1: % VERSION using new aa.cl (style file)
2: % AA vers. 5.01, LaTeX class for Astronomy & Astrophysics
3: % (c) Springer-Verlag HD
4: % revised by EDP Sciences
5: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------
6: %
7: %
8: \documentclass{aa}
9: %\documentclass[referee]{aa} % for a referee version
10: \usepackage{graphicx}
11: %
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{The Galaxy Populations of Double Cluster RX J1053.7+5735 at z=1.13}
15:
16: \author{Yasuhiro Hashimoto\inst{1}
17: J. Patrick Henry \inst{1,2}
18: %G\"unther Hasinger\inst{1}
19: G. Hasinger\inst{1}
20: G. Szokoly \inst{1}
21: M. Schmidt \inst{3}
22: \and
23: %more\inst{1}
24: I. Lehmann \inst{1}
25: }
26:
27: \institute{Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur extraterrestrische Physik,
28: Giessenbachstrasse
29: D-85748 Garching, Germany
30: \and
31: Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA
32: \and
33: Palomar Observatory, California Institute of Technology, MS 320-47 Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
34: }
35:
36:
37: \offprints{Y.\ Hashimoto,\\ e-mail: hashimot@mpe.mpg.de}
38:
39: \date{Received ; accepted}
40:
41: \authorrunning{Hashimoto et al.}
42: \titlerunning{Galaxies in RX J1053.7+5735}
43:
44:
45: %\begin{abstract}
46: \abstract{
47: We present a study of the galaxy population in the cluster RX J1053.7+5735,
48: one of the most distant
49: X-ray selected clusters of galaxies, which also shows an unusual
50: double-lobed X-ray morphology,
51: indicative of a possible equal-mass cluster merger.
52: The cluster was discovered during
53: the {\it ROSAT} deep pointings in the direction of the Lockman Hole.
54: Using Keck-DEIMOS
55: spectroscopic observations of galaxies
56: in the 2\farcm0 $\times$ 1\farcm5 region surrounding
57: RX J1053.7+5735, we
58: secured redshifts for six
59: galaxies
60: in the range
61: 1.129 $<$ $z$ $<$ 1.139, with a mean redshift $<z>$=1.134.
62: The mean redshift agrees well with the
63: cluster {\em X-ray} redshift previously estimated
64: from
65: the cluster X-ray Fe-K line,
66: confirming the presence of a cluster at $z$$\sim$1.135.
67: Galaxies with concordant redshifts
68: are located in both eastern and western sub-clusters of
69: the double cluster structure,
70: indicating that
71: both sub-clusters are at similar redshifts.
72: This result is also consistent with a previous
73: claim that both eastern and western X-ray lobes
74: have similar X-ray redshifts.
75: Based on their
76: separation of $\sim$ 250 kpc/h,
77: these results support the interpretation that
78: RX J1053.7+5735 is an equal-mass cluster merger taken
79: place at $z$ $\sim$ 1, although
80: further direct evidence for dynamical state of the cluster is
81: needed for a more definitive statement about
82: the cluster merging state.
83: The six galaxies have a line-of-sight velocity
84: dispersion $\Delta$$v$ $\sim$ 650 km s$^{-1}$.
85: All six galaxies show clear absorption features of CaII H \& K, and
86: several Balmer lines, typical of early galaxies at the present
87: epoch, in agreement with their $I-K$ colors.
88: A color-magnitude diagram, constructed from
89: deep optical/NIR observations of the RX J1053.7+5735 field,
90: shows a clear red color sequence.
91: There is an indication that the red sequence
92: in RX J1053.7+5735 lies $\sim$ 0.3 to the blue of the Coma line,
93: qualitatively consistent with previous studies investigating
94: other clusters at z$\sim$ 1.
95:
96: %
97: \keywords{Galaxies: clusters: general --
98: Galaxies: high-redshift --
99: Infrared: galaxies --
100: X-rays: galaxies: clusters --
101: Galaxies: evolution --
102: Galaxies: stellar content}
103: %\end{abstract}
104: }
105:
106: \maketitle
107:
108: \section{Introduction}
109:
110: The identification and study of distant galaxy clusters is
111: of great interest in current astronomical research.
112: As the most massive collapsed objects in the universe,
113: clusters provide a sensitive probe of the formation and evolution structure
114: in the universe
115: (Eke, Cole, \& Frenk 1996; Bahcall, Fan, \& Cen 1997).
116: The presence of clusters or large-scale structure at and
117: beyond z = 1 can constrain scenarios for bottom-up structure formation and fundamental
118: cosmological parameters
119: by requiring
120: cluster-level collapse earlier than
121: that epoch.
122: Another equally important use of galaxy clusters lies in
123: studying the formation and evolution of galaxy populations.
124: The study of the spectral and photometric properties of cluster
125: galaxies at large redshifts provides a powerful means of discriminating
126: between scenarios for the formation of elliptical galaxies.
127: Predictions of the color-magnitude distribution of cluster early-types galaxies based on
128: hierarchical models of galaxy formation
129: (Kauffmann 1996; Kauffmann \& Charlot 1998) differ at z $>$ 1 from
130: models in which ellipticals formed at high-z in a monolithic collapse
131: (Eggen, Lynden-Bell, \& Sandage 1962).
132: Meanwhile, study of the individual galaxies in high-z
133: clusters can also provide
134: information on the cluster environment, merging and star formation history
135: in the cluster galaxies, and samples of cluster ellipticals and spirals which could be
136: compared with field galaxies at the high redshift and cluster galaxies at low redshift.
137:
138: The cluster RX J1053.7+5735,
139: which shows an unusual double-lobed
140: X-ray morphology,
141: was discovered during
142: deep (1.31 Msec) {\it ROSAT} HRI pointings
143: (\cite{Hget98}),
144: in the direction of the ``Lockman Hole",
145: a line of sight with exceptionally low HI column density
146: (Lockman et al. 1986).
147: The angular size of the source is 1.7 $\times$ 0.7 arcmin$^2$
148: and
149: two lobes are approximately 1 arcmin apart.
150: The total X-ray flux of the entire source
151: in the 0.5-2.0 keV band
152: is 2 $\times$ 10$^{-14}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$
153: (\cite{Hget98b}).
154: The subsequent deep optical/NIR imaging follow-ups (V $<$ 26.5, R $<$ 25, I $<$ 25,
155: K $<$ 20.5) with LRIS and NIRC on Keck,
156: and the Calar Alto Omega Prime camera
157: revealed a bright 7 arcsecond-long arc with a
158: magnitude of R=21.4 as well as
159: an overdensity of galaxies in both X-ray lobes
160: (e.g. \cite{Thet01}).
161: Further Keck LRIS/NIRSPEC spectroscopic observations on the bright arc
162: and one of the brightest galaxies near the arc showed that the former
163: is a lensed galaxy at a redshift z = 2.57
164: while the latter may be at a redshift of z = 1.263 (\cite{Thet01}).
165: Deep VRIzJHK photometry data
166: produced concordant
167: photometric redshifts for more than 10 objects
168: at redshift of z $\sim$ 1.1-1.3, confirming
169: that at least the eastern lobe is a massive cluster at high redshift.
170: The improbability of chance alignment and similarity of colors for the galaxies in the
171: two X-ray lobes were consistent with the western lobe also being at z $\sim$
172: 1.1-1.3 (\cite{Thet01}).
173:
174: The X-ray data of the XMM-Newton (XMM) observation (with a total
175: effective exposure time
176: $\sim$ 100 ks)
177: performed during the PV phase for this cluster
178: were analyzed
179: (Hashimoto et al. 2002), yielding
180: a best-fit temperature of 4.9 $^{+1.5}_{-0.9}$ keV,
181: while the metallicity was poorly constrained
182: with an upper limit on the iron abundance of 0.62$Z_{\odot}$.
183: Hashimoto et al. (2004), using even deeper ($\sim$ 700 ks) XMM observations,
184: detected the Fe K line in the cluster X-ray emission and obtained a strong constraint on
185: cluster metallicity, which is difficult to achieve for clusters at z $>$ 1.
186: The best-fit abundance is 0.46 $^{+0.11}_{-0.07}$ times the solar value.
187: Comparison with other metallicity measurements of nearby and
188: distant clusters showed that there was little evolution
189: in the ICM metallicity from z $\sim$ 1 to the present.
190: The Fe line emission also allowed them to directly estimate the redshift of
191: diffuse gas, with a value z = 1.14 $^{+0.01}_{-0.01}$.
192: This is one of the first clusters whose
193: X-ray redshift is directly measured prior to the secure knowledge of
194: cluster redshift by optical/NIR spectroscopy.
195: Hashimoto et al. (2004) could also estimate the X-ray redshift separately for each
196: of the two lobes in the double-lobed structure, and the result was
197: consistent with the
198: two lobes being part of one cluster system
199: at the same redshift.
200:
201: Here we report on the optical imaging and spectroscopic follow-up
202: studies of the cluster RX J1053.7+5735 based mainly on our deep observations with 8m-class telescopes.
203: The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2, we briefly
204: describe the observation and data reduction.
205: In Sec. 3, we present imaging and spectroscopic analysis of the
206: cluster RX J1053.7+5735.
207: Sec. 4 summarizes out results.
208: Throughout the paper, we use $H_{o}$ = 65 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$,
209: $\Omega_{m}$=0.3, and $\Omega_{\Lambda}$=0.7
210:
211: \section{Observations and Data}
212: \subsection{Optical and IR Imaging}
213: Deep $R$, $I$, \& $Z$ band images of the region
214: surrounding
215: the cluster
216: RXJ 1053.7+5735 were obtained
217: as a part of IfA Deep Survey (Barris et al. 2004)
218: using
219: the Suprime-Cam
220: (Miyazaki et al. 1998)
221: on the Subaru telescope
222: over ten nights from 2001 November through 2002 April.
223: The camera covers a 34' $\times$ 27' field of view with a
224: pixel scale of 0\farcs20.
225: The $Z$ filter at Subaru has an effective wavelength of 9195 \AA\ and
226: FWHM of 1410 \AA\ (Fukugita et al. 1996), while $R$ and $I$ filters are Cousins
227: $R$ and $I$.
228: The data were taken under various seeing conditions,
229: and we used only
230: images with less than $\sim$ 0\farcs8 seeing.
231: Total effective exposure time after this filtering
232: is 1680s, 2150s, 2640s in $R$, $I$, \& $Z$ band, respectively.
233: The photometry is calibrated to Vega system using Landolt standards (Landolt 1992).
234: For further details of the Subaru data, please see Barris et al. (2004)
235:
236: The infrared $K$ ($K'$) images were obtained in 1994 Nov. and 2002 Jan. at the Calar Alto 3.5m telescope
237: with the Omega-Prime infrared camera, providing a 6\farcm8
238: field of view with 0\farcs39 pixels.
239: The flux scale was calibrated using five UKIRT faint standards
240: (Casali \& Hawarden 1992) obtained during the 2002 January run.
241: The data were taken using dithered motion with amplitude of 10".
242: The total integration time and seeing of
243: the resulting image are 155 min and 1\farcs4.
244:
245: \begin{figure}
246: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[clip]{color.ps}}
247: \caption{
248: The color image of
249: 2\farcm0 $\times$ 1\farcm5 area around the cluster RX J1053.7+5735.
250: The image is composed using $R$, $I$, and $Z$ images taken with Subaru Suprime-
251: Cam.
252: North is up and East is left.
253: Spectroscopically confirmed members (boxes) and their ids are shown.
254: The contour is based on the X-ray image obtained by XMM,
255: combining all events in the 0.2-8 keV band
256: from three
257: (pn, MOS1, \& MOS2) cameras.
258: The lowest contour is 1.9 counts arcsec$^{-2}$ and
259: the contour interval is 0.2 counts arcsec$^{-2}$.
260: }
261: \label{FigTemp}
262: \end{figure}
263:
264: \subsection{Optical Spectroscopy}
265: Spectroscopic observations of cluster galaxies were obtained
266: as a part of optical follow-up program of $\sim$ 140 X-ray sources
267: detected in the Lockman Hole,
268: using
269: the Deep Imaging Multi-Object Spectrograph (DEIMOS; Faber et al. 2003)
270: on the Keck II telescope.
271: Four masks covering a total of 16 $\times$ 20 arcmin$^2$ area
272: were used over a four night observing-run in 2004 February,
273: resulting in a total integration time of $\sim$ 8 hours for each object.
274: Using one mask covering the cluster region,
275: we assigned four tilted slits to cover eight potential cluster members.
276: No fringing is present in the red for DEIMOS,
277: allowing us to use tilted slits, because
278: there is no need to construct
279: a fringe frame
280: using dithered exposures.
281: Cluster galaxies were assigned slits based mainly on their $I-K$ color
282: and $K$ magnitude.
283: We used
284: the 600 lines mm$^{-1}$ grating blazed at 7150 \AA,
285: covering 4550-9700 \AA.
286: The dispersion is 0.65 \AA/pixel.
287: Spectral resolution depends on the angle of the tilted slit, but
288: it is typically $\sim$ 6 \AA.
289: The slit mask data were separated into individual slitlet
290: spectra and then treated as
291: standard long slit spectral data.
292: The integration is split into a series of 1800s exposures.
293: The exposures for each slitlet were reduced separately,
294: then co-added.
295: Wavelength calibration of the spectra was obtained from
296: NeXeCdZnHg arc lamp exposures taken in the same night.
297: A flux calibration was obtained from long-slit
298: observations of the standard stars HZ44 and LTT6028.
299:
300: \begin{figure}
301: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[clip,angle=90]{cm_IK.ps}}
302: \caption{
303: Color-magnitude diagram for galaxies inside a
304: 2\farcm0 $\times$ 1\farcm5
305: field surrounding the cluster RX J1053.7+5735.
306: Colors are based on $I$ band Subaru Suprime-Cam image, and $K$ band
307: Calar Alto Omega-Prime image.
308: Spectroscopically confirmed members are marked by squares, while spectroscopically known foreground galaxies are marked by
309: circles.
310: The error bars near the bottom of the plot indicate
311: the size of 1 $\sigma$ error.
312: The dotted line marks the 5 $\sigma$ limit in $I-K$ color.
313: The dashed line shows the CM relation of Coma
314: transformed to the cluster redshift assuming no evolution.
315: The solid line is a linear fit to the CM relation of galaxies with
316: $K$ $<$ 20, $I-K$ $>$ 3, and $I-K$ $<$ 6, excluding the known foreground galaxies.
317: }
318: \label{FigTemp}
319: \end{figure}
320:
321: \section{RESULTS}
322: \subsection{Photometric Properties}
323: Figure 1 shows
324: a color image of
325: a 2\farcm0 $\times$ 1\farcm5 area around
326: the cluster RX J1053.7+5735.
327: The image is composed using $R$, $I$, and $Z$ band images taken with Subaru Suprime-Cam.
328: Spectroscopically confirmed members (boxes) and their ids, as well as a position of the gravitational arc, are indicated.
329: The contours are from the X-ray image obtained by XMM,
330: combining all events in the 0.2-8 keV band
331: from three
332: (pn, MOS1, \& MOS2) cameras.
333: The lowest contour is 1.9 counts arcsec$^{-2}$ and
334: the contour interval is 0.2 counts arcsec$^{-2}$.
335: A catalog of objects in each optical/IR band was obtained using
336: SExtractor(Bertin \& Arnouts 1996).
337: The photometry was obtained using a fixed 2'' aperture.
338: Objects were detected with the requirement that
339: an object area of 2 arcsec$^2$
340: must be 1.5$\sigma$ above the background.
341: Photometric properties of spectroscopically confirmed
342: galaxies, as well as their spectroscopic redshifts are
343: shown in the table 1.
344:
345: Figure 2 shows
346: a color-magnitude diagram for all objects in a
347: 2\farcm0 $\times$ 1\farcm5
348: field surrounding the cluster RX J1053.7+5735.
349: Colors are based on $I$ image taken with Subaru Suprime-Cam, and
350: $K$ image taken with Calar Alto Omega-Prime camera.
351: Spectroscopically confirmed members are marked by squares, while
352: spectroscopically known foreground galaxies
353: at z=0.05-0.78 from Hasinger et al. (1998b)
354: are marked by
355: circles.
356: The error bars near the bottom of the plot
357: indicate the size of 1 $\sigma$ error.
358: The dotted line marks the 5 $\sigma$ limit in
359: $I-K$ color.
360: The dashed line shows the CM relation of Coma
361: (Stanford et al. 1998)
362: transformed to the cluster redshift assuming no evolution.
363: The solid line is a linear fit,
364: $(I-K)=(4.201\pm0.069)-(0.106\pm0.086)(K-18.5)$,
365: to the CM relation of galaxies with
366: $K$ $<$ 20, $I-K$ $>$ 3, and $I-K$ $<$ 6, excluding the known foreground galaxies.
367: There is an indication that the red sequence
368: in RX J1053.7+5735 lies $\sim$ 0.3 to the blue of the Coma line,
369: qualitatively consistent with previous studies investigating
370: other clusters at z$\sim$ 1
371: using optical-NIR color and, unlike our study,
372: pre-selection of early-type galaxies
373: by their morphologies (e.g. Stanford et al. 1998; van Dokkum et al. 2001;
374: Stanford et al. 2002; Holden et al. 2004).
375: There is also an indication that
376: the fitted slope may be similar with the Coma line,
377: consistent with some high redshift studies
378: (e.g. Blakeslee et al. 2003; Lidman et al. 2004), while
379: contradicting studies reporting the slope evolution
380: (e.g. van Dokkum et al. 2001; Stanford et al. 2002).
381: The caution has to be exercised, however, in interpreting our CM diagram,
382: because of the limitation of
383: the data, and due to the lack of morphological pre-selection.
384:
385: \begin{table}
386: \scriptsize
387: \caption[]{Properties of Galaxies in RX J1053.7+5735}
388: %\begin{center}
389: %\begin{tabular}{lrrrl}
390: %\begin{tabular}{lrrrrrl}
391: \begin{tabular}{lccccrcc}
392: \hline
393: \hline
394: \noalign{\smallskip}
395: ID & R.A. & Decl. & $R$ & $K$ & $R$-$Z$ & $I$-$K$ & Redshift \\
396: & (10:) & (+57:) & (mag) & (mag) & & & \\
397: % & & & (mag) & (mag) & & & \\
398: \noalign{\smallskip}
399: \hline
400: \noalign{\smallskip}
401: %1 & 10:53:46.88 & +57:35:10.39 & 23.08 & 17.21 & -0.19 & 4.44 & 1.130\\
402: %2 & 10:53:46.63 & +57:35:14.56 & 23.68 & 17.66 & -0.08 & 4.44 & 1.129\\
403: %3 & 10:53:44.47 & +57:35:23.79 & 23.55 & 18.38 & -0.15 & 3.64 & 1.139\\
404: %4 & 10:53:42.26 & +57:35:34.67 & 23.88 & 18.29 & -0.16 & 4.06 & 1.139\\
405: %5 & 10:53:41.00 & +57:35:12.69 & 23.86 & 18.42 & -0.32 & 4.03 & 1.130\\
406: %6 & 10:53:40.14 & +57:35:17.77 & 23.48 & 17.30 & 0.00 & 4.6 & 1.135\\
407: 1 & 53:46.88 & 35:10.39 & 23.08 & 17.21 & -0.19 & 4.44 & 1.130\\
408: 2 & 53:46.63 & 35:14.56 & 23.68 & 17.66 & -0.08 & 4.44 & 1.129\\
409: 3 & 53:44.47 & 35:23.79 & 23.55 & 18.38 & -0.15 & 3.64 & 1.139\\
410: 4 & 53:42.26 & 35:34.67 & 23.88 & 18.29 & -0.16 & 4.06 & 1.139\\
411: 5 & 53:41.00 & 35:12.69 & 23.86 & 18.42 & -0.32 & 4.03 & 1.130\\
412: 6 & 53:40.14 & 35:17.77 & 23.48 & 17.30 & 0.00 & 4.60 & 1.135\\
413: \noalign{\smallskip}
414: \noalign{\smallskip}
415: \hline
416: \end{tabular}
417: \end{table}
418:
419: \begin{figure}
420: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[bb=189 100 600 650,clip,angle=90]{splot.1.ps}}
421: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[bb=189 100 487 650,clip,angle=90]{splot.2.ps}}
422: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[bb=150 100 487 650,clip,angle=90]{splot.3.ps}}
423: \caption{Optical spectra of eastern members obtained using DEIMOS mounted on Keck telescope.
424: Sky emission and absorption spectra are shown at the bottom and the top of the figure, respectively,
425: with arbitrary flux levels.
426: Positions of major spectra features are marked by vertical lines. Solid vertical lines represent features
427: used for redshift determination, while dashed lines are plotted just as references.
428: }
429: \label{FigTemp}
430: \end{figure}
431:
432:
433: \subsection{Spectral Properties}
434: Figure 3 and figure 4 show optical spectra of cluster members in the
435: eastern and western subclusters, respectively.
436: Sky emission and absorption spectra are shown at the bottom and the top of the figure, respectively, with arbitrary flux levels.
437: Subtraction of sky {\em emission} lines
438: is relatively good, considering faint magnitude of the objects.
439: The spectra of object 1 and 2 show slightly lower sky-subtraction quality,
440: because they are both observed through a highly tilted slit.
441: Meanwhile, some telluric (i.e. sky absorption) features are eminent,
442: due to the lack of multiplicative sky correction, which is not practical
443: for faint galaxy spectra.
444: Positions of major spectral features are marked by vertical lines. Solid vertical lines represent features
445: used for redshift determination, while dashed lines are plotted just as references.
446: Major spectral absorption features, such as Ca II H \& K and several Balmer lines were typically used for the determination.
447: We avoided using
448: Mg I $\lambda$3830 absorption feature because of its proximity to
449: the telluric lines.
450: Redshifts were calculated by
451: centering these major spectral features,
452: and then fitting a redshift solution using IRAF $rvidlines$ task.
453: Among eight candidate galaxies,
454: six galaxies were found to have redshifts in the range
455: 1.129 $<$ $z$ $<$ 1.139, with a mean redshift $<z>$=1.134 and a
456: line-of-sight velocity dispersion $\Delta$$v$ $\sim$ 650 km s$^{-1}$.
457: The mean redshift agrees well with the cluster redshift
458: derived from
459: the X-ray spectroscopy by Hashimoto et al. (2004).
460: The velocity dispersion may be consistent with
461: that expected from cluster X-ray temperature,
462: although caution has to be exercised in interpreting the
463: result because of the uncertainty associated with the dynamical status
464: of the cluster.
465: All six secure members show clear absorption features of CaII H \& K, and several Balmer lines, typical of early galaxies in the present
466: epoch, and consistent with their $I-K$ colors.
467: An emission like feature at $\sim$8100\AA\ of the object 2 is
468: an artifact caused by cosmic ray which we are unable to completely
469: remove because of its location on a major sky emission line.
470: One additional galaxy in the eastern lobe shows a single emission-like feature
471: in otherwise featureless spectrum. If we interpret this as a real
472: [OII]$\lambda$3727 emission, this may yield a seventh member galaxy at
473: redshift of z=1.122.
474: To be conservative, however, we decided to exclude this galaxy
475: from the cluster membership, because its redshift was estimated by
476: an insecure single feature.
477: For the last (eighth) galaxy we observed, we are unable to obtain a redshift
478: due to the lack of any spectral features.
479:
480: \begin{figure}
481: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[bb=189 100 600 650,clip,angle=90]{splot.4.ps}}
482: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[bb=189 100 487 650,clip,angle=90]{splot.5.ps}}
483: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics[bb=150 100 487 650,clip,angle=90]{splot.6.ps}}
484: \caption{Optical spectra of western members obtained using DEIMOS.
485: Symbols are the same as Fig. 3.
486: }
487: \label{FigTemp}
488: \end{figure}
489:
490:
491: \section{Summary}
492: Using Keck-DEIMOS
493: spectroscopic observations of galaxies
494: in the 2\farcm0 $\times$ 1\farcm5 region surrounding
495: the X-ray detected cluster candidate
496: RX J1053.7+5735, we secured redshifts for six
497: galaxies
498: in the range
499: 1.129 $<$ $z$ $<$ 1.139, with a mean redshift $<z>$=1.134.
500: The mean redshift agrees well with the
501: cluster X-ray redshift previously estimated
502: by Hashimoto et al. (2004) using the cluster X-ray Fe-K line,
503: confirming the presence of a cluster at $z$$\sim$1.135.
504: Galaxy ID 1 shows a clear redshift z=1.13, being
505: consistent with previous photometric redshift, but inconsistent
506: with NIR spectroscopic redshift estimated by Thompson et al. (2001).
507: Galaxies with concordant redshifts
508: are located in both eastern and western sub-clusters of the
509: double cluster structure,
510: indicating that
511: both components are possibly at similar redshifts.
512: This result is also consistent with Hashimoto et al. (2004)
513: where they claimed that both eastern and western X-ray lobes
514: have similar X-ray redshifts.
515: Based on their separation of $\sim$ 250 kpc/h,
516: these results support the interpretation that
517: RX J1053.7+5735 is an equal-mass cluster merger taking
518: place at $z$ $\sim$ 1, although
519: further direct evidence for dynamical state of the cluster is
520: needed for a more definitive statement about
521: the cluster merging state.
522: The six galaxies have a line-of-sight velocity
523: dispersion $\Delta$$v$ $\sim$ 650 km s$^{-1}$.
524: All six galaxies show clear absorption features of CaII H \& K, and
525: several Balmer lines, typical of early galaxies at the present
526: epoch, in agreement with their $I-K$ colors.
527: A color-magnitude diagram, constructed from
528: deep optical/NIR observations of the RX J1053.7+5735 field,
529: shows a clear red color sequence.
530: There is an indication that the red sequence
531: in RX J1053.7+5735 lies $\sim$ 0.3 to the blue of the Coma line,
532: qualitatively consistent with other studies investigating
533: other clusters at z$\sim$ 1
534: using optical-NIR color and pre-selection of early-type galaxies
535: by their morphologies.
536: There is also an indication that
537: the fitted slope may be similar with the Coma line,
538: consistent with some high redshift studies,
539: while
540: contradicting studies reporting the slope evolution.
541: The caution has to be exercised, however, in interpreting our CM diagram,
542: because of the limitation of
543: the data and due to the lack of morphological pre-selection.
544:
545: \begin{acknowledgements}
546: We thank the IfA Surf's Up collaborations for their
547: help in acquiring the Subaru data.
548: JPH thanks the Alexander v. Humboldt Foundation for its
549: generous support.
550: We thank Sekyoung Yi and Sugata Kaviraj for helpful information.
551: We acknowledge referee's comments which improved the manuscript.
552: \end{acknowledgements}
553:
554:
555: \begin{thebibliography}{}
556:
557:
558: \bibitem[Bahcall et al. 1997]{Baet97}
559: Bahcall N., Fan X., Cen R. 1997, ApJ, 485, L53
560:
561: \bibitem[Barris et al. 2004]{Baet04}
562: Barris B.J., Tonry J.L., Blondin S., et al. 2004, ApJ 602, 571
563:
564: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts 1996]{BeAr96}
565: Bertin E., Arnouts S. 1996 A\&AS, 117, 393
566:
567: \bibitem[Blakeslee et al. 2003]{Blet03}
568: Blakeslee J.P., Franx M., Postman M. et al. 2003 ApJ 569, 143
569:
570: \bibitem[Casali \& Hawarden 1992]{CaHa92}
571: Casali M.M., \& Hawarden T.G. 1992, JCMT-UKIRT Newsletter, 4, 33
572:
573: \bibitem[Eggen et al. 1962]{Eget62}
574: Eggen O.J, Lynden-Bell D., Sandage A.R., 1962 ApJ 136 748
575:
576: \bibitem[Eke et al. 1996]{Ekeet96}
577: Eke V.R., Cole S., Frenk C.S., 1996, MNRAS 282, 263
578:
579: \bibitem[Faber et al. 2003]{Faet03}
580: Faber S.M., Phillips A.C, Kibrick R.I. et al. 2003 SPIE 4841, 1657
581:
582: \bibitem[Fukugita et al. 1996]{Fuet96}
583: Fukugita M., Ichikawa T., Gunn J.E. et al. 1996, AJ, 111, 1748
584:
585: \bibitem[Hashimoto et al. 2002]{Haet02}
586: Hashimoto Y., Hasinger G., Arnaud M., Rosati P., \& Miyaji T., 2002, A\&A 381, 841
587:
588: \bibitem[Hashimoto et al. 2004]{Haet04}
589: Hashimoto Y., Barcons X., B\"ohringer H., Fabian A.C, Hasinger G.,
590: et al. 2004, A\&A 419, 819
591:
592: \bibitem[Hasinger et al. 1998a]{Hget98}
593: Hasinger G., Burg R., Giacconi R., et al., 1998a, A\&A 329, 482
594:
595: \bibitem[Hasinger et al. 1998b]{Hget98b}
596: Hasinger G., Giacconi R., Gunn J.E., et al., 1998b, A\&A 340, L27
597:
598: \bibitem[Holden et al. 2004]{Hoet04}
599: Holden B.P., Stanford S.A., Esenhardt P., et al. 2004, AJ 127, 2484
600:
601: \bibitem[Kauffmann 1996]{Ka96}
602: Kauffmann G. 1996 MNRAS, 281, 487
603:
604: \bibitem[Kauffmann \& Charlot 1998]{KaCh91}
605: Kauffmann, G., \& Charlot, S. 1998, MNRAS, 294, 705
606:
607: \bibitem[Lidman et al. 2004]{Liet04}
608: Lidman C., Rosati P., Demarco R. et al. 2004, A\&A, 416, 829
609:
610: \bibitem[Lockman etal. 1986]{Loet86}
611: Lockman F.J, Jahoda K., \& McCammon D. 1986, ApJ 302, 432
612:
613: \bibitem[Miyazaki et al. 1998]{Miet98}
614: Miyazaki S., Sekiguchi M., Imi K. et al. 1998, Proc SPIE, 3355, 363
615:
616: \bibitem[Stanford et al. 1998]{Stet98}
617: Stanford S.A, Eisenhardt P.R., Dickinson M., 1998 ApJ 492, 461
618:
619: \bibitem[Stanford et al. 2002]{Stet02}
620: Stanford S.A, Holden B., Rosati P., et al. 2002, ApJ 123, 619
621:
622: \bibitem[Thompson et al. 2001]{Thet01}
623: Thompson D., Pozzetti L., Hasinger G, et al., 2001, A\&A 377, 778
624:
625: \bibitem[van Dokkum et al. 2001]{va01}
626: van Dokkum P.G., Stanford S.A., Holden B.P. et al., 2001 ApJ 552, L101
627:
628:
629: \end{thebibliography}
630:
631: \end{document}
632: