:01,Altavilla:etal:04}.
1230: The remaining differences are now explained by the sensitivity of
1231: $\alpha$ on the adopted relation between color and $\Delta m_{15}$
1232: (equations~\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}$-$\ref{eq:color:mean:VI}).
1233:
1234: From the above it is clear that a positive/negative excess of the
1235: coefficient $\beta$ in equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}) propagates
1236: into $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ and into the absorption values such that
1237: the magnitudes $M^{00}_{\max}$ (or $m^{00}_{\max}$) are too
1238: faint/bright by ${\cal R}\Delta\beta\Delta m_{15}$. Yet it is to be
1239: noted that the magnitudes $M^{00}_{\max15}$, normalized to $\Delta
1240: m_{15}=1.1$, are not affected by this error, because they are
1241: corrected by an additional term $\Delta\alpha\Delta m_{15} = {\cal
1242: R}\Delta\beta\Delta m_{15}$ of opposite sign. The error compensation
1243: is only exact if $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ is determined from the
1244: intrinsic colors given in equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}). In the
1245: present case also the intrinsic colors from
1246: equations~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV35} \& \ref{eq:color:mean:VI}) are used
1247: to determine $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$, but the three determinations
1248: agree so well that it is sufficient here to show that any effect of an
1249: incorrect value of $\beta$ on $M^{00}_{\max15}$ is compensated by the
1250: adopted value of $\alpha$ in Table~\ref{tab:other:dm15R}.
1251:
1252: \citet{Perlmutter:etal:97} have introduced the ``stretch factor'',
1253: $s$, instead of $\Delta m_{15}$ to characterize the light curve
1254: shape. The two parameters $s$ and $\Delta m_{15}$ show a tight
1255: correlation \citep{Jha:02,Altavilla:etal:04}; they are interchangeable for
1256: all practical purposes.
1257:
1258: An alternative method to allow for the correlation between
1259: luminosity and light curve shape and to determine at the same time the
1260: total absorption $A_{V}$ was introduced by \citet[][see also
1261: \citealt{Jha:02}; \citealt{Wang:etal:03};
1262: \citealt{Tonry:etal:03}]{Riess:etal:96,Riess:etal:98}. Their various
1263: forms of ``Multi-color Light Curve Shape'' (MLCS) fitting are
1264: difficult to apply and offer no obvious advantages.
1265:
1266:
1267: % ******************************************************************
1268: % 6.3 The dependence of the SN luminosity on the color
1269: % ******************************************************************
1270: \subsection{The Dependence of the SN Luminosity on the Color}
1271: \label{sec:other:color}
1272: %
1273: Following a proposal by \citet{Tripp:98} and \citet{Parodi:etal:00} we
1274: test the question whether SN luminosity depends on the color
1275: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$ and/or
1276: $(V\!-\!I)^{00}_{\max}$ in Figure~\ref{fig:other:color}.
1277: Dependencies at the $\ga2\sigma$ level
1278: seem to exist of $M^{00}_{B\max15}$ and $M^{00}_{I\max15}$ on
1279: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$ and of $M^{00}_{I\max15}$ on
1280: $(V\!-\!I)^{00}_{\max}$ (see equations at the panel bottoms of
1281: Figure~\ref{fig:other:color}). The correlations should be considered,
1282: however, with some reservations because the range of about
1283: $\pm0.15\;$mag in either color is only about two times the estimated
1284: observational error of a single color determination (about
1285: $\pm0.07\;$mag).
1286:
1287: In the following the correlation of SN luminosity on
1288: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$ is taken at face value. $(B\!-\!V)$ colors are
1289: preferred over $(V\!-\!I)$ colors because the latter are not available
1290: for all SNe\,Ia of the fiducial sample. The allowance for the color
1291: dependence does not shift the mean luminosity of SNe\,Ia, but brings a
1292: marginal decrease of the luminosity dispersion, at least in $I$. In
1293: any case the allowance for color can bring no harm.
1294:
1295: % ***********************************************
1296: % Figure 12: M_B,V,I versus (B-V)00/(V-I)00
1297: % ***********************************************
1298: \begin{figure*}[t]
1299: \epsscale{0.97}
1300: \plotone{fig12.eps} % was fig12b.eps
1301: \caption{The dependence of the absolute magnitudes
1302: $M_{BVI}^{00}$ on the color $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$ and
1303: $(V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{00}$. The SNe\,Ia with open symbols have not
1304: been used for the solution. They are identified in
1305: Figure~\ref{fig:absorption:Mabs}.}
1306: \label{fig:other:color}
1307: \end{figure*}
1308: % ***********************************************
1309:
1310:
1311: % ******************************************************************
1312: % 6.4 SN magnitudes corrected for $\Delta m_{15}$ and color
1313: % ******************************************************************
1314: \subsection{SN Magnitudes Corrected for \boldmath{$\Delta m_{15}$} and Color}
1315: \label{sec:other:corrected}
1316: %
1317: From the discussion in \S~\ref{sec:other:lightcurve} and
1318: \ref{sec:other:color} follows that minimum scatter of the
1319: absolute magnitude $M^{00}_{BVI}$ can be achieved by
1320: correcting for the decline rate $\Delta m_{15}$ {\em and\/} color
1321: $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$.
1322: The corresponding ansatz
1323: \begin{equation}\label{eq:other:3fitd}
1324: M_{BVI}^{\rm 00} = a(\Delta m_{15}-1.1) + b[(B\!-\!V) +0.024] + c
1325: \end{equation}
1326: leads with the fiducial sample of 62 SNe\,Ia to the coefficients $a$,
1327: $b$, and $c$ in Table~\ref{tab:coeff3fit}.
1328: % ***********************************************
1329: % Table 5: The coefficients in equation (23)
1330: % ***********************************************
1331: \def\baselinestretch{1.1}
1332: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrr}
1333: \tablewidth{0pt}
1334: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1335: \tablenum{5}
1336: \tablecaption{The coefficients in
1337: equation~(\ref{eq:other:3fitd}).\label{tab:coeff3fit}}
1338: % ***********************************************
1339: \tablehead{
1340: % ***********************************************
1341: & \colhead{$a$} & \colhead{$b$} & \colhead{$c$} & \colhead{$\sigma$} &
1342: \colhead{N}
1343: }
1344: % ***********************************************
1345: \startdata
1346: % ***********************************************
1347: \multicolumn{6}{c}{with $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$} \\
1348: \noalign{\smallskip}
1349: \tableline
1350: \noalign{\smallskip}
1351: % ***********************************************
1352: $M_{B}, (B\!-\!V)$: & $0.612\pm0.073$ & $0.692\pm0.357$ & $-19.57\pm0.02$ & $0.15$ & 62 \\
1353: $M_{V}, (B\!-\!V)$: & $0.612\pm0.073$ & $-0.308\pm0.357$ & $-19.55\pm0.02$ & $0.15$ & 62 \\
1354: $M_{I}, (B\!-\!V)$: & $0.439\pm0.072$ & $0.827\pm0.350$ & $-19.29\pm0.02$ & $0.14$ & 58 \\
1355: % ***********************************************
1356: \enddata
1357: % ***********************************************
1358: \def\baselinestretch{1.5}
1359: \end{deluxetable}
1360: % ***********************************************
1361:
1362: If one subtracts the first two terms of
1363: equation~(\ref{eq:other:3fitd}) from the fully absorption-corrected
1364: magnitudes $m^{00}_{BVI}$ in columns~5-7 Table~\ref{tab:SN3} one
1365: obtains the magnitudes $m^{\rm corr}_{BVI}$ (columns 8-10) which are
1366: in addition reduced to $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$ and a corresponding color
1367: of $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}=-0.024$. The distribution functions of the
1368: resulting absolute magnitudes $M^{\rm corr}_{BVI}$ of the
1369: fiducial sample -- always on the basis of $H_{0}=60$ -- are shown in
1370: Figure~\ref{fig:MabsHisto}. They are well fitted by Gaussians after
1371: five SNe\,Ia, discussed in \S~\ref{sec:absorption:host}, are
1372: excluded.
1373: % ***********************************************
1374: % Figure 13: Distributionof M^{corr}_{BVI}
1375: % ***********************************************
1376: \begin{figure*}[t]
1377: \epsscale{1.0}
1378: \plotone{fig13.eps}
1379: \caption{The distribution in absolute magnitude $M_{BVI}^{\rm
1380: corr}$ of the 62\,(58) SNe\,Ia with
1381: $3000<v<20\,000\kms$. Additional five SNe\,Ia as in
1382: Figure~\ref{fig:absorption:Mabs} are
1383: identified; they are not used for the solution.}
1384: \label{fig:MabsHisto}
1385: \end{figure*}
1386: % ***********************************************
1387:
1388:
1389:
1390:
1391: % ******************************************************************
1392: % 7 Photometric Properties of peculiar SNe\,Ia
1393: % ******************************************************************
1394: \section{PHOTOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF PECULIAR SNe\,Ia (SNe-91T AND
1395: SNe-91bg AND TWO OTHERS)}
1396: \label{sec:SNpec}
1397: %
1398: % ******************************************************************
1399: % 7.1 SNe-91T and SNe-99aa
1400: % ******************************************************************
1401: \subsection{SNe-91T and SNe-99aa}
1402: \label{sec:SNpec:T}
1403: %
1404: SNe-91T, with SN\,1991T as the prototype and long suspected to be
1405: overluminous, are spectroscopically well defined \citep[e.g.][and
1406: references therein]{Li:etal:01b}. The
1407: observed and derived photometric properties of the known quartet are
1408: listed in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}b and \ref{tab:SN3}b, respectively.
1409: They are characterized by quite slow decline rates $\Delta m_{15}$.
1410: Their intrinsic color $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$, being unknown, was
1411: {\em assumed\/} to be given by equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}) like
1412: that of normal SNe\,Ia. If one derives color excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm
1413: host}$ and absorption values on this basis, one finds the mean
1414: photometric parameters given in Table~\ref{tab:SNeIa-T}.
1415: The fact that the resulting mean value of
1416: $<\!(V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{\rm corr}\!> = -0.29$ is similar to
1417: normal SNe\,Ia shows that the present assumption on
1418: $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$ leads at least to consistent
1419: results. Their absolute magnitudes $M_{BVI}^{00}$, as given
1420: in Table~\ref{tab:SNeIa-T}, turn out to be brighter than normal
1421: SNe\,Ia (equation~\ref{eq:other:Mabs} below) by $\Delta
1422: M_{B}=-0.40\pm0.08$ on average with remarkably small scatter. Even if
1423: one reduces their luminosity to $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$
1424: (equation~\ref{eq:absorption:dm15}) they remain overluminous by
1425: $-0.32\pm0.08$. This conclusion could only be avoided by postulating
1426: that SNe-91T were very blue at maximum, i.e.\
1427: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}\approx-0.11$. This is, however, not supported
1428: by interstellar absorption lines which give
1429: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}=-0.04$ to $+0.06$ for SN\,1991T
1430: \citep{Filippenko:etal:92} and $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}=-0.03$ for
1431: SN\,1997br \citep{Li:etal:99}.
1432: % ***********************************************
1433: % Table 6: Mean photometric parameters of SNe-91T, -99aa, 00cx
1434: % ***********************************************
1435: % TODO: How to make dashed lines in tables?
1436: % ********************
1437: \def\baselinestretch{1.1}
1438: \begin{deluxetable}{lcrrrrrr}
1439: \tablewidth{0pt}
1440: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1441: \tablenum{6}
1442: \tablecaption{Mean photometric parameters of SNe-91T, SNe-99aa, and
1443: SN\,2000cx (not reduced to a common $\Delta m_{15}$ or
1444: color).\label{tab:SNeIa-T}}
1445: % ***********************************************
1446: \tablehead{
1447: % ***********************************************
1448: & & \colhead{$\Delta m_{15}$} &
1449: \colhead{$(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$} &
1450: \colhead{$(V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{00}$} &
1451: \colhead{$M_{B\max}^{00}$} &
1452: \colhead{$M_{V\max}^{00}$} &
1453: \colhead{$M_{I\max}^{00}$} \\
1454: & & \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} &
1455: \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)}
1456: }
1457: % ***********************************************
1458: \startdata
1459: % ***********************************************
1460: SNe-91T & mean & $0.95$ & $-0.03$\tablenotemark{a} & $-0.29$ & $-20.01$\tablenotemark{b} & $-19.98$\tablenotemark{b} & $-19.63$\tablenotemark{b} \\
1461: & & $\pm.03$ & & $\pm.06$ & $\pm.08$ & $\pm.08$ & $\pm.12$ \\
1462: & N & 4 & 4 & 3 & 4 & 4 & 3 \\
1463: \noalign{\smallskip}
1464: \multicolumn{8}{c}{-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1465: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1466: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --} \\
1467: \noalign{\smallskip}
1468: SNe-99aa & mean & 0.92 & $-0.01$\tablenotemark{c} & $-0.34$ & $-19.88$ & $-19.87$ & $-19.53$ \\
1469: & & $\pm.03$ & $\pm0.01$ & $\pm.05$ & $0.10$ & $\pm.10$ & $\pm.10$ \\
1470: & N & 7 & 7 & 7 & 7 & 7 & 7 \\
1471: \noalign{\smallskip}
1472: \multicolumn{8}{c}{-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1473: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1474: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --} \\
1475: \noalign{\smallskip}
1476: SN\,2000cx & & $0.97$ & $-0.03$\tablenotemark{a} & $-0.61$ & $-20.39$ & $-20.36$ & $-19.75$ \\
1477: & & or & $ 0.09$\tablenotemark{d} & $-0.46$ & $-19.96$ & $-20.05$ & $-19.59$ \\
1478: % ***********************************************
1479: \enddata
1480: % ***********************************************
1481: \tablenotetext{a}{$(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$ assumed to be
1482: $-0.030$ from equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV})}
1483: \tablenotetext{b}{For SN\,1991T the Cepheid distance of
1484: $(m-M)^{0}=30.74$ was adopted \citep{Saha:etal:01}}
1485: \tablenotetext{c}{On the assumption that $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$
1486: and $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{35}$ are given by
1487: equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV} \& \ref{eq:color:mean:BV35}) for
1488: normal SNe\,Ia}
1489: \tablenotetext{d}{Allowing only for Galactic absorption and
1490: assuming zero reddening in the S0 host galaxy}
1491: % ***********************************************
1492: \def\baselinestretch{1.5}
1493: \end{deluxetable}
1494: % ***********************************************
1495:
1496: SNe-91T are rare events. Four representatives out of a total of
1497: 124 corresponds to a relative frequency of about $3\%$. A few
1498: unrecognized SNe-91T may have to be added, but on the other hand
1499: their presumed overluminosity enhances their discovery chance, which
1500: is further enhanced by their slow decline rates. Hence a rate of
1501: roughly $3\%$ seems realistic.
1502:
1503: \citet{Li:etal:01b} have noted in the pre-maximum spectra of some
1504: SNe\,Ia features typical for normal SNe\,Ia and others typical for
1505: SNe-91T \citep[see also][]{Garavini:etal:04}. At maximum and later
1506: they have normal spectra. The prototype is SN\,1999aa; the class is
1507: here designated as SNe-99aa. Seven SNe\,Ia in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}
1508: were classified as SNe-99aa by \citet{Li:etal:01b}; they are marked
1509: with a dagger. If one determines their host galaxy extinction on the
1510: assumption that they have $(B\!-\!V)$ colors at maximum and at
1511: $t_{B}=35^{\rm d}$ like normal SNe\,Ia, their average color
1512: $(V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{00}$ becomes roughly the same as for normal SNe\,Ia
1513: as seen in Table~\ref{tab:SNeIa-T}.
1514: Since SNe-99aa are spectroscopically a milder form of SNe-91T one
1515: expects that their luminosity lies between the latter and normal
1516: SNe\,Ia. This expectation is born out in
1517: Table~\ref{tab:SNeIa-T}. SNe-99aa are brighter by only $\Delta
1518: M_{B}=-0.30\pm0.10$ than normal SNe\,Ia, which is further reduced to
1519: $-0.19\pm0.10$ if normalized to $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$.
1520:
1521: If overluminosity and strikingly slow decline rates ($\Delta
1522: m_{15}<1.02$) are typical for SNe-99aa, it is noted that
1523: Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a contains 13 additional possible candidates.
1524: At least three of them are normal SNe\,Ia
1525: (SN\,1997bp, \citealt{Anupama:97} and references therein;
1526: SN\,1998ef, \citealt{Li:etal:01b};
1527: and SN\,2000E, \citealt{Valentini:etal:03}),
1528: leaving 10 candidates at most. If they are added to the 7 known cases,
1529: the total of known or unrecognized SNe-99aa in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}
1530: is $\le14\%$, i.e.\ less than estimated by \citet{Li:etal:01b}. Their
1531: true frequency in a volume-limited sample may be even lower
1532: considering that their suggested overluminosity and their slow decline
1533: rates favor their discovery.
1534:
1535: % ******************************************************************
1536: % 7.2 SNe-91bg
1537: % ******************************************************************
1538: \subsection{SNe-91bg}
1539: \label{sec:SNpec:bg}
1540: %
1541: Seven SNe\,Ia in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}b (excluding SN\,1986G) are of
1542: type SNe-91bg with SN\,1991bg as the prototype. They are
1543: characterized by peculiar spectra \citep[][and references
1544: therein]{Mazzali:etal:97}, very red color, low
1545: luminosity and unparallelledly fast decline rates $\Delta m_{15}$. Their
1546: rate of occurrence seems high in early-type galaxies. This offers a
1547: handle on their intrinsic properties, because the four known
1548: SNe-91bg in early-type galaxies may be assumed to have minimum
1549: reddening. Since the remaining three SNe-91bg in spirals are not
1550: significantly redder [$\Delta(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}=0.66\pm0.09$ versus
1551: $0.59\pm0.08$] we assume that the internal reddening of this class can
1552: be neglected. Minimal reddening is also independently confirmed for
1553: SN\,1999bg in the spiral NGC\,2841 from late-phase multi-color
1554: photometry \citep{Garnavich:etal:04}.
1555: The ensuing mean photometric parameters are compiled in
1556: Table~\ref{tab:SNeIa-bg}.
1557:
1558: % ***********************************************
1559: % Table 7: Mean photometric parameters of SNe-91bg, 86G
1560: % ***********************************************
1561: \def\baselinestretch{1.1}
1562: \begin{deluxetable}{ccrrrrrrr}
1563: \tablewidth{395pt}
1564: \tablenum{7}
1565: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
1566: \tablecaption{Mean photometric parameters of SNe-91bg.\label{tab:SNeIa-bg}}
1567: % ***********************************************
1568: \tablehead{
1569: % ***********************************************
1570: & & \colhead{$\Delta m_{15}$} &
1571: \colhead{$(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$} &
1572: \colhead{$(V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{00}$} & \colhead{~~} &
1573: \colhead{$M_{B\max}^{00}$} &
1574: \colhead{$M_{V\max}^{00}$} &
1575: \colhead{$M_{I\max}^{00}$} \\
1576: & & \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} & \colhead{(3)} & & \colhead{(4)} &
1577: \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)}
1578: }
1579: % ***********************************************
1580: \startdata
1581: % ***********************************************
1582: mean && $1.91$ & $0.62$ & $0.23$ && $-17.46$\tablenotemark{a} & $-18.07$\tablenotemark{a} & $-18.30$\tablenotemark{a} \\
1583: && $\pm.02$ & $\pm.06$ & $\pm.03$ && $\pm.16$ & $\pm.14$ & $\pm.11$ \\
1584: $\sigma$ && $0.04$ & $0.15$ & $0.09$ && $0.42$ & $0.37$ & $0.30$ \\
1585: N && 7 & 7 & 7 && 7 & 7 & 7 \\
1586: % ***********************************************
1587: \noalign{\smallskip}
1588: \multicolumn{9}{c}{-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1589: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1590: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --} \\
1591: \noalign{\smallskip}
1592: % ***********************************************
1593: && $1.69$ & $0.00$\tablenotemark{b} & \nodatr && $-19.16$\tablenotemark{d} & $-19.16$\tablenotemark{d} & \nodatr \\
1594: \raisebox{1.5ex}[0cm][0cm]{86G} && or & $0.43$\tablenotemark{c} & \nodatr && $-17.58$\tablenotemark{d} & $-18.01$\tablenotemark{d} & \nodatr \\
1595: % ***********************************************
1596: \enddata
1597: % ***********************************************
1598: \tablenotetext{a}{Adopting for SN\,1999by the Cepheid
1599: distance of $(m-M)^{0}=30.74$ \citep{Macri:etal:01}}
1600: \tablenotetext{b}{$(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}$ assumed to be
1601: $0.00$ as for all normal SNe\,Ia with $\Delta m_{15}=1.69$ (see
1602: equation~\ref{eq:color:mean:BV})}
1603: \tablenotetext{c}{$(B\!-\!V)_{35}^{00}$ assumed to be
1604: $1.067$ as for normal SNe\,Ia with $\Delta m_{15}=1.69$ (see
1605: equation~\ref{eq:color:mean:BV35})}
1606: \tablenotetext{d}{Adopting for the parent galaxy NGC\,5128
1607: (Cen\,A) $(m-M)^{0}=27.80$ \citep{Thim:etal:03}}
1608: % ***********************************************
1609: \def\baselinestretch{1.5}
1610: \end{deluxetable}
1611: % ***********************************************
1612:
1613: The SNe-91bg emerge -- besides for their spectral peculiarities
1614: -- as a separate class of SNe with quite narrowly confined photometric
1615: properties. Their decline rate varies little about $\Delta
1616: m_{15}=1.91$, while no normal SN\,Ia is known with $\Delta
1617: m_{15}\ga1.7$. Their extremely red intrinsic colors have only moderate
1618: scatter. In fact their $(V\!-\!I)_{\max}^{00}$ shows less scatter than
1619: normal SNe\,Ia. Their absolute magnitudes show somewhat more
1620: variation than normal SNe\,Ia, but they are all strikingly
1621: underluminous by $\Delta M_{B}=2.11\pm0.16$, $\Delta
1622: M_{V}=1.48\pm0.14$, and $\Delta M_{I}=0.93\pm0.11$ on average.
1623: The underluminosity may be somewhat reduced if we have underestimated
1624: the host galaxy absorption, but we deem values as large as $A_{B\,{\rm
1625: host}}\approx 0.3$ (and correspondingly less in $V$ and $I$) as
1626: unlikely.
1627: Models of two SN-91bg (SN\,1991bg and SN\,1999by) were
1628: elaborated by \citet{Mazzali:etal:97} and by \citet{Hoeflich:etal:02}.
1629:
1630: The frequency per unit volume of SNe-91bg can roughly be
1631: estimated by noting that the seven known cases all lie within
1632: $5000\kms$, and that Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a contains 47 SNe\,Ia within
1633: this distance limit.
1634: Of these, 45 have $\Delta m_{15}<1.7$ and the remaining two
1635: (SN\,1981D and 1984A) are normal SNe\,Ia on the basis of their
1636: colors. Hence seven cases out of a total of 54 correspond to a
1637: frequency of $13\%$, or somewhat more because their fast decline rates
1638: impair their discovery probability \citep[see also][]{Li:etal:01a}.
1639: Since they occur preferentially in early-type galaxies, it is
1640: suggested that they stem from an older population \citep{Howell:01}.
1641:
1642: % ******************************************************************
1643: % 7.3 Two additional peculiar SNe\,Ia (SN\,2000cx and SN\,1986G)
1644: % ******************************************************************
1645: \subsection{Two Additional Peculiar SNe\,Ia (SN\,2000cx AND SN\,1986G)}
1646: \label{sec:SNpec:add}
1647: %
1648: Only two SNe\,Ia in Table~\ref{tab:SN1} are neither normal nor belong
1649: to the SNe-91T (including SNe-99aa) and SNe-91bg classes.
1650: % ******************************************************************
1651: % 7.3.1 SN\,2000cx
1652: % ******************************************************************
1653: \subsubsection{SN\,2000cx}
1654: \label{sec:SNpec:add:00ca}
1655: %
1656: The spectrum of SN\,2000cx resembles SNe-91T at early phases, but
1657: its light curve is highly unusual, in fact unique
1658: \citep{Li:etal:01c,Candia:etal:03}. The observed photometric
1659: parameters are given in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}b. The intrinsic
1660: photometric properties at maximum are calculated here for two
1661: different assumptions.
1662: a) The SN has $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}=-0.01$ like normal SNe\,Ia, or
1663: b) The SN suffers zero reddening in its S0 host galaxy. The ensuing
1664: colors and luminosities are shown in Table~\ref{tab:SNeIa-T}. In
1665: either case SN\,2000cx may be with $M_{B\,\max}^{00}\la-20.0$ one of
1666: the brightest SN in the entire sample.
1667: \citet{Fisher:etal:99} have argued that such high luminosities,
1668: although still depending on the exact value of $H_{0}$, require
1669: one Chandrasekhar mass of pure $^{56}$Ni which cannot be provided by a
1670: single White Dwarf. They proposed therefore a model with two merging
1671: White Dwarfs. SN\,2000cx may be a prime candidate for this process.
1672:
1673: % ******************************************************************
1674: % 7.3.2 SN\,1986G
1675: % ******************************************************************
1676: \subsubsection{SN\,1986G}
1677: \label{sec:SNpec:add:86G}
1678: %
1679: The spectrum of SN\,1986G is similar to SNe-91bg, but less extreme
1680: \citep[][and references therein]{Cristiani:etal:92}. Its photometric
1681: observables are in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}c. They show that SN\,1986G was
1682: observed to be even redder than SNe-91bg, but to have a clearly
1683: slower decline rate. Much of its redness is certainly due to its
1684: position in the dust lane of NGC\,5128 (Cen\,A).
1685:
1686: The intrinsic color and luminosity are calculated here for
1687: two different assumptions.
1688: a) $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$ of SN\,1986G is given by
1689: equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}) like normal SNe\,Ia,
1690: and b) it has the tail color $(B\!-\!V)_{35}^{00}=1.067$ which, from
1691: equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV35}), is the tail color of a normal SN
1692: with $\Delta m_{15}=1.69$. The results for both cases are shown in
1693: Table~\ref{tab:SNeIa-bg}. In the latter case, with the tail color as
1694: standard, the extinction $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max\,35}$ becomes $0.489$,
1695: which seems on the low side given its position in a prominent dust
1696: lane.
1697: However, even the small reddening makes SN\,1986G bluer than average
1698: SNe-91bg and its relatively slow decline rate ($\Delta m_{15}=1.69$)
1699: remains untypical for this class, although with the distance modulus
1700: of NGC\,5128 of $(m-M)^{0}=27.80$ \citep{Thim:etal:03} its absolute
1701: magnitudes $M_{BV}$ become quite similar to SNe-91bg. On the other
1702: hand case a) leads to $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}=0.922$ and
1703: $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm total}=1.037$ (including Galactic reddening) in good
1704: agreement with the independent
1705: estimates of \citet{Rich:87} and \citet{Cristiani:etal:92}. Hence, we
1706: prefer solution a) and conclude that the luminosity of SN\,1986G
1707: lies inbetween normal SNe\,Ia and SNe-91bg (see
1708: Table~\ref{tab:SNeIa-bg}).
1709:
1710: An overview of the luminosity distribution in $B$ of the various
1711: types of SNe\,Ia is given in Figure~\ref{fig:SNe-Pec}.
1712: % ***********************************************
1713: % Figure 14: Distribution M^{00}_{B} for different types of SNe
1714: % ***********************************************
1715: \begin{figure}[t]
1716: \epsscale{0.49}
1717: \plotone{fig14.eps}
1718: \caption{The distribution in absolute magnitude $M^{00}_{B}$ of
1719: SNe\,Ia. The 58 normal SNe\,Ia of the fiducial sample, normalized
1720: for $\Delta m_{15}$ and $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$, are shown in the
1721: open histogram with a fitted Gauss curve. The spectroscopically
1722: peculiar SNe-91bg and SNe-91T are in dark grey, the SNe-99aa in
1723: light grey. In addition the unusual SN\,1986G and 2000cx are
1724: shown.}
1725: \label{fig:SNe-Pec}
1726: \end{figure}
1727: % ***********************************************
1728:
1729:
1730:
1731:
1732: % ******************************************************************
1733: % 8 The Hubble Diagram of Normal SNe Ia
1734: % ******************************************************************
1735: \section{THE HUBBLE DIAGRAM OF NORMAL SNe\,Ia}
1736: \label{sec:hubble}
1737: %
1738: The Hubble diagram -- $\log cz$ vs. $m_{BVI}^{\rm corr}$ -- is shown in
1739: Figure~\ref{fig:hubble} for 108 normal SNe\,Ia. The recession velocities
1740: are corrected for streaming motions as described in the explanation of
1741: column~5 of Table~\ref{tab:SN1} (\S~\ref{sec:Data}).
1742: The apparent magnitudes are corrected for
1743: Galactic and host galaxy absorption as laid out in
1744: \S~\ref{sec:absorption} and reduced to $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$
1745: and $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}=-0.024$ (equation~\ref{eq:other:3fitd}).
1746: % ***********************************************
1747: % Figure 15: log cz versus m_B,V,I -> Hubble diagram
1748: % ***********************************************
1749: \begin{figure}[t]
1750: \epsscale{0.53}
1751: \plotone{fig15.eps}
1752: \caption{The Hubble diagram in $B$, $V$, and $I$ of 108 normal
1753: SNe\,Ia. The $\Omega_{\rm M}=0.3, \Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$ fits
1754: to the Hubble line in each color as given in
1755: Table~\ref{tab:hubble} do not use five SNe\,Ia (plotted with
1756: $\times$) discussed in \S~\ref{sec:absorption:host}. The SNe\,Ia
1757: with $v<3000\kms$ and $v>20\,000\kms$ are shown as open
1758: symbols. The dashed line corresponds to a flat matter-dominated
1759: Universe.}
1760: \label{fig:hubble}
1761: \end{figure}
1762: % ***********************************************
1763:
1764: A slightly curved Hubble line, corresponding to a flat Universe
1765: with $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$, is fitted to the points in
1766: Figure~\ref{fig:hubble}. The corresponding relation is given by
1767: \citet{Carroll:etal:92}
1768: \begin{equation}\label{eq:hubble:01}
1769: \phi(z) = 0.2 m_{\lambda}^{\rm corr} + C_{\lambda},
1770: \end{equation}
1771: where
1772: \begin{equation}\label{eq:hubble:02}
1773: \phi(z) = \log c(1+z_{1})\int_{0}^{z_{1}}[(1+z)^{2}(1+0.3z)-0.7z(2+z)]^{-1/2}dz,
1774: \end{equation}
1775: and where the intercept is given by
1776: \begin{equation}\label{eq:hubble:03}
1777: C_{\lambda} = \log H_{0} - 0.2 M_{\lambda}^{\rm corr} -5.
1778: \end{equation}
1779: From this follows the decisive relation
1780: \begin{equation}\label{eq:hubble:04}
1781: \log H_{0} = 0.2 M_{\lambda}^{\rm corr} + C_{\lambda} + 5.
1782: \end{equation}
1783: As equation~(\ref{eq:hubble:04}) shows, the determination of $H_{0}$
1784: requires an independent calibration of $M_{\lambda}^{\rm corr}$ of
1785: normal SNe\,Ia and an evaluation of the intercept $C_{\lambda}$. While
1786: a revised calibration of $M_{\lambda}^{\rm corr}$ will be provided in
1787: the forthcoming summary paper, the determination of $C_{\lambda}$ is
1788: given here.
1789:
1790: Nine solutions for $C_{\lambda}$ are presented in
1791: Table~\ref{tab:hubble} for different subsets of the SNe\,Ia in
1792: Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a. The subsets are defined by velocity cuts and by
1793: different amounts of the total reddening $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm t}$.
1794:
1795: It is very satisfactory that the solutions 1-3 and 6-8 for
1796: SNe\,Ia beyond $3000\kms$ give the same values for $C_{\lambda}$ in
1797: each waveband within the statistical errors. $C_{B}$ varies by
1798: $\pm0.003$ implying a variation in mean absolute magnitude
1799: $<\!\!M_{B}^{\rm corr}\!\!>$ of only $\pm0.015\mag$, which influences
1800: $H_{0}$ by less than $\pm1\%$.
1801:
1802: Solution~3 is from the fiducial sample as defined in
1803: \S~\ref{sec:absorption:host}. It is least affected by photometric
1804: errors, peculiar motions, possibly remaining
1805: errors of the K-correction, and cosmological effects. The
1806: corresponding values of $C_{BVI}$ with equation~(\ref{eq:hubble:03})
1807: and $H_{0}=60$ give
1808: \begin{equation}\label{eq:other:Mabs}
1809: M_{B}^{\rm corr} = -19.57\pm0.02,\quad
1810: M_{V}^{\rm corr} = -19.55\pm0.02, \mbox{ and}\quad
1811: M_{I}^{\rm corr} = -19.29\pm0.02.
1812: \end{equation}
1813: It is also
1814: noted that $C_{B}-C_{V}=0.005\pm0.006$ corresponding to
1815: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}=-0.025\pm0.03$, and that
1816: $C_{V}-C_{I}=0.051\pm0.006$ corresponding to
1817: $(V\!-\!I)^{00}=-0.26\pm0.03$, -- both values being consistent with
1818: the observed colors in equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean}).
1819:
1820: % ***********************************************
1821: % Table 8: Nine solutions of C_lambda in equation (27)
1822: % ***********************************************
1823: \def\baselinestretch{1.1}
1824: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccccc}
1825: \tablewidth{0pt}
1826: \tablenum{8}
1827: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
1828: \tablecaption{Nine solutions of $C_{\lambda}$ in equation~(\ref{eq:hubble:04})
1829: for different choices of the SNe\,Ia sample.\label{tab:hubble}}
1830: % ***********************************************
1831: \tablehead{
1832: % ***********************************************
1833: & \colhead{$C_{B}$} & \colhead{$\sigma_{B}$}
1834: & \colhead{$C_{V}$} & \colhead{$\sigma_{V}$} & \colhead{$\!\!N_{BV}\!\!\!\!$}
1835: & \colhead{$C_{I}$} & \colhead{$\sigma_{I}$} & \colhead{$N_{I}$}
1836: }
1837: % ***********************************************
1838: \startdata
1839: % ***********************************************
1840: 1) all: & $0.696\pm0.006$ & $0.30$ & $0.691\pm0.006$ & $0.30$ & $105$ & $0.634\pm0.006$ & $0.27$ & $85$ \\
1841: 2) $v>3000[\kms]$: & $0.697\pm0.004$ & $0.16$ & $0.693\pm0.004$ & $0.16$ & $68$ & $0.640\pm0.004$ & $0.15$ & $61$ \\
1842: 3) $3000<v<20000$: & $0.693\pm0.004$ & $0.14$ & $0.688\pm0.004$ & $0.14$ & $62$ & $0.637\pm0.004$ & $0.14$ & $58$ \\
1843: 4) $v<2000$: & $0.675\pm0.021$ & $0.51$ & $0.670\pm0.021$ & $0.51$ & $23$ & $0.590\pm0.025$ & $0.47$ & $14$ \\
1844: 5) $v<1200$: & $0.656\pm0.034$ & $0.59$ & $0.651\pm0.034$ & $0.59$ & $12$ & $0.583\pm0.045$ & $0.60$ & $ 7$ \\
1845: 6) $v>3000,E_t<0.30$: & $0.697\pm0.004$ & $0.16$ & $0.692\pm0.004$ & $0.16$ & $ 63$ & $0.639\pm0.004$ & $0.15$ & $58$ \\
1846: 7) $v>3000,E_t<0.15$: & $0.697\pm0.005$ & $0.17$ & $0.693\pm0.005$ & $0.17$ & $51$ & $0.638\pm0.005$ & $0.15$ & $46$ \\
1847: 8) $v>3000,E_t<0.05$: & $0.692\pm0.006$ & $0.16$ & $0.687\pm0.006$ & $0.16$ & $24$ & $0.635\pm0.006$ & $0.15$ & $21$ \\
1848: 9) $v>5000$, Table\,2:& $0.695\pm0.007$ & $0.17$ & $0.692\pm0.006$ & $0.14$ & $21$ & $0.640\pm0.005$ & $0.10$ & $20$ \\
1849: % ***********************************************
1850: \enddata
1851: % ***********************************************
1852: \def\baselinestretch{1.5}
1853: \end{deluxetable}
1854: % ***********************************************
1855:
1856: The solutions 6-8 admit different amounts of the total
1857: extinction $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm t}$ in the Galaxy and in the host
1858: galaxy. This has virtually no effect on $C_{I}$, and even $C_{B}$,
1859: which is most sensitive to absorption corrections,
1860: changes by not more than $0.005$ (corresponding to $0.025\mag$). This
1861: proves in
1862: favor of the adopted unconventional values of ${\cal R}_{BVI}$
1863: (equation~\ref{eq:absorption:R}). The SNe\,Ia in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a have
1864: $<\!\!E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm t}\!\!>=0.16$,
1865: and an error of ${\cal R}_{B}$ of more than $\Delta {\cal
1866: R}_{B}\approx\pm0.25$ would cause a larger discrepancy.
1867: The limitation of the maximum value of $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm t}$ does not
1868: lead to a decrease of the scatter about the Hubble line.
1869: This suggest that the magnitude dispersion is mainly due to {\em
1870: random\/} errors of $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm t}$ and of the corresponding
1871: absorption corrections.
1872:
1873: If one averages the $B$, $V$, and $I$ magnitudes to define the
1874: Hubble line in solutions 1-8, the scatter is {\em not\/} reduced,
1875: which indicates that the magnitude errors are strongly correlated.
1876:
1877: It is not meaningful to compare the values of $C_{BVI}$
1878: derived here with those of other authors, because they depend on
1879: a number of choices taken here: the intrinsic color of SNe\,Ia, the
1880: reddening and absorption law, and the reduction to the standard values
1881: of $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$ and $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{00}=-0.024$.
1882: It is therefore mandatory, if the present values of $C_{\lambda}$ are
1883: to be used to obtain $H_{0}$ through equation~(\ref{eq:hubble:04}),
1884: that the calibrating SNe\,Ia are treated according to the
1885: prescriptions given here.
1886:
1887: The dispersion about the Hubble line in solution~3, i.e.\
1888: $\sigma_{BVI}=0.14\mag$, is quite satisfactory
1889: for a large sample of 62 (58) SNe\,Ia.
1890: \citet{Tripp:98} has found from 29 SNe\,Ia $\sigma_{B}=0.15\mag$, but
1891: his reddening-to-absorption ratio of ${\cal R}_{B}=2.09$ for Galactic
1892: and host galaxy absorption seems unrealistic.
1893: Previous values of
1894: $\sigma_{V}=0.14$ \citep{Hamuy:etal:96b,Phillips:etal:99} or even
1895: $\sigma_{V}=0.12\mag$ \citep{Parodi:etal:00} are based on
1896: smaller samples, and are in addition color-limited by
1897: $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}\le0.2$. \citet{Altavilla:etal:04} have found
1898: $\sigma_{B}=0.20\mag$ for 18 of their low-extinction SNe\,Ia. For
1899: comparison the MLCS method of fitting the SN light curves has yielded
1900: $\sigma_{V}=0.16$ \citep{Riess:etal:99,Jha:etal:99} and
1901: $\sigma_{V}=0.20\mag$ \citep{Tonry:etal:03}. The ``Bayesian Adapted
1902: Template Match'' (BATM) of \citet{Barris:Tonry:04} yields a scatter of
1903: $\sigma_{(m-M)}=0.21\mag$. The very small scatter of $\sigma=0.08\mag$
1904: achieved by \citet{Wang:etal:03} with their ``Color-Magnitude Intercept
1905: Calibration'' may not be representative because it is derived from a
1906: severely color-restricted sample; their color limit
1907: $(B\!-\!V)_{\max}^{0}\le0.05$ cuts into the realistic color
1908: distribution of even unreddened SNe\,Ia (cf.\
1909: Figure~\ref{fig:color:tab2}).
1910:
1911: A physically more relevant question concerns the {\em
1912: intrinsic\/} scatter of homogenized SN luminosities. The best handle
1913: for this is offered by the 21 (20) SNe\,Ia in
1914: Table~\ref{tab:color:minred} with minimum absorption in their host
1915: galaxies and $v>5000\kms$ (solution~9 of Table~\ref{tab:hubble}). The
1916: higher velocity limit is chosen here to guard against peculiar motions
1917: which, if $\sim\!300\kms$, can contribute a magnitude dispersion of
1918: $0.2\;$mag still at $v=3000\kms$. The sample gives a puzzlingly large
1919: value of $\sigma_{B}=0.17$, but quite low values for $\sigma_{V}=0.14$
1920: and $\sigma_{I}=0.10\mag$.
1921: The small scatter in $I$ is particularly noteworthy because $I_{\max}$,
1922: occurring before $B_{\max}$, requires good photometry at an early
1923: phase. Allowing conservatively for an average photometric error of
1924: $\sigma_{m}=0.05\mag$, we derive an intrinsic scatter of the
1925: homogenized $I_{\max}$ magnitudes of $\la0.10\mag$, which -- in view
1926: of the many small and not so small spectroscopic and light curve
1927: differences between normal SNe\,Ia -- is remarkably small.
1928:
1929: We have refrained from weighting the SN data, as some
1930: authors have done, by the quoted magnitude errors or by the time
1931: interval between inferred $B$ maximum and the onset of the photometry,
1932: although these data are given for most, but not all SNe\,Ia in
1933: Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a. The reason is mainly that the quoted magnitude
1934: errors from many different sources carry an subjective element, and
1935: that they include sometimes systematic errors and sometimes not. We
1936: have instead made alternative solutions excluding SNe\,Ia with large
1937: quoted magnitude errors and/or with a late onset of their
1938: photometry. In no case the result or even the statistical error was
1939: significantly changed. In view of the large sample considered here
1940: this is no surprise.
1941:
1942: A last comment to the solutions in Table~\ref{tab:hubble} concerns
1943: the relative size of $H_{0}$ in the local Universe. The strong
1944: increase of $\sigma_{BVI}$ in solution~4 and 5 is certainly due to
1945: peculiar motions whose influence becomes important at small redshifts.
1946: The median velocity of the SNe\,Ia in solution~4 is $1200\kms$.
1947: The observed magnitude scatter of $\sigma_{I}=0.47$ corresponds
1948: therefore to typical peculiar motions of $\sim\!280\kms$. Within
1949: $v<1200\kms$ the median velocity is $1000\kms$ and the scatter
1950: corresponds here to $\sim\!300\kms$.
1951: These values are high relative to the small rms peculiar velocity
1952: of $<100\kms$ consistently derived over still smaller scales
1953: \citep[e.g.][]{Tammann:Sandage:85,Sandage:86,Sandage:87,Karachentsev:Makarov:96},
1954: but many of the SNe\,Ia lie in the Virgo cluster region which is known
1955: to be noisy \citep{Tammann:etal:02}, and peculiar velocities are
1956: generally expected to increase with increasing scale length up to some
1957: asymptotic value which, judging from the CMB dipole, is
1958: $\ga630:\sqrt{3}=360\kms$ in the radial direction. --
1959: For $v<2000\kms$ $C_{BV}$ becomes smaller by $0.018\pm0.021$ and
1960: $C_{I}$ by $0.047\pm0.025$ than in solution~3. This correspond from
1961: equation~(\ref{eq:hubble:04}) to a local decrease of $H_{0}$ by $5\pm5\%$
1962: or $12\pm6\%$. Analogously the very local value of $H_{0}$ is, from
1963: solution~5, $9\pm9\%$ or $16\pm14\%$ smaller than the cosmic
1964: value. The local decrease of $H_{0}$ is in view of the small number of
1965: SNe\,Ia and the statistical errors only suggestive.
1966:
1967: The mean absolute magnitude $M^{\rm corr}_{V}$ in
1968: equation~(\ref{eq:other:Mabs}) is combined with the individual
1969: apparent magnitudes $m^{\rm corr}_{V}$ in Table~\ref{tab:SN3}a,
1970: column~9, to yield photometric absorption-free distance moduli for 111
1971: normal SNe\,Ia and hence of their parent galaxies (Table~\ref{tab:SN3}a,
1972: column~11). The expected random error is only
1973: $\sigma_{m\!-\!M}=0.14\mag$; some moduli suspected for one reason or
1974: another to be less accurate are shown in parentheses. The moduli have
1975: the advantage -- particularly for the nearby galaxies -- to be
1976: independent of peculiar motions. Of course, all distances are still to
1977: be shifted by a constant amount, once the adopted value of $H_{0}=60$
1978: can be replaced by the actual value of $H_{0}$, which is the ultimate
1979: aim of this series.
1980:
1981:
1982:
1983:
1984: % ******************************************************************
1985: % 9 Summary and Conclusions
1986: % ******************************************************************
1987: \section{SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS}
1988: \label{sec:conclusions}
1989: %
1990: The main purpose of this paper is to update an earlier
1991: summary by \citet{Parodi:etal:00} on the reddening, absorption and
1992: second parameter corrections for a color-restricted sample of "Branch
1993: normal" type Ia supernovae where the corrected data were used
1994: to construct the Hubble diagram in $B$, $V$, and $I$. Here the sample
1995: is increased to 124 type Ia supernovae with no restrictions
1996: placed on the observed color, thereby avoiding the criticisms of
1997: the \citeauthor{Parodi:etal:00} sample raised by others concerning
1998: observational selection biases.
1999:
2000: All SN believed to be "Branch normal" \citep{Branch:etal:93}
2001: were used, together with 13 spectroscopically peculiar SNe\,Ia
2002: (types 91T, 91bg, SN\,2000cx, 1986G) that deviate in one way or another
2003: from the main sample. The peculiar supernovae are listed
2004: separately in Tables~\ref{tab:SN1}b, \ref{tab:SN1}c, \ref{tab:SN3}b,
2005: and \ref{tab:SN3}c and are discussed in \S~\ref{sec:SNpec}.
2006:
2007: Because no a priori cut in observed color at maximum was
2008: imposed, many of the SNe in our enlarged sample
2009: suffer non-negligible reddening in their host galaxies, and care
2010: has been taken at each step in the reductions to guard against
2011: systematic errors in the derived absorptions.
2012:
2013: The twelve main research points made in the paper are these.
2014:
2015: (1) The 22 SNe\,Ia in E or S0 galaxies and the 12 SNe\,Ia
2016: in the outlying regions of spirals, set out in
2017: Table~\ref{tab:color:minred}, are expected to have nearly negligible
2018: extinction due to the host galaxy.
2019: Their mean intrinsic colors, corrected for Galactic reddening and
2020: nearly free of any host galaxy reddening, are
2021: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}=-0.013$, $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{35}=1.092$ (i.e.\ the
2022: tail color at phase $t_{B}=35^{\rm d}$), and
2023: $(V\!-\!I)^{00}_{\max}=-0.232$. The individual colors
2024: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$ become marginally redder, the colors
2025: $(V\!-\!I)^{00}_{\max}$ significantly redder with increasing
2026: decline rate $\Delta m_{15}$, while the tail colors
2027: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{35}$ become clearly bluer with increasing $\Delta
2028: m_{15}$ (equations~\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}$-$\ref{eq:color:mean:VI}). The
2029: latter result is in variance with
2030: \citet{Lira:95},
2031: \citet{Phillips:etal:99},
2032: \citet{Jha:02}, and
2033: \citet{Altavilla:etal:04},
2034: who assumed the tail colors to be independent of any second
2035: parameters.
2036:
2037: (2) The host galaxy reddenings for all other normal SNe\,Ia in
2038: the sample are based on the intrinsic colors derived in item~(1)
2039: above. The difference between the observed, Galactic-reddening-free
2040: colors $(B\!-\!V)^{0}_{\max}$, $(B\!-\!V)^{0}_{35}$, and
2041: $(V\!-\!I)^{0}_{\max}$ and the corresponding colors from
2042: equations~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}$-$\ref{eq:color:mean:VI}), i.e.\
2043: adjusted to the appropriate value of $\Delta m_{15}$, yield three
2044: different estimates of the reddening $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$,
2045: $E(B\!-\!V)_{35}$, and $E(V\!-\!I)_{\max}$.
2046:
2047: (3) Due to the general color dependence of color excesses caused
2048: by the photometric bandwidth effect, the excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{35}$,
2049: determined in item~(2) from a late, quite red
2050: phase of the SN light curves, must be converted to the value
2051: applicable at the blue maximum phase. This is achieved by requiring
2052: that $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$ as well as $(V\!-\!I)^{00}_{\max}$ be
2053: independent of $E(B\!-\!V)_{35}$
2054: (cf. Figures~\ref{fig:color:E35} \& \ref{fig:color:EVIhost}).
2055: The requirement leads to equation~(\ref{eq:color:EBVmax35}) which
2056: converts $E(B\!-\!V)_{35}$ to $E(B\!-\!V)_{max35}$, and to
2057: equation~(\ref{eq:color:EBVVIhost}) which converts $E(V\!-\!I)$ into
2058: $E(B\!-\!V)^{V\!-\!I}_{\max}$. The three determinations of
2059: $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max}$ are intercompared in Figures~\ref{fig:color:comp1}
2060: \& \ref{fig:color:comp2}. They agree well and are averaged to give the
2061: adopted reddening $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ in the host galaxy. The
2062: random error of $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ is $0.043\;$mag.
2063:
2064: (4) The adopted color excesses $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ depend on
2065: the assumption that the sample of SNe\,Ia in E/S0 galaxies and the
2066: outliners in spirals in Table~\ref{tab:color:minred} suffer no
2067: host-galaxy reddenings.
2068: If, in fact, they do suffer a non-zero amount of
2069: reddening, the true intrinsic colors of the complete sample,
2070: determined by the method of items~(1) through (3), will be bluer, and
2071: the magnitudes brighter than adopted here, but this will have no
2072: effect on the calibration of $H_{0}$ to be made in the final summary
2073: paper of this series as long as the calibrating SNe\,Ia in host
2074: galaxies are reduced to the {\em same\/} color.
2075: In that case, the local calibrators would suffer the same error in
2076: absorption as would the distant SNe\,Ia defining the global
2077: Hubble diagram, and the error cancels.
2078:
2079: (5) The magnitudes $m^{0}_{BVI\max}$, corrected for conventional
2080: Galactic absorption, were transformed into absolute magnitudes
2081: $M^{0}_{BVI\max}$ for a ``fiducial'' sample of 62\,(58) SNe\,Ia
2082: which have $3000<v_{\rm CMB}<20\,000\kms$ (excluding only the highly
2083: absorbed SN\,1996ai and five SNe\,Ia deviating by more than $2\sigma$
2084: and discussed in \S~\ref{sec:absorption:host}) to guard against
2085: peculiar motions and other effects. A flat Universe with $H_{0}=60$,
2086: $\Lambda=0.7$ was assumed. We show in \S~\ref{sec:absorption:host} a
2087: strong correlation of $M^{0}_{BVI\max}$ with $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$
2088: (Figure~\ref{fig:absorption:Mabs}).
2089: This correlation determines the ratio of absorption-to-reddening in
2090: the host galaxy. The absorption-to-reddening values determined in this
2091: way are
2092: ${\cal R}_{B}=3.65\pm0.16$,
2093: ${\cal R}_{V}=2.65\pm0.15$, and
2094: ${\cal R}_{I}=1.35\pm0.21$.
2095: These well determined values differ significantly from
2096: the canonical values in the Galaxy of ${\cal R}_{BVI}$ of
2097: $4.1$, $3.1$, and $1.8$. The significant difference with the
2098: Galactic values has been pointed out before by
2099: \citet{Branch:Tammann:92},
2100: \citet{Riess:etal:96},
2101: \citet{Phillips:etal:99},
2102: \citet{Krisciunas:etal:00},
2103: \citet{Wang:etal:03}, and
2104: \citet{Altavilla:etal:04}.
2105: An explanation is that the intense radiation of the supernovae in some
2106: manner modifies the size distribution of the dust grains in the host
2107: galaxy near the SN.
2108: The canonical values of ${\cal R}_{BVI}$ have been used to determine
2109: the Galactic absorption and the new, smaller values of ${\cal
2110: R}_{BVI}$ for the absorption in the host galaxy.
2111:
2112: (6) The absorption-free magnitudes $M^{00}_{V}$ of the fiducial
2113: sample are plotted against the Hubble type of the host galaxies in
2114: Figure~\ref{fig:other:type}. It is confirmed that the
2115: supernovae in E/S0 galaxies average $\sim\!0.3$ magnitude
2116: fainter than SNe in late-type spirals,
2117: known already since 1995
2118: (\citealt{Hamuy:etal:95};
2119: \citealt{Saha:etal:97,Saha:etal:99};
2120: \citealt{Sandage:Tammann:97};
2121: \citealt{Sandage:etal:01}, Figure~6).
2122: It has been seen in a different form by the discovery by
2123: \citet[][their Figure~4]{Hamuy:etal:96b}, that the decline rate,
2124: $\Delta m_{15}$, is correlated
2125: with galaxy type (SNe\,Ia in E/S0 galaxies have average decline rates
2126: near $1.5\mag$, while those in late-type spirals have a mean rate near
2127: $1.0$), coupled with the fact that the SNe\,Ia with large decline rates
2128: are fainter than those with smaller rates.
2129:
2130: The reason for the $M^{00}_{\max}$-galaxy type correlation
2131: is expected to be related to the different gestation
2132: times for type Ia SNe and the subsequent difference in the Fe
2133: abundance between E/S0 galaxies and spirals of the same age. The
2134: consequences may or may not be profound in using SNe\,Ia for
2135: cosmological probes as is the current trend
2136: \citep{Riess:etal:98,Riess:etal:04,Perlmutter:etal:99,Knop:etal:03,Barris:etal:04},
2137: depending on the precision
2138: with which the effect can be compensated for by the $\Delta m_{15}$
2139: correlations with galaxy type.
2140:
2141: (7) The fully absorption-corrected magnitudes $M^{00}_{BVI}$
2142: confirm the \citet{Pskovskii:67} effect of a correlation with the
2143: $\Delta m_{15}$ decline rates (Figure~\ref{fig:other:dm15}) with
2144: correlation slopes of
2145: $\alpha_{B}=0.619\pm0.076$,
2146: $\alpha_{V}=0.608\pm0.074$,
2147: $\alpha_{I}=0.438\pm0.076$ (Table~\ref{tab:other:dm15R}).
2148:
2149: The present slopes $\alpha_{BVI}$, which correct for the
2150: magnitude differences of SNe\,Ia in E/S0 galaxies and spirals,
2151: lie between the smaller values of \citet{Parodi:etal:00} and the
2152: larger values of \citet{Phillips:etal:99} and
2153: \citet{Altavilla:etal:04}. It is shown that the reason for this is the
2154: sensitivity of $\alpha_{BVI}$ on the adopted slopes of the
2155: color-$\Delta m_{15}$ relation in
2156: equations~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV}$-$\ref{eq:color:mean:VI}). Steeper
2157: slopes of these relations lead necessarily to larger values of
2158: $\alpha_{BVI}$. Incorrect slopes of the
2159: color-$\Delta m_{15}$ relation enter the color excesses and propagate
2160: strongly into the absorption and hence into the $M^{00}$
2161: magnitudes. They cancel, however, if the latter are normalized to a
2162: common value of $\Delta m_{15}$ ($M^{00}_{15}$).
2163:
2164: (8) The absolute magnitudes, $M^{00}_{BVI\max}$ show some
2165: dependence on the $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$ and $(V\!-\!I)^{00}_{\max}$
2166: colors (Figure~\ref{fig:other:color}), as suggested by
2167: \citet{Tripp:Branch:99} and \citet{Parodi:etal:00}.
2168: Therefore the adopted magnitudes $M^{\rm corr}_{BV}$ of normal SNe\,Ia
2169: have been reduced to common values of $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$ {\em and\/}
2170: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}=-0.024$ by equation~(\ref{eq:other:3fitd}) and
2171: Table~\ref{tab:coeff3fit}.
2172: This slightly reduces the dispersion about the Hubble line without
2173: changing the {\em mean\/} magnitude of the sample.
2174:
2175: (9) The present sample of 124 SNe\,Ia contains only four
2176: spectroscopically distinct SNe-91T, with SN\,1991T as the
2177: prototype. Their apparent rarity must be real because of their
2178: pronounced overluminosity. The overluminosity amounts to $\Delta
2179: M_{B}=-0.40\pm0.08$ on average if one assumes them to have the same
2180: color at maximum $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$ as normal SNe\,Ia
2181: (Table~\ref{tab:SNeIa-T}). The mean overluminosity is reduced to
2182: $-0.32\pm0.08$ if one allows in addition for their below-average
2183: decline rates $\Delta m_{15}$.
2184:
2185: The new class of SNe-99aa \citep{Li:etal:01b}, named after
2186: SN\,1999aa, comprises seven objects in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a (marked
2187: with $\dagger$). They are spectroscopically between normal SNe\,Ia and
2188: SNe-91T, but are difficult to recognize because their spectroscopic
2189: peculiarity is confined to the pre-maximum phase. Their true frequency
2190: in a distance-limited sample may therefore be as high as
2191: $\sim\!14\%$. They are less overluminous than SNe-91T, i.e.\
2192: $\Delta M_{B}=-0.30\pm0.10$, or $\Delta M_{B}=-0.19\pm0.10$ if reduced
2193: to $\Delta m_{15}=1.1$, as compared to normal SNe\,Ia.
2194: -- SNe-99aa have very slow decline rates ($<\!\Delta
2195: m_{15}\!>=0.92$) and occur correspondingly in late-type galaxies. The
2196: mean coded type of their host galaxies is $<\!T\!>=3.7\pm0.5$
2197: ($\sim$Sbc) as compared to $<\!T\!>=3.5\pm1.0$ for SNe-91T and
2198: $<\!T\!>=1.8$ ($\sim$Sab) for normal SNe\,Ia.
2199:
2200: The most luminous SN in the sample is probably the very peculiar
2201: SN\,2000cx which has -- with plausible absorption corrections --
2202: $M^{00}_{BV}\approx-20.3$.
2203:
2204: (10) Seven SNe-91bg, whose eponymous star is SN\,1991bg, have
2205: sufficient photometry to be included in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}c. They are
2206: very red and spectroscopically peculiar. In accordance with their
2207: exceptionally fast decline rates ($\Delta m_{15}\ge1.9$) they lie
2208: preferentially in early-type galaxies ($<\!T\!>=-0.6$). This suggests
2209: little absorption in their host galaxies; zero absorption is assumed
2210: here to derive their intrinsic photometric properties
2211: (Table~\ref{tab:SNeIa-bg}). The SNe-91bg emerge as a surprisingly
2212: homogeneous and separate class with $B$ magnitudes at maximum about
2213: $2\mag$ below that of normal SNe\,Ia. The luminosity of SN\,1986G
2214: seems to lie between SNe\,Ia and SNe-91bg (see
2215: Table~\ref{tab:SNeIa-bg}).
2216:
2217: (11) The Hubble diagrams in $B$, $V$, and $I$ for all 111 normal
2218: SNe\,Ia in Table~\ref{tab:SN1}a are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:hubble} using
2219: fully corrected apparent magnitudes $m^{\rm corr}_{BVI}$. Solutions
2220: for the intercepts $C_{\lambda}$ of the Hubble line are given for
2221: various subsets with different restrictions in Table~\ref{tab:hubble}.
2222: The fiducial sample of 62 (58) SNe\,Ia with $3000<v<20\,000\kms$ is
2223: taken as the most reliable sample (solution~3 in
2224: Table~\ref{tab:hubble}). The resulting values of
2225: $C_{\lambda}$ inserted in equation~(\ref{eq:hubble:04}) and $H_{0}=60$
2226: give
2227: $<\!M_{B}^{\rm corr}\!>=-19.57\pm0.02$,
2228: $<\!M_{V}^{\rm corr}\!>=-19.55\pm0.02$, and
2229: $<\!M_{I}^{\rm corr}\!>=-19.29\pm0.02$.
2230: The dispersion of the $m_{BVI}^{\rm corr}$ magnitudes (corrected for
2231: Galactic and internal absorption and normalized to $\Delta
2232: m_{15}=1.1$) about the Hubble line is $\sigma_{BVI}=0.14\mag$
2233: (solution~3 in Table~\ref{tab:hubble}). It increases for distances
2234: shorter than $3000\kms$ due to peculiar motions (solutions~5 and
2235: 6). Much of the dispersion beyond $3000\kms$ is caused by random
2236: errors of the host galaxy absorption, as seen by the SNe\,Ia with
2237: minimum absorption in Table~\ref{tab:color:minred} which give
2238: $\sigma_{I}=0.10\mag$, if restricted in addition to $v>5000\kms$.
2239: This is for normal SNe\,Ia, after they are normalized to common values
2240: of $\Delta m_{15}$ and $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$, an {\em upper\/} limit
2241: to their intrinsic luminosity dispersion in $I$ in view of remaining
2242: observational magnitude errors. The intrinsic dispersion in $B$ and
2243: $V$ may be somewhat larger.
2244:
2245: In spite of the noticeable scatter introduced by the corrections
2246: for host galaxy absorption, the {\em mean\/} of the corrections must
2247: be nearly correct. This is demonstrated by solutions~3 and 6-8 in
2248: Table~\ref{tab:hubble}, where different cuts of the accepted maximum
2249: value of the total color excess $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm t}$ lead to
2250: statistically insignificant variations of the intercept $C_{\lambda}$
2251: of only $\pm0.004$ (corresponding to $\pm0.02\mag$).
2252:
2253: The combination of the absolute magnitude $M^{\rm corr}_{V}$ from
2254: above with the individual apparent magnitudes $m^{\rm corr}_{V}$
2255: yields the absorption-free luminosity distances of 111 parent galaxies
2256: of normal SNe\,Ia (Table~\ref{tab:SN3}a, column~11). The distances are
2257: particularly valuable for nearby galaxies because they are insensitive
2258: to peculiar motions. If the value $H_{0}=60$ is to be replaced by any
2259: other value, the listed distance moduli need only a bulk correction by
2260: an additive term.
2261:
2262: Had we adopted a flat Universe with $\Omega_{\rm M}=1$ the value
2263: of $C_{\lambda}$ in solution~3 of Table~\ref{tab:hubble} would change
2264: by only $-0.009$. This would decrease $H_{0}$ by merely $2\%$. The
2265: insensitivity of $H_{0}$ to the cosmological model is due to the
2266: velocity cut at $v_{\rm CMB}<20\,000\kms$ of solution~3.
2267:
2268: (12) The main goal of the present paper is to determine an
2269: up-to-date Hubble diagram using a large and unbiased sample of
2270: Branch-normal SNe\,Ia, whose magnitudes are corrected for Galactic and
2271: host galaxy absorption and normalized to standard values of the
2272: decline rate $\Delta m_{15}$ and of the color
2273: $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{\max}$. Regardless whether one considers the
2274: unrestricted sample of non-local or restricted samples with only a
2275: minimum of extinction one finds remarkably robust solutions for the
2276: intercept $C_{\lambda}$, which through equation~(\ref{eq:hubble:04})
2277: is decisive for the determination of the value of $H_{0}$. The
2278: remaining uncertainty of $C_{\lambda}$ of $\sim\!0.004$ will carry an
2279: error into the derived value of $H_{0}$ of only $1\%$. The consequence
2280: is that the accuracy of the derived large-scale value of $H_{0}$ will
2281: depend almost exclusively on the goodness of the luminosity
2282: calibration that we can achieve in a forthcoming paper by means of the
2283: SNe\,Ia in host galaxies with known Cepheids.
2284:
2285:
2286: % ***********************************************
2287: % Acknowledgments
2288: % ***********************************************
2289: \acknowledgments
2290: We are greatly indebted to Dr.~G.~Altavilla for kindly providing his
2291: unpublished template-fitted $V_{\max}$ magnitudes for a large sample
2292: of SNe\,Ia. We are equally indebted to Dr.~S.~Jha for his generosity
2293: to make his unpublished tail colors $(B\!-\!V)_{35}$ available to
2294: us. B.\,R. thanks an anonymous donator for financial support, while
2295: G.\,A.\,T. thanks the Swiss National Science Foundation for support over
2296: many decades. A.\,S. is indebted to the Carnegie Institution for
2297: ongoing post-retirement facilities support.
2298:
2299:
2300:
2301:
2302: % ******************************************************************
2303: % Bibliography
2304: % ******************************************************************
2305: \begin{thebibliography}{}
2306: %
2307: \bibitem[Altavilla et~al.(2004)]{Altavilla:etal:04}
2308: % Altavilla, G., Fiorentino, G., Marconi, M., Musella, I.,
2309: % Cappellaro, E., Barbon, R., Benetti, S., Pastorello, A.,
2310: % Riello, M., Turatto, M., Zampieri, L.
2311: Altavilla, G., et~al. 2004,
2312: % Cepheid calibration of Type Ia supernovae and the Hubble constant
2313: MNRAS, 349, 1344
2314: %
2315: \bibitem[Anupama(1997)]{Anupama:97}
2316: Anapuma, G.C. 1997,
2317: % Optical Spectra of Recent Supernovae of Type Ia: SN1995AL,
2318: % SN1997Y, SN1997bp
2319: AJ, 114, 2054
2320: %
2321: \bibitem[Barbon et~al.(1973)]{Barbon:etal:73}
2322: Barbon, R., Ciatti, F., \& Rosino, L. 1973,
2323: % On the light curve and properties of type I supernovae.
2324: A\&A, 25, 241
2325: %
2326: \bibitem[Barris \& Tonry(2004)]{Barris:Tonry:04}
2327: Barris, B.J., \& Tonry, J.L. 2004,
2328: % Redshift-Independent Distances to Type Ia Supernovae
2329: ApJ, 613, 21
2330: % was: preprint (astro-ph/0408097)
2331: %
2332: \bibitem[Barris et~al.(2004)]{Barris:etal:04}
2333: Barris, B.J., et~al. 2004, % >20 authors
2334: % Twenty-Three High-Redshift Supernovae from the Institute for
2335: % Astronomy Deep Survey: Doubling the Supernova Sample at z > 0.7
2336: ApJ, 602, 571
2337: %
2338: \bibitem[Benetti et~al.(2004)]{Benetti:etal:04}
2339: % Benetti, S., Meikle, P., Stehle, M., Altavilla, G.,
2340: % Desidera, S., Folatelli, G., Goobar, A., Mattila, S.,
2341: % Mendez, J., Navasardyan, H., + 8 coauthors
2342: Benetti, S., et~al. 2004,
2343: % Supernova 2002bo: inadequacy of the single parameter description
2344: MNRAS, 348, 261
2345: %
2346: \bibitem[Berlind et~al.(1997)]{Berlind:etal:97}
2347: Berlind, P., Jha, S., Garnavich, P., \& Kirshner, R. 1997,
2348: % Supernova 1997cw in NGC 105
2349: IAU Circ., 6700, 2
2350: %
2351: \bibitem[Bottari et~al.(1996)]{Bottari:etal:96}
2352: Bottari, C., Nakano, S., Kushida, Y., Garnavich, P.,
2353: Challis, P., Kirshner, R., Berlind, P., \& Kleyna, J. 1996,
2354: % Supernova 1996ai in NGC 5005
2355: IAU Circ., 6422
2356: %
2357: \bibitem[Branch \& Tammann(1992)]{Branch:Tammann:92}
2358: Branch, D., \& Tammann, G.A. 1992,
2359: % Type IA supernovae as standard candles
2360: ARA\&A, 30, 359
2361: %
2362: \bibitem[Branch et~al.(1993)]{Branch:etal:93}
2363: Branch, D., Fisher, A., \& Nugent, P. 1993,
2364: % On the relative frequencies of spectroscopically normal and
2365: % peculiar type Ia supernovae
2366: AJ, 106, 2383
2367: %
2368: \bibitem[Candia et~al.(2003)]{Candia:etal:03}
2369: % Candia, P., Krisciunas, K., Suntzeff, N.B., Gonz{\'a}lez, D.,
2370: % Espinoza, J., Leiton, R., Rest, A., Smith, R.C., Cuadra, J.,
2371: % Tavenner, T., + 9 coauthors
2372: Candia, P., et~al. 2003,
2373: % Optical and Infrared Photometry of the Unusual Type Ia Supernova
2374: % 2000cx
2375: PASP, 115, 277
2376: %
2377: \bibitem[Carroll et~al.(1992)]{Carroll:etal:92}
2378: Carroll, S.M., Press, W.H., \& Turner, E.L. 1992,
2379: % The cosmological constant
2380: ARA\&A, 30, 499
2381: %
2382: \bibitem[Cristiani et~al.(1992)]{Cristiani:etal:92}
2383: % Cristiani, S., Cappellaro, E., Turatto, M., Bergeron, J., Bues,
2384: % I., Buson, L., Danziger, J., di Serego-Alighieri, S., Duerbeck,
2385: % H.W., Heydari-Malayeri, M.; + 3 coauthors
2386: Cristiani, S., et~al. 1992,
2387: % The SN 1986 G in Centaurus A
2388: A\&A, 259, 63
2389: %
2390: \bibitem[Dale \& Giovanelli(2000)]{Dale:Giovanelli:00}
2391: Dale, D.A., \& Giovanelli, R. 2000,
2392: % The Convergence Depth of the Local Peculiar Velocity Field
2393: in ASP. Conf. Ser. 201, Cosmic Flows Workshop,
2394: eds. S.~Courteau \& J.~Willick (San Francisco: ASP), 25
2395: %
2396: \bibitem[de~Vaucouleurs et~al.(1976)]{deVaucouleurs:etal:76}
2397: de~Vaucouleurs, G., de~Vaucouleurs, A., \& Corwin, H.G. 1976,
2398: Second Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies
2399: (Austin: Univ. of Texas Press)
2400: %
2401: \bibitem[Federspiel et~al.(1994)]{Federspiel:etal:94}
2402: Federspiel, M., Sandage, A., \& Tammann, G.A. 1994,
2403: % Bias properties of extragalactic distance indicators. 3: Analysis
2404: % of Tully-Fisher distances for the Mathewson-Ford-Buchhorn sample of
2405: % 1355 galaxies
2406: ApJ, 430, 29
2407: %
2408: \bibitem[Filippenko et~al.(1992)]{Filippenko:etal:92}
2409: % Filippenko, A.V., Richmond, M.W., Matheson, T., Shields, J.C.,
2410: % Burbidge, E.M., Cohen, R.D., Dickinson, M.,
2411: % Malkan, M.A., Nelson, B., Pietz, J., + 6 coauthors
2412: Filippenko, A.V., et~al. 1992,
2413: % The peculiar Type IA SN 1991T - Detonation of a white dwarf?
2414: ApJ, 384, L15
2415: %
2416: \bibitem[Fisher et~al.(1999)]{Fisher:etal:99}
2417: Fisher, A., Branch, D., Hatano, K., \& Baron, E. 1999,
2418: % On the spectrum and nature of the peculiar Type IA supernova 1991T
2419: MNRAS, 304, 67
2420: %
2421: \bibitem[Garavini et~al.(2004)]{Garavini:etal:04}
2422: % Garavini, G., Folatelli, G., Goobar, A., Nobili, S., Aldering,
2423: % G., Amadon, A., Amanullah, R., Astier, P., Balland, C., Blanc,
2424: % G., + 48 coauthors
2425: Garavini, G., et~al. 2004,
2426: % Spectroscopic Observations and Analysis of the Peculiar SN 1999aa
2427: AJ, 128, 387 % astro-ph/0404393
2428: %
2429: \bibitem[Garnavich et~al.(2004)]{Garnavich:etal:04}
2430: % Garnavich, P.M., Bonanos, A.Z., Krisciunas, K., Jha, S.,
2431: % Kirshner, R.P., Schlegel, E.M., Challis, P., Macri, L.M.,
2432: % Hatano, K., Branch, D., Bothun, G.D., Freedman, W.L.
2433: Garnavich, P.M., et~al. 2004,
2434: % The Luminosity of SN 1999by in NGC 2841 and the Nature of
2435: % `Peculiar' Type Ia Supernovae
2436: ApJ, 613, 1120
2437: % ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0105490)
2438: %
2439: \bibitem[Germany et~al.(2004)]{Germany:etal:04}
2440: Germany, L.M., Reiss, D.J., Schmidt, B.P.,
2441: Stubbs, C.W., \& Suntzeff, N.B. 2004,
2442: % Results of the Mount Stromlo Abell cluster supernova search
2443: A\&A, 415, 863
2444: %
2445: \bibitem[Hamuy et~al.(1995)]{Hamuy:etal:95}
2446: Hamuy, M., Phillips, M.M., Maza, J., Suntzeff, N.B.,
2447: Schommer, R.A., \& Aviles, R. 1995,
2448: % A Hubble diagram of distant type IA supernovae
2449: AJ, 109, 1
2450: %
2451: \bibitem[Hamuy et~al.(1996a)]{Hamuy:etal:96a}
2452: Hamuy, M., Phillips, M.M., Suntzeff, N.B.,
2453: Schommer, R.A., Maza, J., \& Aviles, R. 1996a,
2454: % The Absolute Luminosities of the Calan/Tololo Type IA Supernovae
2455: AJ, 112, 2391
2456: %
2457: \bibitem[Hamuy et~al.(1996b)]{Hamuy:etal:96b}
2458: Hamuy, M., Phillips, M.M., Suntzeff, N.B.,
2459: Schommer, R.A., Maza, J., \& Aviles, R. 1996b,
2460: % The Hubble Diagram of the Calan/Tololo Type Ia Supernovae and the
2461: % Value of Ho
2462: AJ, 112, 2398
2463: %
2464: \bibitem[Hamuy et~al.(1996c)]{Hamuy:etal:96c}
2465: Hamuy, M., Phillips, M.M., Suntzeff, N.B.,
2466: Schommer, R.A., Maza, J., Smith, R.C., Lira, P.,
2467: \& Aviles, R. 1996c,
2468: % The Morphology of Type Ia Supernovae Light Curves
2469: AJ, 112, 2438
2470: %
2471: \bibitem[Hamuy et~al.(2000)]{Hamuy:etal:00}
2472: Hamuy, M., Trager, S.C., Pinto, P.A.,
2473: Phillips, M.M., Schommer, R.A., Ivanov, V.,
2474: \& Suntzeff, N.B. 2000,
2475: % A Search for Environmental Effects on Type IA Supernovae
2476: AJ, 120, 1479
2477: %
2478: \bibitem[Hamuy et~al.(1996d)]{Hamuy:etal:96d}
2479: % Hamuy, M., Phillips, M.M., Suntzeff, N.B.,
2480: % Schommer, R.A., Maza, J., Antezan, A.R.,
2481: % Wischnjewsky, M., Valladares, G., \& Muena, C. 1996d,
2482: Hamuy, M., et~al. 1996d
2483: % BVRI Light Curves for 29 Type Ia Supernovae
2484: AJ, 112, 2408
2485: %
2486: \bibitem[H{\"o}flich et~al.(2002)]{Hoeflich:etal:02}
2487: H{\"o}flich, P., Gerady, C.L., Fesen, R.A., \& Sakai, S. 2002,
2488: % Infrared Spectra of the Subluminous Type Ia Supernova SN 1999by
2489: ApJ, 568, 791
2490: %
2491: \bibitem[Howell(2001)]{Howell:01}
2492: Howell, D.A. 2001,
2493: % The Progenitors of Subluminous Type Ia Supernovae
2494: ApJ, 554, L193
2495: %
2496: \bibitem[Jha(2002)]{Jha:02}
2497: Jha, S. 2002,
2498: %
2499: PhD. thesis, Harvard Univ.
2500: %
2501: \bibitem[Jha et~al.(1999)]{Jha:etal:99}
2502: Jha, S., et~al. 1999, % > 40 coauthors
2503: % The Type IA Supernova 1998BU in M96 and the Hubble Constant
2504: ApJS, 125, 73
2505: %
2506: \bibitem[Karachentsev \& Makarov(1996)]{Karachentsev:Makarov:96}
2507: Karachentsev, I.D., \& Makarov, D.A. 1996,
2508: % The Galaxy Motion Relative to Nearby Galaxies and the Local
2509: % Velocity Field
2510: AJ, 111, 794
2511: %
2512: \bibitem[Knop et~al.(2003)]{Knop:etal:03}
2513: Knop, R.A., et~al. 2003, % > 40 coauthors
2514: % New Constraints on Omega_M, Omega_L, and w from an Independent
2515: % Set of 11 High-Redshift Supernovae Observed with the Hubble Space
2516: % Telescope
2517: ApJ, 598, 102
2518: %
2519: \bibitem[Kowal(1968)]{Kowal:68}
2520: Kowal, C.T. 1968,
2521: % Absolute magnitudes of supernovae
2522: AJ, 73, 1021
2523: %
2524: \bibitem[Kraan-Korteweg(1986)]{Kraan-Korteweg:86}
2525: Kraan-Korteweg, R.C. 1986,
2526: % A catalog of 2810 nearby galaxies - The effect of the
2527: % Virgocentric flow model on their observed velocities
2528: A\&AS, 66, 255
2529: %
2530: \bibitem[Krisciunas et~al.(2000)]{Krisciunas:etal:00}
2531: Krisciunas, K., Hastings, N.C., Loomis, K., McMillan, R.,
2532: Rest, A., Riess, A.G., \& Stubbs, C. 2000,
2533: % Uniformity of (V-Near-Infrared) Color Evolution of Type Ia
2534: % Supernovae and Implications for Host Galaxy Extinction
2535: % Determination
2536: ApJ, 539, 658
2537: %
2538: \bibitem[Krisciunas et~al.(2001)]{Krisciunas:etal:01}
2539: % Krisciunas, K., Phillips, M.M., Stubbs, C., Rest, A.,
2540: % Miknaitis, G., Riess, A.G., Suntzeff, N.B., Roth, M.,
2541: % Persson, S.E., Freedman, W.L.
2542: Krisciunas, K., et~al. 2001,
2543: % Optical and Infrared Photometry of the Type Ia Supernovae 1999da,
2544: % 1999dk, 1999gp, 2000bk, and 2000ce
2545: AJ, 122, 1616
2546: %
2547: \bibitem[Krisciunas et~al.(2003)]{Krisciunas:etal:03}
2548: % Krisciunas, K., Suntzeff, N.B., Candia, P., Arenas, J.,
2549: % Espinoza, J., Gonzalez, D., Gonzalez, S., H{\"o}flich, P.A.,
2550: % Landolt, A.U., Phillips, M.M., Pizarro, S.
2551: Krisciunas, K., et~al. 2003,
2552: % Optical and Infrared Photometry of the Nearby Type Ia Supernova 2001el
2553: AJ, 125, 166
2554: %
2555: \bibitem[Li et~al.(2001a)]{Li:etal:01a}
2556: Li, W., Filippenko, A.V., \& Riess, A.G. 2001a,
2557: % Monte Carlo Simulations of Type Ia Supernova Observations in
2558: % Supernova Surveys
2559: ApJ, 546, 719
2560: %
2561: \bibitem[Li et~al.(2001b)]{Li:etal:01b}
2562: Li, W., Filippenko, A.V., Treffers, R.R., Riess, A.G.,
2563: Hu, J., \& Qiu, Y. 2001b,
2564: % A High Intrinsic Peculiarity Rate among Type IA Supernovae
2565: ApJ, 546, 734
2566: %
2567: \bibitem[Li et~al.(2001c)]{Li:etal:01c}
2568: % Li, W., Filippenko, A.V., Gates, E., Chornock, R.,
2569: % Gal-Yam, A., Ofek, E.O., Leonard, D.C., Modjaz, M.,
2570: % Rich, R.M., Riess, A.G., Treffers, R.R.
2571: Li, W., et~al. 2001c,
2572: % The Unique Type Ia Supernova 2000cx in NGC 524
2573: PASP, 113, 1178
2574: %
2575: \bibitem[Li et~al.(1999)]{Li:etal:99}
2576: % Li, W.D., Qiu, Y.L., Qiao, Q.Y., Zhu, X.H.,
2577: % Hu, J.Y., Richmond, M.W., Filippenko, A.V., Treffers, R.R.,
2578: % Peng, C.Y., Leonard, D.C.
2579: Li, W.D., et~al. 1999,
2580: % The Type IA Supernova 1997BR in ESO 576-G40
2581: AJ, 117, 2709
2582: %
2583: \bibitem[Lira(1995)]{Lira:95}
2584: Lira, P. 1995,
2585: %
2586: Master Thesis, Univ. Chile
2587: %
2588: \bibitem[Macri et~al.(2001)]{Macri:etal:01}
2589: Macri, L.M., Stetson, P.B., Bothun, G.D., Freedman, W.L.,
2590: Garnavich, P.M., Jha, S., Madore, B.F., \& Richmond, M.W. 2001,
2591: % The Discovery of Cepheids and a New Distance to NGC 2841 Using
2592: % the Hubble Space Telescope
2593: ApJ, 559, 243
2594: %
2595: \bibitem[Mandel et~al.(2001)]{Mandel:etal:01}
2596: Mandel, K., Jha, S., Matheson, T., Challis, P.,
2597: \& Kirshner, R.P. 2001,
2598: % Optical Photometry of the Type Ia Supernova 2001V in NGC 3987
2599: BAAS, 33, 1370
2600: %
2601: \bibitem[Mazzali et~al.(1997)]{Mazzali:etal:97}
2602: Mazzali, P.A., Chugai, N., Turatto, M., Lucy, L.B.,
2603: Danziger, I.J., Cappellaro, E., della Valle, M.,
2604: \& Benetti, S. 1997,
2605: % The properties of the peculiar type IA supernova 1991bg - II. The
2606: % amount of ^56Ni and the total ejecta mass determined from spectrum
2607: % synthesis and energetics considerations
2608: MNRAS, 284, 151
2609: %
2610: \bibitem[Nobili et~al.(2003)]{Nobili:etal:03}
2611: Nobili, S., Goobar, A., Knop, R., \& Nugent, P. 2003,
2612: % The intrinsic colour dispersion in Type Ia supernovae
2613: A\&A, 404, 901
2614: %
2615: \bibitem[Parodi et~al.(2000)]{Parodi:etal:00}
2616: Parodi, B.R., Saha, A., Sandage, A., \& Tammann, G.A. 2000,
2617: % Supernova Type Ia Luminosities, Their Dependence on Second
2618: % Parameters, and the Value of Ho
2619: ApJ, 540, 634
2620: %
2621: \bibitem[Perlmutter et~al.(1997)]{Perlmutter:etal:97}
2622: Perlmutter, S., et~al. 1997, % > 20 coauthors
2623: % Measurements of the Cosmological Parameters Omega and Lambda from
2624: % the First Seven Supernovae at Z >= 0.35
2625: ApJ, 483, 565
2626: %
2627: \bibitem[Perlmutter et~al.(1999)]{Perlmutter:etal:99}
2628: Perlmutter, S., et~al. 1999, % > 30 coauthors
2629: % Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
2630: ApJ, 517, 565
2631: %
2632: \bibitem[Phillips(1993)]{Phillips:93}
2633: Phillips, M.M. 1993,
2634: % The absolute magnitudes of Type Ia supernovae
2635: ApJ, 413, L105
2636: %
2637: \bibitem[Phillips et~al.(1999)]{Phillips:etal:99}
2638: Phillips, M.M., Lira, P., Suntzeff, N.B., Schommer, R.A.,
2639: Hamuy, M., \& Maza, J. 1999,
2640: % The Reddening-Free Decline Rate Versus Luminosity Relationship
2641: % for Type Ia Supernovae
2642: AJ, 118, 1766
2643: %
2644: \bibitem[Pignata et~al.(2004)]{Pignata:etal:04}
2645: Pignata, G., et~al. 2004, % > 20 coauthors
2646: % Photometric Observations of the Type Ia SN 2002er in UGC 10743
2647: MNRAS, in press (astro-ph/0408234)
2648: %
2649: \bibitem[Pskovskii(1967)]{Pskovskii:67}
2650: Pskovskii, Y.P. 1967,
2651: % The Photometric Properties of Supernovae
2652: Sov. Astron., 11, 63
2653: %
2654: \bibitem[Pskovskii(1971)]{Pskovskii:71}
2655: Pskovskii, Y.P. 1971,
2656: % Photometric Aspects of Type I Supernovae
2657: Sov. Astron., 14, 798
2658: %
2659: \bibitem[Pskovskii(1984)]{Pskovskii:84}
2660: Pskovskii, Y.P. 1984,
2661: % Photometric classification and basic parameters of type I
2662: % supernovae
2663: Sov. Astron., 28, 658
2664: %
2665: \bibitem[Rich(1987)]{Rich:87}
2666: Rich, R.M. 1987,
2667: % Echelle spectroscopy of SN 1986G in NGC 5128 - Complex NA
2668: % absorption and interstellar diffuse bands
2669: AJ, 94, 651
2670: %
2671: \bibitem[Riess et~al.(1996)]{Riess:etal:96}
2672: Riess, A.G., Press, W.H., \& Kirshner, R.P. 1996,
2673: % A Precise Distance Indicator: Type IA Supernova Multicolor
2674: % Light-Curve Shapes
2675: ApJ, 473, 88
2676: %
2677: \bibitem[Riess et~al.(1998)]{Riess:etal:98}
2678: Riess, A.G., et~al. 1998, % + 19 coauthors
2679: % Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating
2680: % Universe and a Cosmological Constant
2681: AJ, 116, 1009
2682: %
2683: \bibitem[Riess et~al.(1999)]{Riess:etal:99}
2684: Riess, A.G., et~al. 1999, % + 40 coauthors
2685: % BVRI Light Curves for 22 Type IA Supernovae
2686: AJ, 117, 707
2687: %
2688: \bibitem[Riess et~al.(2004)]{Riess:etal:04}
2689: Riess, A.G., et~al. 2004, % + 18 coauthors
2690: % Type Ia Supernova Discoveries at z > 1 from the Hubble Space
2691: % Telescope: Evidence for Past Deceleration and Constraints on Dark
2692: % Energy Evolution
2693: ApJ, 607, 665
2694: %
2695: \bibitem[Saha et~al.(1996)]{Saha:etal:96}
2696: Saha, A., Sandage, A., Labhardt, L., Tammann, G.A.,
2697: Macchetto, F.D., \& Panagia, N. 1996,
2698: % Cepheid Calibration of the Peak Brightness of Type IA
2699: % Supernovae. VI. SN 1960F in NGC 4496A
2700: ApJS, 107, 693 (SN\,1960F)
2701: %
2702: \bibitem[Saha et~al.(1997)]{Saha:etal:97}
2703: Saha, A., Sandage, A., Labhardt, L., Tammann, G.A.,
2704: Macchetto, F.D., \& Panagia, N. 1997,
2705: % Cepheid Calibration of the Peak Brightness of Type IA
2706: % Supernovae. VIII. SN 1990N in NGC 4639
2707: ApJ, 486, 1 (SN\,1990N)
2708: %
2709: \bibitem[Saha et~al.(2001b)]{Saha:etal:01b}
2710: Saha, A., Sandage, A., Tammann, G.A., Dolphin, A.E.,
2711: Christensen, J., Panagia, N., \& Macchetto, F.D. 2001b,
2712: % Cepheid Calibration of the Peak Brightness of Type Ia
2713: % Supernovae. XI. SN 1998aq in NGC 3982
2714: ApJ, 562, 314 (SN\,1998aq)
2715: %
2716: \bibitem[Saha et~al.(1999)]{Saha:etal:99}
2717: Saha, A., Sandage, A., Tammann, G.A., Labhardt, L.,
2718: Macchetto, F.D., \& Panagia, N. 1999,
2719: % Cepheid Calibration of the Peak Brightness of Type IA
2720: % Supernovae. IX. SN 1989B in NGC 3627
2721: ApJ, 522, 802 (SN\,1989B)
2722: %
2723: \bibitem[Saha et~al.(2001a)]{Saha:etal:01}
2724: Saha, A., Sandage, A., Thim, F., Labhardt, L.,
2725: Tammann, G.A., Christensen, J., Panagia, N.,
2726: \& Macchetto, F. D. 2001a,
2727: % Cepheid Calibration of the Peak Brightness of Type IA
2728: % Supernovae. X. SN 1991T in NGC 4527
2729: ApJ, 551, 973 (SN\,1991T)
2730: %
2731: \bibitem[Sandage(1986)]{Sandage:86}
2732: Sandage, A. 1986,
2733: % The redshift-distance relation. IX - Perturbation of the very
2734: % nearby velocity field by the mass of the Local Group
2735: ApJ, 307, 1
2736: %
2737: \bibitem[Sandage(1987)]{Sandage:87}
2738: Sandage, A. 1987,
2739: % The redshift-distance relation. IXa - Reinterpretation of the
2740: % Local Group deceleration data emphasizing the Kahn-Woltjer mass
2741: % determination
2742: ApJ, 317, 557
2743: %
2744: \bibitem[Sandage \& Tammann(1982)]{Sandage:Tammann:82}
2745: Sandage, A., \& Tammann, G.A. 1982,
2746: % Steps toward the Hubble constant. VIII - The global value
2747: ApJ, 256, 339
2748: %
2749: \bibitem[Sandage \& Tammann(1993)]{Sandage:Tammann:93}
2750: Sandage, A., \& Tammann, G.A. 1993,
2751: % The Hubble diagram in V for supernovae of Type IA and the value
2752: % of H(0) therefrom
2753: ApJ, 415, 1
2754: %
2755: \bibitem[Sandage \& Tammann(1995)]{Sandage:Tammann:95}
2756: Sandage, A., \& Tammann, G.A. 1995,
2757: % Steps toward the Hubble Constant. X. The Distance of the Virgo
2758: % Cluster Core Using Globular Clusters
2759: ApJ, 446, 1
2760: %
2761: \bibitem[Sandage \& Tammann(1997)]{Sandage:Tammann:97}
2762: Sandage, A., \& Tammann, G.A. 1997,
2763: % The Evidence for the Long Distance Scale with H0< 65
2764: in Critical Dialogues in Cosmology, ed. N. Turok
2765: (Singapore: World Scientific), 130
2766: %
2767: % Paper~II
2768: \bibitem[Sandage et~al.(2004)Paper~II]{Sandage:etal:04}
2769: Sandage, A., Tammann, G.A., \& Reindl, B. 2004,
2770: % New Period-Luminosity and Period-Color relations of classical
2771: % Cepheids: II. Cepheids in LMC
2772: A\&A, 424, 43 % (Paper~II)
2773: %
2774: \bibitem[Sandage et~al.(2001)]{Sandage:etal:01}
2775: Sandage, A., Tammann, G.A., \& Saha, A. 2001,
2776: % How good are SNe Ia as standard candles? A short history
2777: in Supernovae and gamma-ray bursts: the greatest explosions since
2778: the Big Bang, eds. M.~Livio, N.~Panagia, \& K.~Sahu (Cambridge:
2779: Cambridge University Press), 304
2780: %
2781: \bibitem[Schaefer(1998)]{Schaefer:98}
2782: Schaefer, B.E. 1998,
2783: % The Peak Brightness of SN 1974G in NGC 4414 and the Hubble Constant
2784: ApJ, 509, 80
2785: %
2786: \bibitem[Schlegel et~al.(1998)]{Schlegel:etal:98}
2787: Schlegel, D., Finkbeiner, D., \& Davis, M. 1998,
2788: % Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening
2789: % and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds
2790: ApJ, 500, 525
2791: %
2792: \bibitem[Stritzinger et~al.(2002)]{Stritzinger:etal:02}
2793: % Stritzinger, M., Hamuy, M. Suntzeff, N.B., Smith, R.C.,
2794: % Phillips, M.M., Maza, J., Strolger, L.-G., Antezana, R.,
2795: % Gonz{\'a}lez, L., Wischnjewsky, M., + 7 coauthors
2796: Stritzinger, M., et~al. 2002,
2797: % Optical Photometry of the Type Ia Supernova 1999ee and the Type
2798: % Ib/c Supernova 1999ex in IC 5179
2799: AJ, 124, 2100
2800: %
2801: \bibitem[Strolger et~al.(2002)]{Strolger:etal:02}
2802: % Strolger, L.-G., Smith, R.C., Suntzeff, N.B., Phillips, M.M.,
2803: % Aldering, G., Nugent, P., Knop, R., Perlmutter, S.,
2804: % Schommer, R.A., Ho, L.C., + 32 coauthors
2805: Strolger, L.-G., et~al. 2002,
2806: % The Type Ia Supernova 1999aw: A Probable 1999aa-like Event in a
2807: % Low-Luminosity Host Galaxy
2808: AJ, 124, 2905
2809: %
2810: \bibitem[Tammann et~al.(2002)]{Tammann:etal:02}
2811: Tammann, G.A., Reindl, B., Thim, F., Saha, A., \& Sandage, A. 2002,
2812: % Cepheids, Supernovae, Ho, and the Age of the Universe
2813: in ASP Conf. Ser. 283, A New Era in Cosmology,
2814: eds. T. Shanks \& N. Metcalfe
2815: (San Francisco: ASP), 258
2816: %
2817: \bibitem[Tammann \& Sandage(1985)]{Tammann:Sandage:85}
2818: Tammann, G.A., \& Sandage, A. 1985,
2819: % The infall velocity toward Virgo, the Hubble constant, and a
2820: % search for motion toward the microwave background
2821: ApJ, 294, 81
2822: %
2823: % Paper~I
2824: \bibitem[Tammann et~al.(2003)Paper~I]{Tammann:etal:03}
2825: Tammann, G.A., Sandage, A., \& Reindl, B. 2003,
2826: % New Period-Luminosity and Period-Color relations of classical
2827: % Cepheids: I. Cepheids in the Galaxy
2828: A\&A, 404, 423 % (Paper~I)
2829: %
2830: \bibitem[Thim et~al.(2003)]{Thim:etal:03}
2831: Thim, F., Tammann, G.A., Saha, A., Dolphin, A.,
2832: Sandage, A., Tolstoy, E., \& Labhardt, L. 2003,
2833: % The Cepheid Distance to NGC 5236 (M83) with the ESO Very Large
2834: % Telescope
2835: ApJ, 590, 256
2836: %
2837: \bibitem[Tonry et~al.(2003)]{Tonry:etal:03}
2838: Tonry, J.L., et~al. 2003, % > 20 coauthors
2839: % Cosmological Results from High-z Supernovae
2840: ApJ, 594, 1
2841: %
2842: \bibitem[Tripp(1998)]{Tripp:98}
2843: Tripp, R. 1998,
2844: % A two-parameter luminosity correction for Type IA supernovae
2845: A\&A, 331, 815
2846: %
2847: \bibitem[Tripp \& Branch(1999)]{Tripp:Branch:99}
2848: Tripp, R., \& Branch, D. 1999,
2849: % Determination of the Hubble Constant Using a Two-Parameter
2850: % Luminosity Correction for Type IA Supernovae
2851: ApJ, 525, 209
2852: %
2853: \bibitem[Valentini et~al.(2003)]{Valentini:etal:03}
2854: Valentini, G., et~al. 2003, % + 17 coauthors
2855: % Optical and Near-Infrared Photometry of the Type Ia Supernova
2856: % 2000E in NGC 6951
2857: ApJ, 595, 779
2858: %
2859: \bibitem[van~den~Bergh et~al.(2002)]{vandenBergh:etal:02}
2860: van den Bergh, S., Li, W., \& Filippenko, A.V. 2002,
2861: % Classifications of the Host Galaxies of Supernovae
2862: PASP, 114, 820
2863: %
2864: \bibitem[van~den~Bergh et~al.(2003)]{vandenBergh:etal:03}
2865: van den Bergh, S., Li, W., \& Filippenko, A.V. 2003,
2866: % Classifications of the Host Galaxies of Supernovae, Set II
2867: PASP, 115, 1280
2868: %
2869: \bibitem[Vink{\'o} et~al.(2003)]{Vinko:etal:03}
2870: Vink{\'o}, J., et~al. 2003, % + 12 coauthors
2871: % The Type Ia Supernova 2001V in NGC 3987
2872: A\&A, 397, 115
2873: %
2874: \bibitem[Wang et~al.(2003)]{Wang:etal:03}
2875: Wang, L., Goldhaber, G., Aldering, G., \& Perlmutter S. 2003,
2876: % Multicolor Light Curves of Type Ia Supernovae on the
2877: % Color-Magnitude Diagram: A Novel Step toward More Precise Distance
2878: % and Extinction Estimates
2879: ApJ, 590, 944
2880: %
2881: \bibitem[Wells et~al.(1994)]{Wells:etal:94}
2882: Wells, L.A., et~al. 1994, % > 40 coauthors
2883: % The Type Ia supernova 1989B in NGC 3627 (M66)
2884: AJ, 108, 2233
2885: %
2886: \end{thebibliography}
2887: % ******************************************************************
2888:
2889:
2890:
2891:
2892: \clearpage
2893: \onecolumn
2894: \setlength\oddsidemargin {-1.45cm}%
2895: \setlength\evensidemargin {-1.45cm}%
2896: \setcounter{table}{0}
2897: % ***********************************************
2898: % Table 1: SNe Ia -- observed quantities.
2899: % ***********************************************
2900: \def\baselinestretch{1.0}
2901: \begin{deluxetable}{llcrrrrrcrrrrl}
2902: \tablewidth{540pt}
2903: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
2904: \tablecaption{Observed parameters of SNe\,Ia.\label{tab:SN1}}
2905: % ***********************************************
2906: \tablehead{
2907: % ***********************************************
2908: \colhead{SN} &
2909: \colhead{Galaxy} &
2910: % \colhead{Type} &
2911: \colhead{T} &
2912: \colhead{$v_{\rm hel}$}&
2913: \colhead{$\!\!v_{\rm CMB/220}\!\!$}&
2914: \colhead{$B_{\max}$} &
2915: \colhead{$V_{\max}$} &
2916: \colhead{$I_{\max}$} &
2917: \colhead{$\!\Delta m_{15}\!$} &
2918: \colhead{$E(B\mbox{-}V)$}&
2919: \colhead{$E(B\mbox{-}V)$} &
2920: \colhead{$E(B\mbox{-}V)$} &
2921: \colhead{$E(B\mbox{-}V)$} &
2922: \colhead{Ref.} \\
2923: %
2924: \colhead{} & \colhead{} &
2925: \colhead{} & \colhead{} &
2926: \colhead{} & \colhead{} &
2927: \colhead{} & \colhead{} &
2928: \colhead{} & \colhead{Gal} &
2929: \colhead{max} & \colhead{max35} &
2930: \colhead{$V\!-\!I$} & \colhead{} \\
2931: %
2932: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} &
2933: \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} &
2934: \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} &
2935: \colhead{(7)} & \colhead{(8)} &
2936: \colhead{(9)} & \colhead{(10)} &
2937: \colhead{(11)} & \colhead{(12)} &
2938: \colhead{(13)} & \colhead{(14)}
2939: }
2940: % ***********************************************
2941: \startdata
2942: % ***********************************************
2943: %\noalign{\smallskip}
2944: \multicolumn{14}{c}{\footnotesize (a) normal SNe\,Ia}\\
2945: \noalign{\smallskip}
2946: \tableline
2947: % ***********************************************
2948: 1937C & IC 4182$^{\ast}$ & 5 & 321 & 330$^{\rm v}$ & 8.80 & 8.82 & \nodata & 0.85 & 0.014 & 0.001 & -0.045 &\nodatr & A \\
2949: 1960F & NGC 4496A$^{\ast}$ & 5 & 1730 & 1179$^{\rm V}$ & 11.60 & 11.51 & \nodata & 0.87 & 0.025 & 0.099 &\nodatr &\nodatr & Sa \\
2950: 1972E & NGC 5253$^{\ast}$ & 5 & 404 & 167$^{\rm v}$ & 8.49 & 8.49 & 8.80 & 1.05 & 0.056 & -0.030 & -0.052 & -0.069 & Sa \\
2951: 1972J & NGC 7634 & -1 & 3225 & 2855 & 14.80 & 14.56 & \nodata & 1.45 & 0.046 & 0.202 & -0.040 &\nodatr & A \\
2952: 1974G & NGC 4414$^{\ast}$ & 5 & 716 & 655$^{\rm v}$ & 12.48 & 12.30 & \nodata & 1.11 & 0.019 & 0.184 & 0.137 &\nodatr & S \\
2953: 1980N & NGC 1316 & 1 & 1760 & 1338$^{\rm F}$ & 12.49 & 12.42 & 12.70 & 1.30 & 0.021 & 0.064 & 0.039 & -0.045 & HA \\
2954: 1981B & NGC 4536$^{\ast}$ & 4 & 1808 &(1179$^{\rm V}$)& 12.04 & 11.98 & \nodata & 1.13 & 0.018 & 0.064 & 0.009 &\nodatr & A \\
2955: 1981D & NGC 1316 & 1 & 1760 & 1338$^{\rm F}$ & 12.59 & 12.40 & \nodata & \nodata & 0.021 & 0.242 &\nodatr &\nodatr & P \\
2956: 1982B & NGC 2268 & 4 & 2222 & 2610$^{\rm v}$ & 13.65 & 13.40 & \nodata & 0.94 & 0.064 & 0.217 & 0.041 &\nodatr & A \\
2957: 1983G & NGC 4753 & -1 & 1239 & 1497$^{\rm v}$ & 13.00 & 12.80 & \nodata & 1.30 & 0.034 & 0.180 & 0.281 &\nodatr & A \\
2958: 1984A & NGC 4419 & 1 & -261 & 1179$^{\rm V}$ & 12.50 & 12.30 & \nodata & \nodata & 0.033 & 0.240 &\nodatr &\nodatr & H \\
2959: 1989B & NGC 3627$^{\ast}$ & 3 & 727 & 549$^{\rm v}$ & 12.34 & 11.99 & 11.70 & 1.31 & 0.032 & 0.332 & 0.298 & 0.302 & W \\
2960: 1990N & NGC 4639$^{\ast}$ & 3 & 1010 & 1179$^{\rm V}$ & 12.75 & 12.73 & 12.95 & 1.05 & 0.026 & 0.020 & 0.070 & 0.012 & HA \\
2961: 1990O & MCG 3-44-03 & 1 & 9193 & 9175 & 16.59 & 16.51 & 16.80 & 0.94 & 0.093 & 0.018 & -0.001 & -0.076 & HA \\
2962: 1990T & PGC 63925 & 1 & 11992 & 11893 & 17.27 & 17.35 & 17.36 & 1.13 & 0.053 & -0.111 & 0.055 & 0.114 & HA \\
2963: 1990Y & Anon 0335-33 & -3 & 11702 & 11603 & 17.69 & 17.42 & 17.57 & 1.13 & 0.008 & 0.284 & 0.205 & 0.063 & HA \\
2964: 1990af & Anon 2135-62 & -1 & 15080 & 14966 & 17.91 & 17.84 & \nodata & 1.59 & 0.035 & 0.036 & -0.022 &\nodatr & H \\
2965: 1991S & UGC 5691 & 3 & 16489 & 16807 & 17.78 & 17.75 & 17.99 & 1.00 & 0.026 & 0.032 & 0.033 & 0.004 & HA \\
2966: 1991U & IC 4232 & 4 & 9426 & 9724 & 16.67 & 16.61 & 16.62 & 1.11 & 0.062 & 0.021 & 0.056 & 0.108 & HA \\
2967: 1991ag & IC 4919 & 3 & 4264 & 4161 & 14.67 & 14.56 & 14.83 & 0.87 & 0.062 & 0.082 & -0.012 & -0.032 & HA \\
2968: 1992A & NGC 1380 & 0 & 1877 & 1338$^{\rm F}$ & 12.56 & 12.55 & 12.80 & 1.47 & 0.018 & -0.001 & -0.032 & -0.040 & HA \\
2969: 1992J & Anon 1009-26 & -2 & 13491 & 13828 & 17.88 & 17.76 & 17.88 & 1.69 & 0.057 & 0.060 & 0.032 & -0.011 & HA \\
2970: 1992P & IC 3690 & 1 & 7615 & 7941 & 16.14 & 16.16 & 16.40 & 1.05 & 0.021 & -0.015 & 0.014 & 0.003 & HA \\
2971: 1992ae & Anon 2128-61 & -3 & 22484 & 22366 & 18.62 & 18.54 & \nodata & 1.30 & 0.036 & 0.059 & 0.053 &\nodatr & A \\
2972: 1992ag & ESO 508-G67 & 5 & 7795 & 8095 & 16.64 & 16.47 & 16.50 & 1.20 & 0.097 & 0.092 & 0.359 & 0.059 & HA \\
2973: 1992al & ESO 234-G69 & 3 & 4197 & 4048 & 14.59 & 14.65 & 14.93 & 1.09 & 0.034 & -0.070 & -0.015 & -0.036 & HA \\
2974: 1992aq & Anon 2304-37 & 1 & 30279 & 30014 & 19.42 & 19.39 & 19.48 & 1.69 & 0.012 & 0.015 & 0.026 & 0.044 & HA \\
2975: 1992au & Anon 0010-49 & -3 & 18287 & 18092 & 18.17 & 18.13 & 18.51 & 1.69 & 0.017 & 0.020 & -0.014 & -0.141 & HA \\
2976: 1992bc & ESO 300-G9 & 2 & 5996 & 5876 & 15.13 & 15.25 & 15.56 & 0.90 & 0.022 & -0.109 & -0.108 & -0.027 & HA \\
2977: 1992bg & Anon 0741-62 & 1 & 10793 & 10936 & 17.39 & 17.30 & 17.32 & 1.15 & 0.185 & -0.074 & -0.015 & -0.002 & HA \\
2978: 1992bh & Anon 0459-58 & 4 & 13491 & 13519 & 17.68 & 17.63 & 17.75 & 1.13 & 0.022 & 0.050 & 0.061 & 0.070 & HA \\
2979: 1992bk & ESO 156-G8 & -3 & 17284 & 17237 & 18.07 & 18.14 & 18.21 & 1.67 & 0.015 & -0.087 & -0.018 & 0.056 & HA \\
2980: 1992bl & ESO 291-G11 & 0 & 12891 & 12661 & 17.34 & 17.37 & 17.59 & 1.56 & 0.011 & -0.038 & -0.033 & -0.024 & HA \\
2981: 1992bo & ESO 352-G57 & -2 & 5396 & 5164 & 15.86 & 15.84 & 15.95 & 1.69 & 0.027 & -0.010 & -0.030 & 0.020 & HA \\
2982: 1992bp & Anon 0336-18 & -2 & 23684 & 23557 & 18.53 & 18.53 & 18.68 & 1.52 & 0.069 & -0.064 & 0.020 & -0.024 & HA \\
2983: 1992br & Anon 0145-56 & -3 & 26382 & 26259 & 19.34 & 19.27 & \nodata & 1.69 & 0.026 & 0.041 & -0.020 &\nodatr & H \\
2984: 1992bs & Anon 0329-37 & 3 & 18887 & 18787 & 18.33 & 18.33 & \nodata & 1.15 & 0.011 & 0.010 & 0.017 &\nodatr & A \\
2985: 1993B & Anon 1034-34 & 3 & 20686 & 21011 & 18.71 & 18.65 & 18.71 & 1.30 & 0.079 & -0.004 & 0.122 & 0.045 & HA \\
2986: 1993H & ESO 445-G66 & 2 & 7257 & 7522 & 16.99 & 16.72 & 16.60 & 1.69 & 0.060 & 0.207 & 0.022 & 0.137 & HA \\
2987: 1993L & IC 5270 & 4 & 1926 & 1854$^{\rm v}$ & 13.40 & 13.22 & \nodata & 1.47 & 0.014 & 0.173 & 0.212 &\nodatr & A \\
2988: 1993O & Anon 1331-33 & -2 & 15589 & 15867 & 17.79 & 17.86 & 17.99 & 1.26 & 0.053 & -0.107 & -0.012 & 0.026 & HA \\
2989: 1993ac & PGC 17787 & -3 & 14690 & 14674 & 18.42 & 18.25 & 18.12 & 1.25 & 0.163 & 0.024 & -0.004 & 0.101 & RPA \\
2990: 1993ae & IC 126 & -3 & 5712 & 5410 & 15.42 & 15.52 & 15.65 & 1.47 & 0.038 & -0.131 & -0.058 & 0.019 & RPA \\
2991: 1993ag & Anon 1003-35 & -2 & 14700 & 15013 & 18.30 & 18.12 & 18.22 & 1.30 & 0.112 & 0.082 & 0.055 & -0.007 & HA \\
2992: 1993ah & ESO 471-G27 & -1 & 8803 & 8504 & 16.32 & 16.36 & 16.65 & 1.45 & 0.020 & -0.052 & 0.048 & -0.065 & HA \\
2993: 1994D & NGC 4526 & -1 & 448 & 1179$^{\rm V}$ & 11.86 & 11.94 & 12.11 & 1.31 & 0.022 & -0.088 & -0.054 & 0.022 & HA \\
2994: 1994M & NGC 4493 & -3 & 6943 & 7289 & 16.35 & 16.30 & 16.40 & 1.45 & 0.023 & 0.035 & 0.083 & 0.052 & RPA \\
2995: 1994Q & PGC 59076 & -1 & 8863 & 8861 & 16.44 & 16.36 & 16.63 & 0.90 & 0.017 & 0.096 & 0.007 & 0.002 & RPA \\
2996: 1994S & NGC 4495 & 3 & 4550 & 4831 & 14.79 & 14.83 & 15.14 & 1.02 & 0.021 & -0.034 & -0.055 & -0.038 & R \\
2997: 1994T & PGC 46640 & 1 & 10390 & 10703 & 17.35 & 17.23 & 17.38 & 1.45 & 0.029 & 0.099 & 0.028 & 0.016 & RPA \\
2998: 1994ae & NGC 3370 & 5 & 1279 & 1575$^{\rm v}$ & 13.15 & 13.10 & 13.40 & 0.87 & 0.030 & 0.054 & 0.070 & -0.025 & RPA \\
2999: 1995D & NGC 2962 & 0 & 1966 & 2129$^{\rm v}$ & 13.44 & 13.40 & 13.70 & 1.03 & 0.058 & 0.009 & 0.028 & -0.063 & RPA \\
3000: 1995E & NGC 2441 & 3 & 3470 & 3496 & 16.82 & 16.10 & \nodata & 1.19 & 0.027 & 0.712 & 0.582 &\nodatr & RA \\
3001: 1995ak & IC 1844 & 1 & 6811 & 6589 & 16.09 & 16.10 & 16.21 & 1.45 & 0.038 & -0.040 & 0.172 & 0.033 & RPA \\
3002: 1995al & NGC 3021 & 4 & 1541 & 1851$^{\rm v}$ & 13.36 & 13.25 & 13.50 & 0.89 & 0.014 & 0.129 & 0.066 & 0.018 & RPA \\
3003: 1996C & MCG 8-25-47 & 1 & 8094 & 8245 & 16.59 & 16.56 & 16.77 & 0.94 & 0.013 & 0.048 & -0.007 & 0.039 & RPA \\
3004: 1996X & NGC 5061 & -3 & 2039 & 2120$^{\rm v}$ & 13.26 & 13.21 & 13.39 & 1.32 & 0.069 & -0.005 & -0.016 & -0.024 & RPA \\
3005: 1996Z & NGC 2935 & 3 & 2277 & 2285$^{\rm v}$ & 14.61 & 14.25 & \nodata & 1.22 & 0.064 & 0.314 & 0.350 &\nodatr & R \\
3006: 1996ab & Anon 1521+28$\!\!\!\!$ & 5 & 37240 & 37370 & 19.54 & 19.42 & \nodata & 0.87 & 0.032 & 0.122 & 0.080 &\nodatr & R \\
3007: 1996ai$^{1)}$ & NGC 5005 & 4 & 946 & 1298$^{\rm v}$ & 16.96 & 15.26 & \nodata & 0.85 & 0.014 & 1.721 & 1.501 &\nodatr & RA \\
3008: 1996bk & NGC 5308 & -1 & 2041 & 2462$^{\rm v}$ & 14.84 & 14.41 & \nodata & 1.69 & 0.018 & 0.409 & 0.207 &\nodatr & RA \\
3009: 1996bl & Anon 0036+11$\!\!\!\!$ & 5 & 10793 & 10447 & 17.08 & 16.98 & 17.03 & 1.11 & 0.092 & 0.031 & 0.036 & 0.059 & RPA \\
3010: 1996bo & NGC 673 & 5 & 5182 & 4893 & 16.15 & 15.78 & \nodata & 1.30 & 0.077 & 0.307 & 0.206 &\nodatr & RA \\
3011: 1996bv & UGC 3432 & 5 & 4998 & 5016 & 15.77 & 15.54 & 15.56 & 0.84 & 0.105 & 0.160 & 0.098 & 0.092 & RPA \\
3012: 1997E & NGC 2258 & -1 & 4001 & 3998 & 15.59 & 15.45 & 15.46 & 1.39 & 0.124 & 0.026 & 0.013 & 0.031 & J \\
3013: 1997Y & NGC 4675 & 3 & 4806 & 4964 & 15.28 & 15.30 & 15.36 & 1.25 & 0.017 & -0.020 & 0.024 & 0.100 & J \\
3014: 1997bp & NGC 4680 & 3 & 2492 & 2647$^{\rm v}$ & 14.12 & 13.92 & 14.09 & 0.97 & 0.044 & 0.185 & 0.286 & 0.036 & AJ \\
3015: 1997bq & NGC 3147 & 4 & 2820 & 2879 & 14.57 & 14.27 & 14.37 & 1.01 & 0.024 & 0.304 & 0.082 & 0.092 & J \\
3016: 1997cw$^{\dagger}$ & NGC 105 & 2 & 5133 & 4782 & 16.00 & 15.52 & 15.33 & 1.02 & 0.073 & 0.434 & 0.335 & 0.233 & J \\
3017: 1997dg & anonymous & 1 & 10193 & 9845 & 17.20 & 17.11 & 17.14 & 1.13 & 0.078 & 0.034 &\nodatr & 0.081 & J \\
3018: 1997do & UGC 3845 & 4 & 3034 & 3140 & 14.56 & 14.46 & 14.59 & 0.99 & 0.063 & 0.065 &\nodatr & 0.044 & J \\
3019: 1997dt & NGC 7448 & 4 & 2194 & 2356$^{\rm v}$ & 15.64 & 15.08 & 14.54 & 1.04 & 0.057 & 0.529 &\nodatr & 0.463 & J \\
3020: 1998V & NGC 6627 & 3 & 5268 & 5148 & 15.88 & 15.71 & 15.62 & 1.06 & 0.196 & -0.001 & -0.018 & 0.066 & J \\
3021: 1998ab$^{\dagger}$ & NGC 4704 & 5 & 8134 & 8354 & 15.94 & 15.93 & 15.98 & 0.88 & 0.017 & 0.026 & 0.070 & 0.141 & J \\
3022: 1998aq & NGC 3982$^{\ast}$ & 3 & 1109 & 1514$^{\rm v}$ & 12.22 & 12.28 & \nodata & 1.12 & 0.014 & -0.051 & -0.053 &\nodatr & Sa \\
3023: 1998bu & NGC 3368$^{\ast}$ & 2 & 897 & 810$^{\rm v}$ & 12.22 & 11.86 & 11.65 & 1.15 & 0.025 & 0.356 & 0.209 & 0.272 & A \\
3024: 1998dh & NGC 7541 & 5 & 2678 & 2766$^{\rm v}$ & 14.24 & 13.98 & 14.04 & 1.23 & 0.068 & 0.210 & 0.090 & 0.061 & J \\
3025: 1998dk & UGC 139 & 5 & 3963 & 3609 & 14.93 & 14.74 & 14.81 & 1.05 & 0.044 & 0.172 & 0.127 & 0.091 & J \\
3026: 1998dm & MCG-01-4-44$\!\!$ & 4 & 1968 & 1976$^{\rm v}$ & 14.70 & 14.48 & 14.28 & 1.07 & 0.044 & 0.201 & 0.259 & 0.258 & J \\
3027: 1998dx & UGC 11149 & -3 & 14990 & 14895 & 17.71 & 17.74 & 17.86 & 1.55 & 0.041 & -0.068 &\nodatr & 0.015 & J \\
3028: 1998ec & UGC 3576 & 3 & 5966 & 6032 & 16.44 & 16.21 & 16.22 & 1.08 & 0.085 & 0.169 &\nodatr & 0.092 & J \\
3029: 1998ef & UGC 646 & 3 & 5319 & 5020 & 15.21 & 15.18 & 15.28 & 0.97 & 0.073 & -0.014 &\nodatr & 0.056 & J \\
3030: 1998eg & UGC 12133 & 5 & 7423 & 7056 & 16.62 & 16.50 & 16.49 & 1.15 & 0.123 & 0.018 &\nodatr & 0.067 & J \\
3031: 1998es$^{\dagger}$ & NGC 632 & 2 & 3168 & 2868 & 13.99 & 13.87 & 14.11 & 0.87 & 0.032 & 0.122 & 0.031 & 0.011 & J \\
3032: 1999X & CGCG 180-22$\!\!\!\!$ & \nodata & 7503 & 7720 & 16.45 & 16.29 & 16.31 & 1.11 & 0.032 & 0.151 &\nodatr & 0.126 & J \\
3033: 1999aa$^{\dagger}$ & NGC 2595 & 5 & 4330 & 4572 & 14.92 & 14.88 & 15.24 & 0.85 & 0.040 & 0.035 & -0.033 & -0.069 & AJ \\
3034: 1999ac$^{\dagger}$ & NGC 6063 & 4 & 2848 & 2944 & 14.34 & 14.28 & 14.32 & 1.00 & 0.046 & 0.042 &\nodatr & 0.113 & J \\
3035: 1999aw & Anon 1101-06$\!\!\!\!$ & \nodata & 11992 & 12363 & 16.86 & 16.84 & 17.24: & 0.81 & 0.032 & 0.025 & -0.076 & -0.083 & SlA \\
3036: 1999cc & NGC 6038 & 5 & 9392 & 9452 & 16.85 & 16.82 & 17.03 & 1.46 & 0.023 & 0.014 &\nodatr & -0.018 & J \\
3037: 1999cl & NGC 4501 & 3 & 2281 & 1179$^{\rm V}$ & 15.11 & 13.89 & 13.08 & 1.19 & 0.038 & 1.201 &\nodatr & 0.634 & J \\
3038: 1999dk & UGC 1087 & 5 & 4485 & 4181 & 15.04 & 14.95 & 15.22 & 1.28 & 0.054 & 0.051 & 0.084 & -0.064 & KA \\
3039: 1999dq$^{\dagger}$ & NGC 976 & 5 & 4295 & 4060 & 14.88 & 14.68 & 14.76 & 0.88 & 0.110 & 0.123 & 0.119 & 0.047 & J \\
3040: 1999ee & IC 5179 & 4 & 3422 & 3163 & 14.93 & 14.61 & 14.66 & 0.92 & 0.020 & 0.332 & 0.237 & 0.135 & St \\
3041: 1999ef & UGC 607 & 5 & 11733 & 11402 & 17.52 & 17.39 & 17.69 & 1.06 & 0.087 & 0.068 &\nodatr & -0.089 & J \\
3042: 1999ej & NGC 495 & 0 & 4114 & 3831 & 15.65 & 15.60 & 15.66 & 1.41 & 0.071 & -0.011 &\nodatr & 0.041 & J \\
3043: 1999ek & UGC 3329 & 4 & 5253 & 5278 & 17.97 & 17.19 & 16.54 & 1.13 & 0.561 & 0.241 &\nodatr & 0.113 & J \\
3044: 1999gd & NGC 2623 & \nodata & 5535 & 5775 & 17.02 & 16.61 & 16.27 & 1.14 & 0.041 & 0.391 &\nodatr & 0.342 & J \\
3045: 1999gh & NGC 2986 & -3 & 2302 & 2314$^{\rm v}$ & 14.46 & 14.27 & 14.25 & 1.69 & 0.058 & 0.129 & 0.046 & 0.076 & J \\
3046: 1999gp$^{\dagger}$ & UGC 1993 & 3 & 8018 & 7806 & 16.25 & 16.10 & 16.43 & 0.94 & 0.056 & 0.125 & 0.027 & -0.071 & AJ \\
3047: 2000B & NGC 2320 & -2 & 5944 & 6020 & 15.94 & 15.77 & 15.94 & 1.46 & 0.068 & 0.109 & 0.028 & -0.030 & J \\
3048: 2000E & NGC 6951 & 3 & 1424 & 1824$^{\rm v}$ & 14.31 & 13.83 & 13.49 & 0.94 & 0.366 & 0.145 & 0.167 & 0.096 & VA \\
3049: 2000bk & NGC 4520 & 0 & 7628 & 7974 & 16.98 & 16.95 & 16.81 & 1.69 & 0.025 & 0.002 & 0.116 & 0.178 & KA \\
3050: 2000ce & UGC 4195 & 3 & 4888 & 4940 & 17.31 & 16.66 & 16.22 & 1.00 & 0.057 & 0.621 & 0.445 & 0.404 & AJ \\
3051: 2000cf & MCG 11-19-25$\!\!\!\!$ & \nodata & 10793 & 10805 & 17.15 & 7.10 & 17.31 & 1.27 & 0.032 & 0.034 &\nodatr & -0.008 & J \\
3052: 2000cn & UGC 11064 & 5 & 7043 & 6969 & 16.82 & 16.63 & 16.71 & 1.58 & 0.057 & 0.135 & -0.061 & 0.024 & J \\
3053: 2000dk & NGC 382 & -3 & 5229 & 4932 & 15.63 & 15.56 & 15.74 & 1.57 & 0.070 & 0.002 & -0.062 & -0.048 & J \\
3054: 2000fa & UGC 3770 & 5 & 6378 & 6533 & 15.99 & 15.95 & 16.12 & 1.00 & 0.069 & -0.001 & 0.044 & 0.013 & J \\
3055: 2001V & NGC 3987 & 3 & 4502 & 4810 & 14.64 & 14.60 & 14.84 & 0.99 & 0.020 & 0.048 & 0.036 & 0.010 & ViM \\
3056: 2001el & NGC 1448 & 5 & 1164 & 1030$^{\rm v}$ & 12.81 & 12.73 & 12.82 & 1.13 & 0.014 & 0.088 & 0.201 & 0.095 & K \\
3057: 2002bo & NGC 3190 & 1 & 1271 & 1547$^{\rm v}$ & 14.04 & 13.58 & 13.52 & 1.13 & 0.025 & 0.457 & 0.311 & 0.180 & B \\
3058: 2002er & UGC 10743 & 3 & 2569 & 2804$^{\rm v}$ & 14.89 & 14.59 & 14.49 & 1.33 & 0.157 & 0.156 & 0.116 & 0.079 & Pi \\
3059: % ***********************************************
3060: % ***********************************************
3061: \tableline
3062: \noalign{\smallskip}
3063: \multicolumn{14}{c}{\footnotesize (b) SNe-91T}\\
3064: \noalign{\smallskip}
3065: \tableline
3066: % ***********************************************
3067: 1991T & NGC 4527$^{\ast}$ & 3 & 1736 &(1179$^{\rm V}$)& 11.69 & 11.50 & 11.62 & 0.94 & 0.022 & 0.199 & (0.064)$^{2)}$ & 0.088 & HA \\
3068: 1995ac & Anon 2245-08 & 1 & 14990 & 14635 & 17.21 & 17.21 & 17.36 & 0.95 & 0.042 & -0.012 & (-0.011)& 0.052 & RPA \\
3069: 1995bd & UGC 3151 & 5 & 4377 & 4326 & 17.27 & 16.50 & \nodata & 0.88 & 0.498 & 0.305 & (0.109) & \nodatr & RA \\
3070: 1997br & ESO 576-40 & 5 & 2085 & 2193$^{\rm v}$ & 14.04 & 13.68 & 13.44 & 1.03 & 0.113 & 0.274 & (0.198) & 0.231 & AJ \\
3071: \noalign{\smallskip}
3072: 2000cx & NGC 524 & -1 & 2379 & 2454$^{\rm v}$ & 13.44 & 13.27 & 13.62 & 0.93 & 0.083 & (0.118) & (-0.228)& -0.105 & AL \\
3073: % ***********************************************
3074: \tableline
3075: \noalign{\smallskip}
3076: \multicolumn{14}{c}{\footnotesize (c) SNe-91bg}\\
3077: \noalign{\smallskip}
3078: \tableline
3079: % ***********************************************
3080: 1991bg & NGC 4374 & -3 & 1060 & 1179$^{\rm V}$ & 14.75 & 13.96 & 13.51 & 1.94 & 0.041 & ---~~ & (0.005)$^{2)}$ & ---~~ & HA \\
3081: 1992K & ESO 269-G57$\!\!\!$& 3 & 3080 & 3334 & 16.31 & 15.42 & 15.16 & 1.94 & 0.101 & ---~~ & (-0.029) & ---~~ & HA \\
3082: 1997cn & NGC 5490 & -3 & 4855 & 5092 & 16.93 & 16.39 & 16.14 & 1.90 & 0.027 & ---~~ & \nodatr & ---~~ & J \\
3083: 1998bp & NGC 6495 & -3 & 3127 & 3048 & 15.73 & 15.25 & 15.01 & 1.83 & 0.076 & ---~~ & (0.059) & ---~~ & J \\
3084: 1998de & NGC 252 & 2 & 4990 & 4671 & 17.56 & 16.80 & 16.48 & 1.94 & 0.058 & ---~~ & (0.053) & ---~~ & AJ \\
3085: 1999by & NGC 2841$^{\ast}$ & 3 & 638 & 896$^{\rm v}$ & 13.66 & 13.15 & 12.91 & 1.90 & 0.016 & ---~~ & (0.011) & ---~~ & G \\
3086: 1999da & NGC 6411 & -3 & 3806 & 3748 & 16.90 & 16.16 & 15.85 & 1.94 & 0.058 & ---~~ & (0.027) & ---~~ & KA \\
3087: \noalign{\smallskip}
3088: 1986G & NGC 5128 & -1 & 547 & 317$^{\rm v}$ & 12.48 & 11.44 & \nodata & 1.69 & 0.115 & (0.922) & (0.489) & \nodatr & A \\
3089: % ***********************************************
3090: \enddata
3091: % ***********************************************
3092: \tablerefs{[A] \citet{Altavilla:etal:04},
3093: [B] \citet{Benetti:etal:04},
3094: [G] \citet{Garnavich:etal:04},
3095: [H] \citet{Hamuy:etal:96b,Hamuy:etal:96c,Hamuy:etal:96d},
3096: [J] \citet{Jha:02},
3097: [K] \citet{Krisciunas:etal:01,Krisciunas:etal:03},
3098: [L] \citet{Li:etal:01c},
3099: [M] \citet{Mandel:etal:01}
3100: [P] \citet{Parodi:etal:00},
3101: [Pi] \citet{Pignata:etal:04},
3102: [R] \citet{Riess:etal:99},
3103: [Sa] \citet{Saha:etal:96,Saha:etal:01b},
3104: [S] \citet{Schaefer:98},
3105: [Sl] \citet{Strolger:etal:02},
3106: [St] \citet{Stritzinger:etal:02},
3107: [V] \citet{Valentini:etal:03},
3108: [Vi] \citet{Vinko:etal:03},
3109: [W] \citet{Wells:etal:94}.}
3110: \tablenotetext{\dagger}{99aa-like SNe\,Ia. See \S~\ref{sec:SNpec:T}.}
3111: \tablenotetext{\ast}{Host galaxies for which a Cepheid
3112: distance is available.}
3113: \tablenotetext{1)}{The SN suffers exceptionally large
3114: absorption in the host galaxy \citep{Bottari:etal:96}; it is not
3115: used in the following.}
3116: \tablenotetext{2)}{The values of $E(B\!-\!V)_{\max35}$ for SNe-91T,
3117: SNe-91bc, and for SN\,2000cx and 1986G are not used in the
3118: following. They are calculated on the assumption that their
3119: intrinsic color $(B\!-\!V)^{00}_{35}$ is given by
3120: equation~(\ref{eq:color:mean:BV35}) as for normal SNe\,Ia.}
3121: % ***********************************************
3122: \end{deluxetable}
3123: % ***********************************************
3124:
3125:
3126:
3127:
3128: \clearpage
3129: \onecolumn
3130: \setlength\oddsidemargin {-0.20cm}%
3131: \setlength\evensidemargin {-0.20cm}%
3132: \setcounter{table}{2}
3133: % ***********************************************
3134: % Table 3: SNe Ia -- derived quantities.
3135: % ***********************************************
3136: \def\baselinestretch{1.1}
3137: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrrrrrc}
3138: \tablewidth{0pt}
3139: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
3140: \tablecaption{Derived parameters of SNe\,Ia. \label{tab:SN3}}
3141: % ***********************************************
3142: \tablehead{
3143: % ***********************************************
3144: \colhead{SN} &
3145: \colhead{$E(B\mbox{-}V)_{\rm h}$}&
3146: \colhead{$(B\mbox{-}V)^{00}$} &
3147: \colhead{$(V\mbox{-}I)^{00}$} &
3148: \colhead{$m^{00}_{B}$} &
3149: \colhead{$m^{00}_{V}$} &
3150: \colhead{$m^{00}_{I}$} &
3151: \colhead{$m^{\rm corr}_{B}$} &
3152: \colhead{$m^{\rm corr}_{V}$} &
3153: \colhead{$m^{\rm corr}_{I}$} &
3154: \colhead{$(m-M)^{00}_{\rm lum}$} \\
3155: %
3156: \colhead{(1)} & \colhead{(2)} &
3157: \colhead{(3)} & \colhead{(4)} &
3158: \colhead{(5)} & \colhead{(6)} &
3159: \colhead{(7)} & \colhead{(8)} &
3160: \colhead{(9)} & \colhead{(10)} &
3161: \colhead{(11)}
3162: }
3163: % ***********************************************
3164: \startdata
3165: % ***********************************************
3166: \multicolumn{11}{c}{\footnotesize (a) normal SNe\,Ia}\\
3167: \noalign{\smallskip}
3168: \hline
3169: % ***********************************************
3170: 1937C & -0.022 & -0.012 &\nodatr & 8.823 & 8.835 &\nodatr & 8.967 & 8.991 &\nodatr & 28.54 \\
3171: 1960F & 0.099 & -0.034 &\nodatr & 11.137 & 11.171 &\nodatr & 11.284 & 11.308 &\nodatr & 30.86 \\
3172: 1972E & -0.050 & -0.006 & -0.316 & 8.444 & 8.450 & 8.767 & 8.462 & 8.486 & 8.774 & 28.04 \\
3173: 1972J & 0.081 & 0.113 &\nodatr & 14.316 & 14.203 &\nodatr & 14.007 & 14.031 &\nodatr & 33.58 \\
3174: 1974G & 0.161 & 0.000 &\nodatr & 11.816 & 11.815 &\nodatr & 11.793 & 11.817 &\nodatr & 31.37 \\
3175: 1980N & 0.019 & 0.030 & -0.332 & 12.334 & 12.304 & 12.637 & 12.175 & 12.199 & 12.504 & 31.75 \\
3176: 1981B & 0.037 & 0.005 &\nodatr & 11.832 & 11.827 &\nodatr & 11.794 & 11.818 &\nodatr & 31.37 \\
3177: 1981D & 0.193 & -0.024 &\nodatr & 11.801 & 11.825 &\nodatr & 11.801 & 11.825 &\nodatr & 31.38 \\
3178: 1982B & 0.129 & 0.057 &\nodatr & 12.917 & 12.860 &\nodatr & 12.958 & 12.982 &\nodatr & 32.53 \\
3179: 1983G & 0.231 & -0.065 &\nodatr & 12.018 & 12.083 &\nodatr & 11.924 & 11.948 &\nodatr & 31.50 \\
3180: 1984A & 0.190 & -0.024 &\nodatr & 11.669 & 11.693 &\nodatr & 11.669 & 11.693 &\nodatr & 31.24 \\
3181: 1989B & 0.311 & 0.007 & -0.162 & 11.075 & 11.068 & 11.223 & 10.925 & 10.949 & 11.105 & 30.50 \\
3182: 1990N & 0.034 & -0.040 & -0.298 & 12.520 & 12.560 & 12.858 & 12.562 & 12.586 & 12.893 & 32.14 \\
3183: 1990O & -0.020 & 0.007 & -0.385 & 16.281 & 16.274 & 16.659 & 16.357 & 16.381 & 16.704 & 35.93 \\
3184: 1990T & 0.019 & -0.152 & -0.104 & 16.983 & 17.135 & 17.239 & 17.053 & 17.077 & 17.332 & 36.63 \\
3185: 1990Y & 0.184 & 0.078 & -0.403 & 16.985 & 16.907 & 17.307 & 16.897 & 16.921 & 17.210 & 36.47 \\
3186: 1990af & 0.007 & 0.028 &\nodatr & 17.739 & 17.712 &\nodatr & 17.404 & 17.428 &\nodatr & 36.98 \\
3187: 1991S & 0.023 & -0.019 & -0.304 & 17.590 & 17.609 & 17.912 & 17.647 & 17.671 & 17.952 & 37.22 \\
3188: 1991U & 0.062 & -0.064 & -0.172 & 16.191 & 16.255 & 16.425 & 16.212 & 16.236 & 16.454 & 35.79 \\
3189: 1991ag & 0.013 & 0.035 & -0.367 & 14.369 & 14.334 & 14.701 & 14.469 & 14.493 & 14.753 & 34.04 \\
3190: 1992A & -0.025 & 0.017 & -0.241 & 12.576 & 12.559 & 12.801 & 12.321 & 12.345 & 12.605 & 31.90 \\
3191: 1992J & 0.027 & 0.036 & -0.230 & 17.547 & 17.511 & 17.741 & 17.145 & 17.169 & 17.432 & 36.72 \\
3192: 1992P & 0.001 & -0.042 & -0.268 & 16.052 & 16.093 & 16.361 & 16.094 & 16.118 & 16.398 & 35.67 \\
3193: 1992ae & 0.056 & -0.012 &\nodatr & 18.268 & 18.280 &\nodatr & 18.138 & 18.162 &\nodatr & 37.71 \\
3194: 1992ag & 0.170 & -0.097 & -0.380 & 15.623 & 15.719 & 16.096 & 15.612 & 15.636 & 16.112 & (35.19) \\
3195: 1992al & -0.040 & -0.054 & -0.271 & 14.598 & 14.651 & 14.923 & 14.624 & 14.648 & 14.952 & 34.20 \\
3196: 1992aq & 0.028 & -0.010 & -0.143 & 19.267 & 19.277 & 19.420 & 18.896 & 18.920 & 19.150 & 38.47 \\
3197: 1992au & -0.045 & 0.068 & -0.343 & 18.265 & 18.197 & 18.540 & 17.840 & 17.864 & 18.205 & 37.41 \\
3198: 1992bc & -0.081 & -0.061 & -0.231 & 15.337 & 15.398 & 15.630 & 15.485 & 15.509 & 15.748 & 35.06 \\
3199: 1992bg & -0.030 & -0.065 & -0.221 & 16.742 & 16.807 & 17.028 & 16.740 & 16.764 & 17.040 & 36.31 \\
3200: 1992bh & 0.060 & -0.032 & -0.228 & 17.369 & 17.402 & 17.629 & 17.357 & 17.381 & 17.623 & 36.93 \\
3201: 1992bk & -0.016 & -0.069 & -0.068 & 18.068 & 18.137 & 18.205 & 17.750 & 17.774 & 17.992 & 37.32 \\
3202: 1992bl & -0.032 & -0.009 & -0.192 & 17.411 & 17.420 & 17.613 & 17.119 & 17.143 & 17.399 & 36.69 \\
3203: 1992bo & -0.007 & 0.000 & -0.136 & 15.774 & 15.774 & 15.911 & 15.396 & 15.420 & 15.632 & 34.97 \\
3204: 1992bp & -0.023 & -0.046 & -0.210 & 18.330 & 18.377 & 18.587 & 18.089 & 18.113 & 18.421 & 37.66 \\
3205: 1992br & 0.010 & 0.034 &\nodatr & 19.196 & 19.162 &\nodatr & 18.795 & 18.819 &\nodatr & 38.37 \\
3206: 1992bs & 0.014 & -0.025 &\nodatr & 18.234 & 18.259 &\nodatr & 18.204 & 18.228 &\nodatr & 37.78 \\
3207: 1993B & 0.054 & -0.073 & -0.234 & 18.188 & 18.261 & 18.494 & 18.099 & 18.123 & 18.447 & 37.67 \\
3208: 1993H & 0.122 & 0.088 & -0.119 & 16.299 & 16.211 & 16.327 & 15.860 & 15.884 & 15.976 & 35.43 \\
3209: 1993L & 0.193 & -0.027 &\nodatr & 12.640 & 12.666 &\nodatr & 12.415 & 12.439 &\nodatr & 31.99 \\
3210: 1993O & -0.031 & -0.092 & -0.158 & 17.685 & 17.777 & 17.936 & 17.635 & 17.659 & 17.922 & 37.21 \\
3211: 1993ac & 0.040 & -0.033 & -0.135 & 17.606 & 17.639 & 17.773 & 17.520 & 17.544 & 17.714 & 37.09 \\
3212: 1993ae & -0.057 & -0.081 & -0.105 & 15.471 & 15.552 & 15.658 & 15.284 & 15.308 & 15.543 & 34.86 \\
3213: 1993ag & 0.044 & 0.024 & -0.303 & 17.682 & 17.657 & 17.960 & 17.526 & 17.550 & 17.832 & 37.10 \\
3214: 1993ah & -0.023 & -0.037 & -0.286 & 16.322 & 16.359 & 16.645 & 16.117 & 16.141 & 16.502 & 35.69 \\
3215: 1994D & -0.040 & -0.062 & -0.146 & 11.916 & 11.978 & 12.124 & 11.814 & 11.838 & 12.064 & 31.39 \\
3216: 1994M & 0.056 & -0.029 & -0.204 & 16.050 & 16.079 & 16.282 & 15.839 & 15.863 & 16.133 & 35.41 \\
3217: 1994Q & 0.035 & 0.028 & -0.338 & 16.243 & 16.215 & 16.552 & 16.329 & 16.353 & 16.597 & 35.90 \\
3218: 1994S & -0.042 & -0.019 & -0.281 & 14.858 & 14.877 & 15.159 & 14.904 & 14.928 & 15.190 & 34.48 \\
3219: 1994T & 0.047 & 0.044 & -0.250 & 17.058 & 17.014 & 17.264 & 16.797 & 16.821 & 17.054 & 36.37 \\
3220: 1994ae & 0.033 & -0.013 & -0.382 & 12.907 & 12.920 & 13.302 & 13.040 & 13.064 & 13.393 & 32.61 \\
3221: 1995D & -0.009 & -0.009 & -0.364 & 13.234 & 13.243 & 13.607 & 13.267 & 13.291 & 13.626 & 32.84 \\
3222: 1995E & 0.647 & 0.046 &\nodatr & 14.347 & 14.301 &\nodatr & 14.244 & 14.268 &\nodatr & 33.82 \\
3223: 1995ak & 0.055 & -0.103 & -0.232 & 15.734 & 15.837 & 16.068 & 15.574 & 15.598 & 15.979 & 35.15 \\
3224: 1995al & 0.071 & 0.025 & -0.362 & 13.043 & 13.018 & 13.379 & 13.138 & 13.162 & 13.431 & 32.71 \\
3225: 1996C & 0.026 & -0.009 & -0.262 & 16.440 & 16.450 & 16.711 & 16.528 & 16.552 & 16.769 & 36.10 \\
3226: 1996X & -0.015 & -0.004 & -0.250 & 13.032 & 13.036 & 13.286 & 12.883 & 12.907 & 13.173 & 32.46 \\
3227: 1996Z & 0.332 & -0.036 &\nodatr & 13.135 & 13.172 &\nodatr & 13.070 & 13.094 &\nodatr & 32.64 \\
3228: 1996ab & 0.101 & -0.013 &\nodatr & 19.040 & 19.053 &\nodatr & 19.173 & 19.197 &\nodatr & 38.75 \\
3229: 1996ai & 1.611 & 0.075 &\nodatr & 11.023 & 10.948 &\nodatr & 11.107 & 11.131 &\nodatr & (30.68) \\
3230: 1996bk & 0.308 & 0.104 &\nodatr & 13.641 & 13.538 &\nodatr & 13.192 & 13.216 &\nodatr & 32.77 \\
3231: 1996bl & 0.042 & -0.034 & -0.225 & 16.550 & 16.584 & 16.808 & 16.551 & 16.575 & 16.812 & 36.13 \\
3232: 1996bo & 0.257 & 0.036 &\nodatr & 14.898 & 14.862 &\nodatr & 14.734 & 14.758 &\nodatr & 34.31 \\
3233: 1996bv & 0.117 & 0.008 & -0.311 & 14.913 & 14.905 & 15.213 & 15.050 & 15.074 & 15.301 & 34.62 \\
3234: 1997E & 0.024 & -0.008 & -0.202 & 14.996 & 15.003 & 15.205 & 14.807 & 14.831 & 15.064 & 34.38 \\
3235: 1997Y & 0.035 & -0.072 & -0.128 & 15.084 & 15.156 & 15.283 & 15.025 & 15.049 & 15.256 & 34.60 \\
3236: 1997bp & 0.169 & -0.013 & -0.451 & 13.322 & 13.335 & 13.782 & 13.394 & 13.418 & 13.831 & 32.97 \\
3237: 1997bq & 0.159 & 0.117 & -0.341 & 13.890 & 13.774 & 14.112 & 13.848 & 13.872 & 14.035 & 33.42 \\
3238: 1997cw & 0.334 & 0.073 & -0.346 & 14.481 & 14.408 & 14.748 & 14.463 & 14.487 & 14.703 & (34.04) \\
3239: 1997dg & 0.057 & -0.045 & -0.207 & 16.670 & 16.716 & 16.922 & 16.667 & 16.691 & 16.927 & 36.24 \\
3240: 1997do & 0.055 & -0.018 & -0.284 & 14.103 & 14.120 & 14.403 & 14.166 & 14.190 & 14.446 & 33.74 \\
3241: 1997dt & 0.496 & 0.007 & -0.189 & 13.595 & 13.588 & 13.768 & 13.611 & 13.635 & 13.768 & 33.19 \\
3242: 1998V & 0.016 & -0.042 & -0.186 & 15.019 & 15.060 & 15.246 & 15.055 & 15.079 & 15.278 & 34.63 \\
3243: 1998ab & 0.079 & -0.086 & -0.177 & 15.581 & 15.667 & 15.842 & 15.759 & 15.783 & 15.990 & (35.33) \\
3244: 1998aq & -0.052 & -0.022 &\nodatr & 12.353 & 12.375 &\nodatr & 12.339 & 12.363 &\nodatr & 31.91 \\
3245: 1998bu & 0.279 & 0.056 & -0.191 & 11.098 & 11.043 & 11.228 & 11.013 & 11.037 & 11.140 & 30.59 \\
3246: 1998dh & 0.120 & 0.072 & -0.307 & 13.522 & 13.451 & 13.755 & 13.377 & 13.401 & 13.619 & 32.95 \\
3247: 1998dk & 0.130 & 0.016 & -0.299 & 14.275 & 14.259 & 14.555 & 14.278 & 14.302 & 14.544 & 33.85 \\
3248: 1998dm & 0.239 & -0.063 & -0.173 & 13.646 & 13.710 & 13.878 & 13.692 & 13.716 & 13.923 & 33.27 \\
3249: 1998dx & -0.026 & -0.045 & -0.139 & 17.638 & 17.683 & 17.822 & 17.377 & 17.401 & 17.641 & 36.95 \\
3250: 1998ec & 0.131 & 0.014 & -0.293 & 15.614 & 15.600 & 15.890 & 15.600 & 15.624 & 15.868 & 35.17 \\
3251: 1998ef & 0.021 & -0.064 & -0.223 & 14.833 & 14.897 & 15.120 & 14.941 & 14.965 & 15.210 & 34.52 \\
3252: 1998eg & 0.043 & -0.046 & -0.206 & 15.959 & 16.005 & 16.211 & 15.944 & 15.968 & 16.207 & 35.52 \\
3253: 1998es & 0.055 & 0.033 & -0.354 & 13.660 & 13.626 & 13.979 & 13.761 & 13.785 & 14.032 & (33.34) \\
3254: 1999X & 0.139 & -0.011 & -0.245 & 15.812 & 15.823 & 16.065 & 15.797 & 15.821 & 16.050 & 35.37 \\
3255: 1999aa & -0.022 & 0.022 & -0.382 & 14.838 & 14.815 & 15.198 & 14.959 & 14.983 & 15.270 & (34.53) \\
3256: 1999ac & 0.077 & -0.063 & -0.202 & 13.869 & 13.932 & 14.133 & 13.957 & 13.981 & 14.209 & (33.53) \\
3257: 1999aw & -0.045 & 0.033 & -0.382 & 16.893 & 16.860 & 17.243 & 17.031 & 17.055 & 17.323 & 36.61 \\
3258: 1999cc & -0.002 & 0.009 & -0.237 & 16.763 & 16.754 & 16.991 & 16.520 & 16.544 & 16.806 & 36.09 \\
3259: 1999cl & 0.918 & 0.264 & -0.451 & 11.605 & 11.341 & 11.773 & 11.351 & 11.375 & 11.495 & (30.93) \\
3260: 1999dk & 0.024 & 0.012 & -0.372 & 14.732 & 14.720 & 15.091 & 14.597 & 14.621 & 14.982 & 34.17 \\
3261: 1999dq & 0.096 & -0.006 & -0.350 & 14.078 & 14.084 & 14.432 & 14.200 & 14.224 & 14.514 & (33.77) \\
3262: 1999ee & 0.234 & 0.066 & -0.385 & 13.992 & 13.927 & 14.307 & 14.040 & 14.064 & 14.312 & 33.61 \\
3263: 1999ef & -0.010 & 0.053 & -0.399 & 17.201 & 17.148 & 17.547 & 17.172 & 17.196 & 17.501 & 36.75 \\
3264: 1999ej & 0.015 & -0.036 & -0.172 & 15.304 & 15.340 & 15.512 & 15.123 & 15.147 & 15.386 & (34.70) \\
3265: 1999ek & 0.177 & 0.042 & -0.313 & 15.023 & 14.981 & 15.291 & 14.959 & 14.983 & 15.223 & 34.53 \\
3266: 1999gd & 0.366 & 0.003 & -0.197 & 15.515 & 15.513 & 15.702 & 15.472 & 15.496 & 15.662 & 35.05 \\
3267: 1999gh & 0.084 & 0.048 & -0.166 & 13.917 & 13.869 & 14.033 & 13.506 & 13.530 & 13.714 & 33.08 \\
3268: 1999gp & 0.027 & 0.067 & -0.438 & 15.922 & 15.855 & 16.293 & 15.957 & 15.981 & 16.288 & (35.53) \\
3269: 2000B & 0.036 & 0.066 & -0.306 & 15.530 & 15.464 & 15.769 & 15.248 & 15.272 & 15.537 & 34.82 \\
3270: 2000E & 0.136 & -0.022 & -0.315 & 12.313 & 12.335 & 12.648 & 12.410 & 12.434 & 12.716 & 31.98 \\
3271: 2000bk & 0.099 & -0.094 & -0.023 & 16.518 & 16.611 & 16.632 & 16.205 & 16.229 & 16.430 & 35.78 \\
3272: 2000ce & 0.490 & 0.103 & -0.281 & 15.287 & 15.184 & 15.456 & 15.261 & 15.285 & 15.395 & 34.84 \\
3273: 2000cf & 0.013 & 0.005 & -0.269 & 16.971 & 16.966 & 17.235 & 16.847 & 16.871 & 17.136 & 36.42 \\
3274: 2000cn & 0.033 & 0.100 & -0.197 & 16.467 & 16.366 & 16.563 & 16.087 & 16.111 & 16.250 & 35.66 \\
3275: 2000dk & -0.036 & 0.036 & -0.224 & 15.473 & 15.438 & 15.662 & 15.144 & 15.168 & 15.406 & 34.72 \\
3276: 2000fa & 0.018 & -0.047 & -0.284 & 15.640 & 15.687 & 15.971 & 15.717 & 15.741 & 16.034 & 35.29 \\
3277: 2001V & 0.032 & -0.012 & -0.308 & 14.443 & 14.454 & 14.761 & 14.502 & 14.526 & 14.799 & 34.08 \\
3278: 2001el & 0.128 & -0.062 & -0.277 & 12.285 & 12.347 & 12.622 & 12.293 & 12.317 & 12.640 & 31.87 \\
3279: 2002bo & 0.316 & 0.119 & -0.390 & 12.783 & 12.665 & 13.048 & 12.666 & 12.690 & 12.917 & 32.24 \\
3280: 2002er & 0.117 & 0.026 & -0.259 & 13.819 & 13.793 & 14.049 & 13.644 & 13.668 & 13.907 & 33.22 \\
3281: % ***********************************************
3282: % ***********************************************
3283: \tableline
3284: \noalign{\smallskip}
3285: \multicolumn{11}{c}{\small (b) SNe\,Ia-T}\\
3286: \noalign{\smallskip}
3287: \tableline
3288: % ***********************************************
3289: 1991T & 0.143 & 0.025 & -0.338 & 11.077 & 11.052 & 11.387 & 11.141 & 11.165 & 11.417 & \\
3290: 1995ac & 0.020 & -0.062 & -0.231 & 16.965 & 17.027 & 17.257 & 17.083 & 17.107 & 17.355 & \\
3291: 1995bd & 0.305 & -0.033 &\nodatr & 14.113 & 14.147 &\nodatr & 14.255 & 14.279 &\nodatr & \\
3292: 1997br & 0.252 & -0.005 & -0.240 & 12.656 & 12.661 & 12.896 & 12.686 & 12.710 & 12.911 & \\
3293: \noalign{\smallskip}
3294: 2000cx & 0.007 & \multicolumn{9}{l}{\hspace*{0.8cm}see Table~6} \\
3295: % ***********************************************
3296: \tableline
3297: \noalign{\smallskip}
3298: \multicolumn{11}{c}{\small (c) SNe\,Ia-bg}\\
3299: \noalign{\smallskip}
3300: \tableline
3301: % ***********************************************
3302: 1991bg & 0.00\tablenotemark{1)} & 0.749 & 0.397 & 14.582 & 13.833 & 13.436 & & & & \\
3303: 1992K & 0.00\tablenotemark{1)} & 0.789 & 0.129 & 15.896 & 15.107 & 14.978 & & & & \\
3304: 1997cn & 0.00\tablenotemark{1)} & 0.513 & 0.215 & 16.819 & 16.306 & 16.091 & & & & \\
3305: 1998bp & 0.00\tablenotemark{1)} & 0.404 & 0.141 & 15.418 & 15.014 & 14.873 & & & & \\
3306: 1998de & 0.00\tablenotemark{1)} & 0.702 & 0.245 & 17.322 & 16.620 & 16.376 & & & & \\
3307: 1999by & 0.00\tablenotemark{1)} & 0.494 & 0.219 & 13.594 & 13.100 & 12.881 & & & & \\
3308: 1999da & 0.00\tablenotemark{1)} & 0.682 & 0.235 & 16.662 & 15.980 & 15.746 & & & & \\
3309: \noalign{\smallskip}
3310: 1986G & \multicolumn{9}{l}{\hspace*{0.8cm}see Table~7} \\
3311: % ***********************************************
3312: \enddata
3313: % ***********************************************
3314: \tablenotetext{1)}{$E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$ assumed to be 0.00 (see
3315: \S~\ref{sec:SNpec:bg}).}
3316: \tablecomments{Negative extinction and absorption corrections in the
3317: host galaxies have been subtracted algebraicly in columns 3-9 in
3318: order not to skew the distribution function and not to shift the
3319: {\em mean\/} value. For the most probable values of {\em
3320: individual\/} SNe\,Ia negative extinctions $E(B\!-\!V)_{\rm host}$
3321: and corresponding absorption corrections should be set to zero.}
3322: % ***********************************************
3323: \end{deluxetable}
3324: % ***********************************************
3325:
3326:
3327: % ******************************************************************
3328: \end{document}
3329: % ******************************************************************
3330: % *********** end of ms.tex ***********
3331: % ******************************************************************
3332:
3333: