1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{natbib}
4:
5: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
6: \newcommand{\myemail}{valboz@sa.infn.it}
7:
8: \shorttitle{Gravitational Lensing of stars orbiting Sgr A*}
9: \shortauthors{Bozza and Mancini}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \title{Gravitational Lensing of stars in the central arcsecond of our Galaxy}
14:
15: \author{V. Bozza$^{1,2,3}$ and L. Mancini$^{2,3}$}
16: \affil{$^1$Centro Studi e Ricerche ``Enrico Fermi'', via
17: Panisperna 89/A, Roma, Italy.}
18:
19: \affil{$^2$Dipartimento di Fisica ``E.R. Caianiello'',
20: Universit\'a di Salerno, via S. Allende, Baronissi (SA), Italy.}
21:
22: \affil{$^3$Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di
23: Napoli, Italy.}
24:
25:
26: \begin{abstract}
27: In the neighborhood of Sgr A*, several stars (S2, S12, S14, S1,
28: S8, S13) enjoy an accurate determination of their orbital
29: parameters. General Relativity predicts that the central black
30: hole acts as a gravitational lens on these stars, generating a
31: secondary image and two infinite series of relativistic images.
32: For each of these six stars, we calculate the light curves for the
33: secondary and the first two relativistic images, in the
34: Schwarzschild black hole hypothesis, throughout their orbital
35: periods. The curves are peaked around the periapse epoch, but two
36: subpeaks may arise in nearly edge-on orbits, when the source is
37: behind or in front of Sgr A*. We show that for most of these stars
38: the secondary image should be observable during its brightness
39: peak. In particular, S14 is the best candidate, since its
40: secondary image reaches K=23.3 with an angular separation of 0.125
41: mas from the apparent horizon of the central black hole. The
42: detection of such images by future instruments could represent the
43: first observation of gravitational lensing beyond the weak field
44: approximation.
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \keywords{Gravitational lensing --- Black hole physics --- Stars:
48: individual(\objectname{S2},\objectname{S12},\objectname{S14},\objectname{S1},\objectname{S8},\objectname{S13})
49: --- Galaxy: center}
50:
51:
52: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
53: \section{Introduction}
54: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
55:
56: In the last years, the existence of a supermassive black hole
57: corresponding to the radio source Sgr A* has been established on a
58: quite solid ground \citep{MelFal}. The studies of stellar dynamics
59: in the neighborhood of Sgr A* have played a major role in this
60: scientific process providing strong evidence in favor of the
61: existence of a huge point-like mass hidden in this radio source.
62: The most accurate observations have been led by an American group
63: at Keck \citep{Ghez1,Ghez2,Ghez3}, and by a German group at VLT
64: \citep{EckGen,Genzel,Eckart,Sch1,Sch2,Eis}.
65:
66: The measurement of the proper motions of stars very close to the
67: central black hole has led to a three-dimensional reconstruction
68: of the orbits of six stars, named S2, S12, S14, S1, S8, S13 by
69: \citet{Sch2} and S0-2, S0-19, S0-16, S0-1, S0-4, S0-20 by
70: \citet{Ghez3}, respectively. The ambiguity on the sign of the
71: inclination was resolved for the first of these stars by Doppler
72: shift measures \citep{Ghez2}. Then, very recently, further
73: measurements have resolved this ambiguity also for the remaining
74: stars \citep{Eis}. Now the orbital parameters of all of them are
75: known to an accuracy reasonable enough to start investigations
76: relying on the knowledge of the geometric configurations between
77: the star and the central black hole. Indeed one of the most
78: interesting effects to search for is gravitational lensing.
79:
80: The bending of light by gravitational fields is an invaluable
81: instrument to investigate the properties of the lensing object,
82: its mass distribution, the gravitational potential and many
83: general relativistic effects. The stars around the black hole at
84: the Galactic Center provide a unique lab for gravitational lensing
85: researches, which may have very much to say in the near future on
86: gravitational physics.
87:
88: The first studies of gravitational lensing by Sgr A* have been
89: performed by \citet{WarYus}, who focused on sources in the stellar
90: cluster surrounding it. They realized that gravitational lensing
91: would slightly deplete the sky of visible stars in a region of
92: radius 10 mas, pushing them to 30 mas. However, such a statistical
93: effect is practically unobservable given the observed stellar
94: density in the neighborhood of Sgr A*. Gravitational lensing could
95: be recognized by identifying opposite images of a star passing
96: behind the central black hole. Several stars should be
97: significantly lensed at a given time. Estimates by \citet{Jar},
98: \citet{AleSte}, \citet{CGM} agree that roughly 10 stars in the
99: Galactic bulge are simultaneously lensed by Sgr A* with a
100: detection threshold for the secondary image of 23 mag in the
101: K-band. However, recognizing gravitational lensed images is by no
102: way a trivial task. While the secondary image would stay very
103: close to the central black hole (at about 30 mas), the direct
104: image of the source could be displaced by as much as several
105: arcsecs. The association between the two images could be
106: established on the basis of common spectral properties, flux
107: variation and full correlation in their proper motions (the
108: lensing event should have a duration of some months). Eventual
109: observations of several pairs of images could pinpoint the exact
110: position of the black hole \citep{Ale}. The secondary images could
111: be additionally lensed by a possible population of stellar size
112: black holes around the supermassive one \citep{AleLoe,CGM,Muno},
113: though such a double microlensing event is relatively unlikely.
114: Another possibility is to measure the shift of the apparent
115: position of a star passing just behind the black hole
116: \citep{NusBro}. Such a measurement, would provide an independent
117: estimate of the distance of Sgr A*.
118:
119: Coming to our six stars, we have an evident advantage: we
120: precisely know their location in space as a function of time and
121: thus the geometry of the lensing configuration. Since we already
122: observe the direct image, we can predict at any time where to look
123: for a secondary lensing image and what its apparent magnitude
124: should be. Thanks to our knowledge of their orbits, we can easily
125: predict the best time to observe these secondary images. Finally,
126: since the distances between the sources and the lens are known,
127: the information extraction from gravitational lensing observations
128: is much easier and unambiguous.
129:
130: A very important fact that must be taken into account in the study
131: of the light curves of gravitational lensing images is that the
132: weak field regime for the secondary image holds only for a very
133: good alignment between source, lens and observer. This is not the
134: case for the six stars studied in this article. This forces us to
135: resort to the full General Relativity deflection angle formula,
136: which is very well known since old times in terms of elliptic
137: integrals \citep{Dar}. The deflection angle diverges
138: logarithmically at a characteristic minimum impact angle for any
139: class of spherically symmetric black holes \citep{Boz1}, implying
140: the existence of two infinite series of "ghosts", as called by
141: \citet{Dar}, or relativistic images, as named by \citet{VirEll}.
142: These images are due to photons winding one or more times around
143: the black holes and are usually extremely faint. Moreover, they
144: would appear very close to the central black hole, at angular
145: separations comparable to the apparent Schwarzschild horizon,
146: which is about 23 $\mu$as. The detection of such images would thus
147: require a higher order technological effort, including very long
148: baseline interferometry in the K-band and very high sensitivity.
149: However, these images are very precious witnesses of the extreme
150: gravitational field at distances slightly larger than the
151: Schwarzschild radius of the central black hole. The information
152: stored in them is of striking importance to unveil the features of
153: the true gravitational theory and the mysteries on the physics of
154: the central black hole. Relativistic images produced by Sgr A*
155: have also been studied by \citet{Pet}, who noticed that their
156: contribution to microlensing is negligible, and by \citet{EirTor}
157: in the context of retro-lensing.
158:
159: S2 was the first star around Sgr A* to be studied as a possible
160: source for gravitational lensing effects \citep{DeP}. Even if its
161: orbit never allows a good alignment with Sgr A*, the secondary
162: image can reach K$\lesssim 30$ while it is in a fully relativistic
163: regime. In a previous work \citep{BozMan}, we presented a complete
164: study of S2 gravitational lensing using the tools of the Strong
165: Field Limit method \citep{BCIS,Boz1}. In this way we have been
166: able to predict the precise epoch of the best observability of the
167: secondary image.
168:
169: In this paper we develop a complete analysis of the six
170: aforementioned stars as potential sources for gravitational
171: lensing by the central black hole, finding interesting results,
172: especially for the star S14. To cover the whole range of
173: gravitational lensing regimes, from strong to weak, we will
174: exclusively use the exact deflection formula known for the
175: Schwarzschild black hole. In this way we can achieve a very
176: reliable and precise description for the light curves of all
177: images.
178:
179: Our paper is structured as follows. In \S~ 2 we review the exact
180: Schwarzschild deflection formula and some basics of gravitational
181: lensing. In \S~ 3 we recall the features of the six stars we want
182: to examine, discussing the geometry of their orbits. In \S~ 4 we
183: present the results of our analysis, with the light curves of our
184: six stars and the positions of the secondary images. In \S~ 5 we
185: discuss the perspectives for observations of these images using
186: long baseline interferometry. Finally, \S~ 6 contains the
187: conclusions.
188:
189:
190:
191: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
192: \section{Schwarzschild gravitational lensing}
193: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
194:
195: \begin{figure}
196: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{F1.eps}}
197: \caption{A generic lensing configuration.}
198: \label{Fig Lens Eq}
199: \end{figure}
200:
201: Consider the generic three-point configuration between source,
202: lens and observer, illustrated in Figure \ref{Fig Lens Eq}. We
203: indicate by $D_{OL}$, $D_{LS}$ and $D_{OS}$ the distance between
204: observer and lens, lens and source, observer and source
205: respectively. All the distances are measured in terms of the
206: Schwarzschild radius of the black hole
207: \begin{equation}
208: R_{Sch}=\frac{2G M}{c^2}.
209: \end{equation}
210:
211: We call optical axis the line connecting the observer and the
212: lens. We denote by $\gamma$ the angle between the line connecting
213: the source to the lens and the optical axis, and by $\beta$ the
214: angle formed by the line connecting source and observer with the
215: optical axis. The direct image of the source suffers (weak)
216: gravitational lensing only when $\gamma$ is very close to zero.
217: The secondary image is formed by photons passing behind the black
218: hole, as shown in Figure \ref{Fig Lens Eq}. The impact angles for
219: the photons as seen from the observer and the source are $\theta$
220: and $\overline{\theta}$, respectively. The deflection angle is
221: defined as the angle between the asymptotic directions of motion
222: of the photons, before and after the encounter with the black
223: hole.
224:
225: By inspection of Figure \ref{Fig Lens Eq}, we can write down the
226: following lens equation
227: \begin{equation}
228: \gamma=\alpha(\theta)- \theta -\overline{\theta}. \label{Lens Eq}
229: \end{equation}
230:
231: The impact parameter $u$ is related to the impact angles $\theta$
232: and $\overline{\theta}$ by
233: \begin{equation}
234: u= D_{OL} \sin\theta =D_{LS} \sin \overline{\theta}.
235: \end{equation}
236: This relation can be used to eliminate $\overline{\theta}$ in
237: favor of $\theta$. The position angle of the source $\gamma$ runs
238: from 0 (perfect alignment) to $\pi$ (perfect anti-alignment).
239:
240: Besides the direct and the secondary image, we also have higher
241: order relativistic images, which form closer to the central black
242: hole. Because of their potential importance as probes of very
243: strong gravitational fields, in our analysis we will also discuss
244: the third and the fourth order image. The third order image is
245: formed by photons turning around the black hole and reaching the
246: observer from the same side of the direct image. It is described
247: by a lens equation of the type
248: \begin{equation}
249: 2\pi-\gamma=\alpha(\theta)- \theta -\overline{\theta}.
250: \end{equation}
251: Notice that the deflection angle $\alpha(\theta)$ is in the range
252: $[\pi, 2\pi ]$.
253:
254: The fourth order image is formed by photons performing a complete
255: loop around the black hole and reaching the observer from the side
256: of the secondary image. It is described by a lens equation of the
257: type
258: \begin{equation}
259: 2\pi+\gamma=\alpha(\theta)- \theta -\overline{\theta}.
260: \end{equation}
261: The required deflection angle is in the range $[2\pi, 3\pi ]$.
262:
263: The direct and the third order image have positive parity while
264: the secondary and the fourth order ones have negative parity.
265:
266: The exact deflection angle was calculated by \citet{Dar} in terms
267: of elliptic integrals. It can be written as a function of the
268: closest approach distance $x_0$ as
269:
270: \begin{equation}
271: \alpha(x_0)=-\pi-4 F \left( \varphi_0,\lambda
272: \right)G\left(x_0\right), \label{alpha exact}
273: \end{equation}
274: where
275: \begin{equation}
276: G\left(x_0\right)=\sqrt{\frac{8x_0\left(-3+x_0+\sqrt{(-1+x_0)(3+x_0)}
277: \right)}{3-2x_0}}
278: \end{equation}
279: and
280: \begin{equation}
281: F \left( \varphi_0,\lambda
282: \right)=\int\limits_0^{\varphi_0}\left(1-\lambda \sin^2 \varphi
283: \right)^{-1/2} {d} \varphi%
284: \label{Elliptic function}
285: \end{equation}
286: is an elliptic integral of first kind. The parameters $\varphi_0$
287: and $\lambda$ are themselves functions of $x_0$:
288: \begin{equation}
289: \varphi_0=\arcsin \sqrt{\frac{-3+x_0-\sqrt{-3+2x_0+x_0^2}}
290: {2\left(-3+2x_0 \right)}} ,
291: \end{equation}
292: and
293: \begin{equation}
294: \lambda=\frac{3-x_0-\sqrt{-3+2x_0+x_0^2}}
295: {3-x_0+\sqrt{-3+2x_0+x_0^2}}.
296: \end{equation}
297:
298: The relation between the closest approach distance $x_0$ and the
299: impact parameter $u$ can be easily found by the conservation of
300: angular momentum
301: \begin{equation}
302: x_0^2=\left(1-\frac{1}{x_0} \right) u^2.
303: \end{equation}
304:
305: The use of the exact formula (\ref{alpha exact}) is rather
306: cumbersome in analytical applications. Actually, before Darwin's
307: work only the weak field limit for large impact parameters was
308: known. In Schwarzschild units, it reads
309: \begin{equation}
310: \alpha_{WFL}= \frac{2}{u}.
311: \end{equation}
312:
313: The opposite limit is recovered when $u$ approaches its minimum
314: value $u_m=3\sqrt{3}/2$. In this limit, we have
315: \citep{Dar,Oha,BCIS}
316: \begin{equation}
317: \alpha_{SFL}=-\log\left( \frac{u}{u_m}-1
318: \right)+\log\left[216(7-4\sqrt{3}) \right]-\pi.
319: \end{equation}
320: This formula was later extended by \citet{Boz1} to a generic
321: spherically symmetric black hole and to a Kerr black hole for
322: equatorial motion \citep{Boz2}. The logarithmic divergence of the
323: deflection angle at the minimum impact parameter signals the
324: presence of an infinite sequence of images with deflection angles
325: which differ by a multiple of $2\pi$ (an arbitrary number of loops
326: around the black hole). For impact parameters below $u_m$, the
327: photon is always captured by the black hole. The striking
328: importance of higher order images comes from the fact that they
329: can be directly related to the values of the metric components and
330: their derivatives close to the horizon \citep{Boz1}. This provides
331: a unique way to identify the class to which the black hole
332: belongs, possibly giving hints on the correct gravitational theory
333: that holds in the strong field regime.
334:
335: \begin{figure}
336: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{F2.eps}}
337: \caption{Comparison between the exact deflection angle (solid line),
338: the weak field approximation (dotted line) and the strong field limit approximation
339: (dot-dashed line), as functions of $\mathrm{Log}_{10}(u/u_m-1)$.}
340: \label{Fig Compari}
341: \end{figure}
342:
343: In Figure \ref{Fig Compari}, we compare the exact deflection angle
344: with the two approximations. We see that the weak field limit is
345: valid only for very small deflection angles at large impact
346: parameters, while the strong field limit starts to be accurate
347: from $\alpha=\pi$ at impact parameters very close to the minimum
348: value. For our purpose neither of the two limits is suitable,
349: since the secondary image demands a deflection angle in the whole
350: range $[0, \pi ]$.
351:
352: Our strategy is to solve the exact lens equations for the direct,
353: the secondary, the third order and fourth order image, using the
354: approximate solutions as starting points (the weak field solution
355: for the direct and the strong field ones for the others). We shall
356: keep the terms $\theta$ and $\overline{\theta}$ in the equations,
357: since they are relevant in the weak field regime and in the
358: intermediate one, though they become very small in the strong
359: field regime, at least for the sources considered here.
360:
361: The magnification of an image at angle $\theta$ is given by the
362: general formula
363: \begin{equation}
364: \mu=\frac{D_{OS}^2}{D_{LS}^2}\frac{\sin\theta}{ \frac{d
365: \gamma}{d\theta} \sin{\gamma}}. \label{mu}
366: \end{equation}
367:
368: The derivative can be suitably approximated by the finite
369: difference ratio, as we do not solve the lens equation
370: analytically. Armed with these tools, once we know the absolute
371: magnitude and the position of a star around Sgr A*, we can give
372: the position and the apparent magnitude of its four most relevant
373: images.
374:
375: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
376: \section{Gravitational Lensing candidates around Sgr A*}
377: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
378:
379: \begin{figure}
380: \resizebox{13cm}{!}{\includegraphics{F3.eps}}
381: \caption{Orbits of the stars S2, S12, S14, S1, S8, S13 around Sgr A*, following \citet{Eis}.}
382: \label{Fig Orbite}
383: \end{figure}
384:
385: In the neighborhood of Sgr A*, proper motion and Doppler
386: measurements have strongly increased our knowledge of stellar
387: dynamics in this region. For six stars a complete reconstruction
388: of the orbit has been achieved (Fig. \ref{Fig Orbite}). For our
389: analysis we shall follow the latest data published by \citet{Eis}.
390: Alternative solutions (compatible within uncertainties) for the
391: orbits of these six stars, derived by different measurements and
392: methodologies, can be found in \citet{Ghez3}.
393:
394: All these stars appear to belong to early spectral types B0-B9
395: \citep{Eis}, opening questions about the presence of such young
396: stars in the inner few hundredths of a parsec around the Galactic
397: center. Table 1 sums up their orbital parameters, taken from
398: \citet{Eis}. These stars have been observed in the K-band centered
399: on $\lambda=2.2$ $\mu$m, in which the extinction has been
400: estimated to be 2.8 mag \citep{Eis}. In these new data all the
401: uncertainties have been drastically reduced, save for S13, whose
402: orbital plane is still largely undetermined. In our analysis, we
403: will only use the best fit values of each parameter. In the last
404: section we will discuss how the uncertainties may affect our
405: predictions. The Schwarzschild radius of the central black hole is
406: \begin{equation}
407: R_{Sch}=\frac{2GM_{BH}}{c^2}=0.071 \;\; \mathrm{ AU},
408: \end{equation}
409: taking for its mass the value $M_{BH}=3.61\times 10^6$ M$_\odot$
410: \citep{Eis}. The distance of the Sun from the Galactic center is
411: currently estimated to $D_{OL}\simeq 8$ kpc \citep{Reid}; then the
412: apparent size of the event horizon is
413: \begin{equation}
414: \theta_m=\frac{3\sqrt{3}R_{Sch}}{2D_{OL}}=23 \mathrm{\mu as}.
415: \end{equation}
416:
417: Among our stars, the minimum distance from the central black hole
418: is reached by S14, which touches 110 AU, still 1545 times greater
419: than $R_{Sch}$. Hence, we can safely consider, from the
420: gravitational lensing point of view, both the observer and the
421: source as being infinitely distant from the lens. The case of a
422: source orbiting very close to the lens has been examined in the
423: context of stellar black holes by \citet{CunBar}.
424:
425: \begin{table*}
426: \centering
427: \begin{scriptsize}
428:
429: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
430: \hline \hline
431:
432: Parameter & S2 & S12 & S14 & S1 & S8 & S13 \\
433: \hline
434: $a$ (arcsec) \dotfill & $0.1226\pm 0.0025$ & $0.286\pm0.012$ & $0.225\pm0.022$ & $0.412\pm0.024$ & $0.329\pm0.018$ & $0.219\pm0.058$ \\
435: $P$ (yr) \dotfill & $15.24\pm 0.36$ & $54.4\pm3.5$ & $38.0\pm 5.7$ & $94.1\pm9.0$ & $67.2\pm5.5$ & $36\pm15$ \\
436: $e$ \dotfill & $0.8760\pm 0.0072$ & $0.9020\pm0.0047$ & $0.9389\pm0.0078$ & $0.358\pm0.036$ & $0.927\pm0.019$ & $0.395\pm0.032$ \\
437: $T_0$ (yr) \dotfill& $2002.315\pm0.012$ & $1995.628\pm0.016$ & $2000.156\pm0.052$ & $2002.6\pm0.6$ & $1987.71\pm0.81$ & $2006.1\pm1.4$ \\
438: $i$ (deg) \dotfill& $131.9\pm1.3$ & $32.8\pm1.6$ & $97.3\pm2.2$ & $120.5\pm1.0$ & $60.6\pm5.3$ & $11\pm35$ \\
439: $\Omega$ (deg) \dotfill& $221.9\pm1.3$ & $233.3\pm4.6$ & $228.5\pm1.7$ & $341.5\pm0.9$ & $141.4\pm1.9$ & $100\pm198$ \\
440: $\omega$ (deg) \dotfill& $62.6\pm1.4$ & $311.8\pm3.6$ & $344.7\pm2.2$ & $129.8\pm4.7$ & $159.2\pm1.8$ & $250\pm161$ \\
441: $K$ (mag) \dotfill & 13.9 & 15.5 & 15.7 & 14.7 & 14.5 & 15.8
442: \\
443: \hline
444:
445: \end{tabular}
446: \end{scriptsize}
447:
448: \caption{Orbital parameters of the six stars examined in the
449: paper: $a$ is the semimajor axis, $P$ is the orbital period, $e$
450: is the eccentricity, $T_0$ is the epoch of periapse, $i$ is the
451: inclination of the normal of the orbit with respect to the line of
452: sight, $\Omega$ is the position angle of the ascending node,
453: $\omega$ is the periapse anomaly with respect to the ascending
454: node (data taken from \citealt{Eis}). $K$ is the magnitude in the
455: K-band, taken from \citet{Sch2}.}
456: \end{table*}
457:
458:
459: In order to calculate the position and the brightness of the
460: gravitational lensing images of our stars, we need to track their
461: position with respect to the central black hole as a function of
462: time. In particular, we need their distance $D_{LS}$ and their
463: position angle $\gamma$ with respect to the optical axis. By
464: simple geometry, we can relate them to the anomaly angle from the
465: periapse, denoted by $\phi$
466: \begin{eqnarray}
467: && D_{LS}=\frac{a(1-e^2)}{1+e \cos \phi}\\ &&
468: \gamma=\arccos[\sin(\phi+\omega)\sin i], \label{gamma}
469: \end{eqnarray}
470: where $a$ is the semimajor axis, $e$ is the eccentricity, $i$ is
471: the inclination of the orbit and $\omega$ is the periapse anomaly
472: with respect to the ascending node. To find $\phi$ as a function
473: of time, we can use angular momentum conservation (neglecting
474: corrections by possible deviations of the mass distribution from
475: spherically symmetry), which provides a differential equation for
476: $\dot \phi$
477: \begin{equation}
478: \frac{\left[a(1-e^2) \right]^{3/2}}{\sqrt{G M_{enc}}(1+e \cos
479: \phi)^2}\dot \phi=1, \label{dotphi}
480: \end{equation}
481: where $M_{enc}$ is the mass enclosed in the orbit of the star we
482: are considering, related to the orbital period $P$ by
483: \begin{equation}
484: G M_{enc}=4\pi^2\frac{a^3}{P^2}.
485: \end{equation}
486:
487: Integrating and inverting equation (\ref{dotphi}), we can get
488: $\phi$ as a function of time, exploiting the initial condition
489: $\phi(T_0)=0$, with $T_0$ given in Table 1.
490:
491:
492: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
493: \section{Results}
494: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
495:
496: In this section we shall present the outcome of the gravitational
497: lensing analysis for our six stars. We will show the light curves
498: of the secondary, third and fourth order images, and the expected
499: trajectory of the secondary image with respect to the central
500: black hole. In the following, we shall discuss the results
501: individually for each of them.
502:
503: \begin{figure*}
504: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{F4.eps}}
505: \caption{$S2.$ -- (a)
506: Light curves for the gravitational lensing images of S2. From top
507: to bottom, we have the secondary, the third order and fourth order
508: images. (b) Details of the same light curves at the peak epoch.
509: (c) Trajectory of the secondary image around the central black
510: hole (marked by the cross in the middle). The dashed circle is its
511: apparent horizon. (d) The angle $\gamma$, formed by the line
512: connecting S2 with the central black hole and the optical axis;
513: (e) distance between S2 and Sgr A*; (f) radial velocity of S2. All
514: quantities are plotted as functions of time. }
515: \label{Fig S2}
516: \end{figure*}
517:
518: $S2.$ -- The spectral analysis of S2 reveals it as a main sequence
519: star of 15 M$_\odot$ of class O8 -- B0 \citep{Ghez2,Eis}. It is
520: also famous as the star providing the best orbital constraint on
521: the mass of the central black hole.
522:
523: Figure \ref{Fig S2}a shows the apparent magnitudes in the K-band
524: of its most important gravitational lensing images as functions of
525: time, throughout the next orbital period. From top to bottom, we
526: have the secondary image, the third order and the fourth order
527: one. Their brightness changes very slowly during the whole orbital
528: period, save for a sharp peak corresponding to the periapse epoch,
529: as it is evident from Figure \ref{Fig S2}e, which shows $D_{LS}$
530: as a function of time. This is easily understood as a consequence
531: of the $D_{LS}^{-2}$ dependence in the magnification formula
532: (\ref{mu}). In general, because of this dependence, we can say
533: that highly eccentric orbits have more prominent peaks (once the
534: inclination of the orbit has been fixed), since the minimum
535: distance of the star from the black hole becomes smaller and
536: smaller with respect to the maximum distance. Also the duration of
537: the peak is determined by the eccentricity, in that the time the
538: star spends to complete the passage at the periapse is shorter for
539: more eccentric orbits.
540:
541: To be more quantitative, it is possible to show that for high
542: eccentricities ($1-e \ll 1$), the ratio between the duration of
543: the peak and the orbital period scales as $1-e$, while the ratio
544: between the maximum and minimum brightness scales as $(1-e)^{-2}$.
545:
546: Figure \ref{Fig S2}b shows a detail of the peak epoch. We see that
547: the new estimates for the orbital parameters of S2 bring the
548: secondary image below K=27 in the middle of 2017. We recall that
549: the previous estimates for the peak magnitude gave K=30
550: \citep{DeP,BozMan} for the beginning of 2018. The third order
551: image reaches K=34 at the same time, while the fourth order image
552: has K=36.
553:
554: In Figure \ref{Fig S2}c we report the trajectory of the secondary
555: image around the central black hole, marked by a cross. The
556: apparent event horizon is the circle of angular radius $\theta_m$
557: shown in dashed style. The trajectory of the secondary image is an
558: ovoidal figure very close to the apparent event horizon for a
559: large fraction of the orbital period. The distance of the image
560: from the position of the central black hole is fixed by the lens
561: equation (\ref{Lens Eq}). It basically depends on the angle
562: $\gamma$, formed by the line joining the source to the lens with
563: the optical axis. To see this correspondence in the specific case
564: of S2, one can compare with Figure \ref{Fig S2}d, where $\gamma$
565: is plotted as a function of time. We see that during the periapse
566: epoch, $\gamma$ becomes smaller than $\pi/2$, which means that S2
567: is behind the black hole, the minimum value being 0.83 rad. At
568: this epoch, the secondary image reaches the largest distance from
569: the black hole. By contrast, during most of the period S2 is on
570: the same side of the observer with respect to the black hole.
571: During this period, the secondary image comes closer to the event
572: horizon, since the photons require a larger deflection by the
573: black hole in order to reach the observer.
574:
575: The position angle of the secondary image around the black hole is
576: always opposite to the position of the direct image, in the
577: Schwarzschild black hole hypothesis. The third and fourth order
578: images are formed very close to the apparent event horizon (their
579: typical separation is a fraction of $\mu$as), so that in the scale
580: of Figure \ref{Fig S2}c they would just be superposed on the
581: dashed circle. Therefore, we omit them in all figures. For
582: completeness, we have also included the plot of the radial
583: velocity (Fig. \ref{Fig S2}f).
584:
585:
586: \begin{figure*}
587: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{F5.eps}}
588: \caption{Results for S12. For the meaning of each panel, refer to the caption of Fig. \ref{Fig S2}.
589: }
590: \label{Fig S12}
591: \end{figure*}
592:
593: $S12.$ -- The results for this star are summarized in Figure
594: \ref{Fig S12}. Here the maximal brightness is reached in
595: {\scriptsize C.E.} 2050, when S12 will reach its minimum distance
596: from Sgr A* again. At that time S12 will be in front of the black
597: hole ($\gamma>\pi/2$), as can be seen from Figure \ref{Fig S12}d.
598: Comparing the light curves for the images of S12 with those of S2,
599: we find a very interesting difference. The magnification peaks are
600: determined not only by the minimum $D_{LS}$, but also by the
601: degree of alignment of the star with the optical axis. The peaks
602: of the negative parity images (secondary and fourth order) are
603: enhanced when $\gamma$ is closer to 0, i.e., when the star lies
604: behind the black hole. The third order image and the other
605: positive parity images are maximally magnified when $\gamma$ is
606: closer to $\pi$, i.e., when the star lies in front of the black
607: hole. Since S2 is behind the black hole at the periapse, the
608: secondary and fourth order images are strongly enhanced, while the
609: third order image has only a quite small peak. The brightness of
610: the fourth order image almost reaches that of the third order
611: image. On the contrary, S12 is in front of the black hole at the
612: periapse, and the third order image is more enhanced than the
613: secondary and the fourth order image. Its brightness almost
614: reaches that of the secondary image. Moreover, since the minimum
615: value of $\gamma$ is reached just few months after the periapse,
616: the peaks of the secondary and of the fourth order images are
617: broadened and "attracted" toward the time at which $\gamma$ is
618: minimal. The same happens to the third order image of S2, which is
619: stretched toward earlier times, when $\gamma$ is closer to $\pi$.
620: A radical difference with respect to S2 also arises in the
621: trajectory of the secondary image. Looking at Figure \ref{Fig
622: S12}c, we see that the secondary image spends most of the time at
623: larger distances from the black hole, since S12 is behind the
624: black hole for most of its orbit (Fig. \ref{Fig S12}d). During the
625: periapse, S12 very quickly passes in front of the black hole and
626: the secondary image grazes the apparent horizon making half of the
627: tour in a very short time. This situation is the opposite of that
628: of S2, which is in front of the black hole for most its orbit and
629: behind it just at the periapse. Another interesting thing to
630: notice is that the secondary image of S12 does not move very far
631: from the apparent horizon, since the orbit has a lower inclination
632: and $\gamma$ is bounded to a lower range around $\pi/2$.
633:
634: \begin{figure*}
635: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{F6.eps}}
636: \caption{Results for S14. For the meaning of each panel, refer to the caption of Fig. \ref{Fig S2}.
637: }
638: \label{Fig S14}
639: \end{figure*}
640:
641: $S14.$ -- This star represents the most interesting lensing
642: candidate, since its orbit is almost edge-on ($i=97.3$ deg), and
643: its eccentricity brings it very close to the black hole. The best
644: alignment and anti-alignment times are very close to the periapse
645: epoch and are responsible for two subpeaks, which are unresolved
646: in Figure \ref{Fig S14}a, but clearly visible in Figure \ref{Fig
647: S14}b, which zooms on the peak. The periapse takes place while
648: $\gamma \sim \pi/2$, so that this represents an intermediate case
649: with respect to the former ones. First we have the anti-alignment
650: peak, mostly enhancing the third order image, which reaches the
651: brightness of the secondary image. Then we have the alignment
652: peak, which mostly enhances the secondary and fourth order images.
653: If the periapse coincided with the best alignment or
654: anti-alignment time, the corresponding peak would have been much
655: more prominent than shown in Figure \ref{Fig S14}b.
656:
657: What makes S14 particularly interesting is the high brightness
658: attained by the secondary image. At the best alignment time the
659: secondary image has K=23. This is because we are close to a weak
660: field gravitational lensing situation as can also be seen by the
661: analysis of Figure \ref{Fig S14}c. The trajectory of the secondary
662: image is composed by two half rings: one grazing the apparent
663: horizon when S14 is in front of the black hole and the other being
664: the approximate weak field solution for the secondary image in a
665: typical microlensing event. In fact, consider a source passing
666: behind a point-lens along the line parameterized by
667: \begin{equation}
668: \vec{y}=(v t, b_0),
669: \end{equation}
670: where $v$ is the transverse velocity and $b_0$ is the microlensing
671: impact parameter. Then the approximate solution for the secondary
672: image in the case $b_0 \gg 1$ is
673: \begin{equation}
674: \vec{x}\simeq \frac{1}{b_0^2+v^2t^2}(-v t, -b_0),
675: \end{equation}
676: which parameterizes a circle of radius $1/2b_0$ centered at
677: $(0,-1/2b_0)$. This is exactly the big circle described by the
678: secondary image in Figure \ref{Fig S14}c, apart from small
679: distortions caused by the curvature of the orbit of S14.
680:
681: The duration of the main peak is about one month and is determined
682: by the velocity of S14 at the periapse epoch. One may wonder
683: whether the direct image is affected in a significant way by this
684: almost weak field event. However, we find $\Delta \mu/\mu\sim
685: 10^{-3}$ for the direct image, which makes the peak practically
686: unobservable. The next brightness peak of the secondary image of
687: S14 will occur in {\scriptsize C.E.} 2038, according to the
688: current estimates of the orbital parameters, and the maximal
689: angular distance from the apparent event horizon is about 0.125
690: mas. The perspectives for the observation of such event will be
691: discussed in the next section.
692:
693: The third order image reaches K=32, deserving particular
694: attention, since the eventual observation of such image would be
695: of striking importance for the physics of the gravitational field
696: in the strong regime.
697:
698: \begin{figure*}
699: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{F7.eps}}
700: \caption{Results for the star S1. For the meaning of each panel, refer to the caption of Fig. \ref{Fig S2}.
701: }
702: \label{Fig S1}
703: \end{figure*}
704:
705: $S1.$ -- This star is characterized by a lower eccentricity, as
706: clearly visualized in Figure \ref{Fig S1}e, where the range of
707: values of $D_{LS}$ is small, and in Figure \ref{Fig S1}f, where we
708: see low radial velocities compared to the other stars. It happens
709: that the periapse is in coincidence with the best alignment time,
710: (see Fig. \ref{Fig S1}d), and in fact the peaks in the secondary
711: and fourth order images are very enhanced, while the third order
712: image has only a small modulation throughout the orbit (Fig.
713: \ref{Fig S1}a). We also observe that the third order image has a
714: small secondary peak at the best alignment time, which is formed
715: in a way analogous to that discussed for S14. In any event, the
716: secondary image will stay fainter than K=32 at the next peak,
717: occurring only in {\scriptsize C.E.} 2091, so that this is a less
718: interesting case for observations.
719:
720: The trajectory of the secondary image (Fig. \ref{Fig S1}c) can be
721: easily interpreted from the considerations given in the previous
722: cases.
723:
724: \begin{figure*}
725: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{F8.eps}}
726: \caption{Results for S8. For the meaning of each panel, refer to the caption of Fig. \ref{Fig S2}.
727: }
728: \label{Fig S8}
729: \end{figure*}
730:
731: $S8.$ -- This star is known to have a high eccentricity (so high
732: that, before the last data were released, it was still unclear
733: whether the orbit was open or closed \citep{Ghez3}). According to
734: \citet{Eis}, the orbit is closed and it makes sense to discuss
735: predictions for the next brightness peaks. Even though the
736: periapse distance is small, the inclination is not very high, so
737: that we do not have the same favorable situation as S14. In
738: {\scriptsize C.E.} 2054, the secondary image will "only" reach
739: K=28. The periapse lies between the best alignment and
740: anti-alignment times, being a bit closer to the first
741: configuration. Then the secondary and fourth order image peaks are
742: a bit more prominent than the peak of the third order image, which
743: also shows a very small deformation at the best alignment time.
744:
745: \begin{figure*}
746: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{F9.eps}}
747: \caption{Results for S13. For the meaning of each panel, refer to the caption of Fig. \ref{Fig S2}.
748: }
749: \label{Fig S13}
750: \end{figure*}
751:
752: $S13.$ -- For this star the uncertainty on the orientation of the
753: orbital plane remains very large. So, our predictions can just
754: give an indication, which will be updated when further
755: measurements are available. In any case, the inclination of the
756: orbital plane should be quite low and the images have a nearly
757: constant low brightness, as shown in Figure \ref{Fig S13}a. The
758: distance of the secondary image from the black hole is also nearly
759: constant. Hence, this star also seem less promising as a candidate
760: for gravitational lensing observations.
761:
762: Table 2 summarizes the main characteristics of the gravitational
763: lensing images for our six stars, allowing an immediate reading of
764: all results.
765:
766:
767: \begin{table*}
768: \centering
769:
770: \begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
771: \hline \hline
772:
773: & S2 & S12 & S14 & S1 & S8 & S13 \\
774: \hline
775: $K_2$ (mag) \dotfill & 26.8 & 32.6& 23.3 & 32.6 & 27.6 & 36.2\\
776: $T_2$ (yr) \dotfill & 2017.59& 2050.27 & 2038.41 & 2092.13 & 2054.7 & 2041.38\\
777: $\Delta \theta_2$ ($\mu$as) \dotfill & 16 & 9.8& 125 & 25 & 26 & 5.6 \\
778: $K_3$ (mag) \dotfill & 34.0& 35.7 & 32.1 & 39.9& 34.8& 39.9\\
779: $T_3$ (yr) \dotfill & 2017.54& 2049.95 & 2038.04 & 2121.29& 2055.2 & 2042.33\\
780: $\Delta \theta_3$ ($\mu$as) \dotfill & 0.33 & 0.25 & 0.62 & 0.41 & 0.42 & 0.17\\
781: $K_4$ (mag) \dotfill & 35.7& 40.2 & 36.7 & 42.2& 37.3& 43.7\\
782: $T_4$ (yr) \dotfill & 2017.58& 2050.11 & 2038.4 & 2092.44& 2054.74 & 2041.8\\
783: $\Delta \theta_4$ ($\mu$as) \dotfill & 0.014 & 0.011 & 0.026 & 0.017 & 0.017 & 0.007\\
784:
785: \hline
786:
787: \end{tabular}
788: \caption{Summary of the main features of the relativistic images
789: of the six stars examined in this paper. $K_i$ is the peak K-band
790: magnitude for the $i$-th image; $T_i$ is the time of the peak;
791: $\Delta \theta_i=\theta_i - \theta_m$ is the maximal angular
792: distance from the apparent event horizon.}
793: \end{table*}
794:
795:
796:
797: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
798: \section{Perspectives for observations}
799: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
800:
801: From our analysis, S14 emerges as the most interesting lensing
802: candidate, because of its small minimum distance from the black
803: hole and because of the high inclination of its orbit, which
804: allows good alignments and anti-alignments with Sgr A*. The
805: secondary image will reach K=23 at the next periapse epoch, which
806: will occur around {\scriptsize C.E.} 2038. The rapid motion of
807: this image would help to distinguish it from background sources of
808: similar brightness, while its distortion should also be an
809: unambiguous sign of its gravitational lensing nature with respect
810: to fast moving stars around Sgr A*. The theoretical baseline
811: needed to resolve two sources of comparable brightness placed at
812: an angular distance of $\theta=0.12$ mas in the K-band, amounts to
813: $\lambda/ \theta=3.8$ km. However, the apparent magnitude of Sgr
814: A* is K=18.8 \citep{Ghez4,Genzel2}, which means that we have to
815: distinguish a faint source from a 63 times brighter contaminant.
816: This complication can be tackled by longer baselines and nulling
817: interferometry techniques. Sgr A* is still unresolved in this
818: band. One may be worried that if its infrared flux comes from a
819: region of several Schwarzschild radii, then the secondary images
820: of lensed stars would be merged within its diffuse infrared
821: emission. However, current models explaining the rapid observed
822: variability suggest that this emission takes place within 10
823: $R_{Sch}$ from the central black hole \citep{YQN}. In this case,
824: the secondary image of S14 would come out of the infrared emission
825: of Sgr A* and could be resolved, in principle, by interferometry
826: facilities.
827:
828: At the present time, the best resolution in the K-band is achieved
829: by the Keck telescope and the VLT units, the latter reaching 75
830: mas without interferometry, thanks to active and adaptive optics.
831: The VLT units can be combined to perform interferometry
832: observations with an equivalent baseline of 200 m and a maximal
833: angular resolution of 2.2 mas (http://www.eso.org/projects/vlti).
834: A new interferometric instrument under construction is the Large
835: Binocular Telescope (LBT), which will use two 8.4 m telescopes
836: reaching an equivalent resolution of a 22 m telescope
837: (http://medusa.as.arizona.edu/lbto).
838:
839: New perspectives are opened by space telescopes. The Terrestrial
840: Planet Finder (TPF) will be composed by four 3.5 m telescopes
841: working in team. The design details are still under study; in
842: particular, the four units may be mounted on the same structure or
843: flying in formation several meters apart
844: (http://www.terrestrial-planet-finder.com). A similar project is
845: DARWIN, which will exploit six telescopes flying in formation with
846: an equivalent aperture of 50 meters
847: (http://ast.star.rl.ac.uk/darwin). These two missions are foreseen
848: to launch around 2015 and are mainly aimed at exoplanet
849: researches. The problem of resolving a faint planet from its
850: mother-star, which is typically millions of times brighter, can be
851: faced by the technique of nulling interferometry, which combines
852: the signal from a number of different telescopes in such a way
853: that the light from the central star is cancelled out, leaving the
854: much fainter planet easier to see. Of course the situation of a
855: faint gravitational lensing image close to Sgr A* has great
856: analogies with that of exoplanets and the same techniques can be
857: used. In order to achieve resolutions better than 0.1 mas, we need
858: a baseline larger than several kilometers, which must be kept
859: stable at a very high precision. A similar problem is faced by the
860: LISA mission in the search for gravitational waves. In this
861: mission, three spacecraft should fly in a triangular formation at
862: relative distances of 5 million km (http://lisa.nasa.gov).
863: Finally, the MAXIM mission will perform X-ray interferometry with
864: a constellation of several spacecraft and a detector kept 450 km
865: behind the mirrors (http://maxim.gsfc.nasa.gov). To accomplish
866: formation flying with high accuracy, these missions are planning
867: to use a laser ranging system between spacecraft and
868: microthrusters to offset drifts.
869:
870: Given the present situation and all the technical advances that
871: will soon be exploited in scientific researches, 0.1 mas
872: resolution in the K-band and the detection of secondary
873: gravitational lensing images around Sgr A* seem just the next step
874: after the generation of telescopes currently under study.
875: Hopefully, new instruments will be available before the next
876: periapse passage of S14 is in {\scriptsize C.E.} 2038, to catch
877: its secondary image. For S2 and S8 the situation is more
878: difficult, since the peak magnitude and the angular separations of
879: the secondary images are lower, but the numbers do not rule out
880: the possibility of observing them with reasonable future
881: facilities.
882:
883: As regards higher order images, S14 is still the best candidate.
884: However, the peak magnitude of the third order image is K=32.1,
885: and the separation from the apparent horizon is only 0.62 $\mu$as.
886: In order to see such a faint image so close to the event horizon
887: we would need a complete imaging at very high resolution ($<0.1$
888: $\mu$as) of Sgr A*. In the K-band this seems a very difficult
889: task. The highest resolution ever reached is 18 $\mu$as in the mm
890: band of the electromagnetic spectrum \citep{Krich}. Higher
891: resolution imaging seems to be possible at sub-mm wavelengths
892: \citep{FMA}, though no compact radio sources (suitable for
893: gravitational lensing) are known around Sgr A*. Finally, MAXIM
894: claims that a 0.1 $\mu$as resolution is achievable in the X-ray
895: band. In this case, one should look for suitable X-ray sources
896: around the Galactic center, which could be provided by a recently
897: observed population of black holes within 1 pc from Sgr A*
898: \citep{Muno}. Higher order images thus stand as a possible
899: long-term target for future observations.
900:
901:
902:
903:
904:
905: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
906: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
907: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
908:
909: It is really amazing that at present time it makes sense to
910: discuss on gravitational lensing in strong fields by real physical
911: objects. Indeed, the existence of a supermassive black hole at the
912: center of our Galaxy with its rich stellar environment provides a
913: unique laboratory for this research. However, this would not be
914: enough without the great technical advances in high resolution
915: observations of the last years, which allow us to speak about
916: microarcsecond resolutions in sub-mm observations and possibly in
917: higher frequency bands. The proper motion observations of stars
918: surrounding Sgr A* are progressing daily, providing more and more
919: precise estimates for the orbital parameters. In this work, we
920: have analyzed six stars enjoying a good determination of their
921: orbital parameters. Our aim has been to look for observable
922: gravitational lensing effects on these stars by the black hole in
923: Sgr A*. Our investigation has considered the full set of
924: gravitational lensing images, including weak field and
925: relativistic ones, the latter being of striking importance for a
926: deeper understanding of General Relativity, as they provide
927: observational tests for gravitational theories in previously
928: unprobed regimes. We have explicitly shown the light curves of the
929: secondary, third order and fourth order images for our six stars.
930: Moreover, we have shown the position in time of the secondary
931: image w.r.t. the central black hole. We have given physical
932: interpretations to our results, relating, in particular, the peaks
933: to minima of $D_{LS}$ and best alignment and anti-alignment times.
934:
935: We want to stress that this work is just a first analysis, which
936: is susceptible to be corrected by eventual upcoming estimates of
937: the orbital parameters, enlarged to eventual new candidate stars,
938: and generalized to different classes of black holes. The most
939: physically motivated generalization of the Schwarzschild black
940: hole is of course the Kerr solution. However, while in the
941: Schwarzschild case the deflection angle can be still expressed
942: analytically by equation (\ref{alpha exact}), the treatment of
943: gravitational lensing by Kerr black holes is done in a completely
944: numerical way at the present time \citep{CunBar,Vie,RauBla}.
945: Moreover, the exact value of the spin of Sgr A* is still very
946: uncertain and inferred by indirect deductions \citep{LiuMel,Asc}.
947: The deviations from the Schwarzschild predictions are bigger for
948: higher order images, while they become very small in the weak
949: field limit. This means that a high value of the spin would
950: considerably alter the predictions for higher order images, but,
951: for example, the peak of the secondary image of S14 would be
952: affected in a negligible way. So, for a first analysis,
953: Schwarzschild lensing is basically sufficient to understand the
954: highlights of the lensing scenario and the order of magnitude of
955: the observables. Kerr lensing comes as a second step refinement.
956:
957: Another topic that deserves some discussion concerns the
958: uncertainties in our predictions coming from the present
959: uncertainties in the estimates of the orbital parameters. The
960: first thing to notice is that all these stars have been observed
961: during their periapse epochs. We can thus be confident that even
962: if the semimajor axis and the eccentricity are affected by large
963: errors, the periapse distance is well determined by direct
964: observations. Since the inclinations are also relatively well
965: determined, we can conclude that the magnitudes of the peaks
966: cannot be very different from the ones that we have calculated
967: using the best-fit values of the orbital parameters. By contrast,
968: the precise timing of the peaks is strictly related to the
969: accuracy of the orbital period estimate. This can be established
970: only with a good sampling on the whole orbit which requires more
971: systematic observations in the future. As an example, given the
972: present uncertainties, the brightness peak of the images of S14
973: could be displaced few years later or before the date that we have
974: indicated using the best-fit value.
975:
976: Finally, with the progress of the observation techniques, it is
977: inevitable that new stars will be discovered around Sgr A* and
978: followed during their orbits. If new stars are discovered closer
979: and closer to Sgr A*, then the thin lens approximation cannot be
980: used any longer. In that case, the analysis should proceed in the
981: way indicated by \citet{CunBar}. All these considerations make us
982: confident that even better candidates than S14 may be found in the
983: future to open the era of gravitational lensing by strong fields.
984:
985: \begin{acknowledgements}
986: We thank Gaetano Scarpetta for useful comments on the manuscript.
987: We also thank the referee for many suggestions which have helped
988: us to improve our paper considerably.
989: \end{acknowledgements}
990:
991: ------------------------------------------------------------------
992: \begin{thebibliography}{}
993: %-----------------------------------------------------------------
994:
995: \bibitem[Alexander(2001)]{Ale} Alexander, T. 2001, \apj, 553,
996: L149
997:
998: \bibitem[Alexander \& Loeb(2001)]{AleLoe} Alexander, T., \& Loeb, A. 2001, \apj, 551,
999: 223
1000:
1001: \bibitem[Alexander \& Sternberg(1999)]{AleSte} Alexander, T., \& Sternberg, A. 1999, \apj, 520,
1002: 137
1003:
1004: \bibitem[Aschenbach(2004)]{Asc} Aschenbach, B. 2004, astro-ph/0406545
1005:
1006: \bibitem[Bozza(2002)]{Boz1}
1007: Bozza, V. 2002, \prd, 66, 103001
1008:
1009: \bibitem[Bozza(2003)]{Boz2}
1010: Bozza, V. 2003, \prd, 67, 103006
1011:
1012: \bibitem[Bozza et al.(2001)]{BCIS}
1013: Bozza, V., Capozziello, S., Iovane, G. \& Scarpetta, G. 2001, Gen.
1014: Rel. and Grav., 33, 1535
1015:
1016: \bibitem[Bozza \& Mancini(2004)]{BozMan}
1017: Bozza, V. \& Mancini, L. 2004, \apj, 611, 1045
1018:
1019: \bibitem[Chanam\'e et al.(2001)]{CGM} Chanam\'e, J., Gould, A., \& Miralda-Escud\'e, J. 2001, \apj, 563,
1020: 793
1021: %
1022:
1023: \bibitem[Cunningham \& Bardeen(1973)]{CunBar} Cunningham, C.T., \& Bardeen, J.M. 1973, \apj, 183,
1024: 237
1025:
1026: \bibitem[Darwin(1959)]{Dar} Darwin, C. 1959, Proc. of the Royal Soc. of London, 249,
1027: 180
1028:
1029: \bibitem[De Paolis et al.(2003)]{DeP}
1030: De Paolis, F., Geralico, A., Ingrosso, G. \& Nucita, A.A. 2003,
1031: \aap, 409, 809
1032:
1033: \bibitem[Eckart \& Genzel(1997)]{EckGen} Eckart, A., \& Genzel, R. 1997, \mnras, 284,
1034: 576
1035: %
1036: \bibitem[Eckart et al.(2002)]{Eckart} Eckart, A., Genzel, R., Ott, T., \& Sch\"odel, R. 2002, \mnras, 331,
1037: 917
1038:
1039: \bibitem[Eiroa \& Torres(2004)]{EirTor}
1040: Eiroa, E.F. \& Torres, D.F. 2004, \prd, 69, 063004
1041:
1042: \bibitem[Eisenhauer et al.(2005)]{Eis} Eisenhauer, F., Genzel, R., Alexander, T., et al. 2005, astro-ph/0502129
1043:
1044: \bibitem[Falcke et al.(1999)]{FMA} Falcke, H., Melia, F., \& Agol, E. 1999, \apj,
1045: 528, L13
1046:
1047: \bibitem[Genzel et al.(1996)]{Genzel} Genzel, R., Thatte, N., Krabbe, A., et al. 1996, \apj, 472,
1048: 153
1049:
1050: \bibitem[Genzel et al.(2003)]{Genzel2} Genzel, R., Sch\"odel, R., Ott, T., et al. 2003, \nat, 425,
1051: 934
1052:
1053: \bibitem[Ghez et al.(1998)]{Ghez1} Ghez, A.M., Klein, B.L., Morris, M., \& Becklin, E.E. 1998, \apj, 509,
1054: 678
1055:
1056: \bibitem[Ghez et al.(2003)]{Ghez2} Ghez, A.M., Duch\^ene, G., Matthews, K., et al. 2003, \apj, 586,
1057: L127
1058:
1059: \bibitem[Ghez et al.(2004)]{Ghez4} Ghez, A.M., Wright, S. A., Matthews, K., et al. 2004, \apj, 601,
1060: L159
1061:
1062: \bibitem[Ghez et al.(2005)]{Ghez3} Ghez, A.M., Salim, S., Hornstein,
1063: et al. 2005, \apj, 620, 744
1064:
1065: \bibitem[Jaroszy\'nski(1998)]{Jar} Jaroszy\'nski, M. 1998, Acta Astron., 48,
1066: 413
1067:
1068: \bibitem[Krichbaum et al.(2002)]{Krich} Krichbaum, T.P., Graham, D.A., Alef, W., et al. 2002,
1069: Proc. 6th European VLBI Network Symposium, Bonn, Germany,
1070: astro-ph/0207022
1071:
1072: \bibitem[Liu \& Melia(2002)]{LiuMel} Liu, S., \& Melia, F. 2002, \apj, 573, L23.
1073:
1074: \bibitem[Melia \& Falcke(2001)]{MelFal} Melia, F., \& Falcke, H. 2001, \araa, 39,
1075: 309
1076:
1077: \bibitem[Muno et al.(2004)]{Muno} Muno, M.P., Pfahl, E., Baganoff, F.K., et al. 2004,
1078: astro-ph/0412492
1079:
1080: \bibitem[Nusser \& Broadhurst(2004)]{NusBro} Nusser, A., \& Broadhurst, T. 2004,
1081: astro-ph/0407220
1082:
1083: \bibitem[Ohanian(1987)]{Oha}
1084: Ohanian, H. 1987, Amer. Jour. Phys., 55, 428
1085:
1086: \bibitem[Petters(2003)]{Pet} Petters, A.O. 2003, \mnras, 338, 457
1087:
1088: \bibitem[Rauch \& Blandford(1994)]{RauBla} Rauch, K.P., \& Blandford, R.D. 1994, \apj, 421,
1089: 46
1090:
1091: \bibitem[Reid(1993)]{Reid} Reid, M.J. 1993, \araa, 31,
1092: 345
1093: %
1094: %\bibitem[Rieke et al.(1989)]{Rie} Rieke, G.H., Rieke, M.J., \& Paul, A.E. 1989, \apj, 336,
1095: %752
1096:
1097: \bibitem[Sch\"odel et al.(2002)]{Sch1} Sch\"odel, R., Ott, T., Genzel, R., et al. 2002, \nat, 419,
1098: 694
1099:
1100: \bibitem[Sch\"odel et al.(2003)]{Sch2} Sch\"odel, R., Ott, T., Genzel, R., et al. 2003, \apj, 596,
1101: 1015
1102:
1103: \bibitem[Viergutz(1993)]{Vie}
1104: Viergutz, S.U. 1993, \aap, 272, 355
1105:
1106: \bibitem[Virbhadra \& Ellis(2000)]{VirEll}
1107: Virbhadra, K.S., \& Ellis, G.F.R. 2000, \prd, 62, 084003
1108:
1109: \bibitem[Wardle \& Yusuf-Zadeh(1992)]{WarYus} Wardle, M., \& Yusuf-Zadeh, F. 1992, \apj, 387,
1110: L65
1111:
1112: \bibitem[Yuan et al.(2004)]{YQN} Yuan, F., Quataert, E., \& Narayan, R. 2004, \apj, 606,
1113: 894
1114:
1115:
1116:
1117: \end{thebibliography}
1118:
1119: \bibliographystyle{aa}
1120:
1121:
1122: \end{document}
1123:
1124: %%
1125: