1: \documentclass[apjl]{emulateapj}
2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
5:
6: \newcommand{\kev}{keV}
7: \newcommand{\fe}{Fe~K$\alpha$}
8: \newcommand{\etal}{et al.}
9: \newcommand{\fourc}{4C+74.26}
10: \newcommand{\mcg}{MCG--6-30-15}
11: \newcommand{\ergcms}{erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$}
12: \newcommand{\xmm}{\textit{XMM-Newton}}
13:
14: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
15: \slugcomment{Accepted by ApJ Letters}
16:
17: \shorttitle{Untruncated accretion disk in \fourc}
18: \shortauthors{Ballantyne \& Fabian}
19:
20: %\usepackage{onecolfloat5}
21: \usepackage{times}
22: \usepackage{graphicx}
23:
24: \begin{document}
25:
26: \title{Evidence for an Untruncated Accretion Disk in the broad-line
27: radio galaxy \fourc}
28:
29: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
30: %% author and affiliation information.
31:
32: \author{D. R. Ballantyne\altaffilmark{1} and A. C. Fabian\altaffilmark{2}}
33: \altaffiltext{1}{Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics,
34: McLennan Labs, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3H8;
35: ballantyne@cita.utoronto.ca}
36: \altaffiltext{2}{Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge,
37: U.K. CB3 0HA; acf@ast.cam.ac.uk}
38:
39: \begin{abstract}
40: We present evidence for a broad, ionized \fe\ line in the \xmm\
41: spectrum of the broad-line radio galaxy (BLRG) \fourc. This is the
42: first indication that the innermost regions of the accretion flow in
43: BLRGs contain thin, radiatively efficient disks. Analysis of the 35~ks
44: \xmm\ observation finds a broad line with an inner radius close to the
45: innermost stable circular orbit for a maximally spinning black
46: hole. The outer radius of the relativistic line is also found to be
47: within 10~gravitational radii. The \fe\ line profile gives an
48: inclination angle of $\sim 40$\degr, consistent with the radio
49: limit. There are two narrow components to the \fe\ complex: one at
50: 6.4~\kev\ from neutral Fe, and one at 6.2~\kev. These may form the
51: blue and red horns of a diskline from farther out on the disk, but a
52: longer observation is required to confirm this hypothesis. We discuss
53: the implications of this observation for models of jet production, and
54: suggest that BLRGs and radio-loud quasars will have larger than
55: average black hole masses, thus resulting in thicker accretion flows
56: close to the black hole.
57: \end{abstract}
58:
59: \keywords{accretion, accretion disks --- galaxies: active ---
60: galaxies: individual (\fourc) --- galaxies: jets --- X-rays: galaxies}
61:
62: \section{Introduction}
63: \label{sect:intro}
64: A long-standing problem in modern astrophysics is to understand the
65: production of large-scale, relativistic jets. In terms of the active
66: galactic nuclei (AGN) phenomenon, this problem has traditionally
67: manifested itself as understanding the underlying physical difference
68: between the majority radio-quiet population and the minority
69: radio-loud sources \citep[e.g.][]{kel89,wc95}. A potentially promising
70: way to elucidate this difference is to compare X-ray observations of
71: the two populations, since the X-rays originate from the inner regions
72: of the accretion flow, as do relativistic jets
73: \citep{bz77,bp82,koi04}. Studies of broad-line radio galaxies (BLRGs)
74: with \textit{ASCA}, \textit{RXTE} and \textit{BeppoSAX} seemed to
75: indicate that they had weaker reflection features and \fe\ lines then
76: their radio-quiet Seyfert~1 counterparts
77: \citep*{eh98,woz98,era00}. This could be explained if BLRGs contain a
78: truncated accretion flow, where the geometrically thin, radiatively
79: efficient accretion disk transforms close to the black hole into an
80: thicker, tenuous and radiatively inefficient configuration such as an
81: ADAF \citep[e.g.,][]{ny95}. This idea has some theoretical
82: justification as models of jet production have emphasized the
83: importance and connection of the polodial magnetic field to the inner
84: accretion flow \citep*{mei99,lop99,mei01,lpk03}. Furthermore, Galactic
85: black holes show radio emission (and, when resolved, jet structure)
86: only in the low-luminosity 'hard' or 'power-law dominated' state
87: \citep*[e.g.,][]{fbg04} where the accretion rate is expected to be
88: very low compared to the Eddington rate.
89:
90: An alternative explanation for the weak reflection features observed
91: in BLRGs was put forward by \citet*{brf02}, who suggested an origin in
92: an ionized non-truncated accretion disk. This might be expected if the
93: accretion rate was a much larger fraction of Eddington. More
94: sensitive observations of BLRGs by \xmm\ were expected to discriminate
95: between the two explanations, but, until now, the results have been
96: inconclusive (NGC~6251, \citealt{gli04}; 3C~120, \citealt*{bfi04};
97: 3C~111, \citealt{lew05}). In this Letter, we present the first
98: evidence, in the form of a broad \fe\ line, for an untruncated
99: accretion disk in a luminous BLRG. The line is broad enough to require
100: emission within the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) of a
101: Schwarzschild black hole, and, along with the reflection continuum, is
102: well fit by a moderately ionized reflector. Thus, this observation may
103: provide important constraints on the geometry of the inner accretion
104: flow in jet producing systems.
105:
106: In the next section, we provide a brief introduction to the BLRG
107: \fourc, and then describe the \xmm\ observation and data reduction in
108: \S~\ref{sect:obs}. The spectral analysis is presented in
109: \S~\ref{sect:results}, and then we discuss the implications of the
110: results in the final section. Throughout this paper, a \textit{WMAP}
111: cosmology ($H_0=70$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.73$,
112: $\Omega_0=1$; \citealt{spe03}) is assumed.
113:
114: \section{The Broad-line Radio Galaxy \fourc}
115: \label{sect:fourc}
116: \fourc\ ($z=0.104$; \citealt{ril88}) is a low luminosity radio-loud
117: quasar notable for its 10\arcmin\ radio lobes \citep{ril88}. A
118: one-sided jet has been detected by the VLA \citep{rw90} and at pc
119: scales by VLBI \citep{pear92}. The lack of a counter jet gives a limit
120: to the inclination angle of $i \la 49$\degr\ \citep{pear92}. The
121: total radio luminosity of the source places it on the border between
122: the FRI/II classes, although the observed structure is similar to a
123: FRII source \citep{ril88}. \citet{wu02} quote a bolometric luminosity of $L_{\mathrm{bol}} \approx 2\times
124: 10^{46}$~ergs~s$^{-1}$. Optical spectra of \fourc\ show very broad
125: permitted lines, with \citet{cor97} measuring a H$\beta$ FWHM of
126: 11,000~km~s$^{-1}$, although other authors give values closer to
127: 8000~km~s$^{-1}$ \citep{ril88,brink98,rob99}. Using the \citet{cor97}
128: value of the FWHM and the \citet{kas00} radius-luminosity relation,
129: \citet{wu02} estimate the black hole mass in \fourc\ to be $\sim
130: 4\times 10^9$~M$_{\odot}$.
131:
132: A 23~ks \textit{ASCA} observation of \fourc\ yielded inconclusive
133: results despite three separate analyses. \citet{brink98} and
134: \citet{rt00} uncovered a \fe\ line at the ~97\% level, but
135: \citet{sem99} claimed the line was significant at $>99$\%. The data
136: could not determine if the line was broadened. The spectrum showed
137: evidence for hardening at high energies, which \citet{sem99} fit by a
138: separate power-law component, attributed to jet emission. When the
139: data was fit by reflection models, reflection fractions much greater
140: than unity were found ($R \sim 6$, \citealt{brink98}; or $R \sim 3$,
141: \citealt{rt00}). An unresolved line was clearly detected in the 100~ks
142: \textit{BeppoSAX} observation reported by \citet*{hse02}. The broadband
143: fits indicated a Compton reflection component at the 98.7\% level with
144: $R \sim 1$. This fact, along with the flat light
145: curve at high energies, shows that the X-rays are not significantly
146: contaminated by jet emission.
147:
148: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
149: \label{sect:obs}
150: \xmm\ \citep{jan01} observed \fourc\ during revolution 762 between
151: 2004 February 6 13:57:42 and 2004 February 6 23:22:54. The European
152: Photon Imaging Camera (EPIC), comprising of two MOS \citep{tur01} and
153: one pn \citep{str01} detectors, was operated in large window mode with
154: the medium optical filter in place. Calibrated event lists were
155: extracted from the observation data files using the standard
156: processing chains (\textsc{epchain} and \textsc{emchain}) provided by
157: the \xmm\ Science Analysis System (SAS) v.6.1. A circular region with
158: radius 115\arcsec\ (as suggested by the SAS `extraction optimizer')
159: was employed to extract a pn spectrum of \fourc\ that included both
160: single and double events. The background spectrum was extracted from a
161: source free area on the same CCD using a circular region with a radius
162: of 60\arcsec. Contamination from a background flare $\sim 22$~ks into
163: the observation was removed with the use of a good-time interval file.
164: The SAS task \textsc{epatplot} confirmed that the pn spectrum was free
165: from pileup, but found evidence for it in the MOS spectra. These data
166: were thus excluded from spectral analysis. The final, background
167: subtracted pn spectrum contains 252 050 counts obtained in 28.8~ks of
168: good exposure time, for a mean count rate of 8.6~s$^{-1}$. The
169: response matrix and ancillary response file for the pn spectrum were
170: generated using the \textsc{rmfgen} and \textsc{arfgen} tools within
171: the SAS.
172:
173: \section{Spectral Analysis}
174: \label{sect:results}
175: As this paper is concentrating on the \fe\ region of the spectrum, we
176: restrict our analysis to the 2--12~\kev\ region of the pn data (full
177: broadband fits will be presented in a forthcoming paper). Prior to spectral
178: analysis, the data were grouped to have a minimum of 20 counts per
179: bin. Model fitting was performed with XSPEC v.11.3.1p
180: \citep{arn96}. The uncertainties quoted on the best-fit parameters are
181: the 2$\sigma$ errorbars for one parameter of interest (i.e. $\Delta
182: \chi^2 = 2.71$). The Galactic absorption column of $1.19\times
183: 10^{21}$~cm$^{-2}$ \citep{dl90} is included in all the spectral fits
184: presented below, and is modeled with the \textsc{tbabs} code
185: \citep*{wam00} within XSPEC. All energies are quoted in the rest
186: frame, while the figures are plotted in the observed frame.
187:
188: To get an overall sense of the \fe\ region in \fourc, we begin by
189: fitting the 2--12~\kev\ spectrum with a simple power-law model, but
190: excluding the region between 5 and 7~\kev. A good fit
191: ($\chi^2/$d.o.f.$=857/939$; d.o.f. = degrees of freedom) was obtained
192: with $\Gamma=1.69\pm 0.02$. Figure~\ref{fig:ratio} plots the residuals
193: to this fit including the previously ignored energy range.
194: %
195: \begin{figure}
196: \centerline{
197: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f1.eps}
198: }
199: \caption{Plot of the data-to-model ratio between 2 and 10~\kev\
200: (observed frame) when an absorbed power-law model has been fit to
201: the 2--12~\kev\ data, excluding the range between 5 and 7~\kev\
202: (rest frame). The shape of the \fe\ line is evident in the
203: residuals, and includes a narrow core and a weak red tail. Another
204: possible narrow component is also apparent at $\sim 6.2$~\kev\ (rest
205: frame). The figure also illustrates the hardening at high energies
206: due to the reflection continuum.}
207: \label{fig:ratio}
208: \end{figure}
209: %
210: The figure reveals a well resolved \fe\ line profile consisting of a
211: broad red wing and potentially two narrow components contributing to
212: the line core. At higher energies, the residuals show the spectral
213: hardening indicative of a reflection continuum.
214:
215: %
216: \begin{deluxetable*}{cccccccccc}
217: %\tabletypesize{\small}
218: %\rotate
219: \tablewidth{0pt}
220: \tablecaption{\label{table:fits}Model parameters from fitting the
221: 2--12~keV (observed frame) spectrum of \fourc.}
222: \tablehead{
223: \colhead{Model} & \colhead{$\Gamma$} & \colhead{$E_{\mathrm{G}}$} &
224: \colhead{EW} & \colhead{$R$} & \colhead{$r_{\mathrm{out}}$} &
225: \colhead{$i$} & \colhead{EW$_{\mathrm{L}}$} & \colhead{$\log \xi$} & \colhead{$\chi^2$/d.o.f.}}
226: \startdata
227: PL+G\tablenotemark{a} & 1.71$\pm 0.02$ & 6.46$^{+0.04}_{-0.02}$ & 45$^{+9}_{-15}$ &
228: \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & \nodata & 1163/1301 \\[1mm]
229: PL+G\tablenotemark{a}+L\tablenotemark{b} & 1.74$\pm 0.02$ & 6.46$^{+0.04}_{-0.03}$ & 28$^{+11}_{-12}$ & \nodata &
230: 7.1$^{+8.0}_{-2.4}$ & 45$^{+11}_{-14}$ & 238$^{+77}_{-80}$ & \nodata &
231: 1138/1298 \\[1mm]
232: PEXRAV\tablenotemark{c}+G\tablenotemark{a}+L\tablenotemark{b} & 1.81$^{+0.06}_{-0.05}$ & 6.46$^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ &
233: 25$^{+11}_{-12}$ & 1.2$^{+0.7}_{-0.6}$ & 5.4$^{+3.2}_{-1.4}$ & 45\tablenotemark{f}
234: & 167$^{+69}_{-66}$ & \nodata & 1128/1298\\[1mm]
235: IONDISK*blr\tablenotemark{d}+IONDISK\tablenotemark{e} & 1.82$\pm 0.02$ & \nodata & 35 & 1\tablenotemark{f} &
236: 6.3$^{+3.2}_{-3.0}$ & 37$^{+34}_{-6}$ & 154 &
237: 2.64$^{+0.06}_{-0.08}$ & 1130/1299\\[1mm]
238: IONDISK*blr\tablenotemark{d}+IONDISK\tablenotemark{e}+G\tablenotemark{a}
239: & 1.82$\pm 0.02$ & 6.23$^{+0.04}_{-0.05}$ & 38 \& 20 & 1\tablenotemark{f} &
240: 6.3$^{+3.5}_{-2.5}$ & 34$^{+10}_{-5}$ & 134 &
241: 2.60$^{+0.07}_{-0.08}$ & 1121/1297 \\
242: \enddata
243: \tablenotetext{a}{$\sigma=0$\tablenotemark{f}}
244: \tablenotetext{b}{$r_{\mathrm{in}}=1.235$~$r_g$\tablenotemark{f},
245: emissivity$=-3$\tablenotemark{f}, $E=6.4$~\kev \tablenotemark{f}}
246: \tablenotetext{c}{$E_{\mathrm{fold}}=200$~\kev \tablenotemark{f},
247: abundances=solar\tablenotemark{f}}
248: \tablenotetext{d}{$r_{\mathrm{in}}=1.235$\tablenotemark{f},
249: emissivity$=-3$\tablenotemark{f}}
250: \tablenotetext{e}{Reflection dominated, $\log \xi=1$\tablenotemark{f}}
251: \tablenotetext{f}{Parameter fixed at value}
252: \tablecomments{In the model descriptions, PL=power-law, G=Gaussian
253: emission line, L=\citet{lao91} relativistic line, PEXRAV=neutral
254: reflection continuum of \citet{mz95}, IONDISK=ionized
255: reflection spectrum of \citet{rfy99}, and 'blr'=blurred with the
256: Laor relativistic kernel. $E_{\mathrm{G}}$ is the energy of the
257: added Gaussian line in \kev, EW is the equivalent width(s) of any
258: narrow component in eV, $R$ is the reflection fraction,
259: $r_{\mathrm{out}}$ is the outer radius of the relativistic emission
260: line in $r_g$, $i$ is the inclination angle in degrees,
261: EW$_{\mathrm{L}}$ is the equivalent width of the relativistic line
262: in eV, and $\xi$ is the ionization parameter in the IONDISK model.}
263: \end{deluxetable*}
264: %
265: Results of the spectral fitting are show in
266: Table~\ref{table:fits}. All the fits provide a very acceptable
267: statistical fit to the data, but significant improvements were found
268: with the addition of a broad \fe\ component, reflection, and a narrow
269: line at $\sim 6.2$~\kev. After many trials with the \citet{lao91} and
270: 'diskline' \citep{fab89} relativistic line models, the best fit was
271: found with an inner radius close to the ISCO for a spinning Kerr black
272: hole, and an outer radius at $\sim 6$~$r_g$, where $r_g=GM/c^2$ is the
273: gravitational radius for a black hole with mass $M$. Broad lines with
274: larger inner radii not only had larger $\chi^2$s ($\Delta \chi^2
275: \approx +10$), but gave inclination angles $i \sim 20$\degr, implying
276: that the physical size of the \fourc\ radio source is $\sim 3$~Mpc,
277: larger than almost any other known giant radio galaxy (GRG;
278: \citealt{lar01,lar04}). The broad Laor line results in a larger
279: inclination angle, and therefore a smaller physical size of $\sim
280: 2$~Mpc, more in line with other GRGs. Allowing the line emissivity $\beta$
281: to vary did not improve the fit ($\beta=-3^{+4}_{-1.6}$).
282:
283: The rest energy of the Laor line was fixed at the emission energy for
284: neutral iron at 6.4~\kev, but, when that line and the PEXRAV continuum
285: was replaced with the ionized reflection model of \citet*{rfy99}, the
286: ionization parameter was found to be tightly constrained at $\xi
287: \approx 400$ and predicted emission from helium like Fe at
288: 6.7~\kev. For this model, denoted IONDISK*blr+IONDISK in
289: Table~\ref{table:fits}, a reflection dominated neutral continuum
290: accounted for the sharp core of the line. Figure~\ref{fig:model} plots
291: this model and the residuals to this fit.
292: %
293: \begin{figure}
294: \centerline{
295: \includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.45\textwidth]{f2.eps}
296: }
297: \caption{The top panel shows the IONDISK*blr+IONDISK model from
298: Table~\ref{table:fits}, with the solid line denoting the total model
299: and the dashed line plots the blurred, ionized reflector. The
300: unblurred, neutral reflector which accounts for the narrow 6.4~\kev\
301: line is off the bottom of the plot. The lower panel plots the
302: residuals (in units of standard deviations) when this model is fit to
303: the \fourc\ data.}
304: \label{fig:model}
305: \end{figure}
306: %
307: The residuals show a possible additional emission feature associated
308: with the \fe\ complex. A narrow Gaussian added to the model was found
309: to be significant at the 99\% level, and had a best fit energy of
310: $6.2$~keV and EW of 20~eV. The origin of this line is unknown. It is
311: possible that it and the 6.4~\kev\ line may comprose the red and blue
312: horns of a diskline from farther out on the disk
313: \citep*[c.f.][]{tur02,yaq03,tkr04}. To test this, we replaced the
314: Gaussian in the PEXRAV+G+L model with a diskline with rest energy
315: 6.4~\kev, an outer radius of 1000~$r_g$, and an emissivity of $-2$ (a
316: flatter emissivity is expected if the disk is warped at larger
317: radii). A good fit was obtained with $\chi^2/$d.o.f.$=1126/1299$, but
318: the inner radius was unconstrained ($r_{\mathrm{in}} > 52$~$r_g$).
319:
320: The last model in Table~\ref{table:fits} yields a 2--10~\kev\ flux of
321: $F_{\mathrm{2-10\ keV}} = 2.43\times 10^{-11}$~\ergcms. The earlier
322: \textit{ASCA} and \textit{BeppoSAX} observations found
323: $F_{\mathrm{2-10\ keV}} = 1.7\times 10^{-11}$~\ergcms\ and $1.4\times
324: 10^{-11}$~\ergcms, respectively, indicating that this \xmm\
325: observation caught \fourc\ in a higher flux state. The unabsorbed rest
326: frame 2--10~\kev\ \xmm\ luminosity is $L_{\mathrm{2-10\ keV}} =
327: 6.6\times 10^{44}$~erg~s$^{-1}$. The total unabsorbed 0.3--12~\kev\
328: luminosity of \fourc\ is $L_{\mathrm{0.3-12\ keV}}=1.6\times
329: 10^{45}$~erg~s$^{-1}$. Assuming this comprises about 10\% of the
330: bolometric luminosity, $L_{\mathrm{bol}}\approx 1.6\times
331: 10^{46}$~erg~s$^{-1}$, in good agreement with the $L_{\mathrm{bol}}$
332: found by \citet{wu02}. A black hole mass of $4\times 10^9$~M$_{\odot}$
333: \citep{wu02} then gives an observed Eddington ratio of $\sim 0.04$,
334: consistent with the presence of a untruncated thin accretion disk over
335: an inner ADAF-like flow (which requires
336: $\dot{M}/\dot{M}_{\mathrm{Edd}} \la \alpha^2$, where $\alpha \sim 0.1$
337: is the \citet{ss73} viscosity parameter; \citealt{ree82}).
338:
339: \section{Discussion}
340: \label{sect:discuss}
341: In the previous section we presented evidence that the X-ray spectrum
342: of \fourc\ exhibits a broad ionized \fe\ line extending very close to
343: a spinning black hole. This evidence is by no means conclusive (e.g.,
344: it is difficult to rule out the possibility that the line shape is
345: actually due to a complex series of absorbers), but it is
346: suggestive. A longer \xmm\ observation is required to confirm its
347: presence and extent. Below, we assume the line is as measured above,
348: and discuss how it may shed light on the problem of jet formation.
349:
350: It may be constructive to compare the properties of \fourc\ to those
351: of the well known radio-quiet Seyfert~1 \mcg\ which also has a broad
352: line that implies a spinning black hole \citep{fab02}. What quality
353: (or qualities) allow \fourc\ to produce a strong radio jet and
354: inhibits one in \mcg? Evidently, the spin of the black hole seems not
355: to be important as there is increasing evidence (albeit
356: circumstantial) that most black holes are spinning. This is based on
357: comparisons of the accreted black hole mass density (as judged from
358: the X-ray background) to the local density of black holes
359: \citep*{erz02,bar04}, and from simulations of black hole growth
360: including both mergers and accretion \citep{shap04}. Moreover, the
361: observation that radio emission is quenched as Galactic black holes
362: move from the low state to the high state precludes a strict spin
363: dependence. The accretion rates may also be ruled out as the governing
364: parameter since radio-loud quasars produce jets at high accretion
365: rates, as does the BLRG 3C~120 \citep{bfi04}.
366:
367: Interestingly, the mass of the black hole in \fourc\ is estimated to
368: be $\sim 10^3\times$ larger than the one in \mcg\ \citep{bz03}. In
369: the last few years, other authors have presented evidence that
370: radio-loud AGN preferentially have large black hole masses
371: \citep{lao00,md02,mj04}, although there have been dissenting views
372: \citep{ho02,wu02b}. Assuming the same accretion rate and a radiation
373: pressure dominated inner disk, a larger black hole mass will increase
374: the scale height $H$ and decrease the density of the accretion flow
375: \citep{ss73}. The larger value of $H/r$ (where $r$ is the radius along
376: the disk) may enhance the polodial magnetic field over the lower mass AGN and
377: increase the chances of jet emission.
378:
379: There now seems to be two types of sources that produce strong radio
380: emission \citep*{mcf04}. The first are low accretion rate objects, such as LINERs and
381: other low-luminosity AGN, and Galactic black holes in the low,
382: power-law dominated state \citep[e.g.][]{ho02}. These are the sources
383: that populate the fundamental plane of black hole activity recently
384: discovered by \citet*{mhd03}. The second class of sources have much
385: higher luminosities and accretion rates, and we would argue that it includes BLRGs
386: and radio-loud quasars. These objects would have
387: untruncated, radiatively efficient accretion disks, but relatively
388: high black-hole masses and thus a larger $H/r$ close to the black hole
389: than radio-quiet Seyfert~1s\footnote{\fourc\ has a relatively low
390: $\xi$ (Table~\ref{table:fits}), suggesting that the disk must be
391: fairly dense or not highly illuminated. This may be understood if, as
392: is often suggested \citep[e.g.][]{br02}, the ionization parameter is
393: correlated with the accretion rate. This would also explain the
394: possible very
395: high $\xi$ inferred from 3C~120 \citep{bfi04}.}. Those sources which
396: fall along the fundamental plane are powered by radiatively
397: inefficient accretion flows, which are also thick and would have
398: enhanced polodial magnetic fields. The connection between all jet
399: emitting sources would then be the structure and magnetic strength of
400: the inner accretion flow. Hopefully, this hypothesis can be confirmed
401: by numerical simulations of jet formation.
402:
403: In summary, the broad \fe\ line detected in the \xmm\ observation of
404: \fourc\ rules out the possibility of a truncated accretion disk in
405: BLRGs. Rather, the observation strengthens the scenario that the disk
406: thickness (in the sense of $H/r$) close to the black hole is the
407: important parameter for jet production. For high accretion rate
408: sources, such as BLRGs, the thickness is a result of a relatively high
409: black hole mass. In low accretion rate sources, such as low-state
410: X-ray binaries, it is caused by a radiatively inefficient accretion
411: flow.
412:
413:
414: \acknowledgments
415:
416: This research is based on observations obtained with \xmm, an ESA
417: science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by
418: ESA Member States and NASA. DRB acknowledges financial support by the
419: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. ACF
420: thanks the Royal Society for support.
421:
422: \begin{thebibliography}{}
423: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Arnaud}{1996}]{arn96} Arnaud, K.A.,
424: 1996, in Jacoby, G.H. \& Barnes, J., eds., ASP Conf. Ser. 101,
425: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V
426: (Astron. Soc. Pac.: San Francisco), 17
427: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ballantyne \& Ross}{2002}]{br02}
428: Ballantyne, D.R. \& Ross, R.R., 2002, \mnras, 332, 777
429: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ballantyne, Ross \&
430: Fabian}{Ballantyne \etal}{2002}]{brf02} Ballantyne, D.R., Ross,
431: R.R. \& Fabian, A.C., 2002, \mnras, 332, L45
432: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ballantyne, Fabian \&
433: Iwasawa}{Ballantyne \etal}{2004}]{bfi04} Ballantyne, D.R.,
434: Fabian, A.C. \& Iwasawa, K., 2004, \mnras, 354, 839
435: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Barger \etal}{2005}]{bar04} Barger,
436: A.J., Cowie, L.L., Mushotzky, R.F., Yang, Y., Wang, W.-H., Steffen,
437: A.T. \& Capak, 2005, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0410527)
438: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Bian \& Zhao}{2003}]{bz03} Bian,
439: W. \& Zhao, Y., 2003, \mnras, 343, 164
440: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Blandford \& Znajek}{1977}]{bz77}
441: Blandford, R.D. \& Znajek, R., 1977, \mnras, 179, 433
442: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Blandford \& Payne}{1982}]{bp82}
443: Blandford, R.D. \& Payne, D.G., 1982, \mnras, 199, 383
444: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Brinkmann \etal}{1998}]{brink98}
445: Brinkmann, W., Otani, C., Wagner, S.J. \& Siebert, J., 1998, \aap,
446: 330, 67
447: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Corbin}{1997}]{cor97} Corbin, M.R.,
448: 1997, \apjs, 113, 245
449: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dickey \& Lockman}{1990}]{dl90}
450: Dickey, J.M. \& Lockman, F.J., 1990, \araa, 28, 215
451: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Elvis, Risaliti \& Zamorani}{Elvis
452: \etal}{2002}]{erz02} Elvis, M., Risaliti, G. \& Zamorani, G., 2002, \apj,
453: 565, L75
454: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Eracleaous \& Halpern}{1998}]{eh98}
455: Eracleous, M. \& Halpern, J.P., 1998, \apj, 505, 577
456: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Eracleous, Sambruna \&
457: Mushotzky}{Eracleous \etal}{2000}]{era00} Eracelous, M., Sambruna,
458: R. \& Mushotzky, R.F., 2000, \apj, 537, 654
459: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Fabian \etal}{1989}]{fab89} Fabian,
460: A.C., Rees, M.J., Stella, L. \& White, N.E., 1989, \mnras, 238, 729
461: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Fabian \etal}{2002}]{fab02} Fabian,
462: A.C., Vaughan, S., Nandra, K., Iwasawa, K., Ballantyne, D.R., Lee,
463: J.C., De Rosa, A., Turner, A. \& Young, A.J., 2002, \mnras, 335, L1
464: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Fender, Belloni \&
465: Gallo}{Fender \etal}{2004}]{fbg04} Fender, R.P., Belloni, T.M. \&
466: Gallo, E., 2004, \mnras, 355, 1105
467: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gliozzi \etal}{2004}]{gli04}
468: Gliozzi, M., Sambruna, R.M., Brandt, W.N., Mushotzky, R. \&
469: Eracleous, M., 2004, \aap, 413, 139
470: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hasenkopf, Sambruna \&
471: Eracleous}{Hasenkopf \etal}{2002}]{hse02} Hasenkopf, C.A.,
472: Sambruna, R.M. \& Eracleous, M., 2002, \apj, 575, 127
473: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ho}{2002}]{ho02} Ho, L.C., 2002,
474: \apj, 564, 120
475: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Jansen \etal}{2001}]{jan01} Jansen,
476: F. \etal, 2001, \aap, 365, L1
477: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kaspi \etal}{2000}]{kas00} Kaspi, S.,
478: Smith, P.S., Netzer, H., Maoz, D., Jannuzi, B.T. \& Giveon, U.,
479: 2000, \apj, 533, 631
480: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kellerman \etal}{1989}]{kel89}
481: Kellerman, K.I., Sramek, R., Schmidt, M., Shaffer, D.B. \& Green,
482: R., 1989, \aj, 98, 1195
483: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Koide}{2004}]{koi04} Koide, S., 2004,
484: \apj, 606, L45
485: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Laor}{1991}]{lao91} Laor, A., 1991,
486: \apj, 376, L90
487: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Laor}{2000}]{lao00} Laor, A., 2000,
488: \apj, 543, L111
489: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lara \etal}{2001}]{lar01} Lara, L.,
490: Cotton, W.D., Feretti, L., Giovannini, G., Marcaide, J.M.,
491: M\'{a}rquez, I. \& Venturi, T., 2001, \aap, 370, 409
492: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lara \etal}{2004}]{lar04} Lara, L.,
493: Giovannini, G., Cotton, W.D., Feretti, L., Marcaide, J.M.,
494: M\'{a}rquez, I. \& Venturi, T., 2004, \aap, 421, 899
495: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Lewis \etal}{2005}]{lew05} Lewis, K.,
496: Eracleous, M., Gliozzi, M., Sambruna, R.M. \& Mushotzky, R.F., 2005,
497: \apj, in press (astro-ph/0412537)
498: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Livio, Ogilve \& Pringle}{Livio
499: \etal}{1999}]{lop99} Livio, M., Ogilve, G.I. \& Pringle, J.E.,
500: 1999, \apj, 512, 100
501: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Livio, Pringle \& King}{Livio
502: \etal}{2003}]{lpk03} Livio, M., Pringle, J.E. \& King, A.R., 2003,
503: \apj, 593, 184
504: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Magdziarz \& Zdziarski}{1995}]{mz95}
505: Magdziarz, P. \& Zdziarski, A.A., 1995, \mnras, 273, 837
506: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Marchesini, Celotti \&
507: Ferrarese}{Marchesini \etal}{2004}]{mcf04} Marchesini, D.,
508: Celotti, A. \& Ferrarese, L., 2004, \mnras, 351, 733
509: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{McLure \& Dunlop}{2002}]{md02}
510: McLure, R.J. \& Dunlop, J.S., 2002, \mnras, 331, 795
511: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{McLure \& Jarvis}{2004}]{mj04}
512: McLure, R.J. \& Jarvis, M.J., 2004, \mnras, 353, L45
513: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Meier}{1999}]{mei99} Meier, D.L.,
514: 1999, \apj, 522, 753
515: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Meier}{2001}]{mei01} Meier, D.L.,
516: 2001, \apj, 548, L9
517: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Merloni, Heinz \& di Matteo}{Merloni
518: \etal}{2003}]{mhd03} Merloni, A., Heinz, S. \& di Matteo, T.,
519: 2003, \mnras, 345, 1057
520: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Narayan \& Yi}{1995}]{ny95} Narayan,
521: R. \& Yi, I., 1995, \apj, 444, 231
522: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Pearson \etal}{1992}]{pear92}
523: Pearson, T.J., Blundell, K.M., Riley, J.M. \& Warner, P.J., 1992,
524: \mnras, 259, 13\textsc{p}
525: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Reeves \& Turner}{2000}]{rt00}
526: Reeves, J.N. \& Turner, M.J.L., 2000, \mnras, 316, 234
527: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Rees \etal}{1982}]{ree82} Rees, M.J.,
528: Phinney, E.S., Begelman, M.C. \& Blandford, R.D., 1982, \nat, 295, 17
529: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Riley \& Warner}{1990}]{rw90} Riley,
530: J.M. \& Warner, P.J., 1990, \mnras, 246, 1\textsc{p}
531: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Riley \etal}{1988}]{ril88} Riley,
532: J.M., Warner, P.J., Rawlings, S., Saunders, R., Pooley, G.G. \& Eales,
533: S.A., 1988, \mnras, 236, 13\textsc{p}
534: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Robinson \etal}{1999}]{rob99}
535: Robinson, A., Corbett, E.A., Axon, D.J. \& Young, S., 1999, \mnras,
536: 305, 97
537: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Ross, Fabian \& Young}{Ross
538: \etal}{1999}]{rfy99} Ross, R.R., Fabian, A.C. \& Young, A.J.,
539: 1999, \mnras, 306, 461
540: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Sambruna, Eracleous \&
541: Mushotzky}{Sambruna \etal}{1999}]{sem99} Sambruna, R.M.,
542: Eracleous, M. \& Mushotzky, R.F., 1999, \apj, 526, 60
543: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Shakura \& Sunyaev}{1973}]{ss73}
544: Shakura, N.I. \& Sunyaev, R.A., 1973, \aap, 24, 337
545: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Shapiro}{2005}]{shap04} Shapiro, S.L.,
546: 2005, \apj, 620, 59
547: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Spergel \etal}{2003}]{spe03} Spergel,
548: D.N. \etal, 2003, \apjs, 148, 175
549: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Str\"{u}der \etal}{2001}]{str01}
550: Str\"{u}der, L. \etal, 2001, \aap, 365, L18
551: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Turner \etal}{2001}]{tur01} Turner,
552: M.J.L. \etal, 2001, \aap, 365, L27
553: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Turner, Kraemer \& Reeves}{Turner
554: \etal}{2004}]{tkr04} Turner, T.J., Kraemer, S.B. \& Reeves, J.N.,
555: 2004, \apj, 603, 62
556: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Turner \etal}{2002}]{tur02} Turner,
557: T.J., Mushotzky, R.F., Yaqoob, T., George, I.M., Snowden, S.L.,
558: Netzer, H., Kraemer, S.B., Nandra, K. \& Chelouche, D., 2002, \apj,
559: 574, L123
560: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Wilms, Allen \& McCray}{Wilms
561: \etal}{2000}]{wam00} Wilms, J., Allen, A. \& McCray, R., 2000,
562: \apj, 542, 914
563: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Wilson \& Colbert}{1995}]{wc95}
564: Wilson, A.S. \& Colbert, E.J.M., 1995, \apj, 438, 62
565: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Woo \& Urry}{2002a}]{wu02} Wu,
566: J.-H. \& Urry, C.M., 2002a, \apj, 579, 530
567: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Woo \& Urry}{2002b}]{wu02b} Wu,
568: J.-H. \& Urry, C.M., 2002b, \apj, 581, L5
569: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Wo\'{z}niak \etal}{1998}]{woz98}
570: Wo\'{z}niak, P.R., Zdziarski, A.A., Smith, D., Madejski, G.M. \&
571: Johnson, W.N., 1998, \mnras, 299, 449
572: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Yaqoob \etal}{2003}]{yaq03} Yaqoob,
573: T., George, I.M., Kallman, T.R., Padmanabhan, U., Weaver, K.A. \&
574: Turner, T.J., 2003, \apj, 596, 85
575: \end{thebibliography}
576:
577: \end{document}
578:
579: