1: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
2: %%
3: %% Modified 2004 January 9
4: %%
5: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
6: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
7:
8: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
9: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
10: %% any data that comes before this command.
11:
12: %% The command below calls the preprint style
13: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
14: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
15: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
16: %%
17: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
18:
19: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
20:
21: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
22:
23: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
24:
25: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
26:
27: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
28: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
29: %% use the longabstract style option.
30:
31: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
32:
33: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
34: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
35: %% the \begin{document} command.
36: %%
37: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
38: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
39: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
40: %% for information.
41:
42: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
43: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
44:
45: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
46:
47:
48: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
49: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
50: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
51: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
52: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
53: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
54:
55: %\slugcomment{To appear in {\bf A\&A} Letters}
56: \shorttitle{The Nature of Ultra Luminous X-ray Sources}
57: %\shortauthors{C. M. Guti\'errez, H. Arp \& M. L\'opez-Corredoira}
58: \begin{document}
59: \title{The Nature of Ultra Luminous X-ray Sources}
60: \author{C. M. Guti\'errez$^1$, and M. L\'opez-Corredoira$^{1}$}
61: \affil{\small$^1$Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias, E-38205, La Laguna,
62: Tenerife, Spain (cgc@ll.iac.es, martinlc@iac.es)}
63: %\affil{\small$^3$Astronomisches Institut der Universit\"at Basel.
64: %Venusstrasse 7. CH-4102 Binningen, Switzerland}
65:
66: \begin{abstract}
67:
68: We present spectroscopic observations of six
69: optical counterparts of intermediate luminosity
70: X-ray sources (ULXs) around nearby galaxies.
71: The spectra of the six objects show the presence
72: of broad emission features. The identification
73: of these allow us to classify all of the objects
74: as quasars at higher redshift than their assigned
75: parent galaxy. This is one of the first and
76: largest identifications of such objects using
77: unambigous optical spectral features. These
78: results, in conjuction with previous similar
79: identifications of other sources, indicate that
80: high redshift quasars represent an important
81: fraction of catalogued ULX sources. We estimate
82: the density of such sources and compare this with
83: expectations for a population of randomly
84: distributed background quasars.
85:
86: \end{abstract}
87:
88: \keywords{galaxies: active - quasars: general - X-rays: galaxies}
89:
90: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
91:
92: %% \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
93:
94: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
95:
96: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
97:
98: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
99: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
100: %% use the longabstract style option.
101:
102: \section{Introduction}
103:
104: One of the most intriguing astrophysical objects are the ultraluminous X-ray sources
105: (ULXs) discovered around nearby galaxies
106: by the X-ray satellites {\itshape Einstein}, {\itshape ROSAT}, {\itshape Chandra} and {\itshape XMM--Newton}.
107: Assuming that they are at the same distance as the
108: galaxies that are apparently close to them on the sky, their luminosities in the 0.1--2.4 keV X-ray band are in the range
109: $10^{39}$--$10^{40}$ erg s$^{-1}$, so that they are too luminous to be X-ray
110: cataclysmic binary stars (Pakull \& Mirioni 2002) and too faint to be compared with the
111: typical luminosities of active galactic nuclei.
112: Although much remains to be clarified, several
113: explanations concerning the nature of these objects in terms of globular clusters, HII
114: regions, etc.\ (Pakull \& Mirioni 2002; Angelini, Loewenstein \& Mushotzky 2001; Gao
115: et al.\ 2003; Roberts, Goad, \& Warwick 2003; Wang 2002), or of hypothetical
116: supermassive stars or beamed emission (King et al.\ 2001; K\"ording, Falcke, \&
117: Markoff 2002) have been proposed. Studies with {\itshape XMM--Newton}
118: (Jenkins et al.\ 2004) point to a heterogeneus class of objects whose spectral
119: properties are similar to those of objects with lower X-ray luminosities.
120:
121: A catalogue of ULXs around bright nearby galaxies has been compiled (Colbert \& Ptak
122: 2002, CP02 hereafter) by cross-correlating public archive {\itshape ROSAT} HRI images with a selection of
123: nearby ($cz\le 5000$ km s$^{-1}$) galaxies taken from the RC3 catalogue (de
124: Vaucouleurs et al.\ 1991). The catalogue of ULXs (or IXOs, Intermediate X-ray
125: Objects, in the notation of CP02) comprises 87 objects around 54 bright
126: nearby galaxies. According to the analysis of the CP02 catalogue made
127: by Irwin, Bregman \& Athey (2004) ULXs with luminosities below $\sim 2\times
128: 10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$ can be explained naturally by accretion on to black holes with
129: masses $\sim 10$--20$ M_o$. The analysis of objects with higher X-ray luminosities has
130: revealed that only for parent galaxies of late types is the distribution of objects
131: concentrated towards the galactic centre. Also, according to the analysis of these authors,
132: the number of ULXs is smaller in
133: early type parent galaxies and compatible with the expected number of
134: foreground/background sources, while the
135: number of ULXs around late-type galaxies is larger and requires the existence of a
136: new class of objects within the parent galaxy. The contamination of background
137: objects obviously increases with distance to the parent galaxy; in fact Ptak \&
138: Colbert (2004) have claimed that most of the ULXs listed in the CP02 catalogue at distances
139: from the assumed parent galaxy $\ge 0.5D_{25}$ are probably background objects.
140:
141: These considerations on the nature of ULXs are based on indirect statistical
142: evidence. The confirmation of this evidence with the identification of counterparts in other
143: bands is essential. The number of such optical
144: identifications is still small (e.g.\ Roberts et al.\ 2001; Wu et al.\ 2002; Maseti et al.\ 2003; Liu,
145: Bregman \& Seitzer 2004) and is usually restricted to single galaxies, making
146: statistical studies very difficult. The study presented here includes sources in
147: several galaxies and allows one of the first identifications based
148: on unambiguous spectral features in the optical. We have looked for these
149: counterparts of the ULX sources listed in the CP02 catalogue in the Digital Sky
150: Survey (DSS) images and in the digitalized USNO catalogues. The typical magnitudes of such objects are
151: 18--20 mag in the $b$ band and are therefore bright enough targets for spectroscopic
152: observations with 2 to 4 m telescopes. Previously we have presented (Arp,
153: Guti\'errez \& L\'opez-Corredoira 2004) an analysis of the first three objects
154: observed; two of them (IXO~1 and 2), close to the galaxy NGC~720, resulted in quasars
155: at much higher redshift (0.959 and 2.216 respectively) than the parent galaxy.
156: Given the paucity of quasars in the sky, a misidentification is unlikely. The third
157: one (IXO~5) was associated with an HII region at the redshift of the parent galaxy
158: (NGC~1073). This last object was at the edge of a spiral arm of the parent galaxy,
159: where there are many HII regions. If the identification is correct, these would confirm
160: previous findings (Gao et al.\ 2003) claiming that many of the X-ray sources around
161: the Cartwheel galaxy are associated with HII regions. In this paper, we present the
162: results of new observations of six other cases, all of which also turn out to be quasars at
163: higher redshift than their parent galaxies.
164:
165: \section{Observations and data analysis}
166:
167: We took spectroscopy in January 2004 for the optical counterparts of sources (following the notation of the
168: CP02 catalogue)
169: IXO~33, 45, 58, 69, 71 and 84. The observations were conducted at the William Herschel Telescope
170: (WHT)\footnote{The William Herschel Telescope is operated by the Isaac Newton
171: Group and the IAC in Spain's Roque de los Muchachos Observatory. The observations
172: were done in service time.}. We used the red arm of the ISIS spectrograph with the
173: R158R grism. The slit width was between 1.20 and 1.45 arcsec. We used Cu--Ar and
174: Cu--Ne lamps for wavelength calibration. This provides a sampling of 1.62 \AA\,
175: pixel$^{-1}$ and an effective resolution of 8--10 \AA~(depending on the slit width
176: used and atmospheric seeing). A single image with an exposure
177: time of 1800 s was taken for each object. The spectra were analysed following a standard
178: procedure using IRAF\footnote{IRAF is the Image Reduction and Analysis Facility,
179: written and supported by the IRAF programming group at the national Optical
180: Astronomy Observatories (NOAO) in Tucson, Arizona.} that comprises bias
181: subtraction, extraction of the spectra and wavelength calibration. We used the
182: standard spectroscopic stars Feige~67 (Oke 1990), and BD+26 2606 (Oke
183: \& Gunn 1983) to correct approximately for the response of the configuration to different
184: wavelengths. Given the prohibitive time needed to obtain flat-field images (especially
185: in the blue part of the spectrum), we did not correct for that effect. However, we
186: have checked that this correction would have been very small ($\leq 1$ \%) and would not have
187: affected any of the identifications of the main spectral features reported here.
188:
189: Figure~1 shows the DSS images with the identification of the optical
190: counterpart. Figure~2 presents the spectra taken for these objects. Spectra of
191: four of the objects (IXO~45, 58, 69 and 71) are rather flat while the other two
192: (IXO~33 and 84) rise slightly towards red wavelengths. The main lines in the
193: spectra of objects IXO~33 and 71 are wide Balmer lines (H$_\alpha$ and
194: H$_\beta$) and narrow forbidden OII ($\lambda \lambda 3727$ \AA) and OIII
195: ($\lambda \lambda 4959, \, 5007$ \AA) lines, while the spectra of the other
196: four (objects IXO~45, 58, 69 and 84) are dominated by the wide emission line
197: of Mg II (2798 \AA). All these features are characteristic of quasar spectra.
198: The position of the main emission lines allows unambigous determination of
199: the redshifts of the objects. The uncertainties in the determination of
200: redshift are $\sim$0.001 for objects in which we detect the MgII lines and
201: $\sim$0.0002 for the rest. Table~1 presents a summary of the main properties of
202: the objects and the estimated redshifts.
203:
204: {\bf Other objects in the slit}
205:
206: In three of the cases (IXO~33, 58 and 84) there is more than one
207: object in the DSS very close to the main object and whose position
208: is marginally compatible with that of the X-ray source. In all these cases we
209: positioned the slit crossing these objects also. These are:
210:
211: \begin{itemize}
212:
213: \item Second object near IXO~33: This object, not listed in the USNO catalogue,
214: is nevertheless visible in the DSS plates. It is at a distance $\sim18$ arcsec
215: from the main object. The spectra has absorption features typical of a local
216: cold star.
217:
218: \item Second object near IXO~58: According to the USNO catalogue, this object
219: has 18.8 and 18.5 mag in $b$ and $r$ bands respectively and is at a distance of $\sim$14 arcsec
220: from the main object. We have identified weak Balmer H$_\delta$,
221: H$_\gamma$, H$_\beta$ and H$_\alpha$ lines at z=0.317 in its continuum, which has no strong features. We tentatively
222: identify the spectra as a BL Lac type object.
223:
224: \item Objects near IXO~84: An object at $\sim$18 arcsec from the main one
225: has a very weak continuum in which we detect a narrow emission line at 6843
226: \AA, which we were unable to identify. By chance, the slit also crosses
227: another object at a distance of $\sim$64 arcsec from the main object. It
228: has a spectum typical of an HII region resulting a redshift of $z=0.0525$. The
229: object is extended and, given its redshift and its location near an arm of the
230: galaxy NGC~5774, it seems to be an HII region of this galaxy.
231:
232: \end{itemize}
233:
234: \section{Discussion and conclusions}
235:
236: In the following analysis we also include the three objects IXO~1, 2 and 5 that were observed with the
237: same set-up and presented in Arp et al.\ (2004).
238: The ULXs analysed here have X-ray luminosities in the range
239: $\sim$1--6$\times 10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (assuming
240: that the X-ray sources are at the distance of the putative parent galaxy) and are at projected distances
241: in the range $\sim$0.7--1.9$\times D_{25}$ from the
242: centre of such galaxiex, six of them in elliptical galaxies and three in spirals. All except for one (IXO~5)
243: turn out to be quasars at higher redshift than the assumed parent galaxy.
244: These results extend the findings of Foschini et al.\ (2002) and Maseti
245: et al.\ (2003), who also found optical counterparts of ULXs at a higher
246: redshift than that of the assigned host galaxy, and that other objects obeying the
247: observational criteria used to define ULXs were not included in the CP02
248: compilation because they were previously known high redshift quasars
249: (see the discussion on this in Arp et al.\ 2004). Because our targets were selected
250: among those visible in the DSS, it should be reasonable to
251: deduce that an important fraction (the majority in the case of early-type parent galaxies) of
252: the ULX sources with optical counterparts in the range $\sim$18--20 mag must
253: also be quasars. The only object that has a redshift similar to that of the
254: assigned parent galaxy is IXO~5, which is in a star forming region of
255: the spiral galaxy NGC~1073.
256:
257: It is interesting to compare these results with the statistics of quasars in the
258: field. This analysis is difficult because of the characteristics in terms of
259: completeness, coverage, etc., of the CP02 catalogue and the small size of our
260: sample. A simplistic and rough calculation can be made by considering the optical
261: magnitudes of the quasars detected, and the area surveyed by CP02. The total area
262: enclosed in a circle centred on the parent galaxy and enclosing the ULXs found in
263: our sample is $\sim$500 square arcmin. According to the study by Ptak \& Colbert
264: (2004) only $\sim$10 \% of the RC3 galaxies observed with HRI have at least one ULX,
265: so that the total area surveyed in which the quasars have been found is $\sim$1.5
266: square degrees. From the 2dF Quasar Survey (Croom et al.\ 2004) and the fit presented
267: by L\'opez-Corredoira \& Guti\'errez (2004) to the Boyle et al.\ (2000) data, there
268: are about 0.2, 3, and 17 quasars per square degree brighter than 18, 19 and 20 mag,
269: respectively, in the $b$ band. So, in principle, the inferred distribution of quasars
270: from our measurements is roughly in agreement with expectations for a purely
271: random distribution of background quasars. This would confirm the statistical analysis by Irwin et al.\
272: (2004) and Ptak \& Colbert (2004), who claimed that the distribution of ULXs around
273: early-type galaxies is compatible with expectations from the background
274: population of objects. However, an
275: accurate assesment of this would require a direct
276: comparison with the density of X-ray selected
277: background quasars. In any case, searching for optical counterparts of ULXs and taking their
278: spectra seems to be one of the most promising and unambiguous methods of unravelling the
279: true nature of such objects.
280:
281: \section*{Acknowledgements}
282:
283: We thank H. Arp for fruitful discussions. We also thank the anonymous referees for their comments,
284: and
285: important issues regarding the statistical analysis.
286:
287: \begin{thebibliography}{}
288:
289: \bibitem []{} Arp, H., Guti\'errez, C. M., \&
290: L\'opez-Corredoira, M. 2004, N A\&A Lett., 418, 877
291:
292: \bibitem []{} Boyle, B. J. et al. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 1014
293:
294: \bibitem []{} Colbert, E. \& Ptak, A. 2002,
295: ApJS, 143, 25
296:
297: \bibitem []{} Croom, S. M., Smith, R. J., Boyle, B. J.,
298: Shanks, T., Miller, L., Outram, P. J., \& Loaring, N. S. 2004,
299: MNRAS, 349, 1397
300:
301: \bibitem []{} de Vaucouleurs, G., de Vaucouleurs,
302: A., Corwin, H. G. Jr., Buta, R. J., Paturel, G., \& Pascal, F. 1991,
303: {\it Third reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies.} (New York: Springer) (RC3)
304: Volume 1-3, XII, 2069 pp. 7 figs.. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York
305:
306: \bibitem []{} Foschini, L., et al. 2002, A\&A, 392, 817
307:
308: \bibitem []{} Gao, Y., Wang, Q. D., Appleton, P.
309: N., \& Lucas, R. A. 2003, ApJ, 596, L171
310:
311: \bibitem []{} Irwin, J. A., Gregman, J. N., \& Athey, A. E. 2004, ApJ, 601, L143
312:
313: \bibitem []{} Jerkins, I. P., Roberts, T. P., Warwick, R. S., Kilgard, R. E., \&
314: Ward, M. J. 2004, MNRAS, 349, 404
315:
316: \bibitem []{} King, A. R., Davies, M. B., Ward, M.
317: J., Fabbiano, G., \& Elvis, M. 2001, ApJ,
318: 552, L109
319:
320: \bibitem []{} K\"ording, E., Falcke, H., \& Markoff, S. 2002, A\&A,
321: 382, L13
322:
323: \bibitem []{} Liu, J. F., Bregman, J. N., \& Seitzer, P. 2004, ApJ, 602, 249
324:
325: \bibitem []{} L\'opez-Corredoira, M., \& Guti\'errez, C. M. 2004, A\&A, 421, 407
326:
327: \bibitem []{} Maseti, N., Foschini, L., Ho, L. C., Dadina, M., Di Cocco, G., Malaguti,
328: G., \& Palazzi, E. 2003, A\&A, 406, L27
329:
330: \bibitem []{} Oke, J. B. 1990, AJ, 99, 1621
331:
332: \bibitem []{} Oke, J. B., \& Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713
333:
334: \bibitem []{} Pakull, M. W. and Mirioni, L. 2002, (astro-ph/0202488)
335:
336: \bibitem []{} Ptak, A., \& Colbert, E. 2004, ApJ, 606, 291
337:
338: \bibitem []{} Roberts, T. P., et al. 2001, MNRAS, MNRAS, 325, L7
339:
340: \bibitem []{} Roberts, T. P., Goad, M. R., \& Warwick, R. S. 2003,
341: MNRAS, 342, 709
342:
343: \bibitem []{} Wang, Q. D. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 764
344:
345: \bibitem []{} Wu, H. et al. 2002, ApJ, 577, 738
346:
347: \end{thebibliography}
348:
349: \newpage
350:
351: \begin{figure}
352: %\epsscale{.80}
353: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.38]{f1a.ps}%
354: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.38]{f1b.ps}%
355: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.38]{f1c.ps}
356: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.38]{f1d.ps}%
357: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.38]{f1e.ps}%
358: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.38]{f1f.ps}%
359: \vspace{7mm}
360: \caption{Images of the Digital
361: Sky Survey in the blue filter of 1 square arcminute centred on optical
362: counterparts of the ultraluminous X-ray sources analized in this paper. Names
363: according to the notation by Colbert \& Ptak (2002) are indicated. North is up
364: and East to the left. The small dark line indicate the position of such
365: objects. The grey wide lines indicate the orientation of the slit.}
366: \end{figure}
367:
368: \newpage
369:
370: \begin{figure} \caption{Optical spectra (for clarity, corrected by redshift) of the
371: sources marked on Figure~1. The y-axis is the flux in arbitrary units. The
372: main spectral features and the redshifts estimated for each object are indicated The
373: gaps in the spectra correspond to the position of the telluric A band.}
374: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.60]{f2a.eps}
375: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=.60]{f2b.eps}
376: \end{figure}
377:
378: \newpage
379: \clearpage
380:
381: \begin{deluxetable}{lccclccccc}
382: \tablewidth{0pt}
383: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
384: \tablecaption{Optical counterpart of ULX sources}
385: \tablehead{
386: \colhead{ID} & \colhead{RA (J2000)} & \colhead{Dec (J2000)} & \colhead{$\log \,(L_X)$}
387: & \colhead{ID Gal.} &
388: \colhead{$d$} & \colhead{$d/R_{25}$} & \colhead{$z_g$} & \colhead{$z$} & Object\\
389: & \colhead{(hh:mm:ss.s)}
390: & \colhead{($^\circ$:$^\prime$:$^{\prime \prime}$)} & \colhead{(erg
391: s$^{-1}$)} &
392: & \colhead{(arcmin)}
393: }
394: \startdata
395: IXO~1 & 01:52:49.7 & $-$13:42:11 & 39.1 & NGC~720 & 3.0 & 1.3 & 0.0058 & 2.216 & QSO\\
396: IXO~2 & 01:53:02.9 & $-$13:46:53 & 39.7 & NGC~720 & 2.6 & 1.1 & 0.0058 & 0.959 & QSO\\
397: IXO~5 & 02:43:38.3 & +01:24:13 & 39.1 & NGC~1073 & 1.8 & 0.7 & 0.0040 & 0.0037& HII\\
398: IXO~33 & 09:10:27.0 & +06:59:10 & 39.5 & NGC~2775 & 3.6 & 1.7 & 0.0045 & 0.253& QSO\\
399: IXO~45 & 12:15:15.7 & +33:10:20 & 39.0 & NGC~4203 & 2.7 & 1.6 & 0.0036 & 0.967& QSO\\
400: IXO~58 & 12:29:27.9 & +08:06:34 & 39.4 & NGC~4472 & 8.1 & 1.6 & 0.0033 & 1.194& QSO\\
401: IXO~69 & 12:43:36.8 & +11:30:06 & 39.4 & NGC~4649 & 3.2 & 0.8 & 0.0037 & 1.195& QSO\\
402: IXO~71 & 12:44:09.2 & +11:33:36 & 39.7 & NGC~4649 & 7.1 & 1.9 & 0.0037 & 0.401& QSO\\
403: IXO~84 & 14:53:44.7 & +03:33:30 & 39.4 & NGC~5775 & 3.3 & 1.5 & 0.0056 & 1.365& QSO\\
404: \enddata
405: \tablenotetext{*}{
406: 1. Identification of the ULXs following the Colbert \& Ptak (2002)
407: notation;
408: 2-3. RA (J2000) and Dec (2000) position of the optical counterpart
409: according to the DSS plates and USNO catalogues;
410: 4. Luminosity in the band 0.1-2.4 KeV (in units of erg s$^{-1}$) assuming
411: that the X-ray sources are at the distance of the parent galaxy;
412: 5. Identification of the parent galaxy;
413: 6-7. Angular distance (in arcmin and in units of $R_{25}$ of the central galaxy) between
414: these galaxies and the X-ray source;
415: 8 Redshift of the parent galaxy (taken from the literature);
416: 9. Redshift of the X-ray source as computed in this work. 10. Type of the optical counterpart.
417: The analysys of objects IXO~1, IXO~2 and IXO~5 was presented in Arp et al. (2004).
418: }
419: \end{deluxetable}
420:
421: \end{document}
422:
423:
424:
425:
426:
427:
428:
429:
430:
431:
432:
433: