astro-ph0502344/TN.tex
1: 
2: 
3: \documentclass[twocolumn]{elsart}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: 
6: \def\gW{W}
7: \begin{document}
8: \begin{frontmatter}
9: \title{On the Possibility of Combustion of Neutrons into Strange Quark Matter}
10: 
11: 
12: \author{I.Tokareva$^{1}$} \ead{iya@tx.technion.ac.il} and \author {A.Nusser$^{1,2}$}\ead{adi@physics.technion.ac.il}
13: 
14: \address{$^{1}$Physics Department, Technion, Technion-city, Haifa 32000, Israel\\
15: $^2$ Astrophysics, Oxford University, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RK, UK}
16: 
17: \begin{abstract}
18: It is shown
19: that a conversion of neurons into strange quark matter in
20: neutron stars  is possible by means of a  combustion process with a well-defined front.
21: Conditions for the realization of a specific combustion mode,
22: whether deflagration, detonation, or fast combustion, are discussed
23: for several forms of the  equations of state of neutron and strange matters.
24: \end{abstract}
25: 
26: \begin{keyword}
27: % keywords here, in the form: keyword \sep keyword
28: Neutron stars \sep dense matter\sep combustion
29: % PACS codes here, in the form: \PACS code \sep code
30: \PACS 97.60.Jd \sep 95.30.Lz \sep 26.60.+c \sep 12.39.Ba
31: \end{keyword}
32: \end{frontmatter}
33: %\pub{Received (received date)}{Revised (revised date)}
34: 
35: 
36: \section{Introduction}
37: Recently, the possibility of  emergence end existence of   strange
38: quark stars has been intensively discussed in the literature
39: \cite{Alcoc,Olinto}. A likely origin for strange stars is the
40: conversion of neutrons into strange quark matter in neutron stars
41: \cite{Witt,Alcoc}. The process
42:   is accompanied
43: by a powerful release of energy (of about $10^{53}$ erg) since
44: nascent light quarks acquire relativistic temperature
45: \cite{Alcoc,Olinto}.
46:  Cooling of high-temperature strange stars has been
47:  proposed as a mechanism of intensive neutrino and
48: $\gamma$-ray emission (see \cite{Hat,Usov}, and references therein).
49: There is mounting, albeit controversial, observational evidence for
50: the existence of strange stars. Likely candidates to be strange
51: stars are the the compact objects 3C58
52:  and RX J1856.5-3754.\cite{Helfand,Drake}.
53:  The possibility to detect indirectly strange quark stars (that  may be
54: formed after SNe explosions)  by their effect on the SN-ejecta and
55: connections between  the formation of strange stars and GRBs were
56: discussed in \cite{Ouyed1,Ouyed2}. Recently, the authors of
57: paper~\cite{Haen} have pointed out that a soft gamma ray
58: precursor, like GRB980425/SN1998bw, detected by Swift could
59: provide evidence for the formation of a quark star.
60: 
61:  Hydrodynamical considerations
62: lead to the conclusion that the conversion is likely to proceed in
63: the form of combustion with a well defined front \cite{HB,Ben,TNGF}.
64:   General conditions under which
65: combustion in neutron stars may occur have been discussed  in
66: paper
67:  ~\cite{Ng}. Based on the conservation laws of hydrodynamics
68:  the authors of that paper have
69: investigated the necessary  conditions for  combustion for a wide
70: ranges of values for bag constant $B$  of the quark matter
71: equation of state   and the density of the neutron matter (NM).
72: They have argued that neither slow combustion (deflagration) nor
73: detonation may be realized. Their analysis, however,
74: assumed that the energy per baryon must be smaller in the quark
75: matter after the conversion. This assumption is correct only if
76: one ignores the kinetic and internal energies gained by the quark
77: at the combustion front.
78: 
79: In this paper we show that all combustion modes are possible and
80: present the relevant constraints on the parameters of the neutron
81: and quark matter equations of state.
82: \section{Conservation laws}
83: Our strategy is to assume the existence of a combustion front and
84: then assess the necessary conditions for its preservation and the
85: realization of specific combustion modes. Let $v_i$, $n_{i}$, $p_i$,
86: and, $\varepsilon_i$ be, respectively,
87:  the  velocity relative to the front, the baryon number density,
88:   the pressure, and energy density, where the subscript $``i''$ is either
89:  $``n"$ or $ ``s"$  referring to NM
90: or strange quark matter (SM), respectively. In a frame of reference
91: moving with the combustion front, the state of NM and SM at both
92: sides of the front are related by the equations of baryon flux
93: conservation,
94: \begin{equation}
95:  \label{cond3}
96: {n_s}{v_s}{\gW_s}={n_n}{v_{n}}{\gW _{n}},
97: \end{equation}
98: {\rm the\, momentum\, flow\, conservation,\begin{equation}
99: \label{cond1} \omega_s v_s  \gW_s ^{2} = \omega_{n} v_{n}  \gW
100: _{n}^{2};
101: \end{equation}
102:  and  energy flow conservation,
103: \begin{equation}
104: \label{cond2}
105:  \omega_s v_s^{2}  \gW_s ^{2} + p_s = \omega_{n}
106: v_{n}^{2} \gW _{n}^{2}+p_n,
107: \end{equation}
108:  where
109: $\omega_i=p_i + \varepsilon_i $ is the  specific enthalpy and
110: $W_i=1/\sqrt{1-v_i^2}$ is Lorentz factor~\cite{Land}. These
111: conservation laws allow us to express the velocities $v_{n}$ and
112: $v_{s}$ in terms of the energy density and pressure of NM and SM
113: as follows,
114: \begin{equation}
115: v_s^2=\frac{(p_s-p_n)(\varepsilon_n+p_s)}{(\varepsilon_s-\varepsilon_n)(\varepsilon_s+p_n)},\qquad
116: \label{eq:vels}
117: \end{equation}
118: \begin{equation}
119: v_n^2=\frac{(p_s-p_n)(\varepsilon_s+p_n)}{(\varepsilon_s-\varepsilon_n)(\varepsilon_n+p_s)}.
120: \label{eq:veln}
121: \end{equation}
122: The conservation laws also yield,
123: \begin{equation}
124: n_s^2=n_n^2\frac{(\varepsilon_s+p_s)(\varepsilon_s+p_n)}{(\varepsilon_n+p_n)(\varepsilon_n+p_s)}
125: \, . \label{eq:den}
126: \end{equation}
127: 
128: 
129: \section{Equations of State}
130:  To make progress, we have to adopt specific forms for the equations of
131:  state of NM and SM.
132: We will assume the  ideal gas approximation for the quark SM with
133: temperature $T$ and chemical potential $\mu$, with vanishing quark
134: masses $m_q=0$ and a  strong coupling constant $\alpha_s=0$. The
135: MIT bag model equation of state (EOS)~\cite{cleim} for this matter
136: is expressed as follows\footnote{\footnotesize For the SM, $T$,
137: $\mu$ are measured in $\rm fm^{-1}$ and $\varepsilon$ and $P$ in
138: $\rm fm^{-4}$, while for the NM $\varepsilon $ and $p$ are in $\rm
139: Mev\; fm^{-3}$. },
140: \begin{eqnarray}
141:  \varepsilon_{s} = {\frac{{19}}{{12}}}\pi ^{2}T^{4} +
142: {\frac{{9}}{{2}}}T^{2}\mu ^{2} + {\frac{{9}}{{4\pi ^{2}}}}\mu ^{4}
143: + B,\, \nonumber\\
144: p_s = \frac{19}{36}\pi ^{2}T^{4} +\frac{3}{2}T^{2}\mu
145: ^{2}+\frac{3}{4\pi ^{2}}\mu
146: ^4 - B;\nonumber \\
147: n_s = T^{2}\mu + {\frac{{1}}{{\pi
148: ^{2}}}}\mu ^{3},\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\nonumber\\
149: \label{eos1}s_s = {\frac{{19}}{{9}}}\pi ^{2}T^{3} + 3T\mu
150: ^{2},\qquad\qquad\qquad\;
151: \end{eqnarray}
152: where $B$ is the MIT bag constant.
153:  The sound speed in such matter
154: is defined as $(\partial p/
155: \partial \varepsilon )_{s} \equiv c_{s}^{2}$.
156: It is easy to see that the sound speed is $c_{s} = 1 / \sqrt {3}
157: $.
158: \begin{figure}[h]
159: \includegraphics[width=75mm,height=65 mm]{3_EOS.eps}
160: \caption{{\footnotesize Dependence of the energy density and
161:  the pressure on the baryon density of zero-temperature NM for
162:  the  FD  (dott-dashed line),
163:  BJ  (dotted line), and the LR (dashed line) equations of state.}}
164:  \label{feos}
165:  \end{figure}
166: 
167: For the NM we will work with the following three forms  for the EOS,
168: \begin{itemize}
169: \item the zero-temperature ideal Fermi-Dirac (FD) neutron gas EOS~\cite{ShapT}
170:  \begin{equation}
171: \varepsilon_n =m_n\,n_n+119\,n_n^{5/3}\,,
172:   \end{equation}
173:   \begin{equation}
174: p_n =79.3\;n_n^{5/3}\,;
175:  \end{equation}
176:  \item the zero-temperature Bethe-Johnson (BJ) EOS~\cite{ShapT}
177:   \begin{equation}
178:   \varepsilon_n=236\;n_n^{2.54}+m_n\,n_n\,,
179:     \end{equation}
180:   \begin{equation}p_n=364\;n_n^{2.54}\,;
181:    \end{equation}
182:    where $m_n$ is neutron mass in MeV.
183:    \item finite temperature Lattimer - Ravenhall (LR) EOS~\cite{LR}
184:    $$\varepsilon_n=d_1\tau+d_2\tau n_n+
185: \frac{1}{4}d_3 n_n^{2}+d_4 n_n^{3},
186:   $$
187:   $$p_n=\frac{2}{3}d_1\tau+\frac{5}{3}d_2\tau n_n+ \frac{1}{4}d_3
188: n_n^{2}+2d_4 n_n^{3},
189:    $$
190:     \begin{equation}
191:    n_n=\frac{1}{2 \pi^2}\left(\frac{2m^{\star}}{\hbar\beta}
192:    \right)^{3/2}F_{1/2}(y),
193:    \end{equation}
194:  where $\tau$  is the baryonic kinetic energy density
195: \begin{equation}\tau=\frac{1}{2 \pi^2}\left(\frac{2m^{\star}}{\hbar^2\beta}\right)
196:    ^{5/2}F_{3/2}(y)\; ,
197: \end{equation}
198:    $m^{\star} $ is effective mass of the neutron given by
199:    \begin{equation}   \hbar^2/2m^{\star}=d_1+d_2n_n\; ,
200: \end{equation}
201:    and $F_i(y)$ is Fermi integral,
202: \begin{equation} F_{i}(y)=\int_0^{\infty}\frac{u^idu}{\exp(u+y)+1}\; .
203:  \end{equation}
204:  The coefficients have the values $d_1=20.75\, {\rm Mev\, fm}^2,\;
205:  d_2 =-8\,{\rm Mev\,fm}^5,\, d_3=-752.27\,{\rm Mev\, fm}^3,$ $d_4 = 466.6\,
206:  {\rm Mev\, fm}^6;\;  \beta=1/k_BT$.
207: \end{itemize}
208: Fig.\ref{feos} is an  illustration of these three choices
209: for the  NM EOS.
210: 
211: \section{Constraints}
212: 
213: For a given set of the the parameters, $T_{n}$, $T$, $n_{n}$, and
214: $B$, the  EOS of the NM uniquely determines  $\varepsilon_{n}$ and
215: $p_{n}$, while the SM EOS  can be used to obtain $\varepsilon_{s}$
216: and $p_{s}$ as a function of $\mu$. Further, by substitution in the relation
217: (\ref{eq:den})
218:  the value of strange matter chemical potential $\mu$ may be  derived.
219:  Typically,
220:  there are
221: several roots for (\ref{eq:den}), but only one  satisfying the
222: physical condition $\mu>0$. Once $\mu$ is obtained the relations
223: (\ref{eq:vels}) and (\ref{eq:veln}) yield $v_s^2$ and $v_n^{2}$,
224: respectively. For any given $T_{n}$, $T_{s}$, $n_{n}$, and $B$
225: combustion is possible whenever $v_{n}^{2}$ and $ v_{s}^{2}$ are
226: positive and less than unity. Once this occurs three modes of
227: combustion are identified as follows:
228: \begin{figure*}[t]
229: \includegraphics[width=130mm,height=75 mm]{fd.eps}
230: \caption{ {\footnotesize The different regions of combustion of FD
231: NM into SM with $T_s=10$ and $T_s=60$ MeV as indicated in the
232: panels. The regions of the detonation, ``super-sonic'' combustion
233: (from the viewpoint $v_s>c_s$), and deflagrations are bounded by
234:  solid lines,  dotted  line, and dashed lines, respectively.
235:  Regions which are not explicitly
236:  labeled represent physically unacceptable solutions.}}
237:  \label{fig1}
238: \end{figure*}
239: \begin{itemize}
240: \item detonation: $p_s>p_n$, $c_n\le v_n \le 1$ and $v_s \le c_s$;
241: \item deflagration: $v_n<c_n$ and $p_s<p_n$.
242: \item ``super-sonic'' combustion$p_s>p_n$, $c_n\le v_n \le 1$ and $c_s<v_s<1 $
243: \end{itemize}
244: Figs.~(\ref{fig1})-(\ref{fig3}) illustrate the regions in the $n_{n}-B$ plane
245: in which the  various combustion modes occur, for a few representative
246: values of $T_{s}$.
247:  Fig.\ref{fig1} shows results for the FD EOS.
248:  We can see that all modes of combustion may be realized for
249:  a wide range of the parameters. Regions which are not explicitly
250:  labeled represent physically unacceptable solutions having any of the following
251:  cases: imaginary
252:  baryon flux; $v_n<c_n,\; v_q>c_n$
253:   (absolutely unstable combustion); $p_s <p_n$ and $v_n>c_n$; $p_{s}>p_{n}$ and $v_n<c_n$
254:   (see ~\cite{Land}).
255: 
256: 
257:  Fig.~\ref{fig2}
258:  presents the combustion regions   for BJ
259: EOS for different temperatures. We can see again conditions for
260: deflagration, detonation  and ``super-sonic''  combustion. Results
261: for LR EOS are shown in Fig.\ref{fig3}. They only slightly  differ
262: from those of BJ EOS.
263: \begin{figure*}[t]
264: \includegraphics[width=130mm,height=75 mm]{bj.eps}
265: \caption{ Combustion regions for  BJ EOS NM $T_s=47$ (panel to the left)
266: and $T_{s} =60$  MeV (to the right). The
267: notation of the lines is the same as in the previous figure.}
268:  \label{fig2}
269: \end{figure*}
270: \begin{figure*}[t]
271: \includegraphics[width=130mm,height=75mm]{LR.eps}
272: \caption{{\footnotesize  The combustion regions
273: for the  LR EOS with  $T_{s}=60$  Mev and $T_{n}=0$ (panel to the left) and
274: $T_{n}=30$ Mev (to the right).
275: The notation of the line is the same as in the two previous figures. }}
276:  \label{fig3}
277: \end{figure*}
278: 
279: \section{Discussion}
280: We have shown that
281:  conversion of neutrons
282: into strange quark matter  in a combustion mode with a well defined front
283:  is possible for
284: a wide range of the parameters, $T_{s}$, $n_{n}$, $T_{n}$, and $B$.
285:  The
286: concrete type of the process  depends on the values of these parameters and the
287:  equation of state of neutron. The results of the current work
288: differ from   paper~\cite{Ng} which assume that  the energy per
289: baryon in the strange matter ($\varepsilon_s/n_s$) must be less than
290: the energy per baryon ($\varepsilon_n/n_n$) in neutron matter.
291: However,  the energies $\varepsilon_{s}$ and $\varepsilon_{n}$
292: contain thermal contributions in addition to the rest energies of
293: the baryons and therefore the condition,  $\varepsilon_n/n_n>
294: \varepsilon_s/n_s$, does not necessarily  hold in general.
295: 
296: 
297: In the current paper we have treated $T_{s}$ as a free parameter.
298: Physically, the value of $T_{s}$ is affected by the details of the
299: initial conditions for the conversion process. In a subsequent
300: paper, we will discuss in detail, possible constraints on this
301: parameter assuming that seed strange matter is initially generated
302: by means of quantum nucleation~\cite{Bomb1,Bomb}.
303: \section{Acknowledgements}
304: I.T. thanks V.Gurovich for useful
305: discussions.
306: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
307: \bibitem{Alcoc}
308: C.Alcock , E.Farhi and  A.Olinto ,  ApJ  {\bf 310}, 261,(1986)
309: \bibitem{Olinto}A. Olinto,  Phys. Lett. {\bf B192}, 71 (1987).
310: \bibitem{Witt}
311: E. Witten, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D30}, 272 (1984).
312: \bibitem{Hat}
313: T.Hatsuda, Modern Phys. Lett. A 2,  805 (1987)
314: \bibitem{Usov}
315:  V.V. Usov, ApJ.{\bf559}, L135, (2001)
316:  \bibitem{Helfand}
317: P.O.Slane,D.J.Helfand,  S.S.Murray, 2002, ApJ {\bf 571}, L45
318: \bibitem{Drake}
319: J.J.Drake,  H. L.Marshall,   S.Dreizler,  P. E.Freeman,
320: A.Fruscione, M.Juda,   V.Kashyap, F.Nicastro,  D. O.Pease, B. J.
321: Wargelin,  K. Werner,  ApJ {\bf 572}, 996 (2002).
322: \bibitem{Ouyed1}
323: R.Ouyed, J.Dey, M.Dey, A\&A, {\bf 390},L39, (2002)
324: \bibitem{Ouyed2}
325: R.Ouyed, \O.Elgar\o y, H.Dahle, P.Ker\"{a}nen,A\&A, {\bf 420},1025
326: (2004).
327: \bibitem{Haen}B. Paczynski, P. Haensel,astro-ph/0502297, to be
328: published  in Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
329: \bibitem{HB} J.E.Horvath, O.G.Benvenuto,  Phys. Lett. {\bf B 213}, 516(1988).
330: \bibitem{Ben}O.G. Benvenuto, J.E.Horvath, H.Vucetich,
331:   IJMP {\bf A4}, 257 (1989).
332: \bibitem{TNGF}I.Tokareva, A.Nusser,V.Gurovich, V.Folomeev, to
333: be published in IJMP{\bf D}
334: \bibitem{Ng} H.T.Cho, K.W.Ng, Ac. D. Speliotopoulos,
335:  Phys. Lett. {\bf B 326},111 (1994).
336: \bibitem{Land}L.Landau, E.Lifshitz, {\it Fluid mechanics},
337:  (Pergamon,Oxford,1987).
338: \bibitem{cleim}J.Cleymans, R.Gavai, E.Suhonen, Phys. Rep. {\bf 130},
339: 217 (1986).
340: \bibitem{ShapT} S.L.Shapiro, S.A.Teulkolsky,
341:  {\it Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars -
342:   the physics of compact objects}, (Wiley-Interscience, New York,1983).
343: \bibitem{LR}J.M.Lattimer, D.G.Ravenhall, Astrophys. J.{\bf 223}, 314 (1978)
344: \bibitem{Lug}G.Lugones  ,   O.G.Benvenuto and  H.Vucetich ,
345:  Phys. Rew. {\bf D50}, 6100 (1994).
346: \bibitem{Land1} L.Landau, E.Lifshitz,
347: {\it The classical theory of fields}, (Pergamon, Oxford, 1975).
348: \bibitem{Bomb1}Z.Berezhiani, I.Bombaci, A.Drago, F.Frontera, and
349: A.Lavagno,{\it ApJ} {\bf 586}, 1250 (2003)
350: \bibitem{Bomb}I.Bombaci,
351: I.Parenti, I.Vidana,
352:  Astrophys.J. {\bf 314}, 614 (2004)
353: \end{thebibliography}
354: \end{document}
355: