1: \documentclass[11pt,twoside]{article}
2: \usepackage{asp2004}
3: \usepackage{epsf}
4: \usepackage{psfig}
5: \usepackage{lscape} % for landscape figures/tables
6:
7: \markboth{Gianninas, Bergeron, and Dufour}{DA White Dwarfs from McCook \& Sion}
8: % e.g. \markboth{Dickens, Wilde and Coward}{Some Literature}
9: % e.g. \markboth{Manyauthor et al.}{Results from a Large Collaboration}
10: % only surnames, no initials
11: % make sure that the running heads are short enough so that they do
12: % not affect the page numbers!!
13: %
14: % Capitalize significant words in the titles
15: \pagestyle{myheadings}
16: \setcounter{equation}{0}
17: \setcounter{figure}{0}
18: \setcounter{section}{0}
19: \setcounter{table}{0}
20: % Do NOT define any macros - they will be erased!!!
21:
22: \begin{document}
23: \title{Analysis of DA White Dwarfs from the \\
24: McCook \& Sion Catalog}
25: \author{A. Gianninas, P. Bergeron, and P. Dufour}
26: \affil{D\'epartement de Physique, Universit\'e de Montr\'eal, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montr\'eal, Qu\'ebec, Canada, H3C 3J7}
27: % please use mixed case type and Initials-Familyname order
28: % The last author's name must be proceeded by 'and'.
29: % If you have many authors and institutions you may want to use
30: % superscripts instead and collect all institutions at the end of the
31: % author list. In this case the superscript should follow the
32: % separating comma
33: % \author{A. Author1,$^1$ B. Author2,$^2$ C. Author3,$^3$
34: % and D. Author4$^3$}
35: % \affil{$^1$Institute1 with Postal Address\\
36: % $^2$Institute2 with Postal Address\\
37: % $^3$Institute3 with Postal Address\\}
38: \begin{abstract}
39: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey has already doubled the number of
40: spectroscopically identified white dwarfs. However, there remains a
41: wealth of white dwarfs in the McCook \& Sion catalog for which little
42: or nothing is known. We have thus undertaken a spectroscopic survey of
43: all Northern hemisphere DA white dwarfs from this catalog in order to
44: (1) confirm the spectroscopic classification, and (2) provide
45: measurements of $T_{\rm eff}$ and $\log g$ for each star. As part of
46: this project, we have also secured spectroscopic data for all DA stars
47: with high-speed photometric measurements available, in order to study
48: the purity of the ZZ Ceti instability strip, which has recently been
49: challenged, once again.
50: \end{abstract}
51:
52: \section{The Survey}
53:
54: High Balmer line spectroscopic observations of DA stars from the
55: McCook \& Sion catalog were secured using the Steward Observatory
56: 2.3-m telescope equipped with the Boller \& Chivens
57: spectrograph. Objects were selected on the basis of (1) their
58: temperature index lying between 3 and 7, (2) having an apparent visual
59: magnitude brighter than 17 and (3) being situated in the Northern
60: hemisphere (i.e. declination greater than $-$30 degrees). Eventually, we
61: are planning to secure similar observations for all bright ($V <$ 17)
62: white dwarfs of all spectral types in the catalog. In our attempt to
63: provide a spectroscopic confirmation of all DA stars in the McCook \&
64: Sion catalog, we have found 22 stars classified DA in the McCook \&
65: Sion catalog that are clearly lower gravity objects. These represent
66: $14\%$ of the stars which we have observed to date.
67:
68: \subsection{Results}
69:
70: All DA spectra were fitted with the spectroscopic method described in
71: Bergeron et al. (1992) to determine $T_{\rm eff}$ and $\log
72: g$. Stellar masses are then derived using the evolutionary models of
73: Wood (1995) with thick hydrogen layers. In Figure 1 we show the
74: resulting mass distribution as a function of effective temperature for
75: a total of 770 stars surveyed thus far. Also superposed are isochrones
76: based on the evolutionary models of Wood (1995) and Fontaine et
77: al. (2001) at different ages along the white dwarf cooling sequence
78: (ages are indicated in Gyr). The solid lines correspond to the white
79: dwarf cooling times only, while the dotted lines include the main
80: sequence lifetime.
81:
82:
83: \begin{figure}[!ht]
84: \plotone{f1.eps}
85: \caption{Mass distribution of all DA white dwarfs in our sample as a function of $\log T_{\rm eff}$. The solid lines correspond to isochrones of white dwarf cooling times only, while the dotted lines include the main sequence lifetime as well.}
86: \end{figure}
87:
88:
89: The most striking feature here is the upturn of the sequence at $\log
90: T_{\rm eff}$$\sim$4.1, or $T_{\rm eff}$$\sim$13,000
91: K. Above this temperature, the sequence shows a distribution
92: consistent with an average mass near 0.6 $M_{\sun}$. Since there is no
93: reason, a priori, for white dwarf masses to increase as they cool
94: below 13,000 K, our results may indicate some inadequate treatment of
95: the physics of white dwarf atmospheres (convection, line broadening,
96: opacities, etc.). Alternatively, our basic physical assumptions may be
97: incorrect, such as the atmospheric composition, which is assumed to be
98: of pure hydrogen. Indeed, it is known that the presence of
99: spectroscopically invisible helium in cool DA stars may affect the
100: determinations of $\log g$ (see Boudreault \& Bergeron, these
101: proceedings).
102:
103: Finally, we see that the majority of stars have inferred ages smaller
104: than 10 Gyr based on the isochrones that include main sequence
105: lifetimes. DA stars below $M\sim$0.47 $M_{\sun}$ must have followed a
106: different evolutionary path, most likely through binary star
107: evolution.
108:
109: \subsection{Mass Distribution}
110:
111: The mean mass of our sample turns out to be fairly high at 0.620 $\pm$ 0.140
112: $M_{\sun}$. However, when the sample is divided into two
113: groups, above and below 13,000 K, the mean mass of the hot component
114: decreases to a value of 0.596 $\pm$ 0.131 $M_{\sun}$, more consistent with the
115: results of previous spectroscopic analyses. The cool component has a
116: mean of 0.693 $\pm$ 0.143 $M_{\sun}$, significantly larger than that of hotter
117: stars. This peculiar yet interesting result is currently being
118: investigated by our group.
119:
120: \section{The ZZ Ceti Instability Strip}
121:
122: Figure 2 shows an enlargement of the area in the $T_{\rm eff}$-$\log
123: g$ plane that contains the ZZ Ceti instability strip. The filled
124: circles represent the 36 ZZ Ceti stars from Bergeron et al. (2004),
125: while the open circles correspond to all DA stars that have been
126: confirmed as photometrically constant by various
127: investigators. Finally, the triangles represent all the remaining DA
128: stars in our sample that have not been investigated for photometric
129: variability, to our knowledge.
130:
131:
132: \begin{figure}[!ht]
133: \plotone{f2.eps}
134: \caption{The region of the $T_{\rm eff}$-$\log g$ plane which contains the ZZ Ceti instability strip.}
135: \end{figure}
136:
137: If we consider the photometric samples only (open and filled circles),
138: our result is clearly consistent with the ZZ Ceti instability strip
139: being pure, with all constant stars falling outside the empirical
140: strip, shown as dotted lines in Figure 2. This is clearly at odds with
141: the recent results obtained by Mukadam et al. (2004) who claim, based
142: on the analysis of the DA stars in the SDSS, that the ZZ Ceti
143: instability strip contains a significant fraction of non-variable
144: stars. We believe that high signal-to-noise (S/N $>$ 50)
145: spectroscopic observations are required to achieve the results shown
146: here, a quality that is not necessarily achieved in the SDSS data.
147:
148: Finally, there are 2 program stars that fall well inside the
149: instability strip. One of these two, HE 1429$-$0343, has already been
150: confirmed as a new ZZ Ceti pulsator (see Silvotti et al., these
151: proceedings). With regards to the remaining candidate, high-speed
152: photometric observations are planned in order to ascertain its variability.
153:
154: \section{GD 362: A New Metal-Rich DAZ Star}
155:
156: During the course of large surveys, it is often the case that
157: interesting objects are uncovered. This is the case with GD 362,
158: previously classified as a subdwarf, or possibly as having a composite
159: spectrum. GD 362 is in fact a cool DAZ star, as displayed in Figure
160: 3. This is quite an unusual object showing a number of metallic lines
161: in its spectrum. Also shown is our best fit to the data with
162: the atmospheric parameters indicated in the Figure. The major spectral
163: metallic features are indicated as well. A more detailed analysis of
164: this object will be presented elsewhere.
165:
166: \begin{figure}[!ht]
167: \plotone{f3.eps}
168: \caption{Observed ({\it top}) and synthetic ({\it bottom}) spectra of GD 362.}
169: \end{figure}
170:
171: \acknowledgements{This work was supported in part by the NSERC\\ Canada
172: and by the Fund FQRNT (Qu\'ebec)}.
173:
174: \begin{references}
175: \reference Bergeron, P., Saffer, R. A., \& Liebert J. 1992, \apj, 394, 228
176: \reference Bergeron, P., Fontaine, G., Bill\`eres, M., et al. 2004,
177: \apj, 600, 404
178: \reference Fontaine, G., Brassard, P., \& Bergeron, P. 2001, \pasp, 113, 409
179: \reference Mukadam A. S., Winget, D. E., von Hippel, T., et al. 2004,
180: \apj, 612, 1052
181: \reference Wood, M. A., 1995, in White Dwarfs, Proc. of the 9$^{th}$
182: European Workshop on White Dwarfs, eds. D. Koester \& K. Werner
183: (Berlin: Springer), 41
184: \end{references}
185: \end{document}
186:
187:
188: