1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \newcommand{\hst}{{\sl HST}}
3: \newcommand{\vis}{$V_{606}$}
4: \newcommand{\nir}{$I_{814}$}
5: \slugcomment{ApJL accepted on 17 March 2005}
6: \shorttitle{The the WDs Cooling sequence in NGC~6791}
7: \shortauthors{Bedin et al.}
8: \begin{document}
9: \def\subr #1{_{{\rm #1}}}
10: \title{THE WHITE DWARF COOLING SEQUENCE IN NGC\ 6791}
11:
12: \author{ Luigi R.\ Bedin\altaffilmark{1,2},
13: Maurizio Salaris\altaffilmark{3},
14: Giampaolo Piotto\altaffilmark{2},
15: Ivan R.\ King\altaffilmark{4},
16: Jay Anderson\altaffilmark{5},
17: Santi Cassisi\altaffilmark{6},
18: \and
19: Yazan Momany\altaffilmark{2}
20: }
21:
22: \altaffiltext{1}{European Southern Observatory,
23: Karl-Schwarzschild-Str.\ 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany; lbedin@eso.org}
24:
25: \altaffiltext{2}{Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit\`a di Padova,
26: Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 2, I-35122 Padova, Italy; piotto-momany@pd.astro.it}
27:
28: \altaffiltext{3}{Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores
29: Univ., 12 Quays House, Birkenhead, CH41 1LD, UK; ms@astro.livjm.ac.uk}
30:
31: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy, University of Washington,
32: Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195-1580; king@astro.washington.edu}
33:
34: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Mail Stop 108,
35: Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005;
36: jay@eeyore.rice.edu}
37:
38: \altaffiltext{6}{INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Collurania,
39: via M. Maggini, 64100 Teramo, Italy;
40: cassisi@te.astro.it}
41:
42: \begin{abstract}
43: %
44: In the old, populous, and metal-rich open cluster NGC\ 6791 we have
45: used deep \hst/ACS images to track the white dwarf cooling sequence
46: down to $m_{\rm F606W}\simeq28.5$. The white dwarf luminosity
47: function shows a well defined peak at $m_{\rm F606W}\simeq27.4$, and a
48: bending to the blue in the color--magnitude diagram. If this peak
49: corresponds to the end of the white dwarf cooling sequence the
50: comparison with theoretical isochrones provides a cluster age estimate
51: of $\sim 2.4$ Gyr, in sharp contrast with the age of 8--9 Gyr inferred
52: from the main-sequence turn-off. If the end is at fainter magnitudes,
53: the peak at $m_{\rm F606W}\simeq27.4$ is even more enigmatic. We
54: discuss possible causes, none of them very convincing.
55: %
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58: \keywords{open clusters and associations: individual (NGC\ 6791) ---
59: white dwarfs}
60:
61: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
62: %
63: \section{Introduction}
64: %
65: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
66:
67: NGC\ 6791 is one of the richest open clusters, with age $>8$ Gyr and
68: ([Fe/H] $\sim$ +0.4). Because of these unusual properties, it has
69: been the target of several studies, the most recent by Carney, Lee, \&
70: Dodson (2005).
71:
72: NGC\ 6791 is close enough that \hst/ACS imaging can hope to reach the
73: bottom of the white dwarf (WD) cooling sequence, and therefore
74: estimate its age independently of the main-sequence (MS) turn-off
75: (TO). For clusters older than 3 Gyr this kind of age estimate has
76: previously been attempted only in the $\sim$4-Gyr-old open cluster M67
77: (Richer et al.\ 1998), and the globular cluster M4 (Hansen et al.\
78: 2002, 2004). In the latter case the end of the cooling sequence was
79: not detected, and the age estimate was based on modeling the shape of
80: the observed part of the WD luminosity function (LF).
81:
82: The data on which this letter is based were originally taken to reach
83: the bottom of the MS in NGC\ 6791, but when we first saw the CMD it
84: was clear that the WD cooling sequence (WDCS) was equally exciting. A
85: companion paper will describe the color--magnitude diagram and the MS
86: LF of NGC 6791, and compare the observations with models. Here we
87: focus on the WD sequence.
88:
89: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
90: %
91: \section{Observations and Measurements}
92: %
93: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
94:
95: The data were taken on July 16--17 2003, with \hst's ACS/WFC (GO
96: 9815), and consist of 6 long ($\sim$1150s) and 3 short exposures of
97: $\sim$30s through each of the filters F606W and F814W. A detailed
98: discussion of the data reduction, photometric calibration, and
99: artificial star tests is presented in our companion paper. Briefly,
100: the images in each filter were corrected for distortion according to
101: Anderson (2002), and combined into a stack in which pixels are
102: sub-sampled by a factor of two to remove undersampling. The
103: photometry was performed with DAOPHOT (Stetson 1987). Artificial
104: stars were added in order to determine the completeness curve. The
105: calibration to the ACS Vega-mag system was done following the recipes
106: in Bedin et al.\ (2005).
107:
108: Figure 1 summarizes our observational results. Panel $a)$ shows the
109: color--magnitude diagram (CMD), while panel $b)$ displays the
110: completeness-corrected WD LF. There is a clear peak of density at
111: $m_{\rm F606W}\sim27.4$, after which the LF drops, but stays well
112: above zero down to $m_{\rm F606W}\sim28.2$, where our completeness
113: becomes $\le 50$\%. The peak in the LF coincides with a bending in
114: the CMD of the WDCS. At $m_{\rm F606W}\sim28.2$ there seems to be a
115: second peak, but its significance remains to be investigated. Panel
116: $c)$ shows the input (continuous line) and the output CMD from the
117: artificial-star experiments, and panel $d)$ the corresponding joint
118: (two filters) completeness curve for WDs. Panels $e)$ and $f)$ show a
119: blow-up of the CMD focused on the observed and artificial WDs,
120: respectively.
121:
122: It is evident from panels $b)$ and $d)$ that at the level of the
123: density peak in the WD LF the completeness is still $\sim85$\%, and
124: therefore the peak and the bending to the blue are real.
125: %
126: At $\ell\sim70^\circ$, $b\sim+11^\circ$ we expect the contribution of
127: field WDs in our small field to be negligible, and because we rejected
128: all non-point-like sources by visual inspection, we expect the number
129: of contaminating galaxies also to be negligible.
130:
131: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
132: %
133: \section{Comparison with theory}
134: %
135: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
136:
137: In Fig.~2, DA WD isochrones for ages of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 Gyr are
138: compared with the observed WD sequence. The isochrones came from the
139: WD models by Salaris et al.\ (2000), transformed into the ACS Vega-mag
140: system using the most up-to-date on-orbit transmission curves
141: (Sirianni et al.\ 2005), and color transformations generously provided
142: by P.\ Bergeron, based on the model atmospheres used in Bergeron,
143: Leggett, \& Ruiz (2001). In addition to the cooling models, we have
144: adopted the empirical relation between WD mass and progenitor mass
145: initial-final mass relation, IFMR) by Weidemann (2000). The
146: progenitor lifetimes come from the Pietrinferni et al.\ (2004) grid of
147: stellar models.
148:
149: In the WD model-fitting we adopted the distance and reddening found in
150: our companion paper, where we showed that the best fit to the MS TO
151: and subgiant branch (reproduced also in Fig.~2) is obtained with
152: [Fe/H] = 0.26, an apparent modulus $(m-M)_{\rm F606W}= 13.44$, and a
153: reddening $E(m_{\rm F606W}-m_{\rm F814W})= 0.14$. These correspond to
154: $(m-M)_V$=13.50 and $E(B-V)$=0.15 in the Johnson band-passes (Bedin et
155: al.\ 2005). Notably, the age derived from the fitting of the TO is
156: between 8 and 9 Gyr, as discussed in more detail in our companion
157: paper. All these values are in broad agreement with the recent
158: analysis by Carney et al.\ (2005).
159:
160: The brighter parts of our WD isochrones are populated by objects with
161: mass of $\sim$0.54 $m_{\odot}$---i.e., WDs produced by the stars
162: presently at the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) tip. The isochrones
163: reproduce well the main body of the observed WD sequence between
164: $m_{\rm F606W}\sim 24$ and $m_{\rm F606W}\sim 26$. A few objects in
165: this magnitude range lie to the red side of the main locus of the
166: WDCS, most probably a mixture of field contamination, He-core WDs and
167: possibly unresolved binary WD-WD systems.
168:
169: The bottom of the WD isochrones shows a turn to the blue due to the
170: appearance of larger WD masses, from the more massive stars that
171: evolved off the AGB early in the cluster's history. The brightness of
172: this turn to the blue is a function of cluster age (see, e.g., Salaris
173: et al.\ 2000, Richer et al.\ 2000). It is clear from Fig.~2 that even
174: the bottom of the 6 Gyr WD isochrone is at a brightness where the peak
175: in the WD population has already dropped.
176:
177: Figure 2 highlights {\it a potentially serious mismatch between the
178: MSTO and WD ages for NGC\ 6791}. For comparison we also show in
179: Fig.~2 the location of the sample of cool WDs in the solar
180: neighborhood (open squares) analyzed by Bergeron et al.\ (2001),
181: translated into the same ACS Vega-mag system with the transformations
182: adopted in this paper. As expected, the local WDs reach fainter
183: magnitudes than the bulk of the cluster WDCS, down to a brightness
184: consistent with our 8 Gyr isochrone.
185:
186: To investigate further this age mismatch, we consider again the LF of
187: the cluster WDCS (see Fig.~3 {\it top} panel), with its well-defined
188: peak at $m_{\rm F606W}\sim$ 27.4. From a theoretical point of view,
189: one can determine a LF for a given age starting from the appropriate
190: WD isochrone and adopting an initial mass function (IMF) for the
191: progenitors (see, e.g., Richer et al.\ 2000); all theoretical LFs show
192: a peak at the faint end that moves toward fainter luminosities as the
193: cluster age increases, reflecting the behavior of the underlying
194: isochrones. This peak is caused by the ``piling up'' at the bottom of
195: the WD isochrone of WDs of all masses, due to their finite cooling
196: age. If one uses a power-law IMF ($dn/dm\propto m^{-(1+x)}$), the
197: exact value of the exponent $x$ ($x=1.35$ for Salpeter IMF) does not
198: affect the position of the LF peak. The position of the peak of the
199: observed WDCS can be reproduced only by assuming an age below 3~Gyr,
200: in clear disagreement with the estimated TO age of about 8--9 Gyr
201: ($\sim$1.5~mag fainter). A sub-population of stars with age of
202: $\sim$3 Gyr can be excluded by the fact that we do not observe the
203: corresponding TO.
204:
205: Further evidence that we are facing a serious problem is given in
206: Fig.~3 ({\it middle} and {\it bottom} panels), which compares the WD
207: LF of the solar-metallicity open cluster M67 (Richer et al.\ 1998)
208: with our NGC 6791 WD LF. The NGC\ 6791 WD data have been transformed
209: into the Johnson-Cousins system from the ACS one, using the
210: transformations by Sirianni et al.\ (2005), which should be accurate
211: to a few hundredths of a magnitude. The distance moduli have been
212: subtracted from both LFs (we used values in Percival \& Salaris 2003),
213: and the NGC\ 6791 LF has been rebinned in order to match the M67
214: binning. The M67 LF also shows a peak, which most probably denotes
215: the bottom of the DA WD sequence. Surprisingly enough, the peaks in
216: the two clusters are at the same absolute magnitude. But the TO age
217: of M67 is
218: %
219: only $\sim$4 Gyr (see, e.g., Salaris, Weiss \& Percival 2004), i.e.,
220: about half the NGC\ 6791 age. With our WD isochrones, using lifetimes
221: for solar-metallicity progenitors, we can reproduce the observed peak
222: in the M67 WD LF adopting an age of 3.5 Gyr, consistent with its TO
223: age. The same result is obtained by Richer et al.\ (1998, 2000) with
224: their own WD isochrones. The fact that the TO and WD ages agree for
225: M67 makes the disagreement in NGC\ 6791 even more puzzling.
226:
227: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
228: %
229: \section{Discussion}
230: %
231: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
232:
233: As shown in the previous paragraph, the nature of the the WD LF peak
234: at $m_{\rm F606W}\simeq27.4$ is enigmatic. We are faced with two
235: possibilities:\ 1) either the peak represents the bottom of the WDCS,
236: and in this case we need to understand why the WD cooling age is in
237: sharp contrast with the age inferred from the MS TO; or 2) the peak is
238: not due to the classical DA WDs. In the following we will further
239: discuss the consequences of these two hypotheses.
240:
241: Let us first examine the possibility that the observed peak indeed
242: represents the bottom of the WDCS of NGC\ 6791. A wrong cooling age
243: could simply come from having adopted a wrong distance modulus, but an
244: apparent distance modulus smaller by 1.5 mag would imply a TO age well
245: above 20 Gyr. On the other hand, we cannot exclude that the TO age
246: could be wrong because the adopted metallicity is wrong, though the
247: most likely metallicity interval (Taylor 2001) cannot solve the
248: discrepancy.
249:
250: Another possibility is an IFMR radically different from the one we
251: used. However, as we have verified with various numerical tests, none
252: of the proposed IFMR in Fig.\ 11 of Hansen et al.\ (2004) helps solve
253: the problem. As noted by the referee (H.\ Richer), the WD LF shows an
254: apparent gap (of low statistical significance, however), at $M_{\rm
255: F606W} \simeq12.2$, which could correspond to a similar feature
256: identified in M4 at $M_{\rm F606W}\simeq13.2$ (Hansen et al.\
257: 2004)---a full magnitude fainter. Is this further evidence that the
258: cooling models specific for NGC\ 6791 fail? In the magnitude range
259: covered by the bottom of the observed WD sequence all modern WD
260: cooling models---including the Salaris et al.\ (2000) models we have
261: adopted here---provide very similar cooling times (see, e.g.,
262: Prada-Moroni \& Straniero 2002).
263:
264: Another possibility of explaining this age mismatch is to invoke a
265: wrong CO chemical stratification in the WD core of the models (that
266: underestimates the energy available during the cooling and the
267: crystallization process) and/or a wrong atmospheric H-layer thickness.
268: However, the most recent determination of the $\rm C^{12}(\alpha,
269: \gamma)O^{16}$ reaction rate would not solve the problem, nor would
270: the largest possible value of $\Delta m_{\rm H}$ for the H-layer.
271:
272: The CMD of Fig.~1 clearly shows that NGC\ 6791 has a large population
273: of binaries. It might be that the LF peak is made of DA WDs whose
274: progenitors were produced by merging (or stripping) in binaries,
275: possibly during their MS phase. If these mergers occur about 2--3~Gyr
276: after the birth of the cluster and the resulting objects have masses
277: of $\sim$1.5~$m_{\odot}$, their WD progeny would populate the region
278: of the LF peak for a cluster age of about 8~Gyr. The counterpart of
279: these merged progenitors might be the blue stragglers (BSs). Davies,
280: Piotto, \& De Angeli (2004), based on observational evidence by Piotto
281: et al.\ (2004), show that the number of BSs coming from evolving
282: binaries should have been much larger in the first few Gyr of the life
283: of the cluster. We also note that the HB of NGC\ 6791 has an
284: anomalous morphology (Yong et al.\ 2000). The origin of this anomaly
285: is not at all clear, and it is even less clear how it propagates into
286: the WD regime.
287:
288: Let us now explore the case that the LF peak is not due to DA WDs.
289: WDs with a degenerate He-core and masses of 0.3--0.4 $m_{\odot}$, from
290: progenitors of $\sim$1.3--1.5 $m_{\odot}$, can populate the region of
291: the observed peak if we adopt a cluster age of $\sim$8 Gyr, according
292: to the He-core WD models by Serenelli et al.\ (2001). However, a
293: substantial contamination by He-core WDs can be excluded because, due
294: to their lower mass, they are much redder than the bulk of the WDCS we
295: observe. We explicitly verified this point by transforming into the
296: ACS Vega-mag photometric system the He-core WD models by Serenelli et
297: al.\ (2001) for masses of 0.32 and 0.41 $m_{\odot}$ (see Fig.~2).
298: Moreover, using as normalizing factor the number of stars on the MS,
299: and adopting a Salpeter IMF, we estimated that the total number of CO
300: WDs in our field should be $\sim$430, which compares reasonably well
301: with the $\sim$600 objects observed. Though ignorance of the IMF at
302: higher masses, and mass segregation effects, make this number
303: extremely uncertain, there seems little room for a substantial
304: population of He-core objects. For DA WD luminosities around
305: $\log(L/L_{\odot})\sim -4.0$, non-DA objects are slightly fainter than
306: DAs ($\sim$0.5 mag, but the exact value depends on the WD mass), and
307: the difference increases fast with decreasing luminosity. These
308: objects may contribute to the possible second peak around $\sim$28.2
309: but, again, only for ages around 3~Gyr. Also, the possibility that
310: the peak comes from a cluster of far, unresolved blue galaxies can be
311: excluded, as the spatial distribution of the observed WDs is not
312: significantly different from that of the cluster MS stars.
313:
314: We also note that the WD LF of Fig.~1b never drops to zero. This fact
315: could indicate that we have not reached the end of the WDCS. In this
316: case the presence of a peak in the WDCS may also indicate the onset of
317: an unknown energy release at this specific age and metallicity
318: (sedimentation/separation of CO, pycnonuclear reaction, or whatever
319: can cause a temporary slowdown in the cooling).
320:
321: Finally, it is worth remarking that NGC\ 6791 is a cluster with
322: several peculiarities (high binary fraction, anomalous HB, very metal
323: rich, dynamically old, etc.) that may have altered the stellar
324: populations in the cluster, and hence it is too early to call for
325: major revisions in the WD formation and evolution models. It is
326: surely of great interest to extend the present investigation at least
327: down to the magnitude where we expect to see the peak of a 8--9 Gyr
328: WDCS.
329:
330:
331: \acknowledgments
332:
333: We are grateful to Pierre Bergeron and to Alvio Renzini. I.R.K.\ and
334: J.A.\ acknowledge support by STScI grant GO-9815. S.C., G.P., and
335: Y.M.\ acknowledge support by MIUR under PRIN2003.
336:
337: \clearpage
338:
339: \begin{thebibliography}{}
340:
341: \bibitem[]{} Anderson, J. 2002, HST Calibration Workshop 2002, ed.\ S.\ Arribas, A.\ Koekemoer, B.\ Whitmore (Baltimore:\ STScI), p.\ 13
342: \bibitem[]{} Anderson, J., \& King, I.\ R. 2000, \pasp, 112, 1360
343: \bibitem[]{} Bedin, L.\ R., et al. 2005, \mnras, 357, 1038
344: \bibitem[]{} Bergeron, P., Leggett, S.\ K., \& Ruiz, M.\ T. 2001, \apjs, 133, 413
345: \bibitem[]{} Carney, B.\ W., Lee, J-W., \& Dodson, B. 2005, AJ, 129, 656
346: \bibitem[]{} Davies, M., Piotto, G., \& De Angeli, F. 2004, \mnras, 349, 129
347: \bibitem[]{} Hansen, B.\ M.\ S., et al.\ 2002, \apjl, 574, 155
348: \bibitem[]{} Hansen, B.\ M.\ S., et al.\ 2004, \apjs, 155, 551
349: \bibitem[]{} Percival, S.\ M., \& Salaris, M. 2003, \mnras, 343, 539
350: \bibitem[]{} Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., \& Castelli, F. 2004, \apj, 612, 168
351: \bibitem[]{} Piotto, G., et al. 2004, \apjl, 604, 109
352: \bibitem[]{} Prada-Moroni, P.\ G., \& Straniero, O. 2002, \apj, 581, 585
353: \bibitem[]{} Richer, H.\ B., et al.\ 1998, \apjl, 504, 91
354: \bibitem[]{} Richer, H.\ B., et al.\ 2000, \apj, 529, 318
355: \bibitem[]{} Salaris, M., et al. 2000, \apj, 544, 1036
356: \bibitem[]{} Salaris, M., Weiss, A., \& Percival, S.\ M. 2004, \aap, 414, 163
357: \bibitem[]{} Serenelli, A.\ M. et al. 2001, \mnras, 325, 607
358: \bibitem[]{} Sirianni, M., et al. 2005, \pasp, submitted
359: \bibitem[]{} Stetson, P.\ B., 1987, PASP, 99, 191
360: \bibitem[]{} Taylor, B. \ J. 2001, \aap, 377, 473
361: \bibitem[]{} Weidemann, V. 2000, \aap, 188, 74
362: \bibitem[]{} Yong, H., Demarque, P, \& Yi, S. 2000, \apj 539, 928
363: \end{thebibliography}
364:
365: \clearpage
366:
367: \begin{figure}
368: \epsscale{1.00}
369: \plotone{f1.eps}
370: \caption{The CMD and WD LF of NGC\ 6791 and the artificial-star
371: results (see text). The broadening in color of the observed CMD at
372: the level of the WD peak is $\sim60\%$ larger than for artificial
373: stars.}
374: \end{figure}
375:
376: \begin{figure}
377: \epsscale{1.00}
378: \plotone{f2.eps}
379: \caption{The MS and the WDCS of NGC\ 6791, fitted with 2, 4, 6, 8, and
380: 10 Gyr isochrones, with the same distance modulus and reddening. The
381: lines on the red side of the WD isochrones indicate the loci of WDs
382: with pure helium cores of 0.32 and 0.41 $m_\odot$.}
383: \end{figure}
384:
385: \begin{figure}
386: \epsscale{1.00}
387: \plotone{f3.eps}
388: \caption{ ({\it Top} panel) The completeness-corrected LF, with the
389: theoretical LFs for 2.4 and 8 Gyr overplotted. The vertical dotted
390: line is the 50\% completeness level. The WD LF of M67 ({\it middle}
391: panel) and that NGC\ 6791 ({\it bottom} panel) have peaks at the same
392: absolute magnitude, corresponding to an age $<$4 Gyr.}
393: \end{figure}
394:
395: \end{document}
396: