1: \documentstyle[emulateapj,apjfonts,psfig,natbib]{article}
2: \citestyle{aa}
3:
4: \def\ra#1#2#3{#1$^{\rm h}$#2$^{\rm m}$#3$^{\rm s}$}
5: \def\dec#1#2#3{$#1^\circ#2'#3''$}
6: \def\swift{{\it Swift}}
7:
8:
9: \def\ociw{1}
10: \def\prince{2}
11: \def\hubble{3}
12: \def\cit{4}
13: \def\lco{5}
14: \def\nrao{6}
15: \def\psu{7}
16: \def\yale{8}
17: \def\uh{9}
18: \def\gsfc{10}
19: \def\oab{11}
20:
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \title{\large The Discovery of the Optical and Near-IR Afterglows of
24: the First \swift\ Gamma-Ray Bursts}
25:
26: \author{
27: E.~Berger\altaffilmark{\ociw,}\altaffilmark{\prince,}\altaffilmark{\hubble},
28: D.~B.~Fox\altaffilmark{\cit},
29: S.~R.~Kulkarni\altaffilmark{\cit},
30: W.~Krzeminski\altaffilmark{\lco},
31: A.~M.~Soderberg\altaffilmark{\cit},
32: D.~A.~Frail\altaffilmark{\nrao},
33: D.~N.~Burrows\altaffilmark{\psu},
34: S.~B.~Cenko\altaffilmark{\cit},
35: E.~J.~Murphy\altaffilmark{\yale},
36: P.~A.~Price\altaffilmark{\uh},
37: A.~Gal-Yam\altaffilmark{\cit,}\altaffilmark{\hubble},
38: D.-S.~Moon\altaffilmark{\cit},
39: N.~Gehrels\altaffilmark{\gsfc},
40: W.~L.~Freedman\altaffilmark{\ociw},
41: S.~E.~Persson\altaffilmark{\ociw},
42: S.~Barthelmy\altaffilmark{\gsfc},
43: J.~E.~Hill\altaffilmark{\psu},
44: J.~A.~Nousek\altaffilmark{\psu},
45: A.~Moretti\altaffilmark{\oab}
46: }
47:
48: \altaffiltext{\ociw}{Observatories of the Carnegie Institution
49: of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101}
50:
51: \altaffiltext{\prince}{Princeton University Observatory,
52: Peyton Hall, Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544}
53:
54: \altaffiltext{\hubble}{Hubble Fellow}
55:
56: \altaffiltext{\cit}{Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy,
57: 105-24, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125}
58:
59: \altaffiltext{\lco}{Las Campanas Observatory, Carnegie Observatories,
60: Casilla 601, La Serena, Chile}
61:
62: \altaffiltext{\nrao}{National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Socorro,
63: NM 87801}
64:
65: \altaffiltext{\psu}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
66: Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Laboratory, University
67: Park, PA 16802}
68:
69: \altaffiltext{\yale}{Department of Astronomy, Yale University, P.O.
70: Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520-8101}
71:
72: \altaffiltext{\uh}{Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii,
73: 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822}
74:
75: \altaffiltext{\gsfc}{NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,
76: MD 20771}
77:
78: \altaffiltext{\oab}{INAF -- Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera,
79: Via Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate, Italy}
80:
81:
82: \begin{abstract}
83: We present optical and near-infrared searches for afterglow emission
84: from the first four \swift\ bursts with accurate positions from the
85: X-ray Telescope (XRT). Using telescopes at Las Campanas, Keck, and
86: Palomar observatories we rapidly identified and followed up afterglows
87: for three of the four bursts. The burst positions were also observed
88: with the Very Large Array, but no radio afterglow emission was
89: detected. The optical/NIR afterglows are fainter than about $75\%$ of
90: all afterglows detected to date, with GRB\,050126 being the faintest,
91: and were identified thanks to accurate and rapid positions from the
92: XRT and rapid response with $\gtrsim 1$-m telescopes. This suggests
93: that the fraction of dust-obscured bursts is small, $\lesssim 10\%$
94: when combined with afterglows localized by the HETE-2 Soft X-ray
95: Camera. The X-ray fluxes are typical of the known population, with
96: the exception of GRB\,050126 which has the faintest X-ray afterglow to
97: date (normalized to $\Delta t=10$ hr), and was detected thanks to a
98: response time of only 130 s after the burst. Finally, we find that
99: all three optical/NIR afterglows are located $\lesssim 2$ arcsec away
100: from the nominal XRT positions, suggesting that the XRT is capable of
101: delivering highly accurate positions, which will revolutionize
102: afterglow studies.
103: \end{abstract}
104:
105: \keywords{gamma-rays:bursts}
106:
107:
108: \section{Introduction}
109: \label{sec:intro}
110:
111: The \swift\ $\gamma$-ray satellite \citep{gcg+04}, launched on 2004,
112: November 20, holds great promise for our understanding of
113: $\gamma$-ray bursts (GRBs), as well as their use for cosmological
114: applications. This is primarily because of the positional accuracy
115: and great sensitivity of the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT), and the
116: on-board X-ray telescope (XRT) and UV/optical telescope (UVOT), which
117: are capable of providing $\sim 0.3-5$ arcsec positions and detailed
118: light curves within a few minutes after the burst. Starting in
119: mid-December 2004 \swift\ has localized several bursts of which a few
120: have been followed up with the XRT providing $\sim 8-30$ arcsec error
121: circles on a timescale of several hours. The rapidity and accuracy of
122: these localizations have enabled deep ground-based optical and
123: near-infrared (NIR) searches.
124:
125: Here we present a comprehensive investigation (optical, near-IR,
126: radio) of the first four \swift\ bursts with XRT detections: GRBs
127: 041223, 050117a, 050124 and 050126. The observations were conducted
128: at Las Campanas Observatory (LCO), Palomar Observatory, Keck
129: Observatory and the Very Large Array (VLA). Even at this early stage,
130: with the localization timescale and accuracy still an order of
131: magnitude below the eventual capability of \swift, the combination of
132: \swift\ and $\gtrsim 1$-m class ground-based telescopes suggests that
133: the fraction of dust-obscured GRBs is likely low, and the afterglow
134: recovery rate for \swift\ bursts may approach unity.
135:
136:
137: \section{Afterglow Identification and Follow-Up of \swift\ Gamma-Ray
138: Bursts}
139: \label{sec:obs}
140:
141: \subsection{GRB\,041223}
142:
143: The \swift\ Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) localized this burst on 2004,
144: December 23.5877 UT to a $7'$ radius error circle
145: \citep{gcn2898,gcn2909}. A series of XRT observations was initiated
146: on December 23.780 UT, and a fading source was detected at
147: $\alpha$=\ra{06}{40}{49.2}, $\delta$=\dec{-37}{04}{21.5} (J2000) with
148: an uncertainty of about $15''$ radius \citep{gcn2901}. The spectral
149: energy index was $\beta_x=-1.02\pm 0.13$ and the temporal decay rate
150: was about $\alpha_x=-1.7\pm 0.2$ ($F_\nu\propto t^\alpha\nu^\beta$)
151: with a flux of $6.5\times 10^{-12}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ ($0.5-10$
152: keV) about 6.2 hr after the burst (Table~\ref{tab:swift};
153: \citealt{bhc+05}). Following our discovery of the optical transient,
154: the XRT position was revised to \citep{gcn2910} $\alpha$=
155: \ra{06}{40}{47.4}, $\delta$=\dec{-37}{04}{22.3} (J2000), within about
156: $1"$ of the optical afterglow position.
157:
158: Ground-based observations commenced on December 24.185 UT (14.4 hours
159: after the burst) using the Swope 40-in telescope at LCO
160: \citep{gcn2902}. We imaged the entire $7'$ radius BAT error circle in
161: the $r$-band for a total of 20 min. The data were bias-subtracted,
162: flat-fielded, and combined using standard IRAF routines. Astrometry
163: was performed relative to the USNO-B catalog using 200 stars in common
164: to the two frames. The resulting rms positional uncertainty was
165: $0.15''$. A stationary source not present in the Digital Sky Survey
166: (DSS) was detected at $\alpha$=\ra{06}{40}{47.323}, $\delta$=
167: \dec{-37}{04}{22.77} (J2000) with a magnitude of $r\approx 21\pm 0.15$.
168: This position was $7.5''$ outside of the initial XRT error circle, but
169: only $1''$ from the revised nominal XRT position. A field centered on
170: the position of the afterglow of GRB\,041223 is shown in
171: Figure~\ref{fig:041223}, and the observations are summarized in
172: Table~\ref{tab:gb}.
173:
174: Additional observations with the Swope 40-in telescope were obtained
175: starting on December 25.15 UT in the $r$ and $i$ bands. A total of 1
176: hr was obtained in each filter. A comparison of the first and second
177: epoch indicated that the afterglow had faded by $1.2$ mag,
178: corresponding to a decay rate of $\alpha\approx -1.1$.
179:
180: We subsequently observed the position of the afterglow with the
181: Low-Resolution Imager and Spectrograph (LRIS; \citealt{occ+95})
182: mounted on the Keck-I 10-m telescope on 2005, January 8.34 UT. We
183: obtained $R$-band observations for a total of 70 min. The data were
184: reduced and analyzed in the manner described above. These
185: observations reveal a faint source at the position of the afterglow
186: with $R\approx 24.5\pm 0.3$ mag. An extrapolation of the afterglow
187: flux at $t=1.56$ d to the epoch of the LRIS observation suggests that
188: this object is most likely the afterglow, although any steepening in
189: the afterglow evolution (e.g., jet break) would mean that the emission
190: is dominated by the host galaxy.
191:
192: Late-time observations were obtained with the Near Infra-Red Camera
193: (NIRC; \citealt{ms94}) mounted on the Keck-I telescope in the
194: $K_s$-band on 2005, January 25.33 UT. A total of sixty-two 50-s
195: images were collected. The individual images were dark-subtracted,
196: flat-fielded, and corrected for bad pixels and cosmic rays. We then
197: created object masks, which were used to construct improved flat
198: fields for a second round of reduction. The data were finally
199: registered, shifted, and co-added. Photometry was performed relative
200: to three 2MASS sources in the field, and no object was detected at the
201: position of the afterglow to a $3\sigma$ limit of $K_s=22.0$ mag.
202:
203: Finally, we obtained spectroscopic observations using LRIS with a
204: $400$-line grating on the red side (dispersion of 1.86 \AA/pix) and a
205: $600$-line grism on the blue side (dispersion of 0.63 \AA/pix). Two
206: 2400 s exposures were obtained with a 1.5" slit. The data were
207: bias-subtracted and flat-fielded using IRAF. Rectification and sky
208: subtraction were performed using the method and software described in
209: \citet{kel03}. We detect weak continuum emission, but no obvious
210: emission lines in the range $\approx 3500-9500$\AA.
211:
212:
213: \subsection{GRB\,050117a}
214:
215: This burst was localized by the BAT on 2005, January 17.5365 UT to a
216: $4'$ radius error circle \citep{gcn2952,gcn2962}. XRT observations
217: revealed a fading source at $\alpha$=\ra{23}{53}{53.0}, $\delta$=
218: \dec{+65}{56}{20} (J2000) with an uncertainty of $15''$ radius
219: \citep{gcn2955}. We note that the location of GRB\,050117a less than
220: $4^\circ$ away from the Galactic plane results in large extinction,
221: $E(B-V)=1.75$ mag \citep{sfd98}, which severely hampered optical
222: searches.
223:
224: We observed the XRT position of GRB\,050117a with the Wide Field
225: Infra-red Camera (WIRC) mounted on the Palomar Hale 200-in telescope
226: on January 18.146 UT (14.6 hrs after the burst; \citealt{gcn2960}). A
227: total of 32 min were obtained in the $K_s$ band. Several 2MASS and
228: DSS sources were detected within and near the XRT position. A field
229: centered on the XRT error circle of GRB\,050117a is shown in
230: Figure~\ref{fig:050117}. At the present no afterglow candidate is
231: identified.
232:
233: We observed the field with the VLA\footnotemark\footnotetext{The VLA
234: is operated by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, a facility of
235: the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement
236: by Associated Universities, Inc.} on 2005, January 19.08 and 24.14 UT
237: (1.54 and 6.60 days after the burst, respectively) at a frequency of
238: 8.46 GHz \citep{gcn2963,gcn2980}. No source was detected within the
239: error circle to a $3\sigma$ limit of 98 (Jan.~19.08) and 84
240: (Jan.~24.14) $\mu$Jy.
241:
242:
243: \subsection{GRB\,050124}
244:
245: This burst was localized by the BAT on 2005, January 24.4792 UT to a
246: $6'$ radius error circle \citep{gcn2972,gcn2973}. An XRT observation
247: was initiated on January 24.607 UT ($3.1$ hr after the burst), and
248: ground analysis revealed a source at $\alpha$=\ra{12}{51}{30.4},
249: $\delta$=\dec{+13}{02}{39.0} (J2000), with an uncertainty of $8''$
250: \citep{gcn2974}. The flux of the source was $2\times 10^{-12}$ erg
251: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ ($2-10$ keV).
252:
253: We observed the XRT $8''$ error circle with NIRC in the $J$ and $K_s$
254: bands starting on January 25.501 (24.5 hrs after the burst;
255: \citealt{gcn2978}). A total of $15$ min were obtained in each band.
256: Within the XRT error circle we detected a single point source, located
257: at $\alpha$=\ra{12}{51}{30.35}, $\delta$=\dec{+13}{02}{41.3} (J2000).
258: The astrometry was performed relative to an image of the field from
259: the Palomar 60-in telescope with an rms positional uncertainty of
260: $0.2''$. The NIR afterglow position is only $2.4''$ away from the
261: nominal XRT position. Follow-up observations with NIRC on January
262: 26.471 (47.8 hours after the burst) in the $J$ (13.3 min) and $K_s$
263: (14.2 min) bands revealed a clear fading of the point source
264: confirming its identification as the afterglow of GRB\,050124
265: \citep{gcn2983}. The brightness of the source was $Ks=19.66\pm 0.06$
266: mag in the first observation. The observations are summarized in
267: Table~\ref{tab:gb} and the first epoch NIRC image is shown in
268: Figure~\ref{fig:050124}.
269:
270: Observations were conducted with the VLA at 4.86 and 8.46 GHz on 2005,
271: January 29.41 UT (4.93 days after the burst; \citealt{gcn3000}). No
272: source was detected at the position of the NIR afterglow, or within
273: the XRT position, to a $3\sigma$ limit of 130 (4.86 GHz) and 100 (8.46
274: GHz) $\mu$Jy.
275:
276:
277: \subsection{GRB\,050126}
278:
279: This burst was localized with the BAT on 2005, January 26.5001 UT to a
280: $4'$ radius error circle \citep{gcn2987}. The XRT observation started
281: 129 s after the burst and revealed a source which was localized to a
282: $30''$ error circle. Ground analysis based on data from four orbits
283: resulted in a refined position of $8''$ accuracy \citep{gcn2996}
284: centered on $\alpha$= \ra{18}{32}{27.0}, $\delta$=\dec{+42}{22}{13.5}
285: (J2000).
286:
287: We observed the XRT $30''$ error circle with NIRC in the $K_s$ band
288: starting on 2005, January 26.682 UT ($4.4$ hours after the burst;
289: \citealt{gcn2985,gcn2997}) for a total of $8.3$ min. The data were
290: reduced in the manner outlined above, and astrometry was performed
291: relative to the DSS using six stars in common between the two images.
292: The resulting rms positional uncertainty was $0.12''$. Within the
293: revised XRT error circle we detect one object not visible in the DSS
294: at $\alpha$=\ra{18}{32}{27.18}, $\delta$=\dec{+42}{22}{13.6} (J2000).
295: This position is only $2.0''$ away from the nominal XRT position. The
296: source has $Ks=19.45\pm 0.17$ mag. The NIRC image is shown in
297: Figure~\ref{fig:050126}. We note that while this is the only
298: candidate in the XRT error circle, we have been unable to confirm that
299: the object has actually faded. If this is in fact not the NIR
300: afterglow, then this is by far the faintest limit for any afterglow
301: observed to date (see Figure~\ref{fig:moal} and \citealt{khg+03}).
302:
303: We observed the position of GRB\,050126 with the VLA at 8.46 GHz on
304: 2005, January 26.67 and $28.59$ UT (4.1 hr and $2.09$ d after the
305: burst, respectively). No object was detected at the position of the
306: NIR candidate or within the revised XRT error circle to a limit of
307: about 100 $\mu$Jy \citep{gcn2993}.
308:
309:
310:
311: \section{Afterglow Properties}
312: \label{sec:ag}
313:
314: We now provide a simple analysis of the afterglow emission from the
315: individual bursts. For GRB\,041223 we combine the data presented in
316: this paper with measurements in the $J$- and $K$-band from
317: \citet{bhc+05}. Correcting for Galactic extinction ($A_R=0.32$,
318: $A_I=0.23$, $A_J=0.11$, and $A_K=0.04$ mag; \citealt{sfd98}) we find
319: that the best-fit spectral index using all the available observations
320: is $\beta=-0.6\pm 0.1$, while the best-fit temporal decay rate is
321: $\alpha=-1.1\pm 0.1$ In the absence of significant extinction within
322: the host galaxy, we can use these values, along with the synchrotron
323: closure relations (e.g.~\citealt{bkb+02}), to determine the value of
324: the electron distribution power law index, $p$ ($N(\gamma)\propto
325: \gamma^{-p}$), the geometry of the circumburst environment (ISM or
326: Wind), and the location of the synchrotron cooling frequency relative
327: to the optical/NIR band. Three possibilities exist, namely $\alpha
328: -3\beta/2=0$ (${\rm ISM_b}$), $\alpha-3\beta/2-1/2=0$ (${\rm ISM_r}$
329: and ${\rm Wind_r}$), and $\alpha-3\beta/2+1/2=0$ (${\rm Wind_b}$); the
330: subscript designates whether the cooling frequency is blueward (b) or
331: redward (r) of the optical/NIR band. The ${\rm ISM_b}$ closure
332: relation provides the best result, $-0.2\pm 0.25$, indicating that
333: $p\approx 2.2\pm 0.2$, and the cooling frequency is located blueward
334: of the optical/NIR band. This conclusion is supported by the X-ray
335: spectral index, $\beta_x\approx -1\pm 0.1$, which indicates $p\approx
336: 2\pm 0.2$.
337:
338: A comparison of the optical/NIR flux and the X-ray flux, extrapolated
339: to a common time of 19.6 hr using $\alpha_x=-1.7$, indicates that
340: $\beta_{ox}\approx -0.65$. Taken in conjunction with the optical and
341: X-ray spectral indices, this indicates that the cooling frequency is
342: $\nu_c\approx 1.1\times 10^{17}$ Hz or about 0.45 keV. We note,
343: however, that in the context of this model, the X-ray temporal decay
344: is expected to be $\alpha_x\approx -1.1\pm 0.1$, which is about
345: $2.7\sigma$ away from the measured value, $\alpha_x\approx -1.7\pm
346: 0.2$. The steeper decay may be due to a contribution from inverse
347: Compton emission \citep{se01}. We note that \citet{bhc+05} suggest
348: that the optical/NIR and X-ray afterglows are dominated by two
349: different physical components.
350:
351: We perform a similar analysis for GRB\,050124. Based on the pair of
352: $J$- and $K_s$-band observations taken on the first and second nights
353: after the burst, we find a spectral index, $\beta\approx 0.4\pm 0.2$,
354: and a temporal decay index $\alpha\approx 1.45\pm 0.25$. These values
355: satisfy the closure relation for the ${\rm Wind_b}$ case, $-0.35\pm
356: 0.55$, indicating that $p\approx 2.1\pm 0.3$ and the cooling frequency
357: is located blueward of the NIR bands. A comparison of the X-ray flux
358: at 7.1 hours after the burst to the NIR flux, extrapolated to the
359: epoch of the X-ray observations using the measured value of $\alpha$,
360: indicates an optical/X-ray spectral index, $\beta_{ox}\approx -0.5$,
361: in good agreement with the optical/NIR spectral index. This suggests
362: that the cooling break is most likely located near the X-ray band.
363:
364: Finally, for GRB\,050126 we simply note that both the NIR and X-ray
365: afterglows are fainter than any other afterglow detected to date. For
366: the purpose of this comparison we extrapolate the NIR flux to the
367: optical $R$-band using a typical spectral index of $-0.6$, and the
368: X-ray flux from 200 s to 10 hr using $\alpha_x\approx -1.3$, which is
369: typical for X-ray afterglows \citep{bkf03}.
370:
371:
372:
373: \section{Disucssion and Conclusions}
374: \label{sec:conc}
375:
376: One of the main promises of \swift\ is rapid localization and
377: follow-up with the XRT and UVOT. The X-ray fluxes from XRT
378: \citep{bhc+05,hil+05,osb+05,tag+05} are summarized in
379: \S\ref{sec:obs} and Table~\ref{tab:swift}. In Figure~\ref{fig:moal}
380: we plot the X-ray fluxes normalized to 10 hours after the burst in
381: comparison to the sample of \citet{bkf03}. We find that three of the
382: four XRT afterglows are typical of the general population, but the
383: X-ray afterglow of GRB\,050126 is the faintest detected to date (when
384: normalized to 10 hrs), and it was only detected thanks to the rapid
385: response of the XRT. The fluxes were extrapolated to the common epoch
386: using the measured temporal decay index or the typical $F_\nu\propto
387: t^{-1.3}$ \citep{bkf03}. We note that the X-ray flux for GRB\,050117a
388: is dominated by the prompt emission and should be considered an upper
389: limit.
390:
391: Similarly, we plot the $R$-band magnitudes of the \swift\ afterglows,
392: measured directly or extrapolated from the NIR (using the measured
393: spectral indices or a typical $F_\nu\propto\nu^{-0.6}$), in comparison
394: to a compilation of optical light curves collected in the past seven
395: years. We find that the afterglows are fainter than about $75\%$ of
396: the population on a similar timescale (Figure~\ref{fig:moal}). In
397: particular, the possible afterglow of GRB\,050126 is the faintest
398: detected to date. The afterglow detections are due to the accurate
399: positions available from the XRT which allowed us to both identify the
400: afterglows more readily, and to search the error circles in the NIR
401: with a large aperture telescope. We note that the faintness of the
402: optical afterglows may also explain the non-detections in the radio.
403:
404: Several conclusions can already be drawn from this early work. First,
405: nearly every XRT localization has resulted in the identification of an
406: optical or NIR afterglow; the single exception (GRB\,050117a) is likely
407: due to large Galactic extinction. The optical/NIR afterglow recovery
408: rate for XRT (3/4) and the HETE-2 SXC (12/13) is $\gtrsim 90\%$. The
409: brightness of the XRT+SXC sample normalized to $t=12$ hr compared to
410: all other optical afterglows is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:sxcxrt}. The
411: afterglows of the XRT bursts appear to be fainter than about $75\%$ of
412: all afterglows detected prior to \swift, suggesting that past
413: non-detections were mainly the result of large error regions and/or
414: shallow searches. This indicates that the fraction of ``dark''
415: (dust-obscured) GRBs is low, although we note that two of the XRT
416: bursts were localized in the NIR and may still be dust-obscured. If
417: this trend persists then this bodes well for identification of high
418: redshift afterglows using the Lyman break technique, since the main
419: contaminant is dust-obscured bursts.
420:
421: Second, in the three cases in which an optical/NIR afterglow was
422: detected, the offset relative to the nominal XRT position has been
423: $\lesssim 2$ arcsec, much less than the size of the error circles.
424: This suggests that in the near future the XRT will be capable of
425: providing $\sim 2$ arcsec positions. This will significantly reduce
426: the delay from localization to identification of the optical/NIR
427: afterglow in cases when a UVOT sub-arcsecond position is not
428: available.
429:
430: We end by noting that the faintness of the optical/NIR afterglows
431: studied in this paper ($R\approx 18$ mag at $\Delta t=1$ hr;
432: Figures~\ref{fig:moal} and \ref{fig:sxcxrt}) may make it difficult for
433: small robotic telescopes to provide long-term follow-up of \swift\
434: bursts. However, larger telescopes, while somewhat slower to respond,
435: will allow both long-term follow-up and detection of the faintest
436: afterglows, particularly in the NIR.
437:
438:
439: \acknowledgements We thank the staff at the Las Campanas Observatory,
440: the Palomar Observatory, the Keck Observatory, and the Very Large
441: Array. We also thank Mario Hamuy for generous use of his observing
442: time and Dan Kelson for help with his sky background subtraction
443: software. E.B. is supported by NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant
444: HST-01171.01 awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute, which
445: is operated by AURA, Inc., for NASA under contract NAS 5-26555.
446: Additional support was provided by NSF and NASA grants. A.G.
447: acknowledges support by NASA through Hubble Fellowship grant
448: HST-HF-01158.01-A awarded by STScI, which is operated by AURA, Inc.,
449: for NASA, under contract NAS 5-26555.
450:
451:
452:
453: \begin{thebibliography}{}
454:
455: \bibitem[{Barthelmy} {\it et al.}\ (2005)]{gcn2962}
456: {Barthelmy}, S. {\it et al.}\ 2005, GRB Circular Network, 2962, 1.
457:
458: \bibitem[{Berger}, {Krzeminski} \& {Hamuy}(2004)]{gcn2902}
459: {Berger}, E., {Krzeminski}, W., and {Hamuy}, M. 2004, GRB Circular Network,
460: 2902, 1.
461:
462: \bibitem[Berger \& Kulkarni(2005a)]{gcn2978}
463: Berger, E. and Kulkarni, S.~R. 2005a, GRB Circular Network, 2978, 1.
464:
465: \bibitem[Berger \& Kulkarni(2005b)]{gcn2983}
466: Berger, E. and Kulkarni, S.~R. 2005b, GRB Circular Network, 2983, 1.
467:
468: \bibitem[Berger \& Kulkarni(2005c)]{gcn2985}
469: Berger, E. and Kulkarni, S.~R. 2005c, GRB Circular Network, 2985, 1.
470:
471: \bibitem[Berger \& Kulkarni(2005d)]{gcn2997}
472: Berger, E. and Kulkarni, S.~R. 2005d, GRB Circular Network, 2997, 1.
473:
474: \bibitem[{Berger} {\it et al.}\ (2002)]{bkb+02}
475: {Berger}, E. {\it et al.}\ 2002, \apj, 581, 981.
476:
477: \bibitem[{Berger}, {Kulkarni} \& {Frail}(2003)]{bkf03}
478: {Berger}, E., {Kulkarni}, S.~R., and {Frail}, D.~A. 2003, \apj, 590, 379.
479:
480: \bibitem[Burrows {\it et al.}\ (2005a)]{bhc+05}
481: Burrows, D.~N. {\it et al.}\ 2005a, {ApJ in press}.
482: \bibitem[{Burrows} {\it et al.}\ (2004)]{gcn2901}
483: {Burrows}, D.~N. {\it et al.}\ 2004, GRB Circular Network, 2901, 1.
484:
485: \bibitem[{Campana} {\it et al.}\ (2005)]{gcn2996}
486: {Campana}, S. {\it et al.}\ 2005, GRB Circular Network, 2996, 1.
487:
488: \bibitem[{Cummings} {\it et al.}\ (2005)]{gcn2973}
489: {Cummings}, J. {\it et al.}\ 2005, GRB Circular Network, 2973, 1.
490:
491: \bibitem[{Fox}, {Cenko} \& {Murphy}(2005)]{gcn2960}
492: {Fox}, D.~B., {Cenko}, S.~B., and {Murphy}, E. 2005, GRB Circular Network,
493: 2960, 1.
494:
495: \bibitem[{Frail}(2005)]{gcn2963}
496: {Frail}, D.~A. 2005, GRB Circular Network, 2963, 1.
497:
498: \bibitem[{Frail} \& Soderberg(2005)]{gcn2993}
499: {Frail}, D.~A. and Soderberg, A.~M. 2005, GRB Circular Network, 2993, 1.
500:
501: \bibitem[{Gehrels} {\it et al.}\ (2004)]{gcg+04}
502: {Gehrels}, N. {\it et al.}\ 2004, \apj, 611, 1005.
503:
504: \bibitem[Hill {\it et al.}\ (2005a)]{hil+05}
505: Hill, J.~E. {\it et al.}\ 2005a, {in prep.}
506:
507: \bibitem[{Hill} {\it et al.}\ (2005b)]{gcn2955}
508: {Hill}, J.~E. {\it et al.}\ 2005b, GRB Circular Network, 2955, 1.
509:
510: \bibitem[{Kelson}(2003)]{kel03}
511: {Kelson}, D.~D. 2003, \pasp, 115, 688.
512:
513: \bibitem[{Klose} {\it et al.}\ (2003)]{khg+03}
514: {Klose}, S. {\it et al.}\ 2003, \apj, 592, 1025.
515:
516: \bibitem[{Markwardt} {\it et al.}\ (2004)]{gcn2909}
517: {Markwardt}, C. {\it et al.}\ 2004, GRB Circular Network, 2909, 1.
518:
519: \bibitem[{Markwardt} {\it et al.}\ (2005)]{gcn2972}
520: {Markwardt}, C. {\it et al.}\ 2005, GRB Circular Network, 2972, 1.
521:
522: \bibitem[{Matthews} \& {Soifer}(1994)]{ms94}
523: {Matthews}, K. and {Soifer}, B.~T. 1994, in { ASSL Vol. 190: Astronomy with
524: Arrays, The Next Generation}, 239.
525:
526: \bibitem[{Oke} {\it et al.}\ (1995)]{occ+95}
527: {Oke}, J.~B. {\it et al.}\ 1995, \pasp, 107, 375.
528:
529: \bibitem[Osborne {\it et al.}\ (2005a)]{osb+05}
530: Osborne, J.~P. {\it et al.}\ 2005a, {in prep.}
531:
532: \bibitem[{Pagani} {\it et al.}\ (2005)]{gcn2974}
533: {Pagani}, C. {\it et al.}\ 2005, GRB Circular Network, 2974, 1.
534:
535: \bibitem[{Sakamoto} {\it et al.}\ (2005)]{gcn2952}
536: {Sakamoto}, T. {\it et al.}\ 2005, GRB Circular Network, 2952, 1.
537:
538: \bibitem[{Sari} \& {Esin}(2001)]{se01}
539: {Sari}, R. and {Esin}, A.~A. 2001, \apj, 548, 787.
540:
541: \bibitem[{Sato} {\it et al.}\ (2005)]{gcn2987}
542: {Sato}, G. {\it et al.}\ 2005, GRB Circular Network, 2987, 1.
543:
544: \bibitem[{Schlegel}, {Finkbeiner} \& {Davis}(1998)]{sfd98}
545: {Schlegel}, D.~J., {Finkbeiner}, D.~P., and {Davis}, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525.
546:
547: \bibitem[Soderberg \& {Frail}(2005a)]{gcn3000}
548: Soderberg, A.~M. and {Frail}, D.~A. 2005a, GRB Circular Network, 3000, 1.
549:
550: \bibitem[Soderberg \& {Frail}(2005b)]{gcn2980}
551: Soderberg, A.~M. and {Frail}, D.~A. 2005b, GRB Circular Network, 2980, 1.
552:
553: \bibitem[Tagliaferri {\it et al.}\ (2005)]{tag+05}
554: Tagliaferri, G. {\it et al.}\ 2005, {in prep.}
555:
556: \bibitem[{Tagliaferri} {\it et al.}\ (2004)]{gcn2910}
557: {Tagliaferri}, G. {\it et al.}\ 2004, GRB Circular Network, 2910, 1.
558:
559: \bibitem[{Tueller} {\it et al.}\ (2004)]{gcn2898}
560: {Tueller}, J. {\it et al.}\ 2004, GRB Circular Network, 2898, 1.
561:
562: \end{thebibliography}
563:
564:
565:
566: \clearpage
567: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllllll}
568: \tabcolsep0.1in\footnotesize
569: \tablecolumns{9}
570: \tabcolsep0.06in\footnotesize
571: \tablewidth{0pc}
572: \tablecaption{Prompt Emission and X-Ray Afterglow Properties
573: \label{tab:swift}}
574: \tablehead {
575: \colhead {GRB} &
576: \colhead {$t_0$} &
577: \colhead {$F$} &
578: \colhead {$t_{90}$} &
579: \colhead {$\alpha$} &
580: \colhead {$t_X$} &
581: \colhead {$F_X$} &
582: \colhead {$\alpha_X$} &
583: \colhead {$\beta_X$} \\
584: \colhead {} &
585: \colhead {(UT)} &
586: \colhead {(erg cm$^{-2}$)} &
587: \colhead {(s)} &
588: \colhead {} &
589: \colhead {(s)} &
590: \colhead {(erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$)} &
591: \colhead {} &
592: \colhead {}
593: }
594: \startdata
595: 041223 & 23.5877 & $5\times 10^{-5}$ & 130 & 1.1 & $1.63\times 10^4$
596: & $6.5\times 10^{-12}$ & $-1.72\pm 0.20$ & $-1.02\pm 0.13$ \\
597: %
598: 050117a & 17.5365 & $1.7\times 10^{-5}$ & 220 & \nodata & 193 &
599: $1.8\times 10^{-8}$ $^a$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
600: %
601: 050124 & 24.4792 & $2.1\times 10^{-6}$ & 4.1 & 1.5 & $2.54\times 10^4$
602: & $2.2\times 10^{-12}$ & \nodata & \nodata \\
603: %
604: 050126 & 26.5001 & $2.0\times 10^{-6}$ & 26 & 1.3 & 200 & $2.5\times
605: 10^{-11}$ & \nodata & \nodata
606: \enddata
607: \tablecomments{Prompt emission and X-ray afterglow properties of the
608: four bursts discussed in this paper. The columns are (left to right):
609: (i) GRB name, (ii) burst time, (iii) fluence in the $15-350$ keV band,
610: (iv) burst duration, (v) spectral index, (vi) time of X-ray
611: observation, (vii) X-ray flux, (viii) X-ray temporal decay index, (ix)
612: X-ray spectral index. $^a$ The X-ray flux of GRB\,050117a is dominated
613: by the prompt emission.}
614: \end{deluxetable}
615:
616:
617: \clearpage
618: \begin{deluxetable}{lllll}
619: \tabcolsep0.1in\footnotesize
620: \tablecolumns{5}
621: \tabcolsep0.1in\footnotesize
622: \tablewidth{0pc}
623: \tablecaption{Ground-Based Optical and Near-Infrared Data
624: \label{tab:gb}}
625: \tablehead {
626: \colhead {Date} &
627: \colhead {$\Delta t$} &
628: \colhead {Telescope} &
629: \colhead {Filter} &
630: \colhead {Magnitude} \\
631: \colhead {(UT)} &
632: \colhead {(days)} &
633: \colhead {} &
634: \colhead {} &
635: \colhead {}
636: }
637: \startdata
638: \multicolumn{5}{c}{\bf GRB\,041223} \\\hline
639: 2004, Dec.~24.185 & 0.60 & LCO40 & $r$ & $20.99\pm 0.15$ \\
640: 2004, Dec.~25.204 & 1.62 & LCO40 & $r$ & $22.19\pm 0.14$ \\
641: 2004, Dec.~25.232 & 1.65 & LCO40 & $i$ & $21.82\pm 0.07$ \\
642: 2005, Jan.~8.339 & 15.75 & Keck/LRIS & $R$ & $24.5\pm 0.3$ \\
643: 2005, Jan.~25.333 & 32.75 & Keck/NIRC & $K_s$ & $>22.0$ \\ \hline
644: \hline\\
645: %
646: \multicolumn{5}{c}{\bf GRB\,050117a} \\\hline
647: 2005, Jan.~18.146 & 0.61 & P200/WIRC & $K_s$ & $>18.5$ \\\hline
648: \hline\\
649: %
650: \multicolumn{5}{c}{\bf GRB\,050124} \\\hline
651: 2005, Jan.~25.500 & 1.02 & Keck/NIRC & $K_s$ & $19.66\pm 0.06$ \\
652: 2005, Jan.~25.486 & 1.04 & Keck/NIRC & $J$ & $20.90\pm 0.05$ \\
653: 2005, Jan.~26.472 & 1.99 & Keck/NIRC & $K_s$ & $20.63\pm 0.18$ \\
654: 2005, Jan.~26.486 & 2.01 & Keck/NIRC & $J$ & $22.04\pm 0.17$ \\
655: \hline\\
656: %
657: \multicolumn{5}{c}{\bf GRB\,050126} \\\hline
658: 2005, Jan.~26.682 & 0.18 & Keck/NIRC & $K_s$ & $19.45\pm 0.17$ \\
659: \enddata
660: \tablecomments{Ground-based optical and NIR observations of the four
661: bursts discussed in this paper. The columns are (left to right): (i)
662: UT date of the observation, (ii) time since the burst, (iii)
663: telescope/instrument, (iv) filter, and (v) observed magnitude (not
664: corrected for Galactic extinction). Limits are $3\sigma$.}
665: \end{deluxetable}
666:
667:
668:
669: \clearpage
670: \begin{figure}
671: %\epsscale{0.9}
672: %\plotone{f1.ps}
673: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig1_2.ps,width=6.0in}}
674: \caption{The field centered on the position of the optical afterglow of
675: GRB\,041223 (crosshairs) imaged in the $r$-band with the LCO 40-in
676: telescope on Dec.~24.185 UT (14.4 hrs after the burst). Also shown
677: are the initial (XRT-1) and revised (XRT-2) $15''$ radius error circles
678: from \swift/XRT.
679: \label{fig:041223}}
680: \end{figure}
681:
682: \clearpage
683: \begin{figure}
684: %\epsscale{0.9}
685: %\plotone{f2.ps}
686: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig2_2.ps,width=6.0in}}
687: \caption{The field centered on the XRT position of GRB\,050117a imaged
688: in the $K_s$-band with WIRC on the Palomar 200-in telescope on
689: Jan.~18.146 UT (14.6 hrs after the burst). Also shown is the $15''$
690: radius XRT error circle.
691: \label{fig:050117}}
692: \end{figure}
693:
694: \clearpage
695: \begin{figure}
696: %\epsscale{0.9}
697: %\plotone{f3.ps}
698: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig3_2.ps,width=6.0in}}
699: \caption{The field containing the position of the NIR afterglow of
700: GRB\,050124 (crosshairs) imaged in the $K_s$-band with NIRC on the
701: Keck I 10-m telescope on Jan.~25.501 UT (24.5 hrs after the burst).
702: Also shown is the revised \swift/XRT $8''$ radius error circle.
703: \label{fig:050124}}
704: \end{figure}
705:
706: \clearpage
707: \begin{figure}
708: %\epsscale{0.9}
709: %\plotone{f4.ps}
710: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig4_2.ps,width=6.0in}}
711: \caption{The field containing the position of the NIR afterglow of
712: GRB\,050126 (crosshairs) imaged in the $K_s$-band with NIRC on the
713: Keck I 10-m telescope on Jan.~26.682 UT (4.4 hrs after the burst).
714: Also shown are the initial (XRT-1) $30''$ radius \swift/XRT error
715: circle, and the revised (XRT-2) $8''$ radius error circle.
716: \label{fig:050126}}
717: \end{figure}
718:
719: \clearpage
720: \begin{figure}
721: %\epsscale{0.9}
722: %\plotone{f5.ps}
723: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig5.ps,width=6.0in}}
724: \caption{Optical light curves of the \swift\ bursts discussed in this
725: paper (and upper limit on GRB\,050117a) compared to the sample of
726: afterglows detected and studied in the past seven years. We
727: transformed the NIR flux of GRB\,050124 to the $R$-band using the
728: measured spectral index, and that of GRB\,050126 assuming a typical
729: index of $\beta=-0.6$. The \swift\ afterglows are fainter than about
730: $75\%$ of the known afterglow population. Their detection was due to
731: the small error circles from XRT and searches with large telescopes.
732: The inset shows the distribution of X-ray fluxes at $t=10$ hrs after
733: the burst for the XRT bursts (using measured temporal decay indices or
734: assuming the typical $\alpha_x=-1.3$) compared to the sample of
735: \citet{bkf03}. Three of the four afterglows are typical of the
736: general population, but the afterglow of GRB\,050126 is the faintest
737: detected to date, in agreement with the faintness of the possible NIR
738: afterglow. We note that the X-ray emission for GRB\,050117a is
739: contaminated by the prompt emission and should be considered as an
740: upper limit.
741: \label{fig:moal}}
742: \end{figure}
743:
744: \clearpage
745: \begin{figure}
746: %\epsscale{1}
747: %\plotone{f6.ps}
748: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig6.ps,width=6.0in}}
749: \caption{Distribution of $R$-band magnitudes normalized to 12 hrs after
750: the burst for the XRT+SXC sample (black; 16 afterglows) compared to
751: all other optical afterglows (gray; 31 afterglows). The afterglow
752: detection rate for the XRT+SXC sample is about $90\%$ suggesting that
753: the fraction of dust-obscured (``dark'') GRBs is small. The inset
754: shows the cumulative distribution for all afterglows discovered prior
755: to \swift\ along with the three afterglows discussed in this paper.
756: The \swift/XRT bursts are fainter than about $75\%$ of all afterglows
757: localized to date. In the past, these may have been designated as
758: dark.
759: \label{fig:sxcxrt}}
760: \end{figure}
761:
762: \end{document}
763: